DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Niobrara Confluence and Ponca Bluffs Conservation Areas, Nebraska and South Dakota

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Niobrara Confluence and Ponca Bluffs Conservation Areas, Nebraska and South Dakota Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Land Protection Plan Niobrara Confluence and Ponca Bluffs Conservation Areas Nebraska and South Dakota March 2013 Prepared by National Park Service Missouri National Recreational River 508 East 2nd Street Yankton, South Dakota 57078 605 / 665 0209 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6, Mountain–Prairie Region Division of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 303 / 236 8145 CITATION U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service. 2013. Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Land Protection Plan—Niobrara Confluence and Ponca Bluffs Conservation Areas, Nebraska and South Dakota. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain–Prairie Region. 200 p. Abstract Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Land Protection Plan Niobrara Confluence and Ponca Bluffs Conservation Area, Nebraska and South Dakota Type of Action: Administrative Lead Agencies: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service Responsible Officials: Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Michael Reynolds, Regional Director, Midwest Region, National Park Service This draft environmental impact statement and conservation action because they keep the land in land protection plan identifies the purpose and need private ownership and on local tax bases. The pro- for a joint conservation effort along the Missouri posed action (alternative C) for the Niobrara Conflu- River in northeast Nebraska and southeast South ence Conservation Area sets forth a conservation Dakota and describes and evaluates four alternative goal of 80,000 acres, with 64,000 acres of that goal plans for managing wildlife, habitat, recreational being acquired through easements. For the Ponca access, and protection of historic sites. This process Bluffs Conservation Area, the proposed action sets has involved the development of a vision, goals, objec- forth a goal of 60,000 acres, with 48,000 acres being tives, and strategies that meet the legal directives of conserved through conservation easements. the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and The alternatives considered were developed using National Park Service (NPS) and has considered the a prioritization matrix that included: input of interested groups and the public. Under the no-action alternative (alternative A), ■■ important habitats for Federal trust species the proposed conservation areas would not be estab- (bald eagles, least terns, piping plovers, and lished and FWS and NPS would continue to operate pallid sturgeon); as under current conditions—that is, continuing to manage the Missouri River and portions of the Nio- ■■ areas that are important for overall river brara River and Verdigre Creek as the Missouri health and functionality (confluences, histor- National Recreational River. FWS would continue to ical floodplain, and large islands); work with private landowners on restoration efforts with no option for conservation easements or fee-title ■■ areas in which to improve or maintain rec- acquisition. reational access sites to the Missouri River; Alternatives B–D evaluate a range of conserva- tion goals that include a mix of 80 percent conserva- ■■ historically significant sites; tion easements and 20 percent fee-title acquisition. Conservation easements are the preferred method of ■■ areas with high-quality scenic attributes. Commenting: Comments are due 60 days after the notice of availability of this document is published in the Federal Register. Com- ments should be mailed to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attention: Nick Kaczor, Division of Refuge Planning, 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300, Lakewood, CO 80228. Comments can also be submitted online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/niob-ponca or by email to [email protected]. All comments received from the public and interested groups will be placed in the administrative record for this planning process. Comments will be made available for inspection by the public, and copies may also be provided to the public. For further information, contact Nick Kaczor at 303 / 236 4387. Cooperating Agencies: Nebraska Natural Resources Conservation Service; South Dakota Natural Resource Conservation Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Nebraska Game and Parks Commission; South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks. Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................... XV Environmental Impact Statement ChAPTER 1—Introduction ...................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Need for Action ................................................................ 3 Proposed Project Areas ......................................................................... 3 1.2 Decision to be Made ....................................................................... 4 1.3 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Refuge System ...................................... 4 1.4 The National Park Service and the Wild and Scenic Rivers System .............................. 5 1.5 Contributions to National and Regional Plans ................................................. 6 Landscape Conservation Cooperatives .............................................................. 6 The State of Nebraska Natural Legacy Project ........................................................ 6 The State of South Dakota Wildlife Action Plan ....................................................... 