DOCSLIB.ORG

Construction Environmental Management Guidance Technical Document No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Construction Environmental Management Guidance Technical Document No RECONNECTING COMMUNITIES Construction Environmental Management Guidance Technical Document No. 10: Lizard Management Report prepared for: New Zealand Transport Agency KiwiRail Holdings Ltd Report prepared by: NCTIR Date: June 2018 Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Setting ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Kaikoura lizards – Species & habitats ................................................................................................................... 4 3 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Project Activities ................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Risk Category ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 4 Control Measures............................................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Coastal boulder deposits ...................................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Mature indigenous shrublands ............................................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Mangamaunu, Okiw and Waipapa Bays .............................................................................................................. 7 4.4 Measures for incidental situations ........................................................................................................................ 7 Appendix A: Project Ecological Principles Appendix B: Kaikoura lizard species, threat classifications and habitat use Page 2 Construction Environmental Management | June 2018 1 Introduction This technical document (TD) provides guidance to project teams on management measures around coastal, oceanic and riverine birds in relation to North Canterbury Transport Infrastructure Recovery (NCTIR) projects. All construction activities should be operated, maintained, supervised, monitored and controlled at all times, so that the risks around effects on native lizards are minimised as much as practicable. This TD is principally prepared for the NCTIR Environmental Advisors supporting the NCTIR delivery teams. It sets out: Roles and responsibilities of parties involved in project works and implementing controls relating to native lizards; A summary of the existing environment as it relates to native lizard habitats within the project area; A risk assessment of typical construction activities in the context of the sensitivity of the receiving environment; Management measures to limit the impacts of the project on native lizards, and advice on how to implement them through project specific Environmental Management Plans (EMP) and Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS). 1.1 Roles and Responsibilities This TD sits under the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the NCTIR programme of works. The CEMP should be referred to for broader roles and responsibilities as they relate to the programme as a whole. The roles and responsibilities described below are specific to the management of coastal, oceanic and riverine birds: Role Senior Environmental Site Engineer Project Project Engineer Environmental Advisor E c o lo g ist Advisor Responsibilities Reviewing and Advising delivery Development of Advice on site Inspection of works reporting on the teams on site EMP and controls and to assess compliance management of management of SWMS to include monitoring with the CEMP and native lizards as part native lizards. management of required to relevant of the CEMP native lizards. delivery teams management plans. responsibilities. Visual inspections of and wider (i.e. environmental On the ground site design). Ensure sub- Facilitates and compliance. supervision. contractor adherence oversees Respond to, and to the management environmental Input into EMPs, On the job training. provide advice plans. CWPs and SWMS. monitoring. Visual inspections on, any native lizard Emergency contact. Reviews and updates of environmental compliance. management this TD as issues / effects. necessary. Input into EMPs, CWPs and SWMS. Reviews and updates this TD as necessary. Technical Document No. 10: Lizard Management Page 3 2 Setting Developing an understanding of both the general and specific environment is essential to determining the type and scale of control measures required during construction. This section provides the general description of the environment of where NCTIR projects are located. There are multiple work streams and will ultimately be many project sites that generally come under one of three areas; the Coastal Route, Inland Route and Alternative Route. An overview of the environment relevant to the management of native lizards is summarised below. 