Pages 27995±28466 Vol. 61 6±4±96 No. 108 federal register June 4,1996 Tuesday of thisissue. Washington, DC,seeannouncementontheinsidecover For informationonbriefingsinChicago,IL,and Briefings onHowToUsetheFederalRegister 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996

SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES

PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, Assistance with public subscriptions 512–1806 (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), by General online information 202–512–1530 the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Single copies/back copies: Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the Paper or fiche 512–1800 regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register Assistance with public single copies 512–1803 (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC FEDERAL AGENCIES 20402. Subscriptions: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 523–5243 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 523–5243 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and For other telephone numbers, see the Reader Aids section Executive Orders and Federal agency documents having general applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published at the end of this issue. by act of Congress and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless FEDERAL REGISTER WORKSHOP earlier filing is requested by the issuing agency. The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration THE FEDERAL REGISTER: WHAT IT IS AND authenticates this issue of the Federal Register as the official serial HOW TO USE IT publication established under the Federal Register Act. 44 U.S.C. 1507 provides that the contents of the Federal Register shall be FOR: Any person who uses the Federal Register and Code of Federal judicially noticed. Regulations. The Federal Register is published in paper, 24x microfiche and as WHO: Sponsored by the Office of the Federal Register. an online database through GPO Access, a service of the U.S. WHAT: Free public briefings (approximately 3 hours) to present: Government Printing Office. The online database is updated by 6 1. The regulatory process, with a focus on the Federal Register a.m. each day the Federal Register is published. The database system and the public’s role in the development of includes both text and graphics from Volume 59, Number 1 (January 2, 1994) forward. Free public access is available on a regulations. Wide Area Information Server (WAIS) through the Internet and via 2. The relationship between the Federal Register and Code of asynchronous dial-in. Internet users can access the database by Federal Regulations. using the World Wide Web; the Superintendent of Documents l 3. The important elements of typical Federal Register home page address is http://www.access.gpo.gov/su docs/, by documents. using local WAIS client software, or by telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, then login as guest, (no password required). 4. An introduction to the finding aids of the FR/CFR system. Dial-in users should use communications software and modem to WHY: To provide the public with access to information necessary to call (202) 512–1661; type swais, then login as guest (no password research Federal agency regulations which directly affect them. required). For general information about GPO Access, contact the GPO Access User Support Team by sending Internet e-mail to There will be no discussion of specific agency regulations. [email protected]; by faxing to (202) 512–1262; or by calling (202) 512–1530 between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern time, Monday– Friday, except for Federal holidays. CHICAGO, IL The annual subscription price for the Federal Register paper edition is $494, or $544 for a combined Federal Register, Federal WHEN: June 11, 1996 at 9:00 am Register Index and List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA) WHERE: Metcalfe Federal Building, Conference Room subscription; the microfiche edition of the Federal Register 328, 77 West Jackson, Chicago, Illinois including the Federal Register Index and LSA is $433. Six month 60604 subscriptions are available for one-half the annual rate. The charge for individual copies in paper form is $8.00 for each issue, or $8.00 RESERVATIONS: 1–800–688–9889 for each group of pages as actually bound; or $1.50 for each issue in microfiche form. All prices include regular domestic postage and handling. International customers please add 25% for foreign WASHINGTON, DC handling. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or charge to your GPO Deposit [Two Sessions] Account, VISA or MasterCard. Mail to: New Orders, WHEN: June 18, 1996 at 9:00 am, and Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA June 25, 1996 at 9:00 am 15250–7954. WHERE: Office of the Federal Register Conference There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing Room, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., in the Federal Register. Washington, DC (3 blocks north of Union How To Cite This Publication: Use the volume number and the Station Metro) page number. Example: 61 FR 12345. RESERVATIONS: 202–523–4538′

2 III

Contents Federal Register Vol. 61, No. 108

Tuesday, June 4, 1996

Agricultural Marketing Service Education Department RULES NOTICES Papayas grown in Hawaii, 28000–28002 Agency information collection activities: Pork promotion, research, and consumer information, Proposed collection; comment request, 28188 28002–28003 Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28189 Tobacco inspection: Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Growers; mail referendum, 27997–27998 National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research— Agriculture Department Research and demonstration projects, etc., 28436– See Agricultural Marketing Service 28462 See Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service See Food and Consumer Service Employment and Training Administration See Food Safety and Inspection Service NOTICES See Foreign Agricultural Service Unemployment compensation: See Forest Service Unemployment insurance program letters— See Natural Resources Conservation Service Disclosure of confidential employment information to private entities, 28236–28237 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service PROPOSED RULES Energy Department Exportation and importation of animals and animal See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission products: NOTICES Horses from contagious equine metritis-affected Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: countries; new testing and treatment protocols for Commercialization ventures program, 28189–28190 mares and stallions, etc., 28073–28085 Hydrogen feasibility studies, 28190–28191

Assassination Records Review Board Engraving and Printing Bureau NOTICES NOTICES Formal determinations on records release, 28158–28163 Agency information collection activities: Meetings; Sunshine Act, 28163 Proposed collection; comment request, 28258 Children and Families Administration NOTICES Environmental Protection Agency Agency information collection activities: RULES Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28212– Air quality implementation plans; approval and 28213 promulgation; various States: Pennsylvania, 28061–28067 Coast Guard PROPOSED RULES RULES Pesticides; tolerances in food, animal feeds, and raw Electrical engineering: agricultural commodities: Merchant vessels; electrical engineering requirements, 1,1-Difluoroethane, 28118–28120 28260–28293 A-alkyl(C12-C15)-w-hydroxy poly(oxyethylene) sulfate, Ports and waterways safety: etc., 28120–28122 NOTICES Hudson River, Albany, NY; safety zone, 28055–28057 Air pollutants, hazardous; national emission standards: Commerce Department Initial list of categories of major and area sources, and See International Trade Administration standards promulgation schedule; revisions, 28197– See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 28208

Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements Executive Office of the President NOTICES See Presidential Documents Cotton, wool, and man-made textiles: See Trade Representative, Office of United States Guatemala, 28183 Thailand, 28183–28184 Federal Aviation Administration RULES Corporation for National and Community Service Airworthiness directives: NOTICES Beech, 28031–28033 Agency information collection activities: Fokker, 28029–28031 Proposed collection; comment request, 28184 McDonnell Douglas, 28028–28029 Meetings; Sunshine Act, 28184–28185 Airworthiness standards: Aircraft engines— Defense Department Continued rotation, rotor locking, and vibration, See Navy Department 28430–28433 IV Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Contents

Child restraint systems: Polymers— Booster seats and vest- and harness-type systems, Petroleum hydrocarbon resins (cyclopentadiene-type), approval withdrawn; and lap held systems; existing hydrogenated, 28049–28051 prohibition emphasis, 28416–28423 PROPOSED RULES Class E airspace, 28033–28046 Administrative practice and procedure: PROPOSED RULES Miscellaneous amendments; Federal regulatory review, Airworthiness directives: 28116–28118 CFM International, 28112–28114 NOTICES Pratt & Whitney, 28114–28116 Color additive petitions: NOTICES ProMedica International, 28213 Exemption petitions; summary and disposition, 28255– 28256 Food Safety and Inspection Service NOTICES Federal Communications Commission Codex Alimentarius Commission; international sanitary and PROPOSED RULES phytosanitary standard-setting activities, 28132–28158 Radio services, special: Maritime services— Foreign Agricultural Service Large cargo and small passenger ships; radio NOTICES installation inspection, 28122–28123 Meetings: U.S.-Canada Forum for World Food Summit, 28158 Federal Emergency Management Agency RULES Forest Service Flood insurance; communities eligible for sale: NOTICES Maine et al., 28067–28069 Environmental statements; availability, etc.: NOTICES Ochoco National Forest, OR, 28158 Flood insurance program: Flood map changes, 28296–28414 General Services Administration NOTICES Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal telecommunications standards: NOTICES Telecommunications— Electric rate and corporate regulation filings: Land mobile radio projects, 28210–28211 Medina Power Co. et al., 28191–28192 Federal travel: Mid-American Power LLC et al., 28192–28195 Special actual subsistence expense reimbursement Environmental statements; availability, etc.: ceiling— Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co., 28195 Atlanta, GA; per diem localities impacted by 1996 Natural gas certificate filings: Olympic Games, 28211–28212 GPM Gas Corp. et al., 28195–28197 Small business competitiveness demonstration program; solicitation procedures change, 28212 Federal Reserve System Health and Human Services Department NOTICES See Children and Families Administration Banks and bank holding companies: See Food and Drug Administration Change in bank control, 28208 See Health Resources and Services Administration Formations, acquisitions, and mergers, 28208–28209 See Indian Health Service Permissible nonbanking activities, 28209 See National Institutes of Health Federal Open Market Committee: See Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Domestic policy directives, 28209–28210 Administration Meetings; Sunshine Act, 28210 Health Resources and Services Administration Fish and Wildlife Service NOTICES NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Endangered and threatened species permit applications, Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28213– 28231 28214

Food and Consumer Service Housing and Urban Development Department NOTICES NOTICES Agency information collection activities: Agency information collection activities: Proposed collection; comment request, 28132 Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28227– 28230 Food and Drug Administration RULES Immigration and Naturalization Service Administrative practice and procedure: RULES Advisory committees— Immigration: Name and function changes, 28047–28049 Benefits applicants fingerprint taking; designated outside Food additives: entities certification, 28003–28020 Adjuvants, production aids, and sanitizers— NOTICES Hydrogen peroxide, etc. (aqueous solution), 28051– Agency information collection activities: 28053 Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28234 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Contents V

Indian Health Service National Aeronautics and Space Administration NOTICES NOTICES Grant and cooperative agreement awards: Patent licenses; non-exclusive, exclusive, or partially Indian health scholarship program; recipients list, 28214– exclusive: 28222 NextGen Systems, Inc., 28248

Interior Department National Bankruptcy Review Commission See Fish and Wildlife Service NOTICES See Land Management Bureau Meetings, 28248–28249 See National Park Service See Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office National Credit Union Administration RULES Internal Revenue Service Practice and procedure: RULES Uniform and local rules, 28021–28028 Excise taxes: PROPOSED RULES Gasoline and diesel fuel registration requirements Credit unions: Correction, 28053 Corporate credit unions; capital strengthening risk PROPOSED RULES management and control, 28085–28112 Income taxes: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Foreign corporations— Determination of interest expense deduction and RULES Motor vehicle safety standards: branch profits tax; correction, 28118 Child restraint systems— International Trade Administration Child harnesses and backless restraints use in aircraft; NOTICES manufacturers labeling requirements, 28423–28427 PROPOSED RULES Antidumping: Motor vehicle safety standards: Engineered process gas turbo-compressor systems, Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment— assembled or unassembled, and complete or Clearance, side marker, and identification lamps, and incomplete, from— backup lamps; Society of Automotive Engineers Japan, 28164–28166 standards incorporation; petition denied, 28123– Fresh cut flowers from— 28124 Mexico, 28166–28168 Power-operated window, partition, and roof panel Roller chain, other than bicycle, from— systems, 28124–28131 Japan, 28168–28174 Antidumping duty orders and findings: National Institute of Justice Determinations not to revoke, 28163 NOTICES Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Research Triangle Institute et al., 28174–28175 Community policing technology research and University of— development partnership projects, 28235–28236 Southern California et al., 28176–28177 Wisconsin-Eau Claire et al., 28175–28176 National Institutes of Health NOTICES Justice Department Meetings: See Immigration and Naturalization Service National Center for Human Genome Research, 28222 See Justice Programs Office National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 28222 See Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office National Institute of Dental Research, 28223–28224 See National Institute of Justice National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 28222–28223 Justice Programs Office National Institute of Nursing Research, 28223 NOTICES National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Agency information collection activities: Disorders, 28223 Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28234– Research Grants Division special emphasis panels, 28235 28224–28225

Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOTICES RULES Agency information collection activities: Fishery conservation and management: Proposed collection; comment request, 28235 Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands groundfish, 28071–28072 Gulf of Alaska groundfish, 28069–28071 Labor Department NOTICES See Employment and Training Administration Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: See Occupational Safety and Health Administration Northeast multispecies; fishing capacity reduction See Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration program; comment request, 28177–28181 Meetings: Land Management Bureau South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 28181– NOTICES 28182 Meetings: Permits: Green River Basin Advisory Committee, 28231 Endangered and threatened species, 28182–28183 VI Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Contents

National Park Service See Health Resources and Services Administration NOTICES See Indian Health Service Environmental statements; availability, etc.: See National Institutes of Health Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park, AK, 28231 See Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Oil and gas plans of operation; availability, etc.: Administration Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area, OH, 28231 Securities and Exchange Commission Natural Resources Conservation Service NOTICES RULES Agency information collection activities: Technical assistance: Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28252– Soil loss and wind erosion equations, universal; soil 28253 erosion due to water and wind prediction, 27998– Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: 28000 Capital Market Fund, Inc., 28253–28254 SuperTrust Trust for Capital Market Fund, Inc., 28254– Navy Department 28255 NOTICES Base realignment and closure: Small Business Administration Surplus Federal property— NOTICES Naval Air Station Glenview, IL, 28185–28188 Meetings: Nuclear Regulatory Commission National Small Business Development Center Advisory NOTICES Board, 28255 Meetings: Reactor Safeguards Advisory Committee, 28249–28251 Social Security Administration Meetings; Sunshine Act, 28251 RULES Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Social security benefits: Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc., 28249 Disability and blindness determinations— Musculoskeletal system listings; expiration date Occupational Safety and Health Administration extension, 28046–28047 RULES NOTICES State plans; development, enforcement, etc.: Organization, functions, and authority delegations: North Carolina, 28053–28055 Inspector General; subpoenas issuance, 28255

Office of United States Trade Representative Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services See Trade Representative, Office of United States Administration NOTICES Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration Federal workplace drug testing programs; mandatory NOTICES guidelines, 28225–28226 Employee benefit plans; prohibited transaction exemptions: Meetings: Everett Clinic et al., 28237–28243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., et al.; correction, 28243– Administration National Advisory Council, 28226– 28244 28227 Sprague Electric Co. et al., 28244–28248 Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office Personnel Management Office NOTICES RULES Agency information collection activities: Prevailing rate systems, 27995–27997 Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28231– NOTICES 28233 Excepted service: Schedules A, B, and C; positions placed or revoked— Textile Agreements Implementation Committee Update, 28251–28252 See Committee for the Implementation of Textile Postal Service Agreements RULES Organization and administration: Trade Representative, Office of United States Mail reasonably suspected of being dangerous to persons NOTICES or property; treatment, 28059–28061 Meetings: United States-Pacific Trade and Investment Policy Presidential Documents Commission, 28258 PROCLAMATIONS Special observances: Transportation Department Small Business Week (Proc. 6902), 28465 See Coast Guard See Federal Aviation Administration Prospective Payment Assessment Commission See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NOTICES NOTICES Meetings, 28252 Aviation proceedings: Certificates of public convenience and necessity and Public Health Service foreign air carrier permits; weekly applications, See Food and Drug Administration 28255 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Contents VII

Treasury Department Part IV See Engraving and Printing Bureau Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation See Internal Revenue Service Administration and National Highway Traffic Safety NOTICES Administration, 28416–28427 Agency information collection activities: Submission for OMB review; comment request, 28256– Part V 28258 Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 28430–28433 United StatesÐPacific Trade and Investment Policy Commission Part VI NOTICES Department of Education, 28436–28462 Meetings, 28258 Part VII Veterans Affairs Department The President, 28465 RULES Loan guaranty: Miscellaneous amendments, 28057–28059 Reader Aids Additional information, including a list of public laws, telephone numbers, reminders, and finding aids, appears in the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue. Separate Parts In This Issue

Part II Electronic Bulletin Board Department of Transportation, Coast Guard, 28260–28293 Free Electronic Bulletin Board service for Public Law numbers, Federal Register finding aids, and a list of Part III documents on public inspection is available on 202–275– Federal Emergency Management Agency, 28296–28414 1538 or 275–0920. VIII Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Contents

CFR PARTS AFFECTED IN THIS ISSUE

A cumulative list of the parts affected this month can be found in the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue.

3 CFR Proposed Rules: Proclamations: 180 (2 documents) ...... 28118, 6902...... 28465 28120 5 CFR 44 CFR 532 (3 documents) ...... 27995, 64...... 28067 27996 46 CFR 7 CFR 108...... 28260 29...... 27997 110...... 28260 610...... 27998 111...... 28260 928...... 28000 112...... 28260 1230...... 28002 113...... 28260 161...... 28260 8 CFR 103...... 28003 47 CFR 299...... 28003 Proposed Rules: 9 CFR 0...... 28122 80...... 28122 Proposed Rules: 92...... 28073 49 CFR 12 CFR 571...... 28423 747...... 28021 Proposed Rules: Proposed Rules: 571 (2 documents) ...... 28123, 704...... 28085 28124 709...... 28085 50 CFR 741...... 28085 672 (3 documents) ...... 28069, 14 CFR 28070 33...... 28430 675 (2 documents) ...... 28071, 39 (3 documents) ...... 28028, 28072 28029, 28031 71 (17 documents) ...... 28033, 28034, 28035, 28036, 28037, 28038, 28039, 28040, 28041, 28042, 28043, 28044, 28045 91...... 28416 121...... 28416 125...... 28416 135...... 28416 Proposed Rules: 39 (2 documents) ...... 28112, 28114 20 CFR 404...... 28046 21 CFR 14 (2 documents) ...... 28047, 28048 177...... 28049 178...... 28051 Proposed Rules: 1...... 28116 2...... 28116 3...... 28116 5...... 28116 10...... 28116 12...... 28116 20...... 28116 56...... 28116 58...... 28116 26 CFR 40...... 28053 48...... 28053 Proposed Rules: 1...... 28118 29 CFR 1952...... 28053 33 CFR 165...... 28055 38 CFR 36...... 28057 39 CFR 233...... 28059 40 CFR 52...... 28061 27995

Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 61, No. 108

Tuesday, June 4, 1996

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER workers employed in Philadelphia establish a new Jefferson, NY, NAF contains regulatory documents having general County. After another detailed review, wage area with a survey area consisting applicability and legal effect, most of which OPM found that it would not be feasible of Jefferson County—currently an are keyed to and codified in the Code of for the Montgomery County survey host unsurveyed county in the Oneida wage Federal Regulations, which is published under activity to support a survey expanded to area. The Oneida wage area is presently 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. include an additional large urban area composed of one survey area county The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by like Philadelphia County. Hence, OPM (Oneida) and nine area of application the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of concurs with the findings of FPRAC and counties (Albany, Clinton, Jefferson, new books are listed in the first FEDERAL does not agree that the Montgomery Onondaga, Ontario, Schenectady, REGISTER issue of each week. survey area should be expanded. Saratoga, Seneca, and Steuben). After Regarding the suggestion of a this change, a new wage area, Jefferson, differential, OPM has provided directly NY, will include seven of these OFFICE OF PERSONNEL to the sender of the suggestion guidance counties, with Jefferson designated as MANAGEMENT on how agencies may request wage the survey area and Albany, Oneida, flexibilities under current regulations Onondaga, Ontario, Schenectady, and 5 CFR Part 532 for special rates, special schedules, and Steuben designated as areas of RIN 3206±AH22 increased minimum rates to counter application. Clinton, Saratoga, and recruitment or retention difficulties. Seneca, which have no FWS employees, Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment Therefore, the interim rule is being will be deleted. of Philadelphia, PA, Nonappropriated adopted as a final rule. DATES: This interim rule becomes Fund Wage Area effective on June 6, 1996. Comments Regulatory Flexibility Act must be received by July 5, 1996. AGENCY: Office of Personnel I certify that these regulations will not Employees currently paid rates from the Management. have a significant economic impact on Oneida, NY, NAF wage schedule will ACTION: Final rule. a substantial number of small entities continue to be paid from that schedule because they will affect only Federal until their conversion to the Jefferson, SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel agencies and employees. NY, NAF wage schedule on May 16, Management (OPM) is issuing a final 1996. rule to abolish the Philadelphia, PA, List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Administrative practice and Wage System (FWS) wage area and to Donald J. Winstead, Assistant procedure, Freedom of information, Director for Compensation Policy, redefine the five counties having Government employees, Reporting and continuing FWS employment as areas of Human Resources Systems Service, recordkeeping requirements, Wages. Office of Personnel Management, Room application to nearby NAF wage areas Accordingly, under the authority of 5 6H31, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, for pay-setting purposes. U.S.C. 5343, the interim rule amending DC 20415, or FAX: (202) 606–2394. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 5, 1996. 5 CFR part 532 published on November FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 14, 1995 (60 FR 57145), is adopted as Shields, (202) 606–2848. Paul Shields, (202) 606–2848. final without any changes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Office of Personnel Management. the closing of the Oneida, NY, November 14, 1995, OPM published an Lorraine A. Green, nonappropriated fund (NAF) wage area interim rule to abolish the Philadelphia, Deputy Director. host activity, Griffiss Air Force Base, left PA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) [FR Doc. 96–13842 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Oneida County without an activity Federal Wage System wage area and having the capability to conduct a wage BILLING CODE 6325±01±M redefine the five counties having survey, the Department of Defense continuing FWS employment as areas of requested that the Oneida wage area be application to nearby NAF wage areas 5 CFR Part 532 abolished and that a new Jefferson, NY, for pay-setting purposes. Philadelphia NAF wage area be established with a County and Chester County, PA, are RIN 3206±AH41 survey area consisting of Jefferson being redefined to the Montgomery, PA, County—currently an unsurveyed Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition wage area. New Castle County, DE; Cape county in the Oneida wage area. The of Oneida, NY, Nonappropriated Fund May, NJ; and Salem County, NJ, are Oneida wage area is presently composed Wage Area being redefined to the Burlington, NJ, of one survey area county (Oneida) and wage area. The remaining Philadelphia AGENCY: Office of Personnel nine area of application counties wage area counties (Camden and Management. (Albany, Clinton, Jefferson, Onondaga, Cloucester, NJ) have no FWS employees ACTION: Interim rule with request for Ontario, Schenectady, Saratoga, Seneca, and are being deleted. The interim rule comments. and Steuben). provided a 30-day period for public The new wage area being established comment. OPM received one comment SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel by this interim rule, Jefferson, NY, will during the comment period suggesting Management (OPM) is issuing an include seven of these counties, with that the Montgomery, PA, survey area be interim rule to abolish the Oneida, NY, Jefferson designated as the survey area expanded to include Philadelphia nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal and Albany, Oneida, Onondaga, County or that a differential be paid to Wage System (FWS) wage area and to Ontario, Schenectady, and Steuben 27996 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations designated as areas of application. the general notice of proposed Oneida Jefferson County meets the minimum rulemaking. Also, pursuant to section Onondaga requirements to be the survey area. Fort 553(d)(3) of title 5, United States Code, Ontario Drum, located in Jefferson County, has I find that good cause exists for making Schenectady 181 NAF Federal Wage System this rule effective in less than 30 days. Steuben employees and has the capability to The notice is being waived and the * * * * * conduct the survey. Jefferson County regulation is being made effective in less [FR Doc. 96–13840 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] also meets the other regulatory than 30 days because preparations for BILLING CODE 6325±01±M requirement of a minimum of 1,800 the 1996 Jefferson, NY, NAF wage area private enterprise employees in survey must begin immediately. establishments within survey Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 CFR Part 532 specifications (with approximately I certify that these regulations will not 16,970 such employees). Clinton, RIN 3206±AH29 Saratoga, and Seneca, which have no have a significant economic impact on FWS employees, will be deleted. a substantial number of small entities Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment As required in regulation, 5 CFR because they affect only Federal of Franklin, OH, Nonappropriated Fund 532.219, the following criteria were agencies and employees. Wage Area considered in redefining these wage List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 areas: AGENCY: Office of Personnel (1) Proximity of largest activity in Administrative practice and Management. each county; procedure, Freedom of information, ACTION: Final rule. (2) Transportation facilities and Government employees, Reporting and commuting patterns; and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel (3) Similarities of the counties in: Office of Personnel Management. Management (OPM) is issuing a final (i) Overall population; rule to abolish the Franklin, OH, Lorraine A. Green, (ii) Private employment in major nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal industry categories; and Deputy Director. Wage System (FWS) wage area and (iii) Kinds and sizes of private Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR redefine the five counties having industrial establishments. part 532 as follows: continuing FWS employment as areas of The criteria strongly favor redefinition application to the Greene-Montgomery, to the proposed Jefferson survey area for PART 532ÐPREVAILING RATE OH, NAF wage area for pay-setting the closest two counties to be redefined, SYSTEMS purposes. Those five counties include Oneida and Onondaga. For the four three Ohio counties (Franklin, Licking, more distant counties to the southwest 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: and Ross) and two West Virginia (Ontario and Steuben) and to the counties (Raleigh and Wayne). The southeast (Schenectady and Albany), Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 remaining Franklin wage area county the regulatory criteria are mixed, with also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. (Cabell) has no FWS employment and is Jefferson first-ranked on either the Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 532 being deleted. transportation and commuting patterns [Amended] EFFECTIVE DATE: July 5, 1996. criterion or the similarities in population and private industry 2. In appendix B to subpart B, the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: criterion. Although consideration was listing for the State of New York is Paul Shields, (202) 606–2848. given to the possible redefinition of amended by removing the entry for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On these four counties to the closer Niagara, Oneida and adding in alphabetical order January 31, 1996, OPM published an New York, or Hampden, Massachusetts, a new entry of Jefferson with a interim rule to abolish the Franklin, OH, areas, the mixed nature of these findings beginning month of survey of ‘‘March’’ nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal supports this redefinition. Other and a fiscal year of full-scale survey of Wage System wage area and redefine the relevant factors weighed include the ‘‘Even.’’ five counties having continuing FWS continuity of the historical composition 3. Appendix D to subpart B is employment as areas of application to of the old wage area and a natural amended by removing the wage area list the Green-Montgomery, OH, NAF wage affinity of these New York counties for Oneida, New York, and by adding in area for pay-setting purposes. Those five having continuing NAF employment. alphabetical order a new list for counties include three Ohio counties The willingness of DOD and its wage Jefferson, New York, to read as follows: (Franklin, Licking, and Ross) and two committee to establish a new wage area West Virginia counties (Raleigh and Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532Ð and conduct a new survey furthers the Wayne). The remaining Franklin wage Nonappropriated Fund Wage and concepts of wage rates based on area county (Cabell) has no FWS Survey Areas prevailing local rates and of effective employment and is being deleted. The partnership in this period of wage area * * * * * interim rule provided a 30-day period realignments as base closures shrink the for public comment. OPM received no NAF workforce. New York comments during the comment period. The full-scale surveys will continue to * * * * * Therefore, the interim rule is being be ordered in March of even numbered adopted as a final rule. fiscal years—e.g., in March 1996. The Jefferson Survey Area Regulatory Flexibility Act Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory New York Committee reviewed this Jefferson I certify that these regulations will not recommendation and by consensus have a significant economic impact on Area of Application. Survey Area Plus recommended approval. a substantial number of small entities Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), I New York because they will affect only Federal find that good cause exists for waiving Albany agencies and employees. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 27997

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 EFFECTIVE DATE: July 5, 1995. The Department of Agriculture is Administrative practice and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: issuing this rule in conformance with procedure, Freedom of information, Rebecca Fial, Assistant to the Director, Executive Order 12866. Government employees, Reporting and Tobacco Division, Agricultural This final rule has been reviewed recordkeeping requirements, Wages. Marketing Service, United States under Executive Order 12788, Civil Accordingly, under the authority of 5 Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box Justice Reform. This action is not U.S.C. 5343, the interim rule amending 96456, Washington, DC 20090–6456; intended to have retroactive effect. The 5 CFR part 532 published on January 31, telephone number (202) 260–0151. final rule will not preempt any State or 1996 (61 FR 3175), is adopted as final local laws, regulations, or policies, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice without any changes. unless they present an irreconcilable was published in the March 18, 1996, conflict with this rule. There are no Office of Personnel Management. issue of the Federal Register (61 FR, administrative procedures which must Lorraine A. Green, 10903) announcing that a referendum be exhausted prior to any judicial Deputy Director. would be conducted among active flue- challenge to the provisions of this rule. [FR Doc. 96–13839 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] cured producers who sold tobacco on Additionally, in conformance with BILLING CODE 6325±01±M either Sanford or Carthage-Aberdeen, the provisions of the Regulatory during the 1995 season to ascertain if Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), full such producers favored the consideration has been given to the DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE consolidation. potential economic impact upon small The notice of referendum announced business. Most tobacco producers and Agricultural Marketing Service the determination by the Secretary that many tobacco warehouses are small the consolidated market of Sanford- businesses as defined in the Regulatory 7 CFR Part 29 Carthage-Aberdeen, North Carolina, Flexibility Act. This action will not [Docket No. TB±95±18] would be designated as a flue-cured substantially affect the normal tobacco auction market and receive movement of the commodity in the Tobacco Inspection; Growers' mandatory Federal grading of tobacco marketplace. It has been determined Referendum Results sold at auction for the 1996 and that this action will not have a succeeding seasons, subject to the AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, significant impact on a substantial USDA. results of the referendum. The number of small entities. determination was based on the ACTION: Final rule. evidence and arguments presented at a List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 29 SUMMARY: This document contains the public hearing held in Sanford, North Administrative Practices and determination with respect to the Carolina, on November 7, 1995, Procedures, Advisory Committees, referendum on the merger of Sanford pursuant to applicable provisions of the Government Publications, Imports, and Carthage-Aberdeen, North Carolina, regulations issued under the Tobacco Pesticides and Pests, Reporting and to become the consolidated market of Inspection Act, as amended. The Recordkeeping Procedures, Tobacco. Sanford-Carthage-Aberdeen. A mail referendum was held in accordance For the reasons set forth in the referendum was conducted during the with the provisions of the Tobacco preamble, 7 CFR Part 29, Subpart D, is period of April 15–19, 1996, among Inspection Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. amended as follows: tobacco growers who sold tobacco on 511d) and the regulations set forth in 7 these markets in 1995 to determine CFR 29.74. Subpart DÐOrder of Designation of producer approval/disapproval of the Ballots for the April 15–19 Tobacco Markets designation of these markets as one referendum were mailed to 622 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR consolidated market. Growers approved producers. Approval required votes in Part 29, Subpart D, continues to read as the merger. Therefore, for the 1996 and favor of the proposal by two-thirds of follows: succeeding flue-cured marketing the eligible voters who cast valid seasons, the Sanford and Carthage- ballots. The Department received a total Authority: Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 732, as amended Aberdeen, North Carolina, tobacco of 156 responses: 127 eligible producers by Sec. 157(a)(1), 95 Stat. 374 (7 U.S.C. markets shall be designated as and voted in favor of the consolidation; 27 511d). called Sanford-Carthage-Aberdeen. The eligible producers voted against the 2. In Section 29.8001, the table is regulations are amended to reflect this consolidation; and 2 ballots were amended by adding a new entry (hhh) new designated market. determined to be invalid. to read as follows:

Territory Types of tobacco Auction markets Order of designation Citation

******* (hhh) North Carolina ...... flue-cured ...... Sanford-Carthage-Aber- July 5, 1996. deen. 27998 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Dated: May 28, 1996. Regulatory Flexibility Act: No and are applicable in the northern and Kenneth C. Clayton, significant impact. southern plains, midwest, southern, and Acting Administrator. Paperwork Reduction Act: Does not eastern United States. [FR Doc. 96–13832 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] apply. LS Factor: USLE uses one LS table; BILLING CODE 3410±02±P National Environmental Policy Act: RUSLE uses four LS tables, as Not applicable. determined by the relationship of rill to Civil Rights Impact Analysis: Not interrill erosion. Although both the Natural Resources Conservation applicable. USLE and RUSLE can account for the Service Federalism Assessment: Does not effects of complex slopes, RUSLE have sufficient federalism implications simplifies this LS determination 7 CFR Part 610 to warrant an assessment. through the use of computer technology. Unfunded Mandate: Not applicable. C Factor: USLE provides estimates of Technical Assistance Background And Purpose soil changes for 4–5 crop stage periods throughout the year. RUSLE provides AGENCY: Natural Resources The Natural Resources Conservation estimates of cover and soil changes on Conservation Service, USDA. Service (NRCS) of the United States one-half month intervals, especially in ACTION: Final rule. Department of Agriculture (the relation to canopy, surface residue, Department), utilizes the universal soil residue just under the surface, and the SUMMARY: Section 301(c) of the Federal loss equation (USLE), the revised effects of climate on residue Agriculture Improvement and Reform universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) decomposition, roughness, roots, and Act of 1996 (FAIRA) requires the and the wind erosion equation (WEQ) to soil consolidation. Secretary of Agriculture to publish in predict soil erosion due to water and P Factor: USLE uses P factors for the Federal Register, within 60 days of wind. Section 301(c) of the Federal contouring, contour stripcropping, and the enactment of FAIRA, the universal Agriculture Improvement and Reform terracing from table values established soil loss equation (USLE) and wind Act of 1996 (FAIRA), which was for field slope ranges; and for terraces, erosion equation (WEQ) used by the enacted April 4, 1996, requires the the P factor is also based on channel Department of Agriculture (the Secretary of Agriculture to publish in gradients. RUSLE uses P factors for Department) as of the date of the Federal Register by June 3, 1996, the farming across the slope and includes publication. The Natural Resources USLE and WEQ used by the Department new process-based routines to Conservation Service (NRCS) utilizes as of the date of publication. NRCS is determine the effect of stripcropping factors from the USLE, the revised publishing the equations and the rules and buffer strips. Values for farming universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) under which the USLE, RUSLE, and across the slope are based on slope and the WEQ in equations to predict WEQ factors are used for administering length and steepness, row grade, ridge soil erosion due to water and wind. The programs. height, storm severity, soil infiltration, Department was first required to use the The equation for predicting soil loss and the cover and roughness conditions. factors from the USLE and WEQ to make due to erosion for both the USLE and The stripcropping P factor is based on × × × × highly erodible land (HEL) RUSLE is A=R K LS C P. The factors the amount and location of soil determinations under the Food Security in the equation have the following deposition. Act (FSA) of 1985, Pub. L. 99–198. The definitions: The equation for predicting soil loss FSA defined HEL as land that has the 1. A is the estimation of average due to wind erosion is E=f(IKCLV). The potential for an excessive annual rate of annual soil loss in tons per acre caused factors in the equation have the erosion in relation to the soil loss by sheet and rill erosion. following definitions: tolerance level as determined by the 2. R is the rainfall erosivity factor. 1. E is the estimation of average Secretary through application of factors 3. K is the soil erodibility factor. annual soil loss in tons per acre. from the USLE and WEQ. 4. LS is the slope length and steepness 2. f indicates the equation includes This final rule sets forth the USLE and factor. functional relationships that are not WEQ used by the Department as of this 5. C is the cover and management straight-line mathematical calculations. date and the circumstances under the factor. 3. I is the soil erodibility index. equations are used. Since the first 6. P is the support practice factor. 4. K is the ridge roughness factor. mandated use of the USLE in 1985, the A paper published by K.G. Renard, et 5. C is the climatic factor. All climatic technology used to predict soil erosion al., in the May–June, 1994 Journal of factor values are expressed as a due to water has been refined. The Soil and Water Conservation, volume percentage of the value established at refinement is reflected in a revised 49(3), pages 213–220, entitled, ‘‘RUSLE Garden City, Kansas. Garden City, USLE (RUSLE) which will also be used revisited: Status, questions, answers, Kansas was the location of early under the circumstances described in and the future’’, describes the revision. research in the WEQ and established the this rule. Primary differences between the USLE standard for climatic factors against EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective and RUSLE include the following: which the other locations are measured. June 3, 1996. R Factor: RUSLE includes more R 6. L is the unsheltered distance across values for the Western United States an erodible field, measured along the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: than the USLE. For the eastern United prevailing wind erosion direction. David L. Schertz, National Agronomist, States, R values are generally the same 7. V is the vegetative cover factor. Natural Resources Conservation Service, as those used in the USLE but includes The Department was first statutorily P.O. Box 2890, Washington, D.C. 20013; some revisions. required to use the factors from the Fax 202–720–2646 or K Factor: Values used in RUSLE are USLE and WEQ to make highly erodible Internet:[email protected]. similar to the USLE values but are land (HEL) determinations under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: adjusted to account for changes, such as Food Security Act (FSA) of 1985, Pub. freezing and thawing, and soil moisture. L. 99–198. The Department published Rulemaking Analyses These adjustments are calculated at one- the equations used to determine HEL EO 12291: Not major. half month intervals for use in RUSLE during promulgation of the regulations Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 27999 implementing the HEL and wetland meet more restrictive levels of erosion rules under which NRCS will utilize the conservation provisions of the FSA, 7 reduction that might result from using USLE, the revised universal soil loss CFR Part 12 (see Federal Register, Vol. RUSLE instead of USLE while carrying equation (RUSLE), and the WEQ. 52, No. 180, page 35194, September 17, out existing conservation plans. 1987). Section 12.21 provides that land Therefore, all existing conservation § 610.12 Equations for predicting soil loss due to water erosion. in a soil map unit will be considered to plans developed using USLE, that have be highly erodible if the quotient of been implemented, will remain (a) The equation for predicting soil either the RKLS/T or the CI/T equals or loss due to erosion for both the USLE acceptable plans for purposes of the × × × × exceeds 8. The factors, R, K, and LS are HEL conservation provisions of the and the RUSLE is A=R K LS C P. (For from the USLE. The USLE factors are FSA. further information about USLE see the explained in the U.S. Department of U.S. Department of Agriculture Agriculture Handbook 537. The factors List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 610 Handbook 537, ‘‘Predicting Rainfall C and I are from the WEQ. The WEQ Soil conservation, Technical Erosion Losses—A Guide to factors are explained in a paper by N.P. assistance, Water resources. Conservation Planning,’’ dated 1978. Woodruff and F.H. Siddaway, 1965. The For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR Copies of this document are available soil loss tolerance (T) value represents Part 610 is amended as follows: from the Natural Resources the average annual rate of soil erosion Conservation Service, P.O. Box 2890, that could occur without causing a PART 610ÐTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Washington, DC 20013. For further decline in long term productivity. The information about RUSLE see the U.S. 1. The authority for Part 610 is revised Department of Agriculture Handbook specific factors values which are used to read as follows: for determining whether soil map units 703, ‘‘Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: are considered to be highly erodible are Authority: 16 U.S.C. 590a–590f, 590q, A Guide to Conservation Planning with published in the local Field Office 3801(a)(9). the Revised Universal Soil Loss Technical Guide (FOTG) which is §§ 610.1±610.5. [Designated as Subpart A] Equation (RUSLE).’’ Copies may be purchased from the National Technical maintained in each NRCS field office. 2. Sections 610.1 through 610.5 are Information Service, 5285 Port Royal The values published as of January 1, designated as subpart A—Conservation 1990, in the FOTG are the basis for all Road, Springfield, VA 22161.) Operations. (b) The factors in the USLE equation HEL determinations. The FOTG is 3. Section 610.1 is revised to read as are: available for review in each NRCS field follows: office. The values vary across the (1) A is the estimation of average country to correspond to differences in § 610.1 Purpose. annual soil loss in tons per acre caused climate, soil types, and topography. This subpart sets forth Natural by sheet and rill erosion. Since the publication of the USLE in Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) (2) R is the rainfall erosivity factor. 1985, additional research on erosion policies and procedures for furnishing Accounts for the energy and intensity of processes has resulted in refined technical assistance in conservation rainstorms. technology for determining the factor operations. (3) K is the soil erodibility factor. values in the USLE. RUSLE represents 4. Subpart B—Soil Erosion Prediction Measures the susceptibility of a soil to a revision of the USLE technology in Equations containing §§ 610.11 through erode under a standard condition. how the factor values in the equation 610.14 is added to read as follows: (4) LS is the slope length and are determined. RUSLE is explained in steepness factor. Accounts for the effect the U.S. Department of Agriculture Subpart BÐSoil Erosion Prediction of length and steepness of slope on Equations Handbook 703, ‘‘Predicting Soil Erosion erosion. by Water: A Guide to Conservation Sec. (5) C is the cover and management Planning with the Revised Universal 610.11 Purpose and scope. factor. Estimates the soil loss ratio for Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE).’’ 610.12 Equations for predicting soil loss each of 4 or 5 crop stage periods Since the passage of the FSA in 1985, due to water erosion. throughout the year, accounting for the 610.13 Equations for predicting soil loss USLE and WEQ have been used to due to wind erosion. combined effect of all the interrelated compile the highly erodible soils list 610.14 Use of USLE, RUSLE, and WEQ. cover and management variables. and to make highly erodible field (6) P is the support practice factor. determinations. USLE has been used to Subpart BÐSoil Erosion Prediction Accounts for the effect of conservation develop conservation plans and Equations support practices, such as contouring, revisions and to conduct status reviews. contour stripcropping, and terraces on As new understanding is gained through § 610.11 Purpose and scope. soil erosion. research on erosion processes, updates This subpart sets forth the equations (c) The factors in the RUSLE equation of erosion prediction equations can and rules for utilizing the equations that are defined as follows: occur. Changing the highly erodible are used by the Natural Resources (1) A is the estimation of average soils list and field determinations each Conservation Service (NRCS) to predict annual soil loss in tons per acre caused time these technologies are updated soil erosion due to water and wind. by sheet and rill erosion. would be disruptive to farmers and Section 301 of the Federal Agriculture (2) R is the rainfall erosivity factor. impractical for long range planning. Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 Accounts for the energy and intensity of Therefore, no changes to the existing (FAIRA) and the Food Security Act, as rainstorms. highly erodible soils list or field amended, 16 U.S.C. 3801–3813 (3) K is the soil erodibility factor. determinations will be made as a result specified that the Secretary would Measures the susceptibility of a soil to of the implementation of RUSLE. publish the universal soil loss equation erode under a standard condition and However, as technology is improved, (USLE) and wind erosion equation adjusts it bi-monthly for the effects of such as with RUSLE, NRCS will use it (WEQ) used by the Department within freezing and thawing, and soil moisture. to develop new conservation plans, plan 60 days of the enactment of FAIRA. This (4) LS is the slope length and revisions, and to conduct status reviews. subpart sets forth the equations, steepness factor. Accounts for the effect NRCS will not require producers to definition of factors, and provides the of length and steepness of slope on 28000 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations erosion based on 4 tables reflecting the distance is measured beginning at a 928 for the 1996–97 and subsequent relationship of rill to interrill erosion. stable border on the upwind side and fiscal periods. The Committee is (5) C is the cover and management continuing downward to the responsible for local administration of factor. Estimates the soil loss ratio at nonerodible or stable area, or to the the marketing order which regulates the one-half month intervals throughout the downwind edge of the area being handling of papayas grown in Hawaii. year, accounting for the individual evaluated. Authorization to assess papaya handlers effects of prior land use, crop canopy, (7) V is the vegetative cover factor. It enables the Committee to incur surface cover, surface roughness, and accounts for the kind, amount, and expenses that are reasonable and soil moisture. orientation of growing plants or plant necessary to administer the program. (6) P is the support practice factor. residue on the soil surface. DATES: Effective on July 1, 1996. Accounts for the effect of conservation Comments received by July 5, 1996, will § 610.14 Use of USLE, RUSLE, and WEQ. support practices, such as cross-slope be considered prior to issuance of a final farming, stripcropping, buffer strips, (a) All Highly Erodible Land (HEL) rule. determinations are based on the and terraces on soil erosion. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are formulas set forth in 7 CFR § 12.21 using invited to submit written comments § 610.13 Equations For Predicting Soil some of the factors from the USLE and concerning this rule. Comments must be Loss Due To Wind Erosion. WEQ and the factor values that were sent in triplicate to the Docket Clerk, (a) The equation for predicting soil contained in the local Field Office Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, loss due to wind in the Wind Erosion Technical Guide (FOTG) as of January 1, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2523–S, Equation (WEQ) is E=f(IKCLV). (For 1990. In addition, this includes the soil Washington, DC 20090–6456, FAX (202) further information on WEQ see the loss tolerance values used in those 720–5698. Comments should reference paper by N.P. Woodruff and F.H. formulas for determining HEL. The soil the docket number and the date and Siddaway, 1965. ‘‘A Wind Erosion loss tolerance value is used as one of the page number of this issue of the Federal Equation,’’ Soil Science Society of criteria for planning soil conservation Register and will be available for public America Proceedings, Vol. 29, No. 5, systems. These values are available in inspection in the Office of the Docket pages 602–608, which is available from the FOTG in the local field office of the Clerk during regular business hours. the American Society of Agronomy, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Madison, Wisconsin. In addition, the (b) RUSLE will be used to: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: use of the WEQ in NRCS is explained (1)(i) Evaluate the soil loss estimates Mary Kate Nelson, Marketing Assistant, in the Natural Resources Conservation of conservation systems contained in California Marketing Field Office, Fruit Service (NRCS) National Agronomy the FOTG. and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, Manual, 190–V–NAM, second ed., Part (ii) Evaluate the soil loss estimates of 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, 502, March, 1988, which is available systems actually applied, where those Fresno, California 93721, telephone from the NRCS, P.O. Box 2890, systems were applied differently than (209) 487–5901, FAX (209) 487–5901, or Washington, DC 20013.) specified in the conservation plan Charles L. Rush, Marketing Specialist, (c) The factors in the WEQ equation adopted by the producer or where a Marketing Order Administration are defined as follows: conservation plan was not developed, in Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, (1) E is the estimation of the average determining whether a producer has AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room annual soil loss in tons per acre. complied with the HEL conservation 2523–S, Washington, DC 20090–6456, (2) f indicates the equation includes provisions of the Food Security Act of telephone (202) 720–5127, FAX (202) functional relationships that are not 1985, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 3801 et 720–5698. straight-line mathematical calculations. seq., set forth in 7 CFR Part 12; and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule (3) I is the soil erodibility index. It is (2) Develop new or revised is issued under Marketing Agreement the potential for soil loss from a wide, conservation plans. No. 928 and Order No. 928, both as level, unsheltered, isolated field with a Dated: May 30, 1996. amended (7 CFR part 928), regulating bare, smooth, loose and uncrusted Paul W. Johnson, the handling of papayas grown in surface. Soil erodibility is based on soil Hawaii, hereinafter referred to as the surface texture, calcium carbonate Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service. ‘‘order.’’ The marketing agreement and content, and percent day. order are effective under the [FR Doc. 96–13920 Filed 5–31–96; 11:33 am] (4) K is the ridge roughness factor. It Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act is a measure of the effect of ridges BILLING CODE 3410±16±M of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), formed by tillage and planting hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ implements on wind erosion. The ridge The Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service roughness is based on ridge spacing, (Department) is issuing this rule in height, and erosive wind directions in 7 CFR Part 928 conformance with Executive Order relation to the ridge direction 12866. (5) C is the climatic factor. It is a [Docket No. FV96±928±1±IFR] This rule has been reviewed under measure of the erosive potential of the Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice wind speed and surface moisture at a Papayas Grown in Hawaii; Assessment Reform. Under the marketing order now given location compared with the same Rate in effect, handlers of papayas grown in factors at Garden City, Kansas. The AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, Hawaii are subject to assessments. annual climatic factor at Garden City is USDA. Funds to administer the order are arbitrarily set at 100. All climatic factor ACTION: Interim final rule with request derived from such assessments. It is values are expressed as a percentage of for comments. intended that the assessment rate as that at Garden City. issued herein will be applicable to all (6) L is the unsheltered distance. It is SUMMARY: This interim final rule assessable papayas beginning July 1, the unsheltered distance across an establishes an assessment rate for the 1996, and continuing until amended, erodible field, measured along the Papaya Administrative Committee suspended, or terminated. This rule will prevailing wind erosion direction. This (Committee) under Marketing Order No. not preempt any State or local laws, Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28001 regulations, or policies, unless they formulate an appropriate budget and are available from the Committee or the present an irreconcilable conflict with assessment rate. The assessment rate is Department. Committee meetings are this rule. formulated and discussed in a public open to the public and interested The Act provides that administrative meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons may express their views at these proceedings must be exhausted before persons have an opportunity to meetings. The Department will evaluate parties may file suit in court. Under participate and provide input. Committee recommendations and other section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any The Committee met on April 26, 1996, available information to determine handler subject to an order may file and unanimously recommended 1996– whether modification of the assessment with the Secretary a petition stating that 97 expenditures of $485,300 and an rate is needed. Further rulemaking will the order, any provision of the order, or assessment rate of $0.0059 per pound of be undertaken as necessary. The any obligation imposed in connection papayas. In comparison, last year’s Committee’s 1996–97 budget and those with the order is not in accordance with budgeted expenditures were $435,800. for subsequent fiscal periods will be law and request a modification of the The assessment rate of $0.0059 is the reviewed and, as appropriate, approved order or to be exempted therefrom. Such same as last year’s established rate. by the Department. handler is afforded the opportunity for Major expenditures recommended by After consideration of all relevant a hearing on the petition. After the the Committee for the 1996–97 year material presented, including the hearing the Secretary would rule on the include $160,000 for the marketing and information and recommendation petition. The Act provides that the promotion program, $130,000 for submitted by the Committee and other district court of the United States in any research and development, and $67,000 available information, it is hereby found district in which the handler is an for salaries. Budgeted expenses for these that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, inhabitant, or has his or her principal items in 1995–96 were $165,500, will tend to effectuate the declared place of business, has jurisdiction to $115,000, and $67,000 respectively. policy of the Act. review the Secretary’s ruling on the The assessment rate recommended by Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also petition, provided an action is filed not the Committee was derived by dividing found and determined upon good cause later than 20 days after the date of the anticipated expenses by expected that it is impracticable, unnecessary, entry of the ruling. shipments of papayas grown in Hawaii. and contrary to the public interest to Pursuant to requirements set forth in Papaya shipments for the year are give preliminary notice prior to putting the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the estimated at 30 million pounds which this rule into effect, because: (1) The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) should provide $177,000 in assessment Committee needs to have sufficient has considered the economic impact of income. Income derived from handler funds to pay its expenses which are this rule on small entities. assessments, the Hawaii Department of incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the The purpose of the RFA is to fit Agriculture, the USDA’s Foreign 1996–97 fiscal period begins on July 1, regulatory actions to the scale of Agricultural Service, the County of 1996, and the marketing order requires business subject to such actions in order Hawaii, and the Japanese Inspection that the rate of assessment for each that small businesses will not be unduly program, along with interest income and fiscal period apply to all assessable or disproportionately burdened. funds from the Committee’s authorized papayas handled during such fiscal Marketing orders issued pursuant to the reserve, will be adequate to cover period; (3) handlers are aware of this Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve action which was unanimously unique in that they are brought about will be kept within the maximum recommended by the Committee at a through group action of essentially permitted by the order. public meeting and is similar to other small entities acting on their own While this rule will impose some assessment rate actions issued in past behalf. Thus, both statutes have small costs on handlers, the costs are in the years; and (4) this interim final rule entity orientation and compatibility. form of uniform assessments on all provides a 30-day comment period, and There are approximately 400 handlers. Some of the costs may be all comments timely received will be producers of papayas in the production passed on to producers. considered prior to finalization of this area and approximately 60 handlers However, these costs should be offset rule. subject to regulation under the by the benefits derived by the operation marketing order. Small agricultural of the marketing order. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 928 producers have been defined by the Based on available information, the Marketing agreements, Papayas, Small Business Administration (13 CFR Agricultural Marketing Service has Reporting and recordkeeping 121.601) as those having annual receipts determined that this rule will not have requirements. less than $500,000, and small a significant economic impact on a For the reasons set forth in the agricultural service firms are defined as substantial number of small entities. preamble, 7 CFR part 928 is amended as those whose annual receipts are less The assessment rate established in follows: than $5,000,000. The majority of papaya this rule will continue in effect producers and handlers may be indefinitely unless modified, PART 928ÐPAPAYAS GROWN IN classified as small entities. suspended, or terminated by the HAWAII The papaya marketing order provides Secretary upon recommendation and 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR authority for the Committee, with the information submitted by the part 928 continues to read as follows: approval of the Department, to Committee or other available formulate an annual budget of expenses information. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. and collect assessments from handlers Although this assessment rate is 2. Section 928.226 is added to read as to administer the program. The effective for an indefinite period, the follows: members of the Committee are Committee will continue to meet prior Note: This section will appear in the Code producers and handlers of papayas to or during each fiscal period to of Federal Regulations. grown in Hawaii. They are familiar with recommend a budget of expenses and the Committee’s needs and with the consider recommendations for § 928.226 Assessment rate. costs for goods and services in their modification of the assessment rate. The On and after July 1, 1996, an local area and are thus in a position to dates and times of Committee meetings assessment rate of $0.0059 per pound is 28002 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations established for papayas grown in imposed in connection with such order The Order requires importers of Hawaii. is not in accordance with law; and porcine animals to pay the U.S. Customs Dated: May 29, 1996. requesting a modification of the order or Service (USCS), upon importation, the Robert C. Keeney, an exemption from the order. Such assessment of 0.45 percent of the person is afforded the opportunity for a animal’s declared value and importers Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division. hearing on the petition. After the of pork and pork products to pay USCS, [FR Doc. 96–13853 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] hearing, the Secretary would rule on the upon importation, the assessment of BILLING CODE 3410±02±P petition. The Act provides that the 0.45 percent of the market value of the district court of the United States in the live porcine animals from which such district in which such person resides or 7 CFR Part 1230 pork and pork products were produced. does business has jurisdiction to review This final rule increases the assessments [No. LS±96±001] the Secretary’s determination, if a on all of the imported pork and pork complaint is filed not later than 20 days products subject to assessment as Pork Promotion, Research, and after the date such person receives published in the Federal Register as a Consumer Information OrderÐ notice of such determination. final rule June 7, 1995, and effective Increase in Importer Assessments Pursuant to requirements set forth in September 3, 1995; (60 FR 29965). This the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, increase is consistent with the increase United States Code(U.S.C.) 601 et seq.), USDA. in the annual average price of domestic the Agricultural Marketing Service ACTION: Final rule. barrows and gilts for calendar year 1995 (AMS) has considered the economic as reported by USDA, AMS, Livestock SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Pork impact of this final action on small and Grain Market News (LGMN) Promotion, Research, and Consumer entities. The effect of the Order upon Branch. This increase in assessments Information Act (Act) of 1985 and the small entities was discussed in the will make the equivalent market value Order issued thereunder, this final rule September 5, 1986, issue of the Federal of the live porcine animal from which increases the amount of the assessment Register (51 FR 31898), and it was the imported pork and pork products per pound due on imported pork and determined that the Order would not were derived reflect the recent increase pork products to reflect an increase in have a significant effect upon a in the market value of domestic porcine the 1995 five-market average price for substantial number of small entities. animals, thereby promoting domestic barrows and gilts. This action Many of the estimated 200 importers comparability between importer and brings the equivalent market value of may be classified as small entities. This domestic assessments. This final rule the live animals from which such final rule increases the amount of will not change the current assessment imported pork and pork products were assessments on imported pork and pork rate of 0.45 percent of the market value. products subject to assessment by two- derived in line with the market values The methodology for determining the of domestic porcine animals. These hundredths of a cent per pound, or as expressed in cents per kilogram, four- per pound amounts for imported pork changes will facilitate the continued and pork products was described in the collection of assessments on imported hundredths of a cent per kilogram. Adjusting the assessments on imported Supplementary Information porcine animals, pork, and pork accompanying the Order and published products. pork and pork products would result in an estimated increase in assessments of in the September 5, 1986, Federal EFFECTIVE DATE: July 5, 1996. $104,000 over a 12-month period. Register at 51 FR 31901. The weight of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Accordingly, the Administrator of AMS imported pork and pork products is Ralph L. Tapp, Chief, Marketing has determined that this action will not converted to a carcass weight equivalent Programs Branch, 202/720–1115. have a significant economic impact on by utilizing conversion factors which SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The a substantial number of small entities. are published in the Department’s Department of Agriculture (Department) The Act (7 U.S.C. 4801–4819) Statistical Bulletin No. 697 ‘‘Conversion is issuing this final rule in conformance approved December 23, 1985, Factors and Weights and Measures.’’ with Executive Order 12866. authorized the establishment of a These conversion factors take into This final rule has been reviewed national pork promotion, research, and account the removal of bone, weight lost under Executive Order 12778, Civil consumer information program. The in cooking or other processing, and the Justice Reform. This is not intended to program was funded by an initial nonpork components of pork products. have a retroactive effect. The Act states assessment rate of 0.25 percent of the Secondly, the carcass weight equivalent that the statute is intended to occupy market value of all porcine animals is converted to a live animal equivalent the field of promotion and consumer marketed in the United States and an weight by dividing the carcass weight education involving pork and pork equivalent amount of assessment on equivalent by 70 percent, which is the products and of obtaining funds thereof imported porcine animals, pork, and average dressing percentage of porcine from pork producers and that the pork products. However, that rate was animals in the United States. Thirdly, regulation of such activity (other than a increased to 0.35 percent in 1991 (56 FR the equivalent value of the live porcine regulation or requirement relating to a 51635) and to 0.45 percent effective animal is determined by multiplying the matter of public health or the provision September 3, 1995 (60 FR 29963). The live animal equivalent weight by an of State or local funds for such activity) final Order establishing a pork annual average market price for barrows that is in addition to or different from promotion, research, and consumer and gilts as reported by USDA, AMS, the Act may not be imposed by a State. information program was published in LGMN Branch. This average price is The Act provides that administrative the September 5, 1986, issue of the published on a yearly basis during the proceedings must be exhausted before Federal Register (51 FR 31898; as month of January in LGMN Branch’s parties may file suit in court. Under corrected, at 51 FR 36383 and amended publication ‘‘Livestock, Meat, and Wool § 1625 of the Act, a person subject to an at 53 FR 1909, 53 FR 30243, 56 FR 4, Weekly Summary and Statistics.’’ order may file a petition with the 56 FR 51635, and 60 FR 29963) and Finally, the equivalent value is Secretary stating that such order, a assessments began on November 1, multiplied by the applicable assessment provision of such order or an obligation 1986. rate of 0.45 percent due on imported Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28003 pork and pork products. The end result PART 1230ÐPORK PROMOTION, Dated: May 28, 1996. is expressed in an amount per pound for RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER Kenneth C. Clayton, each type of pork or pork product. To INFORMATION Acting Administrator. determine the amount per kilogram for [FR Doc. 96–13833 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR pork and pork products subject to BILLING CODE 3410±02±P assessment under the Act and Order, the Part 1230 continues to read as follows: cent per pound assessments are Authority: 7 U.S.C. 4801–4819. multiplied by a metric conversion factor DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2.2046 and carried to the sixth decimal. Subpart BÐ[Amended] Immigration and Naturalization Service The formula in the preamble for the 2. In Subpart B—Rules and Order at 51 FR 31901 contemplated that Regulations, § 1230.110 is revised to 8 CFR Parts 103 and 299 it would be necessary to recalculate the read as follows: equivalent live animal value of [INS No. 1666±94] § 1230.110 Assessments on imported pork imported pork and pork products to and pork products. RIN 1115±AD75 reflect changes in the annual average price of domestic barrows and gilts to (a) The following HTS categories of Certification of Designated maintain equity of assessments between imported live porcine animals are Fingerprinting Services domestic porcine animals and imported subject to assessment at the rate specified. AGENCY: Immigration and Naturalization pork and pork products. Service, Justice. The average annual market price ACTION: Final rule. Live porcine Assessment increased from $39.57 in 1994 to $41.76 animals in 1995, an increase of about 6 percent. SUMMARY: This rule amends the 0103.10.0000 0.45 percent Customs En- Immigration and Naturalization Service This increase will result in a tered Value. (Service) regulations by certifying corresponding increase in assessments 0103.91.0000 0.45 percent Customs En- designated fingerprinting services (DFS) for all HTS numbers listed in the table tered Value. to take fingerprints of applicants for in § 1230.110, 60 FR 29965; June 7, 0103.92.0000 0.45 percent Customs En- tered Value. immigration benefits. This rule 1995, of an amount equal to two- establishes the eligibility requirements hundredths of a cent per pound, or as and application procedures for DFS expressed in cents per kilogram, four- (b) The following HTS categories of certification. When the rule is hundredths of a cent per kilogram. imported pork and pork products are implemented, it will facilitate the Based on the most recent available subject to assessment at the rates processing of applications for Department of Commerce, Bureau of specified. immigration benefits, protect the Census, data on the volume of imported Assessment integrity of the fingerprinting process, pork and pork products, the increase in Pork and pork prod- and relieve the strain on Service assessment amounts would result in an ucts Cents/lb Cents/kg personnel resources. estimated $104,000 increase in EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective assessments over a 12-month period. 0203.11.0000 ...... 27 .507058 July 5, 1996. Entities desiring to 0203.12.1010 ...... 27 .507058 On March 22, 1996, AMS published 0203.12.1020 ...... 27 .507058 continue providing fingerprint services in the Federal Register (61 FR 11776) a 0203.12.9010 ...... 27 .507058 for immigration benefits without proposed rule which would increase the 0203.12.9020 ...... 27 .507058 interruption must file an application for per pound assessment on imported pork 0203.19.2010 ...... 31 .573196 DFS status in accordance with the and pork products consistent with 0203.19.2090 ...... 31 .573196 standards of this rule no later than 0203.19.4010 ...... 27 .507058 November 1, 1996. After December 31, increases in the 1995 average prices of 0203.19.4090 ...... 27 .507058 domestic barrows and gilts to provide 1996, the Service will not accept 0203.21.0000 ...... 27 .507058 fingerprints taken by entities who have comparability between imported and 0203.22.1000 ...... 27 .507058 not filed an application for DFS domestic assessments. The proposal was 0203.22.9000 ...... 27 .507058 0203.29.2000 ...... 31 .573196 certification and been approved by the published with a request for comments Service. by April 22, 1996. No comments were 0203.29.4000 ...... 27 .507058 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: received. 0206.30.0000 ...... 27 .507058 0206.41.0000 ...... 27 .507058 Jack Rasmussen, Adjudications Officer, Accordingly, this final rule 0206.49.0000 ...... 27 .507058 or Kathleen Hatcher, Adjudications establishes the new per-pound and per- 0210.11.0010 ...... 27 .507058 Officer, Adjudications Division, kilogram assessments on imported pork 0210.11.0020 ...... 27 .507058 Immigration and Naturalization Service, and pork products. 0210.12.0020 ...... 27 .507058 425 I Street, NW., Room 3214, 0210.12.0040 ...... 27 .507058 Washington, DC 20536, telephone (202) List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1230 0210.19.0010 ...... 31 .573196 0210.19.0090 ...... 31 .573196 514–3240; Kim Mangan, Adjudications Administrative practice and 1601.00.2010 ...... 37 .683426 Officer, Immigration and Naturalization procedure, Advertising, Agricultural 1601.00.2090 ...... 37 .683426 Service, 2901 Metro Dr., Suite 100, research, Marketing agreement, Meat 1602.41.2020 ...... 41 .749564 Bloomington, MN 55425, telephone 1602.41.2040 ...... 41 .749564 and meat products, Pork and pork (612) 335–2234; Delia Ramirez, 1602.41.9000 ...... 27 .507058 Adjudications Officer, Immigration and products. 1602.42.2020 ...... 41 .749564 Naturalization Service, EOFP 6th Fl., For the reasons set forth in the 1602.42.2040 ...... 41 .749564 P.O. Box 30080, Laguna Niguel, CA 1602.42.4000 ...... 27 .507058 92607–0080, telephone (714) 360–3314; preamble, 7 CFR Part 1230 is amended 1602.49.2000 ...... 37 .683426 as follows: 1602.49.4000 ...... 31 .573196 or Yolanda Sanchez, Adjudications Officer, Immigration and Naturalization 28004 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Service, 509 N. Belt, Houston, TX The notice of proposed rulemaking where there may not be sufficient 77060, telephone (713) 229–2833. These presented a certification process that business interest in the DFS process, are not toll-free numbers. included eligibility criteria, certification Service personnel will continue to offer requirements, application procedures, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: fingerprinting services. Accordingly, and a date on which the Service will INS local offices have the flexibility to Background stop accepting fingerprint cards make decisions based on local Applicants for various types of prepared by unauthorized organizations. conditions. immigration benefits are required to Name Change From DOE to DFS In § 103.2(e)(2) of the proposed rule, submit a set of fingerprints along with In the proposed rule the Service the Service provided that when district their applications. These fingerprints referred to organizations certified to take offices do not have the resources to are forwarded to the Federal Bureau of fingerprints as ‘‘DOEs’’ (Designated provide fingerprinting services, they Investigation (FBI) for criminal history Outside Entities). The Service has made shall certify ‘‘one or multiple outside records clearance. The Service’s field a technical name change from ‘‘DOE’’ entities’’ as DFS(s) to provide the offices frequently have been unable to (Designated Outside Entity) to ‘‘DFS’’ service. One commenter asked INS to provide timely fingerprinting services (Designated Fingerprinting Services) in due to the fluctuating demand in many clarify whether this provision gave the order to minimize confusion and district director broad discretionary localities. As a result of these ambiguity with other organizations fluctuating fingerprinting demands, authority to limit the number of DFS(s) performing functions ‘‘outside’’ the he or she would certify. On closer applicants for immigration benefits Service. This technical name change to frequently sought fingerprinting services review of this provision, the proposed ‘‘DFS’’ (Designated Fingerprinting language could be misleading or from outside enterprises. Initially, the Services) more accurately describes the Service gauged the quality of outside improperly construed as allowing the specific function or services being district director to designate a single or fingerprinting through reviewing and provided by the certified and designated a discretionary number of DFS(s) for the evaluating individual application organization(s). Furthermore, the entire immigration district. This fingerprint documents. However, with Service desires to increase outside or increasing volume of applications community-based partnership roles in particular interpretion of the proposed requiring fingerprints, this approach other areas related to immigration forms provision would be at odds with the proved to be less than effective. In or documents, and many immigration- Service’s expectation that all district addition, concerns were raised about the related service organizations have directors certify as many DFS(s) as there integrity of fingerprints submitted with expressed concern that the certification are qualified applicants. In the final many applications. In February of 1994, given these outside entities may have rule, the Service revised the language in the Inspector General of the Department been interpreted beyond the intended the proposed § 103.2(e)(2) and merged it of Justice completed a study regarding fingerprinting role. with § 103.2(e)(1) to clearly reflect this the Service’s fingerprint controls. The policy. The text in § 103.2(e)(1) now study identified two major deficiencies Discussion of Comments includes the provision that ‘‘the district as follows: (1) the Service relies on Forty-four individuals or groups director shall consider all qualified unknown and untrained outside entities submitted comments. Most commenters applicants for DFS certification and to prepare fingerprints and (2) the strongly supported the fingerprinting certify applicants who meet the Service does not know if the certification process. Many expressed an regulatory standards to supplement the fingerprints submitted by the applicants interest in seeking DFS status. Only district’s efforts.’’ are their own. Additionally, the Office three commenters preferred the current of Inspector General (OIG) pointed out fingerprinting procedures over the new Section 103.2(e)(2) Designated that fingerprint cards submitted by certification process. The following is a Fingerprinting Services applicants were often of poor quality summarized discussion of those and had to be rejected by the FBI. The comments and the Service’s response. The Service has renamed the new OIG recommended that the Service § 103.2(e)(2) as ‘‘Designated establish procedures to institute control Section 103.2(e)(1) Fingerprinting by fingerprinting services’’ and clarified and oversight of the fingerprint process. the Service the different procedures involving the Following the OIG report, the General One commenter stated that the two classes of designated fingerprinting Accounting Office (GAO) conducted an purpose of this regulation is to establish services: (1) Designated law audit of the Service’s fingerprint oversight of organizations that charge a enforcement agencies (Federal, state, collection process and ratified the OIG’s fee for fingerprinting services. This and local police or military police); and findings. Furthermore, on July 14, 1994, commenter indicated that this purpose (2) other businesses, organizations, and the Senate Committee on should be clearly stated in the individuals. As a law enforcement Appropriations included language regulation. The Service believes that the agency, a Federal, state, or local police directing that the Service implement a proposed regulation was clear on this department may register with the fingerprint collection system which point but has added language to the last Service to gain automatic DFS status but permits only trained Service employee, sentence of the general statement in the is exempted from the requirements in recognized law enforcement agencies, or introductory text of paragraph (e) to this paragraph regarding operating Service-certified outside entities to take make the purpose of this regulation licenses, identification and training of fingerprints. more explicit. The Service responded by revising Another commenter suggested that employees, attestation, inspections, or and refining its policies and publishing the Service stop providing application fees. On the other hand, all these in a notice of proposed rule fingerprinting service altogether and, other designated fingerprinting services, making in the Federal Register on May instead, rely entirely on certified DFS(s). including businesses, individuals, or 15, 1995 (60 FR 25856) with a 60-day The intent of the proposed rule was to not-for-profit organizations, must abide public comment period. The public make available to INS customers high by the regulations and procedures comment period ended on July 14, 1995. quality fingerprinting services. In areas established in § 103.2(e). Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28005

Section 103.2(e)(3) Transition to use interested individuals from of the crime or the number of years that Designated Fingerprinting Services participating in volunteering work. have elapsed since the offense. Two The U.S. citizens and LPR commenters objected to this provision, The Service has decided to implement requirements were designed for security arguing that there are no uniform the DFS Certification Program in two purposes. Since the Service will have to standards that can be used to determine stages: (1) As of 120 days from the rely on the DFS(s) to ensure the integrity rehabilitation of a convicted felon. effective date of this final rule, the of the fingerprinting process, the status These commenters urged that all Service will require that all fingerprints of United States citizen or permanent convicted felons be barred from taking submitted must be taken by a Service resident creates a reasonable fingerprints regardless of when the employee, a DFS fingerprinter, a presumption of allegiance and loyalty. crime was committed. As a rule, the recognized law enforcement agency, or While the Service is not persuaded that Service will not approve a convicted an intending DFS who has completed not-for-profit organizations should be felon as a DFS fingerprinter. However, and filed an application for certification exempted from the U.S. citizen and LPR if a convicted felon can demonstrate with the Service; and (2) As of 180 days requirement, the ownership provision that he or she has since been after the effective date of the final rule, may pose an undue burden on private rehabilitated and has led a productive, the Service will no longer accept organizations. Specifically, the burden constructive and law-abiding life in his fingerprint cards for immigration imposed by this requirement does not or her community and our society for benefits that are taken by unauthorized result in an equal or better enhancement many years, the district director may fingerprinters. However, the Service to security needs. Therefore, and until approve such an individual as a inadvertently misstated in paragraph the DFS certification program may be fingerprinter. However, the Service (e)(3)(iii) that an intending DFS or evaluated over time, the Service has believes that cases like this should be organization would have only 90 days to now determined that the ownership evaluated on a case-by-case basis. In any file an application for DFS certification provision is not necessary. The case, the district director will not instead of 120 days. This has been ownership language was removed. approve a DFS fingerprinter with a corrected in the final rule under Section 103.2(e)(5) Criminal History felony conviction unless the individual paragraph (e)(3)(i). Records Check can satisfactorily and clearly Two commenters were concerned that demonstrate a record of rehabilitation. The same commenter also requested possible delays in the processing of The burden of proof rests solely with that not-for-profit organizations and applications for DFS certification or the applicant. their employees be exempt from the FBI renewal would interrupt the applicants’ fingerprint check, arguing that this Section 103.2(e)(6) Requirements businesses. They suggested that where requirement would invade their privacy Paragraph (e)(6)(ii) delayed adjudication occurred, the and deter participation by volunteers Service grant the applicants an who are usually prominent and The commenters were evenly divided automatic grace period provided that accomplished members of the society. on the issue of unannounced on-site the applications were timely filed (in Another commenter asked for a waiver inspections. Three commenters, all the case of initial certification, within of the FBI fingerprint check for not-for- would-be DFS(s), were opposed to the the 120-day window, in the case of profit entities approved by the Board of requirement that a DFS permit renewal, 90 days before the certification Immigration Appeals under the unannounced on-site inspections by the expires). The Service recognizes these provisions of 8 CFR 292.2. Although it Service to ensure compliance with concerns and has stressed the is true that persons affiliated with BIA- regulatory requirements. These importance of timely processing to its approved entities under § 292.2 commenters felt that Government field personnel during training sessions generally are respected and oversight of their businesses was not on DFS certification. The Service is accomplished individuals, this is also needed because they regularly monitor confident that DFS applications will be likely to be true of other outside their own employees. One commenter processed quickly, but agrees that in fingerprinters. Since there is no was concerned that surprise visits by case of lengthy processing delays, the objective way to pre-determine any the Service would be disruptive to DFS district director may, on a case-by-case individual’s moral character, it would activities and violate the confidentiality basis, grant discretionary relief to be unfair for the Service to selectively of individuals seeking legal assistance. applicants of a timely filed application exempt groups of DFS applicants from On the other hand, several commenters to avoid interruption to their businesses. the FBI fingerprint check. The objective praised the Service’s initiative in this Section 103.2(e)(4) Eligibility for DFS of this fingerprint check is to strengthen regard. One commenter pointed out that and restore the integrity of this security his organization enjoyed a good rapport The Service proposed that DFS(s) be process. Information obtained from the with the Service’s field personnel when U.S. citizens or lawful permanent fingerprint check will not be shared working with them during the residents (LPRs), and in the case of a with any entity other than the Legalization Program, and is looking business entity, that the majority organization seeking certification or a forward to working closely with the ownership of the business be held by law enforcement agency should there be Service again as a DFS. U.S. citizens and LPRs. One commenter an outstanding warrant. As explained earlier, the Service opposed this requirement, arguing that The Service proposed to bar from DFS undertook this rulemaking to restore people with other immigration status status any individuals who have been integrity and establish oversight of the could also be entrusted with this convicted of an aggravated felony or a fingerprint process. The unannounced responsibility. Another commenter said crime involving dishonesty or false on-site inspection requirement is a that the majority-ownership statement, or who have been subjected quality control feature designed to requirement would require not-for-profit to a civil penalty for fraud. However, ensure compliance with the DFS(s) organizations to inquire into the legal exceptions could be made for an certification requirements. At the same status of their volunteer officers, and employee of an outside entity if time, on-site inspections provide the that these inquiries could be perceived convincing mitigating factors exist—for Service with the opportunity to stay in as an invasion of privacy and deter example, the person’s youth at the time active communication with the DFS(s), 28006 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations enabling the Service to evaluate the can be made for those who have excluded many people who were in effectiveness of the DFS certification received training from the FBI or the lawful status but who did not possess program. Only by observing DFS(s) at Service)’’ and ‘‘to conduct periodic either a passport or a Service-issued work during their regular business refresher training as needed.’’ photo-ID, such as refugees, asylees, or hours can the Service determine even some United States citizens. The Paragraph (e)(6)(vii) whether the objectives of the DFS commenters recommended that DFS(s) certification are being met. The Service The proposed rule would require be allowed to accept state-issued photo- will conduct these inspections in a DFS(s) to offer free retakes if they IDs, such as a driver’s license. The reasonable and nonintrusive manner in prepared illegible fingerprints that were Service’s intent in this requirement was order to minimize disruption to DFS rejected by the FBI. One commenter two-fold: (1) to exclude photo-IDs that operations. suggested that the Service include a can be easily counterfeited; and (2) to statement on its fee receipts to benefit keep the verification process as simple Paragraph (e)(6)(iii) applicants that DFS(s) are obligated to and clear as possible. But the Service The Service proposed that outside retake illegible fingerprints free of agrees that the list of acceptable photo- entities be trained in fingerprinting charge. Two other commenters were IDs may be expanded without techniques and procedures by the FBI or concerned that the benefit applicants compromising the integrity of the photo- the Service before receiving would need some kind of proof to show ID verification process to include other certification, but that exceptions could who took the rejected fingerprints. valid photo-IDs. Therefore, foreign be made for an individual who could Another commenter stated that Federal, national identification documents have demonstrate proficiency in state, and local police registered as been added to the list of acceptable fingerprinting techniques. One DFS(s) should also give free retakes documents. Two (2) examples of commenter pointed out that an since they too charge a fee for taking national identification documents individual who is proficient in taking fingerprints. Recognizing that benefit which may be acceptable are those fingerprints may not be knowledgeable applicants will need to show proof of issued by the Government of Hong Kong about the various DFS responsibilities rejection by the FBI to the responsible and Taiwan. Likewise, military and requirements. Since the training DFS(s) in order to receive free retakes, identification documents issued by the focuses both on fingerprinting the Service suggests that claimants for Northern Atlantic Treaty Organization techniques and certification free retakes show the notice they will would be acceptable. Additionally, requirements, including completion of receive from INS that they must drivers’ licenses and state-issued photo the attestation form and proper photo-ID resubmit their fingerprints along with a identification documents have been verification, it was recommended that sales receipt from the responsible DFS. added to the list of acceptable only those who have had ‘‘equivalent Police agencies registered with the documents. The final rule has been training’’ be exempt from the training Service as DFS(s) are subject to the same revised to reflect these changes. requirement. The commenter’s point is free retake requirement if they charge a well taken and has been adopted. fingerprinting fee. Paragraph (e)(6)(xiii) It was proposed that the DFS provide Paragraph (e)(6)(iv) Paragraph (e)(6)(viii) specific information on the fingerprint The Service proposed that DFS The proposed rule would require the card, FD–258, or other Service- applicants notify the Service of the DFS(s) to submit fingerprints on FD–258 designated documents. The specific completion of any scheduled training and other Service-designated forms. One information to be provided by the DFS prior to the approval of their commenter wondered if DFS(s) would included the following: (1) The DFS had applications. One commenter be expected to take fingerprints for been certified by the Service; (2) The recommended that DFS(s) be required to applicants seeking to replace their Alien name and address of the DFS; (3) The complete any scheduled training within Registration Cards on Form I–90. Form DFS certification number, including the 60 days of the submission of the I–90, Application for Replacement of expiration date; and (4) The application. The Service considered this Alien Registration Card, and Form I– fingerprinter’s name and employee suggestion, but decided that a time limit 765, Application for Employment Identification number. One commenter is not necessary since a DFS employee Authorization Document, will be recommended that DFS(s) be required to is not permitted to take fingerprints included in the group of fingerprint put this information on a rubber stamp. until he or she has been approved by the forms DFS(s) are authorized to prepare The Service agrees that a standardized Service. A DFS employee who fails to after they have been revised to rubber stamp would be more efficient complete the scheduled training in a incorporate a fingerprint block and a insofar as the information needed from timely manner will only delay his or her DFS attestation. But the Service will the DFS. Accordingly, the DFS may use employment. To clarify that the Service have to undertake rulemaking before a rubber stamp if he or she desires. The will not approve a DFS employee unless implementing these planned revisions. regulation requires that stamped or he or she completes the required written information be placed on the training, paragraph (e)(6)(iv) has been Paragraph (e)(6)(xi) backside of the fingerprint card in the modified to require DFS(s) to ‘‘notify the The Service proposed that DFS(s) space reserved. Should the DFS use a district director, where the application verify the identification of the rubber stamp it is recommended that the was filed, and when the completion of individuals they fingerprint by stamped information be clearly legible fingerprinting training occurred prior to comparing their photo-IDs with the and fit into the space (four inches [4′′] the approval of the application, if such information on their fingerprint cards. wide, and one and one quarter inches training was not completed but was in The proposed rule would require DFS(s) [11⁄4′′] high). The specific information progress or had been scheduled at the to accept only passports, alien provided on a rubber stamp must filing of the application.’’ Additionally, registration cards (green cards) or other contain the information listed as items a correction has been made in paragraph Service-issued photo-IDs for (1) through (4) in this paragraph. (e)(6)(v) to insert the word ‘‘and,’’ which identification verification. Six Additionally, it is required that the was inadvertently left out in the commenters protested that this specific information provided on the proposed rule, between ‘‘(exceptions requirement was to restrictive because it rubber stamp also include a space for Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28007 the fingerprinter’s signature and the The Service also considered and form that can only be revised by that date the fingerprints were taken. The rejected a suggestion that it require agency. Any change to the design of the DFS may also imprint a blank stamp, DFS(s) to post a $500 bond to guarantee form will have an effect on the FBI’s with DFS(s) original signature and date, retakes for benefit applicants who were automated fingerprint classification on a sealed envelope which contains the provided with poor quality fingerprints. process. The Service will refer this completed fingerprint document. When The Service believes that the DFS suggestion to the FBI for its the envelope containing the completed regulation provides sufficient consideration. The Service is reluctant fingerprint document is sealed, that performance incentives. A requirement to increase the administrative burdens envelope may not be opened or altered. to post a performance bond would be by lengthening the period for which The Services has revised paragraph too much of a burden on the DFS(s) and DFS(s) must keep copies of their (e)(6) in the final rule to reflect these the Service. attestations on file. The rationale for the 3-month requirement is to provide the changes. Paragraph (e)(6)(xviii) Service with a sample of the quality of Paragraph (e)(6)(xiv) One commenter suggested that the the DFS’ work. However, any DFS is It was proposed that DFS(s) be Service remove the requirement to free to maintain copies of attestations allowed to charge a reasonable fee for maintain ‘‘clean and suitable agencies for a longer period as a way to verify providing fingerprinting services and that are accessible to the public,’’ asking fingerprinting sales and reconcile that the fees be published in a list ‘‘who will determine what is clean and requests for retakes. suitable or whether there is sufficient distributed by each INS district office. access to the public?’’ The commenter Paragraph (e)(7)(ii) Two commenters recommended that, in raised a valid point. Since all businesses It was also suggested that the terms order to keep the fee reasonable, the must comply with various public safety ‘‘the original copy’’ and ‘‘the second Service should impose a limit on fees. and health regulations imposed by the copy’’ as used in the proposed rule be Another commenter suggested that the relevant Federal, state, and local changed to ‘‘the original’’ and ‘‘the Service was proposing to control the governments, the Service agrees that it copy.’’ The suggestion was adopted and fees DFSs charge by disclosing that should defer to the responsible paragraph (e)(7)(ii) was amended to information to competitors, and governments in this case. However, reflect this change. Finally, due to the maintained that DFS fees should be since the DFS(s) are certified to provide expansion of the types of photo-IDs determined entirely by competition in fingerprinting services to applicants for acceptable for identification verification the marketplace. The Service’s position immigration benefits, they must operate purposes as prescribed by paragraph on the fee issue is motivated by two at permanent business locations that are (e)(6)(xi) of the final rule, parallel policies: (1) DFS(s) should be allowed to accessible to the public. Moreover, changes have been made to paragraph set prices and compete for business; and except in situations where DFS(s) have (e)(7)(i)(C) to ensure consistency. (2) the consumers’ interests are to be made advance arrangements to process Section 103.2(e)(8) Application protected. In including the fee groups of applicants off-site, DFS(s) are information on the DFS list, the Service expected to conduct their fingerprinting Three commenters asked whether is ensuring that consumers will have the businesses at the addresses given on there was a limited application period information they need while allowing their applications for certification. and whether DFS(s) certified by a given DFS(s) to compete for customers by Accordingly, paragraph (e)(6)(xviii) was Service local office were limited to offering the best value and service. revised to include the joint requirement providing service to people who resided Paragraph (e)(6)(xv) that DFS(s) ‘‘maintain facilities which within the jurisdiction of that office. An are permanent and accessible to the outside organization may file an One commenter suggested that the public.’’ The use of this joint application for DFS certification at any Service define the term ‘‘immediately’’ requirement specifically excludes time after the final rule takes effect. as used in the proposed rule, which facilities described as private homes, However, only those currently would require DFS(s) to immediately vans or automobiles, mobile carts, and providing fingerprinting services who report to the Service any changes in removable stands or portable file within the initial 120 days may personnel responsible for taking storefronts. continue to take fingerprints without fingerprints. Since DFS(s) may not interruption. Those who file after the employ any fingerprints without prior Section 103.2(e)(7) Attestation 120-day window will have to wait until approval by the Service, this reporting Four commenters thought that the their applications are approved to begin requirement is really intended to requirement of a DFS attestation on taking fingerprints. Once an provide notice to the Service when Form I–850A for each person organization obtains DFS certification, fingerprinters are no longer employed in fingerprinted was unnecessary and the DFS is not limited to taking those positions. The approval of a DFS unduly burdensome. Two of the fingerprints of benefit applicants who fingerprinter is conditioned on his or commenters recommended that the reside in the same jurisdiction. A her continued employment with a attestation be stamped on or certified DFS may take fingerprints of particular DFS employer. To protect the incorporated into the fingerprint card, applicants who reside in other integrity of the Service’s master DFS FD–258, instead. Two other commenters jurisdictions, but any completed listings, it is important that DFS(s) suggested that DFS(s) be required to fingerprint card must bear the specific report personnel changes as soon as retain copies of their attestations for 1 code for the Service office where the they take place. For the purpose of this year instead of 3 months. One of these fingerprint card will be filed. For paragraph, a DFS is encouraged to commenters said that DFS(s) should example, a DFS certified by the New report personnel changes in advance keep copies of the attestations longer York District Office may fingerprint a where feasible, and is required to notify than 3 months as a way of tracking their visitor from San Francisco on an FD– the district director having jurisdiction own customers in cases where free 258 fingerprint card if the correct over the DFS(s) business location of a retakes were needed. Originating Agency Identifier (ORI) code personnel change within 2 working The fingerprint card, FD–258, is a for San Francisco is entered in the block days. The final rule reflects this change. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) labeled ORI. At the same time, a DFS 28008 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations with multiple locations which fall ‘‘certification’’ and the word ‘‘to;’’ and Miscellaneous Items under the jurisdiction of the same (2) replacing the word ‘‘fingerprints’’ 1. Opposing Views Service district director may file a single with ‘‘fingerprints.’’ That sentence now application, with one fee, by including reads: ‘‘When the application has been Three commenters preferred the all the business locations and approved, the district director shall current system, stating that the employees. However, DFS(s) with cross- assign a certification number to the DFS proposed regulation was unnecessary jurisdiction locations will have to file and individual ID numbers to its and burdensome. One commenter challenged the OIG report, arguing that separate applications for business approved fingerprints.’’ offices that fall under the jurisdiction of there had been no known report of fraud different district directors. Each Section 103.2(e)(12) Denial of the in the submission of fingerprints. As application must include the required Application explained in the background section of fee and information on all business the supplemental information, the locations and employees in that Three commenters asked the Service Service initiated this rulemaking to jurisdiction. to clarify the appeals process available provide integrity to its benefits One commenter suggested that the to DFS applicants whose applications adjudications process and to address the Service make DFS applications a part of are denied. DFS applicants are entitled concerns of the Senate Committee on the public record. This suggestion was to appeal rights as provided by 8 CFR Appropriations and the Department of not adopted because applications 103.3 and 8 CFR 103.5. DFS applicants Justice’s Office of Inspector General contain, in part, information that is who wish to appeal a denial decision (OIG). It has been established that the private or proprietary. Those portions may file an appeal on Form I–290B, current fingerprinting process does not that are subject to release are available with the required fee, with the Service’s adequately ensure either the quality or under the Freedom of Information Act, Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) the integrity of fingerprints submitted to 5 U.S.C. 552. within 30 days of the decision. DFS the Service by applicants for applicants may also file a motion to immigration benefits. In drafting this Section 103.2(e)(9) Registration of rule, the Service has carefully Police Stations or Military Police reopen or reconsider with the Service district office having jurisdiction. considered the policies of Executive Agencies Order 12866 and the Regulatory One commenter proposed that local Section 103.2(e)(17) Change of Flexibility Act and has attempted to police in rural areas be allowed to Address or in Fee ensure that the intended objectives are continue their fingerprinting services met without unduly burdening the since certified DFS(s) might be a long Under the proposed rule, a DFS was affected small businesses. distance away. Two commenters required to report promptly, to the complained that the police were not district director having jurisdiction over 2. Application Fee adequately regulated, attaching alleged the DFS(s) place of business, any change Three commenters protested the examples of poor quality fingerprinting in address or in fee. One commenter application fee of $370. One of them work by local police stations. Another thought that the proposed requirement suggested that the Service underwrite commenter wanted college and was inadequate in that it did not require the costs of administering the DFS university campus police to be granted the DFS to report these changes in certification program, including DFS status without registration. The advance. This commenter argued that it training. The other two said the Service understands that people living would be difficult to preserve fair estimated costs for training and in remote areas rely on the local police competition among DFS(s) and protect monitoring were too high. However, for fingerprinting service, and has the consumers unless DFS(s) were another commenter said the Service always intended to include the police as required to report changes in address or underestimated the program costs, DFS(s). The DFS regulation provides in fee in advance. In order to give the maintaining that the proposed that Federal, state, and local police, as Service sufficient time to update its DFS application fee of $370 was not enough well as military police, can listings and to make that information to offset the administrative costs of the automatically become DFS(s) if they available to the public, the commenter program. The Service’s Adjudications program register with the Service. Once suggested that DFS(s) be required to does not receive any appropriated funds registered, they will be placed on the report these changes at least 10 working from Congress. Instead, it is authorized DFS list and receive updates of the DFS days before they occur. The Service regulation and requirements. Further, by Congress to collect user fees to concurs that the public should be campus police who have general arrest support its functions. In order to protected from possible fee authority pursuant to a state statute, and determine the appropriate application manipulation by DFS(s) and that the who have met the training requirements fee for the DFS Certification Program, DFS listings will not have the intended established for law enforcement officers, the Service conducted a fee analysis effect unless the public is provided with are exempted from the DFS based on estimated processing and requirements and may follow the accurate information about DFS fees and administrative costs, such as staffing, streamlined registration procedures locations. Accordingly, the Service has training of Service personnel on the DFS reserved for law enforcement agencies. adjusted the final rule to require a 10- certification process, adjudication of Clarifying language has been added to working day advance notice for changes applications, oversight of DFS(s), and § 103.2(e)(2)(i) to explain this point. in address or fee. DFS(s) who make providing fingerprinting training. The unreported fee changes are subject to actual cost of running the DFS Section 103.2(e)(11) Approval of revocation of their DFS status as Certification Program will not be known Application provided by paragraph (e)(17). Note that until it has been fully implemented. At The Service has made typographical the requirement of a permanent address that time, the Service will determine corrections in the second sentence of does not preclude a DFS from whether the fee structure needs to be the introductory text to paragraph processing groups of applicants off site, adjusted. (e)(11) by: (1) inserting the word such as processing applicants for One other commenter recommended ‘‘number’’ between the word naturalization at a school auditorium. that the Service make special provisions Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28009 for outside entities with multiple fingerprinting services or both.’’ It provision of 8 CFR 292.2, when they business locations across the country. further provides that these studios must charge a reasonable fee for This commenter suggested that be ‘‘operated by sponsoring fingerprinting services. businesses with multiple locations be organizations on a nonprofit basis solely Some commenters proposed that the allowed to file a single application with for the benefit of persons seeking to Service exclude from DFS certification a single application fee, and that a site comply with the requirements of the any entity which has had a history of fee of $35 be charged for each additional immigration and naturalization laws.’’ offering assistance in matters involving location to cover administrative and During the implementation period of the the immigration law without a license. monitoring costs. While the regulation legalization program, as provided by the They were concerned that these allows DFS(s) with multiple business Immigration Reform and Control Act practitioners would exploit unknowing locations within the jurisdiction of the (IRCA) of 1986, the Service’s local aliens if authorized to provide same Service district to file a single Legalization offices often had studios fingerprinting services. One commenter application with a single fee, it does not operated by not-for-profit organizations. suggested that DFS applicants be provide for certification of a national However, due to overcrowding and lack required to sign a statement on the fingerprinting service with cross- of resources, most district offices have application form attesting to compliance jurisdiction business locations. ended this practice over the past few with the requirements of 8 CFR 292, However, the Service agrees that outside years. Moreover, the remaining agencies which prescribes the authority to entities with multiple locations in the operating under § 332.2 remain subject represent applicants for immigration jurisdiction of the same district office to the separate restrictions of these benefits. This commenter also suggested will incur greater administrative and regulations. This new program that the Service require DFS applicants monitoring costs and should be required addresses a larger group of organizations to list all other services that they to pay a site fee for each location. which is largely not subject to § 332.2. provide in addition to fingerprinting to Because the public has not been offered ensure that they were not ‘‘practicing 4. Not-For-Profit Organizations and the opportunity to comment on the law without authorization.’’ Entities Approved by the Board of concept of a site fee, the Service has The sole purpose of the DFS Immigration Appeals (BIA) under 8 CFR decided to defer the consideration of a regulation (8 CFR 103.2(e)) is to Part 292 site fee until after the full establish eligibility requirements and implementation of the DFS certification Twenty-one of the commenters are application procedures for outside program. If it is evident then that the not-for-profit organizations which were entities who wish to be approved as application fee was below cost, the accredited for representation of others fingerprinters. The authority granted to Service will make appropriate by the BIA. They asked that they be outside entities certified under 8 CFR adjustments to the application fee granted automatic DFS status, without 103.2(e) is limited to providing structure through rulemaking. fee. These commenters argued that they fingerprinting services. Meanwhile, 8 As noted in our earlier discussions should not have to apply for DFS status CFR 292 provides for the accreditation regarding § 103.2(e)(8), due to regulatory because they had already been approved of individuals or organizations that wish limitations placed on the district by the BIA. They further argued that to represent aliens before the Service director’s authority, a district director not-for-profit organizations were and/or the Board of Immigration cannot approve DFS(s) operating typically under-funded, and the Appeals (BIA). Qualified individuals or outside of his or her jurisdiction. proposed application fee of $370 would organizations must apply to the BIA for Therefore, while DFS(s) with multiple pose a significant financial burden for accreditation. Since the governing business locations in the same INS them. They also argued that they were regulations clearly define the scope and district only needs to file one limited to charging only a ‘‘nominal fee’’ conditions of each of these two types of application with one fee, DFS(s) with that could not be used to supplement authorizations, it is unlikely that there multiple business operations in their administrative costs. will be confusion about their purposes. different INS districts must file a The Service is sympathetic to these However, to avoid the possibility that separate application, with the required commenters’ financial difficulties and is outside entities might exploit their DFS fee, with each district director having willing to assist where feasible. But status, the Service has added a new jurisdiction over the business because the Service’s benefit programs paragraph (e)(18) in the final rule to location(s). are all supported by user fees, the DFS prohibit them from engaging in any kind Certification Program must also be of advertisement or presentation which 3. Free Space for Photographing and funded by its user—the DFS applicants. may create a false impression that they Fingerprinting Studios Waiving the fee or the application are authorized by the Service to do more One commenter protested that the requirement for not-for-profit than fingerprinting. DFS(s) are Service gives preferential treatment to organizations would be perceived as prohibited from using images of the not-for-profit organizations. This giving preferential treatment to special Service’s logo type or official seal on commenter cited as an example the free interest groups. Moreover, the Service any of their stationery, information use of studio space (for fingerprinting would be obligated to charge other DFS flyers, or advertisements. When dealing and/or photographing services), in the applicants a higher fee to offset the costs with the public or advertising for Service’s local offices, by certain not- incurred by the not-for-profit business, a DFS is required to refer to for-profit organizations. The commenter organizations. itself as ‘‘an INS-Authorized argued that this practice, as provided by When the $370 application fee is Fingerprinting Service.’’ Violators are 8 CFR 332.2, unfairly disadvantaged apportioned for 3 years, the period subject to revocation of their DFS status other competing business entities and during which a DFS certification as provided by 8 CFR 103.2(e)(18). had to be changed. Indeed, 8 CFR 332.2 remains valid, the annual certification The information collection provides that district directors may cost is $123, which can easily be passed requirements contained in this rule have make available, free of charge, space on to the users as a service charge. The been cleared by the Office of within district offices for the Service is of the opinion that entities Management and Budget, under the ‘‘establishment and operation of studios accredited for representation by the BIA provisions of the Paperwork Reduction providing photographic services, are not in violation of the ‘‘nominal fee’’ Act. Clearance numbers for these 28010 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations collections are contained in 8 CFR This rulemaking action is being 2. Section 103.1 is amended by: 299.5, Display of Control Numbers. conducted in order to address the a. Removing the ‘‘and’’ from concerns of the Justice Department’s paragraph (f)(3)(iii)(LL), Regulatory Flexibility Act Office of the Inspector General (OIG) b. Removing the ‘‘.’’ from the end of The Commissioner of the Immigration and the Committee on Appropriations of paragraph (f)(3)(iii)(MM) and replacing and Naturalization Service, in the United States Senate regarding the it with a ‘‘; and’’, and by accordance with the Regulatory current fingerprinting process. The c. Adding a new paragraph Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has objectives of this rule are to facilitate (f)(3)(iii)(NN), to read as follows: reviewed this regulation and, by processing of applications for § 103.1 Delegations of Authority. approving it, certifies that the rule will immigration benefits, protect the not have a significant economic impact integrity of the fingerprinting process, * * * * * on a substantial number of small and relieve strain on Service resources (f) * * * entities. The Service has drafted this by establishing criteria for the (3) * * * rule in a way to minimize the impact cerrtification of designated (iii) * * * that it has on small business while fingerprinting services to take (NN) Application for Certification For meeting its intended objectives. fingerprints. The legal basis for this rule Designated Fingerprinting Services The Service believes that there are is the authority conferred upon the under § 103.2(e) of this chapter. approximately 3,000 outside entities Attorney General and delegated to the 3. In § 103.2, a new paragraph (e) is which are taking fingerprints for Service under section 103 (a) and (b) of added to read as follows: immigration benefit applicants. Because the Immigration and Nationality Act to the entities providing fingerprinting § 103.2 Applications, petitions, and other establish regulations needed to carry out documents. services at present are primarily small its functions. This rule will businesses, the Service has developed * * * * * substantially promote the Service’s and reviewed this rule with the needs (e) Fingerprinting. Service regulations ability to identify and deny benefits to and circumstances of small businesses require that applicants for various types ineligible aliens, and to promptly and specifically in mind. The Service is not of immigration benefits submit their effectively administer the immigration aware of any relevant Federal rules fingerprints with the applications. To laws of the United States by reducing which duplicate, overlap, or conflict ensure they have access to reputable unnecessary delays caused by poor with this rule. fingerprinting services, the The Service has considered fingerprint cards. fingerprinting of these benefit significant alternatives to this rule Executive Order 12612 applicants must be carried out pursuant which accomplish the objectives and to the fingerprinting service provisions The regulation will not have established in this paragraph. which minimize any significant substantial direct effects on the States, economic impact of this rule on small (1) Fingerprinting by the Service. on the relationship between the Where feasible, a local Service office entities, including the use of contracting National Government and the States, or or greater use of Service agencies. The shall provide fingerprinting service to on the distribution of power and applicants for immigration benefits. Service has sought to avoid burdens on responsibilities among the various outside entities beyond those Also, the district director shall consider levels of government. Therefore, in all qualified applicants for DFS requirements needed to improve the accordance with Executive Order 12612, quality of the fingerprints taken and to certification and certify applicants who it is determined that this rule does not meet the regulatory standards to provide assurance to the Service that the have sufficient federalism implications fingerprints it receives are genuine. As supplement the district’s efforts. Where to warrant the preparation of a district Service personnel are providing appropriate, requirements have been Federalism Assessment. drafted as performance standards, for fingerprinting services, the district example: that the fingerprints taken be List of Subjects director may end such services when he or she determines that there are legible and classifiable; that DFS 8 CFR Part 103 personnel charged with the sufficient outside or private responsibility to take fingerprints pass Administrative practice and fingerprinting services available at a an FBI criminal history records check; procedure, Authority delegations reasonable fee. and that such DFS personnel be trained (Government agencies), Reporting and (2) Designated fingerprinting services. in fingerprinting or otherwise be able to recordkeeping requirements. (i) Law enforcement agencies. Federal, demonstrate their proficiency. 8 CFR Part 299 state, or local police, or military police, in the United States are not required to Executive Order 12866 Immigration, Reporting and apply for DFS certification. However, it The Immigration and Naturalization recordkeeping requirements. is essential that any Federal, state, and Service, Department of Justice, Accordingly, chapter I of title 8 of the local police, or military police, that considers this rule be a ‘‘significant Code of Federal Regulations is amended provide fingerprinting services to regulatory action’’ as defined by section as follows: applicants for immigration benefits be 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. With familiar with the Service’s perhaps as many as 3,000 entities likely PART 103ÐPOWERS AND DUTIES OF fingerprinting regulations and to file for DFS certification, this rule SERVICE OFFICERS; AVAILABILITY requirements. In order to receive may lead to the collection of application OF SERVICE RECORDS updates on such regulations and fees that would ‘‘materially alter the 1. The authority citation for part 103 requirements, a policy agency that does budgetary impact of * * * user fees continues to read as follows: provide such services must register with ** * or the rights and obligations of the Service pursuant to procedures Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C. recipients’’ of the related services. The 1101, 1103, 11201, 1252 note, 1252b, 1304, prescribed by § 103.2(e)(9). Campus Office of Management and Budget has 1356; 31 U.S.C. 9701; E.O. 12356, 47 FR police departments having general arrest conducted the necessary review of this 14874, 15557, 3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 166; 8 powers pursuant to a State statute and rule. CFR part 2. meeting training requirements Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28011 established by law or ordinance for law history check, attestation, or application (v) Use only FBI or Service-trained enforcement officers are included fee provisions in this paragraph. employees to train its new employees within the category of state or local (5) Criminal history records check. on fingerprinting procedures police departments for purposes of (i) An identification and criminal (exceptions can be made for those who § 103.2(e). history record check is required for each have previously received training from (ii) Other business entities or employee or person as otherwise the FBI or the Service) and to conduct individuals. Businesses and individuals described in paragraphs (e)(4) (i) and (ii) periodic refresher training as needed; who apply and qualify shall, subject to of this section who will take fingerprints (vi) Make every reasonable effort to the requirements of § 103.2(e), be listed on the application for DFS take legible and classifiable fingerprints, approved by the Service to provide certification. The district director shall using only black ink; fingerprinting services. designate Service personnel of the (vii) Retake the applicants’ prints free (3) Transition to use designated district office to obtain and transmit of charge if the DFS initially fails to take fingerprinting services. As of December fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of legible and classifiable prints; 31, 1996, the Service will not accept Investigation (FBI) for such checks. If a (viii) Use only the fingerprint card(s), fingerprint cards for immigration DFS needs to add new or replacement Form(s) FD–258, or other Service- benefits unless they are taken by: employees to the personnel approved by designated documents to take (i) A DFS accompanied by a the Service, it must file a new fingerprints for immigration purposes; completed attestation, Form I–850A, application with the district director (ix) Ensure that the fingerprint card(s) Attestation by Designated having jurisdiction over the DFS’s place or other Service-designated fingerprint Fingerprinting Services Certified to of business. That new application must documents are completed in accordance Take Fingerprints; be accompanied by the required fee for with the instructions provided, using (ii) An intending DFS or organization the FBI fingerprint check. The Service FBI prescribed personal descriptor that has completed an filed an will accept fingerprints from an codes; (x) Ensure that the fingerprint card(s) application for DFS status prior to applicant for DFS certification only it or other Service-designated forms are November 1, 1996 which may, pending the fingerprints were taken by signed by the applicants in their the Service’s action upon its designated Service personnel. presence and by the fingerprinter; application, take fingerprints and (ii) An employee who has been (xi) Verify the identification of the complete the Form I–850A, indicating convicted of an aggravated felony or a person being fingerprinted by that its application for DFS status is crime involving dishonestly or false comparing the information on the pending. This provisional authority for statement, or who has been subjected to fingerprint card, Form FD–258, or other an outside entity shall cease if its a civil penalty for fraud, may not be Service-designated forms with the application is denied or as of December assigned to take fingerprints unless the applicant’s passport, national ID, 31, 1996 whichever occurs first. DFS can establish to the Service’s military ID, driver’s license or state- satisfaction that the circumstances of (iii) A recognized law enforcement issued photo-ID, alien registration card, the offense are such (because of the agency that is registered as a DFS; or or other acceptable Service-issued person’s youth at the time of the offense, (iv) Designated Service employees. photo-ID; (4) Eligibility for DFS. An outside and/or the number of years that have (xii) Complete an attestation on Form entity applying for DFS status may be a passed since its commission) that there I–850A, Attestation by Designated business, a not-for-profit organization, can be no reasonable doubt as to the Fingerprinting Service Certified to Take or an individual. person’s reliability in taking fingerprints Fingerprints, and provide it to the (i) An individual must establish that in conformity with these rules. person being fingerprinted; he or she is a United States citizen or (6) Requirements. Except as provided (xiii) Note (legibly by hand or using lawful permanent resident, and has not under paragraph(e)(9) of this section, an a rubber stamp) on the back of the been convicted of an aggravated felony outside entity seeking certification as a fingerprint card, Form FD–258, or a or any crime related to dishonesty or DFS must agree that it will: Service designated fingerprint false statements involving a civil (i) Abide by Service regulations document, the DFS’s name and address, penalty for fraud. governing certification of DFS(s); certification number, expiration date, (ii) A business or a not-for-profit (ii) Permit Service personnel and the DFS fingerprinter’s ID number and organization must establish the identity Service contract personnel to make on- signature, and the date on which the of its chief operations officer, who site inspections to ensure compliance fingerprints are taken. The DFS exercises primary and oversight control with required procedures; fingerprint shall seal the completed over the organization’s operations, and (iii) Ensure that the personnel fingerprint card or fingerprint its fingerprinting employees; and the responsible for taking fingerprints document, and sign or imprint a stamp business or a not-for-profit organization received training in fingerprinting with an original signature crossing the must establish that the chief operations procedures by the Service or FBI sealed area. officer and fingerprinting employees are (exceptions can be made for those who (xiv) Charge only reasonable fees for United States citizens or lawful have previously received training from fingerprinting services, and the current permanent resident(s), and that its the FBI or the Service or who can fee status is to be made known to the principal officers, directors, or partners otherwise demonstrate equivalent Service; meet the standard for individual training); (xv) Notify the director having applicants. (iv) Notify the district director where jurisdiction over the applicant’s place of (iii) A Federal, state, or local law the application was filed when the business within 2 working days, on enforcement agency may register as a completion of fingerprinting training Form I–850 without fee, of any changes designated fingerprinting service. occurred prior to the approval of the in personnel responsible for taking However, a law enforcement agency is application, if such training was not fingerprints; not required to comply with the completed but was in progress or had (xvi) Request approval for any new operating license(s), identification and been scheduled at the filing of the personnel to take fingerprints according training of employees, criminal record application; to the procedures set forth in paragraphs 28012 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

(e) (4), (5), (6), (8), and (9) of this (ii) A copy of all business licenses or collected for immigration purposes in section; permits required for its operations and other law enforcement efforts. (xvii) Notify the Service of any if the organization is a not-for-profit (11) Approval of application. The conviction for an aggravated felony or entity, documented evidence of such district director shall consider all for a crime involving dishonesty or false status; supporting documents submitted and statement, or of any civil penalty for (iii) The names and signatures of may request additional documentation fraud subsequent to the DFS personnel who will take fingerprints of as he or she may deem necessary. When certification of an employee authorized applicants for immigration benefits; the application has been approved, the to take fingerprints; and (iv) A set of fingerprints taken by a district director shall assign a (xviii) Maintain facilities which are Service employee on Form FD–258 for certification number to the DFS and permanent and accessible to the public. each employee whose name appears on individual ID numbers to its approved The use of the terms permanent and the application form pursuant to fingerprinters. The approval will be accessible to the public shall not paragraph (e)(4) of this section, and the valid for a period of 3 years and may be include business or organizational required fee (for each employee) for the renewed in accordance with paragraph operations in private homes, vans or FBI criminal history record check; (e)(13) of this section. The district automobiles, mobile carts, and (v) A statement on Form I–850 director shall notify the applicant of the removable stands or portable indicating the fee, if any, it will charge approval and include in the notice of storefronts. for the fingerprinting service; and approval the following items: (7) Attestation. (vi) A signed statement on Form I–850 (i) Instructions on how to prepare Applicant Fingerprint Cards, Form FD– (i) To ensure the integrity of the attesting that the DFS will abide by the 258; fingerprint cards submitted by Service regulation governing (ii) A listing of acceptable Service- applicants for benefits, all DFS fingerprinting and the certification of issued photo-IDs; and fingerprinters must fill out an attestation designated fingerprinting services. (iii) A statement detailing the DFS(s) on Form I–850A each time they take (9) Registration of police stations or responsibilities and rights, including the fingerprints for an immigration benefit military police agencies. renewal and revocation procedures as applicant. Such attestation mut be (i) Federal, state, or local police provided by paragraphs (e) (12) and (13) signed and dated by the fingerprinter stations, or military police agencies, of this section. and show: may individually register to take (12) Denial of the application. The (A) The fingerprinter’s name and ID fingerprints of applicants for applicant shall be notified of the denial number (as assigned by the Service) and immigration benefits by filing a Form I– of an application, the reasons for the a statement that the requirements of 850, application for Certification for denial, and the right to appeal to the § 103.2(e) have been met; Designated Fingerprinting Services, AAO under 8 CFR part 103. (B) The name, address, certification completing only the relevant parts of the (13) Renewal (i) Subject to paragraph number (as assigned by the Service), form. No fee or fingerprint cards need to (e)(13)(ii) of this section, a DFS must and expiration date of the DFS be submitted for their personnel charged apply for renewal of its certification at certification; with the fingerprinting responsibility; least ninety (90) days prior to the (C) That he or she has checked the nor are these personnel required to have expiration date to prevent interruption identity of the person he or she additional training in fingerprinting in its ability to provide fingerprinting fingerprinted and has listed the techniques and procedures. services. An application for renewal identification number from the Furthermore, law enforcement agencies must be made on Form I–850 with the individual’s passport, national ID, registered to take fingerprints under this required fee and documentation as military ID, driver’s license or state- paragraph are not subject to on-site contained in paragraph (e)(8) of this issued photo-ID, alien registration card, inspections by the Service. The Service section. In considering an application or other acceptable Service-issued will communicate with these agencies for renewal, the Service will give photo-ID; and through regular liaison channels at the appropriate weight to the volume, (D) That it is signed and dated by the local level. nature, and the substance of complaints benefit applicant. (ii) A police department may request or issues raised in the past regarding (ii) DFS fingerprinters must execute registration on behalf of all of its that particular DFS and or relevant the attestations in duplicate in the subordinate stations on a single circumstances which are made known presence of the applicant. The original application by listing their precinct to the Service by the general public, must be given to the applicant to be numbers and addresses. Once other governmental or private filed with the Service with his or her registered, the Service will include the organizations, or through Service fingerprint card, and the copy, which individual police stations and military inspections. Also, the Service will may be a reproduced copy of the police agencies on the Service’s list of favorably consider the absence of such original, must be kept on file at the DFS DFS organizations. The Service will complaints or issues. Each renewal shall for at least 3 months for Service make available to these agencies the be valid for 3 years. Failure to apply for inspection. fingerprinting regulations, related renewal will result in the expiration of (8) Application. An outside instruction material or other relevant the outside entity’s DFS status. organization seeking certification as a information when appropriate. (ii) The Service will certify and renew DFS, or a DFS seeking approval for (10) Confidentiality. A DFS is DFS(s) as long as the need for their personnel change, must submit an prohibited from releasing fingerprints service exists. Following the application on Form I–850, Application taken pursuant to certification, other development of an automated for Certification for Designated than to the Service or to the applicant fingerprint information system, the Fingerprinting Services, to the district or as otherwise provided in the Service will determine if there is a director having jurisdiction over the Service’s regulations. Law enforcement continued need for the DFS’ services applicant’s place of business. The agencies enumerated under paragraph and, if so, whether they should switch application must include the following: (e)(9) of this section are not precluded to newer technologies, such as acquiring (i) The required fee; from using the fingerprints they have compatible automated fingerprinting Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28013 equipment. In either event, the Service notify the DFS of the revocation (1) * * * shall issue a public notification or issue decision, detailing the reasons, and of * * * * * a new rule, as appropriate. Nothing in its right to appeal. Form I–850. For filing an application for this paragraph shall preclude the (D) The district director shall consider certification as a designated fingerprinting Service, in its discretion, from all timely submitted evidence and service—$370 plus $23 for each fingerprint discontinuing the DFS certification decide whether to revoke the DFS check for initial certification; $200 for program after the initial 3 years or from approval. The district director shall also renewal of certification; and $23 for each requiring, as a condition of continued decide whether any such revocation fingerprint check for adding or replacing certification, that the DFS incorporate shall preclude accepting fingerprints employees. No fee will be charged to police stations, military police or campus police automated fingerprinting equipment. taken by that DFS (or any of its offices agencies registering pursuant to § 103.2(e)(9). (14) Revocation of certification. The or employees) during some or all of the district director shall revoke an period of its certification. * * * * * approval of application for DFS status (iii) If the Service’s investigation PART 229ÐIMMIGRATION FORMS under the following circumstances: uncovers evidence of material (i)Automatic revocation. The approval misconduct, the Service may, in 5. The authority citation for part 299 of any application is automatically addition to revocation, refer the matter continues to read as follows: revoked if the DFS: for action pursuant to section 274C of (A) Goes out of business prior to the the Act (Penalties for Document Fraud), Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103; 8 CFR part expiration of the approval; or or 18 U.S.C. 1001 (false statement), or 2. (B) Files a written withdrawal of the for other appropriate enforcement application. 6. Section 299.1 is amended by action. adding to the listing of forms, in proper (ii)Revocation on notice. The Service (15) Appeal of revocation of approval. shall revoke on notice the certification numerical sequence, the entry for Forms The revocation of approval may be ‘‘I–850 and I–850A’’ to read as follows: of a DFS which has violated the appealed to the Service’s Administrative regulations governing the fingerprinting Appeals Office (AAO). There is no § 299.1 Prescribed forms. process as established in paragraph (e) appeal from an automatic revocation. * * * * * of this section. (16) List of DFS(s). Each district office (A) If the district director finds that a shall make available a list of the DFS(s) Form No. Edition Title DFS has failed to meet the required it has certified to take fingerprints. Such date standards, he or she will issue a notice list shall contain the name, address, of intent to revoke detailing reasons for telephone number, if available, and the ***** the intended revocation. Within 30 days fingerprinting fee charge, if any, of each I±850 ...... 05±21±96 Application for Cer- of the receipt of the notice, the DFS may DFS certified in the district. tification for Des- submit evidence in rebuttal or request (17) Change of address or in fee. A ignated Finger- an inspection following corrective DFS shall notify the Service, on Form I– print Services. actions. The district director shall I±850A ..... 05±21±96 Attestation by Des- 850, without an application fees, of any ignated cancel the notice of intent to revoke if change(s) of address or change(s) in the he or she is satisfied with the evidence Fingerprinting fee charged for fingerprinting at least 10 Service Certified presented by the DFS or the results of working days before such a change takes to Take Finger- a reinspection. place. The district office shall update its prints. (B) For flagrant violations, such as DFS list, including any fingerprinting failure to verify the identity of the fee changes, upon receipt of the notice ***** persons seeking fingerprinting, the of change(s). district director may, in his or her (18) False advertising or 7. Section 299.5 is amended by discretion, issue a suspension order and misrepresentation by a DFS. Designated adding to the listing of forms, in proper place the DFS on immediate fingerprinting services are prohibited numerical sequence, the entry for Forms suspension. During the suspension form exploiting their DFS status by ‘‘I–850 and I–850A’’ to read as follows: period, the DFS may not take creating the impression that they are fingerprints, and the Service will not authorized by the Service to do more § 299.5 Display of control numbers. accept fingerprints taken by the than fingerprinting. DFS(s) are * * * * * suspended DFS. The DFS under prohibited from using the Service logo suspension may submit a plan for on their stationery, flyers, or Currently corrective action to the district director advertisements. When dealing with the INS form INS form title assigned within 30 days and request a No. OMB con- public or advertising for business, a DFS trol No. reinspection. If the district director may refer to itself only as ‘‘an INS- approves the plan, he or she shall Authorized Fingerprinting Service.’’ permit the DFS to resume fingerprinting ***** DFS(s) found in violation of this I±850 ...... Application for 1115±0193 on probation pending the results of the requirement are subject to suspension or Certification for reinspection and the Service will revocation actions pursuant to Designated resume accepting submitted § 103.2(e)(14). Fingerprinting fingerprints. The district director shall 4. In § 103.7, paragraph (b)(1) is Services. cancel the suspension order if he or she amended by adding to the listing of I±850A ..... Attestation by 1115±0194 finds the results of a reinspection forms, in proper numerical sequence, Designated satisfactory. the entry for ‘‘Form I–850’’ to read as Fingerprinting Service Cer- (C) If the DFS fails to submit evidence follows: of rebuttal or corrective actions within tified to Take the 30-day period, or if unsatisfactory § 103.7 Fees. Fingerprints. conditions persist at the second * * * * * ***** inspection, the district director shall (b) * * * 28014 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Dated: February 28, 1996. Doris Meissner, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service. [Note: Appendix A and B will not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations]

BILLING CODE 4410±10±M Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28015 28016 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28017 28018 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28019 28020 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

[FR Doc. 96–13856 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410±10±C Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28021

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION generally supported the proposal, but The NCUA received no comments on ADMINISTRATION each suggested improvements or further this section, which is adopted as revisions. proposed. 12 CFR Part 747 The final rule implements the Section 747.6 Appearance and proposal with certain changes, Practice in Adjudicatory Proceedings Uniform Rules of Practice and including revisions responsive to some Procedure of the concerns expressed by the The proposal permitted the AGENCY: National Credit Union commenters. The following section-by- administrative law judge (ALJ) to Administration. section analysis summarizes the final require counsel who withdraws from representing a party to accept service of ACTION: Final rule. rule and highlights the changes from the proposal that the NCUA made in papers for that party until either: (1) A SUMMARY: The National Credit Union response to the commenters’ new counsel has filed a notice of Administration (NCUA) is amending its suggestions. appearance; or (2) the party indicates regulatory provisions implementing the The OCC, OTS, FDIC and Board have that he or she will proceed on a pro se Uniform Rules of Practice and published separate final rules, effective basis. Procedure (Uniform Rules). The final June 5, 1996, that are substantively The NCUA received one comment on rule is intended to clarify certain identical to the NCUA’s final rule (61 this section. The commenter suggested provisions and to increase the efficiency FR 20330 et seq.), except as noted below that the proposal did not adequately and fairness of administrative hearings. in regard to §§ 747.1 and 747.9. address certain situations: for example, EFFECTIVE DATE: June 5, 1996. when counsel withdraws because of a II. Section-by-Section Summary and lack of payment of legal fees that is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Discussion of Amendments to the caused by an agency asset freeze, or Steven W. Widerman, Trial Attorney, Uniform Rules Office of General Counsel, 703/518– withdraws because the client discharged 6557, National Credit Union Section 747.1 Scope him or her. The commenter’s implication is that it is unfair to require Administration, 1775 Duke Street, The proposal added a statutory Alexandria, VA 22314. counsel to continue to accept service in provision to the list of civil money these situations. Moreover, the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: penalty provisions to which the commenter expressed concern that the Uniform Rules apply. The added I. Background administrative proceeding may become provision was enacted by section 125 of involved in a dispute between the client Section 916 of the Financial the Riegle Community Development and and counsel when the ALJ requires Institutions Reform, Recovery and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 counsel to continue to accept service Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Pub. (CDRI), Pub. L. 103–325, 108 Stat. 2160, after a client discharges counsel. The L. 101–73, 103 Stat. 183 (1989), required which amended section 102 the Flood commenter suggested that the rule the NCUA, the Office of the Comptroller Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (FDPA) should require that service be given to of the Currency (OCC), the Office of (42 U.S.C. 4012a). Section 102 now both the unreplaced counsel and the Thrift Supervision (OTS), the Federal gives each ‘‘Federal entity for lending party. Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), regulation’’ authority to assess civil The proposal was intended to ensure and the Board of Governors of the money penalties against a regulated that a lawyer is always available to Federal Reserve System (Board) lending institution if the institution has receive service in order to prevent a (agencies) to develop uniform rules and a pattern or practice of committing party from halting the administrative procedures for administrative hearings. violations under the FDPA or the notice proceedings simply by evading service. The agencies each adopted final requirements of the National Flood The regulatory text is clear, however, Uniform Rules in August 1991.1 Based Insurance Act of 1968 (NFIA) (42 U.S.C. that the ALJ has the discretion whether on their experience in using the rules 4104a). Under the FDPA, the term to require former counsel to continue to since then, the agencies have identified ‘‘Federal entity for lending regulation’’ accept service. Fairness to counsel is sections of the Uniform Rules that includes the agencies and the Farm among the factors the ALJ would should be modified. Accordingly, the Credit Administration. consider in exercising this discretion, agencies proposed amendments to the CDRI section 525 also gave the and the NCUA therefore believes that Uniform Rules on June 23, 1995 (60 FR agencies authority to require a regulated the provision as proposed is sufficiently 32882).2 lending institution to take remedial flexible to accommodate the concerns The NCUA received four comments actions that are necessary to ensure that on the proposal. All commenters raised by the commenter. the institution complies with the The final rule changes the proposal’s requirements of the national flood reference from ‘‘service of process’’ to 1 The agencies issued a joint notice of proposed insurance program if: (1) The institution rulemaking on June 17, 1991 (56 FR 27790). The ‘‘service’’ to clarify that this section agencies issued their final rules on the following has engaged in a pattern and practice of applies to all papers that the party is dates: NCUA on August 8, 1991 (56 FR 37767); OCC noncompliance with regulations issued entitled to receive. This section is on August 9, 1991 (56 FR 38024); Board on August pursuant to the FDPA and NFIA; and (2) otherwise adopted as proposed. 9, 1991 (56 FR 38052); FDIC on August 9, 1991 (56 has not demonstrated measurable FR 37975); and OTS on August 12, 1991 (56 FR Section 747.8 Conflicts of Interest 38317). improvement in compliance despite the 2 On December 30, 1994, NCUA proposed an assessment of civil money penalties. The proposal sought to improve in amendment to the provision of the Uniforms Rules The final rule adds a new paragraph to two ways the provisions governing the which restricts ex parte communications, § 747.9 the scope section that reflects this conflicts of interest that may arise when (59 FR 67655). The other agencies each issued a 3 similar notice of proposed rulemaking in November additional authority. and December 1994. The amendment makes clear Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813), to impose civil that the scope of § 747.9 conforms to that of the 3 Another provision of the CDRI, section 406, money penalties for BSA violations. The definition Administrative Procedure Act. NCUA received two amended the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) (31 U.S.C. of Federal banking agencies includes the other comments on this proposal, both of which are 5321) to require the Secretary of the Treasury to agencies, but does not include NCUA. Therefore, addressed below. This final rule implements the delegate authority to the Federal banking agencies, while each of the other agencies has inserted this amendment to § 747.9. as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit provision in its final rule, NCUA has not. 28022 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations counsel represents multiple persons The current § 747.9(b) prohibits ex parte charges or to settle or terminate an connected with a proceeding. communications between a party, the existing enforcement proceeding. Other First, the proposal sought to protect party’s counsel, or another interested parties to the proceeding are not entitled the interests of individuals and financial person, and the NCUA Board or other to participate in such a decision. institutions by expanding the decisional employee regarding the Accordingly, the NCUA adopts this circumstances under which counsel merits of an adjudicatory proceeding. section as proposed. must certify that he or she has obtained The agencies’ intention when Section 747.11 Service of Papers a waiver from each non-party of any adopting the Uniform Rules in 1991 was potential conflict of interest. The former that § 747.9 conform to, but not exceed, The proposal changed this section by rule required counsel to obtain waivers the scope of the APA provisions permitting parties, the NCUA Board, only from non-party institutions ‘‘to restricting ex parte communications. and ALJs to serve a subpoena on a party which notice of the proceedings must be The APA prohibits ex parte by delivering it to a person of suitable given.’’ The proposal required counsel communications between agency age and discretion at a party’s place of to obtain waivers from all parties and decisionmakers and ‘‘interested persons work. non-parties that counsel represents on a outside the agency’’ regarding the merits The NCUA received one comment on matter relevant to an issue in the of an adjudicatory proceeding. 5 U.S.C. this section. The commenter supported proceeding. It thus ensured that all § 557(d). It also prohibits enforcement the intent of the proposal, but asserted appropriate party and non-party staff within the agency from that the provision permitting service at individuals and institutions are participating or advising in the decision, a person’s place of work was too broad informed of potential conflicts. recommended decision, or agency to be effective, particularly where a Second, the proposal simplified this review of an adjudicatory matter except financial institution has numerous provision by eliminating the as witness or counsel. 5 U.S.C. § 554(d). branches. requirement for counsel to certify that The APA does not prohibit agency The NCUA interpreted the phrase each client has asserted that there are no enforcement staff from seeking approval ‘‘person’s place of work’’ as used in the conflicts of interest. The NCUA Board to amend a notice of, or to settle or proposal to mean the physical location believes that the former provision was terminate, a proceeding. at which an individual works and not as superfluous because the responsibility The current § 747.9(b) could in any office of the corporation or for identifying potential conflicts practice be misinterpreted to expand the association that employs the person. To resides with counsel. prohibition on ex parte communications avoid confusion, the NCUA has added The NCUA received one comment on beyond the scope of the APA to prohibit specific reference to physical location to this section. The commenter noted that communications between enforcement the regulatory text. In addition, the final the proposal may inhibit multiple staff and the NCUA Board regarding rule states expressly that only an representation that otherwise complies approval to amend or to terminate individual, not a corporation or with applicable ethics rules. The existing enforcement actions. To insure association, may be served at a commenter suggested that the proposal against such an unintended result, the residence or place of work. could inappropriately tilt the proposed amendment clarifies that the The same comment points out, proceeding in favor of the agencies. section is intended to conform to the however, that the former Uniform Rules The provision does not limit the right provisions of the APA by limiting the did not expressly permit certain of any party to representation by prohibition on ex parte communications methods of service that are useful for counsel of the party’s choice. Rather, it to communications to or from serving a corporation or other ensures that all interested persons are ‘‘interested persons outside the agency,’’ association. The final rule, therefore, informed of potential conflicts so that 5 U.S.C. 557(d), and by incorporating permits service on a party corporation they may avoid the conflict if they explicitly the APA’s separation of or other association by delivery of a choose. In the NCUA’s view, it is functions provisions, 5 U.S.C. 554(d). copy of a notice to an officer, managing reasonable to establish a baseline This approach is consistent with the or general agent, or to any other agent standard requiring the affirmative most recent Model Adjudication Rules authorized by appointment or by law to waiver of conflicts by all affected prepared by the Administrative receive service of process. Even though persons or entities in order to ensure the Conference of the United States (ACUS). a credit union technically may not integrity of the administrative ACUS, Model Adjudication Rules satisfy the definition of a corporation or adjudication process. State rules of (December 1993). other association, it is to be treated as professional responsibility that impose The NCUA received two comments on such for purposes of service under this more stringent ethical standards are this section. One commenter supported rule. unaffected by this requirement. the proposal provided that it is limited The final rule also provides that, if the In addition, the NCUA is to intra-agency communications agent is one authorized by a statute to unpersuaded by the argument that the concerning amending a notice of receive service and the statute so conflicts provision grants the agencies charges or settling or terminating a requires, the serving party must also significant advantage in a proceeding. proceeding. The other commenter mail a copy to the party. The final rule Persons and entities may be well and claimed that ‘‘NCUA has not stated any also restructures this provision for vigorously represented even if they are compelling need for [the amendment], clarity. and we view the proposed rule as not all represented by the same counsel. Section 747.12 Construction of Time Therefore, the NCUA adopts this inconsistent with the fundamental Limits section as proposed. principles of fairness built into our legal system.’’ This commenter fails to The proposal clarified that the Section 747.9 Ex parte recognize that the proposed amendment additional time allotted for responding Communications allows ex parte communications with to papers served by mail, delivery The proposal sought to clarify that the the NCUA Board only on service, or electronic media restriction on ex parte communications nonadjudicatory matters, such as when transmission under § 747.12(c) is not parallels the requirements of the NCUA enforcement staff seeks NCUA included in determining whether an act Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Board approval to amend a notice of is required to be performed within ten Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28023 days. The proposal also clarified that prohibited so that they would be ordinary course of business or by additional time allotted for responding available for use on a limited basis. The organizing them to correspond to the to papers served by mail, delivery, or other urged that interrogatories be categories in a document request; and electronic media transmission is expressly permitted without limitation. (2) identify similar documents by counted by calendar days and, therefore, Both comments are effectively moot in category when they are voluminous and a party must count Saturdays, Sundays, failing to recognize that NCUA’s current are protected by the deliberative and holidays when calculating a time Local Rule of Practice and Procedure, process, attorney-client, or attorney deadline. with a single narrow exception, already work-product privilege. The NCUA received one comment on expressly prohibits all forms of The proposal also amended § 747.25 this section, asserting that Saturdays, discovery other than production of to permit a party to require payment in Sundays and holidays should be documents. 12 CFR 747.100. advance for the costs of copying and excluded when calculating a time The proposal also sought to focus shipping requested documents; and deadline because small credit unions document discovery requests so that clarified that, if a party has stated its and U.S. Post Offices frequently are not they are not unreasonable, oppressive, intention to file a timely motion for open on those days. This comment excessive in scope, or unduly interlocutory review, the ALJ may not addresses time deadlines generally, burdensome to any of the parties. release, or order a party to produce, whereas the proposed amendment Accordingly, the proposal preserved the documents withheld on grounds of counts Saturdays, Sundays and holidays former rule’s limitation on document privilege until the motion for only when calculating extra time added discovery by permitting discovery only interlocutory review has been decided. under § 747.12(c) for responding to of documents that have material The NCUA received two comments on papers served by mail, delivery, or relevance. However, the proposal this section. One comment suggested electronic media transmission. The specifically provided that a request that a request for interlocutory review proposed amendment does not affect the should be considered unreasonable, should automatically stay the oppressive, excessive in scope, or current rule excluding those days from proceeding. Under § 747.28(d) of the unduly burdensome if, among other deadlines of ten days or less, and Uniform Rules, a party may request that things: (1) It fails to include justifiable including them in deadlines of more a proceeding be stayed during the limitations on the time period covered than ten days. NCUA adopts the section pendency of an interlocutory review, and the geographic locations to be as proposed. and the ALJ has the discretion to decide searched; (2) the time provided to whether a stay is appropriate. The Section 747.20 Amended Pleadings respond in the request is inadequate; or NCUA believes that this procedure The proposal changed this section to (3) the request calls for copies of adequately protects the parties. For this permit a party to amend its pleadings documents to be delivered to the reason and to avoid adding unnecessary without leave of the ALJ and to permit requesting party and fails to include the the ALJ to admit evidence over the requestor’s written agreement to pay in delays in the administrative objection that the evidence does not fall advance for the copying, in accordance proceedings, the NCUA declines to directly within the scope of the issues with § 747.25. provide for an automatic stay whenever raised by a notice or answer. Under the proposal, the scope of a party requests interlocutory review. The NCUA received one comment on permissible document discovery is not The second comment asserted that this section. The commenter asserted as broad as that allowed under Rule permitting the NCUA to require that the change could unduly prejudice 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil payment in advance for document a party if a notice were amended to add Procedure (28 U.S.C. app.). Historically, copying and shipping costs would give or delete allegations immediately prior given the specialized nature of the NCUA an advantage over other to the hearing. The commenter enforcement proceedings in regulated creditors if the party is bankrupt expressed concern that the amendment industries, discovery in administrative following the administrative hearing. would give a party insufficient time to proceedings has not been as expansive The commenter does not assert that it is seek additional discovery or file for as it is in civil litigation. a violation of the bankruptcy laws for summary judgment. The NCUA received one comment on the NCUA or any other creditor to The regulatory text gives the ALJ this subsection, urging that the Federal require prepayment for products or discretion to revise the hearing schedule Rule 26(b) standard in the current services. Moreover, the NCUA believes to ensure that no prejudice results from subsection be retained. The agencies’ that the situations causing the last minute amendments to a notice. experience with document discovery in commenter’s concern would be very The NCUA believes this approach is their administrative proceedings has rare. Accordingly, the NCUA adopts this adequate to avoid prejudice to a party been that substantial time and resources section as proposed. and, therefore, the NCUA adopts this are squandered on extraneous document Section 747.27 Deposition of Witness section as proposed. discovery. A standard somewhat more Unavailable for Hearing restrictive than that of Federal Rule Section 747.24 Scope of Document 26(b) is needed to reasonably confine The proposal clarified that a party Discovery document discovery. Accordingly, the may serve a deposition subpoena on a The former Uniform Rules were silent NCUA adopts this subsection as witness who is unavailable by serving on the use of interrogatories. The proposed. the subpoena on the witness’s proposal expressly prohibited parties authorized representative. The final rule from using interrogatories on grounds Section 747.25 Request for Document does not include this proposed change that other discovery tools are more Discovery From Parties because, in § 747.11(d), the final rule efficient and less burdensome and The NCUA proposed several changes expressly permits a party to serve a therefore more appropriate to to § 747.25. First, the proposal sought to subpoena by delivering the subpoena to administrative adjudications. NCUA reduce unnecessary burden by an agent, which includes delivery to an received two comments on this permitting a party to: (1) Respond to authorized representative. The proposed subsection. One urged that document discovery either by producing change to § 747.27 would be redundant. interrogatories not be expressly documents as they are kept in the The NCUA received no comments on 28024 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations this section. The final rule does not, the record when he filed the record with parties to administrative actions, or therefore, change this provision. the NCUA Board. The proposal added counsel. this requirement and reorganized this Section 747.33 Public Hearings V. Executive Order 12612 section to improve its clarity. The proposal changed this section to The NCUA received no comments on This final rule, like the current part specify that a party must file a motion this section, which is adopted as 747 it is replacing, will apply to all for a private hearing with the NCUA proposed. Federally insured credit unions. The Board, and not the ALJ, but must serve Technical Changes NCUA Board, pursuant to Executive the ALJ with a copy of the motion. Order 12612, has determined, however, The NCUA received no comments on The final rule makes several technical that this joint proposed rule will not this section, which is adopted as changes to the proposal that make the have a substantial direct effect on the proposed. final rule specific to the NCUA. These states, on the relationship between the changes appear throughout the rule text. Section 747.34 Hearing Subpoenas national government and the states, or For example, bracketed references to the on the distribution of power and The former Uniform Rules did not ‘‘agency head’’ have been replaced with responsibilities among various levels of specifically require that a party inform ‘‘the NCUA Board’’ and the blank part government. Further, this joint proposed all other parties when a subpoena is designation before each section number rule will not preempt provisions of state issued to a non-party. The proposal has been filled in with ‘‘747.’’ law or regulations. required that, after a hearing subpoena III. Rationale for Expedited Effective VI. Effective Date is issued by the ALJ, the party that Date applied for the subpoena must serve a Section 302 of the Riegle Community copy of it on each party. Under the The effective date of NCUA’s final Development and Regulatory proposal, any party may move to quash rule, June 5, 1996, is less than the thirty Improvement Act 1994 delays the any hearing subpoena and must serve days from publication. The APA effective date of regulations the motion on each other party. requires thirty days’ notice of promulgated by the Federal banking The NCUA received no comments on effectiveness, but permits that agencies that impose additional this section, which is adopted as requirement to be waived upon a reporting, disclosure, or other new proposed. showing of good cause. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). Good cause exists in this case requirements to the first date of the first Section 747.35 Conduct of Hearings for making NCUA’s final rule effective calendar quarter following publication The proposal limited the number of June 5. The Uniform Rules were of the final rule. The NCUA believes counsel permitted to examine a witness originally developed and recently that Section 302 is not applicable to this and clarified that hearing transcripts revised jointly with the other agencies. final rule, because the regulation does may be obtained only from the court The purpose of the June 5 effective date not impose any additional reporting or reporter. The former Uniform Rules for NCUA’s final rule adopting the other requirements not already were silent on these issues. revisions is to conform to the effective contained in the current version of the The NCUA received no comments on date of the other agencies’ final rules. Uniform Rules. this section, which is adopted as No party to an NCUA administrative Text of the Final Rule proposed. proceeding governed by the Uniform Rules will be prejudiced by the June 5 The text of the amendments to 12 CFR Section 747.37 Post-hearing Filings effective date because the revisions part 747 follows: The proposal changed the title of this adopted in the final rule apply only to section from ‘‘Proposed findings and formal administrative proceedings NATIONAL CREDIT UNION conclusions’’ to ‘‘Post-hearing filings’’ to commenced (through filing of a notice ADMINISTRATION describe more accurately the content of of charges) after the effective date (see the section. 58 FR 37766). Formal administrative 12 CFR Part 747 The proposal also moved, from proceedings pending on or before the List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 747 § 747.35(b) to § 747.37(a), the provision effective date will not be affected by the that requires the ALJ to serve each party revisions. Administrative Practice and with notice of the filing of the certified Procedure, Bank Deposit Insurance, transcript of the hearing (including IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act Claims, Credit Unions, Crime, Equal hearing exhibits). The proposal added a Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Access to Justice, Hearing Procedures, requirement that the ALJ must use the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the NCUA Investigations, Lawyers, Penalties. hereby certifies that this final rule will same method of service for this notice Authority and Issuance for each recipient. not have a significant economic impact Finally, the proposal clarified that the on a substantial number of small For the reasons set out in the ALJ may, when appropriate, permit entities. Accordingly, a regulatory preamble, part 747 of chapter VII of title parties more than the allotted 30 days to flexibility analysis is not required. 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is file proposed findings of fact, proposed This final rule imposes only amended as set forth below: conclusions of law, and a proposed procedural requirements in order. administrative adjudications. It contains PART 747ÐADMINISTRATIVE The NCUA received no comments on no substantive requirements. It ACTIONS, ADJUDICATIVE HEARINGS, this section, which is adopted with a improves the Uniform Rules of Practice RULES OF PRACTICE AND minor technical change. and Procedure and facilitates the PROCEDURE, AND INVESTIGATIONS orderly determination of administrative Section 747.38 Recommended proceedings. The changes in this final 1. The authority citation for part 747 Decision and Filing of Record rule are primarily clarifications and is revised to read as follows: Under the former Uniform Rules, the impose no significant additional Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1766, 1786, 1784 and ALJ was not required to file an index of burdens on regulated institutions, 1787; and 42 U.S.C. 4012a. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28025

Subpart AÐ[Amended] appearance or until the represented ex parte matters as authorized by law, party indicates that he or she will the administrative law judge may not 2. In § 747.1, paragraph (c)(2) is proceed on a pro se basis. consult a person or party on any matter amended by removing ‘‘and’’ after the * * * * * relevant to the merits of the semicolon, paragraph (c)(3) is revised, 4. In § 747.8, paragraph (b) is revised adjudication, unless on notice and paragraph (c)(4) is added, paragraph (d) to read as follows: opportunity for all parties to participate. is redesignated as paragraph (e) and An employee or agent engaged in the revised, and new paragraph (d) is added § 747.8 Conflicts of interest. performance of investigative or to read as follows: * * * * * prosecuting functions for the NCUA in § 747.1 Scope. (b) Certification and waiver. If any a case may not, in that or a factually person appearing as counsel represents related case, participate or advise in the * * * * * two or more parties to an adjudicatory decision, recommended decision, or (c) * * * proceeding or also represents a non- agency review of the recommended (3) The terms of any final or party on a matter relevant to an issue in decision under section 747.40, except as temporary order issued under section the proceeding, counsel must certify in witness or counsel in public 206 of the Act or any written agreement writing at the time of filing the notice proceedings. executed by the National Credit Union of appearance required by § 747.6(a): 6. In § 747.11, paragraphs (c)(2) and Administration (‘‘NCUA’’), any (1) That the counsel has personally (d) are revised to read as follows: condition imposed in writing by the and fully discussed the possibility of NCUA in connection with the grant of conflicts of interest with each such § 747.11 Service of papers. an application or request, certain unsafe party and non-party; and * * * * * or unsound practices or breaches of (2) That each such party and non- (c) * * * fiduciary duty, or any law or regulation party waives any right it might (2) If a party has not appeared in the not otherwise provided herein, pursuant otherwise have had to assert any known proceeding in accordance with § 747.6, to 12 U.S.C. 1786(k); and conflicts of interest or to assert any non- the NCUA Board or the administrative (4) Any provision of law referenced in material conflicts of interest during the law judge shall make service by any of section 102(f) of the Flood Disaster course of the proceeding. the following methods: Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 5. In § 747.9, paragraphs (a) and (b) (i) By personal service; 4012a(f)) or any order or regulation are revised and a new paragraph (e) is (ii) If the person to be served is an issued thereunder; added to read as follows: individual, by delivery to a person of (d) Remedial action under section suitable age and discretion at the 102(g) of the Flood Disaster Protection § 747.9 Ex parte communications. physical location where the individual Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(g)); and (a) Definition. (1) Ex parte resides or works; (e) This subpart also applies to all communication means any material oral (iii) If the person to be served is a other adjudications required by statute or written communication relevant to corporation or other association, by to be determined on the record after the merits of an adjudicatory proceeding delivery to an officer, managing or opportunity for an agency hearing, that was neither on the record nor on general agent, or to any other agent unless otherwise specifically provided reasonable prior notice to all parties that authorized by appointment or by law to for in Subparts B through J of this Part. takes place between— receive service and, if the agent is one 3. In § 747.6, paragraph (a)(3) is (i) An interested person outside the authorized by statute to receive service revised to read as follows: NCUA (including such person’s counsel); and and the statute so requires, by also § 747.6 Appearance and practice in (ii) The administrative law judge mailing a copy to the party; adjudicatory proceedings. handling that proceeding, the NCUA (iv) By registered or certified mail (a) * * * Board, or a decisional employee. addressed to the person’s last known (3) Notice of appearance. Any (2) Exception. A request for status of address; or individual acting as counsel on behalf of the proceeding does not constitute an ex (v) By any other method reasonably a party, including the NCUA Board, parte communication. calculated to give actual notice. shall file a notice of appearance with (b) Prohibition of ex parte (d) Subpoenas. Service of a subpoena OFIA at or before the time that the communications. From the time the may be made: individual submits papers or otherwise notice is issued by the NCUA Board (1) By personal service; appears on behalf of a party in the until the date that the NCUA Board (2) If the person to be served is an adjudicatory proceeding. The notice of issues its final decision pursuant to individual, by delivery to a person of appearance must include a written § 747.40(c): suitable age and discretion at the declaration that the individual is (1) No interested person outside the physical location where the individual currently qualified as provided in NCUA shall make or knowingly cause to resides or works; paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section be made an ex parte communication to (3) By delivery to an agent, which, in and is authorized to represent the any member of the NCUA Board, the the case of a corporation or other particular party. By filing a notice of administrative law judge, or a decisional association, is delivery to an officer, appearance on behalf of a party in an employee; and managing or general agent, or to any adjudicatory proceeding, the counsel (2) No member of the NCUA Board, other agent authorized by appointment agrees and represents that he or she is administrative law judge, or decisional or by law to receive service and, if the authorized to accept service on behalf of employee shall make or knowingly agent is one authorized by statute to the represented party and that, in the cause to be made to any interested receive service and the statute so event of withdrawal from person outside the NCUA any ex parte requires, by also mailing a copy to the representation, he or she will, if communication. party; required by the administrative law * * * * * (4) By registered or certified mail judge, continue to accept service until (e) Separation of functions. Except to addressed to the person’s last known new counsel has filed a notice of the extent required for the disposition of address; or 28026 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

(5) By any other method reasonably that it is not within the issues raised by § 747.25 Request for document discovery calculated to give actual notice. the notice or answer, the administrative from parties. * * * * * law judge may admit the evidence when (a) General rule. Any party may serve 7. In § 747.12, paragraphs (a), (c)(1), admission is likely to assist in on any other party a request to produce (c)(2), and (c)(3) are revised to read as adjudicating the merits of the action and for inspection any discoverable follows: the objecting party fails to satisfy the documents that are in the possession, administrative law judge that the custody, or control of the party upon § 747.12 Construction of time limits. admission of such evidence would whom the request is served. The request (a) General rule. In computing any unfairly prejudice that party’s action or must identify the documents to be period of time prescribed by this defense upon the merits. The produced either by individual item or subpart, the date of the act or event that administrative law judge may grant a by category, and must describe each commences the designated period of continuance to enable the objecting item and category with reasonable time is not included. The last day so party to meet such evidence. particularity. Documents must be computed is included unless it is a produced as they are kept in the usual Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. 9. In § 747.24, paragraphs (a) and (b) course of business or must be organized When the last day is a Saturday, are revised to read as follows: to correspond with the categories in the Sunday, or Federal holiday, the period § 747.24 Scope of document discovery. request. runs until the end of the next day that (b) Production or copying. The request is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal (a) Limits on discovery. (1) Subject to must specify a reasonable time, place, holiday. Intermediate Saturdays, the limitations set out in paragraphs (b), and manner for production and Sundays, and Federal holidays are (c), and (d) of this section, a party to a performing any related acts. In lieu of included in the computation of time. proceeding under this subpart may inspecting the documents, the However, when the time period within obtain document discovery by serving a requesting party may specify that all or which an act is to be performed is ten written request to produce documents. some of the responsive documents be days or less, not including any For purposes of a request to produce copied and the copies delivered to the additional time allowed for in documents, the term ‘‘documents’’ may requesting party. If copying of fewer § 747.12(c), intermediate Saturdays, be defined to include drawings, graphs, than 250 pages is requested, the party to Sundays, and Federal holidays are not charts, photographs, recordings, data whom the request is addressed shall included. stored in electronic form, and other data bear the cost of copying and shipping * * * * * compilations from which information charges. If a party requests 250 pages or (c) * * * can be obtained, or translated, if more of copying, the requesting party (1) If service is made by first class, necessary, by the parties through shall pay for the copying and shipping registered, or certified mail, add three detection devices into reasonably usable charges. Copying charges are the current calendar days to the prescribed period; form, as well as written material of all per-page copying rate imposed by 12 (2) If service is made by express mail kinds. CFR part 4 implementing the Freedom or overnight delivery service, add one of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). The (2) Discovery by use of deposition is calendar day to the prescribed period; or party to whom the request is addressed (3) If service is made by electronic governed by subpart I of this part. may require payment in advance before media transmission, add one calendar (3) Discovery by use of interrogatories producing the documents. day to the prescribed period, unless is not permitted. * * * * * otherwise determined by the NCUA (b) Relevance. A party may obtain (e) Privilege. At the time other Board or the administrative law judge in document discovery regarding any documents are produced, the producing the case of filing, or by agreement matter, not privileged, that has material party must reasonably identify all among the parties in the case of service. documents withheld on the grounds of 8. Section 747.20 is revised to read as relevance to the merits of the pending privilege and must produce a statement follows: action. Any request to produce documents that calls for irrelevant of the basis for the assertion of privilege. § 747.20 Amended pleadings. material, that is unreasonable, When similar documents that are (a) Amendments. The notice or oppressive, excessive in scope, unduly protected by deliberative process, answer may be amended or burdensome, or repetitive of previous attorney work-product, or attorney- supplemented at any stage of the requests, or that seeks to obtain client privilege are voluminous, these proceeding. The respondent must privileged documents will be denied or documents may be identified by answer an amended notice within the modified. A request is unreasonable, category instead of by individual time remaining for the respondent’s oppressive, excessive in scope, or document. The administrative law judge answer to the original notice, or within unduly burdensome if, among other retains discretion to determine when the ten days after service of the amended things, it fails to include justifiable identification by category is insufficient. notice, whichever period is longer, limitations on the time period covered * * * * * unless the NCUA Board or and the geographic locations to be (g) Ruling on motions. After the time administrative law judge orders searched, the time provided to respond for filing responses pursuant to this otherwise for good cause. in the request is inadequate, or the section has expired, the administrative (b) Amendments to conform to the request calls for copies of documents to law judge shall rule promptly on all evidence. When issues not raised in the be delivered to the requesting party and motions filed pursuant to this section. If notice or answer are tried at the hearing fails to include the requester’s written the administrative law judge determines by express or implied consent of the agreement to pay in advance for the that a discovery request, or any of its parties, they will be treated in all copying, in accordance with § 747.25. terms, calls for irrelevant material, is respects as if they had been raised in the unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in notice or answer, and no formal * * * * * scope, unduly burdensome, or repetitive amendments are required. If evidence is 10. In § 747.25, paragraphs (a), (b), (e), of previous requests, or seeks to obtain objected to at the hearing on the ground and (g) are revised to read as follows: privileged documents, he or she may Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28027 deny or modify the request, and may proposed subpoena on every other correct, upon stipulation of the parties, issue appropriate protective orders, party. or following notice to the parties upon upon such conditions as justice may (2) A party may apply for a hearing the administrative law judge’s own require. The pendency of a motion to subpoena at any time before the motion. strike or limit discovery or to compel commencement of a hearing. During a 14. In § 747.37, the section heading production is not a basis for staying or hearing, a party may make an and paragraph (a)(1) are revised to read continuing the proceeding, unless application for a subpoena orally on the as follows: otherwise ordered by the administrative record before the administrative law § 747.37 Post-hearing filings. law judge. Notwithstanding any other judge. provision in this part, the administrative (3) The administrative law judge shall (a) Proposed findings and conclusions law judge may not release, or order a promptly issue any hearing subpoena and supporting briefs. (1) Using the party to produce, documents withheld requested pursuant to this section. If the same method of service for each party, on grounds of privilege if the party has administrative law judge determines the administrative law judge shall serve stated to the administrative law judge its that the application does not set forth a notice upon each party that the certified intention to file a timely motion for valid basis for the issuance of the transcript, together with all hearing interlocutory review of the subpoena, or that any of its terms are exhibits and exhibits introduced but not administrative law judge’s order to unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in admitted into evidence at the hearing, produce the documents, and until the scope, or unduly burdensome, he or she has been filed. Any party may file with motion for interlocutory review has may refuse to issue the subpoena or may the administrative law judge proposed been decided. issue it in a modified form upon any findings of fact, proposed conclusions of * * * * * conditions consistent with this subpart. law, and a proposed order within 30 11. In § 747.33, paragraph (a) is Upon issuance by the administrative days following service of this notice by revised to read as follows: law judge, the party making the the administrative law judge or within application shall serve the subpoena on such longer period as may be ordered by § 747.33 Public hearings. the person named in the subpoena and the administrative law judge. (a) General rule. All hearings shall be on each party. * * * * * open to the public, unless the NCUA (b) Motion to quash or modify. (1) 15. Section 747.38 is revised to read Board, in its discretion, determines that Any person to whom a hearing as follows: holding an open hearing would be subpoena is directed or any party may contrary to the public interest. Within § 747.38 Recommended decision and filing file a motion to quash or modify the of record. 20 days of service of the notice, any subpoena, accompanied by a statement respondent may file with the NCUA (a) Filing of recommended decision of the basis for quashing or modifying Board a request for a private hearing, and record. Within 45 days after the subpoena. The movant must serve and any party may file a reply to such expiration of the time allowed for filing the motion on each party and on the a request. A party must serve on the reply briefs under § 747.37(b), the person named in the subpoena. Any administrative law judge a copy of any administrative law judge shall file with party may respond to the motion within request or reply the party files with the and certify to the NCUA Board, for ten days of service of the motion. NCUA Board. The form of, and decision, the record of the proceeding. procedure for, these requests and replies * * * * * The record must include the are governed by § 747.23. A party’s 13. In § 747.35, paragraph (a)(3) is administrative law judge’s failure to file a request or a reply redesignated as paragraph (a)(4), a new recommended decision, recommended constitutes a waiver of any objections paragraph (a)(3) is added, and paragraph findings of fact, recommended regarding whether the hearing will be (b) is revised to read as follows: conclusions of law, and proposed order; all prehearing and hearing transcripts, public or private. § 747.35 Conduct of hearings. exhibits, and rulings; and the motions, * * * * * (a) * * * 12. In § 747.34, paragraphs (a) and briefs, memoranda, and other (3) Examination of witnesses. Only (b)(1) are revised to read as follows: supporting papers filed in connection one counsel for each party may conduct with the hearing. The administrative § 747.34 Hearing subpoenas. an examination of a witness, except that law judge shall serve upon each party (a) Issuance. (1) Upon application of in the case of extensive direct the recommended decision, findings, a party showing general relevance and examination, the administrative law conclusions, and proposed order. reasonableness of scope of the testimony judge may permit more than one (b) Filing of index. At the same time or other evidence sought, the counsel for the party presenting the the administrative law judge files with administrative law judge may issue a witness to conduct the examination. A and certifies to the NCUA Board for subpoena or a subpoena duces tecum party may have one counsel conduct the final determination the record of the requiring the attendance of a witness at direct examination and another counsel proceeding, the administrative law the hearing or the production of conduct re-direct examination of a judge shall furnish to the NCUA Board documentary or physical evidence at the witness, or may have one counsel a certified index of the entire record of hearing. The application for a hearing conduct the cross examination of a the proceeding. The certified index shall subpoena must also contain a proposed witness and another counsel conduct include, at a minimum, an entry for subpoena specifying the attendance of a the re-cross examination of a witness. each paper, document or motion filed witness or the production of evidence * * * * * with the administrative law judge in the from any state, territory, or possession (b) Transcript. The hearing must be proceeding, the date of the filing, and of the United States, the District of recorded and transcribed. The reporter the identity of the filer. The certified Columbia, or as otherwise provided by will make the transcript available to any index shall also include an exhibit law at any designated place where the party upon payment by that party to the index containing, at a minimum, an hearing is being conducted. The party reporter of the cost of the transcript. The entry consisting of exhibit number and making the application shall serve a administrative law judge may order the title or description for: Each exhibit copy of the application and the record corrected, either upon motion to introduced and admitted into evidence 28028 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations at the hearing; each exhibit introduced information may be examined at the maintenance for the majority of affected but not admitted into evidence at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), operators. However, under the hearing; each exhibit introduced and Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules provisions of paragraph (c) of the final admitted into evidence after the Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., rule, the FAA may approve requests for completion of the hearing; and each Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los adjustments to the compliance time if exhibit introduced but not admitted into Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, data are submitted to substantiate that evidence after the completion of the Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960 such an adjustment would provide an hearing. Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, acceptable level of safety. California; or at the Office of the Federal Dated: May 28, 1996. Request To Provide Time Frame of Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Becky Baker, Improper Installation suite 700, Washington, DC. Secretary of the Board, National Credit Union FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: One commenter maintains that the Administration. unsafe condition occurred because [FR Doc. 96–13814 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Walter Eierman, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM– correct procedures were not followed BILLING CODE 7535±01±P 130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft during aircraft production. In light of Certification Office, 3960 Paramount this, the commenter requests that the Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; proposal be revised to provide a time DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION telephone (310) 627–5336; fax (310) frame during which the addressed 627–5210. problem occurred and allow operators Federal Aviation Administration to inspect a sampling of airplanes SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A produced during that time to determine 14 CFR Part 39 proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal if the lanyard problem is present on Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to those airplanes. [Docket No. 95±NM±188±AD; Amendment include an airworthiness directive (AD) 39±9642; AD 96±11±18] The FAA does not concur with the that is applicable to certain McDonnell commenter’s request. The FAA is RIN 2120±AA64 Douglas Model DC–9–80 series unable to determine the time frame airplanes, and Model MD–88 and MD– during which the apparent improper Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell 90 airplanes was published in the installation occurred because the Douglas Model DC±9±80 Series Federal Register on February 12, 1996 manufacturing procedures that existed Airplanes, and Model MD±88 and MD± (61 FR 5334). That action proposed to during the production of all of the 90 Airplanes require, for Model DC–9–80 series affected airplanes did not contain airplanes and Model MD–88 airplanes, AGENCY: Federal Aviation provisions for monitoring the length of a one-time measurement of the length of Administration, DOT. the lanyard. Therefore, all airplanes the oxygen mask lanyards of the PSU, ACTION: Final rule. listed in the applicability of the final and modification, if necessary. For rule may be subject to the addressed SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a Model MD–90 airplanes, the action unsafe condition. proposed to require modification of the new airworthiness directive (AD), Conclusion applicable to certain McDonnell oxygen mask lanyards of the PSU. Douglas Model DC–9–80 series Interested persons have been afforded After careful review of the available airplanes, and Model MD–88 and MD– an opportunity to participate in the data, including the comments noted 90 airplanes, that requires a one-time making of this amendment. Due above, the FAA has determined that air measurement of the length of the oxygen consideration has been given to the safety and the public interest require the mask lanyards of the passenger service comments received. adoption of the rule as proposed. unit (PSU), and modification of lanyards Support for the Proposal Cost Impact that are longer than the proper length. Several commenters support the This amendment is prompted by a There are approximately 1,200 proposed rule. report that the length of the oxygen McDonnell Douglas Model DC–9–80 mask lanyards of the PSU were found to Request To Extend Compliance Time series airplanes, Model MD–88 be too long, apparently due to improper airplanes, and Model MD–90 airplanes Two commenters request that the of the affected design in the worldwide installation during production. The compliance time be extended from the actions specified by this AD are fleet. The FAA estimates that 650 proposed 24 months to 36 months. One airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected intended to ensure that the length of of these commenters states that it would these oxygen mask lanyards is correct, by this AD. have to special schedule its fleet of For airplanes on which inspection of so that the oxygen canister will be airplanes in order to accomplish the the lanyard is required, it will take properly activated when needed during proposed measurement and approximately 81 work hours per an emergency. modification within the proposed airplane to accomplish the required DATES: Effective July 9, 1996. compliance time; this would entail inspection, at an average labor rate of The incorporation by reference of considerable additional expenses and $60 per work hour. Based on these certain publications listed in the schedule disruptions. figures, the cost impact of the inspection regulations is approved by the Director The FAA does not concur. In required by this AD on U.S. operators is of the Federal Register as of July 9, 1996. developing an appropriate compliance estimated to be $4,860 per airplane. ADDRESSES: The service information time for this action, the FAA considered For airplanes on which modification referenced in this AD may be obtained not only the degree of urgency of the lanyard is required, it will take from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, associated with addressing the subject approximately 121 work hours per 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, unsafe condition, but the practical airplane to accomplish the required California 90846, Attention: Technical aspect of completing the required modification at an average labor rate of Publications Business Administration, modification within an interval of time $60 per work hour. Based on these Department C1–L51 (2–60). This that parallels normal scheduled figures, the cost impact of the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28029 modification required by this AD on having manufacturer’s fuselage numbers 924 Note 2: Information concerning the U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,260 through 1094 inclusive, and 1095 through existence of approved alternative methods of per airplane. 2113 inclusive; and Model MD–90 airplanes, compliance with this AD, if any, may be The cost impact figures discussed having manufacturer’s fuselage numbers obtained from the Los Angeles ACO. above are based on assumptions that no 2094 through 2098 inclusive, and 2100; (d) Special flight permits may be issued in certificated in any category. operator has yet accomplished any of accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 the requirements of this AD action, and Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR identified in the preceding applicability 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to that no operator would accomplish provision, regardless of whether it has been a location where the requirements of this AD those actions in the future if this AD modified, altered, or repaired in the area can be accomplished. were not adopted. subject to the requirements of this AD. For (e) The measurement and modification Regulatory Impact airplanes that have been modified, altered, or shall be done in accordance with McDonnell repaired so that the performance of the Douglas Service Bulletin MD80–35–022, The regulations adopted herein will requirements of this AD is affected, the dated August 29, 1995 (for Model DC–9–80 not have substantial direct effects on the owner/operator must request approval for an series airplanes and Model MD–88 States, on the relationship between the alternative method of compliance in airplanes), or McDonnell Douglas Service national government and the States, or accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. Bulletin MD90–35–001, dated August 29, on the distribution of power and The request should include an assessment of 1995 (for Model MD–90 airplanes). This the effect of the modification, alteration, or incorporation by reference was approved by responsibilities among the various repair on the unsafe condition addressed by the Director of the Federal Register in levels of government. Therefore, in this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR accordance with Executive Order 12612, been eliminated, the request should include part 51. Copies may be obtained from it is determined that this final rule does specific proposed actions to address it. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 not have sufficient federalism Compliance: Required as indicated, unless Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California implications to warrant the preparation accomplished previously. 90846, Attention: Technical Publications of a Federalism Assessment. To ensure that the length of the oxygen Business Administration, Department C1– For the reasons discussed above, I mask lanyards is correct, so that the oxygen L51 (2–60). Copies may be inspected at the certify that this action (1) is not a canister will be properly activated when FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under needed during an emergency, accomplish the Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at following: the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a (a) For Model DC–9–80 series airplanes Office, Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960 ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT and Model MD–88 airplanes, having Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 manufacturer’s fuselage numbers 1095 or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) through 2113 inclusive; and Model MD–90 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, will not have a significant economic airplanes: Within 2 years after the effective Washington, DC. impact, positive or negative, on a date of this AD, perform a one-time (f) This amendment becomes effective on substantial number of small entities measurement of the length of the oxygen July 9, 1996. under the criteria of the Regulatory mask lanyards of the passenger service unit Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 23, Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has (PSU) from the loop on the firing pin or 1996. aluminum ring to the mask, in accordance been prepared for this action and it is with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin John J. Hickey, contained in the Rules Docket. A copy MD80–35–022, dated August 29, 1995 (for Acting Manager, Transport Airplane of it may be obtained from the Rules Model DC–9–80 series airplanes and Model Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Docket at the location provided under MD–88 airplanes), or McDonnell Douglas [FR Doc. 96–13609 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] the caption ADDRESSES. Service Bulletin MD90–35–001, dated August BILLING CODE 4910±13±U 29, 1995 (for Model MD–90 airplanes), as List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 applicable. Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (1) If the length of all oxygen mask 14 CFR Part 39 safety, Incorporation by reference, lanyards is found to be within the limits Safety. specified in the applicable service bulletin, [Docket No. 95±NM±172±AD; Amendment no further action is required by this 39±9640; AD 96±11±16] Adoption of the Amendment paragraph. RIN 2120±AA64 Accordingly, pursuant to the (2) If the length of any oxygen mask authority delegated to me by the lanyard is found to exceed the limits Airworthiness Directives; Fokker specified in the applicable service bulletin, Administrator, the Federal Aviation prior to further flight, modify that oxygen Model F28 Mark 0100 Series Airplanes Administration amends part 39 of the mask lanyard of the PSU in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR AGENCY: Federal Aviation the applicable service bulletin. Administration, DOT. part 39) as follows: (b) For Model DC–9–80 series airplanes having manufacturer’s fuselage numbers 924 ACTION: Final rule. PART 39ÐAIRWORTHINESS through 1094 inclusive: Within 2 years after SUMMARY: DIRECTIVES the effective date of this AD, modify the This amendment adopts a oxygen mask lanyards of the PSU in new airworthiness directive (AD), 1. The authority citation for part 39 accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service applicable to certain Fokker Model F28 continues to read as follows: Bulletin MD80–35–022, dated August 29, Mark 0100 series airplanes, that requires Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 1995. a one-time measurement during (c) An alternative method of compliance or refueling to determine the pressure in § 39.13 [Amended] adjustment of the compliance time that each collector tank; for certain 2. Section 39.13 is amended by provides an acceptable level of safety may be airplanes, non-destructive test (NDT) adding the following new airworthiness used if approved by the Manager, Los inspections to detect cracking or directive: Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. deformations of the collector tank ribs 96–11–18 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment Operators shall submit their requests through on each wing, and repair, if necessary; 39–9642. Docket 95–NM–188–AD. an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance and modification of top-hat stringers in Applicability: Model DC–9–80 series Inspector, who may add comments and then each outer wing tank. This amendment airplanes and Model MD–88 airplanes, send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. is prompted by a report of damage to the 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations ribs of the wing collector tank caused by Bulletin SBF100–57–030. The original Cost Impact over-pressure in the collector tank issue of the service bulletin was The FAA estimates that 58 airplanes during refueling. The actions specified referenced in the proposal as the of U.S. registry will be affected by this by this AD are intended to prevent appropriate source of service AD, that it will take approximately 85 cracking and deformation of the wing information related to the proposed work hours per airplane to accomplish collector tanks due to over-pressure, inspection. The commenters point out the required actions, and that the which could result in reduced structural that Revision 1 of that service bulletin, average labor rate is $60 per work hour. integrity of the wing. which was released on September 27, Based on these figures, the cost impact 1995, now recommends that the DATES: Effective July 9, 1996. of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated inspection be performed within a The incorporation by reference of to be $295,800, or $5,100 per airplane. shorter time period than that certain publications listed in the The cost impact figure discussed recommended in the original issue of regulations is approved by the Director above is based on assumptions that no the service bulletin. The commenters of the Federal Register as of July 9, 1996. operator has yet accomplished any of state that, if the FAA were to reduce the ADDRESSES: The service information the requirements of this AD action, and compliance period of the proposed AD referenced in this AD may be obtained that no operator would accomplish as recommended in Revision 1, then from Fokker Aircraft USA, Inc., 1199 those actions in the future if this AD they would be faced with scheduling North Fairfax Street, Alexandria, were not adopted. Virginia 22314. This information may be problems and/or increased costs examined at the Federal Aviation resulting from airplane downtime and Regulatory Impact labor. Administration (FAA), Transport The regulations adopted herein will Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, The commenters further point out that not have substantial direct effects on the 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Fokker’s reason for recommending the States, on the relationship between the Washington; or at the Office of the more restrictive compliance time national government and the States, or Federal Register, 800 North Capitol specified in Revision 1, is that further on the distribution of power and Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. analyses could not completely exclude responsibilities among the various FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the possibility of static electricity build- levels of government. Therefore, in Ruth E. Harder, Aerospace Engineer, up during refueling. The commenters accordance with Executive Order 12612, Standardization Branch, ANM–113, consider this reason to be highly it is determined that this final rule does FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, improbable and maintain that it does not have sufficient federalism 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, not constitute adequate justification for implications to warrant the preparation Washington 98055–4056; telephone the reduced compliance time. of a Federalism Assessment. (206) 227–1721; fax (206) 227–1149. For these reasons, the commenters For the reasons discussed above, I SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A assert that, if the FAA were to issue a certify that this action (1) is not a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal supplemental proposed rule to propose ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to reducing the compliance to correlate Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a include an airworthiness directive (AD) with the recommendations of Revision 1 ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT that is applicable to certain Fokker of the service bulletin, they would Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 Model F28 Mark 0100 series airplanes oppose adoption of the AD. FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) was published in the Federal Register The FAA responds to these will not have a significant economic on December 19, 1995 (60 FR 65256). commenters’ concern by stating that it impact, positive or negative, on a That action proposed to require: does not consider reducing the substantial number of small entities 1. a one-time measurement during compliance time of this AD to correlate under the criteria of the Regulatory refueling to determine the pressure in with the revised service bulletin to be Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has each collector tank; warranted. The FAA has based the been prepared for this action and it is 2. for certain airplanes, non- compliance time requirements of this contained in the Rules Docket. A copy destructive test (NDT) inspections to AD in consideration of the safety of it may be obtained from the Rules detect cracking or deformations of the implications, the average utilization rate Docket at the location provided under collector tank ribs on each wing, and of the affected fleet, the practical aspects the caption ADDRESSES. of an orderly inspection of the fleet repair, if necessary; and List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 3. modification of top-hat stringers in during regular maintenance periods, each outer wing tank. and the availability of required Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation Interested persons have been afforded modification parts. In addition, the FAA safety, Incorporation by reference, an opportunity to participate in the has worked in consultation with the Safety. making of this amendment. Due airworthiness authorities of the Adoption of the Amendment consideration has been given to the Netherlands and with Fokker to develop comments received. the compliance time. The FAA has Accordingly, pursuant to the determined that the compliance time authority delegated to me by the Support for the Proposal requirements, as specified in the Administrator, the Federal Aviation All commenters supported the proposal and in this final rule, are Administration amends part 39 of the proposal. acceptable to correct the unsafe Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR condition in a timely manner. Request Not to Reference New Service part 39) as follows: Conclusion Information PART 39ÐAIRWORTHINESS Although all of the commenters After careful review of the available DIRECTIVES support the proposal, they have data, including the comments noted concerns about the recommended above, the FAA has determined that air 1. The authority citation for part 39 compliance times that are specified in a safety and the public interest require the continues to read as follows: recent revision to Fokker Service adoption of the rule as proposed. Authority: 49 U.S.C 106(g), 40113, 44701. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28031

§ 39.13 [Amended] outer wing tank area by removing the SBF100–57–029, Revision 1, dated March 23, 2. Section 39.13 is amended by restriction blocks, in accordance with the 1995. This incorporation by reference was adding the following new airworthiness Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) directive: Service Bulletin SBF100–57–029, Revision 1, dated March 23, 1995. and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained 96–11–16 Fokker: Amendment 39–9640. (d) For Pressure Limits Category 6, and for from Fokker Aircraft USA, Inc., 1199 North Docket 95–NM–172–AD. airplanes having pressure limits within the Fairfax Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Applicability: Model F28 Mark 0100 limits specified in Categories 3 through 5 and Copies may be inspected at the FAA, airplanes, serial numbers 11244 through that have exceeded the number of Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 11277 inclusive, 11279, 11281 through 11287 accumulated total flight cycles specified in Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the inclusive, and 11289 through 11400 Table 1: Within 100 flight cycles, accomplish Office of the Federal Register, 800 North inclusive, certificated in any category. the requirements of paragraphs (d)(1) and Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane (d)(2) of this AD. (1) Perform the NDT inspections in (j) This amendment becomes effective on identified in the preceding applicability July 9, 1996. provision, regardless of whether it has been accordance with the procedures of Part 2 of modified, altered, or repaired in the area the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 23, subject to the requirements of this AD. For Service Bulletin SBF100–57–030, dated 1996. airplanes that have been modified, altered, or December 17, 1994. The fueling pressure John J. Hickey, must not exceed 25 pounds per square inch repaired so that the performance of the Acting Manager, Transport Airplane (PSI) during refueling. requirements of this AD is affected, the Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. (2) Modify the four affected top-hat owner/operator must request approval for an [FR Doc. 96–13608 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] alternative method of compliance in stringers (2.32, 2.33, 2.34, and 2.35) in each BILLING CODE 4910±13±U accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD. outer wing tank area by removing the The request should include an assessment of restriction blocks, in accordance with the the effect of the modification, alteration, or Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker repair on the unsafe condition addressed by Service Bulletin SBF100–57–029, Revision 1, 14 CFR Part 39 this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not dated March 23, 1995. (e) For Pressure Limits Category 7: Prior to [Docket No. 95±NM±180±AD; Amendment been eliminated, the request should include 39±9641; AD 96±11±17] specific proposed actions to address it. further flight following the measurement required by paragraph (a) of this AD, RIN 2120±AA64 Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplish the requirements of paragraphs accomplished previously. (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD. Airworthiness Directives; Beech To prevent over-pressurization and/or (1) Perform the NDT inspections in damage to the wing collector tanks, which (Raytheon) Model BAe 125 Series accordance with the procedures of Part 2 of 1000A and Model Hawker 1000 could result in reduced structural integrity of the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker the wings, accomplish the following: Service Bulletin SBF100–57–030, dated Airplanes (a) Within 45 days after the effective date December 17, 1994. of this AD, perform a one-time measurement AGENCY: Federal Aviation (2) Modify the four affected top-hat Administration, DOT. during refueling to determine the pressure in stringers (2.32, 2.33, 2.34, and 2.35) in each each collector tank in accordance with Part outer wing tank area by removing the ACTION: Final rule. 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of restriction blocks, in accordance with the Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–57–030, Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a dated December 17, 1994. Service Bulletin SBF100–57–029, Revision 1, new airworthiness directive (AD), Note 2: Pressure Limits Categories are dated March 23, 1995. applicable to certain Beech (Raytheon) defined in Table 2 of Fokker Service Bulletin (f) If any cracking or deformation is Model BAe 125 series 1000A and Model SBF100–57–030, dated December 17, 1994. detected during any inspection required by Hawker 1000 airplanes, that requires a (b) For Pressure Limits Category 1: Within this AD, prior to further flight, repair in one-time inspection for adequate 2 years after the effective date of this AD, accordance with a method approved by the clearances between, and damage to, the modify the four affected top-hat stringers Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM–113, flap cables and turnbuckles, airbrakes FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. (2.32, 2.33, 2.34, and 2.35) in each outer wing cables and turnbuckles, and all other tank area by removing the restriction blocks, (g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that flight control cables and turnbuckles at in accordance with the Accomplishment keel subframe 15A; and various follow- Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin provides an acceptable level of safety may be SBF100–57–029, Revision 1, dated March 23, used if approved by the Manager, on actions, if necessary. This 1995. Standardization Branch, ANM–113. amendment is prompted by reports of (c) For Pressure Limits Categories 2 Operators shall submit their requests through chafing due to insufficient clearance through 5: Except as provided by paragraph an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance between the flaps turnbuckle and the (d) of this AD, prior to the number of Inspector, who may add comments and then subframe, and between the airbrakes accumulated total flight cycles or within the send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM–113. cable and the subframe. The actions time specified in Table 1 of Fokker Service specified by this AD are intended to Bulletin SBF100–57–030, dated December Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of prevent such chafing, which could 17, 1994, whichever occurs earlier, result in damage to the flaps turnbuckle accomplish the requirements of paragraphs compliance with this AD, if any, may be (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD. obtained from the Standardization Branch, and the airbrakes cable, and subsequent (1) Perform the Non-Destructive Test (NDT) ANM–113. fraying or seizing of the flight control inspections specified in Part 2 of the (h) Special flight permits may be issued in cables. These conditions, if not Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 corrected, could result in restriction or Service Bulletin SBF100–57–030, dated of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR loss of the flight controls. December 17, 1994, to detect cracking or 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to DATES: Effective July 9, 1996. deformations of the collector tank ribs on a location where the requirements of this AD The incorporation by reference of each wing at wing stations 1825, 2230, and can be accomplished. certain publications listed in the 2635. These inspections are to be performed (i) The measurement and inspections shall in accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin be done in accordance with Fokker Service regulations is approved by the Director SBF100–57–030, dated December 17, 1994. Bulletin SBF100–57–030, dated December of the Federal Register as of July 9, 1996. (2) Modify the four affected top-hat 17, 1994. The modification shall be done in ADDRESSES: The service information stringers (2.32, 2.33, 2.34, and 2.35) in each accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin referenced in this AD may be obtained 28032 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations from Raytheon Aircraft Company, determined that these changes will PART 39ÐAIRWORTHINESS Manager Service Engineering, Hawker neither increase the economic burden DIRECTIVES Customer Support Department, P.O. Box on any operator nor increase the scope 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201–0085. This of the AD. 1. The authority citation for part 39 information may be examined at the continues to read as follows: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Cost Impact Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules The FAA estimates that 25 airplanes § 39.13 [Amended] Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., of U.S. registry will be affected by this 2. Section 39.13 is amended by Renton, Washington; or at the Office of AD, that it will take approximately 1 the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol adding the following new airworthiness work hour per airplane to accomplish directive: Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. the required actions, and that the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: average labor rate is $60 per work hour. 96–11–17 Beech Aircraft Corporation Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, (Formerly DeHavilland; Hawker Based on these figures, the cost impact Siddeley; British Aerospace, PLC; Standardization Branch, ANM–113, of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated Raytheon Corporate Jets, Inc.): FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, to be $1,500, or $60 per airplane. Amendment 39–9641. Docket 95–NM– 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, The cost impact figure discussed 180–AD. Washington 98055–4056; telephone above is based on assumptions that no Applicability: Model BAe 125 series 1000A (206) 227–2797; fax (206) 227–1149. operator has yet accomplished any of and Model Hawker 1000 airplanes, as listed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A in Hawker Service Bulletin SB.27–168, dated the requirements of this AD action, and July 17, 1995; certificated in any category. proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal that no operator would accomplish Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane those actions in the future if this AD identified in the preceding applicability include an airworthiness directive (AD) were not adopted. that is applicable to certain Beech provision, regardless of whether it has been Regulatory Impact modified, altered, or repaired in the area (Raytheon) Model BAe 125 series 1000A subject to the requirements of this AD. For and Model Hawker 1000 airplanes was The regulations adopted herein will airplanes that have been modified, altered, or published in the Federal Register on repaired so that the performance of the March 12, 1996 (61 FR 9959). That not have substantial direct effects on the requirements of this AD is affected, the action proposed to require a one-time States, on the relationship between the owner/operator must request approval for an visual inspection for adequate national government and the States, or alternative method of compliance in clearances between, and/or damage to, on the distribution of power and accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. the flap cables and turnbuckles, responsibilities among the various The request should include an assessment of airbrakes cables and turnbuckles, and levels of government. Therefore, in the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by all other flight control cables and accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not turnbuckles at keel subframe 15A (left- been eliminated, the request should include and right-hand side); and various not have sufficient federalism specific proposed actions to address it. follow-on actions, if necessary. implications to warrant the preparation Note 2: Beech (Raytheon) Model BAe 125 Interested persons have been afforded of a Federalism Assessment. series 800B and BAe 125 series 1000B an opportunity to participate in the For the reasons discussed above, I airplanes are similar in design to the making of this amendment. No certify that this action (1) is not a airplanes that are subject to the requirements comments were submitted in response ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under of this AD and, therefore, also may be subject to the proposal or the FAA’s to the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a However, as of the effective date of this AD, determination of the cost to the public. ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT those models are not type certificated for Changes to the Final Rule Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 operation in the United States. Airworthiness FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) authorities of countries in which the Model The FAA has revised the final rule to will not have a significant economic BAe 125 series 800B and BAe 125 series correctly designate the affected airplane impact, positive or negative, on a 1000B airplanes are approved for operation models as ‘‘Beech (Raytheon) Model substantial number of small entities should consider adopting corrective action, BAe 125 series 1000A and Model under the criteria of the Regulatory applicable to those models, that is similar to the corrective action required by this AD. Hawker 1000 airplanes.’’ Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has Additionally, a new ‘‘Note 2’’ has been prepared for this action and it is Compliance: Required as indicated, unless been added to the final rule to clarify accomplished previously. contained in the Rules Docket. A copy To prevent restriction or loss of the flight that airworthiness authorities of of it may be obtained from the Rules countries in which Beech (Raytheon) controls due to insufficient clearance and Docket at the location provided under resultant chafing and damage to the flaps Model BAe 125 series 800B and BAe the caption ADDRESSES. cable and/or turnbuckle and the airbrakes 125 series 1000B airplanes are approved cable, accomplish the following: for operation should consider adopting List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 (a) Within 6 months after the effective date corrective action that is similar to that of this AD: Perform a one-time detailed required by this AD, since those Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation visual inspection for adequate working airplanes are similar in design to the safety, Incorporation by reference, clearances and for damage of the flap, affected airplanes. Safety. airbrakes, and other flight control cables and turnbuckles with the structure at keel Conclusion Adoption of the Amendment subframe 15A (left- and right-hand sides) After careful review of the available Accordingly, pursuant to the specified in Hawker Service Bulletin SB.27– 168, dated July 17, 1995. Perform the data, including the comments noted authority delegated to me by the inspection in accordance with that service above, the FAA has determined that air Administrator, the Federal Aviation bulletin. The detailed visual inspection for safety and the public interest require the Administration amends part 39 of the working clearances shall be conducted for adoption of the rule with the changes Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR each affected flight control through its full previously described. The FAA has part 39) as follows: range of travel. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28033

(1) If all clearances are within the limits 14 CFR Part 71 is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR specified in the service bulletin, and no 71.1 The Class E airspace designation damage is found: No further action is [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±24] listed in this document will be required by this AD. Revision of Class E Airspace; Mena, published subsequently in the Order. (2) If the clearance for the flaps controls is outside the limits specified in the service AR The Rule bulletin: Prior to further flight, accomplish AGENCY: Federal Aviation This amendment to part 71 of the Modification SB 27–168–253705B in Administration (FAA), DOT. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR accordance with the service bulletin. ACTION: Final rule. part 71) amends the Class E airspace (3) If the clearance for the airbrakes located at Mena Intermountain controls is outside the limits specified in the SUMMARY: This action revises the Class Municipal Airport, Mena, AR, to service bulletin: Prior to further flight, repair E airspace extending upward from 700 provide controlled airspace extending in accordance with the service bulletin. feet above ground level (AGL) at Mena, upward from 700 feet AGL for aircraft (4) If any cable is found to be damaged, and AR. The development of a Global executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 17. the damage exceeds the limits defined in Positioning System (GPS) Standard The FAA has determined that this Chapter 20–10–31 of the Airplane Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) regulation only involves an established Maintenance Manual: Prior to further flight, to Runway (RWY) 17 at Mena body of technical regulations that need replace the damaged cable with a new cable Intermountain Municipal Airport has frequent and routine amendments to in accordance with the service bulletin. keep them operationally current. It, (5) If any turnbuckle, keel subframe, or made this action necessary. This action is intended to provide adequate Class E therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant polythene strip is found to be damaged: Prior regulatory action’’ under Executive to further flight, repair in accordance with a airspace to contain instrument flight Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant method approved by the Manager, rule (IFR) operations for aircraft rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies Standardization Branch, ANM–113, FAA, executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 17 at Transport Airplane Directorate. Mena Intermountain Municipal Airport, and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February (b) An alternative method of compliance or Mena, AR. 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant adjustment of the compliance time that EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 u.t.c., August 15 preparation of a regulatory evaluation as provides an acceptable level of safety may be 1996. the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will used if approved by the Manager, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: only affect air traffic procedures and air Standardization Branch, ANM–113. Chuck Frankenfield, Operations Branch, Operators shall submit their requests through navigation, it is certified that this rule Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, will not have a significant economic an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Inspector, who may add comments and then impact on a substantial number of small Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– entities under the criteria of the send it to the Manager, Standardization 222–5591. Branch, ANM–113. Regulatory Flexibility Act. Note 3: Information concerning the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 existence of approved alternative methods of History compliance with this AD, if any, may be Airspace, Incorporation by reference, obtained from the Standardization Branch, On January 24, 1996, a proposal to Navigation (air). ANM–113. amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Adoption of the Amendment Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise (c) Special flight permits may be issued in In consideration of the foregoing, the accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 the Class E airspace at Mena, AR, was published in the Federal Register (61 Federal Aviation Administration of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to FR 1871). A GPS SIAP to RWY 17 developed for Mena Intermountain a location where the requirements of this AD PART 71Ð[AMENDED] can be accomplished. Municipal Airport, Mena, AR, requires (d) The actions shall be done in accordance the revision of the Class E airspace at 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR with Hawker Service Bulletin SB.27–168, this airport. The proposal was to revise part 71 continues to read as follows: dated July 17, 1995. This incorporation by the controlled airspace extending Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; reference was approved by the Director of the upward from 700 feet AGL to contain E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. IFR operations in controlled airspace Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be during portions of the terminal 11.69. obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, operation and while transitioning Manager Service Engineering, Hawker between the enroute and terminal § 71.1 [Amended] Customer Support Department, P.O. Box 85, environments. 2. The incorporation by reference in Wichita, Kansas 67201–0085. Copies may be Interested parties were invited to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane participate in this rulemaking Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, proceeding by submitting written Designations and Reporting Points, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal comments on the proposal to the FAA. dated August 17, 1995, and effective Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite No comments to the proposal were September 16, 1995, is amended as 700, Washington, DC. received. The rule is adopted as (e) This amendment becomes effective on follows: proposed. July 9, 1996. Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas The coordinates for this airspace Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 23, extending upward from 700 feet or more docket are based on North American above the surface of the earth. 1996. Datum 83. Class E airspace designations * * * * * John J. Hickey, for airspace areas extending upward Acting Manager, Transport Airplane from 700 feet or more AGL are ASW AR E5 Mena, AR [Revised] Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Mena Intermountain Municipal Airport, AR [FR Doc. 96–13610 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, (Lat. 34°32′55′′ N., long. 94°12′29′′ W.) BILLING CODE 4910±13±U and effective September 16, 1995, which Mena RBN 28034 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

(Lat. 34°32′55′′ N., long. 94°12′36′′ W.) transitioning between the enroute and § 71.1 [Amended] That airspace extending upward from 700 terminal environments. 2. The incorporation by reference in feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile Interested parties were invited to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation radius of Mena Intermountain Municipal participate in this rulemaking Administration Order 7400.9c, Airspace Airport and within 8 miles south and 4 miles proceeding by submitting written Designations and Reporting Points, north of the 086° radial from the Mena RBN extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 16 comments on the proposal to the FAA. dated August 17, 1995, and effective miles east of the RBN and within 2 miles No comments to the proposal were September 16, 1995, is amended as each side of the 001° bearing from the airport received. The rule is adopted as follows: proposed. extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 12.6 Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas miles north of the airport. The coordinates for this airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more * * * * * docket are based on North American above the surface of the earth. Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. Datum 83. Class E airspace designations * * * * * Albert L. Viselli, for airspace areas extending upward Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, from 700 feet or more AGL are ASW TX E5 Dumas, TX [Revised] Southwest Region. published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Dumas, Moore County Airport, TX ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ [FR Doc. 96–13943 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, (Lat. 35 51 28 N., long. 102 00 48 W.) BILLING CODE 4910±13±M and effective September 16, 1995, which That airspace extending upward from 700 is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR feet above the surface within a 6.8-mile 71.1. The Class E airspace designation radius of Moore County Airport, and within ° 14 CFR Part 71 listed in this document will be 1.9 miles each side of the 023 bearing from published subsequently in the Order. the airport extending from the 6.8-mile [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±30] radius to 8.9 miles northeast of the airport. The Rule * * * * * Revision of Class E Airspace; Dumas, This amendment to part 71 of the Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. TX Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Albert. L. Viselli, AGENCY: Federal Aviation part 71) revises the Class E airspace Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Administration (FAA), DOT. located at Dumas, TX, to provide Southwest Region. ACTION: Final rule. controlled airspace extending upward [FR Doc. 96–13941 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing BILLING CODE 4910±13±M SUMMARY: This action revises the Class the GPS SIAP to RWY 19 at Moore E airspace extending upward from 700 County Airport. feet above ground level (AGL) at Dumas, The FAA has determined that this 14 CFR Part 71 TX. The development of a Global regulation only involves an established [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±29] Positioning System (GPS) standard body of technical regulations that need instrument approach procedure (SIAP) frequent and routine amendments to Revision of Class E Airspace; to Runway (RWY) 19 at Moore County keep them operationally current. It, Brownfield, TX Airport has made this action necessary. therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant This action is intended to provide regulatory action’’ under Executive AGENCY: Federal Aviation adequate Class E airspace to contain Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant Administration (FAA), DOT. instrument flight rule (IFR) operations rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies ACTION: Final rule. for aircraft executing the GP SIAP to and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February SUMMARY: RWY 19 at Moore County Airport, 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant This action revises the Class Dumas, TX. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as E airspace extending upward from 700 EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 u.t.c., August 15, the anticipated impact is so minimal. feet above ground level (AGL) at 1996. Since this is a routine matter that will Brownfield, TX. The development of a Global Positioning System (GPS) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: only affect air traffic procedures and air Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air navigation, it is certified that this rule standard instrument approach Traffic Division, Southwest Region, will not have a significant economic procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 02 Federal Aviation Administration, Fort impact on a substantial number of small at Terry County Airport has made this Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– entities under the criteria of the action necessary. This action is 222–5593. Regulatory Flexibility Act. intended to provide adequate Class E airspace to contain instrument flight SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 rule (IFR) operations for aircraft History Airspace, Incorporation by reference, executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 02 at Terry County Airport, Brownfield, TX. On January 31, 1996, a proposal to Navigation (air). EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 u.t.c., August 15, amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Adoption of the Amendment 1996. Regulation (14 CFR part 71) to revise the Class E airspace at Dumas, TX, was In consideration of the foregoing, the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: published in the Federal Register (61 FR Federal Aviation Administration Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air 3357). A GPS SIAP to RWY 19 amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort developed for Moore County Airport, PART 71Ð[AMENDED] Dumas, TX, requires the revision of Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– Class E airspace at this airport. The 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 222–5593. proposal was to revise controlled part 71 continues to read as follows: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: airspace extending upward from 700 Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; History feet AGL to contain IFR operations in E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 controlled airspace during portions of Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR On January 31, 1996, a proposal to the terminal operation and while 11.69. amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28035

Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise navigation, it is certified that this rule feet above ground level (AGL) at the Class E airspace at Brownfield, TX, will not have a significant economic Galliano, LA. The development of a was published in the Federal Register impact on a substantial number of small Global Positioning System (GPS) (61 FR 3356). A GPS SIAP to RWY 02 entities under the criteria of the standard instrument approach developed for Terry County Airport, Regulatory Flexibility Act. procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 18 Brownfield, TX, requires the revision of at South La Fourche Airport has made List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 781 the Class E airspace at this airport. The this action necessary. This action is proposal was to revise the controlled Airspace, Incorporation by reference, intended to provide adequate Class E airspace extending upward from 700 Navigation (air). airspace to contain instrument flight feet AGL to contain IFR operations in Adoption of the Amendment rule (IFR) operations for aircraft controlled airspace during portions of executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 18 at the terminal operation and while In consideration of the foregoing, the South La Fourche Airport, Galliano, LA. transitioning between the enroute and Federal Aviation Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15, terminal environments. amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 1996. Interested parties were invited to PART 71Ð[AMENDED] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate in this rulemaking Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air proceeding by submitting written 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Traffic Division, Southwest Region, comments on the proposal to the FAA. part 71 continues to read as follows: Federal Aviation Administration, Fort No comments to the proposal were Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– received. However, the proposal was Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; 222–5593. published with incorrect coordinates for E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR the location of Terry County Airport. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 11.69. The correct coordinates for the airport History should have been (Lat. 33°10′25′′ N, § 71.1 [Amended] ° ′ ′′ On January 24, 1996, a proposal to long. 102 11 33 W). The description of 2. The incorporation by reference in amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation the Class E airspace in this rule has been 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to establish revised to reflect this change. The FAA Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace Class E airspace at Galliano, LA, was has determined that this is an editorial Designations and Reporting Points, published in the Federal Register (61 change and will not increase the scope dated August 1, 1995, and effective FR 1872). A GPS SIAP to RWY 18 of this rule. Except for the non- September 16, 1995, is amended as developed for South La Fourche substantive change just discussed, the follows: rule is adopted as proposed. Airport, Galliano, LA, requires the The coordinates for this airspace Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas establishment of Class E airspace at this docket are based on North American extending upward from 700 feet or more airport. The proposal was to establish Datum 83. Class E airspace designations above the surface of the earth. controlled airspace extending upward for airspace areas extending upward * * * * * from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR from 700 feet or more AGL are ASW TX E5 Brownfield, TX [Revised] operations in controlled airspace during published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA portions of the terminal operation and Brownfield, Terry County Airport, TX while transitioning between the enroute Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, (Lat. 33°10′25′′ N., long. 102°11′33′′ W.) and effective September 16, 1995, which Brownfield RBN and terminal environments. is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR (Lat. 33°10′45′′ N., long. 102°11′32′′ W.) Interested parties were invited to 71.1. The Class E airspace designation That airspace extending upward from 700 participate in this rulemaking listed in this document will be feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile proceeding by submitting written published subsequently in the Order. radius of Terry County Airport and within comments on the proposal to the FAA. ° No comments to the proposal were The Rule 2.5 miles each side of the 201 bearing from the Brownfield RBN extending from the 6.6- received. The rule is adopted as This amendment to part 71 of the mile radius to 76.1 miles southwest of the proposed. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR airport. The coordinates for this airspace part 71) amends the Class E airspace * * * * * docket are based on North American located at Terry County Airport, Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. Datum 83. Class E airspace designations Brownfield, TX, to provide controlled Albert L. Viselli, for airspace areas extending upward airspace extending upward from 700 Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, from 700 feet or more AGL are feet AGL for aircraft executing the GPS Southwest Region. published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA SIAP to RWY 02. [FR Doc. 96–13940 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, The FAA has determined that this BILLING CODE 4910±13±M and effective September 16, 1995, which regulation only involves an established is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR body of technical regulations that need 71.1. The Class E airspace designation frequent and routine amendments to 14 CFR Part 71 listed in this document will be keep them operationally current. It, published subsequently in the Order. therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±23] The Rule regulatory action’’ under Executive Establishment of Class E Airspace; Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant Galliano, LA This amendment to part 71 of the rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February AGENCY: Federal Aviation part 71) establishes the Class E airspace 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Administration (FAA), DOT. located at Galliano, LA, to provide preparation of a regulatory evaluation as ACTION: Final rule. controlled airspace extending upward the anticipated impact is so minimal. from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing Since this is a routine matter that will SUMMARY: This action establishes Class the GPS SIAP to RWY 18 at South La only affect air traffic procedures and air E airspace extending upward from 700 Fourche Airport, Galliano, LA. 28036 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

The FAA has determined that this 14 CFR Part 71 listed in this document will be regulation only involves an established published subsequently in the Order. [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±14] body of technical regulations that need The Rule frequent and routine amendments to Revision of Class E Airspace; Hondo, This amendment to part 71 of the keep them operationally current. It, TX therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR regulatory action’’ under Executive AGENCY: Federal Aviation part 71) amends the Class E airspace Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant Administration (FAA), DOT. located at Hondo Municipal Airport, Hondo, TX, to provide controlled rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies ACTION: Final rule. airspace extending upward from 700 and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February SUMMARY: This action revises the Class feet AGL for aircraft executing the GPS 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant E airspace extending upward from 700 SIAP to RWY 17. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as feet above ground level (AGL) at Hondo, The FAA has determined that this the anticipated impact is so minimal. TX. The development of a Global regulation only involves an established Since this is a routine matter that will Positioning System (GPS) Standard body of technical regulations that need only affect air traffic procedures and air Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) frequent and routine amendments to navigation, it is certified that this rule to Runway (RWY) 17 at Hondo keep them operationally current. It, will not have a significant economic Municipal Airport has made this action therefore— (1) is not a ‘‘significant impact on a substantial number of small necessary. This action is intended to regulatory action’’ under Executive entities under the criteria of the provide adequate Class E airspace to Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant Regulatory Flexibility Act. contain instrument flight rule (IFR) rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies operations for aircraft executing the GSP List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February SIAP to RWY 17 at Hondo Municipal 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Airport, Hondo, TX. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as Navigation (air). EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 u.t.c., August 15, the anticipated impact is so minimal. 1996. Since this is a routine matter that will Adoption of the Amendment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule In consideration of the foregoing, the Chuck Frankenfield, Operations Branch, will not have a significant economic Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, impact on a substantial number of small amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 67193–0530, telephone 817– entities under the criteria of the PART 71Ð[AMENDED] 222–5591. Regulatory Flexibility Act. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Airspace, Incorporation by reference, part 71 continues to read as follows: History Navigation (air). Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; On January 24, 1996, a proposal to E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Adoption of the Amendment Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR Regulations (14 CFR Part 71) to revise In consideration of the foregoing, the 11.69. the Class E airspace at Hondo, TX, was Federal Aviation Administration published in the Federal Register (61 amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: § 71.1 [Amended] FR 1868). A GPS SIAP to RWY 17 2. The incorporation by reference in developed for Hondo Municipal PART 71Ð[AMENDED] 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation Airport, Hondo, TX, requires the revision of the Class E airspace at this 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace airport. The proposal was to revise the part 71 continues to read as follows: Designations and Reporting Points, controlled airspace extending upward Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; dated August 17, 1995, and effective from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 September 16, 1995, is amended as operations in controlled airspace during Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR follows: portions of the terminal operations and 11.69. Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas while transitioning between the enroute § 71.1 [Amended] extending upward from 700 feet or more and terminal environments. 2. The incorporation by reference in above the surface of the earth. Interested parties were invited to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation * * * * * participate in this rulemaking Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace proceeding by submitting written ASW LA E5 Galliano, LA [New] Designations and Reporting Points, comments on the proposal to the FAA. dated August 17, 1995, and effective Galliano, South La Fourche Airport, LA No comments to the proposal were September 16, 1995, is amended as ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ (lat. 29 26 41 N., long. 090 15 40 W.) received. The rule is adopted as follows: That airspace extending upward from 700 prepared. feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile The coordinates for this airspace Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more radius of South La Fourche Airport. docket are based on North American Datum 83. Class E airspace designations above the surface of the earth. * * * * * for airspace areas extending upward * * * * * Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. from 700 feet or more AGL are ASW TX E5 Hondo, TX [Revised] Albert L. Viselli, published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Hondo Municipal Airport, TX Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, (Lat. 29°21′35′′ N., long. 99°10′36′′ W.) Southwest Region. and effective September 16, 1995, which Hondo RBN [FR Doc. 96–13944 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR (Lat. 29°22′24′′ N., long. 99°10′19′′ W.) BILLING CODE 4910±13±M 71.1. The Class E airspace designation Hondo VOR Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28037

