DOCSLIB.ORG

Big Historical Foundations for Deep Future Speculations: Cosmic Evolution, Atechnogenesis, and Technocultural Civilization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big Historical Foundations for Deep Future Speculations: Cosmic Evolution, Atechnogenesis, and Technocultural Civilization Vrije Universiteit Brussel Big Historical Foundations for Deep Future Speculations Last, Cadell Published in: Foundations of Science DOI: 10.1007/s10699-015-9434-y Publication date: 2017 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Last, C. (2017). Big Historical Foundations for Deep Future Speculations: Cosmic Evolution, Atechnogenesis, and Technocultural Civilization. Foundations of Science, 22(1), 39-124. [22]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015- 9434-y General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. Oct. 2021 Found Sci DOI 10.1007/s10699-015-9434-y Big Historical Foundations for Deep Future Speculations: Cosmic Evolution, Atechnogenesis, and Technocultural Civilization Cadell Last1 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Abstract Big historians are attempting to construct a general holistic narrative of human origins enabling an approach to studying the emergence of complexity, the relation between evolutionary processes, and the modern context of human experience and actions. In this paper I attempt to explore the past and future of cosmic evolution within a big historical foundation characterized by physical, biological, and cultural eras of change. From this analysis I offer a model of the human future that includes an addition and/or reinterpretation of technological singularity theory with a new theory of biocultural evo- lution focused on the potential birth of technological life: the theory of atechnogenesis. Furthermore, I explore the potential deep futures of technological life and extrapolate towards two hypothetical versions of an ‘Omega Civilization’: expansion and compression. Keywords Big history Á Anthropology Á Futures Á Evolution Á Singularity Á Philosophy 1 Introduction My focus is to explore the ‘deep future’ of ‘big history’ in-as-far as it can be explored given a lack of empirical data, inability to test future predictions, and an incomplete knowledge of local and global physical, biological, and cultural processes currently in operation. We can gain a new understanding of possible future trends and processes by analyzing the emerging science of cosmic evolution within the narrative architecture of big history. Although modern phenomena like technological complexification and sociopo- litical convergence receive considerable attention, few researchers approach these issues from the vantage point of 13.8 billion years of interconnected evolution. Fewer still have & Cadell Last [email protected]; http://www.cadelllast.com 1 Global Brain Institute (GBI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) (Free University of Brussels), Brussels, Belgium 123 C. Last detailed a working model for understanding deeper reaches of the human future despite the fact (or perhaps because of the fact) that the phenomenon of humanity has the broadest of all possible future event states. We can predict the future evolutionary possibilities for galaxies, stars, and planets on the deepest conceivable scales of time, but we have trouble predicting human possibility out even 100 years. The most important addition to the literature offered in this paper involves taking bio- cultural evolution seriously as a natural phenomenon of equal significance to the hierarchy of cosmic processes that also include physicochemical and biochemical forms of evolu- tionary change. The failure to understand culture, and in particular the relationship between biology and culture as part of cosmic evolution, may be one of the primary failings of science in the modern world. This is a factor in holding back progress in our understanding of both the nature of humanity and the future of humanity. Therefore, in my approach to the deep future I focus on the emergence of the big historical cultural era. Specifically, I want to bring closer attention to the biocultural reproductive nature of the human phenomenon as it presents us with a peculiar cosmic evolutionary relationship that potentially offers clues regarding the future of evolutionary change and complexity construction. This approach to culture as part of a cosmic evolutionary process is partly a response to an emerging realization that we need to understand the ‘‘nature of cosmic culture’’ (see Dick and Lupisella 2009), as well as the ‘‘future of culture’’ (see Dick 2009a). Our inability to understand the nature of cultural phenomenon and its future implications has many causes, but is made all the more difficult due to the ‘‘two cultures’’ divide that has pervaded academic inquiry for decades (see Snow 1959; Wilson 1998; Kauffman 2010). The heart of this divide is created by fundamentally different epistemological worldviews that emphasize different approaches to understanding natural phenomenon. Historically (and broadly) the sciences attempt an understanding of the world that is predictive and approaches objectivity through the formulation of timeless, context-independent physical laws. In contrast, the humanities have mainly focused on narrative construction and the subjective dimension of human experience, with special emphasis on context, choice, and latent possibility within any event. This epistemological division