DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Algae and the Origins of Multicellularity in the Plant Kingdom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Algae and the Origins of Multicellularity in the Plant Kingdom Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Green Algae and the Origins of Multicellularity in the Plant Kingdom James G. Umen Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63132 Correspondence: [email protected] The green lineage of chlorophyte algae and streptophytes form a large and diverse clade with multiple independent transitions to produce multicellular and/or macroscopically complex organization. In this review, I focus on two of the best-studied multicellular groups of green algae: charophytes and volvocines. Charophyte algae are the closest relatives of land plants and encompass the transition from unicellularity to simple multicellularity. Many of the innovations present in land plants have their roots in the cell and developmental biology of charophyte algae. Volvocine algae evolved an independent route to multicellularity that is captured by a graded series of increasing cell-type specialization and developmental com- plexity. The study of volvocine algae has provided unprecedented insights into the innova- tions required to achieve multicellularity. he transition from unicellular to multicellu- and rotifers that are limited by prey size (Bell Tlar organization is considered one of the ma- 1985; Boraas et al. 1998). Reciprocally, increased jor innovations in eukaryotic evolution (Szath- size might also entail advantages in capturing ma´ry and Maynard-Smith 1995). Multicellular more or larger prey. organization can be advantageous for several There is some debate about how easy or reasons. Foremost among these is the potential difficult it has been for unicellular organisms for cell-type specialization that enables more to evolve multicellularity (Grosberg and Strath- efficient use of scarce resources and can open mann 2007). A conceptual division of multi- up new adaptive niches (Stanley 1973; Szath- cellularity into two classes, simple and complex, ma´ry and Maynard-Smith 1995; Ispolatov et has also been proposed (Knoll 2011). How- al. 2012). In addition, multicellularity allows ever, the argument that simple multicellulari- organismal size to scale independently of cell ty is easier to achieve than complex multicellu- size, thus freeing organisms from the constraints larity may be less compelling than it seems at of individual cells and allowing them to evolve first glance. In the 2-billion year history of fundamentally new relationships with their eukaryotic life, “simple” multicellularity has physical and biological surroundings (Beardall arisen about two dozen times (Grosberg and et al. 2009). A third potential advantage of mul- Strathmann 2007; Knoll 2011; Adl et al. 2012). ticellularity and increased organismal size is es- In contrast, complex multicellularity (defined cape from microscopic predators such as ciliates by three-dimensional body plans and multiple Editors: Patrick J. Keeling and Eugene V. Koonin Additional Perspectives on The Origin and Evolution of Eukaryotes available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2014 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016170 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016170 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press J.G. Umen cell types) has only arisen a few times with “toolkits” available in unicellular ancestors, as animals and plants being clear examples, and well as on the specific circumstances and envi- fungi, brown algae and red algae achieving ronment in which multicellularity arose (Rokas somewhat lesser extents of complexity. In any 2008; Knoll 2011; Bowman 2013; Niklas and case, because complex multicellularity almost Newman 2013; Smolarkiewicz and Dhonukshe certainly evolved from simple multicellularity, 2013). By examining the origins of multicellu- the odds of going from simple to complex mul- larity in diverse lineages, it can be determined ticellularity are quite high (approximately one whether commonalities exist that transcend in 12), whereas the initial transition from uni- lineage-specific solutions to achieve multicellu- cellular to simple multicellular seems far more lar organization. difficult (one in thousands). Achieving the benefits of multicellularity re- UNIQUE ASPECTS OF MULTICELLULARITY quired evolutionary innovations. At minimum, IN PLANTS AND GREEN ALGAE