Animals - Advanced

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Animals - Advanced Animals - Advanced Douglas Wilkin, Ph.D. Jennifer Blanchette Jean Brainard, Ph.D. Say Thanks to the Authors Click http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (No sign in required) AUTHORS Douglas Wilkin, Ph.D. To access a customizable version of this book, as well as other Jennifer Blanchette interactive content, visit www.ck12.org Jean Brainard, Ph.D. EDITOR Douglas Wilkin, Ph.D. CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-source, collaborative, and web-based compilation model, CK-12 pioneers and promotes the creation and distribution of high-quality, adaptive online textbooks that can be mixed, modified and printed (i.e., the FlexBook® textbooks). Copyright © 2016 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org The names “CK-12” and “CK12” and associated logos and the terms “FlexBook®” and “FlexBook Platform®” (collectively “CK-12 Marks”) are trademarks and service marks of CK-12 Foundation and are protected by federal, state, and international laws. Any form of reproduction of this book in any format or medium, in whole or in sections must include the referral attribution link http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (placed in a visible location) in addition to the following terms. Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Com- mons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. Complete terms can be found at http://www.ck12.org/about/ terms-of-use. Printed: January 24, 2016 www.ck12.org Chapter 1. Animals - Advanced CHAPTER 1 Animals - Advanced CHAPTER OUTLINE 1.1 Animals - Advanced 1.2 Classification of Animals - Advanced 1.3 Evolution of Animals - Advanced 1.4 Animal Behavior - Advanced 1.5 Evolution of Animal Behavior - Advanced 1.6 Innate Behavior in Animals - Advanced 1.7 Learned Behavior in Animals - Advanced 1.8 Social Behavior in Animals - Advanced 1.9 Communication Behavior in Animals - Advanced 1.10 Animal Migration - Advanced 1.11 Circadian Rhythms - Advanced 1.12 Animal Aggression - Advanced 1.13 Animal Competition - Advanced 1.14 Animal Mating Systems - Advanced 1.15 Animal Courtship - Advanced 1.16 Parental Care in Animals - Advanced 1.17 References Introduction 1 www.ck12.org Do all animals have a head and limbs? Do you know what these greenish, blob-like shapes are? Would it surprise you to learn that they are animals? They don’t look anything like the animals you are probably familiar with —animals such as dogs, deer, fish, and frogs. But the greenish blobs are animals nonetheless. They belong to a phylum called Cnidaria, but you may know them as jellyfish. They are very simple animals and, in fact, are not fish at all. How can an organism as simple as a jellyfish be considered an animal? How are animals defined? What traits must an organism have to be classified in the animal kingdom? In these concepts, you will learn the answers to these questions. You will find out just what it means to be an animal. 2 www.ck12.org Chapter 1. Animals - Advanced 1.1 Animals - Advanced • Describe the characteristics of animals and how they differ from the characteristics of organisms in other kingdoms. What do all animals have in common? The ability to smile? No. But they are all eukaryotic, heterotrophic, and multicellular. All organisms on earth are divided up, or classified, into six primary groups called kingdoms. The six kingdoms of organisms are: • Archaebacteria. • Eubacteria. • Protista. • Fungi. • Plantae. • Animalia. In these concepts we will examine the animal kingdom. Members of the animal kingdom have a number of characteristics that distinguish them from organisms within other kingdoms, such as the internal organization of their cells and how they obtain nutrients. The animal kingdom is subdivided into a number of different groups called 3 1.1. Animals - Advanced www.ck12.org phyla. In the three Animals concepts, we will explore the characteristics of animals, the classification of animals into different phyla, and the major trends that can be seen in the evolution of animals. Characteristics of Animals There is enormous variation among the different species that make up the multicellular organisms of the animal kingdom, as shown in the Figure 1.1. Despite this variation, there are a number of basic characteristics that are shared by all animals. In this section, we will first consider how it is that such a diverse group of organisms are evolutionarily related to each other, and then we will examine the common traits that exist among all animals. FIGURE 1.1 Examples of some of the many diverse species that make up the animal kingdom. (A) Sponge, (B) Flatworm, (C) Flying Insect, (D) Frog, (E) Tiger, (F) Gorilla. How