DOCSLIB.ORG

Miami Bicycle Master Plan Which Would Transform Miami Into a Bicycle Friendly City

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Miami Bicycle Master Plan Which Would Transform Miami Into a Bicycle Friendly City TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 2-1 3.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ........................................................................................................................ 3-1 4.0 EXISTING BIKEWAY NETWORK CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Study Area .................................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Major Corridors ........................................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Existing Bikeway Network........................................................................................................................... 4-3 5.0 OUTREACH EFFORTS .................................................................................................................................. 5-1 6.0 BIKEWAY NETWORK PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Proposed 2030 bikeway network Infrastructure ......................................................................................... 6-6 6.2 2010 Phase ................................................................................................................................................. 6-9 6.2.1 Shared Use Lane Markings (Sharrows) ....................................................................................... 6-10 6.2.2 Bicycle Lanes ................................................................................................................................ 6-10 6.2.3 Shared Use Paths/Greenway ....................................................................................................... 6-12 6.3 2015 Phase ............................................................................................................................................... 6-14 6.3.1 Bicycle Routes .............................................................................................................................. 6-15 6.3.2 Shared Use Lane Markings (Sharrows) ....................................................................................... 6-16 6.3.3 Bicycle Lanes ................................................................................................................................ 6-19 6.3.4 Shared Use Paths/Greenways ..................................................................................................... 6-21 6.3.5 Bicycle Boulevards ....................................................................................................................... 6-23 6.3.6 Neighborhood Connections .......................................................................................................... 6-24 6.3.7 Scenic View Routes ...................................................................................................................... 6-25 6.4 2020 Phase ............................................................................................................................................... 6-26 6.4.1 Bicycle Routes .............................................................................................................................. 6-27 6.4.2 Shared Use Lane Markings (Sharrows) ....................................................................................... 6-28 6.4.3 Bicycle Lanes ................................................................................................................................ 6-30 6.4.4 Shared Use Paths/Greenways ..................................................................................................... 6-31 6.4.5 Bicycle Boulevards ....................................................................................................................... 6-32 6.4.6 Neighborhood Connections .......................................................................................................... 6-33 6.4.7 Scenic View Routes ...................................................................................................................... 6-34 6.5 2030 Phase ............................................................................................................................................... 6-35 6.5.1 Bicycle Routes .............................................................................................................................. 6-36 6.5.2 Shared Use Lane Markings (Sharrows) ....................................................................................... 6-36 6.5.3 Bicycle Lanes ................................................................................................................................ 6-36 6.5.4 Shared Use Paths/Greenways ..................................................................................................... 6-37 6.5.5 Bicycle Boulevards ....................................................................................................................... 6-37 6.5.6 Neighborhood Connections .......................................................................................................... 6-41 6.5.7 Scenic View Routes ...................................................................................................................... 6-41 7.0 BICYCLE PARKING PLAN............................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.1 Implementation ........................................................................................................................................... 