ASBURY SEMINARY 1 09403S314 Abstract

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ASBURY SEMINARY 1 09403S314 Abstract ASBURY SEMINARY 1 09403S314 Abstract The Spirit and Sanctification: Changes Within American Wesleyanism Victor Paul Reasoner One of the many contributions John Wesley made to the worldwide church was his understanding of Christian perfection. He brought Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox, and Protestant contributions together with his own convictions in a way that conformed to the teaching of scripture. When the American holiness movement came into being it sought to restore the original teachings of John Wesley. In 1952 the Inter-church Holiness Convention formed in reaction to changes occurring within the larger holiness movement. The purpose of the proposed study is to examine what credentialed ministers today within the Inter-church Holiness Convention believe about sanctification - initial, entire, progressive, and final - and compare that emphasis with John Wesley's teachings on sanctification. A survey was developed and sent to a random cross-section of clergy within the IHC movement. The results of the survey were analyzed to determine how Wesleyan the Inter-church Holiness Convention actually is in their thinking. An analysis of the current emphasis on sanctification in the Inter-church Holiness Convention can have practical benefits for the caring pastor who wants to be biblical and avoid an unbalanced emphasis. It would have special interest to those who have been influenced by the I. H. C. emphasis. The survey indicated an over-reliance upon certain holiness proof texts. Many pastors seem to have a fragmented concept of sanctification. They have missed Wesley's big picture. Initial sanctification has been overlooked. Entire sanctification is thought of almost exclusively as a crisis experience with little regard given to the progressive work of the Holy Spirit. Entire sanctification is too often understood as a permanent state of grace instead of a moment- by-moment condition to be maintained. To teach that entire sanctification is accomplished through the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a shift from Wesley's terminology. It is my hope that this study can assist pastors in working through their own beliefs and then offering help in determining what are the real needs of their congregation. I want to demonstrate some of the consequences of the departure from Wesley and how a rediscovery of Wesley can help me be a better counselor and communicator of truth. DISSERTATION APPROVAL This is to certify that the dissertation entitled THE SPIRIT AND SANCTIFICATION : CHANGES WITHIN AMERICAN WESLEYANISM presented by Victor Paul Reasoner has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for the DOCTOR OF MINISTRY degree at Asbury Theological Seminary e Wi Imor , Kentucky Date Date Director, Doctor of Ministry Program Date THE SPIRIT AND SANCTIFICATION: CHANGES WITHIN AMERICAN WESLEYANISM A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Asbury Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Ministry by Victor Paul Reasoner May 1994 Copyright 1994 Victor Paul Reasoner ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1 . Introduction 1 The Significance of this Study 1 Purpose of the Inquiry 5 The Procedure 6 Overview of the Study 17 2. Development of the Doctrine of Sanctification 19 The Old Testament 19 The New Testament 22 The Church Fathers 23 Three Eighteenth Century Streams 33 Wesley's Synthesis 35 3. Shifts in Wesleyan/Holiness Theology 40 A Paradigm Shift 40 Nineteenth Century Holiness Theology 69 Consequences of the Change 78 Conclusion 84 4. Understanding Current Beliefs of the IHC 91 A Description of the IHC 91 The Development of a Survey 95 ii The Results of the Survey 97 Critique of the Survey 100 5. Conclusions and Summary 104 An Analysis of the Data 104 Areas of Agreement/Disagreement 114 The Problem 116 The Findings 119 The Recommendations 121 Appendixes A. Sample - First Cover Letter 129 B. Sample - Second Cover Letter 130 C. Sample Survey 131 D. Sample of Letter to Rev- Schmul 134 E. Copy of Rev- Schmul 's Reply 135 F. Copy of Bible Missionary Letter 136 List of Works Cited 137 iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Significance of this Study In A Fundamental Practical Theology Don S . Browning explained that no one does theology in a vacuum. Total objectivity is impossible. We all approach a problem with our own background and presuppositions. Instead of moving from theory to practice, which he claims we never do in real life, his recommendation is that we begin with descriptive theology (9). My starting point is the context in which I was raised and the community of faith in which I have pastored. My family identified with the conservative holiness movement in the 1940s. This segment of the holiness movement would have been more concerned with cultural issues than the larger holiness denominations. Melvin Dieter