(Lat. 29°21′16′′ N., long. 99°10′33′′ W.) controlled airspace extending upward Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; That airspace extending upward from 700 from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile operations in controlled airspace during Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR radius of the Hondo Municipal Airport and portions of the terminal operation and 11.69. within 8 miles west and 4 miles east of the ° while transitioning between the enroute § 71.1 [Amended] 180 bearing from the Hondo RBN extending and terminal environments. from the airport to 16 miles south of the RBN 2. The incorporation by reference in and within 2.3 miles each side of the 352° Interested parties were invited to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation radial of the Hondo VOR extending from the participate in this rulemaking Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace 6.7-mile radius to 6.9 miles north of the proceeding by submitting written Designations and Reporting Points, airport and within 2 miles each side of the comments on the proposal to the FAA. ° dated August 17, 1995, and effective 360 radial of the airport extending from the No comments to the proposal were September 16, 1995, is amended as 6.7-mile radius to 10.5 miles north of the received. The rule is adopted as follows: airport. prepared. * * * * * The coordinates for this airspace Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. docket are based on North American extending upward from 700 feet or more Albert L. Viselli, Datum 83. Class E airspace designations above the surface of the earth. Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, for airspace areas extending upward * * * * * Southwest Region. from 700 feet or more AGL are ASW TX E5 Gainesville, TX [Revised] [FR Doc. 96–13930 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Gainesville Municipal Airport, TX BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, (Lat. 33°38′57′′ N., long. 97°11′43′′ W.) and effective September 16, 1995, which Gainesville RBN is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR (Lat. 33°42′24′′ N., long. 99°10′19′′ W.) 14 CFR Part 71 71.1. The Class E airspace designation That airspace extending upward from 700 [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±15] listed in this document will be feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile published subsequently in the Order. radius of Gainesville Municipal Airport and within 1.5 miles each side of the 003° bearing Revision of Class E Airspace; The Rule Gainesville, TX from the Gainesville RBN extending from the This amendment to part 71 of the 6.6-mile radius to 9.3 miles north of the AGENCY: Federal Aviation airport and within 1 mile each side of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR ° Administration (FAA), DOT. part 71) amends the Class E airspace 001 bearing from the airport from the 6.6- mile radius to 10.4 miles north of the airport. ACTION: Final rule. located at Gainesville Municipal Airport, Gainesville, TX, to provide * * * * * SUMMARY: This action revises the Class controlled airspace extending upward Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. E airspace extending upward from 700 from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing Albert L. Viselli, feet above ground level (AGL) at the GPS SIAP to RWY 17. Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Gainesville, TX. The development of a The FAA has determined that this Southwest Region. Global Positioning System (GPS) regulation only involves an established [FR Doc. 96–13929 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Standard Instrument Approach body of technical regulations that need BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 17 frequent and routine amendments to at Gainesville Municipal Airport has keep them operationally current. It, made this action necessary. This action therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant 14 CFR Part 71 is intended to provide adequate Class E regulatory action’’ under Executive airspace to contain instrument flight Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±32] rule (IFR) operations for aircraft rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 17 at and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February Establishment of Class E Airspace; Gainesville Municipal Airport, 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Sallisaw, OK Gainesville, TX. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as AGENCY: Federal Aviation EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 u.t.c., August 15, the anticipated impact is so minimal. Administration (FAA), DOT. 1996. Since this is a routine matter that will ACTION: Final rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: only affect air traffic procedures and air Chuck Frankenfield, Operations Branch, navigation, it is certified that this rule SUMMARY: This action establishes Class Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, will not have a significant economic E airspace extending upward from 700 Federal Aviation Administration, Fort impact on a substantial number of small feet above ground level (AGL) at Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– entities under the criteria of the Sallisaw, OK. The development of a 222–5591. Regulatory Flexibility Act. Global Positioning System (GPS) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 standard instrument approach procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 35 History Airspace, Incorporation by reference, and a SIAP, utilizing the Sallisaw On January 24, 1996, a proposal to Navigation (air). Nondirectional Radio Beacon (NDB) at amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Adoption of the Amendment Sallisaw Municipal Airport have made Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise this action necessary. This action is the Class E airspace at Gainesville, TX, In consideration of the foregoing, the intended to provide adequate Class E was published in the Federal Register Federal Aviation Administration airspace to contain instrument flight (61 FR 1860). A GPS SIAP to RWY 17 amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: rule (IFR) operations for aircraft developed for Gainesville Municipal PART 71Ð[AMENDED] executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 35 and Airport, Gainesville, TX, requires the the NDB or GPS SIAP to RWY 35 at revision of the Class E airspace at this 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Sallisaw Municipal Airport, Sallisaw, airport. The proposal was to revise the part 71 continues to read as follows: OK. 28038 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, preparation of a regulatory evaluation as of the Sallisaw NDB extending from the 6.5- 1996. the anticipated impact is so minimal. mile radius of 9.5 miles south of the airport. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Since this is a routine matter that will * * * * * Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air only affect air traffic procedures and air Issued in Fort Worth, TX on May 15, 1996. Traffic Division, Southwest Region, navigation, it is certified that this rule Albert L. Viselli, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort will not have a significant economic Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– impact on a substantial number of small Southwest Region. 222–5593. entities under the criteria of the [FR Doc. 96–13927 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Regulatory Flexibility Act. BILLING CODE 4910±13±M SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 History Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 14 CFR Part 71 On January 31, 1996, a proposal to Navigation (air). amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±21] Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to establish Adoption of the Amendment the Class E Airspace at Sallisaw, OK, In consideration of the foregoing, the Establishment of Class E Airspace; was published in the Federal Register Federal Aviation Administration Livingston, TX (61 FR 3354). A GPS SIAP to RWY 35 amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: AGENCY: Federal Aviation and a NDB or GPS SIAP to RWY 35 Administration (FAA), DOT. developed for Sallisaw Municipal PART 71Ð[AMENDED] ACTION: Airport, Sallisaw, OK, requires the Final rule. 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR establishment of Class E airspace at this part 71 continues to read as follows: SUMMARY: This action establishes Class airport. The proposal was to establish E airspace extending upward from 700 controlled airspace extending upward Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; feet above ground level (AGL) at E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR Livingston, TX. The development of a operations in controlled airspace during Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR 11.69. Global Positioning System (GPS) portions of the terminal operation and standard instrument approach while transitioning between the enroute § 71.1 [Amended] procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 30 and terminal environments. 2. The incorporation by reference in at Livingston Municipal Airport has Interested parties were invited to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation made this action necessary. This action participate in this rulemaking Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace is intended to provide adequate Class E proceeding by submitting written Designations and Reporting Points, airspace to contain instrument flight comments on the proposal to the FAA. dated August 17, 1995, and effective rule (IFR) operations for aircraft No comments to the proposal were September 16, 1995, is amended as executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 30 at received. The rule is adopted as follows: Livingston Municipal Airport, proposed. Livingston, TX. The coordinates for this airspace Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, docket are based on North American extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth. 1996. Datum 83. Class E airspace designations FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: for airspace areas extending upward PART 71Ð[AMENDED] from 700 feet or more AGL are Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, part 71 continues to read as follows: Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– and effective September 16, 1995, which Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 222–5593. 71.1. The Class E airspace designation Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed in this document will be 11.69. History published subsequently in the Order. § 71.1 [Amended] On January 24, 1996, a proposal to 2. The incorporation by reference in The Rule amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation This amendment to part 71 of the Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to establish Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR the Class E airspace at Livingston, TX, Designations and Reporting Points, part 71) establishes Class E airspace at was published in the Federal Register dated August 17, 1995, and effective Sallisaw, OK, to provide controlled (61 FR 1874). A GPS SIAP to RWY 30 September 16, 1995, is amended as airspace extending upward from 700 developed for Livingston Municipal follows: feet AGL for aircraft executing the GPS Airport, Livingston, TX, requires the SIAP and NDB or GPS SIAP to RWY 35 Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas establishment of Class E airspace at this at Sallisaw Municipal Airport. extending upward from 700 feet or more airport. The proposal was to establish The FAA has determined that this above the surface of the earth. controlled airspace extending upward regulation only involves an established * * * * * from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR body of technical regulations that need ASW OK E5 Sallisaw, OK [New] operations in controlled airspace during frequent and routine amendments to portions of the terminal operation and Sallisaw Municipal Airport, OK keep them operationally current. It, (Lat. 35°26′18′′ N., long. 94°48′08′′ W.) while transitioning between the enroute therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant Sallisaw NDB and terminal environments. regulatory action’’ under Executive (Lat. 35°23′55′′ N., long. 94°47′39′′ W.) Interested parties were invited to Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant That airspace extending upward from 700 participate in this rulemaking rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile proceeding by submitting written and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February radius of Sallisaw Municipal Airport and comments on the proposal to the FAA. 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant within 3.2 miles each side of the 165° bearing No comments to the proposal were Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28039 received. The rule is adopted as Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas the terminal operation and while proposed. extending upward from 700 feet or more transitioning between the enroute and The coordinates for this airspace above the surface of the earth. terminal environments. * * * * * docket are based on North American Interested parties were invited to Datum 83. Class E airspace designations ASW TX E5 Livingston, TX [New] participate in this rulemaking for airspace areas extending upward proceeding by submitting written from 700 feet or more AGL are Livingston, Livingston Municipal Airport, TX (Lat. 30°41′9′′ N., long. 095°01′05′′ W.) comments on the proposal to the FAA. published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA That airspace extending upward from 700 No comments to the proposal were Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile received. However, the proposal was and effective September 16, 1995, which radius of Livingston Municipal Airport. is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR published with an incorrect coordinate * * * * * 71.1. The Class E airspace designation for the location of the Harrison County Issued in Forth Worth, TX, on May 15, Airport. The correct coordinates for the listed in this document will be 1996. ° ′ ′′ published subsequently in the Order. airport should have been (Lat. 32 31 18 Albert L. Viselli, N, long. 094°18′29′′ W). The description The Rule Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, of the Class E airspace in this rule has This amendment to part 71 of the Southwest Region. been revised to reflect this change. The Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR [FR Doc. 96–13926 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] FAA has determined that this is an part 71) establishes Class E airspace BILLING CODE 4910±13±M editorial change and will not increase located at Livingston, TX, to provide the scope of this rule. Except for the controlled airspace extending upward non-substantive change just discussed, 14 CFR Part 71 from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing the rule is adopted as proposed. the GPS SIAP to RWY 30. [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±22] The coordinates for this airspace The FAA has determined that this docket are based on North American regulation only involves an established Revision of Class E Airspace; Datum 83. Class E airspace designations body of technical regulations that need Marshall, TX for airspace areas extending upward frequent and routine amendments to AGENCY: Department of Transportation from 700 feet or more AGL are keep them operationally current. It, (FAA), DOT. published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant ACTION: Final rule. Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, regulatory action’’ under Executive and effective September 16, 1995, which Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant SUMMARY: This action revises the Class is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies E airspace extending upward from 700 71.1. The Class E airspace designation and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February feet above ground level (AGL) at listed in this document will be 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Marshall, TX. The development of a published subsequently in the Order. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as Global Positioning System (GPS) the anticipated impact is so minimal. standard instrument approach The Rule Since this is a routine matter that will procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 33 This amendment to part 71 of the only affect air traffic procedures and air at Harrison County Airport has made Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR navigation, it is certified that this rule this action necessary. This action is part 71) revises the Class E airspace will not have a significant economic intended to provide adequate Class E located at Marshall, TX, to provide impact on a substantial number of small airspace to contain instrument flight controlled airspace extending upward entities under the criteria of the rule (IFR) operations for aircraft from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing Regulatory Flexibility Act. executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 33 at the GPS SIAP to RWY 33. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Harrison County Airport, Marshall, TX. EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, The FAA has determined that this Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 1996. regulation only involves an established Navigation (air). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: body of technical regulations that need Adoption of the Amendment Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air frequent and routine amendments to keep them operationally current. It, In consideration of the foregoing, the Traffic Division, Southwest Region, therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation, Fort regulatory action’’ under Executive amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– 222–5593. Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant PART 71Ð[AMENDED] rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR History 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant part 71 continues to read as follows: On January 24, 1996, a proposal to preparation of a regulatory evaluation as Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation the anticipated impact is so minimal. E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise Since this is a routine matter that will Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR only affect air traffic procedures and air 11.69. the Class E airspace at Marshall, TX, was published in the Federal Register navigation, it is certified that this rule § 71.1 [Amended] (61 FR 1873). A GPS SIAP to RWY 33 will not have a significant economic 2. The incorporation by reference in developed for Harrison County Airport, impact on a substantial number of small 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation Marshall, TX, requires the revision of entities under the criteria of the Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace Class E airspace at this airport. The Regulatory Flexibility Act. Designations and Reporting Points, proposal was to establish controlled List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 dated August 17, 1995, and effective airspace extending upward from 700 September 16, 1995, is amended as feet AGL to contain IFR operations in Airspace, Incorporation by reference, follows: controlled airspace during portions of Navigation (air). 28040 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Adoption of the Amendment executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 36 at Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant In consideration of the foregoing, the Midlothian-Waxahachie Municipal rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies Federal Aviation Administration Airport, Modlothian-Waxahachie, TX. and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 u.t.c., August 15, 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 1996. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as PART 71Ð[AMENDED] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the anticipated impact is so minimal. Chuck Frankenfield, Operations Branch, Since this is a routine matter that will 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, only affect air traffic procedures and air part 71 continues to read as follows: Federal Aviation Administration, Fort navigation, it is certified that this rule Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– will not have a significant economic E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 222–5591. impact on a substantial number of small Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR 11.69. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. § 71.1 [Amended] History List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 2. The incorporation by reference in On January 24, 1996, a proposal to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to establish Navigation (air). Designations and Reporting Points, Class E airspace at Midlothian- dated August 17, 1995, and effective Waxahachie, TX, was published in the Adoption of the Amendment September 16, 1995, is amended as Federal Register (61 FR 1866). A GPS In consideration of the foregoing, the follows: SIAP to RWY 36 developed for Midlothian-Waxahachie Municipal Federal Aviation Administration Paragraph 6005: Class A Airspace areas amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: extending upward from 700 feet or more Airport, requires the establishment of the Class E airspace at this airport. The above the surface of the earth. PART 71Ð[AMENDED] proposal was to establish controlled * * * * * airspace extending upward from 700 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR ASW TX E5 Marshall, TX [Revised] feet AGL to contain IFR operation in part 71 continues to read as follows: Marshall, Harrison County Airport, TX controlled airspace during portions of (Lat. 32°31′18′′ N., long. 94°18′29′′ W.) the terminal operation and while Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; That airspace extending upward from 700 transitioning between the enroute and E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile terminal environments. Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR radius of Harrison County Airport and within Interested parties were invited to 11.69. 1.8 miles each side of the 157° bearing from participate in this rulemaking the airport extending from the 6.6-mile proceeding by submitting written § 71.1 [Amended] radius to 8.6 miles southeast of the airport. comments on the proposal to the FAA. 2. The incorporation by reference in * * * * * No comments to the proposal were 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. received. The rule is adopted as Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace Albert L. Viselli, proposed. Designations and Reporting Points, Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, The coordinate for this airspace dated August 17, 1995, and effective Southwest Region. docket are based on North American September 16, 1995, is amended as [FR Doc. 96–13925 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Datum 83. Class E airspace designations follows: BILLING CODE 4910±13±M for airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more AGL are Paragraph 6005: Class E. Airspace areas published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA extending upward from 700 feet or more 14 CFR Part 71 Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, above the surface of the earth. and effective September 16, 1995, which [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±19] * * * * * is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR ASW TX E5 Midlothian-Waxahachie, TX Establishment of Class E Airspace; 71.1. The Class E airspace designation [New] Midlothian-Waxahachie, TX listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order. Midlothian-Waxahachie, Midlothian- AGENCY: Federal Aviation Waxahachie Municipal Airport, TX ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ Administration (FAA), DOT. The Rule (Lat. 32 27 22 N., long. 096 54 45 W.) ACTION: Final rule. This amendment to part 71 of the That airspace extending upward from 700 Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile SUMMARY: This action establishes Class part 71) establishes Class E airspace radius of Midlothian-Waxahachie Municipal E airspace extending upward from 700 located at Midlothian-Waxahachie Airport, excluding that airspace which feet above ground level (AGL) at Municipal Airport, Midlothian- overlies the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX Class E Midlothian-Waxahachie Municipal Waxahachie, TX, to provide controlled area. Airport, Midlothian-Waxahachie, TX. airspace extending upward from 700 * * * * * The development of a Global feet AGL for aircraft executing the GPS Issued in Forth Worth, TX, on May 15, Positioning System (GPS) Standard SIAP to RWY 36. 1996. Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) The FAA has determined that this Albert L. Viselli, to Runway (RWY) 36 at Midlothian- regulation only involves an established Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Waxahachie Municipal Airport has body of technical regulations that need Southwest Region. made this action necessary. This action frequent and routine amendments to [FR Doc. 96–13922 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] is intended to provide adequate Class E keep them operationally current. It, airspace to contain instrument flight therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant BILLING CODE 4910±13±M rule (IFR) operations for aircraft regulatory action’’ under Executive Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28041

14 CFR Part 71 listed in this document will be within 1.6 miles each side of the 034° bearing published subsequently in the Order. from the airport extending from the 6.6-mile [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±25] radius to 7.8 miles northeast of the airport. The Rule Revision of Class E Airspace; Belen, * * * * * This amendment to part 71 of the Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. NM Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Albert L. Viselli, AGENCY: Federal Aviation part 71) amends the Class E airspace Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Administration (FAA), DOT. located at Alexander Municipal Airport, Southwest Region. ACTION: Final rule. Belen, NM, to provide controlled [FR Doc. 96–13936 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] airspace extending upward from 700 BILLING CODE 4910±13±M SUMMARY: This action revises the Class feet AGL for aircraft executing the GPS E airspace extending upward from 700 SIAP to RWY 21. feet above ground level (AGL) at Belen, The FAA has determined that this 14 CFR Part 71 NM. The development of a Global regulation only involves an established Positioning System (GPS) Standard body of technical regulations that need [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±26] Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) frequent and routine amendments to Revision of Class E Airspace; to Runway (RWY) 21 at Alexander keep them operationally current. It, Carlsbad, NM Municipal Airport has made this action therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant necessary. This action is intended to regulatory action’’ under Executive AGENCY: Federal Aviation provide adequate Class E airspace to Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant Administration (FAA), DOT. contain instrument flight rule (IFR) rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies ACTION: Final rule. operations for aircraft executing the GPS and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February SIAP to RWY 21 at Alexander 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant SUMMARY: This action revises the Class Municipal Airport, Belen, NM. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as E airspace extending upward from 700 EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, the anticipated impact is so minimal. feet above ground level (AGL) at 1996. Since this is a routine matter that will Carlsbad, NM. The development of a Global Positioning System (GPS) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: only affect air traffic procedures and air Chuch Frankenfield, Operations Branch, navigation, it is certified that this rule standard instrument approach Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, will not have a significant economic procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 21 Federal Aviation Administration, Fort impact on a substantial number of small at Cavern City Air Terminal has made Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– entities under the criteria of the this action necessary. This action is 222–5591. Regulatory Flexibility Act. intended to provide adequate Class E airspace to contain instrument flight SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 rule (IFR) operations for aircraft History Airspace, Incorporation by reference, executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 21 at Navigation (air). Cavern City Air Terminal, Carlsbad, On January 24, 1996, a proposal to NM. amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Adoption of the Amendment EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise In consideration of the foregoing, the 1996. the Class E airspace at Belen, NM, was Federal Aviation Administration published in the Federal Register (61 amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FR 1870). A GPS SIAP to RWY 21 Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air developed for Alexander Municipal PART 71Ð[AMENDED] Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Airport, Belen, NM, requires the Federal Aviation Administration, Fort 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– revision of the Class E airspace at this part 71 continues to read as follows: airport. The proposal was to revise the 222–5593. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; controlled airspace extending upward SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR History operations in controlled airspace during 11.69. portions of the terminal operation and On January 24, 1996, a proposal to while transitioning between the enroute § 71.1 [Amended] amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation and terminal environments. 2. The incorporation by reference in Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise Interested parties were invited to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation the Class E airspace at Carlsbad, NM, participate in this rulemaking Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace was published in the Federal Register proceeding by submitting written Designations and Reporting Points, (61 FR 1869). A GPS SIAP to RWY 21 comments on the proposal to the FAA. dated August 17, 1995, and effective developed for Cavern City Air Terminal, No comments to the proposal were September 16, 1995, is amended as Carlsbad, NM, requires the revision of received. The rule is adopted as follows: Class E airspace at this airport. The proposed. proposal was to establish controlled The coordinates for this airspace Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas airspace extending upward from 700 extending upward from 700 feet or more docket are based on North American above the surface of the earth. feet AGL to contain IFR operations in Datum 83. Class E airspace designations controlled airspace during portions of for airspace areas extending upward * * * * * the terminal operation and while from 700 feet or more AGL are ASW NW E5 Belen, NM [Revised] transitioning between the enroute and published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Belen, Alexander Municipal Airport, NW terminal environments. Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, (Lat. 34°38′43′′ N., long. 106°50′01′′ W.) Interested parties were invited to and effective September 16, 1995, which That airspace extending upward from 700 participate in this rulemaking is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile proceeding by submitting written 71.1. The Class E airspace designation radius of Alexander Municipal Airport and comments on the proposal to the FAA. 28042 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

No comments to the proposal were PART 71Ð[AMENDED] EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, received. However, the proposal was 1996. published without coordinates for the 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: location of the Cavern City Air Terminal Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air Localizer. The coordinates for the Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103; 40113, 40120; Traffic Division, Southwest Region, ° ′ ′′ E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 localizer (Lat. 32 20 22 N, long. Federal Aviation Administration, Fort 104°15′19′′W) should have been Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR 11.69. Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– included in the Class E description. The 222–5593. final description of the Class E airspace § 71.1 [Amended] in this rule has been revised to reflect 2. The incorporation by reference in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: this change. The FAA has determined 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation History that this is an editorial change and will Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace not increase the scope of this rule. Designations and Reporting Points, On November 22, 1995, a proposal to Except for the non-substantive change dated August 17, 1995, and effective amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation just discussed, the rule is adopted as September 16, 1995, is amended as Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise proposed. follows: the Class E airspace at Hobbs, NM, was The coordinates for this airspace published in the Federal Register (60 Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas docket are based on North American FR 57842). A GPS SIAP to RWY 30 extending upward from 700 feet or more developed for Lea County Airport, Datum 83. Class E airspace designations above the surface of the earth. for airspace areas extending upward Hobbs, NM, requires the revision of the * * * * * from 700 feet or more AGL are Class E airspace at this airport. The published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA ASW NM E5 Carlsbad, NM [Revised] proposal was to revise the controlled Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, Carlsbad, Cavern City Air Terminal, NM airspace extending upward from 700 and effective September 16, 1995, which (Lat. 32°20′15′′ N., long. 104°15′48′′ W.) feet AGL to contain IFR operations in is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR Cavern City Air Terminal Localizer, NM controlled airspace during portions of 71.1. The Class E airspace designation (Lat. 32°20′22′′ N., long. 104°15′19′′ W.) the terminal operation and while listed in this document will be That airspace extending upward from 700 transitioning between the enroute and published subsequently in the Order. feet above the surface within a 7.4-mile terminal environments. radius of Cavern City Air Terminal and Interested parties were invited to The Rule within 1.4 miles each side of the Cavern City participate in this rulemaking Air Terminal Localizer southwest course This amendment to part 71 of the proceeding by submitting written extending from the 7.4-mile radius to 9.4 comments on the proposal to the FAA. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR miles southwest of the airport and within 1.8 part 71) revises the Class E airspace miles each side of the 044° bearing from the No comments to the proposal were located at Carlsbad, NM, to provide airport from the 7.4-mile radius to 8.7 miles received. However, the proposal was controlled airspace extending upward northeast of the airport. published with an incorrect coordinate from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing * * * * * for the location of the Lea County Airport. The correct coordinates for the the GSP SIAP to RWY 21 at Cavern City Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. ° ′ ′′ Air Terminal. Albert L. Viselli, airport should have been (Lat. 32 41 15 N, long, 103°13′01′′ W). The description The FAA has determined that this Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region. of the Class E airspace in this rule has regulation only involves an established been revised to reflect this change. The [FR Doc. 96–13935 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] body of technical regulations that need FAA has determined that this is an frequent and routine amendments to BILLING CODE 4910±13±M editorial change and will not increase keep them operationally current. It, the scope of this rule. Except for non- therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant 14 CFR Part 71 substantive, editorial changes, the rule regulatory action’’ under Executive is adopted as proposed. Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±28] The coordinates for this airspace rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies docket are based on North American and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February Revision of Class E Airspace; Hobbs, Datum 83. Class E airspace designations 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant NM for airspace areas extending upward preparation of a regulatory evaluation as AGENCY: Federal Aviation from 700 feet or more AGL are the anticipated impact is so minimal. published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Since this is a routine matter that will Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, only affect air traffic procedures and air and effective September 16, 1995, which navigation, it is certified that this rule SUMMARY: This action revises the Class is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR will not have a significant economic E airspace extending upward from 700 71.1. The Class E airspace designation impact on a substantial number of small feet above ground level (AGL) at Hobbs, listed in this document will be entities under the criteria of the NM. The development of a Global published subsequently in the Order. Regulatory Flexibility Act. Positioning System (GPS) standard The Rule List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 instrument approach procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 30 at Lea County This amendment to part 71 of the Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Airport has made this action necessary. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Navigation (air). This action is intended to provide part 71) amends the Class E airspace Adoption of the Amendment adequate Class E airspace to contain located at Lea County Airport, Hobbs, instrument flight rule (IFR) operations NM, to provide controlled airspace In consideration of the foregoing, the for aircraft executing the GPS SIAP to extending upward from 700 feet AGL for Federal Aviation Administration RWY 30 at Lea County Airport, Hobbs, aircraft executing the GPS SIAP to RWY amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: NM. 30. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28043

The FAA has determined that this radius to 10.6 miles southwest of the airport, Interested parties were invited to regulation only involves an established and within 1.5 miles each side of the 222° participate in this rulemaking body of technical regulations that need radial of the Hobbs VORTAC extending from proceeding by submitting written the 6.7-mile radius to 10.6 miles southwest frequent and routine amendments to of the airport, and 1.8-miles each side of the comments on the proposal to the FAA. keep them operationally current. It, 125° bearing from the airport extending from No comments to the proposal were therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant the 6.7-mile radius 9.1 miles southeast of the received. The rule is adopted as regulatory action’’ under Executive airport. proposed. Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant * * * * * The coordinates for this airspace rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. docket are based on North American and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February Albert L. Viselli, Datum 83. Class E airspace designations 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, for airspace areas extending upward preparation of a regulatory evaluation as Southwest Region. from 700 feet or more AGL are the anticipated impact is so minimal. [FR Doc. 96–13934 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Since this is a routine matter that will BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Order 7400.9c dated August 17, 1995, only affect air traffic procedures and air and effective September 16, 1995, which navigation, it is certified that this rule is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR will not have a significant economic 14 CFR Part 71 71.1. The Class E airspace designation impact on a substantial number of small [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±27] listed in this document will be entities under the criteria of the published subsequently in the Order. Regulatory Flexibility Act. Revision of Class E Airspace; Deming, The Rule List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 NM Airspace, Incorporation by reference, AGENCY: Federal Aviation This amendment to part 71 of the Navigation (air). Administration (FAA), DOT. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) amends the Class E airspace ACTION: Final rule. Adoption of the Amendment located at Deming Municipal Airport, In consideration of the foregoing, the SUMMARY: This action revises the Class Deming, NM, to provide controlled Federal Aviation Administration E airspace extending upward from 700 airspace extending upward from 700 amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: feet above ground level (AGL) at feet AGL for aircraft executing the GPS Deming, NM. The development of a SIAP to RWY 04. PART 71Ð[AMENDED] Global Positioning System (GPS) The FAA has determined that this 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR standard instrument approach regulation only involves an established part 71 continues to read as follows: procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 04 body of technical regulations that need at Deming Municipal Airport has made Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; frequent and routine amendments to E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 this action necessary. This action is keep them operationally current. It, Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR intended to provide adequate Class E therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant 11.69. airspace to contain instrument flight regulatory action’’ under Executive rule (IFR) operations for airspace Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant § 71.1 [Amended] executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 04 at rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 2. The incorporation by reference in Deming Municipal Airport, Deming, and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation NM. 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, preparation of a regulatory evaluation as Designations and Reporting Points, 1996. the anticipated impact is so minimal. dated August 17, 1995, and effective FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Since this is a routine matter that will September 16, 1995, is amended as Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air only affect air traffic procedures and air follows: Traffic Division, Southwest Region, navigation, it is certified that this rule Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas Federal Aviation Administration, Fort will not have a significant economic extending upward from 700 feet or more Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– impact on a substantial number of small above the surface of the earth. 222–5593. entities under the criteria of the * * * * * Regulatory Flexibility Act. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ASW NM E5 Hobbs, NM [Revised] History List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Hobbs, Lea County Airport, NM Airspace, Incorporation by reference, ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ On November 22, 1995, a proposal to (Lat. 32 41 15 N., long. 103 13 01 W.) amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Navigation (air). Hobbs VORTAC (Lat. 32°38′18′′ N., long. 103°16′10′′ W.) Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise Adoption of the Amendment Lea County ILS Localizer the Class E airspace at Deming, NM, was (Lat. 32°41′39′′ N., long. 103°12′27′′ W.) published in the Federal Register (60 In consideration of the foregoing, the That airspace extending upward from 700 FR 57843). A GPS SIAP to RWY 04 Federal Aviation Administration feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile developed for Deming Municipal amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: radius of Lea County Airport, and within 1.5 Airport, Deming, NM, requires the miles each side of the 043° radial of the revision of the Class E airspace at this PART 71Ð[AMENDED] Hobbs VORTAC extending from the 6.7-mile airport. The proposal was to revise the radius to 9.7 miles northeast of the airport, controlled airspace extending upward 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR and within 1.6 miles each side of the Lea from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR part 71 continues to read as follows: County ILS Localizer northeast course extending from the 6.7-mile radius to 9.7 operations in controlled airspace during Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; miles northeast of the airport, and within 1.6 portions of the terminal operation and E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 miles each side of the ILS Localizer while transitioning between the enroute Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR southwest course extending from the 6.7-mile and terminal environments. 11.69. 28044 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

§ 71.1 [Amended] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 2. The incorporation by reference in History 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace On January 24, 1996, a proposal to Navigation (air). Designations and Reporting Points, amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Adoption of the Amendment dated August 17, 1995, and effective Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to establish September 16, 1995, is amended as the Class E airspace at Tallulah, LA, was In consideration of the foregoing, the follows: published in the Federal Register (61 Federal Aviation Administration FR 1863). A GPS SIAP to RWY 18 amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas developed for Vicksburg/Tallulah extending upward from 700 feet or more PART 71Ð[AMENDED] above the surface of the earth. Regional Airport, Tallulah, LA, requires * * * * * the establishment of Class E airspace at 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR this airport. The proposal was to part 71 continues to read as follows: ASW NM E5 Deming, NM [Revised] establish controlled airspace extending Deming Municipal Airport, NM upward from 700 feet AGL to contain Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; (Lat. 32°15′44′′ N., long. 107°43′14′′ W.) IFR operations in controlled airspace E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Deming VORTAC Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ during portions of the terminal 11.69. (Lat. 32 16 33 N., long. 107 36 20 W.) operation and while transitioning That airspace extending upward from 700 between the enroute and terminal § 71.1 [Amended] feet above the surface within a 6.8-mile environments. radius of Deming Municipal Airport, and 2. The incorporation by reference in within 1.6 miles each side of the 081° radial Interested parties were invited to 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation of the Deming VORTAC extending from the participate in this rulemaking Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace 6.8-mile radius to 12.3 miles east of the proceeding by submitting written Designations and Reporting Points, airport, and within 1.8 miles each side of the comments on the proposal to the FAA. dated August 17, 1995, and effective 232° bearing from the airport extending from No comments to the proposal were September 16, 1995, is amended as the 6.8-mile radius to 8.2 miles southwest of received. The rule is adopted as the airport. follows: proposed. * * * * * The coordinates for this airspace Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. extending upward from 700 feet or more docket are based on North American above the surface of the earth. Albert L. Viselli, Datum 83. Class E airspace designations Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, for airspace areas extending upward * * * * * Southwest Region. from 700 feet or more AGL are ASW LA E5 Tallulah, LA [New] [FR Doc. 96–13933 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 a.m.] published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Vicksburg/Tallulah Regional Airport, LA BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, (Lat. 32°21′06′′ N., long. 091°01′39′′ W.) and effective September 16, 1995, which That airspace extending upward from 700 is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 14 CFR Part 71 feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 71.1. The Class E airspace designation radius of Vicksburg/Tallulah Regional [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±12] listed in this document will be Airport excluding that airspace which published subsequently in the Order. overlies the Vicksburg, MS, Class E area. Establishment of Class E Airspace; * * * * * Tallulah, LA The Rule Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. AGENCY: Federal Aviation This amendment to part 71 of the Albert L. Viselli, Administration (FAA), DOT. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, ACTION: Final rule. Part 71) amends the Class E airspace Southwest Region. located at Tallulah, LA, to provide [FR Doc. 96–13932 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: This action establishes Class controlled airspace extending upward BILLING CODE 4910±13±M E airspace extending upward from 700 from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing feet above ground level (AGL) at the GPS SIAP to RWY 18. Tallulah, LA. The development of a The FAA has determined that this 14 CFR Part 71 Global Positioning System (GPS) regulation only involves an established standard instrument approach body of technical regulations that need [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±13] procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 18 frequent and routine amendments to at Vicksburg/Tallulah Regional Airport keep them operationally current. It, Revision of Class E Airspace; Santa has made this action necessary. This therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant Fe, NM action is intended to provide adequate regulatory action’’ under Executive Class E airspace to contain instrument Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant AGENCY: Federal Aviation flight rule (IFR) operations for aircraft rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies Administration (FAA), DOT. executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 18 at and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February ACTION: Final rule. Vicksburg/Tallulah Regional Airport, 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Tallulah, LA. preparation of a regulatory evaluation as SUMMARY: This action revises the Class EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, the anticipated impact is so minimal. E airspace extending upward from 700 1996. Since this is a routine matter that will feet above ground level (AGL) at Santa FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: only affect air traffic procedures and air Fe, NM. The development of a Global Donald J. Day, Operations Branch, Air navigation, it is certified that this rule Positioning System (GPS) Standard Traffic Division, Southwest Region, will not have a significant economic Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) Federal Aviation Administration, Fort impact on a substantial number of small to Runway (RWY) 28 at Santa Fe Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– entities under the criteria of the Municipal Airport has made this action 222–5593. Regulatory Flexibility Act. necessary. This action is intended to Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28045 provide adequate Class E airspace to Santa Fee, NM, to provide controlling extending from the 9.7-mile radius to 10.4 contain instrument flight rule (IFR) airspace extending upward from 700 miles east of the airport. operations for aircraft executing the GPS feet AGL for aircraft executing the GPS * * * * * SIAP to RWY 28 at Santa Fe Municipal SIAP to RWY 28. Issued in Fort Worth, TX on May 15, 1996. Airport, Santa Fe, NM. The FAA has determined that this Albert L. Viselli, EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, regulation only involves an established Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, 1996. body of technical regulations that need Southwest Region. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: frequent and routine amendments to [FR Doc. 96–13931 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Chuck Frankenfield, Operation Branch, keep them operationally current. It, BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant Federal Aviation Administration, Fort regulatory action’’ under Executive Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 14 CFR Part 71 222–5591. rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies [Airspace Docket No. 95±ASW±16] and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Establishment of Class E Airspace; History preparation of a regulatory evaluation as Reserve, LA On January 24, 1996, a proposal to the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will AGENCY: Federal Aviation amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to revise only affect air traffic procedures and air ACTION: the Class E airspace at Santa Fe, NM, navigation, it is certified that this rule Final rule. was published in the Federal Register will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small SUMMARY: This action establishes Class (61 FR 1862). A GPS SIAP to RWY 28 E airspace extending upward from 700 developed for Santa Fe Municipal entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. feet above ground level (AGL) at Airport, Santa Fe, NM, requires the Reserve, LA. The development of a revision of the Class E airspace at this List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Global Positioning System (GPS) airport. The proposal was to revise the Standard Instrument Approach controlled airspace extending upward Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 17 from 700 feet AGL to contain IFR at Saint John The Baptist Parish Airport operations in controlled airspace during Adoption of the Amendment has made this action necessary. This portions of the terminal operation and In consideration of the foregoing, the action is intended to provide adequate while transitioning between the enroute Federal Aviation Administration Class E airspace to contain instrument and terminal environments. amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: flight rule (IFR) operations for aircraft Interested parties were invited to executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 17 at participate in this rulemaking PART 71Ð[AMENDED] Saint John The Baptist Parish Airport, proceeding by submitting written Reserve, LA. comments on the proposal to the FAA. 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 U.T.C., August 15, No comments to the proposal were part 71 continues to read as follows: 1996. received. However, the proposal was Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; published with incorrect coordinates for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Chuck Frankenfield, Operations Branch, the location of the Santa Fe Municipal Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR Airport. The correct coordinates for the 11.69. Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, airport should have been (Lat. 35°37′00′′ Federal Aviation Administration, Fort N, long. 106°05′17′′ W). The description § 71.1 [Amended] Worth, TX 76193–0530, telephone 817– of the Class E airspace in this rule has 2. The incorporation by reference in 222–5591. been revised to reflect this change. The 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FAA has determined that this is an Administration Order 7400.9C Airspace History editorial change and will not increase Designations and Reporting Points, the scope of this rule. Except for the dated August 17, 1995, and effective On January 24, 1996, a proposal to non-substantive change just discussed, September 16, 1995, is amended as amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation the rule is adopted as proposed. The follows: Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to establish coordinates for this airspace docket are Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas Class E airspace at Reserve, LA, was based on North American Datum 83. extending upward from 700 feet or more published in the Federal Register (61 Class E airspace designations for above the surface of the earth. FR 1861). A GPS SIAP to RWY 17 airspace areas extending upward from * * * * * developed for Saint John The Baptist 700 feet or more AGL are published in Parish Airport, Reserve, LA, requires the Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9C ASW NM E5 Santa Fe, NM [Revised] establishment of the Class E airspace at dated August 17, 1995, and effective Santa Fe County Municipal Airport, NM this airport. The proposal was to September 16, 1995, which is (Lat. 35°37′00′′ N, long. 106°05′17′′ W) establish controlled airspace extending Santa Fe VORTAC upward from 700 feet AGL to contain incorporated by reference in 14 CFR ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ 71.1. The Class E airspace designation (Lat. 35 32 26 N, long. 106 03 54 W) IFR operations in controlled airspace listed in this document will be That airspace extending upward from 700 during portions of the terminal published subsequently in the Order. feet above the surface within a 9.7-mile operation and while transitioning radius of Santa Fe County Municipal Airport, between the enroute and terminal The Rule and within 8 miles east and 4 miles west of the 165° radial of the Santa Fe VORTAC environments. This amendment to part 71 of the extending from the 9.7-mile radius to 20.8 Interested parties were invited to Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR miles southeast of the airport and within 2 participate in this rulemaking part 71) amends the Class E airspace miles each side of the 112° radial from the proceeding by submitting written located at Santa Fe Municipal Airport, Santa Fe County Municipal Airport comments on the proposal to the FAA. 28046 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

No comments to the proposal were PART 71Ð[AMENDED] step three of our sequential evaluation received. Except for the non-substantive process. 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR change just discussed and editorial EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is part 71 continues to read as follows: changes, the rule is adopted as effective June 4, 1996. proposed. However, the proposal was Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: published with an incorrect coordinates E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Regarding this Federal Register for the location of the Saint John The Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR 11.69. document—Richard M. Bresnick, Legal Baptist Parish Airport. The correct Assistant, Division of Regulations and coordinates for the airport should have § 71.1 [Amended] Rulings, Social Security Administration, ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ been (Lat. 30 05 21 N, long. 90 34 54 2. The incorporation by reference in 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD W). The description of the Class E 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 21235, (410) 965–1758; regarding airspace in this rule has been revised to Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace eligibility or filing for benefits—our reflect this change. The FAA has Designations and Reporting Points, national toll-free number, 1–800–772– determined that this is an editorial dated August 17, 1995, and effective 1213. change and will not increase the scope September 16, 1995, is amended as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On of this rule. follows: December 6, 1985, we published revised The coordinates for this airspace Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas listings, including the musculoskeletal docket are based on North American extending upward from 700 feet or more system listings (50 FR 50068), in parts Datum 83. Class E airspace designations above the surface of the earth. A and B of appendix 1 (Listing of for airspace areas extending upward * * * * * Impairments) to subpart P of part 404. from 700 feet or more AGL are We use the listings at the third step of published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA ASW LA E5 Reserve, LA [New] the sequential evaluation process to Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, Saint John The Baptist Parish Airport, LA evaluate claims filed by adults and and effective September 16, 1995, which (Lat. 30°05′21′′ N. long. 090°34′54′′ W.) children for benefits based on disability is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR That airspace extending upward from 700 and blindness under the Social Security 71.1. The Class E airspace designation feet above the surface within a 6.1-mile and SSI programs. The listings describe listed in this document will be radius of Saint John The Baptist Parish impairments considered severe enough published subsequently in the Order. Airport. to prevent a person from doing any * * * * * The Rule gainful activity, or, for an individual Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996. under age 18 applying for SSI benefits This amendment to part 71 of the Albert L. Viselli, based on disability, from functioning Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, independently, appropriately, and part 71) establishes Class E airspace Southwest Region. effectively in an age-appropriate located at Saint John The Baptist Parish [FR Doc. 96–13924 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] manner. We use the criteria in part A Airport, Reserve, LA, to provide BILLING CODE 4910±13±M mainly to evaluate impairments of controlled airspace extending upward adults. We use the criteria in part B first from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing to evaluate impairments of individuals the GPS SIAP to RWY 17. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION under age 18. If those criteria do not The FAA has determined that this apply, we may use the criteria in part A. 20 CFR Part 404 When we published the revised regulation only involves an established listings in 1985, we indicated that body of technical regulations that need [Regulations No. 4] medical advances in disability frequent and routine amendments to RIN 0960±AE43 evaluation and treatment and program keep them operationally current. It, experience would require that the therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant Federal Old-Age, Survivors and listings be periodically reviewed and regulatory action’’ under Executive Disability Insurance; Determining updated. Accordingly, we established a Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant Disability and Blindness; Extension of date of December 6, 1990, for the rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies Expiration Date for Musculoskeletal musculoskeletal system listings in part and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February System Listings A, and December 6, 1993, for the 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant musculoskeletal system listings in part preparation of a regulatory evaluation as AGENCY: Social Security Administration. B, on which the listings would no the anticipated impact is so minimal. ACTION: Final rule. longer be effective unless extended by Since this is a routine matter that will SUMMARY: The Social Security the Secretary of Health and Human only affect air traffic procedures and air Administration (SSA) issues listings of Services (the Secretary) or revised and navigation, it is certified that this rule impairments to evaluate disability and promulgated again. Under section 102 of will not have a significant economic blindness under the Social Security and the Social Security Independence and impact on a substantial number of small supplemental security income (SSI) Program Improvements Act of 1994, entities under the criteria of the programs. This rule extends the Public Law 103–296, this rulemaking Regulatory Flexibility Act. expiration date for the musculoskeletal authority was transferred from the List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 system listings. We have made no Secretary to the Commissioner of Social revisions to the medical criteria in the Security (the Commissioner). Airspace, Incorporation by reference, listings; they remain the same as they Subsequently, we issued a final rule Navigation (air). now appear in the Code of Federal on December 12, 1990 (55 FR 51100), Adoption of the Amendment Regulations. This extension will ensure extending the expiration date of the that we continue to have medical musculoskeletal system listings in part In consideration of the foregoing, the evaluation criteria in the listings to A to June 6, 1992, and again on June 5, Federal Aviation Administration adjudicate claims for disability based on 1992 (57 FR 23946), extending that amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: musculoskeletal system impairments at expiration date to December 6, 1993. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28047

Thereafter, on December 6, 1993 (58 FR comment is unnecessary, and we are PART 404ÐFEDERAL OLD-AGE, 64121), the expiration date of the issuing this regulation as a final rule. SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY musculoskeletal system listings in both In addition, we find good cause for INSURANCE (1950± ) parts A and B was extended, as were the dispensing with the 30-day delay in the expiration dates for several other body effective date of a substantive rule, Subpart PÐ[Amended] system listings. That rule provided that provided for by 5 U.S.C. 553(d). As the musculoskeletal system listings 1. The authority citation for subpart P explained above, we are not making any would no longer be effective on June 6, of part 404 continues to read as follows: substantive changes in the listings. 1996. Authority: Secs. 202, 205(a), (b), and (d)– However, without an extension of the Also, we published a notice of (h), 216(i), 221(a) and (i), 222(c), 223, 225, expiration date for the musculoskeletal proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 system listings, we will lack regulatory December 21, 1993 (58 FR 67574) that U.S.C. 402, 405(a), (b), and (d)–(h), 416(i), guidelines for assessing musculoskeletal 421(a) and (i), 422(c), 423, 425, and included proposed revisions to these system impairments at the third step of 902(a)(5)). listings. We will publish any changes to the listings based on that NPRM in a the sequential evaluation processes after 2. Appendix 1 to subpart P of part 404 subsequent final rule. the current expiration date of the is amended by revising item 2 of the listings. In order to ensure that we In this final regulation, we are introductory text before part A to read extending for one year, to June 6, 1997, continue to have regulatory criteria for as follows: the date on which the musculoskeletal assessing these impairments under the Appendix 1 to Subpart PÐListing of system listings will no longer be listings, we find that it is in the public Impairments effective. We believe that the interest to make this rule effective upon requirements in these listings are still publication. * * * * * valid for our program purposes. Executive Order 12866 2. Musculoskeletal System (1.00 and Specifically, if we find that an 101.00): June 6, 1997. individual has an impairment that We have consulted with the Office of * * * * * meets the statutory duration Management and Budget (OMB) and [FR Doc. 96–13882 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] requirement and also meets or is determined that this rule does not meet BILLING CODE 4190±29±P equivalent in severity to an impairment the criteria for a significant regulatory in the listings, we will find that the action under Executive Order 12866. individual is disabled without Thus, it was not subject to OMB review. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND completing the remaining steps of the HUMAN SERVICES sequential evaluation process. We do Regulatory Flexibility Act not use the listings to find that an We certify that this regulation will not Food and Drug Administration individual is not disabled. Individuals have a significant economic impact on whose impairments do not meet or a substantial number of small entities. 21 CFR Part 14 equal the criteria of the listings receive Therefore, a regulatory flexibility individualized assessments at the Advisory Committee; Change of Name analysis as provided in Public Law 96– subsequent steps of the sequential and Function 354, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, is evaluation process. not required. AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Regulatory Procedures HHS. Paperwork Reduction Act Pursuant to section 702(a)(5) of the ACTION: Final rule. This regulation imposes no reporting/ Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5), SUMMARY: The Food and Drug recordkeeping requirements as amended by section 102 of Public Administration (FDA) is amending the necessitating clearance by OMB. Law 103–296, SSA follows the standing advisory committees’ Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance regulations to change the name and the rulemaking procedures specified in 5 Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security- function of the Fertility and Maternal U.S.C. 553 in the development of its Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security- Health Drugs Advisory Committee. This regulations. The APA provides Retirement Insurance; 96.004, Social action is being taken to more accurately exceptions to its notice and public Security-Survivors Insurance; 96.006, describe this committee. comment procedures when an agency Supplemental Security Income) finds there is good cause for dispensing EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. with such procedures on the basis that List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 404 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: they are impracticable, unnecessary, or Donna M. Combs, Committee Administrative practice and contrary to the public interest. We have Management Office (HFA–306), Food procedure, Blind, Disability benefits, determined that, under 5 U.S.C. and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Old-Age, Survivors and Disability 553(b)(B), good cause exists for Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–443– Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping dispensing with the notice and public 2765. requirements, Social Security. comment procedures in this case. Good SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is cause exists because this regulation only Dated: May 20, 1996. announcing that the name of the extends the date on which the Shirley S. Chater, Fertility and Maternal Health Drugs musculoskeletal system listings will no Commissioner of Social Security. Advisory Committee has been changed. longer be effective. It makes no After reestablishment of this committee, substantive changes to the listings. The For the reasons set forth in the on March 23, 1978, the agency decided current regulations expressly provide preamble, part 404, subpart P, chapter that the name ‘‘Advisory Committee for that the listings may be extended, as III of title 20 of the Code of Federal Reproductive Health Drugs’’ would well as revised and promulgated again. Regulations is amended as set forth more accurately describe the subject Therefore, opportunity for prior below. areas for which the committee is 28048 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations responsible. The mandate of the (c) * * * the Generic Drugs Advisory Committee committee has expanded significantly in (9) Advisory Committee for had been changed in the charter renewal recent years to include drugs for Reproductive Health Drugs. dated January 22, 1996. In this menopausal women and drugs used in * * * * * document, FDA is hereby formally the practice of andrology. The change is (ii) Function: Reviews and evaluates changing the name and function of the consistent with the growing use of this data on the safety and effectiveness of committee by revising 21 CFR term by specialists in the field of marketed and investigational human 14.100(c)(16). reproductive health, which includes drugs for use in the practice of Publication of this final rule obstetrics, gynecology, endocrinology, obstetrics, gynecology, and related constitutes a final action on this change andrology, epidemiology, and related specialties. under the Administrative Procedure specialties. The committee reviews and * * * * * Act. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d) evaluates data on the safety and Dated: May 28, 1996. and under 21 CFR 10.40(d) and (e), the effectiveness of marketed and agency finds good cause to dispense investigational human drugs for use in Michael A. Friedman, Deputy Commissioner for Operations. with notice and public procedure, and the practice of obstetrics, gynecology, to proceed to an immediately effective [FR Doc. 96–13978 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] and related specialties. regulation. Such notice and procedures The Fertility and Maternal Health BILLING CODE 4160±01±F are unnecessary and are not in the Drugs Advisory Committee’s name was public interest, because the final rule is changed in the charter renewal dated 21 CFR Part 14 merely a clarifying amendment to March 23, 1996. In this document, FDA existing regulations and when effective is hereby formally changing the name Standing Advisory Committees; will reflect the current committee and the function of the committee by Change of Name and Function charter. revising 21 CFR 14.100(c)(9). Publication of this final rule AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 14 constitutes a final action on this change HHS. Administrative practice and under the Administrative Procedure ACTION: Final rule. Act. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d) procedure, Advisory committees, Color and 21 CFR 10.40(d) and (e), the agency SUMMARY: The Food and Drug additives, Drugs, Radiation protection. finds good cause to dispense with notice Administration (FDA) is amending the Therefore, under the Federal Food, and public procedure and to proceed to standing advisory committees’ Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under an immediately effective regulation. regulations to change the name and the authority delegated to the Commissioner Such notice and procedures are function of the Generic Drugs Advisory of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 14 is unnecessary and are not in the public Committee to the Advisory Committee amended as follows: interest, because the final rule is merely for Pharmaceutical Science. This action a clarifying amendment to existing is being taken to more accurately PART 14ÐPUBLIC HEARING BEFORE regulations and when effective will describe this committee. A PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE reflect the current committee charter. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 14 Donna M. Combs, Committee part 14 continues to read as follows: Administrative practice and Management Office (HFA–306), Food Authority: Secs. 201–903 of the Federal procedure, Advisory committees, Color and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. additives, Drugs, Radiation protection. Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–443– 321–394; 21 U.S.C. 41–50, 141–149, 467f, Therefore, under the Federal Food, 2765. 679, 821, 1034; secs. 2, 351, 354, 361 of the Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201, authority delegated to the Commissioner announcing that the name of the 262, 263b, 264); secs. 2–12 of the Fair of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 14 is Generic Drugs Advisory Committee has Packaging and Labeling Act (15 U.S.C. 1451– amended as follows: been changed. After establishment of 1461); 5 U.S.C. App. 2; 28 U.S.C. 2112. this committee, on January 22, 1990, the 2. Section 14.100 is amended by PART 14ÐPUBLIC HEARING BEFORE agency decided that the name A PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE revising the heading for paragraph ‘‘Advisory Committee for (c)(16) and paragraph (c)(16)(ii) to read 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR Pharmaceutical Science’’ would more as follows: part 14 continues to read as follows: accurately describe the committee. The Committee reviews primary scientific § 14.100 List of standing advisory Authority: Secs. 201–903 of the Federal issues dealing with pharmaceutical Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. committees. science including testing, research, 321–394; 21 U.S.C. 41–50, 141–149, 467f, * * * * * 679, 821, 1034; secs. 2, 351, 354, 361 of the biopharmaceutics, pharmacology, and Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201, new chemistry. The Committee also (c) * * * 262, 263b, 264); secs. 2–12 of the Fair gives advice on scientific and technical (16) Advisory Committee for Packaging and Labeling Act (15 U.S.C. 1451– issues concerning the safety and Pharmaceutical Science. 1461); 5 U.S.C. App. 2; 28 U.S.C. 2112. effectiveness of human generic drug * * * * * 2. Section 14.100 is amended by products for use in the treatment of a (ii) Function: Gives advice on revising the heading of paragraph (c)(9) broad spectrum of human diseases. scientific and technical issues and paragraph (c)(9)(ii) to read as Therefore, the agency feels the name concerning the safety and effectiveness follows: change will more accurately describe this Committee to the public. In the of human generic drug products for use § 14.100 List of standing advisory Federal Register of February 21, 1996 in the treatment of a broad spectrum of committees. (61 FR 6644 at 6645), FDA published a human diseases. * * * * * notice that indicated that the name of * * * * * Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28049

Dated: May 28, 1996. type), hydrogenated, and is approved for additive whose use will result in such Michael A. Friedman, other food additive uses under this low exposure levels (Ref. 2), and the Deputy Commissioner for Operations. name in § 177.1520. Therefore, the agency has not required such testing [FR Doc. 96–13979 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] additive will be identified with this here. However, the agency has reviewed BILLING CODE 4160±01±F name in the remainder of this the available toxicological data from document. The agency has also acute toxicity and subchronic studies on reviewed the safety of the additive and the additive. No adverse effects were 21 CFR Part 177 the chemical impurities that may be reported in these studies. present in the additive resulting from its FDA has evaluated the safety of this [Docket No. 94F±0022] manufacturing process. Although the additive under the general safety clause, considering all available data and using Indirect Food Additives: Polymers additive itself has not been shown to cause cancer, it may contain minute risk assessment procedures to estimate AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, amounts of polynuclear aromatic the upper-bound limit of lifetime HHS hydrocarbons (PAH’s), carcinogenic human risk presented by polynuclear ACTION: Final rule. impurities resulting from the aromatic hydrocarbons that may be manufacture of the additive. Residual present as impurities in the additive. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug amounts of reactants, manufacturing This risk evaluation of polynuclear Administration (FDA) is amending the aids, and their constituent impurities, aromatic hydrocarbons has two aspects: food additive regulations to provide for such as polynuclear aromatic (1) Assessment of the worse-case the safe use of petroleum hydrocarbon hydrocarbons in this instance, are exposure to the impurity from the resins (cyclopentadiene-type), commonly found as contaminants in proposed use of the additive; and (2) hydrogenated, as an adjuvant in the chemical products, including food extrapolation of the risk observed in the manufacture of polypropylene additives. animal bioassays to the conditions of homopolymer films and copolymer probable exposure to humans. films of propylene and ethylene I. Determination of Safety containing not less than 94 weight Under the so-called ‘‘general safety A. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons percent propylene for use in contact clause’’ of the Federal Food, Drug, and FDA has estimated the hypothetical with fatty and alcoholic foods. This Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. worst-case exposure to polynuclear action responds to a petition filed by 348(c)(3)(A), a food additive cannot be aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH’s) from the Exxon Chemical Co. The agency is also approved for a particular use unless a petitioned uses of the additive to be 0.3 correcting a technical error in the fair evaluation of the evidence nanograms per person per day (ng/ current listing for petroleum establishes that the additive is safe for person/day), based on a PAH dietary hydrocarbon resins. that use. FDA’s food additive concentration of 4.9 parts per trillion DATES: Effective June 4, 1996; written regulations (21 CFR 170.3(i)) define safe and a daily diet of 3 kilograms of food objections and requests for a hearing by as ‘‘a reasonable certainty in the minds per person per day (Ref. 1). July 5, 1996. of competent scientists that the PAH’s occur as a mixture of substance is not harmful under the compounds; the toxicity of these ADDRESSES: Submit written objections to intended conditions of use.’’ compounds varies, and some members the Dockets Management Branch (HFA– The anticancer or Delaney clause of of the family have been shown to be 305), Food and Drug Administration, the act provides that no food additive carcinogenic in animal studies. For this 12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1–23, shall be deemed safe if it is found to risk estimate, FDA has made the ‘‘worst- Rockville, MD 20857. induce cancer when ingested by man or case’’ assumption that the PAH’s in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: animal. Importantly, however, the additive consist entirely of Julius Smith, Center for Food Safety and Delaney clause applies to the additive benzo[a]pyrene, the member of the PAH Applied Nutrition (HFS–216), Food and itself and not to impurities in the family which current data indicate to be Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW., additive. That is, where an additive one of the more potent carcinogens. Washington, DC 20204, 202–418–3091. itself has not been shown to cause Therefore, the agency used data from SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice cancer, but contains a carcinogenic a carcinogenesis bioassay on published in the Federal Register of impurity, the additive is properly benzo[a]pyrene, conducted by H. Brune March 10, 1994 (59 FR 11278), FDA evaluated under the general safety et al., to estimate the upper-bound limit announced that a petition (FAP 4B4411) clause using risk assessment procedures of lifetime human risk from exposure to had been filed by Exxon Chemical Co., to determine whether there is a this chemical resulting from the P.O. Box 241, Baton Rouge, LA 70821. reasonable certainty that no harm will proposed use of petroleum hydrocarbon (The address of the petitioner has been result from the proposed use of the resins (cyclopentadiene-type), changed to P.O. Box 5200, Baytown, TX additive. (Scott v. FDA, 728 F.2d 322 hydrogenated (Ref. 3). The results of the 77522–5200.) The petition proposed to (6th Cir. 1984).) bioassay on benzo[a]pyrene amend the food additive regulations in demonstrated that the material was § 177.1520 Olefin polymers (21 CFR II. Safety of Petitioned Use of the carcinogenic for Sprague-Dawley rats 177.1520) to provide for the safe use of Additive under the conditions of the study. The hydrogenated cyclodiene resins as a FDA estimates that the petitioned use test material induced treatment-related component of polypropylene of the additive, petroleum hydrocarbon benign forestomach tumors or homopolymer or a copolymer of resins (cyclopentadiene-type), esophageal tumors in male rats. propylene and ethylene containing not hydrogenated, will result in levels of Based on a potential exposure of 0.3 less than 94 weight percent propylene exposure to the additive no greater than ng/person/day, FDA estimates that the for use in contact with food. 0.77 parts per million (ppm) in the daily upper-bound limit of lifetime human In its evaluation of this additive, FDA diet (Ref. 1). risk from the potential exposure to has determined that the additive is more FDA does not ordinarily consider PAH’s from the use of the subject accurately described as petroleum chronic toxicological studies to be additive is 8.8 x 10±9, or less than 1 in hydrocarbon resins (cyclopentadiene- necessary to determine the safety of an 100 million (Ref. 4). Because of 28050 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations numerous conservative assumptions IV. Environmental Impact the Dockets Management Branch used in calculating the exposure In the notice of filing for this petition (address above) written objections estimate and the carcinogenic potency that published in the Federal Register of thereto. Each objection shall be of PAH’s in the additive, the actual March 10, 1994 (59 FR 11278), FDA separately numbered, and each lifetime averaged individual exposure to gave interested parties an opportunity to numbered objection shall specify with PAH’s is expected to be substantially submit comments on the petitioner’s particularity the provisions of the less than the potential exposure, and environmental assessment by April 11, regulation to which objection is made therefore, the upper-bound limit of 1994, to the Dockets Management and the grounds for the objection. Each human risk would be less. Thus, the Branch (address above). FDA received numbered objection on which a hearing agency concludes that there is a no comments in response to that notice. is requested shall specifically so state. reasonable certainty of no harm from the The agency has carefully considered Failure to request a hearing for any exposure to PAH’s that might result the potential environmental effects of particular objection shall constitute a from the proposed use of the additive. this action. FDA has concluded that the waiver of the right to a hearing on that objection. Each numbered objection for B. Need for Specifications action will not have a significant impact on the human environment, and that an which a hearing is requested shall The agency has also considered environmental impact statement is not include a detailed description and whether a specification is necessary to required. The agency’s finding of no analysis of the specific factual control the amount of PAH’s present as significant impact and the evidence information intended to be presented in impurities in the additive. The agency supporting that finding, contained in an support of the objection in the event finds that a specification is not environmental assessment, may be seen that a hearing is held. Failure to include necessary for the following reasons: (1) in the Dockets Management Branch such a description and analysis for any Because of the low level at which PAH’s (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 particular objection shall constitute a may be expected to remain as impurities p.m., Monday through Friday. waiver of the right to a hearing on the following production of the additive, objection. Three copies of all documents the agency would not expect these V. References shall be submitted and shall be impurities to become components of The following references have been identified with the docket number food at other than extremely low levels; placed on display in the Dockets found in brackets in the heading of this and (2) the upper-bound limit of Management Branch (address above) document. Any objections received in lifetime human risk from exposure to and may be seen by interested persons response to the regulation may be seen the PAH’s, even under worst-case between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday in the Dockets Management Branch assumptions, is very low, less than 1 in through Friday. between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 100 million. through Friday. 1. Memorandum from the Chemistry III. Conclusion on Safety Review Branch, FDA, to the Indirect List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 177 Additives Branch, FDA, concerning ‘‘FAP FDA has evaluated the data in the Food additives, Food packaging. petition and other relevant material and 4B4411 (MATS 754 M2.1): Hydrogenated Cyclodiene Resins—Use in Polypropylene concludes that the proposed uses of the Therefore, under the Federal Food, Films in Contact With Fatty and Alcoholic Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under additive in polypropylene Food—Exxon Chemical Co.—Submission of homopolymer films and propylene/ 1/3/94,’’ dated June 8, 1994. authority delegated to the Commissioner ethylene copolymer films in contact 2. Kokoski, C. J., ‘‘Regulatory Food of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 177 is with fatty and alcoholic foods are safe. Additive Toxicology,’’ in Chemical Safety amended as follows: The agency also concludes that the Regulation and Compliance, edited by F. PART 177ÐINDIRECT FOOD additive will have its intended technical Homburger, J. K. Marquis, and S. Karger, ADDITIVES: POLYMERS effect. The agency is also amending the New York, NY, pp. 24 to 33, 1985. current listing for the additive to correct 3. Brune, H., R. P. Deutsch-Wenzel, M. Habs, S. Ivankovis, and D. Schmahl, 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR a technical error by changing ‘‘cubic ‘‘Investigation of the Tumorigenic Response part 177 continues to read as follows: centimeters’’ to read ‘‘centipoise.’’ to Benzo(a)pyrene in Aqueous Caffeine Therefore, § 177.1520 should be Authority: Sec. 201, 402, 409, 721 of the Solution Applied Orally to Sprague-Dawley Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 amended as set forth below. Rats,’’ Journal of Cancer Research and U.S.C. 321, 342, 348, 379e.) In accordance with § 171.1(h) (21 CFR Clinical Oncology, 102:153 to 157, 1981. 171.1(h)), the petition and the 4. Memorandum from the Indirect 2. Section 177.1520 is amended in the documents that FDA considered and Additives Branch, FDA, to the Executive table in paragraph (b) for the item relied upon in reaching its decision to Secretary, Quantitative Risk Assessment ‘‘Petroleum hydrocarbon resins approve the petition are available for Committee, FDA, concerning, ‘‘Estimation of (cyclopentadiene-type) * * *’’ under the the Upper Bound Lifetime Risk from inspection at the Center for Food Safety Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH’s) heading ‘‘Substance’’ by removing the and Applied Nutrition by appointment in Hydrogenated Cyclodiene Resin, the phrase ‘‘cubic centimeters’’ and with the information contact person subject of Food Additive Petition No. 4B4411 replacing it with ‘‘centipoise’’ and listed above. As provided in 21 CFR (Exxon Chemical Co.),’’ dated May 11, 1995. under the heading ‘‘Limitations’’ by 171.1(h), the agency will delete from the revising the entry to read as follows: documents any materials that are not VI. Objections available for public disclosure before Any person who will be adversely § 177.1520 Olefin polymers. making the documents available for affected by this regulation may at any * * * * * inspection. time on or before July 5, 1996, file with (b) * * * Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28051

Substance Limitations

******* Petroleum hydrocarbon resins (cyclopentadiene-type) * * * ...... For use only as an adjuvant at levels not to exceed 30 percent by weight in blends with: (1) Polypropylene complying with paragraph (c), item 1.1 of this section, or (2) a copolymer of propylene and ethylene containing not less than 94 weight percent propylene and complying with paragraph (c), item 3.2 of this section. The average thickness of the food-contact film is not to exceed 0.1 millimeter (0.004 inch). The finished polymer may be used in contact with (1) Food types I, II, IV±B, VI±A, VI±B, VII± B, and VIII identified in Table 1 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter and under conditions of use C through G described in Table 2 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter; and (2) food types III, IV±A, V, VI±C, VII±A, and IX identi- fied in Table 1 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter and under conditions of use D through G described in Table 2 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter. *******

* * * * * 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, acid, peroxyacetic acid, octanoic acid, Dated: May 29, 1996. 202–418–3083. peroxyoctanoic acid, sodium 1- William K. Hubbard, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice octanesulfonate, and 1- Associate Commissioner for Policy published in the Federal Register of hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic Coordination. May 17, 1993 (58 FR 28882), FDA acid. The functions of these components [FR Doc. 96–13983 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] announced that a food additive petition and the basis for FDA’s determination of (FAP 3B4371) had been filed by Ecolab, the safety of these components in the BILLING CODE 4160±01±F Inc., 840 Sibley Memorial Hwy., St. subject sanitizing solution are described Paul, MN 55118. The petition proposed below. 21 CFR Part 178 to amend the food additive regulations in § 178.1010 Sanitizing solutions (21 A. Hydrogen Peroxide CFR 178.1010) to provide for the safe Hydrogen peroxide functions as an [Docket No. 93F±0136] use of an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, peroxyacetic acid, antimicrobial agent in the subject Indirect Food Additives: Adjuvants, sanitizing solution. Hydrogen peroxide Production Aids, and Sanitizers octanoic acid, peroxyoctanoic acid, sodium 1-octanesulfonate, and is permitted as an ingredient in sanitizing solutions under AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, hydroxyethylene diphosphonic acid as a HHS. sanitizing solution for use on food § 178.1010(b)(30) and (b)(38), and it is affirmed as generally recognized as safe ACTION: Final rule. processing equipment and utensils, including food-contact surfaces in (GRAS) for use in food with specific SUMMARY: The Food and Drug public eating places. limitations under 21 CFR 184.1366. On Administration (FDA) is amending the While the agency used the term the basis of the data submitted in food additive regulations to provide for hydroxyethylene diphosphonic acid in support of the already-regulated uses of the safe use of an aqueous solution of the notice of filing, the agency has hydrogen peroxide and the data hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, determined that a more specific and contained in the food additive petition peroxyacetic acid, octanoic acid, therefore more appropriate name for the submitted in support of this sanitizing peroxyoctanoic acid, sodium 1- substance is 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1- solution, FDA finds that the use of octanesulfonate, and 1- diphosphonic acid. This more specific hydrogen peroxide in the subject hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic name will be used in the remainder of sanitizing solution is safe (Refs. 1 and acid as a sanitizing solution for use on this document and in the regulation. 2). food processing equipment and utensils, I. Safety and Functional Effect of B. Acetic Acid including food-contact surfaces in Petitioned Use of the Additive public eating places. This action Sanitizing solutions are mixtures of Acetic acid functions as an acidifier responds to a petition filed by Ecolab, in the subject sanitizing solution. Acetic Inc. chemicals that function together to sanitize food-contact surfaces and are acid is permitted as as ingredient in DATES: Effective June 4, 1996; written regulated as such. Each listed sanitizing solutions under objections and requests for a hearing by component in a sanitizing solution has § 178.1010(b)(30) and (b)(38), and it is July 5, 1996. a functional effect; however, the agency affirmed as GRAS for use in food under ADDRESSES: Submit written objections to evaluates data on the antimicrobial 21 CFR 184.1005. On the basis of the the Dockets Management Branch (HFA– efficacy of the entire sanitizing solution. data submitted in support of the 305), Food and Drug Administration, In addition, FDA regulations require already-regulated uses of acetic acid and 12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1–23, that food-contact surface sanitizing the data contained in the food additive Rockville, MD 20857. solutions be labeled in accordance with petition submitted in support of this FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and sanitizing solution, FDA finds that the Mitchell A. Cheeseman, Center for Food Rodenticide Act (§ 178.1010(d)). The use of acetic acid in the subject Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS– subject sanitizing solution is an aqueous sanitizing solution is safe (Refs. 1 and 217), Food and Drug Administration, solution of hydrogen peroxide, acetic 2). 28052 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

C. Peroxyacetic Acid data submitted in support of this Diphosphonic Acid as Sanitizer Components,’’ dated June 12, 1995. Peroxyacetic acid (POA) functions as regulated use of 1-hydroxyethylidene- 1,1-diphosphonic acid and the data 2. Memorandum entitled ‘‘FAP 3B4371 an antimicrobial agent in the subject (MATS #704 M2.1): KX–6094 - Sanitizer sanitizing solution. POA is permitted as contained in the food additive petition Formulation Consisting of Hydrogen an ingredient in sanitizing solutions submitted in support of this sanitizing Peroxide, Octanoic Acid, Peroxyoctanoic under § 178.1010(b)(30) and (b)(38). On solution, FDA finds that the use of 1- Acid, Sodium 1-Octanesulfonate, and 1- the basis of the data submitted in hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic Hydroxyethylidene-1,1-Diphosphonic Acid. support of the already-regulated uses of acid in the subject sanitizing solution is Klenzade submission of 3/9/93,’’ dated POA and the data contained in the food safe (Refs. 1 and 2). October 20, 1993. additive petition submitted in support H. Conclusion on Safety IV. Filing of Objections of this sanitizing solution, FDA finds Any person who will be adversely that the use of POA in the subject As discussed above, FDA has evaluated data on the antimicrobial affected by this regulation may at any sanitizing solution is safe (Refs. 1 and time on or before July 5, 1996, file with 2). efficacy of the entire sanitizing solution and data in the petition and other the Dockets Management Branch D. Octanoic Acid relevant materials on the safety of each (address above) written objections Octanoic acid functions as a synergist of the components of the sanitizing thereto. Each objection shall be in the subject sanitizing solution. solution. On the basis of this evaluation, separately numbered, and each Octanoic acid is permitted as an the agency concludes that these data numbered objection shall specify with ingredient in sanitizing solutions under and materials establish the safety and particularity the provisions of the § 178.1010(b)(27), (b)(35), (b)(36), and efficacy of the additive for use as a regulation to which objection is made (b)(39), and it is approved for direct use sanitizing solution on food-processing and the grounds for the objection. Each in food under 21 CFR 172.860 (caprylic equipment and utensils, including food- numbered objection on which a hearing acid). On the basis of the data submitted contact surfaces in public eating places, is requested shall specifically so state. in support of the already-regulated uses and that the regulations should be Failure to request a hearing for any of octanoic acid and the data contained amended in § 178.1010 as set forth particular objection shall constitute a in the food additive petition submitted below. waiver of the right to a hearing on that in support of this sanitizing solution, In accordance with § 171.1(h) (21 CFR objection. Each numbered objection for FDA finds that the use of octanoic acid 171.1(h)), the petition and the which a hearing is requested shall in the subject sanitizing solution is safe documents that FDA considered and include a detailed description and (Refs. 1 and 2). relied upon in reaching its decision to analysis of the specific factual approve the petition are available for information intended to be presented in E. Peroxyoctanoic Acid inspection at the Center for Food Safety support of the objection in the event Peroxyoctanoic acid (POOA) is a by- and Applied Nutrition by appointment that a hearing is held. Failure to include product of hydrogen peroxide and with the information contact person such a description and analysis for any octanoic acid. Because of the highly listed above. As provided in 21 CFR particular objection shall constitute a reactive nature of POOA, the actual 171.1(h), the agency will delete from the waiver of the right to a hearing on the dietary concentration of POOA is likely documents any materials that are not objection. Three copies of all documents to be close to zero. Based on the likely available for public disclosure before shall be submitted and shall be dietary concentration and information making the documents available for identified with the docket number submitted in the petition, FDA finds inspection. found in brackets in the heading of this that the use of POOA in the subject document. Any objections received in sanitizing solution is safe (Refs. 1 and II. Environmental Impact response to the regulation may be seen 2). The agency has carefully considered in the Dockets Management Branch the potential environmental effects of between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday F. Sodium 1-Octanesulfonate this action. FDA has concluded that the through Friday. Sodium 1-octanesulfonate (SOS) action will not have a significant impact functions as a surfactant in the subject on the human environment, and that an List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 178 sanitizing solution. SOS is permitted as environmental impact statement is not Food additives, Food packaging. as ingredient in sanitizing solutions required. The agency’s finding of no Therefore, under the Federal Food, under § 178.1010(b)(27) and (b)(42). On significant impact and the evidence Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under the basis of the data submitted in supporting that finding, contained in an authority delegated to the Commissioner support of the already-regulated uses of environmental assessment, may be seen of Food and Drugs and redelegated to SOS and the data contained in the food in the Dockets Management Branch the Director, Center for Food Safety and additive petition submitted in support (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 Applied Nutrition, 21 CFR part 178 is of this sanitizing solution, FDA finds p.m., Monday through Friday. amended as follows: that the use of SOS in the subject sanitizing solution is safe (Refs. 1 and III. References PART 178ÐINDIRECT FOOD 2). The following references have been ADDITIVES: ADJUVANTS, placed on display in the Dockets PRODUCTION AIDS, AND SANITIZERS G. 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1,1- Management Branch (address above) Diphosphonic Acid 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR and may be seen by interested persons part 178 continues to read as follows: 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1,1- between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday diphosphonic acid functions as a through Friday. Authority: Secs. 201, 402, 409, 721 of the stabilizer in the subject sanitizing Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 1. Memorandum entitled ‘‘Safety Review of U.S.C. 321, 342, 348, 379e). solution. 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1,1- Hydrogen Peroxide, Acetic Acid, diphosphonic acid is permitted as as Peroxyacetic Acid, Octanoic Acid, 2. Section 178.1010 is amended by ingredient in sanitizing solutions under Peroxyoctanoic Acid, Sodium 1- adding new paragraphs (b)(45) and § 178.1010(b)(30). On the basis of the Octanesulfonate, and Hydroxyethylidene (c)(39) to read as follows: Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28053

§ 178.1010 Sanitizing solutions. 108 parts per million of hydrogen Correction of Publication * * * * * peroxide; at least 23 parts per million Accordingly, the publication of final (b) * * * and not more than 69 parts per million regulations which are the subject of FR (45) An aqueous solution of hydrogen of peroxyacetic acid; at least 20 parts Doc. 96–5586 is corrected as follows: peroxide, acetic acid, peroxyacetic acid, per million and not more than 61 parts octanoic acid, peroxyoctanoic acid, per million of octanoic acid (including § 48.4101±1 [Corrected] sodium 1-octanesulfonate, and 1- peroxyoctanoic acid); at least 140 parts On page 10460, column 2, paragraph hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic per million and not more than 343 parts (f)(3)(ii)(D), lines 4 and 5 are corrected acid. In addition to use on food- per million of acetic acid; at least 3 parts by merging the two lines to read processing equipment and utensils, this per million and not more than 17 parts ‘‘paragraph (j) of this section, without solution may be used on food-contact per million of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1- regard to’’. surfaces in public eating places, subject diphosphonic acid; and at least 18 parts Cynthia E. Grigsby, to the limitations in paragraph (c)(39) of per million and not more than 55 parts Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief this section. per million of sodium 1- Counsel (Corporate). * * * * * octanesulfonate. [FR Doc. 96–13721 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] (c) * * * * * * * * BILLING CODE 4830±01±P (39)(i) The solution identified in Dated: May 24, 1996. paragraph (b)(45) of this section, when Fred R. Shank, used on food processing equipment and Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied DEPARTMENT OF LABOR utensils, including dairy and beverage- Nutrition. processing equipment but excluding Occupational Safety and Health [FR Doc. 96–13982 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] food-contact surfaces in public eating Administration places and dairy and beverage BILLING CODE 4160±01±F containers, shall provide when ready for 29 CFR Part 1952 use at least 72 parts per million and not [Docket No. T±015A] more than 216 parts per million of DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY hydrogen peroxide; at least 46 parts per North Carolina State Plan: Approval of million and not more than 138 parts per Internal Revenue Service Revised Compliance Staffing million of peroxyacetic acid; at least 40 Benchmarks parts per million and not more than 122 26 CFR Parts 40 and 48 parts per million of octanoic acid AGENCY: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health (including peroxyoctanoic acid); at least [TD 8659] 281 parts per million and not more than Administration (OSHA). 686 parts per million of acetic acid; at ACTION: Approval of revised State RIN 1545±AR92 least 7 parts per million and not more compliance staffing benchmarks. than 34 parts per million of 1- Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Excise Tax; SUMMARY: This document amends hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic Registration Requirements; Correction Subpart I of 29 CFR 1952 to reflect the acid; and at least 36 parts per million Assistant Secretary’s decision to and not more than 109 parts per million AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), approve revised compliance staffing of sodium 1-octanesulfonate. Treasury. benchmarks of 64 safety inspectors and (ii) The solution identified in ACTION: Correction to final regulations. 50 industrial hygienists for the North paragraph (b)(45) of this section, when Carolina State plan. used on food-contact equipment and SUMMARY: This document contains EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. utensils in warewashing machines, corrections to final regulations [TD including warewashing machines in 8659] which were published in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: public eating places, at temperatures no Federal Register for Thursday, March Anne Cyr, Acting Director, Office of less than 120 °F (49 °C) shall provide 14, 1996 (61 FR 10450). The final Information and Consumer Affairs, when ready for use at least 30 parts per regulations relate to the taxes on Occupational Safety and Health million and not more than 91 parts per gasoline and diesel fuel reflecting and Administration, U.S. Department of million of hydrogen peroxide; at least 19 implementing certain changes made by Labor, Room N–3637, 200 Constitution parts per million and not more than 58 the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, parts per million of peroxyacetic acid; at of 1993. (202) 219–8148. least 17 parts per million and not more EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 1996. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: than 52 parts per million of octanoic acid (including peroxyoctanoic acid); at FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background least 119 parts per million and not more Frank Boland (202) 622–3130 (not a toll- Section 18 of the Occupational Safety than 290 parts per million of acetic acid; free number). and Health Act of 1970 (‘‘the Act,’’ 29 at least 3 parts per million and not more SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: U.S.C. 651 et seq.) provides that States than 14 parts per million of 1- which desire to assume responsibility hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic Background for developing and enforcing acid; and at least 15 parts per million The final regulations that are subject occupational safety and health and not more than 46 parts per million to these corrections are under sections standards may do so by submitting, and of sodium 1-octanesulfonate. 4081 and 4101 of the Internal Revenue obtaining Federal approval of, a State (iii) The solution identified in Code. plan. Section 18(c) of the Act sets forth paragraph (b)(45) of this section, when the statutory criteria for plan approval, Need for Correction used on dairy or beverage containers, and among these criteria is the shall provide when ready for use at least As published, [TD 8659] contains requirement that the State’s plan 36 parts per million and not more than errors that are in need of clarification. provide satisfactory assurances that the 28054 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations state agency or agencies responsible for individual State revision of benchmarks, detailed submissions containing both implementing the plan have ‘‘* * * the North Carolina reassessed the narrative explanation and supporting qualified personnel necessary for the compliance staffing necessary for a data for North Carolina’s proposed enforcement of * * * standards,’’ 29 ‘‘fully effective’’ occupational safety and revised benchmarks (Docket No. T– U.S.C. 667(c)(4). health program in the State. In 015A). A summary of the benchmark A 1978 decision of the U.S. Court of September 1984, North Carolina revision process is set forth in the Appeals and the resultant implementing requested that the Assistant Secretary January 16, 1985 Federal Register notice order issued by the U.S. District Court approve revised compliance staffing concerning the Wyoming State plan (50 for the District of Columbia (AFL–CIO v. levels of 50 safety and 27 health FR 2491). An informational record was Marshall, C.A. No. 74–406) interpreted compliance officers for a ‘‘fully established in a separate docket (Docket this provision of the Act to require effective’’ program responsive to the No. T–018) and contained background States operating approved State plans to occupational safety and health needs information relevant to the benchmark have sufficient compliance personnel and circumstances in the State. These issue and the current benchmark necessary to assure a ‘‘fully effective’’ revised benchmarks were approved by revision process. enforcement effort. The Assistant the Assistant Secretary on January 17, To assist and encourage public Secretary of Labor for Occupational 1986 (51 FR 2481). participation in the benchmark revision Safety and Health (the Assistant In March 1989 the North Carolina process, a copy of North Carolina’s Secretary) was directed to establish House Appropriations Committee of the complete record was maintained in the ‘‘fully effective’’ compliance staffing North Carolina General Assembly OSHA Docket Office in Washington, DC. levels, or benchmarks, for each State passed a resolution instructing the Copies of North Carolina’s record were plan. Commissioner of Labor to renegotiate also maintained in the OSHA Region IV In 1980 OSHA submitted a Report to the appropriate number of occupational Office in Atlanta, Georgia, and in the the Court containing these benchmarks safety and health compliance officers Office of the North Carolina Department and requiring North Carolina to allocate with OSHA. In June 1990 the State of of Labor, in Raleigh, North Carolina. 83 safety and 119 health compliance North Carolina requested that the The March 7 proposal invited personnel to conduct inspections under Assistant Secretary approve revisions to interested parties to submit, by April 11, the plan. Attainment of the 1980 its 1984 compliance staffing benchmark 1995, written comments and views benchmark levels or subsequent levels which the State found to be more regarding whether North Carolina’s revision thereto is a prerequisite for reflective of current occupational safety proposed revised compliance staffing State plan final approval consideration and health needs and circumstances benchmark levels should be approved. under section 18(e) of the Act. within the State. This reassessment Two comments were received regarding Both the 1978 Court Order and the resulted in a proposal to OSHA of North Carolina’s proposed benchmarks. 1980 Report to the Court explicitly revised compliance staffing benchmarks contemplate subsequent revisions to the Summary and Evaluation of Comments of 64 safety and 50 health compliance Received benchmarks in light of more current officers for the State of North Carolina. data, including State-specific In September 1991, a catastrophic fire In response to the March 7 Federal information, and other relevant occurred at a poultry processing plant in Register notice for North Carolina, considerations. In August 1983 OSHA, North Carolina, resulting in the OSHA received one comment from Kae together with State plan representatives, reinstitution of limited Federal Livsey, Governmental Affairs Manager initiated a comprehensive review and concurrent jurisdiction and a special of the American Association of revision of the 1980 benchmarks. The Federal evaluation of the State’s Occupational Health Nurses, Inc. State of North Carolina participated in occupational safety and health (Exhibit 4–1), and one comment from this benchmark revision process, which operations. Consideration of North Ruth Anne Smith, President, and Susan resulted in a methodology whereby a Carolina’s benchmarks revision was A. Randolph, Chair for Governmental State could submit data that would suspended during this time. Significant Affairs, of the North Carolina justify revision of its 1980 benchmarks. legislative and budgetary changes were Association of Occupational Health In May 1992, North Carolina proposed made to the North Carolina State Nurses (Exhibit 4–2). Charles N. Jeffress, to the Assistant Secretary revised program and, for Fiscal Year 1995, the Deputy Commissioner of the North compliance staffing levels for a ‘‘fully State authorized compliance staffing of Carolina Department of Labor, effective’’ program responsive to the 64 safety and 51 health inspectors. In responded to the public comments occupational safety and health needs of late 1994, the North Carolina (Exhibit 4–3). Both comments the State. (A complete discussion of Department of Labor requested that the recommended that the North Carolina both the 1980 benchmarks and the Assistant Secretary resume program include occupational health present revision system process is set consideration of State’s proposed nursing positions in determining forth in the January 16, 1985 Federal revision of its benchmarks. revisions to the State’s benchmark levels Register (50 FR 2491) regarding the for compliance staffing and utilizing History of the Present Proceedings Wyoming occupational safety and occupational health nurses to fill health plan.) On March 7, 1995, the Occupational compliance and consultation positions. Safety and Health Administration In his response, Deputy Proposed Revision of Benchmarks published notice in the Federal Register Commissioner Jeffress agreed with the In 1980, OSHA submitted a report to of its proposal to approve revised two comments that occupational health the Court containing the benchmarks compliance staffing benchmarks for nurses are beneficial to a ‘‘full service’’ and requiring North Carolina to allocate North Carolina (60 FR 12488). A occupational safety and health 83 safety compliance officers and 119 detailed description of the methodology program,’’ and noted that the North industrial hygienists. Pursuant to the and State-specific information used to Carolina Department of Labor has a long initiative begun in August 1983 by the develop the revised compliance staffing history of employing occupational State plan designees as a group, and in levels for North Carolina was included health nurses to provide training and accord with the formula and general in the notice. In addition, OSHA expert advice in compliance principles established by that group for submitted, as a part of the record, investigations. Mr. Jeffress also Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28055 explained that North Carolina program’s Section 1952.393, Compliance staffing revised staffing requirements on January proposed revised compliance staffing benchmarks, has been revised to reflect 17, 1986. In June 1990, North Carolina benchmarks apply specifically to the approval of the revised benchmarks reconsidered the information utilized in personnel for the enforcement of for North Carolina. In addition, the the initial revision of its 1980 occupational safety and health addresses of locations where the North benchmarks and determined that standards and that although an Carolina plan may be inspected have changes in local conditions and individual with an educational been updated and are found at improved inspection data warranted background in occupational health § 1952.156. further revision of its benchmarks to 64 nursing would be eligible to apply for safety inspectors and 50 industrial Regulatory Flexibility Act consideration for these positions, it hygienists. After opportunity for public would be inappropriate to reserve OSHA certifies, pursuant to the comment and service on the AFL–CIO, staffing positions for individuals with a Regulatory Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601, et the Assistant Secretary approved these particular occupational health degree. seq.), that this rulemaking will not have revised staffing requirements on June 4, significant economic impact on a 1996. Decision substantial number of small entities. 3. Section 1952.156 is revised to read OSHA has carefully reviewed the Approval of the revised compliance as follows: staffing benchmarks for North Carolina record developed during the above § 1952.156 Where the plan may be described proceedings. In light of all the will not place small employers in the inspected. State under any new or different facts presented on the record, including A copy of the principal documents requirements nor would any additional the absence of any objections from comprising the plan may be inspected burden be placed upon the State interested parties, the Assistant and copied during normal business government beyond the responsibilities Secretary has determined that the hours at the following locations: revised compliance staffing levels already assumed as part of the approved proposed for North Carolina meet the plan. Office of State Programs, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. requirements of the 1978 Court Order in List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1952 Department of Labor, Third Street and AFL–CIO v. Marshall in providing the Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N3700, number of safety and health compliance Intergovernmental relations, Law Washington, DC 20210; officers for a ‘‘fully effective’’ enforcement, Occupational safety and Office of the Regional Administrator, enforcement program. Therefore, the health. Occupational Safety and Health revised compliance staffing levels of 64 (Sec. 18, 84 Stat. 1608 (29 U.S.C. 667); 29 Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, safety and 50 health compliance officers CFR Part 1902, Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 1375 Peachtree Street, NE., Suite 587, 9–83 (43 FR 35736)) Atlanta, Georgia 30367; and for North Carolina are approved. Office of the Commissioner, North Carolina Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of Effect of Decision Department of Labor, 319 Chapanoke Road, May 1996. Raleigh, North Carolina 27603. The approval of the revised staffing Joseph A. Dear, [FR Doc. 96–13913 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] levels for North Carolina, set forth Assistant Secretary of Labor. elsewhere in this notice, establishes the BILLING CODE 4510±26±P requirement for a sufficient number of PART 1952Ð[AMENDED] adequately trained and qualified compliance personnel as set forth in Accordingly, Subpart I of 29 CFR Part DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1952 is amended as follows: Section 18(c) of the Act and 29 CFR Coast Guard 1902.37(b)(1). These benchmarks are Subpart IÐNorth Carolina established pursuant to the 1978 Court 33 CFR Part 165 Order in AFL–CIO v. Marshall and 1. The authority citation for Part 1952 define the compliance staffing levels continues to read: [CGD01±96±023] necessary for a ‘‘fully effective’’ program Authority: Sec. 18, 84 Stat. 1608 (29 U.S.C. RIN 2115±AA97 in North Carolina. The allocation of 667); 29 CFR Part 1902, Secretary of Labor’s sufficient staffing to meet the Order No. 9–83 (43 FR 35736). Safety Zone: Empire State Regatta, Albany, New York benchmarks is one of the conditions 2. Section 1952.153 is revised to read necessary for States to receive an 18(e) as follows: AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT. determination (final State plan ACTION: Temporary final rule. approval) with its resultant § 1952.153 Compliance staffing relinquishment of concurrent Federal benchmarks. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is enforcement jurisdiction. Under the terms of the 1978 Court establishing a temporary safety zone for Explanation of Changes to 29 CFR Part Order in AFL–CIO v. Marshall, the Empire State Regatta on June 7, 1996, from 12:01 p.m. until 3 p.m., and 1952 compliance staffing levels (‘‘benchmarks’’) necessary for a ‘‘fully on June 8, 1996, from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. 29 CFR 1952 contains, for each State effective’’ enforcement program were This safety zone will temporarily close having an approved occupational safety required for each State operating an the Hudson River at Albany, New York, and health plan, a subpart generally approved State plan. In September 1984, from the Patroon Island Bridge to the describing the plan and setting forth the North Carolina, in conjunction with Dunn Memorial Bridge. This safety zone Federal approval status of the plan. This OSHA, completed a reassessment of the is necessary to protect the maritime notice makes several changes to Subpart levels initially established in 1980 and public from the hazards associated with I to reflect the approval of North proposed revised benchmarks of 50 crew shells racing in lanes and having Carolina’s revised compliance staffing safety and 27 health compliance limited maneuverability while benchmarks, as well as to reflect minor officers. After opportunity for public underway. editorial modifications to the structure comment and service on the AFL–CIO, EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is of the Subpart. the Assistant Secretary approved these effective from 12:01 p.m. to 3 p.m. on 28056 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Friday, June 7, 1996, and from 6 a.m. to longitude (NAD 1983), Albany, New dominant in their fields and (2) 6 p.m. on Saturday, June 8, 1996, unless York. This safety zone precludes all government jurisdictions with extended or terminated sooner by the vessels not participating in the event populations less than 50,000. Captain of the Port New York. from transiting this portion of the For the reasons given in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hudson River and is needed to protect Regulatory Evaluation, the Coast Guard Lieutenant Commander R. Trabocchi, mariners from the hazards of crew shells certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this Chief, Coordination and Analysis with limited maneuverability racing in regulation will not have a significant Branch, U.S. Coast Guard Activities confined waters. Participating vessels economic impact on a substantial New York (212) 668–7906. include race participants and race number of small entities. committee craft. All other vessels, Collection of Information SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: swimmers, and personal watercraft of Regulatory History any nature are precluded from entering This regulation contains no or moving within the safety zone collection-of-information requirements Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of without permission of the Captain of the under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 proposed rulemaking (NRPM) was not Port New York. U.S.C. 3501 et seq). published for this regulation. Good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM Regulatory Evaluation Federalism and for making this regulation effective This regulation is not a significant The Coast Guard has analyzed this less than 30 days after Federal Register regulatory action under section 3(f) of action in accordance with the principles publication. Due to the date complete Executive Order 12866 and does not and criteria contained in Executive information regarding this event was require an assessment of potential costs Order 12612, and has determined that received, there was insufficient time to and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that this regulation does not have sufficient draft and publish an NPRM. Any delay order. It has been exempted from review federalism implications to warrant the encountered in this regulation’s by the Office of Management and preparation of a Federalism Assessment. effective date would be contrary to Budget under that order. It is not Environment public interest since immediate action is significant under regulatory policies and needed to close this waterway and procedures of the Department of The Coast Guard has considered the protect the maritime public from the transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; environmental impact of this regulation hazards of crew shells with limited February 26, 1979) The Coast Guard and concluded that, under section maneuverability racing in confined expects the economic impact of this 2.B.2.e. (34)(g) of Commandant waters. regulation to be so minimal that a full Instruction M16475.1B, (as revised by 59 FR 38654, July 29, 1994), the Background and Purpose Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the regulatory policies and promulgation of this regulation is The Coast Guard received a request procedures of DOT is unnecessary. This categorically excluded from further from the Albany Rowing Center to close safety zone closes the Hudson River, environmental documentation. A a portion of the Hudson River for the shore to shore, south of the Patroon Categorical Exclusion Determination Empire State Regatta. This safety zone Island Bridge and north of the Dunn and Environmental Analysis Checklist closes a portion of the Hudson River, Memorial Bridge, Albany, New York, are included in the docket. shore to shore, at Albany, New York, from 12:01 p.m. to 3 p.m. on Friday, List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 between the Patroon Island Bridge and June 7, 1996, and from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. the Dunn Memorial Bridge. The start on Saturday, June 8, 1996, unless Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation docks and start platform will be extended or terminated sooner by the (water), Reporting and recordkeeping installed on Friday, June 7, 1996, by Captain of the Port, New York. Although requirements, Security measures, means of a cable crossing the width of this regulation prevents traffic from Waterways. the river. After 3 p.m., the cable will be transiting this area, the effect of this Final Regulation sunk and the docks clustered on the regulation is not significant for several For reasons set out in the preamble, western shoreline of the Hudson River reasons: this is an annual event with the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR Part at Albany, New York. Crew shells will local support and has been held for the 165 as follows: race in designated lanes within the race past several years without incident or course on Saturday, June 8, 1996. complaint, the closure of the river has PART 165Ð[AMENDED] Commercial and recreational traffic will been reduced from three days to two be escorted through the race course by days this year, vessel traffic will have 1. The authority citation for Part 165 law enforcement vessels. Vessels greater opportunities to transit during continues to read as follows: desiring escort can contact the on-scene the effective period of this regulation Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander on due to modifications to the race course, 33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.046–6, and 160.5; channel 16 VHF–FM. The times that and the notifications that will be made 49 CFR 1.46. vessels can be escorted through the race to the maritime community via local 2. A temporary section, 165.T01–023, course are tentative because actual race notices to mariners. is added to read as follows: times are largely dependent on winds and currents. The tentative times for Small Entities § 165.T01±023 Safety Zone: Empire State escort are 10:10 a.m., 12:30 p.m., and Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act Regatta, Hudson River, Albany, New York. 2:10 p.m.; escort periods are expected to (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Coast Guard (a) Location. The waters of Hudson be no longer than 15 minutes in must consider whether this regulation River, Albany, New York, shore to duration.The safety zone closes all will have a significant economic impact shore, south of the Patroon Island waters south of the Patroon Island on a substantial number of small Bridge at 42°39′50′′ N latitude; Bridge at 42°39′50′′ N latitude; entities. ‘‘Small entities’’ may include 073°43′45′′ W longitude, (NAD 1983) 073°43′45′′ W longitude (NAD 1983) (1) small businesses and not-for-profit and north of the Dunn Memorial Bridge and north of the Dunn Memorial Bridge organizations that are independently at 42°38′43′′ N latitude; 073°44′51′′ W at 42°38′43′′ N latitude; 073°44′51′′ W owned and operated and are not longitude (NAD 1993). Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28057

(b) Effective period. This section is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. residence already adapted with special effective from 12:01 p.m. until 3 p.m. on Judith Caden, Assistant Director for features from $6,000 to $6,500. June 7, 1996, and from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Loan Policy (264), Loan Guaranty The authority cited for § 36.4507(c) is on June 8, 1996, unless extended or Service, Veterans Benefits corrected, from 38 U.S.C. § 3710(c) to terminated sooner by the Captain of the Administration, Department of Veterans § 3711. Port, New York. Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Regulations referring to covenants (c) Regulations. (1) The general Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273–7368. purporting to restrict the sale or regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section occupancy of property by race, color, apply to this safety zone. 36.4216 is deleted since it has been religion, or national origin are removed. (2) Vessels not participating in this superseded by a new 38 CFR Part 44 Previous regulations (§§ 36.4350(b)(7) event, swimmers, and personal which sets forth the current and 36.4515(b)(7)) provided that the watercraft of any nature are precluded requirements for governmentwide violation of such a covenant will not from entering or moving within the debarment and suspension of program render title to property unacceptable to safety zone without permission from the participants, including manufactured VA. Also, under previous § 36.4510(d), Captain of the Port New York. home lenders and loan holders from the a borrower’s recording such a covenant (3) All persons and vessels shall VA Loan Guaranty Program. may have constituted an event of default comply with the instructions of the A recent legal opinion of the VA on a VA direct loan. Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the General Counsel, VAOPGCPREC 26–95, In removing these provisions, VA designated on scene patrol personnel. published in summary form in the stresses its continuing commitment to U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel Federal Register on March 12, 1996, 61 fair housing. VA affirmatively include commissioned, warrant, and FR 10063, holds that the law governing administers its housing programs in a petty officers of the Coast Guard. Upon the housing loan and specially adapted manner to further the purposes and being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard housing programs does not preclude VA objectives of the Fair Housing Act, 42 vessel via siren, radio, flashing light, or from approving a loan or grant when the U.S.C. §§ 3601–3631. VA will not other means, the operator of a vessel property will be held in a Family Living condone any violation of fair housing shall proceed as directed. Trust, provided the veteran has at least law in its programs, and will take all Dated: May 9, 1996. an equitable life estate in the property, necessary measures to deal with any T.H. Gilmour, the lien for any VA financing attaches violation that comes to VA’s attention. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the to the remainder, and the trust VA believes, however, that present law Port, New York. arrangement is valid under State law. makes these regulatory provisions [FR Doc. 96–13859 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Previous regulations specifying the title unnecessary. interest a veteran must obtain in the The provisions relating to racially- BILLING CODE 4910±14±M subject property in order to qualify for restrictive covenants were originally assistance under these programs did not added to the regulations in response to address property held in trust for estate- the Supreme Court decision in Shelley DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS planning reasons. Accordingly, sections v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948). Although AFFAIRS 36.4253(a), 36.4350(a), 36.4402(a), and that decision held that courts may not 36.4515(a) are revised to reflect the enforce racially-restrictive covenants, it 38 CFR Part 36 holding in this precedent opinion. also held such privately-created The Servicemen’s Readjustment Act covenants were not invalid and could be RIN 2900±AI01 of 1944 originally permitted VA to pay effectuated by voluntary adherence. Loan Guaranty: Miscellaneous a guaranty claim when the holder Much has changed in the area of fair reported the loan as being in default. housing since 1948. The Fair Housing AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, P.L. Act clearly and unambiguously ACTION: Final rule. 98–369, § 2512, amended what is now prohibits discrimination in the sale, codified as 38 U.S.C. § 3732(a) to require rental, or financing of housing on the SUMMARY: This document amends the that a liquidation sale must be held basis of race, color, religion, sex, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) before a claim may be paid. Sections familial status, or national origin. VA regulations governing the VA home loan 36.4316 and 36.4318 are amended to believes it is clear that such restrictive program by deleting superseded reflect these statutory changes. covenants are absolutely null and void, provisions, amending provisions to Section 36.4346(g)(2) is revised to and any attempt to create or enforce reflect statutory changes, deleting correct citation references. such a covenant would be unlawful. provisions that have no legal effect, and Section 36.4402(a) is revised to Since these covenants have absolutely updating a position title. This document provide that a veteran is eligible for no effect, VA sees no reason to provide also amends the regulations by assistance under section 2101(a) of by regulation that violations of such incorporating a precedent opinion of the Chapter 21 if he or she has or will purported restrictions may be ignored in VA General Counsel stating that the law acquire an interest in a suitable housing considering whether or not a veteran governing the housing loan and unit which is at least a beneficial has good and marketable title. VA does specially adapted housing programs interest in a revocable Family Living not believe any knowledgeable attorney does not preclude VA from approving a Trust. This change incorporates the or title professional would consider the loan or grant when the property will be holding of VAOPGCPREC 26–95, as existence of such an obsolete, unlawful held in a Family Living Trust, provided discussed above. covenant in reviewing title. the veteran has at least an equitable life Section 36.4404(a) is revised to note Case law also holds that recorders of estate in the property, the lien for any that the maximum statutory amount of deeds may not accept for recording new VA financing attaches to the remainder, a grant to obtain specially adapted racially restrictive covenants. and the trust arrangement is valid under housing is $38,000. Section 36.4404(b) Accordingly, VA sees no purpose in State law. is revised to update the maximum making the recording of such a covenant EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. statutory amount of a grant for a an event of default. 28058 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Finally, all references to the Chief Benefits Director’’ and adding, in its insurance to transfer and assign the loan Benefits Director in Part 36 are changed place ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. and the security therefore to the to refer to this official’s new title, the 6. In § 36.4253, paragraphs (a)(2) and Secretary or to another designated by Under Secretary for Benefits. (e) are amended by removing ‘‘Chief the Secretary upon receipt of payment This final rule consists of interpretive Benefits Director’’ and adding, in its in full of the balance of the rules, restatements of statute, updating a place, ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. indebtedness remaining unpaid to the position title, and nonsubstantive Paragraph (a)(3) is revised, and a new date of such assignment. Such changes, and, therefore, is not subject to paragraph (a)(4) is added to read as assignment may be made without the notice-and-comment and effective- follows: recourse but the transferor shall not date provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553. thereby be relieved from the provisions The Secretary hereby certifies that § 36.4253 Title and lien requirements. of § 36.4325. this final rule will not have a significant (a) * * * * * * * * economic impact on a substantial * * * * * 13. In § 36.4320, paragraph (j) is number of small entities as they are (3) A life estate, provided that the amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits defined in the Regulatory Flexibility remainder and reversionary interests are Director’’ and adding, in its place, Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This final rule subjected to the lien; or ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’; would not cause a significant effect on (4) A beneficial interest in a revocable paragraph (h)(2) is revised, and a new any entities since it consists of Family Living Trust that ensures that authority citation is added at the end of interpretive rules, restatements of the veteran, or veteran and spouse, have the section to read as follows: statute, updating a position title, and an equitable life estate, provided the nonsubstantive changes. Therefore, lien attaches to any remainder interest § 36.4320 Sale of security. pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this and the trust arrangement is valid under * * * * * amendment is exempt from the initial State law. (h) * * * and final regulatory-flexibility analysis * * * * * requirements of §§ 603 and 604. (2) The holder may cancel any § 36.4254 [Amended] insurance in force when the holder The Catalog of Federal Domestic acquires the property, provided the Assistance Program numbers are 64.106, 7. In § 36.4254, paragraph (a)(8) is holder has obtained the prior approval 64.114, 64.118 and 64.119. amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits of the Secretary. Coincident with the List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 36 Director’’ and adding, in its place notice of election to convey or transfer ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. Condominiums, Handicapped, the property to the Secretary or with the Housing loan programs—housing and § 36.4283 [Amended] acquisition of the property by the community development, Veterans. 8. In § 36.4283, paragraph (k) is holder, following such notice, Approved: May 24, 1996. amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits whichever is later, the holder shall Jesse Brown, Director’’ and adding, in its place, obtain endorsements on all such insurance policies naming the Secretary Secretary of Veterans Affairs. ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. 9. The authority citation for part 36 as an assured, as his/her interest may For the reasons set out in the appear. Such insurance policies shall be preamble, 38 CFR part 36 is amended as 36.4300 through 36.4375 is revised to read as follows: forwarded to the Secretary at the time of set forth below. the conveyance or transfer of the Authority: Sections 36.4300 through property to the Secretary or as soon after PART 36ÐLOAN GUARANTY 36.4375 issued under 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, that time as feasible. 3701–3704, 3710, 3712–3714, 3720, 3729, 1. The authority citation for part 36 3732, unless otherwise noted. * * * * * §§ 36.4201 through 36.4287 continues to (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3732, Pub. L. 100–527) read as follows: § 36.4312 [Amended] § 36.4335 [Amended] Authority: Sections 36.4201 through 10. In § 36.4312, paragraph (d)(1)(ix) 36.4287 issued under 38 U.S.C. 501, 3701– and (d)(7)(iv) are amended by removing 14. In § 36.4335, the introductory text 3704, 3707, 3710–3714, 3719, 3720, 3729, ‘‘Chief Benefits Director’’ and adding, in is amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits unless otherwise noted. its place, ‘‘Under Secretary for Director’’ and adding, in its place, ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. § 36.4216 [Removed] Benefits’’. 2. Section 36.4216 is removed. § 36.4316 [Amended] § 36.4342 [Amended] § 36.4220 [Amended] 11. In § 36.4316, paragraph (c) is 15. In § 36.4342, paragraphs (b) and 3. In § 36.4220, paragraph (a) removed, and paragraph (a) is amended (c) are amended by removing ‘‘Chief introductory text is amended by by removing ‘‘, submit a claim for Benefits Director’’ each time it appears removing ‘‘Chief Benefits Director’’ both payment of the guaranty. The holder and adding, in its place ‘‘Under times it appears and adding, in its place, may also then or thereafter’’, and Secretary for Benefits’’. paragraph (b) is amended by removing ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. § 36.4343 [Amended] ‘‘A claim for the guaranty, or’’ and § 36.4221 [Amended] revising ‘‘the’’ to read: ‘‘The’’. 16. In § 36.4343, paragraph (a) is 4. In § 36.4221 paragraphs (b) and (c) 12. In § 36.4318, paragraph (a) is amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits are amended by removing ‘‘Chief revised to read as follows: Director’’ and adding, in its place, Benefits Director’’ each time it appears ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. § 36.4318 Refunding of loans in default. and adding, in its place, ‘‘Under § 36.4346 [Amended] Secretary for Benefits’’. (a) Upon receiving a notice of default or a notice under § 36.4317, the 17. In § 36.4346, paragraph (g)(2) is § 36.4226 [Amended] Secretary may within 30 days thereafter amended by removing ‘‘36.4331’’ and 5. In § 36.4226, paragraphs (d), (f) and require the holder upon penalty of adding, in its place, ‘‘44.205 and (g) are amended by removing ‘‘Chief otherwise losing the guaranty or 44.305’’. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28059

§ 36.4349 [Amended] provided the trust arrangement is valid the veteran, or veteran and spouse, have 18. In § 36.4349, paragraphs (d), (f), under State law; an equitable life estate, provided the and (g) are amended by removing ‘‘Chief * * * * * lien attaches to any remainder interest Benefits Director’’ and adding, in its 25. In § 36.4404, paragraphs (a) and the trust arrangement is valid under place, ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. introductory text, (b)(2), and the State law. 19. In § 36.4350, paragraph (a)(2) is authority citation are revised to read as * * * * * amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits follows: Director’’ and adding, in its place, § 36.4516 [Amended] ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’; § 36.4404 Computation of cost. 31. In § 36.4516, paragraph (c) is paragraph (b)(7) is removed; and (a) Computation of cost of housing amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits paragraph (b)(8) is redesignated as unit. Under section 2101(a) of chapter Director’’ and adding, in its place, paragraph (b)(7). Paragraph (a)(3) is 21, for the purpose of computing the ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. amended by removing ‘‘.’’ and adding, amount of benefits payable to a veteran- § 36.4518 [Amended] in its place, ‘‘; or’’, and a new paragraph beneficiary, there may be included in (a)(4) is added to read as follows: the total cost to the veteran the 32. Section 36.4518 is amended by following amount, not to exceed removing ‘‘Chief Benefits Director’’ and § 36.4350 Estate of veteran in real $38,000: adding, in its place, ‘‘Under Secretary property. * * * * * for Benefits’’. (a) * * * (b) * * * § 36.4520 [Amended] (4) A beneficial interest in a revocable (2) $6,500. Family Living Trust that ensures that 33. In § 36.4520, paragraph (b) is the veteran, or veteran and spouse, have (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2102(a), (b)) amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits Director’’ both times it appears and an equitable life estate, provided the § 36.4408 [Amended] lien attaches to any remainder interest adding, in its place, ‘‘Under Secretary 26. In § 36.4408, paragraph (b) is for Benefits’’. and the trust arrangement is valid under amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits State law. Director’’ and adding, in its place, § 36.4600 [Amended] * * * * * ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. 34. In § 36.4600, paragraphs (g)(2) and § 36.4352 [Amended] 27. The authority citation for part 36 (j) are amended by removing ‘‘Chief §§ 36.4500 through 36.4600 is revised to Benefits Director’’ and adding, in its 20. Section 36.4352 is amended by read as follows: removing ‘‘Chief Benefits Director’’ and place, ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. adding, in its place, ‘‘Under Secretary Authority: Sections 36.4500 through [FR Doc. 96–13855 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] 36.4600 issued under 38 U.S.C. 501, unless for Benefits’’. BILLING CODE 8320±01±P otherwise noted. § 36.4364 [Amended] 28. In § 36.4507, paragraph (b)(2) is 21. In § 36.4364, paragraph (f) is amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits POSTAL SERVICE amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits Director, and adding, in its place, Director’’ and adding, in its place, ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’, and the 39 CFR Part 233 ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. authority citation following paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows: Screening of Mail Reasonably § 36.4393 [Amended] Suspected of Containing Nonmailable 22. In § 36.4393, paragraphs (g) and § 36.4507 Refinancing of mortgage or Firearms (h) are amended by removing ‘‘Chief other lien indebtedness. Benefits Director’’ each time it appears * * * * * AGENCY: Postal Service. and adding, in its place, ‘‘Under (c) * * * ACTION: Final rule. Secretary for Benefits’’. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3711) 23. The authority citation for part 36 SUMMARY: On February 28, 1996, the * * * * * 36.4400 through 36.4411 continues to Postal Service published in the Federal Register a proposed regulation outlining read as follows: § 36.4510 [Removed] the treatment of mail which is Authority: Sections 36.4400 through 29. In § 36.4510, paragraph (d) is reasonably suspected of being 36.4411 issued under 72 Stat. 1114, 1168, as removed. dangerous to persons or property. The amended (38 U.S.C. 501, 2101), unless 30. In § 36.4515, paragraph (a)(2) is otherwise noted. rule also contains language which amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits allows for the screening of mail 24. In § 36.4402, paragraph (a)(4)(iii) Director’’ and adding, in its place, reasonably suspected of containing is amended by removing ‘‘Chief Benefits ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’; and by nonmailable firearms. The proposed Director’’ and adding, in its place, removing paragraph (b)(7); and by rule requested comments, but none were ‘‘Under Secretary for Benefits’’. redesignating paragraph (b)(8) as received. Consequently, the Postal Paragraph (a)(4)(iii) is further amended paragraph (b)(7). Paragraph (a)(3) is Service hereby publishes this final rule. by removing ‘‘;’’ and adding, in its amended by removing ‘‘.’’ in the last EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. place, ‘‘, or’’; and a new paragraph sentence, and adding, in its place, ‘‘; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (a)(4)(iv) is added to read as follows: or’’; and a new paragraph (a)(4) is added to read as follows: George C. Davis, (202) 268–3076. § 36.4402 Eligibility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This (a) * * * § 36.4515 Estate of veteran in real document creates a new subsection (4) * * * property. 233.11 of title 39, Code of Federal (iv) A beneficial interest in a (a) * * * Regulations, to include the requirements revocable Family Living Trust that * * * * * for the treatment of mail which is ensures that the veteran, or veteran and (4) A beneficial interest in a revocable reasonably suspected of being spouse, have an equitable life estate, Family Living Trust that ensures that dangerous to persons or property. This 28060 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations rule is currently contained in the capable of identifying mail containing that is sealed against inspection or Administrative Support Manual (ASM) such firearms in order to obtain revealing the contents of as part 274, but this publication will probable cause for the issuance of a correspondence within mail that is make it more widely available to the Federal warrant to search and seize such sealed against inspection. The screening public. mail. The rule would not permit any is conducted according to these Sections 233.11 (a) and (a)(4) contain screening method that would involve requirements. new language which allows for the opening of sealed mail, or the reading of (1) Screening of mail authorized by screening of mail reasonably suspected the contents of correspondence in paragraph (a) of this section must be of containing nonmailable firearms. sealed mail, without the consent of the limited to the least quantity of mail Formerly, part 274 of the Administrative sender or addressee or under authority necessary to respond to the threat. Support Manual allowed the of a Federal warrant. Moreover, the only (2) Such screening must be done in a examination of mail only to identify screening which may be authorized manner that does not avoidably delay explosives or other materials that would must be limited to the least quantity of the screened mail. pose a danger to life or property. This mail necessary to respond to the threat (3) The Chief Postal Inspector may rule would expand the existing rule to and the screening must be performed authorize screening of mail by postal permit screening for nonmailable without avoidable delay of the mail. employees and by persons not firearms under the same restrictions Any mail not of sufficient weight, for employed by the Postal Service under respecting mail privacy and delay. example, to contain a nonmailable such instruction that require The Postal Service has been advised firearm will not be screened. In compliance with this part and protect by the Honorable Pedro Rosello, addition, international transit mail will the security of the mail. No information Governor of Puerto Rico, that illegal not be screened unless the postal obtained from such screening may be firearms entering Puerto Rico by various treaties are appropriately amended. disclosed unless authorized by this part. (4) Mail of insufficient weight to pose means, including the mails, pose a Sworn reports of all screening methods a hazard to air or surface transportation, serious threat to the safety of citizens of conducted by, or under supervision of, or to contain firearms which are not Puerto Rico. This information has been the Postal Service would be reported to mailable under Section C024 of the confirmed in meetings with the senior postal managers. In view of these Domestic Mail Manual, and Attorney General of Puerto Rico, local factors, the Postal Service has international transit mail must be and federal law enforcement officials, determined that this change in its and officials of the United States excluded from such screening. regulations is a matter of internal (5) After screening conducted under Department of Justice. practice and procedure that will not Practical and legal constraints limit paragraph (a) of this section, mail that substantially affect the rights or our ability to ensure that the mails are is reasonably suspected of posing an obligations of private parties. free of nonmailable firearms. These immediate and substantial danger to life constraints were summarized in the List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 233 or limb, or an immediate and substantial Federal Register at the time the rule Law enforcement, Postal Service. danger to property, may be treated by permitting limited screening of mail postal employees as provided in Accordingly, title 39 CFR, Part 233, is reasonably suspected of containing paragraph (b) of this section. amended as follows: dangerous matter was initially proposed (6) After screening, mail sealed and they remain applicable today. See PART 233ÐINSPECTION SERVICE/ against inspection that presents doubts 55 FR 29637 (July 20, 1990). INSPECTOR GENERAL AUTHORITY about whether its contents are Taking these constraints into account, hazardous, that cannot be resolved this rule authorizes the least intrusive, 1. The authority citation for part 233 without opening, must be reported to least dilatory response to credible continues to read as follows: the Postal Inspection Service. Such mail situations where firearms already Authority: 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 402, 403, must be disposed of under instructions declared ‘‘nonmailable’’ by statute or 404, 406, 410, 411, 3005(e)(1); 12 U.S.C. promptly furnished by the Inspection regulation are reasonably suspected of 3401–3422; 18 U.S.C. 981, 1956, 1957, 2254, Service. being in the mails. Nonmailable 3061; 21 U.S.C. 881; Inspector General Act of (b) Threatening pieces of mail. Mail, firearms are defined in Section C024.1.0 1978, as amended (Pub. L. No. 95–452, as sealed or unsealed, reasonably of the Domestic Mail Manual. They amended), 5 U.S.C. App. 3. suspected of posing an immediate consist, primarily, of pistols, revolvers, 2. Part 233 is amended by adding danger to life or limb or an immediate and other concealable firearms. § 233.11 as follows: and substantial danger to property may, Unloaded rifles and shotguns are 233.11. Mail reasonably suspected of without a search warrant, be detained, mailable although the provisions of the being dangerous to persons or property. opened, removed from postal custody, Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. 921, (a) Screening of mail. When the Chief and processed or treated, but only to the et seq., and regulations of the Bureau of Postal Inspector determines that there is extent necessary to determine and Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms apply a credible threat that certain mail may eliminate the danger and only if a to the shipment of such weapons by contain a bomb, explosives, or other complete written and sworn statement mail or otherwise. material that would endanger life or of the detention, opening, removal, or This rule balances the need to protect property, including firearms which are treatment, and the circumstances that personal safety with the need to enforce not mailable under Section C024 of the prompted it, signed by the person existing laws and regulations against the Domestic Mail Manual, the Chief Postal purporting to act under this section, is mailing of nonmailable firearms, and Inspector may, without a search warrant promptly forwarded to the Chief Postal protects personal privacy in the use of or the sender’s or addressee’s consent, Inspector. the mails. As envisioned by the rule, authorize the screening of such mail by (c) Reports. Any person purporting to when the Chief Postal Inspector any means capable of identifying act under this section who does not determines that a credible threat exists explosives, nonmailable firearms, or report his or her action to the Chief that certain mail may contain other dangerous contents in the mails. Postal Inspector under the requirements nonmailable firearms, the Chief may The screening must be within the limits of this section, or whose action is authorize the use of technology that is of this section and without opening mail determined after investigation not to Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28061 have been authorized, is subject to Quality Planning and Standards, to the Other specific details of the disciplinary action or criminal Regional Air Division Directors, entitled attainment determination revocation prosecution or both. ‘‘Reasonable Further Progress, and the reinstatement of the 15% plan, Stanley F. Mires, Attainment Demonstration, and Related attainment demonstration, and Chief Counsel, Legislative. Requirements for Ozone Nonattainment contingency measures requirements for [FR Doc. 96–13831 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Areas Meeting the Ozone National the Pittsburgh area, and the rationale for Ambient Air Quality Standard,’’ EPA BILLING CODE 7710±12±P EPA’s proposed action are explained in stated that it is reasonable to interpret the February 12, 1996 notice of provisions regarding reasonable further proposed rulemaking (NPR) (61 FR progress (RFP) and attainment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 5360) and will not be restated here. Both demonstrations, along with certain other AGENCY positive and adverse public comments related provisions, so as not to require were received on the NPR. 40 CFR Part 52 certain SIP submissions if an ozone nonattainment area subject to those During the public comment period [PA084±4018; FRL±5511±2] requirements is monitoring attainment EPA received one comment letter in of the ozone standard. favor of the proposal, and two letters Approval and Promulgation of Air Based on this memo, on July 19, 1995, that contained adverse comments. Quality Implementation Plans; EPA published a final determination (60 Following meetings with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: FR 37015) that the Pittsburgh-Beaver representatives of the Pennsylvania Revocation of Determination of Valley and Reading ozone Department of Environmental Attainment of Ozone Standard by the nonattainment areas had attained the Protection, EPA subsequently received Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Ozone ozone standard and that the SIP another letter from one of the Nonattainment Area and requirements for reasonable further commenters, the Commonwealth of Reinstatement of Applicability of progress, (namely the 15% plans and Pennsylvania, setting forth a proposed Certain Reasonable Further Progress attainment demonstrations required schedule of milestones for meeting the and Attainment Demonstration under section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air attainment demonstration requirement. Requirements Act, and the contingency measures The following is a summary of the AGENCY: Environmental Protection required under section 172(c)(9) of the adverse comments received on the NPR, Agency (EPA). Clean Air Act) no longer applied so long and EPA’s response to those comments. as these areas did not violate the ozone # ACTION: Final rule. Comment 1: The Commonwealth of standard. The notice also stated that the Pennsylvania opposed EPA’s proposed SUMMARY: EPA is providing notification sanctions clocks started on January 18, reinstatement of the requirements of of its determination that the Pittsburgh- 1994, for these areas for failure to sections 182(b)(1) and 172(c)(9) on Beaver Valley ozone nonattainment area submit the RFP requirements were August 15, 1996. According to the is no longer attaining the National halted. The effective date of the final Commonwealth, the August 15, 1996 Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) determination occurred one day after date did not allow the state enough time for ozone, based on monitored the sanction clocks expired and these to develop and adopt the necessary violations of the standard during the areas were, in fact, under the offset regulations and make the required 1995 ozone season. EPA is also sanction at the time of EPA’s final submissions. The Commonwealth reinstating the applicability of certain determination. However, the sanctions contended that the August 15, 1996 date reasonable further progress (RFP) and were lifted as a result of EPA’s final was not consistent with EPA’s own attainment demonstration requirements, determination for the same reason that policy of providing a reasonable time along with certain other requirements, the final determination would have taking into account the pertinent of Part D of Title I of the Clean Air Act halted the sanctions clocks. circumstances, did not allow sufficient EPA has reviewed the 1995 ambient for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley ozone time for the Southwestern Pennsylvania air quality data (consistent with the nonattainment area because the area is Ozone Stakeholders process (established requirements contained in 40 CFR part no longer in attainment for ozone. by the Commonwealth) to be completed, 58 and recorded in AIRS) for the EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is was inconsistent with the time frame for Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley ozone effective on August 15, 1996. inspection and maintenance (I/M) nonattainment area (the Pittsburgh program submissions established by the ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents area), and determined that the area is no National Highway Systems Designation relevant to this action are available for longer in attainment. During the 1995 Act (NHSDA) of 1995, and did not public inspection during normal ozone season 17 exceedances of the provide sufficient time for the state business hours at the Air, Radiation, standard were recorded, and two and Toxics Division, U.S. monitors in the Pittsburgh area recorded rulemaking process to occur. Environmental Protection Agency, violations of the ozone NAAQS. The Subsequently, following meetings Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, current design value for the Pittsburgh between EPA and the state, in a letter Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 and area, computed using the ozone dated May 17, 1996, the Commonwealth the Pennsylvania Department of monitoring data for 1993 through 1995, proposed a schedule of milestones for Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air is 133 parts per billion (ppb). The submissions from the Commonwealth to Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market average annual number of expected EPA to comply with the attainment Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105. exceedances is 8.2 for that same time demonstration requirement for the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: period. An area is considered in Pittsburgh area. That schedule includes Maria A. Pino, (215) 566–2181, at the nonattainment when the average annual milestone dates beginning on August 15, EPA Region III office, or at number of expected exceedances is 1996, and ending on December 31, 1997. [email protected] via e-mail. greater than 1.0. A more detailed Response: First, with respect to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a policy summary of the ozone monitoring data proposed August 15, 1996 date for the memorandum dated May 10, 1995, from for the area is provided in the Technical reinstatement of the 15% plan and John Seitz, Director, Office of Air Support Document for this notice. section 172(c)(9) contingency measures 28062 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations requirements, for the reasons stated in element, the photochemical oxidant regulations prior to the 1998 ozone the proposal EPA continues to believe modeling demonstration that identifies season. that date is reasonable and provides the VOC and NOX reduction levels The final element under the schedule state with an adequate time to prepare necessary for attainment of the ozone is the December 31, 1997 date for the and adopt a SIP revision to comply with NAAQS in the area and a list of submission of final, fully-adopted and those requirements. The reasonableness available control strategies, is the enforceable regulations to implement all of that date is conclusively necessary first step in the process of selected control strategies for which demonstrated by the fact that the putting together a complete attainment new regulations are necessary. Commonwealth submitted to EPA a demonstration for the Pittsburgh area. EPA believes that this schedule 15% plan, and the contingency EPA believes that the August 15, 1996 represents a reasonable accommodation measures for the Pittsburgh area, as a date is a reasonable date for this first between the need for expeditious SIP revision, on March 22, 1996. EPA element as it will provide adequate time compliance with the reinstated notes that this submittal also for the completion of the modeling attainment demonstration requirement demonstrates that there is no efforts but ensure that the and the time for the state regulatory inconsistency between the submittal Commonwealth is moving forward process, the technical work regarding date for an interim I/M program under expeditiously towards the submission of the underlying modeling, and allowing the NHSDA provisions (March 27, a full attainment demonstration. for public input regarding these efforts 1996), and the August 15, 1996 date for Under the schedule, the second through the state notice and comment the reinstatement of the requirements as element, an official SIP revision (for process and the Commonwealth’s the state is relying in its 15% plan on which the Commonwealth has stakeholder process, which is scheduled such an I/M program, which it completed the public notice and hearing for completion by the end of 1996. EPA notes, however, that the obligations submitted to EPA on March 22, 1996. process) containing a photochemical regarding submittals to EPA established EPA worked with the Commonwealth to oxidant modeling demonstration and a under this milestone schedule exist develop this 15% plan, and provided list of available control strategies must regardless of the outcome of the comments on the plan for the public be submitted by the Commonwealth to stakeholder process. record. Therefore, EPA is adopting in EPA by October 1, 1996. This will this final action the proposed August EPA rejects the contention of the provide an adequate opportunity for commenter that the dates for the 15, 1996 date for the reinstatement of public input on these matters through a the 15% plan and contingency measures reinstatement of the suspended notice and comment process at the state requirements were based on a requirements. level and through the Southwestern Second, with respect to the date for commitment to establish such dates in Pennsylvania Ozone Stakeholders the reinstatement of the attainment a settlement agreement to settle pending process established by the state for demonstration requirement of section litigation. No settlement agreement addressing Pittsburgh’s ozone problems, 182(b)(1)(A) of the CAA, EPA believes regarding the proposed dates had been while still ensuring that these issues that the comments received indicate entered into at the time of the proposal will be addressed in an expeditious that it is appropriate for EPA to modify and the fact that EPA is establishing the manner. its proposal to allow additional time for dates in this final action based on a the submission of all of the aspects or The third element under the schedule careful evaluation of all circumstances elements of an attainment is a SIP submission from the and comments on the proposal, demonstration. EPA believes that there Commonwealth to EPA that must be including the Commonwealth’s letter of is a range of time periods that would made by April 1, 1997. This submission May 17, 1996, demonstrates that EPA satisfy the criteria of the May 10, 1995 must consist of any emission reduction had not committed itself to the August policy regarding a reasonable time for strategies selected by the 15, 1996 date at the time of the the reinstatement of the suspended Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh area proposal. requirements and that it is also for which new regulations are not The sanctions consequences of this permissible to establish a schedule of required and an enforceable schedule are discussed below in the milestones requiring the submission of commitment, which has undergone CONCLUSIONS section of this notice. # various elements of an attainment public notice and hearing, to submit to Comment 2: ‘‘Transport of ozone demonstration culminating with the EPA by December 31, 1997, as final, from outside Pennsylvania into the submission of fully-adopted, fully-adopted and enforceable Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley area was not enforceable regulations necessary to regulations any emission reduction considered.’’ implement control measures necessary strategies selected by the Response: While Pennsylvania has to attain the ozone standard. While EPA Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh area made great strides in improving the air does not agree with all of the comments for which new regulations are required. quality in the Pittsburgh area, ozone made by the Commonwealth, EPA This will ensure that any selected remains a problem. EPA believes that believes that the schedule proposed by strategies that do not require new the Pittsburgh area generates substantial the Commonwealth in the letter of May regulations are submitted to EPA prior emissions of volatile organic 17, 1996 is a reasonable one in light of to the 1997 ozone season for compounds (VOC) and oxides of the particular circumstances pertinent incorporation in the SIP and that any nitrogen (NOX), which contribute to the submission of an attainment selected strategies for which new significantly to the nonattainment demonstration for the Pittsburgh-Beaver regulations are required will be problem there. This was demonstrated Valley ozone nonattainment area. submitted in an expeditious time frame, in 1995, when exceedances were Under that schedule, the attainment but one that will provide necessary recorded in Pittsburgh, and ozone demonstration would be split into a additional time for state rulemaking concentrations at the border and in all number of elements, the first being due activities. Submission of those other western and central Pennsylvania to be submitted to EPA on August 15, regulations by December 31, 1997, areas were below the standard. The 1996, EPA’s original proposed date for should provide adequate lead time for Commonwealth has performed no the reinstatement of the attainment the implementation of such regulations modeling analyses to demonstrate that demonstration requirement. That first and EPA action regarding those the ozone problem in the Pittsburgh area Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28063 is caused by transport from upwind Commonwealth was aware of the Comment #4: ‘‘The 1995 ozone season sources. An adequate technical violations much sooner. Although the area data was unexpected and unusual demonstration, including emissions data had to go through official quality in comparison to recent data.’’ data and a modeling analysis, must be assurance procedures, the Response: As shown in the tables provided to support any claim of Commonwealth had a strong indication below, the area was not without transport-dominated nonattainment. that the area had violated the ozone exceedances in recent years. From 1987 Comment #3: ‘‘The 1995 ozone season NAAQS before November 1995. In fact, to 1995, the number of exceedances data was not officially submitted to EPA in an October 11, 1995 letter to EPA, varied from year to year with no until November 1995.’’ Governor Ridge acknowledged the discernable pattern. This variation is Response: While the Commonwealth violations of the ozone NAAQS that due to year-to-year variations in did not officially submit the data to EPA occurred in the Pittsburgh area during emissions and meteorological until November 1995, the the summer of 1995. conditions.

PITTSBURGH AREA: NUMBER OF OZONE EXCEEDANCES: 1987±1995

1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

10 41 5 0 2 0 1 4 17

Because the area has not adequately Comment #1: ‘‘An area cannot be 182(b)(1) and 172(c)(9) requirements reduced its VOC and NOX emissions, it removed from nonattainment status also compel imposition of the is subject to ozone exceedances except by the redesignation process conformity and federal implementation whenever meteorological conditions are under section 107(d)(3), which provides plan (FIP) requirements as well—and on conducive to ozone formation. One of that the redesignation cannot occur the same schedule. the goals of the Clean Air Act is to unless the area not only attained the Response: With respect to the minimize the health risks that people standard but also met several other conformity requirements, EPA believes encounter. Since meteorological prerequisites. Because the July 19 that they are not affected by this action. conditions cannot be controlled, the decision did not purport to find—and Rather, the conformity requirements are way to reduce health risks due to ozone had no basis for finding—that these as they were explained in the May 1, in the Pittsburgh area is to reduce the other prerequisites had been met, and 1996 disapproval of the Pittsburgh anthropogenic emissions of VOC and did not purport to relieve the redesignation request and maintenance NOX, both of which are considered Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley area of its plan (61 FR 19193): ‘‘When the final precursor pollutants. Furthermore, nonattainment status, that decision disapproval of the maintenance plan is many VOCs are listed as hazardous air could not lawfully exempt the area from effective, the Pittsburgh area will no pollutants under section 112 of the the requirements imposed by sections longer be able to demonstrate Clean Air Act, and nitrogen dioxide 172, 176, 179, 181, and 182.’’ conformity to the submitted (NO2) is individually regulated by EPA Response: The rationale and maintenance plan pursuant to the because of its health and welfare effects. justification for EPA’s July 19, 1995 transportation conformity requirements As a result, the reduction of VOC and action were thoroughly explained in in 40 CFR 93.128(I). Since the submitted NOX emissions will reduce the health that rulemaking and EPA incorporates maintenance plan budget will no longer risks that are associated with exposure by reference the explanations provided apply for transportation conformity therein as to the lawfulness of EPA’s purposes, the build/no-build and less- to VOC and NOX, as well as reducing the health risks due to elevated ozone action. EPA also incorporates by than-90 tests will apply pursuant to 40 levels. reference the discussions of the CFR 93.122. In addition, the rationales and bases for such actions Commonwealth submitted a 15% rate- Finally, the comment letter referred to contained in other notices regarding of-progress plan (15% plan) on March comments that this same commenter similar actions taken with respect to 22, 1996. Ninety days after this made on another, related action, EPA’s other ozone nonattainment areas—Salt submittal date, the emissions budget February 7, 1996 proposed disapproval Lake City, Utah (60 FR 36723, July 18, contained in this 15% plan will apply of Pennsylvania’s ozone redesignation 1995), Muskegon and Grand Rapids, for conformity purposes pursuant to 40 request for the Pittsburgh area (61 FR Michigan (60 FR 37366, July 20, 1995), CFR 93.118 and 93.128(a)(1)(ii), as well 4598). On May 1, 1996, EPA responded and Cleveland, Ohio (61 FR 20458, May as the build/no-build test under 40 CFR to those comments in the final rule 7, 1996). EPA also notes that it 93.122.’’ disapproving Pennsylvania’s disapproved the Commonwealth’s With respect to the FIP clock, EPA redesignation request for the Pittsburgh November 13, 1993 redesignation believes that the FIP clock is analogous area (61 FR 19193). Those comments request for the Pittsburgh area on May to the sanctions clock and, therefore, and EPA’s responses will not be restated 1, 1996 (61 FR 19193), and that the issue would be reinstated in the same manner here but are incorporated by reference to of whether the July 19, 1995 action had as the sanctions clock. Thus, the FIP the extent relevant to this action. any impact on EPA’s evaluation of the clock, like the sanctions clock, would The second commenter’s position is redesignation request has now been resume as to the particular submission that EPA’s July 19, 1995 waiver of the rendered moot. at issue, with one day less than six 15% plan and attainment demonstration Comment #2: The proposal ‘‘makes no months to run (the amount of time left requirements for the Pittsburgh area was mention of either the conformity on the FIP clock at the time of the July unlawful because it relieved moderate requirements of section 176(c) or the 19, 1995 determination of attainment). ozone nonattainment areas from federal implementation plan For example, with respect to the 15% requirements established for those areas requirements of section 110(c).’’ The plan and contingency measure in sections 172, 176, 179, 181, and 182 same ozone NAAQS violations that requirements that are being reinstated as of the Clean Air Act. compel reimposition of the section of August 15, 1996, the FIP clock would 28064 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations be reinstated at that time, with one day including the Commonwealth’s rule stopped if the Commonwealth makes less than six months to run. With adoption process and the Southwestern the relevant overdue submittal, if EPA respect to the elements of the attainment Pennsylvania Ozone Stakeholders affirmatively determines that the actual demonstration, the FIP clock would process, EPA has determined that it is material submitted by the resume as to each element two weeks reasonable to allow more time than Commonwealth contains the after the due date for each element (the proposed for the submission of a full information necessary to enable EPA to date on which the sanctions would be attainment demonstration SIP. determine whether the reinstated if the submission were not EPA is still revoking the attainment Commonwealth’s submission complies made), with one day less than six determination for the Pittsburgh area, with the pertinent milestone months to run. and reinstating the RFP and attainment requirement. This determination would Comment #3: Since it is the demonstration requirements as of the not be a determination regarding the commenter’s position that the effective date of this action. However, in merits of the submission, but only a requirements never ceased being lieu of requiring the Commonwealth to determination as to whether it contains applicable, the commenter agreed that submit the attainment determination for the necessary elements for EPA to August 15, 1996 is ‘‘a more than the Pittsburgh area as a formal SIP proceed to evaluate its merits. EPA shall reasonable time from the revision by August 15, 1996, EPA is make the determination as to whether Commonwealth to meet those establishing the following milestones. the submittal contains the necessary requirements.’’ The commenter also (1) By August 15, 1996, the information within two weeks of the stated that, ‘‘Further delay in these Commonwealth must submit to EPA, actual submission date by the already long-overdue public health and make available for public comment Commonwealth. EPA’s determination measures must not be tolerated.’’ as a proposed SIP submission, complete will be issued, in writing, in a letter to Response: As stated above, EPA photochemical oxidant modeling for the the Secretary of the Pennsylvania believed that August 15, 1996 provided Pittsburgh area which identifies the Department of Environmental Protection the Commonwealth with a reasonable VOC and NOx reductions levels and will be publicly available. amount of time to develop and submit necessary for attainment, and a list of In the event the Commonwealth a 15% plan, contingency measures, and available control strategies. makes a required submittal by the an attainment demonstration. However, (2) By October 1, 1996, the pertinent milestone date, EPA shall, for the reasons set out in this notice, Commonwealth must submit to EPA a within two weeks of the milestone date, EPA believes that, considering the SIP revision containing a photochemical make a determination, in writing, as to Commonwealth’s particular oxidant modeling demonstration and a whether the actual material submitted circumstances (including its regulatory list of available control strategies. by the Commonwealth contains the adoption process and the Southwestern (3) By April 1, 1997, the information necessary to enable EPA to Pennsylvania Ozone Stakeholders Commonwealth must submit to EPA a determine whether the process) the Commonwealth needs time full SIP revision for those emission Commonwealth’s submission complies beyond August 15, 1996 to complete an reduction strategies selected by the with the pertinent milestone attainment demonstration for the Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh area requirement. If EPA determines that the Pittsburgh area. for which new regulations are not material submitted to EPA by the required. Commonwealth fails to satisfy this Conclusions (4) By April 1, 1997, the minimum criterion, the offset sanction EPA has considered all the comments Commonwealth must submit to EPA a would be reinstated upon that received, and is committed to working committal SIP revision for those determination by EPA and the highway with the Commonwealth to resolve the emission reduction strategies selected sanction clock would be reinstated at Pittsburgh area’s ozone problem. by the Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh that time where it was halted on July 19, Towards that end, EPA is a member of area that require new regulations. 1995 (i.e., with approximately 6 months the Southwestern Pennsylvania Ozone (5) By December 31, 1997, the remaining). Sanctions or sanctions Stakeholders Group and is participating Commonwealth must submit to EPA as clocks would be stopped if the in the Stakeholders process to help a SIP revision adopted final fully Commonwealth subsequently makes a identify appropriate control measures, enforceable regulations encompassing submittal to cure the deficiencies agreeable to all affected parties, that will the emission reduction strategies identified by EPA, and if EPA bring the area into attainment for ozone contained in the committal SIP. affirmatively determines in writing that as quickly as possible, without causing Unless the Commonwealth makes the the material submitted by the an undue economic burden to the required submittal to EPA, the sanctions Commonwealth cures the identified citizens of the area. and sanction clocks halted by the July deficiencies. Again, EPA shall make the Furthermore, EPA still believes that 19, 1995 action suspending the determination as to the adequacy of the the August 15, 1996 date provides the attainment demonstration requirements submittal within two weeks of the date Commonwealth a reasonable amount of at issue will be reinstated, as to each of of the actual submittal to EPA. Each of time to develop a 15% plan and the the submittals included in this the determinations referenced in this contingency measures. As noted above, milestone schedule, two weeks after the paragraph will be made, in writing, in the Commonwealth submitted to EPA a date set for each of the submittals by the a letter to the Secretary of the 15% plan, and the contingency Commonwealth to EPA. If the Pennsylvania Department of measures, as an official SIP revision on Commonwealth fails to make a Environmental Protection and made March 22, 1996. EPA worked with the submission by the required date, the publicly available. Commonwealth to develop this 15% offset sanction would go back into effect In those instances where EPA plan and the contingency measures, and two weeks after the relevant milestone determines that the Commonwealth’s provided comments on the plan for the date, and the highway sanction clock submittal does not contain the public record. would be reinstated at that time where information necessary to enable EPA to Taking the individual circumstances it was halted on July 19, 1995 (i.e., with determine whether the the Commonwealth faces in addressing approximately 6 months remaining). Commonwealth’s submission complies its outstanding SIP requirements, Sanctions or sanctions clocks would be with the pertinent milestone Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28065 requirement, EPA’s letter so informing enforceable commitment or duty to on the FIP clock at the time of the July the Commonwealth will articulate the make those determinations. As noted 19, 1995 determination of attainment). basis for EPA’s determination, specify earlier, these determinations are not Final Action the remedy, and identify the actions determinations on the merits of the necessary by the Commonwealth to individual submissions, but are only Due to the monitored violations of the remedy its submission to satisfy the determinations regarding whether the ozone standard, EPA has determined relevant milestone. contents of the submission are adequate that the air quality in the Pittsburgh- Although this departs from the for EPA to evaluate the merits of the Beaver Valley moderate ozone normal approach to the cessation of a submission. EPA also emphasizes that, nonattainment area is no longer sanctions clock or the lifting of in the event the Commonwealth makes attaining the ozone standard. As a sanctions that have already been no submission at all by the milestone consequence, EPA is reinstating the imposed, EPA believes that the above- date in the schedule, sanctions and requirements of section 182(b)(1) described approach is justified in the sanctions clocks would be reinstated concerning the submission of the 15% present unique circumstances. With this automatically, without further action on RFP plan and ozone attainment action, EPA is establishing a new the part of EPA and would only be demonstration and the requirements of submission schedule for requirements stopped upon an affirmative section 172(c)(9) concerning that had been suspended by the July 19, determination by EPA regarding the contingency measures. In order to 1995 action taken pursuant to the May adequacy of the submission. provide a reasonable time for the 10, 1995 policy. Thus, in this case, the As stated previously, in those Commonwealth to develop and submit underlying requirements that had led to instances where EPA determines that these SIP elements, EPA is revoking the the starting of sanctions clocks and the the Commonwealth’s submittal does not determination of attainment and actual imposition of offset sanctions for contain the information necessary to reinstating these SIP requirements, one day have been suspended since July enable EPA to determine whether the effective beginning August 15, 1996. 19, 1995. EPA believes it is appropriate Commonwealth’s submission complies EPA believes that, under the and justifiable to establish the with the pertinent milestone circumstances presented here, setting an previously-described mechanism in the requirement, EPA’s letter so informing effective date of August 15, 1996 would context of carrying out the terms of the the Commonwealth will articulate the provide the Commonwealth a July 19, 1995 action in the event of a basis for EPA’s determination, specify reasonable amount of time to submit a revocation of that determination of the remedy, and identify the actions 15% plan and related contingency attainment due to subsequent violations, necessary by the Commonwealth to measures. The Commonwealth and the establishment of a milestone remedy its submission to satisfy the submitted a 15% plan, and the schedule that provides the state with a relevant milestone. contingency measures, on March 22, reasonable time to comply with the EPA believes that these commitments 1996. reinstated requirements through the are warranted under the special Furthermore, for the reasons set forth submission of individual elements of circumstances presented by this above, the following schedule is those requirements over a period of situation, including the establishment reasonable for the development and time. That mechanism provides that in by EPA of a phased schedule for the adoption of an attainment the case where the Commonwealth submission of specified elements of a demonstration. makes a submission to comply with the full attainment demonstration upon the (1) By August 15, 1996, the schedule herein established, sanctions revocation of a determination of Commonwealth must submit to EPA, and sanctions clocks would not be attainment that had suspended the and make available for public comment reinstated unless EPA determines that underlying requirements and the fact as a proposed SIP submission, complete the submission was deficient following that the Commonwealth has publicly photochemical oxidant modeling for the the process that was described committed to support this schedule in a Pittsburgh area which identifies the previously. letter to the rulemaking docket. EPA VOC and NOx reductions levels To ensure that such determinations also notes that due to the fact that the necessary for attainment, and a list of are made by EPA expeditiously, EPA is offset sanctions had already been available control strategies. taking the unusual step of committing to imposed in July of 1995, there is no (2) By October 1, 1996, the make such determinations within two safety margin upon the reinstatement of Commonwealth must submit to EPA a weeks of a submission from the the suspended requirements, i.e., the SIP revision containing a photochemical Commonwealth. This will assure that sanction would be immediately oxidant modeling demonstration and a sanctions are not either delayed or reimposed upon the reinstatement of the list of available control strategies. prolonged due to inaction on the part of requirements. Thus, EPA believes it is (3) By April 1, 1997, the EPA. Thus, EPA has also committed to justifiable for it to establish a Commonwealth must submit to EPA a act within two weeks on a submission mechanism that, in the event the full SIP revision for those emission from the Commonwealth made to cure Commonwealth makes a submission to reduction strategies selected by the a previously-identified deficiency. This comply with the milestone schedule, Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh area will assure that sanctions and sanctions will require EPA to act in an for which new regulations are not clocks reinstated due to an identified expeditious manner before the sanctions required. deficiency in a submission will be would be reinstated. (4) By April 1, 1997, the turned off expeditiously in the event the With respect to the FIP clock, EPA Commonwealth must submit to EPA a Commonwealth cures that deficiency. believes that the FIP clock is analogous committal SIP revision for those EPA views these commitments to act to the sanctions clock and, therefore, emission reduction strategies selected within two weeks, to determine whether would be reinstated in the same manner by the Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh a submission contains the information as the sanctions clock. Thus, the FIP area that require new regulations. necessary to enable EPA to determine clock, like the sanctions clock, would (5) By December 31, 1997, the whether the Commonwealth’s resume as to the particular submission Commonwealth must submit to EPA as submission complies with the milestone at issue with one day less than six a SIP revision adopted final fully requirements, as establishing an months to run (the amount of time left enforceable regulations encompassing 28066 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations the emission reduction strategies This action has been classified as a EPA is revoking the determination of contained in the committal SIP. Table 3 action for signature by the attainment for the area made July 19, Sanctions, sanction clocks, and FIP Regional Administrator under the 1995, and is reinstating the reasonable clocks will be reinstated as discussed in procedures published in the Federal further progress and attainment this notice. Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR demonstration requirements of section EPA’s July 19, 1995, final 2214–2225), as revised by a July 10, 182(b)(1) and contingency measure determination put the Commonwealth 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the on notice that these requirements would Assistant Administrator for Air and Clean Air Act beginning on August 15, be reinstated if a violation occurred. Radiation. The Office of Management 1996. With regard to the attainment Since the Commonwealth has been and Budget (OMB) has exempted this demonstration requirements, EPA has aware of the violations and their regulatory action from E.O. 12866 determined that the following schedule consequences since last summer, EPA review. is reasonable for the development, believes that this schedule constitutes Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean adoption, and submittal of an sufficient time for the Commonwealth to Air Act, petitions for judicial review of attainment demonstration by the prepare to meet the reactivated this action regarding the Pittsburgh- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the requirements. Sanctions will not be Beaver Valley ozone nonattainment area Commonwealth). imposed if the Commonwealth submits must be filed in the United States Court (A) By August 15, 1996, the an attainment demonstration for the of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by Commonwealth must submit to EPA, Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley nonattainment (Insert date 60 days from date of and make available for public comment area that EPA does not find deficient in publication). Filing a petition for as a proposed SIP submission, complete accordance with the schedule and reconsideration by the Administrator of photochemical oxidant modeling for the process set out above. As discussed this final rule does not affect the finality Pittsburgh area which identifies the above, the situation as to conformity is of this rule for the purposes of judicial VOC and NOX reductions levels not changed by this rulemaking action review nor does it extend the time necessary for attainment, and a list of and is as it was explained in the May within which a petition for judicial available control strategies. 1, 1995 final action disapproving the review may be filed, and shall not (B) By October 1, 1996, the redesignation request for the Pittsburgh- postpone the effectiveness of such rule Commonwealth must submit to EPA a Beaver Valley ozone nonattainment or action. This action may not be SIP revision containing a photochemical area. challenged later in proceedings to oxidant modeling demonstration and a Under Section 202 of the Unfunded enforce its requirements. (See section list of available control strategies. Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (C) By April 1, 1997, the 307(b)(2).) (‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed Commonwealth must submit to EPA a into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 full SIP revision for those emission prepare a budgetary impact statement to Environmental protection, Air reduction strategies selected by the accompany any proposed or final rule pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh area that includes a Federal mandate that Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, for which new regulations are not may result in estimated costs to State, Reporting and recordkeeping required. local, or tribal governments in the requirements. (D) By April 1, 1997, the aggregate; or to the private sector, of Commonwealth must submit to EPA a $100 million or more. Under section Dated: May 21, 1996. committal SIP revision for those 205, EPA must select the most cost- W. Michael McCabe, emission reduction strategies selected effective and least burdensome Regional Administrator, Region III. by the Commonwealth for the Pittsburgh alternative that achieves the objectives Chapter I, title 40, of the Code of area that require new regulations. of the rule and is consistent with Federal Regulations is amended as (E) By December 31, 1997, the statutory requirements. Section 203 follows: Commonwealth must submit to EPA as requires EPA to establish a plan for a SIP revision adopted final fully informing and advising any small PART 52Ð[AMENDED] enforceable regulations encompassing governments that may be significantly the emission reduction strategies 1. The authority citation for part 52 or uniquely impacted by the rule. contained in the committal SIP. EPA has determined that this action continues to read as follows: (ii) Unless the Commonwealth makes does not include a Federal mandate that Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q. the required submittal to EPA, the may result in estimated costs of $100 sanctions and sanction clocks halted by million or more to either State, local, or Subpart NNÐPennsylvania the July 19, 1995 action suspending the tribal governments in the aggregate, or 2. Section 52.2037 is amended by attainment demonstration requirements to the private sector. This Federal action revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as at issue will be reinstated, as to each of reinstates temporarily suspended follows: the submittals included in this requirements in accordance with the milestone schedule, two weeks after the terms of the July 19, 1995 action that § 52.2037 Control Strategy: Carbon date set for each of the submittals by the suspended them. Accordingly, no Monoxide and Ozone . Commonwealth to EPA. If the additional costs to State, local, or tribal * * * * * Commonwealth fails to make a governments, or to the private sector, (b)(1)(i) Determination—EPA has submission by the required date, the result from this action. made a determination, effective August offset sanction would go back into effect As described in the NPR, EPA has 15, 1996, that the Pittsburgh-Beaver two weeks after the relevant milestone determined that this action will not Valley ozone nonattainment area (the date, and the highway sanction clock affect a substantial number of small Pittsburgh area) is no longer in would be reinstated at that time where entities. EPA’s action does not create attainment of the National Ambient Air it was halted on July 19, 1995 (i.e., with any new requirements but reinstates Quality Standard for ozone due to approximately 6 months remaining). previously applicable requirements that monitored violations of the standard. Sanctions or sanctions clocks would be had temporarily been suspended. Therefore, effective August 15, 1996, stopped if the Commonwealth makes Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28067 the relevant overdue submittal, if EPA clock will be reinstated at that time, coverage as authorized under the affirmatively determines in writing that with one day less than six months to National Flood Insurance Program, 42 the actual material submitted by the run. With respect to the elements of the U.S.C. 4001 et seq., unless an Commonwealth contains the attainment demonstration, the FIP clock appropriate public body adopts information necessary to enable EPA to will resume as to each element (the date adequate floodplain management determine whether the on which the sanctions would be measures with effective enforcement Commonwealth’s submission complies reinstated if the submissions were not measures. The communities listed in with the pertinent milestone made), with one day less than six this document no longer meet that requirement. EPA shall make the months to run. statutory requirement for compliance determination, in writing, as to whether * * * * * with program regulations, 44 CFR part the submittal contains the necessary [FR Doc. 96–13871 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] 59 et seq. Accordingly, the communities will be suspended on the effective date information within two weeks of the BILLING CODE 6560±50±P actual submission date by the in the third column. As of that date, Commonwealth. In the event the flood insurance will no longer be available in the community. However, Commonwealth makes a required FEDERAL EMERGENCY some of these communities may adopt submittal by the pertinent milestone MANAGEMENT AGENCY date, EPA shall, within two weeks of the and submit the required documentation milestone date, make a determination, 44 CFR Part 64 of legally enforceable floodplain in writing, as to whether the actual management measures after this rule is [Docket No. FEMA±7642] material submitted by the published but prior to the actual suspension date. These communities Commonwealth contains the Suspension of Community Eligibility information necessary to enable EPA to will not be suspended and will continue determine whether the AGENCY: Federal Emergency their eligibility for the sale of insurance. Commonwealth’s submission complies Management Agency, FEMA. A notice withdrawing the suspension of with the pertinent milestone ACTION: Final rule. the communities will be published in requirement. If EPA determines that the the Federal Register. SUMMARY: This rule identifies In addition, the Federal Emergency material submitted to EPA by the communities, where the sale of flood Management Agency has identified the Commonwealth fails to satisfy this insurance has been authorized under special flood hazard areas in these minimum criterion, the offset sanction the National Flood Insurance Program communities by publishing a Flood would be reinstated upon that (NFIP), that are suspended on the Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The date of determination by EPA and the highway effective dates listed within this rule the FIRM if one has been published, is sanction clock would be reinstated at because of noncompliance with the indicated in the fourth column of the that time where it was halted on July 19, floodplain management requirements of table. No direct Federal financial 1995 (i.e., with approximately 6 months the program. If the Federal Emergency assistance (except assistance pursuant to remaining). Sanctions or sanctions Management Agency (FEMA) receives the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief clocks would be stopped if the documentation that the community has and Emergency Assistance Act not in Commonwealth subsequently makes a adopted the required floodplain connection with a flood) may legally be submittal to cure the deficiencies management measures prior to the provided for construction or acquisition identified by EPA, and if EPA effective suspension date given in this of buildings in the identified special affirmatively determines in writing that rule, the suspension will be withdrawn flood hazard area of communities not the material submitted by the by publication in the Federal Register. participating in the NFIP and identified Commonwealth cures the identified for more than a year, on the Federal deficiencies. EPA shall make the EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of each community’s suspension is the Emergency Management Agency’s determination as to the adequacy of the initial flood insurance map of the submittal within two weeks of the date third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the third column of the following tables. community as having flood-prone areas of the actual submittal to EPA. Each of (section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster ADDRESSES: If you wish to determine the determinations referred to in this Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. whether a particular community was subparagraph shall be made in writing, 4106(a), as amended). This prohibition suspended on the suspension date, in a letter to the Secretary of the against certain types of Federal contact the appropriate FEMA Regional Pennsylvania Department of assistance becomes effective for the Office or the NFIP servicing contractor. Environmental Protection and made communities listed on the date shown publicly available. In those instances FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: in the last column. where EPA determines that the Robert F. Shea Jr., Division Director, The Acting Associate Director finds Commonwealth’s submittal does not Program Implementation Division, that notice and public comment under contain the information necessary to Mitigation Directorate, 500 C Street, 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and enable EPA to determine whether the SW., Room 417, Washington, DC 20472, unnecessary because communities listed Commonwealth’s submission complies (202) 646–3619. in this final rule have been adequately with the pertinent milestone SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP notified. requirement, EPA’s letter so informing enables property owners to purchase Each community receives a 6-month, the Commonwealth will articulate the flood insurance which is generally not 90-day, and 30-day notification basis for EPA’s determination, specify otherwise available. In return, addressed to the Chief Executive Officer the remedy, and identify the actions communities agree to adopt and that the community will be suspended necessary by the Commonwealth to administer local floodplain management unless the required floodplain remedy its submission to satisfy the aimed at protecting lives and new management measures are met prior to relevant milestone. With respect to the construction from future flooding. the effective suspension date. Since 15 percent plan and contingency Section 1315 of the National Flood these notifications have been made, this measure requirements that are being Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 final rule may take effect within less reinstated as of August 15, 1996, the FIP U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance than 30 days. 28068 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

National Environmental Policy Act Regulatory Classification Order 12778, October 25, 1991, 56 FR This rule is categorically excluded This final rule is not a significant 55195, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 309. from the requirements of 44 CFR Part regulatory action under the criteria of List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64 10, Environmental Considerations. No section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of environmental impact assessment has September 30, 1993, Regulatory Flood insurance, Floodplains. been prepared. Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735. Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is Regulatory Flexibility Act Paperwork Reduction Act amended as follows: The Acting Associate Director has This rule does not involve any PART 64Ð[AMENDED] determined that this rule is exempt from collection of information for purposes of the requirements of the Regulatory the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 1. The authority citation for Part 64 Flexibility Act because the National 3501 et seq. Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as continues to read as follows: amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits Executive Order 12612, Federalism Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; flood insurance coverage unless an This rule involves no policies that Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, appropriate public body adopts have federalism implications under 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, adequate floodplain management Executive Order 12612, Federalism, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. measures with effective enforcement October 26, 1987, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., measures. The communities listed no p. 252. § 64.6 [Amended] longer comply with the statutory 2. The tables published under the requirements, and after the effective Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice Reform authority of § 64.6 are amended as date, flood insurance will no longer be follows: available in the communities unless This rule meets the applicable they take remedial action. standards of section 2(b)(2) of Executive

Date certain federal assist- Community Current effec- ance no longer State/location No. Effective date of eligibility tive map date available in special flood hazard areas

Region I Maine: Arundel, town of, York County ...... 230192 Apr 21, 1976, Emerg.; Apr 1, 1987, Reg.; June 4, 1996 June 4, 1996. June 4, 1996, Susp. Region IV Georgia: Dooly County, unincorporated areas. 130532 Sept. 22, 1995, Emerg.; June 4, 1996, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 4, 1996, Susp. Region V Illinois: Kane County, unincorporated areas .... 170896 July 29, 1976, Emerg.; Mar. 1, 1982, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 4, 1996, Susp. Indiana: LaPorte, city of, LaPorte County ...... 180490 Apr. 28, 1983, Emerg.; Apr. 1, 1993, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 4, 1996, Susp. LaPorte County, unincorporated areas ..... 180144 Jan. 15, 1976, Emerg.; Jan. 1, 1987, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 4, 1996, Susp. Region VI New Mexico: Eddy County, unincorporated 350120 Oct. 22, 1975, Emerg.; June 4, 1996, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. areas. June 4, 1996, Susp. Region IX Arizona: Tucson, city of, Pima County ...... 040076 Jan. 20, 1975, Emerg.; Aug. 2, 1982, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 4, 1996, Susp. Michigan: Bangor, charter township of, Bay County 260019 Mar. 30, 1973, Emerg.; July 2, 1979, Reg.; June 18, 1996 June 18, 1996 June 18, 1996, Susp. Bay City, city of, Bay County ...... 260020 Mar. 30, 1973, Emerg.; Sept. 1, 1978, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Beaver, township of, Bay County ...... 260357 June 25, 1982, Emerg.; Feb. 1, 1986, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Essexville, city of, Bay County ...... 260021 Mar. 30, 1973, Emerg.; Sept. 1, 1978, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Frankenlust, township of, Bay County ...... 260022 Mar. 30, 1973, Emerg.; Nov. 15, 1979, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Fraser, township of, Bay County ...... 260657 Nov. 13, 1981, Emerg.; Nov. 13, 1981, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Hampton, township of, Bay County ...... 260023 Mar. 30, 1973, Emerg.; Aug. 1, 1978, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Kawkawlin, township of, Bay County ...... 260658 Jan. 29, 1979, Emerg.; Feb. 1, 1979, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Merritt, township of, Bay County ...... 260024 Mar. 30, 1973, Emerg.; Aug. 15, 1978, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28069

Date certain federal assist- Community Current effec- ance no longer State/location No. Effective date of eligibility tive map date available in special flood hazard areas

Monitor, township of, Bay County ...... 260358 July 21, 1982, Emerg.; Aug. 19, 1985, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Pinconning, city of, Bay County ...... 260607 Mar. 17, 1975, Emerg.; Aug. 3, 1981, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Pinconning, township of, Bay County ...... 260025 Mar. 30, 1973, Emerg.; Sept. 1, 1978, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Portsmouth, township of, Bay County ...... 260026 Apr. 26, 1973, Emerg.; May 1, 1980, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Williams, township of, Bay County ...... 260359 June 21, 1979, Emerg.; Feb. 1, 1986, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Region VI Louisiana: St. Mary Parish, unincor- 220192 Apr. 6, 1973, Emerg.; Sept. 3, 1980, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. porated areas. June 18, 1996, Susp. Oklahoma: Noble County, unincorporated 400132 May 14, 1990, Emerg.; Nov. 18, 1992, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. areas. June 18, 1996, Susp. Region VII Nebraska: Dakota County, unincorporated areas ...... 310429 Aug. 18, 1975, Emerg.; Apr. 15, 1982, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Homer, village of, Dakota County ...... 310241 Mar. 26, 1975, Emerg.; Apr. 3, 1984, Reg.; ...... do ...... Do. June 18, 1996, Susp. Code for reading third column: Emerg.ÐEmergency; Reg.ÐRegular; Rein.ÐReinstatement; Susp.ÐSuspension.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. DATES: Fishery will be closed midnight, until the TAC is reached, whichever 83.100, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’) A.l.t., June 1, 1996, until 12 noon, A.l.t., occurs first. Issued: May 30, 1996. July 1, 1996. Comments must be Section 672.23(b) specifies that the Richard W. Krimm, received at the following address no time of all openings and closures of Acting Associate Director, Mitigation later than 4:30 p.m., A.l.t., June 14, fishing seasons other than the beginning Directorate. 1996. and end of the calendar fishing year is [FR Doc. 96–13987 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to 12:00 noon, A.l.t. A fishery opening, BILLING CODE 6718±05±P Ronald J. Berg, Chief, Fisheries therefore, normally extends for a Management Division, Alaska Region, minimum of 24 hours. Current NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK information shows the catching capacity DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 99802, Attn: Lori Gravel, or be delivered of vessels catching pollock for to the fourth floor of the Federal processing by the inshore component is National Oceanic and Atmospheric Building, 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, in excess of 9,600 mt per day. The Administration AK. Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has 50 CFR Part 672 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: determined that the remaining portion Michael L. Sloan, 907–581–2062. [Docket No. 960129018±6018±01; I.D. of the TAC allocated to the inshore 052896E] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The component would be exceeded if a 24– groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive hour fishery were allowed to occur. Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; economic zone is managed by the NMFS NMFS intends that the TAC should not Pollock in the Western Regulatory according to the Fishery Management be exceeded, and will not allow a 24– Area Plan for Groundfish of the GOA (FMP) hour directed fishery. prepared by the North Pacific Fishery AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries NMFS in accordance with Management Council under authority of Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and § 672.22(a)(1)(i), is adjusting the season the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), for pollock by vessels catching pollock Commerce. Management Act (Magnuson Act). Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by for processing by the inshore ACTION: Closure; request for comments. regulations implementing the FMP at 50 component in the Western Regulatory Area of the GOA by allowing the SUMMARY: NMFS issues an inseason CFR parts 620 and 672. adjustment closing directed fishing for As of May 11, 1996, 5,704 metric tons scheduled opening of the directed pollock by vessels catching pollock for (mt) of pollock remain in the second fishery at 12:00 noon, A.l.t., June 1, processing by the inshore component in quarterly allowance of the inshore 1996. The fishery will remain open until the Western Regulatory Area of the Gulf allocation of the Western Regulatory 12:00 midnight, A.l.t., June 1 at which of Alaska (GOA). This adjustment closes Area of the GOA pollock TAC. In time it will be closed. This action has the fishery 12 hours after its scheduled accordance with § 672.23(e), directed the effect of opening the fishery for 12 opening at noon, A.l.t., June 1, 1996, fishing for pollock in the Western hours. NMFS is taking this action to and is necessary to allow the harvest of Regulatory Area of the GOA is allow a controlled fishery to occur, the total allowable catch (TAC) of scheduled from 12 noon, A.l.t., June 1 thereby preventing either the pollock in the Western Regulatory Area. until 12 noon, A.l.t., July 1, 1996, or 28070 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations underharvest or overharvest of the total allowable catch (TAC) of pollock in remain open until 12:00 midnight, A.l.t., pollock TAC allocated to the inshore Statistical Area 630. June 1 at which time it will be closed. component as authorized by DATES: Fishery will be closed midnight, This action has the effect of opening the § 672.22(a)(2)(iii). In accordance with A.l.t., June 1, 1996, until 12 noon, A.l.t., fishery for 12 hours. NMFS is taking this 672.22(a)(4), NMFS has determined that July 1, 1996. Comments must be action to allow a controlled fishery to closing the season at midnight, A.l.t., received at the following address no occur, thereby preventing either the June 1 after a 12–hour opening is the later than 4:30 p.m., A.l.t., June 14, underharvest or overharvest of the least restrictive management adjustment 1996. pollock TAC allocated to the inshore to achieve the second quarterly ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to component as authorized by allowance of the pollock TAC allocated Ronald J. Berg, Chief, Fisheries § 672.22(a)(2)(iii). In accordance with to the inshore component and will Management Division, Alaska Region, 672.22(a)(4), NMFS has determined that allow other fisheries to continue in NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK closing the season at midnight, A.l.t., noncritical areas and time periods. 99802, Attn: Lori Gravel, or be delivered June 1 after a 12–hour opening is the least restrictive management adjustment Classification to the fourth floor of the Federal Building, 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, to achieve the second quarterly The Assistant Administrator for AK. allowance of the pollock TAC allocated Fisheries, NOAA, finds for good cause FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to the inshore component and will that providing prior notice and public Michael L. Sloan, 907–581–2062. allow other fisheries to continue in comment or delaying the effective date noncritical areas and time periods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The of this action is impracticable and groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive contrary to the public interest. Without Classification economic zone is managed by the NMFS this inseason adjustment, NMFS could The Assistant Administrator for according to the Fishery Management not allow this fishery, and the second Fisheries, NOAA, finds for good cause Plan for Groundfish of the GOA (FMP) quarterly allowance of the pollock TAC that providing prior notice and public prepared by the North Pacific Fishery in the Western Regulatory Area of the comment or delaying the effective date Management Council under authority of GOA would not be harvested in of this action is impracticable and the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and accordance with the regulatory contrary to the public interest. Without Management Act (Magnuson Act). schedule, resulting in a seasonal loss of this inseason adjustment, NMFS could Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by more than 1.0 million dollars. Under not allow this fishery, and the second regulations implementing the FMP at 50 § 672.22(c)(2), interested persons are quarterly allowance of the pollock TAC CFR parts 620 and 672. invited to submit written comments on in Statistical Area 630 of the GOA As of May 11, 1996, 2,200 metric tons this action to the above address until would not be harvested in accordance of pollock remain in the second June 14, 1996. with the regulatory schedule, resulting quarterly allowance of the inshore This action is taken under § 672.22 in a seasonal loss of more than 450 allocation of Statistical Area 630 of the and is exempt from review under E.O. thousand dollars. Under § 672.22(c)(2), GOA pollock TAC. In accordance with 12866. interested persons are invited to submit § 672.23 (e), directed fishing for pollock written comments on this action to the Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. in Statistical Area 630 of the GOA is above address until June 14, 1996. scheduled from 12 noon, A.l.t., June 1 Dated: May 29, 1996. This action is taken under § 672.22 until 12 noon, A.l.t., July 1, 1996, or Richard W. Surdi, and is exempt from review under E.O. until the TAC is reached, whichever Acting Director, Office of Fisheries 12866. Conservation and Management, National occurs first. Marine Fisheries Service. Section 672.23(b) specifies that the Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. [FR Doc. 96–13952 Filed 5–30–96; 4:21 pm] time of all openings and closures of Dated: May 29, 1996. fishing seasons other than the beginning BILLING CODE 3510±22±F Richard W. Surdi, and end of the calendar fishing year is Acting Director, Office of Fisheries 12:00 noon, A.l.t. A fishery opening, Conservation and Management, National 50 CFR Part 672 therefore, normally extends for a Marine Fisheries Service. minimum of 24 hours. Current [FR Doc. 96–13951 Filed 5–30–96; 4:21 pm] [Docket No. 960129018±6018±01; I.D. information shows the catching capacity BILLING CODE 3510±22±F 052896D] of vessels catching pollock for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; processing by the inshore component is Pollock in Statistical Area 630 in excess of 4,000 mt per day. The 50 CFR Part 672 Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries determined that the remaining portion [Docket No. 960129018±6018±01; I.D. Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and of the TAC allocated to the inshore 052896C] Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), component would be exceeded if a 24– Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Commerce. hour fishery were allowed to occur. Pollock in Statistical Area 620 ACTION: Closure; request for comments. NMFS intends that the TAC should not be exceeded, and will not allow a 24– AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries SUMMARY: NMFS issues an inseason hour directed fishery. Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and adjustment closing directed fishing for NMFS in accordance with Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pollock by vessels catching pollock for § 672.22(a)(1)(i), is adjusting the season Commerce. processing by the inshore component in for pollock by vessels catching pollock ACTION: Closure; request for comments. Statistical Area 630 of the Gulf of Alaska for processing by the inshore (GOA). This adjustment closes the component in Statistical Area 630 of the SUMMARY: NMFS issues an inseason fishery 12 hours after its scheduled GOA by allowing the scheduled opening adjustment closing directed fishing for opening at noon, A.l.t. June 1, 1996, and of the directed fishery at 12:00 noon, pollock by vessels catching pollock for is necessary to allow the harvest of the A.l.t., June 1, 1996. The fishery will processing by the inshore component in Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28071

Statistical Area 620 of the Gulf of Alaska for pollock by vessels catching pollock 50 CFR Part 675 (GOA). This adjustment closes the for processing by the inshore fishery 12 hours after its scheduled [Docket No. 960129019±6019±01; I.D. component in Statistical Area 620 of the 052896H] opening at noon, A.l.t. June 1, 1996, and GOA by allowing the scheduled opening is necessary to allow the harvest of the of the directed fishery at 12:00 noon, Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea total allowable catch (TAC) of pollock in A.l.t., June 1, 1996. The fishery will and Aleutian Islands Area; Aggregate Statistical Area 620. remain open until 12:00 midnight, A.l.t., Species in the Rock Sole/Flathead DATES: Fishery will be closed midnight, June 1 at which time it will be closed. Sole/``Other Flatfish'' Fishery Category A.l.t., June 1, 1996, until 12 noon, A.l.t., This action has the effect of opening the by Vessels Using Trawl Gear July 1, 1996. Comments must be fishery for 12 hours. NMFS is taking this received at the following address no AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries action to allow a controlled fishery to Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and later than 4:30 p.m., A.l.t., June 14, occur, thereby preventing either the 1996. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), underharvest or overharvest of the Commerce. ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to pollock TAC allocated to the inshore ACTION: Modification of a closure. Ronald J. Berg, Chief, Fisheries component as authorized by Management Division, Alaska Region, § 672.22(a)(2)(iii). In accordance with SUMMARY: NMFS is opening directed NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 672.22(a)(4), NMFS has determined that fishing for aggregate species in the rock 99802, Attn: Lori Gravel, or be delivered closing the season at midnight, A.l.t., sole/flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ to the fourth floor of the Federal June 1 after a 12–hour opening is the fishery category by vessels using trawl Building, 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian AK. least restrictive management adjustment to achieve the second quarterly Islands management area (BSAI). This FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: allowance of the pollock TAC allocated action is necessary to fully utilize the Michael L. Sloan, 907–581–2062. to the inshore component and will second seasonal bycatch allowance of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The allow other fisheries to continue in Pacific halibut apportioned to the trawl groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive noncritical areas and time periods. rock sole/flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ economic zone is managed by the NMFS fishery category in the BSAI. according to the Fishery Management Classification EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of The Assistant Administrator for time (A.l.t.), June 3, 1996, until 12 Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1996. Pacific Fishery Management Council Fisheries, NOAA, finds for good cause under authority of the Magnuson that providing prior notice and public FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fishery Conservation and Management comment or delaying the effective date Andrew N. Smoker, 907–586–7228. Act (Magnuson Act). Fishing by U.S. of this action is impracticable and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The vessels is governed by regulations contrary to the public interest. Without groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive implementing the FMP at 50 CFR parts this inseason adjustment, NMFS could economic zone is managed by NMFS 620 and 672. not allow this fishery, and the second according to the Fishery Management As of May 11, 1996, 2,891 metric tons quarterly allowance of the pollock TAC Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the (mt) of pollock remain in the second in Statistical Area 620 of the GOA Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area quarterly allowance of the inshore would not be harvested in accordance (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council under allocation of Statistical Area 620 of the with the regulatory schedule, resulting authority of the Magnuson Fishery GOA pollock TAC. In accordance with in a seasonal loss of more than 500 Conservation and Management Act. § 672.23(e), directed fishing for pollock thousand dollars. Under § 672.22(c)(2), in Statistical Area 620 of the GOA is Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by interested persons are invited to submit scheduled from 12 noon, A.l.t., June 1 regulations implementing the FMP at 50 written comments on this action to the until 12 noon, A.l.t., July 1, 1996, or CFR parts 620 and 675. above address until June 14, 1996. until the TAC is reached, whichever In accordance with § 675.21(c)(1)(iii), occurs first. This action is taken under § 672.22 the Director, Alaska Region, NMFS Section 672.23(b) specifies that the and is exempt from review under E.O. (Regional Director), determined that the time of all openings and closures of 12866. second seasonal bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut apportioned to the trawl fishing seasons other than the beginning Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. and end of the calendar fishing year is rock sole/flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ 12:00 noon, A.l.t. A fishery opening, Dated: May 29, 1996. fishery in the BSAI had been caught. therefore, normally extends for a Richard W. Surdi, Therefore, NMFS prohibited directed minimum of 24 hours. Current Acting Director, Office of Fisheries fishing for species in the rock sole/ information shows the catching capacity Conservation and Development, National flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ fishery of vessels catching pollock for Marine Fisheries Service. category by vessels using trawl gear in processing by the inshore component is [FR Doc. 96–13950 Filed 5–30–96; 4:21 pm] the BSAI effective April 13, 1996 (61 FR in excess of 4,000 mt per day. The BILLING CODE 3510±22±F 16883, April 18, 1996) to prevent Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has exceeding the second seasonal bycatch determined that the remaining portion allowance of Pacific halibut apportioned of the TAC allocated to the inshore to that fishery. component would be exceeded if a 24– The Regional Director has determined hour fishery were allowed to occur. that as of May 11, 1996, 50 metric tons NMFS intends that the TAC should not of halibut mortality remain in the be exceeded, and will not allow a 24– second seasonal bycatch allowance. hour directed fishery. Therefore, NMFS is terminating the NMFS in accordance with previous closure and is opening § 672.22(a)(1)(i), is adjusting the season directed fishing for species in the rock 28072 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations sole/flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS fishery category by vessels using trawl fishery for the sharpchin/northern (Regional Director), has determined, in gear in the BSAI. rockfish species category in the Aleutian accordance with § 675.20(a)(8), that the All other closures remain in full force Islands subarea (AI) of the Bering Sea sharpchin/northern rockfish species and effect. and Aleutian Islands management area category initial TAC in the AI soon will Classification (BSAI). This action is necessary to be reached. Therefore, the Regional prevent exceeding the sharpchin/ Director has established a directed This action is taken under 50 CFR northern rockfish species category total fishing allowance of 4,145 mt, with 675.20 and is exempt from review under allowable catch (TAC) in the AI. consideration that 300 mt will be taken E.O. 12866. EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local as incidental catch in directed fishing Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. time (A.l.t.), May 30, 1996, until 12 for other species in the AI. The Regional Dated: May 29, 1996. midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1996. Director has determined that the Richard W. Surdi, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: directed fishing allowance has been reached. Consequently, NMFS is Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Mary Furuness, 907–586-7228. prohibiting directed fishing for the Conservation and Management, National SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Marine Fisheries Service. sharpchin/northern rockfish species groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive category in the AI. [FR Doc. 96–13843 Filed 5–30–96; 11:39 am] economic zone is managed by NMFS BILLING CODE 3510±22±F according to the Fishery Management Maximum retainable bycatch amounts Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the for applicable gear types may be found Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (FMP) in the regulations at § 675.20(h). 50 CFR Part 675 prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Classification [Docket No. 960129019±6019±01; I.D. Management Council under authority of 052996B] the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and This action is taken under 50 CFR Management Act. Fishing by U.S. 675.20 and is exempt from review under Groundfish of the Bering Sea and vessels is governed by regulations E.O. 12866. Aleutian Islands Area; Sharpchin/ implementing the FMP at 50 CFR parts Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Northern Rockfish Species Category in 620 and 675. the Aleutian Islands Subarea In accordance with § 675.20(a)(7)(ii), Dated: May 30, 1996. Richard W. Surdi, AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries the sharpchin/ northern rockfish species Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and category initial TAC for the AI was Acting Director, Office of Fisheries established by the Final 1996 Harvest Conservation and Management, National Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Marine Fisheries Service. Commerce. Specifications of Groundfish (61 FR 4311, February 5, 1996) as 4,445 metric [FR Doc. 96–13949 Filed 5–30–96; 4:21 pm] ACTION: Closure. tons (mt). BILLING CODE 3510±22±F 28073

Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 61, No. 108

Tuesday, June 4, 1996

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and • Reorganizing the CEM regulations contains notices to the public of the proposed 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, to eliminate duplication and to make issuance of rules and regulations. The except holidays. Persons wishing to their provisions easier to find and use; purpose of these notices is to give interested inspect comments are requested to call • Removing the requirements for persons an opportunity to participate in the ahead on (202) 690–2817 to facilitate clitoral sinusectomies and endometrial rule making prior to the adoption of the final cultures in female horses and rules. entry into the comment reading room. establishing new protocols for the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. collection of specimens for culturing; Joyce Bowling, Staff Veterinarian, • DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Incorporating new testing and Import/Export Animals, National Center treatment protocols for stallions and test for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 Animal and Plant Health Inspection mares; River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD • Service Incorporating a new testing protocol 20737–1231, (301) 734–6479; or E-mail: for thoroughbred horses in training in 9 CFR Part 92 [email protected]. their country of origin; and • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Providing for the use of accredited [Docket No. 95±054±1] veterinarians to monitor horses from Background CEM-affected countries that are Importation of Horses From CEM temporarily in the United States for Countries The regulations in 9 CFR part 92 (referred to below as the regulations) competition purposes. AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health prohibit or restrict the importation of These proposed changes, along with Inspection Service, USDA. certain animals into the United States to several more minor proposed changes, are discussed in greater detail below. ACTION: Proposed rule. prevent the introduction of communicable diseases of livestock and Reorganization of Provisions SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend poultry. Subpart C—Horses, §§ 92.300 We are proposing to reorganize the regulations regarding the through 92.326 of the regulations, § 92.301(c) and § 92.304 (a)(4) through importation of horses from countries pertains to the importation of horses affected with contagious equine metritis (a)(12) to eliminate duplication and into the United States. Sections 92.301 make the provisions directly related to to incorporate new testing and treatment and 92.304 of the regulations contain protocols for mares and stallions, CEM easier to find and use. The specific provisions for the importation proposed new structure would be as provide for the use of accredited and post-entry handling of horses from veterinarians to monitor horses follows: countries affected with contagious The prohibition on the importation of temporarily imported into the United equine metritis (CEM), a highly horses from CEM-affected countries and States for competition purposes, contagious bacterial venereal disease. the list of countries affected with CEM incorporate a new testing protocol for Currently, the regulations in would remain in § 92.301(c)(1). The thoroughbred horses in training in their § 92.301(c)(1) identify countries where exceptions to that prohibition would country of origin, and remove the CEM exists and countries that trade remain in § 92.301(c)(2), but only as requirements for endometrial cultures horses freely with countries where CEM categories of horses that may be and clitoral sinusectomies in mares. exists without testing for CEM and imported into the United States from These proposed changes are intended to prohibit, with certain exceptions, the countries affected with CEM under update, clarify, and streamline the importation of horses into the United certain conditions; we are proposing to existing regulations. The proposed States from those countries (hereafter set out the specific conditions changes would simplify the referred to as CEM-affected countries). applicable to importation of horses from requirements for importing horses from The specific conditions under which each category in new paragraphs countries affected with contagious certain horses may be imported into the § 92.301 (d), (e), (f), and (g). In this way, equine metritis without increasing the United States from CEM-affected rather than having the categories and risk of the disease being introduced into countries are set forth in § 92.301(c)(2). conditions spread across many pages of or disseminated within the United The regulations in § 92.304 (a)(4) regulatory text as is currently the case, States. through (a)(12) provide for the approval the reader would be presented with a DATES: Consideration will be given only of States to receive stallions and mares single list of all the categories of eligible to comments received on or before from CEM-affected countries, list the horses, and then directed to a specific August 5, 1996. States that have received such approval paragraph to find the conditions that ADDRESSES: Please send an original and from the Administrator of the Animal apply to the importation of a particular three copies of your comments to and Plant Health Inspection Service category of horses. Docket No. 95–054–1, Regulatory (APHIS), and provide for the approval of The conditions that apply to the Analysis and Development, PPD, laboratories to conduct CEM cultures importation of horses in one of the APHIS, Suite 3C03, 4700 River Road and tests. categories that would be listed in Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737–1238. We have determined that our CEM § 92.301(c)(2) are brief and require little Please state that your comments refer to regulations can be changed to make elaboration. Specifically, current Docket No. 95–054–1. Comments horse importations easier without § 92.301(c)(2)(ii) provides for the received may be inspected at USDA, increasing the risk of introducing CEM importation of geldings, weanlings, or room 1141, South Building, 14th Street into the United States. Therefore, we are yearlings whose age is certified on the and Independence Avenue SW., proposing to amend the regulations by: import health certificate prescribed in 28074 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

§ 92.314. In short, the category defines • Thoroughbred horses imported for Elimination of Duplication the conditions, so there is no need to list permanent entry from France, Germany, There are places in the current the conditions in a separate paragraph. Ireland, or the United Kingdom (current regulations where provisions found in We are proposing, however, to make § 92.301(c)(2)(iii)) would become new one section are unnecessarily geldings a separate category, distinct § 92.301(d); • duplicated in another. Specifically, the from weanlings and yearlings, because Stallions and mares over 731 days regulations pertaining to the of age imported for permanent entry the age certification required for importation of thoroughbred horses (current § 92.301(c)(2) (iv) through (vii)) weanlings and yearlings is not necessary (§ 92.301(c)(2)(iii)), stallions over 731 would become new § 92.301(e). The for geldings. days of age (§ 92.301(c)(2)(iv)), mares post-entry testing and treatment With regard to weanlings and over 731 days of age (§ 92.301(c)(2) (v), requirements for those stallions and yearlings, we are also proposing to (vi), and (vii)), and horses that have mares (current § 92.304 (a)(4) to (a)(5) amend the definition in § 92.300 of the been temporarily exported to a CEM- and (a)(7) to (a)(8), respectively) would term weanling or yearling, which is affected country from the United States also be incorporated into new currently defined as ‘‘any horse, weaned or another country not known to be § 92.301(e); from its dam, which was foaled not • affected with CEM (§ 92.301(c)(2)(xi)) all more than 731 days prior to its offer for Horses over 731 days of age imported for no more than 90 days to require a horse offered for importation entry into the United States.’’ There to be accompanied by a certificate that have been instances in which an compete in specified events (current § 92.301(c)(2) (viii) through (x)) would confirms certain facts regarding the individual certified that a horse being horse’s health. offered for entry was younger than 731 become new § 92.301(f); and • Horses that have been temporarily The certificate referred to in those days of age, but the horse, upon exported from the United States or paragraphs is the same certificate examination by APHIS, was found to another country not known to be required by § 92.314 for all horses have erupted first permanent incisors. affected with CEM to a country affected offered for importation, and § 92.314 Those teeth are not expected to erupt with CEM (current § 92.301(c)(2)(xi)) clearly describes the information that until a horse has reached 21⁄2 years of would become new § 92.301(g). the certificate must contain and who age, and subsequent investigation We are also proposing to establish two may sign the certificate. Two of the disclosed that the horse was indeed more new paragraphs in § 92.301 into criteria found in § 92.314—the older than 731 days of age and had been which we would move the remaining description of who may sign the fraudulently certified. We are, therefore, CEM-specific provisions of § 92.304. certificate and a requirement that the proposing to include the eruption of the First, we are proposing to move the certificate confirm that each horse has first permanent incisors in the provisions of paragraphs § 92.304 (a)(4) been found free of evidence of definition of weanling or yearling as a through (a)(9) to proposed new communicable disease—are repeated in benchmark; specifically, a sentence paragraph § 92.301(h). Those paragraphs those paragraphs of § 92.301(c)(2) cited would be added to the definition to provide for the approval of States to in the preceding paragraph. Because make it clear that if a horse’s first accept stallions and mares from CEM- those signature and confirmation permanent incisors have erupted, the affected countries and list the States that criteria are clearly described in § 92.314, horse will not be considered to be a have received such approval. Second, we do not believe that it is necessary to weanling or yearling. the provisions of § 92.304 (a)(10) repeat them in other sections of the We are also proposing to add a new through (a)(12), which pertain to the regulations. Therefore, proposed new category of exceptions in § 92.301(c)(2) approval of laboratories to conduct CEM § 92.301 (d), (e), and (g), which would for wild (non-domesticated) species of cultures and tests, would become new contain the requirements for the equidae, such as zebras and wild asses. § 92.301(i). importation of thoroughbred horses, These animals would be allowed to be We are also proposing to make stallions and mares over 731 days of imported without additional restrictions nonsubstantive organizational changes age, and horses temporarily exported to for CEM if the animal had been captured to §§ 92.304(b) and 92.314 to improve a CEM-affected country, would simply in the wild or was to be imported from their readability. Current § 92.304(b) state that the horses must be a zoo or other facility where it would be consists of four sentences, the last of accompanied by a certificate issued in unlikely that the animal would have which contains six clauses, that can accordance with § 92.314. had contact with domesticated horses logically be divided into three We are proposing to eliminate used for breeding. That lack of contact subordinate paragraphs. Similarly, duplication in several other places in minimizes the risk of such an animal current § 92.314 consists of three the regulations by combining, where contracting CEM and spreading the sentences of regulatory text, the first of appropriate, separate provisions for disease to horses in the United States. which takes up over a half a page in the mares and stallions. We believe that The wild or non-domesticated equine Code of Federal Regulations and combining separate provisions is would still have to meet the inspection contains numerous clauses and two possible in those parts of the regulations and certification requirements of provisos. To make those portions of the dealing with the collection of specimens § 92.314 with regard to CEM and other regulations easier to read and use, we because the requirements as to when diseases, as well as all the applicable are proposing to amend § 92.304(b) by and by whom the specimens are to be permit, port-of-entry inspection, and organizing its regulatory text into collected are the same for both stallions other applicable requirements of the paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) and to and mares; it is only the sites from regulations, so the general health and amend § 92.314 by organizing its which the specimens are to be collected movement issues associated with its regulatory text into paragraphs (a) that differ. Therefore, in proposed new importation would continue to be through (c). § 92.301 (d), (e), and (h), we would addressed. As part of our proposed combine those provisions that are The specific provisions for importing reorganization of the regulations, we common to both male and female horses in the remaining categories would also make several nonsubstantive horses, while keeping separate those would be moved to four proposed new editorial changes to improve the clarity provisions that must necessarily be paragraphs: of the regulations. gender-specific. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28075

Similarly, where there are now three end of the paragraph. Footnote 7 states: (c)(2)(vi)(G)), certain mares over 731 different sets of provisions for importing ‘‘Except for stallions that test positive days of age that had originally been female horses over 731 days of age for for CEM, treatment in the country of imported for no more than 90 days and permanent entry (§ 92.301 (c)(2)(v), origin is optional.’’ We are proposing to that are moved to an approved State for (c)(2)(vi), and (c)(2)(vii)), proposed new remove that footnote because we believe permanent entry (§ 92.301(c)(2)(x)), and § 92.301(e) would contain a single set of that the regulatory text of proposed new mares that were not required to undergo provisions. The proposed consolidation § 92.301(e) clearly describes the testing a clitoral sinusectomy as a condition of of those three sets of provisions would and treatment requirements for stallions importation but that have been cultured be made possible, in large part, by other and spells out which stallions must be for CEM with positive results in an proposed changes, discussed below, that treated to be eligible for importation approved State prior to release from would remove the clitoral sinusectomy into the United States. Subsequent State quarantine (§ 92.304(a)(8)(iii)(E)). requirement and standardize testing footnotes in the regulations that refer We believe that the clitoral protocols. the reader to ‘‘footnote 7 to subpart C’’ sinusectomy requirement can be would also be removed. eliminated completely because the Use of Nitrofurazone Once the stallion has been imported procedure is no longer necessary to The regulations require, as a pre- into the United States and has been sent ensure that imported mares do not import treatment for certain stallions to an approved State for quarantine, the introduce CEM into the United States. A and a post-entry treatment for certain regulations in current new procedure has been developed that stallions and mares, that a nitrofurazone § 92.304(a)(5)(iii)(A) require, among allows veterinarians to clean and treat ointment be used to coat or pack the other things, that the prepuce, penis, the clitoral sinuses to eliminate the CEM animals’ genitalia as a means of killing and urethral sinus of the stallion be organism, thus rendering clitoral the CEM organism. However, many scrubbed with a solution of sinusectomies unnecessary. Therefore, countries now prohibit the use of chlorhexidine and packed with an the clitoral sinusectomy requirement nitrofurazone on horses due to concerns ointment of nitrofurazone for 5 and any provisions related to that about its residues in horsemeat, so we consecutive days. Similarly, the requirement would be removed from the are proposing to amend those portions regulations in § 92.304(a)(8)(iii)(B) regulations. Proposed new of the regulations that specifically regarding the treatment and handling of § 92.301(e)(5), which contains the require the use of nitrofurazone. imported mares in quarantine in testing and treatment requirements for Under the regulations in current approved States require that the mare’s mares, would spell out the proposed § 92.301(c)(2)(iv)(E), if a specimen taken external genitalia, vaginal vestibule, new cleaning and treatment procedure. from a stallion prior to export to the and, if present, clitoral sinuses, must be In that procedure, an accredited United States is found positive for CEM, scrubbed with a solution of veterinarian would manually remove the stallion’s prepuce, urethral sinus, chlorhexidine and then coated with an organic debris from the clitoral sinuses and fossa glandis must be scrubbed with ointment of not less than 0.2 percent of a mare, then flush the sinuses with a solution of chlorhexidine and then nitrofurazone; the clitoral fossa and, if a cerumalytic agent. For 5 consecutive packed with an ointment of present, the clitoral sinuses, must also days after the cleaning, the accredited nitrofurazone for 5 consecutive days in be packed with an ointment of not less veterinarian would aseptically clean order to kill the CEM organism. We are than 0.2 percent nitrofurazone. We are and wash the mare’s external genitalia proposing to remove those specific proposing to modify those requirements and vaginal vestibule, including the instructions for scrubbing and packing by removing the reference to clitoral fossa, with a solution of not less and replace them with the requirement nitrofurazone and requiring only that an than 2 percent chlorhexidine in a that the stallion be treated for CEM in ointment effective against the CEM detergent base and then fill the clitoral a manner approved by the national organism be used. Because the fossa and sinuses and coat the external veterinary service of the country of availability of such ointments can vary genitalia and vaginal vestibule with an origin. We would require that the over time and from place to place, and antibiotic ointment effective against the treatments performed and the dates of because the treatments must be CEM organism. This procedure has been the treatments be recorded on the performed by an accredited veterinarian shown to effectively eliminate debris horse’s health certificate, so APHIS and monitored by a State or Federal that could harbor the CEM organism and would have the opportunity to consider veterinarian, we do not believe it is can be carried out without the use of the the treatments used when the stallion is necessary to maintain a list of specific restraints, anesthesia, or tranquilizers offered for importation into the United ointments in the regulations. Rather, the needed for the clitoral sinusectomy States. We would continue to require accredited veterinarian, State surgery, which would clearly be to the that the stallion be retested no less than veterinarian, and Federal veterinarian, mare’s benefit. 21 days following the completion of or any other interested person, could Endometrial Cultures treatment and found free of CEM before obtain a list of ointments recognized as it could enter the United States. Because being effective against the CEM We are proposing to remove the the requirement for retesting would be organism from APHIS. A footnote to that requirement for the collection and in place, we believe that allowing the effect would be added to the regulations culturing of endometrial specimens national veterinary service of the regarding the post-entry treatment and from mares. Currently, the regulations country of origin to use its discretion in handling of stallions and mares. require that endometrial specimens be deciding the appropriate treatment for collected during estrus from female stallions that have been found to be Clitoral Sinusectomy thoroughbred horses positive for CEM would not result in an We are proposing to eliminate the (§ 92.301(c)(2)(iii)(B)), female horses increased risk of CEM-infected stallions requirement that certain mares undergo over 731 days of age (§ 92.301 entering the United States. a clitoral sinusectomy. Currently, (c)(2)(v)(F) and (c)(2)(vi)(D)), test mares As part of these proposed changes, we clitoral sinusectomies are required for used for testing stallions in an approved are also proposing to amend female horses over 731 days of age State (§ 92.304 (a)(5)(iii)(B)(2) and § 92.301(c)(2)(iv)(B) by removing imported for permanent entry (§ 92.301 (a)(5)(iii)(C)(2)), pregnant mares over footnote 7, which is referenced at the (c)(2)(v)(C), (c)(2)(v)(G), and 731 days of age (§ 92.304(a)(8)(iii)(C)(1)), 28076 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules nonpregnant mares over 731 days of age some mares require endometrial days; 7 days after the fifth day of (§ 92.304(a)(8)(iii)(C)(2)), and mares over cultures while others do not, and some cleaning and packing, the stallion must 731 days of age that have been found to mares must undergo a clitoral be test bred to two qualified test mares. be positive for CEM (§ 92.304 sinusectomy, some do not, and others In order to increase the likelihood that (a)(8)(iii)(D) and (a)(8)(iii)(E)). We would have already undergone the testing will detect the presence of CEM, believe that the required collection and surgery before a particular test. With the we are proposing to reverse the order of culturing of endometrial specimens can requirements for endometrial cultures the latter two items, i.e., we would be eliminated completely because over and clitoral sinusectomies removed as require that the test breeding take place the last 10 to 12 years we have cultured proposed above, we believe that we can before the cleaning and packing. If the over 900 pregnant mares offered for simplify matters by standardizing the stallion was infected with CEM, the two importation and have never found a sites from which specimens would be test mares would most likely contract positive endometrial culture in collected from mares and the timing of the disease as a result of the test specimens collected from mares that those collections when multiple sets of breeding, so there would be, in effect, were negative on cultures of the clitoral specimens are needed for culturing. three chances to detect the disease—one sinuses. Because we would continue to We are proposing that for all mares through the tests conducted on the require the collection of specimens from over 731 days of age offered for stallion and two through the tests the clitoral sinuses, and because importation or in quarantine in an conducted on each test mare. The additional specimens would be drawn approved State, specimens would be cleaning and packing, when conducted from the urethra and cervix, we believe collected from the mucosal surface of first, may reduce the chance that an that the requirement for endometrial the urethra, the mucosal surface of the infected stallion would transmit the cultures could be removed without clitoral sinuses, and the mucosal surface disease to the test mares by reducing the increasing the risk of CEM being of the cervix. Using the mucosal presence of the CEM organism to a low introduced into or disseminated within surfaces of the urethra, clitoral sinuses, level. the United States. and cervix as sites for the collection of As part of this proposed change, we specimens for culturing is in keeping Test Mares are also proposing to remove the with current codes of practice for the The current regulations require that a requirement for testing the foals of diagnosis of CEM and would allow us test mare must qualify as apparently free mares that had been pregnant at the to accurately assess the CEM status of from CEM. To qualify, the mare must be time they were received in quarantine in mares over 731 days of age that are tested with negative results by a an approved State. The regulations in offered for importation or that are complement fixation test for CEM, and § 92.304(a)(8)(iii)(C)(1) require that 7 quarantined in an approved State. specimens taken from the mare must be days after the mare foals, three The regulations currently require that cultured negative for CEM. Currently, endometrial specimens be collected three sets of specimens be collected one set of specimens must be drawn from the mare and another specimen be from mares over 731 days of age in from the endometrium, clitoral sinuses, collected from the vaginal vestibule or quarantine in an approved State; those and clitoral fossa; then, no less than 7 prepuce of her foal, depending on its specimens are to be drawn at intervals days later, another set of specimens sex. We believe that the accuracy of the of no less than 7 days. We are proposing must be drawn from the cervix, clitoral cultures of specimens collected from the to decrease the time over which sinuses, and clitoral fossa. As clitoral sinuses, which we cited in the specimens are to be drawn by requiring previously explained, we are proposing previous paragraph as rendering that all three sets of specimens be to remove the requirement for the endometrial cultures unnecessary, also collected over a single 7-day period, collection and culturing of endometrial makes it unnecessary to test foals. If with the collections taking place on the specimens from imported mares. We are cultures of specimens collected from a first, fourth, and seventh days. When proposing to remove that requirement pregnant mare indicated she was free collecting multiple sets of specimens for test mares, for the same reasons. We from CEM infection, there would be no from a horse for culturing, it is prudent are also proposing that test mares would cause to test her foal, since the foal to collect sets of specimens on different have specimens collected from the could only contract the disease from its days in order to increase the likelihood mucosal surface of the urethra, clitoral dam during birth. This proposed change that any infection will be detected. sinuses, and cervix, as proposed for all would also mean that a pregnant mare However, we believe the current 7-day mares over 731 days of age offered for would no longer have to remain under minimum interval between collections importation. This would be in keeping quarantine in the approved State until 7 is unnecessarily long; the proposed 7- with current codes of practice for the days after foaling, since endometrial day collection period would simplify diagnosis of CEM and would allow us cultures from the mare and cultures and shorten the testing process for to accurately assess the CEM status of from the foal would no longer be mares while continuing to provide for a test mares. We are also proposing that required. sufficient amount of time between the three sets of specimens be collected, and collection of sets of specimens. that all sets of specimens be collected Collecting Specimens From Mares Over within a 7-day period, on days 1, 4, and 731 Days of Age Testing and Treatment for Stallions 7. This would be consistent with The current regulations contain three Over 731 days of Age proposed CEM tests for mares offered different pre-import test protocols for Once a stallion over 731 days of age for importation. mares over 731 days of age; a protocol has been imported into the United After being test bred by the stallion, for testing pregnant mares and, later, States and has been sent to quarantine the regulations currently require that their foals, in quarantine in an approved in an approved State, the regulations specimens be collected from the test State after importation; and yet another currently require that a set of specimens mares on the second, fourth, and protocol for testing nonpregnant mares be collected from the stallion and seventh days after breeding and in quarantine in an approved State. cultured for CEM, after which the cultured for CEM; endometrial Those protocols differ in terms of their stallion’s genitalia are to be washed specimens must be collected and timing and sites from which specimens with a surgical scrub and packed with cultured during the next estrus; and two are to be collected for culturing because an antibiotic ointment for 5 consecutive blood serum samples must be drawn Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28077 from the test mares 15 to 40 days after make those sites consistent with the that reference because Australia is no breeding and tested for CEM using the proposed changes regarding collection longer on the list of CEM-affected complement fixation test. As discussed sites for test mares and mares over 731 countries in § 92.301(c)(1). above, we have proposed to remove the days of age and to reflect the proposed Use of Accredited Veterinarians requirement for endometrial cultures, so discontinuation of the collection and that step would be eliminated. We are culturing of endometrial specimens. As The regulations in proposing to further amend those was proposed for the other two § 92.301(c)(2)(viii)(B)(2) require that requirements by shifting the collection categories of female horses, and for the horses imported for no more than 90 of specimens to the third, sixth, and same reasons, the collection sites for days to compete in specified events ninth days after breeding, which means specimens from female thoroughbred must be monitored by an APHIS that any CEM infection would have an horses would be the mucosal surfaces of representative—i.e., an APHIS additional day to manifest itself in the the urethra, clitoral sinuses, and cervix. veterinarian or other authorized APHIS test mares, followed by a full 2 days The regulations regarding the employee—while the horse is on the between the collection of each importation of thoroughbred horses premises at which it is competing. The additional set of samples. By delaying currently contain no specific provisions regulations pertaining to import permits and slightly lengthening the period over for the treatment and retesting of in § 92.304(a)(1)(iii) state that the which specimens are collected from thoroughbred horses that test positive approval of a permit application to bred test mares, we would increase the for CEM during pre-export testing. We temporarily import a horse is contingent likelihood that the presence of CEM are proposing to add provisions that upon APHIS’ determination that a infection will be detected in the test would allow the thoroughbred horse to sufficient number of APHIS personnel mares. We are also proposing to reduce be treated for CEM in a manner are available to provide the required the number of required complement approved by the national veterinary services. In order to increase the number fixation tests to a single test conducted service of the country of origin. We of qualified veterinarians available to 15 days after breeding. We believe that would require that the treatments perform the required activities and the second complement fixation test is performed and the dates of the decrease the costs associated with the unnecessary because the multiple treatments be recorded on the horse’s temporary importation of horses for cultures conducted on the specimens health certificate, so APHIS would have competition, we are proposing to allow drawn during the 9 days after breeding the opportunity to consider the the required monitoring to be conducted would provide, in nearly all cases, an treatments used when the thoroughbred by an accredited veterinarian. An accurate indication of the test mare’s horse is offered for importation into the accredited veterinarian is, by definition, CEM status; a single complement United States. We would require that already familiar with APHIS’ animal fixation test would be adequate to the retesting of the thoroughbred horse health programs and regulations and is confirm the findings of the culturing. take place no less than 21 days approved by the Administrator to following the completion of treatment. perform the functions associated with New Testing Protocol for Thoroughbred The horse would have to be found free those programs, so we believe that Horses of CEM on the retest before it could accredited veterinarians would be fully We are proposing to simplify the pre- enter the United States. These proposed capable of monitoring temporarily export testing protocols for provisions for retesting thoroughbred imported horses at the premises on thoroughbred horses from France, horses are consistent with the retest which they are competing. We would, Germany, Ireland, and the United provisions for stallions and mares over however, provide for an APHIS Kingdom. Under the current regulations, 731 days of age and would serve the representative to conduct spot checks to three sets of specimens must be same purpose. Because the ensure compliance with the regulations. collected and cultured from thoroughbred horses would not be If the APHIS representative found that thoroughbred horses at intervals of no allowed entry into the United States the requirements of the regulations were less than 7 days, with the final until they had been found free of CEM, not being met, APHIS would have the collection and culturing being we believe that allowing thoroughbred option of requiring that all remaining completed within 30 days of export. We horses that have tested positive for CEM monitoring for a particular event be are proposing to shorten the time frame to be treated and retested would not conducted by APHIS representatives. for collections and culturing from over result in an increased risk of CEM- The proposed spot checks and the 2 weeks to 1, with specimens being infected horses entering the United option for APHIS to take over collected on the first, fourth, and States. monitoring duties would act as seventh days of the 7-day period. We We are also proposing to make two additional safeguards against the spread would, however, retain the requirement minor changes in the regulations of disease and would help to ensure that the last set of specimens must be regarding the importation of compliance with the regulations. collected and cultured within 30 days of thoroughbred horses. First, we are export. As noted above with regard to proposing to remove two references to Other Proposed Changes test mares and mares over 731 days of the ‘‘Federal Republic of Germany’’ and The regulations in age quarantined in an approved State, replace them with references simply to § 92.301(c)(2)(viii)(G) currently require we believe the current 7-day interval ‘‘Germany,’’ because the reunification of the owner or importer of a temporarily between collections is unnecessarily East Germany and West Germany has imported horse to enter into a trust fund long; the proposed 2-day interval removed the need to differentiate agreement with APHIS to ensure that he simplifies and shortens the pre-export between the two. Second, footnote 6 in or she pays all costs associated with testing process for thoroughbred horses current § 92.301(c)(2)(iii)(A), which lists APHIS’ supervision and maintenance of while continuing to provide for a specifically approved recordkeeping the horse during the time it is in the sufficient amount of time between the associations in those countries from United States. When the required collection of sets of specimens. which thoroughbred horses may be supervision and maintenance services We are also proposing to modify the imported, contains an out-of-date can be provided by an APHIS collection sites for specimens drawn reference to such associations in representative operating out of his or from female thoroughbred horses to Australia. We are proposing to remove her usual place of duty, however, 28078 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

