DOCSLIB.ORG

NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mount Pleasant North Zone Preliminary Assessment Mount Pleasant Property Southwestern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mount Pleasant North Zone Preliminary Assessment Mount Pleasant Property Southwestern 330 Alison Blvd. Fredericton, New Brunswick Canada, E3C 0A9 Telephone: (506) 454-2359 Facsimile: (506) 454-2355 NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mount Pleasant North Zone Preliminary Assessment Mount Pleasant Property Southwestern New Brunswick, Canada Effective Date: January 22nd, 2010 FINAL REPORT PROJECT NUMBER 6526-03 REVISION: 02 Prepared By: J. Dean Thibault, P. Eng. Thibault & Associates Inc. Tim R. McKeen, P. Eng. Thibault & Associates Inc. Stephanie M. Scott, P. Eng. Thibault & Associates Inc. Trevor Boyd, P. Geo. Consultant for Adex Mining Inc. Andrew Hara, P. Eng. Hara Mining Enterprises Inc. Prepared For: Adex Mining Inc. Toronto, Ontario, Canada NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mount Pleasant North Zone Preliminary Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Geology and Exploration................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Resource Estimate............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Mining................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.5 Processing......................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 Environmental ................................................................................................................... 1-5 SECTION 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Sources of Information ...................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Scope of Work................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Disclaimer.......................................................................................................................... 2-2 SECTION 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ...................................................................... 3-1 3.1 General.............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Geological Studies and Exploration .................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Property Description, History and Ownership ................................................................... 3-1 3.4 Mineralogy, Metallurgical Processing and Waste Treatment............................................ 3-1 3.5 Product Markets and Value of Products............................................................................ 3-1 3.6 Environmental Impact and Environmental Planning ......................................................... 3-2 3.7 Other ................................................................................................................................. 3-2 SECTION 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION .................................................... 4-1 4.1 Mining Claims and Surface Rights.................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Royalties............................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.3 Permits .............................................................................................................................. 4-3 SECTION 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Accessibility....................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Climate and Physiography ................................................................................................ 5-1 5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure .................................................................................. 5-1 SECTION 6.0 HISTORY............................................................................................................... 6-1 SECTION 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING...................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Regional Geology.............................................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Local Geology ................................................................................................................... 7-1 SECTION 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES .................................................................................................. 8-1 8.1 General.............................................................................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Porphyry Tin-(±Indium) Deposits ...................................................................................... 8-1 i SECTION 9.0 MINERALIZATION................................................................................................ 9-1 9.1 General.............................................................................................................................. 9-1 9.2 North Zone ........................................................................................................................ 9-1 SECTION 10.0 EXPLORATION................................................................................................. 