DOCSLIB.ORG

Real Madrid CF Top 2001/02 Club Coefficient Ranking

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Real Madrid CF Top 2001/02 Club Coefficient Ranking Media Release Route de Genève 46 Case postale Communiqué aux médias CH-1260 Nyon 2 Union des associations Tel. +41 22 994 45 59 européennes de football Medien-Mitteilung Fax +41 22 994 37 37 uefa.com [email protected] Date: 12/06/2001 No. 87 - 2001 Real Madrid CF top 2001/02 club coefficient ranking England jump over Germany, France to third place in national association ranking The UEFA coefficient rankings for national associations and clubs have now been finalised and confirm that Spain has taken a firm grip on pole position in European club football. Spain lead the national association ranking list by a handsome margin of almost nine points after earning a coefficient of 16.611 points during the 2000/01 campaign. It was the second successive season in which the Spaniards have accumulated more points than any other association and the third time in the last five years. England’s good performance, with Arsenal FC, Leeds United AFC and Manchester United FC progressing to the knock-out phase of the UEFA Champions League and with Liverpool FC winning the UEFA Cup was reflected in a leap from fifth to third place in the ranking, overtaking Germany and France. Turkey have also enhanced their continental status, moving from 11th to 7th place over the last year, while RSC Anderlecht’s UEFA Champions League run helped Belgium to scale five rungs of the continental ladder into 12th place. The changes entitle England to four entries for the 2002/03 UEFA Champions League (along with Spain and Italy), while Germany, France and the Netherlands will have three. The nine associations below them in the ranking will be entitled to two entries. The national association coefficients also determine the number of participants in the UEFA Cup, where – using criteria which take into account the number of UEFA Champions League participants - two countries (Turkey and Greece) will be entitled to four entrants; a dozen other associations will be able to enter three; and the remainder will have two participants, with the exceptions of Andorra, Liechtenstein and San Marino, who will have one each. UEFA’s club coefficient ranking determines the seeding of clubs in the qualifying rounds and the two group stages of the UEFA Champions League, plus the qualifying stage and the first four rounds of the UEFA Cup. Each club’s coefficient is based on performances in UEFA club competitions during the last five seasons plus half of the national association’s coefficient. Any club which enters the 2001/02 campaign without having competed during the last five seasons (such as English club Ipswich Town FC) will start with the 50% share of the national association coefficient which is, in this particular case, 25.644. In the UEFA club coefficient ranking, there is also good news for Spanish football, with Real Madrid CF rising from fourth position last year to take top spot, at the expense of Juventus FC, who have fallen from first to seventh. Despite this, Italy still has four clubs in the top ten. Manchester United FC, consistent performers in the UEFA Champions League, have stepped up from sixth to second place, while the current champions of Europe, FC Bayern München, retain third place. Beaten finalists Valencia CF move up from 13th position to sixth, while Liverpool FC’s UEFA Cup success has taken the English club from 37th to 14th and Galatasaray SK have also risen spectacularly