DOCSLIB.ORG

FORMATO PDF Ranking Instituciones No Acadã©Micas Por Sub áRea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FORMATO PDF Ranking Instituciones No Acadã©Micas Por Sub áRea Ranking Instituciones No Académicas por sub área OCDE 2020 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología > 2.06 Ingeniería Médica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE CHINA Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 5,000 FRANCE Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 2 5,000 USA VA Boston Healthcare System 3 5,000 FRANCE Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (Inserm) 4 5,000 USA National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA 5 5,000 USA Harvard School of Dental Medicine 6 5,000 USA Massachusetts General Hospital 7 5,000 GERMANY Helmholtz Association 8 5,000 USA Mayo Clinic 9 5,000 SINGAPORE Agency for Science Technology & Research (ASTAR) 10 5,000 NETHERLANDS Utrecht University Medical Center 11 5,000 CHINA University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS 12 5,000 ITALY Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) 13 5,000 FRANCE CNRS - Institute for Engineering & Systems Sciences (INSIS) 14 5,000 SPAIN CIBER - Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red 15 5,000 USA UTMD Anderson Cancer Center 16 5,000 USA Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 17 5,000 FRANCE Assistance Publique Hopitaux Paris (APHP) 18 5,000 USA Boston Children's Hospital 19 5,000 CANADA University Health Network Toronto 20 5,000 FRANCE Inria 21 5,000 NETHERLANDS Erasmus University Medical Center 22 5,000 USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute 23 5,000 GERMANY Max Planck Society 24 5,000 USA NIH Clinical Center (CC) 25 5,000 NETHERLANDS Philips 26 5,000 CHINA Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College 27 5,000 FRANCE CNRS - National Institute for Biology (INSB) 28 5,000 USA The Methodist Hospital - Houston 29 5,000 USA The Methodist Hospital System 30 5,000 SPAIN CIBERBBN 31 5,000 SPAIN Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC) 32 5,000 CHINA Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, CAS 33 5,000 USA Cleveland Clinic Foundation 34 5,000 USA Johns Hopkins Medicine 35 5,000 GERMANY German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) 36 5,000 ITALY Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia - IIT 37 5,000 FRANCE UNICANCER 38 5,000 SOUTH KOREA Yonsei University Health System 39 5,000 JAPAN RIKEN 40 5,000 NETHERLANDS Philips Research 41 5,000 CHINA Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, CAS 42 5,000 USA NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) 43 5,000 USA University of Illinois Chicago Hospital 44 5,000 ITALY Padua Hospital 45 5,000 NETHERLANDS Academic Medical Center Amsterdam 46 5,000 GERMANY Fraunhofer Gesellschaft 47 5,000 GERMANY Siemens AG 48 5,000 CHINA Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, CAS 49 5,000 Página 1 Ranking Instituciones No Académicas por sub área OCDE 2020 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología > 2.06 Ingeniería Médica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE USA Broad Institute 50 5,000 USA US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) 51 4,999 FRANCE CHU Lyon 52 4,998 USA Cedars Sinai Medical Center 53 4,996 BELGIUM University Hospital Leuven 54 4,995 USA Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 55 4,994 SOUTH KOREA Korea Institute of Science & Technology (KIST) 56 4,993 USA United States Department of Energy (DOE) 57 4,991 CHINA Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital 58 4,990 CANADA Ottawa Hospital Research Institute 59 4,989 USA Shirley Ryan AbilityLab 60 4,988 USA International Business Machines (IBM) 61 4,986 FRANCE CEA 62 4,985 SINGAPORE Institute for Infocomm Research 63 4,984 SWITZERLAND University Hospital of Bern 64 4,983 USA Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 65 4,982 CHINA National Center for Nanoscience & Technology - China 66 4,980 UNITED KINGDOM Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust 67 4,979 BELGIUM IMEC 68 4,978 JAPAN Japan Science & Technology Agency (JST) 69 4,977 CZECH REPUBLIC Czech Academy of Sciences 70 4,975 USA United States Department of Defense 71 4,974 SOUTH KOREA Seoul National University Hospital 72 4,973 USA General Electric 73 4,972 USA Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 74 4,970 SPAIN Barcelona Institute of Science & Technology 75 4,969 