10-1 10.1 General.......................................................................................................................... 10-1 10.2 Scoping Study of the Fire Tower Zone.......................................................................... 10-2 SECTION 11.0 DRILLING.......................................................................................................... 11-1 11.1 General.......................................................................................................................... 11-1 11.2 Drill Hole Surveying....................................................................................................... 11-1 SECTION 12.0 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH ........................................................ 12-1 SECTION 13.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY .............................. 13-1 13.1 General.......................................................................................................................... 13-1 13.2 WGM Analytical Methods.............................................................................................. 13-2 SECTION 14.0 DATA VERIFICATION ...................................................................................... 14-1 14.1 General.......................................................................................................................... 14-1 14.2 Adex Assay Verification of the 2008 Diamond Drilling.................................................. 14-1 14.3 Adex Verification of Historical Assay Results (Phase I)................................................ 14-1 14.4 Adex Verification of Historical Assay Results (Phase II)............................................... 14-2 14.5 WGM Data Corroboration ............................................................................................. 14-4 SECTION 15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES............................................................................... 15-1 SECTION 16.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ....................... 16-1 SECTION 17.0 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE..................... 17-1 17.1 General.......................................................................................................................... 17-1 17.2 Drill Hole Database Used.............................................................................................. 17-3 17.3 Basic Statistics of Drill Hole Assay Data....................................................................... 17-5 17.4 Inference of Indium Grades........................................................................................... 17-5 17.5 Interpretation of the Mineralized Zones......................................................................... 17-6 17.6 Sample Compositing ..................................................................................................... 17-8 17.7 Variography ................................................................................................................. 17-15 17.8 Block Model and Estimation Parameters .................................................................... 17-15 17.9 Mineral Resources Estimate Statement...................................................................... 17-17 17.10 Global Mineral Resources Statement ....................................................................... 17-23 17.11 Definition of High Grade Blocks Within the Deep Tin, Upper Deep Tin, North Adit and Lode Deposits .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effect of Porphyritic Andesite Int Metamorphism Aureole in Sel
    E-ISSN : 2541-5794 P-ISSN :2503-216X Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol 5 No 2 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE Effect of Porphyritic Andesite Intrusion on The Formation of Contact Metamorphism Aureole in Selo Gajah Hill Clastic Limestone, Bojonegoro Regency, East Java, Indonesia Tri Winarno1,*, Jenian Marin1, Wisnu Wijaya Jati1 1Department of Geological Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia Corresponding author : [email protected] Telp :+62 857-4006-6835 Received: Nov 18, 2019, Accepted: Jun 25, 2020. DOI 10.25299/jgeet.2020.5.2.4098 Abstract At Selo Gajah Hill, Jari Village, Gondang Sub-district, Bojonegoro Regency, East Java there are limestone intruded by porphyritic andesite. The intrusion produces contact metamorphisms in the wall rocks. It is very interesting to study the protolith rock, facies of metamorphism and the zonation of contact metamorphism aureole. This research uses field observation method and laboratory analysis i.e. petrographic analysis. Field observation is conducted by doing geological mapping in the Bukit Selo Gajah area and rock sampling for petrographic analysis. Petrographic analysis aims to describe the texture of the rocks and the percentage of minerals, which will be used to determine the protolith rock, metamorphism facies and the determination of contact metamorphism zone. The lithology found in Mount Selo Gajah from oldest to youngest are clastic limestone with intercalation of marl, marl with intercalation of sandstone, porphyritic andesite intrusions, hornfels, and pyroclastic breccia. Metamorphic rocks on Selo Gajah Hill is the product of contact metamorphism of carbonate rock which was intruded by porphyritic andesite intrusion. The metamorphism facies found in the research area are hornblende hornfels and pyroxene hornfels with the protolith rock is carbonate rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, West-Central British Columbia