2.1 Regulatory Setting The protection of native birdlife is required under the Wildlife Act (1953), Conservation Act (1987) and the Resource Management Act (1991). In relation to projects along the coastal route, resource consents, Department of Conservation concessions and permits have been granted to cover the project works (all Consents and Approvals are saved in Vault). Key requirements from these approvals are: • Ecological principles that are taken into account when undertaking design and construction works. These principles are provided in the CEMP and listed in Appendix A of this report; • Scoping surveys to be carried out prior to works to identify any At Risk, Threatened or taonga species that may be significantly adversely affected; and • Mitigation measures to avoid as far as practical the effects on species identified during the scoping survey (these measures are set out in this and other Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Technical Documents). Outside of the coastal route, site specific resource consents and/or permits may be required and confirmation of this needs to be obtained prior to starting works. 2.2 Kaikoura Lizards – Species & Habitats Eleven species of native lizard occur between the Waiau River to the south and the Clarence River to the north (refer to Appendix B), representing c. 10% of the New Zealand lizard fauna. The lizard fauna of the greater Kaikōura area is characterised by a high proportion of At Risk and Threatened species1 (73%; 8 of the 11 taxa). Three species appear to be endemic to the Marlborough Region (Kaikōura gecko, Marlborough spotted skink and South Marlborough grass skink) and one species that is restricted to the alpine zone (the black-eyed gecko). The following are five broad habitat types utilised by native lizards in the Kaikoura area: 1. Coastal - the coastal margin, above the high-tide mark, and associated dunelands; 2. Grassland - dominant cover of exotic and/or native grasses, including farmland; 3. Shrubland - dominant cover of indigenous shrub species (Coprosma, Helichrysum, Corokia, kānuka, mānuka, tauhinu, matagouri, Melicytus etc.); 4. Forest - mature or regenerating hardwood/podocarp/beech forest dominated by indigenous species (plantation forestry does not generally support lizard populations, unless it has been planted through native shrub/forest vegetation that contains arboreal geckos); and 5. Rocklands - rock outcrops, scree and talus slopes, riverbeds, terraces and scarps. A layer identifying ‘lizard habitat types’ can be found on the NCTIR GIS website. The current status of the Kaikōura lizard fauna is unknown. Some coastal populations, particularly of the most common and widespread species (Marlborough mini gecko and South Marlborough grass skink), will have been partially or fully buried by earth movements during the earthquake, aftershocks, and further slips caused by high rainfall events. 1 Hitchmough et al. (2016). Conservation status of New Zealand reptiles, 2015. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 17. Department of Conservation, Wellington. Page 4 Construction Environmental Management | June 2018 3 Risk Assessment The scoping surveys undertaken for the project have determined the habitats and species of concern in relation to the construction associated with the earthquake recovery activities. Mitigation measures to be implemented are based around methods to minimise impacts. 3.1 Project Activities The following construction activities associated with the NCTIR programme of works are likely to take place within or adjacent to native lizard habitat and will require controls to be in place: • Stockpiling/temporary storage of materials. • Construction of access roads/tracks and permanent road and rail structures. • Earthworks including sluicing, scaling and blasting. • Vegetation clearance. 3.2 Risk
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago
    Society for Research on Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand (SRARNZ) presents Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago Otago is a large (31,251 km2) and lightly populated region of the southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand, stretching from the eastern coastline west to the Southern Alps. The earliest humans, of East Polynesian origin, arrived about 700 years ago. The largest settlement today is the coastal city of Dunedin (pop. >127,000), which grew from a Scottish influx in the 1800s. The Otago Regional Council administers the region, and tribal authority (mana whenua) rests with the iwi of Ngāi Tahu. Climates in the Otago region (roughly 45°– leiopelmatid frogs survive elsewhere in 47°S) range from changeable, cool- New Zealand. Two species of introduced temperate conditions near the coast to frogs are present, but there are no the near-continental climates (baking hot crocodilians, salamanders, terrestrial summers, freezing winters) of the interior. snakes or turtles. Marine turtles (mainly The