Kelp Forest Monitoring 2002 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kelp Forest Monitoring 2002 Annual Report KELP FOREST MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT 2002 CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK Kelp Forest Monitoring 2002 Annual Report National Park Service Channel Islands National Park Technical Report CHIS-07-01 KELP FOREST MONITORING 2002 ANNUAL REPORT David J. Kushner Paula Rich and Derek Lerma Channel Islands National Park 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, California 93001 Technical Report CHIS-07-01 1 Kelp Forest Monitoring 2002 Annual Report Table of Contents ABSTRACT ..............................................................................................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................7 METHODS................................................................................................................................................................8 STATION RESULTS................................................................................................................................................9 Location: Wycoff Ledge, San Miguel Island ........................................................................................... 10 Location: Hare Rock, San Miguel Island ................................................................................................ 11 Location: Miracle Mile, San Miguel Island.............................................................................................. 13 Location: Johnson’s Lee North, Santa Rosa Island ............................................................................... 14 Location: Johnson’s Lee South, Santa Rosa Island .............................................................................. 16 Location: Rodes Reef, Santa Rosa Island ............................................................................................. 18 Location: Gull Island South, Santa Cruz Island...................................................................................... 19 Location: Fry’s Harbor, Santa Cruz Island ............................................................................................. 21 Location: Pelican Bay, Santa Cruz Island .............................................................................................. 23 Location: Scorpion Anchorage, Santa Cruz Island ................................................................................ 25 Location: Yellow Banks, Santa Cruz Island ........................................................................................... 27 Location: Admirals Reef, Anacapa Island .............................................................................................. 29 Location: Cathedral Cove, Anacapa Island............................................................................................ 31 Location: Landing Cove, Anacapa Island............................................................................................... 33 Location: Southeast Sea Lion Rookery, Santa Barbara Island.............................................................. 35 Location: Arch Point, Santa Barbara Island ........................................................................................... 37 Location: Cat Canyon, Santa Barbara Island......................................................................................... 39 DISCUSSION .........................................................................................................................................................42 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .....................................................................................................................................49 LITERATURE CITED:............................................................................................................................................50 Technical Report CHIS-07-01 2 Kelp Forest Monitoring 2002 Annual Report List of Tables Table 1. Regularly monitored species by taxonomic grouping, common name, scientific name and associated monitoring technique....................................................................................................................52 Table 2. Station Information. ...................................................................................................................................53 Table 3. Summary of sampling techniques used to monitor population dynamics of selected kelp forest taxa. ....................................................................................................................................................................55 Table 4. 2002 Kelp forest monitoring site status..................................................................................................55 Table 5. 2002 Kelp Forest Monitoring Program participant and cruise list. .....................................................57 Table 6. 2002 Echinoderm wasting disease/syndrome observations...............................................................58 List of Figures Figure 1. Kelp Forest Monitoring Locations at Channel Islands National Park. ......................................... 59 Appendices Appendix A. Quadrat Data A1 Appendix B. 5m2-Quadrat Data B1 Appendix C. Band Transect Data C1 Appendix D. Random Point Contact Data D1 Appendix E. Fish Transect Data E1 Appendix F. Roving Diver Fish Count Data F1 Appendix G. Natural Habitat Size Frequency Distributions G1 Appendix H. Macrocystis pyrifera Size Frequency Distributions H1 Appendix I. Gorgonian/Stylaster (Allopora) californica Size Frequency Distributions I1 Appendix J. Artifical Recruitment Modules Size Frequency Distributions J1 Appendix K. 2002 Species Lists for all Kelp Forest Monitoring Sites K1 Appendix L. 2002 Temperature Data L1 Technical Report CHIS-07-01 3 Kelp Forest Monitoring 2002 Annual Report ABSTRACT Observations and results of the 2002 Channel Islands National Park, Kelp Forest Monitoring Program are described. Population dynamics of 68 taxa, or categories, of algae, fish and invertebrates were measured at 16 permanent sites around the five Park islands. Survey techniques utilized SCUBA and surface-supplied-air, and included quadrats, 5m2-quadrats, band transects, random point contacts, fish transects, roving diver fish counts, video transects, size frequency measurements, artificial recruitment modules, and species list surveys. Temperature data were collected using remote temperature