Oscillons in Higher-Derivative Effective Field Theories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oscillons in Higher-Derivative Effective Field Theories PHYSICAL REVIEW D 98, 123512 (2018) Oscillons in higher-derivative effective field theories † Jeremy Sakstein* and Mark Trodden Center for Particle Cosmology, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, 209 S. 33rd St., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA (Received 26 September 2018; published 13 December 2018) We investigate the existence and behavior of oscillons in theories in which higher derivative terms are present in the Lagrangian, such as Galileons. Such theories have emerged in a broad range of settings, from higher-dimensional models, to massive gravity, to models for late-time cosmological acceleration. By focusing on the simplest example—massive Galileon effective field theories—we demonstrate that higher derivative terms can lead to the existence of completely new oscillons (quasibreathers). We illustrate our techniques in the artificially simple case of 1 þ 1 dimensions, and then present the complete analysis valid in 2 þ 1 and 3 þ 1 dimensions, exploring precisely how these new solutions are supported entirely by the nonlinearities of the quartic Galileon. These objects have the novel peculiarity that they are of the differentiability class C1. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123512 I. INTRODUCTION conserved. When the conserved charge results from a global U(1) symmetry [or an unbroken U(1) of some Essentially all of modern physics is described by non- higher gauge group], these objects are typically referred linear partial differential equations (PDEs). In many cases, to as Q-balls [1]. it is sufficient to study highly symmetric configurations Another class of interesting nonlinear solitary objects such that these reduce to ordinary differential equations or are oscillons, sometimes called breathers. Oscillons are to study some linearized regimes in which the equations are stable, extended, quasiperiodic (in time) particlelike exci- easily solved. More generally, of course, multidimensional tations. These are objects with no conserved charges at all and nonlinear processes are crucial to the understanding of and for this reason are typically found in real scalar field a host of phenomena, from weather patterns, to black hole theories. Their stability is due to nonlinearities that result physics, to the early universe. Among the rich and varied in some of their comprising harmonics being localized and phenomena exhibited by nonlinear PDEs, one class of unable to propagate to infinity. In some cases, breathing particularly interesting objects not present in the linear objects may not be exact solutions, and so may be long- regime is solitons, localized particlelike excitations that can lived rather than absolutely stable. It is these objects, be stable or extremely long-lived. Some examples of referred to as quasibreathers, that this paper is concerned solitons include solitary water waves, domain walls, kinks, with. Oscillons can occur in Bose-Einstein condensates and Skyrmions, and vortices. Typically, solitons can be classi- may be relevant in the early universe. Indeed, the end state fied into two classes: topological and nontopological of many models of scalar field inflation is a universe solitons. The former are localized and stable due to the dominated by oscillons that form after the scalar conden- presence of nontrivial homotopy groups of the vacuum sate fractures due to some instability or through parametric manifold of the field equations. These lead to defects that reheating [2,3]. Classical oscillons are supported by non- cannot relax to zero energy configurations due to some linear potentials that are shallower than quadratic away conserved topological quantity. The latter are localized from the minimum [4], but oscillons have also been found and carry some conserved Noether charge Q that requires in Pðϕ;XÞ theories [where X ¼ −ð∂ϕÞ2=2 is the canonical an energetically unfavorable decay in order to remain kinetic term] [5], and, in particular, the Dirac-Born-Infeld action can give rise to such objects. Oscillons can also exist *[email protected] in multifield theories and may form after multifield † [email protected] inflation driven by string moduli [6]. The purpose of this paper is to determine the existence Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of of oscillons in more general classes of higher derivative the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. – Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to effective field theories [7 17]. We focus in particular on a the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, simple representative of such theories, known as Galileons and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3. [8], and perform a preliminary investigation of their 2470-0010=2018=98(12)=123512(13) 123512-1 Published by the American Physical Society JEREMY SAKSTEIN and MARK TRODDEN PHYS. REV. D 98, 123512 (2018) properties. Galileon theories are a class of higher-derivative their contribution to the