POLAND Polish Academy of Sciences 76 4,968 RUSSIA Russian Academy of Sciences 77 4,967 FRANCE Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 78 4,966 GERMANY CARL GUSTAV CARUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 79 4,964 FRANCE CNRS - Institute of Chemistry (INC) 80 4,963 USA Children's National Health System 81 4,962 SINGAPORE Institute of Medical Biology 82 4,961 SOUTH KOREA Samsung Medical Center 83 4,959 TAIWAN Chang Gung Memorial Hospital 84 4,958 GERMANY Helmholtz-Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health 85 4,957 CANADA Princess Margaret Cancer Centre 86 4,956 CANADA Sinai Health System Toronto 87 4,954 CHINA Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, CAS 88 4,953 AUSTRALIA Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) 89 4,952 GERMANY RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 90 4,951 TAIWAN National Taiwan University Hospital 91 4,950 SWITZERLAND Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) 92 4,948 ISRAEL Chaim Sheba Medical Center 93 4,947 ARGENTINA Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) 94 4,946 NETHERLANDS VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER 95 4,945 USA University of Nebraska Medical Center 96 4,943 FRANCE Le Reseau International des Instituts Pasteur (RIIP) 97 4,942 Página 2 Ranking Instituciones No Académicas por sub área OCDE 2020 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología > 2.06 Ingeniería Médica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE USA US Department of Veteran Affairs 98 4,941 ITALY IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 99 4,940 CANADA Sunnybrook Health Science Center 100 4,938 USA The J David Gladstone Institutes 101 4,937 GERMANY EBERHARD KARLS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 102 4,936 CANADA Sunnybrook Research Institute 103 4,935 SPAIN Hospital Clinic de Barcelona 104 4,934 CANADA Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) 105 4,932 DENMARK Odense University Hospital 106 4,931 USA Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia 107 4,930 DENMARK Rigshospitalet 108 4,929 ITALY IRCCS Santa Lucia 109 4,927 CHINA Institute of Automation, CAS 110 4,926 ITALY IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico 111 4,925 USA Salk Institute 112 4,924 ITALY IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi 113 4,922 UNITED KINGDOM Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute 114 4,921 JAPAN National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST) 115 4,920 NETHERLANDS Philips Healthcare 116 4,919 USA Rutgers State University Medical Center 117 4,918 TAIWAN Academia Sinica - Taiwan 118 4,916 FINLAND Helsinki University Central Hospital 119 4,915 AUSTRIA Ludwig Boltzmann Institute 120 4,914 BELGIUM Ghent University Hospital 121 4,913 SPAIN Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya 122 4,911 USA Scripps Research Institute 123 4,910 USA Whitehead Institute 124 4,909 ITALY Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare 125 4,908 HONG KONG Prince of Wales Hospital 126 4,906 SINGAPORE Singapore National Eye Center 127 4,905 SINGAPORE National Heart Centre Singapore 128 4,904 USA Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center 129 4,903 USA NIH National Heart Lung & Blood Institute (NHLBI) 130 4,902 SINGAPORE Bioprocessing Technology Institute 131 4,900 ITALY Fondazione Bruno Kessler 132 4,899 INDIA Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) - India 133 4,898 SOUTH KOREA Seoul St. Mary's Hospital 134 4,897 FRANCE CHU de Montpellier 135 4,895 USA ARUP Laboratories 136 4,894 SWITZERLAND Roche Holding 137 4,893 NETHERLANDS Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences 138 4,892 USA College of American Pathologists 139 4,890 USA Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center 140 4,889 AUSTRALIA Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital 141 4,888 AUSTRALIA Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health 142 4,887 CHINA Institute of Zoology, CAS 143 4,886 AUSTRALIA Murdoch Children's Research Institute 144 4,884 NETHERLANDS Hubrecht Institute (KNAW) 145 4,883 FRANCE Hopital Universitaire Pitie-Salpetriere - APHP 146 4,882 Página 3 Ranking Instituciones No Académicas por sub área OCDE 2020 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología > 2.06 Ingeniería Médica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE CHINA Institute of Genetics & Developmental Biology, CAS 147 4,881 GERMANY German