prevents the construction of unifying conversation between diverse fields within biology and anthropology, and more broadly between the ‘physical/life sciences’ and the ‘social science/humanities’. The most relevant consequence of the ‘two cultures’ divide in respect to this paper is that there has been little research that specifically attempts to understand cosmic processes connecting the development and evolution of physical and chemical systems to the development and evolution of biological, ecological, cultural, and technological systems (Heylighen 2011). As a result, no dominant academic conceptual framework comfortably situates the human phenomenon within an evolutionary context of the whole cosmos. Furthermore, dominant academic paradigms within academia do not lend themselves to such an analysis. In the sciences, many researchers have (often successfully) employed a physically reductionist program to understand life and the universe with the belief that all phenomena can be understood through an analysis of the mechanisms of its constituent parts. Consequently most ‘higher phenomena’ (i.e. more complex) are conceived of as representing ‘epiphenomena’ ultimately reducible to lower-level phenomena. The reduc- tionist program has proven successful in many domains of physics and chemistry, but does not help us in understanding the evolution of complex adaptive systems (CAS) like organisms, ecosystems, and civilizations. Alternatively, over the past several decades, many influential social theorists have developed a postmodern relativistic program, within which grand narratives explaining the human experience are explicitly rejected, and modern notions of a historical direction towards greater ‘freedom’, ‘equality’, and 123 Big Historical Foundations for Deep Future Speculations… ‘progress’ are problematized. The postmodern program has proven successful in critiquing many naı¨ve and western-centric assumptions inherent to the original conception of the modern project, however it offers us no new alternative model within which we can construct a common humanistic sociopolitical direction. My point here is to emphasize that both reductionism and postmodernity, albeit suc- cessful in different ways within the sciences and humanities, cannot help us in terms of formulating a better understanding of big history and its meaning for the human species moving forward into our common future. The physically reductionist program cannot explain the emergence and intensification of hierarchical local complexity, as well as the existence of goal-oriented, purposeful systems (Corning 2002a). Consequently, everything that humans are (e.g. complex, goal and value-oriented, conscious, subjects) and every- thing the human system exhibits (e.g. emergence, purposeful organization, autonomy) becomes alien, unnatural, and impossible to predict and reduce. In contrast, the postmodern relativistic program ignores or fails to confront the implications of rising technological complexity and global convergence, leaving human civilization goal-less on the deepest scales of time (Stewart 2010). As a result, any sociopolitical insight we can gain from understanding large-scale patterns and processes discernible over big historical scales are not fully appreciated. However, pointing out potential flaws in worldview structures is much easier than constructing new worldview structures, and I do not hope to solve all of the problems that have characterized the two cultures divide or the problems of our modern scientific and humanistic approaches to understanding in this paper. However, what I do hope to offer is the foundations for a big historical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cross-References ASTEROID IMPACT Definition and Introduction History of Impact Cratering Studies
    18 ASTEROID IMPACT Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M., and Price, S. D., 2002. The identification and confirmation of impact structures on supplemental IRAS minor planet survey. The Astronomical Earth were developed: (a) crater morphology, (b) geo- 123 – Journal, , 1056 1085. physical anomalies, (c) evidence for shock metamor- Tholen, D. J., and Barucci, M. A., 1989. Asteroid taxonomy. In Binzel, R. P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), phism, and (d) the presence of meteorites or geochemical Asteroids II. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 298–315. evidence for traces of the meteoritic projectile – of which Yeomans, D., and Baalke, R., 2009. Near Earth Object Program. only (c) and (d) can provide confirming evidence. Remote Available from World Wide Web: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ sensing, including morphological observations, as well programs. as geophysical studies, cannot provide confirming evi- dence – which requires the study of actual rock samples. Cross-references Impacts influenced the geological and biological evolu- tion of our own planet; the best known example is the link Albedo between the 200-km-diameter Chicxulub impact structure Asteroid Impact Asteroid Impact Mitigation in Mexico and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Under- Asteroid Impact Prediction standing impact structures, their formation processes, Torino Scale and their consequences should be of interest not only to Earth and planetary scientists, but also to society in general. ASTEROID IMPACT History of impact cratering studies In the geological sciences, it has only recently been recog- Christian Koeberl nized how important the process of impact cratering is on Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria a planetary scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Future Agricultural Change on Ecosystem Service Indicators Sam S
