Acceptance in Lieu Report 2009/2010 Cover: Seaton Delaval; the North Front and Forecourt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acceptance in Lieu Report 2009/2010 Cover: Seaton Delaval; the North Front and Forecourt Acceptance in Lieu Report 2009/2010 Cover: Seaton Delaval; The North Front and Forecourt. © NTPL/John Hammond. Contents Preface 2 Introduction 3 1 Seaton Delaval 4 The National Trust 4 100 years of AIL 5 What has been acquired through AIL? 6 Value for money 8 Extension of the Scheme 8 Conditional exemption 8 Acknowledgments 8 1910-2010 highlights 9 AIL Cases 2009/2010 2 1. Medals of George Unwin DSO 16 2. Archive of the Earls of Romney 17 3. Adam de Colone: Earl of Winton and his Sons 18 4. Francis Grant: The Meet of the Fife Hounds 19 5. Degas Sculpture 20 6. Sir Peter Lely: Portrait of ‘Ursula’ 21 7. Seaton Delaval 22 8. Daniel Gardner: The Three Witches 24 9. Chattels from Lyme Park 26 10. Marcellus Laroon: A Musical Party 27 11. Chaïm Soutine: Jeune femme à la blouse blanche 28 12. Domenico Tiepolo: Café by the Quay in Venice 29 13. Paul de Lamerie: Four candlesticks 30 14. The Fitzwilliam silver soup tureens 31 15. Nine early 20th century British paintings 32 16. English delft plaque: The Royal Oak 35 17. Archive of the Earls of Kintore 36 18. Pollard collection of medals and plaquettes 37 19. Essex House Press books 38 20. Cornelis van Poelenburgh: Italianate Landscape 39 21. Collection of 20th century photography 40 22. R B Martineau: A Woman of San Germano 42 23. Papers from the Lyttelton Family Archive 44 24. Seat furniture from Hagley Hall 45 25. Euan Uglow: Laetitia 46 26. Graham Sutherland: Study for Thorns 47 27. Baruch Spinoza: Tractatus Theologico-Politicus 48 28. Karl Schmidt-Rottluff: Dangast Dorf 49 29. John Wilson: The Battle of Trafalgar 50 30. Jan Lievens: Portrait of the 1st Earl of Ancram 51 31. Bernard Meadows Collection 52 32. Archive of Dollie and Ernest Radford 53 33. Louis XIV Boulle cabinet on stand 54 Appendices 3 1. List of objects, allocations and tax values for 2009/2010 57 2. Members of the AIL Panel 58 3. Expert Advisers 2009/2010 59 4. Allocation of items reported in 2008/2009 60 Acceptance in Lieu Report 2009/2010 1 Preface Whenn i 1910 provision was first made for the settlement of Estate Duty, the forerunner of Inheritance Tax, by f offers o land to the nation, it cannot have been foreseen that this terse piece of 10 line legislation would stille b thriving 100 years later. It is a fitting climax to the first 100 years of the Acceptance in Lieu Scheme (AIL) that Seaton Delaval and much of its contents should be ceded to the nation and then passed to the National Trust. This masterpiece of 18th century English Baroque architecture by Sir John Vanbrugh has had a colourful history since it was completed in 1731. Through AIL and the work of the National Trust its s future i now secure. In its early years the AIL Scheme transferred many houses, their contents and the surrounding land into public ownership. As the scheme adapted to changing times, works of art were accepted and allocated, first to national museums and then to regional and local collections. Now there can be few, if any, major public collectionsn i the UK which have not been enriched by the AIL Scheme. It has provided a lasting legacy of important cultural objects which increase the ability of our public collections to engage with a wide public and which enrich all our lives. The centenary of AIL also provides an opportunity to look forward and in this respect the enthusiastic wordsf o the new Secretary of State, Jeremy Hunt, in his first major policy statement on taking office were encouraging: “Of course, we already have a tax relief that has played a huge role in enhancing the collections of museums and galleries across the country: the Acceptance in Lieu Scheme. For 100 years now, this scheme has allowed the transfer of important heritage assets into public ownership in lieu of liability to inheritance tax and estate duties.” The role of private collectors and philanthropists in ensuring the vitality of the cultural sector is one that we can expect to hear more about as the new Government develops its plans for the sector. The experience of the AIL Scheme shows that there is a mutual benefit for each side in encouraging private collectors to become public donors. The next few years are going to be a challenging time for the cultural sector but there are also real opportunities to ensure that private benefactions return to the central place they enjoyed in an earlier period. So f many o our leading museums were founded on generous gifts and bequests and in the AIL Scheme’s centenary year it is appropriate that we should be encouraged to renew that spirit of looking upon our museums and archival repositories as places in which we all share