DOCSLIB.ORG

The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS) Peter J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS) Peter J MNRAS 000,1{20 (2017) Preprint 31 October 2017 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS) Peter J. Wheatley,1;2? Richard G. West,1;2 Michael R. Goad,3 James S. Jenkins,4;5 Don L. Pollacco,1;2 Didier Queloz,6 Heike Rauer,7;8 St´ephane Udry,9 Christopher A. Watson,10 Bruno Chazelas,9 Philipp Eigmuller,¨ 7 Gregory Lambert,6 Ludovic Genolet,9 James McCormac,1;2 Simon Walker,1 David J. Armstrong,1;2 Daniel Bayliss,9 Joao Bento,1;11 Fran¸cois Bouchy,9 Matthew R. Burleigh,3 Juan Cabrera,7 Sarah L. Casewell,3 Alexander Chaushev,3 Paul Chote,1 Szil´ard Csizmadia,7 Anders Erikson,7 Francesca Faedi,1 Emma Foxell,1;2 Boris T. G¨ansicke,1;2 Edward Gillen,6 Andrew Grange,3 Maximilian N. Gunther,¨ 6 Simon T. Hodgkin,11 James Jackman,1;2 Andr´es Jord´an,13;14;15 Tom Louden,1;2 Lionel Metrailler,9 Maximiliano Moyano,16 Louise D. Nielsen,9 Hugh P. Osborn,1 Katja Poppenhaeger,10 Roberto Raddi,1 Liam Raynard,3 Alexis M. S. Smith,7 Maritza Soto4, Ruth Titz-Weider7 1Dept. of Physics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 2Centre for Exoplanets and Habitability, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 3Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK 4Departamento de Astronomia, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile 5Centro de Astrof´ısica y Tecnolog´ıas Afines (CATA), Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile. 6Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, J.J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK 7Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany 8Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, TU Berlin, Hardenbergstr. 36, D-10623 Berlin, Germany 9Observatoire Astronomique de l'Universit´ede Gen`eve, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland 10Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, BT7 1NN Belfast, UK 11Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mount Stromlo Observatory, Australian National University, Cotter Road, Weston, ACT 2611, Australia 12Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Rise, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 13Instituto de Astrof´ısica, Facultad de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Av. Vicu~na Mackenna 4860, 7820436 Macul, Santiago, Chile 14Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Astronomie, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 15Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Santiago, Chile 16Instituto de Astronomia, Universidad Cat´olica del Norte, Casa Central, Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile Accepted 2017 October 28. Received 2017 October 27; in original form 2017 September 13 ABSTRACT We describe the Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS), which is a ground-based project searching for transiting exoplanets orbiting bright stars. NGTS builds on the legacy of previous surveys, most notably WASP, and is designed to achieve higher photometric precision and hence find smaller planets than have previously been de- tected from the ground. It also operates in red light, maximising sensitivity to late K and early M dwarf stars. The survey specifications call for photometric precision of 0.1 per cent in red light over an instantaneous field of view of 100 square degrees, enabling the detection of Neptune-sized exoplanets around Sun-like stars and super- Earths around M dwarfs. The survey is carried out with a purpose-built facility at arXiv:1710.11100v1 [astro-ph.EP] 30 Oct 2017 Cerro Paranal, Chile, which is the premier site of the European Southern Observatory (ESO). An array of twelve 20 cm f/2.8 telescopes fitted with back-illuminated deep- depletion CCD cameras are used to survey fields intensively at intermediate Galactic latitudes. The instrument is also ideally suited to ground-based photometric follow-up of exoplanet candidates from space telescopes such as TESS, Gaia and PLATO. We present observations that combine precise autoguiding and the superb observing con- ditions at Paranal to provide routine photometric precision of 0.1 per cent in 1 hour for stars with I-band magnitudes brighter than 13. We describe the instrument and data analysis methods as well as the status of the survey, which achieved first