Cost-Benefit Analysis of Runway Occurrences
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Cost-benefit Analysis of runway occurrences Rob van Eekeren Safe-Runway GmbH 1 www.Safe-Runway.com The Issue www.Safe- Runway.com Preven:on successful 2 Runway issues: 3 other events www.Safe- Runway.com Riyadh: A Royal JordanIan Plane veered off the runway early thIs mornIng as It was landIng at SulaimanIyah Internaonal AIrPort In IraqI KurdIstan. The Embraer 175 jet was headIng from Amman, Jordan to IraqI KurdIstan wIth 30 Passengers and crew members aboard, rePorted Jazirah. In a statement, the Royal JordanIan ComPany said no casual:es were rePorted. SOURCE: GDN Gulf Digital News, 04-03. 2017 RIGA, Feb 17 (LETA) –” A VIm AIrlInes charter flIght from the RussIan cIty of Ufa got Into an accIdent at Riga Internaonal AIrPort today when the aircra started skIddIng on the runway before takeoff. There were 43 Passengers and seven crewmembers on board the Plane, but none of them was Injured In the accIdent. The Plane has been taxIed to the apron. The runway has been closed and Is beIng examIned for technIcal Issues. AccordIng to Informaon on the airPort’s websIte, there have been no arrIvals at Riga airPort sInce 11.54 a.m., whIle the last deParture took Place at 11.32 a.m.” SOURCE: LETA, Latvian informa6on agency, 17.02.2017 13:30 KALININGRAD, Jan 17 –”Aeroflot flIght SU1008 suffered a runway excursIon and nose landIng gear collapse aer landIng at KalInIngrad-Khrabrovo AIrPort (KGD) In RussIa. The aircra, an AIrbus A321, deParted Moscow's Sheremetyevo AIrPort at 19:18 UTC on a domes:c servIce to KalInIngrad. The flIght landed on runway 24, a 2400 m long runway, but was not able to stoP on the runway. It overran by 15-20 meters, comIng to rest In the snow wIth a collapsed nose landIng gear.” SOURCE: TASS, Russian News agency 03-01-2017 3 The challenge www.Safe- Runway.com Ø Runway Safety has PrIorIty Ø The ROI of addI:onal Preven:on measures mIght become negave Ø CHALLENGE: FInd cost effec:ve solu:ons for runway safety rIsks 4 INSPIRATION: Two runway excursions www.Safe- Runway.com NO grooving and, NO standard RESA………………WHY NOT? Ø AF 358; 2 aug 2005, A 340, CYYZ, Ø TAM3054; 17 July 2007, A 320, SBSP, runway excursIon Into EtobIcoke creek , runway excursIon Into road fuel staon, 12 InjurIes, fully destroyed. 199 fatalI:es (187 SOB + 12 others) 5 Runway End Safety Area (RESA) www.Safe- Runway.com ICAO standard RESAß Inadequate RESA à Risks RESA RESA Inadequate 6 ALARP EASA NPA 2015-18(B) www.Safe- Runway.com Ø EASA Safety Risk Management defines ALARP: Ø “ Showing that the safety risk is ALARP means that any further risk reducon is either impraccable or grossly outweighed by the cost”. CYYZ Ø ImPrac:cable ? Ø NO Ø Grossly outweIghed by the costs ? Let’s find out. à Model 7 Model Principle www.Safe- Runway.com Costs of runway overruns Model data InPuts Ø AccIdent data AccIdent Ø SeverIty data AccIdent data Assump:ons Calculaon costs Ø AIrcra • Human costs Ø Aerodrome Open Source • DIrect Safety Costs Ø Injury and AccIdent • IndIrect Safety Ø Assump:ons rePorts