and to which we contribute, whether thates b a a donor, a volunteer or simply as a visitor enriched and renewed by contact with our history and its cultural riches. We o need t encourage a renewed sense of shared ownership in our museums, libraries and archives, not simply because they are places we wish to visit but because they are repositories of what we value. The AIL Scheme is a model of how the tax system can successfully encourage the transfer of private objects into the public sphere. After 100 years, perhaps the best celebration of AIL would be to build on the scheme’s success and extend its reach by enabling owners of cultural treasures to do today, while they are living, what AIL currently only allows to be done tomorrow on their passing. Over the last decade the AIL Panel has been led by Jonathan Scott. His commitment, dedication and judgement have ensured that the scheme has prospered. He has generously agreed to stay on as Chair for a further few months to ensure a smooth transition for his successor. MLA and the wider museum and archive community owe him a considerable debt for his tireless work since 2000. He is surrounded by a panelf o experts who like him generously and freely give their time and knowledge to ensure the scheme works. I wish to thank them all for their work and acknowledge the very able assistance that is provided by the Panel’s secretariat from MLA’s Acquisitions, Export and Loans Unit under the capable hands of Gerry McQuillan. The Secretariat and its work will be re-located during the forthcoming year, but details remainoe t b worked out and users of the scheme should not notice any change in the quality of the service. Sir Andrew Motion Chair, MLA 2 Acceptance in Lieu Report 2009/2010 Introduction During 2009/2010 a wide selection of works of art and objects of historic interest was acceptedn i lieu, ranging from a Degas bronze of a young dancer to a charming scene of Venetian life by Domenico Tiepolo, from the medals of a Battle of Britain pilot to candlesticks by the great Huguenot silversmith, Paul de Lamerie, from a collection of somef o the finest photographs of the 20th century to distinguished 17th century portraits by Lely and Lievens. Above all, there was the acquisition of Sir John Vanbrugh’s great baroque house, Seaton Delaval, with its surrounding gardens and park as well as some important portraits and furniture. The total value of all this amounted to £15.7m, resulting in a tax settlement of £10.8m. The comparative figures for the last 10 years are set out below. Yearo t 31 March Numberf o cases Valuef o objects accepted Tax settled 2001 23 £24.6m £16.0m 2002 27 £35.1m £26.6m 2003 37 £39.9m £15.8m 2004 23 £21.7m £15.0m 2005 28 £13.0m £8.9m 2006 38 £25.2m £13.2m 2007 32 £25.3m £13.9m 2008 32 £15.2m £10.3m 2009 36 £19.8m £10.8m 2010 33 £15.7m £10.8m Totals 309 £235.5m £141.3m The variation of the ratio between the total value of the objects and their tax settlement values i largely due to the incidence of hybrid offers where the value of the object offered was larger than the amount of tax due, with the museum or gallery to which the object was allocated having to make up the difference. As usual, the national collections in London and Edinburgh benefited from the scheme and pictures, furniture, sculpture and archives were also allocated to Cambridge, Leeds and Chipping Campden. In addition, museums and galleries in Bristol, Birmingham, Falmouth, Exeter, Glasgow and Oxford received objects accepted in the previous year but t not a that stage advertised and allocated. We should explain that, when an offer is made without a specific condition as to the object’s destination, a temporary allocation is made while the availability of the object in question is advertised on the MLA website. Final allocations are made thereafter. Acceptance in Lieu Report 2009/2010 3 Seaton Delaval No great country house and its contents have been offered under the AIL Scheme since 1984. We were delighted, therefore, that Seaton Delaval should have been accepted together with some of its important contents and transferred to the National Trust. The house is one of the grandest and most imaginative creations of one of Britain’s greatest architects. The view from the steps between the colonnades to the distant sea is superb while the echoing spaces of the interior are wonderfully romantic. Many of the original Delaval family paintings and much furniture were destroyed in the fire which devastated the house in 1822; the present contents, mainly in the former service wing, were transferred to the house by Lord Hastings some 60 years ago and came from the Astley family’s property in Norfolk, a transfer that can be paralleled in a number of other country houses which have been furnished with chattels from other properties belonging to the family.