described the conservative holiness movement as those discontented with changes the holiness denominations made regarding traditional holiness life-styles (Beacon 261 ) . There were defections from all of the major holiness denominations and there were also 2 small holiness groups which had not experienced change. When the Inter-church Holiness Convention (IHC) emerged in the 1950s it would have drawn from both sources. I was raised to suspect the sincerity of anyone who was not identified with the conservative holiness movement. I was also raised to distrust anyone who did not accept our conservative standards of dress and conduct. I attended the first national IHC in 1974 and was then delighted to see there were so many of "us." I was first licensed to preach by the Church of God (Holiness) in 1975 and was ordained by them in 1981. I pastored within that denomination for sixteen years. I was educated at their bible college and in a sense was "pure bred." I always wondered why people who professed to be Bible believing could reject our interpretations. However, shortly into my first pastorate I became aware that some of our favorite proof texts would not necessarily bear the weight we put on them. I came to a crisis in my ministry regarding whether I would preach the traditional interpretations I had grown up with or whether I would strive to be exegetically honest. I chose to be loyal to scripture, not fully realizing where that might lead me. In my second pastorate I served as chairman of the Southern California Inter-church Holiness Convention from 1985-88. I also completed a Master of Divinity degree with a 3 major in church history. My thesis was an attempt to trace a shift in the emphasis on sanctification within the holiness movement. In a sense, I am still trying to grasp the full scope of what happened in the American holiness movement and how that has effected my ministry My third pastorate was an attempt to pastor a congregation which had broken away from certain expectations within the conservative wing of the holiness movement and yet was still trying to maintain ties with that segment of the holiness movement. I was ostracized because I did not adhere to the party line in my interpretation of key biblical passages or in my insistence upon certain dress standards. They had developed their own set of issues, behaviors, and values which made them distinct from the mainstream holiness movement and which justified their existence. I felt I was no longer accepted within the subculture in which I grew up. I went through a painful evaluation trying to discover where I belonged. In June, 1993 I transferred my credentials to the Fellowship of Bible Churches which considers itself to be outside the conservative wing of the holiness movement. This dissertation reflects my own solidification of what I believe and the realization that my conclusions place me outside the conservative wing of the holiness movement. I believe this research will be beneficial to anyone struggling with issues of identity and effectiveness in future ministry. In his history of the Church of God (Holiness) C. E. 4 Cowen asserted that the Methodist Church had lost its zeal for the doctrine of sanctification and therefore it was necessary for the holiness movement to propagate the doctrine (11-14). However, the new emphasis on sanctification was not the original emphasis of John Wesley. In many cases the Methodist church did not oppose the doctrine of Wesley, but the excesses within the nineteenth century holiness movement. I was particularly fascinated by a document in which T. J. Bryant rebutted charges made by John P Brooks in the Banner of Holiness. Brooks had presented a paper, "What Are the Chief Hindrances to the Progress of the Work of Sanctification Among Believers?" at the Holiness Conference held in Cincinnati in 1877. According to Melvin Dieter, it was Brooks who laid the groundwork which led to the formation of holiness churches (Revival 219). Brooks became an early leader of the Church of God (Holiness) and later published The Divine Church in 1891. In his book Brooks argued that "holiness cannot be successfully propagated under sectarian conditions" (271). This meant that holiness sympathizers should "come out" and identify with the one true church. Bryant began with an admission that "there is an honest and growing opposition in the Methodist Episcopal Church to the so-called holiness movement in the West" (4). But he affirms the issue is not the doctrine of holiness, but excesses within the holiness movement. In chapter 3, I will 5 recount the story of A. L. Brewer who was also affiliated with the Church of God (Holiness) for a time. His fanaticism would not represent the whole group, but I began to see that we had no monopoly on either the doctrine or practice of holiness. I came to the conclusion that it was not honest for me to remain identified with a group that came into existence to promote a rather narrow understanding of one doctrine.
