DOCSLIB.ORG

Toxicogenomics Responses in the in Vitro Liver : a View on Human Interindividual Variation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toxicogenomics Responses in the in Vitro Liver : a View on Human Interindividual Variation Toxicogenomics responses in the in vitro liver : a view on human interindividual variation Citation for published version (APA): Jetten, M. J. A. (2014). Toxicogenomics responses in the in vitro liver : a view on human interindividual variation. Maastricht University. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20141205mj Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2014 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20141205mj Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement: www.umlib.nl/taverne-license Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: [email protected] providing details and we will investigate your claim. Download date: 11 Oct. 2021 Toxicogenomics responses in the in vitro liver A view on human interindividual variation ISBN: 978 94 6295 011 5 © Marlon J.A. Jetten Coverdesign: Paul van Cruchten Lay-out: Paul van Cruchten Production: Proefschriftmaken.nl || Uitgeverij BOXPress The studies presented in this thesis were performed at the School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), accredited by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). The research was fund- ed by the carcinoGENOMICS project [LSHB-CT-2006-037712] an FP6 project from the European Union and the ASAT (Assuring Safety without Animal Testing) program an initiative from the Dutch ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports. Toxicogenomics responses in the in vitro liver A view on human interindividual variation PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Maastricht, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Prof. dr. L. L .G. Soete volgens het besluit van het College van Decanen, in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 5 december 2014 om 10.00 uur door Marlon Jacoba Anne Jetten geboren te Roermond op 24 juni 1983 Promotor Prof. Dr. J.C.S. Kleinjans Beoordelingscommissie Prof. Dr. F.C.S. Ramaekers (voorzitter) Prof. Dr. C.H.C. Dejong Prof. Dr. G.M.M. Groothuis (Rijks Universiteit Groningen) Prof. Dr. H. van Loveren Prof. Dr. B. van de Water (Universiteit Leiden) Contents Chapter 1 9 General introduction Chapter 2 33 Interindividual variation in response to xenobiotic exposure established in precision-cut human liver slices Chapter 3 57 Interindividual variation in gene expression responses and metabolite formation in acetaminophen-exposed primary human hepatocytes Chapter 4 83 Baseline and genotoxic compound induced gene expression profiles in HepG2 and HepaRG compared to primary human hepatocytes. Chapter 5 109 Does the epigenome predispose for susceptibility to DNA damage? Chapter 6 143 'Omics analysis of low dose acetaminophen intake demonstrates novel response pathways in humans Chapter 7 167 Summary and general discussion Samenvatting en algemene discussie Addendum I 190 Valorization Dankwoord 197 Curriculum Vitae 198 List of publications 199 8 9 Chapter 1 General introduction Chapter 1 10 Adverse effects to xenobiotic exposure Xenobiotics are defined as any chemical substance of which the occurrence of, or the unusually high concentration in an organism is abnormal. Thus, xenobiotics would typically not be produced by, or be present in an organism. Nevertheless, contact to xenobiotics is an inevitable part of daily life for any organism [1]. For instance, the inhalation of products of combustion whiles breathing or the consumption of food contaminants while feeding are unavoidable scenarios of xenobiotic exposure. Some of the xenobiotics humans are exposed to through air inhalation or food consumption are well known chemical carcinogens; in other words these xenobiotics are chemicals that are known to cause cancer [2]. Chemical carcinogenesis, e.g. the development of cancer