APHIS’ costs can be recovered through The United States is a net exporter of meet the proposed new requirements user fees payable under 9 CFR part 130, horses, exporting three to four horses for either. so it would not be necessary for the every one imported, and unit values for Under these circumstances, the owner or importer to enter into a trust imports and exports favored the United Administrator of the Animal and Plant fund agreement. There are still cases, States until 1994. The unit value of Health Inspection Service has though, in which a trust fund agreement exports was $3,197 per head in 1993, determined that this action would not would be necessary, such as when an while the unit import value was $2,944 have a significant economic impact on APHIS representative is not available to per head; in 1994, these values shifted a substantial number of small entities. provide the necessary services in a to $2,458 per head (export) and $4,032 Executive Order 12372 given area, or there is an insufficient per head (import). number of APHIS representatives to In 1993, U.S. exports of horses totaled This program/activity is listed in the meet the needs of a large event, and an 64,478 head valued at $206.1 million; in Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance APHIS representative must be 1994, the total was 85,299 head valued under No. 10.025 and is subject to temporarily detailed from his or her at $209.7 million. Most of those horses Executive Order 12372, which requires usual place of duty to the site of a were exported to Canada, Mexico, intergovernmental consultation with particular event. Therefore, we are Western Europe (especially the United State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part proposing to amend the regulations to Kingdom and Ireland), the Middle East, 3015, subpart V.) differentiate between those cases where or Asia. U.S. imports of horses, on the Executive Order 12778 user fees would be sufficient to recover other hand, are small relative to total APHIS’ costs and those cases where the inventory and U.S. horse exports. In This proposed rule has been reviewed owner or importer of a horse would 1993, U.S. horse imports totaled 20,715 under Executive Order 12778, Civil have to enter into a trust fund agreement head valued at $61 million; in 1994, the Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is with APHIS. total was 23,186 head valued at $93.5 adopted: (1) All State and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with Miscellaneous Changes million. Canada and Mexico were the source of almost 90 percent of all U.S. this rule will be preempted; (2) no Several of the proposed changes horse imports in those years. In each retroactive effect will be given to this discussed above would result in year, those imports equaled rule; and (3) administrative proceedings footnotes being added, deleted, or approximately 1 percent of the domestic will not be required before parties may moved; therefore, we are proposing to horse inventory (USDA, Economic file suit in court challenging this rule. redesignate the footnotes that follow Research Service, ‘‘Foreign Agricultural Paperwork Reduction Act those that would be affected by the Trade of the United States,’’ January/ proposed changes to maintain February 1995). Small entities maintain This proposed rule contains no new numerical order. almost 95 percent of the domestic horse information collection or recordkeeping inventory. requirements under the Paperwork Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 Flexibility Act The proposed new testing and treatment protocols presented in this et seq.). This proposed rule has been reviewed document are the only aspects of this List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 92 under Executive Order 12866. The rule proposed rule that are expected to have Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, has been determined to be not an economic impact. In each case, the Poultry and poultry products, significant for the purposes of Executive proposed changes would reduce the Quarantine, Reporting and Order 12866 and, therefore, has not time required to collect samples, recordkeeping requirements. been reviewed by the Office of conduct tests, and administer Accordingly, 9 CFR part 92 would be Management and Budget. treatments, which would shorten the amended as follows: This proposed rule would amend the period that an imported horse would regulations regarding the importation of have to spend in quarantine. Because PART 92ÐIMPORTATION OF CERTAIN horses from countries affected with the importer or owner of an imported ANIMALS AND POULTRY AND contagious equine metritis to horse must bear the cost of providing CERTAIN ANIMAL AND POULTRY incorporate new testing and treatment care, feeding, and handling of the horse PRODUCTS; INSPECTION AND OTHER protocols for mares and stallions, during the time it is quarantined for REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN provide for the use of accredited CEM testing and treatment in an MEANS OF CONVEYANCE AND veterinarians to monitor horses approved State, a shorter quarantine SHIPPING CONTAINERS THEREON temporarily imported into the United period would clearly reduce an owner’s States for competition purposes, or importer’s boarding costs. The 1. The authority citation for part 92 incorporate a new testing protocol for current course of testing and treatment would continue to read as follows: thoroughbred horses in training in their runs, on average, from 4 to 6 weeks; the Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622; 19 U.S.C. 1306; country of origin, and remove the testing and treatment protocols 21 U.S.C. 102–105, 111, 114a, 134a, 134b, requirements for endometrial cultures proposed in this document are expected 134c, 134d, 134f, 135, 136, and 136a; 31 and clitoral sinusectomies in mares. to cut that time frame to 2 to 3 weeks. U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d). These proposed changes are intended to We do not expect, however, that the 2. In § 92.300, the definition of update, clarify, and streamline the proposed changes will result in an Weanling or yearling would be revised existing regulations. The proposed increase of horse imports into the to read as follows: changes would simplify the United States. Those countries that can requirements for importing horses from already profitably ship horses to the § 92.300 Definitions. countries affected with contagious United States and meet the current * * * * * equine metritis without increasing the requirements of the regulations would Weanling or yearling. Any horse, risk of the disease being introduced into not be significantly affected, and those weaned from its dam, that was foaled or disseminated within the United countries that do not currently meet not more than 731 days prior to its being States. those requirements are not expected to offered for entry into the United States. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28079

A horse will not be considered to be a (iv) Horses imported in accordance of age and the dates that the horse was weanling or yearling if its first with conditions prescribed by the at such premises; and that none of the permanent incisors have erupted. Administrator as provided in premises are breeding premises; § 92.301(a); (C) He or she has compared the §§ 92.303 and 92.304 [Amended] (v) Thoroughbred horses imported for records maintained by the approved 3. Sections 92.303 and 92.304 would permanent entry from France, Germany, breed association with the records kept be amended as follows: Ireland, or the United Kingdom if the by the trainer and has found the a. In § 92.304, footnote 12 and its horses meet the requirements of information in those two sets of records reference in the section heading would paragraph (d) of this section; to be consistent and current; be removed. (vi) Stallions or mares over 731 days (D) For thoroughbred horses over 731 b. In § 92.303(e), footnote 11 and its of age imported for permanent entry if reference in the text would be days of age, cultures negative for CEM the horses meet the requirements of were obtained from sets of specimens redesignated as footnote 12. paragraph (e) of this section; 4. In § 92.301, paragraph (c) would be collected on 3 separate occasions within (vii) Horses over 731 days of age a 7-day period from the mucosal surface revised and new paragraphs (d) through imported into the United States for no (i) would be added to read as follows: of the urethra, the mucosal surface of more than 90 days to compete in the clitoral sinuses, and the mucosal § 92.301 General prohibitions; exceptions. specified events if the horses meet the surface of the cervix of any female * * * * * requirements of paragraph (f) of this horses and from the surfaces of the (c) Specific prohibitions regarding section; and prepuce, the urethral sinus, and the contagious equine metritis; exceptions. (viii) Horses temporarily exported fossa glandis, including the (1) Importation prohibited. Except as from the United States or from another diverticulum of the fossa glandis, of any provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this country not known to be affected with male horses. For both female and male section, notwithstanding the other CEM to a country listed in paragraph horses, the sets of specimens must be provisions of this part concerning the (c)(1) of this section within the 12 collected on days 1, 4, and 7 of the 7- importation of horses into the United months immediately preceding their day period, and the last of these sets of States, the importation of all horses being offered for entry into the United specimens must be collected within 30 from any of the following listed States if the horses meet the days of exportation. All specimens countries and the importation of all requirements of paragraph (g) of this required by this paragraph must be horses that have been in any listed section. collected by a licensed veterinarian who (d) Thoroughbred horses from France, country within the 12 months either is, or is acting in the presence of, Germany, Ireland, and the United immediately preceding their being the veterinarian signing the certificate; Kingdom. (1) Thoroughbred horses may offered for entry into the United States and be imported for permanent entry from is prohibited, either because contagious (E) All specimens required by France, Germany, Ireland, or the United equine metritis (CEM) exists in the paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D) of this section Kingdom if the horses meet the listed country or because the listed were received within 48 hours of following requirements: country trades horses freely with a collection by a laboratory approved to country in which CEM exists without (i) Each horse is accompanied at the time of importation by an import permit culture for CEM by the national testing for CEM: Austria, Belgium, veterinary service of the country of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech in accordance with § 92.304; (ii) Each horse is accompanied at the export and were accompanied by a Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, statement indicating the date and time Germany, Guinea-Bissau, Ireland, Italy, time of importation by an import health certificate issued in accordance with of their collection. Japan, the Member States of the (2) If any specimen collected in European Union, The Netherlands, § 92.314(a). In addition to the information required by § 92.314(a), the accordance with paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D) Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, of this section is found to be positive for Switzerland, The Former Yugoslav veterinarian signing and issuing the certificate shall certify that: CEM, the horse must be treated for CEM Republic of Macedonia, the United in a manner approved by the national Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, (A) He or she has examined the daily records of the horse’s activities veterinary service of the country of Scotland, Wales, and the Isle of Man), export. After the treatment is completed, and the nonrecognized areas of the maintained by the trainer and certified to be current, true, and factual by the at least 21 days must pass before the former Yugoslavia (Montenegro and horse will be eligible to be tested again Serbia). Note: Montenegro and Serbia veterinarian in charge of the training or in accordance with paragraph have asserted the formation of a joint racing stable; (d)(1)(ii)(D) of this section. All independent State entitled ‘‘The Federal (B) He or she has examined the treatments performed, and the dates of Republic of Yugoslavia,’’ but this entity records of the horse’s activities the treatments, must be recorded on the has not been formally recognized as a maintained by a breed association health certificate. State by the United States. specifically approved by the (2) Exceptions. The provisions of Department 6 and certified by the breed (3) Thoroughbred horses imported paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall not association to be current, true, and under paragraph (d)(1) of this section apply to the following: factual for the following information: must complete the Federal quarantine (i) Wild (non-domesticated) species of Identification of the horse by name, sex, required under § 92.308. Upon equidae if captured in the wild or age, breed, and all identifying marks; completion of the Federal quarantine, imported from a zoo or other facility identification of all premises where the the horses may be released. where it would be unlikely that the horse has been since reaching 731 days (e) Stallions and mares over 731 days animal would come in contact with of age from CEM-affected countries. domesticated horses used for breeding; 6 The following breed associations and their (1) Stallions or mares over 731 days (ii) Geldings; record systems have been approved by the of age may be imported for permanent Department: Weatherby’s Ltd. for the United (iii) Weanlings or yearlings whose age Kingdom and Ireland; Haras du Pain for France; and entry from a country listed in paragraph is certified on the import health Direktorium fu¨ r Vollblutzucht und Rennen e.v. for (c)(1) of this section if the horses meet certificate required under § 92.314(a); Germany. the following requirements: 28080 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

(i) Each horse is accompanied at the Upon completion of the Federal (B) Each mare to which the stallion time of importation by an import permit quarantine, stallions must be sent to an has been test bred shall be cultured for issued in accordance with § 92.304. The approved State listed in paragraph (h)(6) CEM from sets of specimens that are import permit must indicate that, after of this section, and mares must be sent collected from each of the mucosal completion of the Federal quarantine to an approved State listed in paragraph surfaces of the cervix, urethra, and required in § 92.308, the stallion or mare (h)(7) of this section. clitoral sinuses on the third, sixth, and will be consigned to a State that the (ii) Once in the approved State, the ninth days after the breeding, with Administrator has approved to receive stallions or mares shall be quarantined negative results. A complement fixation such horses in accordance with under State or Federal supervision until test for CEM must be done with negative paragraph (h) of this section; the stallions have met the testing and results on the fifteenth day after the (ii) The horses are accompanied at the treatment requirements of paragraph breeding. time of importation by an import health (e)(3) of this section and the mares have (ii) If any culture or test required by certificate issued in accordance with met the testing and treatment this paragraph is positive for CEM, the § 92.314(a); requirements of paragraph (e)(5) of this stallion shall be treated as described in (iii) A set of specimens must be section. paragraph (e)(3)(i)(A) of this section and collected from each horse within 30 (iii) All tests and cultures required by retested by being test bred to two mares days prior to the date of export by a paragraphs (e)(3) through (e)(5) of this no less than 21 days after the last day licensed veterinarian who either is, or is section shall be conducted at the of treatment. acting in the presence of, the National Veterinary Services (iii) A stallion may be released from veterinarian signing the certificate. For Laboratories, Ames, IA, or at a State quarantine only if all cultures and stallions, the specimens must be laboratory approved by the tests of specimens from the mares used collected from the prepuce, urethral Administrator in accordance with for test breeding are negative for CEM sinus, and fossa glandis, including the paragraph (i) of this section to conduct and all cultures performed on diverticulum of the fossa glandis; for CEM cultures and tests. specimens taken from the stallion are mares, the specimens must be collected (iv) To be eligible for CEM culture or negative for CEM. (4) Requirements for test mares. (i) from the mucosal surface of the urethra, testing, all specimens collected in Mares to be used to test stallions for the mucosal surface of the clitoral accordance with paragraphs (e)(3) CEM shall be permanently identified sinuses, and the mucosal surface of the through (e)(5) of this section must be before the mares are used for such cervix. All of the specimens collected received by the National Veterinary testing with the letter ‘‘T.’’ The marking must be cultured for CEM with negative Services Laboratories or the approved shall be permanently applied by an results in a laboratory approved to laboratory within 48 hours of collection inspector, a State inspector, or an culture for CEM by the national and must be accompanied by a veterinary service of the country of accredited veterinarian who shall use a statement indicating the date and time origin; hot iron, freezemarking, or a lip tattoo. of their collection. (iv) The horses described on the If a hot iron or freezemarking is used, (3) Testing and treatment certificate must not have been used for the marking shall not be less than 2 requirements for stallions. (i) Once the natural breeding, for the collection of inches (5.08 cm) high and shall be stallion is in the approved State, one semen for artificial insemination in the applied to the left shoulder or left side specimen each shall be taken from the case of stallions, or for artificial of the neck of the mare. If a lip tattoo prepuce, the urethral sinus, and the insemination in the case of mares, from is used, the marking shall not be less fossa glandis, including the the time the specimens were collected than 1 inch (2.54 cm) high and 0.75 inch diverticulum of the fossa glandis, of the through the date of export; (1.9 cm) wide and shall be applied to stallion and be cultured for CEM. After (v) All specimens required by the inside surface of the upper lip of the negative results have been obtained, the paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section must test mare. be received within 48 hours of stallion must be test bred to two test (ii) The test mares must be qualified collection by a laboratory approved to mares that meet the requirements of prior to breeding as apparently free from culture for CEM by the national paragraph (e)(4) of this section. Upon CEM and may not be used for breeding veterinary service of the country of completion of the test breeding: from the time specimens are taken to export and must be accompanied by a (A) The stallion must be treated for 5 qualify the mares as free from CEM. To statement indicating the date and time consecutive days by thoroughly qualify, each mare shall be tested with of their collection; and cleaning and washing (scrubbing) its negative results by a complement (vi) If any specimen collected in prepuce, penis, including the fossa fixation test for CEM, and specimens accordance with paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of glandis, and urethral sinus while the taken from each mare shall be cultured this section is found to be positive for stallion is in full erection with a negative for CEM. For culture, sets of CEM, the stallion or mare must be solution of not less than 2 percent specimens shall be collected on the first, treated for CEM in a manner approved surgical scrub chlorhexidine and then fourth, and seventh days of a 7-day by the national veterinary service of the thoroughly coating (packing) the period from the mucosal surfaces of the country of export. After the treatment is stallion’s prepuce, penis, including the urethra, clitoral sinuses, and cervix. completed, at least 21 days must pass fossa glandis, and urethral sinus with an (iii) A test mare that has been used to before the horse will be eligible to be ointment effective against the CEM test stallions for CEM may be released 7 tested again in accordance with organism. The treatment shall be from quarantine only if: paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section. All performed by an accredited veterinarian (A) The test mare is found negative for treatments performed, and the dates of and monitored by a State or Federal CEM on all cultures and tests required the treatments, must be recorded on the veterinarian. under paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section; health certificate. (B) The test mare is subjected to an (2) Post-entry. (i) Stallions and mares 7 A list of ointments effective against the CEM ovariectomy by an accredited organism may be obtained from the National Center imported under paragraph (e)(1) of this for Import and Export, Import/Export Animals, VS, veterinarian under the direct section must complete the Federal APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD supervision of a State or Federal quarantine required under § 92.308. 20737–1231. veterinarian; Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28081

(C) The test mare is treated and for no more than 90 days to compete in insemination), may not have any other handled in accordance with paragraph specified events if the following sexual contact with other horses, and (e)(5) of this section; or conditions are met: may not undergo any genital (D) The test mare is moved directly to (1) The horse may remain in the examinations. slaughter without unloading en route, is United States for not more than 90 days (vi) After the horse is transported euthanized, or dies. following the horse’s arrival in the anywhere in the United States, any (5) Testing and treatment United States, except as provided in vehicle in which the horse was requirements for mares. (i) Once the paragraph (f)(6) of this section and, transported must be cleaned and mare is in the approved State, sets of while in the United States, the horse disinfected in the presence of an APHIS specimens shall be collected from each must be moved according to the representative, according to the mare on three separate occasions within itinerary and methods of transport procedures specified in §§ 71.7 through a 7-day period. On days 1, 4, and 7, an specified in the import permit provided 71.12 of this chapter, before any other accredited veterinarian shall collect a for in § 92.304 of this part; horse is transported in the vehicle. specimen from the mucosal surfaces of (2) While the horse is in the United (vii) The cleaning and disinfection the urethra, clitoral sinuses, and cervix, States, the following conditions must be specified in paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this and shall submit each specimen or set met: section must be completed before the of specimens to the National Veterinary (i) Except when in transit, the horse vehicle is moved from the place where Services Laboratories, Ames, IA, or at a must be kept on a premises that has the horse is unloaded. In those cases laboratory approved by the been approved, orally or in writing, by where the facilities or equipment for Administrator in accordance with an APHIS representative. If the approval cleaning and disinfection are inadequate paragraph (i) of this section to conduct is oral, it will be confirmed in writing at the place where the horse is CEM cultures and tests. by the Administrator as soon as unloaded, the Administrator may allow (ii) Following the collection of circumstances permit. To receive the vehicle to be moved to another specimens in accordance with approval, the premises: location for cleaning and disinfection paragraph (e)(5)(i) of the section, an (A) Must not be a breeding premises; when the move will not pose a disease accredited veterinarian shall manually and risk to other horses in the United States. (B) Must be or contain a building in (viii) The owner or importer of the remove organic debris from the sinuses which the horse can be kept in a stall horse must comply with any other of each mare and then flush the sinuses that is separated from other stalls provisions of this part applicable to him with a cerumalytic agent.8 containing horses, either by an empty or her. (iii) For 5 consecutive days after the stall, by an open area across which (3) If the owner or importer wishes to sinuses have been cleaned, an horses cannot touch each other, or by a change the horse’s itinerary or the accredited veterinarian shall aseptically solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4 m) methods by which the horse is clean and wash (scrub) the external high. transported from that which he or she genitalia and vaginal vestibule, (ii) While at the premises at which the specified in the application for the including the clitoral fossa, with a horse competes, the horse must be import permit, the owner or importer solution of not less than 2 percent monitored by an accredited veterinarian must make the request for change in chlorhexidine in a detergent base and or APHIS representative to ensure that writing to the Administrator. Requests then fill the clitoral fossa and sinuses, the provisions of paragraphs (f)(2)(i), should be sent to the Administrator, c/ and coat the external genitalia and (f)(2)(iv), and (f)(2)(v) of this section are o Import-Export Animals Staff, VS, vaginal vestibule with an antibiotic met. If the monitoring is performed by APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, ointment effective against the CEM Riverdale, MD 20737–1231. The change 9 an accredited veterinarian, spot checks organism. will be conducted by an APHIS in itinerary or method of transport may (iv) A mare may be released from representative to ensure that the not be made without the written State quarantine only if all cultures requirements of this section are being approval of the Administrator, who may performed on specimens taken from the met. If an APHIS representative finds grant the request for change when he or mare are negative for CEM. that requirements are not being met, the she determines that granting the request (v) If any culture required by this Administrator may require that all will not endanger other horses in the paragraph is positive for CEM, the mare remaining monitoring for the event be United States and that sufficient APHIS shall be treated as described in conducted by APHIS representatives to personnel are available to provide the paragraphs (e)(5)(ii) and (e)(5)(iii) of this ensure compliance. services required by the owner or section. No less than 21 days after the (iii) While in transit, the horse must importer. If more than one application last day of treatment, the mare shall be be moved in either an aircraft or a for an import permit is received, APHIS tested again in accordance with sealed van or trailer. If the horse is personnel will be assigned in the order paragraph (e)(5)(i) of this section. If all moved in a sealed van or trailer, the seal that the applications that otherwise specimens are negative for CEM, the may be broken only by an APHIS meet the requirements of this section are mare may be released from quarantine. representative at the horse’s destination, received. (f) Special provisions for temporary except in situations where the horse’s (4) The Administrator may cancel, importation. Horses over 731 days of age life is in danger. orally or in writing, the import permit may be imported into the United States (iv) Except when actually competing provided for under § 92.304 of this part or being exercised, the horse must be whenever the Administrator finds that 8 Recommended protocols for the flushing of kept in a stall that is separated from the owner or importer of the horse has sinuses may be obtained from the National Center for Import and Export, Import/Export Animals, VS, other stalls containing horses, either by not complied with the provisions of APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD an empty stall, by an open area across paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(3) of this 20737–1231. which horses cannot touch each other, section or any conditions imposed 9 A list of ointments effective against the CEM or by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet under those provisions. If the organism may be obtained from the National Center for Import and Export, Import/Export Animals, VS, (2.4 m) high. cancellation is oral, the Administrator APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD (v) The horse may not be used for will confirm the cancellation and the 20737–1231. breeding purposes (including artificial reasons for the cancellation in writing as 28082 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules soon as circumstances permit. Any (i) Following completion of the average salary, per hour, for an APHIS person whose import permit is canceled itinerary specified in the import permit representative; may appeal the decision in writing to provided for in § 92.304 of this part, the (iv) Number of miles from the the Administrator within 10 days after horse’s owner or importer applies for premises at which the horse competes to receiving oral or written notification of and receives a new import permit that the APHIS office or facility that is the cancellation, whichever is earlier. If specifies that the stallion or mare will monitoring the activities; the appeal is sent by mail, it must be be moved to an approved State listed in (v) Government rate per mile for postmarked within 10 days after the paragraph (h)(6) or (h)(7) of this section; automobile travel or, if appropriate, cost owner or importer receives oral or and of other means of transportation written notification of the cancellation, (ii) The stallion or mare is transported between the premises at which the whichever is earlier. The appeal must in a sealed vehicle that has been cleaned horse competes and the APHIS office or include all of the facts and reasons upon and disinfected to an approved facility facility; which the person relies to show that the in an approved State where it is (vi) Number of trips between the import permit was wrongfully canceled. quarantined under State or Federal premises at which the horse competes The Administrator will grant or deny supervision until the stallion or mare and the APHIS office or facility that the appeal in writing as promptly as has met the testing and treatment APHIS representatives are required to circumstances permit, stating the reason requirements of paragraph (e)(3) or (e)(5) make in order to conduct the required for his or her decision. If there is a of this section. inspection and monitoring; (vii) Number of days the APHIS conflict as to any material fact, a hearing (7) All costs and charges associated representative conducting the will be held to resolve the conflict. with the supervision and maintenance inspection and monitoring must be in Rules of practice concerning the hearing of a horse imported under paragraphs ‘‘travel status;’’ will be adopted by the Administrator. (f)(1) through (f)(3) of this section will be borne by the horse’s owner or (viii) Applicable government per diem (5) Except in those cases where an importer. The costs associated with the rate; and appeal is in process, any person whose supervision and maintenance of the (ix) Cost of related administrative import permit is canceled must move horse by an APHIS representative at his support services. the horse identified in the import permit or her usual places of duty will be (9) If a trust fund agreement with out of the United States within 10 days reimbursed by the horse’s owner or APHIS has been executed by the owner after receiving oral or written importer through user fees payable or importer of a horse in accordance notification of cancellation, whichever under part 130 of this chapter. with paragraph (f)(8) of this section and is earlier. The horse is not permitted to (8) In the event that an APHIS APHIS determines, during the horse’s enter competition from the date the representative must be temporarily stay in the United States, that the owner or importer receives the notice of detailed from his or her usual place of amount deposited will be insufficient to cancellation until the horse is moved duty in connection with the supervision cover the services APHIS is scheduled out of the United States or until and maintenance of a horse imported to provide during the remainder of the resolution of an appeal in favor of the under paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(3) of horse’s stay, APHIS will issue to the owner or importer. Except when being this section, the owner or importer of horse’s owner or importer a bill to exercised, the horse must be kept, at the the horse must execute a trust fund restore the deposited amount to a level expense of the owner or importer, in a agreement with APHIS to reimburse all sufficient to cover the estimated cost to stall on the premises where the horse is expenses (including travel costs, salary, APHIS for the remainder of the horse’s located when the notice of cancellation per diem or subsistence, administrative stay in the United States. The horse’s is received, or, if the horse is in transit expenses, and incidental expenses) owner or importer must pay the amount when the notice of cancellation is incurred by the Department in billed within 14 days after receiving the received, on the premises where it is connection with the temporary detail. bill. If the bill is not paid within 14 days next scheduled to compete according to Under the trust fund agreement, the after its receipt, APHIS will cease to the import permit. The stall in which horse’s owner or importer must deposit perform the services provided for in the horse is kept must be separated from with APHIS an amount equal to the paragraph (f)(2) of this section until the other stalls containing horses, either by estimated cost, as determined by APHIS, bill is paid. The Administrator will an empty stall, by an open area across for the APHIS representative to inspect inform the owner or importer of the which horses cannot touch each other, the premises at which the horse will cessation of services orally or in writing. or by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet compete, to conduct the monitoring If the notice of cessation is oral, the (2.4 m) high. In cases where the owners required by paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this Administrator will confirm, in writing, of the above specified premises do not section, and to supervise the cleaning the notice of cessation and the reason permit the horse to be kept on those and disinfection required by paragraph for the cessation of services as soon as premises, or when the Administrator (f)(2)(vi) of this section. The estimated circumstances permit. In such a case, determines that keeping the horse on costs will be based on the following the horse must be kept, at the expense the above specified premises will pose factors: of the owner or importer and until the a disease risk to horses in the United (i) Number of hours needed for an bill is paid, in a stall either on the States, the horse must be kept, at the APHIS representative to conduct the premises at which the horse is located expense of the owner or importer, on an required inspection and monitoring; when the notice of cessation of services alternative premises approved by the (ii) For services provided during is received, or, if the horse is in transit Administrator. regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 when the notice of cessation of services (6) Stallions or mares over 731 days p.m., Monday through Saturday, except is received, on the premises at which it of age that are imported for no more holidays), the average salary, per hours, is next scheduled to compete according than 90 days in accordance with for an APHIS representative; to the import permit. The stall in which paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(3) of this (iii) For services provided outside the horse is kept must be separated from section may be eligible to remain in the regular business hours, the applicable other stalls containing horses either by United States if the following is rate for overtime, night differential, or an empty stall, an open area across completed: Sunday or holiday pay, based on the which horses cannot touch each other, Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28083 or a solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4 issued for its exportation from the approval shall continue in effect unless m) high. In cases where the owners of United States and endorsed in otherwise ordered by the Administrator. the above specified premises do not accordance with the export regulations In those instances where there is a permit the horse to be kept on those in part 91 of this chapter; conflict as to the facts, a hearing shall premises, or when the Administrator (4) The horse must be examined by an be held to resolve such conflict. determines that keeping the horse on inspector at the U.S. port of entry and (6) The following States have been the above specified premises will pose found by the inspector to be the approved to receive stallions over 731 a disease risk to other horses in the identical horse covered by the days of age imported under paragraph United States, the horse must be kept, documents required by paragraphs (a) (e) of this section: at the expense of the owner or importer, through (c) of this section and found by on an alternative premises approved by the inspector to be free of The State of Alabama the Administrator. Until the bill is paid, communicable disease and exposure The State of California The State of Colorado the horse is not permitted to enter thereto; and (5) The horse must be quarantined The State of Florida competition. Any amount deposited in The State of Kentucky excess of the costs to APHIS to provide and tested at the U.S. port of entry as The State of Louisiana the required services will be refunded to provided in § 92.308 of this part prior to The State of Maryland the horse’s owner or importer. release. The State of Montana (g) Special provisions for the (h) Approval of States. In order for a The State of New Hampshire importation of horses that have been State to be approved to receive stallions The State of New Jersey temporarily exported to a CEM-affected or mares over 731 days of age from a The State of New York country. If a horse has been temporarily CEM-affected country listed in The State of North Carolina exported for not more than 60 days from paragraph (c)(1) of this section that are The State of Ohio the United States to a CEM-affected imported under paragraph (e) of this The State of South Carolina section, the State must meet the The State of Tennessee country listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this The State of Texas section, or if a horse has been following conditions: The State of Virginia temporarily exported for not more than (1) The State must enter into a written The State of Wisconsin 60 days from another country not agreement with the Administrator, known to be affected with CEM to a whereby the State agrees to enforce its (7) The following States have been CEM-affected country during the 12 laws and regulations to control CEM approved to receive mares over 731 days months preceding its exportation to the and to abide by the conditions of of age imported under paragraph (e) of United States, the horse may be eligible approval established by the regulations this section: for return or importation into the United in this part. The State of Alabama States without meeting the requirements (2) The State must agree to quarantine The State of California of paragraphs (d) through (f) of this all stallions and mares over 731 days of The State of Colorado section under the following conditions: age imported under the provisions of The State of Kentucky (1) The horse must be accompanied paragraph (e) of this section until the The State of Louisiana by a certificate that meets the stallions have been treated in The State of Maryland requirements of § 92.314(a) of this part accordance with paragraph (e)(3) of this The State of Montana The State of Hew Hampshire issued by each CEM-affected country section and the mares have been treated in accordance with paragraph (e)(5) of The State of New Jersey that the horse has visited during the The State of New York term of its temporary exportation, and this section. (3) The State must agree to quarantine The State of North Carolina each certificate must contain the The State of Ohio following additional declarations: all mares used to test stallions for CEM The State of South Carolina (i) That the horse was held separate until the mares have been released from The State of Tennessee and apart from all other horses except quarantine in accordance with The State of Texas for the time it was actually participating paragraph (e)(4) of this section. The State of Virginia in an event or was being exercised by (4) The State must have laws or The State of Wisconsin regulations requiring that stallions over its trainer; (i) Approval of laboratories. (1) The (ii) That the premises on which the 731 days of age imported under Administrator will approve a laboratory horse was held were not used for any paragraph (e) of this section be treated to conduct CEM cultures and tests only equine or horse breeding purpose; in the manner specified in paragraph (iii) That the horse was not bred to or (e)(3) of this section, and that mares after consulting with the State animal bred by any animal, nor did it have any over 731 days of age imported under health official in the State in which the other sexual contact or genital paragraph (e) of this section be treated laboratory is located and after examination while in such country; and in the manner specified in paragraph determining that the laboratory: (iv) That all transport while in such (e)(5) of this section. (i) Has technical personnel assigned country was carried out in cleaned and (5) Approval of any State to receive to conduct the CEM culturing and disinfected vehicles in which no other stallions or mares imported from testing who possess the following horses were transported since such countries affected with CEM may be minimum qualifications: cleaning and disinfection; suspended by the Administrator upon (A) A bachelor’s degree in (2) The horse is accompanied by an his or her determination that any microbiology; import permit issued in accordance requirements of this section are not with § 92.304 of this part at the time of being met. After such action is taken, (B) A minimum of 2 years experience exportation; the animal health authorities of the working in a bacteriology laboratory; (3) If the horse was temporarily approved State will be informed of the and exported from the United States and is reasons for the action and afforded an (C) Experience working with the CEM being returned to the United States, the opportunity to present their views organism, including knowledge of the horse must be accompanied by a copy thereon before such suspension is specific media requirements, of the United States health certificate finalized; however, such suspension of atmospheric requirements, and 28084 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules procedures for the isolation and be automatically withdrawn by the (iv) If the horse or horse test specimen identification of the CEM organism.10 Administrator when the operator of the arrives in the United States at any port (ii) Follows standard test protocol approved laboratory notifies the other than the one designated in the prescribed by the National Veterinary National Veterinary Services permit; Services Laboratories; 11 and Laboratories, Ames, IA 50010, in (v) If the horse or horse test specimen (iii) Reports all official test results to writing, that the laboratory no longer offered for entry differs from that the State animal health official and the conducts CEM culturing and testing. described in the permit; or Veterinarian in Charge. (Approved by the Office of (vi) If the horse or horse test specimen (2) To retain approval, the laboratory Management and Budget under control is not handled as outlined in the must meet the requirements prescribed number 0579–0040) application for the permit and as in paragraph (i)(1) of this section, and 5. Section 92.304 would be amended specified in the permit issued. shall test with the CEM organism each as follows: lot of media it prepares to ensure that a. The section heading would be § 92.308 [Amended] the media will support growth of the revised to read as set forth below. 6. In § 92.308(a)(3), footnote 16 and its laboratory’s reference culture. Media b. In the introductory text of reference in the text would be that will not support growth of the paragraph (a)(1)(ii), the reference redesignated as footnote 14. reference culture must be discarded. ‘‘§ 92.301(c)(2)(viii)’’ would be removed 7. In § 92.308(c)(1), footnote 17 and its (3) The Administrator may deny or both times it appears and the reference reference in the text would be withdraw approval of any laboratory to ‘‘§ 92.301(f)’’ added in its place. redesignated as footnote 15. conduct CEM culturing or testing upon c. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii), in the first 8. Section 92.314 would be revised to a determination that the laboratory does sentence, the reference read as follows: not meet the criteria for approval or ‘‘§ 92.301(c)(2)(viii)’’ would be removed maintenance of approval under and the reference ‘‘§ 92.301(f)’’ added in § 92.314 Horses, certification, and paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this its place. accompanying equipment. section. d. Paragraphs (a)(4) through (a)(12) (a) Horses offered for importation (i) In the case of a denial of approval, would be removed. from any part of the world shall be the operator of the laboratory will be e. Paragraph (b) would be revised to accompanied by a certificate of a informed of the reasons for denial and, read as set forth below. salaried veterinary officer of the upon request, will be afforded an national government of the country of opportunity for a hearing with respect to § 92.304 Import permits for horses from origin, or if exported from Mexico, shall countries affected with CEM and for horse the merits or validity of the denial in specimens for diagnostic purposes; be accompanied either by such a accordance with rules of practice that reservation fees for space at quarantine certificate or by a certificate issued by will be adopted for the hearing. facilities maintained by APHIS. a veterinarian accredited by the (ii) In the case of a withdrawal of (a) * * * National Government of Mexico and approval, before such action is taken, (b) Permit. (1) When a permit is endorsed by a full-time salaried the operator of the laboratory will be issued, the original and two copies will veterinary officer of the National informed of the reasons for the proposed be sent to the importer. It shall be the Government of Mexico, thereby withdrawal and, upon request, will be responsibility of the importer to forward representing that the veterinarian afforded an opportunity for a hearing the original permit and one copy to the issuing the certificate was authorized to with respect to the merits or validity of shipper in the country of origin, and it do so, showing that: the proposed withdrawal in accordance shall also be the responsibility of the (1) The horses described in the with rules of practice that will be importer to ensure that the shipper certificate have been in said country adopted for the hearing. However, the presents the copy of the permit to the during the 60 days preceding withdrawal will become effective carrier and makes the necessary exportation; pending a final determination in the arrangements for the original permit to (2) That each horse has been hearing when the Administrator accompany the shipment to the inspected on the premises of origin and determines that such action is necessary specified U.S. port of entry for found free of evidence of communicable to protect the public health, interest, or presentation to the collector of customs. disease and, insofar as can be safety. The withdrawal will be effective (2) Horses and horse test specimens determined, exposure thereto during the upon oral or written notification, for which a permit is required under 60 days preceding exportation; whichever is earlier, to the operator of paragraph (a) of this section will be (3) That each horse has not been the laboratory. In the event of oral received at the port of entry specified on vaccinated with a live or attenuated or notification, written confirmation will the permit within the time prescribed in inactivated vaccine during the 14 days be given as promptly as circumstances the permit, which shall not exceed 14 preceding exportation: Provided, allow. The withdrawal will continue in days from the first day that the permit however, That in specific cases the effect pending completion of the hearing is effective. Administrator may authorize horses that and any judicial review of the hearing, (3) Horses and horse test specimens have been vaccinated with an unless otherwise ordered by the for which a permit is required under inactivated vaccine to enter the United Administrator. paragraph (a) of this section will not be States when he or she determines that (iii) Approval for a laboratory to eligible for entry if: in such cases and under such conditions conduct CEM culturing or testing will (i) A permit has not been issued for as he or she may prescribe such the importation of the horse or horse importation will not endanger the 10 When training regarding CEM culturing and livestock in the United States, and such testing is necessary, it may be obtained at the test specimen; National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, IA (ii) If the horse or horse test specimen horses comply with all other applicable 50010. is unaccompanied by the permit issued requirements of this part; 11 Standard test protocols prescribed by the for its importation; (4) That, insofar as can be determined, National Veterinary Services Laboratories and a list (iii) If the horse or horse test specimen no case of African horse sickness, of approved laboratories can be obtained from the National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, IA is shipped from any port other than the dourine, glanders, surra, epizootic 50010. one designated in the permit; lymphangitis, ulcerative lymphangitis, Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28085 equine piroplasmosis, Venezuelan in the center heading would be Office of Corporate Credit Unions, at the equine encephalomyelitis, or equine redesignated as footnote 17. above address or telephone (703) 518– infectious anemia has occurred on the 6640; or Edward Dupcak, Director, premises of origin or on adjoining § 92.321 [Amended] Office of Investment Services, at the premises during the 60 days preceding 11. In § 92.321, in the undesignated above address or telephone (703) 518– exportation; and center heading ‘‘MEXICO20’’, footnote 6620. (5) That, except as provided in 20 and its reference in the center SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: § 92.301(g): heading would be redesignated as (i) The horses have not been in any footnote 18. A. Background country listed in § 92.301(c)(1) as § 92.324 [Amended] Part 704 was amended in 1992 to affected with CEM during the 12 months 12. In § 92.324, in the second address a broad array of corporate credit immediately prior to their importation sentence, footnote 21 and its reference union matters. See 57 FR 22626 (May into the United States; 28, 1992). The regulation has been in (ii) The horses have not been on any in the text would be redesignated as footnote 19. effect for several years, during a time of premises at any time during which time great change in the credit union such premises were found by an official Done in Washington, DC, this 30th day of May 1996. industry. NCUA has had an opportunity of the veterinary services of the national to see how the regulation has worked Terry L. Medley, government of the country where such and to consider how it could be premises are located, to be affected with Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. improved. Section 704.12, governing CEM; representation issues, was revised in (iii) The horses have not been bred by [FR Doc. 96–13897 Filed 6–03–96; 8:45 am] 1994. See 59 FR 59357 (Nov. 17, 1994). or bred to any horses from an affected BILLING CODE 3410±34±P In April 1995, NCUA issued a proposed premises; and regulation to revise most of the sections (iv) The horses have had no other of Part 704. See 60 FR 20438 (Apr. 26, contact with horses that have been NATIONAL CREDIT UNION 1995). Comments were due by June 26, found to be affected with CEM or with ADMINISTRATION 1995. On May 17, 1995, NCUA extended horses that were imported from the comment period an additional 60 countries affected with CEM. 12 CFR Parts 704, 709, and 741 days to August 25, 1995. See 60 FR (b) If a horse is presented for 27240 (May 23, 1995). The importation from a country where it has Corporate Credit Unions; Involuntary supplementary information section been for less than 60 days, the horse Liquidation of Federal Credit Unions noted that NCUA had been working must be accompanied by a certificate and Adjudication of Creditor Claims with an outside firm to provide risk- that meets the requirements of Involving Federally Insured Credit profile assessments of corporate credit paragraph (a) of this section that has Unions in Liquidation; Requirements unions, using simulated modeling been issued by a salaried veterinary for Insurance techniques, and that the process had officer of the national government of AGENCY: National Credit Union proven to be more time-consuming than each country in which the horse has Administration (NCUA). envisioned. been during the 60 days immediately ACTION: Proposed rule. In response to the comments received preceding its shipment to the United and results of the modeling, NCUA States. The dates during which the SUMMARY: NCUA is issuing proposed determined to issue this revised horse was in each country during the 60 revisions to the rules governing proposed rule for another round of days immediately preceding its corporate credit unions. As the credit public comment. In developing this exportation to the United States shall be union industry has become more revised proposal, NCUA considered all included as a part of the certification. complex and competitive, the demands of the written comments, the results of (c) Following the port-of-entry on corporate credit unions have become further modeling, and the input inspection required by § 92.306 of this greater. Corporate credit unions are provided by corporate credit union part, and before a horse offered for providing a greater variety of more representatives in a number of dialogue importation from any part of the world sophisticated services. The proposed meetings conducted by NCUA. is released from the port of entry, an rule is intended to strengthen corporate It should be noted that the inspector may require the horse and its credit union capital and ensure that the background section of the initial accompanying equipment to be risk on corporate credit union balance proposed rule observed that NCUA disinfected as a precautionary measure sheets is adequately managed and supervises all corporate credit unions against the introduction of foot-and- controlled. but that only those that are federally mouth disease or any other disease DATES: Comments must be received on chartered pay an operating fee to the dangerous to the livestock of the United or before September 3, 1996. agency. Questions were raised as to States. ADDRESSES: Comments should be whether this put federally chartered § 92.315 [Amended] directed to Becky Baker, Secretary of the corporate credit unions at a competitive 9. In § 92.315, in the undesignated Board. Mail or hand-deliver comments disadvantage and whether all corporate center heading ‘‘CANADA 18’’, footnote to: National Credit Union credit unions should pay for NCUA’s 18 and its reference in the center Administration, 1775 Duke Street, corporate credit union supervision heading would be redesignated as Alexandria, Virginia 22314–3428. Fax program. NCUA asked for comment on footnote 16. comments to (703) 518–6319. Post whether it would be appropriate to comments on NCUA’s electronic assess all corporate credit unions an § 92.319 [Amended] bulletin board by dialing (703) 518– examination fee or to abolish corporate 10. In § 92.319, in the undesignated 6480. Please send comments by one credit union fees altogether and require center heading ‘‘COUNTRIES OF method only. natural person credit unions, since they CENTRAL AMERICA AND WEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: benefit from the existence of corporate INDIES 19’’, footnote 19 and its reference Robert F. Schafer, Acting Director, credit unions, to make up the difference. 28086 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

Most of those who commented on this proposed regulation might be Additional tests included stresses on issue favored assessing all corporate appropriate. To obtain input on those several market-related variables to credit unions a fee, rather than having changes, NCUA hosted a series of determine their effect on MVPE. These natural person credit unions pay for meetings with representatives of included: (1) flattening and steepening corporate credit union supervision. corporate credit unions, natural person the reference yield curve with a pivot at Many noted that not all natural person credit unions, and national credit union the three-year maturity; (2) increasing credit unions use their corporate credit trade associations. There was a market volatilities by 50 percent from union. NCUA has determined not to productive exchange of information and the reference levels; (3) stressing pursue the issue of funding corporate views. This proposed rule incorporates prepayment speed projections for credit union supervision expenses in a number of the suggestions received mortgage-related securities 100 percent this proposed regulation. However, during the meetings. faster for the down 300 basis point given the impact that the proposed rule scenario; (4) stressing prepayment speed D. Modeling could have on future supervision efforts, projections for mortgage-related this issue will be reviewed in the future. NCUA contracted with a mortgage securities 50 percent slower for the up investment and interest rate risk 300 basis point scenario; and (5) B. Comments advisory firm (the firm) to estimate the increasing market spreads by 50 basis NCUA received over 1300 comments market value of portfolio equity and points above projected spreads. on the proposed regulation, the bulk of interest rate sensitivity of the balance Project results concluded that large which were from natural person credit sheets of seven corporate credit unions. changes in prepayment expectations, unions. Comments were also received The modeling exercise was conducted widening spreads, and increases in from the national credit union trade to provide NCUA with an independent volatility levels would adversely affect associations and most of the corporate assessment of the relative market risk in corporate credit union MVPEs. Changes credit unions and state credit union a broad cross-section of corporate credit in the shape of the yield curve did not leagues. Finally, comments were unions. The firm believes that market have a significant adverse effect; this received from other trade associations, value of portfolio equity (MVPE) is the was due, in large part, to the relatively state credit union regulatory authorities, best measure of interest rate risk, as it short asset duration of most corporate credit union organizations and can be computed quickly, captures credit union balance sheets. consultants, a Member of Congress, interest and principal cash flows, The balance sheets of the corporate other entities that do business with provides an analysis of embedded credit unions studied were ‘‘long the credit unions, and individuals. option risk, and is more complete than market,’’ that is MVPE increased when The commenters generally opposed income simulations. In addition, MVPE interest rates declined and decreased the proposed regulation, particularly the models are not driven by assumptions when interest rates rose. This is a result asset-liability management and capital regarding future behavior or reactions to of the effective duration of the corporate requirements. The proposed regulation interest rate changes. The firm credit unions’ assets being longer than required that a corporate credit union concluded that requiring corporate that of their liabilities. Some corporate identically match all of its shares and credit unions to use MVPE techniques credit union assets were shown to be deposits, except for 25 percent of its would introduce a necessary risk negatively convex, that is, projected overnight funds, to corresponding analysis and reduction discipline. The gains to MVPE were smaller for interest assets. The commenters stated that the firm stated that when properly rate declines than losses for equivalent proposal represented an attempt to implemented, MVPE techniques would interest rate increases. This negative eliminate risk from the system, whereas significantly reduce the likelihood of convexity is caused by the presence of the appropriate role of a corporate credit another failure similar to that of Capital embedded options, found most union was to manage risk. They stated Corporate Federal Credit Union, which commonly in mortgage-related that the proposal would make it failed in early 1995. Interestingly, many securities and structured notes. impossible for corporate credit unions of the commenters to the initial The firm determined that many to provide competitive products to their proposed rule recommended that NCUA corporate credit unions would need to members and to generate sufficient use MVPE to measure interest rate risk. upgrade their interest rate risk models to income to meet the proposed minimum The firm noted that managing market account for the impact of embedded capital requirements. The proposed value correctly can reduce the volatility options. It noted that the establishment regulation required that corporate credit of earnings and net worth. The effects of of a minimum MVPE ratio would be a unions achieve primary capital levels of good management decisions stand out key aspect of any regulation attempting 4 percent of average daily assets by when earnings are not significantly to control interest rate risk using MVPE January 1, 1998. affected by unexpected changes in techniques. According to the firm, the The commenters also contended that interest rates. Market value is the best minimum should provide a safe margin the proposed rule would measure of the firm’s value and is above the exposures created by a disproportionately affect small natural usually the best benchmark to judge positive or negative 300 basis point rate person credit unions, which rely more management’s performance. Also, shift. This is necessary because, as the heavily on corporate credit unions for MVPE, and its volatility, is usually the tests indicated, MVPE can also be investments and other services. They best indication of risk to the insurer and affected by changes in the slope of the argued that because the corporate credit regulators. Treasury curve, prepayment activity unions would not be able to earn a The firm analyzed the corporate credit that differs from that expected, changes spread on their investment activities, unions’ base MVPE and the sensitivity in market spread levels, and changes in costs for services would increase and of MVPE for instantaneous and market volatilities. yield on investments would decrease. sustained parallel shifts in interest rates up and down 400 basis points in 100 E. Three-Tiered Approach C. Dialogue Meetings basis point increments. It also provided In developing this revised proposed After considering the comments and a 12-month net interest income rule, NCUA acknowledged the diversity preliminary modeling results, NCUA projection for the same interest rate within the corporate credit union determined that some changes to the scenario. network and the breadth of functions Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28087 that are provided. Accordingly, this which it wishes to operate. While a clarify the application of Part 704, proposal provides the flexibility for corporate credit union may change its NCUA proposed to amend the Scope additional authorities for those level at a later date, it will have to make section so that it states both that the corporate credit unions with a more an initial decision regarding what its regulation applies to all federally developed infrastructure and codifies status will be when the final rule insured corporate credit unions, and the requirements to obtain those becomes effective. So that NCUA can that non federally insured corporate authorities. Presently, such authorities effectively supervise the transition to credit unions must agree, by written are granted by waiver. the new regulation, each corporate contract, to adhere to the regulation and The basic regulatory requirements and credit union will be asked to inform submit to NCUA examination as a authorities applicable to all corporate NCUA, within 90 days of the final rule’s condition of receiving funds from credit unions are set forth in the main publication, of its decision. federally insured credit unions. Some text of Part 704. Thus, a corporate credit A corporate credit union that plans to commenters objected to this latter union that does not seek expanded operate with expanded authorities requirement, arguing that it meant that authorities need read only the main text should submit its application for such NCUA was holding non federally and Appendix A, which contains model authorities as soon as possible to ensure insured corporate credit unions to a disclosure forms that a corporate credit approval and implementation prior to higher standard than other investment union may choose to use for capital the effective date. The application must alternatives available to natural person accounts. A ‘‘basic’’ corporate credit demonstrate that the corporate credit credit unions. union need not read Appendices B and union either has sufficient staffing and These credit unions may be held to a C, which set forth additional authorities infrastructure to support the authorities higher standard because they are available to corporate credit unions and or will make the necessary changes so differently situated than other natural the requirements to obtain such that it will have such staffing and person credit union investment authorities. The incorporation of infrastructure. The application also alternatives. The failure of a corporate expanded authorities allows for an must set forth the expected costs of such credit union, even one not federally element of self-determination that was changes. Since there is no guarantee of insured, would affect the credit union not a component of the initial proposal. approval, a corporate credit union system more dramatically than the This approach is intended to remove the normally will not implement these failure of a bank or broker-dealer. First, ‘‘one-size-fits-all’’ constraint and permit changes until it receives preliminary the public would not necessarily flexibility for a corporate credit union to approval. distinguish between a federally and non choose a path consistent with its NCUA will work closely with a federally insured corporate credit union: members’ needs. The board of a corporate credit union in evaluating its all would be tarnished. Second, it is corporate credit union may pursue, via application. Once all issues are likely that a far greater number of a self- assessment, the level at which it resolved, NCUA will issue a preliminary federally insured natural person credit wishes its institution to operate. approval. If the issues cannot be unions would be affected by the failure of a corporate credit union than would F. Effective Date and Transition resolved, NCUA will notify the corporate credit union. Once be affected by the failure of a bank or Section 704.18 of the initial proposal preliminary approval has been received, broker-dealer. For these reasons, and stated that the rule would take effect on the corporate credit union must make because of NCUA’s responsibility to January 1, 1996. Obviously, that date the planned changes. Once NCUA has protect the National Credit Union Share has passed. Due to the complexity of been notified that the corporate credit Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), NCUA has this rule, it is difficult to determine union is ready to begin using the determined to retain in the revised when a final rule will be issued, and expanded authorities, it will review the proposed rule the requirement that non thus to predict a reasonable effective corporate credit union’s operations. If federally insured corporate credit date. Accordingly, rather than stating an they are sufficient to support the unions must agree, by written contract, effective date in this proposal, the final requested authorities, final approval to adhere to the regulation and submit rule will announce an effective date that will be granted. to NCUA examination as a condition of is approximately 1 year from the date Recognizing that an institution may receiving funds from federally insured the final rule is issued. not be at the required capital level or credit unions. The preamble to the initial proposal As in the first proposed rule, Section within the required MVPE limitations stated that NCUA was considering 704.1(b), which sets forth NCUA’s by the effective date of the regulation, requiring compliance with the authority to waive a requirement of Part NCUA plans to work with the corporate investment section 30 days after 704, is retained in this revised proposal. credit unions to develop realistic time issuance of the final rule, which would NCUA again emphasizes that corporate frames for compliance. NCUA also is be prior to the effective date of the rest credit unions are expected to comply aware of the unique role of wholesale of the regulation. This was to deter with the rule and that waivers will not corporate credit unions and will make corporate credit unions from ‘‘loading be granted as a matter of course. up’’ on investments that would no accommodations to allow such longer be permissible under the new institutions to comply with the Section 704.2—Definitions rule. The commenters generally objected regulation. As noted in the initial proposed rule, to this provision, and NCUA has G. Section-by-Section Analysis Part 704 currently incorporates by determined not to proceed with it. As reference Part 703, which governs noted in proposed Section 704.6(g), a Section 704.1—Scope federal credit union investments, except corporate credit union’s authority to Part 704 applies directly to all where inconsistent with Part 704. To hold an investment is governed by the federally insured corporate credit eliminate the confusion regarding the regulation in effect at the time of unions. It applies to non federally applicability of certain provisions of purchase. insured corporate credit unions, via Part Part 703 to corporate credit unions, As discussed above, if this proposal is 703 of the Rules and Regulations, if NCUA determined in the initial made final, each corporate credit union such credit unions accept shares from proposed rule to make the investment will have to determine the level at federally chartered credit unions. To section in Part 704 stand on its own. 28088 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

Among other tasks, this necessitated terms: ‘‘capital ratio,’’ ‘‘correspondent being included in primary capital. They importing a number of definitions from services,’’ ‘‘credit enhancement,’’ ‘‘daily argued that such shares were at risk and Part 703 into Part 704. No commenters average net assets,’’ ‘‘dealer bid should be counted. The commenters objected to this idea, and it is continued indication,’’ ‘‘gains trading,’’ also argued that the asset and liability in this revised proposal. ‘‘membership capital,’’ ‘‘mortgage- provisions were so stringent that it The definitions that have been backed security,’’ ‘‘moving daily average would be impossible to meet the 4 repeated, either identically or with net assets,’’ ‘‘NCUA,’’ ‘‘non secured percent requirement in the time frame minor changes, from current Part 703 investment,’’ ‘‘paid-in capital,’’ ‘‘private provided. Many commenters also are: ‘‘adjusted trading,’’ ‘‘collateralized placement,’’ ‘‘reserves,’’ ‘‘reserve ratio,’’ objected to using two ratios to measure mortgage obligation,’’ ‘‘federal funds ‘‘secured loan,’’ ‘‘tri-party contract,’’ and the adequacy of corporate credit union transaction,’’ ‘‘futures contract,’’ ‘‘weighted average life.’’ NCUA believes capital. ‘‘immediate family member,’’ ‘‘market that the definitions are self-explanatory, NCUA is proposing to move away price,’’ ‘‘maturity date,’’ ‘‘real estate but will clarify any that are confusing in from the concept of risk-based capital. mortgage investment conduit,’’ the preamble to the final rule. Because corporate credit union assets ‘‘repurchase transaction,’’ ‘‘residual tend to have relatively low credit risk, interest,’’ ‘‘reverse repurchase Section 704.3—Corporate Credit Union most corporate credit unions have high transaction,’’ ‘‘Section 107(8) Capital risk-based capital ratios, even if they institution,’’ ‘‘senior management Section 704.11 of the current have low levels of leverage capital to employee,’’ ‘‘settlement date,’’ ‘‘short regulation establishes specific levels of protect against interest rate or market sale,’’ ‘‘stripped mortgage-backed capital that corporate credit unions risks. This revised proposal focuses on security,’’ and ‘‘trade date.’’ must maintain, based on risk-weighted the capital that is available to protect Since the issuance of the initial assets. Primary capital, which consists against those risks. Comments are proposed rule, NCUA has issued a of reserves and undivided earnings, specifically requested on whether proposed revision to Part 703. 50 FR must be at least 4 percent of risk- NCUA should require the calculation of 61219 (Nov. 29, 1995). Proposed Part weighted assets, and total capital, which the capital to risk-weighted assets ratio. 703 contains a number of new consists of primary capital and In responding to this issue, commenters definitions, some of which have been membership capital share deposits, should bear in mind that NCUA would included in this revised proposed Part must be at least 8 percent of risk- likely require that the ratio be calculated 704. These are: ‘‘business day,’’ weighted assets. In response to public using the same risk weights and risk ‘‘commercial mortgage related security,’’ expressions of concern regarding the categories required by the other federal ‘‘fair value,’’ ‘‘industry-recognized relatively low levels of primary capital financial institution regulators. information provider,’’ ‘‘mortgage in corporate credit unions, Section Proposed Section 704.3(b) requires related security,’’ ‘‘mortgage servicing,’’ 704.12 of the initial proposed rule that a corporate credit union without ‘‘pair-off transaction,’’ ‘‘prepayment established a new capital requirement expanded authorities have a capital model,’’ ‘‘securities lending based on the ratio of primary capital to ratio of 4 percent. Capital is defined as transaction,’’ and ‘‘small business average daily assets. The goal was for the sum of a corporate credit union’s related security.’’ corporate credit unions to reach the reserves and undivided earnings, paid- The initial proposed rule also minimum ratio of 4 percent of primary in capital, and membership capital. introduced a number of new definitions, capital to average daily assets by Membership capital accounts are similar several of which have been included in January 1, 1998. The initial proposed to the current membership capital share this revised proposal. These are: rule also required that all corporate deposits, except that they must have at ‘‘embedded option,’’ ‘‘forward rate credit unions maintain a minimum ratio least a three-year notice provision, agreement,’’ ‘‘long-term investment,’’ of 10 percent of capital to risk-weighted rather than a one-year provision. Paid- ‘‘market value of portfolio equity,’’ assets. in capital consists of funds obtained ‘‘matched’’ (‘‘identically matched’’ in The proposed definition of primary from credit union and non credit union initial proposal), ‘‘official,’’ ‘‘option capital included, in addition to reserves sources. Paid-in capital has no maturity contract,’’ ‘‘penalty for early and undivided earnings, certain other and is callable only at the option of the withdrawal,’’ ‘‘primary dealer,’’ ‘‘short- reserve accounts and a new type of corporate credit union and only if the term investment,’’ ‘‘swap agreement,’’ member-contributed capital, called a corporate credit union meets its and ‘‘wholesale corporate credit union.’’ permanent capital share account minimum level of required capital after The initial proposal rule deleted a (PCSA). Up to 50 percent of primary the funds are called. number of definitions because the terms capital could consist of PCSAs, the most The capital (or ‘‘leverage’’) ratio is were not used in the proposed significant feature of which was that calculated by dividing a corporate credit regulation, or because the meaning was they could be redeemed only with the union’s capital by its moving daily so self-evident as to not require written concurrence of NCUA. In average net assets. Including definition. No commenters objected to general, the commenters opposed this membership capital in the definition of this idea and it is continued in this requirement. Corporate credit union capital means that most corporate credit revised proposal. The definitions that commenters stated that they would be unions are already at 4 percent. NCUA are proposed to be deleted are: ‘‘average unable to sell such shares, and natural believes that 4 percent is appropriate, life,’’ ‘‘capital of a broker/dealer,’’ person credit unions stated that they because it is the amount estimated to ‘‘claims,’’ ‘‘corporate reserves,’’ non would not purchase them. meet corporate credit union needs and credit union member,’’ ‘‘original With respect to the proposed capital is comparable to the levels established maturity,’’ ‘‘other reserves,’’ ‘‘risk-based requirements, the commenters stated by the other financial institution capital,’’ ‘‘secondary capital,’’ that if PCSAs were to be retained, all regulators. ‘‘speculative activities,’’ ‘‘term such shares should be counted toward The role of membership capital subordinated debt,’’ and ‘‘United States primary capital. In addition, the relative to a corporate credit union’s depository institutions.’’ commenters objected to the new internally generated reserves and Finally, this revised proposal has membership capital shares, called undivided earnings has been cause for introduced definitions for the following secondary capital share accounts, not extensive debate. NCUA regards Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28089 membership capital as a vital 704.3(c) establishes mandatory reserve within 10 business days when capital component of the corporate network’s transfers when the amount is below 4 falls below the minimum required. The total capital structure. It is used in percent. Although NCUA expects that a 10 business days refers to the time calculating the minimum leverage ratio 4 percent capital ratio will be period after the books are closed at (also included in total capital appropriate for most corporate credit month end. It is important to notify the requirement for expanded authorities), unions without expanded authorities, a board and supervisory committee so the limit on loans to members, the limit higher level may be necessary in the that they can act promptly, including on loans to CUSOs, and the limit on rare situation when, for example, a the calling of a special meeting, if fixed assets. However, for purposes of corporate credit union refuses to necessary, to ensure compliance within market and credit risk exposure, this recognize a loss, or a loss not the month. proposal sets the MVPE and anticipated by the regulation occurs. A If a corporate credit union is not in concentration limits as a percentage of lower level may be appropriate in the compliance by month end, proposed the sum of reserves and undivided event of a natural disaster or when, for Section 704.3(f) requires that it submit earnings and paid-in capital. Indirectly, example, a merger results in the a plan to restore and maintain its capital the member-contributed capital is in continuing corporate credit union’s ratio at the minimum required level. For line to absorb losses, but the revised reserves falling below 4 percent, and a example, if a corporate credit union proposal seeks to restrict the incidence workout plan has been approved. To closes its books on March 31, and the of losses to a corporate credit union’s accommodate increasing or decreasing capital ratio is 3.9 percent, it must own equity. the capital requirement, proposed notify the board of directors, the The ability of a member to withdraw Section 704.3(d) provides that NCUA supervisory committee, and NCUA by its capital contribution has been may require a different minimum April 10. If, on April 30, the capital ratio preserved in this revised proposal. The capital ratio for an individual corporate is at or above 4 percent, no further fact that a member may cancel its credit union based on its circumstances. action is necessary. If, however, the ownership stake, irrespective of any Before imposing a different capital ratio is at 3.95 percent, a plan must be ability on the part of the corporate credit requirement, NCUA will provide notice submitted to NCUA by May 15. union to replace it, adds an to the corporate credit union and allow Even if a corporate credit union extraordinary dimension to the it to respond. comes into compliance by the end of the capitalization of corporate credit In rare circumstances, conditions may month, a plan is required if the unions. Some have argued that a exist in a corporate credit union when corporate credit union drops below the mechanism needs to exist which additional reserves may be needed but required minimum two more times permits a member to voluntarily provide are not available immediately. In those within 12 months from the first a more permanent form of capital to its cases, NCUA may require a corporate violation. Violating the required corporate credit union. Thus, the credit union to increase the regularly minimum three times in one year revised proposal permits a member to scheduled reserve transfers with indicates a systemic problem that must purchase paid-in capital. This supplemental transfers which will be addressed. Failure to develop an establishes the alternative for a member ultimately raise the reserves to the adequate plan, fully supported by to make a perpetual capital investment required level. As an example, NCUA projections and estimates, increases the which the corporate credit union can may require that a corporate credit chances that NCUA will issue a capital use, along with its reserves and union transfer 12 basis points each directive, a procedure that is provided undivided earnings, for direct risk- period, rather than the 10 basis points for in proposed Section 704.3(g). taking purposes. required by the regulations. This action A capital directive may order a As members of a unique, private, and may be taken in conjunction with a corporate credit union to achieve cooperative financial system, corporate reserve transfer, or in lieu of the reserve adequate capitalization by taking one or credit unions will benefit from building transfer. more of a number of actions, such as appropriate internal capital reserves As noted earlier, NCUA and corporate reducing dividends and limiting and, in turn, diminish the prospect of credit union representatives have deposits. Unless a corporate credit placing member funds directly at risk. discussed this revised proposal during union’s capital level is severely under Over time, the buildup of internal its development. As the 4 percent the required minimum, it is intended reserves will increase a corporate credit capital ratio requirement has been that capital directive will be issued only union’s capacity to provide greater debated, some corporate credit union after verbal and written communication products and services to members while representatives have asked about the between NCUA and the corporate credit it decreases the risk to members that consequences of going below 4 percent, union has failed to result in an they will lose their capital stake due to because, for example, the corporate acceptable capital restoration plan or a market or credit risk exposures or other credit union has accepted a large plan has not been followed. business losses incurred by their volume of shares. NCUA is committed Since a capital directive will be corporate credit union. to corporate credit unions maintaining issued only as a last resort, NCUA Proposed Part 703, noted above, limits capital at the required minimum, but expects full and immediate compliance a natural person credit union’s purchase realizes that there may be situations with any such directive. NCUA will of capital shares in corporate credit where a corporate credit union view failure to comply with a capital unions to one percent of the investing temporarily drops below that level. To directive as a serious issue. credit union’s assets. Commenters with accommodate sudden spikes in share It should be noted that the proposed opinions on this issue should direct growth, the capital ratio is calculated by regulation provides for consultation them at proposed Part 703. dividing capital by the moving daily with the state regulator where a state- Since NCUA believes that the stability average net assets for the previous 12 chartered corporate credit union is of the corporate system will be months. involved. NCUA will support state strengthened if each corporate credit Proposed section 704.3(e) requires requirements for higher capital levels or union’s reserves and undivided earnings management of a corporate credit union shorter time frames for compliance. plus paid-in capital ultimately equals 4 to notify the board of directors, the Section 704.3(a) requires that a percent of net assets, proposed Section supervisory committee, and NCUA corporate credit union develop capital 28090 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules goals, objectives, and strategies. A directors into operating managers. A extension/contraction of weighted corporate credit union should develop board needs to delegate the average life (WAL) and on price various scenarios to accommodate slow, development of goals, policies, and volatility. These are similar to the medium, and rapid asset growth. It also procedures to operating management. second two tests of the Federal should consider setting goals higher However, the board retains the ultimate Financial Institutions Examination than regulatory minimums in order to responsibility for ensuring that such Council (FFIEC) test for CMOs. Unlike avoid non compliance due to delegations are reasonably fulfilled. A the current rule, the proposal allows for unexpected growth. Preplanning for board’s active commitment to this can bonds to extend from the initial capital growth is needed if a corporate significantly improve its awareness and expected WAL provision of five years to credit union anticipates applying for control of potential risks. seven years. The price volatility test sets expanded authorities. the maximum market value decline at Section 704.5—Investments 15 percent of the base case value. This Section 704.4—Board Responsibilities Currently, Section 704.6 requires a means that the volatility of a CMO Currently, several different sections of corporate credit union to develop should not exceed the comparable price Part 704 set out policy and operational written investment policies and sets out volatility of approximately a five year requirements for corporate credit union a list of authorized investments and zero coupon bond. boards of directors. For example, divestiture requirements. In the initial This proposal expands the floating Section 704.3 requires boards to adopt proposed rule, the policies provision rate CMO test to include three new tests. and review strategic plans and to was moved to Section 704.4, and the There is an initial expected WAL limit, prepare business plans for certain remaining provisions were revised and an extension/contraction WAL limit, material expenditures. Sections 704.4 recodified at Section 704.5. Section and a price volatility limit. These tests through 704.7 require corporate credit 704.5 of the proposed rule also included were proposed in response to the unions to develop certain policies and the relevant provisions of Part 703, volatile price history of floating rate goals in the areas of asset and liability governing natural person federal credit CMOs and the inability of the FFIEC test management, capital, investments, and union investments, rather than simply to adequately capture cap and basis risk. lending, but the board is accountable for incorporating them by reference. No The view that floating rate securities are the ratification of and adherence to such comments were received on this matter, immune from general market risks has policies and goals. The initial proposed and the split between Parts 703 and 704 been rudely dispelled over the past rule did not substantially change this has been maintained in this revised several years, and NCUA believes there approach, maintaining the requirement proposal. is a need to subject such securities to for board development of strategic and Section 704.6 of the initial proposed rigorous prepurchase selection tests. business plans in Section 704.3 and the rule restricted the aggregate of a During the dialogue sessions with requirement for credit union corporate credit union’s investment in corporate credit unions, several development of capital goals, objectives, any one institution, issuer, or trust to 25 participants argued have that a and strategies in Section 704.6. Section percent of primary capital. It instituted comprehensive MVPE analysis which 704.4, however, did combine the minimum asset size and rating captures option and basis risk requirements for credit union requirements for investments in eliminates the need for a special CMO development of investment and asset depository institutions. It also tightened test. The fact that total risk is addressed and liability management policies. the standards for CMOs. in MVPE, and subsequently limited as a No significant comments were A number of commenters stated that percentage of reserves and undivided received in this area, but to emphasize the 25 percent of primary capital earnings plus paid-in capital, may make the fact that the board sets the agenda limitation was too low, arguing that it the CMO tests redundant and needlessly and is ultimately responsible for the would concentrate corporate credit restrictive. Commenters are specifically corporate credit union, Section 704.4 of union investments in the hands of fewer requested to address this issue. this revised proposal requires a board to issuers and create more credit risk in the To control possible ‘‘cherry picking’’ approve comprehensive written plans industry. They also suggested that U.S. involving the testing of CMOs (selecting and policies. The board should oversee Government and Agency securities a prepayment model that will allow a senior management to ensure that policy should be exempt from the restriction. particular CMO to pass the tests), this limits are consistent with the existing NCUA agrees that the 25 percent of revised proposal requires a corporate and forecast levels of capital and that all primary capital concentration limit was credit union board to approve at least activities are conducted in a safe and too low and has also determined that three prepayment models, or a median sound manner and are consistent with concentration concerns should properly estimate, that will be used in the tests. the board’s overall risk management focus on credit risk. Therefore, new The models must be used for all philosophy. The board should also concentration limits are set forth in subsequent tests. understand the role financial proposed Section 704.6, which governs Section 704.5(c) of this revised instruments play in the corporate credit credit risk management. proposal establishes consistent, union’s business strategies and the The weakness in the current CMO minimum standards for repurchase and mechanisms used to manage risks. The tests became evident during the bear securities lending transactions. These board must provide for adequate staffing market of 1994. While the fixed-rate transactions create room for spread and technological/financial resources to CMO test proved reasonably adequate in trade opportunities with minimal MVPE support the corporate credit union’s preventing the purchase of many high and credit risk. Proposed Section activities. When a corporate credit risk fixed-rate CMOs, the floating-rate 704.5(c)(4) requires that collateral union plans to enter a new market, the test proved inadequate. Many floating- securities be legal for corporate credit board evaluation should reflect the cost rate CMOs were structured to enable unions, except that CMO/REMIC of establishing appropriate controls, them to pass the test even though they securities that pass the FFIEC HRST are procedures, and attracting professional contained significant market risk permissible provided that the term of staff with necessary expertise. resulting from option and basis risk. the transaction does not exceed 95 days. The emphasis upon board This revised proposal expands the The 95-day limit will permit standard 3- responsibilities is not intended to turn fixed rate CMO test to include limits on month trades with such collateral. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28091

Section 704.5(k) of the initial investment policies address, among agency’s credit research. To the extent proposed rule carried over the provision other things, risk diversification and that a corporate credit union assumes from Part 703 authorizing investment in approved investment credit limits and material credit risk exposures, the a mutual fund if the investments and credit ratings. Section 704.6(b) internal analysis must provide the basis investment transactions of the fund are authorizes the purchase of certain for acceptable credit lines. The analysis legal for the purchasing credit union. investments only if they have specific should contain a rationale for the Proposed Section 704.5(d) broadens this minimum credit ratings. approved risk exposure. A corporate authority by permitting investment in The initial proposed rule did not credit union choosing to accept greater an investment company that is significantly change this approach. risk exposure must have resident credit registered with the Securities and Section 704.4 required a corporate expertise commensurate with the level Exchange Commission under the credit union to develop policies of risk assumed. Investment Company Act of 1940, with regarding acceptable credit risk, to To ensure reduced risks to member the same restriction regarding the identify the credit risk associated with credit unions, the proposal requires a permissibility of the underlying an asset prior to purchase, and to corporate credit union to establish investments and investment monitor such risks while an asset was maximum credit limits based on its transactions. A mutual fund is the most held. Section 704.5 established reserves, undivided earnings, and paid- common type of registered investment minimum credit ratings for certain in capital. NCUA believes that company, but credit unions have been investments and required corporate establishing limits based upon net assets authorized by opinion letter to invest in credit unions to prepare quarterly provides a poor basis to support risk other types, such as money market evaluations of lines of exposure to since the size of a corporate credit mutual funds and unit investment foreign banks. Some commenters took union’s balance sheet does not trusts. The regulatory language has been exception to some of the required meaningfully correlate to its capacity to changed to clarify that these other types ratings and to the mandatory quarterly absorb risk. of registered investment companies are evaluations. In addition, there was a The proposal also requires that a permissible investments for corporate suggestion that credit risk be discussed corporate credit union establish limits credit unions. A corporate credit union more comprehensively. on concentrations of credit risk that may can determine if the investments and This revised proposed rule addresses occur, by, for example, sector (e.g., investment transactions of an credit risk in a separate section and automobile industry related investment company are permissible by requires that the board of a corporate receivables), industry (e.g., banks), or reviewing the fund’s prospectus and credit union adopt a written credit region (e.g., geographical concentrations statement of additional information. policy that reflects objectives and limits of loans in private mortgage-backed Oral or other written representations consistent with its risk management securities). The policies must address regarding the fund’s activities are not philosophy. Proposed Section 704.6 was the fact that diversification by issuer sufficient. The language also clarifies developed in response to concerns that does not mitigate all pertinent credit that investments such as asset-backed some corporate credit unions consider risk factors. Absent the appropriate risk securities (ABS), which are specifically that credit risk management only considerations, NCUA is concerned that authorized for corporate credit unions requires the use of credit ratings. This the corporate credit union system’s but are not registered investment section requires a corporate credit union assets could become overly companies, are permissible regardless of to establish a credit risk management concentrated in one type of credit and the underlying instruments that make policy, sets concentration limits and be prone to a systemic credit crisis. The up the security. minimum credit ratings for certain remedy is not to avoid credit risk but Proposed Section 704.5(e) sets forth investments, and establishes specific rather to analyze and manage it. investment activities that are prohibited reporting and documentation The credit risk management section for corporate credit unions that are not procedures. establishes specific concentration limits operating with expanded authorities. In-depth credit risk management for certain types of securities and money Several prohibitions are carried over requires considerable human and market transactions. These limits are from Part 703. Proposed Section financial resources. Many corporate higher than those set forth in the initial 704.5(e)(1) prohibits a corporate credit credit unions may not wish to commit proposal. NCUA was persuaded that the union from purchasing and selling off- the resources necessary to assume more conservative limits could have the balance-sheet financial derivatives. significant credit risk exposure. unintended consequence of forcing While derivatives can be important risk Therefore, the proposed rule establishes corporate credit unions to purchase management tools, NCUA believes that conservative credit ratings and securities from issuers with greater they are appropriate only for corporate concentration requirements. It also credit risk. A credit instrument which credit unions that have sophisticated permits an expansion of these basic possesses structural components which risk management systems in place. credit authorities provided that credit reduce the risk of default is preferred to Proposed Section 704.5(e)(3) prohibits a risk management resources increase a credit instrument that is based upon corporate credit union from purchasing accordingly. For corporate credit unions the credit quality of the issuer. commercial mortgage related securities that restrict their credit activities, a Therefore, the concentration limits and small business related securities minimum due diligence process is make a distinction between securities because the market for these securities required. However, if a corporate credit which have an element of credit is undeveloped and the potential timing union increases its credit exposure, the enhancement and non secured direct of cash flows from the securities is not requirements will increase accordingly. obligations. The latter have no collateral widely disseminated. Proposed Section 704.6(a) requires or securitization enhancements to that a corporate credit union’s credit absorb losses resulting from default. Section 704.6—Credit Risk Management risk management policy address how it Proposed Section 704.6(c)(1) provides Except for the concept of risk-based will ensure that it has exercised due that the aggregate investments in any assets, the current regulation addresses diligence in analyzing credit risk. The single mortgage-backed security (MBS) credit risk only briefly. Section 704.6(a) due diligence requirement will not be or asset-backed security (ABS) or trust requires that a corporate credit union’s met solely by subscribing to a rating are limited to 200 percent of the sum of 28092 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules the corporate credit union’s reserves substitute for due diligence. Debt a potential threat to corporate credit and undivided earnings and paid-in structures and counterparty unions and the NCUSIF, Section 704.8 capital. MBS and ABS are instruments creditworthiness must still be evaluated, of the initial proposed regulation with substantial credit enhanced and the approval of credit lines and limited loans to one member credit structures. The underlying instruments limits must contain rationale which union to the corporate credit union’s provide protection from a credit risk reasonably justifies the willingness of primary capital. Corporate credit unions perspective. The limit on MBS and ABS the corporate credit union to place its were prohibited from lending to was set higher than the limit on capital at risk. The proposed rule members that were not credit unions, unsecured transactions because of the requires that downgraded instruments except for loans to CUSOs and overdraft relative lower credit risk associated with be reviewed by the corporate credit protection for clearing accounts, and these secured investments. This limit union. The corporate credit union must were also prohibited from lending to allows for an appropriate level of ensure that any decision to hold a non members. activity absent the substantial credit downgraded instrument can be justified. A number of commenters argued that review process that is requisite for The provision does provide flexibility to the limitation on loans to one member proportionately greater credit risk avoid automatic divestiture. The credit union was too low. They argued exposures. specific conditions for instruments with that there should be a separate Repurchase agreements provide rating which fall below the regulatory limitation for secured and unsecured opportunities for most corporate credit minimum is addressed in proposed loans, due to the differing magnitude of unions to obtain spread income while Section 704.10. Although the initial potential risk. NCUA agrees, noting that limiting MVPE exposure. Repurchase proposed rule contained entity ratings, the majority of corporate credit union agreements and securities lending these have not been included in this lending to member credit unions is done typically have a high degree of revised proposal due to the variability of on a secured basis. NCUA also notes protection against default. Since these standards on the part of the rating that a limit based solely on capital, transactions are fully collateralized and agencies. which includes membership capital, valued on a daily basis, they have In establishing a minimum rating for may be unfair to some corporate credit minimal credit risk exposure. The asset-backed securities, NCUA unions, which may choose not to issue concentration limits set forth in considered the additional legal and membership capital. Therefore, Section proposed Section 704.6(c)(2) reflect the financial structure risks resident in such 704.7(c) of this revised proposal limits objective to maintain credit risk securities. The complexity of these unsecured loans to 50 percent of capital management requirements factors is typically greater for lower or 75 percent of the sum of the reserves commensurate with exposures. It rated bonds. Taking these other risk and undivided earnings and paid-in provides that a corporate credit union’s factors into consideration, it was capital, whichever is greater, and limits aggregate investments in repurchase and decided that that ABS would be limited secured loans to 100 percent of capital securities lending agreements with any to AAA, despite the fact that the relative or 200 percent of the sum of reserves one counterparty are limited to 400 credit risk was not necessarily different and undivided earnings and paid-in percent of the sum of reserves and from other similarly rated securities. capital, whichever is greater. NCUA undivided earnings and paid-in capital. Proposed Section 704.6(b) exempts believes that the unsecured limit This limit does not apply to investments from the credit requirements of Section represents a balance between safety and in a wholesale corporate credit union. 704.6 securities issued by the United soundness concerns and the mission of The concentration limit restricts the States government, its agencies, and corporate credit unions to make loans. volume of repurchase transactions with enterprises. Although government- The secured lending limit allows for one counterparty and will require a sponsored enterprises, such as Fannie adequate diversification of the loan corporate credit union to develop an Mae and Freddie Mac, have been portfolio with limited risk associated adequate number of relationships to exempted, they do possess some credit with any one borrower. support the level of current and risk. A corporate credit union should NCUA emphasizes that the term projected repurchase activity. not fail to consider that any material ‘‘secured loan’’ is defined to mean a Proposed Section 704.6(c)(3) limits credit risk needs to be evaluated loan in which the lender has perfected non secured transactions to 100 percent commensurate with the exposure taken. a security interest in the collateral. The of the sum of a corporate credit union’s These entities should not be considered rules for perfecting a security interest reserves and undivided earnings and exempt from due diligence. are governed by state law. For example, paid-in capital. To the extent that a if collateral consists of loans, and state corporate credit union cannot conduct Section 704.7—Lending law requires possession of loan an in-depth analysis of credit Under Section 704.7 of the current documents to perfect a security interest counterparties, this limit restrict rule, loans to one credit union member in a loan, then the corporate credit exposures to an appropriate maximum. are limited to the corporate credit union must take possession of the It is understood that preferences for risk union’s capital or 10 percent of its documents. If this is not feasible, then taking (i.e., credit versus market risk) shares and capital, whichever is greater. the loan must be included in the may change over time. The expanded The aggregate amount of loans to non corporate credit union’s unsecured loan authorities address the capacity for a credit union members is limited to 15 limit. To assess the impact of the corporate credit union to assume greater percent of the corporate credit union’s unsecured vs. secured loan limits, levels of credit exposure if and when it capital. The aggregate amount of loans NCUA seeks comments on restrictions chooses. NCUA is concerned about to credit union non members is limited imposed by state law on individual excessive exposures in non secured to 25 percent of the corporate credit corporate credit unions’ lending credit instruments that are not union’s shares and capital, with the activities. supported by the requisite due loans to one credit union non member NCUA was convinced by comments diligence. being limited to capital or 10 percent of that the corporate credit unions should Proposed Section 704.6(d) addresses shares and capital, whichever is greater. have the ability to make loans to non credit ratings. It cannot be emphasized Out of concern that the existing credit union members. Section 704.7(d) too strongly that a high rating is not a limitation was too permissive and posed of the revised proposal allows corporate Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28093 credit unions to make loans to members rate changes. The supplementary need to develop procedures to ensure other than credit unions as long as the information section of the proposed regulatory and board policy limits are loans are in compliance with Section regulation indicated that NCUA would not exceeded. 701.21(h) of the NCUA Rules and conduct analytical assessments of the The board also is required to establish Regulations, which governs member proposed rule through simulation policy limits on the maximum decline business loans. Additionally, the modeling techniques. in net income in both percentage and aggregate of loans to members other The linchpin of the asset and liability dollar terms. While NCUA does not than credit unions cannot exceed 15 management section of this revised address specific limits for net interest percent of the corporate credit union’s proposed rule is the use of MVPE. income or net income in the asset and capital plus pledged shares. MVPE shocks provide a critical insight liability management section, it NCUA also was convinced that into potential risks to earnings and recognizes that corporate credit unions corporate credit unions should have the capital. Most financial institutions are must evaluate risk both from a authority to make loans to non member comfortable viewing risk in terms of liquidation and a going concern credit unions in order to accommodate variability of income. MVPE adds the perspective. The board should receive credit unions with branches in other dimension of capital-at-risk to the reports which reflect the impact on both states. Proposed Section 704.7(e) assessment of risk exposure. Simulation the net interest margin and the non authorizes a corporate credit union to models that produce estimates for both interest components of income. make an overdraft loan related to net interest income and MVPE provide A corporate credit union also must correspondent services to a non member a more comprehensive risk assessment. model indexes so that it can establish a credit union. Although such a loan NCUA is primarily focused upon the relevant correlation between its cost of generally will have a maturity of only preservation of capital. MVPE funds and the reference indexes to one business day, NCUA will not take simulations provide a long-term, which asset coupon formulas are linked. exception if, in the regular course of dynamic, and forward-looking The risk that an index will change business, an overdraft loan occasionally projection of the market risk impact independently of the factors which has a maturity of two or three days. upon capital. Coupled with net interest affect liabilities creates basis risk. The income sensitivity analysis, MVPE MVPE calculation misses a significant Section 704.8—Asset and Liability provides a mechanism to view earnings risk when indexes (market and non Management on a capital-at-risk basis. In most cases, market) are not modeled appropriately. Section 704.4 of the current regulation the management of MVPE will rely This is particularly important for non requires a corporate credit union to upon the management of asset price market indexes, such as COFI, where develop and implement comprehensive volatility. correlations to funding behavior may be written funds management policies and NCUA realizes that the level of MVPE weak or changes may be difficult to to prepare monthly reports showing the that a corporate credit union targets is project. degree of mismatch between the sources not static. As a corporate credit union Proposed Section 704.8(e) requires a and uses of funds. In addition, 704.6 assumes a greater mismatch between corporate credit union to evaluate the requires a corporate credit union to liabilities and assets, MVPE variability risk in its balance sheet by measuring develop written investment policies will rise. Corporate credit unions will the impact of interest rate changes on its which address funds management need to make constant adjustments to MVPE and MVPE ratio. A corporate strategies, among other things. the level of MVPE exposure based upon credit union must limit its risk exposure In response to the assumption of their market biases and preferences. It is to levels that do not result in an MVPE significant interest rate risk by many assumed that a corporate credit union ratio below 1 percent or a decline in corporate credit unions, Section 704.4 of uncomfortable with positioning its MVPE of more than 18 percent. the initial proposed rule required that balance sheet based upon assumptions Frequency of testing is a function of the corporate credit unions identically about future market factors will MVPE ratio. If MVPE is 2 percent or match almost all shares and deposits to minimize MVPE variability by matching above, testing must be done quarterly. If corresponding assets. In addition, a majority of assets and liabilities. The it falls below 2 percent, monthly testing corporate credit unions were required to management of higher MVPE variability is required. calculate the fair value of all investment requires considerable human, financial, The MVPE floor provision of 1 securities monthly, limit aggregate and system resources. The proposed percent is included in the regulation to losses on available-for-sale assets to 15 regulation recognizes that some reflect, in part, the potential that a percent of primary capital, limit corporate credit unions will have forecast of the effect of interest rates on investment in instruments with sufficient infrastructure to permit them a corporate credit union’s balance sheet embedded options to capital, and to incur more interest rate risk. will only approximate actual market impose early withdrawal penalties to This proposal requires that a effects of interest rates. This floor guarantee protection from replacement corporate credit union maintain a (remaining reserves and undivided risk. Most respondents to the original certain level of MVPE and that it not earnings plus paid-in capital) must also proposal pointed out that this decline too drastically in response to absorb other risks which could affect the combination was too restrictive to interest rate shocks. However, effective corporate’s balance sheet such as permit both a realistic management of risk management begins and ends with operational, credit, legal, liquidity, asset and liability positions and an the board of directors. The board should settlement and systemic risk. adequate provision of basic financial consider that the regulatory limitations There has been considerable debate products and services. in this rule are outer boundaries. It is on the appropriate level of this floor. A To ensure that corporate credit unions anticipated that boards will set policies floor as low as 1 percent provides a were cognizant of potential interest rate within these boundaries, recognizing reduced cushion to absorb differences risk exposures before they arose, that shock tests can only approximate between forecast results and actual proposed Section 704.4 required the real world events are based upon a market conditions, the impact of interest performance of monthly ‘‘shock test’’ number of subjective inputs. Estimated rate risk not fully reflected by a 300 calculations to show the impact on net results frequently vary from actual basis point parallel shock, and the other interest income and MVPE of interest results, and corporate credit unions will risks identified above. This increases 28094 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules the potential that credit unions could (usually none). These options typically disclosure of violations as essential for lose membership capital during represent the most dynamic component this approach to remain valid. It is significant market disruptions. of the MVPE variability. crucial that NCUA, the corporate credit Therefore, a low floor may require Therefore, under the proposed rule, a union board, and the supervisory NCUA to act more quickly and corporate credit union with instruments committee, be informed as soon as forcefully to protect both natural person which possess unmatched embedded possible of any violation that is not credit union membership capital and options in excess of 200 percent of the corrected within 5 days. NCUA will the NCUSIF. sum of its reserves and undivided work with the corporate credit union to NCUA seeks specific data from earnings and paid-in capital must assist it in returning to compliance. corporate credit unions to support the conduct additional tests. NCUA Proposed Section 704.8(g) sets forth claim that a floor other than 1 percent recognizes that this is a naive hurdle procedures for violations of board asset is appropriate. It seeks similar analytical since the book amount of an instrument and liability policy. Again, NCUA must support for challenges to the 18, 35, and with an option does not represent the be informed, but after notification is 50 percent variation limits. actual amount of option risk. The provided to the board. If all liabilities are matched with development of a specific measure of corresponding assets, investing all option risk was not pursued because of Section 704.9—Liquidity Management reserves and undivided earnings and the unwieldy nature of compliance. The current rule does not address paid-in capital in a 6-year zero coupon This level was chosen as an liquidity explicitly, although the bond is about the same as an MVPE approximate threshold when aggregate requirements in Sections 704.4 and variance of 18 percent. This is a unmatched option exposure could have 704.6 regarding the development of moderate but acceptable risk limit for a material effect upon MVPE. A number funds management policies clearly corporate credit unions with limited of tests, in addition to the standard rate include a concern for liquidity. Further, risk management infrastructure. The shocks, are required when this hurdle is Section 704.8 provides that a corporate firm’s modeling results showed that exceeded. For example, a corporate credit union may borrow up to 10 times corporate credit unions with matched credit union must evaluate the effect on capital or 50 percent of shares, assets and liabilities had MVPE MVPE of non parallel shifts in the yield whichever is greater. The initial variances of less than 5 percent when curve. Simulation tests done in proposed rule also did not contain a their balance sheets were subjected to conjunction with this proposal found separate section regarding liquidity, but plus and minus 300 basis point parallel that non linear shifts did not have a paragraph (j) of the asset and liability shocks. Therefore, corporate credit significant incremental effect on the test section did require corporate credit unions that choose to remain with the results. However, the pivot point was unions to develop contingency funding base case authorities will have room to selected at the three year note. A plans that ranked all sources of liquidity manage a mismatch of assets and corporate credit union would need to that were available to service immediate liabilities while remaining within conduct a test which pivots around a outflows of member funds. Proposed prudent limits. point on the curve that reflects its Section 704.9 authorized a corporate The assumption of higher MVPE balance sheet structure. variability is possible through expanded In addition, adjustments to credit union to borrow up to 10 times authorities, but it is expected that a prepayment speeds are necessary capital or 50 percent of shares, corporate credit union with that because the historical evidence whichever was less, and stated that authority will aggressively alter its indicates that prepayment projections borrowing could only be done for balance sheet in response to shifting have varied substantially from actual liquidity needs. market trends. Again, the MVPE prepayment behavior. The adjustment to No significant comments were variability limit should not be viewed as prepayment speeds in the firm’s received on proposed Section 704.4(j), a static operating level for market simulated model exercise yielded but a number of commenters objected to exposure. Managing money via significantly different MVPE results. the proposed limitation on borrowed significantly mismatching assets and The supply and demand factors funds. In addition, many commenters liabilities carries a host of attendant which can dominate various investment questioned the restriction on borrowing risks which must be constantly sectors are reflected in the spread at only for liquidity purposes. In Section evaluated. A corporate credit union which such investments trade relative to 704.9 of this revised proposal, NCUA cannot run a mismatched portfolio with Treasuries. If a model maintains a static has determined to leave the borrowing a ‘‘buy and hold’’ strategy. Instead, it spread assumption in all tests it may not limit at the current level, that is 10 must actively manage its balance sheet reflect a crucial form of market risk. times capital or 50 percent of shares, in response to changing market factors. Credit spreads can be driven by whichever is greater. Further, the NCUA believes that the basic shock numerous factors, and a corporate credit restriction on borrowing only for test set forth in this revised proposal union should be prepared to address the liquidity needs has been removed. will reflect most interest rate risk, impact of such spreads. However, this revised proposal requires although it may fail to capture some of A major potential component of that a corporate credit union take a the risk associated with other market option value is the measure of volatility. number of actions to ensure that it can conditions. One of the primary concerns A corporate credit union must be able fulfill one of its primary functions, that with the MVPE calculations is the to measure the impact of how changes of being a liquidity provider. A estimate of convexity risk resulting from in volatility affect MVPE if it has a corporate credit union must evaluate the embedded options. Most of the material exposure to option risk. potential liquidity needs of its members excessive MVPE variability experienced Proposed Section 704.8(f) sets forth in a variety of economic scenarios, within the corporate network in recent procedures for violations of the continuously monitor sources of years is the result of an excess of regulatory MVPE limits. This proposed internal and external liquidity, ensure options written (e.g., prepayment rule does not require the use of that it has sufficient investment options on amortizing securities and particular risk models, allowing securities classified as available-for-sale periodic and lifetime caps on variable corporate credit unions to use their to meet liquidity needs, and develop a rate bonds) versus options purchased own. NCUA regards the timely contingency funding plan. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28095

Section 704.10—Divestiture guidelines, Section 704.6 incorporates related to services for members of Currently, Section 704.6(d) provides by reference much of Section 701.27, natural person credit unions, such as that a corporate credit union in which governs natural person shared branching and home banking. possession of an investment that does investments in and loans to CUSOs. NCUA is persuaded that corporate meet regulatory requirements must NCUA determined, in the initial CUSOs can have a broader purpose. either sell the investment within 10 proposed rule, to address corporate Accordingly, this revised proposed rule days or request NCUA permission to credit union investments in and loans to requires simply that a corporate CUSO hold it. Section 704.5(a) of the initial CUSOs in one section and to explicitly restrict its services to those related to include the applicable portions of the daily activities of credit unions. proposed rule required divestiture Section 701.27. This was done in Section 701.27(d) of the NCUA within 10 days of any downgraded proposed Section 704.7. Regulations provides guidance in this asset, and 704.5(h)(4) required the same NCUA also proposed to create a new area. of any CMO that failed the average life term for corporate CUSOs: corporate Section 704.7 of the initial proposed test or the price sensitivity test. service organizations (CSOs). A CSO rule limited the aggregate of all Many commenters objected to the was limited to serving only the investments in and loans to member and general divestiture requirement, stating corporate credit unions that had non member CSOs to 15 percent of a that it could result in one corporate invested in or loaned to the CSO and/ corporate credit union’s capital. Some credit union being required to sell a or the members of such corporate credit commenters expressed concern that security at the same time that it was a unions. In addition, CSOs were CUSOs involved in secondary mortgage legal investment for another corporate authorized to provide only a few of the market activities might need additional credit union. The commenters also services authorized for natural person funds at certain times. This revised objected to the absolute nature of both CUSOs. Finally, the proposed rule proposal allows a corporate credit union requirements and the fact that corporate required that a CSO be chartered as a to loan to CUSOs an additional 15 credit unions were given only 10 days corporation under state law. percent of capital, provided that the to sell the downgraded or failed In response to comments and because loan is secured. securities. They stated that automatic ‘‘CUSO’’ is a term used and understood Section 704.7 of the initial proposal divestiture within a short time frame throughout the credit union industry, also incorporated some of the could magnify losses if a corporate NCUA has determined to retain use of limitations and requirements of Section credit union were forced to sell in an the term in the context of corporate 701.27 (b) and (d). One of these was the adverse market. credit unions. To avoid confusion with requirement that the credit union With respect to instruments that have natural person CUSOs, however, this ‘‘ensure’’ that it will not be held liable been downgraded but are still revised proposal does adopt the term for the obligations of the CUSO. Some permissible under the regulations, ‘‘corporate CUSO.’’ In addition, for ease commenters stated that it was proposed Section 704.6 now requires of reference, the definition of corporate impossible to provide absolute only that a corporate credit union CUSO has been included in Section assurance on this score. In response, review the investment and be able to 704.11, rather than being placed in Section 704.11(b) of this revised justify any decision to hold. With Section 704.2. proposal requires a corporate credit respect to instruments that have failed The limitation on the types of entities union to obtain a written legal opinion a requirement of Part 704, proposed that could be served by a CSO was that the corporate CUSO is organized Section 704.10 requires that the board designed to preserve the integrity of and operated in such a manner that the and NCUA be informed within 20 field of membership requirements. The corporate credit union will not business days. If the investment thought was that if a corporate credit ‘‘reasonably be held liable’’ for the continues to fail, the corporate credit union could provide services to any obligations of the corporate CUSO. The union must provide NCUA with a plan natural person credit union through a point of this requirement is to obtain within 25 business days that provides CUSO, field of membership limitations reasonable assurance that a corporate the characteristics and risks of the would be less meaningful. Further, CUSO is operated as a sufficiently investment, how it fits into the NCUA did not wish to address the issue separate entity that a court would not corporate credit union’s asset and of broadening corporate credit union ‘‘pierce the corporate veil,’’ conclude liability management strategy, the fields of membership in the proposed that the CUSO and corporate credit impact of holding or selling, and the regulation. The commenters, however, union were essentially the same likelihood that the investment will argued forcefully that CSOs should be organization, and hold the corporate again meet the requirements of Part 704. able to provide services to non credit union liable for the obligations of Although the proposed rule provides for members. They suggested that a CSO the CUSO. Since there seems to be some NCUA to require submission of the plan should be permitted to develop confusion on this issue, clarifying in less than 25 days, it is anticipated expertise in a specific service which language has been added. that this would be necessary only if could benefit all natural person credit Since initial proposed Sections there were a serious safety and unions. NCUA agrees and the proposed 704.7(b) and (c) received little comment, soundness problem. rule allows corporate CUSOs to serve they have been retained in revised natural person credit unions that are not proposed Sections 704.11(c) and (d). Section 704.11—Corporate Credit Union members of affiliated corporate credit Section 704.7(d) of the initial proposed Service Organizations (Corporate unions. rule required a corporate credit union to CUSOs) In proposing to limit the services that take steps to bring its investments and Currently, the authority of corporate could be provided by CSOs, NCUA was loans in line with the new regulation. credit unions to invest in credit union attempting to relate those services to the Since CSOs were significantly more service organizations (CUSOs) is daily activities of corporate credit restricted than were CUSOs, it was contained in Section 704.6 and the unions, that is, serving credit unions possible that many investments in and authority to lend to CUSOs is contained rather than natural persons. However, loans to CUSOs would not have been in Section 704.7. In addition, rather the commenters argued that CSOs authorized. This provision has not been than setting forth specific CUSO should be able to participate in ventures retained in the revised proposed rule, as 28096 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules corporate CUSOs will have much the better serve their member credit unions, Section 704.15 of the revised same authority as existing CUSOs, and and has set the limit in this revised proposed rule segregates the audit the majority of existing investments and proposed rule at 15 percent of capital. requirements by external and internal loans will continue to be authorized. In addition, the requirements relating to functions. The external audit function Finally, Section 704.11(e) of the revised the submission of waivers from the relates to the annual opinion audit. proposed rule clarifies that the sole limitation have been condensed. As in Although the existing regulation authority for a corporate credit union to the initial proposed rule, this revised contains the phrase reportable invest in or loan to a CUSOs is that proposal eliminates the provision conditions letter, some commenters contained in Part 704. regarding a corporate credit union were confused about the meaning of the term. Accordingly, it has been deleted. Section 704.12—Services proceeding with its investment if it does not receive notification of the action This revised proposal requires that all Section 704.9 currently states that taken on its request within 45 days. This correspondence provided to a corporate corporate credit unions may provide will ensure that NCUA has adequate credit union by the external auditor be services involving investments, time to review requests to invest more made available to NCUA. liquidity management, payment than 15 percent of capital in fixed A number of commenters stated that systems, and correspondent services. assets. $100 million was too low a threshold for NCUA believed that this authority had, an internal auditor function on occasion, been interpreted too Section 704.14—Representation requirement. NCUA agrees and has set broadly and proposed revising this As noted earlier, NCUA amended the a threshold of $400 million in this section to eliminate the specific list of representation section of Part 704 in proposal. In addition, rather than listing services. The initial proposal simply 1994. Those changes were made because specific responsibilities for the internal stated that corporate credit unions could NCUA was concerned about both real auditor, the revised proposed rule provide services to their member credit and apparent conflicts of interest. The simply states that the auditor must meet unions, intending that to mean initial proposed rule recodified that the guidelines of the Standards and traditional loan, deposit, and payment section as 704.13, and amended it Professional Practices of Internal services. The initial proposal also stated further by providing that only Auditing, as established by the Institute that a corporate credit union could representatives of member credit unions of Internal Auditors. This proposal also provide services only to its members were permitted to vote and stand for requires that the internal auditor report and could not provide services to non election. It also incorporated by to the chair of the supervisory members through correspondent credit reference the provisions of Section committee, who may delegate union arrangements or the service 701.14 of the Rules and Regulations, supervision of the internal auditor’s contract authority of Section 701.26 of governing changes in officials and daily activities to the chief executive the NCUA Rules and Regulations. senior executive officers in credit officer of the corporate credit union. Some commenters expressed unions that are newly chartered or in The authority to delegate was provided confusion regarding the prohibition troubled condition. in response to comments that the against correspondent credit union Although few comments were supervisory committee normally is not arrangements. The intent was to directly involved in the daily operation prohibit arrangements whereby two received on this section, NCUA has received assurances that this issue will of the corporate credit union, corporate credit unions would agree for Notwithstanding the statement in the be addressed by the corporate credit one to provide services to the members supplementary information section that unions themselves and, thus, has of another. NCUA has determined, the proposed rule did not require the determined not to go forward with the however, that a corporate credit union hiring of a full-time internal auditor, proposal to allow only representatives may provide services to the members of some commenters stated that the of member credit unions to vote and run another corporate credit union, corporate credit union did not have the for office. provided that the second corporate resources to hire such an auditor. Again, credit union consents and NCUA has For the reasons stated in the preamble this is not required. Some corporates given its prior written approval. A to the initial proposed rule, this revised have the operational complexity to corporate credit union also may provide proposal again incorporates the warrant a full-time internal auditor on correspondent services to non member, provisions of Section 701.14. staff. Other corporate credit unions may natural person credit union branch Section 704.15—Audit Requirements choose to hire a part-time internal operating in the geographical area that auditor or contract with an outside firm the corporate credit union serves. Currently, Section 704.13 only to perform the internal auditor function. addresses the requirements for annual Section 704.13—Fixed Assets audits. The initial proposed rule Section 704.16—Contracts/Written Currently, Section 704.11 limits a recodified the provision at Section Agreements corporate credit union’s investment in 704.14 and added a requirement for an Neither the initial proposed rule nor fixed assets to 15 percent of capital. The internal auditor function for corporate this revised proposal made changes to initial proposed rule changed the credit unions with assets over $100 this provision. limitation to 15 percent of primary million. The proposed rule did not capital, in order to control future large require the hiring of a full-time internal Section 704.17—State-Chartered fixed asset investments. Some auditor, and the supplementary Corporate Credit Unions commenters argued that the proposed information section indicated that, The initial proposed rule added new limitation was too restrictive, while based on the asset size and complexity Section 704.16(b) to put non federally others stated that corporate credit of the institution, it would be insured state-chartered corporate credit unions should not put a significant permissible to hire a part-time auditor unions that receive funds from federally portion of their funds into fixed assets. or contract with an outside firm to insured credit unions on notice that NCUA has determined that corporate perform the function. The proposed rule they were considered ‘‘institution- credit unions may need to make greater did list specific responsibilities of the affiliated parties’’ within Section 206(r) investments in fixed assets, in order to internal auditor. of the Federal Credit Union Act and Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28097 subject to all of the enforcement Appendix B—Expanded Authorities and expanded authorities. The guidelines provisions of the Act. There was no Requirements; Appendix C—Guidelines are based, in part, on a number of significant objection to the proposal and for Evaluating Requests for Expanded subjective factors. Factors include the it has been retained in this revised Authorities areas of board, management and staff; proposed rule. Appendix B of the current rule sets systems and operations; credit risk management; liquidity risk Section 704.18—Fidelity Bond Coverage out off-balance-sheet conversion factors that are used in calculating the capital management; audit and compliance; and The currently regulation specifically to risk-weighted assets ratio. Since the legal. lists the bond forms that NCUA has ratio is not used in this proposal, the The proposal requires that a corporate approved for corporate credit unions. factors have been deleted. Appendix C credit union seeking to use the NCUA has recently approved several currently contains a list of U.S. expanded authorities set forth in Part 1 new forms for credit unions, CUMIS Government obligations and agencies. of Appendix B have a capital ratio of 5 Credit Union Bond 200, CUMIS Credit Rather than having a fixed list, which percent and meet additional Union Bond 300, and CUMIS Credit may become outdated as entities are infrastructure criteria set forth in Union Bond 400, all of which corporate created, dissolved, or changed, the Appendix C. Additional capital is credit unions may use, although some proposed rule contains definitions of required because of the greater may not be appropriate for particular government agencies and enterprises opportunity to take risk. Strengthened institutions. Rather than adding these to and places the responsibility for management, staff, and systems are the proposal and then having to amend determining an entity’s status on the required in order to safely manage that the regulation as other forms are corporate credit union. risk. A corporate credit union seeking to approved in the future, this proposal Appendix B of this revised proposal use the even more expanded authorities sets forth incrementally greater deletes all references to specific bond set forth in Part 2 of Appendix B must authorities for corporate credit unions forms. Instead of listing them in the have a capital ratio of 6 percent and and the infrastructure and capital regulation, NCUA will notify corporate meet even stronger infrastructure requirements that must be in place to credit unions of all approved forms as criteria. Again greater risk requires obtain such authorities. NCUA new forms are approved. greater protection against loss and recognizes that each corporate credit In current Section 704.17, the union has partly evolved in response to greater ability to manage the risk. deductibles are based on a corporate unique competitive forces and member The proposal requires that a corporate credit unions primary capital to risk needs. The mission of a corporate credit credit union seeking to invest in foreign asset ratio. Since the initial proposed union and its capacity to fulfill its obligations, as set forth in Part 3 of rule eliminated this ratio, the primary respective goals can vary considerably Appendix B, have a capital ratio of 5 capital ratio was used in this section. from institution to institution. percent, meet the infrastructure criteria The initial proposal also clarified that Expanded authorities were established required for corporate credit unions the minimum bond coverage would be to permit the corporate credit unions seeking the expanded authorities under based on a corporate credit union’s that qualify to obtain a reasonable Part 1 of Appendix B, and meet average daily assets as of the preceding expansion of market and credit risk additional infrastructure criteria relating December 31. NCUA received few limits. This mechanism permits the to automation of systems and staff comments on this section. flexibility for self-determination and it experience with foreign credit. A Since the primary capital ratio is avoids the consequence of regulating corporate credit union seeking to use being eliminated in this revised down to the least developed institutions financial derivatives, as set forth in Part proposed rule proposed Section 704.19 at the expense of the most developed. 4 of Appendix B, also must have a uses the corporate credit union’s reserve The expanded authorities are a capital ratio of 5 percent and meet the ratio. NCUA requests comments on the natural extension of the existing waiver infrastructure required for corporate effect of this change on a corporate process whereby a corporate can submit credit unions seeking the expanded credit union’s deductible. In addition, a request to NCUA to obtain additional authorities under Part 1 of Appendix B. powers or an exemption from some the proposed rule deletes current In addition, the corporate credit union provision of the rules and regulations. Section 704.17(e), which allows a must apply to NCUA for the specific None of the incremental powers corporate credit union to request derivatives authority sought and have provided for in this proposal are beyond approval for reduced coverage. Under additional staff and systems in place to the scope of existing waiver authorities. Section 704.1, a corporate credit union adequately control the risks of such Codifying these powers in the regulation may request a waiver of any provision instruments. standardizes the process and provides of Part 704. an established set of criteria for Part 709—Involuntary Liquidation and Appendix A—Model Forms approval. Creditor Claims Authorities are segregated into four Appendix A of the current rule sets parts to allow for some measure of Section 709.5(b) of the NCUA Rules forth a summary of risk weights and risk selectivity by corporate credit unions and Regulations establishes a payout categories used to calculate a corporate that may seek only limited expansions priority for claims against credit unions credit union’s capital to risk-weighted of their basic operating powers. These that are in involuntary liquidation. assets ratio. Since this revised proposed parts, and their respective guidelines for Currently, the seventh item is rule eliminates the required calculation approval, are based upon an increasing membership capital share deposits of of that ratio, the summary has been scale of depth and complexity. Greater corporate credit unions. Since the deleted. Appendix A of this revised expansions of authority are supported proposed rule uses the term proposal contains variations of the by greater capacities to measure and ‘‘membership capital,’’ the words ‘‘share model disclosure forms that were set control the corresponding risks. deposits’’ have been deleted. The forth in Appendix C of the initial Proposed Appendix C sets forth proposed rule also provides for an proposal. guidelines for evaluating requests for eighth item, i.e., paid-in capital. 28098 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

Part 741—Requirements for Insurance and recordkeepers are not required to By the National Credit Union Administration Board on May 22, 1996. The initial proposed rule amended respond to this collection of information Section 741.3 of the NCUA Rules and unless it displays a currently valid OMB Becky Baker, Regulations, governing requirements for control number. Secretary of the Board. insured credit unions, to prohibit Respondents: Corporate credit unions. For the reasons set out in the federally insured credit unions from Estimated number of respondents preamble, NCUA proposes to amend 12 transacting business with corporate and/or recordkeepers: 41. CFR parts 704, 709, and 741 as follows: credit unions that did not comply with 1. Part 704 is revised to read as Part 704 and were not examined by Estimated average annual burden follows: NCUA. There was no significant hours per respondent/recordkeeper: objection to the proposal and it has been 3,909 hours. PART 704ÐCORPORATE CREDIT retained in this revised proposed rule. Estimated total annual reporting and UNIONS In the interim, Section 741.3 has been recordkeeping burden: 160,293 hours. Sec. recodified, so this revised proposed rule Estimated Total Annual Cost: 704.1 Scope. creates new Section 741.219, containing $4,018,630. 704.2 Definitions. the same language as set forth in the 704.3 Corporate credit union capital. initial proposal. Executive Order 12612 704.4 Board responsibilities. 704.5 Investments. H. Regulatory Procedures Executive Order 12612 requires 704.6 Credit risk management. Regulatory Flexibility Act NCUA to consider the effect of its 704.7 Lending. actions on state interests. It states that: 704.8 Asset and liability management. NCUA certifies that the proposed rule, ‘‘Federal action limiting the policy- 704.9 Liquidity management. if made final, will not have a significant making discretion of the states should 704.10 Divestiture. economic impact on small credit unions be taken only where constitutional 704.11 Corporate Credit Union Service (those under $1 million in assets). The authority for the action is clear and Organizations (Corporate CUSOs). rule applies only to corporate credit certain, and the national activity is 704.12 Services. unions, all of which have assets well in 704.13 Fixed assets. necessitated by the presence of a 704.14 Representation. excess of $1 million. Accordingly, a problem of national scope.’’ The risk of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not 704.15 Audit requirements. loss to federally insured credit unions 704.16 Contracts/written agreements. required. and the NCUSIF caused by actions of 704.17 State-chartered corporate credit Paperwork Reduction Act corporate credit unions are concerns of unions. national scope. The proposed rule 704.18 Fidelity bond coverage. The collection of information would help assure that proper contained in this notice of proposed Appendix A to Part 704—Model Forms safeguards are in place to ensure the rulemaking has been submitted to the safety and soundness of corporate credit Appendix B to Part 704—Expanded Office of Management and Budget for unions. Authorities and Requirements review in accordance with the Appendix C to Part 704—Guidelines for Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 The rule applies to all corporate credit unions that accept funds from federally Evaluating Requests for Expanded U.S.C. 3504(h)). Comments on the Authorities collection of information should be insured credit unions. NCUA believes that the protection of such credit Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1762, 1766(a), 1781, directed to Ms. Beauchesne, at the and 1789. National Credit Union Administration, unions, and ultimately the NCUSIF, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia warrants application of the proposed PART 704ÐCORPORATE CREDIT 22314–3428; Fax No. (703) 518–6433; E- rule to non federally insured corporate UNIONS Mail Address: [email protected] credit unions. NCUA, pursuant to within 90 days from the date of this Executive Order 12612, has determined § 704.1 Scope. publication in the Federal Register. that this rule may have an occasional (a) This part establishes special rules Comments should also be sent to the direct effect on the states, on the for all federally insured corporate credit OMB Desk Officer at the following relationship between the national unions. Non federally insured corporate address: Mr. Milo Sunderhauf, OMB government and the states, or on the credit unions must agree, by written Reports Management Branch, New distribution of power and contract, to both adhere to the Executive Office Building, Room 10202, responsibilities among the various requirements of this part and submit to Washington DC 20530. levels of government. However, the examinations, as determined by NCUA, The collection of information potential risk to the NCUSIF without as a condition of receiving shares or requirements in this proposed these changes justifies them. deposits from federally insured credit regulation are found in 12 CFR [704.2; I. List of Subjects unions. This part grants certain 704.3(a); 704.4(a); 704.6(a); 704.7(a); additional authorities to federal 704.8(a); 704.3(e)–(g); 704.5(b)(i)–(v); 12 CFR Part 704 corporate credit unions. Except to the 704.6(e); 704.8(e)–(g); 704.10; 704.15(b); extent that they are inconsistent with and Appendices A and B]. This Credit unions, Reporting and this part, other provisions of NCUA’s information is required by corporate recordkeeping requirements. Rules and Regulations (12 CFR Chapter credit union management and staff in 12 CFR Part 709 VII) and the Federal Credit Union Act making critical operational decisions on apply to federally chartered corporate an ongoing basis. Additionally, the Claims, Credit unions, Liquidation. credit unions and federally insured information will be utilized by NCUA 12 CFR Part 741 state-chartered corporate credit unions during the annual examination and the to the same extent that they apply to ongoing supervision process. The Bank deposit insurance, Credit other federally chartered and federally respondents and recordkeepers are unions, Reporting and recordkeeping insured state-chartered credit unions, corporate credit unions. Respondents requirements. respectively. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28099

(b) The Board has the authority to Corporate credit union means an engaged in the business of banking, and issue orders which vary from this part. organization that: is recognized as a bank by the banking This authority is provided under (1) Is chartered under Federal or state supervisory authority of the country in Section 120(a) of the Federal Credit law as a credit union; which it is organized. Union Act, 12 U.S.C. 1766(a). Requests (2) Receives shares from and provides Forward rate agreement means an by state-chartered corporate credit loan services to credit unions; over-the-counter contract between unions for waivers to this part must be (3) Is operated primarily for the counterparties where one party agrees to approved by the state regulator before purpose of serving other credit unions; pay the other a specified interest rate being submitted to NCUA. (4) Is designated by NCUA as a payment on a reference notional amount corporate credit union; at a specified date in the future § 704.2 Definitions. (5) Limits natural person members to (settlement date). The amount paid or Adjusted trading means any method the minimum required by state or received at the settlement date of the or transaction used to defer a loss federal law to charter and operate the contract is based on the market value of whereby a corporate credit union sells credit union; and the contract. The market value depends a security to a vendor at a price above (6) Does not condition the eligibility upon the notional amount, the contract its current market price and of any credit union to become a member rate, and the prevailing market reference simultaneously purchases or commits to on that credit union’s membership in rate at the time of settlement. purchase from the vendor another any other organization. Futures contract means a contract for security at a price above its current Correspondent services means the future delivery of commodities, market price. services provided by one financial including certain money market Asset-backed security means a institution to another, and includes instruments and government securities, security that is primarily serviced by the check clearing, credit and investment sold on commodities exchanges. cashflows of a discrete pool of services, and any other banking Gains trading means the purchase of receivables or other financial assets, services. a security as an investment portfolio either fixed or revolving, that by their Credit enhancement means collateral, asset and the subsequent sale of that terms convert into cash within a finite third-party guarantees, and other same security at a profit after a short- time period plus any rights or other features that are designed to provide term holding period. assets designed to assure the servicing structural support and protection Immediate family member means a or timely distribution of proceeds to the against losses to investors in a particular spouse or other family member living in securityholders. This definition security. the same household. excludes those securities referred to in Daily average net assets means the Industry recognized information the financial markets as mortgage- average of net assets calculated for each provider means an organization which backed securities (MBS), which day during the period. obtains compensation by providing Dealer bid indication means a dealer’s includes collateralized mortgage information to investors and receives no approximation of the bid price of a obligations (CMOs) and real estate compensation for the purchase or sale of security. mortgage investment conduits investments. Embedded option means a Long-term investment means, for the (REMICs). characteristic of certain assets and Business day means a day other than purpose of issue ratings, an investment liabilities which gives the issuer of the that has an initial maturity, or expected a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday. instrument the ability to change the Capital means the sum of a corporate maturity, greater than one year. features such as final maturity, rate, Market price means the price at which credit union’s reserves and undivided principal amount and average life. a security can be bought or sold. earnings, paid-in capital, and Options include, but are not limited to, Market value of portfolio equity membership capital. caps, floors, and prepayment options. (MVPE) means the fair value of assets Capital ratio means the corporate Fair value of a financial instrument minus the fair value of liabilities. All credit union’s capital divided by its means the amount at which an fair value calculations must include the moving daily average net assets. instrument could be exchanged in a value of embedded options. Collateralized Mortgage Obligation current arms-length transaction between Membership capital is treated as a (CMO) means a multi-class bond issue willing parties, other than in a forced liability for purposes of this calculation. collateralized by whole loan mortgages liquidation sale. Market prices, if The MVPE ratio is calculated by or mortgage-backed securities. available, are the best evidence of the dividing MVPE by the fair value of Commercial mortgage related security fair value of financial instruments. If assets. means a mortgage related security where market prices are not available, the best Matched means, with respect to assets the mortgages are secured by real estate estimate of fair value may be based on and liabilities, that the factors which upon which is located a commercial the quoted market price of a financial affect cash flows of an asset are structure. instrument with similar characteristics replicated in a corresponding liability. Commitment means any or on valuation techniques (for example, Material means an amount that unconditional arrangement that the present value of estimated future exceeds 5 percent of the corporate credit obligates a corporate credit union to cash flows using a discount rate union’s capital. extend credit in the form of loans; to commensurate with the risks involved, Maturity date means the date on purchase loans, securities or other option pricing models, or matrix pricing which a security matures, and shall not assets; or to participate in loans and models). mean the call date or the average life of leases. Commitments also include Federal funds transaction means a the security. overdraft facilities, revolving credit, short-term or open-ended transfer of Member reverse repurchase home equity, and mortgage lines of funds between U.S. depository transaction means an integrated credit, and similar transactions. An institutions. transaction in which a corporate credit obligation is conditional if the corporate Foreign bank means an institution union purchases a security from one of credit union is not automatically which is organized under the laws of a its member credit unions under obligated to extend funds. country other than the United States, is agreement by that member credit union 28100 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules to repurchase the same security at a Mortgage related security means a or sold at, or prior to, the settlement or specified time in the future. The security as defined in Section 3(a)(41) of expiration date. corporate credit union then sells that the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Penalty for early withdrawal of a same security, on the same day, to a i.e., a privately-issued security backed share, deposit, or liability means a fee third party, under agreement to by mortgages secured by real estate which will, at a minimum, fully repurchase it on the same date on which upon which is located a dwelling, compensate a corporate credit union for the corporate credit union is obligated mixed residential and commercial the difference between fair value and to return the security to its member structure, residential manufactured book value of the asset that is divested credit union. home, or commercial structure. (including any accumulated losses since Membership capital means funds Mortgage servicing means performing the asset was purchased), or the contributed by members which are tasks to protect a mortgage investment, replacement cost of funds, to meet the available to cover losses that exceed including collecting the installment demand for early withdrawal. reserves and undivided earnings and accounts, monitoring and dealing with Prepayment model means an paid-in capital. In the event of delinquencies, and overseeing empirical method which produces a liquidation of the corporate credit foreclosures and payoffs. reasonable and supportable forecast of union, membership capital is payable Moving daily average net assets mortgage prepayments in alternative only after satisfaction of all liabilities of means the average of daily average net interest rate scenarios. Models are the liquidation estate, including assets for the month being measured typically available from securities uninsured share obligations to and the previous 11 months. broker-dealers and industry-recognized shareholders and the National Credit NCUA means NCUA Board (Board), information providers. These models are Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF). unless the particular action has been used in tests to forecast the weighted The funds have a minimum withdrawal delegated by the Board. average life, change in weighted average notice of three years, are not insured by Net assets means total assets less life, and price sensitivity of CMOs/ the NCUSIF or other share or deposit Central Liquidity Facility (CLF) stock REMICs and mortgage-backed securities. insurers, and cannot be used to pledge subscriptions, CLF loans guaranteed by Primary dealer means a bank or against borrowings. Membership capital the NCUSIF, U.S. Central CLF investment dealer authorized to buy and may be sold to a member, subject to the certificates, and member reverse sell government securities in direct corporate credit union’s approval. The repurchase transactions. For its own dealings with the Federal Reserve Bank funds may be in the form of a term account, a corporate credit union’s of New York in its execution of Fed certificate, or may be in the form of an payables under reverse repurchase open market operations. adjusted balance account. An adjusted agreements and receivables under Private placement means the sale of balance account may be adjusted in repurchase agreements may be netted an entire issue to a small group of relation to a measure established and out if the Generally Accepted investors. Except for investments with disclosed by the corporate credit union Accounting Principles (GAAP) tax shelter provisions, private at the time the account is opened (e.g., conditions for offsetting are met. placement to 35 or fewer investors are one percent of a member credit union’s Net interest income means the exempt from Securities and Exchange assets). Upon written notice of intent to difference between income earned on Commission registration requirements. withdraw membership capital, the interest bearing assets and interest paid Real Estate Mortgage Investment balance of the account will be frozen (no on interest bearing liabilities. Conduit (REMIC) means a nontaxable annual adjustment) until the conclusion Nonsecured investment means an entity formed for the sole purpose of of the notice period. The terms and obligation backed solely by the holding a fixed pool of mortgages conditions of a membership capital creditworthiness of the obligor. secured by an interest in real property account must be disclosed to the Official means any director or and issuing multiple classes of interests recorded owner of such account at the committee member. in the underlying mortgages. time the account is opened and at least Option contract means a right, but not Repurchase transaction means a annually thereafter. Upon notification of an obligation, to buy or sell a security transaction in which a corporate credit intent to withdraw, the amount of the at a specified price and settlement date union agrees to purchase a security from account on notice that can be in the future. a counterpart and to resell the same or considered membership capital is Paid-in capital means funds which any identical security to that reduced by a constant monthly are obtained from credit union and non counterpart at a later date. amortization which ensures the credit union sources and are available to Reserve ratio means the corporate recognition of membership capital is cover losses that exceed reserves and credit union’s reserves and undivided fully amortized at the end of the notice undivided earnings. Paid-in capital is earnings plus paid in capital divided by period. The full balance of a nonvoting and subordinate to its moving daily average net assets. membership capital account that has membership capital and the NCUSIF. Reserves mean all regular or statutory been placed on notice, not just the The funds have no maturity and are reserves, including all valuation remaining non amortized portion, is callable only at the option of the allowances established to meet the full available to absorb losses in excess of corporate credit union and only if the and fair disclosure requirements of the sum of reserves and undivided corporate credit union meets its § 702.3 of this chapter. earnings and paid-in capital until the minimum level of required capital after Residual interest means the remainder funds are released by the corporate the funds are called. The terms and cash flows from a CMO or REMIC credit union at the conclusion of the conditions of a paid-in capital account transaction after payments due notice period. held by a member or non member credit bondholders and trust administrative Mortgage backed security means a union must be disclosed to the recorded expenses have been satisfied. security that represents either an owner of such account at the time the Reverse repurchase transaction means ownership claim in a pool of mortgages account is opened and at least annually a transaction whereby a corporate credit or an obligation that is secured by such thereafter. union agrees to sell a security to a a pool, where the cash flows are passed Pair-off transaction means a security purchaser and to repurchase the same or through to the holders of the security. purchase transaction that is closed out any identical security from that Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28101 purchaser at a future date and at a Undivided earnings means all forms must be calculated on a monthly basis specified price. of retained earnings, except: and funded on at least a quarterly basis. Section 107(8) institution means an (1) Regular or statutory reserves; and (d) Individual capital ratio, reserve institution described in Section 107(8) (2) Valuation allowances established transfer requirement. (1) When of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 to meet the full and fair disclosure significant circumstances or events U.S.C. 1757(8)). requirements of § 702.3 of this chapter. warrant, NCUA may require a different Secured loan means a loan United States Government or its minimum capital ratio and/or reserve collateralized by assets in which the agencies means the United States transfer level for an individual corporate lender has perfected a security interest Government or instrumentalities of the credit union based on its circumstances. under state law. United States, the debt obligations of Factors that might warrant a different Securities lending transaction means which are fully and explicitly minimum capital ratio or reserve a transaction in which a federal credit guaranteed as to the timely payment of transfer level include, but are not union agrees to lend a security to a principal and interest by the full faith limited to, for example: counterparty. and credit of the United States (i) An expectation that the corporate Senior management employee means Government. credit union has or anticipates losses a chief executive officer, any assistant United States Government-sponsored resulting in capital inadequacy; chief executive officer (e.g., any corporations and enterprises means (ii) Significant exposure exists due to assistant president, any vice president agencies originally established or credit, liquidity, market, fiduciary, or any assistant treasurer/manager) and chartered to serve public purposes operational, and similar types of risks; specified by Congress, the debt (iii) A merger has been approved; or the chief financial officer (controller). (iv) An emergency exists because of a Settlement date means the date obligations of which are not explicitly guaranteed by the full faith and credit natural disaster. originally agreed to by a corporate credit (2) When NCUA determines that a union and a counterpart for settlement of the United States Government. Weighted average life means the different minimum capital ratio or of the purchase or sale of a security. weighted average time to principal reserve transfer level is necessary or Short sale means the sale of a security repayment of a security based upon the appropriate for a particular corporate not owned by the seller. proportional balances of the cash flows credit union, NCUA will notify the Short-term investment means, for the that make up the security. corporate credit union in writing of the purpose of issue ratings, an investment Wholesale corporate credit union proposed ratio or level and, if that has an initial maturity, or expected means a corporate credit union which applicable, the date by which the ratio maturity, of one year or less. meets the requirements of Part II of should be reached. NCUA also will Small business related security means Appendix B of this part and which provide an explanation of why the a security as defined in Section 3(a)(53) primarily serves other corporate credit proposed ratio or level is considered of the Securities and Exchange Act of unions. necessary or appropriate for the 1934, i.e., a security, rated in one of the corporate credit union. In the case of a four highest rating categories by a § 704.3 Corporate credit union capital. state-chartered corporate credit union, nationally recognized statistical rating (a) General. A corporate credit union NCUA also will provide notification and organization, that represents ownership must develop and ensure explanation to the state supervisory of one or more promissory notes or implementation of written short- and authority. leases of personal property which long-term capital goals, objectives, and (3)(i) The corporate credit union may evidence the obligation of a small strategies which provide for the respond to any or all of the items in the business concern. It does not mean a building of capital consistent with notice. The response must be in writing security issued or guaranteed by the regulatory requirements, the and delivered to NCUA within 10 Small Business Administration. maintenance of sufficient capital to business days after the date on which Stripped Mortgage-Backed Security support the risk exposures that may the corporate credit union received the means a security that represents either arise from current and projected notice. NCUA may shorten the time the principal or interest only portion of activities, and the periodic review and period when, in its opinion, the the cash flows of an underlying pool of reassessment of the capital position of condition of the corporate credit union mortgages. the corporate credit union. so requires, provided that the corporate Swap agreement means a contract to (b) Capital ratio. A corporate credit credit union is informed promptly of the exchange payments that are based upon union will maintain a minimum capital new time period, or with the consent of a specified dollar amount at specified ratio of 4 percent, except as otherwise the corporate credit union. In its dates in the future. provided in this part. A corporate credit discretion, NCUA may extend the time Trade association means an union must calculate its capital ratio at period for good cause. association of organizations or persons least monthly. (ii) Failure to respond within 10 formed to promote their common (c) Reserve transfers. A corporate business days or such other time period interests. For the purposes of § 704.14, credit union’s monthly reserve transfers as may be specified by NCUA shall the term includes entities owned or are based upon the level of its reserve constitute a waiver of any objections to controlled directly or indirectly by such ratio. Where the reserve ratio is greater any item in the notice. Failure to an association but does not include than or equal to 4 percent, the reserve address any item in a response shall credit unions. transfer is optional. Where the reserve constitute a waiver of any objection to Trade date means the date a corporate ratio is greater than or equal to 3 percent that item. credit union originally agrees, whether but less than 4 percent, the corporate (iii) After the close of the corporate orally or in writing, to enter into the credit union must transfer .10 percent of credit union’s response period, NCUA purchase or sale of a security. its moving daily average net assets. will decide, based on a review of the Tri-party contract means a repurchase Where the reserve ratio is less than 3 corporate credit union’s response and agreement between two parties in which percent, the corporate credit union must other information concerning the a third party acts as a custodian for the transfer .15 percent of its moving daily corporate credit union, and, in the case securities involved. average net assets. Reserve transfers of a state-chartered corporate credit 28102 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules union, in consultation with the state to implement its approved capital credit union is notified of the shortened supervisory authority, whether a restoration plan, NCUA may issue a response period in the notice; different minimum capital ratio or capital directive. (B) With the consent of the corporate reserve transfer level should be (2) A capital directive may order a credit union; or established for the corporate credit corporate credit union to: (C) When the corporate credit union union and, if so, the ratio or level and (i) Achieve adequate capitalization already has advised NCUA that it the date the requirement will become within a specified time frame by taking cannot or will not achieve adequate effective. The corporate credit union any action deemed necessary, including capitalization. will be notified of the decision in but not limited to the following: (iii) Failure to respond within 10 writing. The notice will include an (A) Increase the amount of capital to business days, or another time period explanation of the decision, except for specific levels; specified in the notice, shall constitute a decision not to establish a different (B) Reduce dividends; a waiver of any objections to the minimum capital ratio or reserve (C) Limit receipt of deposits to those proposed directive. transfer level for the corporate credit made to existing accounts; (4) After the closing date of the union. (D) Cease or limit issuance of new corporate credit union’s response (e) Failure to maintain minimum accounts or any or all classes of period, or the receipt of the response, if capital ratio requirement. When a accounts; earlier, NCUA shall consider the corporate credit union’s capital ratio (E) Cease or limit lending or making response and may seek additional falls below the minimum required by a particular type or category of loans; information or clarification. Based on paragraphs (b) or (d) of this section, or (F) Cease or limit the purchase of the information provided during the Appendix B, as applicable, operating specified investments; response period, NCUA will determine management of the corporate credit (G) Limit operational expenditures to whether or not to issue a capital union must notify its board of directors, specified levels; directive and, if issued, the form it supervisory committee, and NCUA (H) Increase and maintain liquid should take. within 10 business days. assets at specified levels; and (5) Upon issuance, a capital directive (f) Capital restoration plan. (1) A (I) Restrict or suspend expanded and a statement of the reasons for its corporate credit union must submit a authorities issued under Appendix B of issuance will be delivered to the plan to restore and maintain its capital this part. corporate credit union. A directive is ratio at the minimum requirement when (ii) Adhere to a previously submitted effective immediately upon receipt by either of the following conditions exist: plan to achieve adequate capitalization. the corporate credit union, or upon such (i) The capital ratio falls below the (iii) Submit and adhere to a capital later date as may be specified therein, minimum requirement and is not plan acceptable to NCUA describing the and shall remain effective and restored to the minimum requirement means and a time schedule by which enforceable until it is stayed, modified, by the next month end; or the corporate credit union shall achieve or terminated by NCUA. (ii) Regardless of whether the capital adequate capitalization. (6) A capital directive may be issued ratio is restored by the next month end, (iv) Meet with NCUA. in addition to, or in lieu of, any other the capital ratio falls below the (v) Take a combination of these action authorized by law in response to minimum requirement for three months actions. a corporate credit union’s failure to in any 12-month period. (3) Prior to issuing a capital directive, achieve or maintain the applicable (2) The capital restoration plan must, NCUA will notify a corporate credit minimum capital ratios. at a minimum, include the following: union in writing of its intention to issue (7) Upon a change in circumstances, (i) Reasons why the capital ratio fell a capital directive. In the case of a state- a corporate credit union may request below the minimum requirement; chartered corporate credit union, NCUA reconsideration of the terms of the (ii) Descriptions of steps to be taken also will provide notice to the state directive. Requests that are not based on to restore the capital ratio to the supervisory authority. a significant change in circumstances or minimum requirement within specific (i) The notice will state: are repetitive or frivolous will not be time frames; (A) The reasons for the issuance of the considered. Pending a decision on (iii) Actions to be taken to maintain directive; and reconsideration, the directive shall the capital ratio at the minimum (B) The proposed content of the continue in full force and effect. required level and increase it thereafter; directive. (iv) Balance sheet and income (ii) A corporate credit union must § 704.4 Board responsibilities. projections, including assumptions, for respond in writing within 10 business (a) General. A corporate credit union’s the current calendar year and one days of receipt of the notice stating that board of directors must approve additional calendar year; and it either concurs or disagrees with the comprehensive written strategic plans (v) Certification from the board of notice. If it disagrees with the notice, it and operating policies, review them directors that it will follow the proposed must state the reasons why the directive annually, and provide them upon plan if approved by NCUA. should not be issued and/or propose request to the auditors, supervisory (3) The capital restoration plan must alternative contents for the directive. committee, and NCUA. The board of be submitted to NCUA, and in the case The response should include all matters directors must know and understand the of a state-chartered corporate credit that the corporate credit union wishes to activities, policies, and procedures of union, to the state supervisory be considered. For its comments to be the corporate credit union. authority, within 30 business days of considered, the state supervisory (b) Operating policies. A corporate the occurrence. authority must respond in writing credit union’s operating policies must (g) Capital directive. (1) If a corporate within the same 10 business days. For be commensurate with the scope and credit union fails to submit a capital good cause, the response time may be complexity of the corporate credit restoration plan; or the plan submitted shortened or lengthened, including the union. is not deemed adequate to either restore following conditions: (c) Procedures. The board of directors capital or restore capital within a (A) When the condition of the of a corporate credit union must ensure reasonable time; or the credit union fails corporate requires, and the corporate that: Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28103

(1) Senior managers have an in-depth, (A) The weighted average life may not median estimate must be based on at working knowledge of their direct areas exceed 5 years at the time of purchase; least 2 prepayment models. of responsibility and are capable of (B) The weighted average life may not (B) If individual prepayment models identifying, hiring, and retaining extend by more than 2 years, nor are used, estimates must be obtained qualified staff; contract by more than 3 years for an from all of the models identified in the (2) Qualified personnel are employed instantaneous, permanent, and parallel corporate credit union’s investment or under contract for all line support shift in market rates of plus or minus policy. One of the individual and audit areas, and designated back-up 300 basis points; prepayment models may be the median personnel with adequate cross-training (C) The extended weighted average prepayment estimate from an industry- are in place; life may not, in any case, exceed 7 years; recognized information provider. All of (3) GAAP is followed; and the models identified in the investment (4) Accurate balance sheets, income (D) The investment’s price may not policy must be used when purchasing statements, and internal risk decline by more than 15 percent for an and retesting a CMO/REMIC. At assessments (e.g., risk management instantaneous, permanent, and parallel purchase, a CMO/REMIC must pass the measures of liquidity, market, and credit shift in market rates of plus or minus tests for each prepayment model used. risk associated with current activities) 300 basis points; At retesting, the CMO/REMIC must pass are produced timely in accordance with (ii) Floating rate CMOs/REMICs must the tests for a majority of the §§ 704.6, 704.8, and 704.9; meet the following NCUA-modified prepayment models used at the time of (5) Systems are audited periodically FFIEC High Risk Security Test purchase. in accordance with industry- requirements: (c) A corporate credit union may enter established standards; (A) The weighted average life of the into a repurchase agreement or (6) Financial performance is evaluated security may not exceed 7 years at the securities lending transaction provided to ensure that the objectives of the time of purchase; that: (B) The weighted average life may not corporate credit union and the (1) The corporate credit union takes extend by more than 2 years, nor responsibilities of management are met; physical possession of the security, contract by more than 3 years for an and receives written confirmation of the instantaneous, permanent, and parallel (7) Planning addresses the necessary purchase and a safekeeping receipt from shift in market rates of plus or minus retention of external consultants to a third party under a written custodial review the adequacy of technical, 300 basis points; (C) The extended weighted average contract, or is recorded as owner of the human, and financial resources security through the Federal Reserve dedicated to support major risk areas. life may not, in any case, exceed 9 years; and Book-Entry Securities Transfer System; § 704.5 Investments. (D) The investment’s price may not (2) Collateral securities are legal (a) All investments must be U.S. decline by more than 10 percent for an investments for corporate credit unions, dollar-denominated and subject to the instantaneous, permanent, and parallel except that a corporate credit union may credit policy restrictions set forth in shift in market rates of plus or minus receive, as permissible collateral, CMO/ § 704.6. 300 basis points; REMIC securities that pass the FFIEC (b) A corporate credit union may (iii) The NCUA-modified FFIEC High High Risk Security Test if the term of invest in: Risk Security Tests must be prepared the repurchase transaction does not (1) Securities, deposits, and monthly on all CMO/REMICs, exceed 95 days from the date of obligations set forth in Sections 107(7), documented and reviewed by an settlement; 107(8), and 107(15) of the Federal Credit appropriate committee, and retained (3) In the event of default, the Union Act, 12 U.S.C. 1757(7), 1757(8), until after completion of the next audit corporate credit union sells the and 1757(15), except as provided in this and examination; collateral in a timely manner, subject to section; (iv) A corporate credit union’s board a bankruptcy stay, to satisfy the (2) Deposits in, the sale of federal of directors must approve at least three commitment of any net principal and funds to, and debt obligations of prepayment models for CMOs/REMICs interest owed to it by the counterpart; corporate credit unions and Section unless a median estimate from an (4) The corporate credit union 107(8) institutions and deposits in state industry-recognized information receives daily assessment of the market banks, trust companies, and mutual provider is used. These approved value of collateral securities, including savings banks not domiciled in the state models must be used consistently for all a market quote or dealer bid indication in which the corporate credit union subsequent compliance tests. Any and any accrued interest, and maintains does business; changes in approved models should be adequate margin that reflects a risk (3) Corporate CUSOs, as defined in infrequent and documented with a assessment of the collateral securities and subject to the limitations of reasonable and supportable justification; and the term of the transaction; § 704.11; and (5) The corporate credit union has (4) Marketable debt obligations of (v) A corporate credit union must entered into signed contracts with all corporations chartered in the United obtain prepayment estimates, based approved counterparts. Such contracts States. This authority does not apply to upon an instantaneous, permanent, must address any supplemental terms debt obligations that are convertible into parallel shift in market rates of plus or and conditions necessary to meet the the stock of the corporation; minus 100, 200, and 300 basis points, to specific requirements of this part. Third (5) Asset-backed securities; and conduct the tests set forth in paragraph party arrangements must be supported (6) CMOs/REMICs, subject to these (b)(6) of this section. by tri-party contracts in which collateral additional limitations: (A) If a median prepayment estimate is priced and reported daily and the tri- (i) Fixed rate CMOs/REMICs must is used, it must be obtained from an party agent ensures compliance; and meet the following NCUA-modified industry-recognized information (6) The corporate credit union has Federal Financial Institutions provider. At purchase, the median sufficient market relationships Examination Council (FFIEC) High Risk estimate must be based on at least 5 established in advance to timely execute Security Test requirements: prepayment models. At retesting, the the disposition of collateral securities. 28104 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

(d) A corporate credit union may (4) Concentrations of credit risk (e.g., than A–1 (or equivalent) for short-term invest in an investment company sector, industry, and regional investments and AA (or equivalent) for registered with the Securities and concentrations); long-term investments at the time of Exchange Commission under the (b) Exemption. The requirements of purchase and at any subsequent time by Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 this section do not apply to instruments the nationally recognized statistical U.S.C. 80a), provided that the portfolio that are issued or fully guaranteed as to rating organization(s) used to meet the of such management company is principal and interest by the U.S. requirements of this part at the time of restricted by its investment policy, government or its agencies or purchase. changeable only if authorized by enterprises or are fully insured (e) Reporting and documentation. shareholder vote, solely to investments (including accumulated interest) by the (1) A written evaluation of each credit and investment transactions that are National Credit Union Administration line must be prepared at least annually permissible for that corporate credit or Federal Deposit Insurance and formally approved by an union. Corporation. appropriate committee of the board. A (e) A corporate credit union is (c) Concentration limits. (1) Aggregate watch list of existing and/or potential prohibited from: investments in mortgage-backed and credit problems must be prepared at (1) Purchasing or selling financial asset-backed securities are limited to least monthly and provided to an derivatives such as futures, options, 200 percent of the sum of reserves and appropriate committee of the board. interest rate swap contracts, or forward undivided earnings and paid-in capital Summary credit exposure reports, rate agreement; for any single security or trust. which demonstrate compliance with the (2) Engaging in pair-off transactions, (2) Except for investments in a corporate’s risk management policies, when issued trading, adjusted trading, wholesale corporate credit union, must be continuously maintained, gains trading, or short sales; and aggregate investments in repurchase and reviewed by appropriate staff, and securities lending agreements with any (3) Purchasing stripped mortgage- provided monthly to the board. one counterpart are limited to 400 backed securities, residual interests in (2) At a minimum, the corporate must percent of the sum of reserves and CMO/REMICs, mortgage servicing maintain: undivided earnings and paid-in capital. rights, commercial mortgage related (i) A justification for each approved (3) Except for investments in a credit line; securities or small business related wholesale corporate credit union, the securities. (ii) Prospectuses for all publicly aggregate of all investments in non traded securities and offering (f) A corporate credit union’s officials, secured obligations of any single memoranda for private placements and employees, and immediate family domestic issuer is limited to 100 percent securities that are exempt from the members of such individuals, may not of the sum of reserves and undivided registration requirements of the receive pecuniary consideration in earnings and paid-in capital. Securities Act of 1933 or the margin connection with the making of an (4) For purposes of measurement, requirements of the Securities Exchange investment or deposit by the corporate each new credit transaction must be Act of 1934; and credit union. Employee compensation is evaluated in terms of the corporate (iii) The latest available financial exempt from this prohibition. All credit union’s sum of reserves and reports, industry analyses, internal and transactions not specifically prohibited undivided earnings and paid-in capital external analyst evaluations, and rating by this paragraph must be conducted at at the time of the transaction. A agency information for each approved arm’s length and in the interest of the subsequent reduction in the sum of credit line. corporate. reserves and undivided earnings and (g) A corporate credit union’s paid-in capital will require a suspension § 704.7 Lending. authority to hold an investment is of additional transactions until (a) Policies. A corporate credit union governed by the regulation in effect at maturities, sales or terminations bring must operate according to a lending the time of purchase. However, all existing exposures within the policy which addresses, at a minimum: grandfathered investments are subject to requirements of this part. (1) Loan types and limits; the requirements of § 704.8 and § 704.9. (d) Credit ratings. (1) All debt (2) Required documentation and collateral; and § 704.6 Credit risk management. instruments must have a credit rating from at least one nationally recognized (3) Analysis and monitoring (a) Policies. A corporate credit union statistical rating organization. standards. must operate according to a credit risk (2) The rating(s) must be monitored (b) General. Each loan or line of credit management policy, which addresses, at for as long as the corporate owns an limit will be determined after analyzing a minimum: instrument. the financial and operational soundness (1) The approval process associated (3) Any rated instrument that is of the borrower and the ability of the with credit limits; downgraded by the nationally borrower to repay the loan. (2) Due diligence analysis recognized statistical rating (c) Loans to member credit unions. requirements; organization(s) used to meet the The maximum aggregate amount in (3) Maximum credit limits with each requirements of this part at the time of loans and irrevocable lines of credit to obligor and transaction counterpart, set purchase must be reviewed by an any one member credit union, excluding as a percentage of the sum of reserves appropriate committee within 20 pass-through and guaranteed loans from and undivided earnings and paid-in business days of the downgrade. the CLF and the NCUSIF, shall not capital. In addition to addressing loans, Instruments that fall below the exceed 50 percent of capital or 75 deposits, and securities, limits with minimum rating requirements of this percent of the sum of reserves and transaction counterparts must address part are subject to the divestiture undivided earnings and paid-in capital, aggregate exposures of all transactions, requirements of 704.10. whichever is greater, for unsecured including, but not necessarily limited (4) Investments in asset-backed loans and irrevocable lines of credit, or to, repurchase agreements, securities securities must be rated no lower than 100 percent of capital or 200 percent of lending, and forward settlement of AAA (or equivalent). All other the sum of reserves and undivided purchases or sales of investments; and investments must be rated no lower earnings and paid-in capital, whichever Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28105 is greater, for secured loans and simulation tests set forth in paragraph paid-in capital must conduct additional irrevocable lines of credit. (e) of this section; tests that address market factors which (d) Loans to members that are not (7) Concentration limits that reflect potentially can impact the value of the credit unions. Any loan or irrevocable the default, liquidity, and market risks instruments and that reflect the policy line of credit made to a member, other of investments; limits addressed in paragraph (a) of this than a credit union or a corporate (8) Policy limits which address section. These factors should include, CUSO, must be made in compliance transaction types and amounts for all but not be limited to, the following: with § 701.21(h) of this chapter, off-balance sheet risk (e.g., lines of (i) Changes in the shape of the governing member business loans. The credit or other contracts); and Treasury yield curve; aggregate amount of loans and (9) The modeling of indexes that serve (ii) Adjustments to prepayment irrevocable lines of credit to members as references in financial instrument projections used for amortizing other than credit unions and corporate coupon formulas. securities to consider the impact of CUSOs shall not exceed 15 percent of (b) Asset and liability management significantly faster/slower prepayment the corporate credit union’s capital plus committee (ALCO). A corporate credit speeds; pledged shares. union’s ALCO must have at least one (iii) Adjustments to the market spread (e) Loans to non member credit member who is also a member of the assumptions for non Treasury unions. A loan to a credit union that is board of directors. The ALCO must instruments to consider the impact of not a member of the corporate credit review the asset and liability widening spreads; and union is only permissible if the loan is management reports on at least a (iv) Adjustments to volatility for an overdraft related to the providing monthly basis. These reports must assumptions to consider the impact that of correspondent services pursuant to address compliance with Federal Credit changing volatilities have on embedded § 704.12. Generally, such a loan will Union Act, NCUA Rules and option values. have a maturity of only one business Regulations, and all related risk (f) Regulatory violations. If a corporate day. management policies. credit union’s base case MVPE or MVPE (f) Loans to corporate CUSOs. A (c) Penalty for early withdrawals. A ratio or the MVPE or MVPE ratio corporate credit union may make loans corporate credit union that permits early resulting from the tests indicated in and issue lines of credit to corporate certificate/share withdrawals must paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section decline CUSOs, subject to the limitations of assess market-based penalties sufficient below the limits established by this part § 704.11. to cover the estimated replacement cost and are not brought into compliance (g) Participation loans with other of the certificate/share redeemed. within 5 business days, operating corporate credit unions. A corporate (d) Risk analysis. A corporate credit management of the corporate credit credit union is permitted to participate union must adopt appropriate tests and union must report the information to the in a loan with another corporate credit criteria for evaluating each investment board of directors, supervisory union and must retain an interest of at prior to its purchase. Risk analysis of committee, and NCUA on the sixth least 5 percent of the face amount of the the instrument type and industry sector business day. If any of these measures loan. The participation agreement may must be conducted for any new product remain below the limits established by be executed at any time prior to, during, that is considered for purchase by the this part by the 25th business day, the or after disbursement. A participating corporate credit union and/or for sale to corporate credit union must submit a corporate credit union must exercise the members. detailed, written action plan to NCUA same due diligence as if it were the (e) Interest rate sensitivity analysis. (1) that sets forth the time needed and originating corporate credit union. A corporate credit union must: means by which it intends to correct the (h) Prepayment penalties. If provided (i) Evaluate the risk in its balance violation. If NCUA determines that the for in the loan contract, a corporate sheet by measuring, at least quarterly, plan is unacceptable, the corporate credit union is authorized to assess the impact of an instantaneous, credit union must immediately prepayment penalties on loans. permanent, and parallel shock in the restructure the balance sheet to bring Treasury yield curve of plus or minus the exposures back within compliance § 704.8 Asset and liability management. 100, 200, and 300 basis points on its or adhere to an alternative course of (a) Policies. A corporate credit union MVPE and MVPE ratio. If the base case action determined by NCUA. must operate according to a written MVPE ratio falls below 2 percent at the (g) Policy violations. If a corporate asset and liability management policy last testing date, these tests must be credit union’s MVPE or MVPE ratio for which addresses, at a minimum: calculated no less frequently than any required test(s) exceed the limits (1) The purpose and objectives of the monthly until the base case MVPE ratio established by the board, it must corporate credit union’s asset and again exceeds 2 percent; and determine how it will bring the liability activities; (ii) Limit its risk exposure to levels exposures within policy limits. The (2) The tests that will be used to that do not result in a MVPE ratio below disclosure to the board of the limit evaluate instruments prior to purchase; 1 percent at any time either from a violation must occur no later than its (3) The maximum allowable calculation of a base case MVPE ratio or next regularly scheduled board meeting. percentage decline in market value of as a result of the tests indicated in A specific written disclosure detailing portfolio equity (MVPE), over specified paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section. the limit violation(s) and the intended periods of time, compared to current (2) A corporate credit union must course of action must be sent to NCUA MVPE; limit its risk exposures to levels that do within 25 business days after disclosure (4) The minimum allowable MVPE not result in a decline in MVPE of more to the board. ratio under any condition; than 18 percent at any time. (5) The maximum decline in net (3) A corporate credit union that owns § 704.9 Liquidity management. income (before reserve transfers), in an aggregate amount of instruments (a) General. In the management of percentage and dollar terms, compared which possess unmatched embedded liquidity, a corporate credit union must: to current net income; options in a book value amount which (1) Evaluate the potential liquidity (6) Policy limits and specific test exceeds 200 percent of the sum of its needs of its membership in a variety of parameters for the interest rate risk reserves and undivided earnings and economic scenarios; 28106 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

(2) Continuously monitor sources of period for plan development than that (1) Follow GAAP; internal and external liquidity; set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. (2) Provide financial statements to the (3) Demonstrate that the accounting (c) If the plan described in paragraph corporate credit union at least quarterly; classification of investment securities is (a) of this section is not approved by (3) Obtain an annual CPA audit and consistent with its ability to meet NCUA, the credit union must adhere to provide a copy to the corporate credit potential liquidity demands; and NCUA’s directed course of action. union; and (4) Develop a contingency funding (4) Allow the auditor, board of plan that addresses alternative funding § 704.11 Corporate Credit Union Service directors, and NCUA complete access to Organizations (Corporate CUSOs). strategies in successively deteriorating its books, records, and any other liquidity scenarios. The plan must: (a) A corporate CUSO is an entity that: pertinent documentation. (i) List all sources of liquidity, by (1) Has received a loan from and/or is (e) Corporate credit union authority to category and amount, that are available at least partly owned by a corporate invest in or loan to a CUSO is limited to service an immediate outflow of credit union; to that provided in this section. A (2) Primarily serves credit unions; funds in various liquidity scenarios. corporate credit union is not authorized (3) Restricts its services to those (ii) Analyze the impact that potential to invest in or loan to a CUSO under related to the daily activities of credit changes in fair value will have on the § 701.27 of this chapter. disposition of assets in a variety of unions; and (4) Is chartered as a corporation under interest rate scenarios; and § 704.12 Services. (iii) Be reviewed by an appropriate state law. Except for correspondent services to a (b) The aggregate of all investments in committee of the board no less non member, natural person credit and loans to member and non member frequently than annually or as market or union branch office operating in the corporate CUSOs shall not exceed 15 business conditions dictate. geographic area defined in the corporate (b) Borrowing. A corporate credit percent of a corporate credit union’s credit union’s charter, a corporate credit union may borrow up to 10 times capital. However, a corporate credit union may provide services only to its capital or 50 percent of shares union may loan to member and non members, subject to the limitations of (excluding shares created by the use of member corporate CUSOs an additional this part. A corporate credit union may member reverse repurchase agreements) 15 percent of capital if it is a secured not provide services to non members and capital, whichever is greater. CLF loan. A corporate credit union may not through agreements with other borrowings and borrowed funds created use this authority to acquire control, corporate credit unions or pursuant to by the use of member reverse directly or indirectly, of another § 701.26 of this chapter, except with the repurchase agreements are excluded financial institution, or to invest in written permission of NCUA. from this limit. The corporate credit shares, stocks, or obligations of another union must demonstrate, through financial institution, insurance § 704.13 Fixed assets. periodic usage of external lines, that all company, trade association, liquidity (a) A corporate credit union’s contingent sources of liquidity remain facility, or similar organization. A ownership in fixed assets shall be available. corporate CUSO must be operated as an limited as described in § 701.36 of this entity separate from any credit union. A chapter, except that in lieu of § 704.10 Divestiture. corporate credit union investing in or § 701.36(c) (1) through (4), paragraph (b) (a) Any corporate credit union in lending to a corporate CUSO must of this section applies. possession of an investment that fails to obtain a written legal opinion that the (b) A corporate credit union may meet a requirement of this part must, corporate CUSO is organized and invest in fixed assets where the within 20 business days of the failure, operated in such a manner that the aggregate of all such investments does report the failed investment to its board corporate credit union will not not exceed 15 percent of the corporate of directors and NCUA. If the corporate reasonably be held liable for the credit union’s capital. A corporate credit credit union does not sell the failed obligations of the corporate CUSO. This union desiring to exceed the limitation investment, and the investment opinion must address factors that have shall submit a written request to NCUA, continues to fail to meet a requirement led courts to ‘‘pierce the corporate veil,’’ which will provide a written decision. of this part, the corporate credit union such as inadequate capitalization, lack must, by the 25th business day after the of separate corporate identity, common § 704.14 Representation. failure, provide to NCUA a written boards of directors and employees, (a) Board representation. The board action plan that addresses: control of one entity over another, and shall be determined as stipulated in the (1) The investment’s characteristics lack of separate books and records. standard corporate federal credit union and risks; (c) An official or senior management bylaws governing election procedures, (2) The process to obtain and employee of a corporate credit union provided that: adequately evaluate the investment’s which has invested in or loaned to a (1) At least a majority of directors, market pricing, cash flows, and risk; corporate CUSO, and immediate family including the chair of the board, must (3) How the investment fits into the members of such an individual, may not serve on the board as representatives of credit union’s asset and liability receive, either directly or indirectly, any member credit unions; management strategy; salary, commission, investment income, (2) The chair of the board may not (4) The impact that either holding or or other income, compensation, or serve simultaneously as an officer, selling the investment will have on the consideration from the corporate CUSO. director, or employee of a credit union corporate credit union’s earnings, This prohibition extends to any other trade association; liquidity, and capital in different corporate credit union employee if such (3) A majority of directors may not interest rate environments; and employee deals directly with the serve simultaneously as officers, (5) The likelihood that the investment corporate CUSO. directors, or employees of the same may again pass the requirements of this (d) Prior to making an investment in credit union trade association or its part. or loan to a corporate CUSO, a corporate affiliates (not including chapters or (b) NCUA may require, for safety and credit union must obtain a written other subunits of a state trade soundness reasons, a shorter time agreement that the corporate CUSO will: association); and Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28107

(4) For purposes of meeting the must be decided by the members of the delegate supervision of the internal requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and corporate credit union. auditor’s daily activities to the chief (a)(2) of this section, an individual may (4) In the event of the disqualification executive officer of the corporate credit not serve as a director or chair of the of any committee member by operation union. The internal auditor’s reports, board if that individual holds a of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the findings, and recommendations will be subordinate employment relationship to remaining qualified committee in writing and presented to the another employee who serves as an members, if constituting a quorum with supervisory committee no less than officer, director, or employee of a credit the disqualified committee members, quarterly, and will be provided upon union trade association. may exercise, by majority vote, all the request to the external auditor and (5) In the case of a corporate credit powers of the committee with respect to NCUA. union whose membership is composed the matter under consideration. Where of more than 25 percent non credit all of the committee members are § 704.16 Contracts/written agreements. unions, the majority of directors serving disqualified, the matter shall be decided Services, facilities, personnel, or as representatives of member credit by the board of directors. equipment shared with any party shall unions, including the chair, must be (d) Administration. (1) A corporate be supported by a written contract, with elected only by member credit unions. credit union shall be under the direction the duties and responsibilities of each (b) Representatives of member credit and control of its board of directors. party specified and the allocation of unions. (1) A member credit union may While the board may delegate the service fee/expenses fully supported appoint one of its members or officials performance of administrative duties, and documented. as a representative to the corporate the board is not relieved of its credit union. The representative shall be responsibility for their performance. § 704.17 State-chartered corporate credit unions. empowered to attend membership The board may employ a chief executive meetings, to vote, and to stand for officer who shall have such authority (a) This part does not expand the election on behalf of the member. No and such powers as delegated by the powers and authorities of any state- individual may serve as the board to conduct business from day to chartered corporate credit union, representative of more than one member day. Such chief executive officer must beyond those powers and authorities credit union in the same corporate answer solely to the board of the provided under the laws of the state in credit union. corporate credit union, and may not be which it was chartered. (2) Any vacancy on the board of a an employee of a credit union trade (b) A state-chartered corporate credit corporate credit union caused by a association. union that is not insured by the representative being unable to complete (2) The provisions of § 701.14 of this NCUSIF, but that receives funds from his or her term shall be filled by the chapter apply to corporate credit federally insured credit unions, is board of the corporate credit union unions, except that where reference is considered an ‘‘institution-affiliated according to its bylaws governing the made to ‘‘Regional Director,’’ substitute party’’ within the meaning of Section filling of board vacancies. ‘‘NCUA.’’ 206(r) of the Federal Credit Union Act, (c) Recusal provision. (1) No director, 12 U.S.C. 1786(r). § 704.15 Audit requirements. committee member, officer, or employee § 704.18 Fidelity bond coverage. of a corporate credit union shall in any (a) External audit. The corporate manner, directly or indirectly, credit union supervisory committee (a) Scope. This section provides the participate in the deliberation upon or shall cause an annual opinion audit to fidelity bond requirements for the determination of any question be made by an independent, duly employees and officials in corporate affecting his or her pecuniary interest or licensed certified public accountant credit unions. the pecuniary interest of any entity (CPA) and shall submit the audit report (b) Review of coverage. The board of (other than the corporate credit union) to the board of directors. A copy of the directors of each corporate credit union in which he or she is interested, except audit report, and copies of all shall, at least annually, carefully review if the matter involves general policy communications that are provided to the bond coverage in force to determine applicable to all members, such as the corporate credit union by the its adequacy in relation to risk exposure setting dividend or loan rates or fees for external auditor, shall be submitted to and to the minimum requirements in services. NCUA within 30 days after receipt by this section. (2) An individual is ‘‘interested’’ in an the board of directors. The CPA’s audit (c) Minimum coverage. Approved entity if he or she: workpapers shall be provided upon forms. Every corporate credit union will (i) Serves as a director, officer, or request to NCUA. A summary of the maintain bond coverage with a company employee of the entity; audit report shall be submitted to the holding a certificate of authority from (ii) Has a business, ownership, or membership at the next annual meeting. the Secretary of the Treasury. All bond deposit relationship with the entity; or (b) Internal audit. A corporate credit forms, and any riders and endorsements (iii) Has a business, financial, or union with average daily assets in which limit the coverage provided by familial relationship with an individual excess of $400 million for the preceding approved bond forms, must receive the whom he or she knows has a pecuniary calendar year, or as ordered by NCUA, prior written approval of NCUA. interest in the entity. must employ or contract, on a full- or Fidelity bonds must provide coverage (3) In the event of the disqualification part-time basis, the services of an for the fraud and dishonesty of all of any directors, by operation of internal auditor. The internal auditor’s employees, directors, officers, and paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the responsibilities will, at a minimum, supervisory and credit committee remaining qualified directors present at comply with the Standards and members. Notwithstanding the the meeting, if constituting a quorum Professional Practices of Internal foregoing, all bonds must include a with the disqualified directors, may Auditing, as established by the Institute provision, in a form approved by NCUA, exercise, by majority vote, all the of Internal Auditors. The internal requiring written notification by surety powers of the board with respect to the auditor will report directly to the chair to NCUA: matter under consideration. Where all of of the corporate credit union’s (1) When the bond of a credit union the directors are disqualified, the matter supervisory committee, who may is terminated in its entirety; 28108 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

(2) When bond coverage is section must have the written approval Sample Form 2 terminated, by issuance of a written of NCUA at least 20 days prior to the Terms and Conditions of Paid-In Capital notice, on an employees, director, effective date of the deductibles. Account officer, supervisory or credit committee (f) Additional coverage. NCUA may member; or require additional coverage for any (1) A paid-in capital account is not (3) When a deductible is increased corporate credit union when, in the subject to share insurance coverage by above permissible limits. Said opinion of NCUA, current coverage is the NCUSIF or other deposit insurer. notification shall be sent to NCUA and insufficient. The board of directors of (2) The funds have no maturity and shall include a brief statement of cause the corporate credit union must obtain are callable only at the option of the for termination or increase. additional coverage within 30 days after corporate credit union and only if the (d) Minimum coverage amounts. (1) the date of written notice from NCUA. corporate credit union meets its The minimum amount of bond coverage minimum level of required capital after will be computed based on the Appendix A—Model Forms the funds are called. corporate credit union’s daily average (3) Paid-in capital is available to cover This appendix contains sample forms net assets as of December 31 of the losses that exceed reserves and intended for use by corporate credit preceding year. The following table lists undivided earnings. unions to aid in compliance with the the minimum requirements. (4) Paid-in capital is nonvoting and membership capital account and paid-in subordinate to membership capital and Mini- capital account disclosure requirements the NCUSIF. of § 704.2 Corporate credit unions that Daily average net assets mum If the form is used when an account bond use this form will be in compliance with is opened, it must also contain the (million) those requirements. following statement: Less than $50 million ...... $1.0 Sample Form 1 I have read the above terms and conditions $50±$99 million ...... 2.0 and I understand them. I further agree to $100±$499 million ...... 4.0 Terms and Conditions of Membership maintain in the credit union’s files the $500±$999 million ...... 6.0 Capital Account annual notice of terms and conditions of the $1.0±$1.999 billion ...... 8.0 (1) A membership capital account is paid-in capital account. $2.0±$4.999 billion ...... 10.0 not subject to share insurance coverage $5.0±$9.999 billion ...... 15.0 The form must be signed by either all $10.0±$24.999 billion ...... 20.0 by the NCUSIF or other deposit insurer. of the directors of the credit union or, $25.0 billion plus ...... 25.0 (2) A member credit union may if authorized by board resolution, the withdraw membership capital with chair and secretary of the board of the (2) It is the duty of the board of three years’ notice. credit union. directors of each corporate credit union (3) Membership capital cannot be If the form is used for the annual to provide adequate protection to meet used to pledge borrowings. notice requirement, it must be signed by its unique circumstances by obtaining, (4) Membership capital is available to the chair of the corporate credit union. when necessary, bond coverage in cover losses that exceed reserves and The chair must then sign a statement excess of the above minimums. undivided earnings and paid-in capital. which certifies that the form has been (e) Deductibles. (1) The maximum sent to credit unions with paid-in (5) Where the corporate credit union amount of deductibles allowed are capital accounts. The certification must is liquidated, membership capital based on the corporate credit union’s be maintained in the corporate credit accounts are payable only after reserve ratio. The following table sets union’s files and be available for satisfaction of all liabilities of the out the maximum deductibles. examiner review. liquidation estate including uninsured Reserve ratio Maximum deductible obligations to shareholders and the Appendix B—Expanded Authorities NCUSIF. and Requirements Less than 1.0 percent 7.5 percent of the If the form is used when an account A corporate credit union may obtain sum of reserves is opened, it must also contain the expanded authorities if it meets all of the and undivided earn- requirements of part 704, fulfills additional ings and paid-in following statement: capital, management, infrastructure, and capital. I have read the above terms and conditions asset and liability requirements, and receives 1.0±1.74 percent ...... 10.0 percent of the and I understand them. I further agree to NCUA’s written approval. The additional sum of reserves maintain in the credit union’s files the requirements and authorities are set forth in and undivided earn- annual notice of terms and conditions of the this Appendix. A corporate credit union ings and paid-in membership capital account. which seeks expanded authorities must capital. submit to NCUA a self-assessment plan 1.75±2.24 percent ..... 12.0 percent of the The form must be signed by either all which analyzes and supports its request. A sum of reserves of the directors of the member credit corporate credit union may adopt these and undivided earn- union or, if authorized by board additional authorities after NCUA has ings and paid-in resolution, the chair and secretary of the provided its written approval. If NCUA capital. board of the credit union. denies a request for expanded authorities, it Greater than 2.25 15.0 percent of the will advise the corporate of the reasons for percent. sum of reserves If the form is used for the annual the denial and what it must do to resubmit and undivided earn- notice requirement, it must be signed by its request. NCUA may revoke these ings and paid-in the chair of the corporate credit union. expanded authorities at any time if an capital up to a max- The chair must then sign a statement analysis indicates a significant deficiency. imum of $1 million. which certifies that the form has been NCUA will notify the corporate credit union sent to member credit unions with in writing of the identified deficiency. A (2) A deductible may be applied membership capital accounts. The corporate credit union may request, in separately to one or more insuring certification must be maintained in the writing, reinstatement of the revoked clauses in a blanket bond. Deductibles corporate credit union’s files and be authorities by providing a self-assessment in excess of those showing in this available for examiner review. plan which details how it has corrected these Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28109 deficiencies. Further guidance on the (2) Meet the management, staff, systems, (1) Short-term investments must be rated characteristics necessary to obtain additional compliance, legal, and risk assessment no lower than A–1 (or equivalent); authorities is available in Appendix C. requirements specified in Appendix C. (2) Long-term investments must be rated no (3) Evaluate monthly the changes in MVPE lower than AA (or equivalent); Part I and the MVPE ratio for the tests set forth in (3) A sovereign issuer, and/or the country (a) In order to participate in the authorities § 704.8(e)(1)(i). in which a corporate issuer is organized, set forth in paragraphs (b)–(d) of this Part I, (b) A corporate credit union which has met must be rated no lower than AA (or a corporate credit union must: the requirements of paragraph (a) of this Part equivalent) for political and economic (1) Have a minimum capital ratio of 5 II is not bound by the concentration limits on stability. percent. investments set forth at § 704.6(c) (1) and (2). (4) For each approved foreign bank line, (2) Meet the management, staff, systems, Instead, the corporate credit union must the corporate credit union must identify the compliance, legal, and risk assessment establish limits on such investments as a specific banking centers and branches to requirements specified in Appendix C. percentage of the sum of reserves and which it will lend funds. (3) Evaluate monthly the changes in MVPE undivided earnings and paid-in capital, that take into account the relative amount of Part IV and the MVPE ratio for the tests set forth in credit risk exposure based upon, but not A corporate credit union which has met § 704.8(e)(1)(i). limited to, the legal and financial structure of the requirements of paragraph (a) of Part I of (b) A corporate credit union which has met the transaction, the collateral, all other types this Appendix and the financial derivatives the requirements of paragraph (a) of this Part of credit enhancement, and the term of the criteria set forth in Appendix C, may engage I is not bound by the concentration limits on transaction. in derivatives transactions which are directly investments set forth at § 704.6(c) (1) and (2). (c) A corporate credit union which has met related to its financial activities and which Instead, the corporate credit union must the requirements of paragraph (a) of this Part have been specifically approved by NCUA. A establish limits on such investments as a II may: corporate credit union may use such percentage of the sum of reserves and (1) Except for investments in a wholesale derivatives authority only for the purposes of undivided earnings and paid-in capital that corporate credit union, invest in non secured creating structured instruments and hedging take into account the relative amount of obligations of any single domestic issuer up its own balance sheet and the balance sheets credit risk exposure based upon, but not to 250 percent of the sum of reserves and of its members. limited to, the legal and financial structure of undivided earnings and paid-in capital; the transaction, the collateral, all other types (2) Purchase short-term investments rated Appendix C—Guidelines for Evaluating of credit enhancement, and the term of the no lower than A–1 (or equivalent) and long- Requests for Expanded Authorities transaction. term investments rated no lower than A– (or This Appendix provides guidance for (c) A corporate credit union which has met equivalent) at the time of purchase and at any corporate credit unions which seek expanded the requirements of paragraph (a) of this Part subsequent time by the nationally recognized authorities under Appendix B of part 704. I may: statistical rating organizations used at the These guidelines represent the prudent time of purchase. (1) Except for investments in a wholesale practices and acceptable qualifications which corporate credit union, invest in non secured (3) Purchase asset-backed securities rated no lower than AA (or equivalent); must be evident in a corporate credit union obligations of any single domestic issuer up for NCUA to approve its request. There are to 150 percent of the sum of reserves and (4) Engage in short sales of permissible investments to reduce interest rate risk; and four distinct expanded authority alternatives undivided earnings and paid-in capital; which are set forth Appendix B. Corporate (2) Purchase short-term investments rated (5) Purchase principal only (PO) stripped mortgage-backed securities to reduce interest credit unions which are granted expanded no lower than A–1 (or equivalent) and long- authorities must adhere at all times to the term investments rated no lower than AA– rate risk. (d) In performing the rate stress tests set requirements set forth in Appendix B and (or equivalent); at the time of purchase and Appendix C. NCUA will ensure that at any subsequent time by same nationally forth in § 704.8(e)(1)(i), the MVPE of a corporate credit union which has met the corporate credit unions continue to meet the recognized statistical rating organization(s) necessary qualifications and remain in sound used at the time of purchase. requirements of paragraph (a) of this Part II may decline as much as 50 percent. financial condition through its regular, on- (3) Purchase asset-backed securities rated going safety and soundness review. Provided no lower than AA (or equivalent); (e) The maximum aggregate amount in secured and unsecured loans and irrevocable that the corporate credit union is in sound (4) Engage in short sales of permissible financial condition, the primary areas which investments to reduce interest rate risk; and lines of credit to any one member credit union, excluding pass-through and are used to evaluate each request for (5) Purchase principal only (PO) stripped guaranteed loans from the CLF and the expanded authority are: board, senior mortgage-backed securities to reduce interest NCUSIF, shall be established by the board of management, and staff; systems and rate risk. directors as a percentage of the corporate operations; credit risk management; liquidity (d) In performing the rate stress tests set credit union’s capital plus pledged shares. risk management; audit and compliance; and forth in § 704.8(e)(1)(i), the MVPE of a legal matters. corporate credit union which has met the Part III Part I requirements of paragraph (a) of this Part I (a) A corporate credit union which has met may decline as much as 35 percent. the requirements of paragraph (a) of Part I of (a) General. Requests for the expanded (e) The maximum aggregate amount in this Appendix and the foreign investment authorities as outlined in Appendix B, Part loans and irrevocable lines of credit to any criteria set forth in Appendix C, may invest I, will be evaluated based on the criteria one member credit union, excluding pass- in: outlined in paragraphs (b) through (g) of this through and guaranteed loans from the CLF (1) Debt obligations of a foreign country; Appendix C, Part I. and the NCUSIF, shall not exceed 100 (2) Deposits in, the sale of federal funds to, (b) Board, senior management, and staff. percent of the corporate credit union’s capital and debt obligations of foreign banks or (1) The board has received adequate for unsecured loans and irrevocable lines of obligations guaranteed by these banks; training and is sufficiently knowledgeable to credit. The board directors will establish the (3) Non secured obligations of any single make informed decisions regarding the risk limit, as a percent of the corporate credit foreign issuer, not exceeding 150 percent of activities of the corporate credit union and to union’s capital plus pledged shares for the sum of reserves and undivided earnings properly evaluate the use of the expanded secured loans and irrevocable lines of credit. and paid-in capital; and authorities. (4) Non secured obligations in any single (2) Senior management has in-depth Part II foreign country, not exceeding 500 percent of experience in their direct areas of (a) In order to participate in the authorities the sum of reserves and undivided earnings responsibility and a working knowledge of set forth in paragraphs (b)–(d) of this Part II, and paid-in capital. most key areas. a corporate credit union must: (b) All investments with sovereign entities (3) The asset and liability committee (1) Have a minimum capital ratio of 6 and foreign banks are subject to the following (ALCO) members are conversant in percent; requirements: investment activities and strategies and are 28110 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules capable of individually explaining, justifying, for internal and external purposes, in (2) Daily liquidity management procedures and supporting the risk exposures of the conformance with GAAP. for investment activities are an integral part corporate credit union. (D) There is an on-line, dedicated, and of the day-to-day operations. (4) Senior investment managers and asset automated system capable of providing (3) Management reporting includes an on- and liability managers have knowledge and timely, accurate reports independent of the going daily liquidity assessment which is experience commensurate with the potential corporate credit union’s risk taking unit. updated to reflect current changes to expanded authorities of the corporate credit Reports are standardized and may be investment and funding positions. union. customized for both financial and risk (f) Audit and compliance. (1) The internal (5) Staff supporting the asset and liability reporting purposes. For example, systems audit and compliance area has staff, or has management functions have expert would include: engaged outside personnel, with expert knowledge in developing and applying the (1) Automated data transfer; knowledge and experience adequate to assumptions, methodologies, and (2) On-demand report generation based on support the scope and complexity of all interrelationships between the financial current data; activities associated with expanded factors driving the risk measurement results. (3) Ability to account for investments with authorities. The staff has the ability to adjust the model (2) The scope of review addresses complex structures and/or embedded options and customize applications consistent with appropriateness of risk as well as general including off-balance sheet activities; the additional test requirements of compliance issues. (4) Accounts for all investment § 704.8(e)(3). (g) Legal issues. The corporate credit union (6) Qualified designated back-ups are in characteristics and cash flows; has inside legal counsel or has access to place and capable of assuming primary (5) General ledger treatment— outside counsel which can provide a responsibilities. Back-ups are adequately amortization/accretion of discounts/ specialized review of all associated legal trained to ensure that minimum disruption premiums can be produced for dynamic matters. would occur in the event of the loss cash-flow instruments and transactions; (temporary or permanent) of primary (6) Security safeguards that ensure Part II personnel. protection and integrity of input and output (a) General. Requests for the expanded (7) Qualified, cross-trained personnel are through a dedicated and controlled system authorities as outlined in Appendix B, Part in place for all essential support positions. environment; II, will be evaluated based on the criteria (c) Systems/Operations. (1) Systems (7) Ability to handle expanded authorities outlined in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this support and operational capacity are and changes in strategies and external market Appendix C, Part II. adequate to process, measure, monitor, and factors; and (b) Senior management and staff. (1) report all financial transactions. This (8) Establishment and maintenance of Senior management is demonstrably familiar includes the capacity to handle volume and adequate back-up arrangements to minimize with key areas of the corporate credit union complexity with timely and accurate results. the disruption of major services and to and conversant in technical factors affecting Systems can provide sophisticated measures address system problems timely. the institution’s risk. of valuation for a variety of simulated market (d) Credit risk management. The credit risk (2) Senior management is substantially scenarios. Systems can interface, and management function is independent and represented by individuals who have automation ensures a strong measure of able to assess the inherent risk associated extensive related experience with a control and standardization. with all concentrations, limits and proposed depository institution, investment banker, or (2) The major financial-related areas, transactions, including any additional broker/dealer. which require a particular emphasis upon authorities provided in Appendix B. The (3) Investment and risk management staff support and control, are the accounting and measuring and monitoring methodologies are have substantial experience and have risk measurement systems. Specific areas of sufficient to meet the scope and complexity received extensive training to support infrastructure strength include, but are not of all credit related activities. (1) expanded authorities. limited to, the following areas: Management/Staff. (i) Credit risk (c) Systems and operations. (1) Qualified (i) Valuation of instruments and risk management is independent from the risk staff are capable of modeling securities and measurement. taking unit and is directed by a level of financial transactions to determine that (A) Methodologies permit alternative senior management sufficient to ensure that components are valued consistent with the scenario analysis in addition to those credit risk activities remain consistent with market. This means that the value of all required in § 704.8(e)(3). board policies and objectives. transactions, securities, and options can be (B) Qualified staff are capable of independently determined by corporate (ii) Analysts are qualified to identify and challenging and validating the analytical credit union staff. assess the inherent credit risk in all applications and assumptions of the risk (2) Senior management receives a daily transactions that possess material credit measurement methodologies. position report detailing current activities, exposures. Analysts have knowledge and (C) Simulations can be produced in a mark-to-market valuations, balance sheet experience in evaluating credit risk in the timely, accurate manner on at least a monthly positions, and other critical financial basis. money and capital markets. information. (D) Variance analysis is conducted each (2) Policies and procedures. (i) Procedures (d) Credit risk management. (1) month to evaluate and explain the reasons for address the methodology for measuring and Management and staff. (i) Senior credit differences between projected and actual monitoring credit risk and the means of analyst(s) has extensive experience (e.g., results. responding to a deterioration in credit. years of experience, held positions of (E) The model(s) and supporting processes (ii) There is a daily process of measuring responsibility, and/or completed specialized are capable of meeting the needs of and reporting the credit exposures in credit training in capital markets) with management reporting for both compliance comparison to policy limits. particular emphasis on evaluating financial and decision-making. (iii) Procedures provide the risk taking unit institutions and debt securities. (F) The model(s) and supporting statistical with daily credit exposures and remaining (ii) Sufficient number of analysts are on analyses used to measure risk are validated limit capacity. staff to ensure that all credits receive prior to use and periodically thereafter. (iv) Credit limits and transaction types are appropriate, timely, and in-depth analysis. (ii) Accounting for transactions. approved by a credit risk committee to (2) Policies and procedures. (i) The credit (A) Accounting processes are independent ensure consistency with corporate credit risk management is a stand-alone unit. of the risk taking unit (investments). union objectives. (ii) There is a formal credit risk committee (B) Accounting systems and processes are (v) Senior credit personnel have the direct which approves all credit limits. commensurate with instruments that have authority to reduce, suspend, or revoke a (e) Audit and compliance. (1) There is an complex structures and/or embedded credit limit. independent, stand-alone risk compliance options, including off-balance sheet (e) Liquidity risk management. (1) Effective unit managed by senior staff who are capable activities. controls exist for liquidity exposures arising of comprehending, evaluating, and (C) Systems have a demonstrated ability to from both market or product liquidity and challenging all potential risk areas of the produce timely, accurate financial statements instrument cash flows. corporate credit union. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28111

(2) A highly qualified senior management including examples of how each type of (5) The risk management system addresses, executive is responsible for the unit. proposed transaction will work; at a minimum, the following: (3) The unit is responsible for assuring the (2) The methodology for measuring (i) Procedures that accurately identify and board of directors that staff in all potential exposures and the proposed limits on each quantify risk levels on a timely basis; risk areas are conducting their activities in type of transaction, as well as an aggregate (ii) Limits and other controls on levels of conformance with all board policies and limit based upon a percentage of capital at risk associated with counterparty credit, procedures. risk; concentrations and other relevant market (4) The unit is also responsible for assisting (3) The costs associated with establishing factors; management in developing and enhancing effective risk management systems and hiring (iii) Limits on aggregate risk positions the existing risk management processes to and retaining professionals with derivative which capture the inter-connected effect of improve the areas where potential transaction experience; all positions; weaknesses or deficiencies are identified. (4) An analysis which justifies the (iv) Reports to senior management and the (5) The unit has specialized staff with reasonableness of the proposed activities board that accurately present the types and extensive knowledge of systems, policies, relative to the corporate credit union’s amounts of risks assumed and demonstrate and procedures used to govern all approved overall financial condition and capital level; compliance with approved policies and activities and which understands the (5) An analysis of the risks that may arise limits; and inherent risk issues affecting those activities. from the use of derivatives which includes, (v) Auditing procedures to ensure the (f) Legal issues. The corporate credit union at a minimum, market, credit, liquidity, integrity of risk management systems and maintains inside counsel or has established operations, and legal risks; confirm compliance with approved policies relationships with outside legal firms which (6) The detailed procedures the corporate and procedures. specialize in evaluating relevant contracts credit union will use to effectively identify, (6) Appropriate resources are devoted to and transactions to ensure that the corporate measure, monitor, report, and control risks; operations sufficient to support the scope credit union’s legal and business interests are (7) The relevant accounting guidelines to and complexity of the activities. represented for all expanded authorities. be used; (7) Effective senior management Part III (8) Internal control procedures detailing supervision and Board oversight is in place the segregating of duties between the staff to ensure that all derivative activities are (a) General. Requests for the expanded that executes transactions and operational conducted in a safe and sound manner. authorities as outlined in Appendix B, Part personnel that monitor and report activity; (8) Comprehensive written policies and III, will be evaluated based on the criteria for and procedures are approved by the board and management, staff, systems, compliance, (9) The scope of the audit and internal risk periodically reviewed thereafter as activity legal, and risk assessment specified in Part I monitoring functions. levels or market and business conditions of this Appendix C and the additional criteria (c) Board, senior management, and staff. warrant. outlined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this Part (1) Board and senior management have (9) Procedures support the proper control III. sufficient knowledge and experience to over the recordation, settlement, and (b) Senior management and staff. (1) understand, approve, and provide oversight monitoring of derivative transactions. Senior management has addressed the for all proposed derivative activities. Internal controls assure that proper unique potential risk impact of foreign (2) Board members and responsible processing procedures for all transactions investments and has contingency policies management and staff have received and reconciliation of front and back office and procedures to address these factors. adequate training to familiarize them with all databases is done on a regular basis. (2) Staff includes qualified analysts with relevant aspects of effective derivative use (10) Policies and procedures address risk knowledge and experience evaluating cross- and related control issues before assuming management (market, credit, liquidity, and border risk. risk exposures. operations), legal issues, capital (3) Analysts are experienced in evaluating (3) Board and senior management requirements, and accounting standards. In sovereign and foreign institution credits and understand and agree that the risk conjunction with the credit risk function, the conduct a timely, in-depth analysis for all approved foreign limits. management process that will be used is methods of valuation (e.g. bid side or mid- (4) Analysts have training and/or appropriate and that actual and potential risk market) are appropriate and the sources and experience in evaluating the political, exposures will be clearly identified and fully methods of pricing are reasonable and economic and regulatory environment and disclosed to the board on a regular basis. supportable. the unique financial and accounting (4) Senior management has retained (e) Credit risk management. (1) Policies standards which affect the interpretation of knowledgeable and experienced personnel in and procedures are in place to address, at a financial data used to evaluate foreign derivative transactions for both the minimum, significant counterparty counterparties. management and operations functions. exposures, concentrations, credit exceptions, (c) Systems and operations. (1) An (5) The manager directly responsible for risk ratings, and non performing contracts. automated system is in place which monitors these activities has extensive related Management has established internal limits all foreign investment exposures by entity experience with a depository institution, which are prudent and consistent with the and country and is updated daily or as investment banker, or broker/dealer. corporate credit union’s financial condition exposures change; and (d) Systems and operations. (1) The board and management’s expertise. (2) Credit risk management procedures has dedicated sufficient financial and (2) Timely, detailed reports, which are address the unique political, legal, and personnel resources to support operations consistent with the policy and procedure economic factors which potentially affect all and systems development and maintenance. requirements, are available for board and approved foreign counterparties. The sophistication of the systems support senior management review. Reports and operational capacity is commensurate consolidate activities by counterparty and are Part IV with the size and complexity of the incorporated into aggregate credit exposure (a) General. Requests for the expanded derivatives activity. reports for other non derivative exposures. authorities as outlined in Appendix B, Part (2) Derivatives support systems provide (3) Approved counterparts have credit IV, will be evaluated based on the criteria for accurate and timely transactions processing ratings no lower than operating parameters management, staff, systems, compliance, and allow for proper risk exposure authorized for the corporate credit union legal, and risk assessment specified in Part I monitoring and interfacing with other under Part I of this Appendix B. of this Appendix C and the additional criteria systems of the corporate credit union. (4) Credit personnel are qualified to outlined in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this (3) The risk measurement system is capable identify and assess the inherent credit risk in Part IV. of quantifying the risk exposures resulting all proposed derivative transactions. (b) Request to NCUA for authority. The from derivatives activities arising from (5) Procedures ensure credit analysis of request for derivative authority must include, changes in relevant market factors. counterparties is performed before at a minimum, the following: (4) The market risk measurement system is transactions are executed and there is (1) A detailed description of the relevant capable of producing prompt and accurate periodic assessment of credit throughout the products, markets and business strategies assessments at least monthly. life of outstanding derivative transactions. 28112 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

(6) Credit procedures address the PART 709ÐINVOLUNTARY ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking availability and impact of credit exposure LIQUIDATION AND CREDITOR CLAIMS (NPRM). reduction techniques (e.g., bilateral collateral agreements and/or mutual margining 2. The authority citation for part 709 SUMMARY: This document proposes the agreements). continues to read as follows: adoption of a new airworthiness (7) The corporate credit union can Authority: 12 USC 1766; Pub. L. 101–73, calculate the current mark-to-market (current directive (AD) that is applicable to CFM 103 Stat. 183, 530 (1989) (12 USC 1787 et International (CFMI) CFM56–5/–5B/–5C exposure) as well as projected changes in seq.). value (potential exposure) when assessing series turbofan engines. This proposal credit exposure per transaction and 3. Section 709.5 is amended by would require initial and repetitive counterparty. revising paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(7); borescope inspections of the stage 1 disk (8) Reports track the aggregate and net removing the period and adding a bore of certain high pressure compressor exposures for each counterparty. semicolon and the word ‘‘and’’ at the rotor (HPCR) stage 1–2 spools for rubs (9) Mark-to-market calculations are end of paragraph (b)(8); and adding and scratches, and replacement, if found obtained independently from qualified paragraph (b)(9) to read as follows: rubbed or scratched, with a serviceable sources as frequently as necessary. (10) Policies and procedures address the § 709.5 Payout Priorities in Involuntary part. This proposal would also require issue of settlement risk and establish prudent Liquidation. removal and replacement of certain settlement limits where applicable. * * * * * stationary number 3 bearing aft air/oil (f) Liquidity risk management. (1) Effective (b) * * * seals as terminating action to the controls exist for liquidity exposures arising (6) Shareholders to the extent of their inspection program. This proposal is from both market or product liquidity and respective uninsured shares and the prompted by a report of an engine found instrument cash flows. National Credit Union Share Insurance with a rub on the forward corner of the (2) Policies address the exposures to cash Fund, to the extent of its payment of HPCR stage 1 disk bore due to contact flow gaps arising from derivative transactions share insurance; with the stationary number 3 bearing aft and establish appropriate limits on the size (7) In a case involving liquidation of and duration of such gaps (e.g., concentration air/oil seal. The actions specified by the a corporate credit union, membership proposed AD are intended to prevent a of swap payments, margin calls, or early capital; and terminations). failure of the stage 1 disk of the HPCR (3) Liquidity management procedures for * * * * * stage 1–2 spool, which could result in derivatives are an integral part of the day-to- (9) In a case involving liquidation of an uncontained engine failure and day operations and are also incorporated into a corporate credit union, paid-in capital. damage to the aircraft. the overall liquidity stress test and * * * * * contingency funding plan requirements of DATES: Comments must be received by § 704.8. PART 741ÐREQUIREMENTS FOR August 5, 1996. (4) Monitoring procedures are integrated INSURANCE ADDRESSES: Submit comments in with the overall liquidity management process for all corporate credit union 4. The authority citation for part 741 triplicate to the Federal Aviation activities. continues to read as follows: Administration (FAA), New England (g) Audit and compliance. (1) An Authority: 12 USC 1757, 1766, and 1781– Region, Office of the Assistant Chief independent risk management unit is 1790. Section 741.11 is also authorized by 31 Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. responsible for measuring and reporting risk USC 3717. 95– ANE–65, 12 New England Executive exposures taken in derivatives. Park, Burlington, MA 01803- 5299. (2) Audit coverage is adequate to ensure 5. Section 741.219 is added to read as follows: Comments may also be submitted to the timely identification of internal control Rules Docket by using the following weaknesses or system deficiencies. Audit § 741.219 Investment requirements. coverage is provided by competent Internet address: professionals who are knowledgeable about Any credit union which is insured ‘‘[email protected]’’. the risks inherent in derivative transactions pursuant to Title II of the Act must Comments may be inspected at this and have commensurate experience auditing adhere to the requirements stated in part location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 financial institutions which utilize the same 703 of this chapter concerning p.m., Monday through Friday, except or similar types of derivatives. The scope of transacting business with corporate Federal holidays. the audit includes coverage of the credit unions. accounting, legal, operating, and risk The service information referenced in controls. [FR Doc. 96–13518 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] the proposed rule may be obtained from (3) All risk measurement applications and BILLING CODE 7535±01±U CFM International, Technical models are reviewed and validated annually. Publications Department, One Neumann (4) Controls are in place to ensure Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215; telephone documentation is confirmed, maintained and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (513) 552–2981, fax (513) 552–2816. safeguarded. Any documentation exceptions This information may be examined at are monitored and reviewed by appropriate Federal Aviation Administration the FAA, New England Region, Office of senior management and legal counsel. the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New (h) Legal issues. (1) The corporate credit 14 CFR Part 39 union has in-house legal counsel or has England Executive Park, Burlington, [Docket No. 95±ANE±65] access to outside counsel which can MA. reasonably ensure that any derivatives RIN 2120±AA64 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: related contracts adequately represent the Robert J. Ganley, Aerospace Engineer, legal and business interests of the corporate Airworthiness Directives; CFM Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine credit union. International CFM56±5/-5B/-5C Series and Propeller Directorate, 12 New (2) The corporate credit union has access Turbofan Engines to outside counsel which is expert in all England Executive Park, Burlington, MA financial derivatives contracts and related AGENCY: Federal Aviation 01803–5299; telephone (617) 238–7138, matters. Administration, DOT. fax (617) 238–7199. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28113

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: engines that have a certain stationary a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Comments Invited number 3 bearing aft air/oil seal Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 installed. This condition, if not FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if Interested persons are invited to corrected, could result in a failure of the promulgated, will not have a significant participate in the making of the stage 1 disk of the HPCR stage 1–2 economic impact, positive or negative, proposed rule by submitting such spool, which could result in an on a substantial number of small entities written data, views, or arguments as uncontained engine failure and damage under the criteria of the Regulatory they may desire. Communications to the aircraft. Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft should identify the Rules Docket The FAA has reviewed and approved regulatory evaluation prepared for this number and be submitted in triplicate to the technical contents of CFM56–5 action is contained in the Rules Docket. the address specified above. All Service Bulletin (SB) No. 72–440, A copy of it may be obtained by communications received on or before CFM56– 5B SB No. 72–064, and contacting the Rules Docket at the the closing date for comments, specified CFM56–5C SB No. 72–229, all Revision location provided under the caption above, will be considered before taking 2, dated June 23, 1995, that describes ADDRESSES. action on the proposed rule. The procedures for borescope inspections of proposals contained in this notice may the stage 1 disk bore of certain HPCR List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 be changed in light of the comments stage 1–2 spools for rubs and scratches. Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation received. Since an unsafe condition has been safety, Safety. Comments are specifically invited on identified that is likely to exist or the overall regulatory, economic, develop on other products of this same The Proposed Amendment environmental, and energy aspects of type design, the proposed AD would Accordingly, pursuant to the the proposed rule. All comments require initial and repetitive borescope authority delegated to me by the submitted will be available, both before inspections of the stage 1 disk bore of Administrator, the Federal Aviation and after the closing date for comments, certain HPCR stage 1–2 spools for rubs Administration proposes to amend part in the Rules Docket for examination by and scratches, and replacement, if found 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations interested persons. A report rubbed or scratched, with a serviceable (14 CFR part 39) as follows: summarizing each FAA-public contact part. This proposal would also require concerned with the substance of this removal and replacement of certain PART 39ÐAIRWORTHINESS proposal will be filed in the Rules stationary number 3 bearing aft air/oil DIRECTIVES Docket. seals as terminating action to the 1. The authority citation for part 39 Commenters wishing the FAA to inspection program. The actions would continues to read as follows: acknowledge receipt of their comments be required to be accomplished in submitted in response to this notice accordance with the SB’s described Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701. previously. must submit a self-addressed, stamped § 39.13 [Amended] postcard on which the following There are approximately 131 engines statement is made: ‘‘Comments to of the affected design in the worldwide 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the Docket Number 95– ANE–65.’’ The fleet. The manufacturer has advised the following new airworthiness directive: CFM International: Docket No. 95–ANE–65. postcard will be date stamped and FAA that there are no engines installed returned to the commenter. on U.S. registered aircraft that would be Applicability: CFM International (CFMI) affected by this AD. Therefore, there is CFM56–5/–5B/– 5C series turbofan engines, Availability of NPRMs installed on but not limited to Airbus A320, no associated cost impact on U.S. A321, and A340 series aircraft. Any person may obtain a copy of this operators as a result of this AD. However, should an affected engine be Note: This airworthiness directive (AD) NPRM by submitting a request to the applies to each engine identified in the FAA, New England Region, Office of the imported on an aircraft and placed on preceding applicability provision, regardless Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: the U.S. registry in the future, it would of whether it has been modified, altered, or Rules Docket No. 95–ANE– 65, 12 New take approximately 402 work hours to repaired in the area subject to the England Executive Park, Burlington, MA accomplish the required actions, and requirements of this AD. For engines that 01803– 5299. that the average labor rate is $60 per have been modified, altered, or repaired so work hour. Required parts would cost that the performance of the requirements of Discussion approximately $87,700 per engine. this AD is affected, the owner/operator must This proposed airworthiness directive Based on these figures, the cost impact use the authority provided in paragraph (h) (AD) is applicable to CFM International of the proposed AD is estimated to be to request approval from the Federal Aviation (CFMI) CFM56–5/–5B/–5C series Administration (FAA). This approval may $111,820 per engine. address either no action, if the current turbofan engines. The Federal Aviation The regulations proposed herein configuration eliminates the unsafe Administration (FAA) has received a would not have substantial direct effects condition, or different actions necessary to report of an engine found with a rub on on the States, on the relationship address the unsafe condition described in the forward corner of the high pressure between the national government and this AD. Such a request should include an compressor rotor (HPCR) stage 1 disk the States, or on the distribution of assessment of the effect of the changed bore due to contact with the stationary power and responsibilities among the configuration on the unsafe condition number 3 bearing aft air/oil seal. The various levels of government. Therefore, addressed by this AD. In no case does the manufacturer has discovered a potential in accordance with Executive Order presence of any modification, alteration, or lack of clearance condition between the repair remove any engine from the 12612, it is determined that this applicability of this AD. HPCR stage 1 disk bore and certain proposal would not have sufficient stationary number 3 bearing aft air/oil Compliance: Required as indicated, unless federalism implications to warrant the accomplished previously. seals. This potential lack of clearance preparation of a Federalism Assessment. To prevent a failure of the stage 1 disk of may result in contact between the two For the reasons discussed above, I the high pressure compressor rotor (HPCR) parts during engine operation. The certify that this proposed regulation (1) stage 1–2 spool, which could result in an manufacturer has determined that this is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ uncontained engine failure and damage to lack of clearance condition is limited to under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not the aircraft, accomplish the following: 28114 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

(a) For CFM56–5/–5B/–5C engines that compliance with this airworthiness directive, result in uncontained engine failure, have a stationary number 3 bearing aft air/oil if any, may be obtained from the Engine inflight engine shutdown, engine cowl seal, Part Number (P/N) 1364M71G02, Certification Office. release, and airframe damage. installed, inspect the stage 1 disk of the (i) Special flight permits may be issued in DATES: Comments must be received by HPCR stage 1–2 spool in accordance with the accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 Accomplishment Instructions of CFM56–5 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR August 5, 1996. Service Bulletin (SB) No. 72–440, CFM56–5B 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to ADDRESSES: Submit comments in SB No. 72–064, or CFM56–5C SB No. 72–229, a location where the requirements of this AD triplicate to the Federal Aviation all Revision 2, dated June 23, 1995, as can be accomplished. Administration (FAA), New England applicable, as follows: Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on Region, Office of the Assistant Chief (1) If the disk has been previously May 22, 1996. inspected prior to the effective date of this Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. AD, inspect prior to accumulating 2,200 Robert E. Guyotte, 93–ANE–79, 12 New England Executive cycles since new (CSN). Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Park, Burlington, MA 01803–5299. (2) If the disk has been previously Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Comments may also be submitted to the inspected prior to the effective date of this [FR Doc. 96–13890 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Rules Docket by using the following AD, and the disk was found not to be rubbed BILLING CODE 4910±13±U Internet address: ‘‘epd- or scratched, reinspect prior to accumulating [email protected]’’. 2,200 cycles since last inspection (CSLI). Comments may be inspected at this (b) Thereafter, for disks that have been inspected in accordance with paragraph 14 CFR Part 39 location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, inspect in [Docket No. 93±ANE±79] accordance with the Accomplishment Federal holidays. Instructions of CFM56–5 SB No. 72–440, RIN 2120±AA64 The service information referenced in CFM56–5B SB No. 72–064, or CFM56–5C SB the proposed rule may be obtained from No. 72–229, all Revision 2, dated June 23, Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Pratt & Whitney, 400 Main Street, East 1995, as applicable, at intervals not to exceed Whitney JT8D Series Turbofan Engines Hartford, CT 06108. This information 2,200 CSLI. may be examined at the FAA, New (c) Remove from service HPCR stage 1–2 AGENCY: Federal Aviation spools with rubbed or scratched stage 1 disks Administration, DOT. England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New England and replace with a serviceable part, as ACTION: Supplemental notice of Executive Park, Burlington, MA. follows: proposed rulemaking; reopening of (1) For spools with less than 2,200 CSN on comment period. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the effective date of this AD, at the next Mark A. Rumizen, Aerospace Engineer, engine shop visit after the effective date of SUMMARY: This notice revises an earlier Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine this AD, or prior to accumulating 2,200 CSN, whichever occurs first. proposed airworthiness directive (AD), and Propeller Directorate, 12 New (2) For spools with 2,200 CSN or more on applicable to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D England Executive Park, Burlington, MA the effective date of this AD, at the next series turbofan engines, that would have 01803–5299; telephone (617) 238–7137, engine shop visit after the effective date of superseded a current AD by reducing fax (617) 238–7199. this AD, or prior to accumulating 2,200 CSLI, the rear flange inspection interval for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: whichever occurs first. combustion chamber outer cases (d) Remove from service stationary number (CCOC’s) when only the aft face of the Comments Invited 3 aft air/oil seals, P/N 1364M71G02, at the next engine shop visit after the effective date rear flange has been inspected, and Interested persons are invited to of this AD, and replace with a serviceable introducing an improved ultrasonic participate in the making of the part. Compliance with this paragraph probe assembly. That proposal was proposed rule by submitting such constitutes terminating action to the prompted by reports of crack origins in written data, views, or arguments as inspection requirements of paragraphs (a)(1), the forward face of the rear flange that they may desire. Communications (a)(2), and (b) of this AD. could not be detected by the inspection should identify the Rules Docket (e) For the purpose of this AD, a methods for installed CCOC’s that were number and be submitted in triplicate to serviceable HPCR stage 1–2 spool is defined mandated in the current AD. This action as a spool without a rub or scratch indication the address specified above. All on the stage 1 disk, a P/N 1834M55G01 retains the elements of the original communications received on or before spool, or a spool that has accomplished the proposal, but simplifies the compliance the closing date for comments, specified stage 1 disk rework in accordance with any instructions, and incorporates a new PW above, will be considered before taking revision level of CFM56–5 SB No. 72–442, Alert Service Bulletin (ASB). This action on the proposed rule. The CFM56–5B SB No. 72–066, or CFM56–5C SB action also revises the proposed rule by proposals contained in this notice may No. 72–230, as applicable. introducing new non-destructive be changed in light of the comments (f) For the purpose of this AD, a serviceable inspection procedures (NDIP’s), and received. stationary number 3 bearing aft air/oil seal is introducing a rotating eddy current defined as any seal other than a P/N Comments are specifically invited on 1364M71G02 seal. probe for shop inspections in which the the overall regulatory, economic, (g) For the purpose of this AD, an engine case is removed from the engine. In environmental, and energy aspects of shop visit is defined as the induction of an addition, this action eliminates the proposed rule. All comments engine into the shop for any reason. fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI), submitted will be available, both before (h) An alternative method of compliance or fluorescent magnetic particle inspection and after the closing date for comments, adjustment of the compliance time that (FMPI), and visual inspections from hot in the Rules Docket for examination by provides an acceptable level of safety may be section disassembly level inspection interested persons. A report used if approved by the Manager, Engine procedures. This action also revises the Certification Office. The request should be summarizing each FAA-public contact forwarded through an appropriate FAA proposed rule by consolidating the concerned with the substance of this Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may inspection requirements of an proposal will be filed in the Rules add comments and then send it to the additional current AD, 95–08–15, into Docket. Manager, Engine Certification Office. this proposed AD. The actions specified Commenters wishing the FAA to Note: Information concerning the existence by this proposed AD are intended to acknowledge receipt of their comments of approved alternative methods of prevent CCOC flange cracks that could submitted in response to this notice Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28115 must submit a self-addressed, stamped prompted by reports of rupture of engines would require inspection postcard on which the following CCOC’s that had only the aft face of the immediately upon AD effectivity. The statement is made: ‘‘Comments to rear flange inspected in accordance with FAA agrees. This proposed AD allows Docket Number 93–ANE–79.’’ The the current AD. the inspection interval previously postcard will be date stamped and Since the issuance of that NPRM, the established under AD 87–11–07 R1 to be returned to the commenter. manufacturer has introduced improved completed prior to imposing the new, non-destructive inspection procedures reduced intervals. Availability of NPRMs (NDIP’s) that are applicable to the One commenter states that inspection Any person may obtain a copy of this existing CCOC inspection requirements records may not specifically state NPRM by submitting a request to the of AD 87–11–07 R1. The FAA has whether or not both faces of the rear FAA, New England Region, Office of the determined that the improved NDIP’s flange were inspected, or if only the aft Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: should be incorporated into the CCOC face was inspected, thus precluding Rules Docket No. 93–ANE–79, 12 New inspection requirements, that the FPI, determination of the appropriate England Executive Park, Burlington, MA FMPI, and visual inspections should be reinspection interval in accordance with 01803–5299. eliminated from the hot section PW ASB No. A6228, dated November 7, Discussion inspection level of disassembly 1995. The FAA agrees. As stated above, inspection requirements, that a new the previously established inspection On October 3, 1989, the Federal rotating eddy current probe should be interval, determined in accordance with Aviation Administration (FAA) issued introduced for shop level inspections in AD 87–11–07 R1, may be used for the airworthiness directive (AD) 87–11–07 which the case is removed from the initial inspection without the need for a R1, Amendment 39–6360 (54 FR 46045, engine, and that the compliance section more comprehensive records search. November 1, 1989), applicable to Pratt should be simplified. One commenter states that an & Whitney (PW) JT8D series turbofan In addition, since issuance of the inspection should not be required at engines, to require repetitive eddy NPRM the FAA has issued AD 95–08– shop visits that occur within a short current, fluorescent penetrant, 15, Amendment 39–9204 (60 FR 20019, time period of a previous shop visit in fluorescent magnetic penetrant, or April 24, 1995), which requires an which the CCOC was inspected. The visual inspections for cracks in the rear additional inspection of the CCOC rear FAA agrees. Shop visits that occur flange, and ultrasonic, fluorescent flange for intergranular cracking. In within 1,000 cycles of a previous shop penetrant, or fluorescent magnetic addition, PW has issued Revision 1 to visit that included a CCOC inspection penetrant inspections for cracks in the the Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) do not need to be reinspected. PS4 boss, and drain bosses of the incorporated in that AD, No. A6202, Three commenters state that the shop combustion chamber outer case (CCOC). dated January 4, 1996, which removes visit definition conflicted with the That action was prompted by reports of the in-shop ultrasonic inspection definition contained in the PW ASB, uncontained rupture of the CCOC. That requirement and clarifies the borescope and in some instances CCOC condition, if not corrected, could result inspection requirements. The FAA has inspections and associated extensive in CCOC flange cracks that if undetected determined that AD 95–08–15 should be engine disassembly could be required could result in uncontained engine superseded and the compliance during limited scope maintenance failure, inflight engine shutdown, requirements of that AD and that PW activities. The FAA agrees. This engine cowl release, and airframe ASB No. A6202, Revision 1, dated proposed AD requires use of the shop damage. January 4, 1996, should be consolidated visit definition in the ASB, and this Since the issuance of that AD, the into the existing CCOC inspection definition has been refined in response FAA has received reports of crack requirements of AD 87–11–07 R1. to operators’ concerns. origins in the forward face of the rear In addition, PW has issued ASB No. One commenter states that an flange that cannot be detected by the A6228, dated November 7, 1995, which incorrect Table reference was specified inspection methods for installed CCOC’s introduces the improved NDIP’s, in paragraph (d) of the NPRM. The FAA that were mandated in that AD. While eliminates the FPI and FMPI from the agrees. This proposed AD contains a no failures have been attributed to these hot section disassembly level inspection simplified compliance section that undetected cracks, analysis indicates requirements, and consolidates limits references to only the applicable that a reduced inspection interval is inspection procedures for the CCOC. major paragraphs of the ASB necessary to prevent crack propagation This ASB is incorporated in this compliance section. to critical lengths as the CCOC’s age. proposed rule. Pratt & Whitney ASB No. Three commenters state that the AD The FAA has determined that to reduce A6228, dated November 7, 1995, also applicability section should specify the the fleet-wide risk to an acceptable includes an inspection of PS4 and drain applicable CCOC part numbers as well level, the inspection interval should be bosses for a thin walled condition in as the applicable engine models. The reduced if only the aft face of the rear Paragraph 2.C, Part III of that ASB. The FAA agrees. The applicability section in flange is inspected. FAA has determined, however, that this this proposed AD includes these part A proposal to amend part 39 of the condition does not pose a significant number references. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR risk to continued safe flight and One commenter states that the ASB is part 39) to add an AD, applicable to PW therefore is not included in this complex and could lead to non- JT8D series turbofan engines, was proposed AD. compliance with the AD. The FAA published as a notice of proposed Interested persons have been afforded agrees. Both the ASB and the proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal an opportunity to participate in the AD have been simplified. Register on March 15, 1994 (59 FR making of this proposal. Due One commenter states that the 11942). That NPRM would have consideration has been given to the equipment and procedures used for the reduced the inspection interval for comments received. inspection of the PS4 and drain bosses CCOC’s that have had only the aft face Two commenters state that the new, produce unreliable results. The FAA of the rear flange inspected and reduced, rear flange inspection interval agrees in part. The FAA acknowledges introduced an improved ultrasonic should only apply to future inspections, that the inspections are complex and probe assembly. That NPRM was and not be retroactive, such that some require skilled and trained inspectors, 28116 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules and refinements have been made to PART 39ÐAIRWORTHINESS (b) Inspect, disposition, and report CCOC these inspection procedures and tools DIRECTIVES distress in accordance with the intervals and based on past in-service experience and procedures described in Paragraphs 2.A. (Part reports from operators of the PW JT8D 1. The authority citation for part 39 I), 2.B. (Part II), and 2.D of PW ASB No. continues to read as follows: A6228, dated November 7, 1995. Reporting series engines. requirements have been approved by the One commenter concurs with the Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701. Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 2120–0056. proposed AD as written. § 39.13 [Amended] Since these changes expand the scope (c) An alternative method of compliance or 2. Section 39.13 is amended by of the originally proposed rule, the FAA adjustment of the compliance time that removing amendment 39–6360 (54 FR has determined that it is necessary to provides an acceptable level of safety may be 46045, November 1, 1989) and used if approved by the Manager, Engine reopen the comment period to provide amendment 39–9204 (60 FR 20019, Certification Office. The request should be additional opportunity for public April 24, 1995) and by adding a new forwarded through an appropriate FAA comment. airworthiness directive to read as Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the The FAA estimates that 6,815 engines follows: installed on aircraft of U.S. registry Manager, Engine Certification Office. would be affected by this proposed AD Pratt & Whitney: Docket No. 93–ANE–79. Note: Information concerning the existence and that it would take approximately Supersedes AD 87–11–07 R1, of approved alternative methods of 4.5 work hours per engine to Amendment 39–6360, AD 87–11–07, compliance with this airworthiness directive, Amendment 39–5619, and AD 95–08–15, if any, may be obtained from the Engine accomplish the proposed actions. Since Amendment 39–9204. Certification Office. publication of the NPRM, the FAA has Applicability: Pratt & Whitney (PW) (d) Special flight permits may be issued in revised its average labor rate estimate Models JT8D–1, –1A, –1B, –7, –7A, –9, –9A, accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 from $55 per work hour to $60 per work –11, –15, –15A, –17, –17A, –17R, and –17AR of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR hour to better reflect current costs. turbofan engines, with combustion chamber 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to Based on these figures, the total cost outer case (CCOC) part numbers (P/Ns) a location where the requirements of this AD impact of the proposed AD on U.S. 490547, 542155, 616315, 728829, 728829– can be accomplished. operators is estimated to be $1,840,050. 001, 730413, 730413–001, 730414, 730414– Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on The regulations proposed herein 001, 767197, 767279, 767279–001 installed. May 22, 1996. These engines are installed on but not Robert E. Guyotte, would not have substantial direct effects limited to Boeing 737 and 727 series, and on the States, on the relationship McDonnell Douglas DC–9 series aircraft. Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. between the national government and Note: This airworthiness directive (AD) the States, or on the distribution of applies to each engine identified in the [FR Doc. 96–13889 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] power and responsibilities among the preceding applicability provision, regardless BILLING CODE 4910±13±U various levels of government. Therefore, of whether it has been modified, altered, or in accordance with Executive Order repaired in the area subject to the 12612, it is determined that this requirements of this AD. For engines that DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND proposal would not have sufficient have been modified, altered, or repaired so HUMAN SERVICES federalism implications to warrant the that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must Food and Drug Administration preparation of a Federalism Assessment. use the authority provided in paragraph (c) For the reasons discussed above, I to request approval from the Federal Aviation 21 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 12, 20, 56, certify that this proposed regulation (1) Administration (FAA). This approval may and 58 is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ address either no action, if the current under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not configuration eliminates the unsafe [Docket No. 96N±0163] condition, or different actions necessary to a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT RIN 0910±AA69 Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if assessment of the effect of the changed Reinvention of Administrative promulgated, will not have a significant configuration on the unsafe condition Procedures Regulations economic impact, positive or negative, addressed by this AD. In no case does the on a substantial number of small entities presence of any modification, alteration, or AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, under the criteria of the Regulatory repair remove any engine from the HHS. Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft applicability of this AD. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed regulatory evaluation prepared for this Compliance: Required as indicated, unless rulemaking. action is contained in the Rules Docket. accomplished previously. A copy of it may be obtained by To prevent CCOC flange cracks that could SUMMARY: The Food and Drug result in uncontained engine failure, inflight contacting the Rules Docket at the Administration (FDA) is considering engine shutdown, engine cowl release, and ways to further streamline its location provided under the caption airframe damage, accomplish the following: ADDRESSES. (a) Inspect, disposition, and report CCOC administrative procedures regulations as a result of a page-by-page review of the List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 distress, in accordance with the intervals and procedures described in Paragraphs 2.A and agency’s regulations. This regulatory Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 2.C of PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. review is part of the administration’s safety, Safety. A6202, Revision 1, dated January 4, 1996. ‘‘Reinventing Government’’ initiative Reporting requirements have been approved that seeks to streamline Government The Proposed Amendment by the Office of Management and Budget and and to ease the burden on regulated Accordingly, pursuant to the assigned OMB control number 2120–0056. industry and consumers. FDA is seeking (1) For the purposes of this AD, the public comment on ways to streamline authority delegated to me by the accomplishment effective date to be used for Administrator, the Federal Aviation determination of inspection intervals, as its administrative procedures Administration proposes to amend part required by Section 2.A of PW ASB A6202, regulations. 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Revision 1, dated January 4, 1996, is defined DATES: Written comments by September (14 CFR part 39) as follows: as the effective date of this AD. 3, 1996. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28117

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and Drug Administration, 5600 revoking or revising other regulations; to the Dockets Management Branch Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, the agency expects to issue additional (HFA–305), Food and Drug 301–443–3480. reinvention proposals in the future. Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March In this notice, FDA is seeking rm. 1–23, Rockville, MD 20857. 4, 1995, President Clinton announced comments on ways listed in the table FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: plans for reforming the Federal below in which its administrative Regarding information concerning the regulatory system as part of his regulations could be updated or revised ‘‘Reinventing Government’’ initiative. In regulations: Philip L. Chao, Policy in order to streamline the agency’s Development and Coordination his March 4, 1995, directive, the administrative practices and Staff (HF–23), Food and Drug President ordered all Federal agencies to procedures. Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, conduct a page-by-page review of their Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827– regulations and to ‘‘eliminate or revise The following table contains a 3380. those that are outdated or otherwise in section-by-section analysis of the Regarding general information on need of reform.’’ This notice represents regulations that FDA is considering FDA’s ‘‘reinventing initiative’’: Lisa FDA’s continuing effort to implement ‘‘reinventing.’’ These regulations are M. Helmanis, Regulations Policy the President’s plan. In previous issues listed numerically as they appear in the Management Staff (HF–26), Food of the Federal Register, FDA proposed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Section-by-Section Analysis of Regulations Under Consideration

21 CFR Cite Description or Title of Regulation Explanation of Reinvention

§ 1.3 ...... Defines label and labeling ...... Should the definitions be amended? There are only two definitions (label and labeling) involved, but they could be updated to be more consist- ent with current statutory language. § 1.21 ...... Describes what constitutes a failure to re- This section provides general information on failures to reveal material veal a material fact. facts. Should this section be revised, expanded, or removed? § 1.23 ...... Describes procedures for requesting a vari- This provision could be rewritten to remove extraneous material and to ance or exemption from required label provide better instructions on procedures for a variance or exemption. statements. § 1.24 ...... Lists granted label exemptions for foods, Because much of the text is devoted to foods, the provision could be re- animal drugs, and cosmetics. located to that part of the CFR devoted to foods. Similar moves could be made for the paragraphs on animal drugs and cosmetics. Would it be more useful to move these provisions to the corresponding subject areas? § 1.90 ...... Notice of sampling ...... This section explains the procedures for notification of sampling of im- ports. Should this section be consolidated with § 1.91? § 1.91 ...... Payment for samples ...... This section provides that FDA will pay for import samples of nonviolative goods. § 2.125 ...... Establishes procedures to permit the use of Should this provision be modified to reflect current requirements under chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) in self-pres- the Clean Air Act and to correspond with the Environmental Protection surized containers. Agency regulations on CFC use and warning labels? § 3.6 ...... States who the product jurisdiction officer is This section should be amended to reflect the current information. Part 5 ...... Delegations of authority ...... Some of the delegations of authority refer to offices or titles that no longer exist or have changed due to reorganizations. This part should be revised to reflect the most current information. Does it remain useful to codify these delegations of authority? Part 10 subparts A Administrative practices and procedures ..... These regulations govern the practices and procedures for petitions, and B. hearings, and other administrative proceedings and activities con- ducted by FDA. Some sections should be revised to provide more flexibility or efficiency. For example, could FDA's citizen petitions proc- ess be made more efficient? Part 12 ...... Formal evidentiary public hearing ...... Should FDA's regulations governing formal hearings be simplified or clarified? Part 20 ...... Public information ...... This part governs FDA's communication with the public. Does this part continue to reflect the best way for FDA to handle public information? Are there better, more efficient approaches that should be embodied in FDA's regulations? § 56.104 ...... Describes exemptions from institutional The first two exempt classes are probably inapplicable today because review boards requirements. they refer to clinical research begun before July 27, 1981. Should this section be amended by removing paragraphs (a) and (b)? Part 58 ...... Good laboratory practice regulations ...... This part describes fundamental principles for laboratories to observe and are intended to ensure the quality and integrity of safety data. Up- dating to reflect current technology (such as greater use of computers) may be needed.

