DOCSLIB.ORG

Looting 2.0 Supporting State Capture at the Krk Gas Terminal Written by Re:Common Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Looting 2.0 Supporting State Capture at the Krk Gas Terminal Written by Re:Common Introduction Looting 2.0 supporting state capture at the Krk gas terminal Written by Re:Common Introduction It is a crisp morning in Zagreb. Streets, coffee places and restaurants are busy and people’s buzz accompanies morning activities. Behind a window, at a corner table of a restaurant, sit two men. Ivo Sanader, the at the time Croatian Prime Minister, is laying back on his chair, looking around and talking to his interlocutor with an annoyed and circumspect look. An envelope slips over the table Omisalj view on bay and Dioki industrial site. Photo ©Re:Common into his hands, he looks inside, then puts it into the inside pocket of At the core of Sanader’s story is company’s most strategic assets. This his jacket. The conversation goes an alleged EUR 10 million bribe deal has been under the scrutiny on, even if the two interlocutors that Ivo Sanader took from the of the Croatian anti-corruption are hardly looking at each other. Hungarian energy company MOL to authority (USKOK), and almost ten Sanader is tapping on the table facilitate a favourable deal for the years later the corruption trial has while saying something along the purchase of the majority stake in the been re-opened and is ongoing. lines of “yes, good, this will be Croatian energy company INA, as a enough for the coffee, you can’t part of its privatisation process. The re-opened trial against expect it to be enough at all”. Sanader refreshes the memory of Why is this relevant today? Because a system where the abuse of power This scene was filmed by a hidden the Croatian government is taking camera. It became viral after Sabor, determined the outcome of the steps to fast-track a major energy country’s strategic choices, ending the Croatian parliament, agreed to investment – a two-phase LNG plant remove Sanader’s parliamentary up fostering the benefit of a few, – on the island of Krk. The project rather than the actual needs of the immunity in December 2010 –criticised for its environmental 1 Croatian people. A story that is and authorities arrested him . A impact – is located at the Dioki corruption trial that shook Croatian repeating today with the proposed petrochemical complex in Omišalj, a construction of a Liquefied Natural politics started shortly after, and property at the core of the Sanader at the time of writing this is still Gas (LNG) and regasification corruption scandal. Indeed, plant on the property of the Dioki ongoing. Several other ministers of according to the accusation, half of Sanader’s government have been petrochemical complex in Omišalj: the Sanader bribe allegedly transited a project that has been on the table arrested and sentenced for money through the bank account of a laundering, abuse of power, illicit for over ten years, and that may be Swiss-Croat entrepreneur named responding to the private interest financing of the HDZ political Robert Ježić, who - during INA’s party2. of a few, rather than to the “energy privatization process - became the security” of the country. And its main shareholder of the Dioki construction can still be stopped, for 1 http://www.editfiume.info/archivio/la- petrochemical complex, one of the the benefit of the Croatian people voce/2010/101210/politica.htm and the people of Europe. 2 https://www.ilpost.it/2010/12/10/ex-pre- mier-ivo-sanader/ January 2019 2 What is the Krk LNG project The Krk LNG terminal is an industrial energy project aimed to regasify and re-export liquefied gas arriving on the island of Krk via ships towards Hungary and other countries in Europe. LNG Carrier Fuji Lng, Photo Ken Hodge, CC BY 2.0, Wikimedia Commons The project, advertised by the Croatian government as a flagship initiative, also enjoys a strong support of the European Union The proponent of the project is The recently approved “LNG and is featured among the so- the Croatian government through law” - aimed at fast-tracking the called EU “projects of common a publicly controlled company construction – is being challenged interest” (PCI). The latter are large set up for the purpose, LNG as unconstitutional5. infrastructure projects that should Hrvatska / LNG Croatia d.o.o.4. serve the interests of the European The proposal is presented as a Union, and that can benefit from two-phase project, consisting of the political and financial support an offshore (floating) terminal of the European Commission and an on-shore terminal which through the Connecting Europe would be completed in the second Facility (CEF), the European phase of the construction. The Fund for Strategic Investments terminal is expected to deliver 2,6 (EFSI) and European financial billion cubic meters of natural gas institutions like the European in the first stage of the project. Investment Bank (EIB). For Critical voices among media, civil example, the EIB is considering society and experts claim that the project for financing, as the the two phases are rather two project status appears to be “under incompatible, separated projects. 