Evolutionary Mode Routinely Varies Among Morphological Traits Within Fossil Species Lineages
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
UNIT 4 HISTORY of HUMAN EVOLUTION* History of Human Evolution
UNIT 4 HISTORY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION* History of Human Evolution Contents 4.0 Introduction 4.1 Trends in Human Evolution: Understanding Pre-modern Humans 4.2 Hominization Process 4.2.1 Bipedalism 4.2.2 Opposable Thumb and Manual Dexterity 4.3 Summary 4.4 References 4.5 Answers to Check Your Progress Learning Objectives: After reading this unit you will be able to: analyze the major trends in human evolution; review characteristics which distinguish human from their primate ancestors; learn anatomical and cultural changes associated with the process of hominization; and comprehend the significance of these changes during evolution of human. 4.0 INTRODUCTION Humans first evolved in East Africa about 2.5 million years ago from an earlier genus of apes called Australopithecus, which means ‘Southern Ape’. About 2 million years ago, some of these archaic men and women left their homeland to journey through and settle vast areas of North Africa, Europe and Asia. Since survival in the snowy forests of northern Europe required different traits than those needed to stay alive in Indonesia’s steaming jungles, human populations evolved in different directions. The result was several distinct species, to each of which scientists have assigned a pompous Latin name. Humans in Europe and western Asia evolved into Homo neanderthalensis (‘Man from the Neander Valley’), popularly referred to simply as ‘Neandethals’. Neanderthals, bulkier and more muscular than us Sapiens, were well adapted to the cold climate of Ice Age western Eurasia. The more eastern regions of Asia were populated by Homo erects, ‘Upright Man’, who survived there for close to 2 million years, making it the most durable species ever. -
Laboratory Primate Newsletter
LABORATORY PRIMATE NEWSLETTER Vol. 45, No. 3 July 2006 JUDITH E. SCHRIER, EDITOR JAMES S. HARPER, GORDON J. HANKINSON AND LARRY HULSEBOS, ASSOCIATE EDITORS MORRIS L. POVAR, CONSULTING EDITOR ELVA MATHIESEN, ASSISTANT EDITOR ALLAN M. SCHRIER, FOUNDING EDITOR, 1962-1987 Published Quarterly by the Schrier Research Laboratory Psychology Department, Brown University Providence, Rhode Island ISSN 0023-6861 POLICY STATEMENT The Laboratory Primate Newsletter provides a central source of information about nonhuman primates and re- lated matters to scientists who use these animals in their research and those whose work supports such research. The Newsletter (1) provides information on care and breeding of nonhuman primates for laboratory research, (2) dis- seminates general information and news about the world of primate research (such as announcements of meetings, research projects, sources of information, nomenclature changes), (3) helps meet the special research needs of indi- vidual investigators by publishing requests for research material or for information related to specific research prob- lems, and (4) serves the cause of conservation of nonhuman primates by publishing information on that topic. As a rule, research articles or summaries accepted for the Newsletter have some practical implications or provide general information likely to be of interest to investigators in a variety of areas of primate research. However, special con- sideration will be given to articles containing data on primates not conveniently publishable elsewhere. General descriptions of current research projects on primates will also be welcome. The Newsletter appears quarterly and is intended primarily for persons doing research with nonhuman primates. Back issues may be purchased for $5.00 each. -
71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas. -
Spatial Mosaic Evolution of Snail Defensive Traits
University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Biological Sciences Faculty Publications Department of Biological Sciences 2007 Spatial Mosaic Evolution of Snail Defensive Traits Steve G. Johnson University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/biosciences_facpubs Recommended Citation Johnson, S.G., C. Darrin Hulsey, Francisco J. Garcia de Leon. 2007. Spatial mosaic evolution of snail defensive traits. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7:50 (open access in pubmed central) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biological Sciences at ScholarWorks@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Spatial mosaic evolution of snail defensive traits Steven G Johnson*1, C Darrin Hulsey2 and Francisco J García de León3 Address: 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lake Shore Drive, New Orleans, LA, 70148 USA, 2Department of Biology, Georgia Tech, 310 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia, 30332, USA and 3Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste, P.O. Box 128, La Paz, B.C.S. Mexico Email: Steven G Johnson* - [email protected]; C Darrin Hulsey - [email protected]; Francisco J García de León - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 30 March 2007 Received: 26 February 2007 Accepted: 30 March 2007 BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:50 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-50 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/50 © 2007 Johnson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. -