are All Animals Related to Each Other? All organisms on earth descend from a single common ancestor. (See http://sci.waikato.ac.nz/evolution/Anima lEvolution.shtml .) This ancestor is thought to have originated approximately 3.5 to 4 billion years ago. Over long periods of time, the process of evolution and natural selection led to a divergence of the descendants of this ancestor. Divergence is the evolutionary process by which some individuals within a species develop traits - due to random mutations - that make them different from other members of the species. Divergent evolution results in the formation of a new species when these differences become so large that the different individuals can no longer interbreed with the original members of the species. This process is called speciation. Over time, divergence and speciation ultimately result in the diversity of species that we see on earth today (see the Concept Evolution (Advanced) chapter). All members of the animal kingdom are more closely related to each other than to organisms in any other kingdom because they diverged more recently from each other than they did from members of other kingdoms. This can be compared to the difference between siblings and cousins. You are related to your cousins, but you have to go back to two generations, to your grandparents, to find an ancestor that you all share. You are more closely related to your siblings because you only have to go back one generation to find a common ancestor: your parents. Of course, all animals have to go back an enormous number of generations to reach their shared common ancestor, but not as far back as an animal and a plant would have to go to find a common ancestor. As a result of this comparatively close relationship, members of the animal kingdom share a number of basic traits. They are all defined as multicellular organisms that must obtain organic nutrients by consuming other organisms and whose cells do not have cell walls. In the next three subsections, we will examine this description in more detail, and we will consider a number of other characteristics that distinguish animals from organisms within the other five 4 www.ck12.org Chapter 1. Animals - Advanced kingdoms. These characteristics are roughly divided into three categories: structure, function, and reproductive life cycle. Animal Structure Animal cells are eukaryotic. This trait is shared with organisms of three other kingdoms: plants, fungi, and protists. Cells of the bacterial kingdoms are prokaryotic. The major difference between a prokaryotic cell and a eukaryotic cell is the presence of a nucleus. The nucleus is a membrane-bound organelle within the cell that contains genetic information in the form of chromosomes composed of DNA. In prokaryotic cells the chromosomes are not enclosed by a membrane compartment. There are generally other membrane-bound organelles within a eukaryotic cell that are specialized for specific cellular functions. An example of a prokaryotic and a eukaryotic cell are shown in the Figure below. These cell types are extensively discussed in the Concept Cell Biology (Advanced) chapter. FIGURE 1.2 A prokaryotic bacterial cell (top) and a eukaryotic animal cell are shown (bottom) for comparison. Various internal struc- tures are labeled. Note the many or- ganelles within the eukaryotic cell that are not present in the prokaryotic cell. The most prominent of these organelles is the cell nucleus, which contains the genetic material. The cells of plants, fungi, some protists, and some prokaryotes have a cell wall. A cell wall is a rigid layer that surrounds the cell membrane and is usually composed primarily of carbohydrate molecules. The cell wall functions to provide structural support and protection to the cell. Animal cells do not have a cell wall. This allows them to have more flexibility and to adopt different shapes. Some animal cells, such as the neuron shown in the Figure 1.3, have an extremely elongated shape that is essential to their function. In the case of neurons, an extended cell shape is necessary for transmitting nerve signals over long distances. This shape would not be feasible if the cell were surrounded by a rigid wall. Neurons are discussed in the The Nervous System concepts under Anatomy and Physiology. 5 1.1. Animals - Advanced www.ck12.org FIGURE 1.3 A diagram of a neuron, illustrating the extended shape and specialized cell regions such as the dendrites (that receive information) and the axon (that transmits information to the next cell). Most animals have specialized tissues and organs that carry out specific functions within the animal, such as the nervous system and the muscular system. These are discussed in the next section.