    https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-44 Preprint. Discussion started: 15 August 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Impacts of future agricultural change on ecosystem service indicators Sam S. Rabin1, Peter Alexander2,3, Roslyn Henry2, Peter Anthoni1, Thomas A. M. Pugh4,5, Mark Rounsevell1, and Almut Arneth1 1Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research / Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany 2School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, UK 3Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, UK 4School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK 5Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, UK Correspondence: Sam S. Rabin ([email protected]) Abstract. A future of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, changing climate, growing human populations, and shifting socioeconomic conditions means that the global agricultural system will need to adapt in order to feed the world. These changes will affect not only agricultural land, but terrestrial ecosystems in general. Here, we use the coupled land use and vegetation model LandSyMM to quantify future land use change and resulting impacts on ecosystem service indicators 5 including carbon sequestration, runoff, and nitrogen pollution. We additionally hold certain variables, such as climate or land use, constant to assess the relative contribution of different drivers to the projected impacts. While indicators of some ecosystem services (e.g., flood and drought risk) see trends that are mostly dominated by the direct effects of climate change, others (e.g., carbon sequestration) depend critically on land use and management. Scenarios in which climate change mitigation is more difficult (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways 3 and 5) have the strongest impacts on ecosystem service indicators, such as a loss 10 of 13–19% of land in biodiversity hotspots and a 28% increase in nitrogen pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Eroticism As a Hormetic Stimulus in Health and Ageing
    Central JSM Sexual Medicine Bringing Excellence in Open Access Review Article *Corresponding author Marios Kyriazis, National Gerontology Centre, 35 Karaoli & Demetriou Street, Larnaca 6021, Cyprus, Email: Eroticism as a Hormetic Submitted: 13 December 2018 Accepted: 27 December 2018 Stimulus in Health and Ageing Published: 31 December 2018 Marios Kyriazis* ISSN: 2578-3718 Copyright National Gerontology Centre, Cyprus © 2018 Kyriazis Abstract OPEN ACCESS Eroticism in later life is, on the whole, a taboo subject, and the stigma attached to expressions Keywords of sexual intent by older people is widespread in most cultures. However, sexuality and eroticism • Sexuality have an important role to play in maintaining healthy ageing. Sexuality is an essential aspect • Eroticism of our biology and its effects have repercussions in systems and organs other than the sexual. • Hormesis In this paper I review the importance of developing a sexual-erotic element in later life, an • Biological amplification element that is intimately coupled with the phenomenon of hormesis. In hormesis, there is biological • Cognition benefit following exposure to a mild stimulus or challenge, whereas exposure to a higher dose of • Healthy human ageing the same stimulus becomes detrimental. Innovative sexual stimulation can be seen as a hormetic opportunity to initiate beneficial effects on the entire ageing human organism. The intention is to show that, health benefits may be obtained not only through physical (exercise), nutritional, mental or pharmacological challenges, but also through sexual stimulation of the appropriate magnitude and quality. By enhancing erotic stimulation it may be possible to experience many other benefits spanning several domains such as the endocrine, immune, circulatory and neurological.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Concrete Scales: a Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, Guia Gali
    Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, Guia Gali To cite this version: Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, Guia Gali. Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2013, 19 (12), pp.2426-2435. 10.1109/TVCG.2013.210. hal-00851733v1 HAL Id: hal-00851733 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00851733v1 Submitted on 8 Jan 2014 (v1), last revised 8 Jan 2014 (v2) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, and Guia Gali a b c Fig. 1. Illustrates popular representations of complex measures: (a) US Debt (Oto Godfrey, Demonocracy.info, 2011) explains the gravity of a 115 trillion dollar debt by progressively stacking 100 dollar bills next to familiar objects like an average-sized human, sports fields, or iconic New York city buildings [15] (b) Sugar stacks (adapted from SugarStacks.com) compares caloric counts contained in various foods and drinks using sugar cubes [32] and (c) How much water is on Earth? (Jack Cook, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Howard Perlman, USGS, 2010) shows the volume of oceans and rivers as spheres whose sizes can be compared to that of Earth [38].