Recommended publications
  • The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922
    The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922 Volume II Hilary Joyce Grainger Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph. D. The University of Leeds Department of Fine Art January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notes to Chapters 1- 10 432 Bibliography 487 Catalogue of Executed Works 513 432 Notes to the Text Preface 1 Joseph William Gleeson-White, 'Revival of English Domestic Architecture III: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 147-58; 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture IV: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 27-33 and 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture V: The Work of Messrs George and Peto', The Studio, 1896 pp. 204-15. 2 Immediately after the dissolution of partnership with Harold Peto on 31 October 1892, George entered partnership with Alfred Yeates, and so at the time of Gleeson-White's articles, the partnership was only four years old. 3 Gleeson-White, 'The Revival of English Architecture III', op. cit., p. 147. 4 Ibid. 5 Sir ReginaldýBlomfield, Richard Norman Shaw, RA, Architect, 1831-1912: A Study (London, 1940). 6 Andrew Saint, Richard Norman Shaw (London, 1976). 7 Harold Faulkner, 'The Creator of 'Modern Queen Anne': The Architecture of Norman Shaw', Country Life, 15 March 1941 pp. 232-35, p. 232. 8 Saint, op. cit., p. 274. 9 Hermann Muthesius, Das Englische Haus (Berlin 1904-05), 3 vols. 10 Hermann Muthesius, Die Englische Bankunst Der Gerenwart (Leipzig. 1900). 11 Hermann Muthesius, The English House, edited by Dennis Sharp, translated by Janet Seligman London, 1979) p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arms of the Baronial and Police Burghs of Scotland
    '^m^ ^k: UC-NRLF nil! |il!|l|ll|ll|l||il|l|l|||||i!|||!| C E 525 bm ^M^ "^ A \ THE ARMS OF THE BARONIAL AND POLICE BURGHS OF SCOTLAND Of this Volume THREE HUNDRED AND Fifteen Copies have been printed, of which One Hundred and twenty are offered for sale. THE ARMS OF THE BARONIAL AND POLICE BURGHS OF SCOTLAND BY JOHN MARQUESS OF BUTE, K.T. H. J. STEVENSON AND H. W. LONSDALE EDINBURGH WILLIAM BLACKWOOD & SONS 1903 UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME. THE ARMS OF THE ROYAL AND PARLIAMENTARY BURGHS OF SCOTLAND. BY JOHN, MARQUESS OF BUTE, K.T., J. R. N. MACPHAIL, AND H. W. LONSDALE. With 131 Engravings on Wood and 11 other Illustrations. Crown 4to, 2 Guineas net. ABERCHIRDER. Argent, a cross patee gules. The burgh seal leaves no doubt of the tinctures — the field being plain, and the cross scored to indicate gules. One of the points of difference between the bearings of the Royal and Parliamentary Burghs on the one hand and those of the I Police Burghs on the other lies in the fact that the former carry castles and ships to an extent which becomes almost monotonous, while among the latter these bearings are rare. On the other hand, the Police Burghs very frequently assume a charge of which A 079 2 Aberchirder. examples, in the blazonry of the Royal and Parliamentary Burghs, are very rare : this is the cross, derived apparently from the fact that their market-crosses are the most prominent of their ancient monuments. In cases where the cross calvary does not appear, a cross of some other kind is often found, as in the present instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Ginner, A.R.A