loggers. In 2002, six sites had Macrocystis pyrifera (giant kelp) forests, one site was a “barren” area in transition, and nine sites were dominated by echinoderms. Of these nine sites dominated by echinoderms, two were dominated by Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (purple sea urchins), one by Strongylocentrotus franciscanus (red sea urchins), three by S. purpuratus and S. franciscanus, one by Pachythyone rubra (aggregated red sea cucumbers), S. purpuratus, S. franciscanus, and Astrangia lajollaensis (cup coral), one by S. purpuratus, S. franciscanus and Ophiothrix spiculata (spiny brittle star), and one by O. spiculata. Technical Report CHIS-07-01 4 Kelp Forest Monitoring 2002 Annual Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Channel Islands National Park has conducted long-term ecological monitoring of the kelp forests around Santa Barbara, Anacapa, Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, and San Miguel Islands since 1982. Permanent transects were established at 16 sites between 1981 and 1986. An additional transect was installed at Miracle Mile at San Miguel Island in 2001. This site was installed by a commercial fisherman with support from Santa Barbara County and was placed in an area of high Haliotis rufescens (red abalone) density to target that species. In 2002, sites were monitored during seven five-day cruises between June and September. Divers using SCUBA or surface-supply-air completed all quadrats, 5m2-quadrats, band transects, random point contacts, fish transects, roving diver fish counts, size frequencies, artificial recruitment modules (ARMs), species list surveys, video transects and temperature loggers were retrieved and deployed at the 16 KFM sites. The 2002 kelp forest monitoring was completed at all 16 monitoring sites by 29 National Park Service (NPS) and volunteer divers completing a total of 635 dives with over 516 hours of bottom time. In addition to the 16 KFM sites, limited sampling was conducted at Miracle Mile, San Miguel Island. This annual report contains a summary of the methods used to conduct the monitoring in 2002 and a brief description of the sites along with the results. All of the data collected during 2002 can be found summarized in the Appendices. In addition to our regular monitoring at five Park Islands, a survey cruise to San Clemente Island was conducted to locate four new kelp forest monitoring sites that will be established in 2003 for the U.S. Navy. During this cruise an additional six divers were utilized and completed 116 dives with over 71 hours of bottom time. The information gathered on this cruise is presented in a special report “San Clemente Island Kelp Surveys May/June 2002”. We expect that the additional information gathered at San Clemente Island will greatly compliment the Park’s existing monitoring program. In 2002, Macrocystis pyrifera (giant kelp) forests were present at six of the 16 Kelp Forest Monitoring sites. These sites included Wyckoff Ledge at San Miguel
Recommended publications
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E
    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Complete Work
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Birkeland, Charles, P. K. Dayton and N. A. Engstrom, 1982. Papers from the Echinoderm Conference. 11. A stable system of predation on a holothurian by four asteroids and their top predator. Australian Museum Memoir 16: 175–189, ISBN 0-7305-5743-6. [31 December 1982]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1967.16.1982.365 ISSN 0067-1967 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM, SYDNEY MEMOIR 16 Papers from the Echinoderm Conference THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SYDNEY, 1978 Edited by FRANCIS W. E. ROWE The Australian Museum, Sydney Published by order of the Trustees of The Australian Museum Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 1982 Manuscripts accepted lelr publication 27 March 1980 ORGANISER FRANCIS W. E. ROWE The Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia CHAIRMEN OF SESSIONS AILSA M. CLARK British Museum (Natural History), London, England. MICHEL J ANGOUX Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium. PORTER KIER Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, U.S.A. JOHN LUCAS James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. LOISETTE M. MARSH Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia. DAVID NICHOLS Exeter University, Exeter, Devon, England. DAVID L. PAWSON Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.e. 20560, U.S.A. FRANCIS W. E. ROWE The Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. CONTRIBUTIONS BIRKELAND, Charles, University of Guam, U.S.A. 96910. (p. 175). BRUCE, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental DNA Reveals the Fine-Grained and Hierarchical
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Environmental DNA reveals the fne‑grained and hierarchical spatial structure of kelp forest fsh communities Thomas Lamy 1,2*, Kathleen J. Pitz 3, Francisco P. Chavez3, Christie E. Yorke1 & Robert J. Miller1 Biodiversity is changing at an accelerating rate at both local and regional scales. Beta diversity, which quantifes species turnover between these two scales, is emerging as a key driver of ecosystem function that can inform spatial conservation. Yet measuring biodiversity remains a major challenge, especially in aquatic ecosystems. Decoding environmental DNA (eDNA) left behind by organisms ofers the possibility of detecting species sans direct observation, a Rosetta Stone for biodiversity. While eDNA has proven useful to illuminate diversity in aquatic ecosystems, its utility for measuring beta diversity over spatial scales small enough to be relevant to conservation purposes is poorly known. Here we tested how eDNA performs relative to underwater visual census (UVC) to evaluate beta diversity of marine communities. We paired UVC with 12S eDNA metabarcoding and used a spatially structured hierarchical sampling design to assess key spatial metrics of fsh communities on temperate rocky reefs in southern California. eDNA provided a more‑detailed picture of the main sources of spatial variation in both taxonomic richness and community turnover, which primarily arose due to strong species fltering within and among rocky reefs. As expected, eDNA detected more taxa at the regional scale (69 vs. 38) which accumulated quickly with space and plateaued at only ~ 11 samples. Conversely, the discovery rate of new taxa was slower with no sign of saturation for UVC.