7-2 7.2 Bicycle Parking Typologies ......................................................................................................................... 7-3 7.2.1 Bicycle Racks ................................................................................................................................. 7-4 7.2.2 Bicycle Shelters .............................................................................................................................. 7-6 7.2.3 Bicycle Lockers ............................................................................................................................... 7-7 7.2.4 Bicycle Stations .............................................................................................................................. 7-9 7.2.5 Bicycle Sharing Systems .............................................................................................................. 7-10 7.3 General Location and Proximity ............................................................................................................... 7-14 7.3.1 Location and Performance Standards .......................................................................................... 7-15 7.4 Maintenance and Aesthetics .................................................................................................................... 7-21 7.5 Priority Corridors and Districts .................................................................................................................. 7-22 8.0 SAFETY AND AWARENESS PLAN ............................................................................................................. 8-1 8.1 Education .................................................................................................................................................... 8-2 8.2 Encouragement .......................................................................................................................................... 8-6 8.3 Enforcement ............................................................................................................................................... 8-9 9.0 EVALUATION PLAN ...................................................................................................................................... 9-1 10.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 10-1 11.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 11-1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1- 1: 2030 Bikeway Network Master Plan ................................................................................. 1-4 Figure 1- 2: Priority Areas for Bicycle Parking Provisions .................................................................... 1-6 Figure 4- 1: Net centers ...................................................................................................................... 4-2 Figure 4- 2: Major Corridors ................................................................................................................ 4-3 Figure 4- 3: Existing Bikeway Network ................................................................................................ 4-4 Figure 6- 1: Bicycle Lane Photo Simulation on NW 8th Avenue .......................................................... 6-1 Figure 6- 2: Shared Use Path / Greenway Photo Simulation on path along NW 12th Ave ................... 6-2 Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miami Marine Stadium Boat Ramp
    Project Name: Miami Marine Stadium Boat Ramp Permittee/Authorized Entity: City of Miami c/o Daniel Rotenberg, Director DREAM 444 SW 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 Email: [email protected] Authorized Agent: TYLIN International c/o Sara Gutekunst Email: [email protected] Environmental Resource Permit - Granted State-owned Submerged Lands Authorization – Not Applicable U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Authorization –Separate Corps Authorization Required Permit No.: 13-306513-011-EI Permit Issuance Date: November 28, 2018 Permit Construction Phase Expiration Date: November 28, 2023 Environmental Resource Permit Permit No.: 13-306513-011-EI PROJECT LOCATION The activities authorized by this Permit are located within Biscayne Bay, within the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve, Outstanding Florida Waters, Class III Waters, adjacent to 3501 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, (Section 17, Township 54 South, Range 42 East), in Miami-Dade County (Latitude N 25° 44’ 34.35”, Longitude W 80° 10’ 10.43”). Offsite mitigation will occur at various locations within Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This permit authorizes the installation of two fixed/floating dock finger piers totaling 1,481 sq. ft, installation of a 60 ft. by 86 ft. (5,160 sq. ft.) boat ramp, and 218 ln. ft. of riprap that extends 6 ft. waterward of MHWL. A portion of the boat ramp is located within the footprint of a previously existing non-functional boat ramp and will be expanded from the historic location. This permit authorizes 4,211 ft² of work in surface waters. The bottom substrate consists of a sandy, silty muck bottom layer with scattered shell and rock along with submerged aquatic vegetation, including seagrass and macroalgae.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Pre-Boom Developers of Dade County : Tequesta