after exposure to a chemical, is a multi-step process. In the first step, the initiation phase, a mutation is introduced in the genetic code. In chemical carcinogenesis this is usually caused through covalent binding of a reactive metabolite to the DNA-strand, leading to a DNA-strand break which, if falsely repaired, causes a mutation in the DNA [3, 4]. When these mutations appear in genes involved in for instance cell differentiation/growth or tumor suppression/promotion, the development of cancerous cells can be induced [5]. The harm done during the initiation phase can still be reversed by the DNA-repair mechanisms. However, when these mechanisms fail mutations become final and a second stage, the promotion stage is entered. This phase promotes cell growth of the mutated cell over a longer period in time leading to the development of non-malignant tumors. Then, during the progression phase, the already mutated cells can acquire even more mutations resulting in unlimited cell growth that will eventually become invasive leading to malignant and metastatic forms of cancer [6]. Another important source of xenobiotics in humans is caused by the exposure to pharmaceuticals/drugs. Organ-related toxicity responses are amongst the unwanted side-effects from xenobiotics coming from the exposure to pharmaceutical chemicals [7]. Adverse reactions to drugs are major issues concerning drug treatment and development, resulting in a high number of deaths and medical costs [8]. Furthermore, idiosyncratic responses impose a financial burden on the pharmacological industry [7, 9]. Chapter 1 11 Interindividual variation in the human population Interindividual variation in adverse responses to xenobiotic exposure within the human population is a well-known phenomenon [10, 11]. For instance, though smoking causes lung cancer, not all individuals that smoke will eventually succumb to this disease. Also, individuals exhibit different side-effects when exposed to similar doses of a pharmaceutical. Environmental factors, but also genetic factors have been proposed as causative elements for the interindividual variation within the human population [10, 11]. Many studies have focused on finding a single or maybe a few factors explaining the variation within a population in response to xenobiotics, for instance the expression level of a single or a few genes [12]. However, a single factor in general does not seem to be able to provide sufficient explanation for the interindividual differences in a population, implying that the variation is rather caused by multiple factors [12]. Nevertheless, up till now the (genetic) factors causing interindividual variation are still largely unknown. Animal models and human risk assessment In an attempt to elucidate the factors influencing sensitivity of individuals towards xenobiotic exposure and in order to establish a system for risk assessment of human xenobiotic exposure, researchers have resorted to the use of in vivo animal models; especially rodent models (mice, rats, etc.). In addition, for the preservation of the current levels of human health and environmental protection many regulatory bodies emphasize the need for toxicity testing [13]. As a result, the use of animal models has become deeply manifested into the rules and regulations around toxicity testing, as such becoming an obligatory hurdle to take to ensure human safety [14]. However, the use of animal models brings along a heavy financial burden, and also goes hand-in- hand with ethical and moral dilemmas [15]. In addition, over the recent years the reliability and applicably of animal model-derived data towards the human situation has been questioned [15]. Currently, risk-assessment methods based on data-extrapolation from the animal to the human situation make use of a golden standard, the 100-fold safety factor [16]. This factor is applied to the outcome of animal model-derived data in order to establish a dose for a compound/xenobiotic that should be safe for human use. The factor is composed of two parts; a 10-fold margin of safety allowing for the extrapolation from the animal to human situation, and another 10- Chapter 1 12 fold margin of safety is included to account for human interindividual variation in susceptibility [16, 17]. Especially the latter 10-fold factor for interindividual variation is a topic of discussion at this moment in time [18]. An overestimation of interindividual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Data