Centre for Cardiovascular Research 148 4,879 JAPAN National Institute for Materials Science 149 4,878 AUSTRALIA Kolling Institute of Medical Research 150 4,877 AUSTRALIA Royal North Shore Hospital 151 4,876 USA National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) - USA 152 4,874 FRANCE CHU de Nantes 153 4,873 USA Henry Ford Hospital 154 4,872 FRANCE Hopital Universitaire Europeen Georges-Pompidou - APHP 155 4,871 AUSTRALIA St Vincents Hospital Sydney 156 4,870 SOUTH KOREA Institute for Basic Science - Korea (IBS) 157 4,868 USA Veterans Health Administration (VHA) 158 4,867 NORWAY Haukeland University Hospital 159 4,866 USA NIH National Institute of Biomedical Imaging & Bioengineering (NIBIB) 160 4,865 TAIWAN China Medical University Hospital - Taiwan 161 4,863 FINLAND Kuopio University Hospital 162 4,862 USA Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute 163 4,861 TAIWAN Taipei Veterans General Hospital 164 4,860 SOUTH KOREA Pusan National University Hospital 165 4,858 USA UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center 166 4,857 BELGIUM European Commission Joint Research Centre 167 4,856 FRANCE CHU Rennes 168 4,855 SINGAPORE Institute of Bioengineering & Nanotechnology 169 4,854 BELGIUM EC JRC Institute for Reference Materials & Measurements (IRMM) 170 4,852 UNITED KINGDOM University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 171 4,851 CHINA Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, CAS 172 4,850 AUSTRALIA St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne 173 4,849 INDIA Department of Science & Technology (India) 174 4,847 SWITZERLAND Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science & Technology (EMPA) 175 4,846
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alfred Nobel
    www.bibalex.org/bioalex2004conf The BioVisionAlexandria 2004 Conference Newsletter November 2003 Volume 1, Issue 2 BioVisionAlexandria ALFRED NOBEL 2004 aims to celebrate the The inventor, the industrialist outstanding scientists and scholars, in a he Nobel Prize is one of the highest distinctions recognized, granting its winner century dominated by instant fame. However, many do not know the interesting history and background technological and T that led to this award. scientific revolutions, through its It all began with a chemist, known as Alfred Nobel, born in Stockholm, Sweden in 1833. Nobel Day on 3 April Alfred Nobel moved to Russia when he was eight, where his father, Immanuel Nobel, 2004! started a successful mechanical workshop. He provided equipment for the Russian Army and designed naval mines, which effectively prevented the British Royal Navy from moving within firing range of St. Petersburg during the Crimean War. Immanuel Nobel was also a pioneer in the manufacture of arms, and in designing steam engines. INSIDE Scientific awards .........3 Immanuel’s success enabled him to Alfred met Ascanio Sobrero, the Italian Confirmed laureates ....4 Lady laureates ............7 provide his four sons with an excellent chemist who had invented Nitroglycerine education in natural sciences, languages three years earlier. Nitroglycerine, a and literature. Alfred, at an early age, highly explosive liquid, was produced by acquired extensive literary knowledge, mixing glycerine with sulfuric and nitric mastering many foreign languages. His acid. It was an invention that triggered a Nobel Day is interest in science, especially chemistry, fascination in the young scientist for many dedicated to many of was also apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Aerospace & Defense
    TURKEY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE 2016 AEROSPACE TURKEY TURKEY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE 2016 Aerospace - Defense - Original Equipment Manufacturers Platforms - Clusters - Multinationals - Sub-Tier Suppliers Distinguished GBR Readers, Since the inception of the Undersecretariat for Defense Industries 30 years ago, significant steps have been taken to achieve the goals of having the Turkish armed forces equipped with modern systems and technologies and promoting the development of the Turkish defense industry. In the last decade alone, the aerospace and defense (A&D) sector's total turnover quadrupled, while exports have increased fivefold, reaching $5.1 billion and $1.65 billion in 2014, respectively. The industry's investment in research and development (R&D) reached almost $1 billion in 2014. The total workforce in the A&D industry reached 30,000 