    Some Pre-Boom Developers of Dade County By ADAM G. ADAMS The great land boom in Florida was centered in 1925. Since that time much has been written about the more colorful participants in developments leading to the climax. John S. Collins, the Lummus brothers and Carl Fisher at Miami Beach and George E. Merrick at Coral Gables, have had much well deserved attention. Many others whose names were household words before and during the boom are now all but forgotten. This is an effort, necessarily limited, to give a brief description of the times and to recall the names of a few of those less prominent, withal important develop- ers of Dade County. It seems strange now that South Florida was so long in being discovered. The great migration westward which went on for most of the 19th Century in the United States had done little to change the Southeast. The cities along the coast, Charleston, Savannah, Jacksonville, Pensacola, Mobile and New Orleans were very old communities. They had been settled for a hundred years or more. These old communities were still struggling to overcome the domination of an economy controlled by the North. By the turn of the century Progressives were beginning to be heard, those who were rebelling against the alleged strangle hold the Corporations had on the People. This struggle was vehement in Florida, including Dade County. Florida had almost been forgotten since the Seminole Wars. There were no roads penetrating the 350 miles to Miami. All traffic was through Jacksonville, by rail or water. There resided the big merchants, the promi- nent lawyers and the ruling politicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Designating Scenic Bikeways: a Framework for Rural Road Owners
    Designating Scenic Bikeways: A Framework for Rural Road Owners Publication No. FHWA-FLH-19-004 June 2019 FOREWARD The Federal Lands Highway (FLH) promotes development and deployment of applied research and technology applicable to solving transportation related issues on Federal Lands. The FLH provides technology delivery, innovative solutions, recommended best practices, and related information and knowledge sharing to Federal Agencies, Tribal Governments, and other offices within the FHWA. The objective of this project was to develop a resource to help road owners navigate the Oregon Scenic Bikeway Designation Process. In addition to helping road owners in Oregon, it was the intent of the project that the resource be useful to road owners across the country who are similarly involved with bikeway designation. The resulting Designating Scenic Bikeways: A Framework for Rural Road Owners is a toolkit intended to assist land management agencies, road owners, and proponent groups to communicate and work together in a positive way to develop bikeways. The project included a literature review covering rural road safety, bikeway designation, and liability of bikeway designation. A Technical Advisory Committee guided the work and participated in three bicycle road safety site visits in Oregon to better understand specific issues facing road owners. Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Green Colored Bicycle Lanes in Florida
    Florida Department of Transportation Evaluation of Green Colored Bicycle Lanes in Florida FDOT Office State Materials Office Report Number FL/DOT/SMO 17-581 Authors Edward Offei Guangming Wang Charles Holzschuher Date of Publication April 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................... 3 TEST EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................................... 4 DYNAMIC FRICTION TESTER (DFT) ................................................................................... 4 CIRCULAR TRACK METER (CTM) ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Macy's Redevelopment Site Investment Opportunity
    Macy’s Redevelopment Site Investment Opportunity JOINT VENTURE OR 100% SALE FLAGLER STREET & MIAMI AVENUE, DOWNTOWN MIAMI CLAUDE PEPPER FEDERAL BUILDING TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 13 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OVERVIEW 24 MARKET OVERVIEW 42 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT 57 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 64 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 68 LEASE ABSTRACT 71 FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: PRIMARY CONTACT: ADDITIONAL CONTACT: JOHN F. BELL MARIANO PEREZ Managing Director Senior Associate [email protected] [email protected] Direct: 305.808.7820 Direct: 305.808.7314 Cell: 305.798.7438 Cell: 305.542.2700 100 SE 2ND STREET, SUITE 3100 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305.961.2223 www.transwestern.com/miami NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, AND SAME IS SUBMITTED SUBJECT TO OMISSIONS, CHANGE OF PRICE, RENTAL OR OTHER CONDITION, WITHOUT NOTICE, AND TO ANY LISTING CONDITIONS, IMPOSED BY THE OWNER. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MACY’S SITE MIAMI, FLORIDA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Downtown Miami CBD Redevelopment Opportunity - JV or 100% Sale Residential/Office/Hotel /Retail Development Allowed POTENTIAL FOR UNIT SALES IN EXCESS OF $985 MILLION The Macy’s Site represents 1.79 acres of prime development MACY’S PROJECT land situated on two parcels located at the Main and Main Price Unpriced center of Downtown Miami, the intersection of Flagler Street 22 E. Flagler St. 332,920 SF and Miami Avenue. Macy’s currently has a store on the site, Size encompassing 522,965 square feet of commercial space at 8 W. Flagler St. 189,945 SF 8 West Flagler Street (“West Building”) and 22 East Flagler Total Project 522,865 SF Street (“Store Building”) that are collectively referred to as the 22 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Wynwood Development Table of Contents 03 Project Overview