Interested persons may, on or before, (ANPRM). Two copies of any comments heading of this document. Received September 3, 1996, submit to the are to be submitted, except that comments may be seen in the office Dockets Management Branch (address individuals may submit one copy. above between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., above) written comments regarding this Comments are to be identified with the Monday through Friday. advance notice of proposed rulemaking docket number found in brackets in the 28118 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

This ANPRM is issued under section § 1.882±5 [Corrected] (CBI). Information so marked will not be 301 et seq. of the Federal Food, Drug, 2. On page 9379, column 3, § 1.882– disclosed except in accordance with and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) 5(d)(6), Example 4. (i), line 18, the procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. and under the authority of the language ‘‘liabilities of 90x U.S. dollars A copy of the comment that does not Commissioner of Food and Drugs. and 1000 x’’ is corrected to read contain CBI must be submitted for Dated: May 28, 1996. ‘‘liabilities of 90x U.S. dollars and inclusion in the public record. William B. Schultz, 1000x’’. Information not marked confidential will be included in the public docket by Deputy Commissioner for Policy. § 1.884±1 [Corrected] EPA without prior notice. The public [FR Doc. 96–13980 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] 3. On page 9380, column 3, § 1.884– docket is available for public inspection BILLING CODE 4160±01±F 1(d)(2)(xi), Example 8., last line, the in Rm. 1132 at the address given above, language ‘‘from securities) of the value from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday of the securities.’’ is corrected to read through Friday, excluding legal DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ‘‘from securities) of the amount of the holidays. securities.’’. Comments and data may also be Internal Revenue Service Cynthia E. Grigsby, submitted electronically by sending 26 CFR Part 1 Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp- Counsel (Corporate). [email protected]. Electronic [INTL±0054±95] [FR Doc. 96–13722 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] comments must be submitted as an RIN 1545±AT96 BILLING CODE 4830±01±U ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Proposed Amendments to the Comments and data will also be Regulations on the Determination of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 Interest Expense Deduction of Foreign AGENCY file format or ASCII file format. All Corporations and Branch Profits Tax; comments and data in electronic form Correction 40 CFR Part 180 must be identified by the docket number, [PP 5E04443/P659]. No CBI AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), [PP 5E04443/P659; FRL±5371±5] should be submitted through e-mail. Treasury. RIN 2070±AB18 Electronic comments on this proposed ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rule may be filed online at many Federal rulemaking. 1,1-Difluoroethane; Proposed Depository Libraries. Additional SUMMARY: This document contains a Exemption from Tolerance information on electronic submissions correction to the notice of proposed can be found below in this document. AGENCY: rulemaking [INTL–0054–95] which was Environmental Protection FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By published in the Federal Register for Agency (EPA). mail: Amelia M. Acierto, Registration Friday, March 8, 1996 (61 FR 9377). The ACTION: Proposed rule. Support Branch, Registration Division notice of proposed rulemaking relate to (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, SUMMARY: This document proposes that the determination of the interest Environmental Protection Agency, 401 residues of 1,1-difluoroethane (CAS Reg. expense deduction of foreign M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. No. 75–37–6) be exempted from the corporations, and the branch profits tax. Office location, telephone number, and requirement of a tolerance when used as FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: e-mail address: 2800 Crystal Drive, an inert ingredient (aerosol propellant) North Tower, Arlington, VA, (703) 308– Ahmad Pirasteh or Richard Hoge (202) in aerosol pesticide formulations used 622–3870 (not a toll-free number). 8375, e-mail: for insect control in food- and feed- [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: handling establishments and animals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The This proposed regulation was requested Background Dupont Company, 1007 Market Street, by The Dupont Company, pursuant to Wilmington, DE 19898 has submitted The notice of proposed rulemaking the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic that is subject to these corrections are pesticide petition (PP) 5E04443 to EPA Act (FFDCA). requesting that the Administrator, under sections 882 and 884 of the DATES: Comments, identified by the Internal Revenue Code. pursuant to section 408(e) of the docket control number [PP 5E04443/ FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(e), propose to Need for Correction P659], must be received on or before amend 40 CFR 180.1001(c) and (e) by July 5, 1996. As published, the proposed establishing an exemption from the rulemaking contains errors that are in ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written requirement of a tolerance for the need of clarification. comments to: Public Response and residues of 1,1-difluoroethane (CAS Reg. Program Resources Branch, Field No. 75–37–6) when used as an inert Correction of Publication Operations Division (7506C), Office of ingredient (aerosol propellant) in Accordingly, the publication of the Pesticide Programs, Environmental aerosol pesticide formulations used for proposed rulemaking which is the Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., insect control in food- and feed- subject of FR Doc. 96–5264 is corrected Washington, DC 20460. In person handling establishments and animals. as follows: deliver comments to: Rm. 1132, Crystal Inert ingredients are all ingredients 1. On page 9378, in the preamble Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, that are not active ingredients as defined under column 2, following the Arlington, VA. in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are paragraph heading ‘‘B. Hedging Information submitted as a comment not limited to, the following types of transactions’’, line 6, the language ‘‘case concerning this document may be ingredients (except when they have a may be, the amount of their U.S.’’ is claimed confidential by marking any pesticidal efficacy of their own): corrected to read ‘‘case may be, the part or all of that information as solvents such as alcohols and amount of its U.S.’’. ‘‘Confidential Business Information’’ hydrocarbons; surfactants such as Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28119 polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty reversible analgesia and feelings of 5E04443/P659] (including comments acids; carriers such as clay and impending loss of consciousness after and data submitted electronically as diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as acute inhalation exposure to 500,000 described below). A public version of carrageenan and modified cellulose; ppm of 1,1-difluoroethane. this record, including printed, paper wetting, spreading, and dispersing 6. 1,1-Difluoroethane is approved versions of electronic comments, which agents; propellants in aerosol under 21 CFR 178.3010 by the United does not include any information dispensers; microencapsulating agents; States Food and Drug Administration claimed as CBI, is available for and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not (FDA) as an indirect food additive (e.g., inspection from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., intended to imply nontoxicity; the blowing agent in the production of Monday through Friday, excluding legal ingredient may or may not be polystyrene articles which come in holidays. The public record is located in chemically active. contact with food). Room 1132 of the Public Response and The data submitted in the petition 7. 1,1-Difluoroethane is a gas at Program Resources Branch, Field and other relevant material have been ambient temperatures. Therefore, rapid Operations Division (7506C), Office of evaluated. As part of the EPA policy volatilization of the substance and Pesticide Programs, Environmental statement on inert ingredients published dilution by ambient air is expected, Protection Agency, Crystal Mallι2, 1921 in the Federal Register of April 22, 1987 suggesting that human exposure would Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA. (52 FR 13305), the Agency set forth a list be insignificant. It would not be of studies which would generally be expected that the Reference Dose (RfD) Electronic comments can be sent used to evaluate the risks posed by the of 74 ppm (200 mg/M3) established by directly to EPA at: [email protected] presence of an inert ingredient in a the Agency for this chemical would be pesticide formulation. However, where reached or exceeded in exposures Electronic comments must be it can be determined without that data resulting from its intended use as an submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the that the inert ingredient will present aerosol propellant. use of special characters and any form minimal or no risk, the Agency The toxicological profile indicates a of encryption. generally does not require some or all of lack of chronic, subchronic or the listed studies to rule on the developmental toxicity. Based upon the The official record for this proposed tolerance or exemption from physico-chemical characteristics, and rulemaking, as well as the public the requirement of a tolerance for an review of its use, and the determination version, as described above will be kept inert ingredient. The Agency has that there is no reasonable expectation in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will decided that no data, in addition to that of finite residues in food or feed items transfer all comments received described below, for 1,1-difluoroethane as a result of its use as a propellent in electronically into printed, paper form will need to be submitted. The rationale pesticide formulations, the Agency has as they are received and will place the for this decision is described below: concluded that the use of 1,1- paper copies in the official rulemaking 1. 1,1-Difluoroethane has been difluoroethane would result in record which will also include all designated by the EPA as a substance negligible risks to human health and the comments submitted directly in writing. about which it has little concern environment. Accordingly, the Agency The official rulemaking record is the regarding its ozone-depleting potential has found that, 1,1-difluoroethane, paper record maintained at the address and is listed as an acceptable substitute when used in accordance with good in ‘‘ADDRESSES ’’ at the beginning of for certain uses of currently used ozone- agricultural practice, is useful and a this document. depleting propellants. 1,1- tolerance is not necessary to protect the The Office of Management and Budget Difluoroethane is now used in consumer public health. Therefore, EPA proposes has exempted this proposed rule from products (e.g., hair sprays, baby oil that the exemption from the the requirements of section 3 of mousse, spray bandage, rug shampoos requirement of a tolerance be Executive Order 12866. established as set forth below. and oven cleaners). This action does not impose any 2. An acute rat toxicity study which Any person who has registered or enforceable duty, or contain any showed no mortality when animals submitted an application for registration ‘‘unfunded mandates’’ as described in were exposed to 1,1-difluoroethane at of a pesticide, under the Federal Title II of the Unfunded Mandates concentrations up to 200,000 ppm, Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), or indicating that the substance is Act (FIFRA) as amended, which require prior consultation as specified essentially non-toxic following acute contains any of the ingredients listed by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, inhalation exposure. herein, may request within 30 days after October 28, 1993), entitled Enhancing 3. A chronic rat inhalation toxicity publication of this document in the the Intergovernmental Partnership, or study with exposures for 6 hours, 5 Federal Register that this proposal be special consideration as required by days/week for 2 years, with a no- referred to an Advisory Committee in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, observed-effect-level (NOEL) of 27,000 accordance with section 408(e) of February 16, 1994). mg/M3 and LOEL of 67,500 mg/M3 FFDCA. based on mild reversible renal effects. Interested persons are invited to Pursuant to the requirements of the 4. A rat inhalation developmental submit written comments on the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96– toxicity study with pregnant CD rats proposed regulation. Comments must 3 54, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601–612), exposed to concentrations of 0, 5,000 or bear a notation indicating the docket the Administrator has determined that 50,000 ppm for 6 hours/day on gestation control number, [PP 5E04443/P659]. All regulations establishing new tolerances days 6 through 15 showing no written comments filed in response to or raising tolerance levels or treatment-related maternal or fetal this petition will be available in the establishing exemptions from tolerance effects at any dose level, indicating that Public Response and Program Resources requirements do not have a significant 1,1-difluoroethane is not a Branch, at the address given above from economic impact on a substantial developmental toxicant at dose levels of 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through number of small entities. A certification equal or less than 50,000 ppm. Friday, except legal holidays. statement to this effect was published in 5. A human (volunteers) study A record has been established for this the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 reported no adverse effects except for rulemaking under docket number [PP FR 24950). 28120 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Dated: May 15, 1991. Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

Environmental protection, Stephen L. Johnson, 2. Section 180.1001 is amended in Administrative practice and procedure, paragraphs (c) and (e) in the table Agricultural commodities, Pesticides Director, Registration Division, Office of therein by adding and alphabetically Pesticide Programs. and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping inserting the inert ingredient, to read as requirements. Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR follows: part 180 be amended as follows: § 180.1001 Exemptions from the PART 180Ð[AMENDED] requirements of a tolerance. 1. The authority citation for part 180 * * * * * continues to read as follows: (c) * * *

Inert Ingredients Limits Uses

******* 1,1-difluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 75±37±6) ...... For aerosol pesticide formula- Aerosol propellant tions used for insect control in food- and feed-handling establishments and animals.

*******

* * * * * (e) * * *

Inert Ingredients Limits Uses

******* 1,1-difluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 75±37±6) ...... For aerosol pesticide formula- Aerosol propellant tions used for insect control in food- and feed-handling establishments and animals

*******

[FR Doc. 96–13440 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] DATES: Comments, identified by the given above, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., BILLING CODE 6560±50±F docket control number [PP 6E04704/ Monday through Friday, excluding legal P657], must be received on or before holidays. July 5, 1996. Comments and data may also be 40 CFR Part 180 ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written submitted electronically by sending [PP 6E04704/P657; FRL±5369±5] comments to: Public Response and electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp- Program Resources Branch, Field RIN 2070±AC18 [email protected]. Electronic Operations Division (7506C), Office of comments must be submitted as an Pesticide Programs, Environmental α-Alkyl (C10-C15)-ω-Hydroxy ASCII file avoiding the use of special Poly(oxyethylene) Sulfate and its Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., characters and any form of encryption. Ammonium, Calcium, Magnesium, Washington, DC 20460. In person Comments and data will also be Potassium, Sodium and Zinc Salts; deliver comments to: Rm. 1132, Crystal accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1 Tolerance Exemption Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, file format or ASCII file format. All Arlington, VA. comments and data in electronic form AGENCY: Environmental Protection Information submitted as a comment must be identified by the docket concerning this document may be Agency (EPA). number, [PP 6E04704/P657]. No CBI claimed confidential by marking any ACTION: Proposed rule. should be submitted through e-mail. part or all of that information as Electronic comments on this proposed SUMMARY: This document proposes that ‘‘Confidential Business Information’’ the current exemption from the (CBI). Information so marked will not be rule may be filed online at many Federal requirement of a tolerance for α-alkyl disclosed except in accordance with Depository Libraries. Additional information on electronic submissions (C12-C15)-ω-hydroxy poly(oxyethylene) procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. sulfate and its ammonium, calcium, A copy of the comment that does not can be found below in this document. magnesium, potassium, sodium and contain CBI must be submitted for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By zinc salts; the polyoxyethylene content inclusion in the public record. mail: Bipin Gandhi, Registration averages 3 moles be amended to include Information not marked confidential Support Branch, Registration Division alkyl groups ranging from C10-C14. This will be included in the public docket by (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, proposed regulation was requested by EPA without prior notice. The public Henkel Corporation pursuant to Federal docket is available for public inspection Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). in Rm. 1132 at the Virginia address Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28121

Environmental Protection Agency, 401 potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the claimed as CBI, is available for M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. poly(oxyethylene) content averages 2 inspection from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Office location, telephone number, and moles will need to be submitted. The Monday through Friday, excluding legal e-mail address: 2800 Crystal Drive, rationale for this decision is described holidays. The public record is located in North Tower, Arlington, VA, (703) 308– below: Room 1132 of the Public Response and 8380, e-mail: gandhi.bipin (1) The closely related surfactant, α- Program Resources Branch, Field @epamail.epa.gov. alkyl (C12-C15)-ω-hydroxy Operations Division (7506C), Office of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Henkel poly(oxyethylene) sulfate and its Pesticide Programs, Environmental Corporation, 4900 Este Avenue, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, Protection Agency, Crystal Mall#2, 1921 Cincinnati, Ohio 45232–1491, has potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA. submitted pesticide petition (PP) poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3 Electronic comments can be sent 6E04704 to EPA requesting that the moles is exempt from the requirement of directly to EPA at: [email protected] Administrator, pursuant to section a tolerance under 40 CFR 180.1001(c). (2) A related alkyl ethoxylate 408(e) of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(e), surfactant, α-alkyl-(C -C )-ω- propose to amend 40 CFR 180.1001(c) 8 18 Electronic comments must be hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) with a and (e) by establishing an exemption submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the poly(oxyethylene) content of 2 to 30 from the requirement of a tolerance for use of special characters and any form moles, is exempt from the requirement α-alkyl (C -C )-ω-hydroxy of encryption. 10 14 of a tolerance under 40 CFR 180.1001(c). The official record for this poly(oxyethylene) sulfate and its (3) The addition of the C10-C14 alkyl rulemaking, as well as the public ammonium, calcium, magnesium chain to the existing C12-C15 alkyl chain version, as described above will be kept potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the of alkyl C12-C15-omega-hydroxy in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will poly(oxyethylene) content averages 2 poly(oxyethylene) sulfate and its transfer all comments received moles when used as an inert ingredient ammonium, calcium, magnasium, electronically into printed, paper form (surfactants, related adjuvants of potassium, sodium and zinc salts and a as they are received and will place the surfactants) in pesticide formulations reduction in average poly(oxyethylene) paper copies in the official rulemaking applied to growing crops or to raw content from 3 moles to 2 moles is not record which will also include all agricultural commodities after harvest. expected to result in any adverse effects comments submitted directly in writing. Inert ingredients are all ingredients on health or the environment. The official rulemaking record is the that are not active ingredients as defined Based upon the above information paper record maintained at the address in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are and review of its use, EPA has found in ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ at the beginning of not limited to, the following types of that, when used in accordance with this document. ingredients (except when they have a good agricultural practice, this The Office of Management and Budget pesticidal efficacy of their own): ingredient is useful and a tolerance is has exempted this proposed rule from solvents such as alcohols and not necessary to protect the public the requirements of section 3 of hydrocarbons; surfactants such as health. Therefore, EPA proposes that the Executive Order 12866. polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty exemption from the requirement of a This action does not impose any acids; carriers such as clay and tolerance be established as set forth enforceable duty, or contain any diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as below. ‘‘unfunded mandates’’ as described in carrageenan and modified cellulose; Any person who has registered or Title II of the Unfunded Mandates wetting, spreading, and dispersing submitted an application for registration Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), or agents; propellants in aerosol of a pesticide, under the Federal require prior consultation as specified dispensers; microencapsulating agents; Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not Act as amended, which contains any of October 28, 1993), entitled Enhancing intended to imply nontoxicity; the the ingredients listed herein, may the Intergovernmental Partnership, or ingredient may or may not be request within 30 days after publication special consideration as required by chemically active. of this document in the Federal Register Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, The data submitted in the petition that this proposal be referred to an February 16, 1994). and other relevant material have been Advisory Committee in accordance with Pursuant to the requirements of the evaluated. As part of the EPA policy section 408(e) of FFDCA. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96– statement on inert ingredients published Interested persons are invited to 3 54, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601–612), in the Federal Register of April 22, 1987 submit written comments on the the Administrator has determined that (52 FR 13305), the Agency set forth a list proposed regulation. Comments must regulations establishing new tolerances of studies which would generally be bear a notation indicating the docket or raising tolerance levels or used to evaluate the risks posed by the control number, [PP 6E04704/P657]. All establishing exemptions from tolerance presence of an inert ingredient in a written comments filed in response to requirements do not have a significant pesticide formulation. However, where this petition will be available in the economic impact on a substantial it can be determined without that data Public Response and Program Resources number of small entities. A certification that the inert ingredient will present Branch, at the Virginia address given statement to this effect was published in minimal or no risk, the Agency above from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 generally does not require some or all of through Friday, except legal holidays. FR 24950). the listed studies to rule on the A record has been established for this List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 proposed tolerance or exemption from rulemaking under docket number [PP the requirement of a tolerance for an 6E04704/P657] (including comments Environmental protection, inert ingredient. The Agency has and data submitted electronically as Administrative practice and procedure, decided that no data, in addition to that described below). A public version of Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping described below, for α-alkyl (C10-C14)-ω- this record, including printed, paper hydroxy poly(oxyethylene) sulfate and versions of electronic comments, which requirements. its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, does not include any information Dated: May 15, 1996. 28122 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules

Stephen L. Johnson, PART 180Ð[AMENDED] and its ammonium, calcium, Director, Registration Division, Office of magnesium, potassium, sodium and Pesticide Programs. 1. The authority citation for part 180 zinc salts; the polyoxyethylene content continues to read as follows: averages 3 moles’’ to read as follows: Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371. part 180 be amended as follows: § 180.1001 Exemptions from the 2. In § 180.1001 the table to requirements of a tolerance. paragraphs (c) and (e) is amended by * * * * * revising the listing for ‘‘α-Alkyl C12-C15- ω-hydroxy poly(oxyethylene) sulfate (c) * * *

Ingredients Limits Uses

******* α-Alkyl (C10-C15)-ω-hydroxy poly(oxyethylene) sulfate ...... Surfactants, related adjuvants of surfactants. and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the poly(oxyethylene) con- tent averages 2 moles.

*******

* * * * * (e) * * *

Ingredients Limits Uses

****** * ` α-Alkyl (C10-C15)-ω-hydroxy poly(oxyethylene) sulfate ...... Surfactants, related adjuvants of surfactants. and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the poly(oxyethylene) con- tent averages 2 moles.

*******

[FR Doc. 96–13437 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] DATES: Comments must be filed on or Docket 95–55, FCC 96–194, 61 FR BILLING CODE 6560±50±F before June 24, 1996, and reply 21151, May 9, 1996, that proposed to comments must be filed on or before permit the Commission to use private July 15, 1996. Written comments by the sector organizations to inspect all U. S. public and federal agencies on the cargo ships and passenger ships that are FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS proposed and/or modified information COMMISSION required by statute to have an collections are due by June 24, 1996. inspection. Because the Commission’s 47 CFR Parts 0 and 80 ADDRESSES: Federal Communications primary objective is preserving safety of Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., life at sea we requested specific [CI Docket 95±55; DA 96±822] Washington, DC 20554. In addition to comments on how to ensure that safety filing comments with the Secretary, a will not be compromised by using Inspection of Radio Installations on copy of any comments on the private sector inspectors. Additionally, Large Cargo and Small Passenger information collections contained we noted that we would coordinate this Ships herein should be submitted to Dorothy proceeding with the U. S. Coast Guard. Conway, Federal Communications AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, 1. The U. S. Coast Guard has Commission. N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the requested an extension of time in which ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of Internet to [email protected], and to to file comments. The Coast Guard time. Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 states that the proposals are substantial and that the additional time will permit SUMMARY: The United States Coast NEOB, 725–17th Street, N.W., it to prepare a thorough review of the Guard (Coast Guard) has requested an Washington, DC 20503 or via the l proposal. We requested that comments extension of time to prepare comments Internet to fain [email protected]. to a Notice of Proposed Rule Making FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: be filed by May 24, 1996, and reply (NPRM) that the Commission adopted George R. Dillon of the Compliance and comments be filed by June 3, 1996. on April 25, 1996. Because the Coast Information Bureau at (202) 418–1100. 2. Because Commission staff are Guard is responsible for maritime safety For additional information concerning coordinating this proposal with the in the United States and the the information collections contained in Coast Guard and we have requested Commission is coordinating this this NPRM contact Dorothy Conway at their comments, we believe that an proposal with the Coast Guard we are 202–418–0217, or via the Internet at extension of time is warranted. For good granting their request. The intended [email protected]. cause shown, and pursuant to Sections effect of this extension is to permit the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April Coast Guard and other interested parties 25, 1996, the Commission adopted a additional time to prepare comments. Notice of Proposed Rule Making, CI Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28123

4(j) and 303(r)of the Communications concludes that there is minimal benefit 60% minimum requirement for Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 154 (j) and 303 to the public in updating the reference individual test points, thus allowing the (r), it is ordered that the period of time to these SAE standards. While deletion of FMVSS 108, Figure 2, for filing comments and reply comments incorporation would make them more Minimum Luminous Intensity in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making, readily available to lighting and vehicle Requirements for Backup Lamps, CI Docket 95–55, released on April 26, design engineers as a reference, this is c. A specific maximum requirement of 1996, is hereby extended. Comments a minimal benefit compared to the 500 cd for a one (1) backup lamp must be filed on or before June 24, 1996. expenditures of Agency resources to system, whereas the current FMVSS Reply comments must be filed on or implement it and other SAE standards 108, Table 2 footnote leaves the before July 15, 1996. whose references in FMVSS No. 108 are maximum requirement subject to 3. To file formally in this proceeding, not the most recent. The Agency’s interpretation, you must file an original and four copies commitment of its resources to its safety d. Specific requirements for limiting of all comments, reply comments, and priorities precludes granting this and measuring the currently specified supporting comments. If you want each petition. However, the agency has ‘‘incidental red, amber, or white light Commissioner to receive a personal compiled a reference document of * * *.’’ copy of your comments, you should file materials incorporated into FMVSS No. e. Additional explanations and an original and nine copies. You should 108 to improve the availability of these guidelines for photometry and send your comments and reply materials. This document is available installation, comments to Office of the Secretary, upon request. f. Revised format with content that is Federal Communications Commission, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. consistent with the current SAE Washington, D.C. 20554. Richard L. Van Iderstine, Office of Crash formatting requirements, and 4. You may also file informal Avoidance Standards, NHTSA, 400 g. Information on SAE publications comments by electronic mail. You Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC referenced in the document. Petitioner further claimed that these should address informal comments to 20590. Mr. Van Iderstine’s telephone revisions make new versions easier to [email protected]. You must put the number is: (202) 366–5280. His docket number of this proceeding on the facsimile number is (202) 366–4329. apply, as well as easier to find because they are located in current SAE subject line (see the caption at the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter beginning of this Notice). You must also Handbooks. Petitioner also claimed that dated February 15, 1996, William A. the changes would not adversely affect include your full name and Postal McKinney, Chairman of the Lighting the costs of any lighting. No claims Service mailing address in the text of Coordinating Committee of the Society the message. Comments and reply about safety or performance were made. of Automotive Engineers, Inc. The agency has reviewed what would comments will be available for public (Petitioner) petitioned the agency to be required to implement the inspection during regular business incorporate the latest version of SAE Petitioner’s desired solution. It has hours in the Reference Center of the J592 Clearance, Side Marker, and found that the tests and many Federal Communications Commission Identification Lamps, and SAE J593 requirements of the new documents are (Room 239), 1919 M Street, N.W., Backup Lamps, into 49 CFR 571.108 from other SAE standards newer than Washington, D.C. 20554. (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard those referenced in FMVSS No. 108, No. 108, Lamps, reflective devices and Federal Communications Commission. making an update only partially of value Beverly G. Baker, associated equipment.) The Petitioner claimed the changes in to any particular user. Thus, the advantage claimed by Chief, Compliance and Information Bureau. SAE J592 DEC94 Clearance, Side Petitioner by referencing standards in [FR Doc. 96–13835 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Marker, and Identification Lamps current SAE Handbooks appears to be BILLING CODE 6712±01±P provide significant improvements as very small because this action would follows: a. Photometric performance update only the two referenced DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION requirements are based on zones, documents, and none of the including 60% minimum requirement subreferenced documents. Additionally, National Highway Traffic Safety for individual test points, and are because NHTSA reference to SAE Administration consistent with the required format used standards is not always absolute, in that for most signal and marking lamps parts of standards are referenced or 49 CFR Part 571 regulated by FMVSS 108, and a 0.5 exceptions are made to specific requirements in SAE standards where Denial of Petition for Rulemaking; degree radius tolerance area for maximum readings is also additionally different or more stringent performance Federal Motor Vehicle Safety is necessary for safety purposes, the Standards specified to allow for inconsequential light streaks, value of having the latest version of an AGENCY: National Highway Traffic b. Additional explanations and SAE document is lessened. Thus, Safety Administration (NHTSA), guidelines for installation are provided, without a careful reading of FMVSS No. Department of Transportation. c. The format and content is 108, a reader of the newest referenced ACTION: Denial of petition for consistent with the current SAE documents could be misled as to the rulemaking. formatting requirements, and pertinent requirements, just as can d. Information on SAE publications occur with the currently referenced SUMMARY: This document denies the referenced in the document is versions. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) incorporated. Additionally, it is unlikely these two petition to incorporate the latest version The petitioner claimed the changes in documents, or any version of a of SAE J592 Clearance, Side Marker, and SAE J593 OCT95 Backup provide the referenced industry standard would be Identification Lamps, and SAE J593 following: wholly usable for more than just a short Backup Lamps, into Federal Motor a. A definition of point of visibility, period of time and probably would be Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. b. Photometric performance out of print within no more than five 108. NHTSA’s analysis of the petition requirements based on zones, including years because of SAE’s 5-year schedule 28124 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules of periodic updating of its standards. In consider any future SAE or other safety of express-up power windows fact, SAE J593 was updated in June petitioner’s request that has significant (i.e., power windows that fully close 1987, February 1995, and October 1995, safety benefit or when such action after a single, momentary touching of three times in less than nine years. would remove impediments to the use the window switch), because numerous Thus, unless SAE changes the policy of of new technologies. callers to NHTSA have alleged that regular updates, the value of the In accordance with 49 CFR part 552, express-up windows exist and are rulemaking effort requested by this this completes the agency’s review of unsafe. petition soon would be negated by the petition. The agency has concluded DATES: Comment Date: Comments must another update. While the agency that there is no reasonable possibility be received by August 5, 1996 acknowledges that industry standards that the specific action requested by the Effective and Compliance Dates: If must be updated to assure their petitioner would be issued at the adopted, the proposed amendments relevance to technology and their value conclusion of a rulemaking proceeding. would become effective, and to users, periodic updating where few if Accordingly, it denies the SAE’s compliance required, 30 days following any substantive changes are made may petition. publication of the final rule. be counterproductive for use as Federal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30103, 30162; ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and the docket and notice number of this Allocation of agency resources and 501.8. notice and be submitted to: Docket agency priorities also must be Issued on: May 29, 1996. Section, Room 5109, National Highway considered in processing what is the Barry Felrice, Traffic Safety Administration, 400 second petition from the SAE to update Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC its standards directly or indirectly Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards. 20590. (Docket Room hours are 9:30 referenced in FMVSS No. 108. All of a.m.–4 p.m., Monday through Friday.) these standards have specific dated [FR Doc. 96–13866 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: versions referenced in FMVSS No. 108. BILLING CODE 4910±59±P The Because the SAE endeavors to update its following persons by mail at the standards on a regular schedule, the National Highway Traffic Safety 49 CFR Part 57l federal regulatory workload from such a Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, course of updating would be continuous [Docket No. 87±10; Notice 6] Washington, DC 20590: For technical issues: and drain resources from the Agency’s RIN 2127±AF83 Mr. Richard Van Iderstine, Office of identified priorities. This is not a Crash Avoidance Standards, NPS–21, desirable course. Nonetheless, NHTSA Federal Motor Vehicle Safety telephone (202) 366–5280, facsimile recognizes that the technical expertise Standards; Power-Operated Window, (202) 366–4329, electronic mail of engineers from around the world Partition, and Roof Panel Systems ‘‘[email protected]’’. participating in SAE Committee AGENCY: National Highway Traffic For legal issues: activities is invaluable to NHTSA’s Mr. Paul Atelsek, Office of the Chief Safety Administration (NHTSA), mission, particularly when performance Counsel, NCC–20, telephone (202) 366– Department of Transportation. requirements must be developed to 2992, facsimile (202) 366–3820, ACTION: accommodate new technologies. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking electronic mail As stated in the recent denial (61 FR (NPRM). ‘‘[email protected]’’. Please note 14044) on the first SAE petition to that comments should be sent to the update references to SAE standards, SUMMARY: In response to a petition from docket section rather than faxed to the NHTSA is considering how best to Prospects Corporation (Prospects), this contact persons. cooperate with SAE. The Agency has document proposes to amend Standard compiled and will provide on request, 118, Power-Operated Window, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: a reference document containing all the Partition, and Roof Panel Systems, to I. Background SAE and other organizations’ standards accommodate power windows, that are directly referenced in FMVSS partitions, and roof panels which Standard No. 118 regulates the safety No. 108. The immediate effect is to automatically reverse when closing if an of power windows, partitions, and roof make it easier for all interested parties, infrared system detects an object in or panels. For the sake of simplicity, and especially lighting and vehicle near the path of the closing window, because NHTSA anticipates that this personnel, to have available the partition, or panel. Since infrared proposal would primarily affect power requirements in the Federal lighting systems may fail to detect an object the windows, the agency collectively refers standard. The agency recognizes the size of a very young child’s finger, but to these three systems as ‘‘power problem of finding older SAE standards, can detect the child’s hand, the agency windows’’ in the preamble. However, and takes this action as a short term is proposing to test those systems using the proposed changes apply equally to solution to solve that problem. Together, a rod representing the side profile of a powered partitions and roofs. The this document of referenced standards child’s hand. The proposal also standard addresses the threat to and the current version of FMVSS No. specifies the infrared reflectance of the unsupervised children of being 108 will provide our customers with as rods used for testing those systems. This strangled or suffering limb-crushing current a version of the lighting document also proposes to amend the injuries by closing power windows. standard as is reasonable. requirements for systems that stop the Originally, the standard required that As a longer term solution, the Agency window, partition, or panel before an the activation of power windows be looks to SAE and our regulated partners appendage or other body part could linked to an ignition interlock. The to help find ways to make the more become trapped by it by eliminating the standard prohibited the activation of recent SAE documents be more requirement that those systems reverse power windows unless the ignition key acceptable from a regulatory burden and after stopping. Reversal is not necessary was in the ignition and turned to the motor vehicle safety perspective, and to unless there is a risk that a person may ‘‘on’’, ‘‘start’’ or ‘‘accessory’’ position, be longer lasting in their value. Thus, become trapped. In addition, this based on the presumption that this the agency will be favorably inclined to document requests comment on the precondition would ensure that a driver Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28125 was present to supervise children. semi-rigid cylindrical rod from 4 mm to detector receives a constant background Making the presence of the ignition key 200 mm in diameter * * *’’ The test level of infrared radiation reflected by a precondition to power window procedure specified a range of rods to the inside of the vehicle. In this activation also ensured that the driver is represent portions of a person’s body, situation, the window may safely close. provided with a simple means of ranging in size from infant fingers to However, when a child’s hand, for disabling the power windows of a juvenile heads, inserted in the window example, approaches the window, the parked vehicle, i.e., key removal. The openings. This procedure addressed the hand reflects a certain amount of power windows of most vehicles are fundamental safety problem in terms of additional radiation from the emitter to still linked to an ignition interlock. the level of squeezing force thought to the detector. The detector senses the Over the years, the standard has been be injurious. It allowed for contact with increase and electronically reverses the amended to permit power window a test rod if reversal is triggered before window even before the child’s hand closing in situations in which the key is the window exerts the injurious reaches the plane of the window. not in the ignition, but the existence of squeezing force on the test rod. Upon To work well under the variety of adult supervision could be presumed for reversal, the window was required to foreseeable circumstances, an infrared other reasons. In the most recent open for the purpose of allowing easy reflectance system must be sufficiently rulemaking, in 1991, NHTSA responded extrication of a trapped head. sensitive to detect a variety of materials. to the interest of manufacturers in At the time of the most recent Different materials (e.g., skin, hair, offering remote controls for window amendment, automatic reversal systems cloth, plastic) have characteristic closing. 56 FR 15290. In doing so, the for power windows did not exist on U.S. abilities to reflect infrared radiation, a agency was mindful that the vehicles. The most detailed comments property called reflectance. The amount unrestricted allowance of remote on the amendment seemed to indicate of radiation reflected is affected by the controls, especially ones that activated companies were contemplating reversal wavelength of the radiation, the angle of windows using radio frequency signals systems triggered by force measurement. incidence of the radiation, the color and which can penetrate obstructing walls, NHTSA assumed that manufacturers texture of the material, and the amount could pose a danger to child occupants would produce power window reversal of surface area exposed. because the person activating the systems based on force sensing Since the standard currently does not window might not be able to see a child technology. specify the infrared reflectance of the in the window opening. Therefore, in an The development of automatic test rods, it cannot adequately assess the effort to ensure the presence of a reversal systems has not proceeded as safety of an automatic window reversal supervising person, the agency amended NHTSA anticipated. NHTSA currently system based on infrared reflectance. the standard to permit power windows is not aware of any force sensing Use of a test rod with a higher to be operable through the use of remote systems currently being certified to meet reflectance than that of a child’s hand controls only if the controls had a very FMVSS No. 118, suggesting that the might allow a system to pass NHTSA’s limited range, i.e., not more than 6 m. manufacturers that had been compliance test even though that system A longer range, up to 11 m, was considering force sensing systems may might not be sufficiently sensitive to permitted for controls that were have found them to be undesirable or detect a child’s hand placed in or near operable only if there were an impractical. the window opening. Therefore, the unobstructed line of sight between the NHTSA also sought to allow the use agency has tentatively decided that the control and the vehicle. of proximity sensing systems by test procedure should be changed to In addition, the agency reasoned that allowing automatic reversal systems that specify the aspects of the test rods that its provisions permitting the remote reversed the power window at any time are necessary for testing the compliance control of a power window need not be before contact with the test rods. The of infrared reflectance-based systems. premised on the likely existence of agency attempted to word carefully the In proposing to amend the standard to supervision if the window were provisions regarding non-contact provide for better testing of non-contact equipped with an automatic reversal systems so as to avoid discouraging systems based on infrared reflectance, system. If the window closing system their development. A commenter on the NHTSA recognizes that in the future itself could sense the child’s hand or 1991 amendment also indicated interest there may be non-contact systems based head when it became trapped between in developing reversal systems triggered on still other principles. However, the the window and the window frame, and by the blockage of light by the child’s agency cannot propose to amend the thereupon stop and reverse to release body (the principle used by automatic standard to address those systems until the child, then supervision would not reversal mechanisms on some garage their underlying principles are be required. Therefore, the agency also doors with remote controls). identified and adequately defined. established a provision permitting Accordingly, the agency drafted a test II. Size of the Target Inboard of the power windows equipped with an procedure that satisfactorily tests non- automatic reversal system to be closed contact systems based on this principle. Window Plane in any manner (e.g., with or without a The test procedure is less appropriate The standard currently specifies key) desired by the manufacturer. It also for non-contact systems based on other information about the sizes of the test permitted remote controls of principles. Prospects Corporation has rods that are appropriate for testing unrestricted range as well as new developed a non-contact automatic contact-based systems for compliance. products, such as devices to open and window reversal system which can The standard requires that the reversal close windows automatically in detect the proximity of some portion of system protect portions of a person’s response to heat and rain, since they a person’s body by sensing the reflection body, as represented by test rods would be made safe by the automatic (instead of the blockage) of infrared light ranging from 4 mm (about the size of an reversal system. by a passenger’s body. In Prospect’s infant’s finger) to 200 mm (about the To qualify as an automatic reversal system, there are an infrared emitter and size of a child’s head) in diameter. system, a system had to reverse a power a detector within the interior of the Typical placements of the test rods are window, either before the window vehicle that are not aligned with one illustrated in drawings showing contacted, or before it exerted ‘‘a another. When no object is present in or cylinders placed in various window and squeezing force of 100 newtons on a near the plane of the window, the roof openings. The illustrations show 28126 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules the portion of the rods inside the reasonably conservative estimate. 1 of the petitioner’s report. The vehicle passenger compartment (the Newborn babies with somewhat smaller apparatus projected infrared light on the portion that would be used as a handle hands would be incapable of raising skin or material sample and received the by the person conducting the test) as themselves up into an exposed position, reflected (or scattered) light at an equal having the same diameter as the portion and even the smallest hands would angle of reflection. The angle of in the plane of the window. The present a target wider than 15 mm in incidence was 16 degrees. The distance standard requires that the part of the test most orientations. Therefore, the test from the source to the sample, and the rod exposed to window contact be rods inside the window should not be distance from the sample to the light protected over the full range of test less than 15 mm in diameter to provide sensor, was the same, about 135 mm. diameters. There is no distinction made a representative test of proximity The light reaching the sensor was for the length or minimum diameter of sensing devices. Although the petitioner measured with and without the sample the part of the test rod inboard of the suggested a hand-shaped test rod, the in place, so that the light reflected from window plane, even though the cross use of cylindrical rods as targets the sample holder could be discounted. section of an infant’s hand is larger than remains desirable because it is easier to Although the light reaching the sensor 4 mm. manufacture and removes the need to can be thought of as having been Because it does not specify the size of consider the orientation of the target reflected by the sample, it arrives by the the portion of the test rods that is along its axis. combination of reflection from the inboard of the window (the area in or surface of the sample and scattering by near the plane of the window when it III. Reflectance of the Target the texture of the sample. Since both the is closed), the existing standard does not A. Testing Methods test apparatus and any in-vehicle specify one of the most important test devices that might be produced measure conditions for the reflective proximity NHTSA also considered what level of the sum of reflection and scatter, there detection scheme used by the petitioner. reflectance would appropriately is no need to distinguish between the The petitioner’s system provides represent the clothed and unclothed two mechanisms which result in light reflective proximity detection by hands and arms of young children. reaching the sensor. Therefore, the term projecting infrared light across the Reflectance is the ratio of the intensity ‘‘reflection’’ is used below in a broad inboard surface of the window, and of the light (measured by a detector as sense to refer to all light reaching the using a sensor to detect the amount of energy) reflected by the surface of a sensor as a consequence of the presence light that is reflected by objects in the material to that of the light that strikes of the sample. zone immediately inboard of the the surface of the material. An NHTSA’s test procedures should be as window. In the case of a child’s hand in important objective of this proposal is to general and as design-independent as or reaching toward the window, the determine a reasonable value of possible, to avoid restricting vehicle smallest object from the standpoint of reflectance for the test rods that NHTSA manufacturers’ choices. Prospects’ tests reflective detection would be the hand, will use in compliance testing. The level compared the infrared reflectance of and not one of the fingers. of reflectance that NHTSA is proposing various portions of a person’s body and Prospects stated that its system may is based on experimental data the clothing materials and found relative fail to detect the presence of the petitioner submitted (Prospects’ report reflectance relationships that ought to smallest rod, which is intended to on the reflectance of skin and clothing hold true for infrared reflectance-based represent an infant’s finger. However, is available in rulemaking docket detection systems in general. However, the petitioner believes that in reality its number 87–10; Notice No. 6). NHTSA the absolute numerical results (in terms system would always protect infant believes that the data generated by of microwatts of power received by the fingers because it would detect the Prospect’s laboratory test apparatus can sensor) are specific to the particular test infant’s hand. The petitioner suggested be applied generally to in-vehicle apparatus used by Prospects. NHTSA that the test rods be shaped like an detection systems based on infrared discussed with the petitioner the need infant’s hand (measured across the reflectance, and requests comment on to express the infrared reflective palm) with a width of 28 mm. this assumption. properties of skin and other material in NHTSA agrees with the petitioner that Prospect’s petition gave little detailed terms that are not specific to a particular it is not appropriate to test the information on reflectance. Therefore, light source and sensor. petitioner’s device with a finger-sized NHTSA asked the petitioner to address A reasonable solution was found in target that is not connected with a the question of reflectance in more the use of a high reflectance mirror as representation of a hand, but does not detail. Because color affects reflectance, a comparison medium. A mirror that agree with the use of a full hand width- the reflective properties of skin of reflects 99.99 percent of infrared light size target. The infant could hold the different shades and colors was of was mounted in the apparatus as a palm of its hand on edge, i.e., in a plane obvious importance, and the effect of sample. The presence of the mirror parallel to the direction of the infrared color was also addressed by the caused the infrared sensor to receive 47 radiation, and extend its finger. petitioner. NHTSA also asked the microwatts. The power measured with Therefore, to provide the minimum petitioner to investigate whether gloves the sample materials was divided by realistic reflective cross section, the and other clothing would be more this power and the resulting ratio was hand should be represented with its full difficult to detect than bare skin. multiplied by 100 percent to produce a thickness (measured from the palm to The petitioner responded by value that is characteristic of each the back of the hand) providing providing measurements of the infrared sample. When normalized by the mirror reflection to the sensor. light reflected from human skin and a measurement in this way, the skin and NHTSA tentatively concludes that a large variety of leathers and fabrics. The material measurements become reasonable worst-case dimension for measurements were conducted with an independent of the power, beam size targets inboard of the plane of the apparatus incorporating an infrared and dispersion of the light source and window is 15 mm. The petitioner light source (nominal wavelength 950 the size and sensitivity of the infrared reports a thickness of at least 15 mm in nanometers (nm)) and a light sensor of sensor. the edge view of a 15 month old infant’s the type used in the prototype window This method of normalizing the hand. The agency considers this to be a reversal system appearing in Appendix power measurements also has the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28127 benefit of producing results of general infrared skin reflection is not very her palm, and a child leaning into the utility, regardless of the size of the sensitive to common variables including vehicle so that his or her head is in the sample. The sensitivity of the the lack of ‘‘flatness’’ of hand samples. window would certainly be detected reflectance determination to changes in This validates the ability of the infrared and protected. the light path length of the apparatus is reflectance proximity sensor to detect its However, it would be possible for a low because measurements using the primary target, skin. It is also person willfully to ‘‘fool’’ the detector sample and the mirror would be affected encouraging that most clothing by placing just the tip of a finger on the in the same proportion by a change in materials appear to improve the infrared outside upper edge of the window as it light path length. Therefore, the length reflectance of the body. However, at shuts. In that location, the finger tip of the light path need not be specified. least one common material would could be shielded from the infrared However, NHTSA is specifying the reduce the reflectance of the body by emitter. (Recall that this situation is angles of incidence and reflection to be two thirds. possible only for persons outside the used when determining the reflectance NHTSA is proposing a minimum vehicle because fingers of a vehicle of test rods, in order to avoid changes reflectance of 0.7 percent for the test occupant cannot get to the pinch points in the relative composition of reflected rods. This is a conservative value which without exposing the hand to detection.) and scattered light from textured equals the minimum reflectance of black The most likely occasion for such abuse samples. The agency notes that cotton/polyester. That material had the involves a child inside the vehicle specifying these angles does not restrict lowest reflectance in Prospects’ operating the windows in playing vehicle design in any way, but only experiment. Bare skin, at about 2–3 ‘‘chicken’’ with another child outside defines the parameters to be used when percent reflectance, is three times more the vehicle. producing test rods. detectable. The agency recognizes the possibility Manufacturers should have little of abuse of the system but believes that B. Test Results difficulty producing test rods with the the possibility is not serious enough to In order to test skin for reflectance proper reflectance. The reflectance of warrant declining to facilitate the use of values, Prospects had different people the surface material of NHTSA’s test power window systems with infrared place their hands against the back of the rods would be tested using an apparatus sensors. This belief is based on the sample holder. The skin of White, Black similar to the one used by Prospects. assumption that manufacturers would and Asian persons was measured at the However, as discussed above, there is not make automatic window closing back of the hand and at the palm. Three considerable flexibility in the possible in the absence of the ignition individuals of each race were measured. construction of the test apparatus. Only key except possibly for rain protection The macro-texture of the palms and the wavelength of the source and the or for a limited time after key removal. backs of hands can be presumed to angles of incidence and reflection NHTSA requests comments on the affect the relative contribution of would need to be kept constant. validity of this assumption. In addition, reflection and scatter. The range of children who can reach the top of the IV. Protection of Persons Outside the reflectance from the palms of hands was window from the ground are old enough Vehicle from 2.43 to 2.96 percent, and the range to possess some level of experience and for the skin on the back of the hand was Since paragraph S5 of Standard No. judgment, and a very slight withdrawal from 2.04 to 2.83 percent. The total 118 relieves power windows systems motion is all that is necessary for self- range of 2.04 to 2.96 percent for with automatic reversal from the protection. differences between races, individuals presence-of-supervision-assuring and hand orientation was very small restrictions of S4, NHTSA should V. Presumption of Supervision compared to that of common fabrics, as consider whether protection is provided Although not raised in the petition can be seen from the following results. for a person who is outside the vehicle submitted by Prospects, many callers to In response to NHTSA’s concern and is reaching toward or into the this agency have expressed certain about the reflectance of various skin vehicle. It cannot be assumed that an reservations about the safety of the coverings, Prospects tested thirty-seven infrared proximity detector will operate existing standard. Accordingly, NHTSA samples comprising various colors, on objects shielded by window glass, is using this document to take the textures and types of fabric and leather, thus only portions of a person’s body opportunity to request comments on including wool, silk, cotton, polyester, inside the window would be capable of these concerns. This is especially and a 35 percent cotton/65 percent triggering it under this proposal. appropriate in light of the consideration polyester blend. The range of reflectance There are a number of reasons to that the agency is giving to making the of the fabric and leather samples was believe that this is not a great danger. standard more permissive. from 0.70 to 6.09 percent. With the Small children inside vehicles can reach The safety of children depends on exception of three samples, the fabrics the pinch points (the area where the driver supervision when power and leathers were more reflective than window and window frame meet) by windows close in the modes permitted skin. The worst case was a black cotton/ standing on the seat, but a child by section S4. However, there are some polyester material which reflected about standing on the ground outside the design possibilities not prohibited by S4 1⁄3 the amount of infrared light reflected vehicle must be considerably older and that can reduce either the likelihood or by human skin. Figure 8 of the taller to reach most pinch points. The the effectiveness of driver supervision. petitioner’s report summarizes the range agency expects that even the single bare The standard allows window closing of material reflectance (Docket No. 87– finger of a child of that size would be with the ignition key in the ‘‘accessory’’, 10; Notice No. 6). The large variety of detected. Even if a bare finger is much as well as in the ‘‘on’’ and ‘‘start’’ skin and potential skin-covering smaller than the proposed test rod positions. Drivers may be tempted to materials Prospects tested appears to diameter of 15 mm, it would likely be leave unattended children in a vehicle provide a good representation of detected because the reflectance of skin with the key in the ‘‘accessory’’ position foreseeable detection targets. is so much greater than the proposed in order to operate the vent fan or the The narrow range of reflectance for test rod. A child holding the edge of the radio, thus failing to maintain skin despite differences in individuals, window would offer an even larger supervision of the power windows. races, and part of body indicates that target for detection, the width of his or Drivers need to supervise children in 28128 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules the rear seat, but vehicles are not extending from the window frame 100 devices operating at wavelengths of 950 required to have a driver controlled mm into the opening and extending nm +/- 100 nm. Is there any evidence lock-out of the rear power windows. horizontally inboard into the interior of that significantly different reflectance Many vehicles are designed to avoid the vehicle 50 mm from the interior properties would be manifested within these potential problems, but designs surface of the closed window would that narrow range of infrared that exceed the safety standard are not probably be sufficient to prevent wavelengths? Would a two hundred universal. Is the presumption of trapping by halting the window alone. nanometer range be sufficient to avoid supervision a valid one? Therefore, NHTSA proposes that non- unduly restricting manufacturer’s Some callers have questioned the contact window systems which detect choice of equipment? Is there any safety of a convenience feature that they proximity of persons over such a large reason to believe that manufacturers say some manufacturers are offering, interior space, thereby halting the would prefer to have infrared devices i.e., an ‘‘express up’’ closing mode, window before the person enters the operating at different parts of the which requires only a momentary pinch zone, be relieved of the necessity infrared spectrum? Are there any data switch contact rather than continuous of reversing as well. showing that devices in other areas of activation to close the window. No It is not necessary for non-contact the spectrum would provide an caller reported any injuries associated systems to detect the proximity of equivalent level of safety? with this feature. NHTSA is aware of persons over such a large range of space D. Would the 16 degree angle of such systems on a few of the most to prevent injury. Even a system incidence/reflection used in the expensive German cars. In all of these sensitive in a narrow zone only a few Prospects study be appropriate for cases, the express-up windows are also millimeters below the window frame testing the reflectance of materials? Are equipped with automatic reversal would prevent contact. However, a there any data indicating that the angle (although these reversal systems may window whose detection system has is critical to the strength of either the not pass the requirements of FMVSS No. such limited sensitivity must be able to reflection or scattering components of 118). It is possible that part of the reverse to avoid the possibility of the detected light? Are other angles interest by vehicle manufacturers in trapping a child’s head. more appropriate? infrared proximity detectors is E. NHTSA is proposing that VII. Questions for Commenters motivated by a desire to assure the compliance testing be done in direct safety of express-up windows. If the A. The proposed test rods would sunlight so that the in-vehicle sensors agency proceeds to a final rule, the combine a reasonable worst case target are exposed to the highest possible agency will consider while writing the size (15 mm) with a reasonable worst background ‘‘noise’’ level of extraneous forthcoming final rule whether to case reflectance (0.7 percent). If there is infrared light. This should make the test propose that express-up operation of an even more appropriate combination more demanding because small windows, other than the driver’s, of factors, please explain what these differences in the amount of infrared should be excluded from the closing factors are and why they are better than radiation reaching the detector should modes of S4, which presume driver the proposed factors. If one considers be harder to perceive against a higher supervision and, by implication, some the target size of 15 mm as indicative of background level. NHTSA requests level of control. These thoughts are bare limbs, would a maximum comment on whether this is a valid offered in the questions to commenters reflectance of 1 percent be adequate? A assumption and whether other below to guide possible future reflectance of 1 percent is half the extraneous factors can affect the safe rulemaking. reflectance of skin and thus would functioning of such in-vehicle infrared provide a factor of safety of 2 relative to detection systems. VI. Need for Reversal bare skin. Is the proposed 0.7 percent F. The safety of children depends on The existing standard requires that reflectance (a factor of safety of 3) driver supervision when power closing power windows halt to avoid necessary to ensure that persons outside windows close in the modes permitted applying excessive squeezing force on a the vehicle are adequately protected? by section S4. The standard allows passenger, and then reverse their travel B. Can prototype infrared proximity window closing with the ignition key in to release the person. The reversing systems detect a target combining the the ‘‘accessory’’, as well as in the ‘‘on’’ requirement is necessary when the worst case size (15 mm) and worst case and ‘‘start’’ positions. Drivers may be halting of a window is triggered by a reflectance (0.7 percent) at all points tempted to leave unattended children in force measurement because, otherwise, near the frame of a large side window? a vehicle with the key in the the squeezed person might remain Would its performance be hindered by ‘‘accessory’’ position in order to operate trapped by the window. bright sunlight or other infrared the vent fan or the radio, failing to Although the petitioner did not sources? What other factors might limit maintain supervision of the power question the application of the reversal the effectiveness of infrared systems? windows. Drivers need to supervise requirement to a window equipped with How should the agency guard against children in the rear seat, but vehicles an infrared sensor, it appears that it may the effects of those factors? are not required to have a driver not be necessary to apply the C. The information submitted to the controlled lock-out of the rear power requirement to all infrared sensing agency concerning the reflectance of windows. Many vehicles are designed to systems since most of these systems skin and the relative reflectance of skin avoid these potential problems. What would detect objects in a large zone and and clothing was obtained using current production vehicles have power would ensure safety by merely halting. infrared light of a nominal 950 nm window operation with the key in the Devices which halt power windows by wavelength. While the agency ‘‘accessory’’ position or have rear power detecting limbs and heads interior to the endeavors to make standards as simple windows without a driver controlled plane of the powered window opening and general as possible, it has no basis lock-out? Do they present safety and in a wide detection area around the to assume that this reflectance problems needing regulatory attention? pinch zone will halt the windows before information is applicable to infrared Is there any evidence of a safety the body enters the pinch zone, light of significantly different problem? eliminating the possibility of trapping. wavelengths. Therefore, the proposed G. The standard does not regulate the A three-dimensional detection zone compliance tests are limited to infrared express-up closing mode which requires Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28129 only a momentary switch contact rather information collection associated with at the above address both before and than continuous activation to close the this proposed rule. after that date. To the extent possible, window. Should windows that have the comments filed after the closing date D. Executive Order 12612 (Federalism) express-up operation be prohibited from will also be considered. Comments closing in the modes specified in S4, NHTSA has analyzed this proposal in received too late for consideration in which presume driver supervision? accordance with the principles and regard to the final rule will be What production vehicles, if any, have criteria contained in E.O. 12612, and considered as suggestions for further express-up window operation and on has determined that this proposed rule rulemaking action. Comments on the which windows is it applied? Is there would not have sufficient federalism proposal will be available for inspection any evidence that express-up windows implications to warrant the preparation in the docket. NHTSA will continue to represent a safety problem? of a Federalism Assessment. file relevant information as it becomes NHTSA is proposing to make the E. Civil Justice Reform available in the docket after the closing proposed amendments effective 30 days date, and it is recommended that after publication of a final rule. This proposed rule would not have interested persons continue to examine Compliance with the requirements any retroactive effect. Under 49 U.S.C. the docket for new material. would be required by manufacturer’s 30103, whenever a Federal motor Those persons desiring to be notified offering infrared reflectance-based vehicle safety standard is in effect, a upon receipt of their comments in the window systems on the same date. State may not adopt or maintain a safety rules docket should enclose a self- NHTSA believes that there would be standard applicable to the same aspect addressed, stamped postcard in the good cause for such an effective date of performance which is not identical to envelope with their comments. Upon since the amendments would not the Federal standard, except to the receiving the comments, the docket impose any new requirements but extent that the state requirement supervisor will return the postcard by instead relieve a restriction. imposes a higher level of performance mail. and applies only to vehicles procured VIII. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices for the State’s use. 49 U.S.C. 30161 sets List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571 A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT forth a procedure for judicial review of Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor Regulatory Policies and Procedures final rules establishing, amending or vehicles. revoking Federal motor vehicle safety In consideration of the foregoing, it is This rulemaking document was not standards. That section does not require proposed that 49 CFR part 571 be reviewed under E.O. 12866, ‘‘Regulatory submission of a petition for amended as follows: Planning and Review.’’ This action has reconsideration or other administrative been determined to be ‘‘non-significant’’ proceedings before parties may file suit PART 571ÐFEDERAL MOTOR under the Department of in court. VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS Transportation’s regulatory policies and procedures. The proposed amendments IX. Submission of Comments 1. The authority citation for part 571 would not impose any new Interested persons are invited to of Title 49 would continue to read as requirements, but simply provide submit comments on the proposal. It is follows: additional detail to the test procedures requested but not required that 10 Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, so that a new technology may be tested, copies be submitted. 30117, and 30166; delegation of authority at thus allowing manufacturers to certify Comments must not exceed 15 pages 49 CFR 1.50. vehicles employing these technologies in length (See 49 CFR 553.21). 2. Section 571.118 would be amended as meeting the existing requirements. Necessary attachments may be as follows: Therefore, the impacts of the proposed appended to these submissions without a. S3 is amended by adding a new amendments would be so minor that a regard to the 15-page limit. This definition in alphabetical order. full regulatory evaluation is not limitation is intended to encourage b. S5 is revised. required. commenters to detail their primary c. S6 is added. arguments in a concise fashion. d. Figure 2 is added to the end of the B. Regulatory Flexibility Act If a commenter wishes to submit section, following Figure 1. NHTSA has also considered the certain information under a claim of The additions and revisions would impacts of this notice under the confidentiality, three copies of the read as follows: Regulatory Flexibility Act. I hereby complete submission, including certify that this proposed rule would not purportedly confidential business § 571.118 Standard No. 118; Power- have a significant economic impact on information, should be submitted to the operated window, partition, and roof panel systems. a substantial number of small entities. Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the street As explained above, the rule would not address given above, and seven copies * * * * * impose any new requirements but from which the purportedly confidential S3. Definitions. would instead relieve a restriction information has been deleted should be * * * * * resulting from a lack of specificity in the submitted to the Docket Section. A Infrared reflectance means the ratio of current requirements. The infrared request for confidentiality should be intensity of infrared light reflected and sensing technologies that may be accompanied by a cover letter setting scattered by a flat sample of the test rod permitted as a result of this proposal are forth the information specified in the material, to the intensity of infrared only likely to be offered on a small agency’s confidential business light incident on that material, as number of vehicles produced by major information regulation. See 49 CFR Part measured by the apparatus shown in automobile manufacturers. 512. Figure 2. All comments received before the * * * * * C. Paperwork Reduction Act close of business on the comment S5. (a) A power operated window, In accordance with the Paperwork closing date indicated above for the partition, or roof panel system that Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–511), proposal will be considered, and will be meets the requirements in paragraphs there are no requirements for available for examination in the docket (1) through (2)(iii) may close in 28130 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules circumstances other than those (c) If a vehicle uses the principle of (1) Test rods are of cylindrical shape specified in S4— proximity detection by infrared in the range of diameter from 4 mm to (1) Except as specified in S5(b), while reflection to halt the powered window, 200 mm, except that a single 15 mm closing, the window, partition or roof partition, or roof panel before it contacts diameter rod shall be used to test power panel system must halt and reverse the test rod, the infrared source shall window, partition, or sunroof systems direction either before project infrared light at a nominal that detect the proximity of a test rod (i) Contacting, or wavelength of not less than 850 and not using infrared reflectance. (ii) Exerting a squeezing force of 100 more than 1050 nm. newtons or more on a semi-rigid (2) For testing power window, S6. Test procedures for determining partition, or sunroof systems that detect cylindrical rod that has the properties compliance with S5. described in S6(b), and that is placed contact with the test rod, the force- (a)(1) For testing power window, through the window, partition or roof deflection ratio of the test rod is not less partition, or sunroof systems designed panel system opening at any location, in than 65 N/mm for a rod 25 mm or to detect contact with the test rod, place the manner described in S6(a); and smaller in diameter, and not less than the test rod through the window, (2) Upon such reversal, the window, 20 N/mm for a rod larger than 25 mm partition or roof panel system must partition, or roof panel opening from the in diameter. inside of the vehicle such that the open to one of the following positions, (3) For testing power window, at the manufacturer’s option: cylindrical surface of the rod contacts any part of the structure with which the partition, or sunroof systems that detect (i) A position that is at least as open the proximity of the test rod using as the position at the time closing was window, partition, or roof panel mates. infrared reflectance, the test rod shall initiated; Typical placements of test rods are meet the following requirements: (ii) A position that is not less than 125 illustrated in Figure 1. Attempt to shut millimeters more open than the position the power window, partition, or roof (i) The infrared reflectance of the rod at the time the window reversed panel. surface material is not less than 0.7 direction; or (2) For testing power window, percent, when measured using the (iii) A position that permits a semi- partition, or sunroof systems designed apparatus shown in Figure 2. to detect the proximity of the test rod rigid cylindrical rod that is 200 mm in (ii) The infrared reflectance of the rod diameter to be placed through the using infrared reflectance and to halt the surface material is measured using a flat opening at the same contact point(s) as powered window, partition, or roof sample and an infrared light source and the rod described in S5(a)(1). panel before it contacts the test rod, this sensor operating at a nominal (b) A closing window, partition, or test is conducted with the vehicle in roof panel system need not reverse direct sunlight. Place a stationary test wavelength of 950 nm. direction as required in S5(a)(1) if it can rod anywhere in the window, partition, (iii) The intensity of incident infrared halt upon entry of any portion of a 15 or roof panel opening, with the window, light is determined using a mirror of mm cylindrical test rod at any location partition, or roof panel in any position. nominally 100 percent reflectance within a zone bounded by: Attempt to close the window, partition, mounted in place of the sample. or roof panel. Remove the test rod. Fully (i) The interior surface of the closed (iv) Measurements of the test rod window, partition, or roof panel, open the window, partition, or roof surface sample and the mirror are (ii) A surface 50 mm inboard of that panel and then begin to close it. While corrected to remove the contribution of surface, the window, partition, or roof panel is infrared light reflected and scattered (iii) The portion of the window, closing, move a test rod so that it from the sample holder and other parts partition, or roof panel frame that the approaches the window, partition, or window, partition, or roof panel closes roof panel, or its frame, in any of the apparatus before the computation against, and orientation from the interior of the of the ratio. (iv) A surface 100 mm from that part vehicle. * * * * * of the frame. (b) Test rods. BILLING CODE 4910±59±P Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Proposed Rules 28131

Issued on: May 29, 1996. Barry Felrice, Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards. [FR Doc. 96–13864 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910±59±C 28132

Notices Federal Register Vol. 61, No. 108

Tuesday, June 4, 1996

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER All comments will be summarized Alimentarius Commission (Codex), in contains documents other than rules or and included in the request for Office of accordance with section 491 of the proposed rules that are applicable to the Management and Budget approval of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as public. Notices of hearings and investigations, information collection. All comments amended by the Uruguay Round committee meetings, agency decisions and will become a matter of public record. Agreements Act, Pub. L. 103–465, 108 rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stat. 4809 (1994), and seeks comments statements of organization and functions are Alan M. Rich, (703) 305–2113. on standards currently under examples of documents appearing in this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: consideration and recommendations for section. Title: Report of the Child and Adult new standards. It also lists other Care Food Program. standard-setting activities of Codex, OMB Number: 0584–0078. including commodity standards, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Expiration Date: August 31, 1996. guidelines, codes of practice, and Type of Request: Extension of a revised texts. This notice covers the Food and Consumer Service currently approved collection. time periods from June 1, 1995, to May Abstract: The Child and Adult Care 31, 1996, and May 31, 1996, to June 1, Agency Information Collection Food Program is mandated by Section 1997. Activities: Proposed Collection; 17 of the National School Lunch Act, as ADDRESSES: Submit written comments Comment RequestÐReport of the amended (42 U.S.C. § 1766). Program to: FSIS Docket Clerk, U.S. Department Child and Adult Care Food Program implementing regulations are contained of Agriculture, Food Safety and AGENCY: Food and Consumer Service, in 7 CFR Part 226. In accordance with Inspection Service, Room 4352, South USDA. Section 226.7(d), State agencies must Agriculture Building, Washington, DC ACTION: Notice. submit a monthly report of program 20250–3700. Please state that your activity in order to receive Federal comments refer to Codex and, if your SUMMARY: In accordance with the reimbursement for meals served to comments relate to specific Codex Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the eligible participants. committees, please identify those Food and Consumer Service (FCS) is Respondents: State agencies that committees in your comments and publishing for public comment a administer the Child and Adult Care submit a copy of your comments to the summary of a proposed information Food Program. Delegate from that particular committee. collection. The proposed collection is Number of Respondents: 53. All comments submitted in response to an extension of a collection currently Estimated Number of Responses per the standard-setting activities of Codex approved for the Child and Adult Care Respondent: The number of responses will be available for public inspection in Food Program. includes initial, revised, and final the Docket Clerk’s Office between 8:30 DATES: Comments on this notice must be reports submitted each month. The a.m. and 1 p.m., and 2 p.m. and 4:30 received by August 5, 1996 to be overall average is three submissions per p.m., Monday through Friday. assured of consideration. State agency per reporting month for a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan ADDRESSES: Send comments and total of 36 per year. Mondschein, Confidential Assistant to requests for copies of this information Estimate of Burden: Public reporting the Administrator, U.S. Department of collection to Alan Rich, Acting Chief, burden for this collection of information Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Data Base Monitoring Branch, Program is estimated to average three hours per Service, Room 1763, South Agriculture Information Division, Food and respondent. Building, 14th & Independence Avenue, Consumer Service, USDA, 3101 Park Estimated Total Annual Burden on SW., Washington, DC 20250–3700; (202) Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302. Respondents: 5,724 hours. 720–7323. For information pertaining to Comments are invited on: (a) Whether Date May 24, 1996. particular committees, the delegate of the proposed collection of information William E. Ludwig, that committee may be contacted. (A complete list of U.S. delegates and is necessary for the proper performance Administrator, Food and Consumer Service. alternate delegates can be found in of the functions of FCS, including [FR Doc. 96–13834 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] whether the information will have Appendix 1 to this notice.) BILLING CODE 3410±30±U practical utility; (b) the accuracy of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FCS’s estimate of the burden of the Background proposed collection of information Food Safety and Inspection Service including the validity of the The World Trade Organization (WTO) methodology and assumptions used; (c) [Docket No. 96±018N] was established on January 1, 1995, as ways to enhance the quality, utility, and the common international institutional clarity of the information to be International Standard-Setting framework for the conduct of trade collected; and (d) ways to minimize the Activities relations among its members in matters burden of the collection of information AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection related to the Uruguay Round on those who are to respond, including Service, USDA. Agreements. The WTO is the successor through the use of appropriate, ACTION: Notice. organization to the General Agreements automated, electronic, mechanical, or on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). U.S. other technological collection SUMMARY: This notice informs the public membership in the WTO was approved techniques or other forms of information of the sanitary and phytosanitary by Congress when it enacted the technology. standard-setting activities of the Codex Uruguay Round Agreements Act, which Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28133 was signed into law by the President on a. A description of the consideration Appendix 3. Definitions for the Purpose December 8, 1994. Pursuant to section or planned consideration of the of Codex Alimentarius 491 of the Trade Agreements Act of standard; Appendix 4. (A) Uniform Procedure for 1979, as amended, the President is b. Whether the United States is the Elaboration of Codex Standards participating or plans to participate in required to designate an agency to be and Related Texts; (B) Uniform the consideration of the standard; responsible for informing the public of Accelerated Procedure for the the sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) c. The agenda for United States participation, if any; and Elaboration of Codex Standards and standard-setting activities of each Related Texts international standard-setting d. The agency responsible for organization, Codex, International representing the United States with Appendix 5. Nature of Codex Standards Office of Epizootics, and the respect to the standard. Appendix 6. Provisional Agenda of the International Plant Protection TO OBTAIN COPIES OF THOSE Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Convention. The President, pursuant to STANDARDS LISTED IN THIS NOTICE Program, Executive Committee of THAT ARE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proclamation No. 6780 of March 23, Codex Alimentarius Commission, BY CODEX, PLEASE CONTACT THE 1995 (60 FR 15845), designated the U.S. 43rd Session. Geneva, Switzerland— CODEX DELEGATE OR THE OFFICE OF Department of Agriculture as the agency June, 1996 responsible for informing the public of U.S. CODEX ALIMENTARIUS. This sanitary and phytosanitary standard- notice also solicits public comment on Appendix 7. List of Standards and setting activities of each international those standards that are under Related Texts Adopted by the 21st standard-setting organization. The consideration and on recommendations Session of the Codex Alimentarius Secretary of Agriculture is delegating to for new standards. The delegate, in Commission, July, 1995 the Under Secretary for Food Safety the conjunction with the responsible Done at Washington, DC. agency, will take the comments received responsibility to inform the public of Michael R. Taylor, into account in participating in the the SPS standard-setting activities of Acting Under Secretary for Food Safety. Codex. The Acting Under Secretary for consideration of the standards and in Food Safety has, in turn, assigned the proposing matters to be considered by Codex Committee on Residues of responsibility for informing the public Codex. Veterinary Drugs in Foods to the Office of U.S. Codex Alimentarius The United States delegate will in the Food Safety and Inspection facilitate public participation in the The Codex Committee on Residues of Service (FSIS). United States Government activities Veterinary Drugs in Foods was Codex was created in 1962 by two relating to Codex Alimentarius. The established in 1986. The Committee U.N. organizations, the Food and United States delegate will maintain a determines priorities for the Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the list of individuals, groups, and consideration of residues of veterinary World Health Organization (WHO). organizations that have expressed an drugs in foods and recommends Codex is the major international interest in the activities of the Codex Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for organization for encouraging fair committees and will disseminate veterinary drugs. A Codex Maximum international trade in food and information regarding United States Limit for Residues of Veterinary Drugs protecting the health and economic delegation activities to interested (MRLVD) is the maximum concentration interests of consumers. Through parties. This information will include of residue resulting from the use of a adoption of food standards, codes of the current status of each agenda item, veterinary drug (expressed in mg/kg or practice, and other guidelines the United States Government’s position ug/kg on a fresh weight basis) that is developed by its committees and by or preliminary position on the agenda recommended by the Codex promoting their adoption and items, and the time and place of Alimentarius Commission to be legally implementation by governments, Codex planning meetings and debriefing permitted or recognized as acceptable in seeks to ensure that the world’s food meetings following Codex committee or on a food. sessions. Please notify the appropriate supply is sound, wholesome, free from An MRLVD is based on the type and adulteration, and correctly labeled. In U.S. delegate or the Office of U.S. Codex Alimentarius, West End Court Building, amount of residue considered to be the United States, the United States without any toxicological hazard for Department of Agriculture (USDA); the Room 311, Washington, DC 20250– 3700, if you would like to receive human health as expressed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI)*, or on Department of Health and Human information about specific committees. The information provided below the basis of a temporary ADI that Services (HHS), and the Environmental utilizes an additional safety factor. An Protection Agency (EPA) manage and describes the status of Codex standard- setting activities by the Codex MRLVD also takes into account other carry out U.S. Codex activities. relevant public health risks as well as As the agency responsible for Committees for the two year period from food technological aspects. informing the public of the sanitary and June 1, 1995 to June 1, 1997. In phytosanitary standard-setting activities addition, the following information is When establishing an MRLVD, of Codex, FSIS will be publishing a included with this Federal Register consideration is also given to residues notice in the Federal Register annually, notice: that occur in food of plant origin and/ setting forth the following information: Appendix 1. List of U.S. Codex Officials or the environment. Furthermore, the 1. The sanitary or phytosanitary (includes U.S. delegates and alternate MRLVD may be reduced to be consistent standards under consideration or delegates). with good practices in the use of planned for consideration; and Appendix 2. Timetable of Codex veterinary drugs and to the extent that 2. For each sanitary or phytosanitary Sessions (June 1995 through June practical and analytical methods are standard specified: 1997) available. 28134 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

US participa- Responsible Codex committee Standard Status of consideration tion/agenda agency

Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (to Levamisole ...... MRL under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA be considered at twenty-second Session step 8. of the Codex Alimentarius Commission) (CAC) Ref. Alinorm 97/31. Triclabendazole ...... MRLs under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA step 8. Carazolol ...... MRLs under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA step 5. Ceftiofur sodium ...... MRLs under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA step 5. Bovine Somatotropin ...... MRL under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA step 8. Doramectin ...... MRLs under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA step 5. Moxidectin ...... MRLs under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA step 5. Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (to Spiramycin ...... MRLs under consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA be considered at twenty-second Session step 5. of the Codex Alimentarius Commission) (CAC) Ref. Alinorm 97/31. * Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI): An estimate by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) of the amount of a veteri- nary drug, expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested daily over a lifetime without appreciable health risk (standard man=60 kg).

Food Additives and Contaminants of the Standard) to be forwarded to the addition of which to food for a The Codex Committee on Food 22nd Session of the Commission at Step technological (including organoleptic) 8; purpose in the manufacture, processing, Additives and Contaminants (CCFAC) • establishes or endorses permitted Proposed Draft General Standard for preparation, treatment, packing, maximum or guideline levels for Contaminants and Toxicants in Food, packaging, transport, or holding of such individual food additives, Annexes IV (see attached list) and V food results, or may be reasonably contaminants, and naturally occurring (Food Categorisation System to be used expected to result (directly or toxicants in food and animal feed. The in the GSC) to be forwarded to the 43rd indirectly), in it or its by-products 29th Session of the CCFAC is tentatively Session of the Executive Committee for becoming a component of or otherwise adoption at Step 5; scheduled for March 17–21, 1997, in the • affecting the characteristics of such Hague, The Netherlands. Position paper on aflatoxins at Step foods. The food additive term does not The following matters are contained 1; include ‘‘contaminants’’ or substances • Draft Maximum Level for Aflatoxin in Alinorm 97/12 and are under added to food for maintaining or M1 in Milk at Step 7; consideration by the CCFAC: • improving nutritional qualities. • Proposed Draft General Standard for Draft Codex Guideline Levels and Food Additives, Annex A (Guidelines Sampling Plans for Total Aflatoxins in The General Standard for Food for the Estimation of Appropriate Levels Peanuts at Step 6; Additives (GSFA) will set forth • of Use of Food Additives) for adoption Proposed Draft Code of Practice for maximum levels of use of food additives at Step 5; the Reduction of Aflatoxins in Raw in various foods and food categories. Materials and Supplementary Feeding The maximum levels will be based on Note: The draft standard is being stuffs for Milk-Producing Animals at developed in stages according to food the food additive provisions of Step 5; previously established Codex additive functional classes, beginning with • antioxidants and preservatives, and Position Paper on Ochratoxins at commodity standards, as well as on the stabilizers, thickeners, and sweeteners; see Step 3; use of the additives in non-standardized • attached list. Proposed Draft Standard for Lead at foods. • Specifications 1 for carmines, Step 3; and curcumin, nitrogen, phosphoric acid, • Draft Guideline Levels for Cadmium Only those food additives for which polydextrose, potassium bromate, and Lead in Cereals, Pulses and an acceptable daily intake (ADI) has potassium nitrate, potassium nitrite, Legumes at Step 6. been established by the Joint FAO/WHO sodium nitrate, and sodium nitrite will Agency Responsible: HHS/FDA. Expert Committee on Food Additives be recommended by CCFAC to the U.S. Participation: Yes. (JECFA) will be included in the general Twenty-second Session of the Codex Standard for Food Additives. The draft Commission for adoption; Food Additives and Contaminants GSFA, which is being developed in • Proposed Draft General Standard for For the purposes of Codex, a food stages, currently covers only those Contaminants and Toxicants in Food additive means any substance not JECFA-reviewed food additives that are Annexes I (Criteria for the normally consumed as a food by itself used as antioxidants, preservatives, Establishment of Maximum Levels in and not normally used as a typical stabilizers, thickeners, and sweeteners. Foods), II (Procedure for Risk ingredient in the food, whether or not it These JECFA-reviewed food additives Management Decisions), and III (Format has nutritive value, the intentional are listed in the table below.

1 Not in Step Procedure. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28135

U.S. partici- Codex committee Substance Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

(Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Acetic Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Anoxomer ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Ascorbic Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Ascorbyl Palmitate ... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Ascorbyl Stearate ..... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Benzoic Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Benzoyl Peroxide ..... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Acetylated Distarch Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Phosphate. Step 4. Acetylated Starch ..... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Acid Treated Starch Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Agar ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Alitame ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Alkaline Treated Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Starch. Step 4. Aluminum Ammo- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA nium Sulphate. Step 4. Ammonium Alginate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Amylose and Amylo- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA pectin. Step 4. Arabinogalactan ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Aspartame ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Baker's Yeast Glycan Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Bentonite ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Bleached Starch ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Brominated Vegeta- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. ble Oil. Step 4. Calcium Acetate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Butylated Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Hydroxyanisole. Step 4. Butylated Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Hydroxytoluene. Step 4. Calcium Ascorbate ... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Benzoate .... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Disodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Ethylenediaminete- Step 4. tr acetate. Calcium Hydrogen Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Sulphite. Step 4. Calcium Propionate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Alginate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Chloride ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Disodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA EDTA. Step 4. Calcium Gluconate ... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Hydroxide ... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. 28136 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

U.S. partici- Codex committee Substance Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

Calcium Lactate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Calcium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Polyphosphate. Step 4. Calcium Stearate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Sulphate ..... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Dioxide ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Carbonates ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Carob Bean Gum ..... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Carrageenan and Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Salts of Step 4. Carrageenan. Carrageenan and its Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Salts with Step 4. Polysorbate 80. Carrageenan (Includ- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA ing Furcelleran). Step 4. Catalase, Aspergillus Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA niger. Step 4. Calcium Sorbate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Calcium Sulphite ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Citric Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Dilauryl Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Thiodipropionate. Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Dimethyl Dicarbonate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Diphenyl ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Disodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Ethylenediaminete- Step 4. tr acetate. Catalase, Bovine Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Liver. Step 4. Cellulase, Aspergillus Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA niger. Step 4. Celluloses, Modified Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Chymosin, Aspergil- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA lus awamori. Step 4. Chymosin, Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Escherichia coli K± Step 4. 12. Chymosin, Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Kluveromyces Step 4. marxianus v. Lactis. Citrates ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Citric and Fatty Acids Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Esters of Glycerol. Step 4. Cyclamates ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Dextrins, White and Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Yellow, Roasted Step 4. Starch. Dicalcium Phosphate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Dioctyl Sodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Sulfosuccinate. Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Disptassium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Diphoshate. Step 4. Dipotassium Phos- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA phate. Step 4. Dipotassium Tartrate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28137

U.S. partici- Codex committee Substance Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

Disodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Diphosphate. Step 4. Disodium Phosphate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Disodium Tartrate ..... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Distarch Glycerol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Distarch Phosphate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Edible Gelatin ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Enzyme Treated Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Starches. Step 4. Ethyl Maltol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Ethylene Oxide Poly- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA mer. Step 4. Dodecyl Gallate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Erthorbic Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. p-Hydroxybenzoate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Formic Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Glucose Oxidase Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA from Aspergillus Step 4. niger. Guaiac Resin ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Hexamethylene Tet- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA ramine. Step 4. Isopropyl Citrates ..... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Ethylene Oxide-Pro- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA pylene Oxide Co- Step 4. polymer. Ferrous Sulphate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Fumaric Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Furcelleran and Salts Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA of Furcelleran. Step 4. Gellan Gum ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Glucose Oxidase, Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Aspergillus niger. Step 4. Glycerol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Glycerol Esters of Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Wood Rosin. Step 4. Glycine ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Guar Gum ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Gum Arabic ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Gum Ghatti ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Hydroxypropyl Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Distarch Adipate. Step 4. Hydroxypropyl Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Distarch Glycerol. Step 4. Hydroxyproyl Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Distarch Phos- Step 4. phate. Hyroxypropyl Starch Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Insoluble Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Polyvinylpyrrolidon- Step 4. e. 28138 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

U.S. partici- Codex committee Substance Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

Invertase ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Isomalt ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Karaya Gum ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Konjac Flour ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Lactic Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Lactic and Fatty Acid Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Esters of Glycerol. Step 4. Lactitol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Lecithin ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Lysozyme ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Magnesium Hydrox- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA ide. Step 4. Maltitol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Maltol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Malto-Lacto Bacteria, Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Leuconostoc oenos. Step 4. Mannitol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Metatartaric Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Microcystalline Cel- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA lulose. Step 4. Microparticulated Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Protein Produce. Step 4. Monocalcium Phos- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA phate. Step 4. Lysozyme ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. methyl p- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Hydroxybenzoate. Step 4. Nisin ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Octyl Gallate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Ortho-Phenylphenol Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Pectins (Amidated Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. and non-Amidated). Step 4. Peptone ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Phosphated Distarch Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Phosphate. Step 4. Phosphatidic Acid, Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Ammonium Salt. Step 4. Polydextrose ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Polyethuylene Glycol Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Polyglycerol Esters of Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Fatty Acids. Step 4. Polyglycerol Esters of Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Interesterified Ric- Step 4. inoleic Acid. Polyoxyethylene (8) Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Stearate. Step 4. Polysorbates 20, 40, Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA 60, 65, and 80. Step 4. Polyvinylpyrrolidone Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Potassium Acetate ... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28139

U.S. partici- Codex committee Substance Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

Potassium Alginate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Potassium Caseinate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Potassium Chloride Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Potassium Hydroxide Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Potassium Lactate .... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Potassium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Polyphosphate. Step 4. Potassium Sorbate ... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Powdered Cellulose Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Potassium Ascorbate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Potassium Benzoate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Potassium Hydrogen Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Sulphite. Step 4. Potassium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Metabisulphite. Step 4. Sodium Nitrite ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium o- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Phenylphenol. Step 4. Processed Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Eucheuma Sea- Step 4. weed. Propylene Glycol Al- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA ginate. Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Propylene Glycol Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Esters of Fatty Step 4. Acids. Propylene Glycol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Rapeseed Oil, Hydro- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA genated. Step 4. Rennet ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Saccharin ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Silicates ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium Alginate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium Aluminum Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Phosphate. Step 4. Sodium Caseinate .... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Hypophosphite. Step 4. Sodium Lactate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Polyphosphate. Step 4. Sodium Potassium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Tartrate. Step 4. Sodium Stearyl Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Fumarate. Step 4. Sorbitan Esters of Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Fatty Acids. Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Sorbitol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A Step 4. Sorbitol Syrup ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Starch Acetate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Starch Aluminum Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Octenyl Succinate. Step 4. 28140 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

U.S. partici- Codex committee Substance Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

Starch Sodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Octenylacetate. Step 4. Sodium Propionate ... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium Sorbate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium Sulphite ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sodium Thiosulphate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sorbic Acid ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Stannous Chloride .... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sulphur dioxide ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. tert-Butylhydroquin Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA one. Step 4. Starch Sodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Octenylsuccinate. Step 4. Starch Sodium Succi- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA nate. Step 4. (Food Additives and Contaminants) Ref. Stearoyl-2-Lactylates Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alinorm 95/12A. Step 4. Succinyl Distarch Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Glycerol. Step 4. Sucrolose ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sucroglycerides ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Sucrose Acetate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Isobutyrate. Step 4. Sucrose Fatty Acid Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Esters. Step 4. Tara Gum ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Tartaric, Acetic and Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Fatty Acid Esters Step 4. of Glycerol. Tetrapotassium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Diphosphate. Step 4. Thiodipropionic ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Tocopherols ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Tocopherols, d-alpha Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Tocopherols, d- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Alpha, Concentrate. Step 4. (CCFAC) Ref. CX/FAC 96/8 ...... Acelsulfame Potas- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA sium. Step 4. Acetic and Fatty Acid Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Esters of Glycerol. Step 4. Acetylated Distarch Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Adipate. Step 4. Acetylated Distarch Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA glycerol. Step 4. Tetrasodium Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Diphosphate. Step 4. Thaumatin ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Tragacanth Gum ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Tricalcium Phsophate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Triethyl Citrate ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Tripotassium Phos- Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA phate. Step 4. Trisodium Phosphate Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28141

U.S. partici- Codex committee Substance Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

Urea ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Xanthan Gum ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4. Xylitol ...... Maximum Levels Under Consideration at Yes ...... HHS/FDA Step 4.

Food Additives and Contaminants The Codex maximum level (ML) for a availability of analytical procedures, fair contaminant or naturally occurring trade and technological implications, A contaminant means any substance toxicant in a food or feed commodity is regional variations, risk assessment, and not intentionally added to food, which the maximum concentration of that risk management. is present in such food as a result of the substance recommended by the Codex The criteria for inclusion of a production (including operations Alimentarius Commission to be legally maximum level for a contaminant in a carried out in crop husbandry, animal permitted in that commodity. The ML is husbandry and veterinary medicine), intended to ensure free movement of food are that: (a) Consumption of the manufacture, processing, preparation, food in international trade while contaminated food presents a significant treatment, packing, packaging, protecting the health of the consumer. risk to consumers; and (b) the existence transport, or holding of such food or as The General Standard for of actual problems in trade of food. The a result of environmental Contaminants and Toxins in Foods will contaminants currently being examined contamination. The term contaminant establish maximum levels for to determine whether they meet these does not include insect fragments, contaminants in foods based on the criteria for inclusion in the Codex rodent hairs, and other extraneous following considerations: toxicological General Standard for Contaminants and matter. data, human exposure estimates, Toxins are listed below:

U.S. partici- Codex committee Standard Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

(CCFAC) Ref. ALINORM 97/12 ...... Arsenic ...... Position Paper to be revised for discussion Yes ...... HHS/FDA during the 1997 CCFAC. Cadmium ...... Additional information requested during Yes ...... HHS/FDA 1996 CCFAC. Lead ...... Additional information requested during Yes ...... HHS/FDA 1996 CCFAC. Tin ...... Position Paper to be drafted for 1997 Yes ...... HHS/FDA CCFAC. Patulin ...... CCFAC Evaluation will be developed for Yes ...... HHS/FDA the 1997 CCFAC.

Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues toxicologically acceptable, that is, supervised trials conducted at the consideration of the various dietary highest nationally recommended, The Codex Committee on Pesticide residue intake estimates and authorized, or registered uses are Residues recommends to the Codex determinations both at the national and included in the review. In order to Alimentarius Commission international level in comparison with accommodate variations in national pest establishment of maximum limits for the ADI,* should indicate that foods control requirements, Codex MRLPs pesticide residues for specific food complying with Codex MRLPs are safe take into account the higher levels items or in groups of food. A Codex for human consumption. shown to arise in such supervised trials, Maximum Limit for Pesticide Residues Codex MRLPs are primarily intended which are considered to represent (MRLP) is the maximum concentration to apply in international trade and are effective pest control practices, and of a pesticide residue (expressed as mg/ derived from reviews conducted by the (b) Toxicological assessment of the kg), recommended by the Codex Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues pesticide and its residue. Alimentarius Commission to be legally (JMPR) following: MRLs recommended for advancement permitted in or on food commodities (a) Review of residue date from to steps 5 or 8 by the 28th CCPR will and animal feeds. Foods derived from supervised trials and supervised uses be considered by the 22nd Session of commodities that comply with the including those reflecting national good the Codex Alimentarius Commission in respective MRLPs are intended to be agricultural practices (GAP). Data from 1997.

* Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of a chemical is of the consumer on the basis of all the known facts is expressed in milligrams of the chemical per the daily intake which, during an entire lifetime, at the time of the evaluation of the chemical by the kilogram of body weight. appears to be without appreciable risk to the health Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues. It 28142 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

U.S. partici- Codex committee Standard Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

Pesticide Residues (considered at the 28th abamectin ...... MRL under consideration at step 5 & MRLs Yes ...... EPA Session of the Codex Committee on Pes- under consideration at step 6 & 7. ticide Residues Ref. CL 1995/44±PR; Annex II, Report 28th Session). acephate ...... Withdrawals ...... Yes ...... EPA aldicarb ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. Pesticide Residues (considered at the 28th aldrin/dieldrin ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA Session of the Codex Committee on Pes- ticide Residues Ref. CL 1995/44±PR; Annex II, Report 28th Session). azinphos-methyl ...... MRLs under consideration at step 6 ...... Yes ...... EPA bentazone ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA bifenthrin ...... MRLs under consideration at step 7 ...... Yes ...... EPA bromide ion ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA bromopropylate ...... MRLs under consideration at step 7 & 8 & Yes ...... EPA withdrawals. buprofezin ...... MRLs under consideration at step 6 ...... Yes ...... EPA captan ...... MRLs under consideration at step 3 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals & amendments. carbendazim ...... MRLs under consideration at step 3 & Yes ...... EPA MRLs under consideration at step 6 & withdrawals. chlormequat ...... withdrawals ...... Yes ...... EPA chlorpyrifos-methyl ... MRLs under consideration at step 5 & Yes ...... EPA MRLs under consideration at step 7. chlorothalonil ...... MRLs under consideration at step 7 & 8 & Yes ...... EPA withdrawals. clethodim ...... MRLs under consideration at step 5 ...... Yes ...... EPA Pesticide Residues (considered at the 28th cycloxydim ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA Session of the Codex Committee on Pes- ticide Residues Ref. CL 1995/44±PR; Annex II, Report 28th Session). DDT ...... MRL under consideration at step 3 & MRLs Yes ...... EPA under consideration at step 8 & amend- ment & withdrawals. diazinon ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. dicofol ...... MRLs under consideration at step 7 & 8 & Yes ...... EPA withdrawals. dichlorvos ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. dimethoate ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. diquat ...... MRLs under consideration at step 5 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. disulfoton ...... MRLs under consideration at step 7 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. dithianon ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA dithiocarbamates ...... MRLs under consideration at step 6 ...... Yes ...... EPA endosulfan ...... MRLs under consideration at step 3 & Yes ...... EPA MRLs under consideration at step 6. Pesticide Residues (considered at the 28th endrin ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA Session of the Codex Committee on Pes- drawals. ticide Residues Ref. CL 1995/44±PR; Annex II, Report 28th Session). ethephon ...... MRLs under consideration at step 5 & 8 & Yes ...... EPA withdrawals. ethion ...... MRLs under consideration at step 5 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. ethofenprox ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA fenbutatin oxide ...... MRLs under consideration at step 7 & 8 & Yes ...... EPA withdrawals. fenpropathrin ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA fentin ...... withdrawal ...... Yes ...... EPA flusilazole ...... MRL under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA folpet ...... MRLs under consideration at step 3 & Yes ...... EPA MRLs under consideration at step 7 & 8 & withdrawals. glufosinate-ammo- MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA nium. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28143

U.S. partici- Codex committee Standard Status of consideration pation/agen- Responsible da agency

glyphosate ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. hexythiazox ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA imazalil ...... MRL under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA Pesticide Residues (considered at the 28th iprodione ...... MRLs under consideration at step 5 & 8 & Yes ...... EPA Session of the Codex Committee on Pes- withdrawals. ticide Residues Ref. CL 1995/44±PR; Annex II, Report 28th Session). metalazyl ...... MRL under consideration at step 6 ...... Yes ...... EPA methamidophos ...... MRL under consideration at step 5 & MRLs Yes ...... EPA under consideration at step 8 & with- drawals. methidathion ...... MRLs under consideration at step 7 & 8 & Yes ...... EPA withdrawals. monocrotophos ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. myclobutanil ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA oxydemeton-methyl MRLs under consideration at step 3 & Yes ...... EPA MRLs under consideration at step 6. parathion-methyl ...... MRLs under consideration at step 3 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. penconazole ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA pirimiphos-methyl ..... MRL under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA procymidone ...... Withdrawals ...... Yes ...... EPA profenofos ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. Pesticide Residues (considered at the 28th propiconazole ...... MRL under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA Session of the Codex Committee on Pes- drawal. ticide Residues Ref. CL 1995/44±PR; Annex II, Report 28th Session). propylenethiourea ..... withdrawals ...... Yes ...... EPA pyrazophos ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA tebuconazole ...... MRLs under consideration at step 5 & 8 .... Yes ...... EPA tecnazene ...... MRL under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawal. tolclofos methyl ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA triadimefon ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 & with- Yes ...... EPA drawals. triadimenol ...... MRLs under consideration at step 8 ...... Yes ...... EPA etrimfos ...... Withdrawals ...... Yes ...... EPA flucythrinate ...... Withdrawal ...... Yes ...... EPA phosalone ...... Withdrawals ...... Yes ...... EPA trichlorfon ...... Withdrawals ...... Yes ...... EPA

Codex Committee on Methods of that methods of analysis and sampling fl Harmonized Guidelines for Analysis and Sampling for residues of pesticides or veterinary Internal Control in Analytical Chemistry drugs in food, the assessment of micro- The Codex Committee on Methods of Laboratories;* biological quality and safety in food, the fl Revised Terms of Reference for Analysis and Sampling: assessment of specifications for food the Committee.* (a) Defines the criteria appropriate to additives, and those methods elaborated The Committee is continuing work Codex Methods of Analysis and by the Codex Committee on Milk and on: Sampling; Milk Products, do not fall within the fl Proposed Draft Codex General (b) Serves as a coordinating body for terms of reference of this Committee; Guidelines on Sampling; Codex with other international groups (e) Elaborates sampling plans and fl Criteria for evaluating acceptable working in methods of analysis and procedures, as may be required; methods of analysis for Codex purposes; sampling and quality assurance systems (f) Considers specific sampling and fl Development of objective criteria for laboratories; analysis problems submitted to it by the for assessing the competence of testing (c) Specifies, on the basis of final Commission or any of its Committees; laboratories involved in the official recommendations submitted to it by the and import and export control of food; other bodies referred to in (b) above, (g) Defines procedures, protocols, fl Harmonization of test results Reference Methods of Analysis and guidelines or related texts for the corrected for recovery factors; Sampling appropriate to Codex assessment of food laboratory fl Harmonization of analytical Standards which are generally proficiency, as well as quality assurance terminology in accordance with applicable to a number of foods; systems for laboratories. international standards; and (d) Considers, amends, if necessary The following matters will be brought fl Endorsement of methods of and endorses, as appropriate, methods to the attention of the 22nd Session of analysis for Codex purposes. of analysis and sampling proposed by the Codex Alimentarius Commission in The Committee agreed to propose the Codex (Commodity) Committees, except June, 1997, for adoption: following new work: 28144 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

fl Review of methods of analysis The Twelfth Session will consider Food Hygiene, will be considered at using ozone-depleting substances; and changes to the Rules of Procedure of Step 8 by the Codex Alimentarius fl Measurement uncertainty. Codex Alimentarius to integrate the role Commission at its Twenty-second The reference document is Alinorm of science in Codex decision-making. session in June, 1997. In addition, the 97/23. The Committee will also consider the next Executive Committee Meeting will *Not in Step procedure. following matters at its next session: consider adoption of the following texts, Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA. fl Strategic planning; each of which then may be considered U.S. Participation: Yes. fl Relationship with Non- at Step 8 during the 1997 Commission Meeting: Codex Committee on Food Import and Governmental Organizations; Export Certification and Inspection fl Establishment of a General Policy fl Draft Revised Recommended Systems for Food Safety; and International Code of Practice—General fl Streamlining Codex elaboration/ Principles of Food Hygiene at Step 8; The Codex Committee on Food Import adoption procedures. fl The Committee agreed to and Export Certification and Inspection Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS. recommend to the Commodity Systems is charged with developing U.S. Participation: Yes. Committees to consider utilizing principles and guidelines for food Method A in the elaboration/revision of import and export certification systems. Codex Committee on Food Labelling their Product Codes; Included in the charge are application of The Codex Committee on Food fl Revised Guidelines for the measures by competent authorities to Labelling is responsible for drafting Application of the Hazard Analysis provide assurance that foods comply provisions on labelling applicable to all Critical Control Point System at Step 5; with essential requirements. foods and to study specific labelling and Recognition of quality assurance problems assigned by the Codex fl Revised Principles for the systems through the development of Alimentarius Commission. All of the Establishment and Application of guidelines will help ensure that foods guidelines and recommendations Microbiological Criteria for Foods at conform to the essential requirements. Step 5; The Fourth Session of the Committee documents listed below are in Alinorm fl Proposed Draft Code of Practice (Alinorm 97/30) recommended that 97/22. The following Draft Guidelines will for Refrigerated Foods with Extended Draft Guidelines for the Exchange of be considered at Step 6 by the Twenty- Shelf-Life at Step 5. Information Between Countries on fourth Session of the Committee, May, The following matters will be Rejections be adopted at Step 8 by the 1996, Ottawa, Canada: discussed at the twenty-ninth Twenty-second session of the Codex fl Draft Guidelines for the Labelling, committee session, October, 1996: Alimentarius Commission in June, 1997. The Proposed Draft Guidelines for the Production, Processing, and Marketing fl *Application of the Hazard Design, Operation, Assessment and of Organically Produced Foods; Analysis and Critical Control Point Accreditation of Food Import and fl Draft Guidelines for Use of Health (HACCP) Approach for the Specific Export Inspection and Certification and Nutrition Claims; and Production of Normandy Camembert Systems will be considered at Step 5 by fl Draft Guidelines for Use of the Cheese; the forty-third session of the Executive term ‘‘Halal.’’ fl *A redrafted recommendation for Committee. Proposed Draft Recommendations for the control of Listeria monocytogenes, Several documents are being prepared the Labelling of Foods that can cause background documents on the revised for future discussion by the Committee: Hypersensitivity will be considered at text will include criteria for Listeria Step 3 and General Guidelines for fl Proposed Revised Draft monocytogenes, Salmonella, with Nutrition Labelling will be reviewed in Guidelines on the Principle Elements in special reference to S. Enteritidis, light of new developments at the an Electronic Documentation System at Campylobacter and entero haemorrhagic Twenty-fourth Session of the Step 3; Escherichia coli; fl Proposed Draft Guidelines for Committee. fl *A discussion paper on Taking into Account of ISO Standards of In addition, the document on the ‘‘Guidelines on the application of the the 9000 Series by Official Systems for Implications of Biotechnology prepared principles of risk assessment and risk Food Export and Import Inspection and by the United States for the Twenty- management to food hygiene including Certification at Step 3; third Session of the Committee was strategies for their application’’; fl Proposed Draft Guidelines for the circulated for additional comment and fl *Implications for the Broader Development of Agreements Regarding recommendations on how the Application of the HACCP system; Food Import and Export Inspection and Committee should proceed. The fl *A first draft Code of Practice for Certification Systems at Step 3; and document is on the Agenda for further all Foodstuffs Transported in Bulk; and fl Guidelines on Food Import discussion at the Twenty-fourth fl *A first draft Code of Hygienic Control Systems at Step 1. Session. Practice for Bottled Water (other than Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA; USDA/ Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA. USDA/ natural mineral water). FSIS. FSIS. *Not in Step Procedure. U.S. Participation: Yes. U.S. Participation: Yes. All documents listed above are contained in Alinorm 97/13. Codex Committee on Food Hygiene Codex Committee on General Principles Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA USDA/ The Codex Committee on General The Food Hygiene Committee drafts FSIS. Principles deals with rules and basic provisions on food hygiene for all U.S. Participation: Yes. procedures referred to it by the Codex foods. The term ‘‘hygiene’’ also Alimentarius Commission. None of the includes, where applicable, Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and following recommendations for microbiological specifications for food Vegetables changing the rules of procedure for and associated methodology. The Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits Codex are in the Step Procedure. The The Proposed Revised Draft Code of and Vegetables was established in June reference document is Alinorm 97/33. Practice on the General Principles of 1988. The Committee is responsible for Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28145 elaborating world-wide standards and fl Draft Standard for Formula Foods fl Proposed Draft Code of Hygienic codes of practice for fresh fruits and for Use in Very Low Energy Diets for Practice for the Products of vegetables. Several of the standards Weight Reduction at Step 8; and Aquaculture; listed below are contained in ALINORM fl Proposed Draft Table of fl Proposed Draft Code of Hygienic 97/35. Conditions for Claims for Nutrient Practice for Frozen Surimi; and The sixth session of the Committee Contents at Step 5. fl Proposed Draft Code of Practice recommended that the following Seven documents were circulated for for the Sensory Evaluation of Fish and standards and codes of practice be comment prior to consideration at the Shellfish. considered for adoption by the Twenty- next Committee meeting in October In addition, the Committee will second Session of the Codex 1996: consider a List of Predatory Species to Alimentarius Commission in June, 1997, fl Revision of Codex Standard for which the Higher Level of at Step 8: Processed Cereal-Based Foods for Methylmercury Applies. fl Draft Standard for Banana; and Infants and Children at Step 3; The reference document containing fl Draft Standard for Mangosteen. fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard the above information is Alinorm 97/18. The Committee also recommended for Food Grade Salt at Step 3 of the Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA. initiation or continuation of work in the procedure; U.S. Participation: Yes. following areas: fl Proposed Draft Guidelines for Codex Committee on Milk and Milk fl Draft Standard for Limes (at Step Dietary Supplements (Vitamins and Products 5); Minerals) at Step 3; fl Draft Standard for Pummelo (at fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard The Codex Committee on Milk and Step 5); for Gluten-Free Foods at Step 3; Milk Products was established by the fl Draft Standard for Guava (at Step fl Proposed Draft Amendment to the Codex Alimentarius at its Twentieth 5); Standard for Infant Formula: Amount of session. The Committee was originally fl Draft Standard for Chayote (at Vitamin B12 at Step 3 of accelerated established by the Food and Agriculture Step 5); procedure; Organization (FAO) and the World fl Code of Practice for the Quality fl Proposed Draft Revised Guidelines Health Organization (WHO) in 1958. Inspection and Certification of Fresh for the Use of Codex Committees on the The Committee was integrated into the Fruits and Vegetables (at Step 5); Inclusion of Provisions on Nutritional Joint FAO/WHO Foods Standards fl Draft Standard for Oranges (at Quality in Food Standards and Other Programme in 1962. Until 1993, the Step 3); Codex Texts at Step 3; and Committee was named the Joint FAO/ fl Draft Standard for Asparagus (at fl Revision to the Codex Standard WHO Committee of Government Experts Step 3); for Infant Formula at Step 3. on the Code of Principles Concerning fl Draft Revised Standard for The Committee is initiating work in Milk and Milk Products. The Committee Pineapple (at Step 3); the following areas: is responsible for establishing fl Draft Standard for Mexican Limes fl Proposed Definitions for Vitamins international codes and standards for (at Step 1); and Minerals as Nutrient Reference milk and milk products. All of the fl Draft Standard for Grapefruit (at Values for Labelling at Step 1; and standards listed below are contained in Step 1); fl Proposed Levels of Vitamins and CX/MMP 96/1. fl Draft Standard for Longan (at Step Minerals in Foods for Special Medical The following Proposed Draft and 1); fl Draft Standard for Ginger (at Step Purposes at Step 1. Proposed Draft Revised Standards will 1); Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA. be considered at the Second session of fl Preparation of a paper on the U.S. Participation: Yes. the Codex Committee on Milk and Milk Products in May 1996 at Step 3: Objective Indices of Maturity in Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery fl Proposed Draft Standard for Commercial Transactions of Fruits and Products Vegetables (at Step 1); and Process(ed) Cheese and Process(ed) fl Document concerning the The Fish and Fishery Products Cheese Preparation; Application of Quality Tolerances at Committee is responsible for elaborating fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Import (at Step 1). standards for fresh and frozen fish, for Creams; Responsible Agency: USDA/AMS. crustaceans, and mollusks. fl Proposed Draft Standards for U.S. Participation: Yes. The following revised codes, Fermented Milks and for Milk Products incorporating the HACCP approach, will Obtained from Fermented Milk Heat- Codex Committee on Nutrition and be considered at the Twenty-second Treated After Fermentation; Foods for Special Dietary Uses session of the Committee at Step 3: fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard The Committee on Nutrition and fl Proposed Draft Revised Code of for Cheddar Cheese; Foods for Special Dietary Uses is Practice for Frozen Fish; fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard responsible for studying nutritional fl Proposed Draft Revised Code of for Danablu Cheese; problems referred by the Codex Practice for Canned Fish; fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Alimentarius Commission. The fl Proposed Draft Revised Code of for Danbo Cheese; Committee also drafts provisions on Practice for Frozen Shrimps and fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard nutritional aspects for all foods and Prawns; for Harvarti Cheese; develops guidelines, general principles, fl Proposed Draft Revised Code of fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard and standards for foods for special Practice for Molluscan Shellfish; for Samso Cheese; dietary uses. fl Proposed Draft Revised Code of fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard The reference document for the Practice for Smoked Fish; and for Chesire Cheese; following matters is Alinorm 95/26. The fl Proposed Draft Revised Code of fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard following documents were adopted by Practice for Salted Fish. for Limburger Cheese; the Twenty-first session of the Codex The Committee will also consider the fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Alimentarius Commission in July 1995: following documents at Step 3: for Saint-Paulin Cheese; 28146 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard fl Draft Revised Standard for The Twenty-first Session of the for Svecia Cheese; Unripened Cheese. Commission endorsed the fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Agency Responsible: HHS/FDA. recommendation of the forty-second for Harzer Kase Cheese; U.S. Participation: Yes. session of the Executive Committee to fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard initiate the revision of the Cocoa for Hushallsost Cheese; Codex Committee on Fats and Oils Products and Chocolate Standards. fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard The Codex Committee on Fats and The Swiss Secretariat has prepared for Marbio Cheese; Oils is responsible for elaborating updated versions of the Standards and fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard standards for fats and oils of animal, requested government comments in CL for Fynbo Cheese; vegetable, and marine origin. 1995/28 CPC. The technical contents of fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard The following Draft Code and the standards were not amended and for Esrom Cheese; Standards will be considered at the comments were requested from fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Fifteenth Session of the Committee, governments on amendments. for Romadur Cheese; November, 1996, at Step 6: The amended standards are: fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard fl Draft Code of Practice for the fl Chocolate; for Amsterdam Cheese; Storage and Transport of Fats and Oils fl Cocoa Butters; fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard in Bulk; fl Cocoa Butters Confectionery; for Leidse Cheese; fl Draft Standard for Fats and Oils fl Cocoa (Cacao) Nib, Cocoa (Cacao) fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard not Covered by Individual Standards; Mass, Cocoa Press Cake and Cocoa Dust for Freise Cheese; fl Draft Standard for Named Animal (Cocoa Fines), For Use in the fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Fats; Manufacture of Cocoa and Chocolate for Edelpilzkase Cheese; fl Draft Standard for Named Products; fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard fl Cocoa Powders (Cacaos) and Dry for Extra Hard Grating Cheese; Vegetable Oils; fl Cocoa-Sugar Mixtures; and fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Draft Standard for Olive Oils and Olive-Pomace Oils; and fl Composite and Filled Chocolate. for Tilsiter Cheese; The amended standards will be fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard fl Draft Standard for Mayonnaise. The following Proposed Draft considered at Step 3 by the Sixteenth for Provolone Cheese; Session of the Committee, October, fl Standards will be considered at Step 4: Proposed Draft Revised Standard 1996. for Cottage Cheese; fl Proposed Draft Standard for Fat fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Spreads; and Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA. for Butterkase Cheese; fl Proposed Draft Standard for U.S. Participation: Yes. Products Sold as an Alternative to Ghee. fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard Certain Codex Commodity Committees for Coulommiers Cheese; All of the above documents are fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard contained in Alinorm 97/17. Several Codex Alimentarius for Herrgardsost Cheese. Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA. Commodity Committees have adjourned fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard U.S. Participation: Yes. sine die. The following Committees fall into this category: for Edam Cheese; Codex Committee on Cocoa Products fl fl Cereals, Pulses and Legumes* Proposed Draft Revised Standard and Chocolate for Gouda Cheese; Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA, fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard The Codex Committee on Cocoa USDA/GIPSA for Camembert Cheese; Products and Chocolate held 15 U.S. Participation: Yes fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard sessions. The last meeting, at which the fl Edible Ices for Brie Cheese; original program of work was Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard completed, was held in 1982. The U.S. Participation: Yes for Emmentaler Cheese; Committee elaborated world-wide fl Meat Hygiene* fl Proposed Draft Revised Standard standards for cocoa products and Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS for Gruyere Cheese; and chocolate. U.S. Participation: Yes fl Code of Principles Concerning The Commission in 1991 decided to fl Processed Fruits and Vegetables Milk and Milk Products. embark on a program of work to update Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA The following Proposed Draft and and revise all of the standards. U.S. Participation: Yes Proposed Draft Revised Standards will The revisions were to include fl Processed Meat and Poultry be considered at the Second session of updating of the sections on food hygiene Products* the Codex Committee on Milk and Milk and food labeling and removal from the Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS Products in May 1996 at Step 7: standards of all non-essential details. U.S. Participation: Yes fl Draft Revised Standard for Butter; The standards, when updated and fl Sugars fl Draft Revised Standard for Milkfat revised, should contain only those Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA Products; provisions that are necessary to protect U.S. Participation: Yes fl Draft Revised Standard for consumer health and prevent fraud. fl Soups and Broths Evaporated Milk; Provisions of an advisory nature Responsible Agency: USDA/FSIS fl Draft Revised Standard for reflecting quality factors and criteria U.S. Participation: Yes Sweetened Condensed Milk; typically used in trade to define or fl Vegetable Proteins* fl Draft Revised Standard for Milk describe the quality of the product are Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA and Cream Powders; to be removed from the standard. These U.S. Participation: Yes fl Draft Revised Standard for Cheese; guidance provisions are intended to *There is no planned activity for fl Draft Revised Standard for Whey assist users of the Codex standard when these Committees in the next year. Cheese; making international purchases and are, A brief report on activities of the fl Draft Revised Standard for Cheese therefore, not subject to formal Codex Committee on Edible Ices, the in Brine; and acceptance by users of the standard. Codex Committee on Sugars, the Codex Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28147

Committee Processed Fruits and U.S. Participation: Yes. Codex Committee for Natural Mineral Vegetables and the Codex Committee on Waters Soups and Broths Soups and Broths follows: The Codex Committee for Natural Edible Ices The Codex Committee on Soups and Mineral Waters (CCNMW) is responsible Broths is responsible for elaborating for elaborating standards for all types of The Committee on Edible Ices is world-wide standards for soups, broths, responsible for elaborating standards for mineral water products. At the bouillons, and consommes. The recommendation of the Nineteenth all types of edible ices, including mixes committee adjourned sine die in 1977. and powders used for their Session of the Codex Alimentarius manufacture. The Committee has been In light of the decision made by the Commission concerning the conversion adjourned since 1978. However, as 19th Session of the Commission to of Regional Standards into World-Wide directed by the Codex Alimentarius simplify and revise Codex standards, a Standards, the Codex European Commission, the Secretariat of the Host revised version of the standard for Regional Standard for Natural Mineral Country (Sweden) has prepared a Bouillon and Consommes was presented Waters was circulated to member Revised Codex Standard for Edible Ices to the Twenty-first Session of the governments for comments at Step 3 in and Ices Mixes (see CL 1995/7–EI). This Commission in July, 1995, for adoption. 1993 (CL 1993/4–NMW). Although, Revised Standard was circulated to The Commission adopted the Standard based on the comments received, the member governments for comments by at Step 8 and noted that a revision of the Commission adopted a number of May 15, 1995. The objective of the Standard in light of late substantive proposed amendments for incorporation revision was to focus the standard only comments would be initiated in the Draft Standard, no further action on public health, food safety, and immediately. The Revised Standard for was taken at the time for the finalization consumer protection. Provisions in the Bouillons and Consommes can be found of the standard because the CCNMW existing standard that deal with quality in Alinorm 95/20, Appendix I. was in adjournment. However, after factors and criteria typically used in Agency Responsible: USDA/FSIS. consultation between the Host Government (Switzerland) and the commerce to define or describe the U.S. Participation: Yes. product are of an advisory nature and Codex Secretariat, it was agreed that the have been removed in the Revised Processed Fruits and Vegetables CCNMW should meet again to finalize Standard. The Twenty-first session of the Standard for Natural Mineral The Codex Committee on Processed the Commission decided to suspend Waters. Therefore, a Draft Standard for Fruits and Vegetables elaborated world- further work on the Revised Standard Natural Mineral Waters (CL 1996/3– wide standards for all types of pending a study to be submitted to the NMW) at Step 6 was circulated to processed fruits and vegetables Forty-third Session of the Executive member governments for comment by including dried products (except Committee in June 1996. June 15, 1996 and a Session by the prunes), canned products (except CCNMW was tentatively scheduled to Agency Responsible: HHS/FDA. juices), and jams and jellies. The U.S. Participation: Yes. be held in the first week of October 1996 Committee held eighteen sessions, the in Switzerland to consider the Draft Sugars last in 1986. Standard at Step 7. The Codex Committee on Sugars is In keeping with the Commission’s Responsible Agency: HHS/FDA. responsible for elaborating world-wide charge to update and revise standards, U.S. Participation: Yes. standards for all types of sugars and the United States Secretariat is sugar products. The Committee has been preparing the revisions. They will then FAO/WHO Regional Coordinating adjourned since 1974. At the direction be circulated for government comment Committees of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, and considered at the Nineteenth The Codex Alimentarius Commission the Secretariat of the Host Government Session of the Committee, February, is made up of an Executive Committee, (the United Kingdom) was asked to 1997. as well as approximately 25 subsidiary examine the existing Codex Standards Agency Responsible: HHS/FDA. bodies. Included in these subsidiary relating to sugars and the Codex U.S. Participation: Yes. bodies are several coordinating Standard for Honey. During the committees. Nineteenth session of the Codex Joint U.N.E.C.E. Codex Alimentarius There are currently five Regional Alimentarius Commission, the Groups of Experts Coordinating Committees: Commission agreed that existing Codex —Coordinating Committee for Africa Standards should be reviewed in order Two groups of experts dealt with to simplify them. Those documents specific commodities much as the —Coordinating Committee for Asia were revised and circulated to member Codex Commodity Committees do. The —Coordinating Committee for Europe governments (see CL 1995/5–S) for Joint Groups of Experts have completed —Coordinating Committee for Latin comments. The objective of the revision their main tasks and have adjourned. America and the Caribbean is to focus the standards only on public They could be called to meet again if the —Coordinating Committee for North health, food safety, and consumer Codex Alimentarius Commission so America and the South-West Pacific protection. The Twenty-first session of decides. These Groups are: The United States participates as an the Commission noted that substantial fl Standardization of Quick Frozen active member of the Coordinating late comments were received and agreed Foods; and Committee for North America and the that further revision of the Draft fl Standardization of Fruit Juices. South-West Pacific, and is informed of Standards should be carried out by the other coordinating committees There are no standards from either correspondence. The Secretariat has through meeting documents, final group being considered by the Twenty- prepared revised Draft Standards and reports, and representation at meetings. second session of the Commission in circulated them for government Each regional committee: June, 1997. comments at Step 6 in document CL —Defines the problems and needs of the 1996/1–S. Agency Responsible: HHS/FDA. region concerning food standards and Agency Responsible: HHS/FDA. U.S. Participation: Yes. food control; 28148 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

—Promotes within the committee Inspection Service, U.S. Department Administration, U.S. Department of contacts for the mutual exchange of of Agriculture, Room 331–E, Jamie L. Agriculture, 10383 N. Executive information on proposed regulatory Whitten Federal Bldg., 14th and Hills Blvd., Kansas City, MO initiatives and problems arising from Independence Avenue, SW., 64153–1394, Phone #: (816) 891– food control and stimulates the Washington, DC 20250–3700, Phone: 0404, Fax #: (816) 891–8070 strengthening of food control (202) 720–8217, Fax: (202) 690–4437 Cereals, Pulses and Legumes and infrastructures; Mr. Michael R. Taylor, Acting Under Research Division (adjourned Sine —Recommends to the Commission the Secretary for Food Safety, U.S. Die) development of world-wide standards Department of Agriculture, Room Dr. I. Kaye Wachsmuth, Assistant for products of interest to the region, 331–E, Jamie L. Whitten Federal Deputy Administrator, Science and including products considered by the Bldg., 14th and Independence Technology, U.S. Department of committee to have an international Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250– Agriculture, Room 405–Cotton market potential in the future; 3700, Phone #: (202) 720–7025, Fax #: Annex Bldg., 12th & C Street, SW., —And, exercises a general coordinating (202) 690–4437 Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: role for the region and such other Mr. Michael V. Dunn, Assistant (202) 205–0675, Fax # (202) 205– functions as may be entrusted to it by Secretary, Marketing and Regulatory 0080 the Commission. Programs, U.S. Department of Food Hygiene Agriculture, Room 228–W, Jamie L. Mr. James Rodeheaver, Chief, Fruit and Codex Coordinating Committee for Whitten Federal Bldg., 14th & Vegetable Division, Processed North America and the South-West Independence Avenue, SW., Product Branch, Agricultural Pacific Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Marketing Service, U.S. Department The Coordinating Committee is 720–4256, Fax #: (202) 720–5775 of Agriculture, Room 0709, South responsible for defining problems and Dr. Alex Thiermann, Deputy Agriculture Building, Washington, # needs concerning food standards and Administrator, International Services, DC 20250, Phone : (202) 720–4693, # food control of all Codex member Animal and Plant Health Inspection Fax : (202) 690–1527 countries of the regions. Service, U.S. Department of Processed Fruits and Vegetables The Committee, at its Third Session, Agriculture, Room 324–E, Jamie L. (adjourned Sine Dine) recommended that the Executive Whitten Federal Bldg., 14th & Dr. Stephen F. Sundlof, Director, Center Committee consider proposals Independence Avenue, SW., for Veterinary Medicine, Food and concerning the broader application of Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Drug Administration, 7500 Standish the HACCP system and that the 720–7593, Fax #: (202) 690–1484 Place (HFV–1), Rockville, MD 20855, Phone #: (301) 594–1740, proposals also be considered by the Dr. Lynn R. Goldman, Assistant # Twenty-first Session of the Codex Administrator, Office of Prevention, Fax : (301) 594–1830 Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods Alimentarius Commission. The Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Committee also requested that a Environmental Protection Agency, Listing of U.S. Delegates and Alternate comprehensive plan for risk assessment 401 M Street, SW (7101), 637 East Delegates Worldwide General Subject methodology and decision making Tower, Washington, DC 20460, Phone Codex Committees #: (202) 260–2902, Fax #: (202) 260– criteria be developed by the Codex Committee on Residues of 1847 Commission, and that risk analysis be Veterinary Drugs in Foods considered as part of the Codex Ms. Penny Fenner-Crisp, Deputy Strategic Plan. Director, Office of Pesticide Programs, (Host Government—United States) The Committee expressed the view U.S. Environmental Protection U.S. Delegate—Dr. Marvin A. Norcross, that the Commission should be the Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Rm. Food Safety and Inspection Service, focus of international harmonization 1119G, Waterside Mall, Washington, U.S. Department of Agriculture, West initiatives with respect to genetically DC 20460, Phone #: (703) 305–7092, # End Court, Room 311, 1255 22nd engineered foods. In addition, the Fax : (703) 308–4776 Street, NW., Washington, DC 20250– Mr. William Schultz, Deputy Committee recommended that further 3700, Phone #: (202) 254–2517, Fax #: Commissioner for Policy, Food and work should be carried out on the sale (202) 254–2530 of potentially harmful herbs and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Alternate Delegate—Dr. Robert C. botanicals as food. Finally, the Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Phone #: # Livingston, Director, Office of New Committee recommended that the work (301) 827–3360, Fax : (301) 594–6777 Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Dr. Fred R. Shank, Director, Center for of the Commission should be expedited. Veterinary Medicine (HFV–100), Food Food Safety and Applied Nutrition The Fourth Session of the Committee, and Drug Administration, 7500 (HFS–1), Food and Drug May, 1996, will continue deliberations Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, Administration, Room 6815, 200 C on the implications of the Agreement on Phone #: (301) 594–1620, Fax #: (301) Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, # # 594–2297 and Technical Barriers to trade to Phone : (202) 205–4850, Fax : (202) countries in the Regions and on the 205–5025 Codex Committee on Food Additives application of risk analysis in the Ms. Linda R. Horton, Director, and Contaminants International Policy, Office of the countries of the Regions. (Host Government—The Netherlands) Commissioner, Food and Drug Agency Responsible: USDA/FSIS. Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, U.S. Delegate—Dr. Alan Rulis, Director, U.S. Participation: Yes. Rockville, MD 20857, Phone #: (301) Office of Premarket Approval, Center Appendix 1—U.S. Codex Alimentarius 827–3344, Fax #: (301) 443–6906 for Food Safety and Applied Officials Nutrition, Food and Drug Codex Committee Chairpersons Administration, 200 C Street, SW., Steering Committee Members Mr. Steven N. Tanner, Deputy Director, (HFS–200), Washington, DC 20204, Mr. Thomas J. Billy, Associate Quality Assurance, Grain Phone #: (202) 418–3100, Fax #: (202) Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection, Packers & Stockyards 418–3131 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28149

Alternate Delegate—Dr. Terry C. Phone #: (202) 720–4566, Fax #: (202) Codex Committee on Nutrition and Troxell, Director, Division of 690–3856 Foods for Special Dietary Uses Programs and Enforcement Policy, (Host Government—Germany) Center for Food Safety and Applied Codex Committee on General Principles Nutrition, Food and Drug (Host Government—France) Delegate—Dr. Elizabeth Yetley, Acting Administration, 200 C Street, SW., Director, Office of Special (HFS–456), Washington, DC 20204, Delegate—Note: A member of the Nutritionals, Center for Food Safety Phone #: (202) 205–5321, Fax #: (202) Steering Committee heads the and Applied Nutrition, FDA, 200 C 205–4422 delegation to meetings of the General Street, SW. (HFS–450), Washington, # Principles Committee. DC 20204, Phone : (202) 205–4168, Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues Fax #: (202) 205–5295 (Host Government—The Netherlands) Codex Committee on Food Labeling Alternate Delegate—Dr. Robert J. Moore, Senior Regulatory Scientist, Center for (Host Government—Canada) U.S. Delegate—Dr. Richard Schmitt, Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Acting Deputy Director, Program Delegate—Dr. F. Edward Scarbrough, Food and Drug Administration, 200 C Management and Support Division, Director, Office of Food Labeling, Street, SW. (HFS–456), Washington, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. # Center for Food Safety and Applied DC 20204, Phone : (202) 205–4605, Environmental Protection Agency, Fax #: (202) 260–8957 401 M Street, SW., (7502C), Crystal Nutrition (HFS–150), Food and Drug Station, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC Administration, 200 C Street, SW., Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery 20460, Phone #: (703) 305–6352, Fax Room 1832, Washington, DC 20204, Products Phone #: (202) 205–4561, Fax #: (202) #: (703) 305–5512 (Host Government—Norway) Alternate Delegate—Dr. Richard Parry, 205–4594 Delegate—Mr. Philip C. Spiller, Jr., Assistant Administrator, Alternate Delegate—Ms. Cheryl Wade, Director, Office of Seafood, (HFS–400) Cooperative Interactions, Agricultural Director, Food Labeling Division, VERB, Center for Food Safety and Research Service, U.S. Department of Food Safety and Inspection Service, Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Agriculture, Room 358–A, Jamie L. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room Administration, 200 C Street, SW., Whitten Federal Bldg., Washington, 201, West End Court, Washington, DC Washington, DC 20204, Phone #: (202) DC 20250, Phone #: (202) 720–3973, 20250–3700, Phone #: (202) 254–2590, # # 418–3133, Fax : (202) 418–3198 Fax : (202) 720–5427 Fax #: (202) 254–2482 Alternate Delegate—Mr. Samuel W. McKeen, Director, Office of Trade and Codex Committee on Methods of Codex Committee on Food Hygiene Analysis and Sampling Industry Services, National Oceanic (Host Government—United States) and Atmospheric Administration, (Host Government—Hungary) NMFS, 1335 East-West Highway, U.S. Delegate—Dr. William Horwitz, Acting Delegate—Mr. E. Spencer Room 6490, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Scientific Advisor, Center for Food Garrett, Director, National Seafood Phone #: (301) 713–2351, Fax #: (301) Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS– Inspection Laboratory, National 713–1081 500), Food and Drug Administration, Marine Fisheries, 705 Convent Street, Pascagoulla, MS 39568–1207, Phone Codex Committee on Cereals, Pulses Room 3832, 200 C Street, SW., and Legumes Washington, DC 20204, Phone #: (202) #: (601) 769–8964, Fax #: (601) 762– 205–4346, Fax #: (202) 401–7740 7144 (Host Government—United States) Alternate Delegate—Dr. William Franks, Alternate Delegate—VACANT Delegate—Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Director, Science Division, Director, International Activities Staff, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Worldwide Commodity Codex Center for Food Safety and Applied Department of Agriculture, Room Committees Nutrition, Room 5823 (HFS–585), 3507, South Agriculture Building, Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 14th & Independence Avenue, SW., Vegetables Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Phone #: (202) 205–5042, Fax #: (202) 720–5231, Fax #: (202) 720–6496 (Host Government—Mexico) 401–6144 Codex Committee on Food Import and Alternate Delegate—Mr. David Delegate—Mr. David Priester, Shipman, Deputy Administrator, Export Certification and Inspection International Standards Coordinator, Systems GIPSA, U.S. Department of FPB, Fruit & Vegetable Division, Agriculture, Room 1092, South (Host Government—Australia) Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Agriculture Building, Washington, DC Department of Agriculture, Room # Delegate—Dr. Fred R. Shank, Director, 20250, Phone : (202) 720–9170, Fax 2069, South Agriculture Building, # Center for Food Safety and Applied : (202) 205–9237 14th and Independence Ave., SW., Nutrition (HFS–1), Food and Drug Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Codex Committee on Milk and Milk Administration, Room 6815, 200 C 720–2184, Fax #: (202) 720–0016 Products Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, Phone #: (202) 205–4850, Fax #: (202) Alternate Delegate—Ms. Sharon E. (Host Government—New Zealand) 205–5025 Bomer-Lauritsen, Deputy Director, Delegate—Mr. Duane Spomer, Chief, Alternate Delegate—Mr. Mark Manis, Fruit and Vegetable Div., Agricultural Dairy Standardization Branch, U.S. Asst. to Deputy Administrator, Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Department of Agriculture, International Programs, Food Safety Agriculture, Room 2077, South Agricultural Marketing Service, Room and Inspection Service, U.S. Agriculture Building, 14th & 2750, South Agriculture Building, Department of Agriculture, Room Independence Avenue, SW., 14th and Independence Ave., SW., 341–E, Jamie L. Whitten Federal Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Bldg., Washington, DC 20250–3700, 720–6393, Fax #: (202) 720–0016 720–9382, Fax #: (202) 720–2643 28150 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Alternate Delegate—Dr. John C. Codex Committee on Processed Fruits Alternate Delegate—Ms. Elizabeth J. Mowbray, Division of Programs and and Vegetables 1 Campbell, Director, Division of Enforcement Policy, Center for Food Programs and Enforcement Policy, (Host Government—United States) Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food Center for Food Safety and Applied and Drug Administration, 200 C U.S. Delegate—Mr. Richard B. Boyd, Nutrition (HFS–155), Food and Drug Street, SW., (HFS–206), Washington, Senior Marketing Specialist, Fruit and Administration, 200 C Street, SW., DC 20204, Phone #: (202) 418–3113, Vegetable Division, Agricultural Washington, DC 20204, Phone #: (202) Fax #: (202) 418–3131 Marketing Service, U.S. Department of 205–5229, Fax #: (202) 205–4594

Agriculture, Room 0717, South 1 Codex Committee on Fats and Oils Agriculture Building, 14th & Codex Committee on Meat Hygiene (Host Government—United Kingdom) Independence Avenue, SW., (Host Government—New Zealand) Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Delegate—Dr. John Prucha, Deputy Delegate—Mr. Charles W. Cooper, 720–5021, Fax #: (202) 690–1527 Administrator, International Director, International Activities Staff, Alternate Delegate—Mr. Charles W. Programs, Food Safety and Inspection Center for Food Safety and Applied Cooper, Director, International Service, U.S. Department of Nutrition, Room 5823 (HFS–585), Activities Staff, Center for Food Safety Agriculture, Room 341–E, Jamie L. Food and Drug Administration, 200 C and Applied Nutrition, Room 5823 Whitten Federal Bldg., Washington, Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, (HFS–585), Food and Drug # # DC 20250–3700, Phone #: (202) 720– Phone : (202) 205–5042, Fax : (202) Administration, 200 C Street, SW., 3473, Fax #: (202) 690–3856 401–6144 Washington, DC 20204, Phone #: (202) Alternate Delegate—Dr. Richard Mikita, Alternate Delegate—Mr. Timothy L. 205–5042, Fax #: (202) 401–6144 Mounts, Research Leader, Food Export Advisor, International Quality and Safety Research Unit, Codex Committee on Edible Ices 1 Programs, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of National Center for Agricultural (Host Government—Sweden) Utilization Research, Agricultural Agriculture, Room 341–E, Jamie L. Research Service, USDA, 1815 North Delegate—Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Whitten Federal Bldg., 14th & University Street, Peoria, IL 61604, Director, International Activities Staff, Independence Ave., SW., Washington, Phone #: (309) 681–6555, Fax #: (309) Center for Food Safety and Applied DC 20250–3700, Phone #: (202) 720– 681–6679 Nutrition, Room 5823 (HFS–585), 0290, Fax #: (202) 690–3856 Food and Drug Administration, 200 C Codex Committee on Processed Meat Worldwide Commodity Codex Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, and Poultry Products 1 Committees (Adjourned Sine Die) Phone #: (202) 205–5042, Fax #: (202) Codex Committee on Cocoa Products 401–6144 (Host Government—Denmark) and Chocolate1 Alternate Delegate—VACANT U.S. Delegate—Mr. Daniel Engeljohn, (Host Government—Switzerland) Codex Committee on Soups and Broths 1 Branch Chief, Quality Control, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Delegate—Mr. Charles W. Cooper, (Host Government—Switzerland) Department of Agriculture, Franklin Director, International Activities Staff, Delegate—Mr. Charles Edwards, Court Building, Room 6912, Center for Food Safety and Applied Director, Product Assessment Washington, DC 20250–3700, Phone Nutrition, Room 5823 (HFS–585), Division, Regulatory Programs, Food #: (202) 501–7319, Fax #: (202) 501– Food and Drug Administration, 200 C Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. 7639 Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, Department of Agriculture, West End Alternate Delegate—Mr. Charles # # Phone : (202) 205–5042, Fax : (202) Court Building, Room 329, Edwards, Director, Product 401–6144 Washington, DC 20250–3700, Phone Assessment Division, Regulatory Alternate Delegate—Dr. Michelle Smith, #: (202) 254–2565, Fax #: (202) 254– Programs, Food Safety and Inspection Food Technologist, Office of Food 2499 Service, U.S. Department of Labeling, Center for Food Safety and Alternate Delegate—Mr. Robert Post, Agriculture, West End Court Building, Applied Nutrition (HFS–158), 200 C Branch Chief, Food Standards and Room 329, Washington, DC 20250– Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, Ingredients Branch, Product 3700, Phone #: (202) 254–2565, Fax #: Phone #: (202) 205–5099, Fax #: (202) Assessment Division, Regulatory (202) 254–2499 205–4594 Programs, Food Safety & Inspection Codex Committee on Natural Mineral Service, U.S. Department of Codex Committee on Sugars 1 Waters 1 Agriculture, West End Court Building, (Host Government—United Kingdom) Room 327, Washington, DC 20250– (Host Government—Switzerland) # # Delegate—Dr. Thomas J. Army, Area 3700, Phone : (202) 254–2588, Fax : U.S. Delegate—Dr. Terry C. Troxell, Director, Mid-South Area, USDA/ (202) 254–2499 Director, Division of Programs and Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Codex Committee on Vegetable Enforcement Policy, Center for Food Box 225, Stoneville, MS 38776–0225, Proteins 1 Safety & Applied Nutrition (HFS– Phone #: (601) 686–5265, Fax #: (601) 305), Food and Drug Administration, 626–5259 (Host Government—Canada) 200 C Street, SW., Washington, DC Alternate Delegate—Dr. Dennis M. U.S. Delegate—Dr. Wilda H. Martinez, 20204, Phone #: (202) 205–5321, Fax Keefe, Office of Premarket Approval, Associate Deputy Administrator, #: (202) 205–4422 Center for Food Safety and Applied Aqua Products and Human Nutrition Alternate Delegate—Ms. Shellee A. Nutrition, Food and Drug Sciences, U.S. Department of Davis, Division of Programs and Administration, 200 C Street, SW Agriculture, Agricultural Research Enforcement Policy, Center for Food (HFS–206), Washington, DC 20204, Service, Room 107, B–005, Beltsville, Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food Phone #: (202) 418–3113, Fax #: (202) MD 20705, Phone #: (301) 504–6275, and Drug Administration, 200 C 418–3131 Fax #: (301) 504–6699 Street, SW (HFS–306), Washington, Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28151

DC 20204, Phone #: (202) 205–4681, Administration, 200 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Fax #: (202) 205–4422 Washington, DC 20204, Phone #: (202) 720–5021, Fax #: (202) 690–1527 205–5042, Fax #: (202) 401–6144 Joint U.N.E.C.E. Codex Alimentarius Subsidiary Bodies of the Codex Groups of Experts Joint ECE/Codex Alimentarius Group of Alimentarius Experts on Standardization of Fruit Joint ECE/Codex Alimentarius Group of There are five regional coordinating Juices 1 Experts on Standardization of Quick committees: Frozen Foods 1 U.S. Delegate—Mr. Charles W. Cooper, Coordinating Committee for Africa U.S. Delegate—Mr. Richard B. Boyd, Director, International Activities Staff, Coordinating Committee for Asia Senior Marketing Specialist, Fruit and Center for Food Safety and Applied Coordinating Committee for Europe Vegetable Division, Agricultural Nutrition, Room 5823 (HFS–585), Coordinating Committee for Latin Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Food and Drug Administration, 200 C America and the Caribbean, and Agriculture, Room 0717, South Street, SW., Washington, DC 20204, Coordinating Committee for North # # Agriculture Building, 14th & Phone : (202) 205–5042, Fax : (202) America and the South-West Pacific Independence Avenue, SW., 401–7739 Contact—Ms. Rhonda S. Nally, Washington, DC 20250, Phone #: (202) Alternate Delegate—Mr. Richard B. Executive Officer for Codex, 720–5021, Fax #: (202) 690–1527 Boyd, Senior Marketing Specialist, Alimentarius, Food Safety & Alternate Delegate—Mr. Charles W. Fruit and Vegetable Division, Inspection Service, U.S. Department Cooper, Director, International Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. of Agriculture, West End Court, Room Activities Staff, Center for Food Safety Department of Agriculture, Room 311, 1255 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 20250–3700, Phone and Applied Nutrition, Room 5823 0717, Agriculture South Building, # # (HFS–585), Food and Drug 14th & Independence Avenue, SW., : (202) 254–2517, Fax : (202) 254– 2530

Appendix 2 Timetable of Codex Sessions

(June 1995 through June 1997)

1995 CX 702±42 Executive Committee of the Codex Alimentarius Commission 28±30 June Rome. (42nd Session). CX 701±21 CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION (21st Session) ...... 3±8 July Rome. CX 715±20 Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (20th 2±6 October Budapest. Session). CX 712±28 Codex Committee on Food Hygiene (28th Session) ...... 28 November± Washington, DC. 1 December CX 730±9 Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (9th 4±8 December Washington, DC. Session). 1996 CX 731±6 Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables (6th Session) 29 January± Mexico City. 2 February CX 733±4 Codex Committee on Food Export and Import Inspection and Cer- 19±23 February Sydney. tification Systems (4th Session). CX 727±10 Codex Regional Coordinating Committee for Asia (10th Session) 5±8 March Tokyo. CX 711±28 Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (28th 18±22 March Manila. Session). CX 718±28 Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (28th Session) ...... 15±20 April The Hague. CX 706±20 Codex Regional Coordinating Committee for Europe (20th Ses- 23±26 April Uppsala. sion). CX 732±4 Codex Coordinating Committee for North America and the South- 30 April±3 May Rotorua. West Pacific (4th Session). CX 722±22 Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products (22nd Session) 6±10 May Bergen. CX 714±24 Codex Committee on Food Labeling (24th Session) ...... 14±17 May Ottawa. CX 703±1 Codex Committee on Milk and Milk Products (2nd Session) ...... 27±31 May Rome. CX 702±43 Executive Committee of the Codex Alimentarius Commission 4±7 June Geneva. (43rd Session). CX 708±16 Codex Committee on Cocoa Products and Chocolate (16th Ses- 30 September±2 TBA. sion). October CX 719±5 Codex Committee on Natural Mineral Waters (5th Session) ...... 3±5 October TBA. CX 707±12 Codex Regional Coordinating Committee for Africa (12th Session) TBA Harare. CX 720±20 Codex Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Uses 7±11 October Bonn Bad-Godesberg. (20th Session).

1 Adjourned sine die. The main tasks of these Committees are completed. However, the committees may be called to meet again if required. 28152 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

CX 712±29 Codex Committee on Food Hygiene (29th Session) ...... 21±25 October Washington, DC. CX 730±10 Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods(10th 29 October± TBA. Session). 1 November CX 709±11 Codex Committee on Fats and Oils (15th Session) ...... 4±8 November London. CX 716±12 Codex Committee on General Principles (12th Session) ...... 25±28 November Paris. 1997 CX 713±19 Codex Committee on Processed Fruits and Vegetables (19th Ses- 3±7 February Washington, DC. sion). CX 725±10 Codex Regional Coordinating Committee for Latin America and 25±28 February Montevideo the Caribbean (10th Session). CX 711±29 Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (29th 17±21 March The Hague. Session). CX 715±21 Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (21st 24±28 March Budapest. Session). CX 718±29 Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (29th Session) ...... 7±12 April The Hague. CX 714±25 Codex Committee on Food Labeling (25th Session) ...... 15±18 April Ottawa. CX 702±44 Executive Committee of the Codex Alimentarius Commission 18±20 June Geneva. (44th Session). CX 701±22 CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION (22nd Session) ...... 23±28 June Geneva.

Appendix 3—Definitions for the manufacture, processing, preparation, Authorized safe uses are determined Purpose of Codex Alimentarius treatment, packing, packaging, transport at the national level and include Words and phrases have specific or holding of such food or as a result of nationally registered or recommended meanings when used by the Codex environmental contamination. The term uses, which take into account public Alimentarius. For the purposes of does not include insect fragments, and occupational health and Codex, the following definitions apply: rodent hairs and other extraneous environmental safety considerations. 1. Food means any substance, matters. Actual conditions include any stage whether processed, semi-processed or 5. Pesticide means any substance in the production, storage, transport, raw, which is intended for human intended for preventing, destroying, distribution and processing of food consumption, and includes drink, attracting, repelling, or controlling any commodities and animal feed. 8. Codex Maximum Limit for Pesticide chewing gum, and any substance which pest including unwanted species of Residues (MRLP) is the maximum has been used in the manufacture, plants or animals during the production, concentration of a pesticide residue preparation or treatment of ‘‘food’’ but storage, transport, distribution and (expressed as mg/kg), recommended by does not include cosmetics or tobacco or processing of food, agricultural the Codex Alimentarius Commission to substances used only as drugs. commodities, or animal feeds or which 2. Food hygiene comprises conditions may be administered to animals for the be legally permitted in or on food and measures necessary for the control of ectoparasites. The term commodities and animal feeds. MRLPs production, processing, storage and includes substances intended for use as are based on their toxological affects distribution of food designed to ensure a plant-growth regulator, defoliant, and on GAP data and foods derived a safe, sound, wholesome product fit for desiccant, fruit thinning agent, or from commodities that comply with the human consumption. sprouting inhibitor and substances respective MRLPs are intended to be 3. Food additive means any substance applied to crops either before or after toxologically acceptable. Codex MRLPs, which are primarily not normally consumed as a food by harvest to protect the commodity from intended to apply in international trade, itself and not normally used as a typical deterioration during storage and are derived from reviews conducted by ingredient of the food, whether or not it transport. The term pesticides excludes the JMPR following: has nutritive value, the intentional fertilizers, plant and animal nutrients, addition of which to food for a food additives, and animal drugs. (a) Toxological assessment of the technological (including organoleptic) 6. Pesticide residue means any pesticide and its residue and purpose in the manufacture, processing, specified substance in food, agricultural (b) Review of residue data from preparation, treatment, packing, commodities, or animal feed resulting supervised trials and supervised uses packaging, transport, or holding of such from the use of a pesticide. The term including those reflecting national good food results, or may be reasonably includes any derivatives of a pesticide, agricultural practices. Data from expected to result, (directly or such as conversion products, supervised trials conducted at the indirectly) in it or its by-products metabolites, reaction products, and highest nationally recommended, becoming a component of or otherwise impurities considered to be of authorized, or registered uses are affecting the characteristics of such toxological significance. included in the review. In order to foods. The food additive term does not 7. Good Agricultural Practice in the accommodate variations in national pest include ‘‘contaminants’’ or substances Use of Pesticides (GAP) includes the control requirements, Codex MRLPs added to food for maintaining or nationally authorized safe uses of take into account the higher levels improving nutritional qualities. pesticides under actual conditions shown to arise in such supervised trials, 4. Contaminant means any substance necessary for effective and reliable pest which are considered to represent not intentionally added to food, which control. It encompasses a range of levels effective pest control practices. is present in such food as a result of the of pesticide applications up to the Consideration of the various dietary production (including operations highest authorized use, applied in a residue intake estimates and carried out in crop husbandry, animal manner which leaves a residue which is determinations both at the national and husbandry, and veterinary medicine), the smallest amount practicable. international level in comparison with Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28153 the ADI, should indicate that foods Apendix 4—Part 1, Uniform Procedure Commission or to the Executive complying with Codex MRLPs are safe for the Elaboration of Codex Standards Committee with a view to its adoption for human consumption. and Related Texts as a draft standard. When making any 9. Veterinary Drug means any Steps 1, 2 and 3 decision at this step, the Commission or substance applied or administered to the Executive Committee will give due (1) The Commission decides, taking consideration to any comments that may any food-producing animal, such as into account the ‘‘Criteria for the meat or milk-producing animals, be submitted by any of its members Establishment of Work Priorities and for regarding the implications which the poultry, fish or bees, whether used for the Establishment of Subsidiary therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic proposed draft standard or any Bodies,’’ to elaborate a Worldwide provisions of the standard may have for purposes or for modification of Codex Standard and also decides which their economic interests. In the case of physiological functions or behavior. subsidiary body or other body should Regional Standards, all members of the undertake the work. A decision to 10. Residues of Veterinary Drugs Commission may present their include the parent compounds and/or elaborate a Worldwide Codex Standard may also be taken by subsidiary bodies comments, take part in the debate and their metabolites in any edible portion propose amendments, but only the of the animal product, and include of the Commission in accordance with the above-mentioned criteria, subject to majority of the Members of the region or residues of associated impurities of the group of countries concerned attending veterinary drug concerned. subsequent approval by the Commission or its Executive Committee at the the session can decide to amend or 11. Codex Maximum Limit for earliest possible opportunity. In the case adopt the draft. When making any Residues of Veterinary Drugs (MRLVD) of Codex Regional Standards, the decisions at this step, the members of is the maximum concentration of Commission shall base its decision on the region or group of countries residue resulting from the use of a the proposal of the majority of members concerned will give due consideration veterinary drug (expressed in mg/kg or belonging to a given region or group of to any comments that may be submitted µg/kg on a fresh weight basis) that is countries submitted at a session of the by any of the members of the recommended by the Codex Codex Alimentarius Commission. Commission regarding the implications Alimentarius Commission to be legally (2) The Secretariat arranges for the which the proposed draft standard or permitted or recognized as acceptable in preparation of a proposed draft any provisions of the proposed draft or on food. standard. In the case of Maximum standard may have for their economic An MRLVD is based on the type and Limits for Residues of Pesticides or interests. amount of residue considered to be Veterinary Drugs, the Secretariat distributes the recommendations for Step 6 without any toxological hazard for maximum limits, when available from human health as expressed by the The draft standard is sent by the the Joint Meetings of the FAO Panel of Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI), or on the Secretariat to all members and Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food basis of a temporary ADI that utilizes an interested international organizations and the Environment and the WHO for comment on all aspects, including additional safety factor. An MRLVD also Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues possible implications of the draft takes into account other relevant public (JMPR), or the Joint FAO/WHO Expert standard for their economic interests. health risks as well as food Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). technological aspects. In the cases of milk and milk products Step 7 When establishing an MRLVD, or individual standards for cheeses, the consideration is also given to residues Secretariat distributes the The comments received are sent by that occur in food of plant origin and/ recommendations of the International the Secretariat to the subsidiary body or or the environment. Furthermore, the Dairy Federation (IDF). other body concerned, which has the MRLVD may be reduced to be consistent (3) The proposed draft standard is power to consider such comments and with good practices in the use of sent to members of the Commission and amend the draft standard. interested international organizations veterinary drugs and to the extent that Step 8 practical and analytical methods are for comment on all aspects including available. possible implications of the proposed The draft standard is submitted draft standard for their economic 12. Good Practice in the Use of through the Secretariat to the interests. Commission together with any written Veterinary Drugs (GPVD) is the official proposals received from members and recommended or authorized usage Step 4 interested international organizations including withdrawal periods approved The comments received are sent by for amendments at Step 8 with a view by national authorities, of veterinary the Secretariat to the subsidiary body or to its adoption as a Codex Standard. In drugs under practicable conditions. other body concerned which has the the case of Regional standards, all 13. Processing Aid means any power to consider such comments and to amend the proposed draft standard. members and interested international substance or material, not including organizations may present their apparatus or utensils, not consumed as Step 5 2 comments, take part in the debate and a food ingredient by itself, intentionally The proposed draft standard is propose amendments but only the used in the processing of raw materials, submitted through the Secretariat to the majority of members of the region or foods or its ingredients, to fulfill a group of countries concerned attending certain technological purpose during 2 Without prejudice to any decision that may be the session can decide to amend and treatment or processing and which may taken by the Commission at Step 5, the proposed adopt the draft. result in the non-intentional but draft standard may be sent by the Secretariat for government comment prior to its consideration at unavoidable presence of residues or Step 5, when, in the opinion of the subsidiary body subsequent session of the subsidiary or other body derivatives in the final product. or other body concerned, the time between the concerned requires such actions in order to advance relevant session of the Commission and the the work. 28154 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Appendix 4—Part 2, Uniform international organizations for Scope Accelerated Procedure for the amendments with a view to its adoption This section should contain a clear, Elaboration of Codex Standards and as a Codex standard. In taking any concise statement as to the food or foods Related Texts decision at this step, the Commission to which the standard is applicable will give due consideration to any Steps 1, 2 and 3 unless the name of the standard clearly comments that may be submitted by any and concisely identifies the food or (1) The Commission or the Executive of its Members regarding the foods. A generic standard covering more Committee between Commission implications which the proposed draft than one specific product should clearly sessions, on the basis of a two-thirds standard or any provisions thereof may identify the specific products to which majority of votes cast, taking into have for their economic interests. the standard applies. account the ‘‘Criteria for the Establishment of Work Priorities and for Appendix 5—Nature of Codex Description Standards the Establishment of Subsidiary This section should contain a Bodies’’, shall identify those standards Codex standards contain requirements definition of the product or products which shall be the subject of an for food aimed at ensuring for the with an indication, where appropriate, accelerated elaboration process.* The consumer a sound, wholesome food of the raw materials from which the identification of such standards may product free from adulteration, and product or products are derived and any also be made by subsidiary bodies of the correctly labelled. A Codex standard for necessary references to processes of Commission, on the basis of a two- any food or foods should be drawn up manufacture. The description may also thirds majority of votes cast, subject to in accordance with the Format for include references to types and styles of confirmation at the earliest opportunity Codex Commodity Standards and product and to type of pack. The by the Commission or its Executive contain, as appropriate, the criteria description may also include additional Committee by a two-thirds majority of listed therein. definitions when these additional votes cast. Format for Codex Commodity definition are required to clarify the (2) The Secretariat arranges for the meaning of the standard. preparation of a proposed draft Standards Including Standards standard. In the case of Maximum Elaborated Under the Code of Essential Composition and Quality Limits for Residues of Pesticides or Principles Concerning Milk and Milk Factors Veterinary Drugs, the Secretariat Products This section should contain all distributes the recommendations for Introduction quantitative and other requirements as maximum limits, when available from to composition including, where The format is also intended for use as the Joint Meetings of the FAO Panel of necessary, identity characteristics, a guide by the subsidiary bodies of the Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food provisions on packing media and Codex Alimentarius Commission in and the Environment and the WHO requirements as to compulsory and presenting their standards, with the Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues optional ingredients. It should also object of achieving, as far as possible, a (JMPR), or the Joint FAO/WHO Expert include quality factors which are uniform presentation of commodity Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). essential for the designation, definition, standards. The format also indicates the In the cases of milk and milk products or composition of the product statements which should be included in or individual standards for cheeses, the concerned. Such factors could include standards as appropriate under the Secretariat distributes the the quality of the raw material, with the relevant headings of the standard. The recommendations of the International object of protecting the health of the sections of the format required to be Dairy Federation (IDF). consumer, provisions on taste, odor, (3) The proposed draft standard is completed for a standard are only those color, and texture which may be sent to Members of the Commission and provisions that are appropriate to an apprehended by the senses, and basic interested international organizations international standard for the food in quality criteria for the finished for comment on all aspects including question. products, with the object of preventing possible implications of the proposed Name of the standard fraud. This section may refer to draft standard for their economic Scope tolerances for defects, such as blemishes interests. When standards are subject to Description or imperfect material, but this Essential composition and quality an accelerated procedure, this fact shall information should be contained in factors be notified to the Members of the appendix to the standard or in another Food additives advisory text. Commission and the interested Contaminants international organizations. Hygiene Food Additives Step 4 Weights and measures This section should contain the Labelling names of the additives permitted and, The comments received are sent by Methods of analysis and sampling the Secretariat to the subsidiary body or where appropriate, the maximum other body concerned which has the Format for Codex Standards amount permitted in the food. It should power to consider such comments and be prepared in accordance with Name of the Standard to amend the proposed draft standard. guidance given on pages 93 to 96 of the The name of the standard should be Codex Procedural Manual and may take Step 5 clear and as concise as possible. It the following form: In the case of standards identified as should usually be the common name by ‘‘The following provisions in respect being subject to an accelerated which the food covered by the standard of food additives and their elaboration procedure, the draft is known or, if more than one food is specifications as contained in section standard is submitted through the dealt with in the standard, by a generic .. . of the Codex Alimentarius are Secretariat to the Commission together name covering them all. If a fully subject to endorsement (have been with any written proposals received informative title is inordinately long, a endorsed) by the Codex Committee on from Members and interested subtitle could be added. Food Additives and Contaminants.’’ Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28155

A tabulation should then follow, viz.: measures, e.g. where appropriate, fill of ‘‘The methods of analysis and ‘‘Name of additive, maximum level container, weight, measure or count of sampling described hereunder are to be (in percentage or mg/kg).’’ units determined by an appropriate endorsed (have been endorsed) by the Contaminants method of sampling and analysis. Codex Committee on Methods of Weights and measures should be Analysis and Sampling.’’ (a) Pesticide Residues: This section expressed in S.I. units. In the case of Appendix 6—Provisional Agenda of the should include, by reference, any levels standards which include provisions for Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards for pesticide residues that have been the sale of products in standardized Programme, Executive Committee of the established by the Codex Committee on amounts, e.g. multiples of 100 grams, Codex Alimentarius Commission, Pesticide Residues for the product S.I. units should be used, but this would Forty-third Session, WHO concerned. not preclude additional statements in Headquarters, Geneva, 4–7 June 1996 (b) Other Contaminants: In addition, the standards of these standardized this section should contain the names of amounts in approximately similar Item and Subject Matter other contaminants and where amounts in other systems of weights 1. Adoption of the Agenda—CX/EXEC appropriate the maximum level and measures. permitted in the food, and the text to 96/43/1 appear in the standard may take the Labelling 2. Financial and Budgetary Matters— CX/EXEC 96/43/2 following form: This section should include all the ‘‘The following provisions in respect Report on the accounts of the Joint labelling provisions contained in the of contaminants, other than pesticide FAO/WHO Food Standards standard and should be prepared in residues, are subject to endorsement Programme for 1994/95 and on the accordance with the guidance given on (have been endorsed) by the Codex budget for 1996/97 pages 91 to 93 of the Codex Procedural Committee on Food Additives and Manual. Provisions should be included Cost implications of providing Contaminants.’’ documentation and interpretation A tabulation should then follow, viz.: by reference to the General Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods. The in the Arabic language ‘‘Name of contaminant, maximum Cost reduction in documentation and level (in percentage or mg/kg).’’ section may also contain provisions which are exemptions from, additions other areas Hygiene to, or which are necessary for the New mechanisms for the strengthening of Codex work Any specific mandatory hygiene interpretation of the General Standard provisions considered necessary should in respect of the product concerned 3. Implementation of the Commission’s be included in this section. They should provided that these can be justified Programme of Work—CX/EXEC 96/ be prepared in accordance with the fully. The following statement should 43/3 guidance given on pages 96 to 98 of the also appear: Progress in achieving the Medium- Codex Procedural Manual. Reference ‘‘The following provisions in respect Term Objectives should also be made to applicable codes of the labelling of this product are Implementation of decisions taken by of hygienic practice. Any parts of such subject to endorsement (have been the 21st Session of the Commission codes, including in particular any end- endorsed) by the Codex Committee on Management of the Programme of product specifications, should be set out Food Labelling.’’ Work Proposals for new items of work (Step in the standard, if it is considered Methods of Analysis and Sampling necessary that they should be made 1) mandatory. The following statement This section should include, either Consideration of Proposed Draft should also appear: specifically or by reference, all methods Standards and related texts at Step of analysis and sampling considered 5 necessary and should be prepared in 4. Risk Analysis in Codex Work: ‘‘The following provisions in respect accordance with the guidance given on Progress Report—CX/EXEC 96/43/4 of the food hygiene of the product are pages 99 to 102 of the Codex Procedural 5. Determination, Interpretation and subject to endorsement (have been Manual. If two or more methods have Application of Residue Limits—CX/ endorsed) by the Codex Committee on been proved to be equivalent by the EXEC 96/43/5 Food Hygiene.’’ Codex Committee on Methods of 6. Draft Provisional Agenda for the 22nd Analysis and Sampling, these could be Session of the Codex Alimentarius Weights and Measures regarded as alternative and included in Commission—CX/EXEC 96/43/6 This section should include all this section either specifically or by 7. Other Business—CX/EXEC 96/43/7 provisions, other than labelling reference. The following statement 8. Adoption of the Report—CX/EXEC provisions, relating to weights and should also appear: 96/43/8

Appendix 7—List of Standards and Related Texts Adopted by the 21st Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission

PART I.ÐSTANDARDS AND RELATED TEXTS ADOPTED AT STEP 8

Standard or related text References Decision

General Standard for Food Additives: Preamble ...... ALINORM 95/12, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Specifications for the Identity and Purity of Food Additives ...... ALINORM 95/12, Appendix IV, Adopted. ALINORM 95/12A, Appendix IV. Amendments to the International Numbering System for Food Addi- ALINORM 95/12, Appendix V ...... Adopted. tives. General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods: Preamble ... ALINORM 95/12A, Appendix VI .... Adopted. Recommended Method of Sampling for the Determination of Pesticide ALINORM 95/24A, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Residues in Milk, Milk Products and Eggs. 28156 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

PART I.ÐSTANDARDS AND RELATED TEXTS ADOPTED AT STEP 8ÐContinued

Standard or related text References Decision

Revised List of Methods of Analysis for Pesticide Residues ...... ALINORM 95/24A, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides ...... ALINORM 95/24A±Add. 1 ...... Adopted. Including the deletion and amendment of certain Codex MRLs as contained in the reference Maximum Residue Limits for the following Veterinary Drugs ...... ALINORM 91/31, Appendix IV ...... Adopted. Estradiol 17±β Progesterone Testosterone Zeranol Trenbolone Acetate ...... ALINORM 93/31, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Sulfadimidine ...... ALINORM 95/31, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Flubendazole Thiabendazole Isometamidium Code of Hygienic Practice for Spices and Dried Aromatic Plants ...... ALINORM 95/13, Appendix II ...... Adopted. (Latin America and Caribbean Regional) Code of Hygienic Practice for ALINORM 95/36, Appendix II ...... Adopted. the Preparation and Sale of Street-Vended Foods. Codex General Methods of Analysis for Contaminants ...... ALINORM 95/23, Appendix III ...... Adopted. Recommended Protocol for the Design, Conduct and Interpretation of ALINORM 95/23, Appendix V ...... Adopted. Method Performance Studies. Harmonized Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of (Chemical) Analyt- ALINORM 95/23, Appendix V ...... Adopted. ical Laboratories. Principles for Food Import and Export Certification and Inspection ...... ALINORM 95/30A, Appendix II ...... Adopted with minor amendments: Guidelines for the Exchange of Information in food Control Emergency ALINORM 95/30A, Appendix III ..... Adopted. Situations. General Statement of Provisions concerning Inspection and Certifi- ALINORM 95/30A, paras. 96 ...... Adopted for inclusion in Procedural cation in Codex Standards. Manual. General Standard for Quick Frozen Fish Fillets ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix II ...... Adopted with editorial changes. Standard for Quick Frozen Raw Squid ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix III ...... Adopted. Revised General Standard for Quick Frozen Blocks of Fish Fillets, ALINORM 95/18, Appendix IV ...... Adopted. Minced Fish Flesh and Mixtures of Fillets and Minced Fish Flesh. Revised Standard for Quick Frozen Finfish, Eviscerated or ALINORM 95/18, Appendix V ...... Adopted. Uneviscerated. Revised Standard for Quick Frozen Lobsters ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix VI ...... Adopted. Revised Standard for Quick Frozen Fish Sticks (Fish Fingers), Fish ALINORM 95/18, Appendix VII ...... Adopted with editorial changes. Portions and Fish FilletsÐBreaded or in Batter. Revised Standard for Quick Frozen Shrimps or Prawns ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix VIII ..... Adopted. Revised Standard for Canned Crab Meat ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix IX ...... Adopted with amendments. Revised Standard for Canned Finfish ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix X ...... Adopted. Revised Standard for Canned Salmon ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix XI ...... Adopted with editorial changes. Revised Standard for Sardines and Sardine-Type Products ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix XII ...... Adopted with an editorial change. Revised Standard for Canned Shrimps or Prawns ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix XIII ..... Adopted. Revised Standard for Canned Tuna and Bonito ...... ALINORM 95/18, Appendix XIV .... Adopted. Revised Standard for Slated Fish and Dried Salted Fish of the ALINORM 95/18, Appendix XV ..... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- Gadidae Family of Fishes. sion of Steps 6 & 7. General Standard for Edible Palm Olein ...... ALINORM 95/17, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Standard for Edible Palm Stearin ...... ALINORM 95/17, Appendix III ...... Adopted. General Standard for Whey Powders ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Standard for Edible Casein Products ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix III ...... Adopted with minor amendments. Standard for Litchi ...... ALINORM 95/35, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Standard for Avocado ...... ALINORM 95/35, Appendix III ...... Adopted with minor amendments. Code of Practice for the Packaging and Transport of Tropical Fresh ALINORM 95/35, Appendix VII ...... Adopted. Fruit and Vegetables. Standard for Rice ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix III ...... Adopted. Standard for Wheat and Durum Wheat ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix IV ...... Adopted. Standard for Peanuts ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix V ...... Adopted. Standard for Oats ...... ALINORM 95/39, Appendix VI ...... Adopted. Standard for Couscous ...... ALINORM 95/28, Addendum ...... Adopted. Standard for Wheat Flour ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix VII ...... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Maize (Corn) ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix VIII ..... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Whole Maize (Corn) Meal ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix IX ...... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Degermed Maize (Corn) Meal and Maize (Corn) Grits ..... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix X ...... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Certain Pulses ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XI ...... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Sorghum Grains ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XII ...... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28157

PART I.ÐSTANDARDS AND RELATED TEXTS ADOPTED AT STEP 8ÐContinued

Standard or related text References Decision

Standard for Sorghum Flour ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XIII ..... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Durum Wheat Semolina and Durum Wheat Flour ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XIV .... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Gari ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XV ..... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Whole and Decorticated Pearl Millet Grains ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XVI .... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Pearl Millet Flour ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XVII ... Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard For Edible Cassava Flour ...... ALINORM 95/29, Appendix XVIII Adopted at Steps 5 & 8 with omis- sion of Steps 6 & 7. Standard for Formula Foods for Use in Very Low Energy Diets for ALINORM 95/26, Appendix II ...... Adopted. Weight Reduction. Revised Standard for Bouillons and Consummes ...... ALINORM 95/20, Appendix I ...... Adopted. General Standard for Food Additives: Annex AÐGuidelines for the ALINORM 95/12A, Appendix III ..... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced Estimation of Appropriate Levels of Use of Food Additives. to Step 6. General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods ...... ALINORM 95/12A, Appendix VII, Adopted at Step 5 and advanced Annexes I, II and III. to Step 6. Criteria for the Establishment of Maximum Levels in Foods Proce- dure for Risk Management Decisions Format of the Standard Draft Maximum Residue Limits for the following Veterinary Drugs: ALINORM 95/31, Appendix IV ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Levamisole Diminazene Draft Guidelines on the Use of Health and Nutrition Claims; and ...... ALINORM 95/22, Appendix III ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Table of Conditions for Claims for Nutrient Contents ...... ALINORM 95/26, Appendix III ...... Draft Guidelines for the Use of the Term Halal ...... ALINORM 95/22, Appendix IV ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft (African Regional) Code of Hygienic Practice for Street Foods ... ALINORM 95/28, Appendix II ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft (Revised) International Code of Practice: General Principles of ALINORM 95/13, Appendix II ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced Food Hygiene. to Step 6. Draft Guidelines for the Exchange of Information between Countries ALINORM 95/30A, Appendix IV .... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced on Rejections of Imported Food. to Step 6. Draft Standard for Edible Fats and Oils not Covered by Individual ALINORM 95/17, Appendix V ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced Standards. to Step 6. Draft Standard for Named Animal Fats ...... ALINORM 95/17, Appendix VII ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Standard for Named Vegetable Oils ...... ALINORM 95/17, Appendix VIII ..... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Standard for Olive Oils and Olive Pomace Oils ...... ALINORM 95/17, Appendix X ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Standard for Mayonnaise ...... ALINORM 95/17, Appendix XI ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Code of Practice for the Storage and Transport of Edi- ALINORM 95/17, Appendix IV ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced ble Oils and Fats in Bulk. to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Butter ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix IV ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Milkfat Products ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix V ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Evaporated Milks ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix VI ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Sweetened Conensed Milks ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix VII ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Milk and Cream Powders ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix VIII ..... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Cheese ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix IX ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Whey Cheese ...... ALINORM 95/11, Appendix X ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Revised Standard for Mangosteen ...... ALINORM 95/35, Appendix V ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. Draft Guideline Levels and Sampling Plans for Total Aflatoxins in Pea- ALINORM 95/29, Appendix II ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced nuts (Intended for Further Processing). to Step 6. Draft Standard for Sugar ...... CL 1995/5±S, Annex I ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6. 28158 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

PART I.ÐSTANDARDS AND RELATED TEXTS ADOPTED AT STEP 8ÐContinued

Standard or related text References Decision

Draft Standard for Honey ...... CL 1995/5±S, Annex II ...... Adopted at Step 5 and advanced to Step 6.

