DOCSLIB.ORG

PFI Hospital on Fast Track with Steel Chelsea Development Champions Steel Floor Vibration Performance 2 NSC June 2005 CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PFI Hospital on Fast Track with Steel Chelsea Development Champions Steel Floor Vibration Performance 2 NSC June 2005 CONTENTS JUNE 2005 VOL13 NO6 NEW STEEL CONSTRUCTION www.new-steel-construction.com PFI hospital on fast track with steel Chelsea development champions steel Floor vibration performance 2 NSC June 2005 CONTENTS JUNE 2005 VOL13 NO6 NEW STEEL CONSTRUCTION www.new-steel-construction.com Cover Image SUNDERLAND ROYAL HOSPITAL Client: City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust Steelwork Contractor: South Durham Structures Ltd Design & Build Contractor: Kier Northern Ltd Structural Engineer: Arup 5 Editor’s comment EDITOR Nick Barrett Tel: 01323 422483 6 News: Europeans learn the secrets of growing the steel market [email protected] Letters and Diary DEPUTY EDITOR 10 David Fowler Tel: 01892 538191 13 Analysis: Dramatic success of off site applied intumescent coatings [email protected] CONTRIBUTING EDITOR has led to a new edition of SCI P160 Ty Byrd Tel: 01892 524455 [email protected] PRODUCTION EDITOR Andrew Pilcher Tel: 01892 524481 PROFILE [email protected] 14 Professor Patrick Dowling is retiring after a career which contributed ISDN: 01892 557302 ADVERTISING SALES MANAGER much to the development of the use of steel in UK construction Sally Devine Tel: 01474 833871 [email protected] FEATURES PUBLISHED BY Steel was diagnosed as having programme and environmental The British Constructional Steelwork Association Ltd 15 4 Whitehall Court, Westminster, London SW1A 2ES benefits which ensured selection for framing an extension to Telephone 020 7839 8566 Fax 020 7976 1634 Sunderland Royal Hospital Website www.steelconstruction.org Email [email protected] 18 Construction of Private Finance Initiative Lymington New Forest Hospital is comfortably ahead of schedule thanks to selection of a The Steel Construction Institute Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7QN steel frame Telephone 01344 623 345 Fax 01344 622 944 Website www.steel-sci.org 20 City money chose steel for one of London’s most exclusive Email [email protected] residential developments Corus Construction and Industrial 24 One of the most striking features of the new Welsh Assembly PO Box 1, Brigg Road, Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire DN16 1BP building is its complex steel roof, which appears to float Telephone 01724 404040 Fax 01724 404224 Website www.corusconstruction.com 26 English Heritage has saved the forerunner of today’s multi-storey Email [email protected] structures, an 18th century former flax mill CONTRACT PUBLISHER & ADVERTISING SALES Barrett, Byrd Associates 28 Dr Stephen Hicks of the Steel Construction Institute analyses the Linden House, Linden Close, vibration performance issues associated with the use of steel- Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 8HH concrete composite floor systems on multi-storey buildings Tel: 01892 524455 www.barrett-byrd.com 30 New and revised codes and standards EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Dr D Tordoff (Chairman); Mr N Barrett; Mr D Fowler; 32 40 Years Ago Our look back through the pages of Building With Mrs Sally Devine; Mr D G Brown, SCI; Mr J P Cartz, BDP; Steel recalls the construction of the Tagus Bridge at Lisbon, then the Mr M Crosby, FaberMaunsell; Mr R Gordon, Mace Ltd; Mr W Gover, Consultant; Mr R Harrison, Glentworth Fabrications longest suspension bridge span in Europe Ltd; Mr A Hughes, Tubelines; Mr A Palmer, Buro Happold; Mr R Steeper, Corus; Mr O Tyler, Wilkinson Eyre, 34 Advisory Desk The latest technical advice from the Steel The role of the Editorial Advisory Board is to advise on the overall style Construction Institute and content of the magazine. 35 Publications New Steel Construction welcomes contributions on any suitable topics relating to 36 BCSA members steel construction. Publication is at the discretion of the Editor. Views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the BCSA, SCI, Corus or the Contract 37 Register of Qualified Steelwork Contractors Publisher. Although care has been taken to ensure that all information contained SCI members herein is accurate with relation to either matters of fact or accepted practice at the 39 time of publication, the BCSA, SCI, Corus and the Editor assume no responsibility for any errors or misinterpretations of such information or any loss or damage arising from or related to its use. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the publishers. CHANGES TO THE MAILING LIST If you wish to notify us of a change: Non Members of either the SCI or the BCSA please telephone Barrett, Byrd Associates on 01892 538191 Members BCSA Telephone BCSA on 020 7839 8566 Members SCI Telephone SCI on 01344 623 345 SUBSCRIPTIONS The Steel To take out a subscription please telephone 01344 623 645 The British Construction Annual subscription £92.00 UK, £117.00 elsewhere. Constructional Steelwork Institute All rights reserved ©2005. ISSN 0968-0098 Association Ltd NSC June 2005 3 EN0486A1 A4 multideck NSC 7/12/04 10:33 am Page 1 SPAN FURTHER New Multideck V2 now spans further than ever. Call now for the new and completely updated Handbook and CD Software on 0870 761 7004 or visit our website kingspanmetlcon.com Kingspan Metl-Con Ltd. Sherburn, Malton, North Yorkshire, YO17 8PQ. England. Tel: 019444 712000NSC Fax:June 2005 01944 710555 e-mail: [email protected] Editor’s Comment Steel success message spreads The message about the remarkable success of the steel industry in capturing market share in the multi-storey sectors over the past 20 years has clearly spread far and wide. A delegation of visitors from other European steel sectors visited the UK last month under the auspices of the European Convention for Constructional Steelwork to hear from the horse’s mouth how it was done (see News). The bare market share figures are striking enough – over 70% of the high rise office market and 43.5% of multi-storey residential – but they are even more laudable when compared to the situation 20 years ago. Then, the industry only wanted to provide columns and beams when customers wanted a solution including floors, which the concrete rivals provided. Steel could not be delivered to site in the time frame customers wanted, whereas concrete, Nick Barrett - Editor however unknown the quality, could start flowing straight away. Fire and corrosion protection had to be added, awkward to do on site, while concrete was seen as having these features built in. Safety was another issue, with steelwork erection perceived to be inherently dangerous. It is hardly surprising that steel was not even considered for many projects. What a contrast with today. As the previously assumed benefits of concrete are exposed as not matching reality as closely as thought, an integrated steel supply chain delivers what is wanted to customers who have been convinced by their own experiences of the outstanding advantages of building in steel. All strands of the supply chain from producers to designers and steel contractors have come together to ensure that customer focussed, seamless solutions are available, with full technical support. The steelwork industry has an improving safety record and an increasing amount of fire protection is applied in offsite factory conditions. The lesson for the continentals is that first of all they have to get all parties involved in the successful delivery of a steel structure reading from the same prayer book, and present united fronts to their respective markets. There is no reason why they cannot enjoy more success by adopting the same strategies which have served the UK steel industry, and its customers, so well. Rig threat averted One of the leading steel figures during those 20 years of transformation in the industry’s fortunes was Professor Patrick Dowling, who is profiled in this issue. One of the stories which is not told in the profile, for reasons of space, is how he combated a severe threat to the future use of steel in the key North Sea market. A major problem had arisen with the welding at the Conoco tension leg platform which was being fabricated at Nigg Bay, near Inverness. Work had come to a halt, the workforce was on strike and there was a possibility that the platform would be abandoned, which would have been a disaster for rig fabrication throughout the UK. Prof Dowling was appointed to head a trouble shooting team to solve the problem, which turned out to not be fundamentally about welding at all. The main problem he found was that nobody was talking to anyone; there had been a complete breakdown in trust and communications between entrenched parties. Establishing the proper channels of communication was the first step to allow everyone to start pulling in the same direction. Everything else fell into place after that, the welding issues were soon sorted and the platform successfully delivered. “We were helped by the whisky,” says Prof Dowling. Maybe we should give some to our European friends to take home. NSC June 2005 5 NEWS Industry to gain responsibility for Eurocode annexes The British Construction Steelwork Eurocodes in collaboration with the and part 1.10 on material toughness mation to support changes that may Association, Corus and the Steel steel industry.” and through thickness properties. result in more economical designs, Construction Institute have been The National Annexes set out SCI senior manager for standards it will be possible to choose values given a strong indication from the Nationally Determined Parameters Charles King said once the award for NDPs to allow engineer to take government that a contract will be (NDPs) — aspects of the codes was confirmed there would be a cal- advantage of this. let to them to develop the National which are not harmonised across ibration process in which the results He added: “Because the codes Annexes to the steel and composite Europe. They include factors of of designs to BS5950 would be com- have been in development for so Eurocodes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development of Robust Details for Sound Insulation in New Build Attached Dwellings