Recommended publications
  • The Free Methodist Church, the Wesleyan Methodist Church, the Salvation Army and the Church of the Nazarene)
    A Study of Denominations 1 Corinthians 14:33 (KJV 1900) - 33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. Holiness Churches - Introduction • In historical perspective, the Pentecostal movement was the child of the Holiness movement, which in turn was a child of Methodism. • Methodism began in the 1700s on account of the teachings of John and Charles Wesley. One of their most distinguishing beliefs was a distinction they made between ordinary and sanctified Christians. • Sanctification was thought of as a second work of grace which perfected the Christian. Also, Methodists were generally more emotional and less formal in their worship. – We believe that God calls every believer to holiness that rises out of His character. We understand it to begin in the new birth, include a second work of grace that empowers, purifies and fills each person with the Holy Spirit, and continue in a lifelong pursuit. ―Core Values, Bible Methodist Connection of Churches • By the late 1800s most Methodists had become quite secularized and they no longer emphasized their distinctive doctrines. At this time, the "Holiness movement" began. • It attempted to return the church to its historic beliefs and practices. Theologian Charles Finney was one of the leaders in this movement. When it became evident that the reformers were not going to be able to change the church, they began to form various "holiness" sects. • These sects attempted to return to true Wesleyan doctrine. Among the most important of these sects were the Nazarene church and the Salvation Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicodemus and the New Birth
    SESSION EIGHT Nicodemus and the New Birth SESSION SUMMARY This session depicts a conversation in which Jesus taught a religious leader, Nicodemus, about the mystery of regeneration—what He described as “being born again.” Christians have been born again by the Spirit of God, through faith in God’s Son. The new birth is the basis of our confidence that God is at work transforming us and all who believe in the gospel. SCRIPTURE John 3:1-21 86 Leader Guide / Session 8 THE POINT Regeneration is God’s supernatural transformation of believers. INTRO/STARTER 5-10 MINUTES Option 1 Toy commercials are usually filled with action. They show kids having fun as they play with whatever product is being promoted. They highlight the gadget’s best features in a way that appeals to a child’s sense of imagination. But at the end, a narrator usually comes on and makes a disclaimer: “Batteries not included.” Most likely, there were numerous occasions when well-meaning parents or guardians purchased a toy their child wanted without realizing there were no batteries in the box—unbearable disappointment in the eyes of a child! The kid feels duped, the parent is embarrassed, and the moment of bliss fades away because the toy can’t function. • When have you been disappointed by something not functioning as you thought it would? What was the reason for the item’s inability to function? As Christians, we believe salvation is a gift. God our Father has shown us grace in giving us salvation. But unlike those disappointing toy commercials, this gift doesn’t need a disclaimer that says “batteries are not included.” The good news about God’s gift is that, alongside forgiveness of sins, we receive the Holy Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRUTH in SONG PSALM 95:1 O Come, Let Us Sing for Joy to the Lord
    THE TRUTH IN SONG Lesson 34 THE TRUTH IN SONG PSALM 95:1 O come, let us sing for joy to the Lord… Let us shout joyfully to the rock of our salvation. www.barahministries.com PASTOR RORY CLARK Barah Ministries www.barahministries.com Hi there! Welcome to Barah Ministries…a Christian Church based in Mesa, AZ…my name is Pastor Rory Clark. Songs do a great job of communicating the Word of God. Today, you’ll hear a song from June Murphy’s latest album…the You Ran After Me album…available for purchase on iTunes…today’s song is BORN AGAIN. TODAY’S SONG Born Again I can remember being called that once … “You aren’t one of those ‘born agains’ are you?” Well I have to admit it…yes I am. In John, Chapter 3, the Lord Jesus Christ, the One and Only Sovereign God of the Universe, talks to a religious man, highlighting the importance of being one of those “born agains…” JOHN 3:1 Now there was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews… He was from the strictest sect of the Pharisees…and a member of the Jewish ruling council. JOHN 3:2 …and this man came to Jesus by night and said to Him, “Rabbi, we know that You have come from God as a teacher…for no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him.” SONGS ©® 2017 Barah Ministries, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 THE TRUTH IN SONG Lesson 34 Nicodemus, by calling the Lord a Rabbi, is reducing the Lord to his level, rather than acknowledging the Lord as God.
    [Show full text]
  • Preacher's Magazine Volume 07 Number 10 J
    Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet Preacher's Magazine Church of the Nazarene 10-1932 Preacher's Magazine Volume 07 Number 10 J. B. Chapman (Editor) Olivet Nazarene University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/cotn_pm Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, International and Intercultural Communication Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, and the Practical Theology Commons Recommended Citation Chapman, J. B. (Editor), "Preacher's Magazine Volume 07 Number 10" (1932). Preacher's Magazine. 82. https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/cotn_pm/82 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Church of the Nazarene at Digital Commons @ Olivet. It has been accepted for inclusion in Preacher's Magazine by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Olivet. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J. B. Chapman, D. D. Editor V o l u m e 7 O c t o b e r , 19 32 N u m b e r 10 GOING AFTER THE CHURCH OF THE FUTURE B y The Editor Of course adults are expected to attend the Sunday school, but after all has been said on the subject, the big work of the Sunday school is to gather in the children and young people and hold them to the church and for the church and for Christ. Last night the pastor of the church where I preached made an earnest speech about his Sunday school and the District Superin­ tendent who sat by me said, “No man will want for material for his church who is able to build a Sunday school.” Of course a preacher who can build a Sunday school must also have ability to do a great many other things, for building a Sunday school is not the simple thing it may sound to be.