multicellularity requires adhesive interactions between cells to maintain a coherent, physically Plants and animals are interesting focal groups connected form. Many multicellular organisms because they arose from unicellular ancestors maintain not only adhesive connections be- that appear to have had very different propen- tween cells, but also physical bridges that allow sities or success rates in experimenting with the transfer of cytoplasmic materials directly multicellular organization. The closest unicellu- between adjacent cells and mediate cell–cell lar ancestors to animals, the choanoflagellates, communication. Diffusible extracellular mole- show a limited degree of colonial or multicellu- cules such as hormones are another means of lar organization outside of their one big hit in signaling between cells that is common in mul- the metazoan lineage (Dayel et al. 2011; Alegado ticellular organisms. In addition to adhesion and King 2014). The streptophytes (charophyte and cell–cell communication, the overall size algae þ embryophytes [land plants]) and their and shape of multicellular organisms typically sister group, the chlorophytes (green algae), follows a defined architecture or patterning that have repeatedly generated multicellular taxa as involves spatially coordinated growth and divi- well as macroscopic unicellular forms that show sion among groups of cells. A final requirement many of the traits that are typically considered for differentiated multicellular organization is hallmarks of multicellularity (Fig. 1) (De Clerck regulation of reproductive potential. Reproduc- et al. 2012; Leliaert et al. 2012). This diversity in tion in multicellular organisms is often con- the green lineage represents a potential treasure fined to a subset of cells (germ cells or stem trove of information on the evolution of multi- cells). This division of labor serves at least two cellular development. A second reason to focus purposes: First, by partitioning or restricting on plants and algae involves the fundamental reproductive capacity to a subset of cells, genetic constraint that a cell wall places on the ability conflicts associated with a transition of fitness of cells to move and reorganize spatially. This from individual cells to cooperating groups of constraint, which is not present in metazoans, cells can be mitigated (Michod and Roze 2001). has shaped the means by which multicellular Second, in multicellular organisms with inde- organization arose in the green lineage. terminate body plans such as land plants, vege- tative stem cells play a critical role in integrating Cellular Diversity in the Green Lineage internal and external signals to regulate and es- tablish overall organismal architecture (Smolar- Among unicellular green algae are found spec- kiewicz and Dhonukshe 2013). tacular amounts of cellular diversification An outstanding question in the evolution of (Lewis and McCourt 2004; Leliaert et al. 2012). multicellularity is its early origins. It is increas- The ancestral species in the green lineage were ingly clear that the path to multicellular evolu- likely to be small unicellular marine biflagellates tion is dependent on the genetic and cellular that originated around 1 billion years ago (De 2 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016170 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Multicellularity in Green Algae and Plants Cellular/multicellular Chlorophytes Differentiated organization cell types? Ulvophyceae Unicellular Cladophorales Y Small cluster Dasycladales NA Bryopsidales NA Sheet/blade Trentepohliales Y N Sarcinoid Ignatius clade Ulvales/Ulotrichales Y Unbranched filament Oltmannsiellopsidales N Branched filament Chlorophyceae Y Large spheroidal Oedogoniales Large multinucleate Chaetophorales Y (siphonocladous) Chaetopeltidales N Multicellular/multinucleate Sphaeropleales Y (siphonocladous) Chlamydomonadales Giant uninucleate Volvocales Y Complex two dimensional Trebouxiouphyceae Oocystaceae N Branched three Chlorellales N dimensional Microthamniales N Trebouxiales N Prasiola N Botryococcus clade N Prasinophytes Pedinophyceae Green Chlrodendrophyceae lineage Picocystis clade Mamiellales Dolichomastigales Pyramimonadales Monomastigales Pycnococcaceae Clade VIII Clade IX Prasinococcales Neophoselmidophyceae Palmophylalles N Streptophytes Charophyte algae Mestostigmatophyceae Chlorokybophyceae N Kelbsormidiophyceae N Charophyceae Y Zygnematophyceae N Coleochaetophyceae Y Embryophytes Y (land plants) Glaucophytes Red algae Figure 1. Multicellularity and morphological complexity in the green lineage. Simplified cladogram based on data in Leliaert et al. (2012) and De Clerck et al. (2012) showing relationships among the green lineage (chlorophytes and streptophytes) and their sister groups, red algae and glaucophytes, which together comprise the Archaeplastida. The major classes in the green lineage are in bold and, in some cases, further expanded into subgroups. Note that the prasinophytes are a paraphyletic grouping of the most