    Figure 2S 4 7 A - C 080125 CSCs 080418 CSCs - + IFN-a 48 h + IFN-a 48 h + IFN-a 72 h 6 + IFN-a 72 h 3 5 MRFI 4 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 MHC I MHC II MICA MICB ULBP-1 ULBP-2 ULBP-3 ULBP-4 MHC I MHC II MICA MICB ULBP-1 ULBP-2 ULBP-3 ULBP-4 7 B 13 080125 FBS - D 080418 FBS - + IFN-a 48 h 12 + IFN-a 48 h + IFN-a 72 h + IFN-a 72 h 6 080125 FBS 11 10 5 9 8 4 7 6 3 MRFI 5 4 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 MHC I MHC II MICA MICB ULBP-1 ULBP-2 ULBP-3 ULBP-4 MHC I MHC II MICA MICB ULBP-1 ULBP-2 ULBP-3 ULBP-4 Molecule Molecule FIGURE 4S FIGURE 5S Panel A Panel B FIGURE 6S A B C D Supplemental Results Table 1S. Modulation by IFN-α of APM in GBM CSC and FBS tumor cell lines. Molecule * Cell line IFN-α‡ HLA β2-m# HLA LMP TAP1 TAP2 class II A A HC§ 2 7 10 080125 CSCs - 1∞ (1) 3 (65) 2 (91) 1 (2) 6 (47) 2 (61) 1 (3) 1 (2) 1 (3) + 2 (81) 11 (80) 13 (99) 1 (3) 8 (88) 4 (91) 1 (2) 1 (3) 2 (68) 080125 FBS - 2 (81) 4 (63) 4 (83) 1 (3) 6 (80) 3 (67) 2 (86) 1 (3) 2 (75) + 2 (99) 14 (90) 7 (97) 5 (75) 7 (100) 6 (98) 2 (90) 1 (4) 3 (87) 080418 CSCs - 2 (51) 1 (1) 1 (3) 2 (47) 2 (83) 2 (54) 1 (4) 1 (2) 1 (3) + 2 (81) 3 (76) 5 (75) 2 (50) 2 (83) 3 (71) 1 (3) 2 (87) 1 (2) 080418 FBS - 1 (3) 3 (70) 2 (88) 1 (4) 3 (87) 2 (76) 1 (3) 1 (3) 1 (2) + 2 (78) 7 (98) 5 (99) 2 (94) 5 (100) 3 (100) 1 (4) 2 (100) 1 (2) 070104 CSCs - 1 (2) 1 (3) 1 (3) 2 (78) 1 (3) 1 (2) 1 (3) 1 (3) 1 (2) + 2 (98) 8 (100) 10 (88) 4 (89) 3 (98) 3 (94) 1 (4) 2 (86) 2 (79) * expression of APM molecules was evaluated by intracellular staining and cytofluorimetric analysis; ‡ cells were treatead or not (+/-) for 72 h with 1000 IU/ml of IFN-α; # β-2 microglobulin; § β-2 microglobulin-free HLA-A heavy chain; ∞ values are indicated as ratio between the mean of fluorescence intensity of cells stained with the selected mAb and that of the negative control; bold values indicate significant MRFI (≥ 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Topological Scoring of Protein Interaction Networks
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/438408; this version posted October 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Topological Scoring of Protein Interaction Networks Mihaela E. Sardiu1, Joshua M. Gilmore1,2, Brad D. Groppe1,3, Arnob Dutta1,4, Laurence Florens1, and Michael P. Washburn1,5‡ 1Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110 U.S.A. 2Current Address: Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, St. Joseph, MO 64506 U.S.A. 3Current Address: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA 02451, U.S.A. 4Current Address: Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Rhode Island, 287 CBLS, 120 Flagg Road, Kingston, RI 02881. 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA ‡To whom correspondence should be addressed: Michael Washburn, Ph.D. Stowers Institute for Medical Research 1000 E. 50th St. Kansas City, MO 64110 Phone: 816-926-4457 E-mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/438408; this version posted October 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract It remains a significant challenge to define individual protein associations within networks where an individual protein can directly interact with other proteins and/or be part of large complexes, which contain functional modules. Here we demonstrate the topological scoring (TopS) algorithm for the analysis of quantitative proteomic analyses of affinity purifications.