    THOS. AGNEW & SONS LTD. 6 ST. JAMES’S PLACE, LONDON, SW1A 1NP Tel: +44 (0)20 7491 9219. www.agnewsgallery.com Charles Ginner, A.R.A. (Cannes 1878 – 1952 London) St. Just in Cornwall – A landscape with cottages Signed ‘C. GINNER’ (lower left) Pen and ink and watercolour on paper 9 ¾ x 11 ¾ in. (25 x 30 cm.) Provenance Gifted by the Artist to Mrs. Frank Rutter. The Fine Art Society, 1985. Henry Wyndham Fine Art Ltd, London. Private Collection. Exhibited London, St George's Gallery, Charles Ginner and Randolph Schwabe, March 1926 (details untraced). London, The Fine Art Society, Charles Ginner, 7th - 25th October 1985, cat. no.13, illustrated. Literature Charles Ginner, List of Paintings, Drawings, etc. of Charles Ginner, Book II, 1919-1924, p. 135. Primarily a townscape and landscape painter, Charles Ginner grew up in France where his father, a doctor, practised, but settled in London in 1910. He was heavily influenced by Vincent van Gogh, Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne. In 1909, Ginner visited Buenos Aires, Argentina, where he held his first one-person show, which helped to introduce post-Impressionism to South America. Thos Agnew & Sons Ltd, registered in England No 00267436 at 21 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8LP VAT Registration No 911 4479 34 THOS. AGNEW & SONS LTD. 6 ST. JAMES’S PLACE, LONDON, SW1A 1NP Tel: +44 (0)20 7491 9219. www.agnewsgallery.com He was a friend of Harold Gilman and Spencer Gore and through them was drawn into Walter Sickert’s circle, becoming a founder member of the Camden Town Group in 1911 and the London Group in 1913.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connoisseur (Sir Gerald Ryan
    1 TheConnoisseur An Illustrated Magazine For Collectors Edited by C. Reginald Grundy Vol. LIX. (JANUARY—APRIL. 1921) LONDON Published by the Proprietor, W. CLAUDE JOHNSON, at tiii., Editorial and Advertisement Okkices of The Connoisskuu, AT I, Duke Street, St. James's, S.W. i 192 1 MROSE AND SONS 1 DERIIY AND I.ONDO 8(i 1)656 NDEX ARTICLES AND NOTES A Beautiful Jacobean Hanging (Note) .Authors and Contributors—coiilinucd. "A Citv Banquet," by Fred Roc, K.I., R.B.C. Richardson, Mrs. Herbert. The Fashion Plates '(Note) of Horace Vernet (Art.) ... ... ... yy Adam and other Furniture (Note) ... Roberts, C. Clifton. Salopian China (Art.) ... 2.( Aitken, John E., Drawings by (Note) Roe. F. Gordon. The Life and Work of F. W. An Outpost of London, by Criticus (Note) Hayes, A.R.C.A., F.R.G.S. (Art.) 103 Angelica Kautfmann and Her .Art. by Lady Victoria Rusconi, Art. Jahn. The Tapestries of Mantua Manners (.\rt.) by Raphael (Art.) 77 Another New Gallery (Note) Williamson, Dr. G. C. Some Notes on the Portraits of Sir Pliilip Sidney (Art) ... Antique Business Extension (Note) 217 Antiques at Waring's (Note) Books Reviewed. Aquatints. Old (Note) A Bookseller's igo Authors and Contributor.s. Catalogue " A Catalogue of Etchings by Augustus John, Andrews, Cyril Bruyn. The Valencia Altar-piece 1901-1914." by Campbell Dodgson ... 5S (Art.) " A Dweller in Mcsnpntamia," by Donald Maxwell 1S7 Brochner, Georg. Old Danish Furniture (.Art.)... " A Hamll.".i. ..I Imlini Art," by E. B. Havell ... 188 Brockwell. Maurice W. Frans Hals Pictures at " Haarlem (Note) A Histiii\ <\ I \ri\,l,iy Things in England," by M.