from 33rd to 16th. The full ranking lists are attached. Direct telephone line to the UEFA Media Services: ++41 22 99 44 55 9 ASSOCIATION COEFFICIENTS FOR SEEDING 2001 UEFA CUP PLACES 2002 1996/97 1997/98 1998/991999/200 2000/01 Total 0 Spain 11.600 8.428 10.000 18.571 16.611 65.210 Italy 10.142 12.285 12.000 12.000 9.812 56.239 England 7.400 7.785 7.437 14.500 14.166 51.288 Germany 9.142 11.000 6.357 11.071 11.062 48.632 France 7.125 6.800 8.642 10.285 9.500 42.352 Netherlands 6.250 6.833 4.833 6.250 6.083 30.249 Turkey 6.875 4.400 3.200 7.750 7.750 29.975 Greece 3.500 6.500 6.200 5.416 6.750 28.366 Russia 2.750 9.875 7.000 4.250 3.833 27.708 Portugal 7.400 3.416 3.500 5.833 6.125 26.274 Czech Republic 3.666 4.875 2.250 8.000 6.000 24.791 Belgium 4.500 3.900 5.500 3.250 7.000 24.150 Ukraine 1.500 5.625 7.333 5.375 4.000 23.833 Austria 3.875 3.875 4.375 3.875 7.750 23.750 Norway 5.375 4.600 3.800 5.200 4.625 23.600 Scotland 3.125 3.125 5.625 5.125 5.375 22.375 Switzerland 5.375 2.250 5.750 4.125 4.375 21.875 Croatia 3.333 5.166 4.875 2.250 4.375 19.999 Sweden 4.800 1.900 2.375 4.333 4.800 18.208 Poland 4.125 2.500 4.000 3.250 3.625 17.500 Denmark 4.300 3.250 4.125 1.750 3.750 17.175 Romania 4.500 3.125 2.500 4.833 0.833 15.791 Yugoslavia 2.250 1.333 4.166 3.166 4.500 15.415 Hungary 2.833 4.125 2.333 3.125 2.666 15.082 Slovakia 2.500 2.666 3.333 2.500 3.666 14.665 Israel 1.125 3.166 5.000 3.000 1.833 14.124 Slovenia 1.666 3.166 2.333 3.000 1.833 11.998 Bulgaria 1.333 0.666 2.833 3.833 3.000 11.665 Cyprus 2.833 2.333 2.500 2.166 1.000 10.832 Georgia 4.000 2.666 1.000 1.500 0.500 9.666 Finland 1.875 1.166 3.000 1.000 1.500 8.541 Latvia 1.333 1.666 1.500 2.500 0.833 7.832 Iceland 1.333 1.500 0.666 1.000 0.833 5.332 Belarus 1.500 1.833 0.500 0.000 1.000 4.833 Moldova 0.500 0.333 0.500 2.000 1.166 4.499 Lithuania 1.000 0.666 0.666 1.333 0.833 4.498 F.Y.R. Macedonia 1.166 0.666 0.333 0.666 0.666 3.497 Republic of Ireland 0.333 0.166 0.500 0.333 2.000 3.332 Estonia 1.333 0.166 0.333 0.000 0.666 2.498 Armenia 0.833 0.333 0.000 0.333 0.666 2.165 Wales 1.333 0.000 0.166 0.500 0.166 2.165 Azerbaijan 0.666 0.000 0.000 0.333 0.666 1.665 Malta 0.333 0.333 0.000 0.666 0.333 1.665 Liechtenstein 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 1.500 Northern Ireland 0.333 0.166 0.333 0.166 0.333 1.331 Bosnia-Herzegovina 0.500 0.500 1.000 Luxembourg 0.166 0.000 0.000 0.166 0.333 0.665 Faroe Islands 0.000 0.166 0.333 0.166 0.000 0.665 Albania 0.000 0.333 0.166 0.000 0.499 Andorra 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 San Marino 0.000 0.000 Cumulative Club Coefficients Season 2001 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/200 2000/01Total Tota 0 Club l 1. Real Madrid CF 21.000 11.000 27.000 23.000 82.000 114.605 2. Manchester United FC 12.000 14.000 20.000 21.000 18.000 85.000 110.644 3. FC Bayern München 2.000 11.000 19.000 24.000 30.000 86.000 110.316 4. FC Barcelona 17.000 5.000 7.000 28.000 19.000 76.000 108.605 5. S.S. Lazio 5.000 20.000 16.000 22.000 14.000 77.000 105.119 6. Valencia CF 10.000 6.000 24.000 28.000 68.000 100.605 7. Juventus FC 22.000 17.000 14.000 11.000 6.000 70.000 98.119 8. Internazionale FC 19.000 20.000 12.000 10.000 61.000 89.119 9. Club Atlético de Madrid 12.000 15.000 16.000 11.000 54.000 86.605 10. Parma AC 2.000 8.000 19.000 13.000 11.000 53.000 81.119 11. AS Monaco FC 18.000 16.000 7.000 11.000 6.000 58.000 79.176 12. Arsenal FC 0.000 1.000 7.000 24.000 19.000 51.000 76.644 13. Chelsea FC 17.000 13.000 19.000 2.000 51.000 76.644 14. Liverpool FC 15.000 4.000 6.000 23.000 48.000 73.644 15. BV Borussia Dortmund 23.000 17.000 9.000 49.000 73.316 16. Galatasaray SK 6.000 4.000 7.000 23.000 17.000 57.000 71.987 17. RC Celta de Vigo 12.000 12.000 14.000 38.000 70.605 18. FC Porto 14.000 4.000 6.000 18.000 13.000 55.000 68.137 19. AS Roma 6.000 11.000 10.000 13.000 40.000 68.119 20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effect of the UEFA Champions League Financial Payout System on Competitive Balance in European Soccer Leagues
