DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Branch Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2006 Hearings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Branch Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2006 Hearings S. HRG. 109–154 LEGISLATIVE BRANCH APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2985 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Architect of the Capitol (except House items) Capitol Guide Board Capitol Police Board Congressional Budget Office Government Accountability Office Government Printing Office Joint Committee on Taxation Joint Economic Committee Library of Congress Nondepartmental Witnesses Office of Compliance U.S. Senate Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 99–872 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland CONRAD BURNS, Montana HARRY REID, Nevada RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado J. KEITH KENNEDY, Staff Director TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia (ex officio) Professional Staff CAROLYN E. APOSTOLOU TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN (Minority) DREW WILLISON (Minority) NANCY OLKEWICZ (Minority) Administrative Support CHRISTEN TAYLOR (II) CONTENTS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2005 Page U.S. Senate: Office of the Secretary ....................................................................... 1 Architect of the Capitol ........................................................................................... 71 TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 2005 Library of Congress ................................................................................................. 121 Government Accountability Office .......................................................................... 169 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27, 2005 U.S. Senate: Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper ............................. 209 Capitol Police Board ................................................................................................ 241 Capitol Guide Board ................................................................................................ 261 WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 2005 Government Printing Office .................................................................................... 265 Congressional Budget Office ................................................................................... 285 Office of Compliance ................................................................................................ 293 MATERIAL SUBMITTED BY AGENCIES NOT APPEARING FOR FORMAL HEARINGS Joint Committee on Taxation ................................................................................. 303 Joint Economic Committee ..................................................................................... 314 Nondepartmental Witnesses ................................................................................... 317 (III) LEGISLATIVE BRANCH APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2005 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met at 10:30 a.m., in room SD–116, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Wayne Allard (chairman) presiding. Present: Senators Allard, Cochran, and Durbin. U.S. SENATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY STATEMENT OF EMILY REYNOLDS, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE ACCOMPANIED BY: MARY SUIT JONES, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE SENATE TIM WINEMAN, FINANCIAL CLERK OF THE SENATE OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR WAYNE ALLARD Senator ALLARD. The Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch, Committee on Appropriations, will come to order. We meet today to hear testimony from the Secretary of the Senate and the Archi- tect of the Capitol on the fiscal year 2006 budget requests. It’s my first hearing as chairman of this subcommittee, and I look forward to learning about the key issues and budget priorities within each of the legislative branch agencies. Overall, the request for the legislative branch totals $4.03 billion, an increase of $482 million, or a 13.5 percent increase over the fis- cal year 2005 level. Clearly, in the constrained budget environment in which we will be operating, an increase of this level will be dif- ficult, if not impossible to provide, so we will be seeking to ensure that all agencies have prioritized their budget requests, are taking steps to operate as cost effectively as possible, and are eliminating wasteful or unnecessary spending. Welcome to our witnesses this morning. We will hear first from Emily Reynolds, Secretary of the Senate, who’s accompanied by the Assistant Secretary of the Senate, Mary Suit Jones, and the Finan- cial Clerk of the Senate, Tim Wineman. Ms. Reynolds, your budget request totals almost $23 million, an increase of about 7 percent over fiscal year 2005, primarily to ac- commodate routine pay and inflation-related increases, as well as to make some upgrades in a few areas. (1) 2 Following the Secretary of the Senate, we will take testimony from Mr. Alan Hantman, Architect of the Capitol. The AOC budget request totals $506 million, an increase of $157 million over the current fiscal year. The increase is largely associated with several construction projects, including completion of the Capitol Visitor Center (CVC), construction of the Library of Congress storage mod- ules at Fort Meade, Maryland, and a new offsite delivery facility for the Capitol Police, as well as startup costs and new personnel for the CVC. Your budget office is to be commended for putting together a budget justification which is transparent and thorough and ex- plains all increases concisely, and we certainly appreciate that ef- fort. There are a number of issues I’d like to explore with you today. Most important, of course, is the schedule and budget for