3 appraisal” at the Bank . The Both projects are being challenged proposed financing is significant: from an environmental, economic EUR 339 million. and administrative point of view. 5 https://dnevnik.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/ zlatko-komadina-i-mirela-ahmetovic-pro- 3 http://www.eib.org/en/projects/pipe- jekt-plutajucega-lng-terminala-neodrziv-i- lines/pipeline/20140627 4 https://www.lng.hr/en/about-us nezakonit---543798.html Looting 2.0: supporting state capture at the Krk gas terminal 3 of the International Consortium But the restructuring of INA 1.The tortuous of Investigative Journalism7, had continued, and in October 2004 plans to develop a gas regasification Dioki was privatised. DIOKI plant in Omišalj, precisely in the Holding AG, headquartered in history of a industrial site owned by INA, named Switzerland, became the majority DINA. Later, when the project owner of Dioki d.d. In parallel, the controversial started to shape up in 2008-2009, project of a regasification plant in the French oil major Total and the Omišalj – designed to be an onshore project German energy company RWE8 also plant and within the property of joined the offshore company9. Dioki - started to get traction among decision-makers in Zagreb. The LNG project on Krk In 1993 INA became a joint stock island has been discussed company10 and in July 1995, it But who was the beneficiary owner for almost 20 years now. started an internal re-organisation. of Dioki Holding AG? A still at Subsequently, the DINA the time unknown Swiss-Croat Since the deep crisis petrochemical plant of Omišalj entrepreneur named Robert Ježić. of the petrochemical was merged with two other plants Media reported about him that he 11 industry in the 1980s in from Zagreb into a new company: had been the president of the Rijeka Dioki d.d. The company’s basic football club since 2000 and that he the former Yugoslavia, activity stated in the public registry had made his fortune in oil trading there have been several is the production of polymers and in Milan, moved to Switzerland 12 plans to relaunch the petrochemicals . and then come back to Croatia to assist the economic recovery of the petrochemical facility From Malta to Switzerland country. The project that he was of Omišalj – facing presenting to investors aimed to relaunch the petrochemical plant Why did INA, still a public company, unemployment – in in Omišalj, including import and need to set up an offshore vehicle order to contribute to the export of gas to foreign clients. to build a regasification plant in a recovery of the local and facility of its property? national economy. Corrupt roots come to This question remains unanswered. surface An offshore vehicle to build The public registry in Malta does not say much about Adria LNG, neither Along the perfect storyline of the so local gas infrastructure about the identity of its board called “crony capitalism” eventually members, nor about the beneficial something went badly wrong. Before In April 1995, while the dramatic owners of the company. construction started, the LNG Yugoslavian war was still ongoing in project was hit by the collapse of its many places and the Dayton Treaty financial and political pillars. hadn’t been signed yet, a number 7 https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/ of oil and gas majors including the nodes/55009251 Robert Ježić and the Croatian Prime Yugoslavian State company INA, 8 Adria LNG Study Company Limited record Minister Ivo Sanader were hit by a the Austrian energy company OMV on Malta company registry massive corruption scandal in 2010, and the Ljubljana-based group 9 At a session of the Croatian government after the publication of internal Geoplin Doo6 came together to set held on September 30th 2008, Prime Minister intelligence reports on Wikileaks13. up an offshore company in Malta: Ivo Sanader explained why Dina Petrokemija The scandal is connected to a the “Adria LNG Study Company industrial site was the best location for the construction of this “strategically important bribe that Prime Minister Sanader Limited”. The company, whose facility”. allegedly took to favour the existence was revealed only recently 10 Orbis database, INA acquisition of the majority share through the offshore leaks database 11 INA-OKI d.d. and INA-Naftaplin’s Ethyl- of INA by the Hungarian energy ene Production Unit 6 Adria LNG Study Company Limited record 12 Dioki d.d. record on Croatian company 13 https://www.ilpost.it/2010/12/10/ex- on Malta company registry registry. premier-ivo-sanader/ January 2019 4 company MOL, that allegedly transited through a bank account on the name of Ježić. This story ended up also involving the Austrian bank Hypo Alpe Adria, the main creditor of Robert Ježić for Dioki and other investments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • News in Brief 12 July