    TOTAL AREA: 60,238 SQ.FT. Wynwood Development Table of Contents 03 Project Overview 15 Conceptual Drawings 17 Location 20 Demographics 23 Site Plan 26 Building Efficiency 29 RelatedISG Project Overview Project This featured property is centrally located in one of Miami’s hottest and trendiest neighborhood, Wynwood. The 60,238 SF site offers the unique possibility to develop one of South Florida’s most ground-breaking projects. There has only been a select amount of land deals in the past few years available in this neighborhood, and it is not common to find anything over 20,000 SF on average. With its desirable size and mixed use zoning, one can develop over 300 units with a retail component. Wynwood has experienced some of the highest rental rates of any area of South Florida, exceeding $3 per SF, and retail rates exceeding $100 SF. As the area continues to grow and evolve into a world renowned destination, it is forecasted that both residential and retail rental rates will keep increasing. Major landmark projects such as the Florida Brightline and Society Wynwood, as well as major groups such as Goldman Sachs, Zafra Bank, Thor Equity and Related Group investing here, it is positioned to keep growing at an unprecedented rate. Name Wynwood Development Style Development Site Location Edgewater - Miami 51 NE 22th Street Miami, FL 33137 Total Size 60,238 SQ. FT. (1.3829 ACRES) Lot A 50 NE 23nd STREET Folio # 01-3125-015-0140 Lot B 60 NE 23nd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0330 Lot C 68 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0320 Lot D 76 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0310 Lot E 49 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-015-0140 Lot F 51 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-015-0130 Zoning T6-8-O URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONE 04 Development Regulations And Area Requirements DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION VALUE CODE SECTION REQUIRED PERMITTED PROVIDED CATEGORY RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED COMMERCIAL LODGING RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL LODGING RESIDENTIAL LODGING PERMITTED GENERAL COMMERCIAL PERMITTED LOT AREA / DENSITY MIN.5,000 SF LOT AREA MAX.
    [Show full text]
  • Alhambra Portfolio
    DOWNTOWN MIAMI LE JEUNE ROAD ALHAMBRA CIRCLE ALHAMBRA PORTFOLIO ICONIC MIXED-USE PROPERTIES IN THE HEART OF CORAL GABLES, FL Offering Memorandum ALHAMBRA PORTFOLIO NON-ENDORSEMENT 367-371 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE & DISCLAIMER NOTICE CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confiden- tial. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Marcus & Millichap Real Estate EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY Investment Services of Florida, Inc. (“Marcus & Millichap”) and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Marcus & Millichap. This Marketing Bro- BENJAMIN H. SILVER chure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, First Vice President Investments and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information con- Senior Director, National Office and tained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Marcus & Millichap has Industrial Properties Group not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation, with respect to the income Fort Lauderdale Office or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the Cell 786.999.4541 size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contam- Office 954.245.3425 inating substances, PCB’s or asbestos, the compliance with State and Federal regulations, the [email protected] physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects License: FL SL3197924 of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review- Resource Guide for Separating Bicyclists from Traffic
    Literature Review Resource Guide for Separating Bicyclists from Traffic July 2018 0 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. FHWA-SA-18-030 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Literature Review: Resource Guide for Separating Bicyclists from Traffic 2018 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Bill Schultheiss, Rebecca Sanders, Belinda Judelman, and Jesse Boudart (TDG); REPORT NO. Lauren Blackburn (VHB); Kristen Brookshire, Krista Nordback, and Libby Thomas (HSRC); Dick Van Veen and Mary Embry (MobyCON). 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME & ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Toole Design Group, LLC VHB 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 8300 Boone Boulevard, Suite 300 DTFH61-16-D-00005 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Vienna, VA 22182 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE FHWA 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The Task Order Contracting Officer's Representative (TOCOR) for this task was Tamara Redmon.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas Road Transit Corridor Study Final Report, May 2014