light in 2015 and began full survey operations in 2016. NGTS data will be made publicly available through the ESO archive. Key words: Atmospheric effects { instrumentation: photometers { techniques: pho- tometric { surveys { planets and satellites: detection { planetary systems © 2017 The Authors ? E-mail: [email protected] 2 P. J. Wheatley et al. Figure 1. The mass-radius relation for known transiting exoplan- ets with masses determined to better than 20 per cent precision (taken from the NASA Exoplanet Archive in January 2017). Plan- Figure 2. The planet and star radii for known transiting exoplan- ets initially discovered in ground-based transit surveys are plotted ets with masses determined to better than 20 per cent precision. as red circles, while those detected from space are plotted as blue Diagonal dotted lines indicate systems with equal transit depth, squares, and planets initially found from radial velocity measure- while the horizontal lines show the radii of solar system plan- ments are plotted as green triangles. Solar system planets are in- ets and the vertical lines are indicative of stellar spectra types dicated with letters and the dotted lines are mass-radius relations (Mamajek, priv. comm., based on Pecaut & Mamajek 2013). The calculated for different compositions by Seager et al.(2007). colours and symbols are the same as Fig.1. 1 INTRODUCTION The photometric detection of transits has proved to be the powerful techniques in exoplanet characterisation is the dis- key to determining a wide range of the physical character- covery of transiting exoplanets, usually in wide-field photo- istics of exoplanets. The depth of a transit depends on the metric surveys. Since most of the characterisation methods relative radii of planet and star (Rp/R∗) and the first transit require high signal-to-noise measurements, there is particu- detections immediately showed that hot Jupiters are gas gi- lar value in the detection of transiting planets around bright ants and not composed primarily of heavy elements (Henry stars. et al. 2000; Charbonneau et al. 2000). Transits also enabled The most successful ground-based surveys for transiting the measurement of stellar obliquities using the Rossiter- exoplanets have been WASP (Pollacco et al. 2006), HAT- McLaughlin effect (Winn et al. 2005), with important im- Net (Bakos et al. 2004) and HATSouth (Bakos et al. 2013), plications for exoplanet migration (e.g. Triaud et al. 2010; which together account for more than 50 per cent of all the Albrecht et al. 2012). They also present the opportunity to known transiting planets with masses determined to bet- determine the composition and structure of planetary at- ter than 20 per cent (including those found from space). mospheres through transmission spectroscopy (e.g. Char- WASP and HATNet employ telephoto lenses mounted on bonneau et al. 2002; Sing et al. 2016), with detections of CCD cameras to make precise photometric measurements Doppler shifts revealing planetary winds (Snellen et al. 2010; over large swaths of the sky, while HATSouth employs 24 Louden & Wheatley 2015) and the detection of deep tran- telescope tubes spread over three locations in the south- sits in ultraviolet lines revealing planetary evaporation (e.g. ern hemisphere. Typically these surveys have found plan- Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003; Ehrenreich et al. 2015). Detec- ets around the mass of Saturn to a few times the mass of tions of secondary eclipses and phase curves in transiting Jupiter, and with radii between that of Saturn and twice systems allow determination of the reflected and thermal Jupiter (Fig.1). A handful of smaller transiting exoplanets emission spectra of exoplanets, together with albedos and have also been found in ground-based transit surveys (Char- the efficiency of heat transport around the planet (e.g. Dem- bonneau et al. 2009; Bakos et al. 2010; Berta-Thompson ing et al. 2005; Charbonneau et al. 2005; Knutson et al. et al. 2015; Gillon et al. 2016, 2017; Dittmann et al. 2017) 2007). When coupled with mass determinations based on the and transits have been found for some planets initially iden- radial-velocities of the star, transits also provide planetary tified in ground-based radial velocity surveys (Gillon et al. densities and hence constraints on their bulk composition 2007; Winn et al. 2011; Bonfils et al. 