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic Calendar
    The Cosmic Calendar Astronomers believe that the Cosmos in which the Solar System and Earth resides is about 16 billion years old. We believe the Earth is about 4.6 billion years old and base this on carbon dating of rocks both from Earth and the Moon. However, billions of years is a very hard thing to grasp! Fortunately there is a creative way to get a grasp on this kind of time and that is with the "cosmic calendar" which Carl Sagan created and popularized. We set the Big Bang on January 1st and divided the events into one year, with now being the first day of the next new year. Before you read further, take a guess at which month humans enter into the calendar! The first stars and galaxies did not begin to form until the universe had cooled and expanded. Our Milky Way galaxy comes into existence on May 1st of our calendar. Our Solar System forms September 9th and the Earth on September 14th. The "infant" Earth was a hot, molten and toxic place, nothing like the paradise we know today. As Earth cooled, the first rocks solidified on October 2nd. The oldest known fossils, nothing more complex than bacteria and blue­green algae, appear October 9th on our cosmic calendar. These early life forms reproduced by splitting cells. Sexes did not begin as a means of reproduction until about November first. The most basic plants which used photosynthesis to get energy, appear on November 12th. The first cells with nuclei, eukaryotes, appear on November 15th, and begin to flourish immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning the Salvo Competition Rebalancing America’S Air and Missile Defenses
    WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK WINNING THE SALVO COMPETITION REBALANCING AMERICA’S AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSES MARK GUNZINGER BRYAN CLARK 2016 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2016 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mark Gunzinger is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Mr. Gunzinger has served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Forces Transformation and Resources. A retired Air Force Colonel and Command Pilot, he joined the Office of the Secretary of Defense in 2004. Mark was appointed to the Senior Executive Service and served as Principal Director of the Department’s central staff for the 2005–2006 Quadrennial Defense Review. Following the QDR, he served as Director for Defense Transformation, Force Planning and Resources on the National Security Council staff. Mr. Gunzinger holds an M.S. in National Security Strategy from the National War College, a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, a Master of Public Administration from Central Michigan University, and a B.S. in chemistry from the United States Air Force Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures
    World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures Series Editors Christopher Chase-Dunn, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Barry K. Gills, Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Leonid E. Grinin, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia Andrey V. Korotayev, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia This series seeks to promote understanding of large-scale and long-term processes of social change, in particular the many facets and implications of globalization. It critically explores the factors that affect the historical formation and current evolu- tion of social systems, on both the regional and global level. Processes and factors that are examined include economies, technologies, geopolitics, institutions, conflicts, demographic trends, climate change, global culture, social movements, global inequalities, etc. Building on world-systems analysis, the series addresses topics such as globali- zation from historical and comparative perspectives, trends in global inequalities, core-periphery relations and the rise and fall of hegemonic core states, transnational institutions, and the long-term energy transition. This ambitious interdisciplinary and international series presents cutting-edge research by social scientists who study whole human systems and is relevant for all readers interested in systems approaches to the emerging world society, especially historians, political scientists, economists, sociologists, geographers and anthropologists. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15714 Cadell Last Global Brain Singularity Universal History, Future Evolution and Humanity’s Dialectical Horizon Cadell Last Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels, Belgium ISSN 2522-0985 ISSN 2522-0993 (electronic) World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures ISBN 978-3-030-46965-8 ISBN 978-3-030-46966-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46966-5 # Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Science Underlying Big History
    Review Article [Accepted for publication: The Scientific World Journal, v2014, 41 pages, article ID 384912; printed in June 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/384912] The Natural Science Underlying Big History Eric J. Chaisson Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA [email protected] Abstract Nature’s many varied complex systems—including galaxies, stars, planets, life, and society—are islands of order within the increasingly disordered Universe. All organized systems are subject to physical, biological or cultural evolution, which together comprise the grander interdisciplinary subject of cosmic evolution. A wealth of observational data supports the hypothesis that increasingly complex systems evolve unceasingly, uncaringly, and unpredictably from big bang to humankind. This is global history greatly extended, big history with a scientific basis, and natural history broadly portrayed across ~14 billion years of time. Human beings and our cultural inventions are not special, unique, or apart from Nature; rather, we are an integral part of a universal evolutionary process connecting all such complex systems throughout space and time. Such evolution writ large has significant potential to unify the natural sciences into a holistic understanding of who we are and whence we came. No new science (beyond frontier, non-equilibrium thermodynamics) is needed to describe cosmic evolution’s major milestones at a deep and empirical level. Quantitative models and experimental tests imply that a remarkable simplicity underlies the emergence and growth of complexity for a wide spectrum of known and diverse systems. Energy is a principal facilitator of the rising complexity of ordered systems within the expanding Universe; energy flows are as central to life and society as they are to stars and galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Ahead to 2050: Evolution of Agricultural Trade Policies