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe OSCE Mission to Croatia News in brief 12 July – 25 July 2006 Prime Minister Sanader visits Serbia On 21 July, Croatian Prime Minister Ivo Sanader paid his second official visit to Serbia, further intensifying bilateral relations between the two countries. Prime Minister Sanader made his first visit to Belgrade in November 2004, followed by a reciprocal visit to Zagreb by Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica in November 2005. Prior to their meeting in Belgrade the two Prime Ministers officially opened the newly renovated border crossing between Croatia and Serbia in Bajakovo, Eastern Croatia. At the ceremony attended by representatives of both governments and the diplomatic corps from Zagreb and Belgrade, the Croatian Premier said that "today we are opening the future of new relations between our two countries." Echoing this sentiment, Prime Minister Koštunica added that both the "Serbian and Croatian governments will work to heal wounds from the past and build a new future for the two states in a united Europe". Later, following talks in Belgrade, both Prime Ministers declared that Serbia and Croatia have a joint objective, to join the European Union, and that strong bilateral relations between the two countries should be the foundation of political security in the region. Prime Minister Sanader commended the efforts both governments had made towards improving the position of minorities in line with the bilateral agreement on minority protection signed between the two countries in November 2004. He went on to stress his cabinet’s wish to see the Serb minority fully integrated into Croatian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia: 2003 Elections and New Government
    Order Code RS21703 January 6, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Croatia: 2003 Elections and New Government name redacted Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary In parliamentary elections held on November 23, 2003, the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), a right-wing party of the late former wartime President Franjo Tudjman, won a plurality of the vote. The HDZ had dominated Croatia’s political scene from 1990 until its defeat in the 2000 elections. Ivo Sanader, who succeeded Tudjman as HDZ party leader and refashioned the party along more moderate, less nationalistic lines, became Prime Minister of a minority government in December 2003. The Sanader government will likelyface significant domestic challenges as well as close international scrutiny over its performance in a number of issue areas. This report analyzes the elections and key issues facing the new government. It will not be updated. For additional information, see also CRS Report RL32136, Future of the Balkans and U.S. Policy Concerns. Introduction The November 2003 elections were Croatia’s fourth parliamentary contest since the country became independent in 1991. In the last vote of January 2000, a coalition of center-left parties soundly defeated the incumbent Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) government, weeks after the death of Franjo Tudjman, the longstanding leader of the HDZ and President of the country. To supporters, Tudjman represented the father of Croatian independence. To critics, however, Tudjman closely resembled nationalist Serb leader Slobodan Milosevic and demonstrated similar territorial designs on neighboring Bosnia. In 1995, Croatia launched two military operations, “Flash” and “Storm,” to regain control over the Krajina, Croat territory held by rebel Serbs after 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Maritime Border Dispute
    UNDER THE ISTRIAN SUN: NAVIGATING INTERNATIONAL LAW SOLUTIONS FOR THE SLOVENIA- CROATIA MARITIME BORDER DISPUTE CHRISTOPHER M. HARTLEY* ABSTRACT Twenty-eight years after Slovenia and Croatia exited the Federation of Yugoslavia on the eve of its bloody civil war, the two countries are still plagued by a maritime border dispute in the northern Adriatic Sea.1 Given that the countries were not in conflict with each other during the war, and given their similar goals for integration into the greater European and international communities, it is perplexing that they have not been able to resolve this dispute. The Bay of Piran (or, Piran Bay), located in the narrow Gulf of Trieste at the land border of the two countries and having a unique, heavily indented geography, is ground zero of this dispute.2 The pivotal issues are sovereign control of the bay itself and access for Slovenian vessels to international waters, a concept that is foreclosed under traditional law of the sea maritime border principles given the constraints of the bay and Slovenia’s miniscule coastline.3 *Assistant Professor, Department of Law, United States Military Academy, West Point. The author is an active duty Army Judge Advocate. The author was a United States military liaison to the Republic of Slovenia’s Ministry of Defense from October 1995 through July 1996. Numerous visits to the Slovenian and Istrian region since his residence there help broaden his unique perspective about this dispute. The views expressed here are the author’s personal views and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Defense, the United States Army, the United States Military Academy, or any other department or agency of the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia by Andrija Henjak Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.22 Million GNI/Capita, PPP: US$ 21,730 (2015)