region provides varied habitats for leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea) herp species, including sand-dunes, visit the coastal waters of Otago but do grasslands, shrublands, wetlands, forests, not nest here. rock structures and scree slopes, some occupied to at least 1900 m above sea level. Today’s herpetofauna is dominated by lizards (solely geckos and skinks), including about 10 described species. A further 12 or more undescribed taxa are recognised Otago by tag names for conservation purposes, and we follow that approach here. All lizards in Otago are viviparous and long- lived, and remain vulnerable to ongoing habitat loss and predation by introduced mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Suitability of Captive-Bred Founders for Lizard Restoration Projects Using Duvaucel’S Geckos (Hoplodactylus Duvaucelii)
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. An assessment of the suitability of captive-bred founders for lizard restoration projects using Duvaucel’s geckos (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii). A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Biology Massey University, Albany, New Zealand. Vivienne Glenday 2016 Abstract Sourcing founders for species restoration projects can be problematic, especially when using rare or endangered animals. Harvesting from small natural populations could be detrimental to those populations. A possible solution is to use captive-bred founders as this would reduce harvesting pressure on natural source populations. In the summer of 2013, a combination of captive-bred and wild-sourced Duvaucel’s geckos (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii) were released on two islands in Auckland’s Hauraki Gulf. To assess the suitability of captive-bred founders for species restoration projects, short-term survival, condition, reproductive performance, dispersal and activity patterns, and habitat use were investigated using mark-recapture surveys and radio telemetry over a 12 month period following the release, and comparisons were made between captive-bred and wild- sourced geckos. Captive-bred geckos were encountered more often than wild geckos one year after the release, and had greater increases in body condition index. They also had better overall health, but more partial tail losses. Gravid females from both groups were encountered during the first post-release breeding season and at least 50% of juveniles were encountered alive during the first year.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCDM-1023668 Herpetofauna: Photo-Identification V1.0 2
    Herpetofauna: photo-identification Version 1.0 This specification was prepared by Marieke Lettink in 2012. Contents Synopsis .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Assumptions .................................................................................................................................... 5 Advantages ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Disadvantages ................................................................................................................................. 6 Suitability for inventory ..................................................................................................................... 6 Suitability for monitoring ................................................................................................................... 6 Skills ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Resources ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Minimum attributes .......................................................................................................................... 7 Data storage ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Lizard Fauna of Janet Stewart and Styx Mill Conservation Reserves, Christchurch
    Prepared for Styx Living Laboratory Trust 2010. Survey of the Lizard Fauna of Janet Stewart and Styx Mill Conservation Reserves, Christchurch Christine McClure – Lincoln University Contents Pg 1. Abstract 3 2. Introduction 3 3. Methods 5 3.1 Study Areas 5 3.1.1 Styx Mill Conservation Reserve 5 3.1.2 Janet Stewart Reserve: Pá Harakeke 6 3.2 Predation 7 3.3 Sites and Sampling 9 3.4 Site descriptions 10 3.6 Pitfall Traps (PF) 12 3.7 Artificial Cover Object (ACO) 14 3.8 Physical variables measured 15 4. Results 16 4.1 Species Identified 16 4.2 Site Results 17 5. Discussion 21 5.1 Effects of vegetation change on lizard habitat use 21 5.2 Herbicides 23 5.3 Predators 23 5.3.1 Predation population eruptions 24 5.4 Vandalism 26 5.5 Recommendations 26 5.6 Conclusion 27 5.7 Further Study 27 6. Acknowledgements 28 7. Benefits f the Summer Scholarship 28 Appendix 29 References Cited 31 2 | Page Survey of the Lizard Fauna of Janet Stewart and Styx Mill Conservation Reserves, Christchurch. 