    [Show full text]
  • ZNF24 (H-11): Sc-393359
    SAN TA C RUZ BI OTEC HNOL OG Y, INC . ZNF24 (H-11): sc-393359 BACKGROUND APPLICATIONS Zinc-finger proteins contain DNA-binding domains and have a wide variety ZNF24 (H-11) is recommended for detection of ZNF24 of mouse, rat and of functions, most of which encompass some form of transcriptional activa - human origin by Western Blotting (starting dilution 1:100, dilution range tion or repression. The majority of zinc-finger proteins contain a Krüppel-type 1:100-1:1000), immunoprecipitation [1-2 µg per 100-500 µg of total protein DNA binding domain and a KRAB domain, which is thought to interact with (1 ml of cell lysate)], immunofluorescence (starting dilution 1:50, dilution KAP1, thereby recruiting histone modifying proteins. ZNF191 (zinc finger pro - range 1:50-1:500) and solid phase ELISA (starting dilution 1:30, dilution tein 191), also known as ZNF24, KOX17, ZSCAN3 or RSG-A, is a 368 amino range 1:30-1:3000). acid nuclear protein that belongs to the Krüppel C H -type zinc-finger protein 2 2 Suitable for use as control antibody for ZNF24 siRNA (h): sc-76969, ZNF24 family. Expressed in tissues throughout the body with the exception of heart, siRNA (m): sc-76970, ZNF24 shRNA Plasmid (h): sc-76969-SH, ZNF24 shRNA ZNF191 functions as a transcriptional repressor for a variety of proteins, such Plasmid (m): sc-76970-SH, ZNF24 shRNA (h) Lentiviral Particles: sc-76969-V as VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), and is thought to be important and ZNF24 shRNA (m) Lentiviral Particles: sc-76970-V.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Materials ZNF281 Enhances Cardiac Reprogramming
    Supplemental Materials ZNF281 enhances cardiac reprogramming by modulating cardiac and inflammatory gene expression Huanyu Zhou, Maria Gabriela Morales, Hisayuki Hashimoto, Matthew E. Dickson, Kunhua Song, Wenduo Ye, Min S. Kim, Hanspeter Niederstrasser, Zhaoning Wang, Beibei Chen, Bruce A. Posner, Rhonda Bassel-Duby and Eric N. Olson Supplemental Table 1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 2; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 3; related to the “quantitative mRNA measurement” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Table 4; related to the “ChIP-seq, gene ontology and pathway analysis” and “RNA-seq” and gene ontology analysis” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Figure S1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Figure S2; related to Figure 2. Supplemental Figure S3; related to Figure 3. Supplemental Figure S4; related to Figure 4. Supplemental Figure S5; related to Figure 6. Supplemental Table S1. Genes included in human retroviral ORF cDNA library. Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol AATF BMP8A CEBPE CTNNB1 ESR2 GDF3 HOXA5 IL17D ADIPOQ BRPF1 CEBPG CUX1 ESRRA GDF6 HOXA6 IL17F ADNP BRPF3 CERS1 CX3CL1 ETS1 GIN1 HOXA7 IL18 AEBP1 BUD31 CERS2 CXCL10 ETS2 GLIS3 HOXB1 IL19 AFF4 C17ORF77 CERS4 CXCL11 ETV3 GMEB1 HOXB13 IL1A AHR C1QTNF4 CFL2 CXCL12 ETV7 GPBP1 HOXB5 IL1B AIMP1 C21ORF66 CHIA CXCL13 FAM3B GPER HOXB6 IL1F3 ALS2CR8 CBFA2T2 CIR1 CXCL14 FAM3D GPI HOXB7 IL1F5 ALX1 CBFA2T3 CITED1 CXCL16 FASLG GREM1 HOXB9 IL1F6 ARGFX CBFB CITED2 CXCL3 FBLN1 GREM2 HOXC4 IL1F7
    [Show full text]
  • Enzyme DHRS7