    Croatia By Andrija Henjak Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.22 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$ 21,730 (2015) Source: World Bank’s World Development Indicators Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 National Democratic 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Governance Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.00 3.00 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 and Independence Corruption 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.64 3.71 3.71 3.64 3.61 3.61 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.71 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia: Accession Negotiations with the EU Overshadowed by Parliamentary Elections
    OswcOMMentary issue 48 | 29.02.2011 | ceNTRe fOR eAsTeRN sTudies Croatia: accession negotiations with the EU overshadowed by parliamentary elections NTARy Me Marta Szpala ces cOM In 2011 Croatia entered the final stage of its accession negotiations with the EU. The completion of these negotiations will probably coincide with the parliamentary elections which should be held in November or December tudies this year. The elections are likely to bring about a change of government, s as public support for Jadranka Kosor's cabinet and her party, the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has been declining; the left-wing opposition is astern likely to take power. Therefore, the government’s main goal is to complete e the accession negotiations in the first half of the year, in order to sign the accession treaty and hold the EU membership referendum before the par- liamentary elections. The HDZ believes that only the successful completion entre for c of the accession negotiations could increase its chances of a good result in the upcoming elections. At the same time, fearing a further fall in support, the government will avoid any decisions and reforms that would be contro- versial for the public, especially in the sphere of the economy; such deci- NTARy sions could also increase Euroscepticism among the Croatian public, and Me result in the rejection of EU accession in the referendum. The government in Zagreb hopes that the currently implemented anti-corruption strategy and reform of the judiciary, as well as the advanced process of adaptation ces cOM to EU conditions, will be enough to complete the negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ongoing Coalition Negotiations on New Government in Croatia Parliamentary Elections Took Place in Croatia on 23 November
    Ongoing coalition negotiations on new government in Croatia Parliamentary elections took place in Croatia on 23 November. The centre-right Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) garnished the largest number of parliamentary seats and has subsequently initiated negotiations on the formation of a new coalition government. President Stjepan Mesic announced that he would likely name the HDZ President, Dr. Ivo Sanader, as the Prime Minister Designate following the publication of the official election results by the State Election Commission. The first session of the new Parliament must be held within 20 days after the election results are officially announced. Coalition negotiations to establish a new government are expected to last at least until that time. At present, the HDZ seems to have the support for an HDZ-led government with a block of 76 seats in the 152-seat Parliament. Sixty-two HDZ Members of Parliament (MPs) will sit in the new Parliament while the HDZ will also nominate four diaspora representatives by way of securing almost 60 per cent of the total diaspora vote. The HDZ agreed to discuss a joint coalition with the centre-right Croatian Social Liberal Party (HSLS) and the Democratic Centre (DC), which together won three seats. The Croatian Pensioners Party (HSU) and the Croatian Democratic Peasants Party (HDSS), which secured three seats and one seat, respectively, have officially offered their support to an HDZ-led government. The HDZ has also received signed statements of support from three of the eight minority MPs, namely the Hungarian MP, the Bosniak MP, who also represents four other official national minorities, and the German MP who also represents 11 other minorities.