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2014-10-24 A Second North American Hot-spot: Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, west-central British Columbia Kuehn, Christian Kuehn, C. (2014). A Second North American Hot-spot: Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, west-central British Columbia (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/25002 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/1936 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY A Second North American Hot-spot: Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, west-central British Columbia by Christian Kuehn A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS CALGARY, ALBERTA OCTOBER, 2014 © Christian Kuehn 2014 Abstract Alkaline and peralkaline magmatism occurred along the Anahim Volcanic Belt (AVB), a 330 km long linear feature in west-central British Columbia. The belt includes three felsic shield volcanoes, the Rainbow, Ilgachuz and Itcha ranges as its most notable features, as well as regionally extensive cone fields, lava flows, dyke swarms and a pluton. Volcanic activity took place periodically from the Late Miocene to the Holocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Map Units
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE LATIR VOLCANIC FIELD AND ADJACENT AREAS, NORTHERN NEW MEXICO By Peter W. Lipman and John C. Reed, Jr. 1989 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS [Ages for Tertiary igneous rocks are based on potassium-argon (K-Ar) and fission-track (F-T) determinations by H. H. Mehnert and C. W. Naeser (Lipman and others, 1986), except where otherwise noted. Dates on Proterozoic igneous rocks are uranium-lead (U-Pb) determinations on zircon by S. A. Bowring (Bowring and others, 1984, and oral commun., 1985). Volcanic and plutonic rock names are in accord with the IUGS classification system, except that a few volcanic names (such as quartz latite) are used as defined by Lipman (1975) following historic regional usage. The Tertiary igneous rocks, other than the peralkaline rhyolites associated with the Questa caldera, constitute a high-K subalkaline suite similar to those of other Tertiary volcanic fields in the southern Rocky Mountains, but the modifiers called for by some classification schemes have been dropped for brevity: thus, a unit is called andesite, rather than alkali andesite or high-K andesite. Because many units were mapped on the basis of compositional affinities, map symbols were selected to emphasize composition more than geographic identifier: thus, all andesite symbols start with Ta; all quartz latites with Tq, and so forth.] SURFICIAL DEPOSITS ds Mine dumps (Holocene)—In and adjacent to the inactive open pit operation of Union Molycorp. Consist of angular blocks and finer debris, mainly from the Sulphur Gulch pluton Qal Alluvium (Holocene)—Silt, sand, gravel, and peaty material in valley bottoms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mount Scott Intrusive Suite, Wichita Mountains, Oklahoma
    The Mount Scott Intrusive Suite, Wichita Mountains, Oklahoma Jonathan D. Price Department of Chemistry, Geosciences, and Physics, Midwestern State University, 3410 Taft Boulevard, Wichita Falls, Texas, 76308. [email protected]. ph. (940) 397-4288. ABSTRACT blende and alkali feldspar near its top to produce a liq- uid that gave rise to the Saddle Mountain Granite. In the last 50 years the Mount Scott Granite and three other granite bodies—the Rush Lake Granite, INTRODUCTION the Medicine Park Granite, and the Saddle Moun- tain Granite—have been characterized and mapped Nearly half a century has passed since Clifford A. Mer- as separate lithodemic units within the eastern Wich- ritt recognized the Mount Scott Granite as a distinctive unit ita Mountains of southwestern Oklahoma. These are based on its petrographic characteristics (Merritt, 1965). part of the Wichita Granite Group (WGG), products His paper is a classic examination of this well-exposed of felsic magmatism during Eocambrian rifting of the Cambrian granite in the eastern Wichita Mountains, south- Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen. Like all members of western Oklahoma. His careful examination arose from the WGG, these are pink-to-red A-type alkali feldspar the exhaustive seminal study of Oklahoma’s crystalline granites. Each is porphyritic and wholly or partially rocks undertaken with William E. Ham and Roger E. Den- granophyric, as are other WGG members. These units, ison (Ham et al., 1964) published the previous year. Ham however, share contact and compositional relationships et al. (1964) examined the rocks of the Wichita Mountains that suggest a common reservoir in the crust that ulti- as the surface exposure of earliest Cambrian magmatism mately fed shallow (locally subvolcanic) tabular pluton- preserved in the Oklahoma basement.