Costs Source: Safe-Runway GmbH 8 Who Pays? www.Safe- Runway.com Ø Aerodrome oPerator Ø OPPortunIty costs Ø Damage (too lImIted data) Ø AIrcra OPerator Ø AIrcra damage costs AccIdent Assump:ons Calculaon AccIdent data costs Ø Delay and DIversIon costs •Human costs Open Ø Passengers comPensaon Source and •DIrect Safety AccIdent Costs rePorts •IndIrect Safety Ø Human Costs Ø Injury and casualty costs Ø ISC Source: Safe-Runway GmbH 9 Major results 2016 www.Safe- Runway.com Count of Damage runway events 2016 Ø 643 Iden:fied runway accIdents Unknown 1% TRAI 8% CAT 18% NCC 17% Ø 52% General AvIaon MIL Ø 18% CAT 4% GEN 52% 2016 runway total runway accident costs € 7000.0 € 1000.0 € 900.0 Millions Millions € 6000.0 € 800.0 € 5000.0 € 700.0 € 600.0 € 4000.0 Ø $ 6.5 BIllIon total costs € 500.0 € 3000.0 € 400.0 Ø averagIng $ 0.5B Per month. € 2000.0 € 300.0 € 200.0 € 1000.0 € 100.0 € - € - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Monthly Total CumulaIve Linear (CumulaIve) 10 Major results 2016 www.Safe- Runway.com Ø 643 Iden:fied runway accIdents. 2016 runway accidents costs per type opera4on Ø Cost dIstrIbu:on Per TyPe of oPeraon: TRAI Unknown Ø CAT (67%) 2% 0% GEN Ø GEN (11%) 11% MIL Ø NCC (13%) 7% NCC Ø MIL (7%) 13% CAT 67% 11 Major results 2016 www.Safe- Runway.com Ø 643 Iden:fied runway accIdents. 2016 runway accident costs per type Ø Cost dIstrIbu:on TyPe of aerodrome. aerodrome Unknown Ø Hubs: (36%) 0% Municipal / Strip Ø 8% Military RegIonal aerodromes (49%) 7% Ø MilItary and MunIcIPal airPorts each (8%). Hub 36% Regional 49% 12 Major results 2016 www.Safe- Runway.com Ø 643 Iden:fied runway accIdents. 2016 runway accident costs per type Ø Cost dIstrIbu:on TyPe of accIdent. event Incursion Unknown Underrun Ø On runway accIdents (34%) 2% 2% 4% Ø Veer-offs (35%) Ø Overruns (23%) Ø IncursIons (<2%) On runway Veer-off 35% 34% Ø Underruns (4%) Overrun 23% 13 Major results 2016 www.Safe- Runway.com Ø 643 Iden:fied runway accIdents. Aerodrome Cost distribu+on operator Ø Cost dIstrIbu:on Per tyPe of oPerator. 4% Ø Aerodrome oPerators (4%) Ø AIrcra oPerators (60%). ISC Ø FatalI:es In InjurIes (7%.) 29% Ø ISC (30%) Aircra/ Human operator 7% 60% 14 Results 2016 www.Safe- Runway.com Ø 52% of Number of occurrences wIth GENeral avIaon Ø 65% of Costs by CAT & MCTOM >5700kg & MCPSC>20. Ø 49% of Costs occur at RegIonal Aerodromes. Ø 62% of Costs are due to Runway excursIons Ø 56% of Runway excursIon costs are due to veer-offs. Ø Costs for AIrcra oPerators 15 x hIgher than for aerodrome oPerators Ø Number of InjurIes and fatalI:es In General avIaon suPersede those In CAT 15 Results Jan-Feb 2017 (provisional) www.Safe- Runway.com 2017 runway total runway accident costs € 1200.0 € 600.0 Millions Millions Conclusion: € 1000.0 € 500.0 € 800.0 € 400.0 No SIgnIficant dIfferences € 600.0 € 300.0 € 400.0 € 200.0 € 200.0 € 100.0 € - € - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Monthly Total CumulaGve LInear (CumulaGve) Aerodrome 2017 2017 runway accident costs per type Cost distribu+on operator runway accidents costs per type event 2% Unknown Incursion Underrun