1. Abstract A survey was conducted in two Christchurch urban reserves, Janet Stewart and Styx Mill Conservation Reserves to establish which reptile species were present, including species preferred habitat type and health and age structure of populations found. Methods used to assess reptile fauna in the chosen areas were low‐intensity monitoring techniques such as pitfall trapping (PF) and artificial cover objects (ACO), placed at 14 sites throughout the reserves. Results show that there are two species of skink; Oligosoma nigriplantare polychroma (Common skink / mokomoko) and Oligosoma maccanni (McCann’s skink / mokomoko) inhabiting dry grassland habitats at Styx Mill Conservation Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal Variation in Extant Species Enables Systematic Identification of New Zealand's Large, Subfossil Diplodactylids
    Scarsbrook et al. BMC Ecol Evo (2021) 21:67 BMC Ecology and Evolution https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01808-7 RESEARCH Open Access Skeletal variation in extant species enables systematic identifcation of New Zealand’s large, subfossil diplodactylids Lachie Scarsbrook1*, Emma Sherratt2, Rodney A. Hitchmough3 and Nicolas J. Rawlence1 Abstract New Zealand’s diplodactylid geckos exhibit high species-level diversity, largely independent of discernible osteologi- cal changes. Consequently, systematic afnities of isolated skeletal elements (fossils) are primarily determined by comparisons of size, particularly in the identifcation of Hoplodactylus duvaucelii, New Zealand’s largest extant gecko species. Here, three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of maxillae (a common fossilized element) was used to determine whether consistent shape and size diferences exist between genera, and if cryptic extinctions have occurred in subfossil ‘Hoplodactylus cf. duvaucelii’. Sampling included 13 diplodactylid species from fve genera, and 11 Holocene subfossil ‘H. cf. duvaucelii’ individuals. We found phylogenetic history was the most important predictor of maxilla morphology among extant diplodactylid genera. Size comparisons could only diferentiate Hoplodactylus from other genera, with the remaining genera exhibiting variable degrees of overlap. Six subfossils were positively identifed as H. duvaucelii, confrming their proposed Holocene distribution throughout New Zealand. Conversely, fve subfossils showed no clear afnities with any modern diplodactylid genera, implying either increased morphological diversity in mainland ‘H. cf. duvaucelii’ or the presence of at least one extinct, large, broad-toed diplodactylid species. Keywords: Diplodactylidae, Ecomorphology, Geometric morphometrics, Hoplodactylus duvaucelii, Taxonomy Background (e.g. coloration and scalation), with interspecifc skeletal New Zealand’s lizard fauna is characteristic of isolated variation rarely analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics Preserving Our Evolutionary Heritage in an Extinction Crisis Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation
    Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation Roseli Pellens Philippe Grandcolas Editors Biodiversity Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics Preserving our evolutionary heritage in an extinction crisis Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation Volume 14 More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7488 Roseli Pellens • Philippe Grandcolas Editors Biodiversity Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics Preserving our evolutionary heritage in an extinction crisis With the support of Labex BCDIV and ANR BIONEOCAL Editors Roseli Pellens Philippe Grandcolas Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB – UMR 7205 Biodiversité, ISYEB – UMR 7205 CNRS MNHN UPMC EPHE, CNRS MNHN UPMC EPHE, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Sorbonne Universités Sorbonne Universités Paris , France Paris , France ISSN 1875-1288 ISSN 1875-1296 (electronic) Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ISBN 978-3-319-22460-2 ISBN 978-3-319-22461-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22461-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015960738 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 . The book is published with open access at SpringerLink.com. Chapter 15 was created within the capacity of an US governmental employment. US copyright protection does not apply. Open Access This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. All commercial rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Conf. 12.11 Nomenclatura Normalizada (Rev