    The development of robust details for sound insulation in new build attached dwellings Received: 30th September, 2005 Sean Smith BSc, PhD, MIOA is RC UK Research Fellow and Principal Research Fellow at the Building Performance Centre, School of the Built Environment, Napier University, External Technical Advisor to Robust Details Ltd and joint project manager of the RSD project. He is also Senior Acoustic Consultant with the Robin Mackenzie Partnership. Dave Baker MRICS, MCIOB, MBEng is CEO of Robust Details Ltd and former Technical Director of the RSD project and House Builders Federation. Richard Mackenzie BSc, MIOA, MInstSCE is Lead Acoustic Consultant with the Robin Mackenzie Partnership and joint project manager of the RSD project. John B. Wood BSc, DA is Lecturer in Architectural Technology at the School of the Built Environment, Napier University and designer of the RSD project submission. Philip Dunbavin MSc, FIOA, MSEE, MIOSH, MInstSCE is Managing Director and Principal Acoustic Consultant with the PDA Group and Chairman of the RD Inspectors. David Panter BSc, MIQA is Operations Manager with Robust Details Ltd. Abstract This paper outlines the background, process and system approach towards the development of robust details (RD) for sound insulation for new build dwellings in England and Wales. Part 1 outlines the initial Robust Standard Details project and its framework, Part 2 describes the structure and operation of the RD scheme for Building Regulation E1 and Part 3 provides feedback on the first operating year of the scheme. In addition, comparisons are made between previous performance levels and constructions used for Part E (1992) relative to the RD approach using recent data feedback from random site inspections and testing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Housing Forum December 2017
    A REPORT FROM THE HOUSING FORUM DECEMBER 2017 Building Homes Better The quality challenge SUPPORTED BY: AMCM GROUP LTD | BLP INSURANCE | HUNTERS Working with NHBC About this report Over the course of 2017, a cross-sector group Report sponsors of members of The Housing Forum formed a working group chaired by Rory Bergin, HTA Design, to investigate how building better quality homes can be delivered to improve the experience of those buying and renting them. We decided to limit our remit to the quality of individual homes while fully acknowledging that good place making and appropriate and sustainable infrastructure are essential to the creation of good living environments. We have looked into the points of interaction between customers and the housing industry and found systemic failures to provide quality outcomes, either in terms of design quality or customer satisfaction. This report is intended to highlight where those problems occur, and what we think can be done about them to achieve a positive change for quality. Contents Foreword Rory Bergin Working Group Chair 3 Executive summary 4 PART ONE: POLICY AND PRACTICE 6 PART TWO: NEW IDEAS AND CASE STUDIES 16 Fostering a quality culture 6 Selecting products to improve the experience 16 of residents Improving the experience of tenants and buyers 8 Case study: London Borough of Newham 18 Pre-planning, regulation and design quality 10 Case study: Cumbrian Homes 20 Procurement and construction 12 How a smart regulatory framework enabled a high 22 performing industry friendly solution Harnessing
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Firm
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Central Archive at the University of Reading NEW GOVERNANCE APPROACHES TO ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION: AN EXAMPLE OF THE CODE FOR SUSTAINABLE HOMES (CHS) Shu-Ling Lu1 and Martin G. Sexton School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading, Reading, UK. Environmental policy in the United Kingdom (UK) is witnessing a shift from command-and-control approaches towards more innovation-orientated environmental governance arrangements. These governance approaches are required which create institutions which support actors within a domain for learning not only about policy options, but also about their own interests and preferences. The need for construction actors to understand, engage and influence this process is critical to establishing policies which support innovation that satisfies each constituent’s needs. This capacity is particularly salient in an era where the expanding raft of environmental regulation is ushering in system-wide innovation in the construction