    [Show full text]
  • We Get Different Igneous Rocks When a Magma (Lava) Crystallizes Because
    r CRITERIA USED TO CLASSIFY IGNEOUS ROCKS: L TEXTURE—THE SIZE, SHAPE, AND RELATIONSHIP OF THE MINERAL GRAINS TO EACH OTHER 2. COMPOSITION—WHAT MINERAL OR MINERALS ARE PRESENT WE GET DIFFERENT IGNEOUS ROCKS WHEN A MAGMA (LAVA) CRYSTALLIZES BECAUSE: 1. MAGMAS HAVE DIFFERENT COMPOSITIONS—COMPOSITION 2. WHETHER 1ST FORMED MINERALS STAY IN LIQUID AND REACT WITH IT OR ARE REMOVED FROM THE LIQUID AND DO NOT REACT WITH IT—COMPOSITION 3. RATE OF COOLING—TEXTURE 4. VOLATILES—TEXTURE AND COMPOSITION 5. ASSIMILATION—COMPOSITION COMPOSITIONS OF MAGMA/LAVA % SiO2 (not quartz) 1. ACIDIC (GRANITIC/RHYOLITIC) >70% 2. INTERMEDIATE (DIORITIC/ANDESITIC) 55-65% 3. BASIC (GABBROIC/BASALTIC) <50% POSSIBLE IGNEOUS ROCK TEXTURES PHANERITIC PORPHYRITIC PHANERITIC PHANERITIC PORPHYRITIC APHANITIC PORPHYRITIC APHANITIC APHANITIC PORPHYRITIC GLASSY PORPHYRITIC GLASSY GLASSY PORPHYRITIC FRAGMENTAL TABLE 4-1. USAGE OF THE WORDS PORPHYRITIC AND PORPHYRY FOR AN IGNEOUS ROCK CONTAINING POTASH FELDSPAR AND QUARTZ % Phenocrysts Groundmass Texture Rock Name 0-5% Phaneritic Phaneritic Granite 5-25% Phaneritic Porphyritic Phaneritic Porphyritic Granite > 25% Phaneritic Phaneritic Porphyritic Granite Porphyry 0-5% Aphanitic Aphanitic Rhyolite 5-25% Aphanitic Porphyritic Aphanitic Porphyritic Rhyolite > 25% Aphanitic Aphanitic Porphyritic Rhyolite Porphyry DiscontinuouLIsS Continuous Series Series •»-* Olivine Anorthite || A> c? Bytownite CO \ 0 . ... Pyroxene ^/ <</ / Labradorite \ $ / w UJ Amphibole cc '§ \ *j ®JY Oligoclase 1 _ Biotite _ . _ * . Albite . — . '— . — . < | UJ
    [Show full text]
  • How Does a Rock Crystallize from a Melt? Si-O Tetrahedra Form First
    1 Rock types and the rock cycle 2 Rock types and the rock cycle 3 Rock types and the rock cycle 4 Rock types and the rock cycle 5 Characteristics of magma • Parent material of igneous rocks is magma 6 Characteristics of magma • Parent material of igneous rocks is magma • Forms from partial melting of rocks inside the Earth 7 Characteristics of magma • Parent material of igneous rocks is magma • Forms from partial melting of rocks inside the Earth • Magma that reaches the surface is called lava 8 Magma to lava 9 How are magmas produced? 10 How are magmas produced? 11 How are magmas produced? 12 How are magmas produced? 13 How are magmas produced? 14 How are magmas produced? 15 How are magmas produced? 16 How are magmas produced? 17 The nature of magma Consists of three components: Melt _ liquid _ mobile ions Solids - silicate minerals (mostly) Volatiles - dissolved gases - H2O, (CO2), (SO2) 18 How does a rock crystallize from a melt? Si-O tetrahedra form first 1 19 How does a rock crystallize from a melt? Si-O tetrahedra form first Tetrahedra connect with each other and other ions 20 How does a rock crystallize from a melt? Si-O tetrahedra form first Tetrahedra connect with each other and other ions Minerals form in a specific order 21 How are igneous rocks classified? 1)Texture 2) Chemistry 22 Extrusive versus intrusive rocks Rocks formed from lava at the surface are extrusive, or volcanic rocks 23 Extrusive versus intrusive rocks Rocks formed from lava at the surface are extrusive, or volcanic rocks Rocks formed from magma that crystallizes
    [Show full text]
  • Tungsten Natural Resources Lands, Minerals and Petroleum Mineral Commodity Profile No
    Tungsten Natural Resources Lands, Minerals and Petroleum Mineral Commodity Profile No. 7 ungsten (W), from the Swedish tung (heavy) and Danish and electric circuit connections. Pure tungsten has a similar Tsten (stone), is a hard, ductile steel grey to greyish white density to gold and can therefore be used in jewelry as an metal. It has the highest melting point of all the non-alloyed alternative to gold or platinum. It is ideal for making rings metals, and is the densest metal used for everyday purposes. that will resist scratching, are hypoallergenic, and will not It also has the lowest vapour pressure and the highest tensile need polishing. In the chemical industry it is used in ceramic strength of all the non-alloyed metals at high temperatures. glazes and enamels, white pigments in paint, fireproofing of Tungsten is typically found in tungstate minerals that contain textiles, and in the production of semiconductor circuits varying proportions of tungsten, iron, manganese, and (International Tungsten Industry Association 2005; Pitfield calcium combined with oxygen; the most common ones are and Brown 2011). wolframite ((Fe,Mn)WO 4 ) and scheelite (CaWO 4 ) (International Tungsten Industry Association 2005). Uses An American man named Irving Langmuir patented the tungsten filament lamp The pure form of tungsten, as well as its compounds and in 1916. This incandescent alloys, are used in the production of hardmetals (tungsten lamp used tungsten rather carbide), specialist steels, and in chemical applications. It is than carbon or other metals estimated that hardmetals utilize 60% of global tungsten as a filament inside the light production.