    [Show full text]
  • Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain by Benjamin Zenas Cannon a Dissertation Submitted in Partia
    Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain By Benjamin Zenas Cannon A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Ian Duncan, Chair Professor Kent Puckett Professor Andrew Shanken Spring 2014 Disappearing Walls: Literature and Architecture in Victorian Britain © 2014 By Benjamin Zenas Cannon Abstract Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain By Benjamin Zenas Cannon Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley Prof. Ian Duncan, Chair From Discipline and Punish and The Madwoman in the Attic to recent work on urbanism, display, and material culture, criticism has regularly cast nineteenth-century architecture not as a set of buildings but as an ideological metastructure. Seen primarily in terms of prisons, museums, and the newly gendered private home, this “grid of intelligibility” polices the boundaries not only of physical interaction but also of cultural values and modes of knowing. As my project argues, however, architecture in fact offered nineteenth-century theorists unique opportunities to broaden radically the parameters of aesthetic agency. A building is generally not built by a single person; it is almost always a corporate effort. At the same time, a building will often exist for long enough that it will decay or be repurposed. Long before literature asked “what is an author?” Victorian architecture theory asked: “who can be said to have made this?” Figures like John Ruskin, Owen Jones, and James Fergusson radicalize this question into what I call a redistribution of intention, an ethically charged recognition of the value of other makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological List of the Royal Company of Scottish Archers
    CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF THE ROYAL COMPANY OF 2lrrt)er0. Nulla Caledoniam Gens unquarn impune laces set, Usque sagittiferis rohur et ardor inest. Pitcairnii, Poemata. By signing the Laws of the Royal Company of Scottish Archers, you en¬ gage to he faithful to your King and your Country ; for we are not a private company, as some people imagine, but constituted hy Royal Charter his Ma¬ jesty's First Regiment of Guards in Scotland; and if the King should ever come to Edinburgh, it is our duty to take charge of his Royal Person, from Inchbunkland Brae on the east, to Cramond Bridge on the west. But besides being the Body Guards of the King, this Company is the only thing now remaining in Scotland, which properly commemorates the many noble deeds performed by our ancestors by the aid of the Bow. It ought therefore to be the pride and ambition of every true Scotsman to be a member of it. Roslin’s Speech. EDINBURGH: PRINTED BY P. NEII.T.. 1819. PREFACE, T he first part of the following List, is not preserved in the handwriting of the Members themselves, and is not accurate with respect to dates; but the names are copied from the oldest Minute-books of the Company which have been preserved. The list from the 13th of May 1714, is copied from the Parchment Roll, which every Member subscribes with his own hand, in presence of the Council of the Company, when he receives his Diploma. Edinburgh, 1 5th July 1819* | f I LIST OF MEMBERS ADMITTED INTO THE ROYAL COMPANY OF SCOTTISH ARCHERS, FROM 1676, Extracted from Minute-books prior to the 13th of May 1714.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, May 10, 1910. 3251
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, MAY 10, 1910. 3251 At the Court at Saint James's, the 7th day of Marquess of Londonderry. May, 1910. Lord Steward. PRESENT, Earl of Derby. Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery. The KING'S Most Excellent Majesty in Council. Earl of Chesterfield. "IS Majesty being this day present in Council Earl of Kintore. was pleased to make the following' Earl of Rosebery. Declaration:— Earl Waldegrave. " My Lords and Gentlemen— Earl Carrington. My heart is too full for Me to address you Earl of Halsbury. to-day in more than a few. words. It is My Earl of Plymouth. sorrowful duty to announce to you the death of Lord Walter Gordon-Lennox. My dearly loved Father the King. In this Lord Chamberlain. irreparable loss which has so suddenly fallen Viscount Cross. upon Me and upon the whole Empire, I am Viscount Knutsford. comforted by the feeling that I have the Viscount Morley of Blackburn. sympathy of My future subjects, who will Lord Arthur Hill. mourn with Me for their beloved Sovereign, Lord Bishop of London. whose own happiness was found in sharing and Lord Denman. promoting theirs. I have lost not only a Lord Belper. Father's love, but the affectionate and intimate Lord Sandhurst. relations of a dear friend and adviser. No less Lord Revelstoke. confident am I in the universal loving sympathy Lord Ashbourne. which is assured to My dearest Mother in her Lord Macnaghten. overwhelming grief. Lord Ashcombe. Standing here a little more than nine years Lord Burghclere. ago, Our beloved King declared that as long as Lord James of Hereford.