sector. In this paper, the Code for Sustainable Homes (the Code) in the UK is used to demonstrate the emergence and operation of these new governance arrangements. The Code sets out a significant innovation challenge for the house-building sector with, for example, a requirement that all new houses must be zero-carbon by 2016. Drawing upon boundary organisation theory, the journey from the Code as a government aspiration, to the Code as a catalyst for the formation of the Zero Carbon Hub, a new institution, is traced and discussed. The case study reveals that the ZCH has demonstrated boundary organisation properties in its ability to be flexible to the needs and constraints of its constituent actors, yet robust enough to maintain and promote a common identity across regulation and industry boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Planning Conditions for the Code for Sustainable Homes and Breeam 14
    1 Contents ONE Introduction 1 BACKGROUND 1 WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION? 2 CLIMATE CHANGE SPD 2 PURPOSE OF GUIDANCE NOTE 1: SUSTAINABLE BUILDING STANDARDS 2 CONTENTS 2 TWO Policy Context 3 NATIONAL CONTEXT 3 LONDON CONTEXT 3 BOROUGH CONTEXT 4 THREE Code for Sustainable Homes 5 BACKGROUND 5 PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENTS 5 PLANNING GUIDELINES 5 Guideline SB1: Pre- Assessment Report (Code for Sustainable Homes) 6 Guideline SB2: Design Stage Assessment (Code for Sustainable Homes) 7 Guideline SB3: Post Construction Stage Assessment (Code for Sustainable Homes) 8 FOUR ‘BREEAM’ Sustainability Ratings (Non-Residential Developments) 9 BACKGROUND 9 PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENTS 9 PLANNING GUIDELINES 10 Guideline SB4: Pre- Assessment Report (BREEAM) 10 Guideline SB5: Design Stage Assessment (BREEAM) 10 Guideline SB6: Post Construction Stage Assessment (BREEAM) 11 FIVE Sustainable Design and Construction Statements 12 BACKGROUND 12 PLANNING POLICY REQUIREMENTS 12 PLANNING GUIDELINE 12 Guideline SB7: Sustainable Design and Construction Statements 12 SIX Model Planning Conditions 13 BACKGROUND 13 PLANNING GUIDELINE 13 Guideline SB8: Use of Planning Conditions (CSH/ BREEAM) 13 MODEL PLANNING CONDITIONS FOR THE CODE FOR SUSTAINABLE HOMES AND BREEAM 14 SEVEN Development Management Flowchart: Code for Sustainable Homes 15 and BREEAM 2 ONE Introduction Background 1.1 In 2009, Sutton became the first Council in the UK to commit to being a ‘One Planet Living' (OPL) Borough. This seeks to reduce our environmental footprint to acceptable levels based on the recognition that if everyone in the world lived as we do in Sutton, we would need almost three planets’ worth of resources to maintain our current levels of consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Sustainable Development
    EASTLEIGH BOROUGH COUNCIL LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Environmentally Sustainable Development SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT ADOPTED 5 MARCH 2009 APPENDIX 1: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Technical Guidance CONTENTS Definitions 1. General Sustainable Development 2. Water 3. Energy/CO2 4. Materials and Waste 5. Green Infrastructure 6. Health and Wellbeing 7. Sustainable Management 8. Major Developments DEFINITIONS [The Code for Sustainable Homes This is for for ‘Residential development’ (all new houses and flats but not extensions and conversions nor institutional accommodation). The Code is an environmental assessment method for new homes based upon the BREEAM ‘Ecohomes’ which it replaced (in England) in April 2007. Each development to be assessed against the Code needs to be registered with the BRE by a BRE-licensed Assessor, who is employed by the developer. The development is assessed by the Assessor who awards credits when sufficient documentary proof has been supplied to satisfy each credit requirement. The Code covers 9 areas of environmentally sustainable development, namely: • Energy/CO2 • Water • Materials • Surface Water Runoff • Waste • Pollution • Health and Wellbeing • Management • Ecology There are minimum mandatory standards for Energy/Co2, Water Consumption, Waste, Surface Water Run-off and Materials at Level 1. There are further minimum mandatory standards for Water Consumption at levels 3 and 5. Energy/CO2 has mandatory APPENDIX 1: GUIDANCE: CODE FOR SUSTAINABLE HOMES minimum standards at each of the levels culminating in level 6 which requires “carbon neutral” development. Lifetime Homes compliance is mandatory at level 6 The BRE audits the assessments and awards a certificate according to the final point score. Seven levels are possible (see table 1): RATING Minimum Score Required (%) FAIL < 36 Level 2 36 Level 2 48 Level 3 57 Level 4 68 Level 5 84 Level 6 90 Table 1: Code FSH Ratings Certification is compulsory at both the design stage (interim certificate) and at the post construction review stage (final certificate).