2012; Dragomir et al. and internal structure (e.g. Seager et al. 2007; Baraffe et al. 2013; Motalebi et al. 2015). The full population of transit- 2008). ing exoplanets with masses determined to better than 20 A prerequisite for the application of this wide range of per cent is shown in Fig.1 (sample taken from the NASA MNRAS 000,1{20 (2017) Next Generation Transit Survey 3 Exoplanet Archive1 in January 2017). The figure illustrates 10 the remarkably diverse nature of the known population, in- Read Dark Sky cluding for instance a factor of eight range in density of Scintillation Jupiter-mass planets. The heating mechanism that inflates Source the low density hot Jupiters remains a matter of debate (e.g. 1 Dark total Spiegel & Burrows 2013). Bright total Space-based surveys, most notably Kepler (Borucki et al. 2010) and CoRoT (Auvergne et al. 2009), have made more precise photometric measurements and have thereby Noise [%] 0.1 discovered transiting exoplanets with smaller radii. These have included rocky exoplanets (e.g. L´eger et al. 2009; Queloz et al. 2009; Batalha et al. 2011), multi-planet sys- tems (e.g. Lissauer et al. 2011) and even circumbinary plan- 0.01 ets (e.g. Doyle et al. 2011; Welsh et al. 2012). Thousands of candidates have been identified, although to date the space- 18 16 14 12 10 8 based surveys have covered a relatively small proportion of I magntiude the sky.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterisation of Young Nearby Stars – the Ursa Major Group
    FRIEDRICH-SCHILLER-UNIVERSITAT¨ JENA Physikalisch-Astronomische Fakult¨at Characterisation of young nearby stars – The Ursa Major group Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt dem Rat der Physikalischen-Astronomischen Fakult¨at der Friedrich-Schiller-Universit¨at Jena von Dipl.-Phys. Matthias Ammler geboren am 10.01.1977 in Neuburg a. d. Donau Gutachter 1. Prof. Dr. Ralph Neuh¨auser 2. Dr. habil. Matthias H¨unsch 3. Prof. Dr. Artie P. Hatzes Tag der letzten Rigorosumspr¨ufung: 26. Juni 2006 Tag der ¨offentlichen Verteidigung: 11. Juli 2006 Meinen Eltern Contents List of Figures vii List of Tables ix Abstract xi Zusammenfassung xiii Remarks and Acknowledgements xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 WhatistheUrsaMajorgroup? . 1 1.1.1 Co-movingstarsin the BigDipper constellation . .... 1 1.1.2 Stellarmotionandmovinggroups . 1 1.1.3 Formation and evolution of open clusters and associations ... 6 1.1.4 The nature of the UMa group – cluster or association, or some- thingelse? ............................ 8 1.2 WhyistheUMagroupinteresting?. 8 1.2.1 Asnapshotinstellarevolution . 8 1.2.2 Alaboratoryinfrontofthedoor . 9 1.2.3 Thecensusofthesolarneighbourhood . 10 1.3 ConstrainingtheUMagroup–previousapproaches . ..... 11 1.3.1 Spatialclustering . 11 1.3.2 Kinematic criteria – derived from a “canonical” memberlist . 12 1.3.3 Kinematic parameters – derived from kinematic clustering ... 15 1.3.4 Stellarparametersandabundances . 17 1.3.5 TheageoftheUMagroup–photometriccriteria . 19 1.3.6 Spectroscopicindicatorsforageandactivity . .... 19 1.3.7 Combining kinematic, spectroscopic, and photometric criteria . 21 1.4 Anewhomogeneousspectroscopicstudy . 21 1.4.1 Definingthesample ....................... 22 1.4.2 Howtoobtainprecisestellarparameters? . .. 23 2 Observations,reductionandcalibration 25 2.1 Requireddata ............................... 25 2.2 Instruments ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Observing Notes
    Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory Winter Observing Notes Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Winter Tour of the Sky with the Naked Eye NGC 457 CASSIOPEIA eta Cas Look for Notice how the constellations 5 the ‘W’ swing around Polaris during shape the night Is Dubhe yellowish compared 2 Polaris to Merak? Dubhe 3 Merak URSA MINOR Kochab 1 Is Kochab orange Pherkad compared to Polaris? THE PLOUGH 4 Mizar Alcor Figure 1: Sketch of the northern sky in winter. North 1. On leaving the planetarium, turn around and look northwards over the roof of the building. To your right is a group of stars like the outline of a saucepan standing up on it’s handle. This is the Plough (also called the Big Dipper) and is part of the constellation Ursa Major, the Great Bear. The top two stars are called the Pointers. Check with binoculars. Not all stars are white. The colour shows that Dubhe is