    The Effect of the UEFA Champions League Financial Payout System on Competitive Balance in European Soccer Leagues Nathan A. Vestrich-Shade Advised by: Timothy Lambie-Hanson Senior Thesis in Economics Haverford College April 28, 2016 Abstract The paper examines the effect of UEFA Champions League payouts on competitive balance across European leagues. A league-level specification identifies the magnitude of the effect of the UEFA payouts on three measures of competitive balance. The results confirm that the UEFA payouts have a statistically significant effect at the league-level depending on which competitive balance measure and league sample is used. However, the UEFA payouts had no statistically significant effect on individual clubs’ average annual payroll or the clubs’ qualification for the Champions League in the following season. Nathan Vestrich-Shade Table of Contents Section I: Introduction………………………………………………….........................................3 Section II: Literature Review……………………………………………………………………...4 Section III: Data…………………………………………………………………………………...9 Section IV: Methodology………………………………………………………………………...12 Section V: Results………………………………………………………………………………..15 Section VI: Discussion…………………………………………………………………………...19 Section VII: Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….23 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………24 References………………………………………………………………………………………..40 2 Nathan Vestrich-Shade Section I: Introduction Over the years, select clubs in European domestic soccer leagues tend to “control” the spots at the top of the end-of-season
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owned Georgia Eng.Pdf
    By Paul Rimple This book is about the businessmen and the companies who own significant shares in broadcasting, telecommunications, advertisement, oil import and distribution, pharmaceutical, privatisation and mining sectors. Furthermore, It describes the relationship and connections between the businessmen and companies with the government. Included is the information about the connections of these businessmen and companies with the government. The book encompases the time period between 2003-2012. At the time of the writing of the book significant changes have taken place with regards to property rights in Georgia. As a result of 2012 Parliamentary elections the ruling party has lost the majority resulting in significant changes in the business ownership structure in Georgia. Those changes are included in the last chapter of this book. The project has been initiated by Transparency International Georgia. The author of the book is journalist Paul Rimple. He has been assisted by analyst Giorgi Chanturia from Transparency International Georgia. Online version of this book is available on this address: http://www.transparency.ge/ Published with the financial support of Open Society Georgia Foundation The views expressed in the report to not necessarily coincide with those of the Open Society Georgia Foundation, therefore the organisation is not responsible for the report’s content. WHO OWNED GEORGIA 2003-2012 By Paul Rimple 1 Contents INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Tagesprogramm