equations of motion enters at the effective field theories whose equations of motion are same order in ε as the canonical kinetic term and mass. precisely second order and therefore are not plagued by (Another way of saying this is that they enter at a lower Ostrogradski ghosts. Rather than being a fully covariant order in ε than one would näively expect.) This approach theory, they are defined on Minkowski space and as such is akin to the construction of so-called flat-top oscillons [4], they arise in the decoupling or low-energy limits of many where one guarantees that higher-order operators are different physical theories, including the Dvali-Gabadaze- important by taking some dimensionless parameter to be Porrati (DGP) braneworld model [18], ghost-free Lorentz- ≫1. While this is necessary to find solutions analytically, invariant massive gravity [19,20], and higher-derivative one typically finds similar large-amplitude objects numeri- covariant theories constructed to avoid Ostrogradski ghosts cally for generic parameter choices [4], and so this [9,10]. Our motivations for searching for breather solutions assumption can ultimately be relaxed. in Galileon theories are manyfold. First, Galileons may Our main results are as follows: 1 play a role in the early universe. Indeed, Galileon inflation (1) 1 þ 1 dimensions: Only the cubic Galileon exists, has been extensively studied (see [28,29] for example), but and it is unable to support quasibreathers without the end point of this process is not clear. Finding Galileon the aid of other non-Galileon operators. We give an oscillons is one step toward determining if Galileon breath- example of this by including shift-symmetric, but ers could be formed after inflation. Similarly, alternatives to not Galileon symmetric, operators and find novel inflation, in particular Galilean genesis, utilizes Galileon breather solutions. This example serves as a warm- field theories [30,31]. Another motivation is that massive up exercise designed to gain an analytic handle on Galileons are a proxy for ghost-free massive gravity [32] the problem, and to glean insight into the construc- and oscillons may act as a potential signature of these tion of Galileon oscillons before moving to higher theories. Finally, the Vainshtein mechanism and nonre- dimensions, where the equations are less analytically normalization theorems that Galileon theories enjoy [8,33] tractable. We construct the profiles for these objects mean that the higher-derivative operators are within the numerically and calculate their amplitude as a regime of validity of the effective field theory (EFT) in function of the model parameters. contrast to Pðϕ;XÞ theories. One example where this is (2) 3 þ 1 dimensions: We find novel oscillons/quasi- problematic for solitons is Skyrmion theories where higher- breathers supported by the nonlinearity of the quartic derivative operators are required for stability so that such Galileon and the canonical kinetic term. These objects objects are outside the regime of validity of the EFT. For are solutions of a highly nonlinear second-order this reason, finding solitons in Galileon theories is inter- ordinary differential equation. Surprisingly, and in esting in its own right. There is a no-go theorem for static contrast to other oscillons relevant for cosmology, solitons [34] but the existence and stability of time- these objects are C1 functions and inhabit the space dependent solitons is still unexplored. W1;1.2 In the next section we give a brief introduction to A. Summary of results and plan of the paper oscillons/quasibreathers in theories with nonlinear poten- tials and Pðπ;XÞ [with X ¼ −ð∂πÞ2=2] operators. In the In this paper we perform a first investigation of oscillon subsequent section we introduce the massive Galileon EFT solutions in massive Galileon EFTs. Because the equations and discuss some salient theoretical features. In Sec. IV we of motion resulting from higher-derivative theories are derive and present the main results of our work outlined rather complicated, it is instructive to find the simplest above. We begin with the warm-up example of constructing system that encapsulates the relevant and new physics; Galileon breathers in 1 þ 1 dimensions before moving as we shall see, Galileons satisfy this requirement. The on to study the quartic Galileon in 3 þ 1 dimensions. We existence of Galileon operators is dimension and geometry conclude and discuss the implications of our findings as dependent. For this reason, we will analyze Galileon well as future directions in Sec. V. Our metric convention breathers in d 1 dimensions where d 1, 2, 3 separately. þ ¼ is the mostly positive one, and we work in units where We determine the existence of oscillons by looking for ℏ ¼ c ¼ 1. small-amplitude solutions controlled by some parameter ε < 1, which is used as an expansion parameter to construct an asymptotic series. Furthermore, we choose parameters 2We remind the reader that a function belongs to the differ- such that the Galileon operators are sufficiently large that entiability class Ck if its derivatives f; f0; …;fðkÞ exist and are continuous.