6 Natural Resources Conservation Service—Wetlands Reserve Program ...................................... 7 Species Recovery Plans ......................................................................... 7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Master Water Control Manual ............................................ 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge Complex Comprehensive Conservation Plan ...... 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program, Mountain–Prairie Region Strategic Plan, Eastern Tallgrass Prairie and Prairie Pothole Focus Areas .............................................. 8 National Park Service—General Management Plans, Missouri National Recreational River ....................... 8 North American Waterfowl Management Plan ........................................................ 8 National Fish Habitat Partnership Action Plan ......................................................... 8 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Missouri River Recovery Program .......................................... 9 Missouri River Ecosystem Recovery Plan ............................................................ 9 Migratory Bird Program ......................................................................... 9 The Nature Conservancy Ecoregional Portfolio ........................................................ 9 Nebraska Surface Water Quality Standards (Title 117) ................................................... 9 South Dakota Antidegradation of Waters of the State (74:51:01:34) ......................................... 10 1.6 Planning Process .......................................................................... 10 Subsequent Planning Activities ................................................................... 10 1.7 Public Involvement ......................................................................... 10 Cooperating Agencies .......................................................................... 12 Tribal Coordination ............................................................................ 12 Involvement of Interested Groups and the Public ...................................................... 13 1.8 Scope of the Document ..................................................................... 13 Decision Area ................................................................................ 13 Analysis Area ................................................................................ 13 1.9 Significant Issues to Address ................................................................ 13 Local Economies and Tourism (Socioeconomics) ....................................................... 13 Partnerships and Collaboration ................................................................... 13 Ecological and River Functionality ................................................................. 15 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 15 vi Draft EIS and LPP—Niobrara Confluence and Ponca Bluffs Conservation Areas, Nebraska and South Dakota Recreational Opportunities ...................................................................... 15 Wildlife, Fisheries, and Their Habitats .............................................................. 16 1.10 Issues Not Addressed ...................................................................... 16 Modification of Missouri River Water Flows and Authorized Purposes ....................................... 16 Use of Emergent Sandbar Habitats along the Missouri River .............................................. 17 Designation of Missouri National Recreational River .................................................... 17 Placement and Approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline .................................................... 17 ChAPTER 2—history, Vision, and Goals ........................................................ 19 2.1 A Portrait of the Missouri
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 26, 2019
    April 26, 2019 Theodore Payne Foundation’s Wild Flower Hotline is made possible by donations, memberships, and the generous support of S&S Seeds. Now is the time to really get out and hike the trails searching for late bloomers. It’s always good to call or check the location’s website if you can, and adjust your expectations accordingly before heading out. Please enjoy your outing, and please use your best flower viewing etiquette. Along Salt Creek near the southern entrance to Sequoia National Park, the wildflowers are abundant and showy. Masses of spring flowering common madia (Madia elegans) are covering sunny slopes and bird’s-eye gilia (Gilia tricolor) is abundant on flatlands. Good crops of owl’s clover (Castilleja sp.) are common in scattered colonies and along shadier trails, woodland star flower (Lithophragma sp.), Munz’s iris (Iris munzii), and the elegant naked broomrape (Orobanche uniflora) are blooming. There is an abundance of Chinese houses (Collinsia heterophylla) and foothill sunburst (Pseudobahia heermanii). This is a banner year for the local geophytes. Mountain pretty face (Tritelia ixiodes ssp. anilina) and Ithuriel’s spear (Triteliea laxa) are abundant. With the warming temperatures farewell to spring (Clarkia cylindrical subsp. clavicarpa) is starting to show up with their lovely bright purple pink floral display and is particularly noticeable along highway 198. Naked broom rape (Orobanche uniflora), foothill sunburst (Pseudobahia heermanii). Photos by Michael Wall © Theodore Payne Foundation for Wild Flowers & Native Plants, Inc. No reproduction of any kind without written permission. The trails in Pinnacles National Park have their own personality reflecting the unusual blooms found along them.