    TAGESPROGRAMM Highlights ab So. 26.09.2021 LaLiga 1 X 2 Ü/U + - H38 So 16:15 FC Barcelona : Levante UD 1,45 4,90 7,10 2,5 1,65 2,25 Premier League 1 X 2 Ü/U + - AF3 So 17:30 Arsenal FC : Tottenham Hotspur 2,25 3,30 3,50 2,5 2,00 1,80 Süper Lig 1 X 2 Ü/U + - DN5 Mo 19:00 Trabzonspor : Alanyaspor 1,60 4,40 5,50 2,5 1,75 2,05 Premier League 1 X 2 Ü/U + - F27 Mo 21:00 Crystal Palace : Brighton & Hove 3,15 3,15 2,50 2,5 2,25 1,65 UEFA Champions League Gruppe A 1 X 2 Ü/U + - BE4 Di 21:00 Paris St. Germain : Manchester City 3,05 3,50 2,35 2,5 1,60 2,35 UEFA Champions League Gruppe B 1 X 2 Ü/U + - DG6 Di 21:00 AC Mailand : Atlético Madrid 2,90 3,25 2,60 2,5 2,15 1,70 UEFA Champions League Gruppe C 1 X 2 Ü/U + - FK8 Di 21:00 Borussia Dortmund : Sporting Lissabon 1,35 5,50 8,80 3,5 2,25 1,65 Hier geht’s zum Download des aktuellen Wettprogramms programm.tipster.de FOLGE DEINEM INSTINKT Hier geht’s zum Download des aktuellen Wettprogramms programm.tipster.de FOLGE DEINEM INSTINKT Tagesprogramm Sonntag, 26.09.2021 Fußball - Deutschland Bundesliga 1 X 2 HC 1 X 2 1X 12 X2 Ü/U + - DM1 So 15:30 VfL Bochum : VfB Stuttgart 3,20 3,50 2,20 1:0 1,65 4,10 3,80 1,65 1,30 1,35 2,5 1,70 2,00 EN2 So 17:30 SC Freiburg : FC Augsburg 1,75 3,70 4,80 0:1 2,80 3,70 2,10 1,19 1,28 2,10 2,5 1,80 1,90 Aktuelle Ligatabelle SP S U N Pkt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Veth Manuel 1142220 Et
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Selling the People's Game Football's transition from Communism to Capitalism in the Soviet Union and its Successor State Veth, Karl Manuel Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 Selling the People’s Game: Football's Transition from Communism to Capitalism in the Soviet Union and its Successor States K.
    [Show full text]
  • FC Bayern München (Alemania) - I Parte
    Cuadernos de Fútbol Revista de CIHEFE https://www.cihefe.es/cuadernosdefutbol XLVI Liga de Campeones 2000/01: FC Bayern München (Alemania) - I Parte Autor: José del Olmo Cuadernos de fútbol, nº 105, enero 2019. ISSN: 1989-6379 Fecha de recepción: 05-12-2018, Fecha de aceptación: 17-12-2018. URL: https://www.cihefe.es/cuadernosdefutbol/2019/01/xlvi-liga-de-campeones-200001-fc-bayern- munchen-alemania-i-parte/ Resumen Nuevo capítulo sobre la historia de la Liga de Campeones. Análisis pormenorizado de la edición correspondiente a la temporada 2000-01 ganada por el Bayern de Múnich. Palabras clave: Bayern Múnich, estadísticas, futbol, historia, Liga de CampeonesUEFA Abstract Keywords:Champions League, Statistics, Football, History, Bayern Munich, UEFA A new release of our series on the history of the UEFA Champions League. An in-depth analysis of the 2000-01 season, won by Bayern Munich. Date : 1 enero 2019 Participantes: El coeficiente quinquenal 1994-1999 fijaba el reparto de plazas por federaciones: cuatro: Italia, España y Alemania; tres Francia, Holanda e Inglaterra; dos Rusia, Grecia, Portugal, Chequia, Austria, Dinamarca, Croacia, Turquía y Ucrania; uno: Noruega, Bélgica, Suecia, Polonia, Escocia, Rumanía, Hungría, Eslovaquia, Chipre, Georgia, Israel, Eslovenia, Bielorrusia, Finlandia, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Letonia, Islandia, Macedonia, Lituania, Moldavia, Estonia, Armenia, Irlanda del Norte, Gales, Irlanda, Malta, Feroe, Albania, Luxemburgo, Azerbaiyán y Bosnia. No entraban ni Andorra ni San Marino. El Real Madrid, vigente campeón, no se había clasificado entre los dos primeros de la Liga, que fueron RC Deportivo y FC Barcelona. Por eso España pudo contar con un tercer equipo clasificado directamente en la fase de grupos.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympiacos CFP V Rosenborg BK