    [Show full text]
  • John Wesley's Teaching Concerning Perfection Edward W
    JOHN WESLEY'S TEACHING CONCERNING PERFECTION EDWARD W. H. VICK Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan Wesley has often been characterized as Arminian rather than as Calvinistic. The fact that he continuously called for repentance from sin, published a journal called the Arminian Magazine, was severe in his strictures against predestination and unconditional election, engaged in controversial cor- respondence with Whitefield over the matter of election, perfection and perseverance seem to indicate a great gulf between his teaching and that of Calvin. Gulf there may be, but it need not be made to appear wider at certain points than can justly be claimed. The fact is that exclusive attention to his opposition to predestination may lead to neglect of his teaching on the relationship between faith and grace. This is not to deny that Wesley was opposed to important Calvinistic tenets. In his sermon on Free Grace, delivered in 1740, he states why he is opposed to the doctrine of pre- destination : (I) it makes preaching vain, needless for the elect and useless for the non-elect ; (2) it takes away motives for following after holiness ; (3) it tends to increase sharpness of temper and contempt for those considered to be outsiders ; (4) it tends to destroy the comfort of religion ; (5) it destroys zeal for good works ; (6) it makes the whole Christian revelation unnecessary and (7) self-contradictory ; (8) it represents the Lord as saying one thing and meaning J. Wesley, Sermons on Several Occasions, I (New York, 1827)~ 13-19. 202 EDWARD W. H. VICK another: God becomes more cruel and unjust than the devil.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Contributions of John Wesley to the Doctrine of Perfection
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 51, No. 2, 301-310. Copyright © 2013 Andrews University Press. THEOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF JOHN WESLEY TO THE DOCTRINE OF PERFECTION THEODORE LEVTEROV Loma Linda University Loma Linda, California Introduction The doctrine of perfection is biblically based. In Matt 5:48 (NIV), Jesus declares, “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” However, the meaning of the term “perfection” is contested, with many different interpretations ranging from one extreme to another.1 At one end of the spectrum, it has been concluded that perfection and Christian growth is not possible, while at the other it is thought that humans can attain a state of sinless perfection. Within this range of understandings, scholars agree that no one has better described the biblical doctrine of perfection than John Wesley. For example, Rob Staples proposes that this doctrine “represents the goal of Wesley’s entire religious quest.”2 Albert Outler notes that “the chief interest and signifi cance of Wesley as a theologian lie in the integrity and vitality of his doctrine as a whole. Within that whole, the most distinctive single element was the notion of ‘Christian perfection.’”3 Harald Lindstrom indicates that “the importance of the idea of perfection to Wesley is indicated by his frequent mention of it: in his sermons and other writings, in his journals and letters, and in the hymn books he published with his brother Charles.”4 John Wesley himself affi rmed that “this doctrine is the grand depositum which God has lodged with the people called Methodists; and for the sake of propagating this chiefl y He appeared to have raised us up.”5 This article will examine Wesley’s basic contributions to the doctrine of perfection.