personnel, of which 30% are engineers. Even more remarkable, Turkey is now at the stage of offering its own platforms for both the local market and to international allies, and has commenced a series of follow up local programs. Although this progress has been achieved under the circumstances of a healthy and consistent political environment and in parallel with sustained growth in the Turkish economy, the proportion of expenditure for defense in the national budget and as a percentage of Turkey’s GDP has been stable. With the help of the national, multinational and joint defense industry projects that have been undertaken in Turkey by the undersecretariat, the defense industry has become a highly capable community comprising large-scale main contractors, numerous sub- system manufacturers, small- and medium-sized enterprises, R&D companies who are involved in high-tech, niche areas, research institutes, and universities.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy the Spring Course
    New York Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy The Spring Course: Best of DDW 2021 Saturday, June 5, 2021 8:00 am – 3:15 pm Virtual Event The Spring Course: Best of DDW 2021 is jointly provided by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine – Montefiore Medical Center and the New York Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Page 1 of 10 Course Description The Spring Course is devoted to a review of the most compelling topics discussed during Digestive Disease Week® 2021. Faculty will present critically important information on new drugs, the etiology and pathophysiology of disease states, the epidemiology of diseases, the medical, surgical and endoscopic treatment of disease, and the social impact of disease states pertaining to gastroenterology, endoscopy, and liver disease. The program includes a video forum of new endoscopic techniques as well as a summary of the major topics presented at the most important academic forum in gastroenterology, making for an invaluable educational experience for those who were unable to attend Digestive Disease Week® and an excellent summary review for all others. Learning Objectives • Discuss the spectrum of gastrointestinal diseases such as motility disorders and colorectal cancer and outline the enhancement and effectiveness of related treatment options such as the use of artificial intelligence in the detection and resection of polyps during colonoscopy • Evaluate advances in the methods of assessing disease status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and discuss the application of these techniques
    [Show full text]
  • ERDAL KILIÇASLAN [email protected] +90 505 912 8952 +90 212 252 6339
    ERDAL KILIÇASLAN [email protected] +90 505 912 8952 +90 212 252 6339 EXPERIENCE: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TÜBİTAK BİLGEM İLTAREN -ANKARA 2013- ◊ Technical Adviser for Electronic Warfare Projects. DDI TECHNOLOGY INC -İSTANBUL 2012- ◊ Technical Adviser for Research and Development Projects RMK MARINE INC -İSTANBUL 2011-2012 ◊ Technical Adviser for the Military Ship Projects İSTANBUL OTOKAR INC -İSTANBUL/ADAPAZARI 2009-2012 ◊ Technical Adviser for the Project of Turkish National Main Battle Tank (ALTAY Project) Evaluation and Conceptual Design of Active Protection System of Turkish National Main Battle Tank Design of “Threat Evaluation Unit” of the Turkish Main Battle Tank Requirement Analysis of the Project MIKES INC. / “BAE SYSTEMS” -ANKARA/NEW YORK 2006-2008 ◊ Promoted to System Engineering Group Leader as a Design Lead System Engineer (Ankara, Facilities – NEW YORK) Participated in the Project of Modernization of F-16 Aircrafts until the preparation of System Test Procedures as System Engineering Group Leader in Ankara and New York Facilities, o Analyzed all the radars in the threat list of F-16 Aircrafts o Guided the Threat Data Package Analysis Process, o Participated in the jamming techniques definition process for the threats of F-16 Aircrafts. o Participated in the definition and analysis process of the system and software requirements, o Prepared the Test Engineering Management Process Document for the Modernization of F-16 Aircrafts Radar Warning Receivers,
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Hospitals' Community Benefit Initiatives