    Olympiacos CFP v Rosenborg BK Georgios Karaiskakis - Athens Tuesday, 13 September 2005 - 20:45 (CET) Group stage - Group F - Matchday 1 Match officials Referee Stefano Farina (ITA) Assistant referees Andrea Consolo (ITA), Massimo Biasutto (ITA) Fourth official Enrico Rocchi (ITA) UEFA delegate Barry Taylor (ENG) Match preview Olympiacos set greater goals Having gone tantalisingly close to reaching the knockout stages of the UEFA Champions League last season, Olympiacos CFP hope to "show their true colours" this term and progress from the group stage for only the second time in ten attempts. 'Early goal' The Greek champions begin their Group F campaign at home to Rosenborg BK on Tuesday with coach Trond Sollied calling on his side to make an early impression ahead of likely tougher tests against Real Madrid CF and Olympique Lyonnais. "There are 18 points up for grabs in the group and we must take as many as we can from each match," said Sollied, a former Rosenborg coach and player whose last experience of Champions League football was at the helm of Club Brugge KV. "If we can get an early goal [on Tuesday] it will certainly boost our chances." False dawns Olympiacos are well used to false dawns in Europe, although they were unlucky not to advance with their tally of ten points in Group A last season. At half-time on Matchday 6 they led Liverpool FC 1-0, and were still on course for the first knockout round at 2-1 down with four minutes to play when Steven Gerrard struck a stunning winner to propel the English team towards the next stage (and eventual glory) and the Piraeus outfit into the UEFA Cup.
    [Show full text]
  • Bachelor's Thesis
    Bachelor’s thesis IDR600 Sport Management Norwegian Football Fans Attendance Case: Norwegian men's football Lars Neerbye Eriksen and Oscar Hesselberg Killingmoe Number of pages including this page: 51 Molde, 02/06-2020 Mandatory statement Each student is responsible for complying with rules and regulations that relate to examinations and to academic work in general. The purpose of the mandatory statement is to make students aware of their responsibility and the consequences of cheating. Failure to complete the statement does not excuse students from their responsibility. Please complete the mandatory statement by placing a mark in each box for statements 1-6 below. 1. I/we hereby declare that my/our paper/assignment is my/our own work, and that I/we have not used other sources or received other help than mentioned in the paper/assignment. 2. I/we hereby declare that this paper Mark each 1. Has not been used in any other exam at another box: 1. department/university/university college 2. Is not referring to the work of others without 2. acknowledgement 3. Is not referring to my/our previous work without 3. acknowledgement 4. 4. Has acknowledged all sources of literature in the text and in the list of references 5. 5. Is not a copy, duplicate or transcript of other work I am/we are aware that any breach of the above will be 3. considered as cheating, and may result in annulment of the examination and exclusion from all universities and university colleges in Norway for up to one year, according to the Act relating to Norwegian Universities and University Colleges, section 4-7 and 4-8 and Examination regulations section 14 and 15.