    Looking Ahead to 2050: Evolution of Agricultural Trade Policies Tim Josling* The past four decades have seen remarkable developments in agricultural trade and in the policies and institutions that provide the environment for that trade. Agricultural trade has moved from being dominated by the purchase of raw materials from land-rich countries and those blessed with tropical climates to a complex network of marketing chains supplying food and other farm products to all corners of the world. The multilateral trade rules have evolved from informal codes of conduct for manufactured goods that had little impact on agricultural trade to a treaty-based agreement that determines in what form and by how much governments can intervene in agricultural markets at home and at the border. The regional trade rules that have been adopted in an explosion of preferential agreements also increasingly apply to agricultural and food trade, leading to a partial polarization of trade around several major markets. The task of this paper is to discuss future trends in agricultural and food trade policies. How are the institutions, domestic, regional or multilateral, likely to evolve over the next forty years? Will the emphasis be on consolidation of progress already made? Will globalization reach its ultimate endpoint of a borderless market for agricultural and food products with consumer choice determining trade flows along with the cool logic of sourcing from low-cost suppliers? Or are we likely to see trade evolve in different directions? Will we see a resurgence
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of PAH and Far-Infrared Emission from the Cosmic Eye
    Accepted for publication in ApJ A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 DETECTION OF PAH AND FAR-INFRARED EMISSION FROM THE COSMIC EYE: PROBING THE DUST AND STAR FORMATION OF LYMAN BREAK GALAXIES B. Siana1, Ian Smail2, A. M. Swinbank2, J. Richard2, H. I. Teplitz3, K. E. K. Coppin2, R. S. Ellis1, D. P. Stark4, J.-P. Kneib5, A. C. Edge2 Accepted for publication in ApJ ABSTRACT ∗ We report the results of a Spitzer infrared study of the Cosmic Eye, a strongly lensed, LUV Lyman Break Galaxy (LBG) at z =3.074. We obtained Spitzer IRS spectroscopy as well as MIPS 24 and 70 µm photometry. The Eye is detected with high significance at both 24 and 70 µm and, when including +4.7 11 a flux limit at 3.5 mm, we estimate an infrared luminosity of LIR = 8.3−4.4 × 10 L⊙ assuming a magnification of 28±3. This LIR is eight times lower than that predicted from the rest-frame UV properties assuming a Calzetti reddening law. This has also been observed in other young LBGs, and indicates that the dust reddening law may be steeper in these galaxies. The mid-IR spectrum shows strong PAH emission at 6.2 and 7.7 µm, with equivalent widths near the maximum values observed in star-forming galaxies at any redshift. The LP AH -to-LIR ratio lies close to the relation measured in local starbursts. Therefore, LP AH or LMIR may be used to estimate LIR and thus, star formation rate, of LBGs, whose fluxes at longer wavelengths are typically below current confusion limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C
    Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C. T. Geppert FLEETING CITIES Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe Co-Edited EUROPEAN EGO-HISTORIES Historiography and the Self, 1970–2000 ORTE DES OKKULTEN ESPOSIZIONI IN EUROPA TRA OTTO E NOVECENTO Spazi, organizzazione, rappresentazioni ORTSGESPRÄCHE Raum und Kommunikation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert NEW DANGEROUS LIAISONS Discourses on Europe and Love in the Twentieth Century WUNDER Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert Imagining Outer Space European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century Edited by Alexander C. T. Geppert Emmy Noether Research Group Director Freie Universität Berlin Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Alexander C. T. Geppert 2012 Chapter 6 (by Michael J. Neufeld) © the Smithsonian Institution 2012 All remaining chapters © their respective authors 2012 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2012 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
    [Show full text]
  • Program E-Conference Evolution, Original Sin and the Fall
    Evolution, original sin and the Fall June 22-24 2020, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO Organizers: Johan De Smedt, Helen De Cruz (Saint Louis University) Scientific committee: Johan De Smedt, Helen De Cruz (Saint Louis University), Adam Green (Azusa Pacific University) This conference will be held online. To register, please email deeptimemorality at gmail dot com by June 20. June 22 (All times are CT (Central Time Zone)) 9:50 – 10:00 Johan De Smedt and Helen De Cruz (Saint Louis University) Introduction, with review of the logistics of the conference (e.g., how participants can ask questions) 10:00 – 10:25 David Brown (Queen's University Belfast) Evolution as ontology and original sin: Is there a need for salvation? 10:25 – 10:30 Short break 10:30 – 10:40 Q and A 10:40 – 10:50 Break 10:50 – 11:15 Paul Macdonald (United States Air Force Academy) In defense of Aquinas’s Adam: Original justice, the Fall, and evolution 11:15 – 11:20 Short break 11:20 – 11:30 Q and A 11:30 – 12:30 Lunch break 12:30 – 13:10 Plenary talk: Hans Madueme (Covenant College) Sin and Evolution: A theological assessment 13:10 – 13:15 Short break 13:15 – 13:30 Q and A 13:30 – 13:40 Break 13:40 – 14:05 Walter Scott Stepanenko (John Carroll University) Evolution, the Fall, and Christian environmentalism 14:05 – 14:10 Short break 14:10 – 14:20 Q and A 14:20 – 14:30 Break 14:30 – 14:55 Janelle Aijian (Biola University) Believing in an interventionist God 14:55 – 15:00 Short break 15:00 – 15:10 Q and A End of day 1 June 23 (All times are CT (Central Time Zone)) 10:00
    [Show full text]