    A Commitment to Community: Massachusetts Hospitals’ Community Benefit Initiatives 2020 Report Region 3 Region 1 Region 2 Region 4 Region 5 Baystate Health • Baystate Franklin Medical Center • Baystate Medical Center • Baystate Noble Hospital • Baystate Wing Hospital Berkshire Health Systems • Berkshire Medical Center Partners HealthCare • Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital • Fairview Hospital • Brigham and Women’s Hospital Beth Israel Lahey Health • Cooley Dickinson Health Care • Anna Jaques Hospital • Martha’s Vineyard Hospital • Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital – Milton • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary • Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital – Needham • Massachusetts General Hospital • Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital – Plymouth • Nantucket Cottage Hospital • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center • Newton-Wellesley Hospital • Beverly and Addison Gilbert Hospitals • North Shore Medical Center • Lahey Hospital & Medical Center Shriners Hospitals for Children-Boston • Mount Auburn Hospital • New England Baptist Hospital Signature Healthcare Brockton Hospital • Winchester Hospital South Shore Hospital Boston Children’s Hospital Southcoast Hospitals Group Boston Medical Center Sturdy Memorial Hospital Cambridge Health Alliance Tenet Healthcare • MetroWest Medical Center Cape Cod Healthcare • Saint Vincent Hospital • Cape Cod Hospital Trinity Health of New England • Falmouth Hospital • Mercy Medical Center Dana-Farber Cancer Institute UMass Memorial Health Care Emerson Hospital • UMass Memorial Health Alliance – Clinton Franciscan Children's Hospital
    [Show full text]
  • NYSNA Pension Plan New Participant Information • (877) RN BENEFITS [762-3633] • Rnbenefits.Org
    NYSNA Pension Plan New Participant Information • (877) RN BENEFITS [762-3633] • rnbenefits.org Defined benefit plan • Once a participant has completed five years of credited service, that participant will be VESTED and upon retirement will receive a monthly pension benefit for the rest of his/her life. Employer makes all contributions • RN contributes nothing Portable between more than 30 participating facilities in the New York City area (see back) How the pension benefit is calculated • Mathematical formula that recognizes earnings (base salary and experience differential only) and years of credited service • Based on the highest final average earnings for any five complete calendar years during the last 10 years of covered employment immediately before termination 3 retirement options to choose from For more detailed information on these options, please refer to your Welcome to the Pension Plan folder Normal retirement starting at age 65 Early retirement (unreduced) Must retire from active covered employment between the ages of 60 and 64 and have at least 20 years of credited service Early retirement Must retire between the ages of 55 and 64 (reduced by 1/2% for each month that early retirement precedes normal retirement at age 65) The information contained herein should not be viewed as a substitute for the Plan document, the most recent Summary Plan Description, and any relevant Summary of Material Modifications. In case of discrepancies or contradictions, the language and terms of the Plan document, the SPD, and SMMs shall prevail. 9/2020 Deferred Vested Benefit • Available to participants who are vested and leave the Plan prior to being eligible for retirement reductions • Payable at Normal Retirement age 65 with no reductions or between age 55 and 64 with early retirement reductions The Preretirement Survivor Benefit • If a vested participant dies before she/he retires • If married, the spouse is automatically the beneficiary.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMATO PDF Ranking Instituciones No Acadã©Micas Por Sub Ã
    Ranking Instituciones No Académicas por sub área OCDE 2020 3. Ciencias Médicas y de la Salud > 3.02 Medicina Clínica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE USA VA Boston Healthcare System 1 5,000 FRANCE Assistance Publique Hopitaux Paris (APHP) 2 5,000 USA UTMD Anderson Cancer Center 3 5,000 USA Mayo Clinic 4 5,000 USA Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 5 5,000 USA Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 6 5,000 USA Massachusetts General Hospital 7 5,000 FRANCE Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (Inserm) 8 5,000 USA National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA 9 5,000 FRANCE UNICANCER 10 5,000 USA Harvard School of Dental Medicine 11 5,000 CANADA University Health Network Toronto 12 