comple- tion of the Capitol Visitor Center. As I understand it, while much progress has been made, there’s still a long way to go before the facility can be opened to the public, and the schedule remains un- clear. There have been significant difficulties with this project, in- cluding coordinating two major construction contractors, weather- related delays, unforeseen site conditions, and, frankly, serious management problems. While it is too late to make major changes to how the project is being run, it is my expectation that you will make every effort to demand the best from your contractors, pro- vide the Congress with a balanced assessment of progress as the project continues, and accept the counsel of the Government Ac- countability Office (GAO), which has been monitoring the project, providing recommendations from the start. GAO has done a very professional job in this oversight effort, and we appreciate this. Their projections on cost and schedule have been accurate, and their recommendations have been good. In addition to the CVC, there continues to be much construction activity around this campus. One of the primary reasons is secu- rity-related work that will continue even after the CVC is complete. All of us have construction fatigue and look forward to when this complex can be returned to a state that we can all be proud of, free of construction activity, dump trucks, jersey barriers, and torn-up streets. So we will be urging you to accelerate these efforts, which have been in the works for many years now. The perimeter security project and the visitor center seem to be emblematic of problems this agency continues to have with project management. As I understand it, about half of the major projects AOC has underway at this time are behind schedule, and too many are over budget, as well. We look forward to hearing what you’re doing to improve project management. There are also concerns with the morale of your workforce. High- lighted in an article a few weeks back in The Hill newspaper, it seems that communication with employees is not as good as it should be. So we look forward to an update on how you’re improv- ing communication and employee morale. Finally, the AOC has been working to develop a long-range mas- ter plan for the Capitol complex, as well as condition assessments of each of the buildings. This should lead to a plan for prioritizing spending for both capital projects and deferred maintenance over 3 the next 5 years. The master planning effort has been underway for some time, so we look forward to understanding when we will have a final product and a roadmap for future budget require- ments. We will now turn to the Secretary of the Senate. I welcome you to the subcommittee and look forward to your testimony, Ms. Rey- nolds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Oversight Manual
    Congressional Oversight Manual Frederick M. Kaiser Specialist in American National Government Walter J. Oleszek Senior Specialist in American National Government Todd B. Tatelman Legislative Attorney June 10, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30240 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Oversight Manual Summary The Congressional Research Service (CRS) developed the Congressional Oversight Manual over 30 years ago, following a three-day December 1978 Workshop on Congressional Oversight and Investigations. The workshop was organized by a group of House and Senate committee aides from both parties and CRS at the request of the bipartisan House leadership. The Manual was produced by CRS with the assistance of a number of House committee staffers. In subsequent years, CRS has sponsored and conducted various oversight seminars for House and Senate staff and updated the Manual as circumstances warranted. The last revision occurred in 2007. Worth noting is the bipartisan recommendation of the House members of the 1993 Joint Committee on the Organization of Congress (Rept. No. 103-413, Vol. I): [A]s a way to further enhance the oversight work of Congress, the Joint Committee would encourage the Congressional Research Service to conduct on a regular basis, as it has done in the past, oversight seminars for Members and congressional staff and to update on a regular basis its Congressional Oversight Manual. Over the years, CRS has assisted many members, committees, party leaders, and staff aides in the performance of the oversight function, that is, the review, monitoring, and supervision of the implementation of public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Fifteenth Congress of the United States of America
    H. Con. Res. 113 Agreed to June 5, 2018 One Hundred Fifteenth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen Concurrent Resolution Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concur- ring), SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on June 16, 2018, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Rep- resentatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be— (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress. (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event. SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equip- ment as may be required for the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • Hubbard Brook Research Foundation