The Evolutive Dynamic of the Bank Vole (Myodes Glareolus): Spatial
The evolutive dynamic of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus) : Spatial structure of the morphometric variations Ronan Ledevin To cite this version: Ronan Ledevin. The evolutive dynamic of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus) : Spatial structure of the morphometric variations. Paleontology. Université Claude Bernard - Lyon I, 2010. English. NNT : 2010LYO10196. tel-00832801 HAL Id: tel-00832801 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00832801 Submitted on 11 Jun 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. N° d’ordre : 196 - 2010 Année 2010 THESE Présentée devant l’UNIVERSITE CLAUDE BERNARD – LYON 1 pour l’obtention du DIPLOME DE DOCTORAT (arrêté du 7 août 2006) Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 25 Octobre 2010 Par M. Ronan LEDEVIN La dynamique évolutive du campagnol roussâtre (Myodes glareolus) : structure spatiale des variations morphométriques Jury Rapporteurs : M. J.-C. AUFFRAY : Directeur de Recherche (Université de Montpellier II) M. A. CARDINI : Lecturer (Universitá di Modena e Reggio Emilia) Examinateurs : Mme D. PONTIER : Professeur des Universités (Université de Lyon I) M. J. R. MICHAUX : Chercheur Qualifié (Université de Liège, en accueil au CBGP de Montpellier) Directeur de Thèse : Mme S. RENAUD : Chargé de Recherche (Université de Lyon I) N° d’ordre : Année 2010 THESE Présentée devant l’UNIVERSITE CLAUDE BERNARD – LYON 1 pour l’obtention du DIPLOME DE DOCTORAT (arrêté du 7 août 2006) Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 25 Octobre 2010 Par M. -
The Web of Life Evolution in Action
The Web of Life Evolution in Action Presentations at the National Association of Biology Teachers Annual Conferences 1998 – 2001 by the Society for the Study of Evolution Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution Table of Contents On Observing Evolution .............................................................................................. 1 DefendingEvolution .................................................................................................... 5 Humans as the World’s Greatest................................................................................... 7 Evolutionary Force ...................................................................................................... 7 Evolution in Our Lives .............................................................................................. 18 Putting the Scientific Method into Biological Taxonomy – Teaching the Phylogenetic System................................................................................................... 20 SNPs : Why all the excitement? ................................................................................ 23 Macroevolution: Evolution on a big scale................................................................. 24 Why Evolution Matters .............................................................................................. 29 Applied Evolution: Technology for the 21st Century................................................. 34 DNA and Early Human HistoryNeandertals and Early Humans: But Did They Mate? .................................................................................................................................. -
Magic Traits: Distinguishing the Important from the Trivial
Letters Trends in Ecology and Evolution January 2012, Vol. 27, No. 1 Magic traits: distinguishing the important from the trivial Benjamin C. Haller1, Luis F. De Le´ on1,2, Gregor Rolshausen1, Kiyoko M. Gotanda1 and Andrew P. Hendry1 1 Department of Biology and Redpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2K6 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 2072, Balboa, Panama´ Servedio et al. [1], following Gavrilets [2], define a magic implies that such a trait is, in a sense, an ordinary trait that trait as ‘a trait subject to divergent selection and a trait contributes to non-random mating, but that is, at times, in a contributing to non-random mating that are pleiotropic ‘magic environment’ that subjects it to divergent selection; expressions of the same gene(s)’. This clarified definition is the magic comes from the trait–environment interaction. certainly helpful, but we outline here several pivotal ques- Thus, a crucial question emerges: how consistently diver- tions for empirical research, particularly surrounding the gent, through time and across space, must selection be for a crucial concept of effect size. trait to be magic and also important for speciation? Again, The effect size of a magic trait, defined by Servedio et al. we argue that expected effect size is the key: divergent [1] as ‘how much the trait contributed to the evolution of selection must be sufficiently strong and consistent to actu- increased reproductive isolation’, determines whether a ally drive divergence. magic trait is actually important for speciation (an ‘impor- The second pillar of the definition is non-random mat- tant magic trait’) or is a ‘trivial magic trait’ (a magic trait of ing. -