    [Show full text]
  • Code for Sustainable Homes: Technical Guide
    Code for Sustainable Homes Technical Guide www.communities.gov.uk community, opportunity, prosperity Code for Sustainable Homes Technical Guide March 2007 Department for Communities and Local Government: London Acknowledgements This Technical Guide has been drafted by the BREEAM Centre at the Building Research Establishment under contract to Communites and Local Government Department for Communities and Local Government Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 020 7944 4400 Website: www.communities.gov.uk © Crown Copyright 2007 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown Copyright and the title of the publication specified. Any other use of the contents of this publication would require a copyright licence. Please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/system/online/pLogin.asp or by writing to the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or email: HMSOlicensing@cabinet-office.x.gsi.gov.uk. If you require this publication in an alternative format please email [email protected] Communities and Local Government Publications PO Box 236 Wetherby West Yorkshire LS23 7NB Tel: 0870 1226 236 Fax: 0870 1226 237 Textphone: 0870 1207 405 Email: [email protected] or online via the Communities and Local Government website: www.communities.gov.uk March 2007 Product Code 06BD04486 Foreword We must act on climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Extra
    Technical Extra February 2015 | Issue 17 In this issue: NHBC STANDARDS Minimum foundation depths in clay soils page 3 Ironmongery for windows and doors page 4 REGULATION AND COMPLIANCE Update on air-tightness testing page 6 Ensuring adequate ventilation to naturally-ventilated dwellings page 8 NHBC updated guidance in respect of guarding to openable windows with low cill heights page 10 Design and use of autoclaved aerated concrete masonry units page 14 CE marking for steelwork fabrications page 16 GUIDANCE AND GOOD PRACTICE Pre-start meetings and risk guides page 18 Provision of fire protection to proprietary dummy chimneys over party walls page 19 robustdetails® animated training videos page 20 NHBC Foundation page 22 Provision of weep holes and weep vents in masonry walls page 24 INFORMATION AND SUPPORT Technical news Page 25 Information and support page 26 Foreword Welcome to Technical Extra 17 Pre-start meetings between site teams and NHBC building inspectors provide an opportunity to identify and consider specific issues and risks associated with the site and build. Whilst not uncommon in the past, we’ve developed a more robust framework for these discussions – read the article in Guidance and good practice for more details on the benefits of these meetings. Readers might be surprised to learn that 15% of the defect-related contacts NHBC receives relate to windows and doors. Ironmongery dominates, with issues relating to handles, locks and hinges accounting for almost half. Comments recorded on customer satisfaction surveys also highlight similar issues; the article ‘Ironmongery for windows and doors’ provides more information. As methods of making homes more airtight have been designed, and construction practices have improved, the level of airtightness you can hope to achieve has also progressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Rebuttal to Lpa's Proof of Evidence
    TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 SECTION 78 APPEAL BY THE WELLINGTON PUB COMPANY PLC PROOF OF EVIDENCE – PLANNING REBUTTAL TO LPA’S PROOF OF EVIDENCE MARK BATCHELOR BSc (Hons), MSc, MRTPI THE WHITE HART, 184 NEW CROSS ROAD, LONDON, SE14 5AA PINS REF: APP/C5690/W/19/324119 LPA REF: DC/18/106613 3 MARCH 2020 1 Rebuttal of LPA’s Planning Evidence | The White Hart, 184 New Cross Road, SE14 5AA Report Control Project: The White Hart Client: The Wellington Pub Company Reference: 17.5061 File Origin: J:\17.5061\4 Boyer Planning\4.02 Reports\Appeal Primary Author DT Checked By: MB Issue Date Status Checked By 1 