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1-1 Introduction
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Introduction. Chapt. 1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored 1-1-1 by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 25 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-1 INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Thinking on a New Scale .................................................................................................................................... 1-1-2 Adaptations to Land ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1-3 Minimum Size..................................................................................................................................................... 1-1-5 Do Bryophytes Lack Diversity?.......................................................................................................................... 1-1-6 The "Moss".......................................................................................................................................................... 1-1-7 What's in a Name?............................................................................................................................................... 1-1-8 Phyla/Divisions............................................................................................................................................ 1-1-8 Role of Bryology................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Chloroplast Rpl23 Gene Cluster of Spirogyra Maxima (Charophyceae) Shares Many Similarities with the Angiosperm Rpl23 Operon
    Algae Volume 17(1): 59-68, 2002 The Chloroplast rpl23 Gene Cluster of Spirogyra maxima (Charophyceae) Shares Many Similarities with the Angiosperm rpl23 Operon Jungho Lee* and James R. Manhart Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, U.S.A. A phylogenetic affinity between charophytes and embryophytes (land plants) has been explained by a few chloro- plast genomic characters including gene and intron (Manhart and Palmer 1990; Baldauf et al. 1990; Lew and Manhart 1993). Here we show that a charophyte, Spirogyra maxima, has the largest operon of angiosperm chloroplast genomes, rpl23 operon (trnI-rpl23-rpl2-rps19-rpl22-rps3-rpl16-rpl14-rps8-infA-rpl36-rps11-rpoA) containing both embryophyte introns, rpl16.i and rpl2.i. The rpl23 gene cluster of Spirogyra contains a distinct eubacterial promoter sequence upstream of rpl23, which is the first gene of the green algal rpl23 gene cluster. This sequence is completely absent in angiosperms but is present in non-flowering plants. The results imply that, in the rpl23 gene cluster, early charophytes had at least two promoters, one upstream of trnI and another upstream of rpl23, which partially or completely lost its function in land plants. A comparison of gene clusters of prokaryotes, algal chloroplast DNAs and land plant cpDNAs indicated a loss of numerous genes in chlorophyll a+b eukaryotes. A phylogenetic analysis using presence/absence of genes and introns as characters produced trees with a strongly supported clade contain- ing chlorophyll a+b eukaryotes. Spirogyra and embryophytes formed a clade characterized by the loss of rpl5 and rps9 and the gain of trnI (CAU) and introns in rpl2 and rpl16.
    [Show full text]
  • Algae & Marine Plants of Point Reyes