Punctuated Equilibrium Vs. Phyletic Gradualism
International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology Vol. 3, No. 4, December, 2011 Punctuated Equilibrium vs. Phyletic Gradualism Monalie C. Saylo1, Cheryl C. Escoton1 and Micah M. Saylo2 1 University of Antique, Sibalom, Antique, Philippines 2 DepEd Sibalom North District, Sibalom, Antique, Philippines [email protected] Abstract Both phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium are speciation theory and are valid models for understanding macroevolution. Both theories describe the rates of speciation. For Gradualism, changes in species is slow and gradual, occurring in small periodic changes in the gene pool, whereas for Punctuated Equilibrium, evolution occurs in spurts of relatively rapid change with long periods of non-change. The gradualism model depicts evolution as a slow steady process in which organisms change and develop slowly over time. In contrast, the punctuated equilibrium model depicts evolution as long periods of no evolutionary change followed by rapid periods of change. Both are models for describing successive evolutionary changes due to the mechanisms of evolution in a time frame. Keywords: macroevolution, phyletic gradualism, punctuated equilibrium, speciation, evolutionary change 1. Introduction Has the evolution of life proceeded as a gradual stepwise process, or through relatively long periods of stasis punctuated by short periods of rapid evolution? To date, what is clear is that both evolutionary patterns – phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium have played at least some role in the evolution of life. Gradualism and punctuated equilibrium are two ways in which the evolution of a species can occur. A species can evolve by only one of these, or by both. Scientists think that species with a shorter evolution evolved mostly by punctuated equilibrium, and those with a longer evolution evolved mostly by gradualism. -
Mosaic Evolution Africa (Broom and Robinson 1947; Le Gros Clark 1947; Washburn and Patterson 1951)
but bipedal Australopithecus fossils from South Mosaic evolution Africa (Broom and Robinson 1947; Le Gros Clark 1947; Washburn and Patterson 1951). In JEREMY M. DESILVA 1959, Wilfrid Le Gros Clark (see le gros clark, Dartmouth College, USA wilfrid edward) first applied the term mosaic evolution to describe this disjunction between brain and locomotor evolution in the australo- Different parts of a species’ biology evolve at dif- piths (Le Gros Clark 1959). It is now commonly ferent rates, resulting in organisms possessing a acceptedthattwoofthemostdistinctivehuman combination of primitive and derived characteris- characteristics—bipedalism and large brains tics. This differential pace of evolutionary change —evolved at different rates and at different times is commonly referred to as mosaic evolution.An in our lineage (McHenry 1975) and that the early exposition of this idea was put forward by disconnect between locomotion and encephal- W. K. Gregory (see gregory, william king) ization extends into the Pliocene (White 1980). (1910), who noted that organisms are a combi- Ever since Ernst Mayr (see mayr, ernst) cited nation of what he called caenotelic (derived) and the evolution of the Hominidae (see hominidae: paleotelic (primitive) features. Robert Broom (see conceptual history) as a “classic example” broom, robert) (1924) used the metaphor of (Mayr 1963, 344) of evolutionary mosaicism, the a palimpsest—the ancient practice of repeatedly term has been widely employed in the scientific writing and erasing text on the same piece of literature on human evolution. parchment—to refer to this phenomenon. The “Mosaic evolution” is also commonly used to concept was further elaborated and popularized refer to the sequential acquisition of evolutionary by G. -
Rainer Ulrich 2002.Pdf