Recommended publications
  • Dark Matter with Density-Dependent Interactions
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Physics Papers Department of Physics 12-28-2012 Dark Matter with Density-dependent Interactions Kimberly K. Boddy California Institute of Technology Sean M. Carroll California Institute of Technology Mark Trodden University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/physics_papers Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Boddy, K. K., Carroll, S. M., & Trodden, M. (2012). Dark Matter with Density-dependent Interactions. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/physics_papers/272 Boddy, K. K., Carroll, S. M., & Trodden, M. (2012). Dark Matter with Density-dependent Interactions. Physical Review D, 86(12), 123529. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123529 © 2012 American Physical Society This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/physics_papers/272 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dark Matter with Density-dependent Interactions Abstract The decay and annihilation cross sections of dark matter particles may depend on the value of a chameleonic scalar field that both evolves cosmologically and takes different values depending on the local matter density. This possibility introduces a separation between the physics relevant for freeze-out and that responsible for dynamics and detection in the late universe. We investigate how such dark sector interactions might be implemented in a particle physics Lagrangian and consider how current and upcoming observations and experiments bound such dark matter candidates. A specific simple model allows for an increase in the annihilation cross section by a factor of 106 between freeze-out and today, while more complicated models should also allow for scattering cross sections near the astrophysical bounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Acceleration Mechanisms
    Exotic Acceleration Mechanisms Mark Trodden U.Penn/Syracuse University Stanford Linear Accelerator Center SLAC Summer Institute 8/11/2008 Outline • Introduction. • A Disclaimer • Topological Defects (I’ll focus on these) - Overview - Classification and Formation - Dynamics - Examples - cusps, superconducting strings, cosmic necklaces • Superheavy Dark Matter (Briefly) - Generation - Preheating - Annihilations and Decays • Lorentz Violations (Even more briefly) • Summary and Conclusions Mark Trodden, U.Penn/Syracuse University SLAC Summer Institute Exotic Acceleration Mechanisms Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, 8/11/2008 Disclaimer • I am not a cosmic ray physicist! • I don’t write papers on this topic! • I really am not a cosmic ray expert in any way! • Honestly! But ... • My particular topic isn’t really about cosmic rays. • It is really about the types of beyond the standard model physics, (both particle physics and cosmology) that can give rise to tremendously high particles in today’s universe. • I do know a bit about that. • Hopefully! Mark Trodden, U.Penn/Syracuse University SLAC Summer Institute Exotic Acceleration Mechanisms Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, 8/11/2008 Main Point We seek extremely high energy particles in today’s universe There are really two broad ways in which one can imagine getting these • Astrophysics: Interacting matter in today’s universe conspires to accelerate particles to high velocities. • Cosmology: Here there is a problem - the universe cools! No simple equilibrium process leads to high energy particles being produced cosmologically in today’s universe. • To get around this need to somehow “preserve” some of the early, high-energy universe, and then persuade it to give up its energy as highly-accelerated particles today.
    [Show full text]
  • ILC Cosmology
    Cosmology and the International Linear Collider Mark Trodden Syracuse University Aspen Winter Workshop Aspen Center for Physics 2/15/2005 Outline • A very brief review, following Josh and Lawrence • The ALCPG Working Group on Cosmological Connections • Dark Matter • The Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe • Dark Energy and Inflation (!) [See related talks by Josh Frieman, Lawrence Krauss, Carlos Wagner, Shufang Su, Geraldine Servant, Aaron Chou, Greg Tarle, Sean Carroll, plus talks on neutrinos (which I haven’t mentioned here). Sorry if I’ve missed anyone!] Particle physics and cosmology, as disciplines independent of one another, no longer exist. Our most fundamental questions are now the same and we are approaching them in complementary ways. We don’t know what these particles are but we have some well-motivated ideas We know what these particles are but not why they haven’t met their antiparticles We have absolutely no idea what this stuff is and we have no ideas that are well-motivated and well-developed! Colliders as Time Machines The ALCPG Working Group on Cosmological Connections http://www.physics.syr.edu/~trodden/lc-cosmology/ Editorial Committee: • Marco Battaglia (Berkeley) • Jonathan Feng (Irvine, co-Chair) [email protected] • Norman Graf (SLAC) • Michael Peskin (SLAC) • Mark Trodden (Syracuse, co-Chair) [email protected] Have commissioned many new studies in addition to Synthesizing existing results into a single coherent picture Although a couple of months later than anticipated, analyses will be reported at LCWS 2005 at Stanford
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICS LETTERS B Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology
    PHYSICS LETTERS B Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Audience p.1 • Impact Factor p.1 • Abstracting and Indexing p.1 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.3 ISSN: 0370-2693 DESCRIPTION . Physics Letters B ensures the rapid publication of important new results in particle physics, nuclear physics and cosmology. Specialized editors are responsible for contributions in experimental nuclear physics, theoretical nuclear physics, experimental high-energy physics, theoretical high- energy physics, astrophysics, astroparticle physics and cosmology. Benefits to authors We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services. Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center AUDIENCE . Nuclear and particle physicists; Mathematical physicists; Astrophysicists IMPACT FACTOR . 2020: 4.771 © Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports 2021 ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING . Current Contents - Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences INSPEC Zentralblatt MATH Mathematical Reviews Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 24 Sep 2021 www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb 1 EDITORIAL BOARD . Experimental High Energy Physics Michael Doser, European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1211, Geneve, Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for New Particles & Symmetries
    The Search for New Particles & Symmetries Mark Trodden Syracuse University Symposium to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory of the Discovery of the Antiproton Berkeley CA, 10/29/2005 Outline • Accounting for the Energy Budget of the Universe • Mysteries of the Pie Chart – Dark Matter; the Baryon Asymmetry; Cosmic Acceleration • Connecting Cosmology and Fundamental Physics New Symmetries @ the TeV Scale. – TeV Scale Physics, the Hierarchy Problem and Dark Matter – TeV Scale Physics and the Baryon Asymmetry – What About Dark Energy? Particle physics and cosmology, as disciplines independent of one another, no longer exist. Our most fundamental questions are now the same and we are approaching them in complementary ways. Mark Trodden, Syracuse University 50th Anniversary Antiproton Symposium, The Search for New Particles & Symmetries Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 10/27/2005 Dark Matter Baryons Dark Energy Mark Trodden, Syracuse University 50th Anniversary Antiproton Symposium, The Search for New Particles & Symmetries Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 10/27/2005 We don’t know what these particles are but we have some well-motivated ideas We know what these Dark Matter particles are but not Baryons why they haven’t met their antiparticles Dark Energy We have absolutely no idea what this stuff is and we have no ideas that are well-motivated and well-developed! Mark Trodden, Syracuse University 50th Anniversary Antiproton Symposium, The Search for New Particles & Symmetries Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 10/27/2005 Our Three Problems • Three problems posed by observational cosmology - a great achievement, but raises many issues. • Need fundamental physics to understand what the universe is made of and why these observations look the way they do.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baryon Asymmetry
    Particle Physics and Cosmology I: The Baryon Asymmetry Mark Trodden Center for Particle Cosmology University of Pennsylvania First Lecture Puerto Vallarta Cosmology on the Beach Conference Mexico 1/11/2011 Problems of Modern Cosmology Why is the cosmological constant so small? Is cosmic acceleration a signal of a breakdown of GR? What is driving cosmic acceleration? LECTURE III Origins: • Why is the universe so flat? What is the nature of dark matter? • Why is the universe so LECTURE II homogeneous? • Why did the universe begin What laid down its from a low entropy state? primordial perturbations? Why is there more • What resolves the big bang matter than antimatter? singularity? LECTURE I Mark Trodden, University of Pennsylvania Cosmology on the Beach Conference Particle Physics and Cosmology I: The Baryon Asymmetry Puerto Vallarta, Mexico 1/11/2011 The Particle Cosmology Connection •Essentially all of these call for fundamental physics solutions, and typically it is the interplay with particle physics that is crucial. •The connections between particle physics and cosmology are vast, and certainly even the basics cannot be covered in 3 lectures. •Instead, I’ll focus on three major problems and describe some popular approaches to them, covering some of the relevant particle physics along the way. •Our discussions sessions should help fill in some gaps. Mark Trodden, University of Pennsylvania Cosmology on the Beach Conference Particle Physics and Cosmology I: The Baryon Asymmetry Puerto Vallarta, Mexico 1/11/2011 Lecture I: Outline • Why is the Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe (BAU) a problem for either particle physics or cosmology? • The general principles behind candidate models.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA TEP Seminar Archives TEP Seminars
    UCLA TEP Seminar Archives TEP Seminars Spring 2021 “How Different is More?: Precision Tuesday, June 15th Simeon Hellerman correlators at large R-change” Tuesday, June 8th Eric D'Hoker (UCLA) “Shortcuts to String Amplitudes” Tuesday, May 25th Ian Moult (Stanford) “Conformal Colliders Meet the LHC” Tuesday, May 18th N/A N/A Tuesday, May 11th N/A N/A Tuesday, May 4th Sandipan Kundu “RG Flows and Bounds from Chaos” Tuesday, April 27th Steven Weinberg (UT Austin) “Massless Particles” Mark Mezei (Stony Brook “Effective field theories for quantum Tuesday, April 20th University) chaos” “The RG Improved Effective Potential Tuesday, April 13th Emily Nardoni (UCLA) from EFT” “Unitarization in Kaluza Klein theory and Tuesday, April 6th Kurt Hinterbichler the Geometric Bootstrap” “5d counter-terms and rigid Tuesday, March 30th Martin Fluder (Princeton) supergravities” Winter 2021 Tuesday, March 23rd N/A N/A Tuesday, March 16th N/A N/A Tuesday, March 9th Per Kraus (UCLA) "Quantizing 3d gravity in a finite box" "Symmetries and Threshold States in Tuesday, March 2nd Igor Klebanov (Princeton) 2d Models for QCD" "Towards all loop supergravity Tuesday, February 23rd Agnese Bissi (Uppsala University) amplitudes" "The IR structure of QCD in the near Tuesday, February 16th Ira Rothstein (Carnegie Mellon) forward limit. A fresh look at an old problem” "The statistical mechanics of near- Tuesday, February 9th Luca Iliesiu (Princeton) extremal and near-BPS black holes" Leonardo Rastelli (Stony Brook Tuesday, February 2nd "A CFT distance conjecture" University)