    Conf. 12.11 Nomenclatura normalizada (Rev. CoP17) RECORDANDO la Resolución Conf. 11.22, aprobada por la Conferencia de las Partes en su 11ª reunión (Gigiri, 2000); TOMANDO NOTA de que la nomenclatura biológica no es inmutable; CONSCIENTE de que es necesaria la normalización de los nombres de los géneros y de las especies de varias familias y de que la actual falta de una obra de referencia normalizada con información adecuada disminuye la eficacia de la aplicación de CITES en lo que respecta a la conservación de numerosas especies incluidas en los Apéndices; RECONOCIENDO que la taxonomía utilizada en los Apéndices de la Convención será más útil a las Partes si está normalizada de acuerdo a una nomenclatura de referencia; CONSCIENTE de que el antiguo Comité de Nomenclatura identificó nombres de taxa en los Apéndices de la Convención que deberían ser cambiados para que reflejen la denominación aceptada en biología; TOMANDO NOTA de que esos cambios deben ser aprobados por la Conferencia de las Partes en la Convención; RECONOCIENDO que hay varios taxa incluidos en los Apéndices de los que existen formas domesticadas y que en varios casos las Partes han decidido establecer una distinción entre las formas silvestres y domesticadas aplicando a la forma protegida un nombre diferente del nombre mencionado en la nomenclatura normalizada; RECONOCIENDO que, en lo que respecta a las nuevas propuestas de inclusión de especies en los Apéndices, las Partes deberían utilizar las obras de referencia normalizadas adoptadas, cada vez que sea posible; CONSIDERANDO
    [Show full text]
  • Stolen Wildlife. Why the EU Needs to Tackle Smuggling of Nationally Protected Species
    Stolen Wildlife Why the EU needs to tackle smuggling of nationally protected species Sandra Altherr Stolen Wildlife Why the EU needs to tackle smuggling of nationally protected species Sandra Altherr November 2014 © Pro Wildlife All rights reserved by Pro Wildlife Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit Pro Wildlife © Cover Left: Calotes nigrilabris © Cherubino Right on top: seizure of Woodworthia brunneus © Department of Conservation, New Zealand Right bottom: Abronia lythrochila from Mexico, sold at reptilie fair in Hamm, Germany © Pro Wildlife Back: Ceratophora stoddartii from Sri Lanka © Kalyanvarma Suggested citation: Altherr, S (2014): Stolen Wildlife – Why the EU needs to tackle smuggling of nationally protected species. Report by Pro Wildlife, Munich, Germany, 32 pp. Pro Wildlife Kidlerstrasse 2 D-81371 Munich Phone: +49 (89) 81299 507 [email protected] www.prowildlife.de Acknowledgments The author would like to thank the following experts (in alphabetical order) for their contribution of valuable information: Dr. Mark Auliya, Prof. Dr. Jonathan Campbell, Prof. Dr. Lee Grismer, Maurice Isaacs, DVM, Paula Kahumbu, Dr. Milivoje Krvavac, Marieke Lettink, Asghar Mobaraki, Colum Muccio, Truong Nguyen, Maria-Elena Sánchez-Teyeliz, Ulrich Schepp, Dr. Chris Shepherd, Dr. Ruchira Somaweera, Sarah Stoner, Tri Ngo Van, Bruce Weissgold, Stuart Williamson and Dr. Thomas Ziegler. The Eva Mayr-Stihl Foundation is thanked for its financial support to this report. Content 1 Executive Summary 5 2 Introduction 6 3 Case Studies 8 3.1 Asia 8 3.1.1 Sri Lanka 8 3.1.2 Indonesia 10 3.1.3 Japan 12 3.1.4 Vietnam 14 3.2 Latin America 16 3.2.1 Mexico 16 3.2.2 Guatemala 18 3.3 Africa 20 3.3.1 Kenya 20 3.3.2 Tanzania 22 3.4 Oceania 24 3.4.1 New Zealand 24 3.4.2 Australia 25 4 Conclusions & Recommendations 26 5 References 28 1 Executive Summary Due to its large area, its wealthy clients and the fetch higher prices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riccarton Bush Pūtaringamotu Management Plan 2015
    December 2015 THE RICCARTON BUSH / PŪTARINGAMOTU MANAGEMENT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS KEY TERMS USED IN THIS MANAGEMENT PLAN Key stakeholders, user groups, Christchurch City Council ABBREVIATED NAME FULL NAME COVERING the Property The Riccarton Bush The whole site under the staff, Ngāi Tahu and the general public were consulted in the property / Pūtaringamotu administration of the Trust preparation of the Riccarton Bush Management Plan and the the Bush The Riccarton Bush The whole of the native input from all has been highly valued. The people listed to the indigenous forest / forest area lower right on this page, in particular, have contributed Pūtaringamotu the House Riccarton House The Riccarton House significantly to the plan’s re-development. building the Cottage Deans Cottage The Deans Cottage building PUBLIC NOTIFICATION and PLAN APPROVAL the Grounds Riccarton House and The grounds around the Cottage Grounds House and the Cottage The draft management plan was publicised publicly in but not including the Bush accordance with section 26(4) of the Riccarton Bush Act 1914 the Trust The Riccarton Bush Trust The Riccarton Bush Trustees (“the Board”) from 14 September to 23 November 2015. Three written submissions were received. The Riccarton Bush Trust The Riccarton Bush Trust Management Plan Working Party approved the draft management plan as the operative Mike Mora Trust Deputy Chairman management plan at the Trust’s board meeting on 2 Tim Deans Trustee December 2015. Tony Gemmill Trustee Dr Brian P Molloy Trustee DISCLAIMER: The content of this plan is not necessarily the Jon Ward Manager complete and accurate record of The Riccarton Bush property.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the Impacts of Invasive Mammals on Arboreal Geckos’ Habitat Use, Cell Foam Retreat Use, and the Effectiveness of Different Monitoring Techniques