[FR Doc. 96–13811 Filed 5–30–96; 9:39 am] SUMMARY: On September 5, 1991, a ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BILLING CODE 3410±DM±P notice of intent to prepare an BOARD environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Rocky Timber Sale on the Notice of Formal Determinations, Foreign Agricultural Service Prineville Ranger District of the Ochoco Designation of Assassination Records, National Forest was published in the and Reconsiderations North American Public Forum for the Federal Register (56 FR 43901). Forest World Food Summit AGENCY: Assassination Records Review Service has decided to cancel the Board. AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, preparation of an EIS for this proposed USDA. action. The Notice of Intent is hereby SUMMARY: The Assassination Records ACTION: Notice of meeting. rescinded. Review Board (Review Board) met in a closed meeting on May 13–14, 1996, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that and made formal determinations on the the U.S.-Canada Forum for the World Direct questions regarding this release of records under the President Food Summit will be held June 24–25, cancellation to Dave Owens, Fire John F. Kennedy Assassination Records 1996. The purpose of the forum is to Management Officer, P.O. Box 490, Collection Act of 1992 (Supp. V 1994) solicit public comments on a draft Prineville, Oregon 97754 or telephone (JFK Act). By issuing this notice, the regional paper and the draft Policy 541–416–8425. Review Board complies with the section Statement and Plan of Action to be Dated: May 22, 1996. of the JFK Act that requires the Review adopted at the Summit. Thomas A. Schmidt, Board to publish the results of its DATES: The forum will be held Monday, decisions on a document-by-document Forest Supervisor. June 24, 1996 from 2:30 to 6:00 p.m., basis in the Federal Register within 14 and continue on Tuesday, June 25, 1996 [FR Doc. 96–13885 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] days of the date of the decision. from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Both BILLING CODE 3410±11±M FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: meetings will be held at Michigan State T. Jeremy Gunn, General Counsel and University in East Lansing, Michigan. Associate Director for Research and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ed, North Slope Helicopter, Saddle, Analysis, Assassination Records Review meeting is open to the public and and Spanish Timber Sales, Ochoco Board, Second Floor, Washington, DC members of the public may provide National Forest, Grant and Wheeler 20530, (202) 724–0088, fax (202) 724– comments in writing to the Office of the Counties, Oregon 0457. National Secretary, Foreign Agricultural SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. Service, Room 3008 South Building, notice complies with the requirements U.S. Department of Agriculture, 14th ACTION: Cancellation of an of the President John F. Kennedy and Independence Ave. SW, environmental impact statement. Assassination Records Collection Act of Washington, DC. 20250 or by faxing 1992, 44 U.S.C. 2107.9(c)(4)(A) (1992). (202) 720–6103. The draft Policy SUMMARY: On November 6, 1990, a On May 13–14, 1996, the Review Board Statement and Plan of Action is notice of intent to prepare an made formal determinations on records available from the FAO North American environmental impact statement (EIS) it reviewed under the JFK Act. These Liaison Office at (202) 653–2400. The for the Ed, North Slope Helicopter, determinations are listed below. The draft U.S./Canada paper will be assassination records are identified by available in early June on the U.S. Saddle, and Spanish Timber Sales on the Paulina Ranger District of the the record identification number Government World Food Summit Home assigned in the President John F. Page (http://ffas.usda.gov/ffas/food l Ochoco National Forest was published in the Federal Register (55 FR 46694). Kennedy Assassination Records summit/summit.html) or by calling Collection database maintained by the (202) 690–0776. Forest Service has decided to cancel the preparation of an EIS for this proposed National Archives. Signed in Washington, D.C., May 23, 1996. action. The Notice of Intent is hereby Notice of Formal Determinations August Schumacher, Jr., rescinded. Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service. For each document, the number of [FR Doc. 96–13899 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: releases of previously redacted information immediately follows the BILLING CODE 3410±10±M Direct questions regarding this cancellation to Kathleen Burleigh, record identification number, followed NEPA Coordination, 171500 Beaver in turn by the number of postponements Forest Service Creek Road, Paulina, Oregon, 97751 or sustained, and, where appropriate, the telephone 541–477–3713. date the document is scheduled to be Rocky Timber Sale, Ochoco National released or re-reviewed. Forest, Crook County, Oregon Dated: May 22, 1996. Thomas A. Schmidt, FBI Documents: Open in Full AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. Forest Supervisor. 124–10035–10107; 38; 0; n/a 124–10142–10153; 38; 0; n/a ACTION: Cancellation of an [FR Doc. 96–13886 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] environmental impact statement. 124–10171–10198; 38; 0; n/a BILLING CODE 3410±11±M 124–10228–10241; 38; 0; n/a Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28159

124–10234–10284; 38; 0; n/a 124–10035–10236; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10158–10077; 5; 5; 05/2006 124–10035–10365; 6; 0; n/a 124–10035–10267; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10159–10414; 0; 1; 01/2006 124–10040–10451; 1; 0; n/a 124–10035–10273; 1; 4; 05/2006 124–10170–10367; 0; 1; 08/1996 124–10049–10008; 8; 0; n/a 124–10035–10275; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10171–10478; 1; 1; 10/2017 124–10055–10172; 1; 0; n/a 124–10035–10277; 0; 8; 05/2006 124–10238–10395; 7; 2; 05/2006 124–10063–10133; 10; 0; n/a 124–10045–10244; 15; 1; 05/2006 124–10242–10266; 0; 1; 01/2006 124–10063–10293; 3; 0; n/a 124–10091–10003; 2; 1; 05/2006 124–10245–10419; 1; 1; 10/2017 124–10063–10340; 6; 0; n/a 124–10151–10482; 4; 3; 05/2006 124–10248–10216; 1; 1; 10/2017 124–10063–10410; 18; 0; n/a 124–10170–10350; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10254–10126; 0; 1; 08/1996 124–10063–10467; 7; 0; n/a 124–10175–10265; 4; 3; 05/2006 124–10254–10141; 0; 2; 08/1996 124–10063–10475; 1; 0; n/a 124–10243–10442; 15; 1; 05/2006 124–10259–10239; 0; 1; 08/1996 124–10065–10090; 26; 0; n/a 124–10249–10294; 2; 2; 05/2006 124–10275–10279; 7; 2; 05/2006 124–10067–10448; 16; 0; n/a 124–10006–10242; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10002–10488; 0; 2; 08/1996 124–10074–10143; 8; 0; n/a 124–10029–10252; 1; 2; 12/2005 124–10023–10246; 0; 1; 01/2006 124–10234–10180; 6; 0; n/a 124–10035–10283; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10086–10335; 0; 3; 08/1996 124–10071–10262; 8; 0; n/a 124–10035–10346; 3; 1; 05/2006 124–10156–10184; 1; 1; 10/2017 124–10073–10270; 2; 0; n/a 124–10035–10348; 5; 2; 05/2006 124–10160–10029; 26; 7; 05/2006 124–10073–10271; 2; 0; n/a 124–10035–10372; 1; 2; 05/2006 124–10162–10089; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10073–10284; 1; 0; n/a 124–10035–10375; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10162–10096; 7; 1; 05/2006 124–10076–10290; 4; 0; n/a 124–10035–10378; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10162–10097; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10076–10296; 8; 0; n/a 124–10035–10380; 1; 9; 05/2006 124–10163–10140; 4; 3; 05/2006 124–10083–10080; 6; 0; n/a 124–10037–10220; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10169–10066; 1; 1; 10/2017 124–10124–10184; 16; 0; n/a 124–10041–10247; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10169–10069; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10156–10108; 4; 0; n/a 124–10041–10374; 1; 1; 05/2006 124–10169–10075; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10275–10237; 2; 0; n/a 124–10043–10111; 2; 1; 05/2006 124–10169–10497; 5; 1; 05/2006 124–10233–10238; 2; 0; n/a 124–10046–10082; 0; 1; 08/1996 124–10170–10023; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10270–10026; 4; 0; n/a 124–10048–10378; 1; 1; 05/2006 124–10170–10026; 3; 1; 05/2006 124–10270–10282; 12; 0; n/a 124–10053–10357; 0; 1; 08/1996 124–10170–10029; 0; 3; 08/1996 124–10270–10285; 5; 0; n/a 124–10055–10227; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10171–10003; 0; 4; 05/2006 124–10270–10389; 2; 0; n/a 124–10055–10428; 1; 1; 05/2006 124–10171–10004; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10270–10461; 6; 0; n/a 124–10062–10339; 1; 1; 05/2006 124–10172–10016; 0; 2; 08/1996 124–10275–10088; 17; 0; n/a 124–10062–10393; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10172–10033; 4; 11; 08/1996 124–10275–10172; 8; 0; n/a 124–10062–10396; 0; 1; 10/2017 124–10172–10035; 1; 1; 08/1996 124–10275–10286; 6; 0; n/a 124–10062–10427; 0; 4; 05/2006 124–10173–10007; 0; 3; 08/1996 124–10276–10007; 1; 0; n/a 124–10062–10450; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10173–10036; 0; 1; 10/2017 124–10276–10215; 12; 0; n/a 124–10062–10452; 14; 1; 05/2006 124–10173–10073; 5; 1; 05/2006 CIA Documents: Open in Full 124–10062–10486; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10231–10113; 1; 1; 08/1996 124–10063–10180; 4; 4; 05/2006 124–10247–10423; 1; 1; 10/2017 104–10007–10339; 6; 0; n/a 124–10063–10284; 3; 3; 05/2006 124–10252–10070; 0; 3; 08/1996 HSCA Documents: Open in Full 124–10063–10394; 3; 3; 05/2006 124–10254–10139; 1; 1; 10/2017 124–10063–10395; 3; 3; 05/2006 180–10076–10034; 1; 0; n/a 124–10257–10074; 0; 2; 08/1996 124–10063–10412; 7; 3; 05/2006 124–10257–10077; 1; 1; 08/1996 FBI Documents: Postponed in Part 124–10071–10139; 7; 2; 05/2006 124–10261–10079; 0; 1; 01/2006 124–10001–10100; 61; 10; 05/2006 124–10097–10442; 0; 1; 05/2004 124–10267–10493; 0; 1; 01/2006 124–10002–10042; 2; 2; 05/2006 124–10239–10408; 2; 13; 10/2017 124–10270–10006; 2; 2; 05/2006 124–10002–10060; 2; 2; 05/2006 124–10250–10314; 1; 1; 05/2006 124–10270–10105; 4; 4; 05/2006 124–10003–10386; 3; 3; 05/2006 124–10261–10246; 2; 13; 10/2017 124–10270–10339; 2; 2; 05/2006 124–10003–10388; 5; 4; 05/2006 124–10275–10295; 2; 13; 10/2017 124–10270–10346; 3; 3; 05/2006 124–10037–10034; 0; 3; 08/1996 124–10003–10407; 3; 3; 05/2006 CIA Documents: Postponed in Part 124–10003–10420; 13; 4; 05/2006 124–10071–10240; 4; 4; 10/2017 124–10005–10228; 2; 3; 05/2006 124–10071–10349; 3; 3; 05/2006 104–10004–10088; 4; 1; 05/2006 124–10006–10049; 0; 4; 05/2006 124–10079–10233; 0; 1; 08/1996 104–10005–10331; 5; 2; 05/1997 124–10006–10050; 3; 3; 05/2006 124–10086–10006; 0; 1; 05/2006 104–10006–10083; 0; 2; 05/1997 124–10018–10375; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10086–10008; 4; 4; 05/2006 104–10007–10003; 0; 1; 05/1997 124–10018–10380; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10087–10340; 1; 1; 05/2006 104–10007–10013; 3; 5; 05/1997 124–10018–10471; 3; 1; 05/2006 124–10097–10288; 9; 1; 10/2017 104–10007–10016; 0; 4; 05/1997 124–10023–10223; 0; 2; 08/1996 124–10101–10027; 0; 2; 08/1996 104–10007–10021; 3; 3; 05/1997 124–10023–10226; 0; 4; 05/2006 124–10114–10025; 1; 1; 05/2006 104–10007–10023; 8; 7; 05/2006 124–10023–10227; 0; 7; 05/2006 124–10124–10094; 2; 2; 05/2006 104–10007–10028; 0; 2; 05/1997 124–10023–10230; 2; 1; 05/2006 124–10125–10023; 4; 4; 05/2006 104–10007–10032; 5; 1; 05/1997 124–10023–10269; 4; 3; 05/2006 124–10125–10038; 4; 4; 05/2006 104–10007–10048; 9; 4; 05/1997 124–10023–10270; 0; 10; 05/2006 124–10125–10043; 2; 2; 05/2006 104–10007–10063; 6; 4; 05/1997 124–10023–10294; 0; 5; 05/2006 124–10125–10099; 6; 6; 05/2006 104–10007–10149; 0; 2; 05/1997 124–10027–10117; 4; 1; 05/2006 124–10150–10425; 0; 1; 08/1996 104–10007–10164; 1; 1; 05/1997 124–10029–10294; 3; 3; 05/2006 124–10156–10179; 0; 2; 08/1996 104–10007–10167; 2; 1; 05/1997 124–10035–10111; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10157–10025; 1; 1; 10/2017 104–10007–10188; 0; 2; 05/1997 124–10035–10173; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10157–10031; 9; 3; 05/2006 104–10007–10192; 0; 1; 05/1997 124–10035–10206; 0; 4; 05/2006 124–10158–10022; 0; 1; 05/2006 104–10007–10196; 3; 2; 05/1997 124–10035–10208; 0; 6; 05/2006 124–10158–10032; 0; 1; 08/1996 104–10007–10202; 5; 3; 05/1997 124–10035–10215; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10158–10038; 0; 4; 05/2006 104–10007–10207; 1; 1; 05/1997 124–10035–10216; 0; 1; 05/2006 124–10158–10044; 3; 3; 05/2006 104–10007–10212; 7; 1; 05/1997 124–10035–10219; 1; 3; 05/2006 124–10158–10045; 0; 2; 08/1996 104–10007–10256; 0; 1; 05/1997 124–10035–10225; 1; 1; 05/2006 124–10158–10047; 9; 1; 10/2017 104–10007–10267; 2; 2; 05/1997 124–10035–10227; 8; 1; 05/2006 124–10158–10049; 0; 3; 08/1996 104–10007–10272; 0; 1; 05/1997 124–10035–10228; 15; 1; 05/2006 124–10158–10051; 0; 1; 05/2006 104–10007–10295; 20; 1; 05/2006 124–10035–10232; 0; 2; 05/2006 124–10158–10053; 0; 28; 05/2006 104–10007–10302; 7; 7; 05/1997 28160 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

104–10007–10309; 0; 5; 05/1997 104–10013–10171; 5; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10048; 16; 1; 05/2001 104–10007–10332; 5; 2; 05/1997 104–10013–10175; 10; 2; 05/2006 104–10015–10059; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10007–10336; 2; 2; 05/1997 104–10013–10178; 4; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10064; 2; 3; 05/2001 104–10007–10341; 5; 1; 10/2017 104–10013–10179; 8; 4; 05/1997 104–10015–10065; 3; 3; 05/2001 104–10007–10342; 12; 3; 05/1997 104–10013–10180; 9; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10081; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10007–10343; 6; 1; 10/2017 104–10013–10182; 3; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10091; 8; 3; 05/2001 104–10007–10381; 7; 4; 05/1997 104–10013–10183; 3; 1; 05/2006 104–10015–10092; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10009–10008; 0; 1; 05/1997 104–10013–10184; 8; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10104; 0; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10015; 16; 3; 05/2006 104–10013–10186; 9; 6; 05/1997 104–10015–10107; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10009–10018; 6; 1; 05/1997 104–10013–10187; 7; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10111; 1; 3; 05/2001 104–10009–10022; 2; 2; 05/1997 104–10013–10188; 21; 3; 05/1997 104–10015–10114; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10009–10024; 15; 4; 05/2006 104–10013–10189; 15; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10115; 3; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10026; 0; 2; 05/1997 104–10013–10190; 12; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10116; 5; 1; 05/2001 104–10009–10038; 10; 1; 05/1997 104–10013–10234; 1; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10117; 0; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10047; 3; 1; 05/1997 104–10013–10236; 11; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10118; 4; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10128; 5; 3; 05/1997 104–10013–10237; 1; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10122; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10009–10171; 13; 2; 05/1997 104–10013–10242; 12; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10123; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10009–10195; 1; 2; 10/2017 104–10013–10259; 10; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10124; 6; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10003; 9; 5; 10/2017 104–10013–10261; 1; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10129; 1; 7; 05/2001 104–10010–10008; 16; 1; 05/1997 104–10013–10263; 2; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10132; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10028; 2; 1; 05/2006 104–10013–10296; 7; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10139; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10040; 14; 1; 05/1997 104–10013–10298; 9; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10141; 2; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10041; 3; 1; 10/2017 104–10013–10307; 8; 2; 05/2006 104–10015–10152; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10043; 10; 1; 10/2017 104–10015–10131; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10015–10156; 5; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10044; 15; 6; 05/1997 104–10015–10142; 8; 1; 05/2006 104–10015–10157; 2; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10057; 1; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10281; 0; 1; 05/2006 104–10015–10158; 7; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10070; 5; 3; 05/1997 104–10015–10282; 10; 1; 05/2006 104–10015–10161; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10076; 7; 4; 05/1997 104–10016–10005; 3; 7; 05/2001 104–10015–10162; 1; 3; 05/2001 104–10010–10078; 10; 2; 05/1997 104–10016–10044; 6; 6; 05/2006 104–10015–10178; 11; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10104; 3; 2; 10/2017 The following documents contained 104–10015–10217; 8; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10139; 1; 1; 05/1997 postponements of an individual’s name 104–10015–10218; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10197; 0; 1; 05/1997 (pseudonym: Scelso) that were scheduled for 104–10015–10219; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10199; 12; 1; 05/1997 re-review on 12/1995, 03/1996, and 05/1996. 104–10015–10220; 4; 3; 05/2001 104–10010–10214; 7; 1; 05/1997 These postponements were reviewed by the 104–10015–10221; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10215; 12; 2; 05/1997 Board on May 13 - 14, 1996. The 104–10015–10222; 9; 1; 05/2001 104–10010–10224; 2; 1; 05/2006 postponements of the individual’s name will 104–10015–10223; 7; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10394; 3; 3; 05/1997 be opened on either May 1, 2001, or three 104–10015–10224; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10010–10403; 4; 1; 10/2017 months after the decease of the individual 104–10015–10227; 4; 2; 05/2001 104–10011–10016; 1; 1; 05/2006 whose name is postponed, whichever occurs 104–10015–10228; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10011–10048; 7; 1; 05/1997 first. 104–10015–10229; 2; 2; 05/2001 104–10011–10050; 18; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10230; 4; 4; 05/2001 104–10011–10096; 97; 5; 05/2001 CIA Documents: Postponed in Part: 104–10015–10231; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10012–10025; 7; 5; 05/1997 104–10002–10072; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10236; 0; 2; 05/2001 104–10012–10026; 11; 1; 05/1997 104–10002–10078; 7; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10251; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10027; 5; 3; 05/2006 104–10002–10138; 6; 2; 05/2001 104–10015–10252; 4; 2; 05/2001 104–10012–10055; 3; 3; 05/1997 104–10003–10014; 16; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10253; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10012–10056; 1; 1; 05/1997 104–10003–10015; 6; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10254; 8; 2; 05/2001 104–10012–10071; 2; 2; 05/1997 104–10003–10016; 8; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10255; 7; 3; 05/2001 104–10012–10076; 2; 1; 10/2017 104–10003–10123; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10256; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10089; 11; 4; 10/2017 104–10003–10161; 6; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10257; 12; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10101; 17; 7; 05/2006 104–10003–10163; 3; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10260; 10; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10113; 1; 1; 05/2006 104–10003–10165; 7; 5; 05/2001 104–10015–10316; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10116; 2; 1; 05/2006 104–10003–10168; 3; 2; 05/2001 104–10015–10372; 5; 5; 05/2001 104–10012–10117; 15; 7; 05/2006 104–10004–10063; 8; 10; 05/1997 104–10015–10385; 15; 7; 05/2001 104–10012–10125; 9; 2; 05/1997 104–10004–10064; 9; 4; 05/1997 104–10015–10386; 8; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10133; 0; 1; 10/2017 104–10004–10184; 5; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10390; 8; 4; 05/2001 104–10012–10134; 0; 1; 10/2017 104–10004–10195; 3; 3; 05/2001 104–10015–10392; 9; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10136; 4; 1; 10/2017 104–10004–10199; 16; 6; 05/2001 104–10015–10396; 13; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10137; 0; 6; 10/2017 104–10004–10206; 19; 5; 05/2001 104–10015–10398; 5; 3; 05/2001 104–10013–10022; 10; 1; 05/1997 104–10004–10207; 8; 2; 05/2001 104–10015–10410; 5; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10031; 9; 8; 05/2006 104–10004–10211; 9; 2; 05/2001 104–10015–10422; 5; 3; 05/2001 104–10013–10033; 8; 7; 05/2006 104–10004–10230; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10437; 3; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10035; 9; 1; 05/1997 104–10004–10245; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10015–10438; 8; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10041; 7; 1; 05/1997 104–10004–10249; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10439; 2; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10050; 21; 1; 05/2001 104–10005–10038; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10440; 0; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10052; 16; 3; 05/2006 104–10005–10202; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10441; 10; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10064; 17; 6; 05/2006 104–10005–10208; 0; 2; 05/2001 104–10015–10442; 0; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10065; 9; 3; 05/2006 104–10005–10231; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10443; 10; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10078; 13; 1; 05/1997 104–10005–10259; 8; 2; 05/1997 104–10015–10444; 2; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10083; 6; 1; 05/1997 104–10005–10273; 10; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10445; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10086; 8; 1; 05/1997 104–10005–10285; 16; 5; 05/2001 104–10015–10446; 4; 2; 05/2001 104–10013–10096; 1; 1; 05/1997 104–10005–10338; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10015–10449; 13; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10151; 29; 1; 05/1997 104–10005–10374; 0; 3; 05/2001 104–10016–10003; 3; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10158; 2; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10007; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10016–10004; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10159; 6; 1; 05/1997 104–10015–10045; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10016–10011; 22; 17; 05/2001 104–10013–10167; 7; 4; 05/1997 104–10015–10046; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10016–10012; 2; 5; 05/1997 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28161

104–10016–10022; 5; 1; 05/2001 104–10021–10107; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10020–10002; 104–10020–10004; 104–10016–10025; 7; 2; 05/2001 104–10125–10002; 5; 1; 05/2001 104–10020–10009; 104–10020–10011; 104–10016–10026; 15; 3; 05/2001 HSCA Documents: Postponed in Part 104–10020–10012; 104–10020–10020; 104–10017–10009; 13; 8; 05/2001 104–10020–10040; 104–10020–10042; 104–10017–10017; 8; 6; 05/2001 180–10075–10180; 1; 1; 10/2017 104–10017–10040; 4; 7; 05/2001 180–10076–10105; 0; 1; 10/2017 104–10020–10043; 104–10020–10054; 104–10017–10042; 13; 6; 05/2001 180–10083–10315; 0; 6; 10/2017 104–10020–10057; 104–10021–10009; 104–10017–10048; 5; 2; 05/2001 180–10083–10316; 0; 6; 10/2017 104–10021–10010; 104–10021–10014; 104–10017–10049; 7; 3; 05/2001 180–10089–10433; 0; 2; 10/2017 104–10021–10015; 104–10021–10017; 104–10017–10052; 8; 3; 05/2001 180–10102–10360; 0; 1; 10/2017 104–10021–10018; 104–10021–10023; 104–10017–10080; 4; 8; 05/2001 180–10102–10367; 0; 1; 10/2017 104–10021–10024; 104–10021–10025; 104–10018–10000; 6; 4; 05/2001 180–10106–10489; 0; 2; 10/2017 104–10021–10026; 104–10021–10028; 180–10116–10318; 0; 7; 10/2017 104–10018–10001; 0; 3; 05/2001 104–10021–10030; 104–10021–10033; 104–10018–10004; 41; 16; 05/2001 180–10117–10032; 1; 7; 10/2017 104–10018–10005; 7; 6; 05/2001 104–10021–10035; 104–10021–10036; 104–10018–10006; 5; 2; 05/2001 Notice of Additional Openings in Full 104–10021–10038; 104–10021–10045; 104–10018–10011; 3; 2; 05/2001 After consultation with appropriate 104–10021–10047; 104–10021–10060; 104–10018–10013; 0; 1; 05/2001 Federal Agencies, the Review Board 104–10021–10063; 104–10021–10064; 104–10018–10041; 4; 4; 05/2001 announces that the following Central 104–10021–10072; 104–10021–10081; 104–10018–10043; 1; 1; 05/2001 Intelligence Agency records are now 104–10021–10087; 104–10021–10092; 104–10018–10053; 1; 2; 05/2001 being opened in full: 104–10002–10014; 104–10021–10095; 104–10021–10098; 104–10018–10054; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10021–10099; 104–10021–10103; 104–10018–10055; 6; 2; 05/2001 104–10002–10134; 104–10003–10075; 104–10018–10057; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10003–10172; 104–10004–10044; 104–10021–10112; 104–10021–10119; 104–10018–10059; 7; 2; 05/2001 104–10004–10137; 104–10004–10140; 104–10021–10120; 104–10021–10127; 104–10018–10064; 4; 3; 05/2001 104–10005–10013; 104–10005–10022; 104–10021–10128; 104–10021–10131; 104–10018–10066; 13; 1; 05/2001 104–10005–10043; 104–10005–10050; 104–10021–10132. 104–10018–10067; 4; 1; 05/2001 104–10005–10056; 104–10005–10062; After consultation with appropriate 104–10018–10069; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10005–10144; 104–10005–10153; Federal Agencies, the Review Board 104–10018–10073; 10; 1; 05/2001 104–10005–10161; 104–10005–10200; announces that the following Federal 104–10018–10079; 4; 2; 05/2001 104–10018–10081; 3; 2; 05/2001 104–10005–10234; 104–10005–10249; Bureau of Investigation records are now 104–10018–10086; 3; 2; 05/2001 104–10005–10254; 104–10005–10257; being opened in full: 124–10001–10111; 104–10018–10089; 7; 6; 05/2001 104–10005–10278; 104–10005–10332; 124–10001–10122; 124–10001–10416; 104–10018–10091; 1; 7; 05/2001 104–10005–10418; 104–10006–10008; 124–10001–10441; 124–10002–10379; 104–10018–10093; 4; 4; 05/2001 104–10006–10009; 104–10007–10198; 124–10002–10486; 124–10003–10441; 104–10018–10096; 9; 11; 05/1997 104–10009–10006; 104–10009–10011; 124–10003–10444; 124–10003–10448; 104–10018–10097; 5; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10033; 104–10009–10036; 124–10003–10454; 124–10003–10473; 104–10018–10098; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10040; 104–10009–10042; 124–10003–10491; 124–10005–10009; 104–10018–10100; 1; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10045; 104–10009–10050; 124–10005–10099; 124–10018–10493; 104–10018–10103; 6; 1; 05/2001 104–10018–10108; 7; 3; 05/2001 104–10009–10135; 104–10009–10173; 124–10023–10313; 124–10035–10205; 104–10019–10020; 2; 2; 05/2001 104–10009–10197; 104–10010–10117; 124–10035–10363; 124–10035–10392; 104–10019–10021; 10; 3; 05/2001 104–10010–10401; 104–10011–10008; 124–10037–10374; 124–10039–10060; 104–10019–10022; 9; 7; 05/2001 104–10011–10098; 104–10012–10005; 124–10039–10081; 124–10039–10490; 104–10019–10023; 17; 6; 05/2001 104–10012–10006; 104–10012–10007; 124–10041–10435; 124–10045–10310; 104–10020–10005; 1; 2; 05/1997 104–10012–10009; 104–10012–10010; 124–10046–10333; 124–10046–10370; 104–10020–10014; 6; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10011; 104–10012–10012; 124–10046–10485; 124–10054–10324; 104–10020–10016; 1; 6; 05/1997 104–10012–10013; 104–10012–10014; 124–10061–10085; 124–10061–10231; 104–10020–10017; 12; 4; 05/2001 104–10012–10029; 104–10012–10030; 124–10061–10242; 124–10062–10060; 104–10020–10033; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10020–10034; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10036; 104–10012–10049; 124–10062–10406; 124–10062–10453; 104–10020–10044; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10082; 104–10012–10090; 124–10062–10455; 124–10063–10469; 104–10020–10046; 9; 3; 05/2001 104–10012–10091; 104–10012–10093; 124–10065–10145; 124–10067–10280; 104–10020–10048; 0; 4; 05/2001 104–10012–10094; 104–10012–10098; 124–10068–10198; 124–10068–10405; 104–10020–10052; 14; 4; 05/1997 104–10012–10103; 104–10012–10104; 124–10068–10415; 124–10069–10312; 104–10020–10058; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10012–10105; 104–10012–10110; 124–10074–10031; 124–10074–10371; 104–10021–10004; 28; 11; 12/1996 104–10013–10018; 104–10013–10074; 124–10075–10090; 124–10075–10091; 104–10021–10005; 7; 4; 05/1997 104–10013–10077; 104–10013–10192; 124–10075–10102; 124–10075–10206; 104–10021–10006; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10219; 104–10013–10227; 124–10076–10218; 124–10079–10235; 104–10021–10008; 0; 2; 05/1997 104–10021–10013; 12; 3; 05/2001 104–10013–10241; 104–10013–10262; 124–10079–10446; 124–10079–10458; 104–10021–10019; 18; 2; 05/1997 104–10013–10264; 104–10013–10265; 124–10080–10195; 124–10085–10028; 104–10021–10020; 2; 3; 05/2001 104–10013–10266; 104–10013–10268; 124–10086–10200; 124–10086–10207; 104–10021–10022; 9; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10270; 104–10013–10276; 124–10086–10334; 124–10089–10119; 104–10021–10034; 22; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10313; 104–10013–10329; 124–10089–10121; 124–10089–10133; 104–10021–10039; 5; 3; 05/2001 104–10013–10359; 104–10013–10382; 124–10089–10151; 124–10090–10035; 104–10021–10040; 13; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10391; 104–10013–10392; 124–10090–10211; 124–10090–10262; 104–10021–10071; 2; 4; 05/1997 104–10013–10396; 104–10013–10432; 124–10092–10052; 124–10093–10130; 104–10021–10078; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10434; 104–10013–10435; 124–10093–10203; 124–10093–10236; 104–10021–10079; 2; 1; 05/2001 104–10021–10086; 1; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10441; 104–10013–10443; 124–10093–10245; 124–10093–10251; 104–10021–10089; 2; 1; 05/2001 104–10013–10447; 104–10013–10448; 124–10102–10318; 124–10102–10327; 104–10021–10091; 5; 2; 05/2001 104–10014–10018; 104–10014–10047; 124–10106–10229; 124–10112–10103; 104–10021–10097; 4; 2; 05/2001 104–10014–10048; 104–10019–10015; 124–10115–10061; 124–10121–10010; 104–10021–10102; 0; 1; 05/2001 104–10019–10016; 104–10019–10017; 124–10121–10016; 124–10123–10044; 28162 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

124–10125–10111; 124–10125–10167; 124–10176–10187; 124–10176–10232; 10299; 180–10112–10303; 180–10112– 124–10126–10086; 124–10129–10023; 124–10176–10337; 124–10177–10149; 10305; 180–10112–10356; 180–10112– 124–10129–10026; 124–10129–10091; 124–10179–10047; 124–10179–10050; 10357; 180–10112–10442; 180–10112– 124–10129–10112; 124–10129–10234; 124–10180–10106; 124–10180–10311; 10482; 180–10112–10494; 180–10119– 124–10129–10267; 124–10130–10236; 124–10180–10312; 124–10180–10313; 10199; 180–10119–10200; 180–10147– 124–10130–10243; 124–10130–10249; 124–10180–10314; 124–10180–10315; 10269. 124–10130–10389; 124–10131–10215; 124–10180–10316; 124–10180–10317; After consultation with appropriate 124–10131–10218; 124–10132–10030; 124–10180–10318; 124–10188–10007; state and Federal agencies, the Review 124–10132–10054; 124–10132–10055; 124–10227–10302; 124–10228–10028; Board announces that the following 124–10132–10056; 124–10132–10058; 124–10228–10277; 124–10228–10386; records are being opened in full: 179– 124–10132–10059; 124–10132–10061; 124–10228–10455; 124–10228–10458; 20001–10172; 179–20004–10231. 124–10135–10038; 124–10135–10039; 124–10228–10467; 124–10228–10477; 124–10135–10042; 124–10135–10082; 124–10228–10497; 124–10228–10498; Designation of Assassination Records 124–10135–10087; 124–10135–10145; 124–10231–10314; 124–10232–10010; 124–10136–10004; 124–10136–10017; 124–10232–10024; 124–10232–10030; On May 13, 1996, the Review Board 124–10136–10034; 124–10136–10113; 124–10232–10089; 124–10232–10277; designated the following United States 124–10136–10118; 124–10136–10133; 124–10232–10462; 124–10232–10465; Secret Service documents as 124–10136–10139; 124–10136–10140; 124–10232–10466; 124–10232–10467; assassination records pursuant to 124–10137–10138; 124–10140–10098; 124–10232–10469; 124–10232–10474; Sections 7(i)(2)(A) and 9(c)(1)(A) the 124–10140–10119; 124–10140–10140; 124–10232–10475; 124–10232–10479; JFK Act and § 1400.1 and § 1400.8 of the 124–10143–10348; 124–10144–10086; 124–10232–10480; 124–10232–10482; Guidance for Interpretation and 124–10146–10007; 124–10146–10008; 124–10232–10483; 124–10232–10498; Implementation of the JFK Act, 36 124–10146–10023; 124–10147–10116; 124–10233–10418; 124–10234–10238; C.F.R. § 1400 (1995): Protective survey 124–10147–10123; 124–10147–10175; 124–10235–10018; 124–10236–10286; reports for planned Presidential trips to 124–10147–10176; 124–10147–10177; 124–10240–10203; 124–10243–10354; Houston, Ft. Worth, and Austin, Texas 124–10147–10178; 124–10147–10184; 124–10244–10169; 124–10244–10428; on November 21–22, 1963; shift reports 124–10147–10186; 124–10147–10189; 124–10246–10283; 124–10246–10378; of unusual incidents (March, 1963– 124–10147–10190; 124–10147–10203; 124–10246–10381; 124–10247–10139; January, 1964); post-assassination Secret 124–10147–10211; 124–10147–10213; 124–10247–10198; 124–10247–10199; Service memoranda describing 124–10147–10239; 124–10148–10009; 124–10247–10224; 124–10247–10229; legislation to define penalties for 124–10148–10023; 124–10148–10025; 124–10247–10230; 124–10249–10140; assassination of federal officials and 124–10149–10010; 124–10149–10076; 124–10249–10179; 124–10249–10378; responsibility for investigating such 124–10149–10083; 124–10149–10089; 124–10249–10381; 124–10250–10030; incidents; letters from the public and 124–10149–10093; 124–10151–10160; 124–10250–10033; 124–10250–10034; memoranda on presidential protection 124–10151–10498; 124–10152–10006; 124–10250–10047; 124–10250–10059; (1962–1963); newsclippings on the 124–10153–10004; 124–10153–10020; 124–10250–10061; 124–10250–10064; Warren Commission; reports and 124–10153–10028; 124–10153–10075; 124–10250–10066; 124–10250–10157; directories describing internal 124–10153–10096; 124–10153–10098; 124–10250–10158; 124–10250–10269; organization at the Secret Service 124–10155–10161; 124–10155–10183; 124–10250–10285; 124–10250–10292; (1961–1962); correspondence between 124–10155–10185; 124–10156–10192; 124–10251–10078; 124–10253–10003; the Secret Service and the House Select 124–10156–10317; 124–10156–10363; 124–10253–10018; 124–10254–10158; Committee on Assassinations (1977– 124–10156–10409; 124–10156–10419; 124–10256–10002; 124–10256–10008; 1978); and the Richard Case Nagell file. 124–10156–10421; 124–10156–10422; 124–10256–10009; 124–10256–10016; In not designating some USSS shift 124–10157–10030; 124–10157–10103; 124–10256–10022; 124–10256–10089; reports and some post-assassination 124–10158–10150; 124–10158–10241; 124–10256–10322; 124–10257–10255; Kennedy Detail assignments as 124–10158–10262; 124–10158–10264; 124–10270–10168; 124–10276–10258. assassination records, the Review Board 124–10158–10414; 124–10159–10054; After consultation with appropriate relied upon the advice of its staff, which 124–10160–10022; 124–10160–10024; state and Federal agencies, the Review conducted a thorough review of 124–10160–10291; 124–10160–10490; Board announces that the following materials in the above listed categories. 124–10162–10017; 124–10162–10093; House Select Committee on Notice of Reconsideration 124–10163–10383; 124–10163–10390; Assassination records are being opened 124–10163–10395; 124–10169–10107; in full: 180–10070–10349; 180–10070– On May 13–14, 1996, the CIA 124–10169–10120; 124–10169–10493; 10390; 180–10076–10353; 180–10076– provided additional evidence to the 124–10170–10050; 124–10170–10165; 10358; 180–10078–10411; 180–10085– Review Board regarding 1 record that 124–10172–10331; 124–10172–10332; 10346; 180–10091–10171; 180–10094– previously had been the subject of 124–10173–10086; 124–10174–10353; 10237; 180–10094–10261; 180–10094– Review Board determinations. Upon 124–10174–10361; 124–10175–10001; 10261; 180–10107–10225; 180–10110– receiving and evaluating this additional 124–10175–10002; 124–10175–10005; 10056; 180–10110–10068; 180–10110– evidence, the Review Board voted to 124–10175–10006; 124–10175–10100; 10076; 180–10111–10074; 180–10112– sustain postponements as follows:

FROM ORIGINAL FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE: 96±8526, 61 FR 15760

No. original re- No. original post- No. revised re- No. revised post- Date of revised Record No. leases ponements leases ponements re-review

104±10004±10180 ...... 19 9 13 15 03/2006 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28163

On May 13–14, 1996, the FBI 2 duplicates) that previously had been evaluating this additional evidence, the provided additional evidence to the the subject of Review Board Review Board voted to sustain Review Board regarding 2 records (and determinations. Upon receiving and postponements as follows:

FROM ORIGINAL FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE: 96±11177, 61 FR 20211

No. original re- No. original post- No. revised re- No. revised post- Date of revised Record No. leases ponements leases ponements re-review

124±10023±10230 ...... 3 0 2 1 05/2006 124±10091±10003 ...... 3 0 2 1 05/2006 124±10018±10380 ...... 1 0 0 1 05/2006 124±10170±10350 ...... 1 0 0 1 05/2006

Additional Notice Second Floor, Washington, DC 20530. We had not received a request to Technical corrections have been made Telephone: (202) 724–0088; Fax: (202) conduct an administrative review for in 104–10019–10022, as released by the 724–0457. the most recent four consecutive annual Board on April 17, 1996, to bring it into David G. Marwell, anniversary months. Therefore, conformity with an identical document, Executive Director. pursuant to § 353.25(d)(4)(i) of the 104–10018–10040, as released by the [FR Doc. 96–14028 Filed 5–30–96; 5:00 pm] Department’s regulations, on April 1, 1996, we published in the Federal Board on August 3, 1995. The record BILLING CODE 6118±01±P should have 9 releases and 7 Register a notice of intent to revoke postponements. Additionally, two these antidumping duty orders and findings and to terminate the suspended documents were incorrectly reported in DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the April 6, 1996 Federal Register (96– investigations and served written notice 8526, 61 FR 15760). Document 104– International Trade Administration of the intent to each domestic interested 10004–10093 was reported as 7 releases party on the Department’s service list in and 1 postponement; the Board’s action Determination Not To Revoke each case. Within the specified time was 6 releases and 2 postponements. Antidumping Duty Orders and frame, we received objections from Document 104–10184–10001 was Findings Nor To Terminate Suspended domestic interested parties to our intent reported as 99 releases and 134 Investigations to revoke these antidumping duty orders postponements; the Board’s action was and findings and to terminate the AGENCY: Import Administration, 41 releases and 189 postponements. suspended investigations. Therefore, The Review Board also rescinded its International Trade Administration, because domestic interested parties earlier determination (noticed at 96– Department of Commerce. objected to our intent to revoke or 11177, 61 FR 20211), regarding the ACTION: Determination Not to Revoke terminate, we no longer intend to revoke following FBI records, in order to Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings these antidumping duty orders and provide the FBI additional time to Nor to Terminate Suspended findings or to terminate the suspended submit evidence in support of its Investigations. investigations. proposed postponements. These records SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Antidumping Proceeding are: 124–10011–10498, 124–10086– is notifying the public of its A–122–085 10157, 124–10173–10044, 124–10250- determination not to revoke the Canada 10245, 124–10252–10073. antidumping duty orders and findings Sugar and Syrups Dated: May 29, 1996. nor to terminate the suspended Objection Date: April 24, 1996; April 29, David G. Marwell, investigations listed below. 1996 Objector: American Sugar Cane League et. Executive Director. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–13838 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] al., Florida Sugar Marketing and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terminal Association, Inc., et.al. BILLING CODE 6118±01±P Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed Contact: David Dirstine at (202) 482–4033 under Antidumping Proceeding at: A–484–801 Office of Antidumping Compliance, Sunshine Act Meeting Greece Import Administration, International Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide DATES: June 4, 1996, 2:00 p.m. This Trade Administration, U.S. Department Objection Date: April 29, 1996 notice changes the date and time of the of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Objector: Kerr-McGee Chemical open meeting noticed in Vol. 61 FR Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, Corporation, Chemetals Inc. 27047, published on May 30, 1996. telephone (202) 482–4737. Contact: Thomas Barlow at (202) 482–0410 PLACE: ARRB, 600 E Street, NW, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The A–779–602 Washington, DC. Department of Commerce (the Kenya Standard Carnations STATUS: Open. Department) may revoke an antidumping duty order or finding or Objection Date: April 26, 1996 Objector: Floral Trade Council MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: terminate a suspended investigation, Contact: Michael Panfeld at (202) 482–0168 1. Review and Accept Minutes of Last pursuant to 19 CFR 353.25(d)(4)(iii), if Open Meeting. no interested party has requested an Dated: May 21, 1996. 2. Amendment of Board Procedures. administrative review for four Roland L. MacDonald, 3. Other Business. consecutive annual anniversary months Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: and no domestic interested party objects Compliance. Thomas Samoluk, Associate Director for to the revocation or requests an [FR Doc. 96–13967 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Communications, 600 E Street, NW, administrative review. BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P 28164 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

[A±588±840] Determination of Industry Support for opposition to the petition from any U.S. the Petition producers or workers. Accordingly, the Initiation of Antidumping Duty Department determines that the petition Investigation: Engineered Process Gas Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act requires the Department to determine, is filed on behalf of the domestic Turbo-Compressor Systems, Whether industry. Assembled or Unassembled, and that a minimum percentage of the Whether Complete or Incomplete, domestic industry supports an Scope of the Investigation From Japan antidumping petition. A petition meets the minimum requirements if (1) The products covered by this investigation are turbo-compressor AGENCY: Import Administration, domestic producers or workers who systems (i.e., one or more ‘‘assemblies’’ International Trade Administration, support the petition account for at least or ‘‘trains’’) which are comprised of Department of Commerce. 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and (2) those various configurations of process gas EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. domestic producers or workers compressors, drivers (i.e., steam FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: expressing support account for more turbines or motor-gear systems designed Irene Darzenta at (202) 482–6320 or than 50 percent of the production of the to drive such compressors), and Katherine Johnson at (202) 482–4929, domestic like product produced by that auxiliary control systems and Office of Antidumping Investigations, portion of the industry expressing lubrication systems for use with such Import Administration, International support for, or opposition to, the compressors and compressor drivers, Trade Administration, U.S. Department petition. whether assembled or unassembled. of Commerce, 14th Street and On May 24, 1996, Mitsubishi Heavy One or more of these turbo-compressor Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, Industries (‘‘MHI’’) submitted a letter assemblies or trains, may be combined. DC 20230. challenging the industry support for the The systems covered are only those petition. MHI argued that the turbo- used in the petrochemical and fertilizer Initiation of Investigation compressor systems covered in the industries, in the production of The Applicable Statute petition are comprised of numerous ethylene, propylene, ammonia, urea, or products, including steam turbines, methanol. This petition does not Unless otherwise indicated, all lubrication systems, and seal systems, as encompass turbo-compressor systems citations to the statute are references to such the petitioners are required to incorporating gas turbine drivers, which the provisions effective January 1, 1995, show industry support for domestic are typically used in pipeline the effective date of the amendments producers of these products. MHI transmission, injection, gas processing, made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the further argued that because the petition and liquid natural gas service. Act’’) by the Uruguay Round contains no data showing industry Compressors are machines used to Agreements Act (‘‘URAA’’). support for these products, e.g., steam increase the pressure of a gas or vapor, The Petition turbines, the Department must resort to or mixture of gases and vapors. polling of these producers. We have Compressors are commonly classified as On May 8, 1996, the Department of determined that MHI’s challenge is reciprocating, rotary, jet, centrifugal, or Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) received without merit. The like product covered axial (classified by the mechanical a petition filed in proper form by by this investigation is a complete means of compressing the fluid), or as Dresser-Rand Company. On May 21, system. The ‘‘products’’ identified by positive-displacement or dynamic-type 1996, Dresser Rand Company provided MHI are subcomponents which are (classified by the manner in which the supplemental data regarding specific included within the like product of mechanical elements act on the fluid to issues relating to scope, industry systems only to the extent that they are be compressed). Subject compressors support, and pricing information. On designed and dedicated to a specific include only centrifugal compressors May 23, 1996, the United Steelworkers system, which is typically designed to engineered for process gas compression, of America (‘‘USW’’) entered an contract specifications. Thus, for e.g., ammonia, urea, methanol, appearance as co-petitioners in this example, steam turbines by themselves propylene, or ethylene service. investigation. The USW represents are not covered by the scope of this Unassembled compressors for purposes turbo-compressor systems production investigation and as a result a showing of this investigation consist of (1) either workers for three domestic producers of of support by the steam turbine industry half of the casing (in the case of a the subject merchandise. In accordance is not required. Rather, only steam horizontally split casing) or the casing with section 732(b) of the Act, the turbines included in the contract for the and end-caps, whether or not petitioners allege that imports of initial system designed and dedicated assembled, and whether or not mounted engineered process gas turbo- for use in a complete system (the like on a platform; or (2) the rotor, whether compressor systems, whether assembled product) are covered. Accordingly, it or not mounted in the casing. or unassembled, and whether complete would be inappropriate to consider Compressors are often disassembled or incomplete (‘‘turbo-compressor whether steam turbine producers into such component parts for shipping. systems’’) from Japan are being, or are support a petition on turbine- Turbines are classified (1) as steam or likely to be, sold in the United States at compressor systems. gas; (2) by mechanical arrangement as less than fair value within the meaning A review of the production data single-casing, multiple shaft, or tandem- of section 731 of the Act, and that such provided in the petition and other compound (more than one casing with imports are materially injuring, or information readily available to the a single shaft); (3) by flow direction threatening material injury to, a U.S. Department indicates that the (axial or radial); (4) by steam cycle, industry. petitioners account for more than 50 whether condensing, non-condensing, Since the petitioners are interested percent of the total production of the automatic extraction, or reheat; and (5) parties as defined under section like product. (See Office of by number of exhaust flows of a 771(9)(C) of the Act, they have standing Antidumping Investigation’s Initiation condensing unit. Steam and gas turbines to file a petition for the imposition of checklist dated May 28, 1996). The are used in various applications. Only antidumping duties. Department received no expressions of steam turbines as dedicated for a turbo- Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28165 compressor system are subject to this marine turbines, stationary, condensing The petitioners submitted three investigation. type, of an output exceeding 40MW; alternatives for determining normal An ‘‘unassembled’’ steam turbine, for 8406.82.1010: Steam turbines, other value. Of the three alternatives, the purposes of this investigation, includes than marine turbines, stationary, Department, for initiation purposes, (1) either half of the turbine casing, condensing type, exceeding 7,460 Kw; relied on the normal value calculated whether or not mounted on a platform; 8406.82.1020: Steam turbines, other based on constructed value (‘‘CV’’) or (2) the turbine rotor, whether or not than marine turbines, stationary, using the U.S. producer’s production mounted in the casing. Steam turbines condensing type, exceeding 7,460 Kw, costs, because the other calculations are commonly disassembled into major but not exceeding 40 MW; were based on non-contemporaneous segments for shipping. 8406.82.1050: Steam turbines, other prices. Since the CV calculation A motor and gear box is used as a than marine turbines, stationary, other provided an adequate basis for compressor driver in lieu of a steam than condensing type, not exceeding initiation, we did not further analyze turbine. A control system is used to 7,460 Kw; 8406.82.1070: steam turbines, the remaining two normal value monitor and control the operation of a other than marine turbines, stationary, calculations submitted by the turbo-compressor system. A lubrication other than condensing type, exceeding petitioners. system is engineered to support a 7,460 Kw, but not exceeding 40 MW. CV includes the cost of manufacturing subject compressor and steam turbine Parts for such turbines are classified (‘‘COM’’), selling, general and (or motor/gear box). under HTSUS subheading 8406.90.2000 administrative expenses (‘‘SG&A’’), U.S. A typical turbo-compressor system through 8406.90.4580. packing, and profit. consists of one or more compressors Control and other auxiliary systems The petitioners calculated COM based driven by a turbine (or in some cases a may be classified under HTSUS on the U.S. producer’s own cost data as motor drive). A compressor is usually 9032.89.6030, ‘‘automatic regulating or reflected in a recent bid proposal to installed on a base plate and the drive controlling instruments and apparatus: produce a turbo-compressor system for is installed on a separate base plate. The complete process control systems.’’ a U.S. sale, adjusted for known turbine (or motor drive) base plate will Motor and gear box entries may be differences between costs incurred in typically also include any governing or classified under HTSUS subheading producing turbo-compressor systems in safety systems, couplings, and a 8501.53.4080, 8501.53.6000, the United States and in Japan. The gearbox, if any. The lube and oil seal 8501.53.8040, or 8501.53.8060. Gear labor and engineering cost estimates systems for the turbine and speed changers used to match the speed were adjusted from one of the U.S. compressor(s) are usually mounted on a of an electric motor to the shaft speed producer’s cost models to reflect the separate skid. of a driven compressor, would be higher compensation levels existing in This scope covers only constituent classified under HTSUS subheading Japan compared to those in the United parts of turbo-compressor systems that 8483.40.5010. States. The Japan/U.S. labor cost inflator are integral to the original start-up and Lubrication systems may be classified used to adjust the labor and engineering operation of the turbo-compressor under HTSUS subheading 8414.90.4075. cost estimates was based on data system, whether shipped individually Although the HTSUS subheadings are petitioners obtained from reports issued or in combination with other subject provided for convenience and customs by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. merchandise. This scope excludes spare purposes, our written description of the For SG&A and profit, the petitioners parts that are sold separately from a scope of this investigation is dispositive. relied on the 1995 financial statements contract for a turbo-compressor system. Scope Comments of a Japanese producer of turbo- Turbo-compressor systems imported compressor systems. We recalculated from Japan as an assembly or train (i.e., The scope of this investigation the SG&A and profit rates, revising the including turbines, compressors, motor includes incomplete and unassembled figures upward to account for an error and gear boxes, control systems and systems. Given that systems may be in the petitioners’ calculations. The lubrication systems, and auxiliary shipped in different containers, it is petitioners did not separately report an equipment) may be classified under important to ensure that the subject amount for U.S. packing. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the merchandise, in particular components Based on comparison of export price United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheading and subassemblies, be readily to the Department’s recalculation of CV, 8414.80.2015, which provides for identifiable to the U.S. Customs Service. the estimated dumping margin is 90.05 centrifugal and axial compressors. The To ensure that any antidumping order percent. U.S. Customs Service may view the which may result is clear and combination of turbine driver and enforceable, we are asking interested Fair Value Comparisons compressor as ‘‘more than’’ a parties to submit comments to the Based on the data provided by the compressor and, as a result, classify the Department by July 8, 1996. Reply petitioner, there is reason to believe that combination under HTSUS subheading comments will be due by July 22, 1996. imports of turbo-compressor systems 8419.60.5000. from Japan are being, or are likely to be, Export Price and Normal Value Compressors for use in turbo- sold at less than fair value. If it becomes compressor systems, if imported The petitioners based export price on necessary at a later date to consider the separately, may also be classified under a foreign producer’s 1995 contract price petition as a source of facts available HTSUS subheading 8414.80.2015. Parts for the sale of: (1) A charge gas under section 776 of the Act, we may for such compressors, including rotors compressor train, (2) a propylene further review the calculations. or impellers and housing, are classified compressor train, and (3) an ethylene under HTSUS subheading 8414.90.4045 compressor sold as an entire package. Initiation of Investigation and 8414.90.4055. The terms of the contract were based on We have examined the petition on Steam turbines for use in turbo- a delivered price with duties paid to the turbo-compressor systems and have compressor systems, if imported nearest U.S. port. Deductions were found that it meets the requirements of separately, may be classified under the made to export price for packing, inland section 732 of the Act, including the following HTSUS subheadings: freight, ocean freight, and customs requirements concerning allegations of 8406.81.1020: steam turbines, other than duties. the material injury or threat of material 28166 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices injury to the domestic producers of a administrative review of the 1995, Aguaje requested an like product by reason of the subject antidumping duty order on certain administrative review and revocation of imports, allegedly sold at less than fair fresh-cut flowers from Mexico, in the order as it pertains to it upon value. Therefore, we are initiating an response to a request by a respondent, completion of the review. We published antidumping duty investigation to Rancho El Aguaje (Aguaje). Although a notice of initiation on May 15, 1995 determine whether imports of turbo- we initiated reviews for two other (60 FR 25885), covering Toro, Guacatay, compressor systems from Japan are producers, Rancho El Toro (Toro) and and Aguaje, and the period April 1, being, or are likely to be, sold at less Rancho Guacatay (Guacatay), we are 1994 through March 31, 1995. On than fair value in the United States. terminating these reviews because Toro August 11, 1995, Toro and Guacatay Unless extended, we will make our and Guacatay timely withdrew their timely withdrew their requests for preliminary determination by October requests for review. We preliminarily review. Because there were no other 15, 1996. intend to revoke the antidumping duty requests for review for these two Distribution of Copies of the Petition order with respect to Aguaje, based on respondents from any other interested our preliminary determination that party, the Department is now In accordance with section Aguaje has had a three-year period of terminating this review for Toro and 732(b)(3)(A) of the Act, a copy of the sales at not less than normal value (NV). Guacatay in accordance with section public version of the petition has been This review covers one producer/ 353.22(a)(5) of the Department’s provided to the representatives of the exporter and entries of the subject regulations. We shall instruct the Government of Japan. We will attempt merchandise into the United States Customs Service to liquidate Toro’s and to provide a copy of the public version during the period April 1, 1994 through Guacatay’s entries of this period at the of the petition to each exporter of turbo- March 31, 1995. rates in effect at the time of entry. compressor systems named in the We have preliminarily determined Because they are previously reviewed petition. that sales have not been made below companies, the cash deposit rates will International Trade Commission NV. Interested parties are invited to continue to be the company-specific (‘‘ITC’’) Notification comment on these preliminary results. rates currently in effect. Parties who submit comments are We have notified the ITC of our The Department is conducting this requested to submit with each comment initiation, as required by section 732(d) review in accordance with section 751 (1) a statement of the issue and (2) a of the Act. of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended brief summary of the comment. (the Act). Preliminary Determinations by the ITC EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. The ITC will determine by June 24, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scope of the Review 1996, whether there is a reasonable Rebecca Trainor or Maureen Flannery, The products covered by this review indication that imports of turbo- Office of Antidumping Compliance, are certain fresh cut flowers, defined as compressor systems from Japan are Import Administration, International standard carnations, standard causing material injury, or threatening Trade Administration, U.S. Department chrysanthemums, and pompon to cause material injury, to a U.S. of Commerce, 14th Street and chrysanthemums. During the period of industry. A negative ITC determination Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, review, such merchandise was will result in the investigation being DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4733. classifiable under Harmonized Tariff terminated; otherwise, the investigation Applicable Statutes and Regulations Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) will proceed according to statutory and Unless otherwise states, all citations items 0603.10.7010 (pompon regulatory time limits. chrysanthemums), 0603.10.7020 Dated: May 28, 1996. to the statute are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the (standard chrysanthemums), and Paul L. Joffe, effective date of the amendments made 0603.10.7030 (standard carnations). The Acting Assistant Secretary for Import to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the HTSUS item numbers are provided for Administration. Uruguay Round Agreements Act convenience and Customs purposes [FR Doc. 96–13966 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise only. The written description remains BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P indicated, all citations to the dispoitive as to the scope of the order. Department’s regulations are to the This review covers sales of the subject [A±201±601] current regulations, as amended by the merchandise entered into the United interim regulations published in the States during the period April 1, 1994 Fresh Cut Flowers From Mexico; Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 through March 31, 1995. Preliminary Results and Partial FR 25130). Termination of Antidumping Duty Verification SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Administrative Review, and Intent to From April 17 through April 19, 1996, Revoke Antidumping Duty Order in Background the Department conducted verification Part On April 23, 1987, the Department of the questionnaire responses AGENCY: Import Administration, published in the Federal Register an submitted by Aguaje, as provided in International Trade Administration, antidumping duty order on certain fresh section 782(i) of the Act. We used Department of Commerce. cut flowers from Mexico (52 FR 13491). standard verification procedures, ACTION: Notice of preliminary results On April 27, 1995, Toro and Guacatay including onsite inspection of the and partial termination of antidumping requested that the Department conduct manufacturer’s facilities, the duty administrative review, and intent an administrative review in accordance examination of relevant accounting, to revoke antidumping duty order in with 19 CFR 353.22(a)(1). Toro and sales, and other financial records, and part. Guacatay also requested that the selection of original documentation Department revoke the antidumping containing relevant information. Our SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce duty order as it pertains to them upon verification results are outlined in the (the Department) is conducting an completion of the review. On April 28, public version of the verification report. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28167

Intent to Revoke Normal Value Because information from prior Aguaje submitted a request, in Because Aguaje had no sales of proceedings constitutes secondary accordance with 19 CFR 353.25(b), that comparable merchandise in the home information, section 776(c) provides the Department revoke the order market or to third countries, we based that the Department shall, to the extent covering certain fresh cut flowers from NV on constructed value (CV) as practicable, corroborate that secondary Mexico with respect to its sales of this defined in section 773(a) of the Act. CV information from independent sources merchandise. consists of the cost of materials and reasonably at its disposal. The In accordance with 19 CFR cultivation, general expenses, profit, Statement of Administrative Action 353.25(b)(1), this request was and U.S. packing costs. We made a (SAA) provides that ‘‘corroborate’’ accompanied by a certification from circumstance-of-sale adjustment to CV means simply that the Department will Aguaje that it had not sold the relevant for the differences in direct selling satisfy itself that the secondary class or kind of merchandise at less then expenses between CEP and CV. information to be used has probative NV for a three year period including this Aguaje reported no profit figure to be value. review period, and would not be so in added to CV because it had no home In this case, we used the weighted- the future. Aguaje also agreed to its market or third country sales of subject average publicly available profit rates of immediate reinstatement in the relevant merchandise. As there was no suitable different Mexican flower producers, antidumping order, as long as any firm information on the record from which to from verified data they reported for the is subject to that order, if the derive a home market profit rate, we 1992–1993 review period. We compared Department concludes under 19 CFR used facts otherwise available for the separate home market profit rates of 353.22(f) that, subsequent to revocation, Aguaje’s profit rate. There was no these companies to each other, and it sold the subject merchandise at less suitable publicly available information found them to be comparable. The profit than NV. on the record for Aguaje for any prior rate we have applied to Aguaje is In the two prior reviews of this order, review period and no other respondent reliable and relevant, and therefore has we determined that Aguaje sold the in the current review. In addition, there probative value, because it is subject flowers from Mexico at not less is insufficient information on the record representative of the profits found to be than NV. The Department conducted a to calculate Aguaje’s profit for the same earned by other Mexican flower verification of the ranch’s response for general category of product as the producers during a recent review this period of review. In this review, we subject merchandise. Therefore, we period. The G&A percentage we used preliminarily determine that Aguaje has used the weighted average publicly also has probative value because it is the sold flowers at not less than NV, which available profit rate for other flower company’s own verified rate from a will satisfy the three-year period of no producers examined in the 1992–1993 recent review period. sales at less than NV. Therefore, we review. Preliminary Results of Review intend to revoke the order in part on Aguaje’s overall corporate G&A figure As a result of our comparison of CEP certain fresh cut flowers from Mexico could not be verified because Aguaje and CV, we preliminarily determine that with respect to Aguaje, if these could not locate all of the G&A support the following weighted-average preliminary findings are affirmed in our documents at verification. However, the dumping margin exists: final results. company was generally cooperative. From the information in the current United States Price Margin (per- review and publicly available Manufacturer/exporter cent) In calculating United States price, we information from prior reviews, we used constructed export price (CEP), in identified three possible alternatives for Rancho El Aguaje ...... 0.00 accordance with subsections 772(b), (c) G&A in this case: (1) Aguaje’s submitted and (d) of the Act, because Aguaje’s G&A data; (2) Aguaje’s publicly Parties to the proceeding may request sales to the first unaffiliated purchaser available G&A data from a prior review disclosure within 5 days of the date of occurred after importation into the period; and (3) publicly available G&A publication of this notice. Any United States. As in the original less- data submitted by other Mexican flower interested party may request a hearing than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation and producers for prior review periods. We within 10 days of publication. Any in all prior administrative reviews, all chose the alternative that resulted in the hearing, if requested, will be held 44 United States prices were weight- highest G&A percentage. Therefore, we days after the publication of this notice, averaged on a monthly basis to account have calculated an amount for G&A or the first workday thereafter. for perishability of the product. CEP was based on Aguaje’s publicly available Interested parties may submit case briefs based on the packed prices to the first information from the most recently within 30 days of the date of publication unrelated purchaser in the United verified review period as facts otherwise of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, which States. available. For each month, we used the must be limited to issues raised in the Where appropriate, we made higher of this amount, or Aguaje’s case briefs, may be filed no later than 37 deductions from CEP for Mexican and reported G&A costs. Our calculation of days after the date of publication. U.S. inland freight, Mexican and U.S. profit and G&A is discussed further in Parties who submit comments are brokerage and handling, and those the memo to the file dated May 23, requested to submit with their imputed credit and warranty expenses 1996, on file in Room B–099 of the comments (1) a statement of the issue that were incurred in the United States. Commerce Department. and (2) a brief summary of the comment. We also deducted those selling expenses The Department will publish a notice of that related to commercial activity in Use of Facts Otherwise Available final results of this administrative the United States, and added amounts Section 776(b) of the Act authorizes review, which will include the results of for revenues earned from box charges the Department to use as facts otherwise its analysis of issues raised in any such and delivery charges. Finally, we made available information derived from the comments. an adjustment for CEP profit in petition, the final determination, a The Department shall determine, and accordance with section 772(d)(3) of the previous administrative review, or other the Customs Service shall assess, Act. information place on the record. antidumping duties on all appropriate 28168 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices entries. Individual differences between [A±588±028] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack CEP and NV may vary from the K. Dulberger, Matt Blaskovich, Ron percentage stated above. Upon Roller Chain, Other Than Bicycle, From Trentham, or Joseph Hanley, Office of completion of this review, the Japan; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Compliance, Import Department will issue appraisement Antidumping Duty Administrative Administration, International Trade instructions directly to the Customs Review and Intent to Revoke Order (in Administration, U.S. Department of Part) Service. Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Furthermore, the following deposit AGENCY: Import Administration, Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5253. rates will be effective upon publication International Trade Administration, of the final results of this administrative Department of Commerce. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of review for all shipments of certain fresh The Applicable Statute cut flowers from Mexico entered, or antidumping administrative review and withdrawn from warehouse, for intent to revoke order (in part). Unless otherwise indicated, all consumption on or after the publication citations to the statute are references to SUMMARY: In response to requests from date, as provided for by section 751 the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the American Chain Association (ACA), (a)(2)(c) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit the effective date of the amendments petitioner in this proceeding, Izumi rate for the reviewed company will be made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) Chain Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Izumi), the rate established in the final results by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd (Daido), and of this review; (2) for merchandise (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise Enuma Chain Mfg. Co., Ltd. (Enuma), indicated, all citations to the exported by manufacturers or exporters respondents in this proceeding, the not covered in these reviews but Department’s regulations are to the Department of Commerce (the current regulations, as amended by the covered in the original LTFV Department) is conducting an investigation or previous review, the interim regulations published in the administrative review of the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 cash deposit will continue to be the antidumping finding on roller chain, FR 225130). company-specific rate published for the other than bicycle, from Japan. This most recent period; (3) if the exporter is review covers seven manufacturers/ Background not a firm covered in this or a previous exporters of the subject merchandise to The Department published an review, or the original LTFV the United States during the April 1, antidumping duty finding on roller investigation, but the manufacturer is, 1994 through March 31, 1995 period of chain, other than bicycle, from Japan on the cash deposit rate will be the rate review (POR). April 12, 1973 (38 FR 9926). The established for the most recent period While we have preliminarily Department published a notice of for the manufacturer of the determined that four manufacturers/ ‘‘Opportunity to Request an merchandise; and (4) for all other exporters reviewed made sales below Administrative Review’’ of the producers and/or exporters of the normal value (NV) during the POR, we antidumping finding for the 1994–95 merchandise, the cash deposit rate shall determined the weighted-average review period on April 4, 1995 (60 FR be 18.20 percent, the rate established in dumping margin for three of the four 17052). On April 25, 1995, petitioner the LTFV investigation. manufacturers/exporters to be de requested that the Department conduct These deposit rates, when imposed, minimis. We have also preliminarily an administrative review of the shall remain in effect until publication determined that the remaining three antidumping duty finding on roller of the final results of the next manufacturers/exporters reviewed had chain, other than bicycle, from Japan for administrative review. no sales or shipments of the subject seven manufacturers/exporters (Daido, merchandise during the POR. If these Enuma, Izumi, Hitachi Metals Techno This notice also serves as a preliminary results are adopted in our Ltd. (Hitachi), Pulton Chain Co., Ltd. preliminary reminder to importers of final results of administrative review, (Pulton), Peer Chain Company (Peer), their responsibility under 19 CFR we will instruct the U.S. Customs and R.K. Excel). Additionally, on April 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the Service (Customs) to assess 28, 1995, Izumi, Daido, and Enuma also reimbursement of antidumping duties antidumping duties equal to the requested that the Department conduct prior to liquidation of the relevant difference between the United States an administrative review of their sales entries during this review period. price (USP) and the NV. of the subject merchandise during the Failure to comply with this requirement In accordance with section 353.25 of POR. In its April 28, 1995 letter, Daido could result in the Secretary’s the Department’s regulations, we intend and Enuma requested partial revocation presumption that reimbursement of to revoke the antidumping duty finding of the finding pursuant to § 353.25(b) of antidumping duties occurred and the with respect to Daido and Enuma the Department’s regulations. We subsequent assessment of double because we have reason to believe that initiated the review on May 15, 1995, antidumping duties. Daido and Enuma have sold the subject (60 FR 25885). This administrative review and notice merchandise at not less than NV for a Hitachi, Pulton, and Peer reported, are in accordance with sections period of at least three consecutive years and the Department verified through 751(a)(1) and 751(d)(1) of the Act (19 and are not likely to sell the subject Customs, that they had no shipments/ U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 353.22 and merchandise at less than NV in the sales of the subject merchandise during 353.25. future. Interested parties are invited to the POR. comment on these preliminary results. The Department extended the time Dated: May 23, 1996. Parties who submit argument in this limits for the deadlines for the Paul L. Joffe, proceeding are requested to submit with preliminary and final results of review Acting Assistant Secretary for Import the argument: (1) A statement of the because of the additional time required Administration. issue; and (2) a brief summary of the for the development of a new [FR Doc. 96–13964 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] argument. questionnaire that accorded with BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P±M EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. URAA. See Antidumping Duty Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28169

Administrative Reviews; Time Limits, 60 form or manner requested, significantly results for these respondents on a FR 56141 (November 7, 1995). As a impedes a determination under the calculated rate rather than a rate based result of the federal government 28-day antidumping statute, or provides such entirely on the facts available. The use total shutdown, these deadlines were information but the information cannot of facts available is necessary to further extended. The Department is be verified, the Department shall use calculate a dumping margin for those conducting this administrative review facts otherwise available in reaching the U.S. sales which lack the proper in accordance with section 751 of the applicable determination. Because information necessary to calculate a Act. Izumi, Daido, and Enuma failed or dumping margin. refused to submit certain information As facts otherwise available we are Scope of the Review that the Department had requested, we assigning to Enuma the highest Imports covered this administrative must use facts otherwise available for all transaction margin calculated on a U.S. review are roller chain, other than three respondents. sale made by Enuma in this review. bicycle, from Japan. The term ‘‘roller A large portion of Izumi’s home Because no non-aberrational dumping chain, other than bicycle,’’ as used in market (HM) sales were to an affiliated margins were found on any U.S. sales this review includes chain, with or reseller. We have concluded that the made by Daido during the period of without attachments, whether or not extremely small percentage of Izumi’s review, use of Daido’s non-aberrational plated or coated, and whether or not remaining HM sales to unaffiliated transaction margin data would not manufactured to American or British customers do not provide a sufficient supply the adverse inference warranted standards, which is used for power factual basis to determine whether sales in this case. Therefore, as facts transmissions and/or conveyance. Such to the affiliated reseller were made at otherwise available we are assigning to chain consists of a series of alternately- arm’s-length prices. See Television Daido the highest rate calculated in this assembled roller links and pin links in Receivers, Monochrome and Color, from review for another company (3.97 which the pins articulate inside from Japan; Final, Results of Antidumping percent). We limited application of the bushings and the rollers are free to Duty Administrative Review, 52 FR these rates to the particular transactions turn on the bushings. Pins and bushings 8940, 8943 (March 20, 1987), and involved. are press fit in their respective link Certain Stainless Steel Cooking Ware Examination of the circumstances plates. Chain may be single strand, from the Republic of Korea; Preliminary surrounding Izumi’s failure to provide having one row of roller links, or Results of Antidumping Duty information on downstream sales made multiple strand, having more than one Administrative Review, 61 FR 8253 in the home market by its affiliated row of roller links. The center plates are (March 4, 1996). Further, Izumi did not reseller indicates that Izumi acted to the located between the strands of roller submit information concerning home best of its ability to comply with the links. Such chain may be either single market downstream sales (sales by the Department’s requests for information. or double pitch and may be used as affiliated customer to unaffiliated Thus, the Department has determined power transmission or conveyor chain. customers). that, in selecting among the facts This review also covers leaf chain, Daido and Enuma’s U.S. sales otherwise available to Izumi, an adverse which consists of a series of link plates subsidiary, Daido Corporation, incurred inference is not warranted in this case. alternately assembled with pins in such further processing costs on certain As facts otherwise available, we are a way that the joint is free to articulate constructed export price (CEP) sales of using Izumi’s reported constructed between adjoining pitches. This review attachment-equipped roller chain. Our value as the basis for NV to calculate further covers chain model numbers 25 analysis of the transfer prices of the dumping margins on U.S. sales that and 35. Roller chain is currently attachments submitted by Daido would have been compared to NV based classified under the Harmonized Tariff Corporation for use in the calculation of on downstream sales had such Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) total further processing costs indicates information been reported. that the submitted transfer prices do not subheadings 7315.11.00 through United States Price 7619.90.00. HTSUS item numbers are consistently reflect the actual material provided for convenience and Customs costs of the attachments. Further, Daido In calculating USP for R.K. Excel, purposes. The written description Corporation used a cost allocation Daido, Enuma, and Izumi we used remains dispositive. methodology which, upon analysis, we export price (EP), as defined in section determined was in a form which did not 772(a) of the Act, because the Verification provide a reliable indication of their merchandise was sold to unaffiliated In accordance with § 353.25(c)(2)(ii) actual further processing costs. U.S. purchasers prior to date of of the Department’s regulations, we For certain U.S. sales where there importation. Additionally, we treated verified information provided by Daido were no contemporaneous sales of certain U.S. sales by Daido and Enuma and Enuma using standard verification identical merchandise in the home as CEP, as defined in section 772(b) of procedures, including on-site inspection market, Daido and Enuma also failed to the Act, when the subject merchandise of the manufacturer’s facilities, the provide the Department with model was first sold to unrelated purchasers examination of relevant sales and match and difference in merchandise after import into the United States. EP financial records, and selection of adjustment information necessary to sales were based on packed, FOB original documentation containing calculate a dumping margin. Finally, as Japanese port, ex-go-down Japanese port relevant information. Our verification a result of findings at verification, we price, or CIF U.S. port prices to results are outlined in the public determined that Daido and Enuma unaffiliated purchasers in the United versions of the verification reports. failed to report a certain number of CEP States. We made adjustments, where sales. applicable, for inland freight from the Use of Facts Available However, because of the overall warehouse, inland insurance, brokerage Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides integrity of Daido and Enuma’s and handling, international freight, that if an interested party withholds questionnaire responses, and because marine insurance, in accordance with information that has been requested by the overall volume of sales affected by section 772(c) of the Act, because these the Department, fails to provide such these deficiencies is small, we have expenses were incident to bringing the information in a timely manner or in the determined to base these preliminary subject merchandise from the original 28170 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices place of shipment in the exporting extent practicable, at the same level of constitute a more advanced stage of country to the place of delivery in the trade as the U.S. sale, as defined by distribution than the level of trade of the United States. section 773(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Act. We CEP sale. We based CEP on packed, FOB based NV for all companies subject to Daido and Enuma reported one level warehouse or delivered price to this review, on packed, delivered prices of trade and one channel of distribution unrelated purchasers in the United to unaffiliated purchasers in the HM. in the HM (direct to end users). Daido States. Pursuant to section 772(c) and We made adjustments, where and Enuma made CEP and EP sales to (d) of the Act, the Department made applicable, in accordance with section the U.S. market and claimed either a adjustments, where applicable, for 773(a)(6) of the Act, for all companies level of trade adjustment for its CEP international freight, brokerage and subject to this review. We made sales, or a CEP offset. The level of trade handling, credit, U.S. inland freight, deductions from NV for brokerage, of the U.S. sales is determined by the commissions, and indirect selling inland freight, insurance and discounts. adjusted price of the CEP sale. expenses. Where applicable, we made adjustments Daido and Enuma’s questionnaire for differences in packing, credit, responses indicate a difference between Normal Value advertising, warranty, and technical the actual selling functions performed A. Viability service expenses. We made adjustments, by Daido and Enuma at the level of where appropriate, for physical trade of the CEP sale and at the level of In order to determine whether there differences in merchandise in trade of the HM sale. The adjusted CEP was sufficient volume of sales in the accordance with 773(a)(6)(C)(ii) of the sales do not reflect the selling functions home market (HM) to serve as a viable Act. to end users, such as developing a basis for calculating NV, we compared Where there were no sales customer base, taking sales orders, the volume of home market sales of the commissions paid in the HM, we offset technical consultations, maintaining foreign like product, for each of the U.S. commissions with the weighted sales and billing records, product companies subject to this review, to the average of home market indirect selling packing and shipping, and inventory volume of U.S. sales of the subject expenses up to the amount of the maintenance. The HM sales reflect these merchandise, in accordance with commissions paid on U.S. sales in additional selling functions performed 773(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Because the accordance with 19 CFR 353.56(b)(1). for direct sales to end users. Therefore, aggregate volume of HM sales of the the selling functions performed for CEP D. Level of Trade/CEP Offset foreign like product for each of the sales are sufficiently different than for companies subject to this review was As set forth in section 773(a)(1)(B)(i) HM sales to consider such sales to be at greater than five percent of its aggregate of the Act and in the Statement of different levels of trade. volume of U.S. sales for the subject Administrative Action (SAA) Because we compared these CEP sales merchandise, we determined that the accompanying the Uruguay Round to HM sales at a different level of trade, HM provides a viable basis for Agreements Act, at 829–831, to the we examined whether a level of trade calculating NV for those companies extent possible, the Department will adjustment may be appropriate. In this subject to this review, pursuant to calculate NV based on sales at the same case, Daido and Enuma only sold at one section 773(a)(1)(C) of the Act. level of trade as the U.S. sale. When the level of trade in the HM; therefore, there Department is unable to find sale(s) in B. Constructed Value is no basis upon which Daido and the comparison market at the same level Enuma has demonstrated a consistent In accordance with section 773(e) of of trade as sale(s) in the U.S., the pattern of price differences between the Act, we calculated constructed value Department may compare sales in the levels of trade. Further, we do not have (CV) for Izumi based on its cost of U.S. and foreign markets at a different information which would allow us to materials and fabrication employed in level of trade. examine pricing patterns on Daido and producing the subject merchandise, In accordance with section Enuma’s sales of other products, and SG&A, and profit incurred and realized 773(a)(7)(A) of the Act, if we compare a there are no other respondents or other in connection with the production and U.S. sale at one level of trade to NV record information on which such sale of the foreign like product, and U.S. sales at a different level of trade, the analysis could be based. packing costs. We used the costs of Department will adjust the NV to Because the data available do not materials and fabrication, as reported in account for the difference in level of provide an appropriate basis for making the CV portion of Izumi’s questionnaire trade if two conditions are met. First, a level of trade adjustment, but the level response. We calculated Izumi’s indirect there must be differences between the of trade in the HM is a more advanced selling and credit expenses based on the actual selling functions performed by state of distribution than the level of information reported in the HM sales the seller at the level of trade of the U.S. trade of the CEP sale, a CEP offset, as portion of Izumi’s questionnaire sale and at the level of trade of the NV requested by Daido and Enuma, is response. We used the U.S. packing sale. Second, the differences must affect appropriate. We have applied the CEP costs as reported in the U.S. sales price comparability as evidenced by a offset to NV. portion of Izumi’s questionnaire pattern of consistent price differences We based the CEP offset amount on response. We calculated actual profit by between sales at different levels of trade the amount of the HM indirect selling using the information provided in in the market in which NV is expenses. We limited the HM indirect Izumi’s 1994 fiscal year financial determined. When CEP is applicable, selling expense deduction by the statements for its chain division. section 773(a)(7)(B) of the Act amount of the indirect selling expenses establishes the procedures for making a C. Price-to-Price Comparisons incurred on sales to the U.S., in CEP offset when (1) NV is at a different accordance with section 772(d)(1)(D). For price-to-price comparisons, we level of trade, and (2) the data available based NV on the price which the foreign do not provide an appropriate basis for Non-shippers like product is first sold for a level of trade adjustment from the U.S. Hitachi, Pulton, and Peer stated that consumption in the exporting country, sale. Also, in accordance with section they did not have shipments during the in the usual commercial quantities, in 773(a)(7)(B), to qualify for a CEP offset, POR, and we confirmed this with the the ordinary course of trade, and to the the level of trade in the HM must also U.S. Customs Service. Therefore, we are Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28171 treating them as non-shippers for this briefs and rebuttals to written publication of the final results of the review, and are rescinding this review comments, limited issues raised in such next administrative review. This notice with respect to these companies. See briefs or comments, may be filed no also serves as a preliminary reminder to Proposed Rule, § 351.213(d)(3), (61 FR later than 37 days after the date of importers of their responsibility under 7365). The cash deposit rates for these publication. The Department will 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate firms will continue to be the rates publish a notice of the final results of regarding the reimbursement of established in the most recently the administrative review, which will antidumping duties prior to liquidation completed final determination, or the include the results of its analysis of of the relevant entries during the period. all-others rate if the respondent was issues raised in any such written Failure to comply with this never assigned its own rate in a comments or at the hearing, within 180 requirement could result in the previous segment of this proceeding. days from the issuance of these Secretary’s presumption that preliminary results. Intent To Revoke reimbursement of antidumping duties The Department shall determine, and occurred and the subsequent assessment Daido and Enuma requested, pursuant Customs shall assess, antidumping of double antidumping duties. to 19 CFR 353.25(b), revocation of the duties on all appropriate entries. This administrative review and notice order with respect to their sales of the Individual differences between USP and are in accordance with section 751(a)(1) merchandise in question and submitted NV may vary from the percentages of the Act. the certification required by 19 CFR stated above. The Department will issue Dated: May 28, 1996. 353.25(b)(1). In addition, in accordance appraisement instructions directly to with 19 CFR 353.25(a)(2)(iii), Daido and Customs. The final results of this review Paul L. Joffe, Enuma have agreed in writing to their shall be the basis for the assessment of Acting Assistant Secretary for Import immediate reinstatement in the order, as antidumping duties on entries of Administration. long as any producer or reseller is merchandise covered by the [FR Doc. 96–13963 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] subject to the order, if the Department determination and for future deposits of BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P concludes under 19 CFR 353.22(f) that estimated duties. Daido and Enuma, subsequent to Furthermore, the following deposit [A±588±028] revocation, sold merchandise at less requirements will be effective upon than NV. Based on the preliminary completion of the final results of these Roller Chain, Other Than Bicycle, From results in this review and the two administrative reviews for all shipments Japan; Preliminary Results of preceding reviews, Daido and Enuma of roller chain, other than bicycle, from Antidumping Duty Administrative have demonstrated three consecutive Japan entered, or withdrawn from Reviews years of sales at not less than NV. If the warehouse, for consumption on or after final results of this and the two publication date of the final results of AGENCY: Import Administration, preceding reviews demonstrate that these administrative reviews, as International Trade Administration, Daido and Enuma sold the merchandise provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: Department of Commerce. at not less than NV, and if the (1) The cash deposit rate for the ACTION: Notice of Preliminary Results of Department determines that it is not reviewed companies will be those rates Antidumping Duty Administrative likely that Daido and Enuma will sell outlined above, except for Daido and Reviews. the subject merchandise at less than NV Enuma, which, because their weighted- in the future, we intend to revoke the average margins were de minimis, will SUMMARY: In response to a request from order with respect to merchandise be zero percent; (2) for merchandise the American Chain Association (ACA), produced and exported by Daido and exported by manufacturers or exporters petitioner in this proceeding, the Enuma. not covered in these reviews but Department of Commerce (the covered in the original LTFV Department) has conducted Preliminary Results investigation or a previous review, the administrative reviews of the As a result of this review, we cash deposit will continue to be the antidumping finding on roller chain, preliminarily determine that the most recent rate published in the final other than bicycle, from Japan. The following weighted-average dumping determination or final results for which reviews cover two manufacturers/ margin exists: the manufacturer or exporter received a exporters of the subject merchandise to company-specific rate; (3) if the exporter the United States during the period Manufacturer/exporter Margin (per- is not a firm covered in these reviews, April 1, 1992 through March 31, 1993, cent) or the original investigation, but the and six manufacturers/ exporters of this merchandise to the United States during Izumi ...... 3.97 manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate R.K. Excel ...... 0.09 will be that established for the the period April 1, 1993 through March Daido ...... 0.14 manufacturer of the merchandise in the 31, 1994. The reviews indicate the Enuma ...... 0.09 final results of these reviews, or the existence of dumping margins for All Others ...... 15.92 LTFV investigation; and (4) if neither certain firms during the relevant the exporter nor the manufacturer is a periods. Parties to this proceeding may request firm covered in these or any previous If these preliminary results are disclosure within five days of reviews, the cash deposit rate will be adopted in our final results of publication of this notice and any 15.92 percent, the ‘‘all-others’’ rate administrative reviews, we will instruct interested party may request a hearing based on the first review conducted by the U.S. Customs Service (Customs) to within 10 days of publication. Any the Department in which a ‘‘new assess antidumping duties equal to the hearing, if requested, will be held 44 shipper’’ rate was established in the difference between the United States days after the date of publication, or the final results of antidumping finding price (USP) and the foreign market first working day thereafter. Interested administrative review (48 FR 51801, value (FMV). parties may submit case briefs and/or November 14, 1983). We invite interested parties to written comments no later than 30 days These deposit requirements, when comment on these preliminary results. after the date of publication. Rebuttal imposed, shall remain in effect until Parties who submit argument in this 28172 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices proceeding are requested to submit with transmission and/or conveyance. Such the LTFV investigation or a prior the argument (1) a statement of the issue chain consists of a series of alternately- administrative review or, if the firm has and (2) a brief summary of the assembled roller links and pin links in never before been investigated or argument. which the pins articulate inside from reviewed, the all others rate from the EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. the bushings and the rollers are free to LTFV investigation; or (2) the highest FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack turn on the bushings. Pins and bushings calculated rate in this review for the Dulberger, Matt Blaskovich, Ron are press fit in their respective link same class or kind of merchandise for Trentham or Joseph Hanley, Office of plates. Chain may be single strand, any firm. (Antifriction Bearings (Other Antidumping Compliance, International having one row of roller links, or Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Trade Administration, U.S. Department multiple strand, having more than one Parts Thereof From the Federal Republic of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; row of roller links. The center plates are of Germany, et al; Final Results of telephone (202) 482–5253. located between the strands of roller Antidumping Duty Administrative links. Such chain may be either single Review, 56 FR 31692, 31704–05 (July 11, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: or double pitch and may be used as 1991); Allied Signal Aerospace Co. v. Background power transmission or conveyer chain. United States, 996 F. 2d 1185 (Fed. Cir. These reviews also cover leaf chain, 1993)). On May 27, 1993, in response to a which consists of a series of link plates timely request from petitioner, the alternately assembled with pins in such Results Based on Total BIA Department published a notice of a way that the joint is free to articulate In response to the Department’s initiation of review for the period April between adjoining pitches. These questionnaire, Pulton stated that it had 1, 1992 through March 31, 1993, for reviews further cover chain model no sales and no exports to U.S. Daido Kogyo, Ltd. (Daido), Enuma numbers 25 and 35. Roller chain is customers during the 1993–94 period of Chain Mfg. Co., Ltd. (Enuma), Hitachi currently classified under the review (POR). Subsequently, the Metals Techno Ltd. (Hitachi), Izumi Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Department received information from Chain Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Izumi), United States (HTSUS) subheadings Customs indicating that there were Pulton Chain Co., Ltd. (Pulton), and 7315.11.00 through 7619.90.00. HTSUS entries of roller chain, other than R.K. Excel. The reviews for Hitachi, item numbers are provided for bicycle, manufactured by Pulton during Izumi, Pulton and R.K. Excel were convenience and Customs purposes. the POR. conducted separately. On December 6, The written description remains When presented with this 1995, the Department published in the dispositive. information, Pulton stated that it had Federal Register (60 FR 62387), the final inadvertently failed to report one results of the 1992–93 administrative Best Information Available (BIA) shipment of subject merchandise during review of the antidumping finding on In accordance with section 776(c) of the POR. Because Pulton failed to report roller chain, other than bicycle, from the Tariff Act, the Department has the shipment of subject merchandise in Japan (38 FR 9226, April 12, 1973) for preliminarily determined that the use of response to the Department’s Hitachi, Izumi, Pulton and R.K. Excel. best information available (BIA) is questionnaire, we have treated Pulton as On May 15, 1994, in response to a appropriate for Pulton for the 1993–94 uncooperative and used first-tier BIA timely request from petitioner, the POR and for Daido and Enuma for the (see above) to determine its dumping Department published a notice of 1992–1993 and 1993–1994 PORs. In margin for this review. In this case the initiation of review for the period April determining what to use as BIA, 19 CFR rate used was 43.29 percent which was 1, 1993 through March 31, 1994 for the 353.37(b) provides that the Department from the first roller chain review following six companies: Daido, Enuma, may take into account whether a party completed by the Department (46 FR Hitachi, Izumi, Pulton, and R.K. Excel. fails to provide requested information. 44488, September 4, 1981). When a company fails to provide the Hitachi and Pulton asserted that they Assignment of Partial BIA had no sales during the period of review information requested in a timely (POR). manner, or otherwise significantly Partial BIA was applied in cases impedes the Department’s review, the where we were unable to use some Applicable Statute and Regulations Department considers that company to portion of a response in calculating a The Department is conducting these be uncooperative, and, in accordance dumping margin. The use of partial reviews in accordance with section 751 with its two-tier BIA methodology, rather than total BIA reflects the fact of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended generally assigns that company first-tier that, in general, the respondent has been (the Act) and § 353.22 of the BIA, which is the higher of (1) the cooperative. Department’s regulations (19 CFR highest rate for any company for the During the 1993–94 POR, a large 353.22). Unless otherwise indicated, all same class or kind of merchandise from portion of Izumi’s home market (HM) citations to the statute and to the any previous review or the original sales were to an affiliated reseller. We Department’s regulations are in investigation, or (2) the highest rate for have concluded that the extremely small reference to the provisions as they a responding firm with shipments of the percentage of Izumi’s remaining HM existed on December 31, 1994. same class or kind of merchandise sales to unaffiliated customers do not during the current review period. provide a sufficient factual basis to Scope of the Review When a company has substantially determine whether sales to the affiliated Imports covered by the reviews are cooperated with our requests for reseller were made at arm’s-length shipments of roller chain, other than information including, in some cases, prices. See Television Receivers, bicycle, from Japan. The term ‘‘roller verification, but fails to provide Monochrome and Color, from Japan; chain, other than bicycle,’’ as used in complete or accurate information, we Final, Results of Antidumping Duty these reviews includes chain, with or assign that company second-tier BIA, Administrative Review, 52 FR 8940, without attachments, whether or not which is the higher of: (1) the highest 8943 (March 20, 1987), and Certain plated or coated, and whether or not rate (including the ‘‘all others’’ rate) Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from the manufactured to American or British ever applicable to the firm for the same Republic of Korea; Preliminary Results standards, which is used for power class or kind of merchandise from either of Antidumping Duty Administrative Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28173

Review, 61 FR 8253 (March 4, 1996). defined in section 772(c) of the Act, reversed the CIT and held that the Further, Izumi did not submit when subject merchandise was sold to statute did not preclude Commerce from information concerning home market unrelated U.S. purchasers after using the ‘‘Zenith footnote 4’’ downstream sales (sales by the affiliated importation. PP sales were based on the methodology to calculate tax-neutral customer to unaffiliated customers). packed, FOB or ex-go-down Japanese dumping assessments (i.e., assessments During the 1992–93 and 1993–94 port price, or CIF U.S. port prices to that are unaffected by the existence or PORs, further processing costs were unrelated purchasers in the United amount of home market consumption incurred by Daido and Enuma in sales States. For PP sales, we made taxes). Moreover, the Federal Circuit of further-assembled, attachment- adjustments, where applicable, for recognized that certain international equipped roller chain, through their brokerage and handling charges, foreign agreements of the United States, in United States subsidiary, Daido inland freight, foreign inland insurance, particular the General Agreement on Corporation. However, Daido and ocean freight, marine insurance, Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Tokyo Enuma reported transfer prices rather commissions, discounts, credit Round Antidumping Code, required the than actual material costs, and used a expenses, and bank charges in calculation of tax-neutral dumping cost allocation methodology which, accordance with 772(d)(2) of the Act. assessments. The Federal Circuit upon analysis, we determined was in a ESP for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 remanded the case to the CIT with form not providing a reliable indication PORs for Daido and Enuma was based instructions to direct Commerce to of their actual further processing costs. on the packed, FOB warehouse or determine which tax methodology it Additionally, Daido and Enuma refused delivered price to unrelated purchasers. will employ. to provide the Department with the We made adjustments, where The Department has determined that necessary model match and difference applicable, for brokerage and handling the ‘‘Zenith footnote 4’’ methodology in merchandise adjustment information charges, movement expenses, marine should be used. First, as the Department necessary to calculate a dumping insurance, inventory expenses, credit has explained in numerous margin for certain U.S. sales where there expenses, packing costs, indirect selling administrative determinations and court were no contemporaneous sales of expenses, and commissions in filings over the past decade, and as the identical merchandise in the home accordance with 772(d)(2) of the Act. Federal Circuit has now recognized, market. During the 1992–93 and 1993–94 PORs, Article VI of the GATT and Article 2 of However, because the overall integrity further processing costs were incurred the Tokyo Round Antidumping Code of Izumi, Daido and Enuma’s by Daido and Enuma’s United States required that dumping assessments be questionnaire responses warrants a subsidiary, Daido Corporation. tax-neutral. This requirement continues calculated rate, but certain U.S. sales However, we determined that the under the new Agreement on lacked the proper further reporting methodology of such expenses Implementation of Article VI of the manufacturing, model match, or is unreliable and assigned a BIA margin General Agreement on Tariffs and downstream sales information necessary to sales that incurred such expenses (see Trade. Second, the URAA explicitly to calculate a dumping margin, we BIA above). amended the antidumping law to applied the appropriate second-tier BIA In light of the Federal Circuit’s remove consumption taxes from the rate (see above) to each respondent. For decision in Federal Mogul versus United home market price and to eliminate the the 1992–93 POR we assigned the States, 63 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1995), the addition of taxes to U.S. price, so that second-tier BIA rate of 1.19 percent to Department has changed its treatment of no consumption tax is included in the Daido and Enuma which is the highest home market consumption taxes. Where price in either market. The Statement of rate previously assigned to Daido and merchandise exported to the United Administrative action (p.159) explicitly Enuma in the final results of the April States is exempt from the consumption states that this change was intended to 1, 1979 through September 30, 1979 tax, the Department will add to the U.S. result in tax neutrality. antidumping administrative review (46 price the absolute amount of such taxes While the ‘‘Zenith footnote 4’’ FR 44488, 44490, September 4, 1981). charged on the comparison sales in the methodology is slightly different from For the 1993–94 POR we applied the home market. This is the same the URAA methodology, in that section second-tier BIA rate of 2.17 percent to methodology that the Department 772(d)(1)(C) of the pre-URAA law Daido and Enuma which is the highest adopted following the decision of the required that the tax be added to United calculated rate in these preliminary Federal Circuit in Zenith versus United States price rather than subtracted from results, and the second-tier BIA rate of States, 988 F. 2d 1573, 1582 (1993), and home market price, it does result in tax- 43.29 percent to Izumi, which is the which was suggested by that court in neutral duty assessments. In sum, the highest rate previously assigned to footnote 4 of its decision. The Court of Department has elected to treat Izumi in the final results of the April 1, International Trade (CIT) overturned consumption taxes in a manner 1983 through March 31, 1984 this methodology in Federal Mogul consistent with its longstanding policy antidumping administrative review (57 versus United States, 834 F. Supp. 1391 of tax-neutrality and with the GATT. FR 46535, October 9, 1992). We limited (1993), and the Department acquiesced application of these rates to the in the CIT’s decision. The Department Foreign Market Value (FMV) particular transactions involved. then followed the CIT’s preferred In calculating FMV for the 1992–93 methodology, which was to calculate and 1993–94 PORs for all companies United States Price (USP) the tax to be added to U.S. price by subject to these reviews, the Department In calculating USP for the 1992–93 multiplying the adjusted U.S. price by used home market price, as defined in and 1993–94 PORs for all companies the foreign market tax rate; the section 773 of the Tariff Act, when subject to these reviews, the Department Department made adjustments to this sufficient quantities of such or similar used purchase price (PP) as defined in amount so that the tax adjustment merchandise were sold in the home section 772 (b) of the Act, when the sale would not alter a ‘‘zero’’ pre-tax market to provide a basis for to the first unrelated purchaser occurred dumping assessment. comparison. prior to importation. The Department The foreign exporters in the Federal We utilized constructed value (CV) as treated Daido and Enuma’s sales as Mogul case, however, appealed that the basis for FMV for those U.S. sales by exporter’s sale price (ESP) sales, as decision to the Federal Circuit, which Izumi during the 1993–94 POR for 28174 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices which there were no corresponding Margin Enuma, which, because their weighted- home market model matches, in Manufacturer/exporter (percent) average margins were de minimis, will accordance with section 773(a) of the be zero percent; Tariff Act. Daido ...... 0.15 (2) For previously reviewed or Enuma ...... 0.04 Home market price, for the 1992–93 investigated companies not listed above, and 1993–94 PORs for all companies Further, we preliminarily determine the the cash deposit rate will continue to be subject to these reviews, was based on following dumping margins for the the company-specific rate published for a packed, FOB or CIF, delivered price to period April 1, 1993 through March 31, the most recent period; related and unrelated purchasers in 1994: (3) If the exporter is not a firm Japan. We calculated CV for Izumi for covered in this review, a prior review, or in the original less-than-fair-value the 1993–94 POR as the sum of Manufacturer/exporter Margin materials, fabrication costs, general (percent) (LTFV) investigation, but the expenses, profit and U.S. packing. We manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Hitachi ...... *12.68 will be the rate established for the most added statutory or actual amounts for Izumi ...... 23.57 the general expenses and profit recent period for the manufacturer of Pulton ...... **43.29 the merchandise; and components of CV, as appropriate. RK Excel ...... 2.17 Daido ...... 0.03 (4) If neither the exporter nor the For PP sales comparisons, where manufacturer is a firm covered in this or applicable, for all companies subject to Enuma ...... 0.06 All Others ...... 15.92 any previous review conducted by the the 1992–93 and 1993–94 PORs, we Department, the cash deposit rate will made deductions from FMV for * No sales during the period. Rate is from be 15.92, the ‘‘all-others’’ rate based on brokerage, inland freight, insurance and the last period in which there were sales. ** Not a calculated rate. Rate reflects the as- the first review conducted by the discounts. Where applicable, we made signment of first-tier total BIA (see BIA section Department in which a ‘‘new shipper’’ adjustment for differences in packing above). rate was established in the final results expenses, credit expenses, advertising The Department shall determine, and of antidumping finding administrative expenses, warranty expenses, technical Customs shall assess, antidumping review (48 FR 51801, November 14, services, and differences in duties on all appropriate entries. 1983). merchandise. We made further Individual differences between United These deposit requirements, when adjustments, where appropriate, for U.S. States price and FMV may vary from the imposed, shall remain in effect until commissions in accordance with 19 CFR percentages stated above. Upon publication of the final results of the 353.56(a)(2). Where commissions were completion of the review the next administrative review. paid on U.S. sales and not paid on home Department will issue appraisement This notice serves as a preliminary market sales, we allowed an offset to instructions on each exporter directly to reminder to importers of their FMV amounting to the lesser of the Customs. responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to weighted-average home market indirect Interested parties may request file a certificate regarding the selling expenses or the U.S. disclosure within five days of the date reimbursement of antidumping duties commissions in accordance with 19 CFR of publication of this notice, and may prior to liquidation of the relevant 353.58(b) of the Department’s request a hearing within ten days of the entries during this period. regulations. We also made an date of publication. Any hearing, if Failure to comply with this adjustment to FMV for consumption requested, will be held as early as requirement could result in the taxes in accordance with the ‘‘Zenith convenient for the parties but not later Secretary’s presumption that footnote 4’’ methodology discussed than 44 days after the date of reimbursement of antidumping duties above. publication or the first work day occurred and the subsequent assessment For comparison to ESP sales by Daido thereafter. Case briefs or other written of double antidumping duties. and Enuma during the 1992–93 and comments from interested parties may This administrative review and notice 1993–94 PORs, we allowed an ESP be submitted not later than 30 days after are in accordance with section 751(a)(a) offset to FMV, amounting to the lesser the date of publication of this notice. of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) of the weighted-average total of home Rebuttal briefs and rebuttal comments, and 19 CFR 353.22. market indirect selling expenses or the limited to issues in the case briefs, may Dated: May 28, 1996. total U.S. indirect selling expenses, in be filed not later than 37 days after the Paul L. Joffe, accordance with 19 CFR 353.56(b)(2). date of publication. The Department Acting Assistant Secretary for Import No other adjustments were claimed or will publish the final results of this Administration. allowed. administrative review, including the [FR Doc. 96–13965 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] results of its analysis of issues raised in We conducted an arms’s length test BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P any such written comments or at a and determined that Izumi’s sales to its hearing. related customers during the 1993–94 Furthermore, the following deposit POR were made at arm’s length because Applications for Duty-Free Entry of requirements will be effective for all Scientific Instruments the prices Izumi charged to its related shipments of roller chain, other than customers were at least 99.5 percent of bicycle, from Japan, entered, or Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the the prices it charged to unrelated withdrawn from warehouse, for Educational, Scientific and Cultural customers. consumption on or after the publication Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. Preliminary Results of the Review date of the final results of these L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part administrative reviews, as provided by 301), we invite comments on the As a result of this review, we section 751(a)(1) of the Act: question of whether instruments of preliminarily determine the following (1) The cash deposit rate for the equivalent scientific value, for the dumping margins for the period April 1, reviewed companies will be those rates purposes for which the instruments 1992 through March 31, 1993: outlined above, except for Daido and shown below are intended to be used, Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28175 are being manufactured in the United characterize the molecular mechanisms DC 20230. Applications may be States. by which odorant molecules examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. Comments must comply with 15 CFR differentially activate olfactory receptor in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 301.5(a) (3) and (4) of the regulations neurons. Application Accepted by Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution and be filed within 20 days with the Commissioner of Customs: April 19, Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. 1996. Docket Number: 95–085R. Applicant: Department of Commerce, Washington, Docket Number: 96–046. Applicant: University of Wisconsin—Eau Claire, DC 20230. Applications may be Smithsonian Institution, National Eau Claire, WI 54702. Instrument: examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 Museum of Natural History, Absorbance and Fluorescence Stopped- p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Washington, DC 20560. Instrument: Flow Spectrophotometer, Model Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Electron Microprobe, Model JXA– SX.17MV. Manufacturer: Applied Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 8900R. Manufacturer: JEOL, Japan. Photophysics, Ltd., United Kingdom. Docket Number: 95–114R. Applicant: Intended Use: The instrument will be Intended Use: Original notice of this Research Triangle Institute, 3040 used for studies of the chemical resubmitted application was published Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle, NC composition, elemental distribution of in the Federal Register of September 29, 27709. Instrument: (2) ICP Mass geological materials and various 1995. Docket Number: 95–093R. Spectrometers, Model PlasmaQuad 2. museum objects. Experiments will Applicant: Florida International Manufacturer: Fisons Instruments, Inc, consist of focussing on a high voltage University, University Park, Miami, FL United Kingdom. Intended Use: Original electron beam on a solid sample 33199. Instrument: Stopped-Flow notice of this resubmitted application (usually a polished grain mount or thin System. Manufacturer: Applied was published in the Federal Register of section), generating characteristic x- Photophysics, United Kingdom. December 14, 1995. rays, and measuring these x-rays Intended Use: Original notice of this Docket Number: 96–043. Applicant: quantitatively with wavelength and resubmitted application was published The University of Chicago, 5841 S. energy dispersive spectrometers. in the Federal Register of November 14, Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637. Application Accepted by Commissioner 1995. Instrument: Autosampler, Model A200S. of Customs: April 30, 1996. Docket Number: 95–097R. Applicant: Manufacturer: Finnigan Corp., Germany. Docket Number: 96–047. Applicant: Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Intended Use: The instrument will be University of Wisconsin-Madison, Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. installed on an existing gas Integrated Microscopy Resource, 1525 Instrument: Stopped-Flow chromatograph/mass spectrometer for Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706. Spectrophotometer, Model SX.17MV. the analysis of biochemical products for Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Manufacturer: Applied Photophysics, human nutrition research. These EM 912 Omega. Manufacturer: LEO Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended Use: biochemicals will be obtained from Electron Microscopy, Germany. Original notice of this resubmitted humans to trace the metabolism of Intended Use: The instrument will be application was published in the nutrients in the human body in studies used to study a variety of biological Federal Register of November 14, 1995. with the objectives of understanding the specimens to determine the detailed Docket Number: 96–025. Applicant: biochemical mechanisms of structural consequences to a particular The Pennsylvania State University, The nutritionally related disease. tissue of a specific experimental Applied Research Laboratory, P O Box Application Accepted by Commissioner manipulation. The instrument will also 30 (Atherton St.), State College, PA of Customs: April 19, 1996. be used to determine the elemental 16804–0030. Instrument: Mach-Zehnder Docket Number: 96–044. Applicant: composition of a biological specimen as Interferometer, Model OP35–I/O. University of California, Los Angeles, well as to provide images of its Manufacturer: UltraOptec Inc, Canada. Plasma Physics Laboratory, 405 Hilgard ultrastructure. Application Accepted by Intended Use: The instrument will be Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1547. Commissioner of Customs: May 2, 1996. used for studies of bulk solids, thin Instrument: Ti:Sapphire Laser. Frank W. Creel, films and material gradients in Manufacturer: MBP Technologies, Inc., experiments which involve noncontact Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. Canada. Intended Use: The instrument elastic property determination, will be used as the illuminator of a lidar [FR Doc. 96–13970 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] dispersion measurements, vibrational system principally to range off the Ca+, BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P mode measurements, crack detection, Fe, N2+, N2* layers in the ionosphere. and 3–D ultrasonic field profiling. In The phenomena studied are changes in Applications for Duty-Free Entry of addition, the instrument will be used for the Ca+, Fe, N2+, N2* densities in the Scientific Instruments educational purposes in the courses ionosphere due to auroral conditions E.Mch. 521 Stress Waves in Solids and and changes in these densities. In Pursuant to section 6(c) of the E.Mch. 440/Mtsc. Nondestructive addition, the instrument will be used for Educational, Scientific and Cultural Evaluation of Flaws. Application educational purposes in graduate level Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: independent research courses. L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part March 1, 1996. Application Accepted by Commissioner 301), we invite comments on the Docket Number: 96–026. Applicant: of Customs: April 19, 1996. question of whether instruments of Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240. Docket Number: 96–045. Applicant: equivalent scientific value, for the Instrument: Rapid Kinetics Accessory, Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 purposes for which the instruments Model SFA–20. Manufacturer: Hi-Tech Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104– shown below are intended to be used, Scientific, United Kingdom. Intended 3308. Instrument: Xenon Flashlamp are being manufactured in the United Use: The instrument will be used for System, Model XF–10. Manufacturer: States. educational purposes in the course Hi-Tech Scientific, United Kingdom. Comments must comply with 15 CFR Chemistry 203 - Physical Chemistry Intended Use: The instrument will be 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and Laboratory involving the study of fast used in electrophysiological studies of be filed within 20 days with the reaction kinetics. Application Accepted signal transduction in vertebrate Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. by Commissioner of Customs: March 6, olfactory receptor neurons to Department of Commerce, Washington, 1996. 28176 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Docket Number: 96–027. Applicant: disease and other disease processes, and the action of intracellular CA2∂ on Belmont University, Biology ultrastructure of normal tissues. In voltage-activated CA2∂ channels. The Department, 1900 Belmont Boulevard, addition, the instrument will be used for CA2∂ currents activated by Nashville, TN 37212–3757. Instrument: educational purposes in the courses depolarization will be monitored during Electron Microscope, Model EM208. PAT 211 - core pathology course and and after the flashes to determine the Manufacturer: Philips, Czechoslovakia. PAT 416 - diagnostic electron kinetics of the blocking mechanism. Intended Use: The instrument will be microscopy. Application Accepted by Photolysis of diazo-4 will produce rapid used primarily for educational purposes Commissioner of Customs: March 12, (<1 ms) reductions in the concentrations in the course BIO 401, Electron 1996. of CA2∂, so that the kinetics of recovery Microscopy in which students will: (1) Docket Number: 96–032. Applicant: of channel function can be determined. Fix, embed, section, and stain plant and University of California, Santa Barbara, Application Accepted by Commissioner animal tissues and single-cell Department of Chemistry, Santa of Customs: March 13, 1996. organisms, (2) learn the proper Barbara, CA 93106–9510. Instrument: Docket Number: 96–034. Applicant: operation of a transmission electron Stopped-Flow Spectrophotometer, National Institutes of Health, 6120 microscope, (3) learn how to take Model SX.18MV. Manufacturer: Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD photographs of the sectioned tissues, (4) Applied Photophysics, United 20892–7260. Instrument: Electron study the ultrastructure of the cells/ Kingdom. Intended Use: The instrument Microscope, Model JEM–1010. tissues that have been photographed, will be used to carry out stopped-flow Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd, Japan. and (5) properly mount and label the kinetics experiments at multiple Intended Use: The instrument will be photographs. Application accepted by wavelengths in order to characterize the used for investigations of autoimmune Commissioner of Customs: March 7, rates of rapid thermal reactions in diseases and ocular complications of 1996. solution as well as the spectra of diabetes from control, experimental Docket Number: 96–028. Applicant: reactive intermediates. The animal tissues and diseased human Florida International University, SERP, instrumentation will complement tissues (mainly ocular) with the University Park, Miami, FL 33199. research into various problems of objectives of development of improved Instrument: (2) Mass Spectrometers, solution phase kinetics under diagnosis and treatment of human Model Delta C. Manufacturer: Finnigan investigation. Application Accepted by ocular diseases. Application Accepted MAT, Germany. Intended Use: The Commissioner of Customs: March 12, by Commissioner of Customs: March 13, instruments will be used in a variety of 1996. 1996. basic research projects, including Frank W. Creel, Docket Number: 96–035. Applicant: studies of food webs in the Everglades Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. State University of New York, and associated coastal systems, studies [FR Doc. 96–13968 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Department of Physics, 1400 of plant uptake of C and N in south Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222. BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P Florida wetlands and coral reefs, and Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model studies of microbial processes such as JEM–2010F. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., respiration and nitrification. In Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Japan. Intended Use: The instrument addition, the instrument will be used in Scientific Instruments will be used to study the microstructure support of an annual workshop course of semiconductors, metals, ceramics, with the objective of stimulating use of Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the polymers and superconductors. stable isotope tracer technologies by Educational, Scientific and Cultural Experiments will be conducted on the faculty and students in their Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. following: (1) Long-range order and environmental research. Application L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part defects in II–VI and III–V semiconductor Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 301), we invite comments on the alloys, (2) process-induced defects in March 11, 1996. question of whether instruments of metals, semiconductors and insulators, Docket Number: 96–029. Applicant: equivalent scientific value, for the (3) plasma etching induced surface University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. purposes for which the instruments defects, (4) ion beam induced surface Instrument: EPR Spectrometer, Model shown below are intended to be used, defects, (5) chemical vapor deposited EMX 6/1. Manufacturer: Bruker are being manufactured in the United metal, semiconductor, and insulator Instruments, Germany. Intended Use: States. thin films, and (6) structure of polymer The instrument will be used to study Comments must comply with 15 CFR thin films. In general, the objective of environmental catalysts which provide 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and these microscopic investigations is to catalytic solutions to environmental be filed within 20 days with the understand the structure-properties problems. The research will focus on Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. correlation and the effects of materials applications of EPR to transition metal Department of Commerce, Washington, processing. In addition, the instrument exchanged zeolites and will yield DC 20230. Applications may be will be used for educational purposes in structural information about the active examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. the course Electron Microscopy, PHY site of the catalyst. Application in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 784. Application Accepted by Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Commissioner of Customs: March 14, March 11, 1996. Avenue NW., Washington, DC. 1996. Docket Number: 96–030. Applicant: Docket Number: 96–033. Applicant: Docket Number: 96–036. Applicant: University of South Alabama, University of Southern California, Lehigh University, Chemistry Department of Pathology, 2451 Department of Neurobiology, 3614 Watt Department, 7 Asa Drive, Bethlehem, Fillingim Street, Mobile, AL 36617. Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089–2520. PA 18015. Instrument: Automatic Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Instrument: Xenon Flashlamp System, Sample Manipulator. Manufacturer: CM100. Manufacturer: N. V. Philips, Model XF–10. Manufacturer: Hi-Tech Scienta Instruments, AB, Sweden. The Netherlands. Intended Use: The Scientific, United Kingdom. Intended Intended Use: The instrument will be instrument will be used for studies of Use: The instrument will be used to used to study a wide category of single human and animal tissues that include rapidly photolyze CA2∂ cage crystal and thin film materials which categorization of neoplasms, storage compounds in a biophysical study of include metal single crystals such as Pd Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28177 and crystals of ZnO-type materials and minerals in investigations of the ages of used in the training of graduate students transition metal chalcogenides such as rocks for earth science questions. In in the techniques of geochemical MoS2, NbS, TaS, WS or ReS. There will addition, the instrument will be used for analysis. Application Accepted by also be studies of thin film materials training of graduate students in methods Commissioner of Customs: March 27, that are laterally homogeneous, but of noble gas analysis. Application 1996. which have compositional variation Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: Frank W. Creel, with depth. The instrument will also be March 20, 1996. Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. Docket Number: 96–040. Applicant: routinely incorporated into advanced [FR Doc. 96–13969 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] undergraduate and graduate courses, Washington University, Department of BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P such as CHEM 338—Advanced Earth and Planetary Science, One Analytical Chemistry and CHEM 350— Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130– Special Topics—Electron Microscopy 4899. Instrument: ICP Mass National Oceanic and Atmospheric for Surface Analysis. Application Spectrometer, Model Element. Administration Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: Manufacturer: Finnigan MAT, Germany. March 14, 1996. Intended Use: The instrument will be [Docket No. 950616159±6146±03; I.D. Docket Number: 96–037. Applicant: used to provide accurate elemental and 052496C] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, isotopic information about the trace and RIN 0648±ZA16 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, minor element compositions of MA 02139. Instrument: Microprobe geological and environmental samples Fishing Capacity Reduction Program Laser Ablation System. Manufacturer: such as rocks, meteorites, sediments, (FCRP) VG Fisons, United Kingdom. Intended oils, and natural waters. In addition, the Use: The instrument will be used for the analytical capabilities of the instrument AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries trace element chemical analysis of will be used in laboratory experiments Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and environmental materials such as marine of mineral solubility, trace element Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), sediments, fossils and rocks. The partitioning, oxidation-reduction Commerce. research will be focused on the reactions involving transition metals ACTION: Notice of proposed program and mechanisms responsible for and organic compounds and the request for comments. fractionation of minor elements between consequences of water/rock reactions. mineral phases, but will also include The instrument will also be used for SUMMARY: NMFS issues this notice to paleoclimatological studies based on the educational purposes in undergraduate describe the proposed FCRP trace element composition of fossil biogeochemistry and environmental requirements and to solicit comments shells. Application Accepted by geochemistry courses. Application on the proposal. The proposed FCRP is Commissioner of Customs: March 15, Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: a $25 million program designed to 1996. March 21, 1996. provide grants to the owners of fishing Docket Number: 96–038. Applicant: Docket Number: 96–041. Applicant: vessels participating in the Northeast Purdue University, Department of Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th multispecies limited access groundfish Biological Science, Lilly Hall, West Street, Augusta, GA 30912. Instrument: fishery who are willing to scrap or make Lafayette, IN 49707. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM–1010. their vessels permanently ineligible to Stopped-Flow Fluorimeter, Model Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. participate in any of the fisheries of the SX.17MV. Manufacturer: Applied Intended Use: The instrument will be United States and to surrender all Photophysics Ltd., United Kingdom. used for traditional TEM studies of cell associated Federal fish harvesting Intended Use: The instrument will be morphology in transgenic animals, permits. used to measure the binding and immunoelectron microscopy of tissue DATES: Comments must be submitted on insertion of proteins into membranes samples and subcellular fractions to or before July 1, 1996. through changes in fluorescence identify the localization of important ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to properties of the protein upon binding. new antigens and in vitro examination the Financial Services Division, The ‘‘stopped-flow’’ aspect will allow of isolated cytoskeletal structures. In National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 the protein to be mixed very rapidly (1/ addition, the instrument will be used for East West Hwy., Silver Spring, MD 1000 of a second, or ‘‘millisecond’’), so teaching graduate students and post- 20910. that the time course of the binding doctoral fellows techniques of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: insertion of the protein into the ultrastructural analysis. Application membrane can be followed through the Accepted by Commissioner of Customs: Michael Grable, (301) 713–2390, fax variation with time. In addition, the March 22, 1996. (301) 589–2686. instrument will be used to train Docket Number: 96–042. Applicant: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: graduate and postdoctoral students in University of Kansas, Department of I. Background use of fast fluorescence methods for Geology, 120 Lindley Hall, Lawrence, studies on protein structure and KS 66045. Instrument: Mass Under the provisions of Public Law conformation. Application Accepted by Spectrometer, Model PlasmaQuad XS. 103–211, the Emergency Supplemental Commissioner of Customs: March 15, Manufacturer: Fisons Instruments, Inc, Appropriations Act of 1994, $2 million 1996. United Kingdom. Intended Use: The was made available as part of the Docket Number: 96–039. Applicant: instrument will be used to measure the Northeast Fisheries Assistance Program Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty chemical composition of natural for a pilot FCRP, which was called the Observatory, Route 9W, Palisades, NY igneous rocks, minerals, ground water, Fishing Capacity Reduction 10964–8000. Instrument: Mass brines and carbonates to determine the Demonstration Program (pilot program). Spectrometer, Model VG 5400. concentration of a wide range of The purpose of this program was to test Manufacturer: Fisons Instruments, elements. The resulting geochemical an approach for permanently reducing United Kingdom. Intended Use: The data will be used to further many areas the fishing capacity in the Northeast instrument will be used for argon of basic research in the Geology multispecies groundfish fishery. On isotope measurements of rocks and Department. The instrument will also be October 11, 1995, NOAA announced 28178 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices that 114 vessel owners, with vessels public entity or nonprofit organization of their gross revenues from the sale of worth over $52 million and representing for research (including fisheries regulated groundfish species during any 31 percent of the active groundfish research), education, training, 3 of the 4 years between 1991 and 1994 capacity, applied to participate in the humanitarian, safety, or law would be eligible. The performance of a pilot program. Under the pilot program, enforcement purposes, but will vessel would continue to be measured NOAA has made grant awards to 11 entertain comments on other by the average gross revenues from the vessel owners totaling $1.89 million. In appropriate reuses. If a vessel is sale of regulated groundfish species addition to the 11 Federal multispecies transferred, NMFS is proposing that the during the 3 years selected. limited access fishing permits entity to which the vessel is transferred Alternative II. Under this alternative, surrendered under the pilot program, an will be required to scrap it once the the 65 percent regulated species additional 15 limited access fishing vessel has served the purpose for which threshold would be dropped, allowing permits for the summer flounder, ocean it was transferred to that entity. NMFS any vessel with a valid multispecies quahog, squid, mackerel, and butterfish also specifically requests comment on limited access permit to be eligible, fisheries were retired as well. Overall, the possibilities of vessel reuse and the regardless of the percentage of their the pilot program has proven that a transfer of vessels to private and public income generated from the sale of vessel removal program can be foreign entities, as well as domestic regulated groundfish species. The successfully designed and implemented, entities, for the limited purposes set performance of a vessel would continue and that there is substantial interest forth in the amended IFA. to be measured by the average annual within the fishing industry to II. Definitions gross revenues from the sale of regulated participate in such a program. groundfish species. As a result of the August 2, 1995, Regulated groundfish species—those Alternative III. This alternative would declaration of a fishery resource disaster species that are regulated under the retain the 65 percent regulated species by the Secretary of Commerce Northeast Multispecies Fishery threshold, but allow vessel owners to (Secretary), $25 million in emergency Management Plan and are limited to use all gross revenues, as opposed to disaster assistance has been made cod, haddock, pollock, yellowtail gross revenues from the sale of regulated available to NOAA for an expanded flounder, winter flounder, gray sole, groundfish species, when calculating fishing capacity reduction program. The American plaice, windowpane flounder, vessel performance. authority for this program is contained white hake and redfish. NMFS is particularly interested in in section 308(d) of the Valid multispecies limited access receiving comments on the alternatives Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act (IFA) of permit—those limited access permits discussed above. 1986 (16 U.S.C. 4107(d)), as amended. defined in the regulations implementing The following sections describe the Recent amendments to the IFA the Northeast Multispecies Fishery proposed requirements and the require that as a condition of awarding Management Plan, as amended by application, scoring, ranking, and assistance under this program, the Amendment 7, 50 CFR part 651.4(b). To selection processes NMFS intends to Secretary shall prohibit the vessel from be valid, a permit must be free of all follow under the FCRP. being used for fishing and require that permit sanctions, pending or otherwise, the vessel be (a) scrapped or otherwise at the time that the application is IV. How To Apply disposed of in a manner approved by submitted, and at the time of closing. A. Eligible Applicants the Secretary; or (b) donated to a nonprofit organization and thereafter III. Proposed Program Applications for FCRP financial used only for purposes of research, The purpose of the FCRP is to reduce assistance will only be considered from education, or training; or (c) used for permanently the maximum effective owners of eligible fishing vessels, in another non-fishing purpose, provided fishing capacity within the groundfish accordance with the procedures set the Secretary determines that adequate fishery through the removal of fishing forth in this notice. An owner may be measures are in place to ensure that the vessels and limited access fishing an individual who is a citizen or vessel cannot reenter any fishery. The permits. Like the pilot program, the national of the United States, or a amendments to the IFA also state that FCRP is a voluntary market based citizen of the Northern Mariana Islands, any vessel prohibited from fishing program intended to remove the greatest or a corporation, partnership, under this program will be permanently amount of effective capacity at the association (non profit or otherwise), ineligible to hold a fishery endorsement. lowest cost and targeted at full-time trust, or other nongovernmental entity, NMFS has preliminarily determined groundfish vessels. It will also allow the if such an entity is a citizen within the that the only effective way to ensure applicant to establish a price for offered meaning of section 802 of the Shipping that a vessel cannot reenter any state or vessels and permits that will be scored Act, 1916, as amended (46 U.S.C. App. Federal fishery is to require that a in a competitive manner. Unlike the 802). Federal Government agencies or vessel’s Coast Guard document has a pilot program, NMFS is proposing that employees, including full-time, part- permanent restriction prohibiting that all fishing vessels with a valid time, and intermittent personnel, and vessel from holding a fishery multispecies limited access permit be Fisheries Management Council members endorsement. Consequently, successful eligible. and employees are not eligible to submit applicants with undocumented vessels Based on comments received during an application. Vessel owners may not would be required to scrap their vessels. the pilot program, NMFS is considering have earned more than $2,000,000 in Like the pilot program, voluntary changes to the scoring method used in net revenues from commercial fishing in sinking will be allowed as long as it is determining a vessel owner’s score. any of the 3 years between 1991–1994 conducted in compliance with all Outlined below are the three chosen by the applicant to determine applicable Federal, state and local alternatives currently under eligibility. environmental laws and regulations. consideration: For a vessel to be eligible for the For documented vessels that obtain Alternative I. This alternative would FCRP, it must meet the following the necessary fishery endorsement use the same eligibility requirements conditions: restriction, NMFS is considering and formula as the pilot program. Only 1. Have a valid multispecies limited allowing the transfer of a vessel to a vessels that derived 65 percent or more access fishing permit free of any permit Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28179 sanctions, pending or otherwise, both at B. Submission of Applications Step B—Calculate Vessel Performance time of application and at closing. Vessel owners will be given 60 days Depending on which alternative is Vessel owners will be required to chosen, vessel performance would be surrender such permits along with all from the date of publication in the Federal Register of the final FCRP calculated by one of the following other Federal fishing permits issued to methods: that vessel if awarded financial Notice to submit an FCRP application form. The form may request the Alternative I. Vessel performance assistance under the FCRP. would be determined by averaging the 2. Be active and functioning at the following information: Owner and vessel name, vessel number, gross annual revenues from the sale of time the vessel owner submits an regulated groundfish species harvested application, which means that a vessel revenues from all landings, and gross revenues from groundfish landings only. by that vessel for any 3 of the 4 years must have made at least two fishing during the qualifying period (1991, trips (of any duration for any species) Proof of eligibility need not be submitted with the application. 1992, 1993, 1994). Applicants could during the 2-month period prior to the only use revenues from those years in final date for the submission of Applicants will be required to submit one signed original application. No which 65 percent or more of gross applications for FCRP assistance, and be revenues was derived from the sale of facsimile applications will be accepted. capable of fishing for groundfish in regulated groundfish species. Proof of receipt may be obtained by Federal waters under its own power at Alternative II. Vessel performance sending an application by certified mail, the time of application. would be determined by averaging the return receipt requested. The 3. Depending on which alternative is annual revenues from the sale of anticipated time required to process chosen, one of the following would regulated groundfish species harvested applications is 120 days from the apply: by that vessel for any 3 of the 4 years closing date of the solicitation. Alternative I. Have derived 65 percent during the qualifying period, regardless or more of its gross annual revenues All multispecies limited access of the percentage this represented of a from the sale of regulated groundfish fishing permit holders will be mailed a vessel’s gross revenues. species in any 3 of the 4 years between copy of the application form along with Alternative III. Vessel performance 1991 and 1994. This means that a copy of the Federal Register notice would be determined by averaging the successful applicants must be able to announcing the availability of funds annual gross revenues from the sale of prove that 65 percent or more of the under the FCRP. Applications will also all fish harvested by that vessel for any gross revenues (for the vessel involved) be made available at the NMFS Regional 3 of the 4 years during the qualifying in any 3 years between 1991, 1992, Office at One Blackburn Drive, period. Applicants could only use gross 1993, and 1994, was from the sale of Gloucester, MA 01930–2298. revenues from those years in which 65 regulated groundfish species. V. Application Review and Scoring percent or more of the gross revenues Alternative II. There would be no 65 were derived from the sale of regulated percent regulated species threshold. All timely submitted and completed groundfish species. Vessel owners would not be required to applications will be assigned a score Step C—Determine Vessel Score show that they generated a certain level calculated by the following method: Depending on which alternative is of revenues from the sale of regulated Step A—Identify Bid groundfish species. chosen, a vessel score would be calculated using one of the following Alternative III. Vessel owners must The bid is the dollar amount formulas: satisfy the 65 percent threshold submitted by the applicant in the requirement, as in Alternative I. application. Alternative I

BID SCORE = (average annual revenues from sale of regulated groundfish species from any 3 of 4 years during qualifying period) Gross revenues may only be used from those years in which an applicant can prove that 65 percent or more of the revenues were derived from the sale of regulated groundfish species. Alternative II

BID SCORE = (average annual revenues from the sale of regulated groundfish species from any 3 of 4 years during qualifying period) No 65 percent regulated species threshold requirement. Alternative III

BID SCORE = (average annual gross revenues for any 3 of 4 years during qualifying period)

Gross revenues may only be used revenues were derived from the sale of Determining a bid amount is from those years in which an applicant regulated groundfish species. extremely important, since this will be can prove that 65 percent or more of the a key factor in the success of an 28180 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices applicant. If the bid is too high in a. Multispecies limited access fishing and regulations prior to closing. At their relation to the vessel’s overall permit. The applicant may provide a own expense, applicants may choose to performance, the bid may not be copy of the permit to NMFS, but the retain closing attorneys to represent competitive. In the pilot program, actual permit must be surrendered at the their interests. To the extent necessary, successful applicants submitted bids time of grant award closing. closing attorneys will be required to pay that resulted in scores between 0.494 b. Proof of landings. Depending on grant funds to vessel lienors in return and 0.725. Applicants will need to which alternative is chosen, NMFS may for lien releases. Should vessel liens carefully consider all costs involved require proof that 65 percent or more of exceed the amount of the FCRP award, with receiving financial assistance a vessel’s gross revenues came from the attorneys must obtain funds from under the FCRP, including satisfying sale of regulated groundfish species in applicants and exchange them for lien vessel liens, vessel scrapping, vessel 3 of the 4 years during the qualifying releases. transfer costs, and tax consequences. period. Landing slips or sales tickets Applicants may wish to consider selling may be used to verify claimed revenues. IX. Award Closing Procedures vessel gear and equipment separately as c. Proof of gross revenues. Depending on which alternative is chosen, vessel After the NMFS Financial Services a way of reducing the amount of a bid. Division has established the award Vessel owners may retain removable owners may be required to prove the annual gross revenues from the sale of terms for each eligible and validated gear and equipment for private application, and the NOAA Grants disposition. all species for the 3 years selected from the qualifying period of 1991 through Management Division has reviewed and VI. Ranking of Applications 1994. Documentation to support income approved these applications for may include, but is not limited to, compliance with the administrative Applications will be ranked, starting requirements in section X, applicants with the lowest score. The Assistant individual or corporate tax returns, or fish sale receipts accompanied by vessel will be notified in writing of the award Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, will by the grants officer and a closing date determine which applications are settlement reports. NMFS may require sworn affidavits from the reporting will be set. Applicants may be required eligible with competitive bids based on to have an attorney present at the the ranking of the applications. NMFS party regarding the accuracy of the information contained in supporting closing. If a vessel is going to be may initially find eligible more scrapped, 75 percent of the award will applications than it can fund but will documentation. Sales that cannot be substantiated will not be included in the be available at the closing. The investigate all such applications in remaining 25 percent will be available order of their ranking. NMFS will calculation of either gross revenues or revenues from regulated groundfish only when applicants provide proof of reserve the right to reject any or all vessel scrapping. If these arrangements applications and may solicit additional species. d. Documentation of fishing have been made by the time of closing, applications. If additional applications capability. Documentation that vessel 100 percent of the award may be are solicited, all applications submitted made at least two fishing trips (of any available at that time. Vessel scrapping previously and not determined to be duration for any species) during the 2- must occur promptly. If a vessel is going eligible with competitive bids will be month period prior to the final date of to be transferred to an eligible entity, the considered rejected. NMFS will notify the submission of application for FCRP transfer must also occur at the closing eligible applicants with competitive assistance. and 75 percent of the award will be bids in writing. However, eligible NMFS will provide legal notice of the available at that time. The remaining 25 applicants are not guaranteed funding names of vessels and their owners for percent will be available when the by simply having a competitive bid; which an investigation has been applicant shows proof that the they will be subject to a thorough successfully completed. Proprietary transferred vessel has a permanent investigation described in section VII. information submitted by applicants restriction on its certificate of VII. Investigation of Applications will only be disclosed to Federal documentation prohibiting that vessel officials who are responsible for the from participating in the fisheries of the A representative from the NMFS FCRP or otherwise when required by United States. If these arrangements Financial Services Division will contact court order or other applicable law. This have been made by closing, 100 percent eligible applicants with competitive information is subject to the Freedom of of the award may be available at that bids regarding the following: Information Act. time. NMFS reserves the right to 1. Ensuring that applicants meet all terminate financial assistance eligibility requirements and can VIII. Establishment of Award Terms negotiations with an applicant if, in the document all claims made in their Representatives from the NMFS opinion of NMFS, there are material applications. Financial Services Division will adverse changes in an applicant’s ability 2. Determining what debts exist establish the programmatic terms of to meet the terms and conditions of a against the vessel offered in the each financial assistance award for FCRP award agreement. application, including any outstanding eligible applications validated during civil penalties or fines. the investigation process. These terms X. Administrative Requirements 3. Determining how applicants will will be binding on the applicants and A. Primary Applicant Certification satisfy all vessel liens before scrapping will control the applicant’s post award or transferring the vessels. Eligible rights and obligations. Terms of the Applicants whose applications are applicants will have to provide written award will address such matters as how selected for funding will be required to evidence of vessel lienors’ willingness the outstanding liens on the vessels will submit a completed Standard Form to satisfy vessel liens for specific be satisfied and how the vessel covered 424B, ‘‘Assurances—Non-Construction amounts. in the application will be scrapped or Programs’’ and Form CD–511, 4. Ensuring availability of transferred to an eligible entity for an ‘‘Certification Regarding Debarment, documentation required to support eligible use. Award terms will also Suspension and Other Responsibility eligible applications, including the include provisions to ensure that Matters; Drug-Free Workplace following: applicants do not violate fisheries laws Requirements and Lobbying,’’ and the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28181 following explanations are hereby Name checks are intended to reveal if This notice contains a collection-of- provided: any key individuals associated with the information requirement subject to the 1. Nonprocurement debarment and recipient have been convicted of, or are Paperwork Reduction Act. The suspension. Prospective participants (as presently facing, criminal charges such collection of this information has been defined at 15 CFR 26.105) are subject to as fraud, theft, perjury, or other matters approved by the OMB (OMB control 15 CFR part 26, ‘‘Nonprocurement that significantly reflect on the number 0648–0289). Public reporting Debarment and Suspension,’’ and the recipient’s management, honesty, or burden for preparation of the grant related section of the certification form financial integrity. A false statement on application is estimated to be 1 hour per prescribed above applies; the application is grounds for denial or response including the time for 2. Drug-free workplace. Grantees (as termination of funds and grounds for reviewing instructions, gathering and defined at 15 CFR 26.605) are subject to possible punishment by a fine or maintaining the data needed, and 15 CFR part 26, subpart F, imprisonment (18 U.S.C. 1001). completing and reviewing the collection ‘‘Governmentwide Requirements for 3. Financial management of information. An additional 15 hour Drug-Free Workplace (Grants),’’ and the certification/preaward accounting reporting burden is estimated for those related section of the certification form survey. At the discretion of the NOAA applicants who are accepted by NMFS, prescribed above applies; Grants Officer, applicants may be including time needed to document the 3. Anti-lobbying. Persons (as defined required to have their financial income claims on their applications, at 15 CFR 28.105) are subject to the management systems certified by an how outstanding liens on their vessels lobbying provisions of 31 U.S.C. 1352, independent public accountant as being will be satisfied, and how the vessels ‘‘Limitation on use of appropriated in compliance with Federal standards will be scrapped. Send comments funds to influence certain Federal specified in the applicable Office of regarding this burden estimate or any contracting and financial transactions,’’ Management and Budget (OMB) other aspect of this collection of and the lobbying section of the Circulars prior to execution of the information, including suggestions for certification form prescribed above award. Any first-time applicant for reducing this burden, to Michael Grable, applies to applications/bids for grants, Federal grant funds may be subject to a Financial Services Division (see cooperative agreements, and contracts pre-award accounting survey by the ADDRESSES). Notwithstanding any other for more than $100,000, and loans and Department prior to execution of the provision of the law, no person is loan guarantees for more than $150,000, award. required to respond to, nor shall any or the single family maximum mortgage 4. Past performance. Unsatisfactory person be subject to a penalty for failure limit for affected programs, whichever is performance under prior Federal awards to comply with a collection of greater; and may result in an application not being information, subject to the requirements 4. Anti-lobbying disclosure. Any considered for funding. of the PRA, unless that collection of applicant who has paid or will pay for 5. Delinquent Federal debts. No award information displays a currently valid lobbying using any funds must submit of Federal funds shall be made to an OMB control number. an SF–LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying applicant or to its subrecipients who Activities,’’ as required under 15 CFR Dated: May 29, 1996. have an outstanding delinquent Federal part 28, Appendix B. Gary Matlock, 5. Lower tier certifications. Applicants debt or fine until either: Program Management Officer, National shall require applicants/bidders for a. The delinquent account is paid in Marine Fisheries Service. subgrants, contracts, subcontracts, or full, [FR Doc. 96–13953 Filed 5–30–96; 4:21 pm] b. A negotiated repayment schedule is other lower tier covered transactions at BILLING CODE 3510±22±W any tier under the award to submit, if established and at least one payment is applicable, a completed Form CD–512, received, or ‘‘Certifications Regarding Debarment, c. Other arrangements satisfactory to [I.D. 052496A] Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary the Department are made. Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered 6. Buy American-made equipment or South Atlantic Fishery Management Transactions and Lobbying’’ and products. Applicants are hereby notified Council; Public Meetings disclosure form SF–LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of that they are encouraged, to the extent feasible, to purchase American-made AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Lobbying Activities.’’ Form CD–512 is Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and intended for the use of recipients and equipment and products with funding under this program. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), should not be transmitted to the Commerce. Department of Commerce (Department). 7. Pre-award activities. If applicants SF–LLL submitted by any tier recipient incur any costs prior to an award being ACTION: Notice of public meetings. made, they do so solely at their own risk or subrecipient should be submitted to SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery the Department in accordance with the of not being reimbursed by the Government. Notwithstanding any Management Council (Council) will instructions contained in the award hold a public meeting of its Scientific document. verbal or written assurance that may have been received, there is no and Statistical Committee, Mackerel B. Other Requirements obligation on the part of the Department Advisory Panel, a joint meeting of its Mackerel Advisory Panel and 1. Federal policies and procedures. to cover pre-award costs. Committee, and a Council session. FCRP grant recipients and subrecipients Classification are subject to all Federal laws and DATES: The meetings will be held from Federal and Department policies, This action has been determined to be June 10 to June 14, 1996. See regulations, and procedures applicable not significant for purposes of E.O. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific to Federal financial assistance awards. 12866. dates and times. Federal assistance funds cannot be used Applications under this program are ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at to pay for a Federal debt. subject to E.O. 12372, the Pier House, One Duval Street, Key 2. Name check review. Applicants are ‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal West, FL; telephone: (305) 296-4600, subject to a name check review process. Programs.’’ (800) 327-8340. 28182 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Council address: South Atlantic June 13, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon enhancement and a modification to a Fishery Management Council, One The full Council will convene to permit that authorizes takes of Southpark Circle, Suite 306; Charleston, receive the Controlled Access Endangered Species Act-listed species SC 29407-4699. Committee report and approve incidental to sport-fishing activities, subject to certain conditions set forth FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amendment 9 to the Snapper Grouper Susan Buchanan, Public Information FMP for public hearing. therein, to the Idaho Department of Fish Officer; telephone: (803) 571-4366; fax: and Game at Boise, Idaho (IDFG). June 13, 1996, 1:30 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. (803) 769-4520; E-mail: ADDRESSES: The applications and [email protected]. The full Council will convene to related documents are available for receive the Executive and Finance review in the following offices, by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Committee reports, and approve the appointment: Meeting Dates supplemental fiscal year 1996 and 1997 Office of Protected Resources, F/PR8, activities schedules and budgets. NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver June 10, 1996, 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Spring, MD 20910–3226 (301-713-1401); June 13, 1996, 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Scientific and Statistical and Committee will meet to discuss Snapper The full Council will review the Environmental and Technical Grouper Amendments 8 & 9 options; recreational sale issue, and develop a Services Division, 525 NE Oregon review the Gag Grouper Assessment; Council position on the sale of bag limit Street, Suite 500, Portland, OR 97232– hear a report on the economic (recreational) caught fish. 4169 (503–230–5400). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: assessment of commercial reef June 13, 1996, 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. The fishermen; review the 1996 Wreckfish modifications to permits were issued Assessment; hear a summary report on The full Council will receive the under the authority of section 10 of the a wreckfish paper entitled, ‘‘The NMFS logbook review presentation. Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) Demand for ITQs: The Puzzle of the June 14, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. (16 U.S.C. 1531–1543) and the NMFS Atlantic Wreckfish Industry’’; and regulations governing ESA-listed fish discuss the NMFS proposal to The full Council will convene to and wildlife permits (50 CFR parts 217– discontinue the Spiny Lobster Fishery receive a lobster trap composition 222). Management Plan (FMP). presentation; review the status of the Notice was published on March 12, Golden Crab FMP, Amendment 1 to the 1996 (61 FR 9979) that an application June 11, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon Shrimp FMP (Rock Shrimp), had been filed by IDFG (P503A) for consolidated regulations, and The Scientific and Statistical modification 7 to scientific research/ withdrawal of the Spiny Lobster FMP; Committee will meet to receive a enhancement permit 795. Modification receive agency and liaison reports, and mackerel stock assessment presentation. 7 to permit 795 was issued to IDFG on discuss other business and upcoming April 30, 1996. Permit 795 authorizes June 11, 1996, 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. meetings. IDFG takes of endangered Snake River The Mackerel Advisory Panel will Special Accommodations sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) meet to develop recommendations for associated with a captive broodstock These meetings are physically program. The captive broodstock total allowable catch (TAC) and bag accessible to people with disabilities. limits for the 1997 fishing year, and program is helping to perpetuate the Requests for sign language species and will provide Snake River develop advisory panel interpretation or other auxiliary aids recommendations on other items. sockeye salmon for future recovery should be directed to the Council office actions. For Modification 7, IDFG is June 12, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon (see ADDRESSES) by June 5, 1996. authorized to release juvenile sockeye Dated: May 28, 1996. progeny of ESA-listed adults into net The Mackerel Advisory Panel will pens in Redfish Lake, ID from June- meet jointly with the Mackerel Richard W. Surdi, October annually and to release those Committee to review the status of king Acting Director, Office of Fisheries fish from the net pens directly into the mackerel trip limits, develop committee Conservation and Management, National Marine Fisheries Service. lake in October each year. IDFG is also recommendations for TACs and bag authorized an increase in the annual limits, and discuss issues pertaining to [FR Doc. 96–13845 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] number of ESA-listed juvenile fish to be Spanish mackerel. BILLING CODE 3510±22±F captured, handled, tagged with passive June 12, 1996, 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. integrated transponders, and released [I.D. 052896F] during the annual juvenile outmigration The full Council will convene to Endangered Species; Permits to the ocean. Modification 7 is valid for receive the Mackerel Committee report. the duration of the permit. Permit 795 At 1:45 p.m. the Council will hear AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries expires on July 31, 1997. public comment on TACs and bag Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and NMFS also amended permit 795 to limits. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), authorize the transfers and releases of The Council will then set the annual Commerce. ESA-listed sockeye salmon captive- TACs and bag limits for king and ACTION: Issuance of modification 7 to brood progeny from the Oregon Spanish mackerel, and discuss other permit 795 (P503A) and modification 2 Department of Fish and Wildlife’s framework actions. to permit 844 (P503I). (ODFW) Bonneville Hatchery. In 1995, June 12, 1996, 3:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. NMFS issued an amendment to Permit SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 795 to allow the Coastal Zone and The Council will receive the Snapper NMFS has issued a modification to a Estuarine Studies Division of the Grouper Committee Report and approve permit that authorizes takes of an Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Amendment 8 to the Snapper Grouper Endangered Species Act-listed species NMFS (CZESD) to transfer ESA-listed FMP for public hearing. for the purpose of scientific research/ juvenile fish, captive-brood sockeye Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28183 salmon progeny suspected of being Dated: May 28, 1996. implementation of certain of their exposed to bacterial kidney disease Margaret Lorenz, provisions. (BKD), from the University of Acting Chief, Endangered Species Division, Donald R. Foote, Washington’s Big Beef Creek Hatchery Office of Protected Resources, National in Seattle to ODFW’s rearing facility at Marine Fisheries Service. Acting Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements. Bonneville Hatchery for final rearing [FR Doc. 96–13844 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Committee for the Implementation of Textile (FR 60 17316, April 5, 1995). Both BILLING CODE 3510±22±F CZESD and ODFW are authorized to act Agreements as agents of IDFG under permit 795. Due May 30, 1996. to the fact that ODFW needed the space Commissioner of Customs, at Bonneville Hatchery by May 1 of this COMMITTEE FOR THE Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC year, permit 795 was amended to allow IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE 20229. ODFW and CZESD to transfer the ESA- AGREEMENTS Dear Commissioner: This directive listed juvenile fish at the hatchery to amends, but does not cancel, the directive IDFG for release at Redfish Lake Creek Adjustment of Import Restraint Limits issued to you on November 29, 1995, by the Chairman, Committee for the Implementation if the progeny did not exhibit clinical for Certain Cotton, Wool and Man- signs of BKD. Any ESA-listed juvenile of Textile Agreements. That directive Made Fiber Textile Products Produced concerns imports of certain cotton, wool and progeny that were determined to be at or Manufactured in Guatemala man-made fiber textile products, produced or risk for BKD were authorized to be manufactured in Guatemala and exported released in the mainstem Columbia May 30, 1996. during the twelve-month period beginning on River at Bonneville Hatchery. These fish AGENCY: Committee for the January 1, 1996 and extending through transfers and releases are valid in 1996 Implementation of Textile Agreements December 31, 1996. only. (CITA). Effective on June 3, 1996, you are directed Notice was published on March 12, to increase the limits for the following 1996 (61 FR 9979) that an application ACTION: Issuing a directive to the categories, as provided for by the Uruguay had been filed by IDFG (P503I) for Commissioner of Customs increasing Round Agreements Act and the Uruguay modification 2 to incidental take permit limits. Round Agreement on Textiles and Clothing: 844. Modification 2 to permit 844 was Category Adjusted twelve-month issued to IDFG on May 24, 1996. Permit EFFECTIVE DATE: June 3, 1996. limit 1 844 authorizes IDFG an incidental take FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of adult and juvenile, threatened, Snake 342/642 ...... 448,910 dozen. River spring/summer chinook salmon Jennifer Aldrich, International Trade 347/348 ...... 1,543,623 dozen. (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and adult, Specialist, Office of Textiles and 351/651 ...... 271,942 dozen. threatened, Snake River fall chinook Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, 443 ...... 76,810 numbers. (202) 482–4212. For information on the salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) 1 quota status of these limits, refer to the The limits have not been adjusted to ac- associated with the State of Idaho’s count for any imports exported after December sport-fishing activities. For modification Quota Status Reports posted on the 31, 1995. 2, IDFG is authorized an incidental take bulletin boards of each Customs port or call (202) 927–5850. For information on The Committee for the Implementation of of unmarked residual, ESA-listed, Snake Textile Agreements has determined that River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus embargoes and quota re-openings, call these actions fall within the foreign affairs nerka) associated with a kokanee fishery (202) 482–3715. exception of the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). in Redfish Lake from May 25 to August SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 7, 1996. The purpose of the fishery is to Sincerely, reduce the kokanee population in Authority: Executive Order 11651 of March Donald R. Foote, 3, 1972, as amended; section 204 of the Redfish Lake since kokanee are a direct Acting Chairman, Committee for the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7 Implementation of Textile Agreements. competitor with captive-brood sockeye U.S.C. 1854); Uruguay Round Agreements salmon for habitat and food. IDFG have Act. [FR Doc. 96–13976 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] amended the Conservation Plan for BILLING CODE 3510±DR±F permit 844 by outlining a monitoring The current limits for certain strategy of the potential take of ESA- categories are being increased for listed species resulting from the Redfish carryover. Adjustment of Import Limits for Certain Lake kokanee fishery. The amended Cotton, Wool and Man-Made Fiber A description of the textile and Conservation Plan includes the scheme Textile Products Produced or apparel categories in terms of HTS that anglers will be directed to avoid Manufactured in Thailand numbers is available in the harvesting fish marked with external CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel hatchery indications. Modification 2 is May 30, 1996. Categories with the Harmonized Tariff valid in 1996 only. Permit 844 expires AGENCY: Committee for the Schedule of the United States (see on April 30, 1998. Implementation of Textile Agreements Issuance of the permit modifications, Federal Register notice 60 FR 65299, (CITA). as required by the ESA, was based on published on December 19, 1995). Also ACTION: Issuing a directive to the a finding that such actions: (1) Were see 60 FR 62398, published on Commissioner of Customs reducing requested in good faith, (2) will not December 6, 1995. limits. operate to the disadvantage of the ESA- The letter to the Commissioner of listed species that are the subject of the Customs and the actions taken pursuant EFFECTIVE DATE: June 3, 1996. permits, and (3) are consistent with the to it are not designed to implement all FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross purposes and policies set forth in of the provisions of the Uruguay Round Arnold, International Trade Specialist, section 2 of the ESA and the NMFS Agreements Act and the Uruguay Round Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. regulations governing ESA-listed Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, but Department of Commerce, (202) 482– species permits. are designed to assist only in the 4212. For information on the quota 28184 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices status of these limits, refer to the Quota and (4) ways to further reduce burden Category Adjusted twelve-month Status Reports posted on the bulletin limit 1 on respondents. boards of of each Customs port or call DATES: The National Senior Service Sublevels in Group II (202) 927–6717. For information on Corps will consider written comments embargoes and quota re-openings, call 338/339 ...... 1,625,470 dozen. 442 ...... 19,197 dozen. on the Project Progress Report and (202) 482–3715. 638/639 ...... 1,938,066 dozen. recordkeeping requirements received by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: August 5, 1996. 1 The limits have not been adjusted to ac- Authority: Executive Order 11651 of March count for any imports exported after December ADDRESS TO SEND COMMENTS: Janice 3, 1972, as amended; section 204 of the 31, 1995. Forney Fisher, National Senior Service Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7 Corps (NSSC), Corporation for National The Committee for the Implementation of U.S.C. 1854); Uruguay Round Agreements Service, 1201 New York Avenue, N.W., Act. Textile Agreements has determined that these actions fall within the foreign affairs Washington, D.C. 20525. The current limits for certain exception to the rulemaking provisions of 5 ESTABLISHED ANNUAL REPORTING OR categories are being reduced for U.S.C.553(a)(1). DISCLOSURE BURDEN: 30,932 hours. carryforward used in 1995. Sincerely, *This document will be made A description of the textile and Donald R. Foote, available in alternate format upon apparel categories in terms of HTS Acting Chairman, Committee for the request. TDD (202) 606–5000 ext. 164. numbers is available in the Implementatin of Textile Agreements. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel [FR Doc.96–13977 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] CONTACT: Janice Forney Fisher (202) Categories with the Harmonized Tariff BILLING CODE 3510±DR±F 606–5000 ext. 275. Schedule of the United States (see REGULATORY AUTHORITY: National Federal Register notice 60 FR 65299, Service Trust Act of 1993. published on December 19, 1995). Also CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND Dated: May 22, 1996. see 60 FR 62396, published on COMMUNITY SERVICE December 6, 1995. Thomas E. Endres, The letter to the Commissioner of Information Collection Activities; Deputy Director, National Senior Service Customs and the actions taken pursuant Proposed Revision of National Senior Corps. to it are not designed to implement all Service Corps' Project Progress [FR Doc. 96–13917 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] of the provisions of the Uruguay Round Report BILLING CODE 6050±28±M Agreements Act and the Uruguay Round Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, but AGENCY: Corporation for National and are designed to assist only in the Community Service. Sunshine Act Meeting implementation of certain of their ACTION: Notice of 60-Day Review and Pursuant to the provisions of the provisions. Comment Period on Project Progress Government in the Sunshine Act (5 Report (PPR). Donald R. Foote, U.S.C. § 552(b)), notice is hereby given Acting Chairman, Committee for the of the following meeting of the Board of Implementation of Textile Agreements. SUMMARY: The National Senior Service Corps announces a 60-day review and Directors of the Corporation for National Committee for the Implementation of Textile comment period during which project and Community Service: Agreements sponsors and the public are encouraged DATE AND TIME: Sunday, June 9, 1996, May 30, 1996. to submit comments on suggested 2:00–6:00 p.m. Commissioner of Customs, revisions to the NSSC Project Progress PLACE: Corintia Room, Parc Fifty Five Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC Report (A–1020). The PPR is used by 20229. Crowne Plaza Hotel, 5 Cyril Magnin, project sponsors funded under the San Francisco, CA. Dear Commissioner: This directive Retired and Senior Volunteer Program STATUS: Open. amends, but does not cancel, the directive (RSVP), Foster Grandparent Program issued to you on November 29, 1995, by the MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Chairman, Committee for the Implementation (FGP), and Senior Companion Program of Textile Agreements. That directive (SCP), collectively known as the Agenda concerns imports of certain cotton, wool, National Senior Service Corps, to report I. Opening Remarks by the Acting Chair. man-made fiber, silk blend and other progress made toward workplan II. Opening Remarks and Report of the Chief vegetable fiber textiles and textile products, accomplishment, problems Executive Officer. produced or manufactured in Thailand and encountered, resources generated and III. Approval of Minutes from the February exported during the twelve-month period budget variances. Established projects 1996 Board Meeting. which began on January 1, 1996 and extends normally report twice annually. First- IV. Committee Reports through December 31, 1996. year projects, new components, A. Executive Committee Effective on June 3, 1996, you are directed B. Management and Budget to adjust the limits for the following demonstrations, and projects 1. Introduction of the Chief Financial categories, as provided for under the Uruguay experiencing problems or substantial Officer-designate Round Agreements Act and the Uruguay project revision will report quarterly, as 2. Status of management’s response to Round Agreement on Textiles and Clothing: identified in the Notice of Grant Award auditability study (NGA). 3. Staffing changes C. Communications Category Adjusted twelve-month Comments are invited on (1) whether limit 1 the existing PPR appropriately meets 1. Reauthorization project oversight and operational 2. Hearings Levels in Group I management, planning and reporting 3. Recruitment 200 ...... 969,718 kilograms. D. Planning and Evaluation 363 ...... 17,432,536 numbers. needs of the Senior Corps programs; (2) 1. Learn & Serve Implementation Plan 604 ...... 626,078 kilograms. ways to enhance the quality, utility and 2. Briefing on New Initiatives 619 ...... 6,012,391 square me- clarity of the PPR; (3) accuracy of a. President’s School and College ters. agency estimates of reporting burden; Initiatives Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28185

b. D.C. Public School Initiative residential, recreational, public service, 1995, for a review that concluded on c. Education Award Only Programs and open space land uses. January 2, 1996. Navy did not receive d. Forums In deciding to dispose of NAS any comments on the FEIS. 3. 1997 AmeriCorps Changes Glenview in a manner consistent with 4. Grant Renewal Update the Consensus Reuse Plan, Navy has Alternatives 5. Evaluation Update V. Report on Special Projects determined that mixed land use will NEPA requires Navy to evaluate a A. First National Senior Service Corps meet the goals of local economic reasonable range of alternatives for Training Conference and National redevelopment and creation of new jobs, disposal and reuse of this Federal Leadership Forum on Senior Service while also maintaining the Village of property. In the NEPA process, Navy B. Presidents’ Summit for Community Glenview’s character and fiscal analyzed the environmental impacts of Volunteering and National Service integrity, minimizing adverse various proposed land uses that could C. Olympics and Paralympics— environmental impacts, and ensuring result from disposal of the Air Station AmeriCorps Team for the Games land uses that are compatible with property. As the basis for this analysis, D. National Volunteer Week surrounding properties. This Record Of Navy relied upon the reuse and VI. Ethic of Service Discussion Decision does not mandate a specific VII. Future Board Meetings redevelopment alternatives identified by A. Locations mix of land uses. Rather, it leaves The Glenview Community Reuse B. Dates (October 3 and 4, 1996) selection of the particular means to Planning Group, an organization created VIII. Public Comment achieve the mixed use redevelopment to by the Village of Glenview in its Adjournment the acquiring entity and the local zoning capacity as the LRA. The Community authority. ACCOMMODATIONS: Those needing Reuse Planning Group analyzed various interpreters or other accommodations Background redevelopment scenarios and land uses and prepared the Glenview Naval Air should notify the Corporation by June 6, The 1993 Defense Base Closure and Station Consensus Reuse Plan which 1996. Realignment Commission recommended was presented to the Department of the CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER closure of NAS Glenview. This Navy on June 21, 1995. INFORMATION: Rhonda Taylor, Associate recommendation was then approved by Director of Special Projects and President Clinton and accepted by the The Community Reuse Planning Initiatives, Corporation for National One Hundred Third Congress in 1993. Group initially considered ten Service, 8th Floor, Room 8619, 1201 Operations at NAS Glenview ceased on preliminary scenarios for New York Avenue NW, Washington, September 9, 1995, and the property has redevelopment that it described as: (1) D.C. 20525. Phone (202) 606–5000 ext. been in caretake status since that date. General Aviation, which based reuse on 282. Fax (202) 565–2794. TDD: (202) NAS Glenview is located entirely continued use of the Air Station as a 565–2799. within the Village of Glenview and general aviation airport with compatible industrial, office, and warehouse uses; Dated: May 31, 1996. consists of 1,121 acres of fee-owned (2) Inherent Land Use Suitability, which Terry Russell, land with 110 buildings that contain 1,332,138 square feet of office and based reuse on a variety of physical General Counsel. storage space. Navy has reserved 78 characteristics such as accessibility, area [FR Doc. 96–14085 Filed 5–31–96; 2:46 pm] acres containing military family housing requirements, adjacent land use, site BILLING CODE 6050±28±P and open space for use as family attractiveness, and environmental housing that will serve the Naval constraints; (3) Core Area Prominence, Training Center at Great Lakes, Illinois. which based reuse on maximizing DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE The remaining property is surplus to the adaptive reuse of the core area buildings needs of the Federal Government and and related development of other areas; Department of the Navy can be conveyed. (4) Residential Neighborhood Focus, which based reuse on the establishment Record of Decision for the Disposal Navy published a Notice of Intent in of new neighborhoods and the and Reuse of Naval Air Station the Federal Register on February 3, introduction of other uses compatible Glenview, IL 1994, announcing that Navy would prepare an Environmental Impact with the residential neighborhoods; (5) The Department of the Navy (Navy), Statement that would analyze the Open Space Focus, which dedicated pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the impacts of disposal and reuse of the half of the Air Station to open space and National Environmental Policy Act of land, buildings, and infrastructure at recreation; (6) Public Use Focus, which 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., NAS Glenview. A 30-day public scoping based reuse on recreational, cultural, and the regulations of the Council on period was established, and a scoping educational, and public service Environmental Quality that implement meeting was held on February 17, 1994, facilities; (7) Major Institution Focus, NEPA procedures, 40 CFR Parts 1500– in the Village of Glenview. which based reuse on the presence of a 1508, hereby announces its decision to On July 14, 1995, Navy distributed a major institution such as a university dispose of Naval Air Station (NAS) Draft Environmental Impact Statement campus, regional government center, or Glenview, Illinois. (DEIS) to Federal, State, and local medical facility; (8) Commercial/ Navy intends to dispose of the agencies, elected officials, special Industrial Focus, which based reuse on property in a manner that is consistent interest groups, and interested persons. revenue-generating activities that would with the Glenview Naval Air Station Navy held a public hearing on August create jobs, maximize revenue flow, and Consensus Reuse Plan submitted by the 17, 1995, in the Village of Glenview. minimize government costs; (9) Sports/ Village of Glenview, the Local Federal agencies, Illinois State agencies, Leisure Complex Focus, which based Redevelopment Authority (LRA) for local governments, and the general reuse on the development of private and NAS Glenview, described in the Final public commented on the DEIS. These public sports and recreational facilities Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) comments and Navy’s responses were of regional interest; and (10) A as the preferred alternative. The incorporated in the Final Environmental Comprehensive Plan, which based reuse Consensus Reuse Plan proposed a Impact Statement (FEIS) which was on the Village of Glenview’s 1990 mixed use approach of commercial, distributed to the public on December 1, Comprehensive Plan that emphasized 28186 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices residential development of the entire change the topography of some areas on buildings, roadways, and parking lots Naval Air Station property. the Naval Air Station property by on land that was previously The Community Reuse Planning grading, filling, and excavating land. It undeveloped. In turn, this would Group evaluated these ten would also be necessary to change the increase stormwater runoff. To address redevelopment scenarios by considering elevation of some areas of the property this problem, the LRA proposed in its the central theme of each scenario, the to permit construction of facilities, resue plan to build a stormwater configuration of the scenario, its roadways, and stormwater retention management system consisting of 25 to economic feasibility, its impact on the areas. None of these changes would 60 acre lake and drainage swales. quality of life, and its potential for result in significant environmental Together with existing drainage areas, creating new jobs. Based upon these impacts. these systems should adequately factors, the Community Reuse Planning Based upon the redevelopment manage normal stormwater runoff. Group selected four of the ten scenarios proposed by the Consensus Reuse Plan, While a 25-acre lake would adequately for further detailed analysis. These four vehicular traffic in the area would manage stormwater runoff for the scenarios were Inherent Land Use increase. The proposed redevelopment redeveloped Naval Air Station property, Suitability, Open Space Focus, Major would generate 52,821 average daily the proposed larger lake would also Institution Focus, and Sports/Leisure trips in the vicinity of the Air Station by meet the stormwater drainage Complex Focus. The Group then the year 2010. This increase in traffic requirements of the surrounding area, evaluated these four scenarios in light of would require roadway and intersection resulting in a positive impact on the twenty-two community redevelopment improvements. Additionally, this region area’s stormwater management and objectives. is projected to grow in the future and water quality. The Community Reuse Planning this future growth would account for Navy has identified several hazardous Group’s analysis examined the extent to most of the increased traffic in the area. waste sites on the Air Station property which each of these four scenarios Thus, most of these improvements and is developing methods for reflected community goals and would be needed even if the Naval Air remediating the sites. Navy has already objectives. The Group then adopted Station were not redeveloped. Roadway initiated cleanup at some of these sites. aspects of each scenarios and combined and intersection improvements that are Navy, the Environmental Protection them into one land use plan designated currently planned and roadway and Agency, and the Illinois Environmental as the Glenview Naval Air Station intersection improvements on the Naval Protection Agency will continue to Consensus Reuse Plan. Navy selected Air Station property recommended by review and approve the risk assessments the Consensus Reuse Plan as the the LRA should adequately mitigate developed to ascertain the potential preferred alternative in the FEIS. Navy impacts caused by the increased traffic. impacts of existing contamination on also considered a ‘‘No Action’’ The long term impact on air quality human health and the environment alternative in the FEIS that proposed that would arise from stationary before Navy remediates the continued Navy ownership of the emission sources, including heating contaminated sites and conveys the property in caretaker status with Navy units, will depend upon the nature and property. maintaining the physical condition of extent of the activities conducted on the the property, providing a security force, property. The Illinois Environmental Aircraft Hanger One, known as the and making repairs essential to safety. Protection Agency (IEPA) will have Curtiss-Reynolds Building, is the only The Consensus Reuse Plan proposed jurisdiction over these emission sources, building or site on the Air Station that mixed use of the Naval Air Station and it will be necessary for all such is eligible for listing on the National property to achieve local economic sources to comply with IEPA standards. Register of Historic Places. Navy, the redevelopment. Light industrial, Certain sources will require appropriate Advisory Council on Historic commercial, retail, and sports and permits fro IEPA. The elimination of Preservation, and the Illinois State leisure activities would occupy about aircraft operations and maintenance Historic Preservation Officer entered 354 acres. Residential uses would activities at the Air Station will reduce into a Programmatic Agreement on May occupy about 245 acres. Open space and mobile sources of emission from the 13, 1996. Under this Agreement, Navy public recreational uses would occupy area. The projected increase in vehicular will encourage adaptive reuse of this about 342 acres, and the remaining 104 traffic would increase mobile source historic structure and maintain and acres of the Air Station property would emissions of nitrogen oxides and preserve the building until conveyance. be occupied by public service uses such volatile organic compounds. The extent Navy will include protective covenants as public works facilities and a of this increased would be mitigated by in the deed for the parcel that contains commuter rail station. the proposed commuter rail station, bike this historic building. paths,pedestrian paths, and shuttle While some wetlands may be drained Environmental Impacts buses. or filled as a result of redevelopment, Navy analyzed the potential impacts The cessation of military aircraft the net amount of wetlands would of the ‘‘No Action’’ alternative and the activity will also result in a substantial increase from construction of the Consensus Reuse Plan alternative for decrease in noise. Construction and stormwater retention lake and the their effects on earth resources, demolition activities arising out of drainage swales. Among the existing transportation, air quality, noise, water redevelopment would cause a wetlands, the Naval Air Station also resources, hazardous materials and temporary increase in ambient noise contains small areas of prairie. The hazardous waste, historical and levels. The long term noise that would proposed commercial and industrial archaeological resources, biological be generated under the proposed reuse redevelopment in the northern part of resources, socioeconomic resources, and plan would be typical of that present in the Air Station may eliminate most of environmental justice. This Record of the community that now surrounds the this remnant prairie. However, since the Decision focuses on the impacts that Air Station. State of Illinois’ Department of Natural would likely result from implementing Redevelopment of the Naval Air Resources has classified this prairie as the Consensus Reuse Plan. Station property would increase the moderately heavily disturbed, its loss In order to implement the Consensus surface areas that will not absorb would not cause a significant impact on Reuse Plan, it would be necessary to rainwater, largely by the construction of local biological resources. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28187

There are no threatened or Absent statutory authority, Navy highest and best use of surplus endangered species listed under the cannot impose restrictions on the future Government property. Federal Endangered Species Act, 16 use of this surplus Federal property. The DBCRA directed the U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., that inhabit the Air Navy will, however, include appropriate Administrator of the General Services Station property.There are two State- notification in the deeds for any parcels Administration (GSA) to delegate to the designated endangered and two State- that are inhabited by endangered or Secretary of Defense authority to designated threatened species that may threatened species protected under State transfer and dispose of base closure be adversely affected by implementation law and that contain wetlands or lie property. Section 2905(b) of DBCRA of the Consensus Reuse Plan. The within floodplains that are protected directs the Secretary of Defense to upland sandpiper and the golden sedge under Federal and State laws. exercise this authority in accordance with GSA’s property disposal are endangered, and the mountain blue- Comments Received on the FEIS eyed grass and early fen sedge are regulations, set forth at Sections 101– threatened. Thus, it will be necessary Navy did not receive any comments 47.1 through 101–47.8 of the FPMR. By for future developers to coordinate with on the FEIS. letter dated December 20, 1991, the the Illinois Department of Natural Regulations Governing the Disposal Secretary of Defense delegated the Resources before conducting activities Decision authority to transfer and dispose of base that may have an impact on these closure property closed under DBCRA Since the proposed action endangered and threatened species. to the Secretaries of the Military contemplates a disposal action under Two of the species (the golden sedge Departments. Under this delegation of the Defense Base Closure and and the early fen sedge) occur in authority, the Secretary of the Navy Realignment Act of 1990 (DBCRA), must follow FPMR procedures for wetlands and may be afforded Public Law 101–510, 10 U.S.C. § 2687 additional protection under Sections screening and disposing of real property note, selection of the Consensus Reuse when implementing base closures. Only 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 Plan as the preferred alternative was U.S.C. § 1252, et seq., which establishes where Congress has expressly provided based upon the environmental analysis additional authority for disposing of a permitting process that is in the FEIS and application of the administered by the United States Army base closure property, e.g., the economic standards set forth in DBCRA, the development conveyance authority Corps of Engineers. Federal Property Management Redevelopment of the Naval Air established in 1993 by Section Regulations (FPMR), 41 CFR Part 101– 2905(b)(4) of DBCRA, may Navy apply Station would result in the creation of 47, and the Department of Defense Rule disposal procedures other than the new jobs and improved socioeconomic on Revitalizing Base Closure FPMR’s prescriptions. conditions. Although the redevelopment Communities and Community In Section 2901 of the National would generate a demand for additional Assistance (DOD Rule), 32 CFR Parts 90 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal infrastructure and community services, and 91. Year 1994, Public Law 103–160, the Consensus Reuse Plan projects that Section 101–47.303–1 of the FPMR Congress recognized the economic public revenue generated by the requires that the disposal of Federal hardship occasioned by base closures, redevelopment would be sufficient to property benefit the Federal government the Federal interest in facilitating fund the additional infrastructure, i.e., and constitute the highest and best use economic recovery of base closure roadway improvements and public of the property. Section 101–47.4909 of communities, and the need to identify utilities, and services, i.e., schools and the FPMR defines the ‘‘highest and best and implement reuse and police and fire protection. use’’ as that use to which a property can redevelopment of property at closing Navy also analyzed the impacts on be put that produces the highest installations. In Section 2903(c) of low income and minority populations monetary return from the property, Public Law 103–160, Congress directed pursuant to Executive Order 12898, promotes its maximum value, or serves the Military Departments to consider Federal Actions to Address a public or institutional purpose. The each base closure community’s Environmental Justice in Minority ‘‘highest and best use’’ determination economic needs and priorities in the Populations and Low-Income must be based upon the property’s property disposal process. Under Populations, and found that there would economic potential, qualitative values Section 2905(b)(2)(E) of DBCRA, Navy be no disproportionately high and inherent in the property, and utilization must consult with local communities adverse human health or environmental factors affecting land use such as before it disposes of base closure effects on minority and low income zoning, physical characteristics, other property and must consider local plans populations. Any impact related to private and public uses in the vicinity, developed for reuse and redevelopment reuse of the Naval Air Station would be neighboring improvements, utility of the surplus Federal property. experienced equally by all groups services, access, roads, location, and The Department of Defense’s goal, as within the regional population. environmental and historical set forth in Section 90.4 of the DOD Rule, is to help base closure Mitigation considerations. After Federal property has been communities achieve rapid economic No mitigation measures are required conveyed to non-Federal entities, the recovery through expeditious reuse and to implement Navy’s decision to dispose property is subject to local land use redevelopment of the assets at closing of the Naval Air Station property. regulations, including zoning and bases, taking into consideration local Navy’s FEIS identified and discussed subdivision regulations and building market conditions and locally the actions that would be necessary to codes. Unless expressly authorized by developed reuse plans. Thus, the mitigate the impacts associated with statute, the disposing Federal agency Department has adopted a consultative reuse and redevelopment. The acquiring cannot restrict the future use of surplus approach with each community to entity, under the direction of Federal, Government property. As a result, the ensure that property disposal decisions State and local agencies with regulatory local community exercises substantial consider the Local Redevelopment authority over protected resources, will control over future use of the property. Authority’s reuse plan and encourage be responsible for implementing For this reason, local land use plans and job creation. As a part of this necessary mitigation measures. zoning affect determination of the cooperative approach, the base closure 28188 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices community’s interests, e.g., reflected in direction of Federal, State and local collection requests. OMB may amend or its zoning for the area, play a significant regulatory authorities. waive the requirement for public role in determining the range of Although the ‘‘No Action’’ alternative consultation to the extent that public alternatives considered in the has less potential for causing adverse participation in the approval process environmental analysis for property environmental impacts, this alternative would defeat the purpose of the disposal. Furthermore, Section would not constitute the highest and information collection, violate State or 91.7(d)(3) of the DOD Rule provides that best use of the Naval Air Station Federal law, or substantially interfere the Local Redevelopment Authority’s property. It would not take advantage of with any agency’s ability to perform its plan generally will be used as the basis the property’s physical characteristics statutory obligations. The Director of the for the proposed disposal action. and the current uses of adjacent Information Resources Group publishes The Federal Property and property. It is not compatible with the this notice containing proposed Administrative Services Act of 1949, 40 LRA’s Consensus Reuse Plan. It would information collection requests prior to U.S.C. § 484, as implemented by the not foster local economic submission of these requests to OMB. FPMR, identifies several mechanisms redevelopment of the Air Station and Each proposed information collection, for disposing of surplus base closure would not create new jobs. grouped by office, contains the property; by public benefit conveyance Accordingly, Navy will dispose of following: (1) Type of review requested, (FPMR Sec. 101–47.303–2); by Naval Air Station Glenview in a manner e.g., new, revision, extension, existing negotiated sale (FPMR Sec. 101–47.304– that is consistent with the Village of or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary 8); and by competitive sale (FPMR Sec. Glenview’s Consensus Reuse Plan for of the collection; (4) Description of the 101–47.304–7). Additionally, in section the property. need for, and proposed use of, the 2905(b)(4), the DBCRA established Dated: May 28, 1996. information; (5) Respondents and economic development conveyances as William J. Cassidy, Jr., frequency of collection; and (6) a means of disposing of surplus base Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy Reporting and/or Recordkeeping closure property. The selection of any (Conversion and Redevelopment). burden. OMB invites public comment at particular method of conveyance merely [FR Doc. 96–13807 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] the address specified above. Copies of the requests are available from Patrick J. implements the Federal agency’s BILLING CODE 3810±FF±M decision to dispose of the property. Sherrill at the address specified above. Decisions concerning whether to The Department of Education is undertake a public benefit conveyance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION especially interested in public comment or an economic development addressing the following issues: (1) is conveyance, or to sell property by Notice of Proposed Information this collection necessary to the proper negotiation or by competitive bid are Collection Requests functions of the Department, (2) will committed by law to agency discretion. this information be processed and used Selecting a method of disposal AGENCY: Department of Education. in a timely manner, (3) is the estimate implicates a broad range of factors and ACTION: Proposed collection; comment of burden accurate, (4) how might the rests solely within the Secretary of the request. Department enhance the quality, utility, Navy’s discretion. and clarity of the information to be SUMMARY: The Director, Information collected, and (5) how might the Conclusion Resources Group, invites comments on Department minimize the burden of this the proposed information collection The Consensus Reuse Plan proposed collection on the respondents, including requests as required by the Paperwork by the Village of Glenview presents the through the use of information Reduction Act of 1995. highest and best use of the NAS technology. DATES: Interested persons are invited to Glenview property. The Village of Dated: May 30, 1996. Glenview, as the LRA, has determined submit comments on or before August 5, Gloria Parker, in its Consensus Reuse Plan that the 1996. property should be used for several ADDRESSES: Written comments and Director, Information Resources Group. purposes, including commercial, light requests for copies of the proposed Office of Special Education and industrial, retail, residential, information collection request should be Rehabilitative Services recreational, public service, and open addressed to Patrick J. Sherrill, space uses. The property’s physical Department of Education, 600 Type of Review: Extension. characteristics and the current uses of Independence Avenue, S.W., Room Title: State Plan Under Part B of the adjacent lands make it appropriate for 5624, Regional Office Building 3, Individuals with Disabilities Education this mixed use redevelopment. Washington, DC 20202–4651. Act. The Consensus Reuse Plan responds FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frequency: Triennially. to local economic conditions, promotes Patrick J. Sherrill (202) 708–8196. Affected Public: State, local or Tribal rapid economic recovery from the Individuals who use a Gov’t, SEAs and LEA. telecommunications device for the deaf impact of the Naval Air Station’s Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping (TDD) may call the Federal Information closure, and is consistent with President Burden: Responses: 1; Burden Hours: Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 Clinton’s Five-Part Plan for revitalizing 551. base closure communities, which between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Abstract: State Educational agencies emphasizes local economic Monday through Friday. are required to submit a State Plan to redevelopment of the closing military SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section the U.S. Department of Education in facility and creation of new jobs as the 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of order to receive funds under Part B of means to revitalize these communities. 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires the Individuals with Disabilities 32 CFR Parts 90 and 91, 59 Fed. Reg. that the Office of Management and Education Act. 16,123 (1994). The resultant Budget (OMB) provide interested environmental impacts can be mitigated Federal agencies and the public an early [FR Doc. 96–13900 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] by the acquiring entity under the opportunity to comment on information BILLING CODE 4000±01±P Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28189

Notice of Proposed Information Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites Responses: 2,219. Collection Requests public comment at the address specified Burden Hours: 36,073. above. Copies of the requests are Abstract: The Higher Education Act of AGENCY: Department of Education. available from Patrick J. Sherrill at the 1965, as amended, requires ACTION: Submission for OMB review; address specified above. postsecondary institutions to complete comment request. Dated: May 30, 1996. and submit this application as a condition of eligibility for any of the SUMMARY: The Acting Director, Gloria Parker, Title IV student financial assistance Information Resources Group, invites Director, Information Resources Group. programs and for the other comments on the proposed information postsecondary programs authorized by collection requests as required by the Office of Elementary and Secondary the HEA. An institution must submit the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Education form (1) initially when it first seeks to DATES: Interested persons are invited to Type of Review: Reinstatement. Title: Title II—Dwight D. Eisenhower become eligible for the Title IV submit comments on or before July 5, programs, (2) every four years after the 1996. Professional Development Program Report Forms. initial certification (‘‘recertification’’), ADDRESSES: Written comments should Frequency: Triennially. (3) when it changes ownership, merges, be addressed to the Office of Affected Public: Not-for-profit or changes from a ‘‘profit’’ to a ‘‘non- Information and Regulatory Affairs, institutions, Federal Government, State, profit’’ institution, and (4) to be Attention: Wendy Taylor, Desk Officer, local or Tribal Gov’t, SEAs and LEAs. reinstated to participate in the Title IV Department of Education, Office of Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping programs. Management and Budget, 725 17th Burden: Responses: 104; Burden hours: Office of Postsecondary Education Street, NW., Room 10235, New 3,640. Executive Office Building, Washington, Abstract: These forms will be used by Type of Review: Reinstatement. DC 20503. Requests for copies of the the Department as a means of collecting Title: GEPA 424 Biennial Report on proposed information collection information on the effectiveness of the the Distribution of Federal Education requests should be addressed to Patrick program at the State and local levels. Funds. J. Sherrill, Department of Education, 600 The data will be used to inform the Frequency: Biennially. Independence Avenue, S.W., Room Department and Congress on the Affected Public: Federal Government; 5624, Regional Office Building 3, progress of the State programs in State, local or Tribal Government, SEAs Washington, DC 20202–4651. meeting performance indicators. The or LEAs. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: information will assure statutory Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Patrick J. Sherrill (202) 708–8196. mandates are followed. Hour Burden: Individuals who use a Responses: 142. Office of Postsecondary Education telecommunications device for the deaf Burden Hours: 3,420. (TDD) may call the Federal Information Type of Review: Reinstatement. Abstract: Section 424 of the General Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 Title: Final Performance Report for Education Provisions Act (GEPA) between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Grants under the Strengthening requires States to report on the Monday through Friday. Institutions Program. distribution of funds for State- administered Federal education funds. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Not-for-profit This reporting requirement, previously 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of institutions. known as GEPA 406A, underwent 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping significant revisions during the 1994 that the Office of Management and Hour Burden: reauthorization of the Elementary and Budget (OMB) provide interested Responses: 1. Secondary Education Act, including Federal agencies and the public an early Burden Hours: 2,472. changing the collection from annual to opportunity to comment on information Abstract: A final performance report biennial, extending the reporting collection requests. OMB may amend or is required of former grantees that have deadlines, and expanding the report to waive the requirement for public completed either a 12-month planning include Federally-administered consultation to the extent that public grant project or a 60-month programs. participation in the approval process development grant project. The reports [FR Doc. 96–13901 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] would defeat the purpose of the enable a grantee and the awarding information collection, violate State or agency to evaluate overall project BILLING CODE 4000±01±P Federal law, or substantially interfere accomplishments and the impact of with any agency’s ability to perform its funded activities on the grantee statutory obligations. The Acting institutions’ academic programs, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Director of the Information Resources institutional management, and fiscal Denver Regional Support Office Group publishes this notice containing stability. proposed information collection Commercialization Ventures Program; requests prior to submission of these Office of Postsecondary Education Notice of Solicitation for Financial requests to OMB. Each proposed Type of Review: Revision. Assistance Applications information collection, grouped by Title: Application for Approval to office, contains the following: (1) Type Participate in Federal Financial Aid AGENCY: Department of Energy. of review requested, e.g., new, revision, Programs. ACTION: Notice of solicitation for extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Frequency: On Occasion. financial assistance application Number Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Affected Public: Individuals or DE–PS48–96R810587. Description of the need for, and households; Business or other for-profit; proposed use of, the information; (5) Not-for-profit institutions. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Respondents and frequency of Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Energy (DOE), through its collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Hour Burden: Commercialization Ventures Program, 28190 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices announces its intention to issue a or reproduced substantially in the Demonstration Act of 1990, Public Law competitive solicitation for applications United States. 101–566, is requesting applications as a for financial assistance from state energy • Have at least 50 percent of the total follow-on to a Notice of Interest offices for projects that will accelerate project costs directly and specifically published in the Commerce Business the commercialization of renewable related to the project come from non- Daily (on April 21, 1995). DOE is energy technologies. This action is federal sources. seeking private-sector led, cost-shared subject to the DOE Financial Assistance • Local governments, State and projects in research, development, and Rules, which can be found in Title 10 private universities, private non-profits, technology validation that include the of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 for-profit businesses, and individuals, integration of hydrogen technologies CFR 600). who are not eligible as direct applicants, such as production, storage, transport, AVAILABILITY OF THE SOLICITATION: DOE must work with the appropriate State and end-use applications. expects to issue the solicitation on or agencies in developing projects and AVAILABILITY OF THE SOLICITATION: To about May 31, 1996. To obtain a copy forming participation arrangements. obtain a copy of the solicitation once it of the solicitation, interested parties Additional requirements will be is issued in June, 1996, write to the U.S. may write to the U.S. Department of described in the solicitation. Department of Energy’s Golden Field Projects may include manufacture of Energy, Denver Regional Support Office, Office, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden, CO an emerging renewable energy Attention: Margaret Learmouth, 1617 80401, Attn: Mr. John Motz, Contract technology or production of energy or Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401. Specialist. Only written requests for the fuel using an innovative application of Only written requests for the solicitation solicitation will be honored. For an existing renewable energy will be honored. For convenience, convenience, requests for the technology. requests for the solicitation may be solicitation may be faxed to Mr. Motz at DOE expects to have approximately faxed to Margaret Learmouth at (303) (303) 275–4754. $8–11 million available for projects, and 275–4830. Telephone requests for the anticipates making 5–10 awards. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The solicitation will not be granted. solicitation is anticipated to be issued purpose of the solicitation is to assist SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DOE on or about May 31, 1996, and will the private sector in the development of Commercialization Ventures Program contain detailed information on integrated hydrogen systems for seeks to assist entry into the funding, cost sharing requirements applications to near- and long-term marketplace of newly emerging eligibility, application preparation and markets. DOE encourages the renewable energy technologies or evaluation methodology. Responses to submission of development plans for innovative applications of existing the solicitation will be due integrated systems related to long-term renewable energy technologies. approximately 75 days after solicitation hydrogen energy markets, although DOE Generally, an emerging technology release. will consider applications for systems means one that has already been proven In addition to the direct financial addressing near-term hydrogen ‘niche’ to be viable, but which has had little or assistance offered through this markets. In any case, all awardees will no operational experience, or when an solicitation, DOE may be in a position be required to participate in a Phase I innovative application of such to offer non-financial assistance in the effort prior to consideration by DOE for technology has not been generally form of consulting expertise on business a subsequent award to participate in utilized. Any such experience has been aspects of proposed projects, such as later phases. The anticipated limited, either to sub-commercial size or development of a business plan or progression of projects awarded under quantities, to restricted or controlled identifying commercial financing for this solicitation will be: Phase I— operation, or to limited applications. promising projects. Candidate projects Feasibility Studies (the subject of this solicitation); Phase II—Technology Restricted Eligibility Notice: for this form of assistance will be identified during the application review Development; Phase III—Technology • Applications must be submitted by process. Validation; and Phase IV— an eligible applicant. Eligible applicants Demonstration/Scale-Up. for purposes of funding under the Issued in Golden, Colorado on May 23, The applications should provide 1996. program are the energy offices of the 50 detailed information regarding Phase I States, the District of Columbia, the U.S. John W. Meeker, efforts, but should also include a Virgin islands, the commonwealth of Chief, Procurement, GO. sufficient description of anticipated Puerto Rico and any territory or [FR Doc. 96–13906 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] efforts in follow-on Phases II through IV possession of the United States. For BILLING CODE 6450±01±P to provide an overall characterization of states lacking official energy offices, the necessary steps to allow eligible applicant is the state agency commercialization of the hydrogen with responsibility for energy matters. A Golden Field Office technology/system at the conclusion of state agency applicant must form a Phase IV. After the conclusion of the Hydrogen Feasibility Studies; Notice of partnering arrangement with at least one Phase I efforts by all awardees, DOE will Solicitation for Financial Assistance for-profit business to be eligible. evaluate the Phase I results and future Applications plans of each awardee. Based upon Project Requirements: AGENCY: Department of Energy. technical, economic, and programmatic • This state agency, as the direct ACTION: Notice of solicitation for considerations, DOE may select award recipient, is required to work in financial assistance applications awardees to participate in follow-on a partnership or subaward arrangement Number DE-PS36-96GO10160. agreements without further competition. with at least one for-profit entity. In Phase I, a cost-shared business and • The activities funded must be SUMMARY: The Department of Energy technical feasibility study will be performed in the United States. (DOE), under authority of Section 2026 undertaken which will result in the • The manufacture and reproduction of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, Public development of information necessary of any invention or product resulting Law 102–486, and the Matsunaga for follow-on applications in Phases II from the project must be manufactured Hydrogen Research, Development, and through IV. Applications submitted in Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28191 response to this solicitation for Phase I 1. Medina Power Company Illinois 62526, tendered for filing a should provide information including, [Docket No. ER94–478–000] Power Sales Tariff, Service Agreement but not limited to: a description of the under which Tennessee Power Take notice that on April 29, 1996, proposed integrated system, including Company will take service under Medina Power Company tendered for status of the individual component Illinois Power Company’s Power Sales filing an amendment in the above- technologies; technology development Tariff. The agreements are based on the referenced docket. Form of Service Agreements in Illinois requirements; anticipated market for the Comment date: June 10, 1996, in technology/system; energy efficiency; Power’s tariff. accordance with Standard Paragraph E Illinois Power has requested an environmental impacts; economic at the end of this notice. performance; regulation, safety, and effective date of June 1, 1996. reliability issues; and capabilities, 2. MidAmerican Energy Company Comment date: June 10, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E experience, and commitment of the [Docket No. ER96–1834–000] proposer. In addition, the proposer will at the end of this notice. Take notice that on May 14, 1996, be required to report data using the MidAmerican Energy Company 5. Illinois Power Company HScan Planning Method. (MidAmerican), 106 East Second Street, [Docket No. ER96–1837–000] DOE will only consider awards to Davenport, Iowa 52801, filed with the Take notice that on May 17, 1996, entities which are led by private-sector Commission a Report of Transactions Illinois Power Company (Illinois firms. The entity can include business Under Rate Schedule For Power Sales Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, partnerships, joint ventures, or other (FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume Illinois 62526, tendered for filing a business relationships between such No. 5) for the Reporting Period of April Power Sales Tariff, Service Agreement organizations as profit or non-profit 16, 1996 to April 30, 1996. This Report under which VTEC Energy Inc. will take corporations, educational institutions, summarizes the rates and other terms of service under Illinois Power Company’s etc. All respondents must propose to transactions with Purchasers who have Power Sales Tariff. The agreements are cost-share at least 50% of the total Phase entered into Service Agreements with based on the Form of Service Agreement I project cost from non-Federal sources MidAmerican under the Tariff or are in Illinois Power’s tariff. (cost share in subsequent phases will be eligible to purchase under the Tariff Illinois Power has requested an negotiated subject to statutory pursuant to interchange agreements effective date of June 1, 1996. guidelines). Awards under this with MidAmerican. Comment date: June 10, 1996, in solicitation will be cooperative The Report of Transactions accordance with Standard Paragraph E agreements, with a term of up to 9 summarizes transactions which have at the end of this notice. months for Phase I. Depending on the been conducted within the 30 days prior availability of Fiscal Year 1997 funding to the filing pursuant to a previously 6. Illinois Power Company for the DOE Hydrogen Program, it is filed service agreement or interchange [Docket No. ER96–1838–000] anticipated that total DOE funding agreement. Therefore, this filing is made Take notice that on May 17, 1996, available for the Phase I efforts will be within the 30 day period allowed by the Illinois Power Company (Illinois approximately $1,000,000. Individual Commission in Prior Notice and Filing Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, awards under this solicitation for Phase Requirements Under Part II of the Illinois 62526, tendered for filing a I will not exceed $150,000 of DOE Federal Power Act, 64 FERC ¶61,139 Power Sales Tariff, Service Agreement funding. The solicitation will be issued (1993), reh’g, 65 FERC ¶61,081 (October under which TransCanada Power in June, 1996, and will contain detailed 19, 1993). Corporation will take service under information on funding, cost sharing Comment date: June 10, 1996, in Illinois Power Company’s Power Sales requirements, eligibility, application accordance with Standard Paragraph E Tariff. The agreements are based on the preparation, the HScan Planning at the end of this notice. Form of Service Agreement in Illinois Method, DOE proposal evaluation 3. Illinois Power Company Power’s tariff. criteria, and the proposal selection Illinois Power has requested an process for awards. Responses to the [Docket No. ER96–1835–000] effective date of May 15, 1996. solicitation will be due 60 days after Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Comment date: June 10, 1996, in solicitation release. Illinois Power Company (Illinois accordance with Standard Paragraph E Issued in Golden, Colorado, on May 23, Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, at the end of this notice. Illinois 62526, tendered for filing a 1996. 7. Illinois Power Company Power Sales Tariff, Service Agreement John W. Meeker, under which National Gas & Electric [Docket No. ER96–1839–000] Chief, Procurement, GO. L.P. will take service under Illinois Take notice that on May 17, 1996, [FR Doc. 96–13905 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Power Company’s Power Sales Tariff. Illinois Power Company (Illinois BILLING CODE 6450±01±P The agreements are based on the Form Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, of Service Agreement in Illinois Power’s Illinois 62526, tendered for filing firm tariff. transmission agreements under which Federal Energy Regulatory Illinois Power has requested an Archer Daniels Midland Company will Commission effective date of May 1, 1996. take transmission service pursuant to its Comment date: June 10, 1996, in open access transmission tariff. The [Docket No. ER94±478±000, et al.] accordance with Standard Paragraph E agreements are based on the Form of at the end of this notice. Service Agreement in Illinois Power’s Medina Power Company, et al.; Electric 4. Illinois Power Company tariff. Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings Illinois Power has requested an [Docket No. ER96–1836–000] effective date of April 26, 1996. May 28, 1996. Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Comment date: June 10, 1996, in Take notice that the following filings Illinois Power Company (Illinois accordance with Standard Paragraph E have been made with the Commission: Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, at the end of this notice. 28192 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

8. Illinois Power Company of Service Agreements in Illinois 15. Washington Water Power Company [Docket No. ER96–1840–000] Power’s tariff. [Docket No. TX96–10–000] Illinois Power has requested an Take notice that on May 17, 1996, effective date of May 1, 1996. Take notice that on May 22, 1996, Illinois Power Company (Illinois Comment date: June 10, 1996, in Washington Water Power Company Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, accordance with Standard Paragraph E tendered for filing an application for an Illinois 62526, tendered for filing firm at the end of this notice. order requiring the Bonneville Power transmission agreements under which Administration to provide transmission Granite City Steel Division of National 12. Illinois Power Company service for power sales to Clark County Steel Corporation will take transmission [Docket No. ER96–1844–000] PUD No. 1. service pursuant to its open access Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Comment date: June 24, 1996, in transmission tariff. The agreements are Illinois Power Company (Illinois accordance with Standard Paragraph E based on the Form of Service Agreement Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, at the end of this notice. in Illinois Power’s tariff. Illinois 62526, tendered for filing firm Standard Paragraph Illinois Power has requested an transmission agreements under which effective date of April 25, 1996. General Tire, Inc., an Ohio corporation E. Any person desiring to be heard or Comment date: June 10, 1996, in will take transmission service pursuant to protest said filing should file a accordance with Standard Paragraph E to its open access transmission tariff. motion to intervene or protest with the at the end of this notice. Illinois Power has requested an Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, effective date of May 11, 1996. 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 9. Illinois Power Company Comment date: June 10, 1996, in 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 [Docket No. ER96–1841–000] accordance with Standard Paragraph E and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Take notice that on May 17, 1996, at the end of this notice. Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions Illinois Power Company (Illinois 13. Interstate Power Company Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, or protests should be filed on or before Illinois 62526, tendered for filing firm [Docket No. ER96–1845–000] the comment date. Protests will be transmission agreements under which Take notice that on May 17, 1996, considered by the Commission in LTV Steel Company, Inc. will take Interstate Power Company, tendered for determining the appropriate action to be transmission service pursuant to its filing two service agreements under taken, but will not serve to make open access transmission tariff. The which firm point-to-point electrical protestants parties to the proceeding. agreements are based on the Form of transmission service will be provided to Any person wishing to become a party Service Agreement in Illinois Power’s Dairyland Power Cooperative. must file a motion to intervene. Copies tariff. Comment date: June 10, 1996, in of this filing are on file with the Illinois Power has requested an accordance with Standard Paragraph E Commission and are available for public effective date of April 25, 1996. at the end of this notice. inspection. Comment date: June 10, 1996, in 14. Northern Indiana Public Service Lois D. Cashell, accordance with Standard Paragraph E Company Secretary. at the end of this notice. [FR Doc. 96–13852 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] [Docket No. ER96–1846–000] BILLING CODE 6717±01±P 10. Illinois Power Company Take notice that on May 17, 1996, [Docket No. ER96–1842–000] Northern Indiana Public Service Company, tendered for filing an [Docket No. EG96±71±000, et al.] Take notice that on May 17, 1996, executed Standard Transmission Illinois Power Company (Illinois Service Agreement between Northern Mid-American Power LLC, et al.; Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, Indiana Public Service Company and Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Illinois 62526, tendered for filing firm Western Power Services, Inc. Filings transmission agreements under which Under the Transmission Service Olin Corporation will take transmission Agreement, Northern Indiana Public May 29, 1996. service pursuant to its open access Service Company will provide Point-to- Take notice that the following filings transmission tariff. The agreements are Point Transmission Service to Western have been made with the Commission: based on the Form of Service Agreement Power Services, Inc. pursuant to the 1. Mid-American Power LLC in Illinois Power’s tariff. Transmission Service Tariff filed by Illinois Power has requested an Northern Indiana Public Service [Docket No. EG96–71–000] effective date of April 26, 1996. Company in Docket No. ER96–399–000 On May 17, 1996, Mid-American Comment date: June 10, 1996, in and allowed to become effective by the Power LLC (‘‘Applicant’’), 2070 South accordance with Standard Paragraph E Commission. Northern Indiana Public Park Place, Suite 150, Atlanta, Georgia at the end of this notice. Service Company, 71 FERC ¶61,104 30339, filed with the Federal Energy 11. Illinois Power Company (1996). Northern Indiana Public Service Regulatory Commission an application Company has requested waiver of the for determination of exempt wholesale [Docket No. ER96–1843–000] Commission’s Regulations to allow the generator status pursuant to Part 365 of Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Transmission Service Agreement to the Commission’s Regulations. Illinois Power Company (Illinois become effective as of June 1, 1996. Applicant intends to directly own and Power), 500 South 27th Street, Decatur, Copies of this filing have been sent to operate all or part of eligible facilities, Illinois 62526, tendered for filing firm the Indiana Utility Regulatory including without limitation a refired transmission agreements under which Commission and the Indiana Office of 53–MW coal-fired plant acquired from A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company Utility Consumers Counselor. Dairyland Power Cooperative and will take transmission service pursuant Comment date: June 10, 1996, in located in Cassville, Wisconsin, to be to its open access transmission tariff. accordance with Standard Paragraph E used for the generation of electric The agreements are based on the Form at the end of this notice. energy exclusively for sale at wholesale. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28193

Comment date: June 19, 1996, in Company in Docket No. ER96–399–000 South Carolina Public Service Authority accordance with Standard Paragraph E and allowed to become effective by the under Rate PSS—Power Sales Service. at the end of this notice. The Commission. Northern Indiana Public A copy of the filing has been mailed Commission will limit its consideration Service Company, 71 FERC ¶ 61,014 to the Kentucky Public Service of comments to those that concern the (1996). Northern Indiana Public Service Commission. adequacy or accuracy of the application. Company has requested waiver of the Comment date: June 11, 1996, in Commission’s Regulations to allow the accordance with Standard Paragraph E 2. Williams Energy Services Company Transmission Service Agreement to at the end of this notice. [Docket No. ER96–1698–000] become effective as of June 1, 1996. 9. Louisville Gas and Electric Company Take notice that on May 13, 1996, Copies of this filing have been sent to Williams Energy Services Company the Indiana Utility Regulatory [Docket No. ER96–1853–000] tendered for filing an amendment in the Commission and the Indiana Office of Take notice that on May 17, 1996, above-referenced docket. Utility Consumer Counselor. Louisville Gas and Electric Company Comment date: June 12, 1996, in Comment date: June 11, 1996, in (LG&E), tendered for filing a purchase accordance with Standard Paragraph E accordance with Standard Paragraph E and sales agreement between LG&E and at the end of this notice. at the end of this notice. American Municipal Power—Ohio, Inc. under Rate PSS—Power Sales Service. 3. Northern Indiana Public Service 5. Louisville Gas and Electric Company A copy of the filing has been mailed Company [Docket No. ER96–1849–000] to the Kentucky Public Service [Docket No. ER96–1847–000] Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Commission. Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Louisville Gas and Electric Company Comment date: June 11, 1996, in Northern Indiana Public Service (LG&E), tendered for filing a purchase accordance with Standard Paragraph E Company tendered for filing an and sales agreement between LG&E and at the end of this notice. QST Energy Trading Inc. under Rate executed Standard Transmission 10. Kentucky Utilities Company Service Agreement between Northern PSS—Power Sales Service. Indiana Public Service Company and A copy of the filing has been mailed [Docket No. ER96–1854–000] UtiliCorp United, Inc. to the Kentucky Public Service Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Under the Transmission Service Commission. Kentucky Utilities Company (KU), Agreement, Northern Indiana Public Comment date: June 11, 1996, in tendered for filing service agreements Service Company will provide Point-to- accordance with Standard Paragraph E between KU and TransCanada Power Point Transmission Service to UtiliCorp at the end of this notice. Corp., Oglethorpe Power Corporation, United, Inc. pursuant to the 6. Louisville Gas and Electric Company South Carolina Public Service Transmission Service Tariff filed by Authority, Utilicorp United, Valero Northern Indiana Public Service [Docket No. ER96–1850–000] Power Services Company, MidCon Company in Docket NO. ER96–399–000 Take notice that on May 17, 1996, Power Services Corp. and DuPont Power and allowed to become effective by the Louisville Gas and Electric Company Marketing, Inc. under its TS Tariff. Commission. Northern Indiana Public (LG&E), tendered for filing a purchase KU requests an effective date of May Service Company, 71 FERC ¶ 61,014 and sales agreement between LG&E and 1, 1996, for Oglethorpe Power (1996). Northern Indiana Public Service Commonwealth Edison Company under Corporation and South Carolina Public Company has requested waiver of the Rate PSS—Power Sales Service. Service Authority, May 3, 1996, for Commission’s Regulations to allow the A copy of the filing has been mailed TransCanada Power Corp., May 13, Transmission Service Agreement to to the Kentucky Public Service 1996, for Valero Power Services become effective as of June 1, 1996. Commission. Company and DuPont Power Marketing, Copies of this filing have been sent to Comment date: June 11, 1996, in Inc. and May 15, 1996, for Utilicorp the Indiana Utility Regulatory accordance with Standard Paragraph E United and MidCon Power Services Commission and the Indiana Office of at the end of this notice. Corporation. Utility Consumer Counselor. 7. Louisville Gas and Electric Company Comment date: June 11, 1996, in Comment date: June 11, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E accordance with Standard Paragraph E [Docket No. ER96–1851–000] at the end of this notice. at the end of this notice. Take notice that on May 14, 1996, 11. New England Power Pool Louisville Gas and Electric Company 4. Northern Indiana Public Service (LG&E), tendered for filing a purchase [Docket No. ER96–1855–000] Company and sales agreement between LG&E and Take notice that on May 17, 1996, [Docket No. ER96–1848–000] Union Electric Company under Rate New England Power Pool Executive Take notice that on May 17, 1996, PSS—Power Sales Service. Committee filed a signature page to the Northern Indiana Public Service A copy of the filing has been mailed NEPOOL Agreement dated September 1, Company tendered for filing an to the Kentucky Public Service 1971, as amended, signed by Granite executed Standard Transmission Commission. State Energy, Inc. (Granite State) and Service Agreement between Northern Comment date: June 11, 1996, in PanEnergy Power Services, Inc. Indiana Public Service Company and accordance with Standard Paragraph E (PanEnergy). The New England Power NorAm Energy Services, Inc. at the end of this notice. Pool Agreement, as amended, has been Under the Transmission Service 8. Louisville Gas and Electric Company designated NEPOOL FPC No. 2. Agreement, Northern Indiana Public The Executive Committee states that Service Company will provide Point-to- [Docket No. ER96–1852–000] acceptance of the signature pages would Point Transmission Service to NorAm Take notice that on May 17, 1996, permit Granite State and PanEnergy to Energy Services, Inc. pursuant to the Louisville Gas and Electric Company join the over 90 Participants that already Transmission Service Tariff filed by (LG&E), tendered for filing a purchase participate in the Pool. NEPOOL further Northern Indiana Public Service and sales agreement between LG&E and states that the filed signature pages do 28194 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices not change the NEPOOL Agreement in filing a Supplement to its Rate Schedule transmission service for the Power any manner, other than to make Granite FERC No. 102, an agreement to provide Authority of the State of New York (the State and PanEnergy Participants in the transmission service for the New York Authority). The Supplement provides Pool. NEPOOL requests an effective date Power Authority (the Authority). The for an increase in the annual revenues on or before May 28, 1996, or as soon Supplement provides for an increase in under the Rate Schedule of $2,575.68. as possible thereafter for the annual revenues under the Rate Con Edison has requested that the commencement of participation in the Schedule of $5,540.16. Con Edison has increase take effect on July 1, 1996. Pool by Granite State and PanEnergy. requested that the increase take effect on Con Edison states that a copy of this Comment date: June 11, 1996, in July 1, 1996. filing has been served by mail upon the accordance with Standard Paragraph E Con Edison states that a copy of this Authority. at the end of this notice. filing has been served by mail upon the Comment date: June 12, 1996, in Authority. accordance with Standard Paragraph E 12. Central Vermont Public Service Comment date: June 12, 1996, in at the end of this notice. Corporation accordance with Standard Paragraph E 19. Lake Cogen, Ltd. [Docket No. ER96–1856–000] at the end of this notice. Take notice that on May 17, 1996, [Docket No. QF92–198–001] 16. Consolidated Edison Company of On May 22, 1996, Lake Cogen, Ltd. Central Vermont Public Service New York, Inc. Corporation (Central Vermont), tendered (Applicant), c/o Energy Initiatives, Inc., for filing an amendment to its FPC Rate [Docket No. ER96–1860–000] One Upper Pond Road, Parsippany, Schedule 29, Supplement 2 which Take notice that on May 17, 1996, New Jersey 07054, submitted for filing tracks a retail rate increase approved by Consolidated Edison Company of New an application for recertification of a the Vermont Public Service Board. York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered for facility as a qualifying cogeneration Central Vermont requests the filing a Supplement to its Rate Schedule facility pursuant to Section 292.205(b) Commission to waive its notice of filing FERC No. 66 an agreement to provide of the Commission’s Regulations. No requirement to permit the amendment transmission service for the Power determination has been made that the to become effective according to its Authority of the State of New York (the submittal constitutes a complete filing. terms. In support of its request Central Authority). The Supplement provides According to Applicant, the topping- Vermont states that allowing the for an increase in the annual revenues cycle cogeneration facility is located in amendment to become effective as under the Rate Schedule of $264.64. Umatilla, Florida. The Commission provided will enable the Company and Con Edison has requested that the previously certified the facility as a its customers to achieve mutual increase take effect on July 1, 1996. Con qualifying cogeneration facility in Lake benefits. Edison states that a copy of this filing Cogen, Ltd., 61 FERC ¶62,109 (1992). Comment date: June 12, 1996, in has been served by mail upon the The instant request for recertification is accordance with Standard Paragraph E Authority. due to a change in ownership of the at the end of this notice. Comment date: June 12, 1996, in facility. Comment date: Thirty days after the accordance with Standard Paragraph E 13. New England Power Company date of publication of this notice in the at the end of this notice. [Docket No. ER96–1857–000] Federal Register, in accordance with 17. Consolidated Edison Company of Standard Paragraph E at the end of this Take notice that on May 17, 1996, New York, Inc. notice. New England Power Company (NEP), filed a Service Agreement with Working [Docket No. ER96–1861–000] 20. Hilo Coast Processing Company Assets Funding Services, Inc. under Take notice that on May 17, 1996, [Docket No. QF96–39–000] NEP’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original Consolidated Edison Company of New On May 20, 1996, Hilo Coast Volume No. 5. York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered for Processing Company (Applicant) Comment date: June 12, 1996, in filing a Supplement to its Rate Schedule tendered for filing a supplement to its accordance with Standard Paragraph E FERC No. 60, an agreement to provide filing in this docket. No determination at the end of this notice. transmission service for the Power has been made that the submittal 14. Mid-American Power LLC Authority of the State of New York (the constitutes a complete filing. Authority). The Supplement provides The supplement provides additional [Docket No. ER96–1858–000] for an increase in the annual revenues information pertaining primarily to the Take notice that on May 17, 1996, under the Rate Schedule of $10,587.84. ownership structure and the thermal Mid-American Power LLC, 2070 South Con Edison has requested that the application of the cogeneration facility. Park Place, Suite 150, Atlanta, Georgia increase take effect on July 1, 1996. Comment date: June 17, 1996, in 30339, tendered for filing, pursuant to Con Edison states that a copy of this accordance with Standard Paragraph E Rule 207 of the Commission’s Rules of filing has been served by mail upon the at the end of this notice. Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207, Authority. an initial rate schedule for the sale of Comment date: June 12, 1996, in Standard Paragraph electricity at market-based rates. accordance with Standard Paragraph E E. Any person desiring to be heard or Comment date: June 12, 1996, in at the end of this notice. to protest said filing should file a accordance with Standard Paragraph E 18. Consolidated Edison Company of motion to intervene or protest with the at the end of this notice. New York, Inc. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 15. Consolidated Edison Company of [Docket No. ER96–1862–000] New York, Inc. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 Take notice that on May 17, 1996, and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of [Docket No. ER96–1859–000] Consolidated Edison Company of New Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 Take notice that on May 17, 1996, York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered for and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions Consolidated Edison Company of New filing a Supplement to its Rate Schedule or protests should be filed on or before York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered for FERC No. 78, an agreement to provide the comment date. Protests will be Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28195 considered by the Commission in to Playtex Apparel, Inc., a direct sales [Docket No. CP96±495±000, et al.] determining the appropriate action to be customer. taken, but will not serve to make GPM Gas Corporation v. Continental The EA has been placed in the public Natural Gas, Inc., et al.; Natural Gas protestants parties to the proceeding. files of the FERC and is available for Any person wishing to become a party Certificate Filings public inspection at: Federal Energy must file a motion to intervene. Copies Regulatory Commission, Public May 28, 1996. of this filing are on file with the Reference an Files Maintenance Branch, Take notice that the following filings Commission and are available for public have been made with the Commission: inspection. 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC Lois D. Cashell, 20426, (202) 208–1371. 1. GPM Gas Corporation v. Continental Secretary. Copies of the EA have been mailed to Natural Gas, Inc. [FR Doc. 96–13884 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Federal, state and local agencies, public [Docket No. CP96–495–000] BILLING CODE 6717±01±P interest groups, interested individuals, Take notice that on May 2, 1996, GPM newspapers, and parties to this Gas Corporation (GPM), First Interstate proceeding. [Docket No. CP96±97±000] Tower, 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Room 880, A limited number of copies of the EA Houston, Texas 77056, filed in Docket Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; are available from: Mr. Herman Der, No. CP96–495–000 a motion to Notice of Availability of the Environmental Project Manager, intervene, complaint, and protest to the Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Review and Compliance new pipeline tap and interconnection Proposed Hockessin Expansion Branch I, Office of Pipeline Regulation, proposed by Northern Natural Gas Project PR–11.1, 888 First Street, N.E., Company (Northern) in its request filed Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208–0896. in Docket No. CP96–246–000 and May 29, 1996. noticed on March 18, 1996, to be The staff of the Federal Energy Any person wishing to comment on constructed and operated under its Regulatory Commission (FERC or the EA may do so. Written comments blanket certificate issued in Docket No. Commission) has prepared an must reference Docket No. CP96–97– CP82–401–000, involving deliveries of environmental assessment (EA) on the 000, and be addressed to: Office of the natural gas to Continental Natural Gas, natural gas pipeline facilities proposed Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Inc. (CNG), for plant feedstock purposes. by Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., GPM requests that its filing be processed (Eastern Shore) in the above-referenced Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208–0896. as a separate application from docket. Northern’s filing, although GPM protests The EA was prepared to satisfy the Comments should be filed as soon as possible, but must be received no later the proposal in Docket Nos. CP82–401– requirements of the National 000 and CP96–246–000, and moves to Environmental Policy Act. The staff than July 5, 1996, to ensure consideration prior to a Commission intervene in those dockets. GPM’s concludes that approval of the proposed complaint is on file with the project, with appropriate mitigating decision on this proposal. A copy of any Commission and open for public measures, would not constitute a major comments should also be sent to Mr. Herman Der, Environmental Project inspection. Federal action significantly affecting the GPM states that its complaint is filed Manager, PR–11.1, at the above address. quality of the human environment. against CNG since it appears that, based The EA assesses the potential Comments will be considered by the on the configuration and the present environmental effects of the Commission but will not serve to make and proposed usage of CNG’s facilities, construction and operation of the the commentor a party to the CNG must first obtain authorization following facilities proposed by Eastern proceeding. Any person seeking to under the Natural Gas Act before it may Shore: • Construction of a 2,170-horsepower become a party to the proceeding must handle the subject gas to be received (hp) compressor station, with a 1,085-hp file a motion to intervene pursuant to from Northern. GPM alleges that CNG is back-up unit, in New Castle County, Rule 214 of the Commission’s Rules of currently, effectively functioning as an Delaware; Practice and Procedures (18 CFR interstate pipeline without Federal • Construction and operation of 0.89 385.214). Energy Regulatory Commission oversight through the use of its own mile of 16-inch-diameter pipeline in The date for filing timely motions to pipelines to effect processing, at New Castle County, Delaware to tie the intervene in this proceeding has passed. suction side of the proposed compressor different plant locations, of interstate Therefore, parties now seeking to file gas received from transmission lines. station into the Hockessin Line; and late interventions must show good • Uprating the maximum allowable Comment date: June 27, 1996, in cause, as required by section operating pressure from 500 pounds per accordance with the first paragraph of square inch gauge (psig) to 590 psig on 385.214(b)(3), why this time limitation Standard Paragraph F at the end of this the 28.7-mile Salisbury Lateral from the should be waived. Environmental issues notice. Answers to the Complaint shall outlet of Eastern Shore’s existing have been viewed as good cause for late also be due or or before June 27, 1996. intervention. You do not heed Bridgeville Compressor Station in 2. K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co. Sussex County, Delaware to the Citizens intervenor status to have your Meter and Regulator Station in comments considered. [Docket No. CP96–531–000] Salisbury, Wicomico County, Maryland. Additional information about this Take notice that on May 22, 1996, The purpose of the proposed facilities project is available from Mr. Herman K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co. is to enable Eastern Shore to provide Der, Environmental Project Manager. (K N Interstate), P.O. Box 281304, 4,796 thousand cubic feet per day Lakewood, Colorado, 80228, filed in the Lois D. Cashell, (Mcfd) of additional firm capacity on its above docket, a request pursuant to system. Secretary. Sections 157.205(b) of the Commission’s Eastern Shore also proposes to [FR Doc. 96–13850 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Regulations under the Natural Gas Act abandon 100 Mcfd of firm sales service BILLING CODE 6717±01±M for authorization to install and operate 28196 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices two new delivery taps and appurtenant 3. El Paso Natural Gas Company Comment date: July 12, 1996, in facilities located in Keith and [Docket No. CP96–535–000] accordance with Standard Paragraph G Scottsbluff Counties, Nebraska. These at the end of this notice. Take notice that on May 22, 1996, El taps will be added as delivery points 4. Williams Natural Gas Company under an existing transportation Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso), Post Office Box 1492, El Paso, Texas, agreement between K N Interstate and [Docket No. CP96–537–000] filed in Docket No. CP96–535–000 a K N Energy, Inc. (K N) and will be used Take notice that on May 22, 1996, request pursuant Sections 157.205(b) by K N to facilitate the delivery of Williams (Williams), ost Office Box and 157.212 of the Commission’s 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed a natural gas to direct retail customers, all Regulations under the Natural Gas Act as more fully set forth in the request that request with the Commission in Docket (18 CFR 157.205(b) and 157.212) to No. CP96–537–000 pursuant to Sections is on file with the Commission and open construct and operate a delivery point 157.205 and 157.212 of the to public inspection. in Hutchinson County, Texas. El Paso Commission’s Regulations under the Specifically, K N Interstate states that states that the grant of the request would Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization by Order issued March 16, 1989, in permit the transportation and delivery to abandon by sale approximately 1.8 Docket Nos. CP83–140–000 and CP83– of natural gas by El Paso to Phillips miles of lateral pipeline and to replace 140–001, the Commission granted K N Petroleum Company (Phillips), all as the Vinita town border setting, all in blanket certificate authority, pursuant to more fully set forth in the request which Craig County, Oklahoma, authorized in Part 157, Subpart F of the Commission’s is on file with the Commission and open blanket certificate issued in Docket No. Regulations, and by Order issued to public inspection. CP82–479–000, all as more fully set August 1, 1989, in Docket No. CP89– El Paso states that Phillips utilizes forth in the request on file with the 1043–000, the Commission granted K N natural gas for feedstock and fuel at Commission and open to public blanket certificate authority to transport Phillips’ Borger Complex in Hutchinson inspection. natural gas pursuant to Part 284, County, Texas. El Paso states that Williams proposes to abandon by sale Subpart G of the Commission’s Phillips has requested gas transportation to Western Resources, Inc. (WRI) Regulations. By Order issued May 5, service from El Paso to augment the gas approximately 1.8 miles of 8-inch lateral pipeline downstream of Williams’s 1993, in Docket No. CP93–41–000, K N service provided by its affiliate, GPM Vinita town border in Craig County, was authorized to abandon all of its Gas Corporation. It is further stated that Oklahoma. WRI would incorporate the jurisdictional facilities and activities by by letter agreement dated March 14, 1996, Phillips and El Paso agreed that El 8-inch pipeline segment into its transfer to K N Interstate, and K N distribution system and offer gas service Interstate was authorized to replace K N Paso would install a new delivery point on El Paso’s 18’’ O.D. E.P.N.G. Schafer to potential customers in the area. as the holder of the certificate In addition, Williams proposes to authorities previously issued by the Plant to Dumas Plant Loop Line and 20’’ O.D. E.P.N.G. Schafer Plant in Dumas replace the Vinita town border setting at Commission in the name of K N, Plant Loop Line in Hutchinson County, the existing location and to reclaim the including the above-named dockets. Texas. Accordingly, El Paso states that 6-inch Vinita town border meter setting, K N Interstate indicates that K N, as it seeks authorization to construct and a regulator setting, and dust scrubber. a local distribution company, has operate the Phillips Hutchinson County The projected volume of delivery with requested the addition of two new Delivery Point. the replacement town border facilities is not expected to exceed the current delivery points under its existing El Paso states that it proposes to delivery volume. transportation service agreement with transport on a firm and interruptible K N Interstate. K N Interstate states that The estimated cost of construction to basis to the Phillips Hutchinson County replace the Vinita town border setting is these proposed delivery points would Delivery Point an estimated 16,425 be located on its main transmission estimated to be $109,115 and the sales MMcf annually, or an average of 45 price of the facilities to WRI would be system in Nebraska and would facilitate MMcf per day of natural gas. The $10. the delivery of natural gas to K N for Phillips Hutchinson County Delivery Comment date: July 12, 1996, in sale to new direct retail customers. Point would be used to deliver gas for accordance with Standard Paragraph G K N Interstate states that the activities use as feedstock and fuel at Phillips’ at the end of this notice. proposed herein comply with the Borger Complex, as further stated. El Standard Paragraphs requirements of Part 157, Subpart F of Paso states that the total estimated cost the Commission’s Regulations. K N of the proposed delivery point, F. Any person desiring to be heard or states that (1) the volumes of gas which including respective overhead and make any protest with reference to said will be delivered at these proposed contingency fees, is $38,600. Pursuant filing should on or before the comment to the March 14, 1996 letter agreement, delivery points will be within the date file with the Federal Energy El Paso states that Phillips has agreed to current maximum transportation Regulatory Commission, 888 First reimburse El Paso for the costs related quantities set forth in K N Interstate’s Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, a to the construction of the Hutchinson motion to intervene or a protest in transportation service agreement with County Delivery Point. K N; (2) the addition of the proposed accordance with the requirements of the El Paso states that construction and Commission’s Rules of Practice and delivery points is not prohibited by K N operation of the Phillips Hutchinson Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and Interstate’s existing FERC Gas Tariff; County Delivery Point is not prohibited 385.214) and the Regulations under the and (3) the addition of the proposed by El Paso’s existing tariff. El Paso Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All delivery points will not have any further states that it has sufficient protests filed with the Commission will adverse impact, on a daily or annual capacity to accomplish the be considered by it in determining the basis, upon its existing customers. transportation and delivery of the appropriate action to be taken but will Comment date: July 12, 1996, in requested gas volumes without not serve to make the protestants parties accordance with Standard Paragraph G detriment or disadvantage to El Paso’s to the proceeding. Any person wishing at the end of this notice. other customers. to become a party to a proceeding or to Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28197 participate as a party in any hearing ACTION: Notice of revisions to initial list SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION therein must file a motion to intervene of categories of major and area sources, I. Background in accordance with the Commission’s and revisions to promulgation schedule Rules. for standards. The Clean Air Act Amendments of Take further notice that, pursuant to 1990 [Pub. L. 101–549] require, under the authority contained in and subject to SUMMARY: This notice publishes the revisions to Section 112, that the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal revisions made or which have been Agency list and promulgate national Energy Regulatory Commission by proposed to the initial list of categories emission standards for hazardous air Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act of sources of hazardous air pollutants pollutants (NESHAP) in order to and the Commission’s Rules of Practice (HAP), published in the Federal control, reduce, or otherwise limit the and Procedure, a hearing will be held Register on July 16, 1992 (57 FR 31576), emissions of HAP from categories of without further notice before the and to the schedule for the major and area sources. Pursuant to the Commission or its designee on this promulgation of emission standards, various specific listing requirements in filing if no motion to intervene is filed which was published on December 3, Section 112(c), the Agency published on within the time required herein, if the 1993 (58 FR 63941) and subsequently July 16, 1992 (57 FR 31576) an initial Commission on its own review of the corrected on March 4, 1994 (59 FR list of 174 categories of major and area matter finds that a grant of the 10461). sources that would be henceforth certificate is required by the public Today’s notice meets the requirement subject to emission standards. convenience and necessity. If a motion in Section 112(c)(1) to publish from Following this listing, pursuant to for leave to intervene is timely filed, or time to time a list of all categories of requirements in Section 112(e), on if the Commission on its own motion sources, reflecting revisions since the December 3, 1993 (58 FR 63941) the believes that a formal hearing is initial list was published. Several of the Agency published a schedule for the required, further notice of such hearing revisions identified in today’s notice promulgation of emission standards for will be duly given. have already been published in actions each of the 174 listed source categories. Under the procedure herein provided associated with listing and The reader is directed to these two for, unless otherwise advised, it will be promulgating emission standards for notices for information relating to unnecessary for the applicant to appear individual source categories, and public development of the initial list and or be represented at the hearing. comment has already been taken in the schedule. There have been specific notices since G. Any person or the Commission’s context of those actions. Some of the the initial list and schedule that have staff may, within 45 days after the revisions in today’s notice have not revised the list and schedule in the issuance of the instant notice by the been reflected in any previous notices, context of actions relating to individual Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 and are being taken without public source categories. For example, on of the Commission’s Procedural Rules comment on the Administrator’s own November 12, 1993 (58 FR 60021), the (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene motion. Such revisions are deemed by Agency listed marine vessel loading or notice of intervention and pursuant EPA to be without need for public operations as a category of major to Section 157.205 of the Regulations comment, based on the nature of the sources, with standards to be under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR actions. Other revisions have been only promulgated, pursuant to Section 157.205) a protest to the request. If no proposed as of today’s date, but are 112(c)(5), by the year 2000. As another protest is filed within the time allowed reflected nevertheless to be inclusive of example, on September 8, 1994 (59 FR therefore, the proposed activity shall be all list and schedule actions of probable 46339), the Agency promulgated deemed to be authorized effective the interest to the reader. standards for HAP emissions for day after the time allowed for filing a EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996. protest. If a protest is filed and not industrial process cooling towers. This withdrawn within 30 days after the time ADDRESSES: Relevant information can be latter action did not revise the list or allowed for filing a protest, the instant found in the two Federal Register schedule, per se, but specifically request shall be treated as an notices cited above in the SUMMARY delineated rule applicability by defining application for authorization pursuant section of this notice. the affected sources within the listed to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. Docket: Docket No. A–90–49, category. The Agency believes that containing supporting information used defining rule applicability and affected Lois D. Cashell, sources as part of standard setting Secretary. in development of this notice, is available for public inspection and constitutes an important aspect of list [FR Doc. 96–13851 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] copying between 8 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., revision. As was stated in the original BILLING CODE 6717±01±P Monday through Friday, at the EPA’s listing notice (57 FR 31576): Air and Radiation Docket and the Agency recognizes that these descriptions Information Center, Waterside Mall, [in the initial list], like the list itself, may be ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION room M–1500, first floor, 401 M Street, revised from time to time as better AGENCY SW, Washington, D. C. 20460, or by information becomes available. The Agency intends to revise these descriptions as part of calling (202) 260–7548 or 260–7549. A the process of establishing standards for each [AD±FRL±5512±9] reasonable fee may be charged for category. Ultimately, a definition of each copying. listed category, or subsequently listed National Emission Standards for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For subcategories, will be incorporated in each Hazardous Air Pollutants; Revision of rule establishing a NESHAP for a category. Initial List of Categories of Sources information concerning this notice, Various other Agency actions may and Schedule for Standards Under contact Mr. David Svendsgaard, trigger the need for list and/or schedule Sections 112(c) and (e) of the Clean Air Emissions Standards Division (MD–13), revisions. Included actions are: Act Amendments of 1990 U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, —The Administrator is obligated to list AGENCY: Environmental Protection North Carolina 27711, telephone any category of major sources. Agency (EPA). number (919) 541–2380. Today’s notice is listing seven 28198 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

categories of major sources for which within other notices for which public for the listed categories, including it did not have prior evidence that at comment has been (or is being) taken. actual rule proposal or promulgation least one major source was present —Other ‘‘housekeeping’’ measures. Federal Register citations. Table 1 is within the category. Two of the seven After investigation by the Agency, it formatted so that the reader can at once additions were effected through has been determined that the titles or see all categories of major and area previous Federal Register notices, descriptions of some categories of sources that have been listed to date, the and are thereby reflected in today’s sources can be amended to clarify associated schedule for standards, and notice. When a category is added to applicability for the ensuing emission any revisions effected by or reflected in the list after the initial listing, standard, and other categories can be today’s notice. Source categories and/or pursuant to Sections 112(c)(1) and (3), included under a different, more schedules for standards in Table 1 that emission standards must be appropriate industry group. In today’s are revised from the initial July 16, 1992 scheduled by November 15, 2000, or notice, two categories of sources are listing and December 3, 1993 schedule within 2 years after the date of listing, renamed, three categories are notices are footnoted or clearly marked whichever is later, to meet the reassigned to different industry for ease in discerning where revisions requirements of Section 112(c)(5). groups, and no categories are have been made. —The Agency may list categories of area redefined (although in most instances, sources pursuant to a number of descriptions of source categories have A. Addition of Categories of Major authorities in Section 112. One area been refined upon determining Sources source category— secondary lead applicability at promulgation of the In response to new information, smelting—has been added to the list rule). today’s notice reflects the listing of the since the initial listing notice as part Section 112(e)(4) states that, following categories of major sources: of a final regulatory action, and is notwithstanding Section 307 of the Act, Carbon Black Production, Ethylene reflected in today’s list. no action of the Administrator listing a Processes, Flexible Polyurethane Foam —The Administrator may delete source category or subcategory under Fabrication Operations, Friction categories of sources on its own Section 112(c) shall be a final Agency Products Manufacturing, Leather motion or on petition. Five source action subject to judicial review, except Tanning and Finishing Operations, categories which were previously that any such action may be reviewed Marine Vessel Loading Operations, and believed to be major source categories under Section 307 when the Nitrile Resins Production. Pursuant to are being deleted from the list on the Administrator issues emission standards Section 112(c)(5), each of the newly Administrator’s own motion in for such pollutant or category. listed categories of sources is scheduled today’s notice. This notice refers to Therefore, today’s list is not a final for standards promulgation by one area source category that has been Agency action and is not subject to November 15, 2000. Descriptions of deleted from the list under a separate judicial review. these source categories can be found in action. None of these deletions is as Prior to issuance of the initial source Section II.I of today’s notice. The reader a result of petition. category list under Section 112(c)(1), the is referred to Docket No. A–90–49, —The Agency may revise the list to EPA published a draft initial list for Section VI-B, for more information delineate the applicability of ‘‘case- public comment (56 FR 28548; June 21, supporting the listing of the above seven by-case’’ emission standards pursuant 1991). Although EPA was not required source categories. to Section 112(j), in instances where to take public comment on the initial the Agency desires to delimit the source category list, it believed it was B. Addition of Categories of Area affected sources because it may not useful to solicit input on a number of Sources establish a Federal emission standard issues related to the list. Indeed, in most The various authorities to list and by the deadline in the regulatory instances, even where there is no regulate area source categories under schedule for standards. No such statutory requirement to take comment, Section 112 are all discretionary and/or revision is made or reflected in EPA solicits public comment on actions require some sort of finding or today’s notice. it is contemplating. The EPA has, determination by the Administrator. —The Agency may revise the regulatory however, decided that it is unnecessary The Agency believes that any such area schedule for standards associated to solicit additional public comment on source listing action is therefore subject with a listed source category, heeding the revisions reflected in today’s notice to public comment and is consequently the limitations in Section 112 because interested parties have already not being taken in today’s notice. (discussed in 58 FR 63941). For had, or will have in the future, the Instead, today—s notice merely reflects example, the regulatory schedule for opportunity to provide comments on any such findings or determinations. one source category—dodecanedioic many of the revisions in the context of Today’s notice reflects a June 23, 1995 acid production—is, in effect, moved individual actions relating to proposing notice (60 FR 32587) finalizing the forward in time, from the year 2000 to and promulgating emissions standards. addition of secondary lead smelters as 1992, following the determination to an area source category. Accompanying II. Description of Individual List and incorporate this category within the this notice is a finding of threat of Schedule Revisions definition of the synthetic organic adverse effects based on seven smelters chemical manufacturing source The revised source category list and that the Agency believes fit the category (see 59 FR 19402). Today’s regulatory schedule, reflecting all definition of an area source. notice specifies two such actions actions (with the exception of proposed involving subsumption of previously actions) up to today’s date, is presented C. Delineation of Standard Applicability listed source categories, or segments in Table 1. This table incorporates the and Affected Sources Through Standard of source categories, within another entire listing of source categories listed Promulgation category, and the corresponding to this date, including those listed Emission standards have been change in regulatory schedules. In initially as well as those listed promulgated under Section 112 for each case, however, the action is not subsequently. Table 1 also includes the several source categories since the being effected by today’s notice, but updated schedule for establishing initial source category list and schedule rather has been effected (or proposed) emission standards under Section 112 were published. Table 1 identifies the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28199

Federal Register cite for each of these 2. Butadiene Dimers Production clearly an organic chemical; thus, the notices. These actions are cited in This major source category, under the previous determination to include this today’s notice because they revise the ‘‘miscellaneous processes’’ grouping on as an inorganic chemical production list in that they delineate rule the initial list, is being changed in name was an error. applicability by defining the affected to ‘‘tetrahydrobenzaldehyde G. Subsumption of Listed Source sources within the listed category. production,’’ under the same industrial Categories (or some affected sources process grouping. The Agency has D. Proposed Delineation of Standard within) Under Other Listed Source determined, based on comments, that Applicability and Affected Sources Categories Through Standard Proposal the butadiene dimer is produced by only one facility in the nation, as a Emission standards have been 1. The Synthetic Organic Chemical waste product from the proposed under Section 112 for several Manufacturing Source Category and tetrahydrobenzaldehyde process. The source categories since the initial source Dodecanedioic Acid Production specific dimer is 1,4-vinyl cyclohexane. category list and schedule were Tetrahydrobenzaldehyde is the only The source category ‘‘Dodecanedioic published. These actions are cited in identified chemical under the butadiene today’s notice principally insofar as Acid Production’’ is being removed dimers source category in the initial list; they propose to revise the list in that from the list of major source categories therefore, changing the name of the they will delineate rule applicability by because the production of this chemical source category will not change the defining the affected sources within the is being regulated under the Hazardous applicability of the subsequent emission listed category. The reader is referred to Organic NESHAP (HON) (59 FR 19402; standard or the affected sources. This Table 1 to obtain the Federal Register April 22, 1994). Based on public change will merely identify the correct citations for these categories of sources. comment, the Agency determined that chemical the Agency intended to dodecanedioic acid (DDDA) production E. Name Changes for Listed Source regulate pursuant to the initial list. is more appropriately regulated as part Categories F. Inclusion of Listed Source Categories of the synthetic organic chemical The Agency has determined that the Under Different Industry Groups manufacturing source category rather names of some source categories are The Agency has determined that three than as part of a separate source inappropriate, and is hereby changing source categories were previously category. Only one facility in the United them. The applicable categories are: categorized under inappropriate States has been identified as 1. Solid Waste Treatment, Storage and industry groups and is hereby moving manufacturing DDDA, and much of the Disposal Facilities (TSDF) these categories to more appropriate equipment used in the DDDA On October 13, 1994 (59 FR 51913), industrial groups for purposes of production process is the same the Agency proposed emission correctness. In each case, the movement equipment used to manufacture standards for the Solid Waste TSDF of the source category will have no adiponitrile, which is included in the source category and changed its title to effect on the development or the list of Synthetic Organic Chemical ‘‘Off-Site Waste and Recovery promulgation date of the NESHAP. Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Operations.’’ As discussed in that 1. Butadiene Furfural Cotrimer (R–11) chemicals regulated by the HON. Thus, notice, this change was considered Production this chemical has been offically added appropriate for two reasons. First, it will This category was improperly listed to the list of SOCMI chemicals subject help avoid confusion with the terms in the initial list under the ‘‘polymer to the HON. ‘‘solid waste’’ and ‘‘treatment, storage, and resins’’ industry group. Butadiene 2. Phthalate Plasticizers Production and and disposal facilities.’’ These terms furfural cotrimer is an insecticide that is have specific meanings within the the Synthetic Organic Chemical commonly used as a delousing agent for Manufacturing Source Category context of statutory and regulatory cows. It is therefore appropriate to move requirements in existing rules this source category to the ‘‘agricultural In the finalized HON, the EPA re- established under authority of the chemicals’’ industry group. evaluated several chemicals, including Resource Conservation and Recovery phthalate esters, which some 2. Polyether Polyols Production Act (RCRA), and this source category commenters had claimed were not would not include those facilities This category was improperly listed SOCMI chemicals. The EPA agreed that defined as solid waste treatment, in the initial list under the phthalate esters were chemicals used storage, and disposal facilities by the ‘‘miscellaneous’’ industry group. primarily as plasticizers, not as building RCRA. Second, the name change will Polyether polyols are defined as better distinguish among the types of blocks for other chemical addition polymers of cyclic ethers, manufacturing. Thus, phthalate esters sources that will be subject to the which include a variety of end use emission standard for this source were removed from the list of SOCMI products ranging from low molecular chemicals covered under the HON. The category, rather than another listed weight polyglycols to high molecular Agency intends to regulate the source category. Facilities within other weight resins. It is therefore appropriate production of these esters under the source categories may generate waste as to move this source category to the separate source category entitled a result of their own production ‘‘polymers and resins production’’ activities, and may elect to treat, store, industry group. ‘‘phthalate plasticizers production,’’ dispose of, or recycle this waste on the under the miscellaneous processes same site. Emissions from these waste 3. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds industry group. The affected chemicals operations will be addressed along with Production are butyl benzyl phthalate, diallyl the other emission points within the This category is more appropriately phthalate, dibutoxy ethyl phthalate, specific source category. This source listed under the heading ‘‘organic diethyl phthalate, diisodecyl phthalate, category specifically addresses only chemicals production,’’ rather than the diisooctyl phthalate, dimethyl activities that manage wastes received ‘‘inorganic chemicals production’’ phthalate, di(2-methoxyethyl) phthalate, from off-site operations. industry group. This compound is and lead phthalate. 28200 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

H. Deletion of Source Categories on the of threat of adverse effect to human year (tpy), which is clearly below the Administrator’s Own Motion health or the environment warranting major source threshold level. In today’s notice, the EPA is deleting regulation, under Section 112(c)(3); it Considering the carcinogenic potency five major source categories on the can list categories of area sources of the chromium compounds emitted, Administrator’s own motion. The emitting the seven specific pollutants, especially those in the hexavalent form, a quantitative risk assessment was principal rationale for deletion of these under Section 112(c)(6); or it can list conducted by EPA to determine if categories is that available data no categories of area sources emitting regulation of area sources would be longer support the determination that certain hazardous air pollutants per the warranted. In making the area source any major sources are present in each criteria of the area source program, finding, the Agency considered factors category. As articulated in the initial list under Section 112(k). The Agency will such as the number of sources in the notice (57 FR 31576), the Agency’s examine area sources in the context of category, the quantity of HAP emissions intent in listing categories of major programs underway to implement these from individual sources and category- sources is one of ‘‘only including various authorities, and list and regulate wide, the toxicity of the HAP emissions, categories of major sources where there specific area sources, as appropriate to and the potential for individual and was reasonable certainty that at least meet the relevant requirements in the Act. The Agency intends to solicit population exposures and risks. one stationary source in the category is Population risks are expressed in terms a major source or where sources in the comment on any future action or strategy specifically proposing to list of annual incidence which is the total category are commonly located on the number of cancer cases expected per premises of major sources.’’ In addition, and regulate particular area source categories under Section 112. year within the exposed population. In one area source category—asbestos contrast, individual risks are expressed processing—has been delisted under a The following does not include the categories of sources which are being in terms of maximum individual separate action; the Agency compiled ‘‘lifetime’’ risks (MIR) which is an newer information which no longer deleted from the list by way of subsumption into other listed indicator of the probability of supported the finding of threat of contracting cancer due to continuous adverse effect on which the initial categories. See Section II.G of this notice for information on these categories. exposure over a lifetime to the listing was based. maximum, modeled, long-term The Agency is not invoking the 1. Asbestos Processing concentration of a HAP discharged from authority within Section 112(c)(9) for The area source category of asbestos a source. deleting source categories. Under Results of the quantitative risk Section 112(c)(9)(B), the EPA may delete processing was included on the initial list, accompanied by a finding of threat assessment shows annual incidence a category of major or area sources from attributable to both plants to be less the list, based on petition of any person of adverse effects to human health. The reader is referred to the original list than 0.01 case per year. The calculated or on the Administrator’s own motion, MIR for both plants ranged from 3 to 7 upon a determination that: (1) In the notice (57 FR 31576) for details of this finding. chances in 100,000. About 200,000 case of sources that emit HAP that may persons are exposed to individual risks During development of the NESHAP result in cancer, no source in the greater than 1 in 1 million. No persons for asbestos processing, the Agency category (or group of sources in the case are exposed to individual risks greater determined that the finding of adverse of area sources) emits HAP in quantities than 1 in 10,000. that may cause lifetime cancer risk effects was based on information which Based on the results of the greater than one chance in one million no longer applies to the asbestos quantitative risk assessment and the fact to the most exposed individual; or, (2) processing industry. Consequently, the that there exists limited opportunities in the case of sources that emit HAP that asbestos processing source category has for additional HAP reductions, due to may result in non-cancer adverse health been deleted from the source category the relatively high levels of control effects or adverse environmental effects, list. For further information regarding already evident at each source, the EPA emissions from no source in the this delisting, the reader is referred to 60 believes that an area source finding for category (or group of sources in the case FR 61550, which was published on the chromium chemicals manufacturing of area sources) exceed a level adequate November 30, 1995. source category is not warranted. to protect public health with an ample 2. Chromium Chemicals Manufacturing margin of safety and no adverse 3. Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing environmental effects will result. The EPA is removing chromium The EPA is removing lead acid battery Instead, in today’s notice, the Agency is chemicals manufacturing from the list of manufacturing from the list of major simply contending that the data categories of major sources. The EPA source categories. Surveys conducted on originally used for listing were has determined that this category this category indicate there are no major erroneous, and that, based on newer contains no major sources. sources currently operating. data, the original listings are not There are only two chromium The lead acid battery manufacturing warranted. chemicals manufacturing facilities in source category includes 84 facilities. For the five major source categories the United States. Chromium Lead compounds are the primary HAP deleted in today’s notice, no action is compounds is the only HAP emitted of concern. A survey of existing taken to list area sources within the from these facilities. Worst case facilities was conducted to determine same category. Any such action would estimates of potential emissions on a annual HAP emissions. Respondents to be taken (and comment requested) chromium compound basis, considering the survey represent more than 90 within the context of other actions both hexavalent and trivalent forms, percent of the total lead acid battery pursuant to the various authorities were compiled for each facility based on production. The highest lead compound under Section 112 for listing area source maximum production capacity and emission rate reported by a facility was categories. The Agency has various actual measured emissions from all 2.8 tpy. authorities for listing and regulating stacks and vents. The resultant estimate In addition, all existing facilities are area source categories under Section of potential HAP emissions for each currently subject to the new source 112, most notably: it can make a finding facility is between 6.0 and 6.5 tons per performance standards (NSPS) for lead Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28201 acid battery manufacturing plants. Any 6. Wood Treatment products, primarily automotive tires, new facilities will also be subject to The EPA is removing the wood belts, and hoses. Other major end uses these standards. The limits from the treatment category from the list of major for carbon black include specialty black NSPS were combined with model plant source categories. Wood treatment is coloring used in toner cartridges for parameters to determine the emission being removed because EPA has copying machines and colorants in inks, levels from large facilities. This analysis determined there are no existing paints, and vinyl plastic. indicated that a large facility would facilities which qualify as a major 2. Ethylene Processes emit a maximum of 5 tpy of lead source. compounds. The finalized HON excluded ethylene Naphthalene, benzene, toluene, processes from applicability under that The Toxic Release Information formaldehyde, pentachloro-phenol, standard and defined the scope of an System (TRIS) data was reviewed for the arsenic compounds, and chromium ethylene process unit as follows: years 1991 and 1992 to determine compounds are the primary HAP ‘‘Ethylene processes’’ includes any emission levels of HAP other than lead emitted from wood treatment facilities chemical manufacturing process unit in compounds. Of the 84 plants, the TRIS that are of potential concern. None of which ethylene and/or propylene are identified two battery manufacturing the existing facilities emit any of these produced by separation from petroleum plants as potential major sources of HAP in sufficient quantities to meet the refining process streams or by subjecting organic HAP. However, upon contacting major source definition. Chromium and hydrocarbons to high temperatures in these plants to obtain current process arsenic compounds are emitted in the presence of steam. The ethylene and emissions information, the EPA quantities less than 100 pounds per process unit includes the separation of determined that the TRIS information year. Pentachlorophenol emissions from ethylene and/or propylene from a ‘‘worst case’’ treatment facility were was no longer applicable. Specifically, associated streams such as a C4 product, one facility had altered part of its estimated to be less than one tpy. pyrolysis gasoline, and pyrolysis fuel process and had not been a major source For creosote treatment facilities, oil. The ethylene process does not since 1992, and the other plant had been emissions test results, combined with include the manufacture of SOCMI originally misclassified in the TRIS and ‘‘worst case’’ estimates of fugitive chemicals such as the production of emissions, were used to determine total was not actually a lead acid battery butadiene from the C4 stream and manufacturer. Based on this emissions of creosote components. aromatics from pyrolysis gasoline. information, the EPA concludes that Emissions of individual HAP were well there are no major sources in the lead under 10 tpy, and total HAP emissions 3. Flexible Polyurethane Foam acid battery manufacturing source were significantly less than 25 tpy. Fabrication Operations category. Therefore, the EPA is deleting this The flexible polyurethane foam category from the source category list fabrication operations source category 4. & 5. Non-Stainless Steel after concluding that there are no major includes facilities engaged in cutting, Manufacturing—Electric Arc Furnace sources in the category. gluing, and/or laminating pieces of (EAF) Operation, Stainless Steel flexible polyurethane foam. This Manufacturing—EAF Operation I. Descriptions of Newly Added Source Categories includes fabrication operations which The EPA is removing the non- are located at the sites of foam The following presents descriptions production plants as well as those stainless and stainless steel electric arc for source categories that have been furnace (EAF) operation categories from which are located off-site of foam added to the list since publication of the plants. Emissions from foam fabrication the list of major source categories. These initial list of source categories, either operations are being removed since primarily result from the use of HAP- through today’s notice or through based adhesives in the gluing process. there are no existing facilities which previous actions. For general qualify as a major source. Methylene chloride is currently the descriptions of other categories most frequently used HAP in adhesives. Arsenic, antimony, beryllium, previously established and listed in cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, Table 1, the reader is referred to Docket 4. Friction Products Manufacturing manganese, mercury, nickel, and No. A–90–49, Item No. IV–A–55 (EPA– This source category includes selenium are believed to be the only 450/3–91–030, entitled ‘‘Documentation facilities and processes that HAP emitted from the EAF source for Developing the Initial Source manufacture or remanufacture friction categories. None of the existing facilities Category List’’). For subsequent changes products including automobile brake emit any of these HAP in sufficient to descriptions of source categories for linings and disc pads. HAP are emitted quantities to meet the major source which a rule has been promulgated, the from solvents added during the definition. Total facility emission reader is advised to consult Table 1 for proportioning and mixing of raw estimates for the EAF source categories the citation of the Federal Register materials and the solvents contained in were calculated by combining actual notice which will include the amended the adhesives used to bond the linings stack emission data with ‘‘worst case’’ definition and corresponding rule to the brake shoes. Most HAP emissions fugitive emission estimates. The results applicability. occur during heated processes such as of this analysis indicated these facilities 1. Carbon Black Manufacturing curing, bonding and debonding would emit about one-half of the processes. Pollutants from friction amount of HAP which would classify This source category includes products facilities include phenol, them as major sources. In addition, facilities that manufacture carbon black toluene, methyl chloroform and existing facilities are already subject to using the channel, thermal, or furnace methylethylketone. the NSPS for EAF operations which process. The primary emission point for regulate the air pollution control device the process offgases from the main filter 5. Leather Tanning and Finishing outlet concentration and visible unit. HAP emitted include carbonyl Operations emissions from the EAF meltshop. Any sulfide, carbon disulfide, and hydrogen The leather tanning and finishing new facilities would also be subject to cyanide. Carbon black is used to color source category includes facilities and the NSPS. and strengthen industrial rubber processes that use chemical and 28202 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices mechanical processes to produce leather 8. Secondary Lead Smelting (Category of and, therefore, is not subject to the having hundreds of different finished Area Sources) Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. characteristics. Leather tanning involves The reader is referred to a June 23, 3501 et seq. primarily wet chemical processes that 1995 notice (60 FR 32587) for specific 2. Executive Order 12866 and Office of produce a stable, usable product. applicability of the secondary lead Management and Budget (OMB) Review Leather finishing involves a number of smelting area source category. conditioning and enhancement Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR processes that give tanned leather III. Administrative Requirements 51735; October 4, 1993), the Agency distinctive and desirable qualities A. Docket must determine whether a regulatory required by end users of the material. action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore The docket for this regulatory action Sources of HAP emissions in the leather subject to OMB review and the is A–90–49. The docket is an organized tanning and finishing processes include requirements of the Executive Order. and complete file of all the information leather finishing operations, The Order defines ‘‘significant’’ submitted to or otherwise considered by waterproofing operations, solvent the Agency in the development of this regulatory action as one that is likely to degreasing operations, and revised list of categories of sources and lead to a rule that may either (1) have miscellaneous fugitive sources. HAP revised schedule for standards. The an annual effect on this economy of from this category include toluene, principal purpose of this docket is to $100 million or more, or adversely and xylene, glycol ethers, methyl isobutyl allow interested parties to identify and materially affecting a sector of the ketone, and methyl ethyl ketone. locate documents that serve as a record economy, productivity, competition, 6. Marine Vessel Loading Operations of the process engaged in by the Agency jobs, the environment, public health or to publish today’s revision to the initial safety, or State, local or tribal This source category includes marine list and schedule. The docket is governments or communities; (2) create terminals which emit HAP from the available for public inspection at the a serious inconsistency or otherwise direct loading and unloading of bulk EPA’s Air and Radiation Docket and interfere with an action taken or liquids from marine vessels. This Information Center, which is listed in planned by another agency; (3) category does not include emissions the ADDRESSES section of this notice. materially alter the budgetary impact of from offshore vessel-to-vessel bulk entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan liquid transfer operations (i.e., lightering B. Regulatory Requirements programs or the rights and obligations of operations). 1. General recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel The reader is also referred to a legal or policy issues arising out of legal Today’s notice is not a rule; it is mandates, the President’s priorities, or September 19, 1995 notice (60 FR essentially a housekeeping or 48399) for specific applicability of the the principles set forth in the Executive maintenance activity which does not Order. marine vessel loading operations source impose regulatory requirements or costs. category. Therefore, the EPA has not prepared an Pursuant to the terms of Executive Order 12866, it has been decided that 7. Nitrile Resins Production assessment of the potential costs and benefits pursuant to Executive Order this is a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ The nitrile resins production source 12866, nor an economic impact analysis within the meaning of the Executive category includes any facility which pursuant to Section 317, nor a Order. For this reason, this action polymerizes acrylonitrile, methyl regulatory flexibility analysis pursuant underwent OMB review. The OMB acrylate, and butadiene latex using an to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. reviewed and released the action emulsion process. 96–354, September 19, 1980), nor a without recommending any changes. The reader is also referred to a March budgetary impact statement pursuant to Dated: May 17, 1996. 29, 1995 notice (60 FR 16090) for the Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995. Mary Nichols, proposed applicability of the nitrile Also, this notice does not contain any Assistant Administrator for Air and resins production source category. information collection requirements Radiation.