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(CMB2006)003 , on Nce Ce
    Physics of the very early Universe: what can we PoS(CMB2006)003 learn from particle collider experiments? Mark Trodden∗† Syracuse University, USA E-mail: [email protected] Modern cosmology poses deep and unavoidable questions for fundamental physics. In this ple- nary talk, delivered at the CMB and Physics of the Early Universe International Conference, on the island of Ischia, Italy, in 2006, I discuss the broad connections between cosmology and parti- cle physics, focusing on physics at the TeV scale, accessible at the next and future generations of colliders. CMB and Physics of the Early Universe 20-22 April 2006 Ischia, Italy ∗Speaker. †A footnote may follow. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Physics of the very early Universe: what can we learn from particle collider experiments? Mark Trodden 1. Introduction I will begin by inventorying the energy budget of the universe, and pointing out the places where our understanding is seriously hampered by issues that are firmly rooted in particle physics. I will then go on to describe in broad terms the current status of our approaches to these issues. In some cases, most notably dark matter and baryogenesis, a linear collider may rule out or provide evidence for existing proposals. On the other hand, if this is not the case, then precision measure- ments of physics at the TeV scale may very well point the way to a new understanding of these PoS(CMB2006)003 fundamental cosmological conundrums. Beyond these topics, I will briefly speculate on possible connections between collider experi- ments and one of the most esoteric cosmological concepts - dark energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Cosmic Parallax Distinguish Between Anisotrophic Cosmologies?
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Physics Papers Department of Physics 12-11-2009 Can Cosmic Parallax Distinguish Between Anisotrophic Cosmologies? Michele Fontanini University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Eric J. West University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Mark Trodden University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/physics_papers Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Fontanini, M., West, E. J., & Trodden, M. (2009). Can Cosmic Parallax Distinguish Between Anisotrophic Cosmologies?. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/physics_papers/41 Suggested Citation: Fontanini, M., E.J. West and M. Trodden. (2009). "Can cosmic parallax distinguish between anisotropic cosmologies?" Physical Review D. 80, 123515. © 2009 The American Physical Society http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.123515 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/physics_papers/41 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Can Cosmic Parallax Distinguish Between Anisotrophic Cosmologies? Abstract In an anisotropic universe, observers not positioned at a point of special symmetry should observe cosmic parallax—the relative angular motion of test galaxies over cosmic time. It was recently argued that the nonobservance of this effect in upcoming precision astrometry missions such as GAIA may be used to place strong bounds on the position of off-center observers in a void-model universe described by the Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric. We consider the analogous effect in anisotropic cosmological models described by an axisymmetric homogeneous Bianchi type I metric and discuss whether any observation of cosmic parallax would distinguish between different anisotropic evolutions. Disciplines Physical Sciences and Mathematics | Physics Comments Suggested Citation: Fontanini, M., E.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Theory University of Pennsylvania
    Mark Trodden The State of Theory University of Pennsylvania Testing Gravity 2015 Simon Fraser University Overview • Motivations - background, and the problem of cosmic acceleration • Why consider Modified gravity? • What are the theoretical issues facing any such approach? Screening mechanisms - focusing on the Vainshtein mechanism. • How to Construct Models - An example: Galileons - origins and novel features An alternative title: “What Are Theorists Thinking/Worrying About Today?” This is a story in progress - no complete answers yet. Useful (hopefully) reference for a lot of what I’ll say is Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model Bhuvnesh Jain, Austin Joyce, Justin Khoury and MT arXiv:1407.0059; to appear in Physics Reports (2015). The State of Theory Mark Trodden, U. Penn Modifying Gravity (Motivated by Acceleration) Maybe cosmic acceleration is due to corrections to GR! One thing to understand is: what degrees of freedom does the metric g µ n contain in general? gµn The graviton: Scalar fields: a spin 2 particle spin 0 particles Aµ hµn A vector field: f We’re familiar a spin 1 particle with this. These are less familiar. GR pins vector A µ and scalar f fields, making non-dynamical, and leaving only familiar graviton hµn e.g., f(r) models Almost any other action will free some of them up [Carroll, Duvvuri, M.T. & Turner, (2003)] More interesting things also possible - massive gravity - see later The State of Theory Mark Trodden, U. Penn A common Language - EFT How do theorists think about all this? In fact, whether dark energy or modified gravity, ultimately, around a background, a theory consists of a set of interacting fields in a Lagrangian.