New Developments in Viral Vaccine Technologies Guest Editors Rainer Ulrich, Berlin George P. Lomonossoff, Norwich Detlev H. Krüger, Berlin 73 figures and 39 tables, 2002 Basel Ⴇ Freiburg Ⴇ Paris Ⴇ London Ⴇ New York Ⴇ Bangalore Ⴇ Bangkok Ⴇ Singapore Ⴇ Tokyo Ⴇ Sydney S. Karger Drug Dosage All rights reserved. Medical and Scientific Publishers The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to en- No part of this publication may be translated into other Basel Ⴇ Freiburg Ⴇ Paris Ⴇ London sure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, Ⴇ Ⴇ accord with current recommendations and practice at the time electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, New York Bangalore Bangkok of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval Ⴇ Ⴇ Singapore Tokyo Sydney in government regulations, and the constant flow of informa- system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in tion relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to urged to check the package insert for each drug for any change the Copyright Clearance Center (see ‘General Information’). in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precau- tions. This is particularly important when the recommended © Copyright 2002 by S. Karger AG, agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. P.O. Box, CH–4009 Basel (Switzerland) Printed in Switzerland on acid-free paper by Reinhardt Druck, Basel ISBN 3–8055–7505–X Fax + 41 61 306 12 34 E-Mail [email protected] www.karger.com Contents Vol. -
New Information on the Late Pleistocene Birds from San Josecito Cave, Nuevo Leon, Mexico ’
A JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY Volume 96 Number 3 The Condor96571-589 Q The Cooper Omithologkzd %cietY 1994 NEW INFORMATION ON THE LATE PLEISTOCENE BIRDS FROM SAN JOSECITO CAVE, NUEVO LEON, MEXICO ’ DAVID W. STEADMAN New York State Museum, The State Education Department, Albany, NY 12230 JOAQUIN ARROYO-CARRALES Museum of Texas Tech University,Lubbock, TX 79409 and Laboratorio de Paleozoologia,Subdireccion de ServiciosAcademicos, Instituto National de Antropologiae Historia, Mexico EILEEN JOHNSON Museum of Texas Tech University,Lubbock, TX 79409 A. FARIOLA GUZMAN Laboratorio de Paleozoologta,Subdireccibn de ServiciosAcademicos, Instituto National de Antropologiiae Historia, Mexico Abstract. We report 90 bird bones representing 18 speciesfrom recent excavations at San Josecito Gave, Nuevo Le6n, Mexico. The new material increasesthe avifauna of this rich late Pleistocenelocality from 52 to 62 species.Eight of the 10 newly recorded taxa are extant; each is either of temperate rather than tropical affinities (such as the American Woodcock Scolopax minor and Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinuscyanocephalus) or is very wide- spreadin its modem distribution. The two extinct taxa are a stork (Ciconia sp. or Mycteria sp.) and Geococcyxcalifornianus conklingi, a large temporal subspeciesof the Greater Road- runner. In this region of the Sierra Madre Oriental (about lat. 24”N, long. lOO”W, elev. 2,000-2,600 m). the late Pleistocene avifauna was a mixture of speciesthat to&y prefer coniferous or pine-oak forests/woodlands,grasslands/savannas, and wetlands. As with var- ious late Pleistoceneplant and mammal communities of the United Statesand Mexico, no clear modem analog exists for the late Pleistoceneavifauna of San JosecitoCave. Key words: Late Pleistoceneavzfaunas; Mexico; historicalbiogeography; extinct species; temperate/tropicaltransition. -
The Concept of Chronospecies in Ammonites
Atti II Conv. Int. Pallini pp. 273-289 Chronospecies in Ammonites F.E.A. Pergola, 87 et alii cur. 3 taw., 6 figg. The concept of chronospecies in ammonites JERZY DZIK Zakfad Paleobiologii PAN, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland RIASSUNTO specific population in samples of the same geologic age (objective in principle), Le sole unita tassonomiche direttamente identificabili in paleonto- (5) reconstruction of evolutionary lineages by assembling logia sono i paleofena o gruppi di esemplari in un campione che pre- series of population from samples of different age, senta una distribuzione continua e unimodale della frequenza di tutti which are identified as being in close ancestor- i caratteri. Paleofena coevi possono essere sistemati in biospecie men- descendant relationships, tre serie temporali di questo formano delle linee filetiche. I risultati di entrambi i procedimenti sono empiricamente comprovabili. (6) delimitation of chronospecies within the lineage (sub- La ricostruzione delle linee e una condizione necessaria a priori per jective in principle), una definizione coscienziosa delle cronspecie, cioe segmenti arbitraria- (7) naming the chronospecies. mente designati di una linea. Un esempio empirico dimostra che pud Chronospecies is an evolutionary concept. Before any non essere possibile riconoscere i paleofena senza la biometria. chronospecies can be precisely defined, the evolution of Vengono discusse Ie prove per la presenza di due biospecie dimorfi- its lineage has to be determined. Even though the mean- che nel Calloviano di -Lukow (Polonia) e per la natura dimorfica dei ing of species in paleontology is so frequently vague, the generi valanginiani Saynoceras e Valanginites. gradualistic evolutionary nature of chronospecies is gener- ally assumed as self-evident.