    Hubbard Brook Research Foundation A Report for 2007 Promoting the understanding and stewardship of ecosystems through scientific research, policy outreach, and education Page Trustees Advisory Council Stuart V. Smith, Jr., Chair Edward A. Ames Susan Arnold John Aber, Vice Chair Posy Bass University of New Hampshire Ellen Baum Peter R. Stein, Secretary Alison Chase Lyme Timber Company Dave Chase Starling Childs Sarah E. Muyskens, Treasurer Fred Ernst Larry K. Forcier Christopher C. Barton Anne T. Forcier Wright State University Isabel Freeman Tom Gross Charles T. Driscoll Dick Henry Syracuse University Joseph Hill Timothy J. Fahey Harold W. Janeway Cornell University Thomas Kehler Lia Lloyd-Clare Kehler Richard T. Holmes Sherman T. Kent Dartmouth College Jenepher Lingelbach Marcy Lyman Thomas C. Jorling Peter Martin Mark Latham Constance L. Royster Vermont Law School Jean Smith Gene E. Likens Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Mission Jane E. S. Sokolow The Hubbard Brook Research Foundation’s mission is to promote the understanding Kathleen C. Weathers and stewardship of ecosystems through Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies scientific research, long-term monitoring, and Stanton Williams education. Founded in 1993, HBRF works to sustain and enhance the Hubbard Brook F. Herbert Bormann, Advisor Ecosystem Study, in partnership with the USDA Forest Yale University Service, the National Science Foundation’s LTER program, Founding Trustee Emeritus and many colleges, universities, and other institutions. Christopher Eagar, Ex Officio Hubbard Brook Consortium, Charter Members: USDA Forest Service Dartmouth College, Plymouth State University, Syracuse University, USDA Forest Service/Northern Research Station, and Wellesley College. Cover photo by Buck Sleeper. Inside photos by Buck Sleeper, Nick Rodenhouse, Scott Schwenk, Judy Brown, Chris Eagar, Hubbard Brook archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Bury Your Gays’
    . Volume 15, Issue 1 May 2018 Toxic regulation: From TV’s code of practices to ‘#Bury Your Gays’ Kelsey Cameron, University of Pittsburgh, USA Abstract: In 2016, American television killed off many of its queer female characters. The frequency and pervasiveness of these deaths prompted outcry from fans, who took to digital platforms to protest ‘bury your gays,’ the narrative trope wherein queer death serves as a plot device. Scholars and critics have noted the positive aspects of the #BuryYourGays fan campaign, which raised awareness of damaging representational trends and money for the Trevor Project, a suicide prevention organization focused on LGBTQ youth. There has been less attention to the ties #BuryYourGays has to toxicity, however. Protests spilled over into ad hominem attacks, as fans wished violence upon the production staff responsible for queer character deaths. Using the death of The 100 character Lexa as a case study, this article argues that we should neither dismiss these toxic fan practices nor reduce them to a symptom of present-day fan entitlement. Rather, we must attend to the history that shapes contemporary antagonisms between producers and queer audiences – a history that dates back to television’s earliest efforts at content regulation. Approaching contemporary fandom through history makes clear that toxic fan practices are not simply a question of individual agency. Longstanding industry structures predispose queer fans and producers to toxic interactions. Keywords: queer fandom, The 100, television, regulation, ‘bury your gays’ Introduction In March of 2016, queer fans got angry at American television. This anger was both general and particular, grounded in long-simmering dissatisfaction with TV’s treatment of queer women and catalyzed by a wave of character deaths during the 2016 television season.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetorics of the Voltron: Legendary Defender Fandom
    "FANS ARE GOING TO SEE IT ANY WAY THEY WANT": THE RHETORICS OF THE VOLTRON: LEGENDARY DEFENDER FANDOM Renee Ann Drouin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2021 Committee: Lee Nickoson, Advisor Salim A Elwazani Graduate Faculty Representative Neil Baird Montana Miller © 2021 Renee Ann Drouin All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Lee Nickoson, Advisor The following dissertation explores the rhetorics of a contentious online fan community, the Voltron: Legendary Defender fandom. The fandom is known for its diversity, as most in the fandom were either queer and/or female. Primarily, however, the fandom was infamous for a subsection of fans, antis, who performed online harassment, including blackmailing, stalking, sending death threats and child porn to other fans, and abusing the cast and crew. Their motivation was primarily shipping, the act of wanting two characters to enter a romantic relationship. Those who opposed their chosen ship were targets of harassment, despite their shared identity markers of female and/or queer. Inspired by ethnographically and autoethnography informed methods, I performed a survey of the Voltron: Legendary Defender fandom about their experiences with harassment and their feelings over the show’s universally panned conclusion. In implementing my research, I prioritized only using data given to me, a form of ethical consideration on how to best represent the trauma of others. Unfortunately, in performing this research, I became a target of harassment and altered my research trajectory. In response, I collected the various threats against me and used them to analyze online fandom harassment and the motivations of antis.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Branch Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2001
    S. HRG. 106–820 LEGISLATIVE BRANCH APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON H.R. 4516, 4577, and 5657/S. 2603 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Architect of the Capitol (except House items) Congressional Budget Office General Accounting Office Government Printing Office Joint Committee on Taxation Joint Economic Committee Library of Congress Office of Compliance U.S. Capitol Police Board U.S. Senate Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 62–802 cc WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont SLADE GORTON, Washington FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HARRY REID, Nevada JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah PATTY MURRAY, Washington BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JON KYL, Arizona STEVEN J. CORTESE, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director JAMES H.