    [Show full text]
  • The Granite System Near Betliar Village (Gemeric Superunit, Western Carpathians): Evolution of a Composite Silicic Reservoir
    Journal of Geosciences, 55 (2010), 131–148 DOI: 10.3190/jgeosci.066 Original paper The granite system near Betliar village (Gemeric Superunit, Western Carpathians): evolution of a composite silicic reservoir Michal KUBIŠ1,2, Igor BROSKA1* 1 Geological Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, P.O. Box 106, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; [email protected] 2 Present address: Geofos Ltd., Veľký diel 3323, 010 08 Žilina, Slovakia * Corresponding author Boron- and fluorine-rich highly evolved granites in the Betliar area (Gemeric Unit, Western Carpathians) represent composite intrusion that formed probably during two distinct magmatic episodes. During the first stage, evolved granitic magma originating from an underlying volatile-rich reservoir intruded into an open fault system in the form of sill-like bodies and crystallized as equigranular or medium- to fine-grained rocks. The subsequent volatile flux enhanced post- magmatic alterations of the solidified granites and led to the formation of greisens with elevated amounts of tourmaline and Nb–Ta–W–Th phases. During the second stage, magma from a deeper magmatic reservoir intruded as a mush containing K-feldspar, albite, mica and quartz phenocrysts and gave rise to porphyritic granites. Partial dissolution and corrosion of the phenocrysts was enhanced by a pressure drop during emplacement of the porphyritic granites into middle-crustal level where the volatile-rich residual melt rapidly crystallized and is now preserved as quartz–albite–K-feldspar matrix with tourmaline and other accessories. Monazite and zircon geochronology indicates that the process occurred during Middle and Late Permian, and possibly extended to Early Triassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Andesite Conference Guidebook
    ANDESITE CONFERENCE GUIDEBOOK I NTERNATI 0 NAL UPPER MANTLE PROJECT Sci enti fi c Report 16-S Published by: State of Oregon, Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, as Bulletin 62 International UPPER MANTLE COMMITTEE Prof. V. V. BELOUSSOV, Chairman (Moscow) Dr. Luis R. A. CAPURRO (Buenos Aires) Prof. A. E. RINGWOOD (Canberra) Dr. J. M. HARRISON (Ottawa) Prof. S. K. RUNCORN (Newcastle-upon-Tyne) Prot. Leon KNOPOFF, Secretary-General (Los Angeles) Dr. Klyoo \,VADATI (Tokyo) ANDESITE CONFERENCE July 1 to 6, 1968 Eugene and Bend, Oregon U. S. A. Sponsored by: University of Oregon Center for Volcanology A. R. McBirney, Director International Upper Mantle Committee Prof. Hisashi Kuno, Chairman Working Group on Petrology and Volcanism State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries H. M. Dole, State Geologist Financial assistance for the Andesite Conference was provided by the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics and by the International Union of Geological Sciences. The Upper Mantle Project is an international program of research on the solid earth sponsored by the International Counci I of Scientific Unions; the program is coordinated by the International Upper Mantle Committee, an IUGG committee set up jointly by the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics and the International Union of Geological Sciences, with rules providing for the active participation of all interested ICSU Unions and Committees. Cover Picture: Andesite Thin Section Cover design is a microdrawing of the hypersthene-augite andesite at the highest peak of Mount jefferson. The rock is typical of the andesites of the Oregon Cascades in both its petrographic features and chemical composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Igneous Rocks and the Rock Cycle