Recommended publications
  • How Does Season Affect Passage Performance and Fatigue of Potamodromous Cyprinids? an Experimental Approach in a Vertical Slot Fishway
    water Article How Does Season Affect Passage Performance and Fatigue of Potamodromous Cyprinids? An Experimental Approach in a Vertical Slot Fishway Filipe Romão 1,* ID , José M. Santos 2 ID , Christos Katopodis 3, António N. Pinheiro 1 and Paulo Branco 2 1 CEris-Civil Engineering for Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] 2 CEF-Forest Research Centre, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] (J.M.S.); [email protected] (P.B.) 3 Katopodis Ecohydraulics Ltd., 122 Valence Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3T 3W7, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: fi[email protected]; Tel.: +351-91-861-2529 Received: 11 February 2018; Accepted: 27 March 2018; Published: 28 March 2018 Abstract: Most fishway studies are conducted during the reproductive period, yet uncertainty remains on whether results may be biased if the same studies were performed outside of the migration season. The present study assessed fish passage performance of a potamodromous cyprinid, the Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei), in an experimental full-scale vertical slot fishway during spring (reproductive season) and early-autumn (non-reproductive season). Results revealed that no significant differences were detected on passage performance metrics, except for entry efficiency. However, differences between seasons were noted in the plasma lactate concentration (higher in early-autumn), used as a proxy for muscular fatigue after the fishway navigation. This suggests that, for potamodromous cyprinids, the evaluation of passage performance in fishways does not need to be restricted to the reproductive season and can be extended to early-autumn, when movements associated with shifts in home range may occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Six Species of Butterflies Migrating Through Northeastern
    diversity Article Origins of Six Species of Butterflies Migrating through Northeastern Mexico: New Insights from Stable Isotope (δ2H) Analyses and a Call for Documenting Butterfly Migrations Keith A. Hobson 1,2,*, Jackson W. Kusack 2 and Blanca X. Mora-Alvarez 2 1 Environment and Climate Change Canada, 11 Innovation Blvd., Saskatoon, SK S7N 0H3, Canada 2 Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, ON N6A 5B7, Canada; [email protected] (J.W.K.); [email protected] (B.X.M.-A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Determining migratory connectivity within and among diverse taxa is crucial to their conservation. Insect migrations involve millions of individuals and are often spectacular. However, in general, virtually nothing is known about their structure. With anthropogenically induced global change, we risk losing most of these migrations before they are even described. We used stable hydrogen isotope (δ2H) measurements of wings of seven species of butterflies (Libytheana carinenta, Danaus gilippus, Phoebis sennae, Asterocampa leilia, Euptoieta claudia, Euptoieta hegesia, and Zerene cesonia) salvaged as roadkill when migrating in fall through a narrow bottleneck in northeast Mexico. These data were used to depict the probabilistic origins in North America of six species, excluding the largely local E. hegesia. We determined evidence for long-distance migration in four species (L. carinenta, E. claudia, D. glippus, Z. cesonia) and present evidence for panmixia (Z. cesonia), chain (Libytheana Citation: Hobson, K.A.; Kusack, J.W.; Mora-Alvarez, B.X. Origins of Six carinenta), and leapfrog (Danaus gilippus) migrations in three species. Our investigation underlines Species of Butterflies Migrating the utility of the stable isotope approach to quickly establish migratory origins and connectivity in through Northeastern Mexico: New butterflies and other insect taxa, especially if they can be sampled at migratory bottlenecks.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroethlogy NROC34 Course Goals How? Evaluation
    Course Goals Neuroethlogy NROC34 • What is neuroethology? • Prof. A. Mason – Role of basic biology – Model systems (mainly invertebrate) • e-mail: – Highly specialized organisms – [email protected] – Biomimetics – [email protected] • Primary literature and the scientific process – No textbook – subject = NROC34 – But if you really want one, there are a couple of suggestion on the • Office Hours: Friday, 1 – 4:00 pm, SW566 syllabus • Basic principles of integrative neural function • Weekly Readings: download from course webpage – More on this a bit later www.utsc.utoronto.ca/amason/courses/coursepage/syllabus2012.html NROC34 2012:1 1 NROC34 2012:1 2 How? Evaluation • Case studies of several model systems – Different kinds of questions – Different kinds of research (techniques) • Weekly readings 5% – Sensory, motor, decision-making… • Mid-term 35-45% • Selected papers each week • Final Exam 45-60% – Read before, discuss during: usually readings are challenging and “discussion” means me explaining (so • Presentation (optional) 10% don’t be discouraged) • Most topics include current work • Weekly reading marks: each week several – Take you to the leading edge of research in selected people will be selected at random to areas contribute 3 questions about the papers. NROC34 2012:1 3 NROC34 2012:1 4 1 Information Neuroethology • Who are you people? • The study of the neural mechanisms • What do you expect to learn in this course? underlying behaviour that is biologically • What previous course have you taken in: relevant to the animal performing it. – neuroscience • This encompasses many basic mechanisms – Behaviour of the nervous system. • Is this a req’d course for you? • Combines behavioural analysis and neurophysiology NROC34 2012:1 5 NROC34 2012:1 6 Neurobiology Behavioural Science • What do I mean by “integrative neural function”? • What does the nervous system do? • Ethology • Psychology – detect information in the environment – biological behaviour – abstract concepts (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 548:181