    [Show full text]
  • [AJPS 3/1 (2000), Pp. 33-60] “TRUTH on FIRE”: PENTECOSTAL THEOLOGY of MISSION and the CHALLENGES of a NEW MILLENNIUM Veli-Ma
    [AJPS 3/1 (2000), pp. 33-60] “TRUTH ON FIRE”:1 PENTECOSTAL THEOLOGY OF MISSION AND THE CHALLENGES OF A NEW MILLENNIUM Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen 1. Introduction: Pentecostals and the Challenge of “Transforming Mission” Pentecostal mission has been successful, extremely successful when we look at the numbers. Whatever reservations one might have with regard to the calculations of D. Barrett2 and of others,3 there is no denying the fact that the advance of Pentecostal/Charismatic mission work has been astonishing. “A growth of from zero to 400 mission in ninety years is unprecedented in the whole of church history.”4 1 The first part of the title is taken from L. Grant McClung, “Truth on Fire Pentecostals and the Urgent Missiology,” in Azusa Street and Beyond, ed. L. Grant McClung (South Plainfield, NJ: Bridge Publishing, 1985), pp. 47-55. For ecumenical perspectives on Pentecostal missiology, see my “Pentecostal Missiology in Ecumenical Context,” International Review of Mission (July 1999, forthcoming). 2 See, David B. Barrett and Todd M. Johnson, “Annual Statistical Table on Global Mission: 1999,” International Bulletin of Missionary Research 23:1 (1999), pp. 24-25. 3 See, e.g., C. Peter Wagner, “Church Growth,” in Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, eds. S. M. Burgess and G. B. McGee (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1988), pp. 180-95. (This dictionary will be indicated henceforth as DPCM.) 4 Walter J. Hollenweger, “From Azusa Street to the Toronto Phenomenon,” Concilium 3, eds. Jürgen Moltmann and Karl-Josef Kuschel (1996), pp. 3-14 (3). 34 Asian Journal of Pentecostal Studies 3/1 (2000) Pentecostals, however, would do well if they, instead of continuing to glory in church growth numbers,5 would have another look at the impending challenges as we are crossing into the third millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20Th and 21St Century
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto ASPECTS OF ARMINIAN SOTERIOLOGY IN METHODIST-LUTHERAN ECUMENICAL DIALOGUES IN 20TH AND 21ST CENTURY Mikko Satama Master’s Thesis University of Helsinki Faculty of Theology Department of Systematic Theology Ecumenical Studies 18th January 2009 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO − HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET Tiedekunta/Osasto − Fakultet/Sektion Laitos − Institution Teologinen tiedekunta Systemaattisen teologian laitos Tekijä − Författare Mikko Satama Työn nimi − Arbetets title Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20th and 21st Century Oppiaine − Läroämne Ekumeniikka Työn laji − Arbetets art Aika − Datum Sivumäärä − Sidoantal Pro Gradu -tutkielma 18.1.2009 94 Tiivistelmä − Referat The aim of this thesis is to analyse the key ecumenical dialogues between Methodists and Lutherans from the perspective of Arminian soteriology and Methodist theology in general. The primary research question is defined as: “To what extent do the dialogues under analysis relate to Arminian soteriology?” By seeking an answer to this question, new knowledge is sought on the current soteriological position of the Methodist-Lutheran dialogues, the contemporary Methodist theology and the commonalities between the Lutheran and Arminian understanding of soteriology. This way the soteriological picture of the Methodist-Lutheran discussions is clarified. The dialogues under analysis were selected on the basis of versatility. Firstly, the sole world organisation level dialogue was chosen: The Church – Community of Grace. Additionally, the document World Methodist Council and the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification is analysed as a supporting document. Secondly, a document concerning the discussions between two main-line churches in the United States of America was selected: Confessing Our Faith Together.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming a Holy People
    _____________________________________________________________________________________ Student Guide Becoming a Holy People Clergy Development Church of the Nazarene Kansas City, Missouri 816-333-7000 ext. 2468; 800-306-7651 (USA) 2004 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright ©2004 Nazarene Publishing House, Kansas City, MO USA. Created by Church of the Nazarene Clergy Development, Kansas City, MO USA. All rights reserved. All scripture quotations are from the Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV). Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 by the International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. NASB: From the American Standard Bible (NASB), copyright the Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 973, 1977, 1995. Used by permission. NRSV: From the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of Churches of Christ in the U.S.A. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Notice to educational providers: This is a contract. By using these materials you accept all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement covers all Faculty Guides, Student Guides, and instructional resources included in this Module. Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, Clergy Development grants to you a nonexclusive license to use these curricular materials provided that you agree to the following: 1. Use of the Modules. • You may distribute this Module in electronic form to students or other educational providers. • You may make and distribute electronic or paper copies to students for the purpose of instruction, as long as each copy contains this Agreement and the same copyright and other proprietary notices pertaining to the Module.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Progress Of