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Monitoring the impacts of invasive mammals on arboreal geckos’ habitat use, cell foam retreat use, and the effectiveness of different monitoring techniques. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Biology Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand Joshua Jeffrey Thoresen 2011 I DOC: AK 20666-FAU; General handling Permit (includes Iwi consultation) (under Dianne Brunton) Ethics approval: Standard research handling of geckos, i.e. measuring demographics only, which does not require animal ethics approval. II “Four things on earth are small, yet they are exceedingly wise... A lizard grasps skillfully with its hands, and it is found in kings’ palaces” Proverbs 30 vs. 24...28 For Adonai III ABSTRACT Gecko ecology was studied in areas of pest control and no control in four areas around Auckland. The density index of geckos was highest at Waiheke (treatment, i.e. pest control) with an average of 137.5 geckos ha¯¹ compared with Waiheke (control, i.e. no pest control): 56 g/ha¯¹, Tawharanui: 20.3 g/ha¯¹ and Shakespear: 9.5 g/ha¯¹. The Waiheke sites were then studied further; gecko condition was measured and males were found to have lower body conditions at the non pest controlled sites, rats were also found to be more abundant at these sites and large invertebrates less abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS)
    NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 17 Conservation status of New Zealand reptiles, 2015 Rod Hitchmough, Ben Barr, Marieke Lettink, Jo Monks, James Reardon, Mandy Tocher, Dylan van Winkel and Jeremy Rolfe Each NZTCS report forms part of a 5-yearly cycle of assessments, with most groups assessed once per cycle. This report is the first of the 2015–2020 cycle. Cover: Cobble skink, Oligosoma aff.infrapunctatum “cobble”. Photo: Tony Jewell. New Zealand Threat Classification Series is a scientific monograph series presenting publications related to the New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS). Most will be lists providing NZTCS status of members of a plant or animal group (e.g. algae, birds, spiders). There are currently 23 groups, each assessed once every 3 years. After each three-year cycle there will be a report analysing and summarising trends across all groups for that listing cycle. From time to time the manual that defines the categories, criteria and process for the NZTCS will be reviewed. Publications in this series are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Series. © Copyright December 2016, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 2324–1713 (web PDF) ISBN 978–1–98–851400–0 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by the Publishing Team; editing and layout by Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the Director, Terrestrial Ecosystems Unit, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. Published by Publishing Team, Department of Conservation, PO Box 10420, The Terrace, Wellington 6143, New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Christchurch Replacement District Plan Hearings Panel
    BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH REPLACEMENT DISTRICT PLAN HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Canterbury Earthquake (Christchurch Replacement District Plan) Order 2014 AND Stage 3 of the Christchurch Replacement District Plan STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF ANITA MARIA SPENCER ON BEHALF OF THE CROWN (SUBMITTER #3721) NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE HEARING Fauna ecology Dated 10 December 2015 Barristers and Solicitors Christchurch Solicitor Acting: Cedric Carranceja / Emma Moore Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Tel 64 3 379 1747 Fax 64 3 379 5659 PO Box 322 DX WX11135 Christchurch 8140 Counsel Acting: Paul Radich QC Tel 64 4 974 5951 Fax 64 4 974 5955 PO Box 10731 Wellington 6143 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 2 2. CODE OF CONDUCT ...................................................................................... 2 3. SCOPE ............................................................................................................ 3 4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. 3 5. CONTEXT – NEW ZEALAND'S INDIGENOUS FAUNA ................................... 4 6. FAUNA VALUES IN THE CHRISTCHURCH DISTRICT .................................. 6 7. ADEQUACY OF PROVISIONS IN REPLACEMENT PLAN TO PROTECT FAUNA VALUES .................................................................................................. 10 8. CONCLUSION
    [Show full text]