    Vol. 548: 181–196, 2016 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published April 21 doi: 10.3354/meps11623 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPEN ACCESS Isotopes and genes reveal freshwater origins of Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha aggregations in California’s coastal ocean Rachel C. Johnson1,2,*, John Carlos Garza1,3, R. Bruce MacFarlane1,4, Churchill B. Grimes1,4, Corey C. Phillis5,8, Paul L. Koch6, Peter K. Weber7, Mark H. Carr2 1Fisheries Ecology Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 3Department of Ocean Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 4Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 5Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, 307 McCone Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 6Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 7Glenn T. Seaborg Institute, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550, USA 8Present address: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 1121 L St. Suite 900, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA ABSTRACT: The ability of salmon to navigate from the ocean back to their river of origin to spawn acts to reinforce local adaptation and maintenance of unique and heritable traits among salmon populations. Here, the extent to which Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha from the same freshwater breeding groups associate together in the ocean at regional and smaller-scale aggre- gations prior to homeward migration is evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Ecology
    AP BIOLOGY BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY 1. Define the following terms: Ethology Behavior 2. Match the description/example with the correct behavior category. A. Classical conditioning E. Insight B. Fixed-action pattern F. Instinct (innate) C. Habituation G. Observational learning D. Imprinting H. Operant conditioning Behaviors that are inherited Performed virtually the same by all individuals regardless of environmental conditions In mammals, the female parent cares for offspring Highly stereotyped sequence of behaviors that, once begun, is usually carried to completion Triggered by a sign stimulus When a graylag goose sees an egg outside her next, she will methodically roll the egg back into the nest. The egg outside the nest is the stimulus. Even if the egg is removed or slips away, she completes the behavior by returning an “imaginary” egg to the nest Male stickleback fish defend their territory against other males. The red belly of males is the stimulus for aggressive behavior. Nikolass Tinbergen discovered any object with a red underside triggers the same aggressive behavior Learning that occurs during a specific time period; generally irreversible Konrad Lorenz discovered that during the first two days of life, graylag goslings will accept any moving object as their mother (even a human) Association of irrelevant stimulus with a fixed physiological response Animal performs a behavior in response to a substitute stimulus rather than the normal stimulus Pavlov’s dogs; dogs were conditioned to salivate in response to a bell Trial and error learning
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 51 Animal Behavior
    Chapter 51 Animal Behavior Lecture Outline Overview: Shall We Dance? • Red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis) gather in groups to dance, prance, stretch, bow, and leap. They grab bits of plants, sticks, and feathers with their bills and toss them into the air. • How does a crane decide that it is time to dance? In fact, why does it dance at all? • Animal behavior is based on physiological systems and processes. • An individual behavior is an action carried out by the muscular or hormonal system under the control of the nervous system in response to a stimulus. • Behavior contributes to homeostasis; an animal must acquire nutrients for digestion and find a partner for sexual reproduction. • All of animal physiology contributes to behavior, while animal behavior influences all of physiology. • Being essential for survival and reproduction, animal behavior is subject to substantial selective pressure during evolution. • Behavioral selection also acts on anatomy because body form and appearance contribute directly to the recognition and communication that underlie many behaviors. Concept 51.1: A discrete sensory input is the stimulus for a wide range of animal behaviors. • An animal’s behavior is the sum of its responses to external and internal stimuli. Classical ethology presaged an evolutionary approach to behavioral biology. • In the mid-20th century, pioneering behavioral biologists developed the discipline of ethology, the scientific study of how animals behave in their natural environments. • Niko Tinbergen, of the Netherlands, suggested four questions that must be answered to fully understand any behavior. 1. What stimulus elicits the behavior, and what physiological mechanisms mediate the response? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Consequences of Partial Migration in Elk Kristin Jennifer Barker University of Montana, Missoula