5,000 USA Cleveland Clinic Foundation 13 5,000 USA Johns Hopkins Medicine 14 5,000 FRANCE Gustave Roussy 15 5,000 NETHERLANDS Erasmus University Medical Center 16 5,000 GERMANY Helmholtz Association 17 5,000 NETHERLANDS Academic Medical Center Amsterdam 18 5,000 SPAIN CIBER - Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red 19 5,000 USA Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 20 5,000 SWITZERLAND Roche Holding 21 5,000 CANADA Princess Margaret Cancer Centre 22 5,000 USA H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute 23 5,000 SPAIN Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron 24 5,000 BELGIUM University Hospital Leuven 25 5,000 USA NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) 26 5,000 SPAIN Hospital Clinic de Barcelona 27 5,000 USA Bristol-Myers Squibb 28 5,000 USA Merck & Company 29 5,000 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust 30 5,000 SOUTH KOREA Seoul National University
    [Show full text]
  • Hospital Profile Report - 2018
    Hospital Profile Report - 2018 Sample Hospital reports from the Halmanac.com website. 330079 ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER Nonprofit - Other 2233 STATE ROUTE 86 12/31/2018 365 Days Settled General Short Term SARANAC LAKE, NY 12983 CR Beds 75 POS Beds 95 FRANKLIN Key Performanace Ind. NATIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES Occupancy Rate 24.9% Balance Sheet Income Statement Length of Stay 3.8 Current Assets 41,075,760 Total Charges 264,858,276 Average Wages 35.90 Fixed Assets 66,813,921 Contract Allowance 161,215,929 60.9% Medicare Part A 9.8% Other Assets 19,534,755 Operating Revenue 103,642,347 39.1% Medicare Part B 9.1% Total Assets 127,424,436 Operating Expense 110,693,447 106.8% Current Ratio 1.9 Current Liabilities 21,548,956 Operating Margin -7,051,100 -6.8% Days to Collect 68.3 Long Term Liabilities 33,444,469 Other Income 12,921,827 12.5% Avg Payment Days 47.2 Total Equity 72,431,011 Other Expense 865,547 0.8% Depreciation Rate 2.7% Total Liab. and Equity 127,424,436 Net Profit or Loss 5,005,180 4.8% Return on Equity 6.9% Selected Revenue Departments Revenue Ranking - 2,107 Line Line Description Rank Cost Charges Ratio 30 Adults and Pediatrics - General Care 2,970 10,847,809 10,015,143 1.083141 31 Intensive Care Unit 2,396 2,304,871 2,335,360 0.986945 50 Operating Room 2,555 5,639,548 28,089,466 0.200771 52 Labor Room and Delivery Room 0 0 0 0.000000 91 Emergency Department 2,478 5,080,784 16,215,928 0.313321 General Service Cost by Line Rank Expense General Service Cost by LIne Rank Expense 01 Capital Cost - Buildings 2,842 2,179,825 02 Capital
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Fast 50 Turkey 2020 Winners Powerful Connections Fast50.Deloitte.Com.Tr 1 Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Turkey 2020 Winners | Powerful Connections Contents
    Technology Fast 50 2020 TURKEY 50 15 years of innovation Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Turkey 2020 Winners | Powerful connections Technology Fast 50 2020 TURKEY 50 15 years of innovation Technology Fast 50 Turkey 2020 Winners Powerful connections fast50.deloitte.com.tr 1 Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Turkey 2020 Winners | Powerful connections Contents Deloitte Foreword 3 Fast Facts 4 Winners List 5 2020 Big Star Awards 6 2020 Facebook Women in Tech Award 12 2020 Facebook Cross-Border Award 14 2020 Top 10 Companies 16 2020 Winners Profiles 22 Runner Ups List Winners 43 Program Partners 47 Technology Fast 50 Turkey Program 49 2 Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Turkey 2020 Winners | Powerful connections In this keystone year, I am thrilled to present This year we will be awarding for a second time, I want to extend my gratitude to Facebook for you the winners of the Fast 50 program the Cross-Border and Women in Tech special their continued cooperation and support in in Turkey. As these results will be the final awards. In addition, we added a “Runner Ups” bringing Fast 50 2020 Turkey together. pre-pandemic results, we once again see list to recognize companies in their 3rd years, an outstanding growth performance in the that are already promising great growths. I also would like to give thanks to our long- Turkish technology industry. 15 years ago, lasting NGO partners for their commitment to when Deloitte started this program in Turkey, Fast 50 program is Deloitte’s commitment the Turkish technology ecosystem. we hoped to bring the Turkish technology to a new generation of corporations that entrepreneurs to the world stage.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Nat Genet