cooler than Merak in the same way that red-hot is cooler than white-hot. 2. Use the Pointers to guide you to the left, to the next bright star. This is Polaris, the Pole (or North) Star. Note that it is not the brightest star in the sky, a common misconception. Below and to the right are two prominent but fainter stars. These are Kochab and Pherkad, the Guardians of the Pole. Look carefully and you will notice that Kochab is slightly orange when compared to Polaris. Check with binoculars. © Rob Peeling, CaDAS, 2007 version 2.0 Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Winter Polaris, Kochab and Pherkad mark the constellation Ursa Minor, the Little Bear.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Studies - Equatorial Sky in Winter
    Phys1810: General Astronomy 1 W2014 Constellation Studies - Equatorial Sky in Winter Preparation before the observing session - Read "Notes on Observing" thoroughly. - Find all the targets listed below using Starry Night and your star charts. - Note: The observatory longitude is 97.1234° W, the latitude is 49.6452° N and elevation is 233 meters. - Observe any predicted events and record your observations during the observing session In the list of constellations below, the name of the constellation is underlined followed by the genitive case of the name in parenthesis followed by the three-letter abbreviation. Note that references to stars such as α UMa, spoken as alpha Ursae Majoris (note genitive case), literally means alpha of Ursa Major. The Greek letters are usually assigned in order of brightness in the constellation (α -- brightest). Note that the constellation, Ursa Major, is a major exception to this rule. As soon as you get to the observatory the following 3 constellations should be sketched on a full page diagram making sure that their relative positions to each other and to the horizon are drawn as accurately as possible - this means completing the sketch in about 15 minutes. You need to repeat the sketch one hour later. Be sure to indicate the time and the location of the horizon on your diagram. Ursa Major (Ursae Majoris) UMa: (The Great Bear, The Big Dipper, The Plow) Through all ages, Ursa Major has been known under various names. It is linked with the nymph Kallisto, the daughter of Lycaon, a king of Arcadia in Greek mythology. Moving along the asterism of the dipper from the lip identify the stars Dubhe (α UMa), Merak (β UMa), Phecda (γ UMa), Megrez (δ UMa), Alioth (ε UMa), Mizar (ζ UMa), and Alkaid (η UMa).
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Zeta Ursae Majoris - Mizar
    Vol. 3 No. 2 Spring 2007 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 51 Stargazers Corner: Focus on Zeta Ursae Majoris - Mizar Jim Daley Ludwig Schupmann Observatory (LSO) New Ipswich, New Hampshire Email: [email protected] Abstract: : This is a general interest article for both the double star viewer and armchair astronomer alike. By highlighting an interesting pair, hopefully in each issue, we have a place for those who love doubles but may have little interest in the rigors of measurements and the long lists of results. Your comments about these mini-articles are welcomed. Arabs long ago named Alcor “Saidak” or “the proof” as Introduction they too used it as a test of vision. Alcor shares nearly My first view of a double star through a telescope the same space motion with Mizar and about 20 other was an inspiring sight and just as with many new stars in what is called the Ursa Major stream or observers today, the star was Mizar. As a beginning moving cluster. The Big Dipper is considered the amateur telescope maker (1951) I followed tradition closest cluster in the solar neighborhood. Alcor’s and began to use closer doubles for resolution testing apparent separation from Mizar is more than a quar- the latest homemade instrument. Visualizing the ter light year and this alone just about rules out this scale of binaries, their physical separation, Keplerian wide pair from being a physical (in a binary star motion, orbital period, component diameters and sense) system and the most recent line-of-sight dis- spectral characteristics, all things I had heard and tance measurements give a difference between them read of, seemed a bit complicated at the time and, I of about 3 light years, ending any ideas of an orbiting might add, more so now! Through the years I found pair.