    Igneous Rocks and the Rock Cycle Designed to meet South Carolina Department of Education 2005 Science Academic Standards Table of Contents What are Rocks? (slide 3) (Standard: 3-3.1 (covers slides 3-39)) Major Rock Types (slide 4) The Rock Cycle (slide 5) Igneous Rocks (slide 6) (3-3.1) What happens to molten rock as it cools? (slide 7) Crystal size and Cooling Rates (slide 8) Texture (slide 9-10) Igneous Rock Textures: (slide 11-20) Phaneritic (12) , Aphanitic (13) , Porphyritic (14) , Glassy (15) , Pegmatitc (16), Pyroclastic (17 - 18), Aa Lava (19) , Pahoehoe (20) Igneous Rocks Mineral Composition (slide 21) Magma and Bowens Reaction Series (slide 22 - 23) Mineral Composition and Magma (slide 24) Ferromagnesian Silicates (slide 25) Non-Ferromagnesian Silicates (slide 26) Igneous Rock Categories: Granitic, Basaltic, Andesitic (slide 27) Igneous Rocks: (slide 28 - 38) Granite (29) , Rhyolite (30) , Pumice (31) , Obsidian (32) , Gabbro (33) , Basalt (34) , Diabase (35) , Andesite (36) , Diorite (37) , Tuff (38) Igneous Rocks in the Landscape (slide 39) Igneous Rocks in South Carolina (slide 40) South Carolina Science Standards (slides 41) Resources and References (slide 42) 2 What are Rocks? Most rocks are an aggregate of one or more minerals and a few rocks are composed of non-mineral matter. There are three major rock types: 1. Igneous 2. Metamorphic 3. Sedimentary 3 Table of Contents Major Rock Types Igneous rocks are formed by the cooling of molten magma or lava near, at, or below the Earth’s surface. Sedimentary rocks are formed by the lithification of inorganic and organic sediments deposited near or at the Earth’s surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry and Geochronology of Eocene Forearc Magmatism on Vancouver Island: Implications for Cenozoic to Recent Plate Configurations in the Pacific Basin
    GEOCHEMISTRY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF EOCENE FOREARC MAGMATISM ON VANCOUVER ISLAND: IMPLICATIONS FOR CENOZOIC TO RECENT PLATE CONFIGURATIONS IN THE PACIFIC BASIN Julianne Kathleen Madsen BSc. Hons. Earth Sciences The University of Victoria, 200 1 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Earth Sciences O Julianne Madsen 2004 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2004 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Julianne Kathleen Madsen Degree: M.Sc. Earth Sciences Geochemistry and geochronology of Eocene forearc magmatsim on Vancouver Island: Title of Thesis: implications for Cenozoic to Recent plate configurations in the Pacific Basin Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Doug Stead Professor Simon Fraser University Dr. Derek J. Thorkelson Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Simon Fraser University Dr. Daniel Marshall Associate Professor Simon Fraser University Dr. Richard Friedman Research Associate (PCIGR) University of British Columbia Dr. Stephen T. Johnston External Examiner Associate Professor Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria Date Approved: December 2,2004 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Igneous Formations
    DESCRIPTION OF THE IGNEOUS FORMATIONS. ANTHRACITE SHEET. By increasing coarseness of grain in the ground- north, and east. In Ragged mountain, a few hardened and iron-stained, as in Mineral point> it The igneous rocks of the Anthracite district mass the porphyrite may grade into diorite. Thus miles north of Mount Marcellina, is a huge lacco­ is often difficult to trace them. the mass of Mount Marcellina has acquired a present three strongly contrasting modes of occur­ lite of coarse grained porphyrite, and here the Description. This dike system represents a structure so nearly granular that the rock has rence. First, and most prominent, are the great strata run high up on the outlying spurs, resting series of eruptions whose products are closely been separately indicated upon the map, though plainly on the laccolite core, and contain thick related to each other in a manner of much interest laccolites and closely related intrusive sheets; strictly belonging to the porphyrite series. Upon second, a remarkable system of dikes; and third, intrusive sheets. to the petrologist. This is especially true of the the Hayden map all of these larger laccolite a great series of volcanic breccias, tuffs, and semi- The geological distribution of these intrusive rocks found in the channel south of Augusta moun­ conglomerates. Both laccolites and dikes pene­ bodies except the Storm ridge mass were called sheets in this area is much more extensive than is tain, for the way in which they gradually pass "porphyritic trachyte." The latter body was not trate the uppermost Cretaceous strata, and are represented on the map, but the various Cretace­ from one variety into another affords valuable certainly of Tertiary age.
    [Show full text]