    [Show full text]
  • SLAC Summer Institute 2017 SLAC, Stanford, August 2017 University Of
    Mark Trodden Dark Energy Theory University of Pennsylvania SLAC Summer Institute 2017 SLAC, Stanford, August 2017 Overview • Motivations - background, and the problem of cosmic acceleration • Some possible approaches: •The cosmological constant • Dynamical dark energy • Modified gravity • What are the theoretical issues facing any dynamical approach? Screening mechanisms, Connections to particle physics and field theory. Try to explain how particle physicists think about • An example: Galileons these things. Useful (hopefully) reference for some of what I’ll say • Discussion of Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model Massive Gravity Bhuvnesh Jain, Austin Joyce, Justin Khoury and MT • A few comments. Phys.Rept. 568 1-98 (2015), [arXiv:1407.0059] Dark Energy Theory Mark Trodden, U. Penn The Cosmic Expansion History What does data tell us about the expansion rate? Expansion History of the Universe Perlmutter, Physics Today (2003) expands We now know, partly forever relative 1 0.1 s 0.01 se 0.001 p 1.5 brightness 0.0001 lla co through this data, that the universe is not only 1.0 0 expanding ... 0.25 After inflation, d 0.5 the expansion either... te a˙ > 0 a 0.75 ed r redshift t e Scale of the Universe 0.5 ra l 1 le e Relative to Today's Scale ce c c e a 1.5 n d he 2 , t s ed y 2.5 ... but is accelerating!! rat a 3 le w e l c a e t d r past today future s o r . i 0.05 . 0.0 f . –20 –10 0 10 a¨ > 0 Billions Years from Today a¨ If we trust GR then µ (r + 3p) a − Then we infer that the universe must be dominated by some strange stuff with p<-ρ/3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Acceleration: Past and Present
    COSMIC ACCELERATION: PAST AND PRESENT A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Nishant Agarwal May 2011 c 2011 Nishant Agarwal ALL RIGHTS RESERVED COSMIC ACCELERATION: PAST AND PRESENT Nishant Agarwal, Ph.D. Cornell University 2011 Our Universe has an exciting history of accelerated expansion. Following its in- ception in an event known as the big bang, the Universe underwent a phase of exponential expansion called inflation. Although precise observations of the cos- mic microwave background (CMB) radiation and large-scale structure support the inflationary paradigm, the absence of a firm physical mechanism for inflation has led to a plethora of theoretical embarkments attempting to understand its genesis. Inflation lasted only for a fraction of a second, but observations suggest that thir- teen billion years after inflation, the Universe began accelerating once again. This acceleration, which continues till date, is attributed to a mysterious component, dubbed dark energy, that fills up our Universe and accounts for almost 73% of the total energy density in the Universe. In this thesis we study and develop models of inflation and dark energy, in the light of current observations. We begin, in Chapter 1, with a detailed introduction to cosmic acceleration, and discuss various models of inflation and dark energy that have been studied in the literature in the recent years. In Chapter 2, we discuss how a hierarchy of Hubble flow parameters, extended to include the evolution of the inflationary sound speed, can be applied to compare a general, single-field inflationary action with cosmological observational data.
    [Show full text]