    [Show full text]
  • The Observer's Handbook for 1915
    T he O b s e r v e r ’s H a n d b o o k FOR 1915 PUBLISHED BY The Royal Astronomical Society Of Canada E d i t e d b y C . A. CHANT SEVENTH YEAR OF PUBLICATION TORONTO 198 C o l l e g e S t r e e t Pr in t e d f o r t h e S o c ie t y CALENDAR 1915 T he O bserver' s H andbook FOR 1915 PUBLISHED BY The Royal Astronomical Society Of Canada E d i t e d b y C. A. CHANT SEVENTH YEAR OF PUBLICATION TORONTO 198 C o l l e g e S t r e e t Pr in t e d f o r t h e S o c ie t y 1915 CONTENTS Preface - - - - - - 3 Anniversaries and Festivals - - - - - 3 Symbols and Abbreviations - - - - -4 Solar and Sidereal Time - - - - 5 Ephemeris of the Sun - - - - 6 Occultation of Fixed Stars by the Moon - - 8 Times of Sunrise and Sunset - - - - 8 The Sky and Astronomical Phenomena for each Month - 22 Eclipses, etc., of Jupiter’s Satellites - - - - 46 Ephemeris for Physical Observations of the Sun - - 48 Meteors and Shooting Stars - - - - - 50 Elements of the Solar System - - - - 51 Satellites of the Solar System - - - - 52 Eclipses of Sun and Moon in 1915 - - - - 53 List of Double Stars - - - - - 53 List of Variable Stars- - - - - - 55 The Stars, their Magnitude, Velocity, etc. - - - 56 The Constellations - - - - - - 64 Comets of 1914 - - - - - 76 PREFACE The H a n d b o o k for 1915 differs from that for last year chiefly in the omission of the brief review of astronomical pro­ gress, and the addition of (1) a table of double stars, (2) a table of variable stars, and (3) a table containing 272 stars and 5 nebulae.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCOVERY of a FAINT COMPANION to ALCOR USING MMT/AO 5 Μm IMAGING∗
    The Astronomical Journal, 139:919–925, 2010 March doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/919 C 2010. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. DISCOVERY OF A FAINT COMPANION TO ALCOR USING MMT/AO 5 μm IMAGING∗ Eric E. Mamajek1, Matthew A. Kenworthy2,PhilipM.Hinz2, and Michael R. Meyer2,3 1 University of Rochester, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Rochester, NY 14627-0171, USA 2 Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 2009 November 26; accepted 2009 December 24; published 2010 February 1 ABSTRACT We report the detection of a faint stellar companion to the famous nearby A5V star Alcor (80 UMa). The companion has M-band (λ = 4.8 μm) magnitude 8.8 and projected separation 1.11 (28 AU) from Alcor. The companion is most likely a low-mass (∼0.3 M) active star which is responsible for Alcor’s X-ray emission detected by ROSAT 28.3 −1 (LX 10 erg s ). Alcor is a nuclear member of the Ursa Major star cluster (UMa; d 25 pc, age 0.5 Gyr), and has been occasionally mentioned as a possible distant (709) companion of the stellar quadruple Mizar (ζ UMa). Comparing the revised Hipparcos proper motion for Alcor with the mean motion for other UMa nuclear members shows that Alcor has a peculiar velocity of 1.1 km s−1, which is comparable to the predicted velocity amplitude induced by the newly discovered companion (∼1kms−1). Using a precise dynamical parallax for Mizar and the revised Hipparcos parallax for Alcor, we find that Mizar and Alcor are physically separated by 0.36 ± 0.19 pc (74 ± 39 kAU; minimum 18 kAU), and their velocity vectors are marginally consistent (χ 2 probability 6%).