    [AJPS 14:1 (2011), pp. 108-146] THE ORIGINS AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS OF THE PENTECOSTAL MISSIONARY ENTERPRISE IN CHINA R. G. Tiedemann We have taken for granted an obscure history of Pentecostalism for so long that the multitudes of nameless people responsible for its grassroots expansion have passed into history unremembered and their memory is now very difficult to retrieve. Allan Anderson1 The Pentecostal movement owes its inspiration and formation to the emergence of radical evangelical currents during the second half of the nineteenth century. These new religious movements were significantly different in their eschatological expectations and missionary methods and began to severely challenge mainstream Protestantism in Europe and North America. Several innovative theological currents had a decisive influence on the formation of a host of new denominations and new missionary bodies. Holiness Wesleyans, higher life fundamentalists, the ascendancy of premillennialism, including its dispensationalist variant, restorationist currents, sabbatarian ideas, as well as diverse strands of German and Scandinavian Pietism all contributed to forge the new Evangelicalism as a protest against the growing ‘worldliness’ of the ‘mainline’ Protestant denominations in Western countries.2 1 Allan Anderson, An Introduction to Pentecostalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 175. 2 See Melvin Easterday Dieter, The Holiness Revival of the Nineteenth Century, 2nd ed. (Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 1996). For a brief background discussion and the relevant literature, see Allan Anderson, Spreading Fires: The Missionary Nature of Early Pentecostalism (London: SCM Press, 2007), Tiedemann, Pentecostal Missionary Enterprise 109 The Holiness leaders, for example, rejected the optimistic postmillennial convictions of mainline Protestantism. Instead, they insisted that the world was about to come to an apocalyptic conclusion, ushering in the imminent Second Coming of Christ prior to the establishment of his millennial kingdom on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected]
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Liberty University Digital Commons Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Trends and Issues in Missions Center for Global Ministries 2009 Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions Recommended Citation Fanning, Don, "Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements" (2009). Trends and Issues in Missions. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Global Ministries at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Trends and Issues in Missions by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pentecostal/Charismatic Movements Page 1 Pentecostal Movement The first two hundred years (100-300 AD) The emphasis on the spiritual gifts was evident in the false movements of Gnosticism and in Montanism. The result of this false emphasis caused the Church to react critically against any who would seek to use the gifts. These groups emphasized the gift of prophecy, however, there is no documentation of any speaking in tongues. Montanus said that “after me there would be no more prophecy, but rather the end of the world” (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Vol II, p. 418). Since his prophecy was not fulfilled, it is obvious that he was a false prophet (Deut . 18:20-22). Because of his stress on new revelations delivered through the medium of unknown utterances or tongues, he said that he was the Comforter, the title of the Holy Spirit (Eusebius, V, XIV).
    [Show full text]
  • The Consecrated Way to Christian Perfection
    The Consecrated Way to Christian Perfection 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................3 CHAPTER I "SUCH AN HIGH PRIEST" .......................9 CHAPTER II CHRIST AS GOD .............................13 CHAPTER III CHRIST AS MAN ............................17 CHAPTER IV "HE TOOK PART OF THE SAME" ................21 CHAPTER V "MADE UNDER THE LAW" .......................27 CHAPTER VI "MADE OF A WOMAN" .........................32 CHAPTER VII THE LAW OF HEREDITY ......................40 CHAPTER VIII "IN ALL THINGS LIKE" ....................45 CHAPTER IX FURTHER QUALIFICATIONS OF OUR HIGH PRIEST .52 CHAPTER X "THE SUM" ..................................57 CHAPTER XI "THAT I MAY DWELL AMONG THEM" .............62 CHAPTER XII PERFECTION ...............................76 CHAPTER XIII THE TRANSGRESSION AND ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION ...............................................86 CHAPTER XIV THE TIME OF FINISHING THE MYSTERY OF GOD 104 CHAPTER XV THE CLEANSING OF THE SANCTUARY ...........113 CHAPTER XVI THE TIMES OF REFRESHING .................120 CHAPTER XVII CONCLUSION .............................126 INTRODUCTION In the manifestation of Christ the Saviour it is revealed that He must appear in the three offices of prophet, priest, and king. Of Him as prophet it was written in the days of Moses: "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put My words in His mouth; and He shall speak unto them all that I shall command Him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto My words which He shall speak in My name, I will require it of him." Deut. 18:18,19. And this thought was continued in the succeeding scriptures until His coming. Of Him as priest it was written in the days of David: "Yet have I set ['anointed,' margin] My King upon My holy hill of Zion." Ps.
    [Show full text]