TABLE 1.ÐCATEGORIES OF SOURCES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS AND REGULATION PROMULGATION SCHEDULE BY INDUSTRY GROUP [Revision date: May 17, 1996]

Scheduled pro- mulgation Industry group, source category a Date/Federal Register Cita- tion b

Fuel combustion: Engine Test Facilities ...... 11/15/00 Industrial Boilers c ...... 11/15/00 Institutional/Commercial Boilers c ...... 11/15/00 Process Heaters ...... 11/15/00 Stationary Internal Combustion Engines c ...... 11/15/00 Stationary Turbines c ...... 11/15/00 Non-ferrous metals processing: Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing ...... Deleted Primary Aluminum Production ...... 11/15/97 Primary Copper Smelting ...... 11/15/97 Primary Lead Smelting ...... 11/15/97 Primary Magnesium Refining ...... 11/15/00 Secondary Aluminum Production ...... 11/15/97 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28203

TABLE 1.ÐCATEGORIES OF SOURCES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS AND REGULATION PROMULGATION SCHEDULE BY INDUSTRY GROUPÐContinued [Revision date: May 17, 1996]

Scheduled pro- mulgation Industry group, source category a Date/Federal Register Cita- tion b

Secondary Lead Smelting ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 32587 (F) Ferrous metals processing: Coke By-Product Plants ...... 11/15/00 Coke Ovens: Charging, Top Side, and Door Leaks ...... 12/31/92 58 FR 57898 (F) 59 FR 01922 (C) Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks ...... 11/15/00 Ferroalloys Production ...... 11/15/97 Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Iron Foundries ...... 11/15/00 Non-Stainless Steel ManufacturingÐElectric Arc Furnace (EAF) Operation ...... Deleted Stainless Steel ManufacturingÐElectric Arc Furnace (EAF) Operation ...... Deleted Steel Foundries ...... 11/15/00 Steel PicklingÐHCl Process ...... 11/15/97 Mineral products processing: Alumina Processing ...... 11/15/00 Asphalt Concrete Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Asphalt Processing ...... 11/15/00 Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Asphalt/Coal Tar ApplicationÐMetal Pipes ...... 11/15/00 Chromium Refractories Production ...... 11/15/00 Clay Products Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Lime Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Mineral Wool Production ...... 11/15/97 Portland Cement Manufacturing ...... 11/15/97 Taconite Iron Ore Processing ...... 11/15/00 Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing ...... 11/15/97 Petroleum and natural gas production and refining: Oil and Natural Gas Production ...... 11/15/97 Petroleum RefineriesÐCatalytic Cracking (Fluid and other) Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur Plant Units ...... 11/15/97 Petroleum RefineriesÐOther Sources Not Distinctly Listed ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 43244 (F) 60 FR 49976 (C) Liquids distribution: Gasoline Distribution (Stage 1) ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 64303 (F) 60 FR 07627 (C) 60 FR 32912 (C) 60 FR 43244 (A) 60 FR 56133 (a) 60 FR 62991 (S) Marine Vessel Loading Operations ...... 11/15/00 60 FR 48399 (F) Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline) ...... 11/15/00 Surface coating processes: Aerospace Industries ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 45948 (F) Auto and Light Duty Truck (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Flat Wood Paneling (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Large Appliance (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Magnetic Tapes (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 64580 (F) Manufacture of Paints, Coatings, and Adhesives ...... 11/15/00 Metal Can (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Metal Coil (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Metal Furniture (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Paper and Other Webs (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 Plastic Parts and Products (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/00 28204 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

TABLE 1.ÐCATEGORIES OF SOURCES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS AND REGULATION PROMULGATION SCHEDULE BY INDUSTRY GROUPÐContinued [Revision date: May 17, 1996]

Scheduled pro- mulgation Industry group, source category a Date/Federal Register Cita- tion b

Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics ...... 11/15/00 Printing/Publishing (Surface Coating) g ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 13664 (P) 60 FR 16920 (C) Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 64330 (F) Wood Furniture (Surface Coating) ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 62930 (F) Waste treatment and disposal: Hazardous Waste Incineration ...... 11/15/00 Municipal Landfills ...... 11/15/00 Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations f ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 51913 (P) 59 FR 65744 (R) Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) Emissions ...... 11/15/95 Sewage Sludge Incineration ...... 11/15/00 Site Remediation ...... 11/15/00 Solid Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (TSDF) ...... Renamed Agricultural chemicals production: 4-Chloro-2-Methylphenoxyacetic Acid Production ...... 11/15/97 2,4-D Salts and Esters Production ...... 11/15/97 Butadiene-Furfural Cotrimer (R±11) Production d ...... 11/15/00 Captafol Production d ...... 11/15/97 Captan Production d ...... 11/15/97 Chloroneb Production d ...... 11/15/97 Chlorothalonil Production d ...... 11/15/97 Dacthal (tm) Production d ...... 11/15/97 Sodium Pentachlorophenate Production g ...... 11/15/97 Tordon (tm) Acid Production d ...... 11/15/97 Fibers production processes: Acrylic Fibers/Modacrylic Fibers Production ...... 11/15/97 Rayon Production ...... 11/15/00 Spandex Production ...... 11/15/00 Food and agriculture processes: Baker's Yeast Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Cellulose Food Casting Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Vegetable Oil Production ...... 11/15/00 Pharmaceutical production processes: Pharmaceuticals Production d ...... 11/15/97 Polymers and resins production: Acetal Resins Production ...... 11/15/97 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 16090 (P) Alkyd Resins Production ...... 11/15/00 Amino Resins Production ...... 11/15/97 Boat Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Butadiene Furfural Cotrimer (R±11) Production ...... Moved Butyl Rubber Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Carboxymethylcellulose Production ...... 11/15/00 Cellophane Production ...... 11/15/00 Cellulose Ethers Production ...... 11/15/00 Epichlorohydrin Elastomers Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Epoxy Resins Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 12670 (F) Ethylene-Propylene Rubber Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28205

TABLE 1.ÐCATEGORIES OF SOURCES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS AND REGULATION PROMULGATION SCHEDULE BY INDUSTRY GROUPÐContinued [Revision date: May 17, 1996]

Scheduled pro- mulgation Industry group, source category a Date/Federal Register Cita- tion b

Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production ...... 11/15/97 Hypalon (tm) Production d ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Maleic Anhydride Copolymers Production ...... 11/15/00 Methylcellulose Production ...... 11/15/00 Methyl Methacrylate-Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Production d ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 16090 (P) Methyl Methacrylate-Butadiene-Styrene Terpolymers Production d ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 16090 (P) Neoprene Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Nitrile Butadiene Rubber Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Nitrile Resins Production ...... 11/15/00 60 FR 16090 (P) Non-Nylon Polyamides Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 12670 (F) Nylon 6 Production ...... 11/15/97 Phenolic Resins Production ...... 11.15.97 Polybutadiene Rubber Production d ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Polycarbonates Production d ...... 11/15/97 Polyester Resins Production ...... 11/15/00 Polyether Polyols Production ...... 11/15/97 Polyethylene Terephthalate Production g ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 16090 (P) Polymerized Vinylidene Chloride Production ...... 11/15/00 Polymethyl Methacrylate Resins Production ...... 11/15/00 Polystyrene Production ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 16090 (P) Polysulfide Rubber Production d ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 30801 (P) Polyvinyl Acetate Emulsions Production ...... 11/15/00 Polyvinyl Alcohol Production ...... 11/15/00 Polyvinyl Butyral Production ...... 11/15/00 Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production ...... 11/15/00 Reinforced Plastic Composites Production ...... 11/15/97 Styrene-Acrylonitrile Production g ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 16090 (P) Styrene-Butadiene Rubber and Latex Production d ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 3080 (P) Production of inorganic chemicals: Ammonium Sulfate ProductionÐCaprolactam By-Product Plants ...... 11/15/00 Antimony Oxides Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Carbon Black Production ...... 11/15/00 Chlorine Production d ...... 11/15/97 Chromium Chemicals Manufacturing ...... Deleted Cyanuric Chloride Production ...... 11/15/97 Fume Silica Production ...... 11/15/00 Hydrochloric Acid Production ...... 11/15/00 Hydrogen Cyanide Production ...... 11/15/97 Hydrogen Fluoride Production ...... 11/15/00 Phosphate Fertilizers Production ...... 11/15/00 Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Production ...... Moved 28206 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

TABLE 1.ÐCATEGORIES OF SOURCES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS AND REGULATION PROMULGATION SCHEDULE BY INDUSTRY GROUPÐContinued [Revision date: May 17, 1996]

Scheduled pro- mulgation Industry group, source category a Date/Federal Register Cita- tion b

Sodium Cyanide Production ...... 11/15/97 Uranium Hexafluoride Production ...... 11/15/00 Production of organic chemicals Ethylene Processes ...... 11/15/00 Quarternary Ammonium Compounds Production ...... 11/15/00 Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing ...... 11/15/92 59 FR 19402 (F) 59 FR 29196 (A) 59 FR 48175 (C) 59 FR 53359 (S) 59 FR 53392 (a) 59 FR 54131 (S) 59 FR 54154 (a) 60 FR 05320 (S) 60 FR 18020 (A) 60 FR 18071 (a) Miscellaneous processes Aerosol Can-Filling Facilities ...... 11/15/00 Benzyltrimethylammonium Chloride Production ...... 11/15/00 Butadiene Dimers Production ...... Renamed Carbonyl Sulfide Production ...... 11/15/00 Chelating Agents Production ...... 11/15/00 Chlorinated Paraffins Production d ...... 11/15/00 Chromic Acid Anodizing ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 04948 (F) 60 FR 27598 (C) 60 FR 33122 (C) Commercial Dry Cleaning (Perchloroethylene)ÐTransfer Machines ...... 11/15/92 58 FR 49354 (F) 58 FR 66287 (A) Commercial Sterilization Facilities ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 62585 (F) Decorative Chromium Electroplating ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 04948 (F) 60 FR 27598 (C) 60 FR 33122 (C) Dodecanedioic Acid Production ...... Subsumed Dry Cleaning (Petroleum Solvent) ...... 11/15/00 Ethylidene Norbornene Production d ...... 11/15/00 Explosives Production ...... 11/15/00 Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operations ...... 11/15/00 Friction Products Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Halogenated Solvent Cleaners ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 61801 (F) 59 FR 67750 (C) 60 FR 29484 (C) Hard Chromium Electroplating ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 04948 (F) 60 FR 27598 (C) 60 FR 33122 (C) Hydrazine Production ...... 11/15/00 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28207

TABLE 1.ÐCATEGORIES OF SOURCES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS AND REGULATION PROMULGATION SCHEDULE BY INDUSTRY GROUPÐContinued [Revision date: May 17, 1996]

Scheduled pro- mulgation Industry group, source category a Date/Federal Register Cita- tion b

Industrial Cleaning (Perchloroethylene)ÐDry-to-dry machines ...... 11/15/92 58 FR 49354 (F) 58 FR 66287 (A) Industrial Dry Cleaning (Perchloroethylene)ÐTransfer Machines ...... 11/15/92 58 FR 49354 (F) 58 FR 66287 (A) Industrial Process Cooling Towers ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 46339 (F) Leather Tanning and Finishing Operations ...... 11/15/00 OBPA/1,3-Diisocyanate Production d ...... 11/15/00 Paint Stripper Users ...... 11/15/00 Photographic Chemicals Production ...... 11/15/00 Phthalate Plasticizers Production ...... 11/15/00 Plywood/Particle Board Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Polyether Polyols Production ...... Moved Pulp and Paper Production ...... 11/15/97 58 FR 66078 (P) 59 FR 12567 (C) 61 FR 09383 (P) Rocket Engine Test Firing ...... 11/15/00 Rubber Chemicals Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Semiconductor Manufacturing ...... 11/15/00 Symmetrical Tetrachloropyridine Production d ...... 11/15/00 Tetrahydrobenzaldehyde Production ...... 11/15/97 Tire Production ...... 11/15/00 Wood Treatment ...... Deleted Categories of area sources: e Asbestos Processing ...... Deleted Chromic Acid Anodizing ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 04948 (F) 60 FR 27598 (C) 60 FR 33122 (C)

Commercial Dry Cleaning (Perchloroethylene)ÐDry-to-Dry Machines ...... 11/15/92 58 FR 49354 (F) 58 FR 66287 (A) Commercial Dry Cleaning (Perchloroethylene) Transfer Machines ...... 11/15/92 58 FR 49354 (F) 58 FR 66287 (A) Commercial Sterilization Facilities ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 62585 (F)

Decorative Chromium Electroplating ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 04948 (F) 60 FR 27598 (C) 60 FR 33122 (C)

Halogenated Solvent Cleaners ...... 11/15/94 59 FR 61801 (F) 59 FR 67750 (C) 60 FR 29484 (C) 28208 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

TABLE 1.ÐCATEGORIES OF SOURCES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS AND REGULATION PROMULGATION SCHEDULE BY INDUSTRY GROUPÐContinued [Revision date: May 17, 1996]

Scheduled pro- mulgation Industry group, source category a Date/Federal Register Cita- tion b

Hard Chromium Electroplating ...... 11/15/94 60 FR 04948 (F) 60 FR 27598 (C) 60 FR 33122 (C)

Secondary Lead Smelting ...... 11/15/00 60 FR 32587 (F) a Only major sources within any category shall be subject to emission standards under Section 112 unless a finding is made of a threat of ad- verse effects to human health or the environment for the area sources in a category. All listed categories are exclusive of any specific operations or processes included under other categories that are listed separately. b The markings in the ``Scheduled Promulgation Date/FEDERAL REGISTER Citation'' column of Table 1 denote the following: (A): amendment to a final rulemaking action (A): proposed amendment to a final rulemaking action (C): correction (or clarification) published subsequent to a proposed or final rulemaking action (F): final rulemaking action (P): proposed rulemaking action (R): reopening of a proposed action for public comment (S): announcement of a stay, or partial stay, of the rule requirements Moved: the source category is relocated to a more appropriate industry group Subsumed: the source category is included within the definition of another listed category and therefore is no longer listed as a separate source category Renamed: the title of this source category is changed to a more appropriate title Deleted: the source category is officially removed from the source category list c Sources defined as electric utility steam generating units under Section 112 (A)(8) shall not be subject to emission standards pending the findings of the study required under Section 112(n)(1). d Equipment handling specific chemicals for these categories or subsets of these categories are subject to a negotiated standard for equipment leaks contained in the Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON), which was promulgated on April 22, 1994. The HON includes a negotiated standard for equipment leaks from the SOCMI category and 20 non-SOCMI categories (or subsets of these categories). The specific processes affected within the categories are listed in Section XX.X0 (C) of the March 6, 1991 FEDERAL REGISTER notice (56 FR 9315). e A finding of threat of adverse effects to human health or the environment was made for each category of area sources listed. The following footnotes apply to source categories that are subject to court ordered promulgation deadlines (differing from the above listed reg- ulatory deadlines) in accordance with a consent decree entered in Sierra Club v. Browner, Case No. 93±0124 (And related cases) (D.C. Dist. Ct.). f judicial deadline: 05/13/96 g judicial deadline: 05/15/96

[FR Doc. 96–13824 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] express their views in writing to the Indianapolis, Indiana, and thereby BILLING CODE 6560±50±P Reserve Bank indicated for that notice indirectly acquire First Bank & Trust or to the offices of the Board of Co., Sullivan, Indiana, and First Governors. Comments must be received National Bank, Kokomo, Indiana. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM not later than June 18, 1996. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Change in Bank Control Notices; A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta System, May 29, 1996. Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 104 William W. Wiles, Bank Holding Companies Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia Secretary of the Board. The notificants listed below have 30303: [FR Doc. 96–13862 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] applied under the Change in Bank 1. Shari K. Jones, Rainsville, Alabama; BILLING CODE 6210±01±F Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § to retain a total of 38 percent of the 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 voting shares of First State Bancshares Formations of, Acquisitions by, and CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank of DeKalb County, Inc., Fort Payne, Mergers of Bank Holding Companies holding company. The factors that are Alabama, and thereby indirectly retain The companies listed in this notice considered in acting on the notices are shares of First State Bank of DeKalb have applied to the Board for approval, set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 County, Fort Payne, Alabama. pursuant to the Bank Holding Company U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) The notices are available for (James A. Bluemle, Vice President) 230 (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part immediate inspection at the Federal South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 225), and all other applicable statutes Reserve Bank indicated. Once the 60690: and regulations to become a bank notices have been accepted for 1. Anna Ruth Hasten and Simona holding company and/or to acquire the processing, they will also be available Hasten, both of Indianapolis, Indiana; to assets or the ownership of, control of, or for inspection at the offices of the Board each acquire a total of 45 percent of the the power to vote shares of a bank or of Governors. Interested persons may voting shares of Hasten Bancshares, bank holding company and all of the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28209 banks and nonbanking companies C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas accompanied by a statement of the owned by the bank holding company, (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 2200 reasons a written presentation would including the companies listed below. North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201- not suffice in lieu of a hearing, The applications listed below, as well 2272: identifying specifically any questions of as other related filings required by the 1. Paris Bancshares, Inc., Paris, Texas; fact that are in dispute, summarizing the Board, are available for immediate to become a bank holding company by evidence that would be presented at a inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank acquiring 100 percent of the voting hearing, and indicating how the party indicated. Once the application has shares of LNB Financial Corp., Dover, commenting would be aggrieved by been accepted for processing, it will also Delaware, and thereby indirectly approval of the proposal. be available for inspection at the offices acquire The Liberty National Bank in Unless otherwise noted, comments of the Board of Governors. Interested Paris, Paris, Texas. regarding the applications must be persons may express their views in In connection with this application, received at the Reserve Bank indicated writing on the standards enumerated in LNB Financial Corp., Dover, Delaware; or the offices of the Board of Governors the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the also has applied to become a bank not later than June 18, 1996. proposal also involves the acquisition of holding company by acquiring 100 A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta a nonbanking company, the review also percent of the voting shares of The (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 104 includes whether the acquisition of the Liberty National Bank in Paris, Paris, Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia nonbanking company complies with the Texas. 30303: standards in section 4 of the BHC Act, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 1. MidSouth Bancorp, Inc., Lafayette, including whether the acquisition of the System, May 29, 1996. Louisiana; to engage de novo through its nonbanking company can ‘‘reasonably William W. Wiles, subsidiary, Financial Services of the be expected to produce benefits to the Secretary of the Board. South, Inc., Lafayette, Louisiana, in public, such as greater convenience, [FR Doc. 96–13861 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] consumer finance activities, pursuant to § 225.25(b)(1)(i) of the Board’s increased competition, or gains in BILLING CODE 6210±01±F efficiency, that outweigh possible Regulation Y, and in credit insurance adverse effects, such as undue activities, pursuant to § 225.25(b)(8)(ii) concentration of resources, decreased or Notice of Proposals to Engage in of the Board’s Regulation Y. unfair competition, conflicts of Permissible Nonbanking Activities or B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago interests, or unsound banking practices’’ to Acquire Companies that are (James A. Bluemle, Vice President) 230 (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois a hearing must be accompanied by a Activities 60690: statement of the reasons a written 1. Palos Bancshares, Inc., Palos The companies listed in this notice Heights, Illinois; to acquire through its presentation would not suffice in lieu of have given notice under section 4 of the a hearing, identifying specifically any subsidiary, Palos Bank and Trust Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. Company, Palos Heights, Illinois, 33.3 questions of fact that are in dispute, 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation summarizing the evidence that would percent of the voting shares of Northern Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, Illinois Financial Services, LLC, be presented at a hearing, and indicating or to acquire or control voting securities how the party commenting would be Willowbrook, Illinois, and thereby or assets of a company that engages indirectly acquire Serve Corps Mortgage aggrieved by approval of the proposal. either directly or through a subsidiary or Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking Services, LLC, Downers Grove, Illinois, other company, in a nonbanking activity and engage in making and servicing activities will be conducted throughout that is listed in § 225.25 of Regulation the United States. loans, pursuant to § 225.25(b)(1) of the Y (12 CFR 225.25) or that the Board has Board’s Regulation Y. Unless otherwise noted, comments determined by Order to be closely 2. Hinsbrook Bancshares, Inc., regarding each of these applications related to banking and permissible for Willowbrook, Illinois; through its must be received at the Reserve Bank bank holding companies. Unless subsidiary, Hinsbrook Bank and Trust, indicated or the offices of the Board of otherwise noted, these activities will be Willowbrook, Illinois, to acquire 33.3 Governors not later than June 28, 1996. conducted throughout the United States. percent of the voting shares of Northern A. Federal Reserve Bank of Each notice is available for inspection Illinois Financial Services, LLC, Richmond (Lloyd W. Bostian, Jr., Senior at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Willowbrook, Illinois, and thereby Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Once the notice has been accepted for indirectly acquire Serve Corps Mortgage Richmond, Virginia 23261: processing, it will also be available for Services, LLC, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1. South Street Financial Corp., inspection at the offices of the Board of and engage in making and servicing Albemarle, North Carolina; to become a Governors. Interested persons may loans, pursuant to § 225.25(b)(1) of the bank holding company by acquiring 100 express their views in writing on the Board’s Regulation Y. percent of the voting shares of Home question whether the proposal complies Savings Bank of Albemarle, Inc., S.S.B., with the standards of section 4 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Albemarle, North Carolina. BHC Act, including whether System, May 29, 1996. B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago consummation of the proposal can William W. Wiles, (James A. Bluemle, Vice President) 230 ‘‘reasonably be expected to produce Secretary of the Board. South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois benefits to the public, such as greater [FR Doc. 96–13863 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] 60690: convenience, increased competition, or BILLING CODE 6210±01±F 1. Community Central Bank gains in efficiency, that outweigh Corporation, Mount Clemens, Michigan; possible adverse effects, such as undue to become a bank holding company by concentration of resources, decreased or Federal Open Market Committee; acquiring 100 percent of the voting unfair competition, conflicts of Domestic Policy Directive of March 26, shares of Community Central Bank, interests, or unsound banking practices’’ 1996 Mount Clemens, Michigan (in (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a In accordance with § 271.5 of its rules organization). hearing on this question must be regarding availability of information (12 28210 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

CFR part 271), there is set forth below behavior of the monetary aggregates will GENERAL SERVICES the domestic policy directive issued by continue to be evaluated in the light of ADMINISTRATION the Federal Open Market Committee at progress toward price level stability, its meeting held on March 26, 1996.1 Federal Telecommunications movements in their velocities, and Standards The directive was issued to the Federal developments in the economy and Reserve Bank of New York as follows: financial markets. AGENCY: Office of Policy, Planning and Many of the data for recent months Evaluation, GSA. reviewed at this meeting were In the implementation of policy for influenced to an uncertain degree by the immediate future, the Committee ACTION: Notice of comments on unusually severe winter weather, seeks to maintain the existing degree of proposed interim Federal industrial strikes, and U.S. government pressure on reserve positions. In the Telecommunications Standards. shutdowns. On balance, the expansion context of the Committee’s long-run SUMMARY: The purpose of the notice is in economic activity appears to have objectives for price stability and solicit the views of Federal agencies, picked up after slowing appreciably in sustainable economic growth, and industry, the public, and State and local late 1995. Nonfarm payroll employment giving careful consideration to governments on proposed interim surged in February, considerably more economic, financial, and monetary Federal Telecommunications Standards: than offsetting a large drop in January, developments, slightly greater reserve 001101 Telecommunications: Land and the civilian unemployment rate fell restraint or slightly lesser reserve Mobile Radio Project 25 ‘‘System and to 5.5 percent. Manufacturing restraint would be acceptable in the Standards Definition’’; 001102, production increased sharply in intermeeting period. The contemplated Telecommunications: Land Mobile February after a sizable decline in reserve conditions are expected to be Radio Project 25 ‘‘Common Air January. Growth of consumer spending, consistent with moderate growth in M2 Interface’’; 001104, which had been sluggish earlier in the and M3 over coming months. Telecommunications: Land Mobile winter, spurted in February, paced by By order of the Federal Open Market Radio Project 25 ‘‘Encryption’’; 001107 strong motor vehicle purchases. Committee, May 29, 1996. Telecommunications: Land Mobile Housing starts rose in January and Donald L. Kohn, Radio Project 25 ‘‘Transceiver February. Orders and contracts point to Performance and Measurement continuing expansion of spending on Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee. Methods’’; and 001108, business equipment and nonresidential [FR Doc. 96–13860 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Telecommunications: Land Mobile structures. The nominal deficit on U.S. BILLING CODE 6210±01±F Radio Project 25 ‘‘Vocoder’’. trade in goods and services narrowed substantially in the fourth quarter from Sunshine Act Meeting DATES: Comments are due on or before its average rate in the third quarter. July 5, 1996. AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of There has been no clear change in ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Governors of the Federal Reserve underlying inflation trends. General Services Administration, Office Changes in short-term market interest System. of Information Technology, Policy and rates have been mixed while long-term TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, June Regulations Division (MKR), 18th and F rates have risen appreciably since the 10, 1996. Streets, NW, Room 3224, Washington, Committee meeting on January 30-31. In PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal DC 20405. (Attn. LMR Stds). foreign exchange markets, the trade- Reserve Board Building, C Street weighted value of the dollar in terms of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the other G-10 currencies has declined entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, Mr. Keith Thurston, General Services slightly over the intermeeting period. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551. Administration, telephone (202) 501– Growth of M2 and M3 has STATUS: Closed. 3194. strengthened considerably in recent MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. The months, while expansion in total 1. Personnel actions (appointments, General Services Administration (GSA) domestic nonfinancial debt has promotions, assignments, reassignments, and is responsible under the provisions of remained moderate on balance. salary actions) involving individual Federal the Federal Property and Administrative The Federal Open Market Committee Reserve System employees. Services Act of 1949, as amended for the seeks monetary and financial conditions 2. Any items carried forward from a Federal Standardization Program that will foster price stability and previously announced meeting. 2. On October 4, 1994, a notice was promote sustainable growth in output. published in the Federal Register (59 FR In furtherance of these objectives, the CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 50630) that proposed the above interim Committee at its meeting in January Federal Telecommunications Standards established ranges for growth of M2 and Board; (202) 452–3204. You may call (202) 452–3207, beginning at for Land Mobile Radios (LMR). Due to M3 of 1 to 5 percent and 2 to 6 percent the on-going level of interest in these respectively, measured from the fourth approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a recorded Standards, GSA is providing this quarter of 1995 to the fourth quarter of additional public comment period to announcement of bank and bank 1996. The monitoring range for growth provide a final opportunity for all holding company applications of total domestic nonfinancial debt was parties to provide comments. set at 3 to 7 percent for the year. The scheduled for the meeting. Dated: May 31, 1996. 3. The justification package as approved by the Federal 1 Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open William W. Wiles, Market Committee meeting of March 26, 1996, Telecommunications Standards which include the domestic policy directive issued Secretary of the Board. Committee (FTSC) and the National at that meeting, are available upon request to the [FR Doc. 96–14132 Filed 5–31–96; 3:41 pm] Communications Systems (NCS) was Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, BILLING CODE 6210±01±P Washington, D.C. 20551. The minutes are published presented to GSA by NCS with a in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board’s recommendation for adoption of the annual report. standards. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28211

4. Interim Federal for other localities still in the process of establishment of such a rate when Telecommunications Standards are non- review which will impact different time special or unusual circumstances result mandatory. periods. in an extreme increase in subsistence 5. LMR standards, also called Project EFFECTIVE DATES: These special rates are costs for a temporary period. The 25, is a joint effort that includes state applicable to claims for reimbursement Departments of Commerce and Justice governments, represented by the covering travel to the Atlanta area in requested establishment of such a rate National-Association of State Georgia during the period June 20 for areas impacted by the 1996 Olympic Telecommunications Directors through August 25, 1996; and to the Games to accommodate employees who (NASTD), and local governments Peachtree City and Newnan areas of perform temporary duty there and represented by the Association of Georgia during the period June 25 experience a temporary but significant Public-safety Communications Officials, through August 6, 1996. increase in lodging costs due to the (APCO) to develop common standards FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: escalation of lodging prices. These for (LMR). Devoanna R. Reels, General Services circumstances justify the need for 6. Proposed Interim Federal Standard Administration, Travel and higher subsistence expense 001101 will adopt Telecommunication Transportation Management Policy reimbursement for designated localities Industry Association (TIA) TSB 102. Division (MTT), Washington, DC 20405, as specified in paragraph 3, below. Proposed Interim Federal Standard telephone 202–501–1538. 3. Maximum rate, effective date, and 001102 will adopt TIA TSB 102BAAA SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The affected localities. The Administrator of and TIA TSB 102BAAB (now in draft). Administrator of General Services, General Services, pursuant to 41 CFR Proposed Interim Federal Standard pursuant to 41 CFR 301–8.3(c) and at 301–8.3(c), has increased the maximum 001104 will adopt TIA Interim Standard the request of the Departments of daily amount of reimbursement that 102AAAA and National Security Commerce and Justice, increased the may be approved for actual and Agency Specification V23–94–1 (for the maximum daily amount of necessary subsistence expenses for encryption of classified information). reimbursement that agencies may official travel to some Georgia localities Proposed Interim Federal Standard approve for actual and necessary as sites for the 1996 Olympic Games. 001107 will adopt TIA TSB 102CAAA subsistence expenses for official travel This special reimbursement rate applied and TSB 102CAAB (now in draft). to certain Georgia areas impacted by the for travel to the following areas of Proposed Interim Federal Standard 1996 Olympic Games. The attached Georgia: 001108 will adopt TIA Interim Standard GSA Bulletin FTR 19 is issued to inform Atlanta Area 102BABA. agencies of the establishment of this 7. Requests for copies of the proposed special actual subsistence expense Counties of Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Interim Federal Standard 001101, ceiling. Fulton, and Gwinnett; a higher actual 001102, 001104, 001107, and 001108 subsistence expense reimbursement rate Dated: May 23, 1996. should be directed to the National not to exceed $357 ($323 maximum for Communications System. Office of Becky Rhodes, lodging and a $34 allowance for meals Technology and Standards, Attn: NT, Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of and incidental expenses (M&IE)) for 701 South Court House Road, Arlington, Transportation and Personal Property. Federal employee travel during the VA 22204–2198. Attachment period June 20 through August 25, 1996. Dated: May 22, 1996 [GSA Bulletin FTR 19] Peachtree City and Newnan Areas G. Martin Wagner, Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, May 23, 1996 Counties of Fayette and Coweta, Planning and Evaluation. TO: Heads of Federal agencies. respectively; a higher actual subsistence [FR Doc. 96–13895 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] SUBJECT: Reimbursement of higher expense reimbursement rate not to exceed $151 ($125 maximum for BILLING CODE 6820±25±M actual subsistence expenses for official travel to per diem localities lodging and a $26 allowance) for impacted by the Atlanta, Georgia, Federal employee travel during the [GSA Bulletin FTR 19] 1996 Olympic Games. period June 25 through August 6, 1996. 1. Purpose. This bulletin informs 4. Other proposed localities. The Federal Travel Regulation; agencies of the establishment of a General Services Administration (GSA) Reimbursement of Higher Actual special actual subsistence expense has received a number of inquiries Subsistence Expenses for Official ceiling for official travel to locations in concerning extraordinary expenses that Travel to Per Diem Localities Impacted the state of Georgia, and other proposed will be incurred by Federal employees by the Atlanta, Georgia, 1996 Olympic surrounding areas, due to the escalation required to perform official travel Games of lodging rates during the 1996 during the 1996 Olympic Games. Other AGENCY: Office of Policy, Planning and Olympic Games. This special rate Federal agencies have identified Evaluation, GSA. applies to claims for reimbursement differing localities and time frames for ACTION: Notice of bulletin. covering travel during periods as consideration. Because of the specified in paragraph 3, below. extraordinary nature created by these SUMMARY: The attached bulletin informs 2. Background. The Federal Travel unusual circumstances, it is anticipated agencies of the establishment of a Regulation (FTR) (41 CFR chapters 301– that higher actual subsistence expense special actual subsistence expense 304) part 308–8 permits the reimbursement rates will be approved ceiling for official travel to locations in Administrator of General Services to for other localities which will impact the state of Georgia, and other proposed establish a higher maximum daily rate different time periods. In order to keep surrounding areas, due to the escalation for the reimbursement of actual Federal agencies apprised, GSA will of lodging rates during the 1996 subsistence expenses of Federal issue supplements, as necessary, to this Olympic Games. it is anticipated that employees on official travel to an area bulletin. higher actual subsistence expense within the continental United States. 5. Expiration date. This bulletin reimbursement rates will be approved The head of an agency may request expires on December 31, 1996. 28212 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

6. For further information contact. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Capital Region) shall be conducted on Devoanna R. Reels, General Services Wisnowski, Office of GSA Acquisition an unrestricted basis. Administration, Travel and Policy, (202) 501–1224. Procurements for architect-engineer Transportation Management Policy SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: services issued by contracting activities Division (MTT), Washington, DC 20405, Procurements of construction or trash/ in Regions 3, 4, 5, 9, and the National telephone 202–501–1538. garbage collection with an estimated Capital Region shall be set aside for [FR Doc. 96–13902 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] value of $25,000 or less will be reserved small business when there is a reasonable expectation of obtaining BILLING CODE 6820±24±M for emerging small business concerns in accordance with the procedures competition from two or more small outlined in the interim policy directive businesses. If no expectation exists, the Change in Solicitation Procedures issued by the Office of Federal procurements may be conducted on an Under the Small Business Procurement Policy (58 FR 13513, unrestricted basis. Competitiveness Demonstration March 11, 1993). Region 3 encompasses the states of Program Procurement of construction or trash/ Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, garbage collection with an estimated Maryland (except Montgomery and AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, Prince Georges counties), and Virginia GSA. value that exceeds $25,000 by GSA contracting activities will be made in (except the city of Alexandria and the ACTION: Notice. accordance with the following counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William). SUMMARY: Title VII of the ‘‘Business procedures; Region 4 encompasses the states of Opportunity Development Reform Act Construction Services in Groups 15, 16, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, of 1988’’ (Public Law 100–656) and 17: North Carolina, South Carolina, established the Small Business Procurement for all construction Mississippi, and Tennessee. Competitiveness Demonstration services (except solicitations issued by Region 5 encompasses the states of Program and designated nine (9) GSA contracting activities in Regions 1, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, agencies, including GSA, to conduct the 3, 5, 6, and 9 in SIC Group 15) shall be Minnesota, and Wisconsin. program over a four (4) year period from conducted on an unrestricted basis. January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1992. Region 9 encompasses the states of Procurements for construction Arizona, California, Hawaii, and The Small Business Opportunity services in SIC Group 15 issued by GSA Enhancement Act of 1992 (Public Law Nevada. contracting activities in Regions 1, 3, 5, The National Capital Region 102–366) extended the demonstration 6, and 9 shall be set aside for small program until September 1996 and encompasses the District of Columbia, business when there is a reasonable Montgomery and Prince Georges made certain changes in the procedures expectation of obtaining competition for operation of the demonstration counties in Maryland, and the city of from two or more small businesses. If no Alexandria and the counties of program. The law designated four (4) expectation exists, the procurements industry groups for testing whether the Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince will be conducted on an unrestricted William in Virginia. competitive capabilities of the specified basis. Non-nuclear ship repair: industry groups will enable them to Region 1 encompasses the states of successfully compete on an unrestricted Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, GSA does not procure non-nuclear basis. The four (4) industry groups are: New Hampshire, Rhode Island and ship repairs. construction (except dredging); Vermont. Dated: May 24, 1996. architectural and engineering (A&E) Region 3 encompasses the states of Ida M. Ustad, services (including surveying and Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, mapping); refuse systems and related Deputy Associate Administrator for Maryland (except Montgomery and Acquisition Policy. services (limited to trash/garbage Prince Georges counties), and Virginia collection); and non-nuclear ship repair. [FR Doc. 96–13896 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] (except the city of Alexandria and the BILLING CODE 6820±61±M Under the program, when a counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, participating agency misses its small and Prince William). business participation goal, restricted Region 5 encompasses the states of competition is reinstituted only for DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, HUMAN SERVICES those contracting activities that failed to Minnesota, and Wisconsin. attain the goal. The small business goal Region 6 encompasses the states of is 40 percent of the total contract dollars Administration for Children and Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska. Families awarded for construction, trash/garbage Region 9 encompasses the states of collection services, and non-nuclear Arizona, California, Hawaii, and Submission for OMB Review; ship repair and 35 percent of the total Nevada. Comment Request contract dollars awarded for architect- Trash/garbage collection services in PSC engineer services. This notice Title: Job Opportunity Basic Skills S205: announces modifications to GSA’s (JOBS) Participation Rate Quarterly solicitation practices under the Procurement for trash/garbage Report. demonstration program based on a collection services in PSC S205 will be OMB No.: 0970–0112. review of the agency’s performance conducted on an unrestricted basis. Description: Jobs participants data during the period from April 1, 1995 to Architect-Engineer services (all PSC collection form ACF–108. States are March 31, 1996. Modifications to codes under the Demonstration required to report participants’ solicitation practices are outlined in the Program): characteristics on a monthly basis. The Supplementary Information section Procurements for all architect- information received from this below and apply to solicitations issued engineer services (except procurements collection will provide the data base to on or after July 1, 1996. issued by contracting activities in GSA analyze and evaluate the JOBS program EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1996. Regions 3, 4, 5, 9, and the National relevant to the degree in which States Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28213 are assisting participants to achieve self- sufficient information to adequately Respondents: State, Local or Tribal sufficiency and reduce welfare respond to inquires from Congress and governments. dependency, and provide ACF with other interested parties.

ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES

Number of Average Number of responses burden Total bur- Instrument respondents per re- hours per den hours spondent response

ACF±108 ...... 54 21 2 1,296 Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,296.

Additional Information: Copies of the [phthalocyaninato(2-)] copper as a color publishes abstracts of information proposed collection may be obtained by additive in nonabsorbable collection requests under review by the writing to The Administration for polyvinylidene fluoride sutures Office of Management and Budget, in Children and Families, Office of intended for use in general and compliance with the Paperwork Information Services, 370 L’Enfant ophthalmic surgery. Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Promenade SW., Washington, D.C. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chapter 35). To request a copy of the 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Mitchell A. Cheeseman, Center for Food clearance requests submitted to OMB for Officer. Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS– review, call the HRSA Reports OMB Comment: OMB is required to 217), Food and Drug Administration, Clearance Officer on (301)–443–1129. make a decision concerning the 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, collection of information between 30 202–418–3083. The following request has been submitted to the Office of Management and 60 days after publication of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice document in the Federal Register. published in the Federal Register of and Budget for review under the Therefore, a comment is best assured of September 26, 1994 (59 FR 49074), FDA Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: having its full effect if OMB receives it announced that a color additive petition Evaluation of the Effectiveness and within 30 days of publication. Written (CAP 4C0244) had been filed by Impact of Community Health Centers— comments and recommendations for the ProMedica International, 620 Newport New—A mail survey will be conducted proposed information collection should Center Dr., suite 575, Newport Beach, of fifty community health centers be sent directly to the following: Office CA 92660. The petition proposed to (CHCs) to collect information on of Management and Budget, Paperwork amend the color additive regulations in Reduction Project, 725 17th Street NW., characteristics of health centers (e.g., § 74.3045 [Phthalocyaninato (2-)] copper patients, services, staffing, financing Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: Ms. (21 CFR 74.3045) to provide for the safe Wendy Taylor. and participation in managed care) use of [phthalocyaninato(-2)] copper as during 1992. The survey is one Dated: May 29, 1996. a color additive in nonabsorbable component of an evaluation of polyvinylidene fluoride sutures Larry Guerrero, community health centers that examines intended for use in general and Director, Office of Information Services. utilization and expenditures among opthalmic surgery. ProMedica [FR Doc. 96–13876 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Medicaid CHC users and non-users, BILLING CODE 4184±01±M International has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future using a sample of 50 health centers in filing (21 CFR 71.6(c)(2)). 10 states. The survey will collect data Food and Drug Administration that supplement information already Dated: May 16, 1996. available from health center annual [Docket No. 94C±0312] Alan M. Rulis, reports, reviews and grant applications. Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Together with the secondary data, the ProMedica International; Withdrawal of Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. survey results provide the basis for Color Additive Petition [FR Doc. 96–13981 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] characterizing attributes of the CHC AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, BILLING CODE 4160±01±F delivery system and examining whether HHS. features of the CHC delivery model ACTION: Notice. Health Resources and Services assist in explaining observed differentials in use and expenditures SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration among CHC users. The survey will be Administration (FDA) is announcing the Agency Information Collection mailed to CHC Executive Directors, who withdrawal, without prejudice to future Activities: Submission for OMB are expected to delegate portions of the filing, of a color additive petition (CAP Review; Comment Request 4C0244) proposing that the color questionnaire to staff for completion. additive regulations be amended to Periodically, the Health Resources Burden estimates are as follows: provide for the safe use of and Services Administration (HRSA)

Average Number of Responses burden per Total bur- Type of respondent respondents per re- response den hours spondent (hours)

Community Health Centers ...... 50 1 7 350 28214 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Written comments and Anderson, Annette Irene, University of Begay, Kristen, New Mexico State University, recommendations concerning the Alaska, Anchorage, Dillingham Native Navajo proposed information collection should Village Begay, Miranda, Navajo Community College, be sent within 30 days of this notice to: Anderson, Lori Dawn, Murray State College, Navajo Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Begay, Rosaline Keams, University of New Virginia Huth, Human Resources and Anderson, Zachariah Jessic, University of Mexico School of Medicine, Navajo Housing Branch, Office of Management North Dakota, School of Medicine, Begay, Tina Rae, Northern Arizona and Budget, New Executive Office Muskogee of Oklahoma University, Navajo Building, Room 10235, Washington, Anoatubby, Christopher Michael, Oklahoma Begay-Ramirez, Josie Carol, College of St. D.C. 20503. University Hlth Sciences Center, Catherine, Lac Courte Oreilles Chippewa Chickasaw Nation of OK Begaye, Brandon Wayne, Northern Arizona Dated: May 29, 1996. Anoatubby, Theresa Rose, University of University, Navajo J. Henry Montes, Oklahoma Hlth Sciences Center, Bekes, Kimberly Dawn, University of New Associate Administrator for Policy Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Mexico School of Medicine, Navajo Coordination. Arce, Julie Gaye, University of Oklahoma Belgarde, Patrick Edward, North Dakota State College of Pharmacy, Choctaw Nation of [FR Doc. 96–13879 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] University College of Pharmacy, Chippewa Oklahoma Cree BILLING CODE 4160±15±P Arkansas, Carmen, University of Utah Bell, Jason Burton, University of North College of Medicine, Eastern Band- Dakota, Three Affiliated Tribes Fort- Cherokee of North Carolina Berthold Indian Health Service Arkie, Carolyn Ann, New Mexico State Ben, Elaine Ann, University of New Mexico, University, Pueblo of Acoma Navajo List of Recipients of Indian Health Armentrout, Estelle Marjorie, Salish Kootenai Benally, Belinda Jane, Arizona State Scholarships Under the Indian Health College, Northern Cheyenne University, Navajo Scholarship Program Armijo, Darlene Jean, Albuquerque Technical Benally, Mellisa Lee, Navajo Community Vocational Institute, Pueblo of Jemez College, Navajo The regulations governing Indian Arneson, Richelle Marie, Tacoma Benally, Shawn T., University of New Health Care Improvement Act Programs Community College, Tlingit & Haida, Mexico, Navajo (Pub. L. 94–437) provide at 42 CFR Central Council Benedict, Alison Mary, SUNY Arts & 36.334 that the Indian Health Service Arviso, ALice R., University of New Mexico, Sciences at Plattsburgh, St. Regis-Mohawk Navajo Berryhill, Wayne Edward, University of shall publish annually in Federal Arviso, Anthony Lionel, University of New Minnesota Minneapolis Medical School, Register a list of recipients of Indian Mexico, Navajo Muskogee (Creek) of OK Health Scholarships, including the Aspaas, Anthony Hans, University of New Berryhill-Paapke, Elise Michele, University name of each recipient, school and Mexico, Navajo of Oklahoma, Muskogee of Oklahoma Atkins, Pamela Jane, University of New tribal affiliation, if applicable. These Bethel, Dennis Wayne, U. of Minnesota scholarships were awarded under the Mexico, Navajo Aunko, Israel Jerome, Midwestern State Duluth Medical Sch., Alabama Quassarte authority of 103 and 104 of the Indian Creek Nation of Oklahoma Health Care Improvement Act, 25 U.S.C. University, Kickapoo of Oklahoma Autaubo, Diana Lynn, University of Bettelyoun, Jodee Marine, Oglala Lakota 1613–1613a,as amended by the Indian Oklahoma Hlth Sciences Center, Seminole College, Oglala Sioux Health Care Amendments of 1998, Pub. of Oklahoma Beyale, Shannon Marie, Northern Arizona L. 100–713. Azure, Sharon Rose, Presentation College, University, Navajo The following is a list of Indian Cheyenne River Sioux Big Knife, Charlotte, Carroll College, Health Scholarship Recipients for Fiscal Bahe, Velma Ann, University of New Mexico, Chippewa Cree Bisonette-Morrow, Terri Ann, Lac Courte Year 1995: Navajo Bailor, Jeanne Lesley, Bartlesville Wesleyan, Oreilles Ojibwa, Lac Courte Oreilles Aaberg, Aaden-Elleph, Eastern Oregon State Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Chippewa College, Aleut Ballew, Gerald Fanning, Oklahoma City Bitsinni, Susan, University of New Mexico Abold-Arellano, Carol Ann, University of Community College, Cherokee Nation of College of Pharmacy, Navajo South Dakota School of Medicine, Oglala Oklahoma Bitsoi, Lydia, Albuquerque Technical Sioux Banks, Joey M. Journeycake, Indiana Vocational Institute, Navajo Abrahamson, Sherry Ann, Murray State University School of Medicine, Cherokee Bivins, John David, Dartmouth Medical College, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Nation of Oklahoma School, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Adams, Lorraine Jean, Fort Peck Community Baracker, Amber Jo, Gonzaga University, Black, Ann Marie, University of North College, Assiniboine & Sioux Turtle Mountain Chippewa Dakota, Devils Lake Sioux Adcock, Keith James, University of New Baracker, Kristie Lea, Montana State Black, Geoffrey Wayne, University of Mexico, College of Pharmacy, Navajo University-Billings, Turtle Mountain Southern California School of Medicine Albers, Leslie Ann, South Dakota State Chippewa Choctaw Nation of OK University, Oglala Sioux Barnoskie, Frances Angela, Central Black-Wall, Angela Dawn, College of Albert, Corrina Dynalle, University of New Washington University, Muskogee of Osteopathic Medicine of OK State Univ., Mexico, Med Tech Program, Pueblo of Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation of OK Laguna Bartholomew, Michael Lee, University of Blacksmith, Allison, University of Allard-Laroque, Stephanie Marie, University Vermont-Burlington, Kiowa of Oklahoma Wisconsin-Stout, Grand Traverse Ottawa & of North Dakota, Turtle Mountain Bartosovsky, Teri Kaye, University of Chippewa Chippewa Oklahoma Hlth Sciences Center, Comanche Blake, Ginger Elaine, University of Central Allery, Gina Louise, University of Minnesota, of Oklahoma Oklahoma, Osage of Oklahoma Turtle Mountain Chippewa Batala, Shirley Ann, University of New Blie, Agnes, University of New Mexico, Allick, Albert Philip, University of Mexico, Hopi Navajo Minnesota Duluth Medical School, Turtle Bean, Meggin Elizabeth, Southwestern Blue, Joanne Cecile, University of North Mountain Chippewa Oklahoma State University, Choctaw Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Allick, Tina Marie, University of North Nation of Oklahoma Blue, Lawrence Donald, University of North Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Beets, Billy Conn, University of Oklahoma Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Allison, Faye June, Arizona State University, College of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Blue, Virginia Pamela, University of North Navajo Oklahoma Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Alsburg, Robert Ruben, Navajo Community Begay, Adriann Westine, University of North Bluehouse, Laura Lee, University of College, Navajo Dakota School of Medicine, Navajo Washington, Devils Lake Sioux Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28215

Bluehouse, Orpha Eleanor, University of New Calder, Jonathan Edward, University of Clark, Dorrance Dean, University of Mexico, Navajo Wisconsin Medical School, Bad River Band Nebraska, Assiniboine & Sioux Bojorquez, Michael Valentino, Yuba College, of Chippewa Clark, Leroy Allen, University of Minnesota Mooretown of Maidu Camden, Davin Bryce, Montana State Duluth Medical School, Cheyenne River Bollig, John Joseph, Oregon Health Sciences University, Crow Tribe of Montana Sioux University—Medical, Alaska Native Campbell, Laurel Suzette, East Central Clarke, David Eric, Pacific University College Bonnet, Bryan Edward, University of Oklahoma State University, Choctaw of Optometry, Santa Ynez of Chumash Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Nation of Oklahoma Clawson, Bobbie Jo, University of New Choctaw Nation of OK Campbell, Stephen Franklin, New Mexico Mexico, Navajo Bormann, Teresa Jo, University of North Highlands University, Osage of Oklahoma Cleveland, Sharon Ann, University of New Dakota School of Medicine, Oglala Sioux Camplain, Jamie Lynn, University of Central Mexico, Navajo Bowie, Albert Steven, University of New Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Cole, Jamie Clearwater, University of Mexico College of Pharmacy, Pueblo of San Camplain, Lisa Nichole, University of Central Vermont, St. Regis-Mohawk Juan Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Conley, Deborah Sue, University of Nebraska- Bowker, Debra Dawn, University of Carey, Matthew, University of Arkansas, Lincoln, Winnebago Minnesota Duluth Medical School, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Conner, Bonita Faye, University of North Cheyenne River Sioux Carey, Rebecca Sue, Bacone College, Dakota Nurse Practitioner Prog., MN Bowling, April Shea, University of Oklahoma Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Chippewa White Earth Band College of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Carlos, Angela Mary, University of North Conter, Keri Lee, Rocky Mountain College, Oklahoma Dakota, Seneca of New York Crow Tribe of Montana Boyd, Ladonna Christian, Eastern Carlson, Gwendolyn Ann, Alderson- Cook, Gina Marie, University of North Washington State College, Confederated Broaddus College Physician Assistant Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Tribes Colville Program, Aleut Coon, Teresa Lynne, East Central University, Boyer, Alexis Francis, George Washington Carlson, Rochelle Ann, University of Seminole of Oklahoma University School of Medicine, Oglala Wisconsin Eau Clair, Bad River Band of Corbine, David Paul, University of North Sioux Chippewa Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Bradley, Stephanie, University of Notre Carmona, Happy Elizabeth, University of Corbine Joseph Lawrence, University of Dame, Eastern Band-Cherokee of North New Mexico School of Medicine, Omaha of North Dakota, Bad River Band of Chippewa Carolina Nebraska Cornelius, Candi Jo, University of Wisconsin Bradsher, Norman Lee, University of Carpenter, James Spencer, University of Eau Claire, Oneida of Wisconsin Minnesota Minneapolis Medical School, Louisville, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Cottenoir, Mitchel Lee, University of Yankton Sioux Braswell, John Joseph, University of Arizona, NW Band Shoshone of Utah Carpenter, Michael Keith, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Cherokee Cotton, Debra Harlow, University of Central Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Nation of Oklahoma Wyoming, Osage of Oklahoma Oklahoma Brooks, Michael Dwayne, Harvard Medical Craig, Velliyah Ellen, University of New Carpio, Jean Marie, University of New School, Lumbee Mexico College of Pharmacy, Pueblo of Mexico College of Pharmacy, Navajo Brosel, Conrad Carl, University of Wisconsin, Laguna Crawford, Jamisu Lynn, Salish Kootenai Oneida of Wisconsin Cartier, Michelle Renae, University of North College, Blackfeet Brown, Janet Marie, Carl Albert State College, Dakota, Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Crawford, Kartha Lamae, Langston Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Charles, Tracey Roseann, Memphis State University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Brown, Jimmie Chairee, University of University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Crazy Bull, Phillip Aaron, University of New Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Charlie, Jimmie Ray, Stanford University Mexico, Assiniboine & Sioux Brown, Jody Keith, University of Oklahoma, School of Medicine, Navajo Crazythunder, Christopher Ron, University of Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Chalie, Josephine Ann, Weber State New Mexico College of Pharmacy, Oglala Brown, Stephanie Michele, Northern University, Navajo Sioux Oklahoma College, Apache Tribe of Charlie, Julius Ray, University of New Crissler, Mary Jo, University of North Dakota Oklahoma Mexico School of Medicine, Navajo School of Medicine, Turtle Mountain Brown, Tishanda Leigh, University of Tulsa, Chase, Duane Maynard, University of Chippewa Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Lower Crittenden, Robert Bryan, University of Brown-Farris, Valerie Lee, University of Brule Sioux Oklahoma Dental School Cherokee Nation South Dakota School of Medicine, Chaudoin, Teresa Lynn, Johns Hopkins of Oklahoma Cherokee Nation of OK University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Crocker-Ericson, Elizabeth Marie, California Brunoe, Carnella Lynn, Mt. Hood Community Chavez, Katherine, University of New State University, Cherokee Nation of College, Pueblo of Laguna Mexico,Navajo Oklahoma Buenting, Lisa Lynette, Loma Linda Chavez, Virgil Thompson, San Juan College, Crouch, Carol Vallee, East Central Oklahoma University, Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Navajo State University, Confederated Salish & Mission Chesnut, Tracie Lynn, Cameron University, Kootenai Bullshoe, Frances Gail, Valley City State Comanche of Oklahoma Crouch, J Kase Mathis, East Central University, Blackfeet Chino, Joachim David, University of New Oklahoma State University, Confederated Burnette, Ronald, New Mexico State Mexico, Navajo Slish & Kootenai University, White Mountain Apache Chosa, Carnell Terry James, Harvard Cruz, Karl Marcus, University of New Burris, Lorena Jean, Oklahoma State University, Pueblo of Jemez Mexico, Pueblo of San Juan University, Osage of Oklahoma Chosa, Erik James, Univ. of Montana School Cummings-Wero, Maeuneka, Northern Burton, Pamela Michele, Pacific University of Pharmacy, Keweenaw of L’Anse & Arizona University, Navajo College of Optometry, Tlingit & Haida, Ontonagon of Chippewa Currin, Philemon Matthew, University of Central Council Chouteau, Christine Wilma, Dartmouth Oklahoma, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Bustamante, Beverly Buckley, Oklahoma medical School, Cherokee Nation of Custer, Michelle Hope, University of New University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma Mexico-Gallup, Navajo Muskogee (Creek) of OK Christensen, Kim Ann, University of New Dagostino, Paul Andrew, Santa Rose Junior Butler, Thetath Ann, Rose State College, Mexico, Navajo College, Alsaka Native Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Chronister, David, Medaille College, Seneca Dahlberg, Carl Alex, Fresno City College, Fort Cain, David Luke, University of Oklahoma of New York Independence Paiute Dental School, Cherokee Nation of Chythlook, William Thomas, Walla Walla Dahozy, Roger Norman, Arizona State Oklahoma College, Alaska Native University, Navajo Calac, Daniel Joseph, Harvard Medical Clah, Melinda, Navajo Community College, Dailey, Josephine, Fort Lewis College, Navajo School, Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Navajo Dale, Cindy Rose, Phoenix College, Navajo 28216 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Dale, Regena Nichol, Loma Linda University Dumontier, Timonthy Albert, University of Fogarty, Alan Robert, North Dakota State Public Health, Navajo Washington School of Medicine, University, Cheyenne River Sioux Daniel, Mary Frances, Connors State College, Confederated Salish & Kootenai Folger, Gloria, University of New Mexico- Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Dunson, Kerri Lynn, University of Oklahoma, Gallup, Navajo Daniels, Virginia, California School of Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Foote, Ricarda Mae, Dull Knife Memorial Professional Psychology, Navajo Duverger, Diane Monts, Oklahoma State College, Northern Cheyenne Darling, Vickie L., University of Alaska, University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Fox, Valerie Louise, University of North Dillinghem Native Village Eaglestaff, Mary Lynn, University of North Dakota School of Medicine, Minnesota Darwin, Donovan, University of New Mexico, Dakota, Three Affiliated Tribes Fort- Chippewa Navajo Berthold Fralinger, Jack Bruce, University of Davis, Aaron, Indiana University, Navajo Earl, Leah Renee, Arizona State University, Minnesota Minneapolis Medical School, Davis, Brenda Ann, University of North Navajo Washoe-NV & CA Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Ecoffey, Stacey Lynn, Boston College School Franceschini, Lisa Anne, University of North Davis, Brenda K., Oklahoma City Community of Social Work, Oglala Sioux Dakota School of Medicine, Choctaw College, Seneca-Cayuga of Oklahoma Eddins, Paul Eugene, Univestity of Nation of Oklahoma Davis, Celeste Lenore, University of Minnesota Duluth Medical School, Navajo Francis, Deannamay, University of New Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Edwards, Polly Ann, Cameron University, England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davis, Daniel G., North Dakota State Caddo Passamaquoddy of Maine University, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Elliott, Billy Wayne, Heritage College, Francis, Theresa R., University of New Davis, Deanne Eileen, University of New Wyandotte of Oklahoma Mexico, Pueblo of Laguna Mexico, Navajo Elliot, Evangela, Heritage College, Navajo Frank, Colleen Lou, Boise State University, Davis, Gloria Marion, University of North Elmore, Matthew Hart, East Central Navajo Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa University, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Freeman, Aaron John, Northeastern State Davis, Jamie Dee, Oklahoma State University, Emarthla, Nanelle Joyce, Seminole Junior University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma College, Seminole of Oklahoma Froelich, Joy Ann, University of Mary, Three Davis, Kimber Lee, University of Oklahoma, Emerson, Nathan Daniel, University of New Affiliated Tribes Fort-Berthold Absentee-Shawnee Mexico, Navajo Gaddy, Aileen, University of New Mexico, Davis, Sarah Anne, University of Emmons, Marlene Rose, Grand Canyon Navajo Washington, Alaska Native College, Navajo Gaikowski-Shindelbower, Rose Anne, Daye, Carrie Lynn, University of New Endischee, Sophia, University of Arizona, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Mexico-Gallup, Navajo Navajo Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Dayzie, Bernadette, University of Colorado Endres, Barbara Joy, University of Oklahoma Gallagher, Theresa Jo, University of Southern Health Sciences Center, Navajo Health Sciences Center, Muskogee (Creek) California School of Social Work, Choctaw De Ment, Rachel Leah, Rochester Institute of of Oklahoma Nation of OK Technology, Oglala Sioux Eng, Freida Anne, University of Washington Garcia, Daryl Katherine, University of New Deasis, Timothy Alvaro, Green River School of Medicine, Alaska Native Community College, Alaska Native Epperson, Tammy Jo, University of Mexico College of Pharmacy, Navajo Decoteau, Tami Jo, University of North Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Garcia, Dean John, University of Utah College Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma of Pharmacy, Three Affiliated Tribes Fort- Degrande, Stephanie Marie, Pima Medical Eriacho, Marlene J., University of New Berthold Institute-Mesa, Quechan of Fort Yuma Mexico, Navajo Garcia, Berrick Anthony, University of New Delorme, Carolyn Marie, North Dakota State Eskamire, Lucinda Ruth, Rose State College, Mexico, Pueblo of Santa Ana University, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Garcia, Margaret Ann, Albuquerque Dennison, Michelle Evangeline, Oklahoma Esquiro, Jennifer Gail Azure, University of Technical Vocational Institute, Pueblo of State University, Kaw Washington School of Medicine, Tlingit & Laguna Deshnod, Sheilah A., Navajo Community Haida Central Council Gardner-McSpadden, Stacee Lee, Langston College, Navajo Essendrup, Lisa Marie, Arizona State University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Destefano, Jacquelyn Marie, Bacone College, University, Aleut Garlow, Cheryl Gay, D’Youville College, Comanche of Oklahoma Estrada, Ronni-Leigh S., Syracuse University Seneca of New York Dexter, Nathan Lee, Lewis & Clark College, School Work, Onondaga of New York Garman-Droman, Camille Diann, SUNY at Klamath Indian Tribe of Oregon Etier, Tonia Jean, University of New Mexico, Buffalo, Seneca-Cayuga of Oklahoma Dickerson, Daniel Lee, Berry College, Alaska Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Garner, Kristi Lois, Harrisburg Area Native Etsitty, Edison Virgil, University of Community College, Fort Independence Dickson, Alton Aaron, San Juan College, Minnesota Duluth Medical School, Navajo Paiute Navajo Etter, Evangeline Riggs, Yuba College- Garner, Lisa Michelle, University of Central Dickson, Janise, Northern Arizona Marysville Campus, Navajo Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma University, Navajo Everling, Denise Sylvia, Metropolitan State Garrison, Chad Matthew, University of Dickson, Jeffrey Todd, East Central Oklahoma Colleage of Denver, Turtle Mountain Oklahoma Dental School, Cherokee Nation State University, Choctaw Nation of Chippewa of Oklahoma Oklahoma Factor, Stephen Walter, The University of Garza, Daniel, University of Oklahoma, Dixon, Shelly Jo, Rogers State College, Oklahoma, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Comanche of Oklahoma Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Fagg, Kristi Danielle, Connors State College, Geddes, Jacqueline Lee, Washington State Dodson, Alan Duane, New Mexico State Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma University, Rosebud Sioux University, Navajo Fields, Bryan Solomon, University of Geronimo, Sonya, New Mexico State Douville, Andre Maurice, South Dakota Oklahoma Dental School, Cherokee Nation University, Mescalero Apache School of Mines & Technology, Oglala of Oklahoma Gesinger, Ruthie Ann, University of South Sioux Fields, Julie Marie, Oklahoma Baptist Dakota, Cheyenne River Sioux Drapeau, Glenn Richard, Valley City State University, Crow Tribe of Montana Ghahate, Alvera Lynnette, University of New University, Yankton Sioux Fischer, Karen Marie, East Central Mexico-Gallup, Zuni Dubray, Kansas Lee, University of Minnesota University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Giles, Justin Bruce, University of Virginia, Duluth Medical School, Cheyenne River Fisher, Michael F., Northeastern Oklahoma Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Sioux State University, Cherokee Nation of Gilstrap, Jennifer, Bacone College, Cherokee Ducheneaux, Colette Ann, University of Oklahoma Nation of Oklahoma North Dakota School of Medicine, Fleming, Pamela Elese, Casper College, Berry Gladue, Evelyn Faye, University of North Cheyenne River Sioux Creek Maidu Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Ducheneaux, Lorelei Dale, Presentation Floyd, Sharon Ann, Tulsa Junior College, Gomez, Sylvia R., University of Arizona, San College, Cheyenne River Sioux Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Carlos Apache Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28217

Gooden, Daniel Albert, North Dakota State Hardy, Valonia Lynn, University of New Huddleston-Giroux, Jennifer A., University of University College of Pharmacy, Navajo Mexico, Navajo South Dakota School of Medicine, Rosebud Gordon, Jennifer Lynn, California State Harhut, Michael Anthony, University of Sioux University, Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Michigan College of Pharmacy, Nome Huffman, Angela Desiree, Dartmouth Medical Chippewa Eskimo Community School, Sac & Fox of Oklahoma Gordon, Marvin James, Shasta College, Harjo, Jim B., University of Tulsa, Muskogee Hugues, Ross Neil, Brigham Young Tazlina Village (Creek) of Oklahoma University, Shoshone-Bannock-Fort Hall Gorman, Marianita Elizabeth, University of Harris, Alia Melissa, The University of Hunt, Justin Lakota, University of Montana, New Mexico, Navajo Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Blackfeet Goulet, Lori Lynn, University of North Harris, Leslie Joo, University of North Hyde, Petie Ann, University of Oklahoma Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa College of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Gourneau, Dean Anthony, Turtle Mountain Harrison, Marjorie, University of New Oklahoma Community College, Turtle Mountain Mexico, Navajo Inge, Rudi Heath, St. Gregory’s College, Chippewa Harrison, Wendy Lynn, Oklahoma University Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Ingram, Dena Gail, Oklahoma City Gourneau, Jessica Lynn, University of North Health Sciences Center, Chickasaw Nation Community College, Chickasaw Nation of Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa of Oklahoma Oklahoma Gourneaj, Lori Ann, University of Minnesota Harrison-Herrod, Carlene, University of New Isaac, Lisa Gail, East Central Oklahoma State Duluth Medical School, Turtle Mountain Mexico College of Nursing, Navajo Chippewa University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Harrison-nez, Vangeline Mae, Navajo Jackson, Debra Trina, University of Grant, Amelda Rose, University of North Community College, Navajo Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Washington, Shoshone-Bannock-Fort Hall Harry, Rebecca Dawn, University of Southern Graumann, Jacqueline Carol, San Francisco Jackson, Valerie Denise, Murray State California, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma State University, Redwood of Pomo College, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Hartman, Terry Lynne, Redlands Community Gray, Deborah Ann, University of Maine, Jamison, Amy Louise, Azusa Pacific College, College, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Hastings, Verna Susan, Northland Pioneer Maine Janis, Rachel Ann, Oglala Lakota College, College, White Mountan Apache Gray, Lisa Irene, University of Tulsa, Rosebud Sioux Oglala Hatch, Robert Leroy, University of Utah Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Jarvis, David Lloyd, University of School of Medicine Physician Assistant Gray, Thomas Kevin, University of North Washington School of Medicine, Osage of Program, Navajo Dakota School of Medicine, Confederated Oklahoma Hately, Mari Carlin, University of Salish & Kootenai Jefferson, Charlotte Kay, University of Montana, Crow Tribe of Montana Green, Ross Preston, Southwestern State Washington School of Medicine, Alaska Jenkins, Holly Sheobhan, East Central College School of Pharmacy, Choctaw Native Oklahoma State University Nursing, Nation of Oklahoma Hattie, Daryl Faith, University of New Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Greenwood, Anthony Wayne, Southeastern Mexico, Zuni Jenkins, Jeffery Lee, University of Oklahoma Oklahoma State University, Chickasaw Hawkins, Andrea Dawn, Oklahoma Baptist University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Nation of Oklahoma Oklahoma Grey, Barry Robert, University of New Haycock-Whitehair, Lorraine, Colorado State University, Navajo Jenkins, John Michael, East Central Mexico School of Medicine, Navajo University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Griggs, Roger Lee, University of Arizona Hayes, Maggie J., Connors State College, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Jensen, Darcy Nicole, University of Mary, College of Medicine, White Mountain Northern Cheyenne Apache Hayes, Robert Wayne, University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy, Chickasaw Jensen, Vanessa, University of Arizona, Grimley, Phoebe Martine, Santa Fe Navajo Community College, Navajo Nation of Oklahoma Heim-Cody, Heather Renee, Benedictine Jerome, Ralph Frederick, Northeastern State Grinnell-Evans, Regina Marie, Oklahoma City University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma University, Sac & Fox of MO, IN, KS & NE College, Kickapoo of Kansas Henderson, Darlene Ann, University of New Jessepe, Melvin Henry, Washburn University, Gubatayeo, John Sawin, University of Prairie Band Potawatomi of Kansas California-Berkeley, Tlingit & Haida, Mexico, Navajo Herrin, James Geoffrey, University of Jim, Lisa Gentry, University of New Mexico, Central Council Klamath Indian Tribe of Oregon California, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Guimaraes, Linda Marie Sherer, Franciscan Joe, Marilyn, Weber State College, Navajo Herrod, Jon David, Fort Lewis College, University of Steubenville, MN Chippewa John Jennifer Lynn, Highline Community Cheyenne-Arapaho of Oklahoma White Earth Band College, Alaska Native Higgins, Clark, Annemarie, University of Gustafson, Janice Kay, University of MN John, Wilma Annette, University of New Maryland School of Medicine, Oneida of College of Pharmacy, Red Cliff Band of Mexico, Navajo Lake Superior Chippewa Wisconsin Johnson, Amy Marie, South Dakota State Guy, Kim Rayna, Oregon Health Sciences Hight, Teresa Lynn, Tulsa Junior College, University, Flandreau Santee Sioux University-Medical, Cherokee Nation of Pueblo of Laguna Johnson, Angela Rae, Southeastern Oklahoma Oklahoma Hix, Christi Elaine, Northeastern State State University, Muskogee (Creek) of Hale, Lisa Ann, University of New Mexico, University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Oklahoma Navajo Hogenson, Jamie Lee, University of Oregon, Johnson, Murna Mae, University of New Hall, Shelly Marie, Salish Kootenai College, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Mexico, Navajo Blackfeet Hogue, Michael Andrew, University of Johnson, Vivian, Laney College, Navajo Hall, Stephanie Rae, Seminole Junior College, Central Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Jonas-Hjelseth, Roxanne Lynn, University of Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Oklahoma North Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Haller, Michael Dean, Eastern Washington Hole, Rose Marie, University of Mary, Turtle Jones, Denise Dawn, University of New University, Confederated Grand Ronde Mountain Chippewa Mexico, Navajo Hamilton, Brandi, University of Oklahoma, Holiday, Karen Louise, University of Jones, Felica, New Nexico Highlands Osage of Oklahoma Oklahoma, Eastern Band-Cherokee of University, Navajo Hamilton, Charles Juaquin, Oklahoma State North Carolina Jones, Janella, Northern Arizona University, Unviersity, Sac & Fox of Oklahoma Holliday, Glenda Lee, Grayson County Navajo Haney, Carrie Leigh, University of Tulsa, College, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Jones, Jennifer Katherine, Northeastern State Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Houston, Jessica Eileen, Bacone College, University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Hanks, Mary Jo, University of North Dakota, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Jones, Joette, Northern Arizona University, Standing Rock Sioux North & South Dakota Hoverson, Brenda Lee, Sisseton Wahpeton Navajo Harder Amanda Gayle, University of Community College, Turtle Mountain Jones, Vernita Michelle, Colorado Tech, Oklahoma, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Chippewa Navajo 28218 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Jones, Zita Roberta, Salish Kootenai College, La Plant, Henrietta, Salish Kootenai College, Lippman, Judy A., Eastern Washington Fort Belknap Blackfeet University of Empire School, Spokane Jurek, Carol Renee, Lake Superior College, Lafferty, Donna Pearl, Metropolitan State Little, Chaleen Laurie, Arizona State Fond Du Luc Band-Minnesota Chippewa College, Cheyenne River Sioux University, Oglala Sioux Juvinel, Lorna Tuanda, University of Lafontaine, Joseph Anthoy, Florida Little, Kendall Jay, University of Oklahoma, Washington School of Medicine, Community College, Turtle Mountain Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Confederated Yakima Chippewa Livermont, Amy Marie, Cheyenne River Kahn-John, M. Michelle, University of New Lafontaine, Stephen Joseph, University of Lakota Nursing Program, Cheyenne River Mexico, Navajo Phoenix-Diamond Bar, Chippewa Cree Sioux Kanawite, Freida Mae, Albuquerque Lafriniere, Melody Lou, University of North Locklear, Arbus Earl, Pembroke State Technical Vocational Institute, Navajo Dakota, Minnesota Chippewa University, Lumbee Kaniatobe, Angie Jo, New England College of Lajeunesse, Roxanne Marie, University of Lofgren, Paul Arthur, University of Maryland Optometry, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma North Dakota, Red Lake Band of Chippewa Baltimore Social Work, Cherokee Nation of Kardonsky, Valerie Quinn, University of Lamar, Colette Marina, University of Central Oklahoma Washington, Jamestown S’Klallam Oklahoma, Three Affiliated Tribes Fort- Logan, Cassity Allen, East Central University, Kaye, Herbert Forrest, Ohio State University, Berthold Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Hopi Lamebull, Charlotte O., Northern Montana Lohnes, Lisa Rae, Albuquerque Technical Kee, Emily Tara Ann, Northern Arizona College, Fort Belknap Vocational Institute, Devils lake Sioux University, Navajo Landavazo, Gloria Christina, University of Lomay, Lorraine, Arizona State University, Keener, Guy Sidney, Bismarck State College, New Mexico, Zuni Hopi Cheyenne River Sioux Laroche, Faith Antoinette, U.S. International Lonasee, Kelly Elizabeth, University of New Kellar, Colleen Neilan, Frontier School of University, Rosebud Sioux Mexico, Zuni Midwifery & Family Nursing, Muskogee Laroque, Michael John, University of North Longstaff, Laura Ann, University of (Creek) of Oklahoma Dakota School of Medicine, Turtle Washington, Seneca of New York Kelley, Ralph Zane, University of Illinois, Mountain Chippewa Lopez, Janet Eileen, College of the Redwoods, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Lascano, Terrance Allen, University of Yurok Tribe Kelley, Ryan Jason, University of the Pacific Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Lopez, Katrina Francine, Southern Oregon Round Valley (formerly Covelo) Comanche of Oklahoma State College, Aleut Kelly, Cynthia Alice, University of Kansas Latocha, William Hawkshield, Saint Mary’s Loretto, Mariam Brenda, Albuquerque School of Social Welfare, Iowa of Kansas College, Standing Rock Sioux of North & Technical Vocational Institute, Pueblo of & Nebraska South Dakota Jemez Kennedy, Jay Pehrson, University of Latray, James Eldon, Rocky Mountain Louis-Lopez, Evellen Marie, Wenatchee Minnesota Minneapolis Medical School, College, Blackfeet Valley College, Confederated Tribes of the Blackfeet Latray, Kevin Scott, Montana State Colville Reservation Kerley, Arthur, Northern Arizona University, University, Blackfeet Lowrance, Shannon Rae, Oklahoma State Navajo Laughter, Richard Kim, University of Utah University, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Kester, Shelly Jo, Southwestern State College College of Medicine, Navajo Lujan, Jose Vicente, University of New School of Pharmacy, Cherokee Nation of Laughter, Sylvester Allen, University of Mexico, Pueblo of Taos Oklahoma Arizona, Navajo Lujan, Natasha Jane, University of New Khoury, Stephen Carter, College of Lawhorn, William Andrew, University of Mexico School of Medicine, Pueblo of Taos Osteopathic Medicine of OK University, Oklahoma, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Lundgren, Roberta Toneena, Everett Muskogee (Creek) of OK Lawrence, Donavon Clay, Presentation Community College, Tulalip Kie, Glorianna, New Mexico State University, College, Cheyenne River Sioux Macdonald, Lynn Frances, California State Pueblo of Laguna Lawrence, Lynnae Susan, University of University-Chico, Yurok Tribe Kienzle, Judy Ann, Allen College of Nursing, Arizona College of Medicine, Hopi MacGregor, Mike G., Stanford University, Oglala Sioux Lawrence, Morse Paul, University of Spokane Kills Pretty Enemy, Casey Adell, University Nebraska Physician Assistant Program, Macktima, Larry Albert, Yavapai College, of North Dakota, Crow Tribe of Montana Oglala Sioux Navajo King, Haskell Douglas, St. Gregory’s College, Lawson-Wesley, Carol Joy, University of Manion, Christopher John, University of Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Red Colorado School of Medicine, Osage of King, Jeannie, University of New Mexico, Lake Band of Chippewa Oklahoma Navajo Le Beau, Mary Kathleen, Cheyenne River Mansfield, Shawn Christopher, University of King, Julie Denise, Bartlesville Wesleyan, Lakota Nursing Program, Cheyenne River New Mexico, Navajo Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Sioux Manuel, Grace, Prescott College, Tohono Kinnebrew, Kimberly Joy, University of Leader Charge, Damon Paul, University of O’Odham Band Washington Medex Northwest Phy Asst South Dakota, Rosebud Sioux Manuelito, Darlene, University of New Prg, Alaska Native Lebeau, Doriann Joyce, Presentation College, Mexico, Navajo Kipp, Billie Jo, College of Great Falls, Cheyenne River Sioux Manuelito, Samantha Kay, Arizona State Blackfeet Lebeau, Michael Edward, University of North University, Navajo Kirkes, Leonard Dean, East Central Dakota, Cheyenne River Sioux Marquez, Frank Joseph, University of University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Lee, Calbert Aaron, University of New Southern California Phy Asst Program, Kitto, Larrie Dale, University of Maryland Mexico, Navajo Northfork Rancheria of Mono School of Medicine, Choctaw Nation of Lee, Lori C., Fort Lewis College, Navajo Martell, Christopher Todd, University of Oklahoma Lee, Michael Patrick, Southwestern State North Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Klaudt, Monte Ray, University of California College School of Pharmacy, Muskogee Martell-Rondeau, Christi Sue, ND State San Francisco School of Medicine, Three (Creek) of Oklahoma University College of Pharmacy, Turtle Affiliated Tribes Fort-Berthold Lee, Sarah Tohannie, University of New Mountain Chippewa Kline, Heather Louise, Alvernia College, Mexico, Navajo Martin, Candelaria Cynthia, University of Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Lefthand, Myra Jean, University of Utah New Mexico, Navajo Knaub, Marcella Ann, Salish Kootenai School of Social Work, Crow Tribe of Martin, Edward Angelo, University of New College, Chippewa Cree Montana Mexico-Gallup, Navajo Knight, Jenny Ella, University of Oklahoma Lente Karen Tracey, Glendale Community Martin, Gail L., Bemidji State University, Health Sciences Center, Seminole of College, Pueblo of Laguna Cheyenne River Sioux Oklahoma Leverett, Paula Mae, University of Central Martin, Sarah Gail, Northeastern State Krause, Robin Ernest, Stanford University Oklahoma, Chicasaw Nation of Oklahoma University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma School of Medicine Muskogee (Creek) of Levering, Robin Deann, Tulsa Junior college, Martin, Terri Jean, University of North Oklahoma Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28219

Martinez, Alyssa ann, University of North Montoya, Diana Lee, University of New Oosahwe, Elizabeth Ann, Northeastern Dakota, Standing Rock Sioux of North & Mexico, Navajo Oklahoma State University, Cherokee South Dakota Moore, Dolly June, University of Washington Nation of Oklahoma Martinez, David, New Mexico Highlands Medex Northwest Phy Asst Prg, Alaska Ortiz, Melayna Jenine, University of New University, Navajo Native Mexico, Pueblo of Acoma Martinez, Julianna Jean, University of Moore, Gloria Marie, Fuller Theological Ortiz, Viola Marie, New Mexico State Arizona, Navajo Seminary, Navajo University, Pueblo of Acoma Mathews, Diane Wagers, Southern Moore, Mark Wilburn, Southwestern Owaleon, Mona Lynette, University of New University-New Orleans, Oglala Sioux Oklahoma State University, Cherokee Mexico, Zuni Matt, Victoria, Tufts University School of Nation of Oklahoma Owens, Janet Lynn, University of Oklahoma, Medicine, Navajo Moore, Thomas Taylor, Fuller Theological Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Matthews, Joshus Frame, Northeastern State Seminary, Minnesota Chippewa Ozbirn, Kathryn Elizabeth, East Central University, Eastern Band-Cherokee of Moose, Ledonna Denyse, Chemeketa Oklahoma State University Nursing, North Carolina Community College, Paiute-Shoshone- Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Mault, Clifford Homer, Ohio University Bishop Pablito, Bertha, University of New Mexico, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Cherokee Mora, Paula Renee, Stanford University Zuni Nation of Oklahoma School of Medicine, Navajo Pahl, Kenneth Gillian, Mendocino College, Maxwell, Jami Lee, University of Oklahoma Morgan, Jay C., University of New Mexico Pionleville of Pomo Health Sciences Center, Cherokee Nation of College of Pharmacy, Navajo Palm, Korri Jane, Catholic University of Oklahoma Morris, Elizabeth Lynette, Washburn America, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma May, Robin Leslee, Seminole Junior College, University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Palm, Toby James, University of Montana, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Moss, George Philip, University of Utah Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma McCrary, John Elmer, Northeastern State School of Social Work, Arapahoe Parker, Jack Andrew, University of New University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Mullins-Moynihan, Kelly Lynn, Illinois Mexico, Navajo McGilberry, Charles Stephen, Oklahoma City School of Professional Psychology, Caddo Parker, Myra Elizabeth, Stanford University, University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Munoz, Curtis John, Cameron University, Three Affiliated Tribes Fort-Berthold McGilbra, Mary Lou, University of Kiowa of Oklahoma Paschel, Dorian Nandi, Tuskegee University, Oklahoma, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Murray, Timothy Michael, Oklahoma State Echota Cherokee McIntosh, Richard Lee, Texas Technical University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Pasquale, Pamela Jo, Pima Community University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Nabahe, April Racquel, University of North College, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma McKenna, Shannon Lee, University of New Dakota School of Medicine, Navajo Patnaude, Lawrence Andrew, North Dakota Mexico, Pueblo of Nambe State University, Turtle Mountain Nadeau, Melanie Ann, University of North McLain, Stephanie Ashley, Oklahoma City Chippewa Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Paukan, Teresa Marie, University of Alaska, Nanaeto, Beverly Jane, Rose State College, McLellan, Stacey Lea, University of Texas Orutsararmuit Native (aka Bethel) Kickapoo of Oklahoma Southwestern Medical School, Chickasaw Paul, Jillian Katherine, Rochester Institute of Natonabah, Ernest, San Juan Community Nation of Oklahoma Technology, Penobscot of Maine McNeill, Tracy Dawn, Campbell University, College, Navajo Pazdernik, Julie Ann, Concordia College, Lumbee Nauhauser, Diane Marie, Muhlenberg Minnesota Chippewa White Earth Band McQuay, Cory Christine, University of Regional Medical Center, Cheyenne River Pebworth, Barry Wade, University of Oklahoma, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Sioux Oklahoma Health Sciences Center/College Meade, Kathryn Rae, University of Arizona Negale, Verenda Christine, University of New of Medicine, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Three Affiliated Mexico, Navajo Perdue, David Garrett, University of Tribes Fort-Berthold Neumeyer, Angela Lean, Connors State Washington School of Medicine, Mehling, Jason Aaron, University of College, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Minnesota-Duluth, Minnesota Chippewa Newbrough, Dayton Dean, South Dakota Pete, Johnnie, University of New Mexico, Fond Du Luc Band School of Mines & Technology, Cheyenne Navajo Merchant, Nicole Dawn, Montana State River Sioux Peter, Myrna Elfrieda, University of University-Billings, Crow Tribe of Montana Newton, Melissa Ann, Oklahoma State Washington, Fort Yukon Native Village Mermejo, Deloris Lynne, University of San University, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Peters, Tony Dale, East Los Angeles College, Francisco, Pueblo of Picuris Nez, Alberta, Northern Arizona University, Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Mesteth, Suzie Faye, University of North Navajo Peterson, Cheryl, University of Washington, Dakota, Three Affiliated Tribes Forth- Nez, Jerome Hansen, Northland Pioneer Turtle Mountain Chippewa Berthold College, San Carlos Apache Petrie, Sarah Ann, University of Oregon Hlth Michalk, Kathleen Ruthanne, Midwestern Nez, Lucinda Lou, Northland Pioneer Sciences Center, Confederated Tribes-Coos, University, Minnesota Chippewa College, Navajo Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Michel, Antoinette Rose, Salish Kootenai Nez, Sonya, Arizona State University, Navajo Peyketewa, Al Lotario, University of New College, Confederated Salish & Kootenai Nickell-Sutton, Laura Elizabeth, East Central Mexico, Zuni Mike, Myra Jean, Northern Arizona Oklahoma State University, Choctaw Peyok, David Matthew, University of University, Navajo Nation of Oklahoma Colorado at Denver, Cherokee Nation of Milford, Ginalori, University of New Mexico, Nimsey, Christine Louise, University of Oklahoma Navajo Oklahoma, Wichita & Affiliated Tribes of Phelps, Nancy Elizabeth, Oklahoma Baptist Miller, Corine Ann, University of Arizona, Oklahoma University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Navajo Notah, Sharon Jean, Syracuse University, Phillips, Tomas Scott, University of Mille, Kenneth Edmund, University of Navajo Washington School of Pharmacy, Kansas School of Social Welfare, Pawnee Nunan, Cindy Lou, La Salle University, Confederated Salish & Kootenai of Oklahoma Wampanoag of Gay Head Pickering, Veltilda, University of New Miller, Marcella, Phoenix College, Tohono O’Brien, Kevin Lee, University of Oklahoma Mexico, Navajo O’Odham Band College of Medicine, Choctaw Nation of Pitsch, Corey Ann, Montana State University- Mills, Trivean, Arizona State University, Oklahoma Billings, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Cocopah Tribe of Arizona O’Connell, Shelby Joan, Southwestern Pittman, Larry Hale, University of Central Mist, Heidi Christine, Tulane University Oklahoma State University, Choctaw Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma School of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Nation of Oklahoma Poitra, Angel Leah, North Dakota State Oklahoma O’Connor, Ramona Mae, University of University, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Moniteiro, Lamona Rene, Georgetown Minnesota, Yankton of Sioux Polacca, Mona Ann, Arizona State University School of Medicine, Old Horn-Vondall, Carol Rose, University of University, Colorado River-Arizona & Narragansett of Rhode Island Montana, Crow Tribe of Montana California 28220 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Pollock-Williamson, Steven Eugene, Runningwolf, Michelle, Montana State Siow, David Earl, University of New Mexico, University of Washington, Blackfeet University, Blackfeet Pueblo of Laguna Porter, Billy James, University of Oklahoma, Russel, Curt Douglas, Connors State College, Small, Jennifer Lynn, Northern Montana Seminole of Oklahoma Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma College, Chippewa Cree Pound-Card, Shelly Kay, Saint Leo College, Russell, Jeffrey Lynn, School College of Smiley, Bennett, Fort Lewis College, Gila Turtle Mountain Chippewa Podiatric Medicine, Cherokee Nation of River Pima-Maricopa Privett, Jonathan Dale, University of Kansas Oklahoma Smiley, Michelle Margaret, Northern Arizona School of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Rutter, James Dull, University of Kansas University, Gila River Pima-Maricopa Oklahoma School of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Smith, Angela Rene, Rocky Mountain Pugh, Jody Marie, Southern Nazarene Oklahoma College, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma University, Otoe-Missouria of Oklahoma Sager, Shawn David, University of North Smith, Bryan Milton, City College-San Quam, Devona Renee, Albuquerque Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Francisco, Yurok Tribe Technical Vocational Institute, Zuni Sam, Michelle Elma, University of Portland, Smith, Dan Mark, Northern Arizona Quam, Gordon, New Mexico State Alaska Native University, Onieda of Wisconsin University, Zuni Sam, Orena Ann, University of New Mexico, Smith, Farrel Wayne, East Central Oklahoma Quintana, Alexandria Lynn, University of Navajo State University, Seminole of Oklahoma New Mexico-Gallup, Navajo Samuel, Christine Bianca, University of New Smith, Jennifer Paige, University of Kansas, Quisno, Jacqueline Elaine, University of Mexico, Navajo Comanche of Oklahoma Washington, Oglala Sioux Sanders, Jay Derek, Southwestern State Smith, Karole Denise, University of Rabbithead, Tiffany Ann, University of North College School of Pharmacy, Choctaw Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Navajo Dakota, Cheyenne River Sioux Nation of Oklahoma Smith, Lisa Pearl, North Dakota State Rafferty, Marc Shannon, University of Sandia, Charles F., University of New University College of Pharmacy, Turtle Oklahoma College of Pharmacy, Citizen Mexico, Pueblo of Jemez Mountain Chippewa Band Potawatomi of OK Sanford, Kimberley Beatrice, Fort Lewis Smith, Nathan Brant, Southwestern Rainer, Lillian Little Red Flower, Brigham College, Navajo Oklahoma State University, Cherokee Young University, San Carlos Apache Sangrey, Cory Leigh, Northern Montana Nation of Oklahoma Ranco, Mark Robert, University of Maine, College, Chippewa Cree Smith, Shiela Rena, University of Sciences Penobscot of Maine Sargent, Christopher John, University of and Arts of Oklahoma, Seminole of Raymond, Joan Elaine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Alaska Oklahoma Montana, Confederated Salish & Kootenai Native Smith, Veronica Ann, Yale University School Reategui, Tyra Nicole, University of North Schildt, Brenda, University of Kansas School of Nursing Nurse Practitioner Program, Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa of Social Welfare, San Carlos Apache Navajo Redeye, Monica, D’Youville College, Seneca Schmidlkofer, Carolyn Louise, East Central Sneed, Roberta Vanessa Lambert, of New York Oklahoma State University, Choctaw Southwestern Community College, Eastern Redgrave, Corryn Jeneva, University of Nation of Oklahoma Bank-Cherokee of NC Arizona, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Schroyer, Jill Annette, John Brown Snell, Jerry David, Northeastern State Redman, Kay Lynne, Medical College of University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Wisconsin, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Scott, Larry Brent, College of Osteopathic Snow, Carl Donelle, Northeastern Oklahoma Redshirt, Trudy Rae, Oklahoma Baptist Medicine of Oklahoma State University, State University, Muskogee (Creek) of University, Navajo Cherokee Nation of OK Oklahoma Reed, Martin Louis, University of New Scott, Michael Tacheeni, Seattle Pacific Snyder, Lisa Kaye, New Mexico Highland Mexico, Oglala Sioux University, Navajo University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Reid, Ron Andrew, University of North Secatero, Shannon, Southwestern State Solis, Vivian West, Southwestern Dakota, Pueblo of Isleta College School of Pharmacy, Navajo Community College, Eastern Band- Reyhner, Deborah Dawn, Montana State Seger, Jeanine, University of Kansas School Cherokee Nation of North Carolina University, Comanche of Oklahoma of Social Welfare, Cheyenne-Arapaho of Somoza, Melinda, University of North Dakota Richardson, Willie Forrest, Pembroke State Oklahoma School of Medicine, Navajo University, Lumbee Self, Andrea Joy, Southwestern State College Soukup, Steven Leo, University of Minnesota Riddle, Helen Yolanda, University of Kansas School of Pharmacy, Cherokee Nation of Duluth, Red Lake Band of Chippewa School of Social Welfare, Navajo Oklahoma Sparks, Kerrie Renee, Oklahoma State Rieck, Charlotte, Fort Lewis College, Navajo Sexton-Carpitcher, Freda G., University of University-Okmulgee, Cherokee Nation of Roanhorse, Julia Anne, Navajo Community Central Oklahoma, Seminole of Oklahoma Oklahoma College, Navajo Sexton-Grimm, Julie Marie, East Central Speicher, Amanda Wenona, Dartmouth Robbins, Cara May, College of the Desert, University, Confederated Salish & Kootenai Medical School, Cherokee Nation of Standing Rock Sioux North & South Dakota Sherman, Sara Ann, Northland Pioneer Oklahoma Robinson, Lenora, Navajo Community College, Navajo Spottedhorse, Gary Allen, Oklahoma City College, Navajo Sherrill, Reece Wade, Oral Roberts Community College, Kiowa of Oklahoma Robinson, Walisi Ann, University of Central University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Springfield, Julia Bernadette, University of Arkansas, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Shields, Darren, East Central Oklahoma State North Dakota, Crow Tribe of Montana Rogers, Charles Michael, University of University, Absentee-Shawnee Stacey (Gene), Miriam Jean, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Muskogee Shirley, Effie M., University of New Mexico, New Mexico, Hopi (Creek) of Oklahoma Navajo Stanley, Jason Michael, Oklahoma State Rolland, Geoffrey Grant, Tulsa Junior Shopteese, Gloria Joyclyn, University of University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma College, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Montana, Fort Belknap Stately, Antony Louis, California School of Romancito, Angela, University of New Shorty, Marvin, Navajo Community College, Professional Psychology, Oneida of Mexico Medical Technology Program, Zuni Navajo Wisconsin Romancito, Gayle Rozelle, University of New Shutt, Jason Taylor, Baylor University, Stefaniak, Yvonne Chester, University of Mexico, Zuni Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana New Mexico, Navajo Romancito, Karen Valerie, University of New Sigstad-Bumpus, Vonda Ann, California State Stewart, Deanna, Phoenix College, Navajo Mexico, Navajo University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Stewart, Mark Gregory, Rush University- Rosal, Gregory McKay, University of North Simmons, Elizabeth Marie, North Central Medical, Echota Cherokee Dakota, Devils Lake Sioux Technical College, Minnesota Chippewa Stewart, Millie Faith, Regis University, Crow Rose, Richard Travis, University of Grand Portage Band Tribe of Montana Oklahoma, Absentee-Shwanee Simpson, Colleen Mae, University of North Stout, Dana Rene, University of Oklahoma Roundstone, Tamara Ann, Salish Kootenai Dakota School of Medicine, Crow Tribe of Health Sciences Center, Cherokee Nation of College, Northern Cheyenne Montana Oklahoma Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28221

Stover, Gena Ruth, Southwestern Oklahoma Toya, Sheila Althea, University of Alaska- Waldroup, Anthony Wayne, University of State University, Chickasaw Nation of Anchorage, Pueblo of Jemez Oklahoma College of Medicine, Tonkawa Oklahoma Tracey, Cassandra Glenbah, Arizona State of Oklahoma Strickland, Shakira Dawn, Wichita State University, Navajo Walker, Sharon K., University of Mary, University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Treat, Shannon Nichole, East Central Minnesota Chippewa Stroble, Vernon Lee, Northeastern State University, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Wallace, Veronica Lynn, Rose State College, University, Muskogee (Creek) of Oklahoma Trevino, Karen Sue, Seminole Junior College, Sac & Fox of Oklahoma Stumblingbear, Zoie Ellen, University of Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Warhol, Peter Joseph, University of Central Oklahoma, Kiowa of Oklahoma Trottier, Janelle Leah, Washington University Minnesota Minneapolis Medical School, Sue, Phyllis Lorraine, University of G. W. Brown School, Turtle Mountain Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Oklahoma, Comanche of Oklahoma Chippewa Warlick, Ethan Aaron, University of Kansas Sullivan, Jami Denise, University of Truesdell, Michael Paul, University of School of Medicine, Cherokee Nation of Montana, Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Arizona College of Medicine, White Oklahoma Sunagoowie, Jack, Washington University G. Mountain Apache Warlick, Matthew Eli, University of Missouri W. Brown School, Cherokee Nation of Tsingine, Georgia Lynn, Arizona State Kansas City School of Medicine, Cherokee Oklahoma University, Navajo Nation of OK Sunday-Carter, Lisa Diane, University of Tsinnie, Ardis Rae, Arizona State University, Warren, Julie Ann, Bacone College, Choctaw Arkansas-Fayetteville, Cherokee Nation of Navajo Nation of Oklahoma Oklahoma Tso, Delsey Renee, Northern Arizona Warren, Sheila, University of Arizona, Swensen, Eric Carl, Grand Canyon University, Navajo Confederated Tribes of the Siletz University, Aleut Tso, Lenora, University of New Mexico, Warrington, Amy Katherine, Seminole Junior Tadgerson, Joanne Lorraine, Michigan State Navajo College, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma University School of Social Work, Sault Tso-Garcia, Jennifer Lynn, University of New Wassillie, Marcia Elice, Washington State Ste. Marie-Chippewa Mexico Medical Technology Program, University, Aleut Tahermandarjani, Babak, University of Navajo Watson, Katie Joanne, Northeastern State Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tsosie, Lawrence Dean, Northern Arizona University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Tahkeal, Antoine Randall, Yakima Valley University, Navajo Watson, Linwood Worth, University of North Community College, Confederated Yakima Tune, Crystal Ann, Rogers State College, Carolina-Chapel Hill, Haliwa-Saponi Taliman, Karrie Candi, Arizona State Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Wauneka, Theron Allen, Arizona State University, Navajo Turner, Meredith Michelle, Northern University, Navajo Tan, Tabitha Leeann, Texas Christian Oklahoma College, Ottawa of Oklahoma Webster, Edwin Quillin, University of University, Navajo Umber, Steven Ray, University of Michigan, Montana, Aleut Tapia, Stefani Marlene, University of Texas Mississippi Band of Choctaw Webster, Roxanne Dione, United Tribes at Austin, Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo-Texas Upshaw, Bryan Michael, Phoenix College, Technical College, Assiniboine & Sioux Tarango, Elena Marveya, California State Navajo Welch, Brian Keith, University of Oklahoma University at Sacramento, Mooretown of Maidu Upshaw, Carmelita, Scottsdale Community College of Pharmacy, Choctaw Nation of Teller, Donnell Rae, Northern Arizona College, Navajo Oklahoma University, Navajo Urbaniak, Angela Dawn, Miles Community Welch, Trudy Ella, University of North Thomas, Dirk Scot, University of Oklahoma College, Assiniboine & Sioux Dakota, Eastern Band-Cherokee of North Dental School, Cherokee Nation of Vaile, Marine Lynn, Blackfeet Community Carolina Oklahoma College, Blackfeet Wells, Alicia Dawn, Northeastern State Thomas, Jennifer Lee, University of North Valdo, Gerald David, Santa Fe Community University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa College, Pueblo of Acoma Wells, Craig James, South Dakota State Thomas, Leonard Don, University of New Vanatta, Sherry Ann, Texas Woman’s University, Cheyenne River Sioux Mexico School of Medicine, Navajo University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Wescott, Siobhan Maureen, University of Thomas, Sheila, New Mexico State Vandusen, Terra Andrea, Oklahoma Baptist Alaska, Crooked Creek Village University, Navajo University, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma West, Darin Joy, Towson State University, Thomas-Langley, Mary Ann, Northeastern Vazquez Rose Lydia, California School of Mississippi Band of Choctaw State University, Cherokee Nation of Professional Pyschology, Navajo West, Michael Clinton, East Central Oklahoma Vent, Liza Sarah, University of Alaska, University, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Thompson, Christina Kay, Palomar College, Huslia Village Wwest, Michael Curtis, University of North Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Viarreal, Genevieve Racheal, Northern New Dakota School of Medicine, Mississippi Thunder, Michael, University of Wisconsin- Mexico Community College, Pueblo of San Band of Choctaw Eau Claire, Ho-Chunk Nation (Formerly WI Juan West, Ronald Reed, University of Miami, Winnebago) Vicenti, Darren, University of New Mexico White Mountain Apache Tiger, Brandy Susan, University of Oklahoma School of Medicine, Hopi Weston, Evelyn Jewel, Oglala Lakota College, Health Sciences Center, Muskogee (Creek) Vickers, Francine Judith, University of Oglala Sioux of Oklahoma Colorado Dental School, Pueblo of Isleta Weston, Joephine, Regis University, Navajo Tiger, Terese, Seminole Junior College, Vielle, Nadine Marie, Blackfeet Community Whipple, Katherine Joy, University of Seminole of Oklahoma College, Blackfeet Minnesota Minneapolis Medical School, Todicheeney, Debbie B., Northland Pioneer Villines, Nathan Clark, University of Spokane College, Navajo Oklahoma Dental School, Cherokee Nation White, Betty Jane, University of Kansas, Toersbijns, Joann Veronica, University of of Oklahoma Cherokee National of Oklahoma New Mexico, Pueblo of Isleta Vogt, Anita Marie, University of Alaska White, Davina Irene, Washington State Tomasik, Heather Renee, Northeastern State School of Nursing/Health, Aleut University, Spokane University, Confederated Tribes Colville Vorpahl, Jacqueline Melissa, U.S. White, Denise Davidica, University of North Tomlin, Kevin David, Western Washington International University, Choctaw Nation Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa University, Cheyenne River Sioux of Oklahoma White, Kalvin Glenual, University of Utah, Tommie, Titania Leonila, University of New Waddell, Barry Lee, University of the Pacific, Navajo Mexico, Navajo Koyuk Village White, Kevin Steven, University of Arizona, Tonemah, Darryl Parker, University of Wade, Aaron Clay, The University of Navajo Nebraska-Lincoln, Kiowa of Oklahoma Oklahoma, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma White, Marlon Dion, Northern Arizona Touchine, Jennifer, University of New Wagner, Joy Ann, New Mexico Highlands University, Navajo Mexico, Navajo University, Blackfeet White Calfe-Sayler, Verlee Kay, University of Townsend, Cheryl Christine, New Mexico Wakole, Carmen Jean, East Central Oklahoma North Dakota School of Medicine, Three Highlands University, Pueblo of Laguna State University, Absentee-Shawnee Affiliated Tribes Fort-Berthold 28222 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

White Horse-Baker, Marilyn R., University of Yazzie, Mildred, University of New Mexico, patentable material, and personal North Dakota, Three Affiliated Tribes Fort- Navajo information concerning individuals Berthold Yazzie, Myra, Grand Canyon College, Navajo associated with applications, the Whitehair, Ivan Leon, University of New Yazzie, Ruybelle Natalie, Arizona State disclosure of which would constitute a Mexico, Navajo University, Navajo Wiggins, Elizabeth Owle, University of North Yazzie, Sheldwin Aaron, University of New clearly unwarranted invasion of Carolina, Eastern Band-Cherokee of North Mexico, Navajo personal privacy. Carolina Ybarra, Ysidro Patrick, University of Alaska- (Catalog of Federal Assistance Program No. Wilcox, Christopher Michael, University of Anchorage, Crow Tribe of Montana 93.172, Human Genome Research.) Missouri Kansas City School of Med, Yellowman, Ida Mae, Pacific Lutheran Date: May 29, 1996. Cherokee Nation of OK University, Navajo Wilcox, Darlene Marie, University of North Yellowman, Marilyn Frances, Arizona State Susan K. Feldman, Dakota, Oglala Siox University, Navajo Committee Management Officer, NIH. Wilkett, David Matthew, Michigan State Yellowman, Ryan, Eastern Michigan [FR Doc. 96–13956 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] University College of Osteopathic Med, University, Navajo BILLING CODE 4140±01±M Choctaw Nation of OK York, Kimberly Robin, D’Youville College, Willeto, Brenda Ann, University of New Seneca of New York Mexico, Navajo Young, Iola Grace, University of Colorado National Heart, Lung, and Blood Willeto, Virginia, University of New Mexico, School of Medicine Phys. Asst. Prog., Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting Navajo Alaska Native Williams, Deidra, University of Arizona, Zenick, Alexander Jon, University of North Notice is hereby given of a change in Navajo Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Williams, Elise Kay, University of California the meeting of the Sleep Academic Zenick, Charles Joseph, University of North Award Special Emphasis Panel, Davis School of Nursing/Phys. Asst. Prog., Dakota, Turtle Mountain Chippewa Yurok Tribe National Heart, Lung, and Blood Williams, Jerry Bruce, The University of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Institute, June 16, 1996, which was Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma Patricia Lee-McCoy, Chief, Scholarship published in the Federal Register on Williams, Kimberly Dawn, East Central Branch, Indian Health Service, May 20, 1996 (61 FR 25230). Oklahoma State University, Citizen Band Twinbrook Metro Plaza, 12300 The meeting date is changed to June Potawatomi of Oklahoma Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 100, 17, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will Williams, Kinde Elizabeth, Cameron Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone: be held at the Holiday Inn, Chevy University, Wichita & Affiliated Tribes of (301) 443–6197, Fax: (301) 443–6048. Oklahoma Chase, Maryland. As previously Williams, Michael Shawn, Utah State Dated: May 7, 1996. advertised, the meeting is closed to the University, Oglala Sioux Michael H. Trujillo, public. Williams, Pauletta Lynn, University of Assistant Surgeon General Director. Dated: May 29, 1996. Southern California Physician Assistant [FR Doc. 96–13880 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45am] Susan K. Feldman, Program, Navajo Williamson, Jeanette, Sisseton Wahpeton BILLING CODE 4160±16±M Committee Management Officer, NIH. Community College, Lower Brule Sioux [FR Doc. 96–13954 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Wilson, Joanna, Oglala Lakota College, Oglala BILLING CODE 4140±01±M Sioux National Institutes of Health Wilson, Sandra, University of Oklahoma, Northern Cheyenne National Center for Human Genome National Institute of Environmental Winton, Brenda Renee, New Mexico State Research; Notice of Closed Meeting Health Sciences; Notice of a Closed University, Navajo Meeting Witt, Margaret Ann, Portland State Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as University, Oglala Sioux Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix), notice is Wood, Chelsea Lee, University of Arizona, Federal Advisory Committee Act, as hereby given of the following meeting: Diomede Native (aka Inalik) amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice Woodie, Thelma, University of New Mexico, Agenda/Purpose: To review and Navajo evaluate grant application and/or is hereby given of the following Woods, Rosemary, Carl Albert State College, contract proposals. National Institute of Environmental Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Name of Committee: Human Genome Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Wooten, Kathleen Ann, University of Research Initial Review Group. (SEP) meeting: Missouri School of Optometry, Cherokee Date: June 24–25, 1996. Name of SEP: Toxicity Testing in Nation of Oklahoma Time: June 24, 6:00 pm to recess, June Animals. Wyaco, Michelle, University of New Mexico, 25, 8:30 am to adjournment. Date: June 21, 1996. Zuni Place: NIH, Natcher (Building 45), Time: 9:00 a.m. Yabeny, Beverly B., University of New Place: National Institute of Mexico, Navajo Rooms F1 and F2, 9000 Rockville Pike, Yazzie, Bettie, Coconino County Community Bethesda, Maryland. Environmental Health Sciences, North College, Navajo Contact Person: Ms. Linda Engel, Campus, Building 18, Conference Room Yazzie, Cassandra Jane, University of Chief, Office of Scientific Review, 1807, Research Triangle Park, NC. Arizona, Navajo National Center for Human Genome Contact Person: Dr. John Braun, Yazzie, Davina Dee, Albuquerque Technical Research, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Vocational Institute, Navajo Building 38A, Room 604, Bethesda, Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Yazzie, Dedra Ann, San Juan College, Navajo Maryland 20892, (301) 402–0838. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) Yazzie, Delvin, University of New Mexico, The meeting will be closed in 541–1446. Navajo accordance with the provisions set forth Purpose/Agenda: To review and Yazzie, Desbah Rae, Grand Canyon University, Navajo in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title evaluate contract proposals. Yazzie, Evelina, Northern Arizona 5, U.S.C. The applications and/or The meeting will be closed in University, Navajo contract proposals, and the discussions accordance with the provisions set forth Yazzie, Henrietta Joan, Alburquerque could reveal confidential trade secrets in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title Technical Vocational Institute, Navajo or commercial property such as 5, U.S.C. Applications and/or proposals Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28223 and the discussions could reveal Name of Committee: Planning Center Drive, MSC 2320, room 3C–31, confidential trade secrets or commercial Subcommittee. Bethesda, MD 20892–2320, (301) 496– property such as patentable material Date of Meeting: June 10. 7243. and personal information concerning Place: National Institutes of Health, Purpose: To recommend individuals individuals associated with the building 31, Conference Room 5B03, to serve on a scientific panel to update applications, the disclosure of which Bethesda, MD. the speech and speech disorders section would constitute a clearly unwarranted Closed: 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. of the Research Plan. invasion of personal privacy. Agenda: Discussion of long-term The meeting will be closed in This notice is being published less planning and policy issues and review accordance with the provisions set forth than fifteen days prior to this meeting of individual grant applications. in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United due to the urgent need to meet timing Name of Committee: National States Code. These discussions could limitations imposed by the contract Advisory Council for Nursing Research. reveal personal information concerning review and funding cycle. Date of Meeting: June 11–12, 1996. these individuals,, the disclosure of Place: National Institutes of Health, which would constitute a clearly (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Building 31, Conference Room 6, unwarranted invasion of personal Programs Nos. 93.113, Biological Response to Bethesda, MD. privacy. Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied Open: June 11, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Agenda: NINR Director’s Report (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Biometry and Risk Estimation; 93.894, Program No. 93.173, Biological Research Resource and Manpower Development, Discussion: Report on the Meeting of Related to Deafness and Communication National Institutes of Health.) Advisory Council And Board Disorders) Dated: May 29, 1996. Representatives, Report of the Planning Dated: May 29, 1996. Subcommittee, Discussion of the Report Susan K. Feldman, Susan K. Feldman, on the Role of Advisory Councils, NIH Committee Management Officer, NIH. Tuition Reimbursement Policy, Committee Management Officer, NIH. [FR Doc. 96–13955 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Environmental Health Research and [FR Doc. 96–13959 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140±01±M Work Group Meeting, Intramural BILLING CODE 4140±01±M Research Programs. Closed: June 12, 8:30 a.m. to National Institute of Nursing Research; adjournment. National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of Meeting of the National Executive Secretary: Dr. Ernest Notice of Closed Meeting of the Advisory Council for Nursing Research Marquez, NINR, NIH, Building 45, National Institute of Dental Research and Its Subcommittee Room 3AN–12, Bethesda, MD 20892. Special Grants Review Committee This notice is being published less Pursuant to Pub. L. 92–463, notice is Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the than 15 days prior to the meeting due hereby given of the meeting of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as to the urgent need to meet timing National Advisory Council for Nursing amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice limitations imposed by the review and Research, National Institute of Nursing is hereby given of the following funding cycle. Research, National Institutes of Health meeting: and its Subcommittee on June 10–12, (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Name of Committee: National 1996. Program No. 93.361, Nursing Research, Institute of Dental Research Special The meeting will be open to the National Institutes of Health.) Grants Review Committee. public as indicated below. Attendance Dated: May 29, 1996. Date: June 13–14, 1996. Time: 8:30 a.m. to Adjournment. will be limited to space available. Susan K. Feldman, Committee Management Officer, NIH. Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One The meetings will be closed to the Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, [FR Doc. 96–13957 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] public as indicated below in accordance Maryland 20814. with the provisions set forth in secs. BILLING CODE 4140±01±M Contact Person: Dr. William Gartland, 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Scientific Review Administrator, NIDR and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92–463, for the National Institute on Deafness and Special Grants Review Committee, review, discussion and evaluation of Natcher Building, Room 4AN–38E, individual grant applications. These Other Communication Disorders; Notice of Closed Meeting Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594–2372. applications and discussions could Purpose/Agenda: To review and reveal confidential trade secrets or Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the evaluate grant applications and/or commercial property such as patentable Federal Advisory Committee Act, as contract proposals. material, and personal information amended (5 United States Code The meeting will be closed in concerning individuals associated with Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of accordance with the provisions set forth the applications, the disclosure of the following meeting: in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title which would constitute a clearly Name of Committee: Ad Hoc Speech 5, U.S.C. Applications and/or proposals unwarranted invasion of personal and Speech Disorders Subcommittee of and the discussions could reveal privacy. the National Deafness and Other confidential trade secrets or commercial A summary of the meetings, roster of Communication Disorders Advisory property such as patentable material committee members, and other Council. and personal information concerning information may be obtained from the Date: July 16, 1996. individuals associated with the Executive Secretary listed below. Time: 1–3 p.m. (telephone applications and/or proposals, the Individuals who plan to attend and conference) disclosure of which would constitute a need special assistance, such as sign Place: National Institutes of Health clearly unwarranted invasion of language interpretation or other Building 31C, Conference Room 8, 9000 personal privacy. reasonable accommodations, should Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892. This notice is being published less contact the Executive Secretary in Contact Person: Mr. Baldwin Wong, than 15 days prior to the meeting due advance of the meeting. Program Analyst, NIDCD/PPHRB, 31 to the urgent need to meet timing 28224 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices limitations imposed by the review and Dated: May 29, 1996. Contact Person: Dr. Harish Chopra, funding cycle. Susan K. Feldman, Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Committee Management Officer, NIH. Rockledge Drive, Room 5112, Bethesda, Program No. 93.121, Dental Research [FR Doc. 96–13961 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1169. Institute; National Institutes of Health, HHS) BILLING CODE 4140±01±M Name of SEP: Biological and Dated: May 29, 1996. Physiological Sciences. Susan K. Feldman, Date: July 11–12, 1996. Committee Management Officer, NIH. National Institutes of Health; Division Time: 8:00 a.m. [FR Doc. 96–13960 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Place: American Inn, Bethesda, MD. BILLING CODE 4140±01±M Meetings Contact Person: Dr. Nicholas Mazarella, Scientific Review Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Federal Advisory Committee Act, as National Institute of Dental Research; Room 5128, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice Notice of a Meeting of the National (301) 435–1018. is hereby given of the following Division Advisory Dental Research Council of Research Grants Special Emphasis Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences. Pursuant to Pub. L. 92–463, notice is Panel (SEP) meetings: Date: July 12, 1996. hereby given of a meeting of the Purpose/Agenda: To review Time: 8:30 a.m. National Advisory Dental Research individual grant applications. Place: Hyatt Arlington, Arlington, VA. Council, National Institute of Dental Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Contact Person: Dr. Alex Liacouras, Research, On June 11–12, 1996. The Sciences. Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 meeting of the full Council will be open Date: June 14, 1996. Rockledge Drive, Room 5154, Bethesda, to the public on June 11 from 8:30 a.m. Time: 5:00 p.m. Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1740. to recess, Conference Room 10, Sixth Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD. Floor, Building 31, National Institutes of Contact Person: Dr. Nancy Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Health, Bethesda, Maryland, for general Lamontagne, Scientific Review Sciences. discussion and program presentations. Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Date: July 17–18, 1996. Attendance by the public will be limited 4170, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) Time: 8:00 a.m. to space available. 435–1726. Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD. In accordance with the provisions set This notice is being published less Contact Person: Dr. Donald forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), than 15 days prior to the above meetings Schneider, Scientific Review Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. due to the urgent need to meet timing Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 92–463, the meeting of the Council will limitations imposed by the grant review Room 5104, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, be closed to the public on June 12, 8:30 and funding cycle. (301) 435–1165. a.m. to adjournment, for the review, Name of SEP: Behavioral and Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary discussion and evaluation of individual Neurosciences. Sciences. grant applications. These applications Date: June 25, 1996. Date: July 24, 1996. and information concerning individuals Time: 9:00 a.m. Time: 10:00 a.m. associated with the discussions could Place: Radisson Barcelo Hotel, Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, reveal confidential trade secrets or Washington, DC. Washington, DC. commercial property such as patentable Contact Person: Dr. Joseph Kimm, Contact Person: Dr. Gerald Becker, material, and personal applications and Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 reports, the disclosure of which would Rockledge Drive, Room 5178, Bethesda, Rockledge Drive, Room 5114, Bethesda, constitute a clearly unwarranted Maryland 20982, (301) 435–1249. Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1750. invasion of personal privacy. Name of SEP: Behavioral and Name of SEP: Biological and Dr. Dushanka V. Kleinman, Executive Neurosciences. Physiological Sciences. Secretary, National Advisory Dental Date: July 8–10, 1996. Date: October 23–25, 1996. Research Council, and Deputy Director, Time: 8:30 a.m. Time: 8:30 a.m. National Institute of Dental Research, Place: Ramada Inn, Rockville, MD. Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD. National Institutes of Health, Building Contact Person: Dr. Joseph Marwah, Contact Person: Dr. Lynwood Jones, 31, Room 2C39, Bethesda, Maryland Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 20892, (telephone (301) 496–9469) will Rockledge Drive, Room 5188, Bethesda, Rockledge Drive, Room 4192, Bethesda, furnish a roster of committee members, Maryland 20982 (301) 435–1253. Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1153. a summary of the meeting, and other Name of SEP: Behavioral and Purpose/Agenda: To review Small information pertaining to the meeting. Neurosciences. Business Innovation Research. Individuals who plan to attend and Date: July 9, 1996. Name of SEP: Microbiological and need special assistance, such as sign Time: 9:30 a.m. Immunological Sciences. language interpretation or other Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD. Date: June 27–28, 1996. reasonable accommodations, should Contact Person: Dr. Herman contact the Executive Secretary listed Teitelbaum, Scientific Review Time: 8:30 a.m. above in advance of the meeting. Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD. This notice is being published less Room 5190, Bethesda, Maryland 20982, Contact Person: Dr. Marcel Pons, than 15 days prior to the meeting due (301) 435–1254. Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 to the urgent need to meet timing Name of SEP: Biological and Rockledge Drive, Room 4196, Bethesda, limitations imposed by the review and Physiological Sciences. Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1217. funding cycle. Date: July 9, 1996. Time: 8:00 a.m. Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Sciences. Program No. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Place: Doubletree Hotel, Rockville, Disorders Research) MD. Date: July 8, 1996. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28225

Time: 8:00 a.m. Substance Abuse and Mental Health letter of certification from SAMHSA, Place: Doubletree Hotel, Rockville, Services Administration HHS (formerly: HHS/NIDA) which MD. attests that it has met minimum Contact Person: Dr. Bill Bunnag, Current List of Laboratories Which standards. Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 Meet Minimum Standards To Engage in In accordance with Subpart C of the Rockledge Drive, Room 5212, Bethesda, Urine Drug Testing for Federal Guidelines, the following laboratories Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1177. Agencies, and Laboratories That Have meet the minimum standards set forth Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Withdrawn From the Program in the Guidelines: Sciences. AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental Aegis Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 624 Date: July 8–10, 1996. Grassmere Park Rd., Suite 21, Nashville, Time: 8:00 a.m. Health Services Administration, HHS (Formerly: National Institute on Drug TN 37211, 615–331–5300 Place: Ramada Inn, Rockville, MD. Alabama Reference Laboratories, Inc., 543 Contact Person: Dr. Dharam Dhindsa, Abuse, ADAMHA, HHS). South Hull St., Montgomery, AL 36103, Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 ACTION: Notice. 800–541–4931/205–263–5745 Rockledge Drive, Room 5206, Bethesda, American Medical Laboratories, Inc., 14225 SUMMARY: Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1174. The Department of Health and Newbrook Dr., Chantilly, VA 22021, 703– Human Services notifies Federal Name of SEP: Biological and 802–6900 agencies of the laboratories currently Associated Pathologists Laboratories, Inc., Physiological Sciences. certified to meet standards of Subpart C 4230 South Burnham Ave., Suite 250, Las Date: July 8, 1996. Vegas, NV 89119–5412, 702–733–7866 Time: 8:00 a.m of Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs (59 Associated Regional and University Place: Doubletree Hotel, Rockville, Pathologists, Inc. (ARUP), 500 Chipeta MD. FR 29916, 29925). A similar notice Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, 801–583– Contact Person: Dr. Harish Chopra, listing all currently certified laboratories 2787 Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 will be published during the first week Baptist Medical Center—Toxicology Rockledge Drive, Room 5112, Bethesda, of each month, and updated to include Laboratory, 9601 I–630, Exit 7, Little Rock, Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1169. laboratories which subsequently apply AR 72205–7299, 501–227–2783 (formerly: for and complete the certification Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Baptist Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Medical Center) Sciences. process. If any listed laboratory’s certification is totally suspended or Bayshore Clinical Laboratory, 4555 W. Date: July 10, 1996. Schroeder Dr., Brown Deer, WI 53223, Time: 8:00 a.m. revoked, the laboratory will be omitted 414–355–4444/800–877–7016 Place: Doubletree Hotel, Rockville, from updated lists until such time as it Cedars Medical Center, Department of MD. is restored to full certification under the Pathology, 1400 Northwest 12th Ave., Contact Person: Dr. Bill Bunnag, Guidelines. Miami, FL 33136, 305–325–5810 Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 If any laboratory has withdrawn from Centinela Hospital Airport Toxicology Rockledge Drive, Room 5212, Bethesda, the National Laboratory Certification Laboratory, 9601 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1177. Program during the past month, it will Angeles, CA 90045, 310–215–6020 be identified as such at the end of the Clinical Reference Lab, 11850 West 85th St., Name of SEP: Biological and Lenexa, KS 66214, 800–445–6917 Physiological Sciences. current list of certified laboratories, and CompuChem Laboratories, Inc., 1904 Date: August 1, 1996. will be omitted from the monthly listing Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, Time: 8:30 a.m. thereafter. NC 27709, 919–549–8263/800–833–3984 Place: Doubletree Hotel, Rockville, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. (Formerly: CompuChem Laboratories, Inc., MD. Giselle Hersh, Division of Workplace A Subsidiary of Roche Biomedical Contact Person: Dr. Abubakar Shaikh, Programs, Room 13A–54, 5600 Fishers Laboratory, Roche CompuChem Scientific Review Administrator, 6701 Laboratories, Inc., A Member of the Roche Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; Tel.: Group) Rockledge Drive, Room 6166, Bethesda, (301) 443–6014. Maryland 20892, (301) 435–1042. CORNING Clinical Laboratories, 4771 Regent SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Blvd., Irving, TX 75063, 800–526–0947 The meetings will be closed in Mandatory Guidelines for Federal (formerly: Damon Clinical Laboratories, accordance with the provisions set forth Workplace Drug Testing were developed Damon/MetPath) in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title in accordance with Executive Order CORNING Clinical Laboratories, 875 5, U.S.C. Applications and/or proposals Greentree Rd., 4 Parkway Ctr., Pittsburgh, 12564 and section 503 of Pub. L. 100– PA 15220–3610, 800–284–7515 (formerly: and the discussions could reveal 71. Subpart C of the Guidelines, confidential trade secrets or commercial Med-Chek Laboratories, Inc., Med-Chek/ ‘‘Certification of Laboratories Engaged Damon, MetPath Laboratories) property such as patentable material in Urine Drug Testing for Federal CORNING Clinical Laboratories, 24451 and personal information concerning Agencies,’’ sets strict standards which Telegraph Rd., Southfield, MI 48034, 800– individuals associated with the laboratories must meet in order to 444–0106 ext. 650 (formerly: HealthCare/ applications and/or proposals, the conduct urine drug testing for Federal Preferred Laboratories, HealthCare/ disclosure of which would constitute a agencies. To become certified an MetPath) CORNING Clinical Laboratories Inc., 1355 clearly unwarranted invasion of applicant laboratory must undergo three personal privacy. Mittel Blvd., Wood Dale, IL 60191, 708– rounds of performance testing plus an 595–3888 (formerly: MetPath, Inc., (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance on-site inspection. To maintain that CORNING MetPath Clinical Laboratories) Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393– certification a laboratory must CORNING Clinical Laboratories, South 93.396, 93.837–93.844, 93.846–93.878, participate in a quarterly performance Central Divison, 2320 Schuetz Rd., St. 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, testing program plus periodic, on-site Louis, MO 63146, 800–288–7293 (formerly: HHS) inspections. Metropolitan Reference Laboratories, Inc.) Dated: May 29, 1996. Laboratories which claim to be in the CORNING Clinical Laboratory, One Malcolm Susan K. Feldman, Ave., Teterboro, NJ 07608, 201–393–5000 applicant stage of certification are not to (formerly: MetPath, Inc., CORNING Committee Management Officer, NIH. be considered as meeting the minimum MetPath Clinical Laboratories) [FR Doc. 96–13958 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] requirements expressed in the HHS CORNING National Center for Forensic BILLING CODE 41140±01±M Guidelines. A laboratory must have its Science, 1901 Sulphur Spring Rd., 28226 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Baltimore, MD 21227, 410–536–1485 Medlab Clinical Testing, Inc., 212 Cherry 708–885–2010 (formerly: International (formerly: Maryland Medical Laboratory, Lane, New Castle, DE 19720, 302–655– Toxicology Laboratories), Inc., National Center for Forensic Science) 5227 SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, CORNING Nichols Institute, 7470–A Mission MedTox Laboratories, Inc., 402 W. County 400 Egypt Rd., Norristown, PA 19403, 800– Valley Rd., San Diego, CA 92108–4406, Rd. D, St. Paul, MN 55112, 800–832–3244/ 523–5447 (formerly: SmithKline Bio- 800–446–4728/619–686–3200 (formerly: 612–636–7466 Science Laboratories) Nichols Institute, Nichols Institute Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc., SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Substance Abuse Testing (NISAT)) Department of Pathology and Laboratory 8000 Sovereign Row, Dallas, TX 75247, Cox Medical Centers, Department of Medicine, 1701 N. Senate Blvd., 214–638–1301 (formerly: SmithKline Bio- Toxicology, 1423 North Jefferson Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46202, 317–929–3587 Science Laboratories) Springfield, MO 65802, 800–876–3652/ Methodist Medical Center Toxicology SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, 417–836–3093 Laboratory, 221 N.E. Glen Oak Ave., 1737 Airport Way South, Suite 200, Dept. of the Navy, Navy Drug Screening Peoria, IL 61636, 800–752–1835/309–671– Seattle, WA 98134, 206–623–8100 Laboratory, Great Lakes, IL, Building 38–H, 5199 South Bend Medical Foundation, Inc., 530 N. Great Lakes, IL 60088–5223, 708–688– MetroLab-Legacy Laboratory Services, 235 N. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601, 2045/708–688–4171 Graham St., Portland, OR 97227, 503–413– 219–234–4176 Diagnostic Services Inc., dba DSI, 4048 Evans 4512, 800–237–7808 (x4512) Southwest Laboratories, 2727 W. Baseline Ave., Suite 301, Fort Myers, FL 33901, National Toxicology Laboratories, Inc., 1100 Rd., Suite 6, Tempe, AZ 85283, 602–438– 813–936–5446/800–735–5416 California Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93304, 8507 Doctors Laboratory, Inc., P.O. Box 2658 906 805–322–4250 St. Anthony Hospital (Toxicology Julia Dr., Valdosta, GA 31604, 912–244– Northwest Toxicology, Inc., 1141 E. 3900 Laboratory), P.O. Box 205, 1000 N. Lee St., 4468 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84124, 800–322– Oklahoma City, OK 73102, 405–272–7052 Drs. Weber, Palmer, Macy, Chartered, 338 N. 3361 Toxicology & Drug Monitoring Laboratory, Front St., Salina, KS 67401, 913–823–9246 Oregon Medical Laboratories, P.O. Box 972, University of Missouri Hospital & Clinics, DrugProof, Division of Dynacare/Laboratory 722 East 11th Ave., Eugene, OR 97440– 2703 Clark Lane, Suite B, Lower Level, of Pathology, LLC, 1229 Madison St., Suite 0972, 503–687–2134 500, Nordstrom Medical Tower, Seattle, Columbia, MO 65202, 314–882–1273 Pathology Associates Medical Laboratories, Toxicology Testing Service, Inc., 5426 N.W. WA 98104, 800–898–0180 / 206–386–2672, East 11604 Indiana, Spokane, WA 99206, (formerly: Laboratory of Pathology of 79th Ave., Miami, FL 33166, 305–593– 509–926–2400 2260 Seattle, Inc., DrugProof, Division of PharmChem Laboratories, Inc., 1505–A Laboratory of Pathology of Seattle, Inc.) TOXWORX Laboratories, Inc., 6160 Variel O’Brien Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025, 415– DrugScan, Inc., P.O. Box 2969, 1119 Mearns Ave., Woodland Hills, CA 91367, 818–226– 328–6200/800–446–5177 Rd., Warminster, PA 18974, 215–674–9310 4373 (formerly: Laboratory Specialists, PharmChem Laboratories, Inc., Texas ElSohly Laboratories, Inc., 5 Industrial Park Inc.; Abused Drug Laboratories; MedTox Division, 7606 Pebble Dr., Fort Worth, TX Dr., Oxford, MS 38655, 601–236–2609 Bio-Analytical, a Division of MedTox 76118, 817–595–0294 (formerly: Harris General Medical Laboratories, 36 South Laboratories, Inc.) Brooks St., Madison, WI 53715, 608–267– Medical Laboratory) UNILAB, 18408 Oxnard St., Tarzana, CA 6267 Physicians Reference Laboratory, 7800 West 91356, 800–492–0800/818–343–8191 Harrison Laboratories, Inc., 9930 W. Highway 110th St., Overland Park, KS 66210, 913– (formerly: MetWest-BPL Toxicology 80, Midland, TX 79706, 800–725–3784/ 338–4070/800–821–3627 Laboratory). 915–563–3300 (formerly: Harrison & Poisonlab, Inc., 7272 Clairemont Mesa Rd., San Diego, CA 92111, 619–279–2600/800– No laboratories withdrew from the Associates Forensic Laboratories) National Laboratory Certification Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati, Inc., 3200 882–7272 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229, 513– Premier Analytical Laboratories, 15201 I–10 Program in May. 569–2051 East, Suite 125, Channelview, TX 77530, Richard Kopanda, LabOne, Inc., 8915 Lenexa Dr., Overland 713–457–3784 (formerly: Drug Labs of Executive Officer, Substance Abuse and Park, Kansas 66214, 913–888–3927 Texas) Mental Health Services Administration. Presbyterian Laboratory Services, 1851 East (formerly: Center for Laboratory Services, a [FR Doc. 96–13875 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Division of LabOne, Inc.) Third Street, Charlotte, NC 28204, 800– Laboratory Corporation of America, 13900 473–6640 BILLING CODE 4160±20±P Park Center Rd., Herndon, VA 22071, 703– Puckett Laboratory, 4200 Mamie St., 742–3100 (Formerly: National Health Hattiesburgh, MS 39402, 601–264–3856/ Laboratories Incorporated) 800–844–8378 Pursuant to Public Law 92±463, Notice Laboratory Corporation of America, 21903 Scientific Testing Laboratories, Inc., 463 Is Hereby Given of the Meeting of the 68th Ave. South, Kent, WA 98032, 206– Southlake Blvd., Richmond, VA 23236, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 395–4000 (Formerly: Regional Toxicology 804–378–9130 Services Administration (SAMHSA) Services) Scott & White Drug Testing Laboratory, 600 National Advisory Council in June Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, S. 25th St., Temple, TX 76504, 800–749– 1996 1120 Stateline Rd., Southaven, MS 38671, 3788 601–342–1286 (Formerly: Roche S.E.D. Medical Laboratories, 500 Walter NE, A portion of the meeting of the Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.) Suite 500, Albuquerque, NM 87102, 505– SAMHSA National Advisory Council Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 244–8800, 800–999–LABS Sierra Nevada Laboratories, Inc., 888 Willow will be open and will include 69 First Ave., Raritan, NJ 08869, 800–437– discussions concerning issues on 4986 (Formerly: Roche Biomedical St., Reno, NV 89502, 800–648–5472 Laboratories, Inc.) SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, SAMHSA’s appropriation and budget, Laboratory Specialists, Inc., 113 Jarrell Dr., 7600 Tyrone Ave., Van Nuys, CA 91045, reorganization, and Knowledge Belle Chasse, LA 70037, 504–392–7961 818–989–2520 Development and Application Program. Marshfield Laboratories, 1000 North Oak SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, These will also be a legislative update, Ave., Marshfield, WI 54449, 715–389– 801 East Dixie Ave., Leesburg, FL 34748, an update on the Agency’s managed 3734/800–222–5835 904–787–9006 (formerly: Doctors & care activities, and a discussion on MedExpress/National Laboratory Center, Physicians Laboratory) issues of quality in a managed care SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, 4022 Willow Lake Blvd., Memphis, TN environment. In addition, there will be 38175, 901–795–1515 3175 Presidential Dr., Atlanta, GA 30340, Medical College Hospitals Toxicology 770–452–1590 (formerly: SmithKline Bio- a report on an exemplary substance Laboratory, Department of Pathology, 3000 Science Laboratories) abuse prevention grantee, and status Arlington Ave., Toledo, OH 43699–0008, SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, reports by the Council’s workgroups on 419–381–5213 506 E. State Pkwy., Schaumburg, IL 60173, Public Education, and Children’s, and Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28227

Services Integration. Public comments DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND the agency form number, if applicable; are welcome during the open session. URBAN DEVELOPMENT (6) what members of the public will be Please communicate with the individual affected by the proposal; (7) how [Docket No. FR±3917±N±86] listed as contact below for guidance. frequently information submissions will Attendance by the public will be limited Office of Administration; Submission be required; (8) an estimate of the total to space available. for OMB Review: Comment Request number of hours needed to prepare the information submission including The meeting will also include the AGENCY: Office of Administration, HUD. number of respondents, frequency of review, discussion and evaluation of ACTION: Notice. response, and hours of response; (9) contract proposals and discussion of whether the proposal is new, an information about the Agency’s SUMMARY: The proposed information extension, reinstatement, or revision of procurement plans. Therefore a portion collection requirement described below an information collection requirement; of the meeting will be closed to the has been submitted to the Office of and (10) the names and telephone public as determined by the Management and Budget (OMB) for numbers of an agency official familiar Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance review, as required by the Paperwork with the proposal and of the OMB Desk with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (4) and Reduction Act. The Department is Officer for the Department. (6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, sec. 10(d). soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork A summary of the meeting and a Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as DATES: Comments due date: July 5, roster of Council members may be amended. 1996. obtained from: Ms. Susan E. Day, Dated: May 22, 1996. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are Program Assistant, SAMHSA National David S. Cristy, invited to submit comments regarding Advisory Council, 5600 Fishers Lane, this proposal. Comments must be Acting Director, Information Resources Room 12C–15, Rockville, Maryland Management Policy and Management received within thirty (30) days from the Division. 20857. Telephone: (301) 443–4640. date of this Notice. Comments should Substantive program information may refer to the proposal by name and/or Notice of Submission of Proposed be obtained from the contact whose OMB approval number should be sent Information Collection to OMB name and telephone number is listed to: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., OMB Desk Title of Proposal: Section 8 Housing below. Officer, Office of Management and Assistance Payments Program and Committee Name: Substance Abuse Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Additional Assistance Program for and Mental Health Services Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Projects with HUD-Held Mortgage. Administration National Advisory FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office: Housing. Kay F. Weaver, Reports Management Council. OMB Approval Number: 2502–0407. Officer, Department of Housing and Meeting Date: June 24, 1996. Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Description of the Need for the Place: Regency Room, DoubleTree Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) Information and Its Proposed Use: Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 708–0050. This is not a toll-free number. Owners or managers of HUD-insured or Maryland 20852. Copies of the proposed forms and other HUD-held project mortgages that experience immediate or potentially Closed: June 24, 1996, 9:00 a.m. to available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Weaver. serious financial difficulties can apply 11:00 a.m. for assistance under the Section 8 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Housing Assistance Payments Program. Open: June 24, 1996, 11:00 a.m. to Department has submitted the proposal These contracts provide the owners or 5:00 p.m. for the collection of information, as managers a mechanism to obligate the Contact: Toian Vaughn, Room 12C– described below, to OMB for review, as necessary funds for the financially 15, Parklawn Building, Telephone (301) required by the Paperwork Reduction troubled projects. 443–4640 and FAX (301) 443–1450. Act (44 U.S.C. 35). The Notice lists the following Form Number: HUD–52530 and Dated: May 23, 1996. information: (1) The title of the 53537. Jeri Lipov, information collection proposal; (2) the Respondents: State, Local, or Tribal Committee Management Officer, Substance office of the agency to collect the Government and Not-For-Profit Abuse and Mental Health Services information; (3) the OMB approval Institutions. Administration. number, if applicable; (4) the Frequency of Submission: Annually [FR Doc. 96–13962 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] description of the need for the and Recordkeeping. BILLING CODE 4162±20±M information and its proposed use; (5) Reporting Burden:

Number of re- × Frequency of × Hours per Burden spondents response response = hours

Information Collection ...... 3,126 1 7,243 22,642

Total Estimated Burden Hours: Contact: Barbara D. Hunter, HUD, Dated: May 22, 1996. 22,642. (202) 708–3994; Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., BILLING CODE 4210±01±M Status: Reinstatement, without OMB, (202) 395–7316. changes. 28228 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28229

BILLING CODE 4210±01±C 28230 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

[FR Doc. 96–13757 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] (1) Road standards, alternative PRT–815484 BILLING CODE 4210±01±M funding, and the NEPA process. Applicant: The Nature Conservancy, (2) Public comment. Wisconsin Chapter, Madison,Wisconsin. This meeting is open to the public. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The applicant requests a permit to Persons interested in making oral take (capture and release, collect) Hine’s Bureau of Land Management comments or submitting written Emerald Dragonfly (Somatochlora statements for the GRBAC’s hineana) within Door County, [WO±300±1310±00] consideration should notify the GRBAC Wisconsin. Surveys are proposed to Coordinator at the above address by document presence or absence of the Green River Basin Advisory June 11. The GRBAC will hear oral Committee, Colorado and Wyoming species. Collection of one adult comments from 4 to 6 p.m. on June 18. dragonfly per site is proposed to verify AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, The GRBAC may establish a time limit species. Research proposed is expected Interior. for oral statements. to enhance survival of the species in the ACTION: Notice of Meeting of the Green Date Signed: May 31, 1996. wild and support recovery of the River Basin Advisory Committee. Mat Millenbach, species. Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management. Written data or comments should be SUMMARY: This notice announces the [FR Doc. 96–14094 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] submitted to the Regional Director, U.S. dates, time, and schedule and initial BILLING CODE 4310±84±P Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of agenda for a meeting of the Green River Ecological Services Operations, 1 Basin Advisory Committee (GRBAC). Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota DATES: June 18, 1996, from 9:00 a.m. Fish and Wildlife Service 55111–4056, and must be received until 6:00 p.m. and June 19, 1996, from within 30 days of the date of this 8:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. If you wish to Endangered and Threatened Species publication. speak at the meeting, you must notify Permit Application Documents and other information the GRBAC by June 11, 1996. submitted with this application are ADDRESSES: Sweetwater County Events AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, available for review by any party who Center, 3320 Yellowstone Road, Rock Interior. submits a written request for a copy of Springs, WY 82901. ACTION: Notice of receipt of application. such documents to the following office FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: within 30 days of the date of publication Terri Trevino, GRBAC Coordinator, The following applicant has applied of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box for a permit to conduct certain activities Service, Division of Ecological Services 1828, Cheyenne, WY 82003, telephone with Endangered species. This notice is Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort (307) 775–6020. provided pursuant to section 10(c) of Snelling, Minnesota 55111–4056. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The topics the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Telephone: (612/725–3536 x250); FAX: for the meeting will include: amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.). (612/725–3526). Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28231

Dated: May 28, 1996. alternatives (two in Seattle) to provide 91–190, as amended), the National Park Matthias A. Kerschbaum, additional opportunities for residents Service, has prepared a draft GMP/EIS Acting Assistant Regional Director, Ecological and visitors to enjoy the park units that describes a proposed action for the Services, Region 3, Fish and Wildlife Service, while protecting the park’s cultural and three Alaska units and one Seattle unit Fort Snelling, Minnesota. natural resources. A no action of the park and three alternatives (two [FR Doc. 96–13903 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] alternative also is evaluated. This notice in Seattle) to provide additional BILLING CODE 4310±55±M announces the dates and locations of opportunities for residents and visitors public meetings to solicit comments on to enjoy the park units while protecting the draft GMP/EIS. the park’s cultural and natural National Park Service DATES: Public comment on the draft resources. Public meetings are scheduled on the dates and at the times Notice of Availability of the Draft GMP/EIS is from May 31 to July 31, 1996. Comments must be postmarked by and locations indicated below. General Management Plan/ • June 18—Seattle, Park Office, 117 Environmental Impact Statement for July 31. Hearing dates, times, and locations are listed under South Main Street, 7:00 p.m. the Klondike Gold Rush National • Supplementary Information, below. July 8—Skagway, Public Library, Historical Park 8th & State Streets, 7:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: Comments on the draft • July 9—Whitehorse, Public Library, AGENCIES: National Park Service, GMP/EIS should be submitted to the 2071 2nd Avenue, 7:00 p.m. Interior. General Management Plan, Klondike The proposed action (alternative C) in ACTION: Notice of availability of the draft Gold Rush National Historical Park, Alaska includes development concept general management plan/ 2525 Gambell Street, Anchorage, AK plans for Dyea and the Chilkoot Trail environmental impact statement for the 99508–2892. Comments may also be and would expand park management, Klondike Gold Rush National Historical sent via electronic mail by July 31 to: development, resource (cultural and Park. KLGO/KLSE GMP [email protected]. natural) protection, and maintenance Copies of the draft GMP/EIS are SUMMARY: The National Park Service components to meet most, but not all, of available by request from the announces the availability of the draft the expected visitor-use increases and aforementioned address. General Management Plan/ interests in the park. A Klondike History Environmental Impact Statement for the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Research Center would be established, Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Mosby, National Park Service, Alaska in cooperation with the city of Skagway Park. The draft General Management System Support Office. Telephone: and State of Alaska, to process, study, Plan and Environmental Impact (907) 257–2650 FAX: (907) 257–2510. conserve, and store historical, Statement describes a proposed action SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant ethnographic, and natural history for the three Alaska units and one to section 102(2)(C) of the National artifacts. Part of the center’s function Seattle unit of the park and three Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. would be to provide interpretive and 28232 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices educational programs, as well as the be slightly increased, as would the and two park locations along with input opportunity for interagency training and visitor center operation. Site bulletins from the city of Skagway, state of academic research within Skagway. would be developed for each restored Alaska, and international assistance Specialized historic-restoration skills building. There would be an increased from Parks Canada. would be made available to others on a emphasis on maintaining the restored Dated: May 16, 1996. cost-reimbursable basis. Access to the historic buildings as that program is Judith Gottlieb, Dyea area would be improved with a completed. In Seattle about 2,800 ft 2 of Field Director, Alaska. rerouted, wider gravel road, and additional lease space would be parking, picnic, interpretive, and trail acquired and improvements would be [FR Doc. 96–13830 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] opportunities. Selected Dyea townsite made to storage capabilities and the BILLING CODE 4310±70±P streets would be cleared and signed. mezzanine area. Collections would be Archaeological inventory, surveys, and moved out of the basement and minor Everflow Eastern, Inc., Cuyahoga mapping; marking the historical improvements made to existing exhibits. Valley National Recreation Area, segments; minor trail rerouting; and Pioneer Square and Washington Street Summit County, OH; Availability of increased interpretive programs would Landing and other appropriate Plan of Operations and Environmental occur along the Chilkoot Trail. White waterfront locations interpretive Assessment; Drilling Two Oil/Gas Pass archaeological inventory, exhibits would be developed and sited. Wells surveying, mapping, and marking the A park friends group would be historic trail route would be completed; established. Notice is hereby given in accordance but no facilities are proposed in the Under alternative D for Alaska, park with Section 9.52(b) of Title 36 of the unit. management, development, resource Code of Federal Regulations that the In Seattle, the proposed action would protection, and maintenance needs National Park Service has received from lead eventually to acquiring a would expand to meet all of the Everflow Eastern, Incorporated, a Plan permanent location for the park visitor expected visitor use increases and of Operations to drill two oil/gas wells center, park offices, and historic interests in the park well into the next in Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation collections. In the interim, expanded century. To accommodate the additional Area, located within Summit County, lease space at the present location visitor use, there would be an increase Ohio. would allow park offices to move to in operational activities, maintenance, The Plan of Operations and accessible space on the third floor; and interpretation, and resources Environmental Assessment are available park collections would be moved to the management, while protecting park for public review and comment for a mezzanine level of the building. The resources from degradation. Park period of 30 days from the publication interpretive focus would shift with more facilities would be upgraded with date of this notice. The documents can emphasis toward the role of the Pacific improvements to the visitor and be viewed during normal business hours Northwest in the gold rush. Additional administrative facilities in Skagway and at the Office of the Superintendent, interpretive information (exhibits and the development of new facilities in Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation walking tours) would be developed Dyea and along the Chilkoot Trail. The Area, 15610 Vaughn Road, Brecksville, within the Pioneer Square area. day-use education center proposed in Ohio. Copies can be requested from the Interpretive exhibits, in cooperation Alternative C would be expanded to Superintendent, Cuyahoga Valley with the city of Seattle, would be added provide for overnight use. This would National Recreation Area, 15610 to the waterfront area at Washington provide visitors with additional activity Vaughn Road, Brecksville, Ohio, 44141. Street Landing. Contacts with the options for a better understanding of Skagway office would be expanded with park themes. Additional historic Dated: May 28, 1996. staff cross training. A Friends of the buildings would be acquired for John P. Debo, Jr., Park group would be organized. restoration and lease for commercial Superintendent, Cuyahoga Valley National Under the No-Action Alternative activities, or retention for administrative Recreation Area. (alternative A), the development of a purposes. Both an historical restoration [FR Doc. 96–13867 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] new general management plan would center and a Klondike History Research BILLING CODE 4310±70±M not take place. Management actions Center would be established in would react to situations as needed. In Skagway. Alaska, work toward a new crossing of The park would work with the state Office of Surface Mining Reclamation Nelson Slough and beach area access of Alaska and city of Skagway to and Enforcement would continue, and the existing park provide better access for the Dyea and Notice of Proposed Information management and operations would Chilkoot Trail areas. The park would Collection continue. In Seattle, the basic operation also initiate and maintain additional would continue unchanged. cooperation with the city of Skagway, AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Under alternative B (minimal Parks Canada, and state and federal land Reclamation and Enforcement. alternative), some actions would take management agencies to assure ACTION: Notice and request for place in the park units. In Alaska, the compatible uses in areas adjacent to the comments. park boundary in Dyea would be park. Maximum protection of cultural marked. Work toward a new crossing of and natural resources would be SUMMARY: In compliance with the Nelson Slough and beach area access provided. Connections with the Brackett Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the would continue. The existing road along Wagon Road and Canadian trails would Office of Surface Mining Reclamation Nelson Slough would be graveled, but be examined, as would additional trail and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing remain one lane. The campground, opportunities along the Chilkoot Trail. that the information collection requests picnic area, and ranger station would be No alternative D (Substantial Change) for the titles described below have been moved to be within the park boundary was developed for Seattle unit. forwarded to the Office of Management and the historic segments of the This document is a collaborative and Budget (OMB) for review and Chilkoot Trail would be marked. In effort between two vastly separated comment. The information collection Skagway interpretive programs would National Park system support offices requests describe the nature of the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28233 information collection and the expected OMB Control Number: 1029–0067. control of the property to be affected, burden and cost. Summary: Respondents supply their compliance status and history. The DATES: Comments must be submitted on information on employment and regulatory authority uses this or before July 5, 1996, to be assured of financial interests. The purpose of the information to ensure that the applicant consideration. collection is to ensure compliance with meets all legal, financial and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: section 517(g) of the Surface Mining compliance requirements prior to To request a copy of the information Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 issuance of a permit. (SMCRA), which places an absolute collection request, explanatory Frequency of Collection: On occasion. information and related forms, contact prohibition on having a direct or John A. Trelease at (202) 208–2783. indirect financial interest in Description of Respondents: underground or surface coal mining Applicants for permits for surface coal SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) operations. mining operation permits and state regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which Bureau Form Number: OSM–23. regulatory authorities. Frequency of Collection: Entrance on implement provisions of the Paperwork Total Annual Resposes: 475. duty and annually. Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), Description of Respondents: Any state Total Annual Burden Hours: 22,665. require that interested members of the regulatory authority employee or pubic and affected agencies have an Title: Rights of Entry. member of advisory boards or opportunity to comment on information commissions established in accordance OMB Control Number: 1029–0055. collection and recordkeeping activities with state law or regulation to represent Summary: This regulation establishes (see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). This notice multiple interests who performs any procedures for non-consensual entry identifies information collections that function or duty under the Act. upon private lands for the purpose of OSM has submitted to OMB for Total Annual Responses: 2,316. abandoned mined land reclamation extension. These collections are Total Annual Burden Hours: 784. contained in (1) 30 CFR 705, Restriction activities or exploratory studies when on financial interests of State Title: Indian lands program. the landowner refuses consent or is not employees; (2) 30 CFR 750, Indian lands OMB Control Number: 1029–0091. available. program; (3) 30 CFR 774, Revision; Summary: Operators who conduct or Frequency of Collection: On occasion. propose to conduct surface coal mining renewal; and transfer, assignment, or Description of Respodents: State sale of permit rights; (4) 30 CFR 778, and reclamation operations on Indian lands must comply with the abandoned mine land reclamation Permit applications—minimum agencies. requirements for legal, financial, requirements of 30 CFR 750 pursuant to compliance, and related information; section 710 of SMCRA. Total Annual Responses: 38. and (5) 30 CFR 877, Rights of entry for Frequency of Collection: On occasion. Total Annual Burden Hours: 38. abandoned mine land reclamation Description of Respondents: Send comments on the need for the projects. Applicants for coal mining permits. An agency may not conduct or Total Annual Responses: 34. collection of information for the sponsor, and a person is not required to Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,688. performance of the functions of the respond to, a collection of information Title: Revision; renewal; and transfer, agency; the accuracy of the agency’s unless it displays a currently valid OMB assignment, or sale of permit rights. burden estimates; ways to enhance the control number. The OMB control OMB Control Number: 1029–0088. quality, utility and clarity of the numbers for OSM’s regulations are Summary: These regulations and information collection; and ways to listed in 30 CFR Parts 700 through 955. sections 506(d), 511(a)(1) and 511(b) of minimize the information collection As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a SMCRA provide that persons seeking burden on respondents, such as use of Federal Register notice soliciting permit revisions, permit renewals, or automated means of collection of the comments on these collections of the transfer, sale, or assignment of information, to the following addresses. information, was published on March permit rights for surface coal mining Please refer to the appropriate OMB 15, 1996 (61 FR 10786). No comments operations must submit relevant control number in all correspondence. were received. information to the regulatory authority Where appropriate, OSM has revised to allow the regulatory authority to ADDRESSES: John A. Trelease, Office of burden estimates to reflect current determine whether the applicant and Surface Mining Reclamation and reporting levels, adjustments based on application meet the requirements for Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Ave, reestimates of the burden or number of approval. NW, Room 120—SIB, Washington, DC respondents, and programmatic Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 20240. changes. OSM will request a 3-year term Description of Respondents: Coal Office of Information and Regulatory of approval for each information mine operators and state regulatory Affairs; Office of Management and collection activity. authorities. Budget, Attention: Department of Total Annual Responses: 6,545. The following information is provided Interior Desk Officer, 725 17th Street, Total Annual Burden Hours: 59,560. for each information collection: (1) Title NW, Washington, DC 20503. of the information collection; (2) OMB Title: Permit applications—minimum control number; (3) summary of the requirements for legal, financial, Dated: May 28, 1996. information collection activity; and (4) compliance, and related information. Gene E. Krueger, frequency of collection, description of OMB Control Number: 1029–0034. Acting Chief, Office of Technology the respondents, estimated total annual Summary: The regulatory and section Development and Transfer. responses, and the total annul reporting 507(b) of SMCRA provide that persons [FR Doc. 96–13892 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] and recordkeeping burden for the seeking a permit to conduct surface coal BILLING CODE 4310±05±M collection of information. mining operations must submit to the Title: Restrictions on financial regulatory authority relevant interests of State employees. information regarding ownership and 28234 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE use of appropriate automated, with 5 Code of Federal Regulation, Part electronic, mechanical, or other 1320.10. Immigration and Naturalization Service technological collection techniques or Written comments and/or suggestions other forms of information technology, regarding the item(s) contained in this Agency Information Collection e.g., permitting electronic submission of notice, especially regarding the Activities: Extension of Existing responses. The proposed collection is estimated public burden and associated Collection; Comment Request listed below: response time, should be directed to the ACTION: Notice of Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Office of Management and Budget, Under Review; Registration for Extension of a currently approved Office of Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Classification as Refugee. collection. Department of Justice Desk Officer, (2) Title of the Form/Collection. Washington, DC, 20530. Additionally, Office of Management and Budget Registration for Classification as comments may be submitted to OMB via (OMB) approval is being sought for the Refugee. facsimile to 202–395–7285. Comments information collection listed below. (3) Agency form number, if any, and may also be submitted to the This proposed information collection the applicable component of the Department of Justice (DOJ), Justice was previously published in the Federal Department of Justice sponsoring the Management Division, Information Register on March 26, 1996 at 61 FR collection: Form I–590. International Management and Security Staff, 13216, allowing for a 60-day public Affairs, Refugee Branch, Immigration Attention: Department Clearance comment period. No comments were and Naturalization Service. Officer, Suite 850, 1001 G Street, NW., received by the Immigration and (4) Affected public who will be asked Washington, DC, 20530. Additionally, Naturalization Service. or required to respond, as well as a brief comments may be submitted to DOJ via The purpose of this notice is to allow abstract: Primary: Individuals or facsimile to 202–514–1534. an additional 30 days for public Households. This information collection Written comments and suggestions comments from the date listed at the top provides a uniform method for from the public and affected agencies of this page in the Federal Register. applicants to apply for refugee status should address one or more of the This process is conducted in accordance and contains the information needed in following points: with 5 Code of Federal Regulations, Part order to adjudicate such applications. (1) Evaluate whether the proposed 1320.10. (5) An estimate of the total number of collection of information is necessary Written comments and/or suggestions respondents and the amount of time for the proper performance of the regarding the item(s) contained in this estimated for an average respondent to functions of the agency/component, notice, especially regarding the respond: 140,000 responses at 35 including whether the information will estimated public burden and associated minutes (.583) per response. have practical utility; response time, should be directed to the (6) An estimate of the total public (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the Office of Management and Budget, burden (in hours) associated with the agencies/components estimate of the Office of Regulatory Affairs, Attention: collection: 81,620 annual burden hours. burden of the proposed collection of Department of Justice Desk Officer, Public comment on this proposed information, including the validity of Washington, DC, 20530. Additionally, information collection is strongly the methodology and assumptions used; comments may be submitted to OMB via encouraged. (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and facsimile to 202–395–7285. Comments Dated: May 29, 1996. clarity of the information to be may also be submitted to the collected; and Department of Justice (DOJ), Justice Robert B. Briggs, (4) Minimize the burden of the Management Division, Information Department Clearance Officer, United States collection of information on those who Management and Security Staff, Department of Justice. are to respond, including through the Attention: Department Clearance [FR Doc. 96–13868 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] use of appropriate automated, Officer, Suite 850, 1001 G Street, NW., BILLING CODE 4410±01±M electronic, mechanical, or other Washington, DC, 20530. Additionally, technological collection techniques or comments may be submitted to DOJ via other forms of information technology, Office of Justice Programs facsimile to 202–514–1534. e.g., permitting electronic submission of Written comments and suggestions Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency responses. from the public and affected agencies and Prevention Agency Information The proposed collection is listed should address one or more of the Collection Activities: Proposed below: (1) Type of information collection. following points: Collection; Comment Request (1) Evaluate whether the proposed New data collection. collection of information is necessary ACTION: Notice of Information Collection (2) The title of the form/collection. for the proper performance of the Under Review; Office of Juvenile Justice Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency functions of the agency/component, Delinquency and Prevention. and Prevention. including whether the information will (3) The agency form number, if any, have practical utility; Office of Management and Budget and the applicable component of the (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the (OMB) approval is being sought for the Department sponsoring the collection. agencies/components estimate of the information collection listed below. Form: None. Office of Justice burden of the proposed collection of This proposed information collection Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, information, including the validity of was previously published in the Federal United States Department of Justice. the methodology and assumptions used; Register and allowed 60 days for public (4) Affected public who will be asked (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and comment. or required to respond, as well as a brief clarity of the information to be The purpose of this notice is to allow abstract. Primary: State or Local. Other: collected; and an additional 30 days for public Non-profit agencies. (4) Minimize the burden of the comments from the date listed at the top (5) An estimate of the total number of collection of information on those who of this page in the Federal Register. respondents and the amount of time are to respond, including through the This process is conducted in accordance estimated for an average respondent to Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28235 respond: 500–600 respondents to Comments and/or suggestions Justice, Information Management and complete a one-time 15 minute mail regarding the item(s) contained in this Security Staff, Justice Management survey. notice, especially regarding the Division, Suite 850, Washington Center, (6) An estimate of the total public estimated public burden and associated 1001 G Street, NW, Washington, DC burden (in hours) associated with the response time should be directed to 20530. collection: 125–150 annual burden Marilyn Landon, Program Manager, Dated: May 28, 1996. Office of Office of Juvenile Justice and hours. Robert B. Briggs, Public comment on this proposed Delinquency Prevention at (202) 307– 0586. To receive a copy of the proposed Department Clearance Officer, United States information collection is strongly Department of Justice. encouraged. information collection instrument with instructions, or additional information, [FR Doc. 96–13907 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Dated: May 29, 1996. please contact Marilyn Landon, 202– BILLING CODE 4410±18±M Robert B. Briggs, 307–0586, Office of Juvenile Justice and Department Clearance Officer, United States Delinquency Prevention, Office of National Institute of Justice Department of Justice. Justice Programs, U.S. Department of [FR Doc. 96–13870 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Justice, Room 782, 633 Indiana Avenue, [OJP (NIJ) No.1082] BILLING CODE 1121±18±M NW, Washington, DC 20531. Additionally, comments may be RIN 1121±ZA35 submitted to the Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and National Institute of Justice (DOJ), Justice Management Division, Solicitation for Technology Research Delinquency Prevention; Agency Information Management and Security Information Collection Activities: and Development Partnership Projects Staff, Attention: Department Clearance for Community Policing Proposed Collection; Comment Officer, Suite 850, 1001 G Street, NW., Request Washington, DC 20530, or via facsimile AGENCY: Department of Justice, Office of ACTION: Notice of information collection to (202) 514–1534 Justice Programs, National Institute of under review; individual gang member Overview of this information Justice. interview and associated tests, collection: ACTION: Announcement of the (1) Type of Information Collection: evaluation of the ‘‘Comprehensive availability of the National Institute of New Collection. Justice Solicitation ‘‘Technology Community-Wide Approach To Gang (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Research and Development Partnership Prevention, Intervention, and Individual Gang Member Interview and Projects for Community Policing.’’ Suppression Program’’. Associated Tests, Evaluation of the The proposed information collection ‘‘Comprehensive Community-Wide DATES: The deadline for receipt of is published to obtain comments from Approach To Gang Prevention, proposals is close of business on August the public and affected agencies. Intervention, and Suppression 1, 1996. Comments are encouraged and will be Program’’. ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice, (3) Agency form number, if any, and accepted for 60 days from the date listed Office of Science and Technology, 633 the applicable component of the at the top of this page in the Federal Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. Department of Justice sponsoring the Register. 20531. collection: Form: None. Sponsored by Request written comments and the Office of Juvenile Justice and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: suggestions from the public and affected Delinquency Prevention, Office of Tawana Waugh, U.S. Department of agencies concerning the proposed Justice Programs, United States Justice Response Center, at 800–421– collection of information. Your Department of Justice. 6770 (in Metropolitan Washington, DC, comments should address one or more (4) Affected public who will be asked 202–307–1480). of the following four points: or required to respond, as well as a brief SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The (1) Evaluate whether the proposed abstract: Primary: Not-for-Profit following supplementary information is collection of information is necessary Institutions. Other: State, Local, or provided: for the proper performance of the Tribal Government. The study will Authority functions of the agency, including obtain interview and test information on whether the information will have youth background, social adjustment, This action is authorized under the practical utility; deviancy/crime activity, self-esteem, Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the and depression/personality adjustment. Act of 1968, secs. 201–03, as amended, agencies estimate of the burden of the It will determine the effectiveness of the 42 U.S.C. 3721–23 (1988). proposed collection of information, program, comparing program subjects to Background including the validity of the non-program gang youth of the same methodology and assumption used; ages, approximately 13 to 20 years old, The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and and their backgrounds. the research agency of the U.S. clarity of the information to be (5) An estimate of the total number of Department of Justice, is soliciting collected; and respondents and the amount of time proposals to conduct research, (4) Minimize the burden of the estimated for an average respondent to development, and application of new collection of information on those who respond: 1,227 responses at 2 hours, per and innovative technologies in support are to respond, including through the response. of the implementation and enhancement use of appropriate automated, (6) An estimate of the total public of community-oriented policing on a electronic, mechanical, or other burden (in hours) associated with the national level. Successful proposals will technological collection techniques or collection: 2,454 annual burden hours. receive grant funding to conduct other forms of information technology, If additional information is required research and development projects. e.g., permitting electronic submission of contact: Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Clearance Proposals are expected to describe responses. Officer, United States Department of research and development efforts to 28236 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices move technologies in support of Federal Register in order to inform the information and returns it to VIE. VIE passes community-oriented policing beyond public. the information back to the requesting current state of the art. The solicitation subscriber. Only a few minutes elapse UIPL 23–96 seeks proposals representing between the subscriber’s request and receipt of UI information via computer. The UI partnerships between the public and The State agencies which administer the Unemployment Insurance program information available to VIE’s subscribers is private sectors to support the research limited to the employer’s name and address, and development of new technologies or collect information concerning the and the employee’s quarterly wages. the innovative adaptation of existing wages paid by employers in the State. Although the information exchange was technologies that could be used as tools This information is required to be originally inspired by mortgage lending, it is for community policing. The solicitation provided by State law, in accordance applicable to all consumer lending. is not intended to fund the purchase of with Section 1137(a)(3) of the Social The Department has been told that the currently available commercial off-the- Security Act. funds received from VIE as payments by the IDES are kept in a separate account and the shelf technologies, systems, or products. There has been a growing interest by private entities to have electronic access VIE will pay for all IDES expenses in setting The National Institute of Justice up the service. IDES will also receive a anticipates a funding level of up to $4 to the wage data collected by the State percentage of the amount VIE charges its million, which will support several in order to verify income for individuals subscribers as a processing fee for each awards under this solicitation. who apply for loans. This UIPL advises transaction. Interested organizations should call States to the Department of Labor’s The procedure is marketed as offering the National Criminal Justice Reference interpretation of Federal law in regard benefits to: lenders, by reducing loan Service (NCJRS) at 1–800–851–3420 to to the disclosure of this information to processing costs; loan applicants, by obtain a copy of NIJ’s ‘‘Technology private entities. shortening the verification period from weeks Research and Development Partnership to days; employers, who will no longer Dated: May 29, 1996. receive employment verification requests; the Projects for Community Policing.’’ (refer Timothy M. Barnicle, UI program, by providing program income; to document no. SL000149). Assistant Secretary of Labor. and the economy in general by reducing bad The solicitation is available debt expenses. electronically via the Justice Technology Directive: Unemployment Insurance Program The Department has examined the issue of Information Network (JUSTNET) on the Letter No. 23–96 disclosure to private entities under the Internet. JUSTNET’s address on the To: All State Employment Security Agencies circumstances described above. This UIPL is World Wide Web is http:// From: Mary Ann Wyrsch, Director, issued to advise the States that, provided Unemployment Insurance Service www.nlectc.org. The solicitation is also certain conditions are met, no issues are Subject: Disclosure of Confidential raised with respect to Federal UI law available through the NCJRS Bulletin Employment Information to Private Board, which can also be accessed via requirements when State law permits the Entities information to be released. Internet. Telnet to ncjrsbbs.ncjrs.org, or Rescissions: None Questions exist when a governmental gopher to ncjrs.org:71. On World Wide Expiration Date: continuing entity requires reports to be made for a given Web, connect to the NCJRS Justice 1. Purpose. To advise States of the reason, such as the administration of a State’s Information Center at http:// Department of Labor’s (Department) position UI law or the Income Eligibility and www.ncjrs.org. Those without Internet regarding the disclosure of certain Verification System required by Section access can dial the NCJRS Bulletin Unemployment Insurance (UI) information to 303(f), SSA, and subsequently releases the Board via modem: dial 301–738–8895. private entities. information, even if the release is made with Set modem at 9600 baud, 8–N–1. 2. Reference. Sections 303(a)(1), 303(a)(8) the individual’s consent and results in and 303(f) of the Social Security Act (SSA); income to the UI program. Because the Jeremy Travis, 20 C.F.R. Part 97; Office of Management and information comes from employers’ private Director, National Institute of Justice. Budget (OMB) Circular No. A–87; ET records, employers have an interest in its [FR Doc. 96–13975 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Handbook No. 336; the Fair Credit Reporting confidentiality. Therefore, States should seek BILLING CODE 4410±18±P Act (FCRA), P.L. 91–508, 15 U.S.C. 1681 et the input of employers before entering into seq. an agreement to release such information to 3. Background. Norwest Mortgage, in the a private entity. 4. Discussion. a. Federal Law Requirements DEPARTMENT OF LABOR form of its subsidiary VIE (Verification of Income & Employment), has signed an in General. Section 303(a)(1), SSA, has long Employment and Training agreement with the State of Iowa’s been interpreted to prohibit disclosure of Department of Employment Services (IDES) claimant and employer UI information. The Administration to allow VIE to utilize Iowa wage records in rationale is that the disclosure of UI a novel way. It is our understanding that VIE information may deter individuals from filing Federal-State Unemployment operates as a credit bureau and provides claims or employers from filing reports and Compensation Program: electronic access to employment verification will impede the proper and effective Unemployment Insurance Program information to credit approving entities administration of the UI program. Letters Interpreting Federal covered under the FCRA,1 such as mortgage Individuals/consumers have an interest in Unemployment Insurance Law lenders which subscribe to its service. VIE confidentiality. Confidentiality of UI records requires individuals seeking credit to sign a avoid publicity about individuals and The Employment and Training consent form authorizing release of employers, and possible notoriety resulting Administration interprets Federal law information pertaining to them. The current from publicity. Publicity could have requirements pertaining to consent form does not, however, specify that disrupting effects on the operations of the unemployment compensation as part of State records will be accessed. VIE receives State agency, would be likely to discourage its role in the administration of the requests for verification from its subscribers many individuals from claiming a statutory Federal-State unemployment in the form of the loan applicant’s social entitlement, and may act as a disincentive for compensation program. These security number and State and forwards the employers to cooperate with the State agency in the administration of the State UI law. interpretations are issued in request electronically to the UI agency which accesses its wage records for the requested Further, Section 303(a)(8), SSA, limits Unemployment Insurance Program grants use to purposes necessary for the Letters (UIPLs) to the State Employment 1 The FCRA regulates the operations of consumer proper and efficient administration of the Security Agencies (SESAs). The UIPL credit reporting agencies and users of consumer Federal-State UI program. Since individuals described below is published in the reports. have an interest in a release of sensitive Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28237 information about themselves, it would not The State must be able to terminate the ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions. be proper administration of the UI program agreement if it determines that the to release such information without the confidentiality provisions are not adhered to. SUMMARY: This document contains individual’s informed consent. The Department also recommends that the notices of pendency before the Confidentiality of UI records is, therefore, an agreement contain a definite expiration date Department of Labor (the Department) of elementary factor necessary in the proper so that the State is assured an opportunity to proposed exemptions from certain of the administration of the UI program, since the periodically evaluate such disclosure. prohibited transaction restriction of the release of UI information without the While it is recognized that no system is individual’s informed consent would bring foolproof, system security through increased Employee Retirement Income Security notoriety upon the UI program. audits and other means must be such that Act of 1974 (the Act) and/or the Internal Certain types of disclosure have, however, any breach will be easily detected. All Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). been permitted. Disclosure of claimant and employees of private entities must be subject Written Comments and Hearing employer information to public officials in to the same confidentiality requirements— the performance of their official duties has and State criminal penalties for violation of Requests been permitted if the cost of providing the those requirements—as are employees of the All interested persons are invited to information is paid for by the requesting State UI agency. submit written comments or request for public official. States have also been d. Income and Costs. Under Section a hearing on the pending exemptions, permitted to disclose information relating to 303(a)(8), SSA, funds received for the an individual to such individual or the unless otherwise stated in the Notice of administration of a State’s UI program may Proposed Exemption, within 45 days individual’s agent. The Department has now be used only as necessary for the ‘‘proper and concluded that States may disclose efficient’’ administration of the State’s UI from the date of publication of this employment and wage information to a law. Departmental regulations at 29 CFR Federal Register Notice. Comments and private entity under a written agreement 97.22(b) provide that OMB Circular No. A– request for a hearing should state: (1) which (1) requires informed consent from the 87 is used to determine whether an the name, address, and telephone individual to whom the information pertains, expenditure of granted funds is an allowable number of the person making the (2) continues to safeguard the information cost. Under both the SSA and the Circular, comment or request, and (2) the nature once in the hands of the private entity, and costs of disclosing information for non-UI of the person’s interest in the exemption (3) requires the private entity to pay all costs purposes are not allowable because such associated with disclosure. and the manner in which the person costs items are not necessary or reasonable would be adversely affected by the b. Informed Consent. States choosing to for proper and efficient performance and disclose employment and wage information administration of the Federal award allocated exemption. A request for a hearing must to credit companies must require the to carry out the State’s UI program. The OMB also state the issues to be addressed and individual to sign a release. The release must Circular also provides at paragraph 20 of include a general description of the contain the following: (1) a specific statement Attachment B that certain costs are not evidence to be presented at the hearing. indicating that the individual’s employment allowable under a grant. These include fines, A request for a hearing must also state history will be released, (2) a statement that penalties, damages and other settlements the issues to be addressed and include the release is only for that particular credit resulting from violations (or alleged transaction, (3) a clear statement informing a general description of the evidence to violations) or failure to comply with law. As be presented at the hearing. the individual that the credit company may a result, the Department recommends that use information from State governmental any agreement with a private entity provide ADDRESSES: All written comments and files, and (4) a statement indicating all the protection to the State for claims that may request for a hearing (at least three parties who may receive the information arise from any unauthorized use of UI copies) should be sent to the Pension released. Consent is not informed if an records obtained under the agreement. and Welfare Benefits Administration, individual is not told that governmental It is the Department’s position that income Office of Exemption Determinations, records may be released and to whom the generated by a State UI agency from the sale Room N–5649, U.S. Department of information may be provided. States must of its wage records must be used only as assure that all statements or forms provided Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., necessary for the proper and efficient Washington, D.C. 20210. Attention: under the terms of any agreements require administration of the UI program pursuant to the informed consent of the individual to use administrative requirements for grants to the Application No. stated in each Notice of the State’s records. States. (See 29 CFR 97.25(g)(2) and ET Proposed Exemption. The applications c. Safeguards. States must safeguard the Handbook No. 336, the ‘‘Program and Budget for exemption and the comments confidentiality of the UI information once a Plan.’’) Therefore, States may not use any received will be available for public private entity has been granted access to it. money generated by the disclosure inspection in the Public Documents In cases where the private entity is acting as authorized under this UIPL for any non-UI Room of Pension and Welfare Benefits a gateway and passes the information along purposes. For example, income from sales Administration, U.S. Department of to a subscriber or client, States must obtain may not benefit a State’s general fund or written assurances from the private entity Labor, Room N–5507, 200 Constitution another program. Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210. that such subscribers will also safeguard the 5. Action Required. State administrators confidentiality of the information and that are requested to provide the above Notice to Interested Persons the information may be used only for the information to appropriate staff. specific credit transaction authorized by the 6. Inquiries. Direct questions to the Notice of the proposed exemptions individual’s release. appropriate Regional Office. will be provided to all interested States must periodically audit a sample of persons in the manner agreed upon by transactions accessing the wage records to [FR Doc. 96–13869 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] the applicant and the Department assure that the private entity has on file a BILLING CODE 4510±30±M within 15 days of the date of publication written release authorizing each access and that the information is not being misused or in the Federal Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of stored in a database for resale or other Pension and Welfare Benefits proposed exemption as published in the unauthorized purpose to assure that no Administration access is made to the wage records without Federal Register and shall inform authorization. If the private entity acts as a [Application No. D±10171, et al.] interested persons of their right to gateway and audits its subscribers, it will be comment and to request a hearing sufficient for the State to periodically audit Proposed Exemptions; The Everett (where appropriate). the gateway’s audit process. A State must Clinic Profit Sharing Plan ensure that any agreement permits it to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The exercise control over the UI records even AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits proposed exemptions were requested in after they are shared with private entities. Administration, Labor. applications filed pursuant to section 28238 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