    [Show full text]
  • (Teleostei: Gobiidae) Ensemble Along of Eastern Tropical Pacific: Biological Inventory, Latitudinal Variation and Species Turnover
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Gamma-diversity partitioning of gobiid fishes (Teleostei: Gobiidae) ensemble along of Eastern Tropical Pacific: Biological inventory, latitudinal variation and species turnover Omar Valencia-MeÂndez1☯, FabiaÂn Alejandro RodrõÂguez-Zaragoza2☯, Luis Eduardo Calderon-Aguilera3☯¤, Omar DomõÂnguez-DomõÂnguez4☯, AndreÂs LoÂpez-PeÂrez5☯* a1111111111 1 Doctorado en Ciencias BioloÂgicas y de la Salud, Universidad AutoÂnoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Ciudad de MeÂxico, MeÂxico, 2 Departamento de EcologõÂa, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco, MeÂxico, a1111111111 3 Departamento de EcologõÂa Marina, Centro de InvestigacioÂn CientõÂfica y de EducacioÂn Superior de a1111111111 Ensenada (CICESE), Ensenada, Baja California, MeÂxico, 4 Facultad de BiologõÂa, Universidad Michoacana a1111111111 de San NicolaÂs de Hidalgo, Morelia, MichoacaÂn, MeÂxico, 5 Departamento de HidrobiologõÂa, Universidad a1111111111 AutoÂnoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Ciudad de MeÂxico, MeÂxico ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. ¤ Current address: University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Valencia-MeÂndez O, RodrõÂguez-Zaragoza Abstract FA, Calderon-Aguilera LE, DomõÂnguez-DomÂõnguez O, LoÂpez-PeÂrez A (2018) Gamma-diversity Gobies are the most diverse marine fish family. Here, we analysed the gamma-diversity partitioning of gobiid fishes (Teleostei: Gobiidae) ensemble along of Eastern Tropical Pacific: (γ-diversity) partitioning of gobiid fishes to evaluate the additive and multiplicative compo- Biological inventory, latitudinal variation and nents of α and β-diversity, species replacement and species loss and gain, at four spatial species turnover. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0202863. scales: sample units, ecoregions, provinces and realms. The richness of gobies from the https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202863 realm Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) is represented by 87 species. Along latitudinal and lon- Editor: Heather M.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sea Stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): Their Biology, Ecology, Evolution and Utilization OPEN ACCESS
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328063815 The Sea Stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): Their Biology, Ecology, Evolution and Utilization OPEN ACCESS Article · January 2018 CITATIONS READS 0 6 5 authors, including: Ferdinard Olisa Megwalu World Fisheries University @Pukyong National University (wfu.pknu.ackr) 3 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Population Dynamics. View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ferdinard Olisa Megwalu on 04 October 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Review Article Published: 17 Sep, 2018 SF Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering The Sea Stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): Their Biology, Ecology, Evolution and Utilization Rahman MA1*, Molla MHR1, Megwalu FO1, Asare OE1, Tchoundi A1, Shaikh MM1 and Jahan B2 1World Fisheries University Pilot Programme, Pukyong National University (PKNU), Nam-gu, Busan, Korea 2Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh Abstract The Sea stars (Asteroidea: Echinodermata) are comprising of a large and diverse groups of sessile marine invertebrates having seven extant orders such as Brisingida, Forcipulatida, Notomyotida, Paxillosida, Spinulosida, Valvatida and Velatida and two extinct one such as Calliasterellidae and Trichasteropsida. Around 1,500 living species of starfish occur on the seabed in all the world's oceans, from the tropics to subzero polar waters. They are found from the intertidal zone down to abyssal depths, 6,000m below the surface. Starfish typically have a central disc and five arms, though some species have a larger number of arms. The aboral or upper surface may be smooth, granular or spiny, and is covered with overlapping plates.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Life-Cycle Analysis of Pacific Ocean Zooplankton by Video Microscopy and DNA Barcoding: Crustacea
