Arxiv:1806.01322V1 [Cs.AI]

Past Visions of Artificial Futures One Hundred and Fifty Years under the Spectre of Evolving Machines Tim Taylor1,2 and Alan Dorin1 1Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia 2Independent Researcher, Edinburgh, Scotland [email protected] Abstract Manchester, the narrator raises the idea of machines making machines and alludes to the profound potential of such a The influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Artificial Life development (see quote above). (ALife) technologies upon society, and their potential to fun- damentally shape the future evolution of humankind, are top- During the same period, the scientific understanding of ics very much at the forefront of current scientific, govern- the complexity of biological life was undergoing a rev- mental and public debate. While these might seem like very olution, in the theories being developed by Charles Dar- modern concerns, they have a long history that is often dis- win and Alfred Russell Wallace. Both theories were regarded in contemporary discourse. Insofar as current de- first presented at the Linnean Society of London in 1858 bates do acknowledge the history of these ideas, they rarely look back further than the origin of the modern digital com- (Darwin and Wallace, 1858), with a greatly extended pre- puter age in the 1940s–50s. In this paper we explore the ear- sentation of Darwin’s theory appearing a year later with the lier history of these concepts. We focus in particular on the publication of The Origin of Species (Darwin, 1859). idea of self-reproducing and evolving machines, and poten- At this time, the intellectual elite of England were a richly tial implications for our own species. We show that discus- sion of these topics arose in the 1860s, within a decade of the connected web of thinkers, among whom ideas of science, publication of Darwin’s The Origin of Species, and attracted philosophy, technology, literature and the arts freely flowed. increasing interest from scientists, novelists and the general It did not take long for the contemporaneous ideas of ma- public in the early 1900s. After introducing the relevant work chines making machines, and of the evolution of biological from this period, we categorise the various visions presented organisms, to be connected—the result was the development by these authors of the future implications of evolving machines for humanity. We suggest that current debates on the of the idea of self-reproducing and evolving machines. co-evolution of society and technology can be enriched by a In this paper we explore the work of prominent authors of proper appreciation of the long history of the ideas involved. the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries who addressed this topic.1 We then identify common themes in their work in terms of the implications of these ideas for the future of Introduction human society and evolution, and conclude with brief com- “And why should one say that the machine does not ments about the relevance of this work to current debates. live? Itbreathes... Itmoves... Andhasitnotavoice? ... And yet the mystery of mysteries is to view ma- Early writing on self-reproducing and evolving arXiv:1806.01322v1 [cs.AI] 4 Jun 2018 chines making machines; a spectacle that fills the mind with curious, and even awful, speculation.” machines Coningsby (Disraeli, 1844, p. 154) Late Nineteenth Century (1860s–1890s) By the climax of the British Industrial Revolution in the Almost as soon as The Origin of Species was published, early 1800s, the widespread introduction of increasingly some authors began exploring the applicability of Darwin’s sophisticated manufacturing machines had raised anxiety ideas to human technology, and the potential consequences about the potential long-term consequences of mechanisa- that this might entail. tion. Areas of unease included not just the impact of technology on the labour conditions of working people—a driv- 1The history of the idea of self-reproducing machines dates ing concern of the Luddite movement (Archer, 2000), but back even earlier (Taylor and Dorin, 2018), but here we focus on also the growing appreciation of the self-amplifying poten- machines that can both self-reproduce and evolve. We acknowledge that our literature search has been conducted primarily in En- tial of the new machines. In 1844, the British author and fu- glish, and there may be relevant sources in other languages that ture prime minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote the novel Con- we are unaware of. The review section of this paper draws upon ingsby. In a section describing the industrial landscape of material presented in our new book (Taylor and Dorin, 2018). Samuel Butler: Darwin Among The Machines (1863) of machines, rather than the reproduction of individuals. and later works As a young man, the English author Butler likened a complicated machine to “a city or