408(a) of the Act and/or section and (4) the potential future purchase of independent appraiser selected by the 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in the leased premises by the Employer independent fiduciary; accordance with procedures set forth in pursuant to the terms of an option (9) at all times, the fair market value 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR agreement contained in the New Lease. of the leased premises represents no 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). This proposed exemption is subject to more than 25% of the total assets of the Effective December 31, 1978, section the following conditions: Plan; 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of (1) the Plan is represented in all the (10) the independent fiduciary 1978 (43 FR 47713, October 17, 1978) transactions by a qualified, independent determines that all of the transactions transferred the authority of the Secretary fiduciary; are appropriate for and in the best of the Treasury to issue exemptions of (2) the terms and conditions of the interests of the Plan and its participants the type requested to the Secretary of transactions are at least as favorable to and beneficiaries at the time of the Labor. Therefore, these notices of the Plan as those the Plan could obtain transactions; proposed exemption are issued solely in comparable arm’s length transactions (11) at all times, the independent by the Department. with unrelated parties; fiduciary monitors and enforces The applications contain (3) under the purchase agreement (the compliance with the terms and representations with regard to the Purchase Agreement) with respect to the conditions of the Purchase Agreement, proposed exemptions which are exchange of Parcel B for Parcel C, the the New Lease, and the exemption; and summarized below. Interested persons Plan pays to the Employer an amount no (12) the Plan incurs no commissions, are referred to the applications on file more than the difference between the costs, fees, nor other expenses relating with the Department for a complete fair market values of Parcel B and Parcel to any of the transactions. statement of the facts and C as of the date of the exchange, as EFFECTIVE DATE: This exemption, if representations. established by a qualified, independent granted, will be effective as of June 1, The Everett Clinic Profit Sharing Plan appraiser, with the Plan receiving full 1996. and 401(k) Employee Savings Plan and market value for Parcel B Summary of Facts and Representations Trust (the Plan) Located in Everett, (notwithstanding its being transferred Washington subject to an easement); 1. The Plan is a defined contribution, (4) the rent paid to the Plan under the 401(k)/profit sharing plan sponsored by [Application No. D–10171] New Lease is and continues to be no the Employer. The Employer, a Proposed Exemption less than the fair market rental value of Washington corporation, is a multi- the leased premises, as established by a The Department is considering specialty group medical practice with a qualified, independent appraiser; granting an exemption under the main campus at 3901 Hoyt Avenue, (5) the rent is adjusted every three authority of section 408(a) of the Act Everett, Washington and five satellite years, based upon an updated and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code and facilities in Snohomish County. As of independent appraisal, but never falls in accordance with the procedures set December 31, 1994, the Plan had 627 below the fair market rental amount forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 participants and beneficiaries and total initially established; FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). If assets of $55,469,695. The trustees of (6) the New Lease is a triple net lease the exemption is granted, the the Plan are Robert E. Andre, M.D., under which the Employer as the tenant restrictions of sections 406(a), 406 (b)(1) James R. Pinkham, M.D., John P. Nolan, is obligated for all operating expenses, and (b)(2) of the Act and the sanctions M.D., Patricia J. Slater, Andrea B. including maintenance, repairs, taxes, resulting from the application of section Rodewald, Ann Wanner, M.D., insurance, and utilities; 4975 of the Code, by reason of section Raymond S. Wilson, M.D., Rochelle (7) the independent fiduciary 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code, Crollard, and Frederick T. Goset. expressly approves any improvements shall not apply to the following 2. Parcel A, which is owned by the over $100,000 to the leased premises proposed transactions between the Plan Plan, consists of an area of 74,846 and any renewal of the New Lease and the Everett Clinic (the Employer), a square feet and includes the old clinic beyond the initial term; party in interest with respect to the building (Old Clinic Building). Parcel A (8) the New Lease contains a two-way Plan: (1) The exchange of cash and real is being leased to the Employer (the option agreement enabling the Plan to property (Parcel B) owned by the Plan Current Lease) pursuant to an sell the leased premises to the Employer for other real property (Parcel C) owned individual administrative exemption (or the Employer to purchase the leased by the Employer; (2) the grant by the granted by the Department, Prohibited premises from the Plan), in the event the Employer to the Plan of a perpetual Transaction Exemption 81– 46 (PTE independent fiduciary determines that easement to run with the land on the 81–46, 46 FR 113, June 12, 1981). The such a sale is in the best interests of the Plan’s Parcel B to be exchanged and on Plan and the Employer initiated a Plan, for cash in an amount which is the the Employer’s property (Parcel E); (3) leasing arrangement in 1962, prior to greater of: (a) the original acquisition the modification and extension of an passage of the Act. In 1974, the parties cost of the premises to the Plan plus existing lease (the New Lease) of entered into a revised lease agreement, expenses, or (b) the fair market value of improved real property by the Plan to which was superseded by the Current the premises as of the date of the sale, the Employer, so as to include Parcel C Lease. The 15-year term of the Current as established by a qualified, and, effective January 1, 1997, a parking Lease will expire on June 30, 1996. The lot owned by the Employer (Parcel D) to rights of the Plan with respect to the 1 provides for a fully discretionary annual Current Lease are represented for all be contributed gratuitously to the Plan; contribution by the Employer. It is represented that Parcel D will be contributed to the Plan on purposes by the First Interstate Bank of 1 The Department notes the Employer’s December 31, 1996 for the 1996 Plan Year and that Washington N.A. (First Interstate), representation that its contribution of Parcel D to no contribution has been declared for the 1996 Plan successor to the Olympic Bank of the Plan will not be a prohibited transaction under Year; therefore, the Employer has no existing Everett, Washington (the Olympic the Department’s regulation at 29 CFR 2509.94–3 obligation to contribute any amounts to the Plan. because the contribution will not be made pursuant However, the Department expresses no opinion Bank). First Interstate will also be acting to any legal obligation of the Employer to herein as to whether the Employer’s contribution of as an independent fiduciary for the Plan contribute. The Plan is a profit- sharing plan which Parcel D to the Plan is fully discretionary. with respect to all the proposed Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28239 transactions which are the subject of the sum of its component parts, in the on Parcels B and E in favor of Parcels instant exemption request. opinion of the appraisers, consolidation A and C to guarantee adequate parking 3. Parcel B, which is owned by the of ownership in one entity will enhance for the Plan-owned property following Plan, consists of a rectangular-shaped the marketability of all the parcels. the exchange. The Plan will receive full parking lot with an area of 28,660 Messrs. McCallum and Gladow market value for Parcel B, square feet and is located directly across further determined that as of July 1, notwithstanding its being transferred the street from the Old Clinic Building. 1996, Parcel A will have a prospective subject to an easement. Finally, an Parcel B adjoins property owned by the fair market rental value of $533,688 per exemption is requested for the New Employer and is being leased to the annum ($44,474 per month) and Parcel Lease, which will modify the Current Employer, along with Parcel A, under C, $413,616 per annum ($34,468 per Lease to reflect the transactions the Current Lease. Parcel B is paved, month). The appraisal states that the described above, as well as the marked, and curbed for automobile zoning status of Parcels A, B, and C is gratuitous contribution by the Employer parking, and has no building R–4, allowing for a variety of uses, to the Plan, effective December 31, 1996, improvements. including multi-family development, of Parcel D (to be included among the Parcel C, which is owned by the commercial activities, and professional premises being leased back to the Employer, consists of an area of 16,818 office/medical facilities. The highest Employer). square feet and includes a fully and best use of the subject parcels, if An actuarial consulting firm improved medical clinic facility (the vacant, is as medical offices. The Trautmann, Maher & Associates, located Addition). Parcel C adjoins the Old highest and best use of the subject in Mill Creek, Washington, prepared an Clinic Building and is otherwise parcels, as improved, is their continued asset projection report of the Plan’s surrounded by property owned by the use as medical facilities. assets. The report, dated September 25, Plan (primarily space used for parking). Parcel D was appraised by Richard J. 1995, states that the fair market value of In its unimproved state, Parcel C DeFrancesco of Macaulay & Associates, all employer real property after the originally belonged to the Plan. It is also an independent real estate Plan’s divestment of Parcel B and its represented that Parcel C was sold to a appraiser certified in the State of acquisition of Parcel C will comprise partnership Colby Building Associates, Washington. Relying primarily on the 12.58% of the Plan’s total assets, as of on June 14, 1984, in accordance with sales comparison approach to valuation, December 31, 1996.5 This projected the provisions of section 414(c)(3) of the Mr. DeFrancesco determined that the percentage of all employer real property Act,2 for purposes of constructing the fair market value of Parcel D as of July was calculated to be the highest level of Addition. That partnership was later 21, 1995 was $110,000. Plan assets that will be reached for the merged with the Employer and no 5. An administrative exemption is duration of the New Lease. longer exists. requested from the Department for the 6. First Interstate, as noted above, will Parcel D, which is owned by the following proposed transactions. The act as an independent fiduciary to Employer, consists of a parking lot with Plan trustees desire that the Plan represent the Plan’s interests with an area of 4,361 square feet and is acquire Parcel C from the Employer in respect to all the proposed transactions. adjacent to Parcel A, which, as order to consolidate ownership of First Interstate and its predecessor the described above, is owned by the Plan. adjoining Parcels A and C, thus Olympic Bank, have served as non- 4. Parcels A, B, and C were appraised enhancing the marketability of property discretionary custodian of a portion of by James D. McCallum, M.A.I., and the Plan already owns. The Employer the Plan’s assets since approximately Grant S. Gladow of McCallum & desires to acquire Parcel B from the Plan December 1980. In addition, the Associates, both independent real estate for purposes of constructing a three- Olympic Bank was appointed the Plan’s appraisers certified in the State of story parking garage on Parcel B and on independent fiduciary at the time of the Washington. Relying primarily on the other contiguous property owned by the filing of the exemption application with income approach to valuation, Messrs. Employer, namely Parcel E. The parking respect to the Current Lease, whose term McCallum and Gladow determined that garage, which will be available free of began in 1981. First Interstate, whose as of July 1, 1996, Parcel A will have a charge to customers of the Employer, fees are paid by the Employer, prospective fair market value of will provide parking as required under represents that it is independent of the $4,900,000 and Parcel C, $3,900,000. municipal building codes to support the Employer and that the Bank has less Relying on the cost approach to new surgery center to be built by the than one percent of its deposits and less valuation, Messrs. McCallum and Employer on Parcel E, as well as the than one percent of its outstanding Gladow determined that as of that same existing clinic facilities on Parcels A loans attributable to deposits and loans date, Parcel B will have a prospective and C. Under the proposed Purchase of the Employer. First Interstate fair market value of $390,000.3 The Agreement, the Plan will convey title to represents that it has extensive appraisal states that the total value of Parcel B to the Employer, and the experience as a fiduciary under the Act, $9,190,000 for all three parcels Employer will convey title to Parcel C that it is knowledgeable as to the subject represents a simple summation of the to the Plan. The Plan will pay to the transactions, and that it acknowledges values of each of the individual parcels. Employer additional cash consideration and accepts its duties and While the available market data does representing the difference between the not provide direct evidence that the fair market values of Parcel B and Parcel to an arrangement whereby the Employer and the assemblage value of the parcels (under C ($3,510,000 as of July 1, 1996), based Plan are intended to have joint use, as opposed to the Plan’s having exclusive use, of the easement single ownership) is greater than the upon an updated independent appraisal (i.e., the Employer will reserve the right of access as of the date of the exchange. The to the new parking garage for all purposes not 2 The Department expresses no opinion herein as Employer will grant to the Plan, as part inconsistent nor in interference with the rights to whether the sale of Parcel C complied with the of the exchange, a perpetual, non- granted to the Plan). requirements of section 414(c)(3) of the Act. 5 Due to the fact that the Employer’s decision to 3 exclusive pedestrian and vehicle The appraisal states that the figure of $390,000 4 contribute Parcel D (valued at $110,000) to the Plan represents a ‘‘fee simple value’’ for Parcel B (i.e., parking easement to run with the land was made subsequent to preparation of the plan a valuation that does not take into account the assets projection report by Trautmann, Maher & anticipated transfer of Parcel B subject to an 4 The Department notes the Employer’s Associates, such report does not take into account easement). representation that the term ‘‘non-exclusive’’ refers the Plan’s acquisition of Parcel D. 28240 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices responsibilities in acting as a fiduciary which is the greater of: (a) the original real property (Parcels A, C, and D) will with respect to the Plan. acquisition cost of the premises to the not exceed approximately 13% of Plan 7. Regardless of whether the exchange Plan plus expenses, or (b) the fair assets for the duration of the New Lease. of Parcel B and Parcel C closes by July market value of the premises as of the The Plan’s acquisition of Parcel C will 1, 1996, the New Lease, which is to date of the sale, as established by a not create a liquidity problem, will extend and modify the Current Lease, qualified, independent appraiser provide increased assurance that the will begin as of that date. The New selected by the independent fiduciary. Plan will be able to sell the adjoining Lease provides for an initial term of 10 Any such sale would be a one-time property the Plan now owns, and will years, which may be extended at the transaction for cash, and the Plan would return income to the Plan. The Plan’s option of the lessee in five-year incur no expenses relating to the sale. divestment of Parcel B will reduce the increments, upon the express approval 8. The independent fiduciary concentration of Plan assets in real of the independent fiduciary. The represents that it has negotiated the estate and the amount that the Plan Employer will pay an initial rent to the terms and conditions of the Purchase must pay for Parcel C. The Current Plan at the annual rate of $533,688 Agreement and of the New Lease and Lease should be extended because of the ($44,474 per month), which is the fair has determined that such terms and difficulties involved in finding another market rental value of Parcel A. When conditions are at least as favorable to the tenant or a ready purchaser for the Parcel C is added (upon closing of the Plan as those the Plan could obtain in leased property at its appraised fair exchange), the rent will increase by an comparable arm’s length transactions market value. The income from the amount equal to the fair market rental with unrelated parties. The properties Current Lease has provided the Plan value of Parcel C as of the date of the involved have been independently with a stable and favorable rate of exchange (appraised at $413,616 per appraised, as well as having been investment return (over 9% per annum year as of July 1, 1996) to an annual rate subjected to an environmental audit. for the period covering the 1980’s and of approximately $947,304 The independent fiduciary recognized the first half of the 1990’s, ranking in (approximately $78,942 per month). that because of Parcel B’s importance to the top 5% of the Independent When Parcel D is added, the rent will the Employer’s plans to construct a Consultants Cooperative database). The increase by an amount to be determined parking garage and a surgery center, the stable and predictable returns provided by the independent fiduciary by Plan was entitled to a premium in the by the Current Lease have enabled the reference to a qualified, independent exchange of Parcel B for Parcel C. Plan trustees to invest the remainder of appraisal of the fair market rental value Accordingly, the Plan will receive from the Plan’s assets in more volatile of Parcel D as of January 1, 1997. The the Employer the benefit of a perpetual investments offering the potential for total rent for the leased premises is to parking easement to run with the land higher returns. The independent be adjusted every three years, based on Parcels B and E, in addition to the fiduciary has also examined the upon an updated independent full market value of Parcel B. Finally, financial viability of the Employer appraisal, and is not to fall below the the independent fiduciary has (including the potential impact of any fair market rental amounts initially conducted an investigation of the substantial malpractice claims), established. The New Lease will be a relevant rental market in order to determined that the Employer’s past triple-net lease under which the develop appropriate terms for the New performance under the Current Lease Employer as the tenant is obligated for Lease. has been in accordance with its all operating expenses, including 9. The independent fiduciary contractual obligations, and concluded maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance, represents that it believes the proposed that the Employer will continue to be a and utilities. The Employer will transactions are in the best interests of good tenant. indemnify and hold the Plan harmless the Plan and its participants and The independent fiduciary will for any loss or damages to the leased beneficiaries. The Plan’s acquisition of recommend to the Plan trustees premises. Parcels C and D will combine adjoining execution of the Purchase Agreement The New Lease permits the Employer Parcels A, C, and D under single and the New Lease only if they remain to remodel and make structural changes ownership, providing the Plan with appropriate for and in the best interests or additions to the leased premises at ownership of almost an entire block (the of the Plan and its participants and the Employer’s expense, so long as such block between Hoyt and Colby beneficiaries at the time of the improvements comply with all Avenues), and thus will enhance the transactions. Further, the independent applicable government regulations. Any value and marketability of property that fiduciary will, at all times, monitor and expense over $100,000 must be the Plan already owns. Parcel B will be enforce the Employer’s compliance with expressly approved by the independent transferred to the Employer at its full the terms and conditions of the fiduciary. The threshold of $100,000 is market value, despite being subject to a Purchase Agreement, the Proposed intended to provide the Employer with perpetual parking easement in favor of Lease, and the exemption. discretion to make routine renovations, Plan-owned Property. The New Lease 10. In summary, the applicant such as the installation of new will generate income to the Plan in the represents that the proposed carpeting, without having to consult the form of rent and thus provide the Plan transactions satisfy the statutory criteria independent fiduciary. Any with a return on its investment in for an exemption under section 408(a) of improvements or renovations of the addition to any appreciation of the the Act for the following reasons: (1) property will belong to the Plan upon value of the leased property. The Plan The Plan will be represented in all the termination of the New Lease. is bearing none of the expenses with transactions by a qualified, independent The New Lease also contains a two- respect to any of the proposed fiduciary; (2) the terms and conditions way option agreement enabling the Plan transactions. of the transactions will be at least as to sell the leased premises to the The independent fiduciary has also favorable to the Plan as those the Plan Employer (or the Employer to purchase determined that the proposed could obtain in comparable arm’s length the leased premises from the Plan), in transactions are appropriate for the Plan transactions with unrelated parties; (3) the event the independent fiduciary in light of the Plan’s overall investment the Plan will pay to the Employer cash determines that such a sale is in the best portfolio for the following reasons. The in an amount no more than the interests of the Plan, for an amount projected percentage of all employer difference between the fair market Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28241 values of Parcel B and Parcel C as of the publication of the notice of pendency in Washington, for use as the Union’s date of the exchange, as established by the Federal Register. Such notice shall headquarters in Seattle. a qualified, independent appraiser; (4) include a copy of the notice of proposed 3. In exchange for $251,200, SUPBC the Plan will receive in the exchange exemption as published in the Federal conveyed to the Plan a pre-paid one full market value for Parcel B, while Register and shall inform interested hundred year lease of the third floor of retaining a perpetual parking easement persons of their right to comment and/ the Building. The lease term began on granting the Plan access to the new or to request a hearing with respect to June 1, 1954. Since 1954, the Plan has parking garage to be constructed; (5) the the proposed exemption. Comments and used the space to provide housing Plan will have single ownership of both requests for a hearing are due within 40 benefits to Plan participants. portions of the clinic facilities, as well days of the date of publication of this 4. The applicants represent that the as Parcel D, which will enhance the notice in the Federal Register. huge decline in the American flag value and marketability of the Plan- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. merchant marine has seriously eroded owned property; (6) the rent paid to the Karin Weng of the Department, the funding available to the Plan. The Plan under the New Lease will be no telephone (202) 219–8881. (This is not Plan’s trustees desire to eliminate the less than the fair market rental value of a toll-free number.) housing program and to concentrate the leased premises, as established by a Plan resources for the purpose of The SUP Welfare Plan (the Plan) qualified, independent appraiser; (7) the providing traditional medical benefits. Located in San Francisco, California rent will be adjusted every three years, An opportunity currently exists to based upon an updated independent [Application No. L–10221] dispose of the Interest because the appraisal, but will never fall below the Proposed Exemption Union and SUPBC have decided that fair market rental amount initially they no longer need to retain their established; (8) the New Lease will be a The Department is considering interests in the property. Accordingly, triple net lease under which the granting an exemption under the the applicants have requested the Employer as the tenant is obligated for authority of section 408(a) of the Act exemption proposed herein to permit all operating expenses, including and in accordance with the procedures the Plan to sell the Interest to SUPBC. maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance, set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart 5. The Plan will receive cash in the and utilities; (9) the independent B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, amount of the appraised fair market fiduciary will expressly approve any 1990). If the exemption is granted, the value of the Interest. Mr. Allen N. Safer, improvements over $100,000 to the restrictions of sections 406(a), 406(b)(1) MAI, of Property Counselors, an leased premises and any renewal of the and (b)(2) of the Act shall not apply to independent appraiser in Seattle, New Lease beyond the initial term; (10) the proposed sale by the Plan of the Washington, appraised the Interest as remaining term of a one-hundred year the New Lease will contain a two-way having a fair market value of $375,000 pre-paid leasehold interest (the Interest) option agreement enabling the Plan to on July 1, 1994. In 1995, Mr. Safer to the Sailors’ Union of the Pacific sell the leased premises to the Employer updated his appraisal of the Interest and Building Corporation (SUPBC), a party (or the Employer to purchase the leased determined that the Interest had a fair in interest with respect to the Plan, premises from the Plan), in the event the market value of $405,000 as of provided the following conditions are independent fiduciary determines that December 14, 1995. However, Mr. Safer satisfied: a) the sale is a one-time such a sale is in the best interests of the represents that he did not take into transaction for cash; b) the Plan pays no Plan, for cash in an amount which is the account any premium that the Plan commissions or other expenses in greater of: (a) the original acquisition might receive based on its position of connection with the sale; c) the Plan cost of the premises to the Plan plus being able to block the SUPBC’s sale of receives the greater of $438,000 or the expenses, or (b) the fair market value of the Building to a third party. Mr. James fair market value of the Interest as of the the premises as of the date of the sale, B. Welle, a Senior Broker for the real date of the sale; and d) the fair market as established by a qualified, estate firm of Cushman & Wakefield of value of the Interest has been independent appraiser selected by the Washington, located in Bellevue, determined by a qualified, independent independent fiduciary; (11) at all times, Washington, has determined that a the fair market value of the leased appraiser. premium of $33,000 to the Plan is premises will represent no more than Summary of Facts and Representations appropriate under the circumstances. 25% of the total assets of the Plan; (12) Accordingly, the applicants represent the independent fiduciary will 1. The Plan was created in 1952 to that the Plan will receive the greater of determine that all of the transactions are provide welfare benefits to eligible $438,000 or the fair market value of the appropriate for and in the best interests unlicensed seamen who work in the Interest as of the date of the sale. The of the Plan and its participants and West Coast maritime industry. The Plan Plan will pay no commissions or other beneficiaries at the time of the is sponsored by the Sailors’ Union of the expenses in connection with the sale. transactions; (13) at all times, the Pacific (the Union). The Plan has 6. In summary, the applicants independent fiduciary will monitor and approximately 2,500 participants and enforce compliance with the terms and beneficiaries, and as of July 31, 1994, represent that the proposed transaction conditions of the Purchase Agreement, the fair market value of the net assets of satisfies the criteria of section 408(a) of the New Lease, and the exemption; and the Plan was $10,269,079. the Act because: (a) the sale is a one- (14) the Plan will incur no commissions, 2. During its early years, the Plan time transaction for cash; (b) the Plan costs, fees, nor other expenses relating acquired facilities in Los Angeles, San will pay no commissions or other to any of the transactions. Francisco, Portland and Seattle to expenses in connection with the sale; provide temporary shelter for and (c) the Plan will receive the greater Notice to Interested Persons participants who were sometimes of $438,000 or the fair market value of Notice of the proposed exemption impoverished and homeless between the Interest as of the date of sale as shall be given to all interested persons periods of shipboard employment. In determined by a qualified, independent by first-class mail and by posting the 1954, the SUPBC, an affiliate of the appraiser. required information at the Employer’s Union, constructed a building (the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary offices within 10 days of the date of Building) at 2505 First Avenue, Seattle, H. Lefkowitz of the Department, 28242 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices telephone (202) 219–8881. (This is not subject to the direction of the Plan’s Rates was $76,132. On December 16, a toll-free number.) investment committee (the Committee). 1992, the Court approved a plan of The Committee, comprised of officers of rehabilitation (the Rehab Plan) of Cablevision Industries Corporation Time Warner Inc. (TWI), the parent Executive Life which provided for the Profit Sharing Plan (the Plan) Located corporation of the Employer, has Rehabilitator to set new rates of interest in New York, New York complete authority to manage and (the Rehab Rates) with respect to the [Application No. D–10233] control Plan assets and to determine the GIC. In accordance with the Rehab Plan, Proposed Exemption investment policy of the Plan. the Rehabilitator established the 2. Assets of the Plan are invested by following Rehab Rates for the principal The Department is considering the Trustee pursuant to the directions of amounts deposited under the GIC: granting an exemption under the the Committee. Among the assets in the From 8/8/86 to 8/8/91: 8.86 percent authority of section 408(a) of the Act Plan is an interest in a single-deposit From 8/8/91 to 8/7/92: 6.00 percent and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code and guaranteed investment contract (the From 8/7/92 to 2/28/93: 3.50 percent in accordance with the procedures set GIC) issued to the Trustee on August 8, From 2/28/93 to 2/15/94: 3.25 percent forth in 29 C.F.R. Part 2570, Subpart B 1986 by Executive Life Insurance From 2/15/94 to Final Payment: 4.00 (55 F.R. 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). Company of California (Executive Life). percent If the exemption is granted the The Trustee purchased the GIC on Pursuant to the Rehab Plan and a restrictions of sections 406(a), 406 (b)(1) behalf of approximately 81 employee and (b)(2) of the Act and the sanctions consequent agreement of January 4, benefit plans which were clients of the resulting from the application of section 1994 (the Rehab Agreement) between Trustee, including the Plan. At the time 4975 of the Code, by reason of section the Trustee and the Rehabilitator, the the GIC was purchased, the Trustee 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code, value of the GIC Interest, determined by served as investment manager of the shall not apply to the proposed the Rehab Rates, was disbursed in a 93.7 Plan. The Plan made an initial principal purchase from the Plan by Cablevision percent immediate payout with a deposit of $49,800, representing a 1.66 Industries Corporation (the Employer), surviving claim (the Surviving Claim) percent interest in the GIC (the GIC the sponsor of the Plan, of the Plan’s for the remaining 6.3 percent. The Interest). Under the terms of the GIC, entire remaining interest (the Surviving Surviving Claim continues to earn a which is designated as Executive Life Claim) in guaranteed investment Rehab Rate of four percent annual Contract Number GCNG8690011A, the contract number GCNG8690011A (the interest until payment to the Trustee principal earns interest at the rate of GIC) issued by the Executive Life with respect to the GIC Interest is 8.86 percent per annum (the Contract Insurance Company (Executive Life); completed. Although the Plan received Rate). The GIC terms permit the Plan to provided that the following conditions $79,862.91 on February 15, 1994 as the make withdrawals (the Withdrawals) are satisfied: 93.7 percent payout with respect to the (A) All terms and conditions of the solely for the purchase of individual GIC Interest exclusive of the Surviving transaction are at least as favorable to annuity contracts for retiring Plan Claim, the Employer represents that the Plan as those which the Plan could participants. Upon the GIC’s stated under the Rehab Plan and the Rehab obtain in an arm’s-length transaction maturity date of August 8, 1991 (the Agreement the Plan will not be made with an unrelated party; Maturity Date), Executive Life was whole with respect to its investment in (B) The Plan receives a cash purchase obligated to make a lump-sum payment the Surviving Claim in accordance with price which is no less than the greater (the Maturity Payment) in the amount of the original terms of the GIC. The value of (1) the fair market value of the the total principal plus interest at the of the Plan’s interest in the Surviving Surviving Claim as of the sale date, or Contract Rate less Withdrawals. Claim, as determined by the Rehab (2) the Plan’s principal investment 3. On April 23, 1991 (the Rates, was $5,871.67 as of April 30, attributable to the Surviving Claim plus Conservatorship Date), Executive Life 1996. interest through the purchase date at the was placed into conservatorship and 4. Meanwhile, in January 1996 the Contract Rate (as defined below); and rehabilitation by order of the Supreme Employer was acquired by a subsidiary (C) In the event the Employer Court of New York (the Court), and a of TWI, and became a member of its subsequently receives payments with rehabilitator (the Rehabilitator) was controlled group of entities involved in respect to the Surviving Claim from any appointed by the Court. Payments and the cable television industry (the source in excess of the purchase price withdrawals with respect to all Merger). As a result of the Merger, the paid to Plan, such excess will be paid Executive Life guaranteed investment Employer has determined to merge the to the Plan. contracts, including the GIC, ceased at Plan with the Time Warner 6 EFFECTIVE DATE: This exemption, if that time. Entertainment Company, L.P. As of the Conservatorship Date, the Additional Account Plan (the New granted, will be effective as of June 17, 7 1996. accumulated book value of the GIC Plan), of which the Fidelity Interest was $74,325. As of the Maturity Management Trust Company (Fidelity) Summary of Facts and Representations Date the amount of the Maturity is the trustee and investment manager. 1. The Employer, an indirect Payment which was due the Plan under However, the Employer represents that subsidiary of Time Warner, Inc., is a the GIC as determined by the Contract Fidelity will be unable to administer the New York corporation engaged in the GIC Interest as part of the merged trust distribution of cable television services, 6 The Department notes that the decisions to assets in the New Plan without acquire and hold the GIC Interest are governed by with its principal place of business in the fiduciary responsibility requirements of Part 4, considerable additional cost. New York, New York. The Plan is a Subtitle B, Title I of the Act. In this proposed The Employer desires to facilitate defined contribution profit sharing plan exemption, the Department is not proposing relief completion of the merger of the Plan with 1,598 participants and total assets for any violations of Part 4 which may have arisen with the New Plan by providing for total as a result of the acquisition and holding of the GIC of approximately $16,810,297 as of Interest. and immediate liquidation of the GIC February 13, 1996. The Plan’s assets are 7 The accumulated book value of the GIC Interest Interest, and to prevent any loss on held by its trustee, Fleet Trust Company is the total principal deposited plus interest at the amounts due the Plan under the terms in New York, New York (the Trustee), Contract Rate less Withdrawals. of the GIC. To accomplish these Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28243 objectives, the Employer and the interest through the purchase date at the Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of Committee determined that the most Contract Rate; (3) The Plan will incur no May, 1996. expeditious means would be the expenses with respect to the proposed Ivan Strasfeld, Employer’s cash purchase of the Plan’s transaction; and (4) In the event the Director of Exemption Determinations, remaining interest in the GIC. The Employer receives payments with Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Employer requests an exemption for this respect to the GIC Interest in excess of U.S. Department of Labor. transaction under the terms and the purchase price paid the Plan, such [FR Doc. 96–13916 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] conditions described herein. excess will be paid to the Plan. BILLING CODE 4510±29±P 5. The Employer proposes that the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Plan transfer to the Employer the Plan’s Ronald Willett of the Department, entire remaining interest in the GIC in [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 96±14; telephone (202) 219–8881. (This is not Exemption Application No. D±09940] exchange for a cash purchase price in a toll-free number.) the amount of the Plan’s GIC Interest Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated principal investment attributable to the General Information (MS&Co) and Morgan Stanley Trust Surviving Claim plus interest at the The attention of interested persons is Company (MSTC) Contract Rate effective August 8, 1986 directed to the following: AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits through the date of the purchase. The (1) The fact that a transaction is the Administration, Labor (the Department). Plan will incur no expenses with subject of an exemption under section respect to the proposed transaction. 408(a) of the Act and/or section ACTION: Notice of technical correction. Subsequent to the purchase, the 4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve On March 12, 1996, the Department Employer, as owner of the GIC Interest, a fiduciary or other party in interest of will receive the Rehab Payments with published in the Federal Register (61 disqualified person from certain other FR 10032) a notice granting an respect to the Surviving Claim, which provisions of the Act and/or the Code, includes interest at four percent. In the individual exemption (the Exemption) including any prohibited transaction event the Employer receives funds from on behalf of MS&Co and MSTC provisions to which the exemption does any source with respect to the Surviving (collectively, the Applicants). The first not apply and the general fiduciary Claim in excess of the purchase price paragraph of the Exemption states, in responsibility provisions of section 404 paid to the Plan by the Employer, such pertinent part, that ‘‘the restrictions of of the Act, which among other things excess will be paid to the Plan. sections 406(a)(1)(A) through (D) and 6. The Employer is requesting that the require a fiduciary to discharge his 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act and the exemption, if granted, be effective as of duties respecting the plan solely in the sanctions resulting from the application June 17, 1996. The Employer explains interest of the participants and of section 4975 of the Code, by reason that its reorganizational activities beneficiaries of the plan and in a of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of commencing with its acquisition by prudent fashion in accordance with the Code, shall not apply to the lending TWI subsidiaries in January 1996 have section 404(a)(1)(b) of the act; nor does of securities to Morgan Stanley & Co., led to a greater number of Plan it affect the requirement of section Incorporated (MS&Co) and to any other participant terminations than usual. 401(a) of the Code that the plan must U.S. registered broker-dealers affiliated Whereas the Plan has permitted operate for the exclusive benefit of the with Morgan Stanley Trust Company distributions only annually, the New employees of the employer maintaining (the Affiliated Broker-Dealer, Plan enables distributions on a monthly the plan and their beneficiaries; collectively, the MS Broker-Dealers) by basis. Because distributions to many (2) Before an exemption may be employee benefit plans with respect to former participants of the Plan are granted under section 408(a) of the Act which MS&Co is a party in pending, the Employer desires to enable and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, interest * * *’’ distributions to be processed in the June the Department must find that the The Applicants believe that the 1996 processing cycle of the New Plan. exemption is administratively feasible, aforementioned language should have This will require the completed in the interests of the plan and of its referred to an MS Broker-Dealer, as a liquidation of the GIC Interest by June participants and beneficiaries and party in interest rather than to MS&Co 17, 1996. Accordingly, the Employer protective of the rights of participants because the exemption application intends to consummate the proposed and beneficiaries of the plan; contemplated that an MS Broker-Dealer, purchase transaction on that date under (3) The proposed exemptions, if other than MS&Co, might be borrowing the terms and conditions described granted, will be supplemental to, and securities from a plan with respect to above. not in derogation of, any other which such MS Broker-Dealer, but not 7. In summary, the applicant provisions of the Act and/or the Code, necessarily MS&Co, is a party in represents that the proposed including statutory or administrative interest. Therefore, the Department has transactions satisfy the criteria of exemptions and transitional rules. amended the first paragraph of the section 408(a) of the Act for the Furthermore, the fact that a transaction Exemption to read as follows: following reasons: (1) The transaction is subject to an administrative or ‘‘The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) will provide the Plan with an immediate statutory exemption is not dispositive of through (D) and 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the return on its investment in the whether the transaction is in fact a Act and the sanctions resulting from the Surviving Claim at a rate of interest, the prohibited transaction; and application of section 4975 of the Code, by Contract Rate, which is higher than the (4) The proposed exemptions, if reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of Rehab Rates; (2) The proposed transfer granted, will be subject to the express the Code, shall not apply to the lending of of the GIC Interest to the Employer for condition that the material facts and securities to Morgan Stanley & Co. a cash purchase price will be a one- representations contained in each Incorporated (MS&Co) and to any other U.S. registered broker-dealers affiliated with time transaction in which the Plan application are true and complete, and Morgan Stanley Trust Company (the receives no less than the greater of the that each application accurately Affiliated Broker-Dealer; collectively, the MS fair market value of the GIC Interest or describes all material terms of the Broker- Dealers) by employee benefit plans the Plan’s principal investment transaction which is the subject of the with respect to which the MS Broker-Dealer attributable to the Surviving Claim plus exemption. who is borrowing such securities is a party 28244 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices in interest or for which Morgan Stanley Trust The notices of proposed exemption For a more complete statement of the Company (MSTC) acts as directed trustee or were issued and the exemptions are facts and representations supporting the custodian and securities lending agent and to being granted solely by the Department Department’s decision to grant this the receipt of compensation by MSTC in because, effective December 31, 1978, exemption refer to the notice of connection with these transactions, provided proposed exemption published on April that the following conditions are met:’’ section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713, October 17, 4, 1996, at 61 FR 15140. In addition, the Department has 1978) transferred the authority of the Comments revised the reference to MS&Co in the Secretary of the Treasury to issue fourth line of the fourth paragraph of exemptions of the type proposed to the The Department received three Section 2 of the Written Comments of Secretary of Labor. written comments from retired the Exemption (published at page participants of the Plan with respect to 10033) to MS Broker-Dealer. Statutory Findings the notice of the proposed exemption. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. In accordance with section 408(a) of These comments did not relate to the Jan D. Broady of the Department, the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the subject Sale transaction. Accordingly, telephone (202) 219–8881. (This is not Code and the procedures set forth in 29 after giving full consideration to the a toll-free number.) CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, entire record, the Department has 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon determined to grant the exemption. Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: May 1996. the entire record, the Department makes Mr. the following findings: C. E. Beaver of the Department, Ivan L. Strasfeld, (a) The exemptions are telephone (202) 219–8881. (This is not Director of Exemption Determinations, administratively feasible; a toll-free number.) Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, (b) They are in the interests of the U.S. Department of Labor. plans and their participants and Dauphin Deposit Bank and Trust [FR Doc. 96–13914 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] beneficiaries; and Company Located in Harrisburg, BILLING CODE 4510±29±P (c) They are protective of the rights of Pennsylvania the participants and beneficiaries of the [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 96–45; [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 96±44; plans. Application No. D–10187] Exemption Application No. D±10049, et al.] Sprague Electric Company Retirement Section I—Exemption for In-Kind and Savings Plan (the Plan) Located in Transfer of CIF Assets Grant of Individual Exemptions; Cincinnati, Ohio Sprague Electric Company The restrictions of sections 406(a) and [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 96–44; 406(b) of the Act and the sanctions AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Exemption Application No. D–10049] resulting from the application of section Administration, Labor. 4975 of the Code, by reason of section Exemption ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions. 4975(c)(1)(A) through (F) of the Code, The restrictions of sections 406(a) and shall not apply, as of May 31, 1996 to SUMMARY: This document contains 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act and the the proposed in-kind transfer of assets exemptions issued by the Department of sanctions resulting from the application of plans for which Dauphin Deposit Labor (the Department) from certain of of section 4975 of the Code, by reason Bank and Trust Company (Dauphin) the prohibited transaction restrictions of of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of acts as a fiduciary (the Client Plans), the Employee Retirement Income the Code, shall not apply to the cash other than plans established and Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and/or sale (the Sale) by the Plan of its 34.2 maintained by Dauphin (the Bank the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the interest in both the Group Annuity Plans), that are held in certain collective Code). Contract No. CG 0128203A (ELIC investment funds maintained by Notices were published in the Federal Contract) issued by Executive Life Dauphin (CIFs) in exchange for shares of Register of the pendency before the Insurance Company and the Group the Marketvest Funds (the Funds), open- Department of proposals to grant such Annuity Contract No. GA–4724 (MBL end investment companies registered exemptions. The notices set forth a Contract) issued by Mutual Benefit Life under the Investment Company Act of summary of facts and representations Insurance Company to American 1940 (the 1940 Act), in situations where contained in each application for Annuity Group, Inc., a party in interest Dauphin acts as investment advisor for exemption and referred interested with respect to the Plan; provided that the Fund and may provide some other persons to the respective applications the following conditions are met: (1) the ‘‘Secondary Service’’ to the Fund as for a complete statement of the facts and Sale is a one-time transaction for cash; defined in Section V(h), in connection representations. The applications have (2) the Plan experiences no loss and with the termination of such CIFs, been available for public inspection at incurs no expense from the Sale; (3) the provided that the following conditions the Department in Washington, D.C. The Plan receives as consideration for the and the general conditions of Section III notices also invited interested persons Sale the greater of either (a) 34.2 percent are met: to submit comments on the requested of the fair market value of the ELIC (a) No sales commissions or other fees exemptions to the Department. In Contract and the MBL Contract, are paid by the Client Plans in addition the notices stated that any respectively, as determined on the date connection with the purchase of Fund interested person might submit a of the Sale, or (b) 34.2 percent of the shares through the in-kind transfer of written request that a public hearing be accumulated book value of the ELIC CIF assets, and no redemption fees are held (where appropriate). The Contract and the MBL Contract, payable in connection with the sale of applicants have represented that they respectively, as set forth in paragraph 4 such shares by the Client Plans to the have complied with the requirements of of the notice of the proposed exemption, Funds. the notification to interested persons. with such determinations as to the (b) Each Client Plan receives shares of No public comments and no requests for consideration for the Sale made by the a Fund which have a total net asset a hearing, unless otherwise stated, were State Street Bank and Trust Company, value that is equal to the value of the received by the Department. the Plan fiduciary. Plan’s pro rata share of the assets of the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28245

CIF on the date of the in-kind transfer, kind transfer of the Client Plan’s CIF the proper crediting of the fees to each based on the current market value of the assets to a corresponding Fund in Plan. CIF’s assets as determined in a single exchange for shares of the Fund. (2) The Client Plan does not pay any valuation performed in the same (f) For all in-kind transfers of CIF Plan-level investment management fees, manner at the close of that business day assets to a Fund, Dauphin sends by investment advisory fees, or similar fees using independent sources in regular mail to each affected Client Plan to Dauphin with respect to any of the accordance with Rule 17a–7 of the the following information: assets of such Plan which are invested Securities and Exchange Commission (1) Within 30 days after completion of in shares of any of the Funds. This (SEC) under the 1940 Act (see 17 CFR the transaction, a written confirmation condition does not preclude the 270.17a–7) and the procedures containing: payment of investment advisory or established by the Funds pursuant to (i) The identity of each security that similar fees by the Funds to Dauphin Rule 17a–7 for the independent was valued for purposes of the under the terms of an investment valuation of such assets. Such transaction in accordance with Rule management agreement adopted in procedures must require that all 17a-7(b)(4); accordance with section 15 of the 1940 securities for which a current market (ii) The price of each such security Act, nor does it preclude the payment price cannot be obtained by reference to involved in the transaction; of fees for Secondary Services to the last sale price for transactions (iii) The identity of each pricing Dauphin pursuant to a duly adopted reported on a recognized securities service or market-maker consulted in agreement between Dauphin and the exchange or NASDAQ be valued based determining the value of such securities; Funds. on an average of the highest current and (b) The price paid or received by a independent bid and lowest current (2) Within 90 days after completion of Client Plan for shares in a Fund is the independent offer, as of the close of each in-kind transfer, a written net asset value per share at the time of business on the Friday preceding the confirmation containing: the transaction, as defined in Section weekend of the CIF transfers, (i) The number of CIF units held by V(e), and is the same price which would determined on the basis of reasonable the Client Plan immediately before the have been paid or received for the inquiry from at least three sources that transfer, the related per unit value, and shares by any other investor at that time. are broker-dealers or pricing services the total dollar amount of such CIF (c) Dauphin, including any officer or independent of Dauphin. units; and director of Dauphin, does not purchase (c) All or a pro rata portion of the (ii) The number of shares in the Funds or sell shares of the Funds from or to assets of a Client Plan held in a CIF are that are held by the Client Plan any Client Plan. transferred in-kind to the Funds in following the transfer, the related per (d) No sales commissions are paid by exchange for shares of such Funds. share net asset value, and the total the Client Plans in connection with the (d) A second fiduciary who is dollar amount of such shares. purchase or sale of shares of the Funds independent of and unrelated to (g) The conditions set forth in and no redemption fees are paid in Dauphin (the Second Fiduciary) paragraphs (e), (f) and (o) of Section II connection with the sale of shares by receives advance written notice of the below are satisfied. the Client Plans to the Funds. in-kind transfer of assets of the CIFs and Section II—Exemption for Receipt of (e) For each Client Plan, the combined full written disclosure of information Fees total of all fees received by Dauphin for concerning the Funds, including: the provision of services to a Client (1) A current prospectus for each The restrictions of section 406(a) and Plan, and in connection with the Fund in which a Client Plan is 406(b) of the Act and the sanctions provision of services to the Funds in considering investing; resulting from the application of section which the Client Plan may invest, are (2) A statement describing the fees for 4975 of the Code, by reason of section not in excess of ‘‘reasonable investment advisory or similar services, 4975(c)(1)(A) through (F) of the Code, compensation’’ within the meaning of any secondary services as defined in shall not apply, as of April 1, 1996, to section 408(b)(2) of the Act. Section IV(h), and all other fees to be the receipt of fees by Dauphin from the (f) Dauphin does not receive any fees charged to or paid by the Client Plan Funds for acting as an investment payable pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under and by the Funds, including the nature adviser for the Funds as well as for the 1940 Act in connection with the and extent of any differential between providing other services to the Funds transactions. the rates of such fees; which are ‘‘Secondary Services’’ as (g) The Client Plans are not employee (3) The reasons why Dauphin defined in Section V(h), in connection benefit plans sponsored or maintained considers investing in the Fund is an with the investment by the Client Plans by Dauphin. appropriate investment decision for the in shares of the Funds, provided that the (h) The Second Fiduciary receives, in Client Plan; following conditions and the general advance of any initial investment by the (4) A statement describing whether conditions of Section III are met: Client Plan in a Fund, full and detailed there are any limitations applicable to (a) Each Client Plan satisfies either written disclosure of information Dauphin with respect to which assets of (but not both) of the following: concerning the Funds, including but not a Client Plan may be invested in a Fund, (1) The Client Plan receives a cash limited to: and, if so, the nature of such limitations; credit of such Plan’s proportionate share (1) A current prospectus for each and of all fees charged to the Funds by Fund in which a Client Plan is (5) Upon request of the Second Dauphin for investment advisory considering investing; Fiduciary, a copy of the proposed services, including any investment (2) A statement describing the fees for exemption and/or a copy of the final advisory fees paid by Dauphin to third investment advisory or similar services, exemption, if granted, once such party sub-advisers, no later than the any secondary services as defined in documents are published in the Federal same day as the receipt of such fees by Section IV(h), and all other fees to be Register. Dauphin. The crediting of all such fees charged to or paid by the Client Plan (e) After consideration of the to the Client Plans by Dauphin is and by the Funds, including the nature foregoing information, the Second audited by an independent accounting and extent of any differential between Fiduciary authorizes in writing the in- firm on at least an annual basis to verify the rates of such fees; 28246 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

(3) The reasons why Dauphin may (a)(2) above with respect to investments (1) The total, expressed in dollars, of consider such investment to be in a particular Fund, an increase in the brokerage commissions of each Fund appropriate for the Client Plan; rate of fees paid by the Fund to Dauphin that are paid to Dauphin by such Fund; (4) A statement describing whether regarding any investment management (2) The total, expressed in dollars, of there are any limitations applicable to services, investment advisory services, brokerage commissions of each Fund Dauphin with respect to which assets of or similar services that Dauphin that are paid by such Fund to brokerage a Client Plan may be invested in the provides to the Fund over an existing firms unrelated to Dauphin; Funds, and if so, the nature of such rate for such services that had been (3) The average brokerage limitations; and authorized by a Second Fiduciary in commissions per share, expressed as (5) Upon request of the Second accordance with paragraph (i) above; or cents per share, paid to Dauphin by Fiduciary, a copy of the proposed (2) For any Client Plan under this each Fund; and exemption and/or a copy of the final exemption, an addition of a Secondary (4) The average brokerage exemption, if granted, once such Service (as defined in Section IV(h) commissions per share, expressed as documents are published in the Federal below) provided by Dauphin to the cents per share, paid by each Fund to Register. Fund for which a fee is charged, or an brokerage firms unrelated to Dauphin. (i) After consideration of the increase in the rate of any fee paid by (o) All dealings between the Client information described above in the Funds to Dauphin for any Secondary Plans and the Funds are on a basis no paragraph (h), the Second Fiduciary Service that results either from an less favorable to the Plans than dealings authorizes in writing the investment of increase in the rate of such fee or from with other shareholders of the Funds. assets of the Client Plan in each the decrease in the number of kind of particular Fund and the fees to be paid services performed by Dauphin for such Section III—General Conditions by such Funds to Dauphin. fee over an existing rate for such (a) Dauphin maintains for a period of (j) All authorizations made by a Secondary Service which had been six years the records necessary to enable Second Fiduciary regarding investments authorized by the Second Fiduciary of the persons described below in in a Fund and the fees paid to Dauphin a Client Plan in accordance with paragraph (b) to determine whether the are subject to an annual reauthorization paragraph (i) above; conditions of this exemption have been wherein any such prior authorization Dauphin will, at least 30 days in met, except that (1) a prohibited referred to in paragraph (i) shall be advance of the implementation of such transaction will not be considered to terminable at will by the Client Plan, additional service for which a fee is have occurred if, due to circumstances without penalty to the Client Plan, upon charged or fee increase, provide a beyond the control of Dauphin, the receipt by Dauphin of written notice of written notice (which may take the form records are lost or destroyed prior to the termination. A form expressly providing of a proxy statement, letter, or similar end of the six-year period, and (2) no an election to terminate the communication that is separate from the party in interest other than Dauphin or authorization described in paragraph (i) prospectus of the Fund and which an affiliate shall be subject to the civil above (the Termination Form) with explains the nature and amount of the penalty that may be assessed under instructions on the use of the form must additional service for which a fee is section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes be supplied to the Second Fiduciary no charged or of the increase in fees) to the imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of less than annually; provided that the Second Fiduciary of the Client Plan. the Code if the records are not Termination Form need not be supplied Such notice shall be accompanied by a maintained or are not available for to the Second Fiduciary pursuant to this Termination Form with instructions as examination as required by paragraph paragraph sooner than six months after described in paragraph (i) above. (b) below. such Termination Form is supplied pursuant to paragraph (l) below, except (m) On an annual basis, Dauphin (b) (1) Except as provided below in to the extent required by such paragraph provides the Second Fiduciary of a paragraph (b)(2) and notwithstanding in order to disclose an additional Client Plan investing in the Funds with: any provisions of section 504(a)(2) of service or fee increase. The instructions (1) A copy of the current prospectus the Act, the records referred to in for the Termination Form must include for the Funds in which the Client Plan paragraph (a) are unconditionally the following information: invests and, upon such fiduciary’s available at their customary location for (1) The authorization is terminable at request, a copy of the Statement of examination during normal business will by the Client Plan, without penalty Additional Information for such Funds hours by— to the Client Plan, upon receipt by which contains a description of all fees (i) Any duly authorized employee or Dauphin of written notice from the paid by the Funds to Dauphin; representative of the Department or the Second Fiduciary; and (2) A copy of the annual financial Internal Revenue Service, (2) Failure to return the Termination disclosure report prepared by Dauphin (ii) Any fiduciary of the Client Plans Form will result in continued which includes information about the who has authority to acquire or dispose authorization of Dauphin to engage in Fund portfolios as well as audit findings of shares of the Funds owned by the the transactions described in paragraph of an independent auditor within 60 Client Plans, or any duly authorized (i) on behalf of the Client Plan. days of the preparation of the report; employee or representative of such (k) For each Client Plan using the fee and fiduciary, and structure described in paragraph (a)(1) (3) Oral or written responses to (iii) Any participant or beneficiary of above with respect to investments in a inquiries of the Second Fiduciary as the Client Plans or duly authorized particular Fund, the Second Fiduciary they arise. employee or representative of such of the Client Plan receives full written (n) With respect to each of the Funds participant or beneficiary; disclosure in a Fund prospectus or in which a Client Plan invests, in the (2) None of the persons described in otherwise of any increases in the rates event such Fund places brokerage paragraph (b)(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be of fees charged by Dauphin to the Funds transactions with Dauphin, Dauphin authorized to examine trade secrets of for investment advisory services. will provide the Second Fiduciary of Dauphin, or commercial or financial (l) (1) For each Client Plan using the such Plan at least annually with a information which is privileged or fee structure described in paragraph statement specifying: confidential. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28247

Section IV—Definitions partner or employee of Dauphin (or is a exemption, refer to the notice of For purposes of this exemption: relative of such persons); proposed exemption published on (3) Such fiduciary directly or (a) The term ‘‘Dauphin’’ means March 12, 1996, at 61 FR 10017. indirectly receives any compensation or Dauphin Deposit Bank and Trust other consideration for his or her own Notice to Interested Persons Company and any affiliate thereof as personal account in connection with The applicant represents that it was defined below in paragraph (b) of this any transaction described in this unable to notify interested persons section. exemption. within the time period specified in the (b) An ‘‘affiliate’’ of a person includes: If an officer, director, partner or Federal Register notice published on (1) Any person directly or indirectly employee of Dauphin (or relative of March 12, 1996. The applicant states through one or more intermediaries, such persons), is a director of such that interested persons were notified, in controlling, controlled by, or under Second Fiduciary, and if he or she the manner agreed upon between the common control with the person; abstains from participation in (i) the applicant and the Department, by April (2) Any officer, director, employee, choice of the Client Plan’s investment 3, 1996. Interested persons were advised relative, or partner in any such person; adviser, (ii) the approval of any such that they had until May 3, 1996 to and purchase or sale between the Client Plan comment on the proposed exemption. (3) Any corporation or partnership of and the Funds, and (iii) the approval of Written Comments and Modifications which such person is an officer, any change in fees charged to or paid by director, partner, or employee. the Client Plan in connection with any The applicant submitted the following (c) The term ‘‘control’’ means the of the transactions described in Sections comments and requests for power to exercise a controlling I and II above, then paragraph (g)(2) of modifications regarding the notice of influence over the management or this section shall not apply. proposed exemption (the Proposal). policies of a person other than an (h) The term ‘‘Secondary Service’’ With respect to Section I(g) of the individual. means a service other than an Proposal, the applicant states that the (d) The term ‘‘Fund’’ or ‘‘Funds’’ shall investment management, investment cross-reference to paragraph (n) of include the Marketvest Funds, Inc. or advisory, or similar service, which is Section II should be changed to any other diversified open-end provided by Dauphin to the Funds. paragraph (o). The Department investment company or companies However, for purposes of Section II(k), acknowledges the applicant’s requested registered under the 1940 Act for which the term ‘‘Secondary Service’’ will not clarification and has so modified the Dauphin serves as an investment include any brokerage services provided language of the exemption. adviser and may also serve as a to the Funds by Dauphin for the With respect to Section IV(i) of the custodian, dividend disbursing agent, execution of securities transactions Proposal, the applicant states that the shareholder servicing agent, transfer engaged in by the Funds. cross-reference to paragraph (h) of agent, Fund accountant, or provide (i) The term ‘‘Termination Form’’ Section II should be changed to some other ‘‘Secondary Service’’ (as means the form supplied to the Second paragraph (i). The Department defined below in paragraph (h) of this Fiduciary which expressly provides an acknowledges the applicant’s requested Section) which has been approved by election to the Second Fiduciary to clarification and has so modified the such Funds. terminate on behalf of a Client Plan the language of the exemption. (e) The term ‘‘net asset value’’ means authorization described in paragraph (i) With respect to the effective dates for the amount for purposes of pricing all of Section II. Such Termination Form the exemption, the applicant notes that, purchases and sales calculated by may be used at will by the Second consistent with the representations dividing the value of all securities, Fiduciary to terminate an authorization made in the application, the Proposal determined by a method as set forth in without penalty to the Client Plan and provided that the effective date of the the Fund’s prospectus and statement of to notify Dauphin in writing to effect a exemption should be March 29, 1996. additional information, and other assets termination by selling the shares of the However, the applicant states that the belonging to the Fund or portfolio of the Funds held by the Client Plan target date for the in-kind transfers of Fund, less the liabilities charged to each requesting such termination within one CIF assets to the Funds has been such portfolio or Fund, by the number business day following receipt by changed to May 31, 1996. Therefore, the of outstanding shares. Dauphin of the form; provided that if, effective date for the exemption under (f) The term ‘‘relative’’ means a due to circumstances beyond the control Section I for the in-kind transfers of CIF ‘‘relative’’ as that term is defined in of Dauphin, the sale cannot be executed assets to the Funds should be changed section 3(15) of the Act (or a ‘‘member within one business day, Dauphin shall to May 31, 1996. However, the applicant of the family’’ as that term is defined in have one additional business day to states that new Client Plans that have section 4975(e)(6) of the Code), or a complete such sale. just retained Dauphin as trustee may brother, a sister, or a spouse of a brother seek to invest in the Funds prior to that or a sister. Effective Date date. Thus, the applicant requests that (g) The term ‘‘Second Fiduciary’’ This exemption is effective as of May the effective date for the exemption means a fiduciary of a Client Plan who 31, 1996, for the in-kind transfers of CIF under Section II concerning the receipt is independent of and unrelated to assets described in Section I. In of fees by Dauphin from the Funds for Dauphin. For purposes of this addition, this exemption is effective as investments in the Funds made by new exemption, the Second Fiduciary will of April 1, 1996, for the receipt of fees Client Plans should be April 1, 1996. not be deemed to be independent of and by Dauphin described in Section II for The Department acknowledges the unrelated to Dauphin if: cash investments made by Client Plans applicant’s requested clarification and (1) Such fiduciary directly or in shares of the Funds which do not has so modified the paragraph in the indirectly controls, is controlled by, or involve any in-kind transfer of CIF exemption relating to the effective date is under common control with Dauphin; assets to such Funds. for the transactions described in Section (2) Such fiduciary, or any officer, For a more complete statement of the I (the in-kind transfers of CIF assets to director, partner, employee, or relative facts and representations supporting the the Funds) and Section II (the receipt of of the fiduciary is an officer, director, Department’s decision to grant this fees by Dauphin from the Funds). 28248 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

No other comments, and no requests NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND represented by the Administrator of the for a hearing, were received by the SPACE ADMINISTRATION National Aeronautics and Space Department on the Proposal. Administration. Written objections to [Notice 96±053] Accordingly, based on all of the facts the prospective grant of a license should and representations made by the Notice of Prospective Copyright be sent to Ms. Robin W. Edwards, Patent Attorney, Langley Research Center. applicant, the Department has License DATE: Responses to this notice must be determined to grant the proposed AGENCY: National Aeronautics and received by August 5, 1996. exemption as modified. Space Administration. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. ACTION: Notice of Prospective Copyright Ms. Robin W. Edwards, Patent Attorney, E. F. Williams of the Department, License. NASA Langley Research Center, Mail telephone (202) 219–8194. (This is not SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice Code 212, Hampton, VA 23681; (804) a toll-free number.) that NextGen Systems, Incorporated, 864–3230. General Information 1006 W. Ninth Avenue, King Of Prussia, Dated: May 24, 1996. Pennsylvania 19406, has applied for a Edward A. Frankle, The attention of interested persons is partially exclusive license to practice General Counsel. directed to the following: the U.S. Copyright in the ‘‘Method for [FR Doc. 96–13894 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] (1) The fact that a transaction is the Visually Integrating Multiple Data BILLING CODE 7510±01±M subject of an exemption under section Acquisition Technologies for Real Time 408(a) of the Act and/or section and Retrospective Analysis Software 4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve Code’’ (also known as ‘‘Crew Response Evaluation Window (CREW)’’), for a fiduciary or other party in interest or NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY REVIEW which a U.S. Copyright Registration disqualified person from certain other COMMISSION Application was filed on May 3, 1996, provisions to which the exemptions by the United States of America as does not apply and the general fiduciary Public Meeting represented by the Administrator of the responsibility provisions of section 404 National Aeronautics and Space AGENCY: National Bankruptcy Review of the Act, which among other things Administration. Written objections to Commission. require a fiduciary to discharge his the prospective grant of a license should ACTION: Notice of public meeting. duties respecting the plan solely in the be sent to Ms. Robin W. Edwards, Patent interest of the participants and Attorney, Langley Research Center. TIME AND DATE: Thursday, June 20, 1996; beneficiaries of the plan and in a DATES: Responses to this notice must be 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. and Friday, June prudent fashion in accordance with received by August 5, 1996. 21, 1996; 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. PLACE: it affect the requirement of section Georgetown University Law Robin W. Edwards, Patent Attorney, Center, Meeting Room: Room 141, 600 401(a) of the Code that the plan must NASA Langley Research Center, Mail New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Washington, operate for the exclusive benefit of the Cope 212, Hampton, VA 23681; D.C. 20001–2022. employees of the employer maintaining telephone (804) 864–3230. the plan and their beneficiaries; ACCESS: As a result of on-going Dated: May 24, 1996. construction at the site, it is suggested (2) These exemptions are Edward A. Frankle, that the public use the Second Street supplemental to and not in derogation General Counsel. entrance to the Law Center. of, any other provisions of the Act and/ [FR Doc. 96–13893 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] STATUS: The meeting will be open to the or the Code, including statutory or BILLING CODE 7510±01±M public. administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: General fact that a transaction is subject to an [Notice 96±054] administrative matters for the administrative or statutory exemption is Commission, including substantive Notice of Prospective Patent License not dispositive of whether the agenda; Commission will hear from invited witnesses; Commission transaction is in fact a prohibited AGENCY: National Aeronautics and subgroups will consider the following transaction; and Space Administration. substantive matters: improving (3) The availability of these ACTION: Notice of Prospective Patent jurisdiction and procedure; consumer exemptions is subject to the express License. bankruptcy; Chapter 11: uses and condition that the material facts and SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice consequences; small businesses and representations contained in each that NextGen Systems, Incorporated, partnerships: a special case?; application accurately describes all 1006 W. Ninth Avenue, King Of Prussia, government as creditor or debtor; mass material terms of the transaction which Pennsylvania 19406, has applied for an torts, future claims, and bankruptcy; is the subject of the exemption. exclusive license to practice the service to the estate: ethical and Signed at Washington, D.C., this 30th day invention disclosed in NASA Case No. economic choices; the global economy: of May, 1996. LAR–15,367–1, entitled ‘‘Method for preparing for transnational insolvencies. Ivan Strasfeld, Visually Integrating Multiple Data CONTACT PERSONS FOR FURTHER Acquisition Technologies for Real Time INFORMATION: Contact Susan Jensen- Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, and Retrospective Analysis’’ (also Conklin or Carmelita Pratt at the U.S. Department of Labor. known as ‘‘Crew Response Evaluation National Bankruptcy Review Window (CREW)’’), for which a U.S. Commission, Thurgood Marshall [FR Doc. 96–13915 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Patent Application was filed on April 3, Federal Judiciary Building, One BILLING CODE 4510±29±P 1996 by the United States of America as Columbus Circle, N.E., Suite G–350, Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28249

Washington, D.C. 20544; Telephone NRC incorporates conditions in the 4. The circumstances establishing that Number: (202) 273–1813. SNM license which provide NRC the the request for a hearing is timely in Susan Jensen-Conklin, latitude to enforce the Agreement State accordance with § 2.1205(c). Deputy Counsel. license conditions, if NRC determines In accordance with 10 CFR [FR Doc. 96–13837 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] such action is necessary. Finally, the § 2.1205(e), each request for a hearing NRC license does not abrogate or must also be served, by delivering it BILLING CODE 6820±36±P diminish the authority of the State personally or by mail, to: governed by its agreement under section 1. The applicant, Chem-Nuclear 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Systems, Inc., 140 Stoneridge Drive, NUCLEAR REGULATORY as amended, with NRC, to regulate, Columbia, South Carolina 29210, COMMISSION inspect or otherwise exercise control of Attention: Mr. William B. House, and; [Docket No.: 27±47] operations, with respect to the source 2. The NRC staff, by delivery to the and byproduct material, for disposal of Executive Director for Operations, One Consideration of Application for that material at the LLW disposal White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Renewal of a License To Dispose of facility at Barnwell, South Carolina. Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, or by mail, Low-Level Radioactive Waste Prior to the issuance of the proposed addressed to the Executive Director for Containing Special Nuclear Material by renewal, NRC will have made findings Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc., and required by the Atomic Energy Act of Commission, Washington, DC 20555. For further details with respect to this Opportunity for a Hearing 1954, as amended, and NRC’s action, the application for amendment regulations. These findings will be AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory request is available for inspection at the documented in a Safety Evaluation Commission. NRC’s Public Document Room, 2120 L Report and an Environmental ACTION: Notice of consideration of an Street NW., Washington, DC 20555. Assessment. application for renewal of a license to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The NRC provides notice that this is dispose of low-level radioactive waste Timothy E. Harris, Low-Level Waste and a proceeding on an application for a containing special nuclear material by Decommissioning Projects Branch, license amendment falling within the Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc., and Division of Waste Management, Office scope of Subpart L, ‘‘Informal Hearing opportunity for a hearing. of Nuclear Material Safety and Procedures for Adjudication in Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Materials Licensing Proceedings,’’ of Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. (NRC) is considering the renewal of NRC’s rules and practice for domestic Telephone: (301) 415–6613. Fax.: (301) License No. 12–13536–01. This license licensing proceedings in 10 CFR Part 2. 415–5398. is issued to Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc. Pursuant to § 2.1205(a), any person (CNSI) for the disposal of wastes whose interest may be affected by this Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day containing special nuclear material proceeding may file a request for a of May, 1996. (SNM) in the low-level radioactive hearing in accordance with § 2.1205(c). For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. waste (LLW) disposal facility, located A request for a hearing must be filed Robert A. Nelson, near Barnwell, South Carolina. NRC within thirty (30) days of the date of Acting Chief, Low-Level Waste and licenses this facility under 10 CFR Part publication of this Federal Register Decommissioning Projects Branch, Division 70. The license renewal application was notice. of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards . submitted on April 10, 1996. The request for a hearing must be The LLW disposal facility located filed with the Office of the Secretary [FR Doc. 96–13877 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] near Barnwell, South Carolina, is either: BILLING CODE 7590±01±P licensed by the State of South Carolina 1. By delivery to the Docketing and for disposal of source and byproduct Service Branch of the Secretary at One material. The NRC license allows the Advisory Committee on Reactor White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Safeguards; Meeting Notice disposal of SNM, and acknowledges that Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–2738; or the State’s regulated activities constitute 2. By mail or telegram addressed to To carry out the responsibilities set the major site activities. As a result, the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory forth in Sections 29 and 182b. of the NRC relies extensively on the State’s Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2039, regulatory program to evaluate the Attention: Docketing and Service 2232b), the Advisory Committee on facility and licensee’s capability to Branch Reactor Safeguards will hold a meeting demonstrate reasonable assurance that In addition to meeting other on June 12–14, 1996, in Conference the disposal of LLW can be Room T–2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, accomplished safely. To this end, NRC applicable requirements of 10 CFR Part 2 of the NRC’s regulations, a request for Rockville, Maryland. The date of this coordinates the review and assessment meeting was previously published in of the license with the State of South a hearing filed by a person other than an applicant must describe in detail: the Federal Register on Monday, Carolina Department of Health and November 27, 1995 (60 FR 58393). Environmental Control. To avoid a 1. The interest of the requester in the duplicate effort, NRC has identified proceeding; Wednesday, June 12, 1996 several areas in which it relies primarily 2. How that interest may be affected 1:00 P.M.–1:15 P.M.: Opening on the State regulatory program. Areas by the results of the proceeding, Remarks by the ACRS Chairman distinct to SNM regulation are directly including the reasons why the requestor (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make evaluated by NRC. Under the NRC should be permitted a hearing, with opening remarks regarding conduct of license, several State identified license particular reference to the factors set out the meeting and comment briefly conditions are referenced. This in § 2.1205(g); regarding items of current interest. approach ensures that NRC is aware of 3. The requestor’s areas of concern During this session, the Committee will significant licensee activities requiring about the licensing activity that is the discuss priorities for preparation of State regulatory action. Additionally, subject matter of the proceeding; and ACRS reports. 28250 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

1:15 P.M.–2:45 P.M.: Draft Regulatory opening remarks regarding conduct of with the use of potassium iodide after Guide, DG–1047, ‘‘Standard Format and the meeting. a severe accident and the potential risk Content for Applications to Renew 8:35 A.M.–9:30 A.M.: Issues associated with the use of potassium Nuclear Power Plant Operating Associated with Steam Generators iodide. Licenses’’ (Open)—The Committee will (Open)—The Committee will hear Representatives of the nuclear hear presentations by and hold presentations by and hold discussions industry will participate, as appropriate. discussions with representatives of the with representatives of the NRC staff 12:45 P.M.–6:00 P.M.: Preparation of NRC staff regarding the draft Regulatory regarding issues associated with steam ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee Guide, DG–1047. generators. Also, briefing by and will continue discussion of proposed Representatives of the nuclear discussions with representatives of the ACRS reports on matters considered industry will participate, as appropriate. Nuclear Energy Institute regarding the during this meeting was well as a 2:45 P.M.–3:45 P.M.: IPE Insights MAAP Code. proposed ACRS report on Severe Report (Open)—The Committee will Representatives of other interested Accident Research. hear presentations by and hold parties will participate, as appropriate. Procedures for the conduct of and discussions with representatives of the 9:30 A.M.–11:00 A.M.: Browns Ferry participation in ACRS meetings were NRC staff and its contractors regarding Nuclear Plant, Unit 3 (Open)—The published in the Federal Register on the Individual Plant Examination (IPE) Committee will hear presentations by September 27, 1995 (60 FR 49925). In Insights Report. and hold discussions with accordance with these procedures, oral or written statements may be presented Representatives of the nuclear representatives of the licensee by members of the public, electronic industry will participate, as appropriate. (Tennessee Valley Authority) and the recordings will be permitted only 4:00 P.M.–5:00 P.M.: Loss of Offsite NRC staff regarding issues that led to the shutdown of Browns Ferry Unit 3, and during the open portions of the meeting, Power at Catawba, Unit 2 (Open)—The and questions may be asked only by Committee will hear presentations by the corrective actions taken by the licensee prior to restart. members of the Committee, its and hold discussions with consultants, and staff. Persons desiring representatives of the NRC staff 11:15 A.M.–11:30 A.M.: Reconciliation of ACRS Comments and to make oral statements should notify regarding the findings and Mr. Sam Duraiswamy, Chief, Nuclear recommendations of the NRC Special Recommendations (Open)—The Committee will discuss responses from Reactors Branch, at least five days Inspection Team which investigated the before the meeting, if possible, so that lost of offsite power event that occurred the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO) to comments and appropriate arrangements can be made on February 6, 1996 at the Catawba to allow the necessary time during the Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. recommendations included in recent ACRS reports, including the EDO meeting for such statements. Use of still, Representatives of the licensee will response to the April 22, 1996 ACRS motion picture, and television cameras participate, as appropriate. report on Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR during this meeting may be limited to 5:00 P.M.–5:30 P.M.: Future ACRS Parts 50 and 100 and Proposed selected portions of the meeting as Activities (Open)—The Committee will Regulatory Guides Relating to Reactor determined by the Chairman. discuss recommendations of the Site Criteria. Information regarding the time to be set Planning and Procedures Subcommittee 12:30 P.M.–7:00 P.M.: Preparation of aside for this purpose may be obtained regarding items proposed for ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee by contacting the Chief of the Nuclear consideration by the full Committee will continue discussion of proposed Reactors Branch prior to the meeting. In during future meetings. ACRS reports on matters considered view of the possibility that the schedule 5:30 P.M.–6:15 P.M.: Report of the during this meeting as well as a for ACRS meetings may be adjusted by Planning and Procedures Subcommittee proposed ACRS report on Severe the Chairman as necessary to facilitate (Open/Closed)—The Committee will Accident Research. the conduct of the meeting, persons hear a report of the Planning and planning to attend should check with Procedures Subcommittee on matters Friday, June 14, 1996 the Chief of the Nuclear Reactors Branch related to the conduct of ACRS 8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening if such rescheduling would result in business, and organizational and Remarks by the ACRS Chairman major inconvenience. personnel matters relating to the ACRS (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make In accordance with Subsection 10(d) staff. opening remarks regarding conduct of P.L. 92–463, I have determined that it is A portion of this session may be the meeting. necessary to close portions of this closed to discuss organizational and 8:35 a.m.–10:00 a.m.: Health Effects of meeting noted above to discuss matters personnel matters that relate solely to Low-Levels of Ionizing Radiation that relate solely to the internal the internal personnel rules and (Open)—The Committee will hear personnel rules and practices of this practices of this Advisory Committee, presentations by and hold discussions Advisory Committee per 5 U.S.C. and matters the release of which would with representatives of the NRC staff, 552b(c)(2), and to discuss matters the constitute a clearly unwarranted Health Physics Society, and invited release of which would constitute a invasion of personal privacy. experts regarding the health effects of clearly unwarranted invasion of 6:15 P.M.–7:00 P.M.: Preparation of low-levels of ionizing radiation. personal privacy per 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee Representatives of the nuclear Further information regarding topics will discuss proposed ACRS reports on industry and other interested parties to be discussed, whether the meeting matters considered during this meeting will participate, as appropriate. has been cancelled or rescheduled, the as well as a proposed ACRS report on 10:15 A.M.–11:45 A.M.: NRC Policy Chairman’s ruling on requests for the Severe Accident Research. Regarding the Use of Potassium Iodide opportunity to present oral statements after a Severe Accident (Open)—The and the time allotted therefor can be Thursday, June 13, 1996 Committee will hear presentations by obtained by contacting Mr. Sam 8:30 A.M.–8:35 A.M.: Opening and hold discussions with Duraiswamy, Chief, Nuclear Reactors Remarks by the ACRS Chairman representatives of the NRC staff Branch (telephone 301/415–7364), (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make regarding the NRC policy associated between 7:30 A.M. and 4:15 P.M. EDT. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28251

ACRS meeting notices, meeting longer wish to receive it, or would like Office of Personnel Management transcripts, and letter reports are now to be added to it, please contact the Not to exceed 500 positions in Federal available on FedWorld from the ‘‘NRC Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Job Information Centers, to be filled MAIN MENU.’’ Direct Dial Access Branch, Washington, D.C. 20555 (301– under the community Outreach number to FedWorld is (800) 303–9672; 415–1963). Information Network Program. Effective the local direct dial number is 703–321– In addition, distribution of this April 11, 1996. 3339. meeting notice over the internet system The 433rd ACRS meeting will be held is available. If you are interested in Department of State on August 8–10, 1996. receiving this Commission meeting International Boundary Commission, Dated: May 29, 1996. schedule electronically, please send an U.S. and Canada Andrew L. Bates, electronic message to [email protected] or [email protected]. Temporary and intermittent field Advisory Committee Management Officer. * * * * * employees such as instrumentmen, [FR Doc. 96–13872 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] foremen, recorders, packers, cooks, and William M. Hill, Jr., BILLING CODE 7590±01±P axemen, for not to exceed 180 working SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the days within any 1 calendar year. Secretary. Effective April 15, 1996. Sunshine Act Meeting [FR Doc. 96–14107 Filed 5–31–96; 2:46 pm] BILLING CODE 7590±01±M Department of Transportation AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. U.S. Coast Guard DATE: Weeks of June 3, 10, 17, and 24, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL Not to exceed 25 positions of Marine 1996. MANAGEMENT Traffic Controllers (Pilot), at grade GS– PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference 11 and below for temporary, Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Excepted Service intermittent, or seasonal employment in Maryland. the State of Louisiana. Effective April AGENCY: Office of Personnel 26, 1996. STATUS: Public and Closed. Management. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: ACTION: Notice. Federal Highway Administration Week of June 3 Temporary, intermittent, or seasonal SUMMARY: This gives notice of positions Thursday, June 6 employment in the field service of the placed or revoked under Schedules A Federal Highway Administration at 3:30 p.m.—Affirmation Session (PUBLIC and B, and placed under Schedule C in MEETING) (if needed) grades not higher than GS–5 for the excepted service, as required by subprofessional engineering aide work Week of June 10—Tentative Civil Service Rule VI, Exceptions from on highway surveys and construction Wednesday, June 12 the Competitive Service. projects. Effective April 26, 1996. 3:00 p.m.—Briefing on Part 100 Final Rule FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: on Reactor Site Criteria (PUBLIC Patricia Paige, (202) 606–0830. Schedule B MEETING) (Contact: Charles Ader, 301– SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office One Schedule B authority was 415–5622) of Personnel Management published its 4:30 p.m.—Affirmation Session (PUBLIC established: MEETING) (if needed) last monthly notice updating appointing authorities established or revoked under Department of Veterans Affairs Week of June 17—Tentative the Excepted Service provisions of 5 Not to exceed 25 Criminal Investigator Tuesday, June 18 CFR part 213 on May 3, 1996 (61 FR (Undercover) positions, GS 1811, in 10:00 a.m.—Briefing on Status of NRC 19963). Individual authorities grades 5 through 12, conducting Operator Licensing Initial Examination established or revoked under Schedules undercover investigations in the Pilot Process (PUBLIC MEETING) A and B and established under Veterans Health Administration (Contact: Stuart Richards, 301–415– Schedule C during the period, April 1, supervised by the VA, Office of 1031) 11:30 a.m.—Affirmation Session (PUBLIC 1996, through April 31, 1996, appear in Inspector General. Initial appointments MEETING) (if needed) the listing below. An established shall be greater than 1 year, but not Schedule B authority not previously exceed 4 years and may be extended Week of June 24—Tentative recorded for March 1996 is also listed indefinitely in 1-year increments. Tuesday, June 25 below. Future notices will be published Effective March 28, 1996. 10:00 a.m.—Briefing on Operating Reactors on the fourth Tuesday of each month, or Schedule C and Fuel Facilities (PUBLIC MEETING) as soon as possible thereafter. A Wednesday, June 26 consolidated listing of all authorities as The following Schedule C authorities 11:30 a.m.—Affirmation Session (PUBLIC were established in April 1996: MEETING) (if needed) of June 30 will also be published. 2:30 p.m.—Meeting with Advisory Schedule A Department of Agriculture Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) (PUBLIC MEETING) No Schedule A authorities were Confidential Assistant to the established in April 1996. Administrator, Food and Nutrition * The schedule for commission The following Schedule A authorities Service. Effective April 10, 1996. meetings is subject to change on short were revoked: Confidential Assistant to the notice. To verify the status of meetings Administrator, Animal and Plant Health call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. National Labor Relations Board Inspection Service. Effective April 18, Contact person for more information: Election Examiners for temporary, 1996. Bill Hill (301) 415–1661. part-time, or intermittent employment Confidential Assistant to the * * * * * in connection with elections under the Administrator, Food and Safety This notice is distributed by mail to Labor-Management Relations Act. Inspection Service. Effective April 24, several hundred subscribers; if you no Effective April 15, 1996. 1996. 28252 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Staff Assistant to the Administrator, Special Advisor to the Deputy U.S. International Trade Commission Federal Service Agency. Effective April Assistant Attorney General. Effective Staff Assistant to a Commissioner. 24, 1996. April 18, 1996. Effective April 25, 1996. Department of Commerce Department of Labor Staff Assistant to the Chairman. Effective April 26, 1996. Special Assistant to the Director of Special Assistant to the Assistant External Affairs. Effective April 26, Secretary for Policy. Effective April 8, United States Tax Court 1996. 1996. Secretary (Confidential Assistant) to a Confidential Assistant to the Assistant Special Assistant to the Assistant Judge. Effective April 12, 1996. Secretary for Legislative and Secretary for Policy. Effective April 18, Authority: 5 U.S.C. 3301 and 3302; E.O. Intergovernmental Affairs. Effective 1996. 10577, 3 CFR 1954–1958 Comp., P.218 April 26, 1996. Secretary’s Representative, Boston, Confidential Assistant to the Director, Office of Personnel Management MA, to the Office of the Associate Lorraine A. Green, Office of Business Liaison. Effective Director. Effective April 22, 1996. April 26, 1996. Deputy Director. Legislative Officer to the Assistant [FR Doc. 96–13841 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Department of Defense Secretary for Congressional and BILLING CODE 6325±01±M Special Assistant to the Assistant Intergovernmental Affairs. Effective Secretary of Defense (Legislative April 24, 1996. Affairs). Effective April 3, 1996. Special Assistant to the Assistant PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT Confidential Assistant to the Assistant Secretary for Administration and ASSESSMENT COMMISSION Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs). Management. Effective April 26, 1996. Effective April 17, 1996. Department of State Public Meeting Staff Assistant to the Director, Policy Planning. Effective April 18, 1996. Senior Policy Advisor to the Assistant Notice is hereby given of the meeting Public Affairs Specialist to the Secretary, Office of Legislative Affairs. of the Prospective Payment Assessment Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Effective April 8, 1996. Commission on Wednesday, June 12, Affairs. Effective April 22, 1996. Foreign Affairs Officer to the Deputy 1996, at the Madison Hotel, 15th & M Assistant Secretary. Effective April 25, Streets, NW, Washington, DC, 202/862– Department of Education 1996. 1600. Special Assistant to the Secretary’s The Full Commission will convene at Regional Representative, Region I. Department of the Treasury 9:00 a.m. on June 12, 1996, and adjourn Effective April 5, 1996. Special Assistant to the Assistant at approximately 12:15 p.m. The Special Assistant to the Director, Secretary (Financial Markets). Effective meeting will be held in Executive Office of Special Education Programs. April 18, 1996. Chambers 1, 2, and 3. The meeting is open to the public. Effective April 11, 1996. Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary Confidential Assistant to the Special of International Affairs. Effective April Donald A. Young, Advisor to the Secretary. Effective April 26, 1996. Executive Director. 26, 1996. [FR Doc. 96–13891 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Special Assistant to the Director, National Transportation Safety Board BILLING CODE 6820±BW±M Office of Bilingual Education and Special Assistant to the Member. Minority Languages Affairs. Effective Effective April 10, 1996. April 26, 1996. Special Assistant to the Member. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Department of Health and Human Effective April 10, 1996. COMMISSION Services Office of Management and Budget Submission for OMB Review; Confidential Advisor to the Associate Staff Assistant to the Deputy Director, Comment Request Commissioner, Child Care Bureau. Office of Management and Budget. Effective April 24, 1996. Upon Written Request, Copies Available Effective April 17, 1996. From: Securities and Exchange Department of Housing and Urban Office of National Drug Control Policy Commission, Office of Filings and Development Information Services, Washington, Staff Assistant to the Director. Special Assistant to the Assistant DC 20549 Effective April 12, 1996. Secretary for Community Planning and Extension: Development. Effective April 1, 1996. Confidential Assistant to the Director. Form F–9, SEC File No. 270–333, Special Assistant to the Chief Effective April 12, 1996. OMB Control No. 3235–0377 Form F–10, SEC File No. 270–334, Financial Officer. Effective April 3, Office of Personnel Management 1996. OMB Control No. 3235–0380 Staff Assistant to the Director, Office Deputy Director of Communications Regulation S–T, SEC File No. 270– of Executive Scheduling. Effective April to the Director of Communications. 375, OMB Control No. 3235–0424 18, 1996. Effective April 12, 1996. Notice is hereby given that pursuant Securities and Exchange Commission to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Department of the Interior (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary to the Director, Division of and Exchange Commission Director, Bureau of Land Management. Corporate Finance. Effective April 26, (‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the Effective April 3, 1996. 1996. Office of Management and Budget Confidential Assistant to a requests for approval of extension on Department of Justice Commissioner. Effective April 26, 1996. the following forms and regulation: Assistant to the Attorney General. Secretary to the Division Director. Form F–9 is used to register Effective April 2, 1996. Effective April 26, 1996. investment grade debt and preferred Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28253 securities that are non-convertible or not [Investment Company Act Release No. Act of 1933. The registration statement convertible for at least one year under 21990; 811±5703] was declared effective on May 29, 1992, the Securities Act of 1933, by registrants and applicant commenced an initial Capital Market Fund, Inc.; Notice of public offering of its shares on incorporated or organized under the Application for Deregistration laws of Canada. This information is November 5, 1992. needed to provide full and fair May 29, 1996. 2. Applicant served as the investment disclosure to the investing public. AGENCY: Securities and Exchange vehicle for The SuperTrust for Capital Approximately 210 Forms F–9 will be Commission (‘‘SEC’’). Market Fund, Inc. Shares (‘‘SuperTrust’’), a unit investment trust filed annually by Canadian issuers with ACTION: Notice of Application for organized in two series: the U.S. an aggregate annual burden hours of Deregistration under the Investment Treasury Money Market Trust for U.S. 420. Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’). Treasury Money Market Shares (‘‘Money Form F–10 is used to register APPLICANT: Capital Market Fund, Inc. Market Trust’’) and the Index Trust for securities under the Securities Act of Index Shares (‘‘Index Trust’’ or, RELEVANT ACT SECTION: Section 8(f). 1933, by any substantial issuer collectively with the Money Market incorporated or organized under the SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant Trust, ‘‘Subtrusts’’). laws of Canada. This information is seeks an order declaring that it has 3. Securityholders of the Subtrusts needed to provide full and fair ceased to be an investment company. had the right to direct the voting of disclosure to the investing public. FILING DATES: The application was filed shares of their respective Series. On Approximately 210 Forms F–10 will be on February 23, 1996 and amended on September 20, 1995, the Subtrusts’ filed annually by Canadian issuers with May 17, 1996. securityholders voted to amend an aggregate annual burden hours of HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An applicant’s Articles of Incorporation to add a provision that would permit the 420. order granting the application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Board of Directors (the ‘‘Board’’) to Regulation S–T sets forth the filing Interested persons may request a redeem shares of each Series of requirements relating to the submission hearing by writing to the SEC’s applicant in connection with its of documents in electronic format Secretary and serving applicant with a liquidation. On the same date, the Board through the Electronic Data Gathering copy of the request, personally or by authorized the redemption of all shares and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. While mail. Hearing requests should be of applicant. the regulation does not specifically received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on 4. In deciding whether to authorize require any information to be disclosed June 24, 1996, and should be the liquidation, the Board considered, but rather addresses the means by accompanied by proof of service on among other things, that it was likely which disclosure required by other applicant, in the form of an affidavit or, that securityholders would redeem a forms and regulations must be filed with for lawyers, a certificate of service. substantial part of the Fund’s assets the Commission. For administrative Hearing requests should state the nature upon termination of the SuperTrust, purposes this Regulation has been of the writer’s interest, the reason for the which would make it difficult for each Series of the Fund to achieve its assigned 1 burden hour. request, and the issues contested. investment objective and result in an General comments regarding the Persons may request notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC’s increase in the Fund’s expense ratio. estimated burden hours should be Secretary. The Board also considered that the directed to the Desk Officer for the investment adviser to the Money Market Securities and Exchange Commission at ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Series had notified the Fund that it the address below. Any comments Street NW., Washington, DC 20549. would not continue to provide advisory Applicant: Capital Market Fund, Inc., concerning the accuracy of the services after November 30, 1995, and 523 West Sixth St., Suite 220, Los estimated average burden hours for the possibility that it would not be Angeles, CA 90014. compliance with Commission rules and feasible to attract a replacement. forms should be directed to Michael E. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Consequently, the Board determined Mercer E. Bullard, Staff Attorney, (202 Bartell, Associate Executive Director, that it would be in the best interests of 942–0565, or Alison E. Baur, Branch Office of Information Technology, the Fund and its shareholders to Chief, (202) 942–0564 (Division of Securities and Exchange Commission, authorize the liquidation of the Fund. Investment Management, Officer of 5. On November 3, 1995, an investor 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC Investment Company Regulation). holding 98 percent of the Index Trust 20549 and Desk Officer for the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The redeemed all of its shares of the Trust Securities and Exchange Commission, following is a summary of the in exchange for shares of the Index Office of Information and Regulatory application. The complete application Series, and concurrently redeemed all of Affairs, Office of Management and may be obtained for a fee at the SEC’s these shares, the proceeds of which Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Public Reference Branch. were distributed primarily ‘‘in kind.’’ Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. All stocks of the Index Series were Applicant’s Representations Dated: May 23, 1996. distributed to this investor. The only Jonathan G. Katz, 1. Applicant is an open-end, remaining assets of the Index Series diversified management investment were cash and cash equivalents, the Secretary. company incorporated under Maryland accrued income from which through [FR Doc. 96–13848 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] law and organized in two series: the November 5, 1995, were included in the BILLING CODE 8010±01±M U.S. Treasury Money Market Series net asset value calculated on November (‘‘Money Market Series’’) and the Index 3, 1995. Similarly, accrued income Series. On November 29, 1988, through November 5, 1995, was applicant registered under the Act and included in the net asset value of the filed a registration statement pursuant to Money Market Series calculated on section 8(b) of the Act and the Securities November 3, 1995. The net asset value 28254 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices for each Series after November 3, 1995 SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant (‘‘Money Market Series’’) and the Index thus did not change prior to the seeks an order declaring that it has Series. termination of applicant. ceased to be an investment company. 3. On November 5, 1995, the 6. On November 5, 1995, the FILING DATES: The application was filed Subtrusts terminated in accordance with Subtrusts terminated and their shares on February 23, 1996 and amended on their respective Reference Trust were redeemed in exchange for shares of May 17, 1996. Indentures and applicant’s prospectus. their respective Series. Concurrently, all HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An Shareholder authorization was not shares of each Series were redeemed at order granting the application will be required. their net asset value determined on issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. 4. The Subtrusts’ securityholders had November 3, 1995. At the time of the Interested persons may request a the right to direct the voting of shares redemption, all shares of each Series hearing by writing to the SEC’s Security of their respective Series. On September were held by the respective Subtrust. and serving applicant with a copy of the 20, 1995, applicant’s securityholders All redemption proceeds were in cash request, personally or by mail. Hearing voted to amend the Fund’s Articles of and were deposited on November 6, requests should be received by the SEC Incorporation to add a provision that 1995, with the SuperTrust’s trustee for by 5:30 p.m. on June 24, 1996, and would permit the Board of Directors (the subsequent distribution to should be accompanied by proof of ‘‘Board’’) to redeem shares of each securityholders. service on applicant, in the form of an Series in connection with its liquidation. On the same date, the Board 7. Applicant has no assets, or debts or affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of authorized the redemption of all shares other liabilities. In connection with service. Hearing requests should state of the Fund. the nature of the writer’s interest, the obtaining shareholder approval to 5. On November 3, 1995, an investor reason for the request, and the issues liquidate the Fund, applicant incurred holding 98 percent of the Index Trust $20,998 in expenses for accounting and contested. Persons may request redeemed all of its shares of the Trust legal services and printing and notification of a hearing by writing to in exchange for shares of the Index distribution costs, which were allocated the SEC’s Secretary. Series, and concurrently redeemed all of between the Money Market Series and ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth these shares, the proceeds of which the Index Series in proportion to their Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. were distributed primarily ‘‘in kind.’’ relative aggregate net assets. Applicant: The SuperTrust Trust for All stocks held by the Index Series were 8. There are no shareholders of Capital Market Fund, Inc. Shares, 523 distributed to this investor. The only applicant to whom distributions in West Sixth St., Suite 220, Los Angeles, remaining assets of the Index Series complete liquidation of their interests CA 90014. were cash and cash equivalents, the have not been made. Applicant is not a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: accrued income from which through party to any litigation or administrative Mercer E. Bullard, Staff Attorney, (202) November 5, 1995, was included in the proceeding. Applicant has no 942–0565, or Alison E. Baur, Branch net asset value calculated on November securityholders and is not now engaged, Chief, (202) 942–0564 (Division of 3, 1995. Similarly, accrued income nor does it propose to engage, in any Investment Management, Office of through November 5, 1995, was business activities other than those Investment Company Regulation). included in the net asset value of the necessary for the winding up of its SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Money Market Series calculated on affairs. following is a summary of the November 3, 1995. The net asset values 9. Applicant intends to file a application. The complete application for each Series after November 3, 1995 certificate of dissolution or similar may be obtained for a fee at the SEC’s thus did not change prior to the document pursuant to the laws of the Public Reference Branch. termination of the Fund. State of Maryland. 6. On November 5, 1995, the Applicant’s Representations For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Subtrusts terminated and their shares Management, under delegated authority. 1. Applicant is a unit investment trust were redeemed in exchange for shares of Jonathan G. Katz, organized under New York law in two their respective Series. Concurrently, all series: the U.S. Treasury Money Market shares of each Series were redeemed at Secretary. Trust for U.S. Treasury Money Market their net asset value determined on [FR Doc. 96–13849 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Shares (‘‘Money Market Trust’’) and the November 3, 1995. At the time of the BILLING CODE 8010±01±M Index Trust for Index Shares (‘‘Index redemption, all shares of each Series Trust’’ or, collectively with the Money were held by the respective Subtrust. Market Trust, ‘‘Subtrusts’’). According All redemption proceeds were in cash [Investment Company Act Release No. to SEC records, applicant registered and were distributed to securityholders 21991; 811±6363] under the Act on July 19, 1991, and on November 7, 1995. filed a registration statement pursuant to 7. Applicant has no assets, or any The SuperTrust Trust for Capital section 8(b) of the Act on July 22, 1991. debts or other liabilities. Applicant Market Fund, Inc. Shares; Notice of On November 29, 1988, applicant filed incurred legal expenses of $1,638 in Application for Deregistration a registration statement under the connection with the liquidation of its May 29, 1996. Securities Act of 1933, which was securities, which were allocated declared effective on May 29, 1992. between the Money Market Trust and AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Applicant commenced an initial public Index Trust in proportion to their Commission (‘‘SEC’’). offering of its shares on November 5, relative aggregate net assets. Expenses in ACTION: Notice of Application for 1992. the amount of $20,998 incurred in Deregistration under the Investment 2. The Capital Market Fund, Inc. connection with the liquidation of the Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’). (‘‘Fund’’) served as the investment Fund were paid by the Fund. vehicle for applicant. The Fund is a 8. There are no securityholders of APPLICANT: The SuperTrust Trust for registered management investment applicant to whom distributions in Capital Market Fund, Inc. Shares. company organized in two series: the complete liquidation of their interests RELEVANT ACT SECTION: Section 8(f). U.S. Treasury Money Market Series have not been made. Applicant is not a Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28255 party to any litigation or administrative Public Law 95–452, as amended by Dated: May 29, 1996. proceeding. Applicant has no Public Law 100–504 (codified at 5 Charles A. Hunnicutt, securityholders and is not now engaged, U.S.C. App.). Specifically, section Assistant Secretary for Aviation and nor does it propose to engage, in any 6(a)(4) authorizes the Inspector General International Affairs. business activities other than those to subpoena the production of all [FR Doc. 96–13865 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] necessary for the winding up of its information, documents, reports, BILLING CODE 4910±62±P affairs. answers, records, accounts, papers and For the SEC, by the Division of Investment other data and documentary evidence Management, under delegated authority. necessary to perform the functions Federal Aviation Administration assigned to the Inspector General. Jonathan G. Katz, [Summary Notice No. PE±96±26] Secretary. This delegation of authority does not limit the Inspector General’s authority [FR Doc. 96–13847 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] Petitions for Exemption: Summary of to issue subpoenas. BILLING CODE 8010±01±M Petitions Received; Dispositions of This delegation revokes and Petitions Issued supersedes all previous delegations pertaining to this subject. Any actions AGENCY: Federal Aviation SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION taken in reliance upon superseded Administration (FAA), DOT. delegations of this authority are hereby ACTION Public Meeting : Notice of petitions for adopted and ratified. exemption received and of dispositions The National Small Business Dated: May 28, 1996. of prior petitions. Development Center Advisory Board David C. Williams, will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking Inspector General. June 25, 1996 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 provisions governing the application, p.m., at the Holiday Inn, 1210 North [FR Doc. 96–13881 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] processing, and disposition of petitions 43rd Street, Grand Forks, ND 58203. BILLING CODE 4190±29±P for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this The purpose of the meeting is to notice contains a summary of certain discuss such matters as may be petitions seeking relief from specified presented by Advisory Board members, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION requirements of the Federal Aviation staff of the SBA, or other present. Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), For further information, write or call Office of the Secretary dispositions of certain petitions previously received, and corrections. Mary Ann Holl, SBA, 4th Floor, 409 3rd [Dockets OST±96±1102 and OST±96±1103] Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20416, The purpose of this notice is to improve (202) 205–7302. Applications of Sky Trek International the public’s awareness of, and Dated: May 22, 1996. Airlines, Inc. for Issuance of New participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication Michael P. Novelli, Certificate Authority of this notice nor the inclusion or Director, Office of Advisory Council. AGENCY: Department of Transportation. omission of information in the summary [FR Doc. 96–13854 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] ACTION: Notice of order to show Cause is intended to affect the legal status of BILLING CODE 8025±01±P (Order 96–5–41). any petition or its final disposition. ADDRESSES: Send comments on any SUMMARY: The Department of petition in triplicate to: Federal SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Transportation is directing all interested Aviation Administration, Office of the persons to show cause why it should Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC– Delegation of Authority To Issue not issue orders (1) finding Sky Trek lll Subpoenas 200), Petition Docket No. , 800 International Airlines, Inc., fit, willing, Independence Avenue, SW., AGENCY: Office of the Inspector General, and able, and (2) awarding it certificates Washington, D.C. 20591. Social Security Administration (SSA). to engage in interstate and foreign Comments may also be sent charter air transportation of persons, ACTION: Notice. electronically to the following internet property, and mail. address: [email protected]. SUMMARY: Notice of the Inspector DATES: Persons wishing to file The petition, any comments received, General’s delegation of authority to objections should do so no later than and a copy of any final disposition are issue subpoenas. June 19, 1996. filed in the assigned regulatory docket EFFECTIVE DATES: This notice is effective ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to and are available for examination in the on June 4, 1996. objections should be filed in Dockets Rules Docket (AGC–200), Room 915G, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OST–96–1102 and OST–96–1103 and FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), Judith A. Kidwell, Office of the addressed to the Documentary Services 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Inspector General, (410) 965–9750. Division (C–55, Room PL–401), U.S. Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Department of Transportation, 400 (202) 267–3132. February 29, 1996, the Inspector General Seventh Street, SW, Washington, D.C. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of the Social Security Administration 20590 and should be served upon the Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of delegated the authority to issue parties listed in Attachment A to the Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation subpoenas to the Deputy Inspector order. Administration, 800 Independence General, the Assistant Inspector General FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; for Investigations, and the Deputy Janet A. Davis, Air Carrier Fitness telephone (202) 267–7470. Assistant Inspector General for Division (X–56, Room 6401), U.S. This notice is published pursuant to Investigations, in accordance with the Department of Transportation, 400 paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of authority set forth in section (6)(a)(4) of Seventh Street, SW, Washington, D.C. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation the Inspector General Act of 1978, 20590, (202) 366–9721. Regulations (14 CFR Part 11). 28256 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 30, the following services as public aircraft Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 1996. under the operations and maintenance 135.143(c)(2). Donald P. Byrne, standards developed by Travis County. Description of Relief Sought/ Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. DENIAL, March 29, 1996, Exemption Disposition: To permit Trans-Southern No. 6418. Airways to operate two Cessna 402C Dispositions of Petitions Docket No.: 28372. airplanes (Registration No. N69SC, Docket No.: 21168. Petitioner: Cessna Aircraft Company. Serial No. 402C–0041 and Registration Petitioner: Executive Air Fleet, Inc. Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR No. N2612C, Serial No. 402C–0077) Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 25.1305(d)(3). under part 135 without a TSO–C112 135.297(a). Description of Relief Sought/ (Mode S) transponder installed. Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit exemption from GRANT, April 18, 1996, Exemption No. Disposition: To extend Exemption No. the rotor system imbalance indicator 6424. 3203, as amended, which permits requirements of § 25.1305(d)(3) for the Docket No.: 28499. Executive Air Fleet, Inc., to use pilots in Cessna Model 550 Citation II airplane Petitioner: Sky Helicopters command who have completed an (Serial 550–0801) at production. Incorporated. instrument proficiency check within the DENIAL, May 8, 1996, Exemption No. Sections of the FAR Affected: 14CFR preceding 12 calendar months and, in 6435. 135.143(c)(2). addition, have satisfactorily completed Docket No.: 28423. Description of Relief Sought/ either an instrument proficiency check Petitioner: American Trans Air Disposition: To permit Sky Helicopters or have trained to proficiency in an Training Corporation. Incorporated to operate one Robinson approved simulator within the Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR R44 (Registration No. N8324V, Serial preceding 6 calendar months. GRANT, 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57(c) and (d); No. 204) and one Robinson R22 April 30, 1996, Exemption No. 3203H. 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) (Registration No. N8358B, Serial No. Docket No.: 23980. and (3); 61.65(c), (e)(2) and (3), and (g); 2573) under part 135 without a TSO– Petitioner: United States Hang Gliding 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2) and C112 (Mode S) transponder installed. Association, Inc. (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix GRANT, April 25, 1996, Exemption No. Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR A, part 61. 6430. 91.309 (formerly § 91.17) and 103.1(b). Description of Relief Sought/ Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To permit American Trans [FR Doc. 96–13945 Filed 6–03–96; 8:45 am] Disposition: To extend Exemption No. Air Training Corporation to use FAA- BILLING CODE 4910±13±M 4144, as amended, which permits approved simulators to meet certain United States Hang Gliding Association, flight experience requirements of part Inc., members to tow unpowered 61. GRANT, April 18, 1996, Exemption DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ultralight vehicles (hand gliders) using No. 6411. powered ultralight vehicles. GRANT, Submission for OMB Review; Docket No.: 28451. Comment Request April 29, 1996, Exemption No. 4144F. Petitioner: Texas Air Charters, Inc. Docket No.: 26160. Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR May 22, 1996. Petitioner: Massachusetts Institute of 135.143(c)(2). The Department of Treasury has Technology. Description of Relief Sought/ submitted the following public Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Disposition: To permit Texas Air information collection requirement(s) to 91.319(c). Charters, Inc., to operate the following OMB for review and clearance under the Description of Relief Sought/ aircraft under part 135 without a TSO– Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Disposition: To extend Exemption No. C112 (Mode S) transponder installed: Public Law 104–13. Copies of the 5210, as amended, which permits MIT Registration No. N402WC, Serial No. submission(s) may be obtained by to operate five aircraft having 402–0215; Registration No. N150GT, calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance experimental airworthiness certificates Serial No. 401B–0040; Registration No. Officer listed. Comments regarding this in a congested airway or over densely N7912Q, Serial No. 401B–0012; information collection should be populated areas. GRANT, May 8, 1996, Registration No. N12Q, Serial No. 401– addressed to the OMB reviewer listed Exemption No. 5210C. 0014; Registration N6241Q, Serial No. and to the Treasury Department Docket No.: 28196. 401A–0041; Registration No. N6221Q, Clearance Officer, Department of the Petitioner: Travis County, Texas. Serial No. 401A–0021; and any Cessna Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York Sections of the FAR Affected: 49 401 or Cessna 402 owned and/or Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. U.S.C. subtitle VII, part A, chapter 411; operated by Texas Air Charter, Inc. chapter 417, § § 41701, 41702, 41708, GRANT, April 18, 1996, Exemption No. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 41709, 41711, and 41738; chapter 447, 6423. Firearms (BATF) § § 44701, 44702, 44704, 44705, 44709, Docket No.: 28455. OMB Number: 1512–0034. 44711, 44713, 44717, and 44722; Petitioner: Sound Flight, Inc. Form Number: ATF F 5000.9. chapter 451; and chapter 463, § § 46301, Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Type of Review: Extension. 46304, 46306, and 46310; and 14 CFR 135.203(a)(1). Title: Personnel Questionnaire part 135 and over 30 sections of part 91. Description of Relief Sought/ Alcohol and Tobacco Products. Description of Relief Sought/ Disposition: To Permit Sound flight, Description: The information listed on Disposition: To permit Travis County; Inc., to conduct operations under visual ATF F 5000.9, Personnel Questionnaire, its aircraft, including those currently flight rules (VFR) outside controlled enables ATF to determine whether or owned and those that will be owned or airspace, over water, at an altitude not an applicant for an alcohol or leased for at least 90 days; and its pilots, below 500 feet. GRANT, April 22, 1996, tobacco permit meets the minimum including those who are currently Exemption No. 6428. qualifications. The form identifies the employed and those who will be Docket No.: 28466. individual, residence, business employed by Travis County; to perform Petitioner: Trans-Southern Airways. background, financial sources for the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28257 business and criminal record. If the within 24 hours of the discovery of the statements of information on labels or applicant is found not to be qualified, loss or theft. This form contains the contained in marks. ATF uses this the permit may be denied. minimum information necessary for information to validate the receipts of Respondents: Business or other for- ATF to initiate criminal investigations. excise tax revenue by the Federal profit. Respondents: Business or other for- government. Consumers are provided Estimated Number of Respondents: profit. with adequate identifying information. 5,000. Estimated Number of Respondents: Respondents: Business or other for- Estimated Burden Hours Per 250. profit. Respondent: 2 hours. Estimated Burden Hours Per Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: Frequency of Response: On occasion. Respondent: 1 hour, 48 minutes. 1,560. Estimated Total Reporting Burden: Frequency of Response: On occasion. Estimated Burden Hours Per 10,000 hours. Estimated Total Reporting Burden: Recordkeeper: 1 hour. OMB Number: 1512–0089. 450 hours. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1 Form Number: ATF F 5100.24 OMB Number: 1512–0190. (replaces ATF F 1637(5100.24)). hour. Form Number: ATF F 5100.11. Clearance Officer: Robert N. Hogarth Type of Review: Extension. Type of Review: Extension. Title: Application for Federal Alcohol (202) 927–8930, Bureau of Alcohol, Title: Withdrawal of Spirits, Tobacco and Firearms, Room 3200, 650 Administration Act Basic Permit to Specifically Denatured Spirits, or Wines Produce, Distill, Rectify, Blend, Bottle Massachusetts Avenue, NW., for Exportation. Washington, DC 20226. and Warehouse, Wholesale or Import. Description: ATF F 5100.11 is Description: ATF Form 5100.24 is OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf completed by exporters to report the (202) 395–7340, Office of Management completed by persons intending to withdrawal of spirits, denatured spirits, engage in the business involving and Budget, Room 10226, New and wines from internal revenue Executive Office Building, Washington, beverage alcohol operations at distilled bonded premises, without payment of spirits plants and bonded wineries. The DC 20503. tax for direct exportation, transfer to a Lois K. Holland, information allows ATF to identify the foreign trade zone, customs Departmental Reports Management Officer. applicant and the location of the manufacturer’s bonded warehouse or business and to determine whether the customs bonded warehouse or for use as [FR Doc. 96–13911 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] applicant qualifies for a basic permit supplies on vessels or aircraft. BILLING CODE 4810±31±P under the Federal Alcohol Respondents: Business or other for- Administration Act. profit. Respondents: Business or other for- Submission for OMB Review; Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: Comment Request profit. 300. Estimated Number of Respondents: Estimated Burden Hours Per May 22, 1996. 300. Recordkeeper: 1 hour. The Department of Treasury has Estimated Burden Hours Per Frequency of Response: On occasion. submitted the following public Respondent: 2 hours. Estimated Total Recordkeeping information collection requirement(s) to Frequency of Response: On occasion. Burden: 6,000 hours. OMB for review and clearance under the Estimated Total Reporting Burden: Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 600 hours. OMB Number: 1512–0195. OMB Number: 1512–0117. Form Number: ATF F 5110.25. Public Law 104–13. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by Form Number: ATF F 5620.7 (2147). Type of Review: Extension. Title: Application for Operating calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Type of Review: Extension. Officer listed. Comments regarding this Title: Claim for Drawback of Tax on Permit Under 26 U.S.C. 5171(d). information collection should be Cigars, Cigarettes, Cigarette Papers and Description: ATF F 5110.25 is completed by proprietors of distilled addressed to the OMB reviewer listed Cigarette Tubes. and to the Treasury Department Description: Form 5620.7 documents spirits plants who engage in certain Clearance Officer, Department of the that taxpaid cigarettes, cigars, cigarette specified types of activities. ATF Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York papers and tubes were exported to a regional office personnel use the Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. foreign country, Puerto Rico, or Virgin information on the form to identify the applicant, the location of the business Special request: In order to complete Islands. This form is used by taxpayers the two stages of the assessment test to claim drawback for tax paid on and the types of activities to be conducted. described below June and August 1996, exported products. the Department of Treasury is Respondents: Business or other for- Respondents: Business or other for- profit. requesting that the Office of profit. Management and Budget (OMB) review Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: Estimated Number of Respondents: 80. and approve this information collection 288. by June 4, 1996. To obtain a copy of this Estimated Burden Hours Per Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15 minutes. survey, please contact the IRS Clearance Recordkeeper: 30 minutes. Officer at the address listed below. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Estimated Total Recordkeeping Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 20 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) hours. Burden: 144 hours. OMB Number: 1545–1349. OMB Number: 1512–0185. OMB Number: 1512–0503. Project Number: SOI–16. Form Number: ATF F 5400.5. Recordkeeping Requirement ID Type of Review: Revision. Type of Review: Extension. Number: ATF REC 5120/3. Title: 1996 Business Master File Title: Report of Theft or Loss of Type of Review: Extension. Telefile Script Usability Assessment Explosives. Title: Marks on Wine Containers. Test. Description: Losses or theft of Description: ATF requires that wine Description: There are several explosives must, by statute, be reported on wine premises be identified by purposes of the BMF TeleFile usability 28258 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices assessment test: (1) To gather FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting will be open to the public preliminary information about the Requests for additional information or from 9:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. comprehensibility and organization of copies of the form(s) and instructions the BMF TeleFile scripts; (2) to obtain should be directed to Department of SUMMARY: The Commission on United reactions and opinions of subject using Treasury, Bureau of Engraving and States-Pacific Trade and Investment the system; and to assess the usability Printing, Lorraine Robinson, 14th & C Policy will hold a meeting on June 12, of two different BMF TeleFile forms. Streets, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20228, 1996, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The The results from this study will allow (202) 874-2532. meeting will be closed to the public the IRS to improve the BMF TeleFile from 12:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: system, consequently making it easier meeting will include a review and for businesses to use. Title: Claim for Amounts in the Case discussion of current issues affecting Respondents: Business or other for- of a Deceased Owner of Mutilated U.S. trade policy with Asia. Pursuant to profit. Currency. Section 2155(f)(2) of Title 19 of the Estimated Number of Respondents: OMB Number: 1520–002. United States Code, the USTR has 32. Form Number: BEP 5287. determined that this portion of the Estimated Burden Hours Per Abstract: To show ownership of meeting will be concerned with matters Respondent: 1 hour. claims submitted for deceased the disclosure of which would seriously Frequency of Response: Other. individuals. compromise the development by the Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 32 Type of Review: Reinstatement United States Government of trade hours. (without change). Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) policy, priorities, negotiating objectives Affected Public: Individuals or 622–3869, Internal Revenue Service, or bargaining positions with respect to households/Business. Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, the operation of any trade agreement Estimated Number of Respondents: NW., Washington, DC 20224. and other matters arising in connection OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf 180. with the development, implementation (202) 395–7340, Office of Management Estimated Total Annual Burden and administration of the trade policy of and Budget, Room 10226, New Hours: 165. the United States. The meeting will be Executive Office Building, Washington, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Comments open to the public and press from 9:00 DC 20503. submitted in response to this notice will a.m. to 12:30 p.m. At this time the Commission will: (1) discuss Lois K. Holland, be summarized and/or included in the assessments/critiques of U.S. trade and Departmental Reports, Management Officer. request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of investment policies and (2) hold a [FR Doc. 96–13912 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] public record. Written comments should discussion on the relationship of U.S. BILLING CODE 4830±01±P address the accuracy of the burden trade policy to human rights and the estimates and ways to minimize burden environment. Attendance during this part of the meeting is for observation Bureau of Engraving and Printing including the use of automated collection techniques or the use of other only. Individuals who are not members Proposed Collection; Comment forms of information technology, as well of the Commission will not be invited Request as other relevant aspects of the to comment. Please call Diane Jenkins at information collection request. (202) 395–4755 if you are interested in ACTION: Notice and request for attending the open session of the Dated: April 30, 1996. comments. Commission meeting. Space is Pamela V. Grayson, extremely limited (20 spaces) and only SUMMARY: The Department of the Management Analyst. those people with reservations will be Treasury, as part of its continuing effort [FR Doc. 96–13918 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] to reduce paperwork and respondent allowed in the open portion of the BILLING CODE 4840±01±M burden, invites the general public and meeting. other Federal agencies to take this DATES: The meeting is scheduled for opportunity to comment on proposed June 12, 1996, unless otherwise notified. COMMISSION ON UNITED STATES- and/or continuing information ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at PACIFIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT collections, as required by the the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th POLICY Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and Constitution Avenue, Washington, Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. United States Trade Representative D.C., Secretary’s Conference Room, 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the Bureau of unless otherwise notified. Engraving and Printing within the Meeting of the Commission on United Department of the Treasury is soliciting FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: States-Pacific Trade and Investment Nancy Adams, Executive Director of comments concerning the Claim for Policy Amounts Due in the Case of a Deceased Commission on United States-Pacific Owner of Mutilated Currency. AGENCY: Commission on United States- Trade and Investment Policy, Room 400, DATES: Written comments should be Pacific Trade and Investment Policy and 600 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. received on or before June 30, 1996 to Office of the United States Trade 20508, (202) 395–9679. be assured of consideration. Representative. Nancy Adams, ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments ACTION: Notice that the June 12, 1996, Executive Director, Commission on United to Department of Treasury, Bureau of meeting of the Commission on United States-Pacific Trade and Investment Policy. Engraving and Printing, Pamela V. States-Pacific Trade and Investment Charlene Barshefsky, Grayson, 14th & C Streets, S.W., Policy will be held from 9:00 a.m. to Acting U.S. Trade Representative. Washington, D.C. 20228, (202) 874– 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be closed to [FR Doc. 96–13846 Filed 6–3–96: 8:45 am] 2212. the public from 12:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. BILLING CODE 3190±01±M federal register June 4,1996 Tuesday Merchant Vessels;FinalRule Electrical EngineeringRequirementsfor 46 CFRParts108,etal. Coast Guard Transportation Department of Part II 28259 28260 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION A copy of the material listed in meeting and 9 commented on the ‘‘Incorporation by Reference’’ of this NPRM. A recording and summary of the Coast Guard rule is available for inspection at room meeting are in the rulemaking docket. 1300, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters. 46 CFR Parts 108, 110, 111, 112, 113, Purpose FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and 161 Mr. Gerald P. Miante, Project Manager, Under the authorities cited in the [CGD 94±108] Office of Design and Engineering ‘‘Authority’’ section for each part Standards (G–MSE), (202) 267–2206. amended, the Coast Guard is amending Electrical Engineering Requirements its electrical engineering and equipment for Merchant Vessels SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: regulations for certain Coast Guard- inspected vessels in 46 CFR chapter I, AGENCY: Request for Comments Coast Guard, DOT. subchapters I–A, J, and Q to accomplish ACTION: Interim rule with request for The Coast Guard encourages the following: comments. interested persons to participate in this (1) To reduce the regulatory burden rulemaking by submitting written data, SUMMARY: As part of the President’s on the marine industry by eliminating views, or arguments, particularly on the obsolete and unnecessary regulations Regulatory Reinvention Initiative, the changes made since the notice of Coast Guard is amending its electrical and by clarifying the remaining ones. proposed rulemaking of February 2, This objective is consistent with the engineering regulations to reduce the 1996, was published. It is not necessary regulatory burden on the marine President’s Regulatory Reinvention to resubmit comments submitted under Initiative and the Coast Guard’s industry, purge obsolete and out-of-date that notice. regulations, and eliminate requirements regulatory reform program. Persons submitting comments should (2) To replace, where appropriate, that create an unwarranted differential include their names and addresses, between domestic rules and requirements that are prescriptive in identify this rulemaking (CGD 94–108) nature with performance-based international standards. This and the specific section of this rule to rulemaking harmonizes, where possible, requirements that incorporate national which each comment applies, and give and international standards and allow the electrical engineering regulations the reason for each comment. Please with recent amendments to the increased flexibility for small submit two copies of all comments and businesses. International Convention for the Safety attachments in an unbound format, no of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended. (3) To eliminate requirements that larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for Additionally, this rulemaking create an unwarranted differential copying and electronic filing. Persons between domestic rules and dramatically revises certain prescriptive wanting acknowledgement of receipt of electrical equipment design, international standards. This comments should enclose stamped, self- rulemaking harmonizes, where possible, specification, and approval addressed postcards or envelopes. requirements and replaces them with the electrical regulations with The Coast Guard will consider all amendments to the International performance-based requirements that comments received during the comment incorporate international standards. Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, period. It may change this rule in view 1974, (SOLAS 74) since the electrical DATES: This rule is effective on of the comments. regulations were last revised in 1982. September 30, 1996. Comments must be The Coast Guard plans no additional (4) To address comments received received on or before August 5, 1996. public meetings. Persons may request a from the marine industry and from The incorporation by reference of public meeting by writing to the Marine Coast Guard field and inspection offices. certain publications listed in the Safety Council at the address under This rulemaking is intended to serve regulation are effective as of September ADDRESSES. The request should include the needs of industry while maintaining 30, 1996. the reasons why a public meeting would a comparable level of safety. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to be beneficial. If it determines that the the Executive Secretary, Marine Safety opportunity for oral presentations will Discussion of Comments and Changes Council (G–LRA/3406) (CGD 94–108), aid this rulemaking, the Coast Guard The following is a summary of the U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 will hold a public meeting at a time and comments received, both by letter and at Second Street SW., Washington, DC place announced by a later notice in the the public meeting, and the changes 20593–0001, or may be delivered to Federal Register. made to the regulatory text since the room 3406 at the same address between NPRM was published. The items are Regulatory History 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through grouped first by those that address a Friday, except Federal holidays. The On February 2, 1996, the Coast Guard general issue, then by those that relate telephone number is (202) 267–1477. published a notice of proposed to a specific provision in the text. Comments on collection-of-information rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ‘‘Electrical requirements must be mailed also to the Engineering Requirements for Merchant I. General Comments Office of Information and Regulatory Vessels’’ in the Federal Register (61 FR (1) A number of comments suggested Affairs, Office of Management and 4132). Correction notices were changes that require further Budget, 725 17th Street NW, published on February 23, 1996 (61 FR consideration by the Coast Guard. For Washington, DC 20503, ATTN: Desk 7050), and March 5, 1996 (61 FR 8539). example, several comments Officer, U.S. Coast Guard. The Coast Guard received 45 letters recommended that certain other The Executive Secretary maintains the commenting on the proposal. As a result standards be referenced in the public docket for this rulemaking. of requests from a national trade regulations as replacements for, or Comments will become part of this association, a notice was published on options to, those cited in the NPRM. A docket and will be available for February 26, 1996 (61 FR 7090), few comments suggested changes to inspection or copying at room 3406, extending the comment period from sections not addressed in the NPRM. U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, between March 18, 1996, to April 2, 1996, and The recommended standards for 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through announcing a public meeting on March incorporation by reference will be Friday, except Federal holidays. 25, 1996. Over 20 persons attended the considered for inclusion in the final rule Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28261 of this rulemaking. These comments are (8) One comment recommended that Electronic Engineer (IEEE) is in the noted in this section of the preamble as all regulations in excess of international process of revising its standards. subject to further consideration. standards be removed and that the The Coast Guard will consider these (2) A number of comments applauded regulations incorporate rules revisions when approved by IEEE and the Coast Guard’s effort to streamline its promulgated by ABS or other update this section accordingly. electrical regulations and incorporate recognized classification societies. (2) One comment noted that industry standards, both domestic and The Coast Guard is continuing to Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) 595 international. address the issue in the ABS-generated is not cited in § 111.60–11(c). Consistent with the President’s U.S. supplement. Presently, ABS Rules The reference to that section has been Regulatory Reinvention Initiative, the are undergoing a major revision and deleted. Coast Guard is taking this approach in some provisions, even now, differ with (3) One comment noted that UL 50 is all its rulemaking projects. those of other International Association listed as being cited in § 111.81–13(a) (3) One comment requested an of Classification Societies (IACS) but this section is removed. additional 60 days for the comment members. The Coast Guard will UL 50 is now cited in § 111.81–1. period and at least four public meetings. consider revising those areas of its (4) One comment recommended that In response, the Coast Guard extended regulations in the future. American Petroleum Institute (API) the comment period an additional 15 Recommended Practices (RP’s) be II. Comments to Specific Sections days and held a public meeting on incorporated by reference. March 25, 1996. Under this interim rule, § 108.170. (1) One comment indicated API RP’s are being considered for the comment period is reopened for an that this section is duplicated in future rulemakings. additional 45 days. § 111.105–33. (5) Two comments stated that some of (4) One comment expressed concern This rulemaking merely corrects a the standards incorporated by reference that proposed mobile offshore drilling citation in the note to the section. This in §§ 110.10–1 and 161.002–1 may also unit (MODU) regulations were being section, as well as the remainder of be available in American National presented in a piecemeal fashion subchapter I–A, is under consideration Standards Institute (ANSI) versions. throughout subchapter J. It suggested for revision at a later date. Items approved by the Director of the that these amendments be added to the (2) One comment suggested a change Federal Register for incorporation by Coast Guard’s MODU regulations and in the wording of Note 1 to align its reference are required to be identified that subchapter I–A be revised to terminology with subpart 111.105. by the information on the cover of the incorporate the 1989 International This change has been made document. Maritime Organization (IMO) MODU accordingly. (6) Several comments noted that MIL– § 101.01–1. (1) Several comments Code. C–24643 and MIL–C–24640 should read The Coast Guard has a long-range suggested that paragraphs (a) and (b) MIL–C–24643A and MIL–C–24640A. plan to extensively revise its MODU were confusing and should be revised or These have been changed accordingly. regulations in 46 CFR chapter I, combined. (7) Several comments noted that The paragraphs have been revised subchapter I–A. At that time, both the ANSI/UL 1581 (VW–1) should read accordingly. ANSI/UL 1581. IMO MODU Code and the American (2) One comment requested that the This title and the three sections Bureau of Shipping Rules for Building effective date be changed from 90 to 120 referenced have been amended and Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling days to provide the additional time accordingly. Units (ABS MODU Rules) will be necessary to comply with the new (8) Several comments indicated that considered. regulations. (5) One comment expressed concern The effective date has been set for the Canadian Standards Association that the Coast Guard proposed to apply September 30, 1996. (CSA) standard CSA–C 22.2 No. 245/UL the International Convention for Safety (3) One comment suggested that the 1309, Marine Shipboard Cable, should of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74) in a term ‘‘vessels’’, as used in proposed be included. blanket fashion to all vessels including paragraph (b), be clarified to exclude This standard is new and still under MODU’s. fixed platforms. consideration by the Coast Guard. SOLAS 74 has not been applied to This change was not considered (9) Several comments requested that non-self-propelled MODU’s under this necessary because nowhere in Coast UL 1569, Metal-Clad Cables, should be rulemaking. Guard regulations is the term ‘‘fixed included. (6) The terms ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and platform’’ included in the definition of The standard has been added as ‘‘pilothouse’’ have been replaced ‘‘vessel.’’ requested. See the discussion of throughout subchapter J with the term (4) One comment suggested adding § 111.60–23 in this preamble. ‘‘navigating bridge’’ as used in SOLAS ‘‘and its tributaries’’ to the definition of (10) One comment noted that 74. Great Lakes vessel. American Society for Testing and (7) One comment recommended that The definition has been revised to Materials (ASTM) D 789, Standard the incorporation by reference list align it with the definition of ‘‘Great Specification for Nylon Injection and include other equivalent international Lakes’’ in the Coast Guard’s Inland Extrusion Materials (PA), should be standards. Navigation Rules, Commandant ANSI/ASTM D 1897. The Coast Guard has a long-range Instruction M16672.2B (33 CFR chapter The correct replacement for ASTM D plan to broaden the use of acceptable I, subchapter E). 789 is ASTM D 4066–94B. The reference standards. Until those standards are § 110.01–3. One comment stated that has been changed accordingly. incorporated into the regulations, any this section is confusing. (11) Many comments suggested that vessel owner or operator who desires to This section has been revised to the references not cite the date of the employ a fitting, material, apparatus, discuss repairs and replacements, document as they are periodically equipment, or arrangement other than alterations and modifications, and revised. that required by this subchapter may conversions in separate paragraphs. As indicated in § 110.10–1(a), only submit a request using the equivalency § 110.10–1. (1) Several comments the edition listed in § 110.10–1(b) can be provision in § 110.20–1. noted that the Institute of Electrical and enforced. The Coast Guard will consider 28262 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations future revisions but must provide public added to this section. Minor conforming a vessel is certificated and that this notice for comment before adopting amendments have been made section should be removed. them. throughout subchapter J to Not all of these subchapters provide (12) One comment questioned accommodate this definition and for this notice. Therefore, this section is whether the vessel must comply with subpart 110.35 has been removed. retained. the specific edition of a standard § 110.20–1. This section has been Subpart 110.35. (1) This subpart has incorporated or could it comply with a aligned with equivalency provisions in been removed because ‘‘independent later edition. other recent Coast Guard rulemakings. laboratory’’ is now defined in § 110.15– When requested, provisions in later § 110.25–1. (1) Several comments 1, Definitions. editions may be used if they are stated that the requirement in proposed (2) One comment requested that the accepted by the Commanding Officer, new paragraph (c)(12) for the owner to Coast Guard use Occupational Safety Marine Safety Center (MSC), under submit lists of equipment and and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) subpart 110.20 or § 161.002–17, as components used in hazardous Nationally Recognized Test Laboratory providing an equivalent level of safety. locations does little to improve safety program. (13) Several comments suggested because components are inspected The Coast Guard’s program under part incorporating ABS MODU Rules into during installation by the Officer in 159, subpart 159.010, focuses on the following sections: §§ 111.12–1(a), Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI). performance in the marine environment, 111.12–3, 111.12–5, 111.12–7, 111.33– Additionally, the comments point out rather than in the general workplace, as 11, 111.35–1, and 111.70–1(a). most of the requirements are duplicated does the OSHA program. Any OSHA The ABS MODU Rules have been in paragraph (i). laboratory capable of testing to marine included as suggested. This requirement is retained because product performance and environment (14) One comment noted that it is vital to the plan review process, may apply for inclusion in the Coast International Electrotechnical which identifies suitability of each Guard’s program. Commission (IEC) Publication 533 was component and the system before § 111.01–1. One comment suggested not mentioned in the referred section. installation. All of the required elements the addition of a general requirement The publication is now referenced in of the plan submittal have been that system integrity be maintained. new § 113.05–7 addressing included in revised paragraph (i) and A new paragraph (c) has been added environmental testing. proposed paragraph (c)(12) has been accordingly. (15) One comment questioned § 111.01–5. Several comments whether some of the material removed. (2) One comment recommended that recommended that the qualifier in incorporated is the latest available paragraph (d) for electric cable be edition or is readily available in the the Coast Guard address, in the note to paragraph (n), the manufacturer’s self- removed. ANSI on-line catalog. This section has been revised to The editions incorporated are the certification to a list standard when that standard requires third-party indicate that protection from bilge water latest supplied to the Coast Guard by the is required for all of the equipment organization which originated the certification. A sentence has been added as listed in paragraphs (a) through (d), if standard. located in or around the bilge area. § 110.15–1. (1) One comment recommended. § 111.01–7. One comment recommended that the ABS definition of (3) One comment pointed out that recommended adding the words ‘‘and ‘‘nonsparking fan’’ is more complete independent laboratories referenced spacing’’ to the title of this section and should be used. must be accepted for testing and listing because spacing is addressed in The definition has been changed or certification. paragraph (b). accordingly. Paragraph (j) has been changed (2) Several comments pointed out accordingly. The change was made accordingly. § 111.01–9. (1) One comment inconsistencies in the definitions of § 110.25–3. One comment observed requested that the words ‘‘on deck’’ be ‘‘waterproof’’ and ‘‘watertight’’ and the that, in the note to paragraph (c), the removed from paragraph (b) because the associated National Electrical Coast Guard Technical Office no longer hazard could exist in other locations on Manufacturers Association (NEMA) and exists. the vessel. IEC ingress protection (IP) ratings. The Technical Office has been In line with this recommendation, The definitions and the text have been replaced by the Marine Safety Center. paragraphs (a) and (b) were revised to corrected accordingly. The note has been revised accordingly. (3) One comment suggested that the § 110.30–1. One comment stated that align the minimum degree of protection definition of ‘‘qualified person’’ indicate the CFR parts listed in this section were required with the hazard rather than the that the person be qualified in electrical out of date. specific location. procedures. The section has been amended to (2) One comment requested that a This change has been made avoid specifying individual parts. NEMA Type 1 enclosure be the accordingly. § 110.30–5. One comment minimum requirement in paragraphs (4) One comment stated that the recommended that this section be (a), (c), and (d). reference to § 1.01 in the definition of removed because information regarding Paragraph (d) has been revised to ‘‘Commandant’’ is unnecessary and the scope of inspection is in the reflect the suggestion. However, the adds no value. pertinent parts under which vessels are minimum requirements for the The reference has been deleted. certificated. equipment in paragraphs (a) and (c) (5) One comment suggested deleting This section is necessary because the have been adjusted to provide a slightly the definition of ‘‘emergency squad’’ pertinent parts refer to subchapter J and higher degree of protection consistent since it no longer appeared in revised because this section addresses with the hazards and vital functions § 113.30–5(d). inspection of electrical equipment performed. The definitions for those ‘‘Emergency squad’’ has been specifically. locations requiring, and those locations reinserted in § 113.30–5(d) for clarity. § 110.30–7. One comment suggested not requiring, exceptional degrees of (6) The definition of the term that notice to the OCMI is already protection have been slightly revised ‘‘independent laboratory’’ has been required in the subchapter under which accordingly. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28263

(3) One comment suggested modifying The options of this test specification (3) Many comments agreed with the the second sentence of paragraph (a) to and ABS Rules table 4/11.1 now appear proposal of prohibiting cable armor include the phrase ‘‘pressure-directed in § 113.05–7. from being used as the grounding liquids’’. (3) One comment suggested that conductor and suggested adding This change was made in paragraph inclination criteria be limited to metallic sheath to the regulation. (b) because of the amendments to conventional hulled or self-propelled Paragraph (c) has been revised as paragraphs (a) and (b) discussed above. vessels and not column stabilized units, suggested and moved to a more (4) One comment stated that personal such as MODU’s and tension leg appropriate location in § 111.60–5(d). computers and similar equipment platforms (TLP’s). (4) One comment suggested adding a should be allowed to be used as control The requirement is retained pending reference to IEC requirements for consoles when not subject to exposure further consideration by the Coast grounding conductors, noting that the from liquids. Guard. 1996 revision of ABS Rules will be Personal computers are not prohibited (4) One comment noted that in incorporating the IEC criteria. under this section if they meet the § 111.01–21 ‘‘all electrical control The IEC criteria is presently under stated degrees of protection. equipment’’ is too broad. Vibration review pending ABS incorporation. § 111.01–15. (1) One comment criteria should be limited to vital § 111.10–7. One comment stated that recommended a major revision of this propulsion and vessel control systems paragraph (b) duplicates the provisions section, including removing paragraphs on self-propelled vessels. of § 112.05–5. (b) and (d), because the preamble to the In addition to the discussion of the This paragraph is intended to NPRM failed to identify the first comment to these sections, the introduce general dead ship power international requirement upon which requirements apply to the control and requirements into subpart 111.10, Power the proposal was based or to give any monitoring equipment referenced in Supply. Section 112.05–5 contains more other justification. ABS Rules 4/11 and communication detailed requirements. The design parameters for this section and alarm systems under part 113 of § 111.10–9. One comment stated that were based upon table 4 of IEC this chapter. the sizing and transformer redundancy Publication 92–101, Electrical § 111.05–07. Several comments requirements are overly prescriptive for Installations in Ships—Part 101: suggested that IEC 92–352 be removed other than self-propelled vessels. Definitions and General Requirements. because it is obscure, misleading, and The requirements are for ship’s The paragraphs are retained. unnecessary and that it be replaced with service supply loads listed in § 111.10– (2) One comment suggested minor a domestic standard. 4(b). Propulsion accounts for only a editorial changes in paragraph (e). IEC Publication 92–352 has been portion of the loads. The transformer The recommendations to clarify replaced with IEC 92–3 and IEEE Std 45 requirements are retained for non-self- paragraph (e) have been adopted. is added as an option. propelled vessels because of safety and § 111.05–9. One comment suggested § 111.01–17. One comment stated that habitability considerations. incorporating the American Boat and the deletion of standard voltages may 111.12–1. (1) One comment pointed Yacht Council Standard E–2 for introduce the risk of proliferation of out that the overspeed trip requirement lightning ground conductors. non-marine arrangements. The Coast Guard is reviewing this in paragraph (b) may not be entirely This section replaces prescriptive standard for possible incorporation by practicable because some manufacturers regulation with performance criteria. reference. recommend different settings, such as The Coast Guard will consider refering § 111.05–23. Two comments indicated 18 percent. to industry standard voltages and that the requirement in paragraph (d) The requirement is consistent with frequencies when IEEE Std 45 is was overly prescriptive and costly, with ABS Rules and is retained. If a revised. limited benefit. One suggested manufacturer designs and recommends §§ 111.01–19, 111.01–21, and 111.01– alternative locations. a trip value in excess of this 23. (1) Several comments stated that Paragraph (d) has been amended requirement, the manufacturer may some requirements in these sections accordingly. apply for equivalency under part 110, were in excess of ABS Rules for § 111.05–27. One comment suggested subpart 110.20. Building and Classing Steel Vessels deleting the provision to ‘‘momentarily (2) One comment pointed out that (ABS Rules), and suggested the Coast remove the indicating device from the pressure-lubricated generator bearings Guard adopt ABS Rules for reference ground’’ because monitoring mentioned in paragraph (c) are rare. The environmental testing. technology exists which obviates the comment also noted that neither Coast Section 111.01–19 is retained because need. Guard regulations nor ABS Rules it applies to all electrical equipment. The requirement is retained because provide for automatic shutdown of a Sections 111.01–21 and 111.01–23, not all ground detection systems employ diesel generator’s prime mover upon although consistent with IEC such state-of-the-art design. failure of that engine’s pressure Publication 92–101, have been removed § 111.05–33. (1) Many comments lubrication system. because they apply to control suggested that the Coast Guard retain its The revision to paragraph (c) in the equipment similar to that covered by the current regulations for equipment NPRM was to expand the present ABS Rules. Environmental testing grounding conductor size according to provision to consider proliferation of requirements for communication, alarm, the National Electrical Code (the NEC). shaft driven generators. The Coast control, and monitoring equipment have Paragraph (a) has been revised as Guard is reviewing its requirements for now been addressed in new § 113.05–7 suggested. generator prime movers and will incorporating table 4/11.1 of ABS Rules. (2) Many comments discussed the address shutdown upon loss of lube oil (2) One comment suggested that proposal to require that equipment in another rulemaking. Lloyd’s Register Type Approval grounding conductors be insulated. § 111.12–11. (1) Several comments System—Test Specification Number 1 Paragraph (b) has been revised to recommended replacing the words be incorporated for all electrical control reference the NEC article 310–12(b) for ‘‘inverse time,’’ in paragraph (c)(1), with equipment. conductor covering and identification. the word ‘‘longtime’’ to be consistent 28264 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations with the proposed change to paragraph (2) One comment pointed out that the This section has been retained to (d). requirement in paragraph (b) repeats the address the noncombustible Paragraph (c)(1) has been amended as requirement in § 111.01–9. requirement and to cross-reference the suggested. Paragraph (b) is retained because it accessibility and degree-of-protection (2) One comment suggested a additionally mentions deck-to-overhead requirements in §§ 111.01–7 and complete revision of paragraph (g) to construction. 111.01–9. align terminology with SOLAS 74 and (3) One comment noted that low and § 111.40–7. One comment suggested allow deviations on a case-by-case basis. medium voltage is defined differently in rewriting this section for ease of The requirements are considered the IEEE and IEC standards. comprehension. comparable. Case-by-case equivalences Paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) have been This section has been rewritten as are already provided for under part 110, revised to reflect this difference. suggested, without substantive change. subpart 110.20. § 111.30–19. (1) One comment stated § 111.50–3. (1) Several comments § 111.15–2. One comment discussed that section 17.11 of IEEE Std 45, as noted that the word ‘‘not’’ was the change in the angle of inclination of referred to in paragraph (a)(1), itself inadvertently omitted from paragraph a battery cell from the existing 30 refers to the NEC article 384–26 (1981). (c). degrees to the proposed 40 degrees, The comment suggested that, where an The paragraph has been revised stating that one specific angle is not edition of a standard is referred to in a accordingly. appropriate for all vessel types in document incorporated by reference, the (2) One comment suggested adding determining suitability for marine use. latest edition of that standard applies. the clarifying phrase ‘‘standard fuse or The figure of 40 degrees static Until IEEE Std 45 adopts a newer circuit breaker’’ after the words ‘‘next inclination is from the international edition of the 1981 NEC and the Coast larger’’ in paragraph (c). standards of IEC Publications 92–101 Guard incorporates the new IEEE Std This paragraph has been revised and 92–305 and is applicable to all 45, the 1981 edition of the NEC applies accordingly. vessels. However, the Coast Guard in this instance. (3) One comment suggested revising recognizes that a 40 degree static (2) One comment pointed out that the last sentence of paragraph (c) to inclination may be beyond the there are no specific acceptance criteria clarify the intent of the requirement. reasonable or practical limits for certain in subchapter J for aluminum bus bars. Paragraph (c) has been revised vessels to which these regulation apply. Guidelines for aluminum bus bar accordingly. Where installations are made on specific installations are contained in Coast § 111.52–3. One comment pointed out vessels that cannot attain or sustain a 40 Guard Navigation and Vessel Inspection that, although this section was not degree static inclination, a lesser value Circular (NVIC) 2–79 and are considered addressed in the NPRM, it merely may be accepted under the equivalency to provide adequate guidance on repeats criteria given in IEEE Std 45. provisions in subpart 110.20. aluminum bus bars until the new The Coast Guard will consider § 111.15–5. (1) One comment revision of IEEE Std 45 is published and revising this section when the new IEEE suggested the prescriptive language in incorporated by reference. Std 45 is published. paragraph (d), be replaced with § 111.30–24. One comment requested § 111.52–5. One comment suggested performance standards relative to that the exclusion for a non-self- deleting the word ‘‘Detailed’’ from the battery tray clearance. propelled MODU be expanded to introductory text because the following Paragraph (d) has been amended as include flotating Outer Continental paragraphs (a) through (d) defined the suggested. Shelf (OCS) facilities. level of detail. (2) One comment discussed the need This section has been revised to The word ‘‘Detailed’’ has been to differentiate between cranking and extend the exclusion to a non-self- removed as suggested. other types of batteries in paragraph (e). propelled floating Outer Continental § 111.53–1. One comment suggested Paragraph (e) has been revised as Shelf (OCS) facility. replacing ‘‘§ 110.35–1’’ in paragraph suggested. § 111.30–29. (1) One comment (a)(3) with ‘‘part 159’’ because § 110.35– § 111.15–20. One comment suggested pointed out that proposed paragraph (i) 1 merely cites part 159 of this chapter. a minor wording order change in was merely a repetition of the ‘‘Independent laboratory’’, as now paragraph (c) for clarity. requirement in § 112.05–5(h). defined in § 110.15–1, references part Paragraph (c) has been revised as Paragraph (i) has been removed 159 and subpart 110.35 has been suggested. accordingly. removed. § 111.15–30. One comment suggested (2) One comment suggested that the § 111.54–1. One comment suggested that portable battery chargers section would appear better organized if the addition of ‘‘one of the following:’’ incorporating an autotransformer may proposed paragraphs (g) and (h) were to the end of the introductory text of impose an intentional ground on a inserted after existing paragraph (a). paragraph (c)(1) so that only one of the vessel’s power supply system and, The section has been revised stated standards need be complied with. therefore, should not be used. accordingly. Paragraph (c)(1) already provides for A sentence was added prohibiting the § 111.30–31. One comment this. use of chargers incorporating grounded recommended that § 111.30–31 be Subpart 111.60. (1) Several comments autotransformers. retained because, even though the pointed out that MIL–C–915 is an 111.30–1. One comment current ABS Rules do not include obsolete standard and should be recommended incorporating IEC switchboard testing, the new 1996 ABS removed. standards on switchboards. Rules will. The standard has been removed. The incorporation has been made The Coast Guard will consider (2) Several comments indicated that accordingly. reinstating the requirement when ABS MIL–C–24640 and 24643 are now in § 111.30–5. (1) One comment issues its new rules. modification A status. observed that the wire sizes mentioned § 111.40–5. One comment The modification A edition of both in the reference of paragraph (a) differed recommended that this section be standards has been referenced. from those cited in § 111.30–19(b)(3). removed because it is redundant and is (3) Many comments pointed out that Section 111.30–19(b)(3) has been only a cross-reference to the ‘‘VW–1’’ is a test that resides in ANSI/ revised accordingly. requirements of §§ 111.01–9. UL 1581. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28265

The standard is now cited as ‘‘ANSI/ specifications would be to include policy on the use of metal-clad (MC) UL 1581 test VW–1.’’ wording requiring independent cable on vessels or recommending its (4) Several comments suggested that laboratory compliances testing for these complete prohibition as being totally Coast Guard regulations be harmonized products. unsuitable for shipboard and MODU with the NEC along with ANSI and Third party testing of marine installations. This extensive range of otherwise recognized national shipboard cable is being considered for comments necessitated a complete standards. inclusion into the 1996 revision IEEE review and revision of the MC cable One of the primary elements of this Std 45 which will be incorporated by section. In the process of revising this and other current Coast Guard reference into the CFR when the section, the Coast Guard reviewed each rulemakings is the incorporation of both standard is published by the IEEE. comment and tried to balance the international and domestic recognized § 111.60–2. One comment pointed out conflicting views to provide a solution industry standards where appropriate. that the 1983 IEEE Std 45 neither that would allow MC cable to be used Article 90–2(b)(1) of the NEC states that requires nor modifies IEEE Std 1202. safely. the NEC does not cover installations in Additionally, it suggests the inclusion of Based upon on-site observations, the ships. In many cases, however, certain Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Coast Guard determined that limited use specific recommendations of the NEC FT–4. of MC cable may be allowed. New are considered appropriate for inclusion This section has been revised to § 111.60–23 is a restatement of the into the regulations. remove the modification language. CSA policy developed by the Coast Guard § 111.60–1. (1) Several comments FT–4 is under review for consideration. since January 1991. questioned whether the Coast Guard § 111.60–3. Several comments § 111.70–1. (1) Several comments will accept cables equivalent to those suggested the need to address cables suggested deleting ‘‘–94’’ after ‘‘ABS stated in this section. exposed to vibration, festooning, and Rules, Part 4/5.87’’ in paragraph (a). Equivalents may be accepted under repeated flexing. This typographical error has been § 110.20–1. Paragraph (d), which references cables corrected and the word ‘‘Part’’ has been (2) Many comments requested that the for special applications in IEEE Std 45 replaced with the correct word 75°C requirement in paragraph (c)(6) be section 19.6.5, has been added to this ‘‘sections’’. changed to 90°C, as allowed in USA/ section. (2) One comment recommended Canadian binational shipboard cable § 111.60–4. One comment pointed out deleting the reference to subpart 111.35 standard UL 1309/CSA C22.2 No. 245. that 2.08 mm2 does not correlate to #14 in paragraph (a)(2) and citing ABS Rules The requirement for 75° is retained in AWG. directly. accordance with IEEE Std 45 and The metric equivalent has been The reference remains as proposed to classification society rules. UL 1309/ revised in accordance with IEEE Std 45 avoid the more lengthy cross-reference CSA C22.2 No. 245 is not recognized by table A6. to ABS Rules each time an electrical either the Coast Guard or the Ship § 111.60–6. One comment suggested propulsion installation is mentioned Inspection Directorate, Transport several standards to be referenced throughout the subchapter. Canada. relative to fiber optic cable and its fire (3) One comment recommended that (3) Several comments noted that load. ABS Rule 4/5.115.6 be included in International Association of Drilling This concern is adequately addressed paragraph (a) due to the NPRM’s Contractors (IADC) guidelines IADC– in paragraph (b) which refers to deleting the NEC article 430. DCCS–1/1991 describes a special- § 111.60–2 concerning specialty cable. Paragraph (a) has been revised purpose cable and, therefore, this § 111.60–13. Several comments accordingly with an additional cross- standard should be referred to in the requested reinserting UL 62 and adding reference to ABS MODU Rules. industrial systems subpart. One article 400 of the NEC as references in § 111.70–3. (1) Several comments requested the removal of the standard paragraph (a). noted that the incorrect NEMA standard altogether. Paragraph (a) has been revised was cited in paragraph (a). The standard is referred to in accordingly. The correct standard is now cited. § 111.60–1 because both § 111.60–1 and § 111.60–17. Several comments (2) One comment suggested that the standard concern cable construction recommended that the thread-cutting enclosures in a hazardous location must details. type of connector is likely to sever meet subpart 111.105 in addition to the (4) Several comments requested that strands of stranded-copper conductors other stated standards. the Coast Guard include acceptance of and, therefore, should not be allowed. Paragraph (a) has been revised IEC 92–350 cable. Several other comments recommended accordingly. This type of cable is not included not allowing the use of the twist-on type (3) One comment suggested that because IEC 92–350 is not now a of connectors. schematics and wiring diagrams need reaffirmed publication. In addition, as a If properly installed and secured, the only be available on the vessel and not result of tests conducted for the Coast twist-on type of connector, used in an necessarily on the door of each Guard, this cable failed to meet all of the enclosure, is suitable for joining controller. performance criteria in IEEE Std 45. relatively small loads to the supply The requirement is retained for safety (5) One comment pointed out that IEC cable. The reference to thread-cutting reasons. This information must be 92–3 does not require any markings and type of connectors has been removed. immediately available in emergency suggested that this section include a § 111.60–19. Several comments situations. marking or labeling requirement to suggested prohibiting cable splices in all (4) One comment suggested replacing avoid confusion and promote Class I, Division 1, locations. ‘‘and’’ with ‘‘or’’ and deleting (v) and consistency. Splices are prohibited in all (vii) in paragraph (d)(1). Paragraph (d) has been revised to hazardous locations, except that splices The comment provided no reason for include a marking requirement. in intrinsically safe systems are allowed these changes. Therefore, the paragraph (6) Several comments suggested that under paragraph (a). remains unchanged. the only reliable way to ensure that § 111.60–23. Many comments were § 111.75–16. One comment requested cable meets the referenced received either requesting a more liberal replacing the prescriptive reference to 28266 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

‘‘floodlights’’ with the more The Coast Guard has determined that, consistent with the terminology used in performance-oriented term ‘‘lighting’’. in this, instance, the UL standards the document referred to (the NEC). The Coast Guard agrees and has referenced adequately address the The recommended change has been amended this section accordingly. equipment. made in this and other locations in the § 111.75–17. (1) One comment started (3) One questioned the proposed rulemaking. that the requirement for flexible cables environmental testing requirements for (2) Several comments noted that the and receptacles is unnecessarily luminaries (lighting fixtures). requirements in §§ 111.81–7 and restrictive and suggested that permanent The comment offered no explanation. 111.81–9 should be consolidated in installations be addressed in paragraphs Coast Guard accepts either standard as § 111.8–1. (e)(e) and (e)(4). an option. This change has been made and The paragraphs has been revised (4) On May 1, 1996, UL announced §§ 111.81–7 and 111.81–9 have been accordingly. the publication of the Marine consolidated into § 111.81–1. (2) One comment recommended Supplements to the Standard for § 111.85–1. One comment including alternative wording in the Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures, UL 1570; recommended the removal of proposed labeling requirement in paragraph the Standard for Incandescent Lighting paragraph (b) because this equipment (d)(3)(1) to allow for the registered Fixtures, UL 1571; and the Standard for could fail and create an arc without certification mark instead of the name of High Intensity Discharge Lighting necessarily reaching the ignition the independent laboratory which tested Fixtures, UL 1572. The requirements in temperature of the oil or vapor. the figure. The paragraph has been removed. Paragraph (d)(3)(1) has been revised these supplements are effective May 3, 1999, and will replace the requirements § 111.87–3. Several comments pointed accordingly. out that third-party certification may (3) One comment suggested that, in of UL 595. UL 595 will be withdrawn at that time. Between May 1, 1996, and place an undue hardship on heater paragraph (d)(3)(i), ‘‘independent manufacturers. laboratory, accepted by the May 3, 1999, UL is allowing compliance testing of fixtures to either the new Paragraph (a) has been revised to Commandant’’ be replaced by ‘‘accepted remove the proposed third-party testing independent laboratory’’ and that ‘‘UL series of standards or UL 595. The Coast Guard accepts either regimen. requirement. Also, the words ‘‘UL safety 1104’’ be replaced by ‘‘this standard’’. and construction standards’’ have been The directions properly express the § 111.77–3. One comment suggested removing the word ‘‘internationally’’ added. intent of the requirement and the § 111.95–1. One comment stated that because both international and domestic wording remains as published in the the list of provisions paragraph (b) is standards are appropriate. NPRM. incomplete. This section has been amended by (4) One comment stated that Paragraph (b) has been amended to removing ‘‘internationally’’ and by navigation lights should also meet avoid specifying individual provisions. international standards (COLREGS). specifying UL safety and construction § 111.99–5. One comment stated that The reference in paragraph (d)(1) to standards. The use of other domestic there are no requirements to install a ‘‘applicable navigation rules’’ includes and international standards may be holding and release system on fire doors COLREGS as well as Inland Navigation requested under the equivalency and that the holding force and power Rules, as applicable. provision in § 110.20–1. (5) One comment suggested that interruption requirements in paragraph § 111.79–1. (1) One comment (e), for systems which are installed, specific requirements for battery- suggested deleting the last sentence of operated navigation lights and exceed any SOLAS 74 requirement. paragraph (d), because the requirement The 1992 Fire Safety Amendments to additional labeling information be is redundant, and moving the included in paragraph (d). SOLAS 74 address fire door release requirement of § 111.79–7 to a more systems in regulation II–2/30.4.3. This Paragraphs (d)(3)(iv), (v), and (vi) appropriate location in new paragraph were added to provide essential subpart has been revised to cross- (e) of § 111.79–1. reference the SOLAS 74 regulation. information needed by marine The changes have been made inspectors to determine the fixture’s § 111.105–5. (1) Several comments accordingly. questioned if the intend of this section suitability for vessel type and location. (2) One comment indicated that the (6) One comment suggested the was to prohibit the use of both NEC and change in the spacing of receptacles in inclusion of specific photometric IEC approved equipment in the same paragraph (b) went beyond recognized requirements for battery powered space. classification society and international navigation lights. The intent of this section is to ensure This concern is currently under standards. that proper and safe equipment is used consideration by the Navigation Safety The Coast Guard agrees and has in hazardous locations. This section has Advisory Committee (NAVSAC) and the amended the section accordingly. been amended to allow safe Coast Guard is awaiting NAVSAC’s § 111.79–5. One comment expressed combinations of both types. recommendations before further concern that adding the words ‘‘suitable (2) Several comments pointed out the rulemaking on this issue. for the environment’’ to § 111.79–1(d) need for the word ‘‘location’’ after the § 111.75–20. (1) Several comments and removing § 111.79–5 would allow word ‘‘hazardous’’ in the second requested clarification of the word misinterpretation and create a safety sentence. ‘‘certified’’ in paragraph (a) and the problem. The sentence has been revised words ‘‘self-certified’’ and ‘‘listing is not Although ‘‘suitable for the accordingly. required’’ in paragraph (e). environment’’ should provide sufficient (3) One comment recommended the These words have been replaced with guidance, paragraph (d) has been inclusion of API RP 505 as a criterion the requirement that the lighting revised to include a specific cross- for system integrity. fixtures meet the stated standards. reference to § 111.01–9, Degrees of The standard is currently under (2) One comment objected to the protection. consideration for incorporation. incorporation of the UL standards in the § 111.81–1. (1) Several comments (4) One comment requested proposal on the grounds that they are suggested replacing ‘‘section 370’’ with clarification of this section’s effect on prescriptive and non-consensus-based. ‘‘article 370’’, in paragraph (d), to be the application of the NEC and IEC Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28267 methods of classification in any one (Zone 0 and Zone 1) hazardous corresponding IEC Zone designations to hazardous location and between similar locations. the NEC locations specified in this areas aboard the same vessel. (2) One comment pointed out that MI section. Any given location is subject to more and SI type cables should be deleted These additions have been made. than one classification. For example, a because they are generally obsolete and § 111.105–47. One comment suggested specific cargo oil tank may be classified are used in only highly specialized that this section should not apply when as a Class I, Division 1, location under applications. the flashpoint of the flammable or the NEC and a Zone 0 location under These type cables have been retained combustible cargo is 60°C or more. the IEC system. Electrical equipment to allow an option for those particular This section has been removed and approved for Class I, Division 1 applications. transferred to § 111.105–31(n). (intrinsically safe) or approved for Zone (3) One comment suggested that the § 111.107–1. (1) One comment noted 0 (Ia) may be used. Class and Zone designations in that IEEE Std 383 referred to in § 111.105–9. Several comments paragraph (d) are incorrect. paragraph (c)(2)(i) has been replaced considered this section unnecessary and Class II and Class III (Zone Z or 10, with IEEE Std 1202. redundant in light of § 111.105–7. and Zone Y or 11) refer to atmospheres This paragraph has been changed Both §§ 111.105–7 and 111.105–9 containing dusts and flyings. Paragraph accordingly. have been revised. Section 111.105–9 is (d) has been slightly revised to clarify. (2) One comment noted that considered necessary due to the term § 111.105–31. (1) Several comments paragraph (c) as proposed required ‘‘explosionproof’’ having a different but pointed out that Appendix B does not compliance with (c) (1), (2), and (3) related meaning in the IEC system. appear in IEEE Std 45–1983 and that instead of (c) (1) and (2) or (c)(3). § 111.105–11. (1) Several comments IEC Publication 92–502 should be Paragraph (c) has been revised as pointed out that either distance included as a reference for this section. noted. separation or a partition is an acceptable This section has been revised as § 112.05–1. One comment suggested practice for intrinsically safe circuits. suggested. removing ‘‘only’’ in paragraph (a) and This section has been revised (2) Several comments requested the adding, after ‘‘emergency’’, ‘‘and those accordingly. rationale of the requirements in new additional loads that may be authorized (2) One comment pointed out that paragraphs (1)(3) and (1)(4). under paragraph (c) of this section.’’ These requirements are consistent Paragraph (a) has been revised as paragraph (a) referred more specifically with ABS Rule 4/5.151.lb. suggested. to intrinsically safe ‘‘components’’ § 111.105–32. One comment suggested § 112.05–5. Several comments instead of ‘‘systems’’; that the reference that the word ‘‘Commandant’’ in requested clarification of the words to § 111.105–7 was redundant; and that paragraph (c) be changed to ‘‘any other machinery’’ in paragraph (d). other changes are needed to provide ‘‘Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Paragraph (d) has been revised to clarity. Center’’. clarify the words. The section has been revised Paragraph (c) has been revised to § 112.15–1. One comment accordingly. provide for concept approval by the recommended that the cross-references § 111.105–15. (1) One comment Commandant (G–MSE) and plan in the last sentence of paragraph (g) pointed out that the preamble to the approval by Commanding Officer, were informational only and, therefore, NPRM stated that electrical installations Marine Safety Center. unnecessary. in hazardous locations will continue to § 111.105–33. One comment The last sentence has been removed. meet explosionproof/intrinsically safe recommended that a provision be added § 112.15–5. (1) One comment requirements but that other allowances to paragraph (f) that loss-of-ventilation suggested that the list of parts in are made in § 111.105–15 for additional alarms be powered independently of the paragraph (e) may not be complete. locations. ventilator’s power system consistent Paragraph (e) has been revised as The comment was correct in with the independency concept for suggested. recognizing that methods other than vessels under 46 CFR 62.30–5. (2) One comment suggested replacing ‘‘explosionproof’’ or ‘‘intrinsically safe’’ This change has been made to the ‘‘a mobil offshore drilling unit’’ in are included in the text. The methods of MODU regulations in § 108.185. paragraph (m) with ‘‘an offshore unit.’’ protection listed in § 111.105–15 are § 111.105–35. One comment Paragraph (m) has been revised as acceptable in addition to recommended adding corresponding suggested. ‘‘explosionproof’’ or ‘‘intrinsically safe.’’ IEC Zone designations to the NEC § 112.50–1. One comment suggested (2) One comment suggested providing locations specified in this section. that the 45-second delay in paragraph acceptable alternative standards based These additions have been made. (d) be aligned with proposed revision of on the NEC in paragraphs (b) and (d). § 111.105–39. Several comments NFPA Standard 301, which would Paragraph (b) has been revised suggested deleting the note to this require a 10-second delay. accordingly; other equivalent types of section because it does not relate to the The 45-second delay is retained protection are being evaluated. subject of the section. because this requirement is aligned with (3) One comment recommended The note has been removed. SOLAS 74. removing paragraph (b0 because its § 111.105–40. One comment suggested § 112.50–3. One comment stated that requirements are redundant. a vertical distance limit be added to paragraphs (f) and (g) have been This section has been revised paragraph (b) so that hazardous location superseded by proposed paragraph (a). accordingly. classification is not extended to an Paragraphs (f) and (g) have been § 111.105–17. (1) Several comments unlimited height. removed. expressed concern about deleting, from The open deck of a roll-on/roll-off § 112.50–5. One comment paragraph (a), the requirements for (RO/RO) vessel is not classified. The recommended that the starting battery armored cable in hazardous locations. paragraph has been revised to address have a reserve starting capacity of at Paragraph (a) has been revised to closed cargo spaces. least three starts. clarify that armored marine shipboard §§ 111.105–43 and 111.105–45. One The proposal already provides for cable is required in Class I, Division 1 comment recommended adding this, either by means of the battery itself 28268 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations or by means of the battery and a second § 113.25–11. (1) One comment Paragraph (i) has been revised source of starting energy. recommended removing specific accordingly. § 113.05–7. Several comments degrees of ingress protection in § 113.35–5. One comment stated that addressed the subject of environmental paragraph (a) because the degree should the audible alarm signal in paragraph testing of communication, alarm, be consistent with the location of the (e)(3) should not be able to be silenced control, and monitoring equipment. device. but reduced in volume. New § 113.05–7, Environmental The NEMA and IEC IP ratings of the This change has been accepted. Testing, has been created in response to contact makers are retained because § 113.35–19. One comment suggested these concerns. exceptional degrees of protection are redesignating this section as § 113.35–7 § 113.10–7. One comment required throughout part 113 since these (which has been removed in this rule) recommended removing the specific systems are emergency in nature. because both § 113.35–19 and § 113.35– degrees of ingress protection referred to However, the ‘‘watertight’’ requirements 5 concern electric engine order in this section due to their excessive have been replaced with the less telegraph systems. nature. stringent ‘‘waterproof’’ requirements. Section 113.35–19 has been The NEMA and IEC IP ratings of the (2) One comment recommended redesignated accordingly. connection boxes are retained because revising the section to address SOLAS § 113.40–10. One comment suggested exceptional degrees of protection are 74-compliant digital systems that do not that the requirement in paragraph (a) required throughout part 113 since these incorporate contact makers. seemed extreme and questioned systems are emergency in nature. Since the term ‘‘contact maker’’ refers whether the system must have an However, the ‘‘watertight’’ requirements to the primary initiating device and not entirely independent power source and have been replaced with the less the resultant audible device, it follows whether it could be physically located stringent ‘‘waterproof’’ requirements. that every system, regardless of design, in the same console as other systems. § 113.10–9. One comment pointed out should employ some form of contact The proposed requirement that the in paragraph (a) that, by requiring the maker as a manual means to initiate the power system be independent is second source of power for the fire alarm. retained because it is the intent that the detection system to be a battery, the § 113.25–12. One comment suggested power for a rudder angle indicator Coast Guard is deviating from its replacing ‘‘bells’’ with the more system be provided from a power present regulations and SOLAS 74, common term ‘‘audible devices’’ and, in supply circuit other than power circuits which allow the second source to be the process, deleting paragraph (b). used for the equipment in paragraph (a). The term ‘‘bells’’ has been removed either the emergency source or a battery. Paragraph (a) is revised to allow and replaced with the SOLAS 74 Paragraph (a) has been revised to keep location in the same console. description ‘‘general emergency alarm the present options and to define the Subpart 113.43. One comment signal.’’ Paragraph (b) has been deleted source of power for the battery charger suggested that the requirement for a as its requirements are now included in if used. steering gear failure alarm be removed paragraph (a). § 113.25–6. One comment suggested § 113.30–1. One comment suggested because it is excessive when compared that, in paragraph (d), the Coast Guard not adding the words ‘‘and each self- to international safety standards and cite the specific SOLAS 74 regulations propelled mobile offshore drilling unit’’ suggested that improved training could for the power supply for the general since MODU’s are defined as vessels in be initiated in place of this requirement alarm system. § 107.111. to address the watchstander’s response The section has been revised to refer This change has been made to steering gear failures. to SOLAS 74, regulations II–1/42, 11– accordingly. This requirement was established in 1/43, III/6, and III/50. § 113.30–3. One comment direct response to a National § 113.25–9. One comment suggested recommended that the section be Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) harmonizing our general alarm revised to address all communication recommendation resulting from their requirements in paragraphs (b) and (c) means that are in compliance with investigation of the SEA WITCH/ESSO with NFPA 72 (National Fire Alarm SOLAS 74, regulations II–1/42, II–1/43, BRUSSELS collision in New York Code). Another comment suggested and III/6.4. Harbor in 1974. Although improved harmonizing the section with the new This section has been revised as crew training and related human factor IMO Lifesaving Appliances Code. suggested. consideration may help, the Coast Paragraph (c) has been revised § 113.30–5. Minor editorial changes Guard determined that both according to the second suggestion. The were made to align this section with the technological and non-technological sound level requirements have been changes made to 113.30–3. solutions should not be considered to be moved from 113.25–9(c), concerning § 113.30–20. One comment mutually exclusive. With regard to location of general emergency alarm recommended that paragraph (b) be human factors, the Coast Guard has signals, to paragraph (d) of § 113.25–12, revised to require that only systems that found that even the best training, by Alarm signals. do not have other effective means of itself, cannot account for the many § 113.25–10. One comment noted that station isolation during a fault have a variables contributing to human error. the prohibition against using red cut-out switch on the navigating bridge. Proper and timely execution of steering flashing or rotating beacons for purposes Paragraph (b) has been revised as orders is critical to safe vessel other than the general alarm seems to be suggested. navigation. While training may assist in in conflict with the IMO ‘‘Code on § 113.30–25. One comment proper actions taken by the helmsman, Alarms and Indicators,’’ which recommended that paragraph (i) be the failure alarm is intended to provide recommends red lights as supplemental revised to allow the option of cable the operator with a warning when the visual alarms for fire alarm and fire- routing through high fire-risk spaces if physical system does not respond as extinguishing medium release. the cable meets the requirements of IEC expected. This regulation is therefore Pending further consideration of the 331. The use of this standard can lead being retained and the Coast Guard IMO Code, proposed paragraph (c) has to significant cost savings and more intends to introduce this system feature been removed. practical installations. as a safety issue to be considered at IMO Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28269 for improving international regulations Guard were in draft form. Once reference under 5 U.S.C. 552 and 1 CFR on steering system controls. finalized, these documents will again be part 51. The material is available as § 113.50–5. (1) Several comments reviewed for inclusion. indicated in that section. discussed the prescriptive nature of the (2) This section has been conformed central amplifier-type system in to the current format for incorporation Regulatory Evaluation paragraph (a) citing the many optional by reference sections. Existing This rule is not a significant system configurations available. paragraph (b), left untouched by the regulatory action under section 3(f) of Paragraph (a) has been revised to NPRM, is removed by this rule. The Executive Order 12866 and does not allow alternative amplifier systems. existing paragraph required require an assessment of potential costs (2) One comment suggested allowing manufacturers to maintain a copy of and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that for a combined public address, general certificates of approval and the material order. It has not been reviewed by the alarm, and fire detecting and alarm listed in proposed paragraph (a) Office of Management and Budget under system, as provided for in Navigation (paragraph (b) in this rule). As the list that order. It is not significant under the and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) of materials has grown, it is unnecessary regulatory policies and procedures of 2–89. for manufacturers to maintain a copy of the Department of Transportation (DOT) Paragraph (a) has been changed all of these documents. (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979). A accordingly. (3) One comment suggested that Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph (3) One comment suggested adding a American National Standards Institute 10e of the regulatory policies and requirement from the IMO Lifesaving (ANSI) be listed as a source of all procedures of DOT has been prepared Appliance Code to protect the public incorporated materials. and is available in the docket for address system from unauthorized use. Though not all of the documents inspection or copying where indicated Paragraph (a) has been revised as listed in § 161.002–1 (Incorporation by under ‘‘ADDRESSES.’’ The Evaluation is suggested. reference) are available from ANSI, summarized as follows. § 113.50–10. (1) One comment some may be obtained from ANSI’s Most of the changes to the regulations suggested deleting the words ‘‘enables address listed in § 110.10–1. are either editorial or update technical an officer on the bridge to broadcast’’ as § 161.002–4. (1) A cross-reference to specifications to reflect latest practices. unnecessary prescriptive language. subchapter J has been added to the end Although some of these changes will The words have been deleted. The of paragraph (b)(1) because it has been cause minor cost increases for requirement for the announcing station deleted from § 161.002–1 (Incorporation shipbuilders, others will result in of the system to be on the bridge is by reference) for formatting reasons. substantial savings. The cost increases retained in § 113.50–5(b). (2) One comment suggested removing resulting from these rules will be more (2) One comment recommended paragraph (b)(3) because there is no than offset by the cost savings, due to removing the replacement for two-way justification for its inclusion. relaxations in the rules. The Coast communication in paragraph (b) LR Test Specification Number 1 is an Guard estimates that the cost of because it appears to require a two-way internationally accepted testing protocol complying with the interim rule over communication as part of the public for shipboard electrical and electronic the next 10 years will total $33,753,392 address system. equipment based upon various (in present value); but, this cost will be Paragraph (b) has been deleted requirements of the IEC and is retained. more than offset by the estimated net because two-way communication (3) An option has been provided in benefits of $73,538.213. This is a cost- requirements are covered in subpart paragraph (b)(3) to include table 4/11.1 benefit ratio of $1.00 of costs to $2.18 113.30. of the ABS Rules. of benefits. § 113.50–15. (1) Several comments § 161.002–10. One comment Many of the changes causing cost recommended revising paragraph (b) to recommended that paragraphs (b)(1)(i) increases are already current marine remove the prescriptive words ‘‘directed and (ii) be revised to clarify the term industry practices, such as an increase aft.’’ ‘‘similar annunciating device.’’ in the protection of cable from bilge Paragraph (b) has been revised as Paragraph (b)(1) has been revised for water. suggested by substituting a performance clarification. standard. § 161.002–15. (1) One comment There are several intangible benefits. (2) One comment suggested replacing requested that ‘‘aural’’ be changed to Due to the increased use of national and table 113.50–15 with the requirements ‘‘audible.’’ international standards, certain items from the IMO Lifesaving Appliance This change has been made because it will now be more readily available ‘‘off Code. conforms to Factory Mutual the shelf’’ for marine use. A significant The table has been removed and the terminology. economic savings will result from the requirements for minimum sound levels (2) Proposed paragraph (b) has been ability of equipment manufacturers, in from the IMO Lifesaving Appliance removed because SOLAS 74 is already many cases, to meet the new Code have been added to paragraph (c). mentioned in § 161.002–1. performance specifications instead of § 113.65–5. (1) One comment § 161.002–17. This section has been the old, prescriptive design standards. suggested removing the note following aligned with equivalency provisions in Also, the cost of submitting detailed § 113.65–5 as being out of date and other recent Coast Guard rulemakings. plans and specifications to the Coast merely a cross-reference to other Subpart 161.004. One comment noted Guard for approval of certain requirements for associated equipment. that subpart 161.004, which is removed, equipment, such as sound powered The note has been removed. included § 161.004–1 as well. telephones, emergency loudspeaker § 161.002–1. (1) Components of This change has been made systems, and navigation lights, will be automatic fire detection systems, EN54 accordingly. eliminated. parts 1 through 11, published by the No comments were received to the European Committee for Incorporation by Reference evaluation in the preamble to the Standardization (CEN) have been The Director of the Federal Register NPRM. The Coast Guard solicits cost removed from this section because some has approved the material in §§ 110.10– data and comments regarding the of the documents obtained by the Coast 1 and 161.002–1 for incorporation by economic impact of the changes made 28270 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations since requirements were published in requirements on newly built vessels and in the enhancement of vessel safety and, the NPRM. modifications of current vessels. thereby, help to minimize impacts on Proposed Use of Information: This the marine environment. A ‘‘Categorical Small Entities information is necessary to determine Exclusion Determination’’ is available in Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act compliance with the electrical the docket for inspection or copying (the Act) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Coast regulations before vessel construction or where indicated under ADDRESSES. Guard must consider the economic modification begins. List of Subjects impact on small entities of a rule for Frequency of Response: The which a general notice of proposed information must be submitted when a 46 CFR Part 108 rulemaking is required. ‘‘Small entities’’ vessel is built or modified. Fire prevention, Marine safety, may include (1) small businesses and Burden Estimate: 478 hours. Occupational safety and health, Oil and not-for-profit organizations that are Respondents: 175 owners or gas exploration, Reporting and independently owned and operated and operators. recordkeeping requirements, Vessels. are not dominant in their fields and (2) Average Burden Hours Per governmental jurisdictions with Respondent: 1 hour per submission. 46 CFR Part 110 II. The following particulars apply to populations of less than 50,000. Incorporation by reference, Reporting subpart 161.002: The concerns of many small entities and recordkeeping requirements, have been addressed by the DOT No.: 2115. Vessels. incorporation of wide variety of national OMB Control No.: 2115–0121. and international standards. This rule Administration: U.S. Coast Guard. 46 CFR Parts 111 and 112 dramatically revises certain prescriptive Title: Electrical Engineering Vessels. requirements concerning the design, Requirements for Merchant Vessels. 46 CFR Part 113 specification, and approval of electrical Need for Information: Subpart equipment and replaces them with 161.002 concerns application for type Communications equipment, Fire performance-based requirements that approval of fire protection systems. prevention, Vessels. Proposed Use of Information: This incorporate national and international 46 CFR Part 161 standards. Whenever possible, information is necessary to ensure requirements have been adjusted to compliance with the electrical Fire prevention, Incorporation by address the size of the vessel and, in regulations. reference, Marine safety, Reporting and some cases, relaxed for smaller vessels. Frequency of Response: A response is recordkeeping requirements. Small entities that build or own vessels due each time initial approval is sought For the reasons set forth in the should experience reduced costs and and each time a revision is requested. preamble, the Coast Guard amends 46 potentially increased business Burden Estimate: 60 hours. CFR parts 108, 110, 111, 112, 113, and opportunities due to the flexibility of Respondents: 6 manufacturers. 161 as follows: Average Burden Hours Per requirements in these rules and the PART 108ÐDESIGN AND EQUIPMENT eliminating of regulatory burden. Respondent: 10 hours per respondent. The collection-of-information Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies 1. The authority citation for part 108 requirements were submitted to the under section 605(b) of the Act that this is revised to read as follows: Department of Transportation on the rule will not have a significant following dates: February 6, 1996, for Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1333; 46 U.S.C. 3102, economic impact on a substantial subchapter Q and February 26, 1996, for 3306; 49 CFR 1.46. number of small entities. subchapter J. The requirements have not 2. In § 108.170, in the notes following Collection of Information yet been approved by OMB under paragraph (b), note 1 is revised to read as follows: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act section 3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act. When approved by (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of § 108.170 Definitions. Management and Budget (OMB) reviews OMB, notice of approval will be published in the Federal Register. * * * * * each rule that contains a collection-of- Notes: 1. Further requirements with respect information requirement to determine Federalism to hazardous locations are contained in part whether the practical value of the 111, subpart 111.105, of this chapter. The Coast Guard has analyzed this information is worth the burden rule under the principles and criteria * * * * * imposed by its collection. Collection-of- contained in Executive Order 12612 and 3. In § 108.181, paragraph (c) is information requirements include revised to read as follows: has determined that this rule does not reporting, recordkeeping, notification, have sufficient federalism implications and other, similar requirements. This § 108.181 Ventilation for enclosed spaces. to warrant the preparation of a rule contains collection-of-information * * * * * Federalism Assessment. requirements in subpart 110.25 of (c) Each fan in a ventilating system subchapter J and subpart 161.002 of Environment must have remote controls installed in subchapter Q. accordance with part 111, subpart The Coast Guard considered the 111.103, of this chapter. I. The following particulars apply to environmental impact of this rule and subpart 110.25: * * * * * concluded that, under paragraph 4. In § 108.185, paragraph (c), DOT No.: 2115. 2.B.2e(34) (d) and (e) of Commandant introductory text, is revised to read as OMB Control No.: 2115–0115. Instruction M16475.1B, this rule is follows: Administration: U.S. Coast Guard. categorically excluded from further Title: Electrical Engineering environmental documentation. This rule § 108.185 Ventilation for enclosed Requirements for Merchant Vessels. concerns only system arrangement and classified locations. Need For Information: Subpart 110.25 equipment approval. The approved * * * * * requires industry to complete electrical system arrangement and equipment (c) Each unit must have alarms that engineering plans to meet performance required by this rule should contribute are powered independently of the Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28271 ventilation motor power and control (b) This subchapter applies only to 8. Section 110.10–1 is revised to read circuitry and sound at a continuously electrical installations contracted for as follows: manned station when— after September 30, 1996. § 110.10±1 Incorporation by reference. * * * * * * * * * * (d) [Reserved] (a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subchapter with the PART 110ÐGENERAL PROVISIONS * * * * * approval of the Director of the Federal 5. The authority citation for part 110 7. Section 110.01–3 is revised to read as follows: Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 is revised to read as follows: CFR part 51. To enforce any edition Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1509; 43 U.S.C. 1333; § 110.01±3 Repairs and alterations. other than that specified in paragraph 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; E.O. 12234, 45 FR (a) Repairs and replacements in kind (b) of this section, the Coast Guard must 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; 49 CFR must comply with either the regulations publish notice of change in the Federal 1.45, 1.46; § 110.01–2 also issued under 44 in this subchapter or those in effect Register; and the material must be U.S.C. 3507. when the vessel was built. available to the public. All approved 6. In § 110.01–1, paragraphs (a) and (b) Alterations and modifications, material is available for inspection at (b) are revised to read as follows and such as re-engining, re-powering, the Office of the Federal Register, 800 paragraph (d) is removed and reserved: upgrading of the main propulsion North Capitol Street NW., suite 700, control system, or replacing extensive Washington, DC, and at the U.S. Coast § 110.01±1 General. amounts of cabling, must comply with Guard, (G–MSE), 2100 Second Street (a) This subchapter applies to all either the regulations in this subchapter SW., Washington, DC 20593–0001, and electrical installations on vessels subject or those in effect at the time the is available from the sources indicated to subchapters D, H, I, I–A, K, L, O, Q, alterations or modifications are made. in paragraph (b) of this section. R, T, U, and W of this chapter whenever (c) Conversions, such as the addition (b) The material approved for those subchapters require an electrical of a midbody or a change in the service incorporation by reference in this installation to be in accordance with of the vessel, are handled on a case-by- subchapter and the sections affected are this subchapter. case basis by Commandant (G–MOC). as follows:

American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) American Bureau of Shipping, Two World Trade Cen- ter, 106th Floor, New York, NY 10048: Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, 1995 ...... 110.15–1; 111.12–1(a); 111.12–3; 111.12–5; 111.12–7; 111.33–11; 111.35–1; 111.70– 1(a); 111.105–31(n); 111.105–39(a); 111.105–40(a); 113.05–7. Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, 1994 ...... 111.12–1(a); 111.12–3; 111.12–5; 111.12–7; 111.33–11; 111.35–1; 111.70–1(a). American National Standards Institute (ANSI), American National Standards Institute, 11 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036: ANSI/ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, 1993 ...... 111.91–1 ANSI/ASME A17.1A, Addenda to ANSI/ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and 111.91–1. Escalators (including Errata, 1995), 1994. ANSI/IEEE C37.04, Rating Structure for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a 111.54–1(c). Symmetrical Current Basis, 1979. ANSI C37.12, For AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a Symmetrical Current 111.54–1(c). Basis—Specification Guide, 1991. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), ASTM International Headquarters, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959: ASTM B 117–95, Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus, 1996 ...... 110.15–1(b). ASTM D 4066–94b, Standard Specification for Nylon Injection and Extrusion Materials 111.60–1(c) (PA), 1994. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854: IEEE Std C37.13, IEEE Standard for Low-Voltage AC Power Circuit Breakers used in 111.54–1(c). Enclosures, 1990. IEEE Std C37.14, IEEE Standard for Low-Voltage DC Power Circuit Breakers Used in 111.54–1(c). Enclosures, 1992. IEEE Std 45–1983, IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Installations on Shipboard, 111.05–7; 111.15–2(b); 111.30–1; 111.30–5(a); 1983. 111.30–19(a); 111.33–3(a); 111.33–5(a); 111.60–1(a); 111.60–2; 111.60–3; 111.60– 5(a); 111.60–6(a); 111.60–11(c); 111.60– 13(a); 111.60–19(b); 111.60–21; 111.60– 23(d); 111.105–3; 111.105–31(e); 111.105– 41; 111.107–1(c); 113–65–5. IEEE Std 100–1992, The New IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics 110.15–1(a). Terms, 1992. IEEE Std 320, Application Guide for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a Sym- 111.54–1(c). metrical Current Basis (ANSI/IEEE C37.010–79), 1979. IEEE Std 331, Application Guide for Low-Voltage AC Nonintegrally Fused Power Cir- 111.54–1(c). cuit Breakers (Using Separately Mounted Current-Limiting Fuses) (ANSI/IEEE C37.27), 1987. IEEE Std 1202–1991, IEEE Standard for Flame Testing of Cables for Use in Cable Tray 111.60–2; 111.60–6(a); 111.107–1(c). in Industrial and Commercial Occupancies, 1991. International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), International Association of Drill- ing Contractors, PO Box 4287, Houston, TX 77210–4287: 28272 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

IADC–DCCS–1/1991, Guidelines for Industrial System DC Cable for Mobile Offshore 111.60–1(f). Drilling Units, 1991. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), (Also available from ANSI—address above.) International Electrotechnical Commission, 1, Rue de Varembe, Geneva, Switzer- land: IEC 68–2–52, Basic Environmental Testing Procedures, Part 2: Tests. Test KB: Salt Mist, 110.15–1(b). Cyclic (Sodium Chloride Solution), 1984. IEC 79–0, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 0: General Require- 111.105–1; 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–7; ments, 1983 (Including Amendment 2, 1991). 111.105–15(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 79–1, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 1: Construction 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–9; 111.105– and Test of Flameproof Enclosures of Electrical Apparatus, 1990 [Including the First 15(b); 111.105–17(b). Supplement to the Second Edition (1971), 1975, and Amendment 1 to the Third Edi- tion (1990), 1993]. IEC 79–2, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 2: Electrical Appa- 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–7(b); ratus—Type of Protection ‘‘p’’, 1983. 111.105–15(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 79–5, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 5: Sand-Filled Ap- 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–15(a); paratus. First Edition (1967), Incorporating the First Supplement, (1969). 111.105–15(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 79–6, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 6: Oil-Immersion 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–15(a); ‘‘o’’, 1995. 111.105–15(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 79–7, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 7: Increased Safety 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–15(a); ‘‘e’’, 1990 (Including Amendment 1, 1991, and Amendment 2 1993). 111.105–15(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 79–11, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 11: Intrinsic Safe- 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–11(a); ty ‘‘i’’, 1991. 111.105–15(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 79–15, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 15: Electrical Ap- 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–15(a); paratus with Type of Protection ‘‘n’’, 1987. 111.105–5(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 79–18, Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres, Part 18: Encapsulation 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–15(a); ‘‘m’’, 1992. 111.105–15(b); 111.105–17(b). IEC 92–3, Electrical Installation in Ships, Part 3: Cables (construction, testing and in- 111.105–7; 111.60–1(a); 111.60–3(a); 111.60– stallations) Second Edition, 1965, as amended through August, 1982. 3(c); 111.81–1(d). IEC 92–101, Electrical Installation in Ships, Part 101: Definitions and General Require- 111.15–1(a); 111.81–1(d). ments, 1994 (Including Amendment 1, 1995). IEC 92–201, Electrical Installation in Ships, Part 201: System Design—General 1994 ...... 111.70–3(a); 111.81–1(d). IEC 92–202, Electrical Installation in Ships, Part 202: System Design—Protection, 1994 111.50–3(c); 111.50–3(e); 111.50–3(g); 111.53–1(a); 111.54–1(a); 111.81–1(d). IEC 92–301, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 301: Equipment—Generators and Mo- 111.25–5(a); 111.70–1(a); 111.81–1(d). tors, 1980 (Including Amendment 1, 1994, and Amendment 2, 1995). IEC 92–302, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 302: Equipment—Switchgear and 111.30–1; 111.30–5(a); 111.30–19(a); 111.81– Controlgear Assemblies, 1980 (Including Amendment 1, 1989, and Amendment 2, 1(d). 1994). IEC 92–303, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 303: Equipment—Transformers for 111.20–15; 111.81–1(d). Power and Lighting, 1980. IEC 92–304, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 304: Equipment—Semiconductor 111.33–3(a); 111.33–5(b); 111.81–1(d). Converters, 1980 (Including Amendment 1, 1995). IEC 92–306, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 306: Equipment—Luminaires and Ac- 111.75–20(a); 111.81–1(d). cessories, 1980. IEC 92–352, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 352: Equipment—Choice and Installa- 111.60–3(a); 111.60–3(c); 111.60–5; 111.81– tion of Cables for Low-Voltage Power Systems, 1979, (Including Amendment 1, 1987, 1(d). and Amendment 2, 1994). IEC 92–501, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 501: Special Features—Electric Pro- 111.81–1(d). pulsion Plant, 1984. IEC 92–502, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 502: Tankers—Special Features, 1994 111.81–1(d); 111.105–31(e). IEC 92–503, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 503: Special Features—A.C. Supply 111.30–5(a); 111.81–1(d). systems with Voltages in the Range Above 1KV up to and including 11KV, 1975. IEC 92–504, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 504: Special Features—Control and 111.81–1(d). Instrumentation, 1994. IEC 331, Fire resisting characteristics of electric cables, 1970 ...... 113.30–25(i). IEC 332–1, Tests on Electric Cables Under Fire Conditions, Part 1: Test on a Single Ver- 111.30–19(b). tical Insulated Wire or Cable, 1993. IEC 332–3, Tests on Electric Cables Under Fire Conditions, Part 3: Test on bunched 111.60–1(b); 111.60–2; 111.60–6(a); 111.107– wires or cables, 1992. 1(c). IEC 363, Short-Circuit Current Evaluation with Special Regard to Rated Short-Circuit 111.52–5(c). Capacity of Circuit-Breakers in Installations in Ships, 1972. IEC 529, Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code) 1989 ...... 111.01–9(a); 111.01–9(b); 111.01–9(c); 111.01–9(d); 111.01–9 (Note); 113.10–7; 113.20–3; 113.25–11; 113.30–25(c); 113.30– 25(h); 113.40–10(b). IEC 533, Electromagnetic Compatibility of Electrical and Electronic Installations in 113.05–7. Ships, 1977. IEC 947–2, Low-Voltage Switchgear and Controlgear, Part 2: Circuit Breakers, 1989 (In- 111.54–1(b); 111.54–1(c). cluding Amendment 1, 1992 and Amendment 2, 1993). IEC IP Code, see IEC 529. International Maritime Organization (IMO), International Maritime Organization, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, England: International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74) Consolidated 111.99–5; 111.105–31(n); 112.15–1(r); Edition, (Including 1992 Amendments to SOLAS 74, and 1994 Amendments to 113.25–6. SOLAS 74), 1992. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28273

The International Society for Measurement and Control (ISA), International Society for Measurement and Control, 67 Alexander Drive. P.O. Box 12277 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709: RP 12.6, Wiring Practices for Hazardous (Classified) Locations Instrumentation Part I: 111.105–11(e). Intrinsic Safety, 1995. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2101 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036: NEMA Standards Publication No. ICS 2, Industrial Control and Systems Controllers, 111.70–3(a). Contractors, and Overload Relays Rated not more than 2000 Volts AC or 750 Volts DC, 1993. NEMA Standards Publication No. 2.3 1983, Instructions for the Handling, Installation, 111.70–3(a). Operation, and Maintenance of Motor Control Centers, 1983. NEMA Standards Publication No. 2.4, NEMA and IEC Devices for Motor Service—A 111.70–3(a). Guide for Understanding the Differences, 1989. NEMA Standards Publication No. 250, Enclosures for Electrical Equipment (1000 Volts 111.01–9(a); 111.01–9(b); 111.01–9(c); Maximum), 1991. 111.01–9(d); 111.01–9 (Note); 111.10–7; 113.20–3; 113.25–11; 113.30–25(c); 113.30– 25(h); 113.40–10(b). NEMA Standards Publication No. WC–3, Rubber Insulated Wire and Cable for the 111.60–13(a); 111.60–13(c). Transmission and Distribution of Electrical Energy, 1980 (with revisions through May 1989). NEMA Standards Publication No. WC–8, Ethylene-Propylene-Rubber-Insulated Wire 111.60–13(a); 111.60–13(c). and Cable for the Transmission and Distribution of Electrical Energy, 1988 (with revi- sions through 1992). National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269: NEC, see NFPA 70.. NFPA 70, National Electrical Code (NEC), 1996 ...... 111.05–33; 111.20–15; 111.25–5(a); 111.50– 3(c); 111.50–9; 111.53–1(a); 111.54–1(a); 111.55–1(a); 111.59–1; Table 111.60–7; 111.60–11(f); 111.60–13(a); 111.60–13(b); 111.60–13(c); 111.60–23; 111.81–1(d); 111.83–3(a); 111.105–1; 111.105–1 (Note); 111.105–3; 111.105–5; 111.105–7; 111.105– 9; 111.105–15(a); 111.105–17(b); 111.107– 1(b). NFPA 77, Recommended Practice on Static Electricity, 1993 ...... 111.105–27. NFPA 99, Standard for Health Care Facilities, 1996 ...... 111.105–37. NFPA 496, Standard for Purged and Pressurized Enclosures for Electrical Equipment, 111.105–7(b). 1993. Naval Publications and Forms Center (NPFC), Naval Publications and Forms Center, Cus- tomer Service—Code 1052, 5801 Tabor Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19120: MIL–W–76D, Military Specification Wire and Cable, Hook-up, Electrical, Insulated, 111.60–11(c). General Specification For, 1992. MIL–W–16878F, Military Specification, Wire, Electrical, Insulated, General Specifica- 111.60–11(c). tion For, 1992. MIL–C–24640A, Military Specification Cables, Light Weight, Electric, Low Smoke, For 111.60–1(a); 111.60–3(c). Shipboard Use, General Specification For, 1995. MIL–C–24643A, Military Specification Cables and Cords, Electric, Low Smoke, For 111.60–1(a); 111.60–3(c). Shipboard Use, General Specification For, 1994 (Including Amendment 1). Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), Naval Sea Systems Command, Code 55Z, Depart- ment of Navy Washington, DC 20362: DDS 300–2, A. C. Fault Current Calculations, 1988 ...... 111.52–5. MIL–HDBK–299 (SH), Military Handbook Cable Comparison Handbook Data Pertaining 111.60–3(c). to Electric Shipboard Cable, 1989. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL), Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., ATTN: Publications Stock, 333 Pfingsten Rd. Northbrook, IL 60062–2096: UL 44, Standard for Rubber-Insulated Wire and Cable, 1991 (including revisions 111.60–11(c). through February, 1996). UL 50, Standard for Enclosures for Electrical Equipment, 1995 ...... 111.81–1(d). UL 62, Standard for Flexible Cord and Fixture Wire, 1991 (including revisions through 111.60–13(a). February, 1996). UL 83, Standard for Thermoplastic-Insulated Wires and Cables, 1991 (including revi- 111.60–1(c); 111.60–11(c). sions through March, 1996). UL 489, Standard for Molded-Case Circuit Breakers and Circuit-Breaker Enclosures, 111.54–1(b). 1991 (including revisions through June, 1995). UL 514A, Standard for Metallic Outlet Boxes, 1991 (including revisions through April, 111.81–1(d). 1995). UL 514B, Standard for Fittings for Conduit and Outlet Boxes, 1989 (including revisions 111.81–1(d). through April, 1995). UL 514C, Standard for Nonmetallic Outlet Boxes, Flush-Device Boxes, and Covers, 111.81–1(d). 1988 (including revisions through April, 1995). UL 595, Standard for Marine-Type Electric Lighting Fixtures, 1985 (including revisions 111.75–20(a); 111.75–20(e). through September, 1991). UL 913, Standard for Intrinsically Safe Apparatus and Associated Apparatus for Use in 111.105–11(a). Class I, II, and III Division 1, Hazardous (Classified) Locations, 1988. 28274 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

UL 1042, Standard for Electric Baseboard Heating Equipment, 1994 (including revisions 111.87–3(a). through November, 1995). UL 1072, Standard for Medium-Voltage Power Cables, 1995 (including revisions 111.60–1(e). through January, 1996). UL 1096, Standard for Electric Central Air Heating Equipment, 1986 (including revi- 111.87–3(a). sions through January, 1988). UL 1104, Standard for Marine Navigation Lights, 1981 (including revisions through 111.75–17(d). May, 1988). UL 1203, Standard for Explosion-Proof and Dust-Ignition-Proof Electrical Equipment for 111.105–9. Use in Hazardous (Classified) Locations, 1994 (including revisions through October, 1995). UL 1569, Standard for Metal-Clad Cables, 1995 (including revisions through April, 111.60–23(a). 1996). UL 1570, Standard for Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures, 1988 (including revisions through 111.75–20. April, 1996). UL 1571, Standard for Incandescent Lighting Fixtures, 1995 (including revisions 111.75–20. through April, 1996). UL 1572, Standard for High Intensity Discharge Lighting Fixtures, 1995 (including revi- 111.75–20. sions through May, 1996). UL 1573, Standard for Stage ad Studio Lighting Units, 1994 (including revisions 111.75–20. through February, 1995). UL 1574, Standard for Track Lighting Systems, 1995 (including revisions through July, 111.75–20. 1995). ANSI/UL 1581, Reference Standard for Electrical Wires, Cables, and Flexible Cords, 111.30–19(b); 111.60–2; 111.60–6(a). 1991 (including revisions through January, 1996).