    Algae & Marine Plants of Point Reyes Green Algae or Chlorophyta Genus/Species Common Name Acrosiphonia coalita Green rope, Tangled weed Blidingia minima Blidingia minima var. vexata Dwarf sea hair Bryopsis corticulans Cladophora columbiana Green tuft alga Codium fragile subsp. californicum Sea staghorn Codium setchellii Smooth spongy cushion, Green spongy cushion Trentepohlia aurea Ulva californica Ulva fenestrata Sea lettuce Ulva intestinalis Sea hair, Sea lettuce, Gutweed, Grass kelp Ulva linza Ulva taeniata Urospora sp. Brown Algae or Ochrophyta Genus/Species Common Name Alaria marginata Ribbon kelp, Winged kelp Analipus japonicus Fir branch seaweed, Sea fir Coilodesme californica Dactylosiphon bullosus Desmarestia herbacea Desmarestia latifrons Egregia menziesii Feather boa Fucus distichus Bladderwrack, Rockweed Haplogloia andersonii Anderson's gooey brown Laminaria setchellii Southern stiff-stiped kelp Laminaria sinclairii Leathesia marina Sea cauliflower Melanosiphon intestinalis Twisted sea tubes Nereocystis luetkeana Bull kelp, Bullwhip kelp, Bladder wrack, Edible kelp, Ribbon kelp Pelvetiopsis limitata Petalonia fascia False kelp Petrospongium rugosum Phaeostrophion irregulare Sand-scoured false kelp Pterygophora californica Woody-stemmed kelp, Stalked kelp, Walking kelp Ralfsia sp. Silvetia compressa Rockweed Stephanocystis osmundacea Page 1 of 4 Red Algae or Rhodophyta Genus/Species Common Name Ahnfeltia fastigiata Bushy Ahnfelt's seaweed Ahnfeltiopsis linearis Anisocladella pacifica Bangia sp. Bossiella dichotoma Bossiella
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Evolution an Introduction to the History of Life
    Plant Evolution An Introduction to the History of Life KARL J. NIKLAS The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London CONTENTS Preface vii Introduction 1 1 Origins and Early Events 29 2 The Invasion of Land and Air 93 3 Population Genetics, Adaptation, and Evolution 153 4 Development and Evolution 217 5 Speciation and Microevolution 271 6 Macroevolution 325 7 The Evolution of Multicellularity 377 8 Biophysics and Evolution 431 9 Ecology and Evolution 483 Glossary 537 Index 547 v Introduction The unpredictable and the predetermined unfold together to make everything the way it is. It’s how nature creates itself, on every scale, the snowflake and the snowstorm. — TOM STOPPARD, Arcadia, Act 1, Scene 4 (1993) Much has been written about evolution from the perspective of the history and biology of animals, but significantly less has been writ- ten about the evolutionary biology of plants. Zoocentricism in the biological literature is understandable to some extent because we are after all animals and not plants and because our self- interest is not entirely egotistical, since no biologist can deny the fact that animals have played significant and important roles as the actors on the stage of evolution come and go. The nearly romantic fascination with di- nosaurs and what caused their extinction is understandable, even though we should be equally fascinated with the monarchs of the Carboniferous, the tree lycopods and calamites, and with what caused their extinction (fig. 0.1). Yet, it must be understood that plants are as fascinating as animals, and that they are just as important to the study of biology in general and to understanding evolutionary theory in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Placement of Botryococcus Braunii (Trebouxiophyceae) and Botryococcus Sudeticus Isolate Utex 2629 (Chlorophyceae)1
    J. Phycol. 40, 412–423 (2004) r 2004 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2004.03173.x PHYLOGENETIC PLACEMENT OF BOTRYOCOCCUS BRAUNII (TREBOUXIOPHYCEAE) AND BOTRYOCOCCUS SUDETICUS ISOLATE UTEX 2629 (CHLOROPHYCEAE)1 Hoda H. Senousy, Gordon W. Beakes, and Ethan Hack2 School of Biology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK The phylogenetic placement of four isolates of a potential source of renewable energy in the form of Botryococcus braunii Ku¨tzing and of Botryococcus hydrocarbon fuels (Metzger et al. 1991, Metzger and sudeticus Lemmermann isolate UTEX 2629 was Largeau 1999, Banerjee et al. 2002). The best known investigated using sequences of the nuclear small species is Botryococcus braunii Ku¨tzing. This organism subunit (18S) rRNA gene. The B. braunii isolates has a worldwide distribution in fresh and brackish represent the A (two isolates), B, and L chemical water and is occasionally found in salt water. Although races. One isolate of B. braunii (CCAP 807/1; A race) it grows relatively slowly, it sometimes forms massive has a group I intron at Escherichia coli position 1046 blooms (Metzger et al. 1991, Tyson 1995). Botryococcus and isolate UTEX 2629 has group I introns at E. coli braunii strains differ in the hydrocarbons that they positions 516 and 1512. The rRNA sequences were accumulate, and they have been classified into three aligned with 53 previously reported rRNA se- chemical races, called A, B, and L. Strains in the A race quences from members of the Chlorophyta, includ- accumulate alkadienes; strains in the B race accumulate ing one reported for B.