    [Show full text]
  • SZEGEDI PÉTER Pozíciók És Oppozíciók: a Futballmező Kialakulása, Struktúrája És Dinamikája
    SZEGEDI PÉTER Pozíciók és oppozíciók: a futballmező kialakulása, struktúrája és dinamikája Az 1945 előtti debreceni labdarúgás történetszociológiai elemzése SZOCIOLÓGIA ÉS SZOCIÁLPOLITIKA TANSZÉK TÉMAVEZETŐ: HADAS MIKLÓS © SZEGEDI PÉTER BUDAPESTI CORVINUS EGYETEM SZOCIOLÓGIA PH.D. PROGRAM Pozíciók és oppozíciók: a futballmező kialakulása, struktúrája és dinamikája Az 1945 előtti debreceni labdarúgás történetszociológiai elemzése PH.D. ÉRTEKEZÉS SZEGEDI PÉTER BUDAPEST 2005 TARTALOM Bevezetés.................................................................................................................... 9 I. A futball társadalmiasultságának történeti-szociológiai vonatkozásai ................18 Kiindulópontok ............................................................................................................... 18 Társadalmi pozíció és sportág-preferencia ................................................................................................... 18 Egyesületek........................................................................................................................................................ 22 A sportegyesületek differenciálódása............................................................................................................. 25 Konfliktusok...................................................................................................................................................... 30 A futballmező ..................................................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • 3. All-Time Records 1955-2019
    UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE STATISTICS HANDBOOK 2019/20 3. ALL-TIME RECORDS 1955-2019 PAGE EUROPEAN CHAMPION CLUBS’ CUP/UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE ALL-TIME CLUB RANKING 1 EUROPEAN CHAMPION CLUBS’ CUP/UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE ALL-TIME TOP PLAYER APPEARANCES 5 EUROPEAN CHAMPION CLUBS’ CUP/UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE ALL-TIME TOP GOALSCORERS 8 NB All statistics in this chapter include qualifying and play-off matches. Pos Club Country Part Titles Pld W D L F A Pts GD ALL-TIME CLUB RANKING 58 FC Salzburg AUT 15 0 62 26 16 20 91 71 68 20 59 SV Werder Bremen GER 9 0 66 27 14 25 109 107 68 2 60 RC Deportivo La Coruña ESP 5 0 62 25 17 20 78 79 67 -1 Pos Club Country Part Titles Pld W D L F A Pts GD 61 FK Austria Wien AUT 19 0 73 25 16 32 100 110 66 -10 1 Real Madrid CF ESP 50 13 437 262 76 99 971 476 600 495 62 HJK Helsinki FIN 20 0 72 26 12 34 91 112 64 -21 2 FC Bayern München GER 36 5 347 201 72 74 705 347 474 358 63 Tottenham Hotspur ENG 6 0 53 25 10 18 108 79 60 29 3 FC Barcelona ESP 30 5 316 187 72 57 629 302 446 327 64 R. Standard de Liège BEL 14 0 58 25 10 23 87 73 60 14 4 Manchester United FC ENG 28 3 279 154 66 59 506 264 374 242 65 Sevilla FC ESP 7 0 52 24 12 16 86 73 60 13 5 Juventus ITA 34 2 277 140 69 68 439 268 349 171 66 SSC Napoli ITA 9 0 50 22 14 14 78 61 58 17 6 AC Milan ITA 28 7 249 125 64 60 416 231 314 185 67 FC Girondins de Bordeaux FRA 7 0 50 21 16 13 54 54 58 0 7 Liverpool FC ENG 24 6 215 121 47 47 406 192 289 214 68 FC Sheriff Tiraspol MDA 17 0 68 22 14 32 66 74 58 -8 8 SL Benfica POR 39 2 258 114 59 85 416 299 287 117 69 FC Dinamo 1948 ROU
    [Show full text]
  • New UEFA National Team Coefficient Ranking System 20 May 2008