    [Show full text]
  • January 1, 2021 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker 1236
    January 1, 2021 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker Minority Leader 1236 Longworth House Office Building 2468 Rayburn House Office Building U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader McCarthy: We write today in support of the existing Capitol Police Board regulations that have helped protect Members for more than 50 years and ask that you not include any provisions in the House Rules package that attempt to alter these protections. Currently, Members of Congress are allowed to carry firearms within the U.S. Capitol Complex as a result of U.S. Capitol Police Board’s regulations and 40 U.S.C. § 5104. The current regulations allowing Members of Congress to carry have helped protect these Members and their Second Amendment rights since 1967. There are substantial precedents for this type of regulation throughout the U.S. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, more than two dozen states allow guns in capitol buildings. Of those states, “nine permit ‘open carry,’ 13 allow firearms owners with permits to carry and four allow legislators or legislative staff to carry in the capitol.’” Washington, D.C. has a violent crime problem and D.C.'s violent crime rate is 158% higher than the national average. In 2020 alone, there have been more than 180 homicides, more than 1,500 assaults with a deadly weapon, and more than 1,800 robberies. Furthermore, there is a history of violent attacks on Members of Congress and Capitol Police.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Capitol Police Hearing
    THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 20, 2015 Printed for the use of the Committee on House Administration ( Available on the Internet: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/house/administration/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 95–310 WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Sep 11 2014 07:27 Jul 08, 2015 Jkt 095310 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\A310.XXX A310 SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with HEARING COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan, Chairman GREGG HARPER, Mississippi ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania RICHARD NUGENT, Florida Ranking Minority Member RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois ZOE LOFGREN, California BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia JUAN VARGAS, California MARK WALKER, North Carolina PROFESSIONAL STAFF SEAN MORAN, Staff Director KYLE ANDERSON, Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 07:27 Jul 08, 2015 Jkt 095310 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 6646 E:\HR\OC\A310.XXX A310 SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with HEARING UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 2015 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to call, at 2:10 p.m., in Room 1310, Longworth House Office Building, Hon. Candice S. Miller [chairman of the Committee] presiding. Present: Representatives Miller, Harper, Nugent, Davis, Walker, Brady, Lofgren, and Vargas. Staff Present: Sean Moran, Staff Director; John Clocker, Deputy Staff Director; Bob Sensenbrenner, Deputy General Counsel; John L.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Grounds (Revised 10/6/14)
    United States Capitol Police Guidelines for Conducting an Event on United States Capitol Grounds (Revised 10/6/14) The guidelines described below, in accordance with the Traffic Regulations for US Capitol Grounds, are to ensure that events held inside the boundaries of US Capitol Grounds, are conducted in a manner that protects public health and safety yet ensures that the Congressional community can fulfill its legislative responsibility. Demonstration activity is defined as any protest, rally, march, vigil, gathering, assembly or similar conduct engaged in for the purpose of expressing political, social, religious or other similar ideas, views or concerns protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Demonstration activity is allowed in designated areas as indicated on Attachment A: the “United States Capitol Grounds Demonstration Areas Map.” Prohibited Areas: Groups of any size are prohibited from demonstrating in the following areas: 1. Inside of any Congressional Buildings 2. On the steps of the United States Capitol 3. On the steps of any building on Capitol Grounds 4. In any area otherwise closed or restricted for official use 5. In roadways or any area routinely used for vehicular traffic 6. Prohibited areas as identified in the “United States Capitol Grounds Demonstration Areas Map.” The following conditions apply to all activities occurring on U.S. Capitol Grounds and permitted by the U.S. Capitol Police Board, to ensure: 1. The safety and convenience of all people who exercise their First Amendment right to free expression 2. The safety and convenience of all people visiting Congressional Office Buildings as well as the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]