    [Show full text]
  • Gavins Point Dam, South Dakota, to Ponca State Park, Nebraska
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense 1986 Gavins Point Dam, South Dakota, to Ponca State Park, Nebraska Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons "Gavins Point Dam, South Dakota, to Ponca State Park, Nebraska" (1986). US Army Corps of Engineers. 38. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha/38 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Corps of Engineers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1It~ 1tatitNt4t ~ ~WM 1te~ 4Itd S(Jed 'DcWda ~1)e4~ 1It 1It'R'R-1 Gavins Point Dam, South Dakota, to Ponca State Park, Nebraska .. ~ ,-" c?0~ - OMAHA DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JULY 1980 SUPPLEMENT NO.1, MARCH 1986 - MRDPD-ER (MROPD-A/17 Apr 86) 1st End Galloway/tw/7280 SUBJECT: Missouri National Recreational River, Supplement No. 1 to General Design Memorandum DA, Missouri River Division, Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 103, Downtown Station, Omaha, Nebraska 68101-0103 Ar~ ~ 4 l,a5 TO: Commander, Omaha District, ATTN: MROPD-A Subject Supplement is approved. FOR THE COMMANDER: Encls wd YAL '=W. TUCKER= Colonel, Corps of Engineers Deputy Commander CF: DAEN-CWO-R, w/encls (5 cys) " 2 - MISSOURI ~~TIONhl RFCFE~TIONAL PIVFr C~VINS PC.H'T DAIf, SOUTB DAI\O'I'~ TO PO~CA STATE FARJ, NEPF~fFA GENEFAL DESIGN ~EMCR~~Dur ~RP-l SUPFLE¥E~T NC.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Trust Asset Appendix
    Platte River Endangered Species Recovery Program Indian Trust Asset Appendix to the Platte River Final Environmental Impact Statement January 31,2006 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado TABLE of CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 The Recovery Program and FEIS ........................................................................................ 1 Indian trust Assets ............................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Indicators ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Background and History .................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 Overview - Treaties, Indian Claims Commission and Federal Indian Policies .................. 5 History that Led to the Need for, and Development of Treaties .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding the Missouri Valley the Politics of Dam Site Selection and Design
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Summer 1997 Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design Robert Kelley Schneiders Texas Tech University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Schneiders, Robert Kelley, "Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design" (1997). Great Plains Quarterly. 1954. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1954 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FLOODING THE MISSOURI VALLEY THE POLITICS OF DAM SITE SELECTION AND DESIGN ROBERT KELLEY SCHNEIDERS In December 1944 the United States Con­ Dakota is 160 feet high and 10,700 feet long. gress passed a Rivers and Harbors Bill that The reservoir behind it stretches 140 miles authorized the construction of the Pick-Sloan north-northwest along the Missouri Valley. plan for Missouri River development. From Oahe Dam, near Pierre, South Dakota, sur­ 1946 to 1966, the United States Army Corps passes even Fort Randall Dam at 242 feet high of Engineers, with the assistance of private and 9300 feet long.! Oahe's reservoir stretches contractors, implemented much of that plan 250 miles upstream. The completion of Gar­ in the Missouri River Valley. In that twenty­ rison Dam in North Dakota, and Oahe, Big year period, five of the world's largest earthen Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's Point dams dams were built across the main-stem of the in South Dakota resulted in the innundation Missouri River in North and South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Niobrara State Park 2018 Activity Schedule for Additional Information Please Call the Park Office at 402-857-3373
    Niobrara State Park 2018 Activity Schedule For additional information please call the park office at 402-857-3373. May 26 - September 2 Horse Trail Rides Monday – Thursday: 9:30, 10:45 a.m.; Tuesday Closed; Friday – Sunday: 9:30, 10:45 a.m., 1, 2:15, 3:30 p.m. 45-minute ride, NO doubles. Rides can be scheduled one day in advance. $18 per person; ages 6 and up June 2 - August 5 Swimming Pool 402-857-3710 Swimming passes are available at the park office. Daily Admission: Adults (13 & older) $4, Children (3-12) $3, 2 & under FREE. Open 1-6 p.m.; August 6 – September 2 Weekends only; subject to lifeguard availability June 16, Buffalo Cookouts and Entertainment July 14, 21, September 1 Located at the Buffalo Cookout Pavilion. Cookout meal will start serving at 6 p.m.; entertainment will follow immediately after serving meal. Reservations are required and must be made by noon on the date of the cookout. Adults (13 & older) $12; Children $8. May 26 7 a.m. Early-bird Bird Watching Join park superintendent Mark Rettig and wildlife bird specialist Mark Brogie as they guide you through the park trails for an early-bird hike and bird watching experience. 10 a.m. Bird in Hand Program with Wildlife Biologist Bird Specialist Mark Brogie Located at the RV campground shelter. 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. National Park Service All Day Event Located at the Buffalo cookout pavilion with mobile ranger station and fishing. May 27 10 a.m. Sidewalk Chalk Art with Monarch Pollinator Program Located at the park office June 16 6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Includes Tribal Court Decision