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Nat Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 October 01. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Nat Genet. 2013 April ; 45(4): 371–384e2. doi:10.1038/ng.2566. Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer Stig E Bojesen1,2,*, Karen A Pooley3,*, Sharon E Johnatty4,*, Jonathan Beesley4,*, Kyriaki Michailidou3,*, Jonathan P Tyrer5,*, Stacey L Edwards6, Hilda A Pickett7,8, Howard C Shen9, Chanel E Smart10, Kristine M Hillman6, Phuong L Mai11, Kate Lawrenson9, Michael D Stutz7,8, Yi Lu4, Rod Karevan9, Nicholas Woods12, Rebecca L Johnston10, Juliet D French6, Xiaoqing Chen4, Maren Weischer1,2, Sune F Nielsen1,2, Melanie J Maranian5, Maya Ghoussaini5, Shahana Ahmed5, Caroline Baynes5, Manjeet K Bolla3, Qin Wang3, Joe Dennis3, Lesley McGuffog3, Daniel Barrowdale3, Andrew Lee3, Sue Healey4, Michael Lush3, Daniel C Tessier13,14, Daniel Vincent13,14, Françis Bacot13,14, Study Group members15, Ignace Vergote16,17, Sandrina Lambrechts16,17, Evelyn Despierre16,17, Harvey A Risch18, Anna González-Neira19, Mary Anne Rossing20,21, Guillermo Pita19, Jennifer A Doherty22, Nuria Álvarez19, Melissa C Larson23, Brooke L Fridley23, Nils Schoof24, Jenny Chang- Claude25, Mine S Cicek26, Julian Peto27, Kimberly R Kalli28, Annegien Broeks29, Sebastian M Armasu23, Marjanka K Schmidt29,30, Linde M Braaf29, Boris Winterhoff31, Heli Nevanlinna32, Gottfried E Konecny33, Diether Lambrechts34,35,
    [Show full text]
  • Institutions That Contributed to the ESTS Registry
    Institutions that contributed to the ESTS Registry Please note that Only units contributing more than 100 patients and consistently (as of December 31th 2019) in the registry are shown Country City Institution ALBANIA TIRANA University Hospital of Lung Diseases "Shefqet Ndroqi" AUSTRIA VIENNA Otto Wagner Hospital BELGIUM ANTWERP University Hospital of Antwerp BELGIUM GENK ZOL St. - Jan Genk BELGIUM BRUSSELS Cliniques Universitaires Saint- Luc BELGIUM BRUSSELS Hopital Academique Erasme BELGIUM LEUVEN University Hospitals Leuven BELGIUM GILLY GHDC Site Gilly, Belgium CROATIA ZAGREB Department of Thoracic Surgery “Jordanovac” University Hospital Centre Zagreb FRANCE LA ROCHELLE Hôpital St Louis FRANCE LE HAVRE Clinique Petit Col Moulin FRANCE LE PLESSISROBINSON Marie Lannelongue Hospital FRANCE LILLE CHU Calmette FRANCE LILLE Clinique de la Louvière FRANCE LILLE Polyclinique du Bois FRANCE LYON CHU Lyon Sud FRANCE LYON Clinique St Louis FRANCE LYON Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz FRANCE MARSEILLE CHU Ste Marguerite FRANCE MARSEILLE HIA Alphonse LAVERAN FRANCE MAXEVILLE Médipole Gentilly FRANCE MEAUX CH - Meaux FRANCE METZ Hôpital Belle-Isle FRANCE MONTPELLIER CHU de Montpellier FRANCE MONTPELLIER Clinique du Millénaire FRANCE MORLAIX CMC de la Baie de Morlaix FRANCE NANCY CHU Central de FRANCE NANTES CHU - Nantes FRANCE NANTES Clinique St Augustin FRANCE NANTES Nouvelle Clinique Nantaise FRANCE NICE CHU Pasteur FRANCE NICE Clinique Saint Georges FRANCE NIMES Clinique les Franciscaines FRANCE PARIS HEGP FRANCE PARIS Hôtel Dieu FRANCE PARIS IMM
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 China Military Power Report
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 Office of the Secretary of Defense Preparation of this report cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $181,000 in Fiscal Years 2018-2019. This includes $12,000 in expenses and $169,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019May02 RefID: E-1F4B924 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 A Report to Congress Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, as Amended Section 1260, “Annual Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China,” of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Public Law 115-232, which amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, Section 1202, Public Law 106-65, provides that the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report “in both classified and unclassified form, on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the People’s Liberation Army and the tenets and probable development of Chinese security strategy and military strategy, and of the military organizations and operational concepts supporting such development over the next 20 years.
    [Show full text]