society” Samuel Butler (1835–1902)spent five years working in New (Butler, 1872, p. 212), and asked “how few of the machines Zealand. Shortly after his arrival in 1859 he read—and are there which have not been produced systematically by was greatly influenced by—the recently published Origin of other machines?” (Butler, 1872, p. 210). He invoked a num- Species. During his stay he published a number of letters ber of biological analogies, such as bee pollination and spe- relating to Darwin’s theory in the local Christchurch news- cialisation of reproductive function in ant colonies, to argue paper, The Press. The second of these, which appeared in that collective machine reproduction is no less like-like than the 13 June 1863 edition under the pseudonym Cellarius, the self-reproduction of individual machines. was entitled Darwin Among the Machines (Butler, 1863). In Erewhon Butler further explored the idea, first ad- Butler began the letter by noting the rapid pace of de- dressed in Lucubratio Ebria, that humans and machines are velopment of machinery from the earliest mechanisms to co-evolving,in a process driven by market economics. How- the most sophisticated examples of the day. He commented ever, in contrast to his earlier writing, he now feared that this that this had far outstripped the pace of development in the might be detrimental to humankind, with machines evolving animal and vegetable kingdoms, and asked what might be by acting parasitically upon their designers: “[the machines] the ultimate outcome of this trend. Observing the increas- have preyed upon man’s grovelling preference for his mate- ingly sophisticated “self-regulating, self-acting power” with rial over his spiritual interests” (Butler, 1872, p. 207). Hu- which machines were being conferred, Butler suggested that mans, he argued, are economically invested in producing humans “are ourselves creating our own successors.” He fur- machines with ever more “intelligibly organised” mechan- ther speculated that, freed from the constraints of feelings ical reproductive systems (Butler, 1872, p. 212): and emotion, machines will ultimately become “the acme of all that the best and wisest man can ever dare to aim at,” at “For man at present believes that his interest lies which point “man will have become to the machine what the in that direction; he spends an incalculable amount of horse and the dog are to man” (Butler, 1863). labour and time and thought in making machines breed At that stage, Butler reasoned, the machines would still better and better ... and there seem no limits to the re- be reliant upon humans for feeding them, repairing them, sults of accumulated improvements if they are allowed and producing their offspring, and hence they would likely to descend with modification from generation to gener- treat us kindly. “[Man] will continue to exist, nay even to ation.” improve, and will be probably better off in his state of do- Erewhon (Butler, 1872, p. 212) mestication under the beneficent rule of the machines than As machines evolved to become ever more complex, But- he is in his present wild state.” However, he then introduced ler was concerned that they might “so equalise men’s pow- the possibility of a time when “the reproductive organs of ers” that evolutionary selection pressure on human physical the machines have been developed in a manner which we capabilities would be reduced to a level that precipitated “a are hardly yet able to conceive,” noting that “it is true that degeneracy of the human race, and indeed that the whole machinery is even at this present time employed in begetting body might become purely rudimentary” (Butler, 1872, p. machinery, in becoming the parent of machines often after 224). This concern about the consequences for the human its own kind” (Butler, 1863). race of entering a long-term co-evolutionary relationship Throughout his subsequent career, Butler wrestled with with machinesis taken up by a number of later authors, most his views on the application of Darwin’s theory to machines, notably J. D. Bernal, whose work we discuss later. and the implications for humanity. In a subsequent letter to The Press entitled Lucubratio Ebria (Butler, 1865), pub- Alfred Marshall: Ye Machine (c. 1867) Contemporane- lished on 29 July 1865, he presented a vision whereby ma- ous with Butler, in 1867 the young Alfred Marshall (1842– chines are seen not as a competing species, but rather as ex- 1924) wrote a series of four papers that formed the basis of tensions to the human body. From this perspective, Butler talks at “The Grote Club”—an intellectual debating society emphasised the capacity of machines to exert positive evo- at the University of Cambridge. His theme was the extent to lutionary influences on the evolution of humankind, not only which the activities of the human mind could be accounted by increasing our physical and mental capabilities, but also for in physical terms.

Load more