    [Show full text]
  • Phragmoplast Microtubule Dynamics – a Game of Zones Andrei Smertenko1,2,‡, Seanna L
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2018) 131, jcs203331. doi:10.1242/jcs.203331 REVIEW SPECIAL ISSUE: PLANT CELL BIOLOGY Phragmoplast microtubule dynamics – a game of zones Andrei Smertenko1,2,‡, Seanna L. Hewitt2,3, Caitlin N. Jacques2,4, Rafal Kacprzyk1, Yan Liu2,5, Matthew J. Marcec2,6, Lindani Moyo2,6, Aaron Ogden1,2, Hui Min Oung1,2, Sharol Schmidt1,2 and Erika A. Serrano-Romero2,5 ABSTRACT during anaphase from the remnants of the central spindle (Segui- Plant morphogenesis relies on the accurate positioning of the partition Simarro et al., 2004). It consists of microtubules, actin, membrane (cell plate) between dividing cells during cytokinesis. The cell plate is compartments and proteins that associate with or regulate the above synthetized by a specialized structure called the phragmoplast, which (Boruc and Van Damme, 2015; Lipka et al., 2015). The microtubule consists of microtubules, actin filaments, membrane compartments component of the phragmoplast consists of two aligned arrays that and associated proteins. The phragmoplast forms between daughter flank the so-called phragmoplast midzone, where cell plate assembly nuclei during the transition from anaphase to telophase. As cells are takes place (Fig. 1). The initial phragmoplast has a disk shape with a commonly larger than the originally formed phragmoplast, the diameter that approximately equals that of the daughter nuclei construction of the cell plate requires phragmoplast expansion. (Fig. 1); however, the parental cell is generally wider. For example, This expansion depends on microtubule polymerization at the the length of a cambium cell exceeds the diameter of the disk-shaped phragmoplast forefront (leading zone) and loss at the back (lagging phragmoplast during late anaphase by up to 100 fold (Larson, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • The Unicellular and Colonial Organisms Prokaryotic And
    The Unicellular and Colonial Organisms Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Cells As you know, the building blocks of life are cells. Prokaryotic cells are those cells that do NOT have a nucleus. They mostly include bacteria and archaea. These cells do not have membrane-bound organelles. Eukaryotic cells are those that have a true nucleus. That would include plant, animal, algae, and fungal cells. As you can see, to the left, eukaryotic cells are typically larger than prokaryotic cells. Today in lab, we will look at examples of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic unicellular organisms that are commonly found in pond water. When examining pond water under a microscope… The unpigmented, moving microbes will usually be protozoans. Greenish or golden-brown organisms will typically be algae. Microorganisms that are blue-green will be cyanobacteria. As you can see below, living things are divided into 3 domains based upon shared characteristics. Domain Eukarya is further divided into 4 Kingdoms. Domain Kingdom Cell type Organization Nutrition Organisms Absorb, Unicellular-small; Prokaryotic Photsyn., Archaeacteria Archaea Archaebacteria Lacking peptidoglycan Chemosyn. Unicellular-small; Absorb, Bacteria, Prokaryotic Peptidoglycan in cell Photsyn., Bacteria Eubacteria Cyanobacteria wall Chemosyn. Ingestion, Eukaryotic Unicellular or colonial Protozoa, Algae Protista Photosynthesis Fungi, yeast, Fungi Eukaryotic Multicellular Absorption Eukarya molds Plantae Eukaryotic Multicellular Photosynthesis Plants Animalia Eukaryotic Multicellular Ingestion Animals Prokaryotic Organisms – the archaea, non-photosynthetic bacteria, and cyanobacteria Archaea - Microorganisms that resemble bacteria, but are different from them in certain aspects. Archaea cell walls do not include the macromolecule peptidoglycan, which is always found in the cell walls of bacteria. Archaea usually live in extreme, often very hot or salty environments, such as hot mineral springs or deep-sea hydrothermal vents.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Mannitol Biosynthesis in Algae : More Widespread and Diverse Than Previously Thought