    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Diversity and life-cycle analysis of Pacific Ocean zooplankton by video microscopy and DNA barcoding: Crustacea Abstract Volume 10 Issue 3 - 2021 Determining the DNA sequencing of a small element in the mitochondrial DNA (DNA Peter Bryant,1 Timothy Arehart2 barcoding) makes it possible to easily identify individuals of different larval stages of 1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of marine crustaceans without the need for laboratory rearing. It can also be used to construct California, USA taxonomic trees, although it is not yet clear to what extent this barcode-based taxonomy 2Crystal Cove Conservancy, Newport Coast, CA, USA reflects more traditional morphological or molecular taxonomy. Collections of zooplankton were made using conventional plankton nets in Newport Bay and the Pacific Ocean near Correspondence: Peter Bryant, Department of Newport Beach, California (Lat. 33.628342, Long. -117.927933) between May 2013 and Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, USA, January 2020, and individual crustacean specimens were documented by video microscopy. Email Adult crustaceans were collected from solid substrates in the same areas. Specimens were preserved in ethanol and sent to the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding at the Received: June 03, 2021 | Published: July 26, 2021 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada for sequencing of the COI DNA barcode. From 1042 specimens, 544 COI sequences were obtained falling into 199 Barcode Identification Numbers (BINs), of which 76 correspond to recognized species. For 15 species of decapods (Loxorhynchus grandis, Pelia tumida, Pugettia dalli, Metacarcinus anthonyi, Metacarcinus gracilis, Pachygrapsus crassipes, Pleuroncodes planipes, Lophopanopeus sp., Pinnixa franciscana, Pinnixa tubicola, Pagurus longicarpus, Petrolisthes cabrilloi, Portunus xantusii, Hemigrapsus oregonensis, Heptacarpus brevirostris), DNA barcoding allowed the matching of different life-cycle stages (zoea, megalops, adult).
    [Show full text]
  • SCAMIT Newsletter Vol. 11 No. 12 1993 April
    f^fO^'M Southern California Association of Marine Invertebrate Taxonomists 3720 Stephen White Drive San Pedro, California 90731 April, 1993 Vol. 11, Nb.12 NEXT MEETING: Master Species List GUEST SPEAKER: None DATE: May 10,1993 9:30 am - 3:00 pm LOCATION: Cabrillo Marine Museum San Pedro, CA MAY 10 MEETING The meeting will be devoted to working on the master species list. We will be resolving the final version of the list containing the four major dischargers and discussing the addition of the minor dischargers. FUNDS FOR THIS PUBLICATION PROVIDED IN PART BY THE ARCO FOUNDATION, CHEVRON USA, AND TEXACO INC. SCAM1T Newsletter is not deemed to be a valid publication for formal taxonomic purposes. MINUTES FROM MEETING ON APRIL 12 Larry Lovell is looking for suggestions for have SCAMIT members volunteer to assist possible speakers and subjects (especially ontripsasknowledgeableguides. Jodi is also non-polychaete taxa) for the next year. He laying plans for a Crustacean Biodiversity would appreciate any input you might have. workshop. He will contact international You can write him at: experts on as many families as possible to get Larry Lovell estimates onnumber of known and remaining 1036 Buena Vista species to be described. Vista, CA 92083 Jodi began by discussing Decapod higher taxonomy. Based on Spears et al. (1992) Larry announced again that for the 1994 Brachyura and Anomura are clearly Annual Meeting of the Southern California differentiated by sperm. Dromidia Academy of Sciences SCAMIT might be able (Dromiacea) and Litkodids (Alaskan King to have a taxonomic symposium. Also crab) have been confirmed as anomurans by discussed was the possibility of SCAMTT recent research.