    4:07-cv-03101-RGK-CRZ Doc # 82 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 1 of 3 - Page ID # 598 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA THE VILLAGE OF PENDER, NEBRASKA, ) Case No. 4:07-cv-03101 RICHARD M. SMITH, DONNA SMITH, ) DOUG SCHRIEBER, SUSAN SCHRIEBER, ) RODNEY A. HEISE, THOMAS J. WELSH, ) JAY LAKE, JULIE LAKE, KEITH ) BREHMER, and RON BRINKMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) JOINT STATUS REPORT AND MOTION ) FOR STATUS CONFERENCE MITCHELL PARKER, In his official ) WITH DISTRICT JUDGE capacity as Member of the Omaha Tribal ) Council, BARRY WEBSTER, In his official ) capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Omaha ) Tribal Council, AMEN SHERIDAN, In his ) official capacity as Treasurer of the Omaha ) Tribal Council, RODNEY MORRIS, In his ) official capacity as Secretary of the Omaha ) Tribal Council, TIM GRANT, In his official ) capacity as Member of the Omaha Tribal ) Council, STERLING WALKER, In his ) official capacity as Member of the Omaha ) Tribal Council, and ANSLEY GRIFFIN, In ) his official capacity as Chairman of the ) Omaha Tribal Council and as the Omaha ) Tribe’s Director of Liquor Control. ) ) Defendants. ) Plaintiffs and Defendants file this Joint Status Report pursuant to the court’s Memorandum and Order dated October 4, 2007. 1. Cross motions for summary judgment were heard by the Omaha Tribal Court on September 10, 2012. 2. On February 4, 2013, the Omaha Tribal Court issued a “Memorandum Opinion and Order,” ruling in favor of Defendants, on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. See Ex. 1. 4:07-cv-03101-RGK-CRZ Doc # 82 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 2 of 3 - Page ID # 599 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Floodplain from River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St
    Hydrogeomorphic Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration Options For The Missouri River Floodplain From River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Minneapolis, Minnesota Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02 Mickey E. Heitmeyer Joseph L. Bartletti Josh D. Eash December 2015 HYDROGEOMORPHIC EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OPTIONS FOR THE MISSOURI RIVER FLOODPLAIN FROM RIVER MILE (RM) 670 SOUTH OF DECATUR, NEBRASKA TO RM 0 AT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Refuges and Wildlife Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Mickey E. Heitmeyer Greenbrier Wetland Services Advance, MO 63730 Joseph L. Bartletti Prairie Engineers of Illinois, P.C. Springfield, IL 62703 And Josh D. Eash U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 Water Resources Branch Bloomington, MN 55437 Greenbrier Wetland Services Report No. 15-02 December 2015 Mickey E. Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Route 2, Box 2735 Advance, MO 63730 www.GreenbrierWetland.com Publication No. 15-02 Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., J. L. Bartletti, and J. D. Eash. 2015. Hydrogeomorphic evaluation of ecosystem restoration options for the Missouri River Flood- plain from River Mile (RM) 670 south of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, Min- neapolis, MN. Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02, Blue Heron Conservation Design and Print- ing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: USACE; http://statehistoricalsocietyofmissouri.org/; Karen Kyle; USFWS http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/; Cary Aloia This publication printed on recycled paper by ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Areas32 State Areas33
    NEBRASKA : THE COR NHUSKER STATE 43 larger cities and counties continue to grow. Between 2000 and 2010, the population of Douglas County—home of Omaha—increased 11.5 percent, while neighboring Sarpy County grew 29.6 percent. Nebraska’s population is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse. The most significant growth has occurred in the Latino population, which is now the state’s largest minority group. From 2000 to 2010, the state’s Latino population increased from 5.5 percent to 9.2 percent, growing at a rate of slightly more than 77 percent. The black population also grew from 3.9 percent to 4.4 percent during that time. While Nebraska’s median age increased from 35.3 in 2000, to 36.2 in 2010 — the number of Nebraskans age 65 and older decreased slightly during the same time period, from 13.6 percent in 2000, to 13.5 percent in 2010. RECREATION AND PLACES OF INTEREST31 National Areas32 Nebraska has two national forest areas with hand-planted trees: the Bessey Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Blaine and Thomas counties, and the Samuel R. McKelvie National Forest in Cherry County. The Pine Ridge Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Dawes and Sioux counties contains native ponderosa pine trees. The U.S. Forest Service also administers the Oglala National Grassland in northwest Nebraska. Within it is Toadstool Geologic Park, a moonscape of eroded badlands containing fossil trackways that are 30 million years old. The Hudson-Meng Bison Bonebed, an archaeological site containing the remains of more than 600 pre- historic bison, also is located within the grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclature of the Main Subdivisions of Phlox (Polemoniaceae)
    NUMBER 4 GRANT: PHLOX NOMENCLATURE 25 NOMENCLATURE OF THE MAIN SUBDIVISIONS OF PHLOX (POLEMONIACEAE) Verne Grant Section of Integrative Biology and Plant Resources Center, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 Abstract: The task of finding the correct names for the main subdivisions of Phlox has been beset with difficulties in interpreting the intent of older authors, particularly Asa Gray. Gray divided Phlox into four main subgroups, some of which have been considered sections, but these are now seen to be only informal groups. Currently Phlox is subdivided into three sections: Phlox, Divaricatae Peter, and Occidentales A. Gray. The name Occidentales A. Gray was not validly published as a section; Gray used it only as part of a heading. The oldest valid name for what has been called sect. Occidentales is sect. Pulvinatae Peter. Recent papers have used the name sect. Annuae A. Gray in place of sect. Divaricatae, on grounds of priority. However, the name that Gray actually used was Annuae, Texenses, and it, like Occidentales, was not validly published. The sections of Phlox are being reconsidered at present in the light of new molecular evidence. Some changes will be needed, but old valid infra­ generic names will still have a role to play in new infrageneric classifications. Keywords: Phlox, nomenclature, Asa Gray. The genus Phlox has had a history of terms subgenus and section in the nine­ problems with the nomenclature of the teenth century. Some authors used the cat­ main infrageneric subgroups. Gray (1870, egory subgenus, others the category section, 1878, 1886) did not make it clear in his still others used both, or neither.