    This is a repository copy of Mannitol biosynthesis in algae : more widespread and diverse than previously thought. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/113250/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Tonon, Thierry orcid.org/0000-0002-1454-6018, McQueen Mason, Simon John orcid.org/0000-0002-6781-4768 and Li, Yi (2017) Mannitol biosynthesis in algae : more widespread and diverse than previously thought. New Phytologist. pp. 1573-1579. ISSN 1469-8137 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14358 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 Mannitol biosynthesis in algae: more widespread and diverse than previously thought. Thierry Tonon1,*, Yi Li1 and Simon McQueen-Mason1 1 Department of Biology, Centre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. * Author for correspondence: tel +44 1904328785; email [email protected] Key words: Algae, primary metabolism, mannitol biosynthesis, mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase, mannitol-1-phosphatase, haloacid dehalogenase, histidine phosphatase, evolution of metabolic pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Reassessment of Chlamydomonas Meslinii (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae) with a Description of Paludistella Gen.Nov
    Phytotaxa 432 (1): 065–080 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.432.1.6 A taxonomic reassessment of Chlamydomonas meslinii (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae) with a description of Paludistella gen.nov. HANI SUSANTI1,6, MASAKI YOSHIDA2, TAKESHI NAKAYAMA2, TAKASHI NAKADA3,4 & MAKOTO M. WATANABE5 1Life Science Innovation, School of Integrative and Global Major, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan. 2Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan. 3Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 997-0052, Japan. 4Systems Biology Program, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-8520, Japan. 5Algae Biomass Energy System Development and Research Center, University of Tsukuba. 6Research Center for Biotechnology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jl. Raya Bogor KM 46 Cibinong West Java, Indonesia. Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Chlamydomonas (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae) is a large polyphyletic genus that includes numerous species that should be classified into independent genera. The present study aimed to examine the authentic strain of Chlamydomonas meslinii and related strains based on morphological and molecular data. All the strains possessed an asteroid chloroplast with a central pyrenoid and hemispherical papilla; however, they were different based on cell and stigmata shapes. Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on 18S rDNA, atpB, and psaB indicated that the strains represented a distinct subclade in the clade Chloromonadinia. The secondary structure of ITS-2 supported the separation of the strains into four species.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Biology and Applied Genetics
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED GENETICS FOR Medical Laboratory Technology Students Upgraded Lecture Note Series Mohammed Awole Adem Jimma University MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED GENETICS For Medical Laboratory Technician Students Lecture Note Series Mohammed Awole Adem Upgraded - 2006 In collaboration with The Carter Center (EPHTI) and The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Education and Ministry of Health Jimma University PREFACE The problem faced today in the learning and teaching of Applied Genetics and Molecular Biology for laboratory technologists in universities, colleges andhealth institutions primarily from the unavailability of textbooks that focus on the needs of Ethiopian students. This lecture note has been prepared with the primary aim of alleviating the problems encountered in the teaching of Medical Applied Genetics and Molecular Biology course and in minimizing discrepancies prevailing among the different teaching and training health institutions. It can also be used in teaching any introductory course on medical Applied Genetics and Molecular Biology and as a reference material. This lecture note is specifically designed for medical laboratory technologists, and includes only those areas of molecular cell biology and Applied Genetics relevant to degree-level understanding of modern laboratory technology. Since genetics is prerequisite course to molecular biology, the lecture note starts with Genetics i followed by Molecular Biology. It provides students with molecular background to enable them to understand and critically analyze recent advances in laboratory sciences. Finally, it contains a glossary, which summarizes important terminologies used in the text. Each chapter begins by specific learning objectives and at the end of each chapter review questions are also included.
    [Show full text]