03/03/2020 Final MB 1. PLANNING REBUTTAL TO LPA’S PROOF OF EVIDENCE 1.1 This rebuttal statement should be read in accordance with my initial proof of evidence dated 18 February 2020 and submitted to PINS on the same date. It seeks to address and clarify the statements made in the Council’s Planning Proof of Evidence (PoE). It will primarily comment on the Agent of Change principle, where the Council, in paragraph 10.4 of their PoE, consider this to be relevant in this instance by virtue of the necessity for conditions to be imposed on the public house to prevent adverse noise and disturbance to future residents. Intend to Publish London Plan policy D13 (Agent of Change), in line with NPPF paragraph 182, states that development should be designed to ensure that established noise and other nuisance-generating uses can continue to operate or grow without having unreasonable restrictions placed on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining a Fabric Energy Efficiency Standard for Zero Carbon Homes
    DEFINING A FABRIC ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARD FOR ZERO CARBON HOMES Executive Summary of Task Group Recommendations November 2009 FACILITATING THE MAINSTREAM DELIVERY OF LOW AND ZERO CARBON HOMES Zero Carbon Hub Acknowledgements The full report ‘Defining a Fabric Energy The Zero Carbon Hub is very grateful to the Efficiency Standard for Zero Carbon Homes’ is following organisations for their involvement available as a PDF download from and contributions in developing these www.zerocarbonhub.org recommendations. Association for Environment Conscious Building (AECB) Aecom Anser Project Managers London Office Barratt Developments PLC 62-68 Rosebery Avenue British Electrotechnical and Allied Manufacturers' London EC1R 4RR Association (BEAMA) Building Research Establishment (BRE) Milton Keynes Office Building Regulations Advisory Committee (BRAC) NHBC House, Davy Avenue Construction Products Association (CPA) Milton Keynes MK5 8FP Countryside Properties PLC Crest Nicholson PLC T 0845 888 7620 Davis Langdon F 0871 813 0569 Energy Saving Trust (EST) [email protected] Fairview New Homes Ltd. Federation of Environmental Trade Associations www.zerocarbonhub.org (FETA) November 2009 Federation of Master Builders (FMB) Reprinted January 2010 Fulcrum Consulting Reprinted with minor changes March 2010 Good Homes Alliance (GHA) Heating and Hotwater Industry Council (HHIC) Heatrae Sadia Home Builders Federation (HBF) nd Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) All costs based on 2 quarter 2009 information and do not take account of: Hot Water Association
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Consultation on Changes to the Building Regulations in Wales Part L (Conservation of Fuel and Power)
    2012 Consultation on Changes to the Building Regulations in Wales Part L (Conservation of fuel and power) Consultation – summary of responses Part 4 #03 Ian Whittaker - UK Registered Architect #17 Gordon Russell - GR Architect #26 Robust Details Limited #34 RTPI Cymru #52 Friends of the Earth Cymru #72 Community Housing Cymru Group #79 Institute of Historic Building Conservation #81 Llanmoor Development Co Limited #84 CBI Wales #90 EAMA The UK zero carbon house myth. What is the definition of a zero-carbon home? 'A home that produces zero or even negative CO2 emissions by maximising the use of energy efficiency and renewable energy.' Guardian 2009 'A zero carbon home is one that generates as much power as it uses over the course of a year and therefore has net zero carbon dioxide emissions.' Tree hugger 2009 A building can be considered fully ‘zero carbon’ when there is no net emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) arising from the energy use within the building. This includes space heating, water heating, lighting, appliances and so on. www.idea.gov.uk The government has set the following targets for zero-carbon buildings: All new-build homes in England and Wales to be ‘zero carbon’ by 2016 . All new schools to be zero carbon by 2010 . All new public sector buildings to be zero carbon by 2018 . All new non- domestic buildings to be zero carbon from 2019. (Local Government Improvement and Development 2011) What is wrong with the current definition of a zero carbon home ? The definitions all neglect to allow for :- The energy used in extracting the materials for the home.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Meeting