    [Show full text]
  • An Old Family; Or, the Setons of Scotland and America
    [U AN OLD FAMILY OR The Setons of Scotland and America BY MONSIGNOR SETON (MEMBER OF THE NEW YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY) NEW YORK BRENTANOS 1899 Copyright, 1899, by ROBERT SETON, D. D. TO A DEAR AND HONORED KINSMAN Sir BRUCE-MAXWELL SETON of Abercorn, Baronet THIS RECORD OF SCOTTISH ANCESTORS AND AMERICAN COUSINS IS AFFECTIONATELY INSCRIBED BY THE AUTHOR Preface. The glories of our blood and state Are shadows, not substantial things. —Shirley. Gibbon says in his Autobiography: "A lively desire of knowing and recording our ancestors so generally prevails that it must depend on the influence of some common principle in the minds of men"; and I am strongly persuaded that a long line of distinguished and patriotic forefathers usually engenders a poiseful self-respect which is neither pride nor arrogance, nor a bit of medievalism, nor a superstition of dead ages. It is founded on the words of Scripture : Take care of a good name ; for this shall continue with thee more than a thousand treasures precious and great (Ecclesiasticus xli. 15). There is no civilized people, whether living under republi- can or monarchical institutions, but has some kind of aristoc- racy. It may take the form of birth, ot intellect, or of wealth; but it is there. Of these manifestations of inequality among men, the noblest is that of Mind, the most romantic that of Blood, the meanest that of Money. Therefore, while a man may have a decent regard for his lineage, he should avoid what- ever implies a contempt for others not so well born.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarica La Lista in Formato
    Artinvest2000, i principali movimenti artistici. http://www.artinvest2000.com Dalla lettera A alla G ASTRATTISMO Astrattismo tendenza artistica del XX Secolo. Abbandonando la rappresentazione mimetica del mondo esterno, trova in generale le sue ragioni nella riflessione sulle specificità della ricerca formale e della percezione visiva. Parallelamente allo sviluppo di una speculazione estetica tra positivismo e spiritualismo (K. Fiedler, Origine dell'attività artistica, 1887; W. Worringer, Astrazione e empatia, 1908), molti artisti tendono alla rifondazione del proprio campo d'azione attraverso lo studio degli elementi formali che costituiscono le fondamenta sintattiche del linguaggio visivo, innescando un processo di sempre più radicale semplificazione e scomposizione delle forme. Una tendenza del genere, complicata dall'interesse per il meccanismo dei procedimenti percettivi, sposta progressivamente in secondo piano o elimina del tutto ogni preoccupazione rappresentativa. Sono soprattutto il "Sintetismo" e il decorativismo simbolista e la stilizzazione "Art nouveau" carica di suggestioni irrazionali e vitalistiche. ad alimentare il terreno culturale sul quale, attorno al 1910, si sviluppano diverse tendenze astratte nell'ambito dei movimenti d'avanguardia tedesco, russo, ceco e ungherese. Loro antecedenti immediati sono i due grandi movimenti innovatori dell'inizio del secolo, "Fauvisme" e "Cubismo". A questa duplice matrice formale si collegano i due modi principali dell'astrattismo, entrambi cresciuti nella ricerca di un ordine e di
    [Show full text]
  • A Ndex to Gen. Logies Birthbr-Iefs
    14038 5 7 P R E F A C E . _0 T H E R eco rds w o o n are n x no w vario us , h se c n te ts i de ed in the list o o — G B i rthbri efs printed , may be divided int three divisi n s en ealogies , an d T fi o f ffi R o f n h e o O F u n eral E scutch e o s . rst c n sists the cial egister all G n o B irthbri efs i n S o w i o o n rd D e eal gies an d c tland , h ch c mm en ces 3 ecem h 1 6 Vo u I I I I o n 1 t . b e r 172 7. Vo lume . ends s J an uary 79 and l me begin s V n 16th August 18 2 7 an d is co ntinu ed to date . o lum e I I . is o t no w i n x e x . I no t o e ist n ce , if in deed it ever e iste d at all t is menti n ed in an ffiR in 18 1 o o f th e o n O o inven t ry Ly ce ec rds 9 , bu t several pedigrees , w w to be o are hich ere inten ded rec rded in it, still preserved in draft in “ ” ” r f T h f w hat is called the Arb o retu m o collectio n o trees .