    [Show full text]
  • Big Dipper's Binary Star Has Surprises
    Physics & Astronomy Big Dipper’s Binary Star Has Surprises There’s more to the Big Dipper than meets stars. Mamajek, an assistant professor of was once thought of as a single star to be the eye. physics and astronomy, led a team that four stars orbiting each other. Alcor and its In ancient times, people with exceptional made the discovery using computer algo- newly identified companion, Alcor B, are vision discovered that one of the bright- rithms to remove as much glare as possible apparently gravitationally bound to the est stars in the Big Dipper was, in fact, two from the image of a star in the hopes of Mizar system, making the whole group a stars so close together that most people spotting a planet near the star. sextuplet. cannot distinguish them. The two stars, “Finding that Alcor had a stellar compan- Mamajek is continuing his efforts to find Alcor and Mizar, were the first binary stars— ion was a bit of serendipity,” says Mamajek. planets around nearby stars, but his atten- a pair of stars that orbit each other—ever “We were trying a new method of planet tion is not completely off Alcor and Mizar. known. hunting and instead of finding a planet “Some of us have a feeling that Alcor Now Rochester astronomer Eric Mamajek orbiting Alcor, we found a star.” might actually have another surprise in has discovered that Alcor, one of the most Modern telescopes have found that Mizar store for us,” he says. studied stars in the sky, is actually two is itself a pair of binaries, revealing what —Jonathan Sherwood ’04 (MA), ’09S (MBA) Alcor A (blotted out) Alcor Alkaid Mizar and Alcor Alcor B BIG DIPPER Mizar B MIZAR AND ALCOR For millennia, stargazers have As astronomers were able recognized that what seemed to Alioth to look more closely at the be the brightest star in the Big Mizar A binary stars known as Mizar Dipper was made up of more and Alcor, they discovered than one star.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Eye Vol 5 No 2
    A Faint Star Orbiting the Big Dipper’s Alcor Discovered Next time you spy the Big Dipper, keep in mind that there is another star invisibly (at least to the unaided eye) contributing to this constellation. According to a new paper published in The Astrophysical Journal, one of the stars that makes the bend in the ladle’s handle, Alcor, has a smaller red dwarf companion. Newly discovered Alcor B orbits its larger sibling, caught in the act with an innovative technique called “common parallactic motion” by members of Project 1640, an international collaborative team that includes astrophysicists at the American Museum of Natural History, the University of Cambridge’s Institute of Astronomy, the California Institute of Technology, and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “We used a brand new technique for determining that an object orbits a nearby star, a technique that’s a nice nod to Galileo,” says Ben R. Oppenheimer, Curator and Professor in the Department of Astrophysics at the Museum. “Galileo showed tremendous foresight. Four hundred years ago, he realized that if Copernicus was right—that the Earth orbits the Sun—they could show it by observing the “parallactic motion” of the nearest stars. Incredibly, Galileo tried to use Alcor to see it but didn’t have the necessary precision.” If Galileo had been able to see change over time in Alcor’s position, he would have had conclusive evidence that Copernicus was right. “Parallactic motion” is the way nearby stars appear to move in an annual, repeatable pattern relative to much more distant stars, simply because the observer on Earth is circling the Sun and seeing these stars from different places over the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Selection for the SUNS and DEBRIS Surveys for Debris Discs in the Solar Neighbourhood