opera4on 1% 0% 1% Unknown TRAI 1% 0% ISC GEN 27% 9% Veer-off On runway 35% MIL 39% 24% Human Aircra/ 3% CAT operator 52% 68% NCC 14% Overrun 24% 16 Opportunies www.Safe- Runway.com 17 Reducing runway events RISK www.Safe- Runway.com Risk=f [ProbabIlIty, SeverIty] SeverIty ProbabIlIty ProbabIlIty à AIrcra oPerator Crew Cost of SOP’s Preven:on rise Law of EquIPment diminishing exPonen:al returns SMS wIth very low ProbabIlIty OversIght 18 Reducing runway events RISK www.Safe- Runway.com Risk=f [ProbabIlIty, SeverIty] SeverIty ProbabIlIty SeverIty à Hardware AIrcra & InterIor Aerodrome Cost of Preven:on rise RESA Law of diminishing exPonen:al StrIP returns wIth very low OversIght ProbabIlIty 19 Severity reducYon costs effecYve? www.Safe- Runway.com AnalysIs study (2016 Safe-Runway GmbH): METHOD • 117 world wIde Installaons • 12 actual overruns Into an EMAS Ø was It Cost effec:ve to brIng a non-ICAO • Each overrun analyzed and assocIated overrun costs es:mated standard RESA to an equIvalent level of • Two scenarIo’s es:mated: safety by EMAS? • Actual overrun costs (AOC) • HyPothe:cal overrun costs If EMAS Ø Total Installaon costs would not have been Installed (HOC) • DIfference between hyPothe:cal accIdent cost Ø Total costs of overruns In EMAS es:mate and actual arrestments costs es:mate • ALL world wIde Installaons costs (wIC) Ø Total hyPothe:cal accIdent costs • NET COSTS SAVED= HOC-AOC-wIC= one bIllIon $ wIthout EMAS 20 Example: New York, 26-10-2016 KLGA, Boeing 737-700 www.Safe- Runway.com On 26 October 2016 at 19:40 eastern daylight 6me, a Boeing 737 N278EA, carrying 37 passengers and 11 crew, including the republican vice presiden6al candidate Pence experienced a runway overrun upon landing at LaGuardia Airport in New York City. Sources state that “it was a rough landing, the pilot jammed the brakes and that the aircraY was suddenly stopped.” • Es:mated PosI:on NO EMAS • Central Parkway rush hour traffic: 300 vehIcles Per mInute • Es:mate a certain nr of Human InjurIes dIstrIbu:on • Es:mate level of damage, assocIated costs (AIrcra and thIrd Party) and ISC • Es:mate Installaon costs, bed rePair costs 21 The key issue: Right Priority? www.Safe- Runway.com € 4000.0 Incurions € 3500.0 Costs 2016 Costs 2016 4% Millions € 3000.0 € 2500.0 Ø Total world-wIde runway accIdents costs of 6.5 BIllIon $ € 2000.0 € 1500.0 € 1000.0 Ø Costs of runway excursIons 25 x Higher than runway € 500.0 € - incursions Excursions Incurions Excursion s 96% Ø Investment In adequate / ImProved RESA’s and runway strIPs could PossIbly be a cost efficIent method to reduce the runway excursIon costs 22 Conclusion & Problem www.Safe- Runway.com Ø Conclusion Ø Further lIkelIhood reduc:on faces future lImIts due to law of dImInIshIng returns Ø As an alternave could the excursIon costs be reduced by addressIng the severIty of excursIons Ø Adequate / ImProved RESA and runway strIP reduce these cost effecively Ø Problem Ø Aerodromes are not all to ICAO RESA or StrIP standard, 2016 runway total runway accident costs € 7000.0 € 1000.0 € 900.0 Ø SItuaon Is accePted by a number of CAA’s.