    Toward the identification of a function of the “orphan” enzyme DHRS7 Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Selene Araya, aus Lugano, Tessin Basel, 2018 Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentenserver der Universität Basel edoc.unibas.ch Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Alex Odermatt (Fakultätsverantwortlicher) und Prof. Dr. Michael Arand (Korreferent) Basel, den 26.6.2018 ________________________ Dekan Prof. Dr. Martin Spiess I. List of Abbreviations 3α/βAdiol 3α/β-Androstanediol (5α-Androstane-3α/β,17β-diol) 3α/βHSD 3α/β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 17β-HSD 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase 17αOHProg 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone 20α/βOHProg 20α/β-Hydroxyprogesterone 17α,20α/βdiOHProg 20α/βdihydroxyprogesterone ADT Androgen deprivation therapy ANOVA Analysis of variance AR Androgen Receptor AKR Aldo-Keto Reductase ATCC American Type Culture Collection CAM Cell Adhesion Molecule CYP Cytochrome P450 CBR1 Carbonyl reductase 1 CRPC Castration resistant prostate cancer Ct-value Cycle threshold-value DHRS7 (B/C) Dehydrogenase/Reductase Short Chain Dehydrogenase Family Member 7 (B/C) DHEA Dehydroepiandrosterone DHP Dehydroprogesterone DHT 5α-Dihydrotestosterone DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium DMSO Dimethyl Sulfoxide DTT Dithiothreitol E1 Estrone E2 Estradiol ECM Extracellular Membrane EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EMT Epithelial-mesenchymal transition ER Endoplasmic Reticulum ERα/β Estrogen Receptor α/β FBS Fetal Bovine Serum 3 FDR False discovery rate FGF Fibroblast growth factor HEPES 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-Piperazineethanesulfonic Acid HMDB Human Metabolome Database HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography HSD Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase IC50 Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration LNCaP Lymph node carcinoma of the prostate mRNA Messenger Ribonucleic Acid n.d.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Gene-Function Correlation on Schizophrenia Susceptibility Genes
    Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 55, 285–292 & 2010 The Japan Society of Human Genetics All rights reserved 1434-5161/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/jhg ORIGINAL ARTICLE An integrated genomic analysis of gene-function correlation on schizophrenia susceptibility genes Tearina T Chu and Ying Liu Schizophrenia is a highly complex inheritable disease characterized by numerous genetic susceptibility elements, each contributing a modest increase in risk for the disease. Although numerous linkage or association studies have identified a large set of schizophrenia-associated loci, many are controversial. In addition, only a small portion of these loci overlaps with the large cumulative pool of genes that have shown changes of expression in schizophrenia. Here, we applied a genomic gene-function approach to identify susceptibility loci that show direct effect on gene expression, leading to functional abnormalities in schizophrenia. We carried out an integrated analysis by cross-examination of the literature-based susceptibility loci with the schizophrenia-associated expression gene list obtained from our previous microarray study (Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 54: 665–75) using bioinformatic tools, followed by confirmation of gene expression changes using qPCR. We found nine genes (CHGB, SLC18A2, SLC25A27, ESD, C4A/C4B, TCP1, CHL1 and CTNNA2) demonstrate gene-function correlation involving: synapse and neurotransmission; energy metabolism and defense mechanisms; and molecular chaperone and cytoskeleton. Our findings further support the roles of these genes in genetic influence and functional consequences on the development of schizophrenia. It is interesting to note that four of the nine genes are located on chromosome 6, suggesting a special chromosomal vulnerability in schizophrenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • (P -Value<0.05, Fold Change≥1.4), 4 Vs. 0 Gy Irradiation