    FINAL REPORT Douglas Road Transit Corridor Study General Planning Consultant (GPC) Services Work Order #GPC V-8 Miami-Dade County, Florida Prepared for: MIAMI-DADE County Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by May 2014 Contents 1. Study Objective ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Need for Project .................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Existing Transit Service ......................................................................................................................... 3 4. Transit Level-of-Service......................................................................................................................... 8 5. Candidate Modes ................................................................................................................................ 10 6. Alternative Alignments ....................................................................................................................... 16 7. Alternatives and Variations ................................................................................................................ 23 7.1. Alternative 1 - 42nd Avenue/Le Jeune Road........................................................................... 23 7.2. Alternative 2 - Ponce de Leon Boulevard ................................................................................ 23 7.3. Alternative
    [Show full text]
  • SEOPW Redevelopment Plan
    NOVEMBER 2004 by Dover Kohl & Partners FINAL UPDATE MAY 2009 by the City of Miami Planning Department (Ver. 2.0) i Table of Contents for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan November 2004 Final Updated May 2009 Section ONE Introduction Page 2 • This Document 2 • Topics Frequently Asked from Neighborhood Stakeholders 2 • Historical Context Page 3 • 21st Century Context Page 5 • The Potential: A Livable City 5 • History of the CRA Page 6 • Revised Boundaries 6 • Revisions from the Original CRA Redevelopment Plan Page 7 • Findings of Necessity Page 9 • New Legal Description Section TWO Goals and Guiding Principles Page 11 • Redevelopment Goals #1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles #3 Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability #4 Creating Jobs within the Community #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Page 13 • Guiding Principles 1. The community as a whole has to be livable. Land uses and transportation systems must be coordinated with each other. 2. The neighborhood has to retain access to affordable housing even as the neighborhood becomes more desirable to households with greater means. 3. There must be variety in housing options. ii 4. There must be variety in job options. 5. Walking within the neighborhood must be accessible, safe, and pleasant. 6. Local cultural events, institutions, and businesses are to be promoted. Section TWO 7. The City and County must provide access to small parks and green spaces of an urban (continued) character. 8. Older buildings that embody the area’s cultural past should be restored.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Rail 2013 On-Board Survey
    TRI-RAIL 2013 ON-BOARD SURVEY Prepared for: July 2013 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority 800 NW 33rd Street Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Prepared by: HNTB Corporation 8700 West Flagler Street, Suite 402 Miami, FL 33174 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope of the Effort ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Previous Tri-Rail Surveys .................................................................................................. 3 2.0 SURVEY DESIGN ............................................................................................. 4 2.1 Sampling Plan ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Survey Instrument ............................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Overview / Comparison to Previous Survey Results ................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Pretest ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 MINIMIZATION/MITIGATION OF NON-RESPONSE BIAS ................................. 9 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 10 4.1 Training ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KATHERINE FERNANDEZ RUNDLE HOWARD ROSEN Assistant State Attorneys ROBERT BEHAR FILED
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE FINAL REPORT OF THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY GRAND JURY FALL TERM A.D. 2018 State Attorney KATHERINE FERNANDEZ RUNDLE Chief Assistant State Attorney DON L. HORN Chief Assistant State Attorney for Special Prosecutions HOWARD ROSEN Assistant State Attorneys DAVID MAER JOHN PERIKLES ROBERT BEHAR ERIK KESSLER VICE FOREPERSON ACTING CLERK FILED August 8, 2019 I N D E X Pape THE HEALTH OF BISCAYNE BAY: WATER FLOWS AND WATER WOES 1-27 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SEWAGE CONTAMINATION 2 A. Direct Discharge of Sewage (Wastewater) Into The Ocean 4 B. Leaking Sewer Pipes 4 HI. HARD DEBRIS: TRASH FLOWING INTO OUR WATERWAYS 8 A. Clean Up Efforts 8 B. Plastics 10 C. Sediment 14 IV. EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS 15 A. Stormwater Runoff 16 B. Agricultural Activities 16 C. Wastewater Sewer Systems 17 V. CONTAMINATION OF THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER - THE SOURCE OF OUR DRINKING WATER 17 A. Septic Tanks 17 B. Hypersalinity of Water in Cooling Canals at Florida Power and Light’s Turkey Point Power Plant 24 C. The Saltwater Plume 25 VI. CONCLUSION 27 INDICTMENTS 28-29 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .30 THE HEALTH OF BISCAYNE BAY: WATER FLOWS AND WATER WOES I. INTRODUCTION Water is essential for human life. Up to 60 percent of the human body of an adult is comprised of water. The brain and heart are 73 percent water. Lungs are 83 percent water. The skin is 64 percent water. Muscles and kidneys are 79 percent water, while bones are 31 percent.
    [Show full text]