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2018 Home Is Where the Food Is: Causes and Consequences of Partial Migration in Elk Kristin Jennifer Barker University of Montana, Missoula Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Barker, Kristin Jennifer, "Home Is Where the Food Is: Causes and Consequences of Partial Migration in Elk" (2018). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11152. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11152 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOME IS WHERE THE FOOD IS: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF PARTIAL MIGRATION IN ELK By KRISTIN J. BARKER B.A., Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, Colorado, 2012 B.A., The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 2006 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife Biology The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2018 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Michael S. Mitchell, Chair Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit Dr. Kelly M. Proffitt Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Dr. Chad J. Bishop Wildlife Biology Program Dr. Creagh W. Breuner Organismal Biology and Ecology Program Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Fiction-Febr, 2020 1 Off-Shore Fly Or Die
    Science & Fiction-Febr, 2020 Off-Shore Fly or Die Holograms for Desert Locust Swarms Dr. Ugur Sevilmis Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana, Turkey [email protected] Abstract A random walk search was conducted on academic papers to find a method for ecological combat of desert locust. Relatedness of papers and concepts were mainly analysed with the core idea of “Fighting Rooster” vs “Desert Locust “ interspecies competition. It was interesting to find a better preator than fighting roosters for locust swarms in the sea. Usage of a technology is required in this theoric approach to modify collective behavior of desert locusts which looks like the achilles heel of swarms. Keywords: Invasion, migration, predation, interspecies competition, süper-organism, swarm intelligence, collective intelligence, multi-species communities Conclusions A locust swarm is a highly adaptive süper-organism using collective behavior and collective intelligence. Complex interactions exists within its interiror and environmental relations coming from genetic evolution of this species. It is hard to totally change its capacity of foraging on herbage due to its high adaptation capacity. The best method to prevent it is to keep them away from terestial ecosystems and keep them off-shore to spend their fats. Just one day will be adequate to destroy a whole swarm; when the night comes. During night time when all individual visual sensors are shut down, the süper-organsim will be fragmented. Under dark and no landing condition, they will spend their energy. Dead bodies of locusts will be the landing zone for the rest of the huge swarm. But predator fishes will be vey happy to hunt 40 and 80 million locusts per square kilometer (a total of around 50 to 100 billion locusts per swarm, representing 100,000 to 200,000 tons of flesh).
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Paper
    1 Foraging on the move Kate Behrmana, Andrew Berdahlb, Steven Ladec, Liliana Salvadord, Allison Shawd (names in alphabetical order by last name) a Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Texas at Austin, USA b Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Canada c Nonlinear Physics Centre, Research School of Physics and Engineering, Australian National University, AU d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, USA proposed a mathematical model for analyzing the wave front Abstract— Many ungulate species embark on migrations where pattern during wildebeest migration and investigated the they are constantly foraging as they move. This means individuals properties of spatial distribution and stability of the front using have to simultaneously balance several demands: finding the best self-organization theory. resources, maintaining the cohesion of the group, and migrating in a While the existing studies of mammalian migration are certain direction. While there is a vast literature on both flocking and mainly focused on groups of animals, studies in classical optimal foraging, there has been no work done to understand how animals should trade off the decision to flock or forage (since it is foraging theory, in contrast, focus on a single individual. difficult to do both simultaneously) during migration. To address this Classical foraging theory describes the payoffs that an question, we developed an individual-based model and implemented individual receives from implementing different strategies for a genetic algorithm to find the best decision-rule for switching searching for and processing food. This body of theory between foraging and flocking, under a variety of parameter settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethology of Geese; Fixed Action Patterns and The