    Table S1: Significant differentially expressed genes (P -Value<0.05, Fold Change≥1.4), 4 vs. 0 Gy irradiation Genbank Fold Change P -Value Gene Symbol Description Accession Q9F8M7_CARHY (Q9F8M7) DTDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase (Fragment), partial (9%) 6.70 0.017399678 THC2699065 [THC2719287] 5.53 0.003379195 BC013657 BC013657 Homo sapiens cDNA clone IMAGE:4152983, partial cds. [BC013657] 5.10 0.024641735 THC2750781 Ciliary dynein heavy chain 5 (Axonemal beta dynein heavy chain 5) (HL1). 4.07 0.04353262 DNAH5 [Source:Uniprot/SWISSPROT;Acc:Q8TE73] [ENST00000382416] 3.81 0.002855909 NM_145263 SPATA18 Homo sapiens spermatogenesis associated 18 homolog (rat) (SPATA18), mRNA [NM_145263] AA418814 zw01a02.s1 Soares_NhHMPu_S1 Homo sapiens cDNA clone IMAGE:767978 3', 3.69 0.03203913 AA418814 AA418814 mRNA sequence [AA418814] AL356953 leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 6 {Homo sapiens} (exp=0; 3.63 0.0277936 THC2705989 wgp=1; cg=0), partial (4%) [THC2752981] AA484677 ne64a07.s1 NCI_CGAP_Alv1 Homo sapiens cDNA clone IMAGE:909012, mRNA 3.63 0.027098073 AA484677 AA484677 sequence [AA484677] oe06h09.s1 NCI_CGAP_Ov2 Homo sapiens cDNA clone IMAGE:1385153, mRNA sequence 3.48 0.04468495 AA837799 AA837799 [AA837799] Homo sapiens hypothetical protein LOC340109, mRNA (cDNA clone IMAGE:5578073), partial 3.27 0.031178378 BC039509 LOC643401 cds. [BC039509] Homo sapiens Fas (TNF receptor superfamily, member 6) (FAS), transcript variant 1, mRNA 3.24 0.022156298 NM_000043 FAS [NM_000043] 3.20 0.021043295 A_32_P125056 BF803942 CM2-CI0135-021100-477-g08 CI0135 Homo sapiens cDNA, mRNA sequence 3.04 0.043389246 BF803942 BF803942 [BF803942] 3.03 0.002430239 NM_015920 RPS27L Homo sapiens ribosomal protein S27-like (RPS27L), mRNA [NM_015920] Homo sapiens tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10c, decoy without an 2.98 0.021202829 NM_003841 TNFRSF10C intracellular domain (TNFRSF10C), mRNA [NM_003841] 2.97 0.03243901 AB002384 C6orf32 Homo sapiens mRNA for KIAA0386 gene, partial cds.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Podocytes Mature Into Vascularized Glomeruli Upon Experimental Transplantation
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Podocytes Mature into Vascularized Glomeruli upon Experimental Transplantation † Sazia Sharmin,* Atsuhiro Taguchi,* Yusuke Kaku,* Yasuhiro Yoshimura,* Tomoko Ohmori,* ‡ † ‡ Tetsushi Sakuma, Masashi Mukoyama, Takashi Yamamoto, Hidetake Kurihara,§ and | Ryuichi Nishinakamura* *Department of Kidney Development, Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics, and †Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan; ‡Department of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan; §Division of Anatomy, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and |Japan Science and Technology Agency, CREST, Kumamoto, Japan ABSTRACT Glomerular podocytes express proteins, such as nephrin, that constitute the slit diaphragm, thereby contributing to the filtration process in the kidney. Glomerular development has been analyzed mainly in mice, whereas analysis of human kidney development has been minimal because of limited access to embryonic kidneys. We previously reported the induction of three-dimensional primordial glomeruli from human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Here, using transcription activator–like effector nuclease-mediated homologous recombination, we generated human iPS cell lines that express green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the NPHS1 locus, which encodes nephrin, and we show that GFP expression facilitated accurate visualization of nephrin-positive podocyte formation in