    [Show full text]
  • For Croatia and Its Neighbors, Teachable Moments on Ethics in Politics Written by Marta Vrbetic
    For Croatia and Its Neighbors, Teachable Moments on Ethics in Politics Written by Marta Vrbetic This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. For Croatia and Its Neighbors, Teachable Moments on Ethics in Politics https://www.e-ir.info/2016/09/11/for-croatia-and-its-neighbors-teachable-moments-on-ethics-in-politics/ MARTA VRBETIC, SEP 11 2016 In 2002, Paddy Ashdown, then the High Representative for Bosnia, removed the Bosnia Federation’s Deputy Prime Minister Nikola Grabovac. While acknowledging that Grabovac was not personally responsible for the misappropriation of public money, Ashdown nevertheless urged Grabovac to step down in order to accept moral and political responsibility for the failures of his staff to oversee the responsible use of the public funds (Chandler 2002). When Grabovac refused, Ashdown dismissed him in the name of European democratic standards, and the dismissal caused anger in Bosnia and beyond (Chandler 2002). Much of this resentment was triggered by the perceived high- handedness of the international administration that was broadly interpreting its peacemaking responsibilities under the Dayton Peace Agreement (Chandler 2002; Knaus and Martin 2003). But it is also true that, by sacking an elected official who was not legally accountable or personally involved in the corruption scandal, Paddy Ashdown shocked the Bosnia elites. As David Chandler noted, Ashdown was projecting on Bosnia “an idealized view of Western politics” (Chandler 2002). Back then and now, the Balkans generally fell short of the West’s ideal of governmental responsibility and political culture in which high officials, even if personally or legally not responsible, may still resign over ethical issues such as disgraces involving their junior officers or else potential conflicts of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • CROATIA: the PRICE of CORRUPTION Hrvoje Krešić
    Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper University of Oxford CROATIA: THE PRICE OF CORRUPTION Hrvoje Krešić Michaelmas Term 2012 Sponsor: The Wincott Foundation TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1. Introduction 2. A Country in transition 3. Media in transition 4. The Strange case of Dr Ivo and Mr Sanader 5. Covering Corruption: the Pliva affair 6. Covering Downfall: Resignation & Arrest 7. Conclusion Bibliography Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and its staff - David Levy, John Lloyd, James Painter, Robert Picard, Alex Reid, Sara Kalim, Kate Hanneford-Smith and Rebecca Edwards - for the support, encouragement, kindness and good humour that made my research possible. Their support and, above all, patience was vast indeed. I would also like to thank my sponsor, The Wincott Foundation, for giving me the opportunity to spend one term in the incredible academic environment of Oxford University and to carry out this research. It was wonderful not only to be a Fellow, but also to meet wonderful people like Sir Geoffrey Owen who genuinely care for journalism and how it develops in South-Eastern Europe. Last but not least, I want to thank my supervisor, Vaclav Stetka. His help, valuable insights good will, patience and good guidance was enormous during my research. My three months at Oxford have been wonderful time indeed, and Reuters Institute remains a place where I will always love to return. 1. INTRODUCTION “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Lord Acton First, there was a war. Then there was an authoritarian regime that brought the country to the verge of international isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia: 2003 Elections and New Government
    Order Code RS21703 January 6, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Croatia: 2003 Elections and New Government Julie Kim Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary In parliamentary elections held on November 23, 2003, the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), a right-wing party of the late former wartime President Franjo Tudjman, won a plurality of the vote. The HDZ had dominated Croatia’s political scene from 1990 until its defeat in the 2000 elections. Ivo Sanader, who succeeded Tudjman as HDZ party leader and refashioned the party along more moderate, less nationalistic lines, became Prime Minister of a minority government in December 2003. The Sanader government will likelyface significant domestic challenges as well as close international scrutiny over its performance in a number of issue areas. This report analyzes the elections and key issues facing the new government. It will not be updated. For additional information, see also CRS Report RL32136, Future of the Balkans and U.S. Policy Concerns. Introduction The November 2003 elections were Croatia’s fourth parliamentary contest since the country became independent in 1991. In the last vote of January 2000, a coalition of center-left parties soundly defeated the incumbent Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) government, weeks after the death of Franjo Tudjman, the longstanding leader of the HDZ and President of the country. To supporters, Tudjman represented the father of Croatian independence. To critics, however, Tudjman closely resembled nationalist Serb leader Slobodan Milosevic and demonstrated similar territorial designs on neighboring Bosnia. In 1995, Croatia launched two military operations, “Flash” and “Storm,” to regain control over the Krajina, Croat territory held by rebel Serbs after 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Jumping Hurdles Croatia Continues EU Membership Bid