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–?? (2009) Printed 18 November 2009 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Target selection for the SUNS and DEBRIS surveys for debris discs in the solar neighbourhood N. M. Phillips1, J. S. Greaves2, W. R. F. Dent3, B. C. Matthews4 W. S. Holland3, M. C. Wyatt5, B. Sibthorpe3 1Institute for Astronomy (IfA), Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ 2School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS 3UK Astronomy Technology Centre (UKATC), Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ 4Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics (HIA), National Research Council of Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada 5Institute of Astronomy (IoA), University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA Accepted 2009 September 2. Received 2009 July 27; in original form 2009 March 31 ABSTRACT Debris discs – analogous to the Asteroid and Kuiper-Edgeworth belts in the Solar system – have so far mostly been identified and studied in thermal emission shortward of 100 µm. The Herschel space observatory and the SCUBA-2 camera on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope will allow efficient photometric surveying at 70 to 850 µm, which allow for the detection of cooler discs not yet discovered, and the measurement of disc masses and temperatures when combined with shorter wavelength photometry. The SCUBA-2 Unbiased Nearby Stars (SUNS) survey and the DEBRIS Herschel Open Time Key Project are complimentary legacy surveys observing samples of ∼500 nearby stellar systems. To maximise the legacy value of these surveys, great care has gone into the target selection process. This paper describes the target selection process and presents the target lists of these two surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0911.5028V2 [Astro-Ph.SR] 25 Dec 2009 03Zrc,Switzerland Zurich, 8093 H Nvriyo Rzn N H Mtsna Institution
    Discovery of a Faint Companion to Alcor Using MMT/AO 5 µm Imaging1 Eric E. Mamajek University of Rochester, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Rochester, NY, 14627-0171, USA Matthew A. Kenworthy, Philip M. Hinz, Michael R. Meyer2 Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA Received ; accepted Accepted for publication in Astronomical Journal arXiv:0911.5028v2 [astro-ph.SR] 25 Dec 2009 1Observations reported here were obtained at the MMT Observatory, a joint facility of the University of Arizona and the Smithsonian Institution. 2Current address: Institute for Astronomy ETH, Physics Department, HIT J 22.4, CH- 8093 Zurich, Switzerland –2– ABSTRACT We report the detection of a faint stellar companion to the famous nearby A5V star Alcor (80 UMa). The companion has M-band (λ = 4.8 µm) magni- tude 8.8 and projected separation 1”.11 (28 AU) from Alcor. The companion is most likely a low-mass (∼0.3 M⊙) active star which is responsible for Alcor’s 28.3 X-ray emission detected by ROSAT (LX ≃ 10 erg/s). Alcor is a nuclear mem- ber of the Ursa Major star cluster (UMa; d ≃ 25 pc, age ≃ 0.5 Gyr), and has been occasionally mentioned as a possible distant (709”) companion of the stellar quadruple Mizar (ζ UMa). Comparing the revised Hipparcos proper motion for Alcor with the mean motion for other UMa nuclear members shows that Alcor has a peculiar velocity of 1.1 km/s, which is comparable to the predicted velocity amplitude induced by the newly-discovered companion (∼1 km/s).