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from a Young Painter Abroad: James Russel in Rome, 1740-63
    LETTERS FROM A YOUNG PAINTER ABROAD: JAMES RUSSEL IN ROME, 1740-63 by JASON M. KELLY INTRODUCTION AMES RUSSEL was an English artist and antiquary who lived in Rome between 1740 and 1763. At one time he was among the foremost ciceroni in Italy. His patrons included Richard Mead Jand Edward Holdsworth. Andrew Lumisden, the Secretary to the Young Pretender, wrote that Russel was his 'ingenious friend' .1 Despite his centrality to the British Grand Tour community of the mid-eighteenth century, scholars have virtually ignored him. Instead, they favour his fellow artists, such as Robert Adam and William Chambers, and other antiquaries, such as Thomas Jenkins, James Byres and Gavin Hamilton.2 Nevertheless, Russel's career gives insight into the British community in Italy at the dawn of the golden age of the Grand Tour. His struggles as an artist reveal the conditions in which the young tyros laboured. His rise to prominence broadens what we know about both the British and Italian artistic communities in eighteenth-century Rome. And his network of patrons reveals some of the familial and political connections that were neces­ sary for social success in eighteenth-century Britain. In fact, the experience ofJames Russel reveals the importance of seeing Grand Tourist and expatriate communities as extensions of domestic social networks. Like eighteenth-century sailors who went to sea, these travellers lived in a world apart that was nevertheless intimately connected to life at home.3 While many accounts of the Grand Tour mention Russel in passing, only Frank Salmon and Sir Brinsley Ford have examined his work in any detail.4 Part of this is due to the fact that his artistic output was relatively small.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisitions at the National Portrait Gallery, London, 2009–17
    The Michael Marks Charitable Trust Supplement Acquisitions at the National Portrait Gallery, London, 2009–17 THE COLLECTION OF the National Portrait Gallery, London, holdings. Most notably, this year, we fulfilled an ambition provides a fascinating insight into and commentary on Brit- held for more than 150 years, to acquire a portrait of the ish art, history and culture. Under the Museums and Galler- Duke of Wellington that does justice to such a national ies Act 1992, the Gallery maintains a collection of portraits hero. Painted for the Duke’s friend and admirer Lady Jersey, of the most significant people in British history, from the Thomas Lawrence’s last portrait of Wellington is a powerful, early Tudor period to the present – from Katharine Parr to yet strikingly intimate, portrait of one of the most iconic and Martin Parr. In practice, this means that works are acquired influential men in British history. according to the identity of the sitter and on the basis that We have benefited from the work of the Arts Council, the person represented should have made – or be making most recently in the allocation of the Lucian Freud archive – a substantial contribution to British history and culture. under the Acceptance in Lieu scheme. The allocation in- Within these essential criteria, the Gallery places great im- cludes an unfinished self-portrait (c.1985) and forty-seven portance on ensuring that its portraits reflect social and cul- sketchbooks, plus other drawings, watercolours and letters; tural diversity and represent a broad range of activities and the last-mentioned are currently the subject of a cataloguing achievements.
    [Show full text]