    New UEFA National Team Coefficient Ranking System 20 May 2008 New UEFA National Team Coefficient Ranking System 1. Purpose of the UEFA national team coefficient The UEFA national team coefficient is an important tool for ensuring sporting balance and fairness in both the qualifying and final rounds of the UEFA European Football Championship. It is used in particular for the pot allocation for the qualifying draw and the final draw, and it is therefore crucial that the coefficient system reflects the real strength of each team as best as possible. 2. Current UEFA coefficient system The current UEFA coefficient system is generated according to the results achieved in the most recent qualifying competitions for the UEFA European Football Championship and the FIFA World Cup. The total number of points obtained in the qualifying competitions of both of the aforementioned competitions is divided by the number of matches played and the resulting coefficient is used for the rankings. In the case of an association that qualifies automatically for the final round of one of the competitions in question (as host association), the coefficient is calculated on the basis of its results in its most recent qualifying competition. The system has the advantage of offering a good comparison of the team strengths in the qualifying competitions. In addition, it is transparent and simple to calculate. However, the fact that matches played during final tournaments are not taken into account distorts the rankings significantly and does not reflect reality. 3. New proposed UEFA system 3.1. Cornerstones and principles 3.1.1. Matches taken into consideration All national A-team matches played in UEFA EURO and the FIFA World Cup qualifying competitions and final tournaments are taken into consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Fußball in Österreich
    Projektbericht Research Report Fußball in Österreich B. Felderer, D. Grozea-Helmenstein, C. Helmenstein, A. Kleissner, A. Schnabl, R. Treitler Projektbericht Research Report Fußball in Österreich B. Felderer, D. Grozea-Helmenstein, C. Helmenstein, A. Kleissner, A. Schnabl, R. Treitler Endbericht Studie im Auftrag des Österreichischen Fussball-Bundes Dezember 2005 Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien ESCE Economic and Social Research, Eisenstadt ExAqua Forschung Kontakt: Bernhard Felderer Institut für Höhere Studien Stumpergasse 56, 1060 Wien : +43/1/599 91-125 Email: [email protected] Daniela Grozea-Helmenstein Institut für Höhere Studien Abteilung Ökonomie und Finanzwirtschaft Stumpergasse 56, 1060 Wien : +43/1/599 91-226 Email: [email protected] Christian Helmenstein ESCE Economic and Social Research Marktstraße 3, 7000 Eisenstadt Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070 Wien : +43/67684/8048-401 Email: [email protected] Anna Kleissner ESCE Economic and Social Research Marktstraße 3, 7000 Eisenstadt Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070 Wien : +43/67684/8048-600 Email: [email protected] Alexander Schnabl Institut für Höhere Studien Abteilung Ökonomie und Finanzwirtschaft Stumpergasse 56, 1060 Wien : +43/1/599 91-211 Email: [email protected] Roland Treitler ExAqua Forschung Reckentragstraße 20 3300 Amstetten : +43/67684/8048-500 Email: [email protected] Inhaltsverzeichnis Executive Summary 1 Ökonomische Wirkungen des Fußballs in Österreich............................................2 Medien und Werbung ............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • England Top Leagues 2019 - 2020 12/07/2020 09:00 1/17
    Issued Date Page England Top Leagues 2019 - 2020 12/07/2020 09:00 1/17 England - Premier League 2019/20 England - Championship20 2019/20 P T Team PL W D L GH W D L GA W D L GT PT Last RES P T Team PL W D L GH W D L GA W D L GT PT Last RES 1 ● LIVERPOOL FC 35 30 3 2 76:27 17 1 0 47:13 13 2 2 29:14 93 Champions L.. D W W 1 ● LEEDS UNITED 42 24 9 9 68:34 13 5 3 35:14 11 4 6 33:20 81 Promotion W W D 2 ● MANCHESTER CITY 35 23 3 9 91:34 13 2 2 50:12 10 1 7 41:22 72 Champions L.. W W L 2 ● WEST BROMWICH AL.. 43 22 15 6 74:41 10 8 3 42:25 12 7 3 32:16 81 Promotion D W W 3 ● CHELSEA FC 35 18 6 11 63:49 9 3 5 27:16 9 3 6 36:33 60 Champions L.. L W W 3 ● BRENTFORD FC 43 23 9 11 78:35 13 5 3 42:16 10 4 8 36:19 78 Prom Poffs W W W 4 ● LEICESTER CITY 34 17 8 9 64:32 10 4 3 33:15 7 4 6 31:17 59 Champions L.. D W L 4 ● FULHAM FC 43 22 10 11 58:44 14 2 6 35:23 8 8 5 23:21 76 Prom Poffs W W W 5 ● MANCHESTER UNITED 34 16 10 8 59:33 10 5 2 37:14 6 5 6 22:19 58 Europa Leag.
    [Show full text]