    COUNCIL MEETING Date: 19 July 2010 Venue: East Northamptonshire House, Cedar Drive, Thrapston Time: 7.30 pm Present: Councillors:- Sue Homer (Chairman) Andy Mercer (Leader of the Council) David Bateman Steven North David Brackenbury Brian Northall Pauline Bradberry JP Sarah Peacock Albert Campbell Ron Pinnock Richard Gell Roger Powell Roger Glithero JP Rupert Reichhold Glenvil Greenwood-Smith John Richardson MBE Philip Hardcastle Anna Sauntson Glenn Harwood MBE Ron Silver Marian Hollomon Robin Underwood Sean Lever Pam Whiting Richard Lewis Clive Wood Peter MacGovern Also Present: Graham Blagden (Chairman of the Standards Board) Father Grant Brockhouse, St. Marys Church, Higham Ferrers 100. PRAYERS Before the commencement of business, at the invitation of the Chairman, prayers were conducted by Father Grant Brockhouse of St. Mary’s Church, Higham Ferrers. 101. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Councillors Peter Bedford, Tony Boto, Sylvia and Dudley Hughes, Barbara Jenney, Eloise Lucille Gill Mercer, Phillip Stearn and Colin Wright sent their apologies. 102. MINUTES The minutes of the Annual Meeting held on 12 May 2010 were approved and signed by the Chairman. 103. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillor Roger Powell declared a personal interest in item 11(b) (Manor Park, Rushden) as a resident of Rushden. The following Members declared a personal and prejudicial interest in the items indicated and were not present during the discussion and voting on these items:- Council Meeting – 19 July 2010 Page 109 Members/Co-opted Members Item Nature of Interest Mr Graham Blagden 10(b) Person the subject of the appointment Councillors Marian Hollomon, 11(b) Members of Rushden Town Council Richard Lewis, Andy Mercer, Steven North, Sarah Peacock, Ron Pinnock, Robin Underwood and Clive Wood 104.
    [Show full text]
  • RD110 ROBUST DETAILS CERTIFICATION SCHEME PLOT REGISTRATION APPLICATION FORM for New Build Attached Dwellings in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
    Robust Details Limited, Block E, Bletchley Park Science and Innovation Centre, Milton Keynes, MK3 6EB Tel: 03300 882 141 Fax: 01908 363433 www.robustdetails.com RD110 ROBUST DETAILS CERTIFICATION SCHEME PLOT REGISTRATION APPLICATION FORM For new build attached dwellings in England, wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. To be completed by the Developer and submitted before work starts on the dwellings. MAIN CONTACT DETAILS (developer or duly appointed representative and to whom all plot registration documents will be sent by email) Name Company Address Postcode Telephone No Email Please indicate your role: Builder Developer only Designer Other (please specify) BUILDER CONTACT DETAILS (details of the builder responsible for the construction of the robust details) Builder Contact Builder Company Builder Address Postcode SITE DETAILS (details of the site where the robust details are to be constructed) Site Name Site Address Postcode BUILDING CONTROL BODy (NAME) NAME OF NEw HOME wARRANTy PROvIDER IMPORTANT INFORMATION - MUST BE COMPLETED DEvELOPER OF THE SITE (the person named on the building control application) Name Company Name Address Postcode Date By signing this form, you confirm that you have read, understood and agree to the current version of Robust Details Limited’s terms and conditions for plot registrations which can be found in the Support/Downloads area of our web site at www.robustdetails.com CODE FOR SUSTAINABLE HOMES (Do you yES DEvELOPER’S SIGNATURE intend to use Robust Details to gain credits NO IMPORTANT INFORMATION - MUST
    [Show full text]