    9.20 M.I.T. 2013 Class #5 Ethology of geese Fixed Action Patterns and the Central Nervous System 1 Video: Konrad Lorenz and his geese, recorded from WGBH-TV, “Wild, Wild World of Animals” • Discovery of imprinting • Nature of imprinting • Natural responses to predators by geese • Imprinting and development of social life by geese 2 Video: Konrad Lorenz and his geese, recorded from WGBH-TV, “Wild, Wild World of Animals” • Discussion: Is the response of geese to an aerial predator innate? – Experiments with exposure of naïve geese to a moving silhouette: 3 Video: Konrad Lorenz and his geese, recorded from WGBH-TV, “Wild, Wild World of Animals” • Discussion: Is the response of geese to an aerial predator innate? – Experiments with exposure of naïve geese to a moving silhouette: Moved in this direction: Fear/ mobbing response Turkeys and chickens appeared to be sensitive to shape, as shown. Geese were not. They respoinded to overhead movement that is slow with respect to size (calm gliding) like the appearance of a hunting white-tailed eagle. Moved in this direction: No such responses Cf. ducks: Their innate releasing mechanism appeared to be tailored more to falcons. 4 A more recent analysis: Schleidt, W., Shalter, M. D., & Moura-Neto, H. (2011, February 21). The Hawk/Goose Story: The Classical Ethological Experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, Revisited. Journal of Comparative Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0022068 Conclusion: Although there appear to be some innate reactions of these birds, the major differences in observed reactions of geese, ducks, turkeys, and chickens to gliding hawk and goose shapes can be explained as the result of differences in the relative novelty of stimulus encounters.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Umwelten in a Changing World
    Tartu Semiotics Library 18 Tartu Tartu Semiotics Library 18 Animal umwelten in a changing world: Zoosemiotic perspectives represents a clear and concise review of zoosemiotics, present- ing theories, models and methods, and providing interesting examples of human–animal interactions. The reader is invited to explore the umwelten of animals in a successful attempt to retrieve the relationship of people with animals: a cornerstone of the past common evolutionary processes. The twelve chapters, which cover recent developments in zoosemiotics and much more, inspire the reader to think about the human condition and about ways to recover our lost contact with the animal world. Written in a clear, concise style, this collection of articles creates a wonderful bridge between Timo Maran, Morten Tønnessen, human and animal worlds. It represents a holistic approach Kristin Armstrong Oma, rich with suggestions for how to educate people to face the dynamic relationships with nature within the conceptual Laura Kiiroja, Riin Magnus, framework of the umwelt, providing stimulus and opportuni- Nelly Mäekivi, Silver Rattasepp, ties to develop new studies in zoosemiotics. Professor Almo Farina, CHANGING WORLD A IN UMWELTEN ANIMAL Paul Thibault, Kadri Tüür University of Urbino “Carlo Bo” This important book offers the first coherent gathering of perspectives on the way animals are communicating with each ANIMAL UMWELTEN other and with us as environmental change requires increasing adaptation. Produced by a young generation of zoosemiotics scholars engaged in international research programs at Tartu, IN A CHANGING this work introduces an exciting research field linking the biological sciences with the humanities. Its key premises are that all animals participate in a dynamic web of meanings WORLD: and signs in their own distinctive styles, and all animal spe- cies have distinctive cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Species: Choreographing Human And
    BETWEEN SPECIES: CHOREOGRAPHING HUMAN AND NONHUMAN BODIES JONATHAN OSBORN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN DANCE STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO MAY, 2019 ã Jonathan Osborn, 2019 Abstract BETWEEN SPECIES: CHOREOGRAPHING HUMAN AND NONHUMAN BODIES is a dissertation project informed by practice-led and practice-based modes of engagement, which approaches the space of the zoo as a multispecies, choreographic, affective assemblage. Drawing from critical scholarship in dance literature, zoo studies, human-animal studies, posthuman philosophy, and experiential/somatic field studies, this work utilizes choreographic engagement, with the topography and inhabitants of the Toronto Zoo and the Berlin Zoologischer Garten, to investigate the potential for kinaesthetic exchanges between human and nonhuman subjects. In tracing these exchanges, BETWEEN SPECIES documents the creation of the zoomorphic choreographic works ARK and ARCHE and creatively mediates on: more-than-human choreography; the curatorial paradigms, embodied practices, and forms of zoological gardens; the staging of human and nonhuman bodies and bodies of knowledge; the resonances and dissonances between ethological research and dance ethnography; and, the anthropocentric constitution of the field of dance studies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the glowing memory of my nana, Patricia Maltby, who, through her relentless love and fervent belief in my potential, elegantly willed me into another phase of life, while she passed, with dignity and calm, into another realm of existence. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my phenomenal supervisor Dr. Barbara Sellers-Young and my amazing committee members Dr.
    [Show full text]