    [Show full text]
  • Starry Nights Typeset
    Index Antares 104,106-107 Anubis 28 Apollo 53,119,130,136 21-centimeter radiation 206 apparent magnitude 7,156-157,177,223 57 Cygni 140 Aquarius 146,160-161,164 61 Cygni 139,142 Aquila 128,131,146-149 3C 9 (quasar) 180 Arcas 78 3C 48 (quasar) 90 Archer 119 3C 273 (quasar) 89-90 arctic circle 103,175,212 absorption spectrum 25 Arcturus 17,79,93-96,98-100 Acadia 78 Ariadne 101 Achernar 67-68,162,217 Aries 167,183,196,217 Acubens (star in Cancer) 39 Arrow 149 Adhara (star in Canis Major) 22,67 Ascella (star in Sagittarius) 120 Aesculapius 115 asterisms 130 Age of Aquarius 161 astrology 161,196 age of clusters 186 Atlantis 140 age of stars 114 Atlas 14 Age of the Fish 196 Auriga 17 Al Rischa (star in Pisces) 196 autumnal equinox 174,223 Al Tarf (star in Cancer) 39 azimuth 171,223 Al- (prefix in star names) 4 Bacchus 101 Albireo (star in Cygnus) 144 Barnard’s Star 64-65,116 Alcmene 52,112 Barnard, E. 116 Alcor (star in Big Dipper) 14,78,82 barred spiral galaxies 179 Alcyone (star in Pleiades) 14 Bayer, Johan 125 Aldebaran 11,15,22,24 Becvar, A. 221 Alderamin (star in Cepheus) 154 Beehive (M 44) 42-43,45,50 Alexandria 7 Bellatrix (star in Orion) 9,107 Alfirk (star in Cepheus) 154 Algedi (star in Capricornus) 159 Berenice 70 Algeiba (star in Leo) 59,61 Bessel, Friedrich W. 27,142 Algenib (star in Pegasus) 167 Beta Cassiopeia 169 Algol (star in Perseus) 204-205,210 Beta Centauri 162,176 Alhena (star in Gemini) 32 Beta Crucis 162 Alioth (star in Big Dipper) 78 Beta Lyrae 132-133 Alkaid (star in Big Dipper) 78,80 Betelgeuse 10,22,24 Almagest 39 big
    [Show full text]
  • Company Vendor ID (Decimal Format) (AVL) Ditest Fahrzeugdiagnose Gmbh 4621 @Pos.Com 3765 0XF8 Limited 10737 1MORE INC
    Vendor ID Company (Decimal Format) (AVL) DiTEST Fahrzeugdiagnose GmbH 4621 @pos.com 3765 0XF8 Limited 10737 1MORE INC. 12048 360fly, Inc. 11161 3C TEK CORP. 9397 3D Imaging & Simulations Corp. (3DISC) 11190 3D Systems Corporation 10632 3DRUDDER 11770 3eYamaichi Electronics Co., Ltd. 8709 3M Cogent, Inc. 7717 3M Scott 8463 3T B.V. 11721 4iiii Innovations Inc. 10009 4Links Limited 10728 4MOD Technology 10244 64seconds, Inc. 12215 77 Elektronika Kft. 11175 89 North, Inc. 12070 Shenzhen 8Bitdo Tech Co., Ltd. 11720 90meter Solutions, Inc. 12086 A‐FOUR TECH CO., LTD. 2522 A‐One Co., Ltd. 10116 A‐Tec Subsystem, Inc. 2164 A‐VEKT K.K. 11459 A. Eberle GmbH & Co. KG 6910 a.tron3d GmbH 9965 A&T Corporation 11849 Aaronia AG 12146 abatec group AG 10371 ABB India Limited 11250 ABILITY ENTERPRISE CO., LTD. 5145 Abionic SA 12412 AbleNet Inc. 8262 Ableton AG 10626 ABOV Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 6697 Absolute USA 10972 AcBel Polytech Inc. 12335 Access Network Technology Limited 10568 ACCUCOMM, INC. 10219 Accumetrics Associates, Inc. 10392 Accusys, Inc. 5055 Ace Karaoke Corp. 8799 ACELLA 8758 Acer, Inc. 1282 Aces Electronics Co., Ltd. 7347 Aclima Inc. 10273 ACON, Advanced‐Connectek, Inc. 1314 Acoustic Arc Technology Holding Limited 12353 ACR Braendli & Voegeli AG 11152 Acromag Inc. 9855 Acroname Inc. 9471 Action Industries (M) SDN BHD 11715 Action Star Technology Co., Ltd. 2101 Actions Microelectronics Co., Ltd. 7649 Actions Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 4310 Active Mind Technology 10505 Qorvo, Inc 11744 Activision 5168 Acute Technology Inc. 10876 Adam Tech 5437 Adapt‐IP Company 10990 Adaptertek Technology Co., Ltd. 11329 ADATA Technology Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]