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material Computational Prediction of SARS
    Supplementary_Material Computational prediction of SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs and their putative host targets Sheet_1 List of potential stem-loop structures in SARS-CoV-2 genome as predicted by VMir. Rank Name Start Apex Size Score Window Count (Absolute) Direct Orientation 1 MD13 2801 2864 125 243.8 61 2 MD62 11234 11286 101 211.4 49 4 MD136 27666 27721 104 205.6 119 5 MD108 21131 21184 110 204.7 210 9 MD132 26743 26801 119 188.9 252 19 MD56 9797 9858 128 179.1 59 26 MD139 28196 28233 72 170.4 133 28 MD16 2934 2974 76 169.9 71 43 MD103 20002 20042 80 159.3 403 46 MD6 1489 1531 86 156.7 171 51 MD17 2981 3047 131 152.8 38 87 MD4 651 692 75 140.3 46 95 MD7 1810 1872 121 137.4 58 116 MD140 28217 28252 72 133.8 62 122 MD55 9712 9758 96 132.5 49 135 MD70 13171 13219 93 130.2 131 164 MD95 18782 18820 79 124.7 184 173 MD121 24086 24135 99 123.1 45 176 MD96 19046 19086 75 123.1 179 196 MD19 3197 3236 76 120.4 49 200 MD86 17048 17083 73 119.8 428 223 MD75 14534 14600 137 117 51 228 MD50 8824 8870 94 115.8 79 234 MD129 25598 25642 89 115.6 354 Reverse Orientation 6 MR61 19088 19132 88 197.8 271 10 MR72 23563 23636 148 188.8 286 11 MR11 3775 3844 136 185.1 116 12 MR94 29532 29582 94 184.6 271 15 MR43 14973 15028 109 183.9 226 27 MR14 4160 4206 89 170 241 34 MR35 11734 11792 111 164.2 37 52 MR5 1603 1652 89 152.7 118 53 MR57 18089 18132 101 152.7 139 94 MR8 2804 2864 122 137.4 38 107 MR58 18474 18508 72 134.9 237 117 MR16 4506 4540 72 133.8 311 120 MR34 10010 10048 82 132.7 245 133 MR7 2534 2578 90 130.4 75 146 MR79 24766 24808 75 127.9 59 150 MR65 21528 21576 99 127.4 83 180 MR60 19016 19049 70 122.5 72 187 MR51 16450 16482 75 121 363 190 MR80 25687 25734 96 120.6 75 198 MR64 21507 21544 70 120.3 35 206 MR41 14500 14542 84 119.2 94 218 MR84 26840 26894 108 117.6 94 Sheet_2 List of stable stem-loop structures based on MFE.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1
    Supplementary Table 1. 492 genes are unique to 0 h post-heat timepoint. The name, p-value, fold change, location and family of each gene are indicated. Genes were filtered for an absolute value log2 ration 1.5 and a significance value of p ≤ 0.05. Symbol p-value Log Gene Name Location Family Ratio ABCA13 1.87E-02 3.292 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family unknown transporter A (ABC1), member 13 ABCB1 1.93E-02 −1.819 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family Plasma transporter B (MDR/TAP), member 1 Membrane ABCC3 2.83E-02 2.016 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family Plasma transporter C (CFTR/MRP), member 3 Membrane ABHD6 7.79E-03 −2.717 abhydrolase domain containing 6 Cytoplasm enzyme ACAT1 4.10E-02 3.009 acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 1 Cytoplasm enzyme ACBD4 2.66E-03 1.722 acyl-CoA binding domain unknown other containing 4 ACSL5 1.86E-02 −2.876 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain Cytoplasm enzyme family member 5 ADAM23 3.33E-02 −3.008 ADAM metallopeptidase domain Plasma peptidase 23 Membrane ADAM29 5.58E-03 3.463 ADAM metallopeptidase domain Plasma peptidase 29 Membrane ADAMTS17 2.67E-04 3.051 ADAM metallopeptidase with Extracellular other thrombospondin type 1 motif, 17 Space ADCYAP1R1 1.20E-02 1.848 adenylate cyclase activating Plasma G-protein polypeptide 1 (pituitary) receptor Membrane coupled type I receptor ADH6 (includes 4.02E-02 −1.845 alcohol dehydrogenase 6 (class Cytoplasm enzyme EG:130) V) AHSA2 1.54E-04 −1.6 AHA1, activator of heat shock unknown other 90kDa protein ATPase homolog 2 (yeast) AK5 3.32E-02 1.658 adenylate kinase 5 Cytoplasm kinase AK7
    [Show full text]