    POLICY Jumping Hurdles Croatia Continues EU Membership Bid Marko Papic, Stratfor Global Intelligence Croatia continues its progress through the European Union accession process, despite an ongoing border dispute with neighboring Slovenia. Overcoming hurdles is not uncommon in the process and Croatia now expects to enter the union by 2011. Slovenian Prime Minister Borut Pahor said in September not legally prejudge the dispute it has with Slovenia. This 2009 that his country would stop blocking Croatia’s mem- essentially satisfied Slovenia’s demand to force Croatia not bership talks with the union. Slovenia’s previous actions to use the EU accession process as a way to make a claim were due to a border dispute between the two former on the border dispute. Yugoslav republics. With Croatia succumbing to Slovenian pressure, the The dispute concerns pockets of land along the Adri- Croatian accession process to the EU can now continue. atic Sea that could play an important role in determining Croatia’s entry into the union will most likely be the last access to the sea. Croatian Prime Minister Jadranka Kosor, one before 2013, when the current six-year EU budget according to reports, sent an official statement to her ends. Because of Croatian-German ties, Croatia’s acces- Swedish counterpart — who held the rotating EU presi- sion will be a boost for Germany under the new decision- dency until December 2009 — affirming that any mention making rules dictated by the Lisbon Treaty. However, the of Croatia’s borders in its EU application materials does Slovenian-Croatian dispute will spell trouble for subse- quent Balkan entries, particularly if Croatia decides to play the same role as Slovenia in threatening to blackball its eastern neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • After the War Was Over After the War Was Over
    VOLUME 3 • NUMBER 140 • 2005 After The War Was Over DP/24134•2005 DP/22922•2005 DP/23794•2005 SERBIA: Sarajevo woman and a new life in Belgrade. SERBIA: Croatian family applies for Serbian citizenship. BOSNIA: A family of Kosovo refugees in Bosnia. DP/21160•2005 BOSNIA: An ethnic Croat risked staying in Republika Srpska during the war. Balkan BOSNIA: Widows Images of the Srebrenica massacre still wait- BOSNIA: An ethnic Serb farmer ing to go home. went back to the Sarajevo region. DP/21656•2005 2005 DP/22484•2005 THE COMPLICATED MOSAIC OF BOSNIA: A Muslim family returned home to DP/22689•2005 a Serb-dominated region BOSNIA: Croat returnees to the Mostar after the war. DP/21074•2005 DP/20851•2005 CROATIA: Croatian family who fled Serb militias in 1991 now back home. DP/20998•2005 CROATIA: An ethnic Serb returnee still waiting to reclaim her occupied home. BOSNIA: Croatian refugee continues to live and work in another refugee’s property. DP/21296•2005 CROATIA: An ethnic Croat family from Bosnia resettled in Croatia. DP/20991•2005 POSTWAR LIFE BOSNIA: An ethnic Serb family living in a Muslim-dominated DP/22784•2005 region of Bosnia. region in the Bosniak-Croat Federation. DP/22392•2005 Mostar’s restored bridge. DP/23184•2005 The ‘miracle’ of Dayton 4 REFUGEES –10 yearsyears laterlater “THE BRIDGE, IN ALL ITS BEAUTY AND GRACE, WAS BUILT TO OUTLIVE US. IT WAS AN ATTEMPT TO GRASP ETERNITY” PHOTOGRAPHS BY VINCENT WINTER REFUGEES 5 The ‘miracle’ of Dayton–10 years later The war years: A temporary footbridge replaces Mostar’s historical bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe Mission to Croatia Headquarters
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Mission to Croatia Headquarters News in Brief 13 - 26 October National debate over date for upcoming Presidential Elections After Prime Minister Ivo Sanader indicated that the first round of the presidential election would be on Tuesday 21 December, a national debate has arisen on the choice of the most relevant date. Employers immediately warned that they could suffer huge financial losses if the elections were held on two Tuesdays which would become non-working days. “I am not happy that this will be a non-working day either [so] I am asking entrepreneurs and everyone in Croatia to support my idea to amend the Constitution,” said Prime Minister Ivo Sanader on Tuesday 19 October, adding that he wanted constitutional amendments to secure that Presidential elections are held exclusively on a set Sunday in the year. The Constitution stipulates that presidential elections are held 30 days at the earliest and 60 days at the latest before the expiry of the presidential term. The five-year term of President Stjepan Mesic expires on 18 February 2005, as he was inaugurated on 18 February 2000. Prime Minister Sanader told reporters that the government had requested advice from the President of the Supreme Court and Chairman of the State Election Commission, Ivica Crnic, and Parliament President Vladimir Seks, about the choice of constitutional dates for the election. After a meeting on Wednesday 20 October between Prime Minister Sanader and the Social Democratic Party (SDP) President Ivica Racan to discuss the constitutional changes, it seems that an agreement could not been reached, and consequently the possible constitutional amendments announced earlier would not take place.
    [Show full text]