    [Show full text]
  • 1985 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications 1985 1985 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs "1985 Annual Report Nebraska Game and Parks Commission" (1985). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1985 ANNUAL REPORT Nebraska Game and Parks Commission PURPO SE Husbandry of state's wildlife, park and outdoor recrea tion re sources. in the best long -term interest of the people . GOAL 1: To plan for and implement all policies and programs in an efficient and objective manner . GOAL 2: To maintain a rich and diverse environment in t he l ands and waters of Nebraska . GOAL 3: To provide outdoor recreation opportuni t ies. GOAL 4: To manage wildlife resources fo r maximum be nefit of the people. GOAL 5: To cultivate man' s appreciation of thi s rol e in t he world of nature. Eugene T. Mahoney was appointed to a six-year term as director of the Game and Parks Commis sion , effective July 22, 1976. He was appointed to hi s second term which began April 22, 1982 . TABL E OF CONT ENTS Admini stration 1 Budget & Fi scal ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Plains Indian Folklore
    STUDIES IN PLAINS INDIAN FOLKLORE BY ROBERT H. LOWIE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY Volume 40, No. 1, pp. 1-28 UNIYERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1942 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AmERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY EDIToRtS: A. L. KROEBER, R. H. LowI, T. D. MOCOWN, R. L. OLSON Volume 40, No. 1, pp. 1-28 Submitted by editors September 4, 1940 Issued April 23, 1942 Price, 35 cents UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY, CALIFORNI CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STUDIES IN PLAINS INDIAN FOLKLORE BY ROBERT H. LOWIE INTRODUCTION IN THE SUMMER Of 1910 and 1911 I visited the Hidatsa and Mandan at Fort Berthold Reservation in North Dakota, my primary object being the study of their age societies for the American Museum of Natural History. During one of these sojourns I obtained from Wolf-chief the following version of the Grandson myth, Englished by Good-bird, which presents several points of theoretical interest. About twenty years later Professor Beckwith visited the same tribes, procuring a very full version of the story from Bear's-arm and some fragmentary data from Arthur Mandan.' In addition there are six pub- lished Crow versions,2 as well as two unpublished ones in my possession; the fullest of my variants has appeared in English and is now available in the original. The present purpose is not to present a complete comparative study, which would inevitably merge in a consideration of the Lodge Boy and Spring Boy cycle, and thence of the Twin myths of the New World, but rather to concen- trate on immediately relevant comparative material and, through it, gain light on the processes of differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Palouse Forbs for Landscaping
    More Palouse Forbs for Landscaping. by David M. Skinner, Paul Warnick, Bill French, and Mary Fauci November, 2005 The following is an additional list of native forbs which may be found in the Palouse region. These forbs may be less suitable for the landscape because of growth habit, aggressiveness, difficulty in propagating and growing, rarity, or it simply may be that we haven’t yet tried to do anything with them. For a list of Palouse forbs which may be more suitable for landscaping and about which we have more information to share, please see “Characteristics and Uses of Native Palouse Forbs in Landscaping.” Nomenclature used in this document also follows Hitchcock, C. Leo, and Arthur Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. of Washington Press. Seattle, WA. In order to facilitate searching for a particular species, we have included some common names and alternate scientific names, but this is by no means intended to be a comprehensive source of common names or synonyms. Detailed information on propagation of many native species can be found at <http://nativeplants.for.uidaho.edu/network/search.asp?SearchType=Continental> Agastache urticifolia is probably too large a plant for a small garden. Requires a moist site. Easy to grow from seed. Plants have a minty smell and a very interesting flower. Common names include nettle-leafed giant hyssop, horsemint. Agoseris grandiflora is not a particularly attractive plant, it looks rather like a weed. Short-lived and attracts rodents, which eat the taproot and kill the plants. Easy to grow from seed, which is wind-borne and goes everywhere.
    [Show full text]