Electoral Events as Collateral Damages Sovereign Debt and the Old 'New' Nationalism in Post-Security Europe 1 WC: 9950 Forthcoming: European Journal of Sociology May 12, 2014 Mabel Berezin, Professor of Sociology Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 607-255-4042 (telephone); 607-255-8473 (fax) E-Mail:
[email protected] http://www.soc.cornell.edu/faculty/berezin.html 1 This article benefited from the careful suggestions of the conveners of the SASE 2013 Mini-Conference on Economic Culture. I particularly wish to thank Lyn Spillman and Nina Bandelj. In addition, I thank Michael Mann for a critical reading of the first draft as well as participants in the Faculty of Law workshop held at the London School of Economics on February 25, 2014. I thank Damian Chalmers for inviting me to participate in the workshop. Berezin, Collateral Damages, EJS, 5/16/2014 2 Abstract In spring 2012, a series of elections suggested an extreme nationalist turn in European politics. Academic and media commentators responded to these events as novelties. This article takes an opposite analytic position. By viewing the spring elections as “events,” it argues that they represented end points rather than beginnings. The data for this article is an election survey that dates back to 1970; as well as public discourse of politicians and European policy and media elites. The article argues that the acceleration and normalization of the nationalist right in contemporary Europe is the collateral damage from the sovereign debt crisis that exacerbated fault lines in the expanding European Union project. It starts from the proposition that the Europe that the 1992 Maastricht Treaty formalized and the subsequent European Monetary Union (EMU) posed a political, and to some extent, cultural challenge.