    [Show full text]
  • Trait Decoupling Promotes Evolutionary Diversification of The
    Trait decoupling promotes evolutionary diversification of the trophic and acoustic system of damselfishes rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Bruno Fre´de´rich1, Damien Olivier1, Glenn Litsios2,3, Michael E. Alfaro4 and Eric Parmentier1 1Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Applied and Fundamental Fish Research Center, Universite´ de Lie`ge, 4000 Lie`ge, Belgium 2Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Research 3Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Ge´nopode, Quartier Sorge, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA Cite this article: Fre´de´rich B, Olivier D, Litsios G, Alfaro ME, Parmentier E. 2014 Trait decou- Trait decoupling, wherein evolutionary release of constraints permits special- pling promotes evolutionary diversification of ization of formerly integrated structures, represents a major conceptual the trophic and acoustic system of damsel- framework for interpreting patterns of organismal diversity. However, few fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 281: 20141047. empirical tests of this hypothesis exist. A central prediction, that the tempo of morphological evolution and ecological diversification should increase http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1047 following decoupling events, remains inadequately tested. In damselfishes (Pomacentridae), a ceratomandibular ligament links the hyoid bar and lower jaws, coupling two main morphofunctional units directly involved in both feeding and sound production. Here, we test the decoupling hypothesis Received: 2 May 2014 by examining the evolutionary consequences of the loss of the ceratomandib- Accepted: 9 June 2014 ular ligament in multiple damselfish lineages. As predicted, we find that rates of morphological evolution of trophic structures increased following the loss of the ligament.
    [Show full text]
  • Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 554-626, 1993 PERCOMORPH PHYLOGENY: A SURVEY OF ACANTHOMORPHS AND A NEW PROPOSAL G. David Johnson and Colin Patterson ABSTRACT The interrelationships of acanthomorph fishes are reviewed. We recognize seven mono- phyletic terminal taxa among acanthomorphs: Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Paracan- thopterygii, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, and a new taxon named Smeg- mamorpha. The Percomorpha, as currently constituted, are polyphyletic, and the Perciformes are probably paraphyletic. The smegmamorphs comprise five subgroups: Synbranchiformes (Synbranchoidei and Mastacembeloidei), Mugilomorpha (Mugiloidei), Elassomatidae (Elas- soma), Gasterosteiformes, and Atherinomorpha. Monophyly of Lampridiformes is justified elsewhere; we have found no new characters to substantiate the monophyly of Polymixi- iformes (which is not in doubt) or Paracanthopterygii. Stephanoberyciformes uniquely share a modification of the extrascapular, and Beryciformes a modification of the anterior part of the supraorbital and infraorbital sensory canals, here named Jakubowski's organ. Our Zei- formes excludes the Caproidae, and characters are proposed to justify the monophyly of the group in that restricted sense. The Smegmamorpha are thought to be monophyletic principally because of the configuration of the first vertebra and its intermuscular bone. Within the Smegmamorpha, the Atherinomorpha and Mugilomorpha are shown to be monophyletic elsewhere. Our Gasterosteiformes includes the syngnathoids and the Pegasiformes
    [Show full text]
  • Open Water Processes of the San Francisco Estuary: from Physical Forcing to Biological Responses
    SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARYESTUARYESTUARY&WAT & WATERSHED&WATERSHEDERSHED Published for the San Francisco Bay-Delta SCIENCEScience Consortium by the John Muir Institute of the Environment SAN FRANCISO ESTUARY & WATERSHED SCIENCE VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1 FEBRUARY 2004 ARTICLE 1 Open Water Processes of the San Francisco Estuary: From Physical Forcing to Biological Responses WIM KIMMERER ROMBERG TIBURON CENTER SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Copyright © 2003 by the authors, unless otherwise noted. This article is part of the collected publications of San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science is produced by the eScholarship Repository and bepress. FEBRUARY 2004 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARYESTUARYESTUARY&WAT & WATERSHED&WATERSHEDERSHED Published for the San Francisco Bay-Delta SCIENCEScience Consortium by the John Muir Institute of the Environment Open Water Processes annual variation in freshwater flow; in particular, abundance of several estuarine-dependent species of of the San Francisco Estuary: fish and shrimp varies positively with flow, although From Physical Forcing the mechanisms behind these relationships are largely to Biological Responses unknown. The second theme is the importance of time scales in determining the degree of interaction WIM KIMMERER between dynamic processes. Physical effects tend to ROMBERG TIBURON CENTER dominate when they operate at shorter time scales SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY than biological processes; when the two time scales are similar, important interactions can arise between physical and biological variability. These interactions DEDICATION can be seen, for example, in the response of phyto- plankton blooms, with characteristic time scales of I dedicate this work to the memory days, to stratification events occurring during neap of Don Kelley.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]