(c) The word ‘‘should,’’ when used in Type 1 with dripshield, NEMA 250 pressure-directed liquids, or similar material incorporated by reference, is to Type 2, or an IEC IP 32 rating. moisture conditions. These locations be construed the same as the words Embarkation station means a location include— ‘‘must’’ or ‘‘shall’’ for the purposes of from which persons embark into (1) On deck; this subchapter. survival craft or are assembled before (2) A machinery space; 9. Section 110.5–1 is revised to read embarking into survival craft. (3) A cargo space; as follows: Emergency squad means the crew designated on the station bill as the (4) A location within a galley or § 110.15±1 Definitions. nucleus of a damage control party. pantry area, laundry, or water closet As used in this subchapter— Flashpoint means the minimum which contains a shower or bath; and (a) The electrical and electronic terms temperature at which a liquid gives off (5) Other spaces with similar are defined in IEEE Std 100 or IEC 92– a vapor in sufficient concentration to environmental conditions. 101. form an ignitable mixture with air near Marine inspector or inspector means a (b) In addition to the definitions in the surface of the liquid, as specified by civilian employee or military member of paragraph (a) of this section— the appropriate test procedure and the Coast Guard assigned by an Officer Coastwise Vessel means a vessel that apparatus. in Charge, Marine Inspection, or the normally navigates the waters of any Great Lakes vessel means a vessel that Commandant to perform duties with ocean or the Gulf of Mexico 20 nautical navigates exclusively on the Great Lakes respect to the inspection, enforcement, miles or less offshore and is certificated and their connecting and tributary and administration of vessel safety and for coastwise navigation by the Coast waters. navigation laws and regulations. Independent laboratory means a Guard. Nonsparking fan means nonsparking Commandant means the Commandant laboratory that is accepted by the Commandant under part 159 of this fan as defined in ABS Rules 4/5.149.6. of the Coast Guard. Ocean vessel means a vessel that Corrosion resistant material or finish chapter for the testing and listing or certification of electrical equipment. navigates the waters of any ocean or the means any material or finish that meets Gulf of Mexico more than 20 nautical the testing requirements of ASTM B– Location not requiring an exceptional degree of protection means a location miles offshore and is certificated by the 117 or test Kb in IEC 68–2–52 for 200 Coast Guard for ocean navigation. hours and does not show pitting, which is not exposed to the cracking, or other deterioration more environmental conditions outlined in Qualified person means a person who severe than that resulting from a similar the definition for locations requiring by virtue of that person’s knowledge, test on passivated AISI Type 304 exceptional degrees of protection. This ability, experience, specialized training, stainless steel. location requires the degree of or licensing can competently and safely protection of § 111.01–9 (c) or (d) of this perform required electrical duties or Corrosive location means a location chapter. These locations include— functions. exposed to the weather on vessels (1) An accommodation space; Waterproof means enclosed so that operating in salt water or a location on (2) A dry store room; board which may be exposed to the equipment meets at least a NEMA 250 (3) A passageway adjacent to quarters; Type 4 or 4X or an IEC IP 56 or 66 corrosive effects of the cargo carried or (4) A water closet without a shower or rating. of the vessel’s systems. bath; Dead ship condition is the condition (5) A radio, gyro and chart room; and Watertight means enclosed so that in which the main propulsion plant, (6) A location with similar equipment meets at least a NEMA 250 boilers and auxiliaries are not in environmental conditions. Type 6 or 6P or an IEC IP 67 or 68 operation due to the absence of power. Location requiring an exceptional rating. Dripproof means enclosed so that degree of protection means a location 10. Section 110.20–1 is revised to read equipment meets at least a NEMA 250 exposed to weather, seas, splashing, as follows: Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28275

§ 110.20±1 Equivalents. Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (c) Maintenance of system integrity The Commanding Officer, Marine and includes items such as cable splices, through compliance with the applicable Safety Center (MSC), may approve any signalling lights, shore connection boxes, system requirements (IEEE, NEC, IEC, submersible pumps, engine order telegraph etc.) to which plan review has been arrangement, fitting, appliance, systems, shaft speed and thrust indicator apparatus, equipment, calculation, systems, and steering gear failure alarm approved. information, or test that provides a level systems. 17. Section 111.01–5 is revised to read of safety equivalent to that established as follows: (n) * * * by specific provisions of this § 111.01±5 Protection from bilge water. subchapter. Requests for approval must Note to paragraph (n): This equipment be submitted to the Marine Safety evaluation is generally performed by the Each of the following in or around the Center. If necessary, the Marine Safety Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, bilge area must be arranged or and includes items such as circuit breakers, constructed so that it cannot be Center may require engineering switches, lighting fixtures, air heating evaluations and tests to demonstrate the damaged by bilge water: equipment, busways, outlet boxes, and (a) Generators. equivalence of the substitute. junction boxes. Items required to meet an (b) Motors. 11. In § 110.25–1, paragraphs (c), (i), IEEE, IEC, NEMA, UL, ANSI, or other (c) Electric coupling. (j), and (l) and the notes to paragraphs industry standard or a military specification (d) Electric cable. (m) and (n) are revised and paragraph are considered acceptable if manufacturer’s 18. Section 111.01–7 is revised to read (o) is added to read as follows: certification of compliance is indicated on a material list or plan. However, if the as follows: § 110.25±1 Plans and information required standards require third-party testing and § 111.01±7 Accessibility and spacing. listing or certification, proof of listing or for new construction. (a) The design and arrangement of * * * * * certification by an independent laboratory must also be submitted. electric apparatus must afford (c) Elementary and isometric or deck accessibility to each part as needed to wiring plans, including the location of (o) Detailed analysis showing facilitate proper inspection, adjustment, each cable splice, a list of symbols, and compliance with the MC cable maintenance, or replacement. the manufacturer’s name and requirements in § 111.60–23(b) of this (b) Within an enclosure, the spacing identification of each item of electrical chapter. between energized components (or equipment, of each— § 110.25±3 [Amended] between an energized component and (1) Steering gear circuit and steering ground) must be to the appropriate motor controller; 12. In § 110.25–3, in paragraph (a)(1), remove ‘‘(G–MSC)’’ and add, in its industry standard for the voltage and (2) General emergency alarm system; current utilized in the circuit. (3) Sound-powered telephone or other place, ‘‘(MSC)’’; paragraph (a)(3) is removed; and, in the note to paragraph Additionally, spacing within any fixed communication system; enclosure must be sufficient to facilitate (4) Power-operated boat winch; (c), remove ‘‘a Coast Guard Technical Office’’ and add, in their place, servicing. (5) Fire detecting and alarm system; 19. Section 111.01–9 is revised to read ‘‘Commanding Officer, Marine Safety (6) Smoke detecting system; as follows: (7) Electric watertight door system; Center,’’. (8) Fire door holding systems; 13. In § 110.30–1, paragraph (a) is § 111.01±9 Degrees of protection. (9) Public address system; revised to read as follows: (a) Interior electrical equipment (10) Manual alarm system; and § 110.30±1 General. exposed to dripping liquids or falling (11) Supervised patrol system. solid particles must be manufactured to * * * * * (a) This section supplements the general requirements for testing and at least NEMA 250 Type 2 or IEC IP 32 (i) For vessels with hazardous degree of protection as appropriate for locations for which part 111, subpart inspecting vessels in other parts of this chapter. the service intended. 111.105, is applicable, plans showing (b) Electrical equipment in locations the extent and classification of all * * * * * requiring exceptional degrees of hazardous locations, including 14. Section 110.30–7 is revised to read protection as defined in § 110.15–1 of information on— as follows: this chapter must be enclosed to meet at (1) Equipment identification by § 110.30±7 Repairs or alterations. least a NEMA 250 Type 4 or 4X or IEC manufacturer’s name and model The Officer in Charge, Marine IP 56; or NEMA 250 Type 6 or 6P or IEC number; IP 67 degree of protection as appropriate (2) Equipment use within the system; Inspection must be notified before— (a) Alterations or modifications that for the service intended. Each enclosure (3) Cable parameters; must be designed in such a way that the (4) Equipment locations; deviate from approved plans; or (b) Repairs, alterations, or total rated temperature of the equipment (5) Installation details; and inside the enclosure is not exceeded. (6) Independent laboratory certificate modifications that affect the safety of the vessel. (c) Central control consoles and of testing. similar control enclosures must be (j) Plans and installation instructions PART 111ÐELECTRICAL SYSTEMSÐ manufactured to at least NEMA 250 for each approved component of an GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Type 2 or IEC IP 32 degree of protection intrinsically safe system listed or regardless of location. certified by an independent laboratory 15. The authority citation for part 111 (d) Equipment for interior locations (see § 111.105–11 of this chapter). is revised to read as follows: not requiring exceptional degrees of * * * * * Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; 49 CFR protection must be manufactured to at (l) Plans and information sufficient to 1.46. least NEMA 250 Type 1 with dripshield evaluate equipment to be considered for 16. In § 111.01–1, paragraph (c) is or IEC IP 11. equivalency under § 110.20–1. added to read as follows: Note to § 111.01–9: The degrees of (m) * * * protection designated in this section are Note to paragraph (m): This equipment § 111.01±1 General. described in NEMA Standards Publication evaluation is generally performed by the * * * * * No. 250 and IEC IP Code 529. 28276 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

20. Section 111.01–15 is revised to 24. Section 111.05–7 is revised to read 30. Section 111.05–29 is revised to read as follows: as follows: read as follows: § 111.01±15 Temperature ratings. § 111.05±7 Armored and metallic-sheathed § 111.05±29 Dual voltage direct current (a) In this subchapter, an ambient cable. systems. temperature of 40°C is assumed except When installed, the metallic armor or Each dual voltage direct current as otherwise stated. sheath must meet the installation system must have a suitably sensitive (b) A 50°C ambient temperature is requirements of IEC 92–3 or section 20 ground detection system which assumed for all rotating electrical of IEEE Std 45. indicates current in the ground machinery in boiler rooms, engine 25. Section 111.05–9 is revised to read connection, has a range of at least 150 rooms, auxiliary machinery rooms, and as follows: percent of neutral current rating and weather decks, unless it can be shown indicates the polarity of the fault. § 111.05±9 Masts. that a 45°C ambient temperature will 31. Section 111.05–33 is revised to not be exceeded in these spaces. Each nonmetallic mast and topmast read as follows: (c) A 45°C ambient temperature is must have a lightning ground conductor. § 111.05±33 Equipment grounding assumed for cable and all other (non- conductors. rotating) electrical equipment in boiler 26. Section 111.05–19 is revised to (a) Each equipment grounding rooms, engine rooms, auxiliary read as follows: conductor must be sized in accordance machinery rooms, and weather decks. § 111.05±19 Tank vessels; grounded with article 250–95 of the National (d) Unless otherwise indicated in this distribution systems. ° Electrical Code (the NEC) (NFPA 70). subchapter, a 55 C ambient temperature (a) If the voltage of a distribution (b) Each grounding conductor of a is assumed for all control and system is less than 1,000 volts, line to cable must be permanently identified as instrumentation equipment. line, a tank vessel must not have a a grounding conductor in accordance (e) If electrical equipment is utilized grounded distribution system. with the requirements of article 310– in a space in which the equipment’s (b) If the voltage of a distribution 12(b) of the NEC. rated ambient temperature is below the system on a tank vessel is 1,000 volts or 32. Section 111.05–37 is revised to assumed ambient temperature of the greater, line to line, and the distribution read as follows: space, its load must be derated. The system is grounded, any resulting assumed ambient temperature of the current must not flow through a § 111.05±37 Overcurrent devices. space plus the equipment’s actual hazardous (classified) location. (a) A permanently grounded temperature rise at its derated load must 27. In § 111.05–23, paragraph (d) is conductor must not have an overcurrent not exceed the equipment’s total rated added to read as follows: device unless the overcurrent device temperature (equipment’s rated ambient simultaneously opens each ungrounded temperature plus its rated temperature § 111.05±23 Location of ground detection conductor of the circuit. rise). indicators. (b) The neutral conductor of the 21. Section 111.01–17 is revised to * * * * * emergency-main switchboard bus-tie read as follows: (d) Be provided (at the distribution must not have a switch or circuit switchboard or at another location, such breaker. § 111.01±17 Voltage and frequency as a centralized monitoring position for variations. the circuit affected) for each branch § 111.05±39 [Removed] Unless otherwise stated, electrical circuit that is isolated from the main 33. Section 111.05–39 is removed. equipment must function at variations source by a transformer or other device. 34. In § 111.10–1, paragraph (a) is ± of at least 5 percent of rated frequency 28. Section 111.05–25 is revised to revised to read as follows: and +6 percent to ¥10 percent of rated read as follows: voltage. This limitation does not address § 111.10±1 Definitions. transient conditions. § 111.05±25 Ungrounded systems. * * * * * 22. Section 111.01–19 is added to Each ungrounded system must be (a) Ships’s service loads mean read as follows: provided with a suitably sensitive electrical equipment for all auxiliary ground detection system located at the services necessary for maintaining the § 111.01±19 Inclination of the vessel. respective switchboard which provides vessel in a normal, operational and (a) All electrical equipment must be continuous indication of circuit status habitable condition. Ship’s service loads designed and installed to operate under to ground with a provision to include, but are not limited to, all any combination of the following momentarily remove the indicating safety, lighting, ventilation, conditions: device from the reference ground. navigational, communications, (1) 15 degrees static list, 22.5 degrees 29. Section 111.05–27 is revised to habitability, and auxiliary propulsion dynamic roll; and read as follows: loads. Electrical propulsion motor, bow (2) 7.5 degrees static trim. thruster motor, cargo transfer, drilling, (b) All emergency installations must § 111.05±27 Grounded neutral alternating cargo refrigeration for other than Class be designed and installed to operate current systems. 5.2 organic peroxides and Class 4.1 self- when the vessel is at 22.5 degrees list Each system must have a suitably reactive substances, and other industrial and 10 degrees trim. sensitive ground detection system type loads are not included. 23. In § 111.05–1, the text, excluding which indicates current in the ground * * * * * the note, is revised to read as follows: connection, be able to withstand the 35. Section 111.10–3 is revised to read maximum available fault current as follows: § 111.05±1 Purpose. without damage, and provides This subpart contains requirements continuous indication of circuit status § 111.10±3 Two generating sources. for the grounding of electric systems, to ground with a provision to In addition to the emergency power circuits, and equipment. momentarily remove the indicating sources required under part 112 of this * * * * * device from the reference ground. chapter, each self-propelled vessel and Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28277 each mobile offshore drilling unit must the main-engine-dependent generator engine. If the generator is operating from have at least two electric generating tripping off-line due to a change in the a power take-off, such as a shaft driven sources. speed or direction of the main generator on a main propulsion engine, 36. Section 111.10–4 is revised to read propulsion unit. the generator must automatically as follows: 37. In § 111.10–7, paragraph (b) is declutch (disconnect) from the prime revised to read as follows: mover upon loss of lubricating pressure § 111.10±4. Power requirements, to generator bearings. generating sources. § 111.10±7 Dead ship. (a) The aggregate capacity of the * * * * * § 111.12±3 [Amended] electric’s ship’s service generating (b) If the emergency generator is used 41. In § 111.12–3, remove the words sources required in § 111.10–3 must be for part or all of the electric power ‘‘Section 35.23 of the American Bureau sufficient for the ship’s service loads. necessary to start the main propulsion of Shipping’s ‘Rules for Building and (b) With the ship’s service generating plant from a dead ship condition, the Classing Steel Vessels,’ ’’ and add, in source of the largest capacity stopped, emergency generator must be capable of their place, the words, ‘‘section 4/5.23 the combined capacity of the remaining providing power to all emergency of the ABS Rules or, for a mobile electric ship’s service generating source lighting, emergency internal offshore drilling unit, section 4/3.23 of or sources must be sufficient to supply communications systems, and fire the ABS MODU Rules,’’. those services necessary to provide detection and alarm systems in addition 42. Section 111.12–5 is revised to read normal operational conditions of to the power utilized for starting the as follows: propulsion and safety, and minimum main propulsion plant. Additional comfortable conditions of habitability. requirements are in § 112.05–3(c) of this § 111.12±5 Generator construction and testing. Habitability services include cooking, chapter. heating, air conditioning (where 38. Section 111.10–9 is revised to read Each generator must meet the installed), domestic refrigeration, as follows: applicable construction and test mechanical ventilation, sanitation, and requirements of section 4/5 of the ABS fresh water. § 111.10±9 Rules, or for mobile offshore drilling (c) The capacity of the ship’s service units, section 4/3 of the ABS MODU generating sources must be sufficient for Ship's service supply transformer; 2 Rules. required. supplying the ship’s service loads 43. Section 111.12–7 is revised to read without the use of a generating source If transformers are used to supply the as follows: which is dependent upon the speed or ship’s service distribution system direction of the main propelling engines required by this subpart for ships and § 111.12±7 Voltage regulation and parallel operation. or shafting. mobile offshore drilling units, there (d) Operating generators must provide must be at least two installed, Voltage regulation and parallel a continuous and uninterrupted source independent power transformers. With operation must meet sections 4/5.31 and of power for the ship’s service load the largest transformer out of service, 4/5.33 of the ABS Rules, or for mobile under normal operational conditions. the capacity of the remaining units must offshore drilling units, sections 4/3.31 Any vessel speed change or throttle be sufficient to supply the ship service and 4/3.33 of the ABS MODU Rules. loads. movement must not cause a ship’s § 111.12±11 [Amended] service load power interruption. Note to § 111.10–9: A ship’s service supply 44. In § 111.12–11, in paragraph (c)(1), (e) Vessels with electric propulsion system would consist of transformers, remove the words ‘‘inverse time’’ and that have two or more constant-voltage overcurrent protection devices, and cables, add, in their place, the word ‘‘longtime’’ generators which supply both ship’s and would normally be located in the system and, in the heading to paragraph (d), service and propulsion power do not between a medium voltage bus and a low remove the words ‘‘inverse time’’ and need additional ship’s service voltage ship’s service switchboard. add, in their place, the words ‘‘longtime generators provided that with any one § 111.10±11 [Removed] overcurrent’’. propulsion/ship’s service generator out 39. Section 111.10–11 is removed. 45. Section 111.15–1 is revised to read of service the capacity of the remaining 40. Section 111.12–1 is revised to read as follows: generator(s) is sufficient for the as follows: electrical loads necessary to provide § 111.15±1 General. normal operational conditions of § 111.12±1 Prime movers. Each battery must meet the propulsion and safety, and minimum (a) Prime movers must meet part 58, requirements of this subpart. comfortable conditions of habitability. subpart 58.10, of this chapter, section 4/ 46. Section 111.15–2 is revised to read (f) A generator driven by a main 5.21 of the ABS Rules, and for mobile as follows: propulsion unit (such as a shaft offshore drilling units, section 4/3.21 of generator) which is capable of providing the ABS MODU Rules. Additional § 111.15±2 Battery construction. electrical power continuously, requirements for prime movers for (a) A battery cell, when inclined at 40 regardless of the speed and direction of emergency generators are in part 112, degrees from the vertical, must not spill the propulsion shaft, may be considered subpart 112.50, of this chapter. electrolyte. one of the ship’s service generating sets (b) Each generator prime mover must (b) Each fully charged lead-acid required by § 111.10–3. A main-engine- have an overspeed device that is battery must have a specific gravity that dependent generator which is not independent of the normal operating meets section 16 of IEEE Std 45. capable of providing continuous governor and adjusted so that the speed (c) Batteries must not evolve hydrogen electrical power may be utilized as a cannot exceed the maximum rated at a rate exceeding that of a similar size supplemental generator provided that a speed by more than 15 percent. lead-acid battery under similar charging required ship’s service generator or (c) Each prime mover must shut down condition. generators having sufficient capacity to automatically upon loss of lubricating (d) Batteries must be constructed to supply the ship’s service loads can be pressure to the generator bearings if the take into account the environmental automatically brought on line prior to generator is directly coupled to the conditions of a marine installation, 28278 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations including temperature, vibration, and lining to a height of at least 76 mm (3 55. Section 111.30–1 is revised to read shock. inches) that meets paragraphs (f)(2) and as follows: 47. In § 111.15–3, the introductory (f)(3) of this section. text and paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) are 49. In § 111.15–10, paragraph (g) is § 111.30±1 Location and installation. redesignated as paragraphs (a) revised to read as follows: Each switchboard must meet the introductory text, (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) location and installation requirements § 111.15±10 Ventilation. and paragraph (b) is added to read as of section 17.1 of IEEE Std 45 or IEC 92– follows: * * * * * 302, as applicable. (g) Boxes for small battery 56. Section 111.30–4 is revised to read § 111.15±3 Battery categories. installations. Each box for a small as follows: * * * * * battery installation must have openings near the top to allow escape of gas. If the § 111.30±4 Circuit breakers removable (b) Batteries that generate less from the front. hydrogen under normal charging and installation is in a non-environmentally- Circuit breakers, when installed on discharging conditions than an controlled location, the installation generator or distribution switchboards, equivalent category of lead-acid must prevent the ingress of water. must be mounted or arranged in such a batteries (e.g., sealed batteries) may have 50. Section 111.15–20 is revised to manner that the circuit breaker may be their battery category reduced to an read as follows: removed from the front without equivalent category of lead-acid § 111.15±20 Conductors. unbolting bus or cable connections or batteries. (a) Each conductor penetration to a deenergizing the supply, unless the 48. In § 111.15–5, paragraphs (a), (c), battery room must be made watertight. switchboard is divided into sections, (e), (f), and (g) and the last sentence of (b) The termination of each cable such that each section is capable of paragraph (d) are revised to read as must be sealed to prevent the entrance providing power to maintain the vessel follows and paragraph (h) is removed: of electrolyte by spray or creepage. in a navigable condition, and meets § 111.15±5 Battery installation. (c) Each connecting cable must have § 111.30–24 (a) and (b). sufficient capacity to carry the (a) Large batteries. Each large battery 57. Section 111.30–5 is revised to read maximum charging current or maximum installation must be in a room that is as follows: discharge current, whichever is greater. only for batteries or a box on deck. 51. Section 111.15–30 is revised to § 111.30±5 Construction. Installed electrical equipment must read as follows: (a) All low voltage and medium meet the hazardous location voltage switchboards (as ‘‘low voltage’’ requirements in support 111.105 of this § 111.15±30 Battery chargers. and ‘‘medium voltage’’ are defined in part. Each battery charger enclosure must the standard used) must meet— * * * * * meet § 111.01–9. Additionally, each (1) For low voltages, either section (c) Small batteries. Small size battery charger must be suitable for the size and 17.2 of IEEE Std 45 or IEC 92–302, installations must be located in well- type of battery installation that it serves. clause 6; or ventilated spaces. They must not be Chargers incorporating ground (2) For medium voltages, either located in closets, staterooms, or similar autotransformers must not be used. section 17.3 of IEEE Std 45 or IEC 92– spaces, unless the batteries are sealed. Except for rectifiers, chargers with a 503, as appropriate. (d) * * *. Each battery tray must voltage exceeding 20 percent of the line (b) Each switchboard must be fitted provide adequate accessibility for voltage must be provided with with a dripshield unless the installation, maintenance, and removal automatic protection against reversal of switchboard is a deck-to-overhead of the batteries. current. mounted type which cannot be (e) Nameplates. Each battery must be 52. Section 111.20–1 is revised to read subjected to leaks or falling objects. provided with the name of its as follows: §§ 111.30±9, 111.30±11, and 111.30±13 manufacturer, model number, type § 111.20±1 General requirements. designation, either the cold cranking [Removed] amp rating or the amp-hour rating at a Each transformer winding must be 58. Sections 111.30–9, 111.30–11, and specific discharge and, for a lead-acid resistant to moisture, sea atmosphere, 111.30–13 are removed. battery, the fully charged specific and oil vapor, unless special 59. Section 111.30–19 is revised to precautions are taken, such as enclosing gravity value. This information must be read as follows: the winding in an enclosure with a high permanently fixed to the battery. § 111.30±19 Buses and wiring. (f) Lining in battery rooms and degree of ingress protection. 53. Section 111.20–15 is revised to (a) General. Each bus must meet the lockers. (1) Each battery room and read as follows: requirements of either— locker must have a watertight lining that (1) Section 17.11 of IEEE Std 45; or is— § 111.20±15 Transformer overcurrent (2) IEC 92–302 (clause 6). (i) On each shelf to a height of at least protection. (b) Wiring. Instrumentation and 76 mm (3 inches); or Each transformer must have control wiring must be— (ii) On the deck to a height of at least protection against overcurrent that (1) Suitable for installation within in 152 mm (6 inches). meets article 450 of the NEC or IEC 92– a switchboard enclosure and be rated at (2) For lead-acid batteries, the lining 303. 90° C or higher; must be 1.6 mm (1⁄16 inch) thick lead or 54. Section 111.25–5, paragraph (a) is (2) Stranded copper; other material that is corrosion-resistant revised to read as follows: (3) No. 14 AWG (2.10 mm 2) or larger to the electrolyte of the battery. or be ribbon cable or similar conductor (3) For alkaline batteries, the lining § 111.25±5 Marking. size cable recommended for use in low- must be 0.8 mm (1⁄32 inch) thick steel or (a) Each motor must have a marking power instrumentation, monitoring, or other material that is corrosion-resistant or nameplate that meets either article control circuits by the equipment to the electrolyte of the battery. 430–7 of the NEC or IEC 92–301 (clause manufacturer; (g) Lining of battery boxes. Each 16). (4) Flame retardant meeting ANSI/UL battery box must have a watertight * * * * * 1581 test VW–1 or IEC 332–1; Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28279

(5) Extra flexible, if used on a hinged § 111.33±11 Propulsion systems. the operation of fuses and thermally panel; and Each power semiconductor rectifier controlled circuit breakers must be (6) In compliance with § 111.60–11. system in a propulsion system must taken into consideration. meet section 4/5.84 of ABS Rules or, for §§ 111±30±21 and 111.30±23 [Removed] * * * * * mobile offshore drilling units, section 4/ 73. In § 111.52–1, the introductory 60. Sections 111.30–21 and 111.30–23 3.84 of ABS MODU Rules. text is revised to read as follows: are removed. 67. Section 111.35–1 is revised to read 61. In § 111.30–24 the introductory as follows: § 111.52±1 General. text is revised to read as follows: The available short-circuit current § 111.35±1 Electrical propulsion must be computed— § 111.30±24 Generation systems greater installations. than 3000 kW. Each electric propulsion system * * * * * 74. Section 111.52–5 is revised to read Except on a non-self-propelled mobile installation must meet sections 4/5.79, as follows: offshore drilling unit (MODU) and a 4/5.81, 4/5.83, and 4/5.84 ABS Rules or, non-self-propelled floating Outer for mobile offshore drilling units, § 111.52±5 Systems 1500 kilowatts or Continental Shelf facility, when the sections 4/3.79, 4/3.81, 4/3.83, and 4/ above. total installed electric power of the 3.84 of ABS MODU Rules. Short-circuit calculations must be ship’s service generation system is more § 111.40±1 [Removed] submitted for systems with an aggregate than 3000 kW, the switchboard must generating capacity of 1500 kilowatts or 68. Section 111.40–1 is removed. have the following: more by utilizing one of the following * * * * * 69. Section 111.40–5 is revised to read as follows: methods: 62. In § 111.30–29, paragraphs (b) (a) Exact calculations using actual through (f) are redesignated as § 111.40±5 Enclosure. impedance and reactance values of paragraphs (d) through (h) and new Each panelboard must have a system components. paragraphs (b) and (c) are added to read noncombustible enclosure that meets (b) Estimated calculations using the as follows: §§ 111.01–7 and 111.01–9. Naval Sea Systems Command Design Data Sheet DDS 300–2. § 111.30±29 Emergency switchboards. 70. Section 111.40–7 is revised to read as follows: (c) Estimated calculations using IEC * * * * * 363. (b) There must be a test switch at the § 111.40±7 Location. (d) The estimated calculations using a emergency switchboard to simulate a Each panelboard must be accessible commercially established analysis failure of the normal power source and but not in a bunker or a cargo hold, procedure for utility or industrial cause the emergency loads to be except a cargo hold on a roll-on/roll-off applications. supplied from the emergency power vessel. 75. Section 111.53–1 is revised to read source. 71. Section 111.50–2 is added to read as follows: (c) The emergency switchboard must as follows: be as near as practicable to the § 111.53±1 General. emergency power source but not in the § 111.50±2 Systems integration. (a) Each fuse must— same space as a battery emergency The electrical characteristics of each (1) Meet the general provisions of power source. overcurrent protective device must be article 240 of the NEC or IEC 92–202 as * * * * * compatible with other devices and its appropriate; coordination must be considered in the (2) Have an interrupting rating § 111.30±31 [Removed] design of the entire protective system. sufficient to interrupt the asymmetrical 63. Section 111.30–31 is removed. Note to § 111.50–2: The electrical RMS short circuit current at the point of 64. In § 111.33–3, redesignate characteristics of overcurrent protective application; and paragraphs (a) and (b) as paragraphs (b) devices may differ between standards. The (3) Be listed by an independent and (c) and add a new paragraph (a) to interchangeability and compatibility of laboratory. read as follows: components complying with differing (b) Renewable link cartridge-type standards cannot be assumed. fuses must not be used. § 111.33±3 Nameplate data. 72. In § 111.50–3, paragraph (c) is (c) Each fuse installation must (a) Each semiconductor rectifier revised to read as follows; paragraph (d) provide for ready access to test the system must have a nameplate of is removed; paragraphs (e) through (h) condition of the fuse. durable material affixed to the unit that are redesignated as paragraphs (d) 76. In § 111.54–1, paragraphs (a), (b), meets the requirements of— through (g); and, at the end of and (c) are revised to read as follows: (1) Section 45.11 of IEEE Std 45; or redesignated paragraphs (e) and (g)(2), (2) IEC 92–304 (clause 8). add the words ‘‘or in IEC 92–202’’: § 111.54±1 Circuit breakers. * * * * * (a) Each Circuit breaker must— 65. Section 111.33–5 is revised to read § 111.50±3 Protection of conductors. (1) Meet the general provision of as follows: * * * * * article 240 of the NEC or IEC 92–202, as (c) Fuses and circuit breakers. If the appropriate; § 111.33±5 Installation. allowable current carrying capacity of (2) Meet subpart 111.55 of this part; Each semiconductor rectifier system the conductor does not correspond to a and must meet the installation requirements, standard fuse or circuit breaker rating (3) Have an interrupting rating as appropriate, of— which meets article 240–6 of the NEC or sufficient to interrupt the maximum (a) Sections 45.2, 45.7, and 45.8 of IEC 92–202 and the next larger standard asymmetrical short-circuit current IEEE Std 45; or fuse or circuit breaker rating is used, it available at the point of application. (b) IEC 92–304. must not be larger than 150 percent of (b) Molded case circuit breakers must 66. Section 111.33–11 is revised to the current carrying capacity of the not be used in circuits having a nominal read as follows: conductor. The effect of temperature on voltage of more than 600 volts (1,000 28280 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations volts for circuits containing circuit (b) Each cable constructed to IEC 92– § 111.60±3 Cable Application. breaks manufactured to IEC 3 must meet the flammability (a) Cable constructed in accordance requirements). Each molded case circuit requirements of IEC 332–3, Category A. with IEEE Std 45 must meet the cable breaker must meet UL 489 and its (c) Electric cable that has a polyvinyl application section 19 of IEEE Std 45. marine supplement 489 SA or IEC 947– chloride insulation with a nylon jacket Cable constructed in accordance with 2 Part 2, except as noted in paragraph (Type T/N) must meet the requirements IEC 92–3 must meet the requirements of (e) of this section. for polyvinyl chloride insulated cable in section 19 of IEEE Std 45 except 19.6.1, (c) Circuit breakers, other than the section 18 of IEEE Std 45, except— 19.6.4, and 19.8. Cable constructed in molded case type, that are for use in one (1) The thickness of the polyvinyl accordance with IEC 92–3 must comply of the following systems must meet the chloride insulation must meet UL 83 for with the ampacity values of IEC 92–352, following requirements: type THWN wire; Table 1. (1) An alternating current system (2) Each conductor must have a nylon (b) Type T/N cables must meet section having a nominal voltage of 600 volts or jacket; 19 of IEEE Std 45 for Type T insulation. less, or 1,000 volts for IEC standard (3) The thickness of the nylon jacket (c) Cables constructed in accordance circuit breakers must meet— must meet UL 83 for type THWN wire; with IEEE Std 45 must be derated in (i) IEEE C37.13; accordance with Table A6, Note 6 of (ii) IEEE Std 331; or (4) The material of the nylon jacket must meet ASTM D 4066–94b Type VIII; IEEE Std 45. Cables constructed in (iii) IEC 947–2, Part 2. accordance with IEC 92–3 must be (5) The cable must have identification (2) A direct current system of 3,000 derated in accordance with IEC 92–352, provided by a durable printing or volts or less must meet ANSI C37.14 or paragraph 8. MIL–C–24640A and MIL– embossing on the cable jacket or a IEC 947–2, Part 2. C–24643A cable must be derated in marker under the cable jacket that gives, (3) An alternating current system accordance with MIL–HDBK–299(SH). at intervals not exceeding 610 mm (24 having a nominal voltage greater than (d) Cables for special applications inches), the information required by 600 volts, or greater than 1,000 volts for must meet section 19.6.5 of IEEE Std 45. section 18.8 of IEEE Std 45; and IEC standard circuit breakers must 84. Section 111.60–4 is revised to read meet— (6) Type T (T/N) insulations are as follows: (i) ANSI/IEEE C37.04 including all limited to a 75° C maximum conductor referenced supplements, IEEE Std 320 temperature rating. § 111.60±4 Minimum cable conductor size. including all referenced supplements, (d) Electrical cable regardless of Each cable conductor must be #18 and ANSI C37.12; or construction must meet, at a minimum, AWG (0.82 mm2) or larger except— (ii) IEC 947–2, Part 2. all of the performance and marking (a) Each power and lighting cable * * * * * requirements of section 18 of IEEE Std conductor must be #14 AWG (2.10 mm2) 45. or larger; and §§ 111.55±5, 111.55±7, and 111.55±9 (e) Medium voltage electric cable (b) Each thermocouple, pyrometer, or [Removed] must meet the requirements of IEEE Std instrumentation cable conductor must 77. Sections 111.55–5, 111.55–7, and 45 and UL 1072, where applicable, for be #22 AWG (0.33 mm2) or larger. 111.55–9 are removed. cables rated above 5,000 volts. 85. In § 111.60–5, paragraph (a) is § 111.57±1 (Subpart 111.57) [Removed] (f) Direct current electric cable for revised; paragraph (b) is redesignated as industrial applications only must be paragraph (c); and new paragraphs (b) 78. Subpart 111.57 consisting of and (d) are added to read as follows: § 111.57–1 is removed. constructed and labeled in accordance 79. Section 111.59–1 is revised to read with IADC–DCCS–1/1991. § 111.60±5 Cable installation. 82. Section 111.60–2 is added to read as follows: (a) Each cable installation must as follows: § 111.59±1 General. meet— § 111.60±2 Specialty cable for (1) Sections 20 and 22, except 20.11, Each busway must meet article 364 of communication and RF applications. of IEEE Std 45; or the NEC. Specialty cables that cannot pass the (2) IEC 92–3 and paragraph 8 of IEC 80. Section 111.59–3 is revised to read 92–352. as follows: flammability test contained in IEEE Std 45, IEEE Std 1202, ANSI/UL 1581 test (b) Each cable installation made in § 111.59±3 No mechanical cooling. VW–1, or IEC 332–3 Category A due to accordance with paragraph 8 of IEC 92– A busway must not need mechanical unique construction properties, such as 352 must utilize the conductor ampacity cooling to operate within its rating. certain coaxial cables, must— values of Table I of IEC 92–352. 81. Section 111.60–1 is revised to read (a) Be installed physically separate * * * * * as follows: from all other cable; and (d) Braided cable armor or cable (b) Have fire stops installed— metallic sheath must not be used as the § 111.60±1 Cable construction and testing. (1) At least every 7 meters (21.5 feet) grounding conductor. (a) Each cable must meet all the vertically, up to a maximum of 2 deck 86. Section 111.60–6 is added to read construction and identification heights; as follows: requirements of either IEEE Std 45, IEC (2) At least every 15 meters (46 feet) 92–3, MIL–C–24640A, or MIL–C– § 111.60±6 Fiber optic cable. horizontally; 24643A and the respective flammability Each fiber optic cable must— tests contained therein and be of a (3) At each penetration of an A or B (a) Be constructed to pass the cooper stranded type. Class boundary; flammability test contained in IEEE Std (4) At each location where the cable 45, IEEE Std 1202, ANSI/UL 1581 test Note to paragraph (a): MIL–C–915 cable is enters equipment; or acceptable only for repairs and replacements VW–1, or IEC 332–3 Category A; or in kind. MIL–C–915 cable is no longer (5) In a cableway that has an A–60 fire (b) Be installed in accordance with acceptable for alterations, modifications, rating. § 111.60–2. conversions, or new construction. (See 83. Section 111.60–3 is revised to read 87. Section 111.60–11 is revised to § 110.01–3 of this chapter). as follows: read as follows: Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28281

§ 111.60±11 Wire. (1) Have a corrugated sheath of (2) Each propulsion motor circuit and (a) Wire must be in an enclosure. aluminum, or other suitable metal, that protection must meet subpart 111.35 of (b) Wire must be component is close-fitting, impervious, and this part. insulated. continuously-welded and an overall (b) In ungrounded three-phase (c) Wire, other than in switchboards, jacket of an impervious PVC or alternating current systems, only two must meet the requirements in sections thermoset material; motor-running protective devices need 19.6.4 and 19.8 of IEEE Std 45, MIL–W– (2) Be certified or listed by an be utilized in any two ungrounded 76D, MIL–W–16878F, UL 44, or UL 83. independent laboratory; and conductors, except when a wye-delta or (d) Switchboard wire must meet (3) Meet the requirements of UL 1569 a delta-wye transformer is utilized. subpart 111.30 of this part. as marine shipboard cable (UBVZ). * * * * * (e) Wire must be of the copper (c) The cable is not allowed in— 94. Section 111.70–3 is revised to read stranded type. (1) Areas or applications exposed to as follows: 88. In § 111.60–13, paragraph (a) is high vibration, festooning, repeated revised to read as follows: flexing, excessive movement, or § 111.70±3 Motor controllers and motor control centers. twisting; and § 111.60±13 Flexible electric cord and (a) General. The enclosure for each cables. (2) Drilling function areas including, motor controller or motor control center (a) Construction and testing. Each but not limited to, drill floor, draw works, shaker areas, and mud pits of an must meet NEMA No. ICS 2 and NEMA flexible cord and cable must meet the No. 2.3 1983 or meet Table 5 of IEC 92– requirements in section 19.6.1 of IEEE offshore floating drilling and production facility. 201, as appropriate, for the location Std 45, article 400 of the NEC, NEMA where it is installed. In addition, each WC 3, NEMA WC 8, or UL 62. (d) The cable must be installed in accordance with article 334 of the NEC, enclosure in a hazardous location must * * * * * incorporating article 318 where meet subpart 111.105 of this part. 89. Section 111.60–17 is revised to NEMA No. 2.4 provides guidance on the read as follows: referenced. The ampacity values found in table A6 IEEE Std 45 may be used. differences between NEMA and IEC devices for motor service. § 111.60±17 Connections and (e) The side wall pressure on the cable (b) Low-voltage release. Each motor terminations. must not exceed 1,000 pounds per foot controller for a fire pump, elevator, of radius. (a) In general, connections and steering gear, or auxiliary that is vital to (f) Equipment grounding conductors terminations to all conductors must the vessel’s propulsion system, except a in the cable must be sized in accordance retain the original electrical, motor controller for a vital propulsion with article 250–95 of the NEC. System mechanical, flame-retarding, and, where auxiliary which can be restarted from a grounding conductors must be of a necessary, fire-resisting properties of the central control station, must have low- cross-sectional area not less than that of cable. All connecting devices must be voltage release if automatic restart after the normal current carrying conductors suitable for copper stranded conductors. a voltage failure or its resumption to (b) If twist-on type of connectors are of the cable. The metal sheath must be operation is not hazardous. If automatic used, the connections must be made grounded but must not be used as a restart is hazardous, the motor within an enclosure and the insulated required grounding conductor. controller must have low-voltage cap of the connector must be secured to (g) On an offshore floating drilling protection. Motor controllers for other prevent loosening due to vibration. and production facility, the cable may motors must not have low-voltage (c) Twist-on type of connectors may be used as interconnect cable between release unless the starting current and not be used for making joints in cables, production modules and between fixed the short-time sustained current of the facilitating a conductor splice, or distribution panels within the additional low-voltage release load is extending the length of a circuit. production modules, except that within the capacity of one ship’s service 90. Section 111.60–19 is revised to interconnection between production read as follows: generator. Automatic sequential starting and drilling operations is prohibited. of low-voltage release controllers is § 111.60±19 Cable splices. Also, the cable may be used within acceptable to meet this paragraph. columns, provided that the columns are (a) A cable must not be spliced in a (c) Low-voltage protection. Each motor not subject to the conditions described controller must have low-voltage hazardous location, except in in paragraph (c) of this section. intrinsically safe systems. protection, except for the following (h) When the cable is used within a (b) Each cable splice must be made in motor controllers: hazardous (classified) location, listed accordance with section 20.11 of IEEE (1) A motor controller that has low- terminations or fittings, appropriate for Std 45. voltage release under paragraph (b) of use with CWCMC type MC cable and 91. In § 111.60–21, the last sentence is this section. approved for that location, are required. revised to read as follows: (2) A motor controller for a motor of 93. In § 111.70–1, paragraphs (a) and less than 2 horsepower (1.5 kW). § 111.60±21 Cable insulation tests. (b) are revised to read as follows: (d) Identification of controllers. (1) * * *. The insulation resistance must § 111.70±1 General. Each motor controller and motor control not be less than that in section 46.2.1 of center must be marked externally with IEEE Std 45. (a) Each motor circuit, controller, and the following information: 92. Section 111.60–23 is added to protection must meet the requirements (i) Manufacturer’s name or read as follows: of ABS Rules sections 4/5.87 through 4/ identification. 5.94 and 4/5.115.6, ABS MODU Rules (ii) Voltage. § 111.60±23 Metal-clad (type MC) cable. sections 4/3.87 through 4/3.94 and 4/ (iii) Number of phases. (a) The only metal-clad (type MC) 3.115.6, or IEC 92–301, as appropriate, (iv) Current. cable permitted on board a vessel is except the following circuits: (v) kW (Horsepower). continuously welded corrugated metal- (1) Each steering gear motor circuit (vi) Identification of motor being clad (CWCMC) cable. and protection must meet part 58, controlled. (b) The cable must— subpart 58.25, of this chapter. (vii) Current rating of trip setting. 28282 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

(2) Each controller must be provided the door will trip a vital auxiliary off- area of water into which it is to be with heat durable and permanent line. launched or recovered must be elementary wiring/schematic diagram of 97. In § 111.75–1, paragraph (a) is adequately illuminated by lighting the controller located on the door revised to read as follows and paragraph supplied from the emergency power interior. (c) and the note are removed: source. 95. In § 111.70–5, paragraph (a) is (b) The arrangement of circuits must revised and paragraph (c) is added to § 111.75±1 Lighting feeders. be such that the lighting for adjacent read as follows: (a) Passenger vessels. On a passenger launching stations for survival craft or vessel with fire bulkheads forming main rescue boats is supplied by different § 111.70±5 Heater circuits. vertical and horizontal fire zones, the branch circuits. (a) If an enclosure for a motor, master lighting distribution system, including 101. In § 111.75–17, in paragraph (b), switch, or other equipment has an low location egress lighting where remove the word ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and electric heater inside the enclosure that installed, must be arranged so that, to add, in its place, the words ‘‘navigating is energized from a separate circuit, the the maximum extent possible, a fire in bridge’’; paragraphs (d) introductory heater circuit must be disconnected any main vertical and horizontal fire text, (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (e)(3), and from its source of potential by a zone does not interfere with the lighting (e)(4) are revised to read as follows; and disconnect device independent of the in any other fire zone. This requirement paragraph (f) is removed: enclosure containing the heater. The is met if main and emergency feeders heater disconnecting device must be passing through any zone are separated § 111.75±17 Navigation Lights. adjacent to the equipment disconnecting both vertically and horizontally as * * * * * device. A fixed sign, warning the widely as practicable. (d) Navigation lights. Each navigation operator to open both devices, must be * * * * * light must meet the following: on the enclosure of the equipment 98. In § 111.75–5, paragraphs (b) and (1) Meet the technical details of the disconnect device, except as in (g) are removed; paragraphs (c) through applicable navigation rules. (2) Be certified by an independent paragraph (b) of this section. (f) are redesignated as paragraphs (b) laboratory to the requirements of UL * * * * * through (e); and newly redesignated 1104. Portable battery powered lights (c) Electric heaters installed within paragraphs (b) and (d) are revised to need meet only the requirements of the motor controllers and energized from a read as follows: separate circuit must be disconnected in standard applicable to those lights. the same manner as required by § 111.75±5 Lighting branch circuits. (3) Be labeled with a label stating the paragraph (a) of this section or by * * * * * following: (i) ‘‘MEETS lllll.’’ (Insert the § 111.70–7(d). (b) Connected load. The connected 96. In § 111.70–7, paragraphs (d) load on a lighting branch circuit must identification name or number of the introductory text and (d)(2) are revised not be more than 80 percent of the standard under paragraph (d)(2) of this to read as follows: rating of the overcurrent protective section to which the light was type- device, computed on the basis of the tested.) (ii) ‘‘TESTED BY lllll.’’ (Insert § 111.70±7 Remote control, interlock, and lamp sizes. indicator circuits. the name or registered certification mark * * * * * * * * * * of the independent laboratory that (d) Overcurrent protection. Each (d) Switching. In the design of a tested the fixture to the standard under lighting branch circuit must be control, interlock, or indicator circuit, paragraph (d)(2) of this section). protected by an overcurrent device rated all practicable steps must be taken to (iii) Manufacturer’s name. at 20 amperes or less, except as allowed eliminate all but one source of power in (iv) Model number. under paragraph (e) of this section. an enclosure. If the control functions (v) Visibility of the light in nautical make it impracticable to energize a * * * * * miles. control interlock or indicator circuit 99. In § 111.75–15, paragraph (c) is (vi) Date on which the fixture was from the load side of a motor and revised to read as follows: type-tested. (vii) Identification of bulb used in the controller disconnect device and the § 111.75±15 Lighting requirements. compliance test. voltage of the control, interlock, or * * * * * indicator circuit is more than 24 volts, * * * * * (c) Illumination of passenger and crew (e) * * * there must be one of the following spaces. (1) Each space used by alternative methods of switching: (3) Be wired by a short length of passengers or crew must be fitted with heavy-duty, flexible cable to a * * * * * lighting that provides for a safe watertight receptacle outlet next to the (2) Each conductor of a control, habitable and working environment light or, for permanently mounted interlock, or indicator circuit must be under normal conditions. fixtures, by direct run of fixed cable; disconnected from all sources of power (2) Sufficient illumination must be and by a disconnect device actuated by the provided by the emergency lighting (4) If it is a double-lens, two-lamp opening of the controller door, or the source under emergency conditions to type, have each lamp connected to its power must first be disconnected to effect damage control procedures and to branch circuit conductors either by an allow opening of the door. The provide for safe egress from each space. individual flexible cable and watertight disconnect device and its connections, * * * * * receptacle plug or, for permanently including each terminal block for 100. Section 111.75–16 is revised to mounted fixtures, by an individual terminating the vessel’s wiring, must read as follows: direct run of fixed cable. not have any electrically uninsulated or 102. Section 111.75–18 is revised to unshielded surface. When this type of § 111.75±16 Lighting of survival craft and read as follows: disconnect device is used for vital rescue boats. auxiliary circuits, a nameplate must be (a) During preparation, launching, and § 111.75±18 Signaling lights. affixed to the vital auxiliary motor recovery, each survival craft and rescue Each self-propelled vessel over 150 controller door that warns that opening boat, its launching appliance, and the gross tons when engaged on an Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28283 international voyage must have on machinery space so that any location operating level drops below the board an efficient daylight signaling can be reached by a portable power cord manufacturer’s recommended minimum lamp that may not be solely dependent having a length not greater than 24 safe level; or upon the vessel’s main source of meters (75 feet). (2) A flow device that opens all electrical power and that meets the (c) Each receptacle outlet must be conductors to the heater if there is following: compatible with the voltage and current inadequate flow. (a) The axial luminous intensity of the of the circuit in which it is installed. 113. In § 111.87–3, paragraph (a) is beam must be at least 60,000 candelas. (d) Each receptacle outlet must be revised to read as follows: (b) The luminous intensity of the suitable for the environment in which it beam in every direction within an angle is installed and constructed to the § 111.87±3 General requirements. of 0.7 degrees from the axial must be at appropriate NEMA or IEC protection (a) Each electric heater must meet UL least 50 percent of the axial luminous standard as referenced in § 111.01–9. safety and construction standards. intensity. Special attention must be given to * * * * * 103. In § 111.75–20, paragraph (a) is outlets in hazardous locations. revised; in paragraph (b), remove the (e) A receptacle outlet must not have § 111.89±1 (Subpart 111.89) [Removed] word ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and add, in its any exposed live parts with the plug 114. Subpart 111.89 consisting of place, the words ‘‘navigating bridge’’; opening uncovered. § 111.89–1 is removed. and paragraph (e) is added to read as follows: § 111.79±5 [Removed] § 111.91±1 [Amended] 107. Section 111.79–5 is removed. 115. In § 111.91–1 and the section § 111.75±20 Lighting fixtures. § 111.79±7 [Removed] heading, remove ‘‘control’’ and add, in (a) The construction of each lighting its place, ‘‘power, control,’’ and remove fixture must meet— 108. Section 111.79–7 is removed. ‘‘ANSI A17.1’’ and add, in its place, (1) UL 595, until May 3, 1999; 109. Section 111.79–13 is revised to ‘‘ANSI/ASME A17.1 and A17.1A’’. (2) UL 1570, UL 1571, or UL 1572, as read as follows: § 111.91±3 [Removed] applicable, including marine § 111.79±13 Different voltages and power supplement; or types. 116. Section 111.91–3 is removed. (3) IEC 92–306. If receptacle outlets on a vessel are 117. In § 111.95–1, paragraph (b) is * * * * * supplied by different voltages (e.g., 110 revised to read as follows: (e) Non-emergency and decorative volts and 220 volts) or by different types § 111.95±1 Applicability. interior lighting fixtures in of power (e.g., AC and DC), each * * * * * environmentally-protected, non- receptacle outlet must preclude the (b) The provisions of this subpart hazardous locations need only meet the plugging of a portable device into a supplement the requirements for boat applicable UL type-fixture standards in receptacle outlet of an incompatible winches in other parts of this chapter UL 1570 through 1574 (and either the voltage or type of power. under which vessels are certificated and general section of the marine 110. In § 111.81–1, paragraphs (d) in subchapter Q, Equipment approvals. supplement or the general section of UL through (f) are added to read as follows: 595), UL 595, or IEC 92–306. These 118. Section 111.95–3 is revised to fixtures must have vibration clamps on § 111.81±1 Outlet boxes and junction read as follows: boxes; general. fluorescent tubes longer than 103 cm (40 § 111.95±3 General requirements. inches), secure mounting of glassware, * * * * * and rigid mounting. (d) Each outlet box and junction box (a) Each electrical component (e.g., 104. Section 111.77–3 is revised to installation must meet article 370 of the enclosure, motor controller, or motor) read as follows: NEC, UL 50, UL 514 series, or IEC Series must be constructed to the appropriate 92 Publications (e.g., IEC 92–306), as NEMA or IEC degree of protection § 111.77±3 Appliances. appropriate. requirement for the service and All electrical appliances, including, (e) Each outlet or junction box must environment in which it is installed. but not limited to, cooking equipment, be securely attached to its mounting and (b) Each main line emergency dishwashers, refrigerators, and be affixed so as to maintain its disconnect switch, if accessible to an refrigerated drinking water coolers, designated degree of protection. unauthorized person, must have a must meet UL safety and construction (f) Each outlet and junction box must means to lock the switch in the open- standards. Also, this equipment must be be suitable for the environment in circuit position with a padlock or its suitably installed for the location and which it is installed and be constructed equivalent. The switch must not lock in service intended. to the appropriate NEMA or IEC the closed-circuit position. standard. §§ 111.77±5, 111.77±7, 111.77±9, and § 111.95±5 [Removed] 111.77±11 [Removed] §§ 111.81±5, 111.81±7, 111.81±9, 111.81±11, 119. Section 111.95–5 is removed. 105. Sections 111.77–5, 111.77–7, 111.81±13, and 111.83±3 [Removed] 111.77–9, and 111.77–11 are removed. 111. Sections 111.81–5, 111.81–7, § 111.95±7 [Amended] 106. Section 111.79–1 is revised to 111.81–9, 111.81–11, 111.81–13, and 120. In § 111.95–7, the note following read as follows: 111.83–3 are removed. paragraph (e) and figures 111.95–7(e)(1) 112. In § 111.85–1, paragraph (d) is through 111.95–7(e)(5) are removed. § 111.79±1 Receptacle outlets; general. revised to read as follows: (a) There must be a sufficient number § 111.97±5 [Amended] of receptacle outlets in the crew § 111.85±1 Electric oil immersion heaters. 121. In § 111.97–5, in paragraph (c), accommodations for an adequate level * * * * * remove the word ‘‘twice’’ and add, in its of habitability. (d) Either— place, the word ‘‘once’’ and remove the (b) There must be a sufficient number (1) A low-fluid-level device that word ‘‘three’’ and add, in its place, the of receptacle outlets throughout the opens all conductors to the heater if the word ‘‘two’’. 28284 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Subpart 111.99Ð[Amended] 128. Section 111.105–5 is revised to installation instructions and restrictions read as follows: on approved system components. 122. In subpart 111.99, in the subpart Typical instructions and restrictions heading, remove the word ‘‘Firescreen’’ § 111.105±5 System integrity. include information addressing— and add, in its place, the word ‘‘Fire’’. In order to maintain system integrity, (1) Voltage limitations; each individual electrical installation in § 111.99±1 [Amended] (2) Allowable cable parameters; a hazardous location must comply (3) Maximum length of cable 123. In § 111.99–1, remove the words specifically with NEC articles 500–505, permitted; ‘‘firescreen doors on passenger vessels’’ as modified by § 111.105–3, or IEC (4) Ability of system to accept passive and add, in their place, the words ‘‘fire series 79 publications, but not in devices; door holding and release systems, if combination in a manner that would (5) Acceptability of interconnections fitted’’. compromise system integrity or safety. with conductors or other equipment for 124. Section 111.99–3 is revised to Hazardous location equipment must be other intrinsically safe circuits; and read as follows: approved as suitable for use in the (6) Information regarding any § 111.99±3 Definitions. specific hazardous atmosphere in which instructions or restrictions which were it is installed. The use of non-approved a condition of approval of the system or As used in this subpart— equipment is prohibited. Central control panel means a its components. 129. Section 111.105–7 is revised to (d) Each intrinsically safe system manually-operated device on the read as follows: navigating bridge or in the fire control must meet ISA RP 12.6, except room for releasing one or more fire § 111.105±7 Approved equipment. Appendix A.1. 133. Section 111.105–15 is revised to doors; When this subpart or the NEC states read as follows: Fire door means a door that is in a fire that an item of electrical equipment boundary, such as a stairway enclosure must be approved or when IEC 79–0 § 111.105±15 Additional methods of or main vertical zone bulkhead, that is states that an item of electrical protection. not usually kept closed. equipment must be tested or approved Each item of electrical equipment that Fire door holding magnet means an in order to comply with IEC 79 series is— electronmagnet for holding a fire door publications, that item must be— (a) A sand-filled apparatus must meet open. (a) Listed or certified by an IEC 79–5; Local control panel means a independent laboratory as approved for (b) An oil-immersed apparatus must manually-operated device next to a fire use in the hazardous locations in which meet either IEC 79–6 or NEC article door for releasing the door so that the it is installed; or 500–2; fire door self-closing mechanism may (b) Purged and pressurized equipment (c) Type of protection ‘‘e’’ must meet close the door. that meets NFPA No. 496 or IEC 79–2. IEC 79–7; 125. Section 111.99–5 is revised to 130. Section 111.105–9 is revised to (d) Type of protection ‘‘n’’ must meet read as follows: read as follows: IEC 79–15; and § 111.99±5 General. § 111.105±9 Explosionproof and (e) Type of protection ‘‘m’’ must meet IEC 79–18. Fire door release systems, if installed, flameproof equipment. 134. Section 111.105–17 is revised to must meet SOLAS 74, regulation II–2/ Each item of electrical equipment that read as follows: 30.4.3. is required in this subpart to be 126. Section 111.105–1 and its note explosionproof under the NEC § 111.105±17 Wiring methods for are revised to read as follows: classification system must be approved hazardous locations. as meeting UL 1203. Each item of (a) Through runs of marine shipboard § 111.105±1 Applicability. electrical equipment that is required in cable meeting subpart 111.60 of this part this subpart to be flameproof must be This subpart applies to installations are required for all hazardous locations. approved as meeting IEC 79–1. in hazardous locations as defined in the Additionally, for all Division 1 (Zone 0, NEC and in IEC 79–0. § 111.105±10 [Removed] 1, 10, and Z) locations, cable must be Note to § 111.105–1: Chemicals and 131. Section 111.105–10 is removed. armored or metal sheathed MI type. materials in addition to those listed in Table 132. Section 111.105–11 is revised to (b) Where conduit is installed, the 500–2 of the NEC and IEC 79–12 are listed read as follows: applicable requirements of either the in subchapter O of this chapter. NEC or IEC 79 must be followed. 127. Section 111.105–3 is added to § 111.105±11 Intrinsically safe systems. (c) Each cable entrance into read as follows: (a) Each system required under this explosionproof or flameproof equipment subpart to be intrinsically safe must use must be made with approved seal § 111.105±3 General requirements. approved components meeting UL 913 fittings, termination fittings, or glands All electrical installations in or IEC 79–11. that meet the requirements of § 111.105– hazardous locations must comply with (b) Each electric cable of an 9. the general requirements of section 43 of intrinsically safe system must— (d) Each cable entrance into Class II IEEE Std 45 and either the NEC articles (1) Be 50 mm (2 inches) or more from and Class III (Zone 10, 11, Z, or Y) 500–505 or IEC series 79 publications. cable of non-intrinsically safe circuits, equipment must be made with dust- When installations are made in partitioned by a grounded metal barrier tight cable entrance seals approved for accordance with the NEC articles, from other non-intrinsically safe electric the installation. marine shipboard cable that complies cables, or a shielded or metallic armored 135. Section 111.105–9 is revised to with subpart 111.60 of this chapter may cable; and read as follows: be used instead of rigid metal conduit, (2) Not contain conductors for non- if installed fittings are approved for the intrinsically safe systems. § 111.105±19 Switches. specific hazardous location and the (c) As part of plan approval, the A switch that is explosionproof or cable type. manufacturer must provide appropriate flameproof, or that controls any Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28285 explosionproof or flameproof (4) Within 10 meters (33 ft) of vent § 111.105±39 Additional requirements for equipment, under § 111.105–19 must outlets for free flow of vapor mixtures vessels carrying vehicles with fuel in their have a pole for each ungrounded and high velocity vent outlets for the tanks. conductor. passage of large amounts of vapor, air or Each vessel that carries vehicles with 136. Section 111.105–21 is revised to inert gas mixtures during cargo loading fuel in their tanks must meet the read as follows: and ballasting or during discharging. requirements of ABS Rule 4/5.157, * * * * * except as follows: § 111.105±21 Ventilation. (a) If the ventilation requirement of A ventilation duct which ventilates a (n) Duct keel ventilation or lighting. ABS Rule 4/5.157 is not met, all hazardous location has the classification (1) Each pipe tunnel, double bottom or installed electrical equipment must be of that location. Each fan for ventilation duct keel ventilation and lighting suitable for a Class I, Division 1; Zone of a hazardous location must be system must meet ABS Rule section 4/ 0; or Zone 1 hazardous location. nonsparking. 5.151.7. (b) If the vessel is fitted with an (2) If a fixed gas detection system is approved fixed gas detection system set §§ 111.105±23 and 111.105±25 [Removed] installed, it must meet the requirements at 25 percent the LEL, each item of the 137. Sections 111.105–23 and of SOLAS 74 and ABS Rules section 4/ installed electrical equipment must 111.105–25 are removed. 5. meet the requirements for a Class I, 138. In § 111.105–29, the introductory 140. In § 111.105–32, the section Division 1; Class I, Division 2; Zone 0; text and paragraphs (a) and (b) are heading and paragraphs (c) and (e) are Zone 1; or Zone 2 hazardous location. redesignated as paragraphs (a), (a)(1), revised to read as follows: 144. Section 111.105–40 is added to and (a)(2); and paragraphs (b) and (c) are read as follows: added to read as follows: § 111.105±32 Bulk liquefied flammable gas and ammonia carriers. § 111.105±40 Additional requirements for § 111.105±29 Combustible liquid cargo * * * * * RO/RO vessels. carriers. (c) Each submerged cargo pump motor (a) Each RO/RO vessel must meet ABS * * * * * design must receive concept approval Rule 4/5.160. (b) If a submerged cargo pump motor by the Commandant (G–MSE) and its (b) Each item of installed electrical is in a cargo tank, it must meet the installation must receive plan approval equipment must meet the requirements requirements of § 111.105–31(d). by the Commanding Officer, Marine for a Class I, Division 1; Class 1, (c) Where the cargo is heated to Safety Center. Division 2; Zone 0; Zone 1; or Zone 2 within 15°C of its flashpoint, the cargo hazardous location when installed 460 * * * * * pumproom must meet the requirements mm (18 inches) or more above the deck of § 111.105–31(f) and the weather (e) A submerged cargo pump motor, if of closed cargo spaces. Electrical locations must meet § 111.10531(1). installed in a cargo tank, must meet equipment installed within 460 mm (18 139. In § 111.105–31, paragraphs (e) § 111.105–31(d). inches) of the deck must be suitable for and (l) introductory text are revised and * * * * * either a Class 1, Division 1; Zone 0; or paragraphs (l)(3), (l)(4), and (n) are 141. Section 111.105–35 is revised to Zone 1 hazardous location. added to read as follows: read as follows: (c) Where the ventilation requirement of ABS Rule 4/5.160 is not met— § 111.105±31 Flammable or combustible § 111.105±35 Vessels carrying coal. (1) All installed electrical equipment cargo with a flashpoint below 60 degrees C must be suitable for a Class 1, Division (140 degrees F), liquid sulfur and inorganic (a) The following are Class II, Division acid carriers. 1, (Zone 10 or Z) locations on a vessel 1; Zone 0; or Zone 1 hazardous location; that carries coal: or * * * * * (1) The interior of each coal bin and (2) If fitted with an approved fixed gas (e) Cargo tanks. A cargo tank is a detection system (set at 25 percent of Class I, Division 1 (IEC Zone 0) location hold. (2) Each compartment that has a coal the LEL), each item of installed which has additional electrical electrical equipment must meet the equipment restrictions outlined in IEEE transfer point where coal is transferred, dropped, or dumped. requirements for either a Class I, Std 45 and IEC 92–502. Cargo tanks Division 1; Class 1, Division 2; Zone 0; must not contain any electrical (3) Each open area within 3 meters (10 Zone 1; or Zone 2 hazardous location. equipment except the following: ft) of a coal transfer point where coal is 145. Section 111.105–41 is revised to (1) Intrinsically safe equipment. dropped or dumped. read as follows: (2) Submerged cargo pumps and their (b) Each space that has a coal associated cable. conveyer on a vessel that carries coal is § 111.105±41 Battery rooms. * * * * * a Class II, Division 2, (Zone 11 or Y) Each electrical installation in a battery (l) Weather locations. The following space. room must meet subpart 111.15 of this locations in the weather are Class I, (c) A space that has a coal conveyer part and IEEE Std 45. Division 1 (Zone 1) locations (except the on a vessel that carries coal must have § 111.105±43 [Amended] open deck area on an inorganic acid electrical equipment approved for Class 146. In § 111.105–43, in paragraphs carrier which is considered a non- II, Division 2, (Zone 11 or Y) hazardous (a) and (b), following ‘‘Group D’’, add hazardous location) and may have only locations, except watertight general ‘‘(Zone 0 or Zone 1)’’. approved intrinsically safe, emergency alarm signals. explosionproof, or purged and 147. Section 111.105–45 is added to pressurized electrical equipment if the § 111.105±37 [Amended] read as follows: location is— 142. In § 111.105–37, remove the § 111.105±45 Vessels carrying agricultural * * * * * words ‘‘NFA No. 56A’’ and add, in their products. (3) Within 5 meters (16 ft) of cargo place, the words ‘‘NFPA No. 99’’. (a) The following areas are Class II, pressure/vacuum valves with an 143. Section 111.105–39 is revised to Division 1, (Zone 10 or Z) locations on unlimited height; or read as follows: vessels carrying bulk agricultural 28286 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations products that may produce dust PART 112ÐEMERGENCY LIGHTING the ship is 10 degrees, either in the fore explosion hazards: AND POWER SYSTEMS or aft direction, or is in any combination (1) The interior of each cargo hold or of angles within those limits. bin. 149. The authority citation for part (d) The emergency power source, its 112 is revised to read as follows: (2) Areas where cargo is transferred, associated transforming equipment, and dropped, or dumped and locations Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; 49 CFR the emergency switchboard must be within 1 meter (3 feet) of the outer edge 1.46. located aft of the collision bulkhead, of these areas in all directions. 150. In § 112.05–1, paragraph (a) is outside the machinery casing, and above (b) The following areas are Class II, revised and paragraph (c) is added to the uppermost continuous deck. Each Division 2, (Zone 11 or Y) locations on read as follows: compartment containing the emergency vessels carrying bulk agricultural power source, its associated products that may produce dust § 112.05±1 Purpose. transforming equipment, and the explosion hazards: (a) The purpose of this part is to emergency switchboard must be readily (1) All areas within 2 meters (6.5 feet) ensure a dependable independent, and accessible from the open deck and must not contain any other machinery not of a Division 1 (Zone 10 or Z) location dedicated emergency power source with associated with the normal operation of in all directions except when there is an sufficient capacity to supply those services that are necessary for the safety the emergency power source. intervening barrier, such as a bulkhead (e) No compartment that has an or deck. of the passengers, crew, and other persons in an emergency and those emergency power source or its vital Note to § 111.105–45: Information on the additional loads that may be authorized components may adjoin a Category A dust explosion hazards associated with the under paragraph (c) of this section. machinery space or those spaces carriage of agricultural products is contained * * * * * containing the main source of electrical in Coast Guard Navigation and Vessel power and its vital components. Inspection Circular 9–84 (NVIC 9–84) (c) Other loads may be authorized by ‘‘Electrical Installations in Agricultural Dust the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety * * * * * Locations.’’ Center (MSC), to be connected to the 152. In § 112.15–1, paragraphs (c), (g), emergency source of power to provide (j), (k), and (p) are revised and 148. Section 111.107–1 is revised to paragraphs (q) and (r) are added to read read as follows: an increased level of safety in recognition of a unique vessel mission as follows: § 111.107±1 Industrial systems. or configuration. When these loads are § 112.15±1 Temporary emergency loads. authorized, the emergency power source (a) For the purpose of this subpart, an * * * * * industrial system is a system that— must— (c) Lighting, including low location (1) Be sized to supply these loads (1) Is not a ship’s service load, as lighting if installed, for passageways, defined in § 111.10–1; using a unity (1.0) service factor; or (2) Be provided with automatic load stairways, and escape trunks in passenger quarters, crew quarters, (2) Is used only for the industrial shedding that removes these loads and public spaces, machinery spaces, function of the vessel; operates before the emergency generator damage control lockers, emergency (3) Is not connected to the emergency trips due to overload. The automatic equipment lockers, and work spaces power source; and load shedding circuit breakers must be sufficient to allow passengers and crew (4) Does not have specific manually reset. requirements addressed elsewhere in 151. In § 112.05–5, paragraph (a), to find their way to open decks and to this subchapter. footnote 1 to table 112.05–5(a), and survival craft, muster stations, and (b) An industrial system that meets paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) are revised to embarkation stations with all watertight doors and fire doors closed. the applicable requirements of the NEC read as follows: must meet only the following: * * * * * (1) The switchgear standards in part § 112.05±5 Emergency power source. (g) Lighting for survival craft 110, subpart 110.10, of this chapter. (a) The emergency power source must launching, including muster stations, (2) Part 110, subpart 110.25, of this meet table 112.05–5(a) and have the embarkation stations, the survival craft, chapter—Plan Submittal. capacity to supply all loads that are its launching appliances and the area of (3) Subpart 111.01 of this part— simultaneously connected to it, except a the water where it is to be launched. General. load on a bus-tie to the main * * * * * (4) Subpart 111.05 of this part— switchboard or non-required loads that (j) All shipwide communications Equipment Ground, Ground Detection, are connected in accordance with systems necessary for the transmittal of and Grounded Systems. § 112.05–1(c). information during an emergency. (k) Each fire door holding and release (5) Sections 111.12–1(b) and 111.12– Table 112.05–5(a) system. 1(c)—Prime movers. * * * * * (6) Subpart 111.105 of this part— * * * * * 1A 12-hour power supply may be (p) Each fire detection system; and gas Hazardous Locations. especially considered for vessels engaged detection system if installed. (c) Cables that penetrate a watertight regularly in voyages of short duration. (q) All lighting relative to helicopter or fire boundary deck or bulkhead * * * * * operations and landing if installed, must— (c) The complete emergency unless provided for by another source of (1) Be installed in accordance with installation must function at full rated power (such as independent batteries § 111.60–5 and meet the flammability power when the vessel is upright or separately charged by solar cells). test requirements of— inclined to the maximum angle of heel (r) Each general emergency alarm (i) Section 18.13.5 of IEEE Std 45 and that results from the assumed damage system required by SOLAS 74. IEEE Std 1202; or defined in 33 CFR part 155 or in 153. In § 112.15–5, paragraphs (b), (e) (ii) IEC 332–3, Category A; or subchapter S of this chapter for the through (g), and (i) through (t) are (2) Be specialty cable installed in specific vessel type or 22.5 degrees, revised and new paragraphs (u) and (v) accordance with § 111.60–2. whichever is greater; when the trim of are added to read as follows: Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28287

§ 112.15±5 Final emergency loads. 155. In § 112.39–1, paragraphs (a)(2) § 112.43±13 [Amended] * * * * * and (a)(3) are revised to read as follows 162. In § 112.43–13(b), remove the (b) The machinery, controls, and and paragraph (a)(4) is removed: word ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and add, in its alarms for each passenger elevator. place, the words ‘‘navigating bridge’’. § 112.39±1 General. * * * * * (a) * * * § 112.43±15 [Amended] (e) One of the fire pumps, if the (2) Have an automatic battery charger emergency power source is its source of 163. In § 112.43–15, remove the word that maintains the battery in a fully power to meet the requirements of the ‘‘firescreen’ and add, in its place, the charged condition; and word ‘‘fire’’. subchapter under which the vessel is (3) Not be readily portable. certificated. § 112.43±17 [Removed] (f) Each sprinkler system, water spray § 112.39±3 [Amended] extinguishing system, or foam system 164. Section 112.43–17 is removed. 156. In § 112.39–3(a), remove the 165. The heading to subpart 112.45 is pump. words ‘‘at least 6’’ and add, in their revised to read as follows: (g) If necessary, the lube oil pump for place, the words ‘‘for at least 3’’. each propulsion turbine and reduction Subpart 112.45ÐVisible Indicators gear, propulsion diesel reduction gear, § 112.43±1 [Amended] and ship’s service generator turbine 157. In § 112.43–1(b), remove § 112.45±5 [Removed] which needs external lubrication. ‘‘§ 112.43–3’’ and add, in its place, 165a. Section 112.45–5 is removed. * * * * * ‘‘§ 112.43–7’’. 166. In § 112.50–1, paragraph (d) is (i) Each radio or global maritime § 112.43±3 [Removed] revised; paragraph (e) is removed; distress and safety system (GMDSs) 158. Section 112.43–3 is removed. paragraphs (f) through (k) are component. redesignated as paragraphs (e) through (j) Each radio direction finder, loran, § 112.43±5 [Amended] (j); newly redesignated paragraph (f) is radar, gyrocompass, depth sounder, 159. In § 112.43–5, remove the words revised; and new paragraph (k) is added global positioning system (GPS), ‘‘lifeboat and liferaft’’ and add, in their to read as follows: satellite navigation system (SATNAV), place, the words ‘‘survival craft’’ and § 112.50±1 General. speed log, rate-of-turn indicator and remove the word ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and propeller pitch indicator. add, in its place, the words ‘‘navigating * * * * * (k) Each steering gear feeder, if bridge’’. (d) The generator set must be capable required by part 58, subpart 58.25, of 160. In § 112.43–7, the section of carrying its full rated load within 45 this chapter. heading and paragraphs (a) introductory seconds after cranking is started with (l) Each general emergency alarm text, (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(4)(ii) through the intake air, room ambient flashing light required by § 113.25–10 of (a)(4)(iv), and (b) are revised; and temperature, and starting equipment at ° this chapter. paragraph (a)(4)(v) is added to read as O C. The generator’s prime mover must (m) Each electric blow-out-preventer follows: not have a starting aid to meet this control system. requirement, except that a (n) Any permanently installed diving § 112.43±7 Navigating bridge distribution thermostatically-controlled electric equipment that is dependent upon the panel. water-jacket heater connected to the vessel’s or drilling unit’s power. (a) Except as allowed in paragraph (b) final emergency bus is permitted. (o) Each emergency generator starting of this section, the following emergency * * * * * compressor, as allowed by § 112.50– lights must be supplied from a (f) The generator set must maintain 7(c)(3)(ii). distribution panel on the navigating proper lubrication when inclined to the (p) Each steering gear failure alarm bridge: angles specified in § 112.05–5(c), and required by part 113, subpart 113.43, of (1) Navigation lights not supplied by must be arranged so that it does not spill this chapter. the navigation light indicator panel. oil under a vessel roll of 30 degrees to (q) The ballast control system on each (2) Lights for survival craft launching each side of the vertical. column-stabilized mobile offshore operations under § 111.75–16, except as drilling unit. allowed in § 112.43–5. * * * * * (k) Each emergency generator that is (r) Each vital system automation load * * * * * arranged to be automatically started required by part 62 of this chapter. (4) * * * (s) Motor-operated valves for each (ii) On the navigating bridge; must be equipped with a starting device cargo oil and fuel oil system, if the (iii) In the chartroom; with an energy-storage capability of at emergency power source is the source of (iv) In the fire control room; and least six consecutive starts. A second, power to meet § 56.60(d) of this chapter. (v) For navigation equipment. separate source of starting energy may (t) Each ship’s stabilizer wing, unless (b) On a mobile offshore drilling unit, provide three of the required six starts. a separate source of emergency power is the distribution panel required in If a second source is provided, the supplied. paragraph (a) of this section must be in system need only provide three (u) Each indicator that shows the the control room. consecutive starts. position of the stabilizer wings, if the * * * * * 167. In § 112.50–3, paragraph (a) is emergency power source is its 161. Section 112.43–11 is revised to revised to read as follows and emergency source of power. read as follows: paragraphs (f) and (g) are removed: (v) Each smoke extraction fan (not § 112.50±3 Hydraulic starting. including smoke detector sampling) and § 112.43±11 Illumination for launching operations. CO2 exhaust fan for spaces. * * * * * Branch circuits supplying power to (a) The hydraulic starting system must § 112.35±7 [Amended] lights for survival craft launching be a self-contained system that provides 154. In § 112.35–7, remove the word operations must supply no other the cranking torque and engine starting ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and add, in its place, the equipment and meet § 111.75–16 of this RPM recommended by the engine words ‘‘navigating bridge’’. chapter. manufacturer. The hydraulic starting 28288 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations system must be capable of six (a) Table 4/11.1 of ABS Rules or the § 113.25±8 [Amended] consecutive starts, unless a second, applicable ENV category of Lloyd’s 179. In § 113.25–8, in paragraph (b), separate source of starting energy Register Type approval System—Test remove the word ‘‘fuses’’ and add, in its capable of three consecutive starts is Specification No. 1; and place, the words ‘‘overcurrent provided. A second, separate source of (b) IEC 553 as appropriate. protection’’; in paragraph (c), remove starting energy may provide three of the 173. The heading to subpart 113.10 is the words ‘‘battery enclosure’’ and add, required six starts. If a second source is revised to read as follows: in their place, the words ‘‘power provided, the hydraulic system need supply’’; in paragraph (f), remove the only provide three consecutive starts. Subpart 113.10ÐFire and Smoke first sentence; and, in paragraph (g), * * * * * Detecting and Alarm Systems remove the words ‘‘the vessel must be 168. Section 112.50–5 is revised to divided into vertical’’ and add, in their read as follows: 174. Section 113.10–7 is revised to place, the words ‘‘the general emergency read as follows: alarm system must be arranged into § 112.50±5 Electric starting. vertical service’’ and remove ‘‘150 feet § 113.10±7 Connection boxes. An electric starting system must have (45.7 meters)’’ and add, in its place, ‘‘40 a starting battery with sufficient Each connection box must be meters (131 feet)’’. capacity for at least six consecutive constructed in accordance with NEMA 180. In § 113.25–9, paragraph (b) is starts. A second, separate source of 250 Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67 revised and paragraph (c) is added to starting energy may provide three of the requirements. read as follows: required six starts. If a second source is 175. In § 113.10–9, in paragraph (a), provided, the electrical starting system § 113.25±9 Location of general emergency following the third sentence, add a alarm signals. need only provide three consecutive sentence to read as follows; paragraph starts. (c) is removed; and paragraph (d) is * * * * * 169. In § 112.50–7, paragraphs (c)(1) (b) Be audible in the spaces identified redesignated as paragraph (c): and (c)(2) are revised to read as follows in paragraph (a) of this section with all and paragraph (d) is removed: § 113.10±9 Power supply. normally closed doors and accesses closed; and § 112.50±7 Compressed air starting. (a) * * *. If the other source is an (c) Be installed in cabins without * * * * * automatically charged battery, the loudspeaker installation. Other audible (c) * * * charger must be supplied from the final devices, such as electronic alarm (1) Has a capacity for at least six emergency power source. *** transducers, are permitted. consecutive starts. A second, separate * * * * * 81. In § 113.25–10, the introductory source of starting energy may provide 176. Section 113.20–3 is revised to text and paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) are three of the required consecutive starts. read as follows: redesignated as paragraphs (a), (a)(1), If a second source is provided, the (a)(2), and (a)(3); redesignated paragraph compressed air starting system need § 113.20±3 Connection boxes. (a)(3) is revised; and new paragraph (b) only provide three consecutive starts. Each connection box and each switch is added to read as follows: (2) Supplies no other system. enclosure in an automatic sprinkler * * * * * system must be constructed in § 113.25±10 Location of flashing red lights. 170. In § 112.55–15, paragraph (a) is accordance with NEMA 250 Type 6 or (a) * * * revised to read as follows: 6P or IEC IP 67 requirements. (3) Is supplied by the general emergency alarm system power supply § 112.55±15 Capacity of storage batteries. Subpart 113.25Ð[Amended] or the vessel emergency power source (a) A storage battery for an emergency through a relay that is operated by the lighting and power system must have 177. In subpart 113.25, remove the general emergency alarm system. the capacity— words ‘‘general alarm system’’ in the (b) A flashing red light must be (1) To close all watertight doors two subpart heading and wherever they installed so that it is visible in the cargo times; appear and add, in their place, the pump rooms of vessels that carry (2) To open all watertight doors once; words ‘‘general emergency alarm combustible liquid cargoes. The and system’’; remove the word installation must be in accordance with (3) To carry the remaining emergency ‘‘wheelhouse’’ wherever it appears and the requirements of part 111, subpart loads continuously for the time add, in its place, the words ‘‘navigating 111.105, of this chapter. prescribed in § 12.05–5(a), table 112.05– bridge’’; and remove the words ‘‘bell’’ 82. Section 113.25–11 is revised to 5(a). and ‘‘alarm bell’’ wherever they appear read as follows: * * * * * and add, in their place, the words § 113.25±11 Contact makers. ‘‘emergency alarm signal’’. PART 113ÐCOMMUNICATION AND Each contact maker must— ALARM SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT 178. Section 113.25–6 is revised to (a) Have normally open contacts and read as follows: be constructed in accordance with 171. The authority citation for part § 113.25±6 Power supply. NEMA 250 Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67 113 is revised to read as follows: requirements; Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; 49 CFR (a) The power supply for the general (b) Have a switch handle that can be 1.46. emergency alarm system must meet the maintained in the ‘‘on’’ position; requirements of SOLAS 74, regulations 172. Section 113.05–7 is added to (c) Have the ‘‘off’’ and ‘‘on’’ positions III–6.4.2 and III/50. read as follows: of the operating handle permanently (b) The emergency power source for marked; and § 113.05±7 Environmental tests. the general emergency alarm system (d) Have an inductive load rating not Communication, alarm system, must meet the requirements of SOLAS less than the connected load or, on large control, and monitoring equipment 74, regulation II–1/42 or II–1/43, as vessels, have auxiliary devices to must meet the environmental tests of— applicable. interrupt the load current. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28289

183. Section 113.25–12 is revised to telephone or other reliable voice stations for the operation of the vessel, read as follows: communication method and must be such as the captain’s and chief independent of the vessel’s electrical engineer’s offices and staterooms, § 113.25±12 Alarm signals. system. emergency power room, carbon dioxide (a) Each general emergency alarm 188. In § 113.30–5, in paragraphs (a) (or other extinguishing agent) control signal must be an electrically-operated through (c), (e), and (f), remove room, and firepump room, must not be bell, klaxon, or other warning device ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and add, in its place, on the same circuit as communications capable of producing a signal or tone ‘‘navigating bridge’’; revise paragraphs stations installed to meet the distinct from any other audible signal (a) introductory text, (d), (g), and (h); requirements of §§ 113.30–5(e) and on the vessel. and add paragraph (i) to read as follows: 113.30–5(h). (b) Electronic devices used to produce (b) If a communications station is in § 113.30±5 Requirements. the general emergency alarm signal the weather and on the same circuit as must meet the requirements of subpart (a) Communication. Each vessel must other required stations, there must be a 113.50 of this part. have a means of communication among cut-out switch on the navigating bridge (c) The minimum sound pressure the following: that can isolate this station from the rest levels for the emergency alarm tone in * * * * * of the stations, unless the system interior and exterior spaces must be 80 (d) Emergency lockers. If the possesses other effective means of dB(A) and at least 10 dB(A) above emergency equipment lockers or spaces station isolation during a fault ambient noise levels existing during used by the emergency squad are not condition. normal equipment operation with the next to the navigating bridge or, on a (c) Jack boxes or headsets must not be vessel underway in moderate weather. mobile offshore drilling unit, next to the on a communications system that 184. Section 113.25–16 is revised to control room, there must be a means of includes any station required by this read as follows: communication between the navigating subpart, except for a station installed to bridge or control room and the § 113.25±16 Overcurrent protection. meet §§ 113.30–5(h) or 113.30–25(d). emergency equipment lockers or spaces. (a) Each fuse in a general emergency 191. Section 113.30–25 is revised to alarm system must meet the * * * * * read as follows: (g) Lookout. Each vessel must have a requirements of part 111, subpart means of communication between the § 113.30±25 Detailed requirements. 111.53, of this chapter. navigating bridge and the bow or (a) Each sound-powered telephone (b) Each overcurrent protection device forward lookout station unless direct station must include a permanently- must cause as wide a differential as voice communication is possible. wired handset with a push-to-talk possible between the rating of the (h) Engineroom local control station. button and a hanger for the handset, branch circuit overcurrent protection Each self-propelled vessel equipped except those stations detailed in device and that of the feeder overcurrent with control from the navigating bridge paragraph (d) of this section. The hanger protection device. must have a means of communication (c) The capacity of the feeder must be constructed so that it holds the between the local station for the control overcurrent device must be as near handset away from the bulkhead and so of the speed or direction of thrust of the practicable to 200 percent of the load that the handset will not be dislodged propulsion machinery and the engine supplied. The capacity of a branch by the motion of the vessel. control room, unless an engine order circuit overcurrent device must not be (b) Each voice communication station telegraph is installed in accordance with higher than 50 percent of the capacity device in the weather must be in a § 113.35–3. Each communication station of the feeder overcurrent device. proper enclosure as required in at a local control station must— § 111.01–9 of this chapter. The audible § 113.25±30 [Amended] (1) Not be on the same circuit as any signal device must be outside the station 185. In § 113.25–30, in the note to other station required by this section; enclosure. paragraph (a), before the word ‘‘bridge’’, and (c) Each station in a navigating bridge add the word ‘‘navigating’’. (2) Provide the capability of reliable or a machinery space must be in an 186. The heading to subpart 113.30 is voice communication when the vessel is enclosure meeting at least NEMA 250 revised to read as follows: underway. Type 2 or IEC IP 32 requirements. (i) Mobile offshore drilling units. Each (d) In a noise location, such as an Subpart 113.30ÐInternal non-self-propelled mobile offshore engine room, there must be a booth or Communications drilling unit must have a means of other equipment to permit reliable voice communication among the control communication during vessel operation. 187. Section 113.30–3 is revised to room, drill floor, machinery space, and read as follows: (e) In a location where the voice silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) room communication station audible signal § 113.30±3 Means of communications. (if installed). Each column-stabilized device cannot be heard throughout the mobile offshore drilling unit must have (a) An emergency means of space, there must be an additional a means of communication between the communication required by this subpart audible signal device or visual device, ballast control room and the spaces that must— such as a light, which is energized from contain the ballast pumps and valves. (1) Be comprised of either fixed or the vessel’s electric system. portable equipment; and § 113.30±10 [Removed] (f) If two or more voice (2) Provide common talking means of 189. Section 113.30–10 is removed. communication stations are near each two-way voice communication and 190. Section 113.30–20 is revised to other, there must be a means that calling among the navigating bridge, read as follows: indicates the station called. emergency control stations, muster (g) Each voice communication talking stations, embarkation stations, and other § 113.30±20 General requirements. circuit must be electrically independent strategic positions listed in § 113.30–5. (a) The communications stations of each calling circuit. A short circuit, (b) The means of communication and listed in § 113.30–5(a) through (d), (f), open circuit, or ground on either side of calling must be a sound-powered (g), and (i) and other communications a calling circuit must not affect a talking 28290 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations circuit. Circuits must be insulated from acknowledgment of an order. The Subpart 113.50ÐPublic Address ground. audible signal device must not be Systems (h) Each connection box must meet at dependent upon any source of power for least NEMA 250 Type 6 or 6P or IP 67 operation other than that of the 203. Sections 113.50–1 and 113.50–5 requirements. movement of the transmitter or are revised to read as follows: (i) Voice communication cables must indicator handle. § 113.50±1 Applicability. be run as close to the fore and aft § 113.35±11 [Removed] This subpart applies to each vessel centerline of the vessel as practicable. required to have a general emergency The cable must not run through high 196. Section 113.35–11 is removed. alarm system in accordance with fire-risk spaces, such as machinery § 113.25–1. rooms and galleys, unless the cable § 113.35±17 [Amended] meets the requirements of IEC 331. 197. In § 113.35–17, remove the word § 113.50±5 General requirements. 192. In § 113.35–3, remove the word ‘‘pilothouse’’ wherever it appears and (a) Each vessel must have an ‘‘wheelhouse’’ wherever it appears and add, in its place, the words ‘‘navigating amplifier-type announcing system that add, in its place, the words ‘‘navigating bridge’’. will supplement the general emergency bridge’’ and revise paragraph (e)(3) to alarm. This system must provide for the read as follows: § 113.35±19 [Amended and Redesignated transmission of orders and information as § 113.35±7] throughout the vessel by means of § 113.35±3 General requirements. microphones and loudspeakers * * * * * 198. In § 113.35–19, in paragraph (a), remove the words ‘‘in the wheelhouse, connected through an amplifier. If a (e) * * * decentralized-type system is used, its (3) Reliable voice communication and the wings of the navigating bridge, or the top of the wheelhouse’’ and add, in overall performance must not be calling that meets the requirements of affected by the failure of a single call § 113.30–5(h) is not provided. their place, the words ‘‘on or on top of, or on the wings of, the navigating station. This system may be combined * * * * * bridge’’; in paragraphs (c) and (d), with the general emergency alarm and 193. In § 113.35–5, the section remove the word ‘‘wheelhouse’’ and, in fire detecting and alarm systems. The heading and paragraphs (b) through (e) its place, add the words ‘‘navigating public address system must be protected are revised to read as follows and bridge’’; and redesignate this section as against unauthorized use. paragraphs (f) through (g) are removed: § 113.35–7. (b) The announcing station must be located adjacent to the general § 113.35±5 Electric engine order telegraph § 113.37±5 [Amended] systems. emergency alarm contact maker on the navigating bridge. * * * * * 199. In § 113.37–5, remove the words (c) There must be a means to silence (b) Each engineroom indicator must ‘‘in the wheelhouse’’ wherever they all other audio distribution systems at be capable of acknowledgment of appear and add, in their place, the the announcing station. orders. words ‘‘on the navigating bridge’’. (d) The system may be arranged to (c) There must be an audible signal at 200. In § 113.37–10, paragraph (b) is allow broadcasting separately to, or to each instrument. The signal at both revised to read as follows and any combination of, various areas on the locations must sound continuously paragraphs (c) and (d) are removed: vessel. If the amplifier system is used when the transmitter and the indicator for the general emergency alarm do not show the same order. § 113.37±10 Detailed requirements. required by subpart 113.25 of this part, (d) Each telegraph instrument must * * * * * the operation of a general emergency meet the protection requirements of (b) Each electric component or its alarm contact maker must activate all § 111.01–9 of this chapter. enclosure must meet NEMA 250 Type 4 speakers in the system, except that a (e) Each system must have an alarm or 4X or IEC IP 56 requirements. separate crew alarm may be used as which— allowed by § 113.25–5(e)(2). 201. In § 113.40–10, in paragraph (a), (1) Automatically sounds and visually (e) The amplifier, and any device used the second sentence is revised and a signals a loss of power to the system; to produce the general emergency alarm third sentence is added; paragraph (b) is (2) Is on the navigating bridge; and signal, must be provided in duplicate. (3) Has a means to reduce the audible revised; and paragraphs (c) through (f) (f) The power supply must be in signal from 100 percent to not less than are removed as follows: accordance with the requirements of 50 percent. § 113.40±10 Detailed requirements. §§ 113.25–6 and 113.25–7. (g) Each electrical subsystem in a § 113.35±7 [Removed] (a) * * *. This system must be weather location must be watertight or 194. Section 113.35–7 is removed. independent of all other systems and in a watertight enclosure (NEMA 250 195. In § 113.35–9, the section not receive power or signal from the Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67). heading is revised; in paragraph (a) steering gear control, autopilot, or 204. Section 113.50–10 is added to following ‘‘other’’, add ‘‘, as’’; paragraph dynamic positioning systems. However, read as follows: (b) is revised to read as follows; and the indicator may be physically located paragraphs (c) through (g) are removed: on a control console, such as an § 113.50±10 Additional requirements for integrated bridge system, if it is readily passenger vessels. § 113.35±9 Mechanical engine order Each passenger vessel must have a telegraph systems. visible by the helmsman at the steering stand. public address system capable of * * * * * broadcasting separately or collectively (b) Each electric component or its (b) Each transmitter and each to the following stations: indicator must have an audible signal enclosure must meet NEMA 250 Type 6 (a) Survival craft stations, port. device to indicate, in the case of an or 6P or IEC IP 67 requirements. (b) Survival craft stations, starboard. indicator, the receipt of an order, and in 202. The heading to subpart 113.50 is (c) Survival craft embarkation the case of a transmitter, the revised to read as follows: stations, port. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28291

(d) Survival craft embarkation except for a single branch circuit American Society for Testing and Materials stations, starboard. supplying all levels of a single space if (ASTM) (e) Public spaces used for passenger all other requirements of this section are American Society for Testing and assembly points. met. Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West (f) Crew quarters. (f) On a vessel not divided into Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959. (g) Accommodation spaces and vertical fire zones by main vertical fire ASTM B 117–95, Standard Practice for service spaces. bulkheads, the vessel must be divided Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus, 1996— 205. In § 113.50–15, the section into vertical zones not more than 40 161.002–4(b). heading and paragraphs (a) through (d) meters (131 feet) long. There must be a Factory Mutual Engineering and Research are revised to read as follows and feeder for each of these zones. (FMER) paragraph (e) and table 113.50–15 are (g) Feeders and branch circuit cables Factory Mutual Engineering and Research, removed: must be in passageways. They must not ATTN: Librarian, 1151 Boston-Providence § 113.50±15 Loudspeakers. be in staterooms, lockers, galleys, or Turnpike, Norwood, MA 02062. machinery spaces, unless it is necessary Class Number 3150: Audible Signal (a) Loudspeakers must be located to Devices, December, 1974—161.002–4(b). eliminate feedback or other interference to supply public address speakers in those spaces. Class Number 3210: Thermostats for which would degrade communications. Automatic Fire Detection, July, 1978— (b) Loudspeakers must be located to § 113.50±25 [Removed] 161.002–4(b). provide intelligible and audible one- 207. Section 113.50–25 is removed. Class Number 3230–3250: Smoke Actuated way communication throughout the Detectors for Automatic Fire Alarm vessel. Weatherdeck loudspeakers must § 113.65±5 [Amended] Signaling, February, 1976—161.002–4(b). Class Number 3260: Flame Radiation be watertight and suitably protected 208. In § 113.65–5, remove the words from the effects of the wind and seas. Detectors for Automatic Fire Alarm ‘‘Section 37.25’’ and add, in their place, Signaling, September, 1994—161.002–4(b). (c) There must be a sufficient number the words ‘‘section 37.19’’ and remove of loudspeakers throughout the vessel. Class Number 3820: Electrical Utilization the note to the section. Equipment, September, 1979—161.002–4(b). The public address system must be installed with regard to acoustically § 113.70±5 (Subpart 113.70) [Removed] International Electrotechnical Commission marginal conditions and not require any 209. Subpart 113.70 consisting of (IEC) action from the addressee. With the § 113.70–5 is removed. International Electrotechnical Commission, vessel underway in normal conditions, 1, Rue de Varembe, Geneva, Switzerland. the minimum sound pressure levels for PART 161ÐELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IEC 533, Electromagnetic Compatibility of broadcasting emergency announcements Electrical and Electronic Installations in must be— 210. The authority citation for part Ships, 1977—161.002–4(b). (1) In interior spaces, 75 dB(A) or, if 161 is revised to read as follows: International Maritime Organization (IMO) the background noise level exceeds 75 Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703, 4302; E.O. International Maritime Organization, 4 dB(A), then at least 20 dB(A) above 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, maximum background noise level; and 277; 49 CFR 1.46. England. (2) In exterior spaces, 80 dB(A) or, if 211. Section 161.002–1 is revised to International Convention for the Safety of the background noise level exceeds 80 read as follows: Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74) Consolidated dB(A), then at least 15 dB(A) above Edition (Including 1992 Amendments to maximum background noise level. § 161.002±1 Incorporation by reference. SOLAS 74, and 1994 Amendments to SOLAS (d) Loudspeakers must not have (a) Certain material is incorporated by 74), 1992—161.002–4(b). external volume controls or local cutout reference into this subpart with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) switches. approval of the Director of the Federal National Fire Protection Association, 1 206. Section 113.50–20 is revised to Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. read as follows: CFR part 51. To enforce any edition NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code, 1993—161.002–4(b). § 113.50±20 Distribution of cable runs. other than that specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the Coast Guard must (a) Each system must have a feeder Lloyd’s Register of Shipping (LR) publish notice of change in the Federal distribution panel to divide the system Lloyd’s Register of Shipping, ATTN: Register; and the material must be into the necessary number of zone Publications, 17 Battery Place, New York, NY available to the public. All approved feeders. Where, because of the 10004–1195. material is available for inspection at arrangement of the vessel, only one zone LR Type Approval System; Test the Office of the Federal Register. 800 feeder is necessary, a branch circuit Specification Number 1, 1990—161.002–4(b). North Capitol Street NW., suite 700, distribution panel must be used. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL) Washington, DC, and at the U.S. Coast (b) The feeder distribution panel must Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., ATTN: be in an enclosed space next to the Guard, (G–MSE), 2100 Second Street SW., Washington, DC 20593–0001, and Publication Stock, 333 Pfingsten Road, public address system power supply. Northbrook, IL 60062–2096. (c) Each system must have at least one is available from the sources indicated UL 38, Standard for Manually Actuated feeder for each vertical fire zone. in paragraph (b) of this section. Signaling Boxes for Use with Fire-Protective (d) Each system must have one or (b) The material approved for Signaling Systems, 1994—161.002–4(b). more branch circuit distribution panels incorporation by reference in this UL 268, Standard for Smoke Detectors for for each zone feeder, with at least one subpart and the sections affected are as Fire Protective Signaling Systems, 1989 branch circuit for each deck level. The follows: (including revisions through June 1994)— 161.002–4(b). distribution panel must be above the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) UL 521, Standard for Heat Detectors for uppermost continuous deck, in the zone American Bureau of Shipping, Two World Fire Protective Signaling Systems, 1993 served, and there must be no disconnect Trade Center, 106th Floor, New York, NY (including revisions through October 1994)— switches for the branch circuits. 10048. 161.002–4(b). (e) A branch circuit must not supply Rules for Building and Classing Steel UL 864, Standard for Control Units for speakers on more than one deck level, Vessels, 1995—161.002–4(b). Fire-Protective Signaling Systems, 1991 28292 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

(including revisions through May 1994)— § 161.002±8 [Amended] 221. Section 161.002–17 is revised to 161.002–4(b). 216. In § 161.002–8, paragraph (b) is read as follows: § 161.002±2 [Amended] removed. 217. In § 161.002–10, in paragraph (b), § 161.002±17 Equivalents. 212. In § 161.002–2, in paragraph (a), revise the paragraph heading and The Commandant may approve any remove the words ‘‘smoke detector paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows; in arrangement, fitting, appliance, systems’’ and add, in their place, the paragraph (b)(2), remove the word apparatus, equipment, calculation, words ‘‘sample extraction smoke ‘‘signal’’ wherever it appears and add, in information, or test that provides a level detection systems’’; in paragraphs (a) its place, the word ‘‘alarm’’; in of safety equivalent to that established and (b), remove the words ‘‘fire paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4), (c)(3), (d), (e) by specific provisions of this subpart. detecting’’ and add, in their place, the paragraph heading, and (e)(2) through Requests for approval must be words ‘‘fire and smoke detecting’’; in (e)(4), remove the words ‘‘alarm bell’’, submitted to Commandant (G–MSE). If paragraph (b), following ‘‘fire ‘‘alarm signal’’, ‘‘audible signal’’, and necessary, the Commandant may require detectors,’’, add ‘‘smoke detectors,’’; in ‘‘bell’’ wherever they appear and add, in engineering evaluations and tests to paragraphs (b) and (c), remove the their place, the words ‘‘audible alarm’’; demonstrate the equivalence of the words ‘‘vibrating bells’’ and add, in in paragraph (e)(1), remove the words substitute. their place, the words ‘‘audible and ‘‘audible trouble alarm bell or buzzer’’ 222. Section 161.002–18 is added to visual alarms distinct in both respects and, in their place, add the words read as follows: from the alarms of any other system not ‘‘audible alarm’’; and paragraphs (i) indicating fire’’; and, in paragraph (d), § 161.002±18 Method of application for through (m) are removed: type approval. remove the words ‘‘smoke detector systems’’ and add, in their place, the § 161.002±10 Automatic fire detecting (a) The manufacturer must submit the words ‘‘sample extraction smoke system control unit. following material to Commandant (G– detection systems’’. * * * * * MSE), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, (b) Fire alarms—(1) General. The 2100 Second Street SW., Washington, § 161.002±3 [Amended] operation of a fire detecting and alarm DC 20593–0001: 213. In § 161.002–3, paragraphs (c), system must cause automatically— (1) A formal written request that the (d), and (e) are removed. (i) The sounding of a vibrating type system be reviewed for approval. fire bell with a gong diameter not (2) Three copies of the system’s 214. In § 161.002–4, paragraph (b) is instruction manual, including added to read as follows: smaller than 15 cm (6 inches) or other audible alarm that has an equivalent information concerning installation, § 161.002±4 General requirements. sound level and that is mounted at the programming, operation, and * * * * * control unit and at the remote troubleshooting. (3) One copy of the complete test (b) Standards. (1) All fire-protective annunicator panel, when provided; (ii) The sounding of a vibrating type report generated by an independent systems must be designed, constructed, fire bell with a gong diameter not laboratory accepted by the Commandant tested, marked, and installed according smaller than 20 cm (8 inches) or other under part 159 of this chapter for the to the applicable standards under audible alarm that has an equivalent testing and listing or certification of fire- § 161.002–1 and subchapter J (Electrical sound level and that is located in the protective systems. A current list of Engineering) of this chapter. engine room; and these facilities may be obtained from the (2) All systems must be listed or (iii) An indication of the fire detecting address in this section. certified as meeting these standards by zone from which the signal originated, (4) Three copies of a list prepared by an independent laboratory that is visible at the control unit and at the the manufacturer that contains the accepted by the Commandant under remote annunicator panel, when name, model number, and function of part 159 of this chapter for the testing provided; each major component and accessory, and listing or certification of fire * * * * * such as the main control cabinet, remote detection equipment and systems. annunicator cabinet, detector, zone (3) All parts of the system must pass §§ 161.002±11 and 161.002±13 [Removed] card, isolator, central processing unit, the environmental tests for control and 218. Sections 161.002–11 and zener barrier, special purpose module, monitoring equipment in either ABS 161.002–13 are removed. or power supply. This list must be Rules Table 4/11.1 or pass the Category identified by the following information § 161.002±12 [Amended] ENV3 tests of Lloyd’s Register Type assigned by the manufacturer: Approval System, Test Specification 218a. In § 161.002–12(a), remove the (i) A document number. Number 1, as appropriate. words ‘‘signaling devices’’ and add, in (ii) A revision number (the original (4) Those parts of the system that are their place, the word ‘‘alarms’’. submission being revision number 0). 219. Section 161.002–15 is revised to to be installed in locations requiring (iii) The date that the manufacturer read as follows: exceptional degrees of protection must created or revised the list. also pass the salt spray (mist) test in § 161.002±15 Sample extraction smoke (b) The Coast Guard distributes a copy either ABS Rules Table 4/11.1; Category detection systems. of the approved instruction manual to ENV3 of Lloyd’s Register Type Approval The smoke detecting system must the manufacturer and to the Coast Guard System, Test Specification No. 1; or consist of a means for continuously Marine Safety Center (MSC). ASTM B–117 with results as described exhausting an air sample from the (c) The manufacturer shall maintain in corrosion-resistant finish in § 110.15– protected spaces and testing the air for an account of the equipment offered for 1 of this chapter. contamination with smoke, together approval. The list identification with visual and audible alarms for information in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) §§ 161.002±5, 161.002±6, and 161.002±7 indicating the presence of smoke. through (a)(4)(iii) of this section appears [Removed] on the Certificate of Approval and 215. Sections 161.002–5, 161.002–6, § 161.002±16 [Removed] indicates the official compilation of and 161.002–7 are removed. 220. Section 161.002–16 is removed. components for the approved system. If Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28293 the manufacturer seeks to apply (3) A report by an independent §§ 161.004±2Ð161.004±7 (Subpart 161.004) subsequently for the approval of a laboratory accepted by the Commandant [Removed] revision (because of, for example, under part 159 of this chapter for the 223. Subpart 161.004, consisting of additional accessories becoming testing and listing or certification of fire- §§ 161.004–2 through 161.004–7, is available, replacements to obsolete protective systems indicating removed. components, or a change in materials or compliance with the standards and standards of safety), changes to the compatibility with the system. Dated: May 22, 1996. approved list must be submitted for J.C. Card, review and approval. (e) If the Coast Guard approves the system or a revision to a system, it Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, (d) To apply for a revision, the Chief, Marine Safety and Environmental manufacturer must submit— issues a certificate, normally valid for a Protection. 5-year term, containing the information (1) A written request under paragraph [FR Doc. 96–13416 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] (a) of this section; in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (a)(4)(iii) (2) An updated list under paragraph of this section. BILLING CODE 4910±14±M (b) of this section; and federal register June 4,1996 Tuesday Notice Compendium ofFloodMapChanges; Management Agency Federal Emergency Part III 28295 28296 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

FEDERAL EMERGENCY DATES: The listing includes changes to this notice is provided to notify MANAGEMENT AGENCY FEMA flood maps that became effective interested parties of changes made to July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995. National Flood Insurance Program flood Compendium of Flood Map Changes FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: maps. The listing shows communities William R. Locke, Director, Hazard affected by map changes, the flood map AGENCY: Federal Emergency Identification and Risk Assessment panel(s) affected, the effective date of Management Agency (FEMA). Division, Mitigation Directorate, Federal the map change and, if applicable, a case number assigned to the map change ACTION: Notice. Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2754. action. Future notices of map changes will be published every six (6) months. SUMMARY: This notice provides a listing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In of changes to FEMA flood maps made accordance with section 1360(i) of the Dated: May 23, 1996. during the second half of 1995. National Flood Insurance Reform Act of Richard W. Krimm, 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4101(i), Acting Associate Director for Mitigation.

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGES [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... BOZRAH, TOWN OF ...... 0900940010C 11/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... BOZRAH, TOWN OF ...... 0900940000 11/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... BOZRAH, TOWN OF ...... 0900940005C 11/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... CHESHIRE, TOWN OF ...... 0900740004D 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... CHESHIRE, TOWN OF ...... 0900740000 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... CLINTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900610006E 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... CLINTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900610005F 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... CLINTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900610000 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... EAST LYME, TOWN OF ...... 0900960000 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... EAST LYME, TOWN OF ...... 0900960005C 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... GROTON LONG POINT ASSOCIATION ...... 0901670001D 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... GROTON, CITY OF ...... 0901260000 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... GROTON, CITY OF ...... 0901260002D 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... GROTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900970003E 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... GROTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900970006E 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... GROTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900970000 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 0900790014D 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 0900790012D 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 0900790000 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MONTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0900990014C 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MONTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0900990009C 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MONTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0900990000 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MONTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0900990003C 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MONTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0900990016C 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... MONTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0900990011C 12/05/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... NEW LONDON, CITY OF ...... 0901000000 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... NEW LONDON, CITY OF ...... 0901000002D 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... ORANGE, TOWN OF ...... 0900870005C 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... ORANGE, TOWN OF ...... 0900870002C 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... ORANGE, TOWN OF ...... 0900870000 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... STONINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 0901930001F 08/02/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... STONINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0901060017F 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... STONINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0901060019F 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... STONINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0901060018F 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... STONINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0901060016F 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... STONINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0901060000 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 0901070015F 09/06/95 01 ...... CONNECTICUT ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 0901070000 09/06/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230015C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230016C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230005C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230008C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230009C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230007C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230000 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... ANSON, TOWN OF ...... 2301230006C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010002C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010004C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010000 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010007C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010005C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010008C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010003C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010006C 10/18/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28297

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010001C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010013C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010014C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010011C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010012C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010015C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010009C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... AUBURN, CITY OF ...... 2300010010C 10/18/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... FARMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2300570002C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... FARMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2300570000 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... FARMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2300570010C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... FARMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2300570013C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... FARMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2300570015C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... FARMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2300570025C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... FARMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2300570020C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... HOLDEN, TOWN OF ...... 2303900010C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... HOLDEN, TOWN OF ...... 2303900005C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... HOLDEN, TOWN OF ...... 2303900000 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260002C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260019C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260016C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260020C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260009C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260004C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260012C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260014C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260000 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... MADISON, TOWN OF ...... 2301260010C 07/03/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280012C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280014C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280002C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280000 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280001C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280015C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280003C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280020C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280004C 09/20/95 01 ...... MAINE ...... SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF ...... 2301280010C 09/20/95 01 ...... MASSACHUSETTS ...... AVON, TOWN OF ...... 2502310002C 09/20/95 01 ...... MASSACHUSETTS ...... AVON, TOWN OF ...... 2502310001C 09/20/95 01 ...... MASSACHUSETTS ...... AVON, TOWN OF ...... 2502310000 09/20/95 01 ...... MASSACHUSETTS ...... MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF ...... 2552140010G 09/30/95 01 ...... MASSACHUSETTS ...... MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF ...... 2552140000 09/30/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... FREEDOM, TOWN OF ...... 3300130000 07/03/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... FREEDOM, TOWN OF ...... 3300130013C 07/03/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... FREEDOM, TOWN OF ...... 3300130015C 07/03/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... FREEDOM, TOWN OF ...... 3300130010C 07/03/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... OSSIPEE, TOWN OF ...... 3300160019C 07/03/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... OSSIPEE, TOWN OF ...... 3300160016C 07/03/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... OSSIPEE, TOWN OF ...... 3300160008C 07/03/95 01 ...... NEW HAMPSHIRE ...... OSSIPEE, TOWN OF ...... 3300160000 07/03/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... CHARLESTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 4453950005E 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... CHARLESTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 4453950000 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... CHARLESTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 4453950010E 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... NARRAGANSETT, TOWN OF ...... 4454020000 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... NARRAGANSETT, TOWN OF ...... 4454020008E 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... NEW SHOREHAM, TOWN OF ...... 4400360002D 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... NEW SHOREHAM, TOWN OF ...... 4400360004D 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... NEW SHOREHAM, TOWN OF ...... 4400360000 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... PORTSMOUTH, TOWN OF ...... 4454050000 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... PORTSMOUTH, TOWN OF ...... 4454050002F 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... SOUTH KINGSTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 4454070032G 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... SOUTH KINGSTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 4454070033G 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... SOUTH KINGSTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 4454070000 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... SOUTH KINGSTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 4454070028F 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... TIVERTON, TOWN OF ...... 4400120007E 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... TIVERTON, TOWN OF ...... 4400120000 09/30/95 01 ...... RHODE ISLAND ...... TIVERTON, TOWN OF ...... 4400120005E 09/30/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ALLENDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0088F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ALLENDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0086F 09/20/95 28298 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ALLENDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0067F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ALLENDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ALLENDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0069F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BERGEN COUNTY* ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BERGENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0211F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BERGENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0184F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BERGENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0192F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BERGENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BOGOTA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BOGOTA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BOGOTA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0194F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BOGOTA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... BOGOTA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0193F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CAPE MAY POINT, BOROUGH OF ...... 3452890001D 12/05/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CARLSTADT, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0253F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CARLSTADT, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0254F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CARLSTADT, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CARLSTADT, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CARLSTADT, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0252F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0204F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0206F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0203F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0202F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0201F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0211F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0212F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0220F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0210F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0203F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0204F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DELRAN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3400940002B 12/05/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DELRAN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3400940001B 12/05/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DELRAN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3400940000 12/05/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DEMAREST, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0210F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DEMAREST, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0204F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DEMAREST, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0203F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DEMAREST, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DUMONT, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0211F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DUMONT, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0203F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DUMONT, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0184F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DUMONT, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0192F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... DUMONT, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EAST PATERSON, BOROUGH ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EAST RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0254F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EAST RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EAST RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0253F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EAST RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0278F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0279F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0286F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0277F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0276F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ELMWOOD PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0188F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ELMWOOD PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0186F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ELMWOOD PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0167F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ELMWOOD PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0169F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ELMWOOD PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EMERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0201F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EMERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0184F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EMERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EMERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0183F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EMERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0181F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... EMERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0276F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0214F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0277F 09/20/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28299

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0213F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0211F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0212F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0187F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0186F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0179F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0178F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0167F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0159F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0286F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0278F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0259F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0267F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FORT LEE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0278F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FORT LEE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0276F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FORT LEE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0277F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FORT LEE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0068F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0152F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0066F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0151F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0064F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0062F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0063F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GARFIELD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GARFIELD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0189F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GARFIELD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0169F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GARFIELD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GARFIELD, CITY OF ...... 34003C0188F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GLEN ROCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0176F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GLEN ROCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0178F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GLEN ROCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0157F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GLEN ROCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0159F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... GLEN ROCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0264F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0262F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0263F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0266F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0331F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0332F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0268F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0307F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0267F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0261F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0245F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0259F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0253F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0252F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0254F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0258F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0252F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0193F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0194F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0189F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0192F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0191F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HACKENSACK, CITY OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HARRINGTON PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0201F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HARRINGTON PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0202F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HARRINGTON PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HARRINGTON PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0113F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HARRINGTON PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0114F 09/20/95 28300 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0252F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0189F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HAWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0201F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HAWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0203F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HAWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0184F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HAWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HAWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HILLSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0181F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HILLSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HILLSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0093F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HILLSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0094F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HILLSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HILLSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0089F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HO-HO-KUS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0176F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HO-HO-KUS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0177F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HO-HO-KUS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0088F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HO-HO-KUS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... HO-HO-KUS, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0089F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LEONIA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0276F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LEONIA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LEONIA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LEONIA, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0213F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LITTLE FERRY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0258F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LITTLE FERRY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LITTLE FERRY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LITTLE FERRY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LODI, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LODI, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0252F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LODI, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LODI, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0188F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LODI, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0189F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LYNDHURST, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0253F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LYNDHURST, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0261F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LYNDHURST, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0235F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LYNDHURST, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0245F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... LYNDHURST, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0068F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0069F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0067F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0076F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0062F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0078F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0061F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0059F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0066F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0054F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0056F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0058F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0057F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAYWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0193F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAYWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0187F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAYWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0191F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAYWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0189F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MAYWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MIDLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0069F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MIDLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0157F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MIDLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MIDLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0156F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MIDLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0068F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3402690011C 09/30/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3402690000 09/30/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MONTVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0091F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MONTVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0092F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MONTVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0087F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MONTVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MONTVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0079F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MOONACHIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0258F 09/20/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28301

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MOONACHIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... MOONACHIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NEW MILFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0191F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NEW MILFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0192F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NEW MILFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0184F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NEW MILFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORTH ARLINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0263F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORTH ARLINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORTH ARLINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0261F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORTH ARLINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0245F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORTHVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0202F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORTHVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0114F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORTHVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0206F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0202F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0201F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0114F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0113F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0062F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0151F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0064F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0063F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0061F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0042F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0044F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0114F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0201F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0113F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0094F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0111F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ORADELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0183F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ORADELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0184F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ORADELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0181F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ORADELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ORADELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PALISADES PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0276F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PALISADES PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0278F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PALISADES PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PALISADES PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0259F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PALISADES PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0186F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0183F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0187F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0191F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0177F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0181F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0176F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0179F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0178F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARK RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0094F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARK RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0093F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARK RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0091F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARK RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0092F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARK RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0087F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... PARK RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0067F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0086F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0078F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0059F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0066F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0058F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0259F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 28302 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0278F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0259F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0177F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0184F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0178F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0176F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0159F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0069F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0088F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 34003C0157F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER EDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0191F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER EDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0192F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER EDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0183F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER EDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0201F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0113F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0094F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0092F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0111F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCHELLE PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0189F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCHELLE PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCHELLE PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0187F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCKLEIGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0202F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCKLEIGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0206F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCKLEIGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0118F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCKLEIGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... ROCKLEIGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0114F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0261F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0253F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE BROOK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0188F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE BROOK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0189F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE BROOK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0187F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE BROOK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0186F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE BROOK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0088F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0089F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0087F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0086F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SOUTH BELMAR, BOROUGH OF ...... 3403280001C 11/02/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SOUTH HACKENSACK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0256F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SOUTH HACKENSACK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... SOUTH HACKENSACK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0257F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0276F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0213F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0192F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0211F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0194F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0193F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TENAFLY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0220F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TENAFLY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0214F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TENAFLY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0211F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TENAFLY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0212F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TENAFLY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0204F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TENAFLY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... TETERBORO, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... UPPER SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0086F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... UPPER SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0087F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... UPPER SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0078F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... UPPER SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28303

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... UPPER SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0079F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WALDWICK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0088F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WALDWICK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WALDWICK, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0069F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WALLINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0253F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WALLINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WALLINGTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0181F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0183F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0089F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0177F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0093F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WESTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0182F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WESTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0181F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WESTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOOD-RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0252F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOOD-RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0254F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOOD-RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0251F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOOD-RIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOODCLIFF LAKE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0093F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOODCLIFF LAKE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0094F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOODCLIFF LAKE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOODCLIFF LAKE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0091F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOODCLIFF LAKE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0087F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WOODCLIFF LAKE, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0089F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0152F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0156F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0157F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0069F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0000 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0064F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW JERSEY ...... WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 34003C0068F 09/20/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON SPA, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0552E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON SPA, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0551E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON SPA, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0439E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON SPA, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0438E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON SPA, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0551E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0552E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0561E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0553E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0554E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0562E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0544E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0541E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0531E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0439E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0533E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0534E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... BALLSTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0532E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0536E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0541E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0537E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0533E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0505E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0531E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0510E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0509E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0530E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CHARLTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0517E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0635E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0569E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0655E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0660E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0670E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0665E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0568E 08/16/95 28304 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0667E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0567E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0566E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0544E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0561E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0562E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0564E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0302E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0292E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0301E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0303E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0308E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0306E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0287E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0309E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0330E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0307E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0304E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0284E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0139E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0138E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0283E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0143E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0164E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0144E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0280E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0163E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0301E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0302E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0306E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0164E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0163E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... CORINTH, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... DAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... EDINBURG, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ELLICOTTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 3600690031C 08/02/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ELLICOTTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 3600690032C 08/02/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ELLICOTTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 3600690025C 08/02/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ELLICOTTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 3600690000 08/02/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ELLICOTTVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 3600690010C 08/02/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... EVANS, TOWN OF ...... 3602400000 07/03/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... EVANS, TOWN OF ...... 3602400015E 07/03/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0414E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0505E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0530E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0510E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0412E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0400E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0404E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0390E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GALWAY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0395E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0406E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0404E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0312E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0313E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0407E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0433E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0428E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0429E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0311E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0408E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0409E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0284E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0308E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0287E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0289E 08/16/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28305

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0288E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0304E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0292E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0303E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... GREENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0294E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0155E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0145E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0164E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0163E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0144E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0165E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0143E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0135E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0040E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HADLEY, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0045E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0677E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0676E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0678E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0686E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0679E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0660E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0683E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0681E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0667E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0567E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0593E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0569E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0586E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0587E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... HALFMOON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0589E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0559E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0554E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0558E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0560E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0566E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0552E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0567E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0576E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0562E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0441E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0465E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0437E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0439E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0442E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0461E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0444E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MALTA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0443E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MECHANICVILLE, CITY OF ...... 36091C0589E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MECHANICVILLE, CITY OF ...... 36091C0593E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MECHANICVILLE, CITY OF ...... 36091C0591E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MECHANICVILLE, CITY OF ...... 36091C0587E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MECHANICVILLE, CITY OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MECHANICVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0438E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0437E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0439E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0436E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0531E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0532E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0551E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0428E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0530E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0418E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0404E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0417E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0409E 08/16/95 28306 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0408E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0412E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0416E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MILTON, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0414E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0333E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0330E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0355E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0334E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0309E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0335E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0307E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0215E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0190E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... MOREAU, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0195E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NEW HAVEN, TOWN OF ...... 3606550000 11/02/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NEW HAVEN, TOWN OF ...... 3606550005D 11/02/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0457E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0476E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0365E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0477E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0456E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0355E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0333E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0334E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... OSWEGO, TOWN OF ...... 3606570010D 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... OSWEGO, TOWN OF ...... 3606570005D 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... OSWEGO, TOWN OF ...... 3606570000 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0404E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0400E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0288E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... RICHLAND, TOWN OF ...... 3606600003D 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... RICHLAND, TOWN OF ...... 3606600001D 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... RICHLAND, TOWN OF ...... 3606600000 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ROUND LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0566E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ROUND LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0558E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... ROUND LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SANDY CREEK, TOWN OF ...... 3606610000 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SANDY CREEK, TOWN OF ...... 3606610020D 07/17/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0441E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0443E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0451E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0461E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0453E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0439E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0465E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0454E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0442E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0428E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0429E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0434E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0433E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0436E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 36091C0437E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0478E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0477E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0479E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0487E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0486E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0476E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0488E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0489E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0458E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0456E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0454E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0457E 08/16/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28307

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0465E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SARATOGA, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0461E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580060C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580037C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580039C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580045C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580035C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580017C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580025C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580024C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580000 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHROON, TOWN OF ...... 3611580019C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHUYLERVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0477E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SCHUYLERVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SOUTH GLENS FALLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0195E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SOUTH GLENS FALLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0215E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... SOUTH GLENS FALLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0583E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0578E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0584E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0591E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0586E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0577E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0601E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0587E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0582E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0576E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0444E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0465E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0488E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0560E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0567E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0559E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0591E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0592E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0584E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0583E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... STILLWATER, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... VICTORY, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0478E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... VICTORY, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0479E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... VICTORY, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0477E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... VICTORY, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0476E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... VICTORY, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0693E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0687E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0691E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0689E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0686E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0678E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0683E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0679E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0691E 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WATERFORD, VILLAGE OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3611610027C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3611610026C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3611610028C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3611610029C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3611610025C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3611610022C 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3611610000 11/16/95 02 ...... NEW YORK ...... WILTON,TOWN OF ...... 36091C0000 08/16/95 02 ...... VIRGIN ISLANDS ...... VIRGIN ISLANDS, COMMONWEALTH ...... 7800000000 09/20/95 02 ...... VIRGIN ISLANDS ...... VIRGIN ISLANDS, COMMONWEALTH ...... 7800000045E 09/20/95 03 ...... MARYLAND ...... OAKLAND, TOWN OF ...... 2400390001C 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0186E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0166E 10/04/95 28308 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0167E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0169E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0168E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALLENPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208450001C 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALLENPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208450002C 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ALLENPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208450000 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ASPINWALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0357E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ASPINWALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0356E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ASPINWALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ASPINWALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... AVALON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0327E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... AVALON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0331E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... AVALON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... AVALON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... AVALON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0477E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0476E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0479E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0478E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0459E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0362E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0457E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0363E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0368E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0364E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN,TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN,TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN,TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0457E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BALDWIN,TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0344E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELL ACRES, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0160E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELL ACRES, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0156E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELL ACRES, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0152E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELL ACRES, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0154E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELL ACRES, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELL ACRES, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELLE VERNON, BOROUGH OF ...... 4204570001C 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELLEVUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0331E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELLEVUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELLEVUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0327E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BELLEVUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BEN AVON HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BEN AVON HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BEN AVON HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BEN AVON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0327E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BEN AVON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BEN AVON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BEN AVON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0462E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0478E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0467E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0459E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0466E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0454E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0456E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0458E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0457E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BLAWNOX, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0376E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BLAWNOX, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BLAWNOX, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRACKENRIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0251E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRACKENRIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0232E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRACKENRIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRACKENRIDGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28309

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0388E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0369E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADFORD WOODS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADFORD WOODS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRADFORD WOODS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0039E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRENTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0477E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRENTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0476E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRENTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0364E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRENTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRENTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRENTWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0363E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRIDGEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0452E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRIDGEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0451E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRIDGEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BRIDGEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BROWNSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 4204580001C 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... BROWNSVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216210001B 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CALIFORNIA, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208480000 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CALIFORNIA, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208480010B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARNEGIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0338E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARNEGIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0339E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARNEGIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARNEGIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0337E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARNEGIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0336E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARNEGIE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4221420010B 12/05/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4221420005B 12/05/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4221420000 12/05/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CASTLE SHANNON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0457E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CASTLE SHANNON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CASTLE SHANNON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0456E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CASTLE SHANNON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0344E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CASTLE SHANNON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CENTERVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 4225520020B 12/05/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHALFANT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHALFANT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0387E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHALFANT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHALFANT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHESWICK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHESWICK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0241E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHESWICK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHURCHILL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0387E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHURCHILL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHURCHILL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHURCHILL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CHURCHILL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0380E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CLAIRTON, CITY OF ...... 42003C0494E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CLAIRTON, CITY OF ...... 42003C0511E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CLAIRTON, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CLAIRTON, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CLAIRTON, CITY OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CLAIRTON, CITY OF ...... 42003C0492E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COAL CENTER, BOROUGH OF ...... 4221310001C 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0317E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0318E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0316E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0336E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0319E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0451E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0338E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0432E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0339E 10/04/95 28310 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CORAOPOLIS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0169E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CORAOPOLIS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0168E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CORAOPOLIS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CORAOPOLIS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRAFTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0341E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRAFTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0337E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRAFTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0333E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRAFTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRAFTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRAFTON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0329E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRESCENT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0162E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRESCENT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0161E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRESCENT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRESCENT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0153E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRESCENT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CRESCENT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0145E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CUMBERLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4211880000 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CUMBERLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4211880010C 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CUMBERLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4211880015C 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... CUMBERLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4211880020C 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DICKINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4215800003B 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DICKINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4215800000 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DICKINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4215800002B 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DICKINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4215800001B 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DONORA, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208510001A 09/30/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DORMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0344E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DORMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DORMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DRAVOSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DRAVOSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0482E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DRAVOSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DRAVOSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUNKARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4224310015C 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUNKARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4224310010C 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUNKARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4224310000 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUNLEVY, BOROUGH OF ...... 4221330001B 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUQUESNE, CITY OF ...... 42003C0501E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUQUESNE, CITY OF ...... 42003C0502E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUQUESNE, CITY OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUQUESNE, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUQUESNE, CITY OF ...... 42003C0388E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... DUQUESNE, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST BETHLEHEM, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4221400005C 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0235E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0234E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0232E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST MCKEESPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0393E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST MCKEESPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST MCKEESPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST MCKEESPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST NORWEGIAN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4220030003B 11/02/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST PITTSBURGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST PITTSBURGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST PITTSBURGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0388E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EAST PITTSBURGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0162E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0166E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0160E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EDGEWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0154E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELCO, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208520001B 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28311

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0494E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0540E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0518E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0551E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0556E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0517E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0554E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0552E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0513E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0516E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0492E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0494E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0504E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0512E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0508E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0511E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EMSWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EMSWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EMSWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EMSWORTH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ETNA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0352E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ETNA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0214E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ETNA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ETNA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EULALIA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4219760000 12/05/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... EULALIA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4219760015C 12/05/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FALLOWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4221480000 09/30/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FALLOWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4221480004B 09/30/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0094E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0092E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0093E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0115E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0091E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0251E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0087E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0232E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0089E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FAYETTE CITY, BOROUGH OF ...... 4204640001C 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0295E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0304E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0302E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0285E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0284E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0139E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0280E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0145E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0303E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOREST HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0387E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOREST HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOREST HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOREST HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOREST HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0380E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0552E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0554E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0553E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0551E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0493E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0530E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0494E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0540E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0238E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0357E 10/04/95 28312 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0236E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0217E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0219E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0218E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0216E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0186E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0187E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0178E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0179E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0177E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0176E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0156E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0160E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0227E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0232E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0093E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0094E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0234E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0089E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0241E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0235E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLASSPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0492E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLASSPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0503E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLASSPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLASSPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLASSPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0482E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLASSPORT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GLENFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0169E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GREEN TREE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0341E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GREEN TREE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0337E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GREEN TREE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GREEN TREE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... GREENSBORO, BOROUGH OF ...... 4204770001B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4218880005B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4218880004B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4218880003B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4218880000 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0201E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0202E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0203E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0204E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0206E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0211E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0216E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0212E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0210E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0239E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0241E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0238E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0237E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0229E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0235E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0236E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0252E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0251E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0232E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0115E 10/04/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28313

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0169E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0168E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0166E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0167E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HEIDELBERG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0339E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HEIDELBERG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HEIDELBERG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0338E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HEIDELBERG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HENDERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4209600005C 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0368E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0369E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0366E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0207E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0230E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0237E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0235E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0229E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0217E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0227E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0210E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0216E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0212E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0206E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0236E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INGRAM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0333E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INGRAM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INGRAM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... INGRAM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0329E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0491E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0493E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0492E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0494E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0488E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0489E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0478E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0479E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0486E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0487E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216290000 09/30/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216290010B 09/30/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216290005B 09/30/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216720008C 11/02/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216720000 11/02/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216720006C 11/02/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216720002C 11/02/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0307E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0326E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0327E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0329E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0328E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KILBUCK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KILBUCK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0186E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KILBUCK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KILBUCK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... KILBUCK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 28314 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEET, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0153E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEET, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEET, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0160E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEET, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEET, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0162E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEET, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0154E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEETSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0162E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEETSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0161E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEETSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0154E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEETSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEETSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LEETSDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0153E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LIBERTY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0504E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LIBERTY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0503E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LIBERTY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LIBERTY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LIBERTY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0511E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0513E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0504E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0512E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0492E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0503E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0494E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310005B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310004B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310001B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310003B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310002B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310000 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310007B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310006B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310008B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216310009B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARION CENTER, CITY OF ...... 4205030001C 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0036E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0019E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0037E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0160E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0039E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0177E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0176E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0191E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0187E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0201E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0192E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0184E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0183E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0177E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0181E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0179E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0211E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0182E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0203E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCDONALD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0426E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCDONALD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0313E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCDONALD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCDONALD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEES ROCKS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0331E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEES ROCKS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0333E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEES ROCKS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0327E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEES ROCKS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEES ROCKS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0329E 10/04/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28315

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEES ROCKS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0503E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0504E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0502E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0501E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0482E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MCKEESPORT, CITY OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MILLVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0352E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MILLVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0351E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MILLVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MILLVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONOGAHELA, CITY OF ...... 4208560001B 09/20/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONONGAHELA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216730010B 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONONGAHELA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216730005B 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONONGAHELA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216730000 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0404E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0403E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0413E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0411E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0412E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0393E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0394E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0383E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0392E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0384E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0391E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0387E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0166E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0164E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0309E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0304E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0168E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0161E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0169E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0162E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0308E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0302E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0145E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0306E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0307E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOUNT OLIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MOUNT OLIVER, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0456E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0344E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0452E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0339E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0457E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MUNHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0368E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MUNHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0369E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MUNHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MUNHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MUNHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... MUNHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0366E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0326E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0327E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0169E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0168E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 28316 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NEWELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 4204650001C 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NICHOLSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4224200010B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0388E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0387E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH CHARLEROI, BOROUGH OF ...... 4221370001B 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0303E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0304E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0311E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0308E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0295E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0314E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0427E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0313E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0312E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0426E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0316E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0318E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0284E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0285E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0388E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0394E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0502E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0506E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0393E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0376E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0212E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0216E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0214E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0218E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0357E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0356E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0219E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0238E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0318E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0314E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0239E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0237E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0238E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OAKMONT, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0186E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0178E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0187E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ONEIDA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216970005B 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ONEIDA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216970000 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4210030010C 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ORBISONIA, BOROUGH OF ...... 4216820001C 07/03/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OSBORNE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0168E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OSBORNE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0166E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OSBORNE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... OSBORNE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28317

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0383E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0384E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0382E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0391E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0380E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0381E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0239E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0376E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0243E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0357E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENNSBURY VILLAGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENNSBURY VILLAGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PENNSBURY VILLAGE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0336E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0065E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0182E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0201E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0181E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0177E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0037E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0039E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0045E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITCAIRN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0393E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITCAIRN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0394E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITCAIRN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0392E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITCAIRN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITCAIRN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITCAIRN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0391E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0364E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0363E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0361E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0362E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0357E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0457E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0366E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0481E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0482E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0477E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0356E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0368E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0380E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0351E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0328E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0329E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0194E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0354E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0331E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0334E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0333E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0352E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0353E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0344E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0342E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0337E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PITTSBURGH, CITY OF ...... 42003C0341E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLEASANT HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0478E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLEASANT HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0479E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLEASANT HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0477E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLEASANT HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLEASANT HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0265E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0381E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0382E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0402E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0384E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0404E 10/04/95 28318 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0403E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0401E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0261E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0262E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0237E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0239E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0244E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0241E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0243E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PLUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0242E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PORT VUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0503E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PORT VUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0501E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PORT VUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PORT VUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PORT VUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0482E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... PORT VUE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RANKIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0369E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RANKIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RANKIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RANKIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RANKIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RESERVE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0353E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RESERVE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0351E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RESERVE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RESERVE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RESERVE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0213E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICES LANDING, BOROUGH OF ...... 4204790001C 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0070E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0206E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0065E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0202E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0201E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0328E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0326E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0329E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0336E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0337E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0317E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0309E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0316E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0169E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0188E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0306E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0308E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0307E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSCOE, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208580001C 10/18/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0211E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0213E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0351E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0331E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0194E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0187E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0189E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0192E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0191E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSSLYN FARMS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0337E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSSLYN FARMS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSSLYN FARMS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0336E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... ROSSLYN FARMS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0337E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0452E 10/04/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28319

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0451E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0341E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0339E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0338E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH ...... 42003C0167E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH ...... 42003C0178E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH ...... 42003C0186E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH ...... 42003C0166E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH ...... 42003C0160E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0186E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0178E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0160E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0167E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY HILLS, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0168E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0167E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0162E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0166E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SEWICKLEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0351E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0356E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0352E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0218E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0211E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0213E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0212E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0214E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHARPSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0352E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHARPSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHARPSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SHARPSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0356E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0318E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0319E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0314E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0426E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0431E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0451E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0453E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0433E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0432E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0427E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0487E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0486E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0478E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0459E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0467E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0489E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0466E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0488E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0516E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0508E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SOUTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPEERS, BOROUGH OF ...... 4221380001B 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0242E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0241E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0242E 10/04/95 28320 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0241E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0235E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0234E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STOCKDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 4208590001C 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0326E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0331E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0327E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STROUD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4206930020B 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STROUD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4206930000 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STROUD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4206930018B 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... STROUD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4206930010B 11/16/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SWISSVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SWISSVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SWISSVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... SWISSVALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TARENTUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0251E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TARENTUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0234E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TARENTUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0232E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TARENTUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TARENTUM, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... THORNBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... THORNBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TURTLE CREEK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0393E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TURTLE CREEK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0391E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TURTLE CREEK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TURTLE CREEK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TURTLE CREEK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... TURTLE CREEK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0387E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UNION, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4208600002D 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UNION, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4208600000 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UNION, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4208600003D 12/19/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0458E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0461E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0462E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0451E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0452E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0456E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0454E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0453E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERONA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERONA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0376E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERONA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0238E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERONA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0239E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERONA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERONA, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0380E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERSAILLES, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0512E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERSAILLES, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERSAILLES, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0504E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... VERSAILLES, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WALL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0394E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WALL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0393E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WALL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WALL, BOROUGHS OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216410003B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216410000 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216410002B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4216410001B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST BROWNSVILLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 4253910001B 09/06/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0089E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0207E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0230E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0227E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0206E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0070E 10/04/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28321

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0087E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0088E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0494E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0369E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0368E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0366E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0479E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0481E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0477E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0369E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0388E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0368E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0482E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0484E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0501E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST VIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0194E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST VIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WEST VIEW, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITAKER, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0369E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITAKER, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITAKER, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITAKER, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITE OAK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITE OAK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0502E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITE OAK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0508E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITE OAK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0504E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITE OAK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITE OAK, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0506E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITEHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITEHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WHITEHALL, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0457E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0380E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0387E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0391E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42003C0383E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0380E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0386E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0367E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILKINSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILMERDING, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILMERDING, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0393E 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILMERDING, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0000 10/04/95 03 ...... PENNSYLVANIA ...... WILMERDING, BOROUGH OF ...... 42003C0389E 10/04/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... HAMPTON, CITY OF ...... 5155270006F 07/03/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... HAMPTON, CITY OF ...... 5155270010F 07/03/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... HAMPTON, CITY OF ...... 5155270000 07/03/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... HAMPTON, CITY OF ...... 5155270014F 07/03/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 5102030040C 09/30/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 5102030000 09/30/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... ROANOKE COUNTY* ...... 51161C0039E 10/18/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... ROANOKE COUNTY* ...... 51161C0000 10/18/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... ROANOKE, CITY OF ...... 51161C0000 10/18/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 51161C0039E 10/18/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 51161C0000 10/18/95 03 ...... VIRGINIA ...... VINTON, TOWN OF ...... 51161C0000 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... FAIRMONT, CITY OF ...... 5400990001B 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... FAIRMONT, CITY OF ...... 5400990000 10/18/95 28322 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... FAIRMONT, CITY OF ...... 5400990002B 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... FAIRMONT, CITY OF ...... 5400990003B 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... GRANVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 5402720001B 11/02/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MARION COUNTY* ...... 5400970000 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MARION COUNTY* ...... 5400970045C 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MARION COUNTY* ...... 5400970085C 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390101C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390068C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390102C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390121C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390122C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390066C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390103C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390104C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390000 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390029C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390028C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MONONGALIA COUNTY* ...... 5401390027C 09/30/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MORGANTOWN, CITY OF ...... 5401410004D 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MORGANTOWN, CITY OF ...... 5401410001D 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MORGANTOWN, CITY OF ...... 5401410003D 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... MORGANTOWN, CITY OF ...... 5401410000 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... RIVESVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 5401050001C 09/20/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... STAR CITY, TOWN OF ...... 5402730001B 10/18/95 03 ...... WEST VIRGINIA ...... WESTOVER, CITY OF ...... 5402740001B 12/19/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... ARCHER, CITY OF ...... 1206700001A 08/02/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... BAL HARBOUR, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... BAL HARBOUR, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... BISCAYNE PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... BISCAYNE PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... BROWARD COUNTY* ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... COCONUT CREEK, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... COOPER CITY, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... CORAL GABLES, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... CORAL GABLES, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... CORAL SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0193K 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... DANIA, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... DAVIE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... DEERFIELD BEACH, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... DELAND, CITY OF ...... 1203070005B 07/03/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... EL PORTAL, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... EL PORTAL, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... FLORIDA CITY, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... FLORIDA CITY, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... FORT LAUDERDALE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... GOLDEN BEACH, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... GOLDEN BEACH, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HACIENDA, VILLAGE OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HALLANDALE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0317G 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HALLANDALE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HIALEAH GARDENS, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HIALEAH GARDENS, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HIALEAH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HIALEAH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HILLSBORO BEACH, TOWN OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HOLLYWOOD, CITY OF ...... 12011C0317G 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HOLLYWOOD, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HOMESTEAD, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... HOMESTEAD, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... INDIAN CREEK, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... INDIAN CREEK, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... ISLANDIA, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... ISLANDIA, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... KEY BISCAYNE, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... KEY BISCAYNE, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28323

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

04 ...... FLORIDA ...... KEY BISCAYNE, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0193K 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... LAUDERDALE LAKES, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... LAUDERHILL, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... LAZY LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... LIGHTHOUSE POINT, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MARGATE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MEDLEY, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MEDLEY, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI SHORES, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI SHORES, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0193K 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIAMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... MIRAMAR, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... NORTH BAY VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... NORTH BAY VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... NORTH LAUDERDALE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... NORTH MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... NORTH MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... NORTH MIAMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... NORTH MIAMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... OAKLAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... OPA-LOCKA, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... OPA-LOCKA, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... PARKLAND, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... PEMBROKE PARK, TOWN OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... PEMBROKE PINES, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... PLANTATION, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... POMPANO BEACH, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SEA RANCH LAKES, VILLAGE OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SOUTH MIAMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SOUTH MIAMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SUNRISE GOLF VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SUNRISE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SURFSIDE, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SURFSIDE, TOWN OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SWEETWATER, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... SWEETWATER, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... TAMARAC, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... TAYLOR COUNTY* ...... 1203020285C 08/16/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... TAYLOR COUNTY* ...... 1203020190C 08/16/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... TAYLOR COUNTY* ...... 1203020000 08/16/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... TAYLOR COUNTY* ...... 1203020175C 08/16/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... TAYLOR COUNTY* ...... 1203020305C 08/16/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... VIRGINIA GARDENS, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... VIRGINIA GARDENS, VILLAGE OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... WEST MAIMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... WEST MAIMI, CITY OF ...... 12025C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... FLORIDA ...... WILTON MANORS, CITY OF ...... 12011C0000 07/21/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0455D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0452D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0460D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0456D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0435D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0380D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0370D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0000 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0389D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0390D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CAMDEN COUNTY* ...... 13039C0393D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CHATHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300300170E 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CHATHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300300160E 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... CHATHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300300000 09/20/95 28324 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

04 ...... GEORGIA ...... COLUMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1300590095B 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... COLUMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1300590090B 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... COLUMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1300590080C 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... COLUMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1300590085C 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... COLUMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1300590040B 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... COLUMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1300590000 09/20/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990175A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990275A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990250A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990300A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990225A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990325A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990200A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990100A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990000 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990125A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990350A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990150A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... EARLY COUNTY* ...... 1304990025A 08/02/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GAINESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1302630015D 09/06/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GAINESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1302630005D 09/06/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GAINESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1302630010D 09/06/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GAINESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1302630000 09/06/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GLYNN COUNTY* ...... 1300920252E 07/17/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GLYNN COUNTY* ...... 1300920258E 07/17/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GLYNN COUNTY* ...... 1300920254E 07/17/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... GLYNN COUNTY* ...... 1300920000 07/17/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... KINGSLAND, CITY OF ...... 13039C0390D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... KINGSLAND, CITY OF ...... 13039C0370D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... KINGSLAND, CITY OF ...... 13039C0000 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0455D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0452D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0000 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0456D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0435D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0460D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0393D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0370D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0389D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0380D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... ST. MARYS, CITY OF ...... 13039C0390D 07/03/95 04 ...... GEORGIA ...... WOODBINE, CITY OF ...... 13039C0000 07/03/95 04 ...... KENTUCKY ...... TAYLOR MILL, CITY OF ...... 2102460001C 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 28075C0175D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 28075C0000 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 28075C0160D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 28075C0105D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 28075C0115D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 28075C0095D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... MARION, TOWN OF ...... 28075C0105D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... MARION, TOWN OF ...... 28075C0000 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... MERIDIAN, CITY OF ...... 28075C0115D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... MERIDIAN, CITY OF ...... 28075C0160D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... MERIDIAN, CITY OF ...... 28075C0000 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... MERIDIAN, CITY OF ...... 28075C0105D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... MERIDIAN, CITY OF ...... 28075C0095D 08/16/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF ...... 2801200001C 10/18/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF ...... 2801200002C 10/18/95 04 ...... MISSISSIPPI ...... PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF ...... 2801200000 10/18/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780000 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780214E 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780213E 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780318E 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780314D 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780356E 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780355D 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... CURRITUCK COUNTY* ...... 3700780357E 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... JOHNSTON COUNTY* ...... 3701380105C 11/02/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... JOHNSTON COUNTY* ...... 3701380130C 11/02/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... JOHNSTON COUNTY* ...... 3701380125C 11/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28325

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... JOHNSTON COUNTY* ...... 3701380100C 11/02/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... JOHNSTON COUNTY* ...... 3701380000 11/02/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... PINE KNOLL SHORES, TOWN OF ...... 3702670000 07/03/95 04 ...... NORTH CAROLINA ...... PINE KNOLL SHORES, TOWN OF ...... 3702670001D 07/03/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... ARCADIA LAKES, TOWN OF ...... 45079C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... BATESBURG-LEESVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0225F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... BATESBURG-LEESVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0195F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... BATESBURG-LEESVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... BATESBURG-LEESVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0200F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... BLYTHEWOOD, TOWN OF ...... 45079C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAREY'S LAKE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAYCE, CITY OF ...... 45063C0290F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAYCE, CITY OF ...... 45063C0295F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAYCE, CITY OF ...... 45063C0285F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAYCE, CITY OF ...... 45063C0277F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAYCE, CITY OF ...... 45063C0279F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAYCE, CITY OF ...... 45063C0278F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CAYCE, CITY OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CHAPIN, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... CHAPIN, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0050F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0133F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45079C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0134F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45079C0080H 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45079C0040H 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... EASTOVER, TOWN OF ...... 45079C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... EDGEFIELD COUNTY* ...... 4502290000 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... EDGEFIELD COUNTY* ...... 4502290145C 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... EDGEFIELD COUNTY* ...... 4502290150C 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... EDGEFIELD COUNTY* ...... 4502290185C 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... FOREST ACRES, CITY OF ...... 45079C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... GASTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... GASTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0425F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0220F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... IRMO, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0129F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... IRMO, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0133F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... IRMO, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0127F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... IRMO, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... IRMO, TOWN OF ...... 45079C0080H 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... IRMO, TOWN OF ...... 45079C0040H 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... IRMO, TOWN OF ...... 45079C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEESVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0161F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0163F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0143F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0144F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0142F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0165F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0200F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0170F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0250F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0251F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0220F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0225F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0195F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0141F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0137F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0139F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0050F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0100F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0025F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0125F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0278F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0129F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0127F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0136F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0253F 07/17/95 28326 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0133F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0134F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0138F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0130F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0252F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0390F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0375F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0400F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0425F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0475F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0450F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0350F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0325F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0285F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0279F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0286F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0288F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0295F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0290F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0254F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0500F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0525F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0259F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0530F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0257F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0258F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0267F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0256F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0265F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0269F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0575F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0270F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0277F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0550F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0276F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0251F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0253F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0252F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0250F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0139F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0138F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... MCCORMICK COUNTY* ...... 4502260000 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... MCCORMICK COUNTY* ...... 4502260150C 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... MCCORMICK COUNTY* ...... 4502260145C 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... MCCORMICK COUNTY* ...... 4502260140C 09/20/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PELION, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0525F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PELION, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PELION, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0390F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PELION, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0375F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PINE RIDGE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0290F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PINE RIDGE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0288F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PINE RIDGE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... PINE RIDGE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0286F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... RICHLAND COUNTY* ...... 45079C0080H 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... RICHLAND COUNTY* ...... 45079C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... RICHLAND COUNTY* ...... 45079C0040H 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SOUTH CONGAREE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0288F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SOUTH CONGAREE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0286F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SOUTH CONGAREE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0270F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SOUTH CONGAREE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0269F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SOUTH CONGAREE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SOUTH CONGAREE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0267F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0278F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0277F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0279F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0257F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0259F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0276F 07/17/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28327

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SUMMIT, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SUMMIT, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0220F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SWANSEA, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... SWANSEA, TOWN OF ...... 45063C0530F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0278F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0279F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0285F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0165F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0277F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0276F 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0000 07/17/95 04 ...... SOUTH CAROLINA ...... WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 45063C0163F 07/17/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... DECHERD, CITY OF ...... 4700540001D 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... DECHERD, CITY OF ...... 4700540002D 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... DECHERD, CITY OF ...... 4700540000 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 4703440125C 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 4703440000 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860003C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860009C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860010C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860008C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860007C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860004C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860005C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860001C 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701860000 08/16/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 4703330000 12/05/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 4703330105C 12/05/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... LAUDERDALE COUNTY* ...... 4703330085C 12/05/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... WINCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 4700560002C 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... WINCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 4700560003C 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... WINCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 4700560001C 09/30/95 04 ...... TENNESSEE ...... WINCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 4700560000 09/30/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BEECHER, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0528E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BEECHER, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0526E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BEECHER, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0507E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BEECHER, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BEECHER, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0509E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0054E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0058E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0045E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0034E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0061E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0062E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0056E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0070E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0053E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0052E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BRAIDWOOD, CITY OF ...... 17197C0415E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... BRAIDWOOD, CITY OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CHANNAHON, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0265E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CHANNAHON, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CHANNAHON, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0260E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CHANNAHON, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0255E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0161E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0162E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0155E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0154E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0134E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0142E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 17197C0153E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CRETE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0379E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CRETE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0386E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CRETE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CRETE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0378E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CRETE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0367E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... CRETE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0359E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ELWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 28328 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ELWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0290E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ELWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0286E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0326E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0331E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0327E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0310E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0195E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0218E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0213E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0214E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... GODLEY, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... GODLEY, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0415E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... HAMPSHIRE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1703270002C 11/02/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0164E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0163E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0170E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0162E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0280E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0190E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0161E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0260E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0285E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0255E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0134E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0144E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0130E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0143E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0110E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0135E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0137E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0142E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0141E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0140E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... JOLIET, CITY OF ...... 17197C0139E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0159E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0170E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0162E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0158E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0154E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0157E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0155E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... LOCKPORT, CITY OF ...... 17197C0156E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MANHATTAN, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0311E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MANHATTAN, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MANHATTAN, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0303E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MINOOKA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MINOOKA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0265E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MINOOKA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0255E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MOKENA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0213E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MOKENA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0216E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MOKENA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0310E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MOKENA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0212E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MOKENA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0211E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MOKENA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MOKENA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0195E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MONEE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MONEE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0365E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MONEE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0361E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... MONEE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0350E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0285E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0305E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0190E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0170E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PARK FOREST, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PEOTONE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28329

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PEOTONE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0500E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0038E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0126E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0127E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0045E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0135E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0130E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0039E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0260E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0163E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0280E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0144E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0070E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0155E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0065E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0062E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0045E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0061E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... ROMEOVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0058E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... SHOREWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0137E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... SHOREWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0143E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... SHOREWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0139E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... SHOREWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... SHOREWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0141E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... STEGER, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... SYMERTON, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0450E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... SYMERTON, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... TINLEY PARK, CITY OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0361E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0366E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0358E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0362E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0354E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0353E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0351E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0350E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0017E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0010E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0031E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0030E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0039E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0045E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0038E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0036E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0037E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0033E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0034E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0032E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0327E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0359E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0052E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0358E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0353E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0354E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0350E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0351E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0361E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0365E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0362E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0326E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0331E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0385E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0378E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0379E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0366E 09/06/95 28330 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0370E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0320E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0056E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0053E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0212E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0211E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0214E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0213E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0195E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0216E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0190E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0164E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0163E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0180E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0170E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0218E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0185E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0260E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0255E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0303E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0295E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0311E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0315E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0290E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0310E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0286E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0265E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0386E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0280E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0270E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0162E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0285E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0159E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0110E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0095E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0127E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0126E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0090E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0130E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0070E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0058E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0305E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0062E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0061E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0134E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0065E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0137E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0135E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0155E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0154E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0157E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0156E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0153E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0158E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0144E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0140E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0139E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0142E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0141E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0054E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0143E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0367E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0526E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0528E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0515E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0520E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0530E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0510E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0540E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0535E 09/06/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28331

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0585E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0390E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0560E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0580E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0507E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0545E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0509E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0505E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0410E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0500E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0409E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0408E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0395E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0405E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0416E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0415E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0450E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0417E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0475E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0440E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0430E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0420E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 17197C0417E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 17197C0409E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 17197C0416E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 17197C0415E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 17197C0408E 09/06/95 05 ...... ILLINOIS ...... WILMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 17197C0000 09/06/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... BATESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 18047C0000 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... BROOKVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0045C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... BROOKVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0000 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... CEDAR GROVE, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0000 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... CEDAR GROVE, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0150C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... CONNERSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1800619999B 08/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... CONNERSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 180061B 08/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... DELPHI, CITY OF ...... 1800209999B 08/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... DELPHI, CITY OF ...... 180020B 08/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... DUPONT, TOWN OF ...... 180106A 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... DUPONT, TOWN OF ...... 1801069999A 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FLORA, TOWN OF ...... 1800219999B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FLORA, TOWN OF ...... 180021B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0050C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0040C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0045C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0075C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0100C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0000 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0020C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0125C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0150C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 18047C0025C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850007B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850003B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850005B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850004B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850002B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850011B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800859999B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850008B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850009B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850010B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850006B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850001B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... HARRISON COUNTY* ...... 1800850000 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801080000 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801080001B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801080003B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801080006B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801089999B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801080005B 11/01/95 28332 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801080002B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... JENNINGS COUNTY* ...... 1801080004B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... LAUREL, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0000 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... LAUREL, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0025C 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... MONROE COUNTY* ...... 1804440007C 08/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... MONROE COUNTY* ...... 1804440003C 08/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... MONROE COUNTY* ...... 1804440000 08/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... MT. CARMEL, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0000 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... OLDENBURG, TOWN OF ...... 18047C0000 11/02/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950001B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950007B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801959999B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950000 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950006B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950005B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950004B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950002B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... PERRY COUNTY* ...... 1801950003B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... REMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 180101B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... REMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 1801019999B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... SCOTT COUNTY* ...... 1804749999B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... SCOTT COUNTY* ...... 1804740004B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... SCOTT COUNTY* ...... 1804740001B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... SCOTT COUNTY* ...... 1804740002B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... SCOTT COUNTY* ...... 1804740000 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... SCOTT COUNTY* ...... 1804740003B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... VERMILLION COUNTY* ...... 1804490002B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... VERMILLION COUNTY* ...... 1804490000 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... VERMILLION COUNTY* ...... 1804490001B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... VERMILLION COUNTY* ...... 1804490003B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... VERMILLION COUNTY* ...... 1804499999B 11/01/95 05 ...... INDIANA ...... VERMILLION COUNTY* ...... 1804490004B 11/01/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... BROWNSTOWN, CHARTERED TOWNSHIP ...... 2602180005D 09/06/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... BROWNSTOWN, CHARTERED TOWNSHIP ...... 2602180000 09/06/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400007D 12/05/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400008D 12/05/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400006D 12/05/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400009D 12/05/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400000 12/05/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400002D 12/05/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400005D 12/05/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MONTROSE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2603990005B 11/02/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MONTROSE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2603990006B 11/02/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MONTROSE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2603990003B 11/02/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MONTROSE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2603990004B 11/02/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... MONTROSE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2603990000 11/02/95 05 ...... MICHIGAN ...... PORT AUSTIN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 260290C 09/30/95 05 ...... MINNESOTA ...... BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701520000 09/30/95 05 ...... MINNESOTA ...... BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701520002C 09/30/95 05 ...... MINNESOTA ...... BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701520001C 09/30/95 05 ...... MINNESOTA ...... BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701520005C 09/30/95 05 ...... MINNESOTA ...... BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701520006C 09/30/95 05 ...... MINNESOTA ...... BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701520004C 09/30/95 05 ...... MINNESOTA ...... BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701520003D 09/30/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... BELLE CENTER, VILLAG ...... 29189C0044H 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... BEXLEY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0260G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... BEXLEY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... BEXLEY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0255G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... BLUFFTON, VILLAGE OF ...... 3900040001B 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... BRICE, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0290G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... BRICE, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... CANAL WINCHESTER, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0379G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... CANAL WINCHESTER, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0385G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... CANAL WINCHESTER, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0377G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... CANAL WINCHESTER, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0170G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0180G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0169G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0186G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0159G 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28333

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0188G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0158G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0157G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0167G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0226G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0228G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0231G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0229G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0227G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0156G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0195G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0220G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0210G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0190G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0141G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0120G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0128G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0126G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0117G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0109G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0108G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0045G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0130G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0135G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0142G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0152G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0144G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0233G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0139G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0136G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0138G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0137G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0155G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0165G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0235G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0290G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0295G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0285G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0335G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0281G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0238G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0378G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0385G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0377G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0279G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0359G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0355G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0240G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0243G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0239G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0245G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0278G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0255G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0260G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0276G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0277G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0270G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0265G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DARBYDALE, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0108G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0107G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0109G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0106G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0126G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0105G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0018G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0019G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0130G 08/02/95 28334 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0038G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... DUBLIN, CITY OF ...... 39049C0128G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... ERIE COUNTY* ...... 3901530080C 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... ERIE COUNTY* ...... 3901530055C 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... ERIE COUNTY* ...... 3901530075C 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... ERIE COUNTY* ...... 3901530000 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FLORIDA, VILLAGE OF ...... 3902630001D 12/05/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0265G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0276G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0277G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0270G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0279G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0260G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0281G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0290G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0295G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0285G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0255G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0283G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0245G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0228G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0229G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0227G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0231G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0226G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0233G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0239G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0243G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0238G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0305G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0235G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0310G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0367G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0376G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0365G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0377G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0360G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0378G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0386G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0387G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0385G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0359G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0379G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0357G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0327G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0328G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0326G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0329G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0320G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0331G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0345G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0355G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0335G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0220G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0333G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0215G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0120G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0126G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0117G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0128G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0116G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0130G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0137G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0138G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0136G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0115G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0135G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0109G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0045G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0064G 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28335

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0038G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0069G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0019G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0090G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0107G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0108G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0106G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0139G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0105G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0141G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0183G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0184G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0182G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0186G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0181G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0188G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0205G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0210G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0195G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0180G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0190G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0170G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0155G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0156G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0152G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0157G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0144G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0158G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0167G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0169G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0165G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0159G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 39049C0240G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0190G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0276G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0188G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0277G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0167G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0169G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GAHANNA, CITY OF ...... 39049C0186G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GLENFORD, VILLAGE OF ...... 3904420001C 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GRAND RIVER, VILLAGE OF ...... 3903150001C 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0235G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0231G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0327G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0328G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0331G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0329G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0333G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0326G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0243G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0238G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0240G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 39049C0239G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVEPORT, VIILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0360G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVEPORT, VIILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0376G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVEPORT, VIILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0359G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVEPORT, VIILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0290G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVEPORT, VIILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVEPORT, VIILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0270G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... GROVEPORT, VIILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0357G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HAMILTON COUNTY* ...... 3902040040C 10/18/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HAMILTON COUNTY* ...... 3902040000 10/18/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HARRISBURG, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0320G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HARRISBURG, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0310G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HARRISBURG, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 28336 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... OHIO ...... HENRY COUNTY* ...... 3907760100B 12/05/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HENRY COUNTY* ...... 3907760050B 12/05/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HENRY COUNTY* ...... 3907760025B 12/05/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HENRY COUNTY* ...... 3907760000 12/05/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HENRY COUNTY* ...... 3907760075B 12/05/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 3901100002D 09/30/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 3901100001D 09/30/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 3901100000 09/30/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0120G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0138G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0128G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0117G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0136G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0116G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0108G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0115G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 39049C0109G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... KELLEYS ISLAND, VILLAGE OF ...... 3907380000 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... KELLEYS ISLAND, VILLAGE OF ...... 3907380002B 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... LAKE COUNTY* ...... 3907710000 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... LAKE COUNTY* ...... 3907710022D 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... LAKE COUNTY* ...... 3907710004D 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... LAURELVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3902730001B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... LOCKBOURNE, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0365G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... LOCKBOURNE, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MALVERN, VILLAGE OF ...... 3900520001B 07/03/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MARBLE CLIFF, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0231G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MARBLE CLIFF, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0227G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MARBLE CLIFF, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870075B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870000 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870025B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870050B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870175B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870125B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870150B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MEIGS COUNTY* ...... 3903870100B 11/16/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MENTOR, CITY OF ...... 3903170000 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MENTOR, CITY OF ...... 3903170005E 09/20/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... MINERVA PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NAPOLEON, CITY OF ...... 3902660005D 11/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0183G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0182G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0180G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0181G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0190G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0195G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... NEW ROME, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... OBETZ, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0355G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... OBETZ, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0360G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... OBETZ, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0265G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... OBETZ, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0270G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... OBETZ, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... PICKERINGTON, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0290G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0295G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0285G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0277G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0283G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0281G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF ...... 39049C0279G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... RIVERLEA, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... RIVERLEA, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0135G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... TRIMBLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 390021A 11/01/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... TRIMBLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3900219999A 11/01/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0227G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0231G 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28337

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

05 ...... OHIO ...... UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0136G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0139G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0137G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0141G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... URBANCREST, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... URBANCREST, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0239G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... URBANCREST, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0238G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... VALLEYVIEW, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0229G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... VALLEYVIEW, VILLAGE OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0156G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0159G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0069G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0152G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0064G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0157G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WESTERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 39049C0158G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WHITEHALL, CITY OF ...... 39049C0276G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WHITEHALL, CITY OF ...... 39049C0278G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WHITEHALL, CITY OF ...... 39049C0260G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WHITEHALL, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WORTHINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0135G 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WORTHINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0000 08/02/95 05 ...... OHIO ...... WORTHINGTON, CITY OF ...... 39049C0155G 08/02/95 05 ...... WISCONSIN ...... CLINTONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 5504940002B 11/16/95 05 ...... WISCONSIN ...... EPHRAIM, VILLAGE OF ...... 5506110001A 12/05/95 05 ...... WISCONSIN ...... WASHBURN, CITY OF ...... 5500190005B 11/02/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... AVOCA, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... BENTON COUNTY* ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... BENTON COUNTY* ...... 05007C0155F 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... BENTONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 05007C0155F 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... BENTONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... BETHEL HEIGHTS, TOWN OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... CAVE CITY, CITY OF ...... 0503130005B 11/02/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... CAVE SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... CENTERTON, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... DECATUR, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... GARFIELD, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... GATEWAY, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... GENTRY, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... GRAVETTE, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... HIGHFILL, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0501800010E 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0501800005E 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0501800000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... LITTLE FLOCK, TOWN OF ...... 05007C0155F 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... LITTLE FLOCK, TOWN OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... LOWELL, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... PEA RIDGE,CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720025C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720200C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720175C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720125C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720100C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720020C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720150C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720075C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... POINSETT COUNTY* ...... 0501720050C 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... ROGERS, CITY OF ...... 05007C0155F 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... ROGERS, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... SHERWOOD, CITY OF ...... 0502350001E 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... SHERWOOD, CITY OF ...... 0502350002E 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... SHERWOOD, CITY OF ...... 0502350000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... SILOAM SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... SPRINGDALE, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... SULPHUR SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 05007C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... ARKANSAS ...... WEINER, CITY OF ...... 0503730001B 08/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... COLFAX, TOWN OF ...... 2200770005C 11/16/95 28338 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760215C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760230C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760225C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760210C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760025C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760050C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760000 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760250C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760195C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760190C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760085C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760205C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760105C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760100C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760150C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760175C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760125C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760180C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760115C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760075C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760095C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760185C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... NEW ROADS, TOWN OF ...... 2201440001C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... POINTE COUPEE PARISH* ...... 2201400000 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... POINTE COUPEE PARISH* ...... 2201400260C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... POINTE COUPEE PARISH* ...... 2201400255C 11/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050240E 08/16/95 06 ...... LOUISIANA ...... ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050000 08/16/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... DONA ANA COUNTY* ...... 35013C0517F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... DONA ANA COUNTY* ...... 35013C0000 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... DONA ANA COUNTY* ...... 35013C0632F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... DONA ANA COUNTY* ...... 35013C0519F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... DONA ANA COUNTY* ...... 35013C0518F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... HATCH, VILLAGE OF ...... 35013C0000 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... LAS CRUCES, CITY OF ...... 35013C0517F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... LAS CRUCES, CITY OF ...... 35013C0519F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... LAS CRUCES, CITY OF ...... 35013C0518F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... LAS CRUCES, CITY OF ...... 35013C0000 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... LAS CRUCES, CITY OF ...... 35013C0632F 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... MESILLA, TOWN OF ...... 35013C0000 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320004B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320043B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320044B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320041B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320042B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320045B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320040B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320046B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320051B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320052B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320048B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320049B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320039B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320047B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320037B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320038B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320028B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320029B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320026B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320027B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320030B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320025B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320031B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320035B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320036B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320033B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320034B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501329999B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320032B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320023B 10/01/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28339

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320008B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320010B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320006B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320007B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320011B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320005B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320012B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320016B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320017B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320014B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320015B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320024B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320013B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320002B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320003B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320020B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320018B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320021B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320022B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320001B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320000 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SAN MIGUEL COUNTY* ...... 3501320019B 10/01/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SUNLAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 35013C0000 09/06/95 06 ...... NEW MEXICO ...... SUNLAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 35013C0000 09/06/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... ATOKA, CITY OF ...... 4000080005C 11/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110050A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110000 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110250A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110225A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110150A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110200A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110025A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110100A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110075A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BLAINE COUNTY ...... 4000110125A 08/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BOYNTON, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BRAGGS, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... BRECKENRIDGE, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... CACHE,TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... CARRIER, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... CHATTANOOGA, TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... CLAREMORE, CITY OF ...... 4053750005F 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... COMANCHE COUNTY* ...... 40031C0261D 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... COMANCHE COUNTY* ...... 40031C0250D 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... COMANCHE COUNTY* ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... COUNCIL HILL, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... COVINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... DOUGLAS, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... DRUMMOND, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... ELGIN, TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... ENID, CITY OF ...... 40047C0095D 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... ENID, CITY OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... FAIRMONT, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... FAXON, TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... FLETCHER, TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... FORT GIBSON, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... GARBER, CITY OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... GARFIELD COUNTY* ...... 40047C0095D 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... GARFIELD COUNTY* ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... GERONIMO, TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... GOLDSBY, TOWN OF ...... 4001020010B 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... GOLDSBY, TOWN OF ...... 4001020005B 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... GOLDSBY, TOWN OF ...... 4001020000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... HASKELL, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... HILLSDALE, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... HUNTER, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... INDIAHOMA, TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... KREMLIN, CITY OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... LAHOMA, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... LAWTON, CITY OF ...... 40031C0261D 11/02/95 28340 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... LAWTON, CITY OF ...... 40031C0250D 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... LAWTON, CITY OF ...... 40031C0253D 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... LAWTON, CITY OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... MUSKOGEE COUNTY* ...... 40101C0133E 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... MUSKOGEE COUNTY* ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... MUSKOGEE COUNTY* ...... 40101C0129E 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... MUSKOGEE, CITY OF ...... 40101C0133E 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... MUSKOGEE, CITY OF ...... 40101C0129E 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... MUSKOGEE, CITY OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... NORTH ENID, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... OKTAHA, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... PORUM, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... ROGERS COUNTY* ...... 4053790000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... ROGERS COUNTY* ...... 4053790130C 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... ROGERS COUNTY* ...... 4053790070D 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... STERLING, TOWN OF ...... 40031C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... TAFT, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810065G 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810070G 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810000 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810040F 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810020F 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810045F 11/02/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... WAINWRIGHT, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... WARNER, TOWN OF ...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... WAUKOMIS, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0000 09/30/95 06 ...... OKLAHOMA ...... WEBBERS FALLS, TOWN OF...... 40101C0000 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0429H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0343H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0427H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0430H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0434H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0431H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0437H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0433H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0341H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0432H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0336H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0339H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0444H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0317H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0443H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0451H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0318H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0452H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0337H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0319H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0439H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0338H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0441H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0440H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0468H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0466H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0555H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0464H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0556H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0462H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0463H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0456H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0454H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0458H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0557H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0461H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0577H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0576H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0580H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0442H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0453H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0116H 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28341

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0110H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0117H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0118H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0235H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0232H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0119H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BARTLETT, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0330H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0307H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0308H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0306H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BELLS, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0395H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0390H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0380H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0385H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0370H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BLUE MOUND, CITY OF ...... 48439C0280H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BLUE MOUND, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BURLESON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0540H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BURLESON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0530H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... BURLESON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... CEDAR PARK, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0215H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0195H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0307H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0330H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0306H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COLLINSVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COMAL COUNTY* ...... 4854630075D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COMAL COUNTY* ...... 4854630055D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COMAL COUNTY* ...... 4854630005E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COMAL COUNTY* ...... 4854630030D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COMAL COUNTY* ...... 4854630000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COMAL COUNTY* ...... 4854630095D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... COMANCHE, CITY OF ...... 4801510005C 11/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... CROWLEY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0510H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... CROWLEY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0530H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... CROWLEY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... CROWLEY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0540H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, TOWN ...... 48439C0441H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, TOWN ...... 48439C0442H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, TOWN ...... 48439C0433H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, TOWN ...... 48439C0434H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, TOWN ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DENISON, CITY OF ...... 48181C0132E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DENISON, CITY OF ...... 48181C0059E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DENISON, CITY OF ...... 48181C0070E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DENISON, CITY OF ...... 48181C0135E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DENISON, CITY OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... DORCHESTER, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EDGECLIFF VILLAGE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EDGECLIFF VILLAGE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0415H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EULESS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EULESS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0330H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EULESS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0215H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EULESS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0335H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EULESS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0220H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EULESS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EVERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... EVERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48439C0420H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FLORENCE, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FOREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 48439C0440H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FOREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FOREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 48439C0410H 08/02/95 28342 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... TEXAS ...... FOREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 48439C0420H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0439H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0319H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0318H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0317H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0316H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0312H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0314H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0313H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0330H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0040H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0370H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0381H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0380H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0360H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0341H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0440H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0337H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0336H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0311H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0170H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0232H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0180H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0169H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0165H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0145H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0160H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0155H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0235H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0255H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0245H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0285H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0295H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0290H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0282H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0280H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0260H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0270H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0265H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0382H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0045H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0385H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0505H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0390H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0485H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0510H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0530H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0555H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0540H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0565H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0335H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0431H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0410H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0395H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0405H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0415H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0420H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0430H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0427H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0429H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0545H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GEORGETOWN, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GEORGETOWN, CITY OF ...... 48491C0225D 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRANGER, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0205H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0220H 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28343

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0215H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0210H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0132E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0059E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0070E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0135E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0144E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0140E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0210E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0145E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GRAYSON COUNTY* ...... 48181C0207E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660140C 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660150C 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660110C 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660120C 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660205C 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660000 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660215C 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660225C 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... GUNTER, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0282H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0284H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0285H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0303H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0295H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0301H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0311H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HASLET, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HASLET, CITY OF ...... 48439C0165H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HASLET, CITY OF ...... 48439C0160H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HASLET, CITY OF ...... 48439C0155H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HOWE, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0210E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HOWE, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0317H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0308H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0316H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0312H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0302H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0306H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0304H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... HUTTO, TOWN OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KAUFMAN COUNTY* ...... 4804110125C 09/06/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KAUFMAN COUNTY* ...... 4804110000 09/06/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KAUFMAN COUNTY* ...... 4804110050C 09/06/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0160H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0189H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0190H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0188H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0185H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0169H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0180H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0170H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KENDALL COUNTY* ...... 4804170275D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KENDALL COUNTY* ...... 4804170270D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KENDALL COUNTY* ...... 4804170000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KENNEDALE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0440H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KENNEDALE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KENNEDALE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0439H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... KENNEDALE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0437H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... LA VERNIA, CITY OF ...... 4810500001B 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... LAKE WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0255H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... LAKE WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 28344 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... TEXAS ...... LAKE WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0265H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... LAKE WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0260H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... LAKE WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0270H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... LAKESIDE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... LEANDER, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0560H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0595H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0577H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0590H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0556H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0576H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0557H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0570H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0585H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0580H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0190H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0189H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0282H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0301H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0188H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0284H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0303H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0302H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0306H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0311H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0295H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0304H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... PANTEGO, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0433H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... PANTEGO, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0434H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... PANTEGO, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0431H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... PANTEGO, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0432H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... PANTEGO, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... PELICAN BAY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0117H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... PELICAN BAY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... POTTSBORO, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0311H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0312H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0304H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0303H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... RIVER OAKS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... RIVER OAKS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0270H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... ROUND ROCK, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SADLER, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SAGINAW, CITY OF ...... 48439C0280H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SAGINAW, CITY OF ...... 48439C0145H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SAGINAW, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SAGINAW, CITY OF ...... 48439C0260H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SAGINAW, CITY OF ...... 48439C0165H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SANSOM PARK VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SANSOM PARK VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0260H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SANSOM PARK VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0270H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SCHERTZ, CITY OF ...... 4802690020D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SCHERTZ, CITY OF ...... 4802690015D 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SCHERTZ, CITY OF ...... 4802690000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0140E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0145E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0144E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0135E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0207E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0132E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0210E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0185H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0180H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0205H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0190H 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28345

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0070H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0215H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTHMAYD, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... SOUTHMAYD, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0140E 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0464H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0440H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0468H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0485H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0585H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0439H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0431H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0437H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0390H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0380H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0415H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0395H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0505H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0420H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0560H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0580H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0565H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0370H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0577H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0556H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0570H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0545H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0555H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0520H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0515H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0540H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0530H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0510H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0581H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0232H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0360H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0155H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0145H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0160H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0165H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0170H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0169H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0140H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0135H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0117H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0118H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0116H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0110H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0130H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0180H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0185H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0282H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0280H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0330H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0335H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0337H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0336H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0265H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0260H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0205H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0195H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0595H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0235H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0255H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0119H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0341H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0245H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TAYLOR, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 28346 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

06 ...... TEXAS ...... THRALL, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... THRALL, CITY OF ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TIOGA, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... TOM BEAN, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... VAN ALSTYNE, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WATAUGA, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0301H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WATAUGA, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0282H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WATAUGA, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WATAUGA, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0169H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WATAUGA, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0188H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTLAKE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTOVER HILLS, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0381H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTOVER HILLS, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0270H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTOVER HILLS, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0382H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTOVER HILLS, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTWORTH VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 48439C0270H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTWORTH VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 48439C0265H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WESTWORTH VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WHITE SETTLEMENT, CITY OF ...... 48439C0381H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WHITE SETTLEMENT, CITY OF ...... 48439C0270H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WHITE SETTLEMENT, CITY OF ...... 48439C0000 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WHITE SETTLEMENT, CITY OF ...... 48439C0265H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WHITE SETTLEMENT, CITY OF ...... 48439C0380H 08/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WHITESBORO, CITY OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WHITEWRIGHT, TOWN OF ...... 48181C0000 07/17/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0225D 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0000 11/02/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WILSON COUNTY* ...... 4802300003B 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WILSON COUNTY* ...... 4802300002B 08/16/95 06 ...... TEXAS ...... WILSON COUNTY* ...... 4802300000 08/16/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... COUNTRYSIDE, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... DESOTO, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... DODGE CITY, CITY OF ...... 2051840001D 09/30/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... EDGERTON, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... FAIRWAY, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... FORD COUNTY* ...... 2001010085C 09/30/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... FORD COUNTY* ...... 2001010000 09/30/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... FORD COUNTY* ...... 2001010105C 09/30/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... GARDNER, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF ...... 2002330001C 12/19/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... JOHNSON COUNTY* ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... KENNETH, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... LAKE QUIVIRA, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... LEAWOOD, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... LEAWOOD, CITY OF ...... 20091C0082E 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... LENEXA, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... MERRIAM, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... MISSION HILLS, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... MISSION WOODS, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... MISSION, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... OLATHE, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... OVERLAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 20091C0081E 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... OVERLAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... OVERLAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 20091C0082E 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... PRAIRIE VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... PRAIRIE VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 20091C0082E 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... ROELAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... SHAWNEE, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... SPRING HILL, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... WESTWOOD HILLS, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... KANSAS ...... WESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 20091C0000 10/18/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BALLWIN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0257H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BALLWIN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0259H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BALLWIN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0258H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BALLWIN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0256H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BALLWIN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BALLWIN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0252H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BALLWIN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0254H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BEL-NOR, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BEL-RIDGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0179H 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28347

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BEL-RIDGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0177H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BEL-RIDGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLA VILLA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLA VILLA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0316H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLEFONTAINE NEIGHBORS, CITY ...... 29189C0202H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLEFONTAINE NEIGHBORS, CITY ...... 29189C0201H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLEFONTAINE NEIGHBORS, CITY ...... 29189C0069H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLEFONTAINE NEIGHBORS, CITY ...... 29189C0089H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLEFONTAINE NEIGHBORS, CITY ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLEFONTAINE NEIGHBORS, CITY ...... 29189C0088H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BELLERIVE, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BERDELL HILLS, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BERKELEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0176H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BERKELEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0181H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BERKELEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0177H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BERKELEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0064H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BERKELEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BERKELEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0063H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BLACK JACK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0067H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BLACK JACK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BLACK JACK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0059H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRANSON, CITY OF ...... 2904360002C 10/18/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRANSON, CITY OF ...... 2904360003C 10/18/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRANSON, CITY OF ...... 2904360004C 10/18/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRANSON, CITY OF ...... 2904360001C 10/18/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRANSON, CITY OF ...... 2904360000 10/18/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0178H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0159H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0176H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRENTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0301H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRENTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0302H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRENTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0189H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRENTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0188H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRENTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0063H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0043H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0152H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0157H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0041H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0156H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0039H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0029H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0036H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0038H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... BRIDGETON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0037H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CALVERTON PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHARLACK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHARLACK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0179H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHARLACK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0178H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0153H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0145H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0161H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0140H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0252H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0139H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0256H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0257H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0163H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0138H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0120H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0135H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLARKSON VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0252H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLARKSON VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0251H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLARKSON VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0138H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLARKSON VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0139H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLARKSON VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0189H 08/02/95 28348 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0188H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0186H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 2900360019C 08/16/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 2900360018C 08/16/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... COLUMBIA, CITY OF ...... 2900360000 08/16/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... COOL VALLEY, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0181H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... COOL VALLEY, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0177H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... COOL VALLEY, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... COUNTRY CLUB HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CRESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0292H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CRESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0311H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CRESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0303H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CRESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0186H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CRESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CRESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0284H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0167H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0169H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0168H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0166H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0161H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0162H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0164H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0163H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... CRYSTAL LAKE PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... DELLWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... DES PERES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0279H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... DES PERES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0281H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... DES PERES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0277H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... DES PERES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... DES PERES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0276H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EDMUNDSON, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ELLISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0258H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ELLISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0254H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ELLISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0252H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ELLISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0253H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ELLISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0251H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ELLISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0243H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0240H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0263H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0244H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0351H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0264H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0352H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0332H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0331H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... EUREKA, CITY OF ...... 29189C0327H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FENTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0293H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FENTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0289H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FENTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0286H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FENTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0288H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FENTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0287H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FENTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FENTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0291H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FERGUSON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0181H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FERGUSON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0182H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FERGUSON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0177H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FERGUSON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0069H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FERGUSON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0064H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FERGUSON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0068H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FERGUSON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORDELL HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0053H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0066H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0068H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0062H 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28349

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0064H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0058H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0061H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0054H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FRONTENAC, CITY OF ...... 29189C0169H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FRONTENAC, CITY OF ...... 29189C0282H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FRONTENAC, CITY OF ...... 29189C0281H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FRONTENAC, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... FRONTENAC, CITY OF ...... 29189C0168H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... GRANTWOOD VILLAGE, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0312H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... GRANTWOOD VILLAGE, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0311H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... GRANTWOOD VILLAGE, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... GREENDALE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HANLEY HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0187H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HANLEY HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0179H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HANLEY HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HAZELWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0063H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HAZELWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0064H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HAZELWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0062H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HAZELWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0042H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HAZELWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HAZELWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0044H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HAZELWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0061H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HILLSDALE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HUNTLEIGH, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0281H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HUNTLEIGH, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0168H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HUNTLEIGH, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0282H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... HUNTLEIGH, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... JENNINGS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0184H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... JENNINGS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0201H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... JENNINGS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... JENNINGS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0182H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... JENNINGS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0181H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... JENNINGS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIMBERLING, CITY OF ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KINLOCH, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KINLOCH, CITY OF ...... 29189C0177H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0279H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0281H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0282H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0284H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0277H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0283H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0287H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0292H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0291H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... KIRKWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LADUE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0188H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LADUE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0301H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LADUE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0282H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LADUE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LADUE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0169H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LADUE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0167H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LAKESHIRE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0311H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LAKESHIRE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0312H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... LAKESHIRE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MACKENZIE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0304H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MACKENZIE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MANCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 29189C0259H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MANCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 29189C0257H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MANCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MAPLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0302H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MAPLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARLBOROUGH, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARY RIDGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0135H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0039H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0038H 08/02/95 28350 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0145H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0151H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0154H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0158H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0156H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0153H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0152H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MOLINE ACRES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0088H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MOLINE ACRES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0182H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MOLINE ACRES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MOLINE ACRES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0069H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... MOLINE ACRES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0201H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... NORMANDY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... NORTHWOODS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... NORTHWOODS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0184H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... NORTHWOODS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... NORWOOD COURT, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... NORWOOD COURT, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0181H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... NORWOOD COURT, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OAKLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OAKLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0284H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OLIVETTE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0167H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OLIVETTE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0186H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OLIVETTE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OVERLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0167H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OVERLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0186H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OVERLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0159H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OVERLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0179H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OVERLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... OVERLAND, CITY OF ...... 29189C0178H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PACIFIC, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PAGEDALE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0191H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PAGEDALE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PAGEDALE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PASADENA HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PASADENA PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PEERLESS PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0286H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PEERLESS PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PEERLESS PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0267H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PEERLESS PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0288H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... PINE LAWN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0189H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0302H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0188H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RIVERVIEW, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RIVERVIEW, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0201H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RIVERVIEW, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0202H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RIVERVIEW, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0089H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... RIVERVIEW, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0088H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ROCK HILL, CITY OF ...... 29189C0301H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ROCK HILL, CITY OF ...... 29189C0282H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ROCK HILL, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SCHUERMANN HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SHREWSBURY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SHREWSBURY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0304H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SHREWSBURY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0302H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. ANN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0176H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. ANN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0178H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. ANN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0159H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. ANN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0157H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. ANN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. JOHN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0179H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. JOHN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0176H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. JOHN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0177H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. JOHN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0178H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. JOHN, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0166H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0164H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0176H 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28351

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0179H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0177H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0167H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0156H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0154H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0153H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0181H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0157H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0158H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0162H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0159H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0161H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0163H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0245H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0243H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0240H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0244H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0252H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0251H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0253H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0152H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0235H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0230H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0184H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0186H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0191H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0189H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0202H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0201H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0182H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0053H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0042H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0041H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0043H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0054H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0044H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0058H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0055H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0039H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0038H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0254H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0015H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0029H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0020H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0037H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0035H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0059H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0060H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0088H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0085H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0089H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0095H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0090H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0120H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0115H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0080H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0069H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0062H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0061H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0063H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0066H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0064H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0068H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0067H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0138H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0312H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0320H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0327H 08/02/95 28352 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0256H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0316H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0315H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0304H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0311H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0308H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0330H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0331H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0410H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0420H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0415H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0405H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0385H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0332H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0351H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0335H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0303H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0326H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0294H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0265H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0270H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0267H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0264H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0263H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0257H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0259H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0293H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0276H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0258H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0289H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0292H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0291H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0277H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0288H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0287H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0278H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0279H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0286H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... ST.GEORGE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SUNSET HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0294H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SUNSET HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0293H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SUNSET HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0292H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SUNSET HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0291H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SUNSET HILLS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SYCAMORE HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0178H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... SYCAMORE HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TIMES BEACH, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0257H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0281H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0276H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0277H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0168H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0145H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0161H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0163H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0164H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... UNIVERSITY CITY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0191H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... UNIVERSITY CITY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0186H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... UNIVERSITY CITY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0189H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... UNIVERSITY CITY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... UPLANDS PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VALLEY PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0286H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VALLEY PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0278H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VALLEY PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0259H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VALLEY PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0267H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VALLEY PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VALLEY PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0287H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VELDA VILLAGE HILLS, VILLAGE ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VELDA VILLAGE HILLS, VILLAGE ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28353

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VELDA VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VINITA PARK, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... VINITA TERRACE, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WARSON WOODS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0304H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0311H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0303H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0302H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0284H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF ...... 29189C0301H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WELLSTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0191H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WELLSTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WELLSTON, CITY OF ...... 29189C0183H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WESTWOOD, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0164H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WESTWOOD, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WESTWOOD, TOWN OF ...... 29189C0168H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WILBUR PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WINCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WINCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 29189C0259H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WINCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 29189C0258H 08/02/95 07 ...... MISSOURI ...... WOODSON TERRACE, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 08/02/95 07 ...... NEBRASKA ...... BLAIR, CITY OF ...... 3102280005C 07/17/95 07 ...... NEBRASKA ...... BLAIR, CITY OF ...... 3102280006C 07/17/95 07 ...... NEBRASKA ...... BLAIR, CITY OF ...... 3102280000 07/17/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0725G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0730G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0800G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0775G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0685G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0825G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0550G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0125G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0680G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0100G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0150G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0470G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0475G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0420G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0465G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0450G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0065G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0052G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0055G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0017G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0010G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0016G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0019G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0035G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0030G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0045G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0036G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0039G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0415G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0075G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0175G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0385G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0375G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0500G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0390G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0200G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0395G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0525G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0655G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0370G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0380G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0345G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0340G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0225G 08/16/95 28354 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0307G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0405G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0250G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0308G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0330G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0335G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0320G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0309G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0650J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0600J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0350J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0675J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0285J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0250J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0235J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0275J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0325J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0280J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0435J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0305J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0550J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0300J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0510J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0575J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0505J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0460J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0455J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0480J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0230J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0485J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0160J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0220J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0375J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0165J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0145J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0170J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0205J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0215J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0195J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0210J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ARVADA, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020510E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020210E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020480E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020485E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020505E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020230E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020215E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020220E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020045E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020040E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020060E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020065E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020080E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020070E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020180E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020185E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020160E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020205E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020090E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020195E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BENNETT, TOWN OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BENNETT, TOWN OF ...... 08001C0450G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BENNETT, TOWN OF ...... 08001C0725G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BOW MAR, TOWN OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BRIGHTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0075G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BRIGHTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0055G 08/16/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28355

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

08 ...... COLORADO ...... BRIGHTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0100G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BRIGHTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0065G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BRIGHTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BRIGHTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0052G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BRIGHTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0045G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... BROOMFIELD, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0170J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0460J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0455J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0165J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600161D 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600168D 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600164E 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600163C 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COLUMBINE VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COLUMBINE VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 08005C0435J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0335G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0100G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0380G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0340G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0375G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0330G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0075G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0065G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF ...... 08001C0045G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... DEER TRAIL, CITY OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 08005C0165J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 08005C0435J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 08005C0455J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 08005C0145J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... FEDERAL HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... FEDERAL HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 08001C0019G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... FEDERAL HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 08001C0330G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... FEDERAL HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 08001C0307G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... GLENDALE, TOWN OF ...... 08005C0160J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... GLENDALE, TOWN OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0455J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0170J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0480J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0460J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... LITTLETON, CITY OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0039G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0330G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0307G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0038G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0037G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0019G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... NORTHGLENN, CITY OF ...... 08001C0036G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... SHERIDAN, CITY OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... SHERIDAN, CITY OF ...... 08005C0145J 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... STRASBURG, TOWN OF ...... 08005C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0035G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0019G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0037G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0036G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0330G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0335G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0045G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0307G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0038G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0039G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 08001C0030G 08/16/95 08 ...... COLORADO ...... WESTMINSTER, CITY OF ...... 08001C0000 08/16/95 28356 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... FARGO, CITY OF ...... 3853640020E 11/02/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... FARGO, CITY OF ...... 3853640000 11/02/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... FARGO, CITY OF ...... 3853640010F 11/02/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... MINOT, CITY OF ...... 3853670018C 11/16/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... MINOT, CITY OF ...... 3853670019C 11/16/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... MINOT, CITY OF ...... 3853670016C 11/16/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... MINOT, CITY OF ...... 3853670000 11/16/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... MINOT, CITY OF ...... 3853670012C 11/16/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... MINOT, CITY OF ...... 3853670005C 11/16/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... MINOT, CITY OF ...... 3853670011C 11/16/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... VELVA, CITY OF ...... 3800510001C 12/05/95 08 ...... NORTH DAKOTA ...... VELVA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3803100005B 11/16/95 08 ...... UTAH ...... DAVIS COUNTY* ...... 4900380190C 11/02/95 08 ...... UTAH ...... DAVIS COUNTY* ...... 4900380000 11/02/95 08 ...... UTAH ...... DAVIS COUNTY* ...... 4900380180C 11/02/95 08 ...... UTAH ...... RIVERDALE, CITY OF ...... 4901900001D 09/06/95 08 ...... UTAH ...... WEBER COUNTY* ...... 4901870428C 09/06/95 08 ...... UTAH ...... WEBER COUNTY* ...... 4901870436C 09/06/95 08 ...... UTAH ...... WEBER COUNTY* ...... 4901870000 09/06/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... AVONDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C2090F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... AVONDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1615H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... AVONDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C2080G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... AVONDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2065F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2480F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2505F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2485F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2055E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2050F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2020F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2015F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2025F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2035F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2040E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... BUCKEYE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2045F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CAREFREE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CAREFREE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0815G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CAVE CREEK, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CAVE CREEK, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0815G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CAVE CREEK, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0795F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CAVE CREEK, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0785G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CHANDLER, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... CHANDLER, CITY OF ...... 04013C2630E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... COCONINO COUNTY* ...... 0400190000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... COCONINO COUNTY* ...... 0400193578C 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... EL MIRAGE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1615H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... EL MIRAGE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1605G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... EL MIRAGE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1165G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... EL MIRAGE, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF ...... 0400200000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF ...... 0400200004C 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF ...... 0400200003C 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... FOUNTAIN HILLS, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILA BEND, TOWN OF ...... 04013C3490E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILA BEND, TOWN OF ...... 04013C3491E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILA BEND, TOWN OF ...... 04013C3485F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILA BEND, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2670F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILA BEND, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILA BEND, TOWN OF ...... 04013C3480F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2670F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1615H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1605G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1645E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1585F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1580F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1595F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1590F 09/30/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28357

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C2065F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C2080G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C2070F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C2090F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C2060E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C1590F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C2055E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C1595F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C1615H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GUADALUPE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2630E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GUADALUPE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... GUADALUPE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2165F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... LITCHFIELD PARK, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... LITCHFIELD PARK, CITY OF ...... 04013C1615H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... LITCHFIELD PARK, CITY OF ...... 04013C2080G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... LITCHFIELD PARK, CITY OF ...... 04013C1595F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... LITCHFIELD PARK, CITY OF ...... 04013C2060E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2060E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2055E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2065F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2070F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2080G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2035F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2025F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2020F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2040E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2090F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2050F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2045F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2480F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2155E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2505F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2515E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2485F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C3485F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C3480F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C3490E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2630E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2670F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2470F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2460F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2880E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2865F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2855F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2860F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2165F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1055F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1240F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1245F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1230F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1165G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1605G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1090G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1510G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1560E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1530G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1595F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1590F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1585F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1570E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1580F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1615H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1145F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1670E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1035F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C3491E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1690E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C0790E 09/30/95 28358 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C0795F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C0780F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C0785G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1060F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C0815G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1705E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1065F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1695F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1085G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C2015F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1070F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1080G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PARADISE VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1695F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PARADISE VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1690E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PARADISE VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PARADISE VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1680F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PARADISE VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1670E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PEORIA, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2145F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1680F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1665G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C0790E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1690E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2080G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2630E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2155E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2165F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1660F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1670E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1655H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1215H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C0795F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1645E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1220G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C0815G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1615H 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1230F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1245F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1240F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PIMA COUNTY* ...... 0400732260D 08/02/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PIMA COUNTY* ...... 0400731670E 08/02/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... PIMA COUNTY* ...... 0400730000 08/02/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... QUEEN CREEK, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1695F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1705E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1690E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C2155E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1230F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1245F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C0815G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1680F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SURPRISE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1605G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SURPRISE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1585F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SURPRISE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1145F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SURPRISE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1580F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SURPRISE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... SURPRISE, TOWN OF ...... 04013C1165G 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TEMPE, CITY OF ...... 04013C2630E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TEMPE, CITY OF ...... 04013C2165F 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TEMPE, CITY OF ...... 04013C2155E 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TEMPE, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TOLLESON, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760030H 08/02/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760025H 08/02/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760000 08/02/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... WICKENBURG, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 09 ...... ARIZONA ...... YOUNGTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 04013C0000 09/30/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28359

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... ANDERSON, CITY OF ...... 0603590001C 09/20/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... EL DORADO COUNTY ...... 0600400000 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... EL DORADO COUNTY ...... 0600400700D 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... EL DORADO COUNTY ...... 0600400687D 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... EL DORADO COUNTY ...... 0600400679D 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... GALT, CITY OF ...... 0602640002C 08/16/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... GALT, CITY OF ...... 0602640001C 08/16/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... GALT, CITY OF ...... 0602640000 08/16/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... KERN COUNTY ...... 0600752025D 09/06/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... KERN COUNTY ...... 0600751825C 09/06/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... KERN COUNTY ...... 0600750000 09/06/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... LIVINGSTON, CITY OF ...... 06047C0400E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... LIVINGSTON, CITY OF ...... 06047C0175E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... LIVINGSTON, CITY OF ...... 06047C0200E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... LIVINGSTON, CITY OF ...... 06047C0000 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0470E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0575E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0500E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0445E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0465E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0600E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0455E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0460E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0700E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0875E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0900E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0850E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0440E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0725E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0650E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0675E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0625E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0825E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0435E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0430E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0225E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0175E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0125E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0150E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0000 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0100E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0240E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0200E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0250E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0415E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0325E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0410E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0420E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0405E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0400E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0350E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0375E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0445E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0650E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0440E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0410E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0000 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0420E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0430E 08/02/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... SHASTA COUNTY* ...... 0603580885D 09/20/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... SHASTA COUNTY* ...... 0603580000 09/20/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... SONOMA COUNTY* ...... 0603750355C 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... SONOMA COUNTY* ...... 0603750365C 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... SONOMA COUNTY* ...... 0603750345C 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... SONOMA COUNTY* ...... 0603750000 10/18/95 09 ...... CALIFORNIA ...... SONOMA COUNTY* ...... 0603750335C 10/18/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010110D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010000 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010065C 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020186D 09/30/95 28360 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020190D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020192D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020191D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020194D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020157D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020160D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020130D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020000 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020140D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020156D 09/30/95 09 ...... HAWAII ...... KAUAI COUNTY* ...... 1500020152D 09/30/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C2640D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C2995D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C2990D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C2650D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C2975D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C2980D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C0000 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... BOULDER CITY, CITY OF ...... 32003C2620D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4060D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2300D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2325D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2250D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2275D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2350D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2225D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2425D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2400D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2525D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2535D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2475D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2500D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2450D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2190D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2145D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2150D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2125D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2135D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2155D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2050D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2170D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2160D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2186D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2187D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2178D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2180D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2545D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2176D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2550D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2610D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2615D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2595D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2605D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2620D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2650D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2640D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2800D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2825D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2700D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2725D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2585D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2675D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2580D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0000 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2556D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2552D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2553D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2557D 08/16/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28361

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2551D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2561D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2560D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2568D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2569D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2566D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2567D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2025D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2562D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2000D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0690D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0695D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0650D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0675D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0700D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0625D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0775D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0750D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0900D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1025D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0850D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0875D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0391D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0825D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0390D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0300D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0325D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0250D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0275D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0350D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0225D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0369D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0367D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0386D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0387D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0375D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0379D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1050D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C0370D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1075D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1750D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1755D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1735D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1745D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1760D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1725D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1770D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1765D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1925D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1950D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1825D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1900D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1600D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1790D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1575D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1120D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1150D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1105D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1115D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1175D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1085D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1425D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1350D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1525D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1550D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1475D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1500D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2850D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1450D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2554D 08/16/95 28362 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2875D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3850D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3875D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3775D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3725D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3750D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3575D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3625D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3925D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3985D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3950D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4080D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4090D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4070D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4005D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4015D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3995D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2910D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3500D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3900D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3450D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3125D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3100D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3150D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3050D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3175D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3400D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3025D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2955D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2930D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2975D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3200D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2990D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2995D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3325D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3225D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3375D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3300D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3250D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO COUNTY* ...... 3200272987D 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO COUNTY* ...... 3200272991D 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO COUNTY* ...... 3200272986D 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO COUNTY* ...... 3200272979D 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO COUNTY* ...... 3200270000 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO COUNTY* ...... 3200272983D 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO COUNTY* ...... 3200273000D 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO, CITY OF ...... 3200100002C 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO, CITY OF ...... 3200100001C 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO, CITY OF ...... 3200100000 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO, CITY OF ...... 3200100003C 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... ELKO, CITY OF ...... 3200100004C 11/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... FORT MOJAVE INDIAN TRIBE ...... 32003C0000 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2595D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2585D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2605D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2580D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2615D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2610D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2930D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2955D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2910D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2225D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2620D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C0000 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2975D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2145D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2180D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2186D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2150D 08/16/95 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28363

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2190D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2160D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2135D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2200D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2178D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C0000 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1735D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2170D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1745D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1750D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1765D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1755D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0386D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0387D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0375D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0000 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0379D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0367D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0391D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0369D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2186D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2160D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2180D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2178D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1755D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1765D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1790D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1770D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1760D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2176D 08/16/95 09 ...... NEVADA ...... NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C0000 08/16/95 10 ...... IDAHO ...... COEUR D'ALENE, CITY OF ...... 1600780005C 07/17/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 41053C0000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... FAIRVIEW, CITY OF ...... 4101800001D 07/03/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... FALLS CITY, CITY OF ...... 41053C0000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF ...... 41053C0000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... KEIZER, CITY OF ...... 4102880005B 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... MARION COUNTY* ...... 4101540125D 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... MARION COUNTY* ...... 4101540175D 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... MARION COUNTY* ...... 4101540000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... MONMOUTH, CITY OF ...... 41053C0000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... POLK COUNTY* ...... 41053C0069E 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... POLK COUNTY* ...... 41053C0000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... POLK COUNTY* ...... 41053C0075D 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... POLK COUNTY* ...... 41053C0067D 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670003F 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670002E 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 41053C0000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670004E 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670000 12/19/95 10 ...... OREGON ...... SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670005E 12/19/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... COUPEVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 53029C0000 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0465D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0130D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0235D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0245D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0240D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0230D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0220D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0205D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0215D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0210D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0275D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0305D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0365D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0350D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0342D 08/16/95 28364 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

COMPENDIUM OF FLOOD MAP CHANGESÐContinued [Map Revisions Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Region State Community Map panel No. date

10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0341D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0340D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0310D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0320D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0315D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0185D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0165D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0170D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0375D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0000 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0410D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0435D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0430D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0445D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0440D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0045D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0065D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0455D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0135D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0145D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0140D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0120D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0115D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0095D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0110D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 53029C0080D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... LANGLEY, CITY OF ...... 53029C0342D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... LANGLEY, CITY OF ...... 53029C0341D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... LANGLEY, CITY OF ...... 53029C0000 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... OAK HARBOR, CITY OF ...... 53029C0120D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... OAK HARBOR, CITY OF ...... 53029C0145D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... OAK HARBOR, CITY OF ...... 53029C0140D 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... OAK HARBOR, CITY OF ...... 53029C0000 08/16/95 10 ...... WASHINGTON ...... OKANOGAN, CITY OF ...... 5301190001C 08/02/95

LOMC DETERMINATION TYPE LOOKUP TABLE

Determination type Description

01 ...... 218±65 Fill involved. 02 ...... 218±70 No fill involved. 05 ...... 102 BFE change. 06 ...... 102A No BFE change. 08 ...... Denial. 12 ...... Floodway revision. 17 ...... 218±65 Inadvertent inclusion in floodway. 18 ...... 218±65 Inadvertent inclusion in floodway.

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGE [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

01 ...... CT BETHEL, TOWN OF ...... 0900010010B 09/06/95 02 01 ...... CT BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF ...... 0900020003C 10/24/95 02 01 ...... CT BRIDGEPORT, CITY O ...... 0900020003C 11/24/95 02 01 ...... CT BRISTOL, CITY OF ...... 0900230006B 11/28/95 02 01 ...... CT DARIEN, TOWN OF ...... 0900050004D 11/13/95 01 01 ...... CT EAST HAVEN, TOWN OF ...... 0900760008D 09/12/95 01 01 ...... CT GREENWICH, TOWN OF ...... 0900080010B 07/14/95 02 01 ...... CT GREENWICH, TOWN OF ...... 0900080011B 07/18/95 02 01 ...... CT GREENWICH, TOWN OF ...... 0900080011B 07/17/95 95±01±060A 02 01 ...... CT GROTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900970006D 07/07/95 02 01 ...... CT GROTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900970006E 09/05/95 02 01 ...... CT GUILFORD, TOWN OF ...... 0900770016B 08/30/95 95±01±059P 05 01 ...... CT GUILFORD, TOWN OF ...... 0900770018B 11/28/95 02 01 ...... CT KILLINGLY, TOWN OF ...... 0901360004B 08/01/95 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28365

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

01 ...... CT LISBON, TOWN OF ...... 0901720005A 11/24/95 02 01 ...... CT NEW BRITAIN, CITY OF ...... 0900320004B 09/30/95 95±01±031P 05 01 ...... CT NEW HAVEN, CITY OF ...... 0900840003C 11/13/95 95±01±084A 02 01 ...... CT NOANK FIRE DISTRICT ...... 0901290001B 10/13/95 02 01 ...... CT NORWALK, CITY OF ...... 0900120010D 10/12/95 95±01±055P 05 01 ...... CT OLD SAYBROOK, TOWN OF ...... 0900690004D 11/24/95 02 01 ...... CT SOMERS, TOWN OF ...... 0901120006B 12/13/95 02 01 ...... CT SOUTHINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900370010C 08/28/95 95±01±079P 06 01 ...... CT STAMFORD, CITY OF ...... 0900150001C 10/13/95 01 01 ...... CT STAMFORD, CITY OF ...... 0900150004C 07/12/95 95±01±023P 05 01 ...... CT STAMFORD, CITY OF ...... 0900150006C 10/02/95 94±01±057P 05 01 ...... CT STAMFORD, CITY OF ...... 0900150009D 11/13/95 95±01±088A 01 01 ...... CT STERLING, TOWN OF ...... 0901180010B 09/12/95 02 01 ...... CT STONINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0901060012D 12/11/95 02 01 ...... CT STRATFORD, TOWN OF ...... 0900160002C 12/14/95 02 01 ...... CT WASHINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 0900570005C 09/12/95 02 01 ...... CT WEST HAVEN, CITY OF ...... 0900920002C 08/22/95 02 01 ...... CT WEST HAVEN, CITY OF ...... 0900920002C 09/07/95 02 01 ...... CT WESTPORT, TOWN OF ...... 0900190002B 07/28/95 02 01 ...... CT WESTPORT, TOWN OF ...... 0900190003B 08/04/95 02 01 ...... CT WESTPORT, TOWN OF ...... 0900190003B 08/04/95 02 01 ...... MA ASHBURNHAM, TOWN OF ...... 2502900005B 11/21/95 02 01 ...... MA BARNSTABLE, TOWN OF ...... 2500010018D 11/21/95 02 01 ...... MA BEDFORD, TOWN OF ...... 2552090005C 12/13/95 02 01 ...... MA BOSTON, CITY OF ...... 2502860002C 09/06/95 02 01 ...... MA BOSTON, CITY OF ...... 2502860013C 10/25/95 02 01 ...... MA BROCKTON, CITY OF ...... 2502610005C 09/09/95 02 01 ...... MA BROCKTON, CITY OF ...... 2502610005C 10/12/95 02 01 ...... MA DANVERS, TOWN OF ...... 2500790003B 10/24/95 02 01 ...... MA DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF ...... 2500510015B 09/28/95 02 01 ...... MA DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF ...... 2500510019C 09/09/95 02 01 ...... MA DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF ...... 2500510022E 10/31/95 95±01±064A 01 01 ...... MA DEDHAM, TOWN OF ...... 2502370005C 09/21/95 95±01±068A 02 01 ...... MA DUXBURY, CITY OF ...... 2502630014C 07/03/95 95±01±029P 05 01 ...... MA EASTHAM, TOWN OF ...... 2500060002D 07/14/95 02 01 ...... MA EASTHAM, TOWN OF ...... 2500060002D 07/18/95 02 01 ...... MA EASTON, TOWN OF ...... 2500530010D 09/22/95 02 01 ...... MA HANOVER, TOWN OF ...... 2502660001B 07/07/95 02 01 ...... MA HUDSON, TOWN OF ...... 2501970001B 07/19/95 02 01 ...... MA LEXINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2501980005C 11/29/95 02 01 ...... MA MALDEN, CITY OF ...... 2502020002B 08/01/95 02 01 ...... MA MANSFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 2500570002A 07/14/95 02 01 ...... MA MANSFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 2500570002A 07/18/95 02 01 ...... MA MARION, TOWN OF ...... 2552130004D 12/11/95 02 01 ...... MA MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF ...... 2552140004D 12/14/95 02 01 ...... MA MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF ...... 2502750030B 10/09/95 95±01±076A 02 01 ...... MA NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF ...... 2500590000 11/29/95 02 01 ...... MA NORTH READING, TOWN OF ...... 2502090001C 10/12/95 01 01 ...... MA NORTON, TOWN OF ...... 2500600004C 07/03/95 02 01 ...... MA OAK BLUFFS, TOWN OF ...... 2500720001D 08/21/95 95±01±021P 05 01 ...... MA PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF ...... 2502780012C 12/07/95 95±01±096P 05 01 ...... MA PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF ...... 2502780012C 12/18/95 96±01±014A 02 01 ...... MA QUINCY, CITY OF ...... 2552190004C 08/24/95 02 01 ...... MA QUINCY, CITY OF ...... 2552190008B 08/29/95 02 01 ...... MA QUINCY, CITY OF ...... 2552190012C 08/21/95 02 01 ...... MA REVERE, CITY OF ...... 2502880001B 07/19/95 02 01 ...... MA REVERE, CITY OF ...... 2502880001B 09/07/95 02 01 ...... MA SANDWICH, TOWN OF ...... 2500120002F 07/18/95 02 01 ...... MA SAUGUS, TOWN OF ...... 2501040004B 10/25/95 02 01 ...... MA SHARON, TOWN OF ...... 2502520010B 07/20/95 02 01 ...... MA SHREWSBURY, TOWN OF ...... 2503320004B 10/27/95 02 01 ...... MA TEWKSBURY, TOWN OF ...... 2502180006B 09/07/95 02 01 ...... MA TOPSFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 2501060001D 07/14/95 02 01 ...... MA TOPSFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 2501060001D 07/18/95 02 01 ...... MA WALPOLE, TOWN OF ...... 2502540005B 11/01/95 02 01 ...... MA WAREHAM, TOWN OF ...... 2552230008C 09/06/95 02 01 ...... MA WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2502270003B 10/13/95 02 01 ...... MA WILMINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 2502270003B 11/28/95 02 01 ...... MA WORCESTER, CITY OF ...... 2503490025A 11/24/95 02 01 ...... ME ACTON, TOWN OF ...... 2301900001B 10/25/95 02 28366 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

01 ...... ME ACTON, TOWN OF ...... 2301900005B 11/21/95 02 01 ...... ME ALFRED, TOWN OF ...... 2301910010B 07/28/95 02 01 ...... ME BELGRADE, TOWN OF ...... 2302320005B 08/07/95 02 01 ...... ME BELGRADE, TOWN OF ...... 2302320010B 12/13/95 02 01 ...... ME BLUE HILL, TOWN OF ...... 2302740015A 09/01/95 02 01 ...... ME BOOTHBAY HARBOR, TOWN OF ...... 2302130002B 11/28/95 02 01 ...... ME BOOTHBAY HARBOR, TOWN OF ...... 2302130003B 12/11/95 96±01±004A 02 01 ...... ME BURNHAM, TOWN OF ...... 2301300015B 09/05/95 02 01 ...... ME BUXTON, TOWN OF ...... 2301460005B 08/07/95 02 01 ...... ME BUXTON, TOWN OF ...... 2301460005B 08/31/95 95±01±090A 02 01 ...... ME BUXTON, TOWN OF ...... 2301460010B 09/06/95 02 01 ...... ME CARIBOU, CITY OF ...... 2300140010C 07/25/95 02 01 ...... ME CHINA, TOWN OF ...... 2302350010B 10/27/95 02 01 ...... ME ELIOT, TOWN OF ...... 2301490010B 10/11/95 02 01 ...... ME ELLSWORTH, CITY OF ...... 2300660020B 07/25/95 02 01 ...... ME ENFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 2303840010A 10/25/95 02 01 ...... ME FRANKLIN, TOWN OF ...... 2302820005B 10/25/95 02 01 ...... ME FREEPORT, TOWN OF ...... 2300460013B 10/25/95 02 01 ...... ME GLENBURN, TOWN OF ...... 2301060005C 11/22/95 01 01 ...... ME GOULDSBORO,TOWN OF ...... 2302830005B 07/07/95 02 01 ...... ME GRAY, TOWN OF ...... 230480015A 09/11/95 02 01 ...... ME JONESPORT, TOWN OF ...... 2301380020D 12/13/95 02 01 ...... ME LAMOINE, TOWN OF ...... 2302850010A 08/17/95 02 01 ...... ME LAMOINE, TOWN OF ...... 2302850010A 08/18/95 02 01 ...... ME LAMOINE, TOWN OF ...... 2302850010A 08/22/95 02 01 ...... ME LAMOINE, TOWN OF ...... 2302850010A 11/06/95 95±01±108A 01 01 ...... ME LEBANON, TOWN OF ...... 230193 09/28/95 02 01 ...... ME LEWISTON, CITY OF ...... 2300040010B 08/30/95 95±01±075P 06 01 ...... ME LINCOLNVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 2301720015A 07/28/95 02 01 ...... ME LINCOLNVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 2301720015A 08/01/95 02 01 ...... ME LITCHFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 2302380005B 09/05/95 02 01 ...... ME MARIAVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 230286 10/25/95 02 01 ...... ME MILBRIDGE, TOWN OF ...... 2301420010B 09/11/95 95±01±092A 01 01 ...... ME NEWCASTLE, TOWN OF ...... 2302180001A 11/27/95 02 01 ...... ME OXFORD, TOWN OF ...... 2308690009A 11/21/95 02 01 ...... ME PRINCETON, TOWN OF ...... 230320B 07/19/95 02 01 ...... ME PRINCETON, TOWN OF ...... 230320B 07/19/95 02 01 ...... ME RAYMOND, TOWN OF ...... 2302050020B 08/29/95 02 01 ...... ME RAYMOND, TOWN OF ...... 2302050020B 12/14/95 02 01 ...... ME SEBAGO, TOWN OF ...... 2302060018B 10/05/95 02 01 ...... ME SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF ...... 2301570015C 11/13/95 95±01±070A 02 01 ...... ME SOUTHPORT, TOWN OF ...... 2302210001B 09/06/95 02 01 ...... ME ST. ALBANS, TOWN OF ...... 230369A 08/02/95 02 01 ...... ME ST. ALBANS, TOWN OF ...... 230369A 12/18/95 96±01±006A 02 01 ...... ME WARREN, TOWN OF ...... 2300810015B 09/06/95 02 01 ...... ME WELLS, TOWN OF ...... 2301580007C 10/04/95 02 01 ...... ME WEST BATH, TOWN OF ...... 2302110015A 11/28/95 02 01 ...... ME WINDHAM, TOWN OF ...... 2301890015B 08/21/95 02 01 ...... ME WINTERPORT, TOWN OF ...... 2302710010A 09/05/95 02 01 ...... NH ANTRIM, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3300820009B 12/14/95 02 01 ...... NH BELMONT, TOWN OF ...... 330002B 09/09/95 02 01 ...... NH HAMPTON, TOWN OF ...... 3301320012B 09/19/95 95±01±078A 18 01 ...... NH HINSDALE, TOWN OF ...... 3300220010B 07/07/95 02 01 ...... NH HINSDALE, TOWN OF ...... 3300220010B 07/19/95 02 01 ...... NH WARREN, TOWN OF ...... 3301680025C 09/05/95 02 01 ...... NH WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF ...... 3302390015A 12/14/95 02 01 ...... RI CRANSTON, CITY OF ...... 4453960006B 07/14/95 02 01 ...... RI CRANSTON, CITY OF ...... 4453960006B 07/18/95 01 01 ...... RI EAST GREENWICH, TOWN OF ...... 4453970002B 08/23/95 02 01 ...... RI EAST GREENWICH, TOWN OF ...... 4453970005B 07/07/95 02 01 ...... VT PUTNEY, TOWN OF ...... 500134B 10/24/95 02 01 ...... VT SHEFFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 500194A 11/09/95 02 01 ...... VT WESTON, TOWN OF ...... 5001570004C 12/14/95 02 02 ...... NJ ABSECON, CITY OF ...... 340001B 12/27/95 NJ 1186 02 02 ...... NJ ALLOWAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3404130001B 12/07/95 95±02±107P 06 02 ...... NJ BERNARDS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3404280010A 10/23/95 NJ 1628 02 02 ...... NJ BLOOMINGDALE, BOROUGH OF ...... 3452840005C 09/27/95 NJ 1151 02 02 ...... NJ BRICK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3452850003C 07/11/95 NJ 1438 01 02 ...... NJ BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3400900003B 09/27/95 NJ 1573 02 02 ...... NJ CRANFORD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3452910001B 10/23/95 NJ 1611 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28367

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

02 ...... NJ DELANCO, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3400930001B 10/23/95 NJ 1618 02 02 ...... NJ DENVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3452920004B 08/03/95 95±02±056A 02 02 ...... NJ DOVER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3452930004D 11/09/95 NJ 1631 02 02 ...... NJ DOVER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3452930005D 10/26/95 95±02±089P 06 02 ...... NJ DOVER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3452930006D 10/26/95 95±02±089P 06 02 ...... NJ DOVER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3452930010D 10/26/95 95±02±089P 06 02 ...... NJ ELK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 340201B 09/27/95 NJ 1551 02 02 ...... NJ FAIRFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 3452950001C 08/21/95 1539 02 02 ...... NJ FAIRFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 3452950001C 07/31/95 NJ 1539 02 02 ...... NJ FAIRFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 3452950002C 08/21/95 1539 02 02 ...... NJ FAIRFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 3452950003C 11/29/95 NJ 1433 02 02 ...... NJ HAZLET, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3402980002B 10/23/95 NJ 1578 02 02 ...... NJ HIGHLANDS, BOROUGH OF ...... 345297A 11/09/95 NJ 1582 02 02 ...... NJ JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405220001B 09/12/95 1572 02 02 ...... NJ JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405220001B 09/12/95 NJ 1572 02 02 ...... NJ JERSEY CITY, CITY OF ...... 3402230004B 08/07/95 95±02±152A 01 02 ...... NJ LACEY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 340376A 07/11/95 NJ 1501 02 02 ...... NJ LAKEWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3403780005B 09/20/95 NJ 1364 02 02 ...... NJ LUMBERTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3401000005B 11/09/95 NJ 1646 02 02 ...... NJ MANASQUAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 3453030001C 08/04/95 1504 02 02 ...... NJ MANASQUAN, BOROUGH OF ...... 3453030001C 09/27/95 NJ 1586 02 02 ...... NJ MANTOLOKING, BOROUGH OF ...... 3403830001B 08/08/95 1485 02 02 ...... NJ MANTOLOKING, BOROUGH OF ...... 3403830001B 08/08/95 NJ 1485 02 02 ...... NJ MAYWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0187F 11/03/95 96±02±005P 06 02 ...... NJ MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3402690003B 07/20/95 95±02±148A 02 02 ...... NJ NATIONAL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 3402090001C 08/04/95 1536 02 02 ...... NJ NATIONAL PARK, BOROUGH OF ...... 3402090001C 07/27/95 NJ 1536 02 02 ...... NJ OLD BRIDGE, TOWN OF ...... 3402650004D 10/23/95 NJ 1575 01 02 ...... NJ PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 34003C0187F 11/03/95 96±02±003P 06 02 ...... NJ PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF ...... 3400620002D 10/11/95 95±02±114C 01 02 ...... NJ PATERSON, CITY OF ...... 3404040001A 10/23/95 NJ 1615 02 02 ...... NJ PEQUANNOCK, VILLAGE OF ...... 3453110001C 11/29/95 NJ 1626 02 02 ...... NJ PEQUANNOCK, VILLAGE OF ...... 3453110002B 09/27/95 NJ 1584 02 02 ...... NJ PEQUANNOCK, VILLAGE OF ...... 3453110003C 11/09/95 1622 02 02 ...... NJ PEQUANNOCK, VILLAGE OF ...... 3453110003C 10/23/95 NJ 1622 02 02 ...... NJ PISCATAWAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3402740006B 07/18/95 94±02±125P 05 02 ...... NJ POINT PLEASANT, BOROUGH OF ...... 3453130001B 08/09/95 1523 02 02 ...... NJ POINT PLEASANT, BOROUGH OF ...... 3453130001B 07/17/95 NJ 1523 02 02 ...... NJ RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0067F 11/29/95 96±02±004A 01 02 ...... NJ RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF ...... 3400640001C 07/11/95 NJ 1277 01 02 ...... NJ RARITAN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3402400014A 09/27/95 NJ 1530 02 02 ...... NJ READINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405140003B 09/25/95 95±02±182A 02 02 ...... NJ READINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405140003B 10/03/95 95±02±206A 02 02 ...... NJ READINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405140006B 09/25/95 95±02±182A 02 02 ...... NJ READINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405140006B 10/03/95 95±02±206A 02 02 ...... NJ RIVERSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3401130001B 11/09/95 NJ 1657 02 02 ...... NJ ROCKLEIGH, BOROUGH OF ...... 34003C0206F 10/13/95 95±02±032P 05 02 ...... NJ SOUTH PLAINFIELD, BOROUGH OF ...... 3402790001B 08/17/95 NJ 1554 01 02 ...... NJ SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3453210002C 09/27/95 NJ 1562 02 02 ...... NJ STILLWATER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405600009B 12/14/95 95±02±033P 06 02 ...... NJ VERNON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3405610035A 09/12/95 NJ 1570 02 02 ...... NJ WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3453270005B 07/11/95 NJ 1432 01 02 ...... NJ WEST CALDWELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 3401960001B 08/04/95 1191 02 02 ...... NJ WEST CALDWELL, BOROUGH OF ...... 3401960001B 08/04/95 NJ 1191 02 02 ...... NJ WEST DEPTFORD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3402140003B 07/11/95 NJ 1507 02 02 ...... NJ WINSLOW, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3401480026B 12/11/95 95±02±178A 02 02 ...... NY ALDEN, TOWN OF ...... 3602250010C 09/20/95 NY 1549 02 02 ...... NY ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF ...... 360326C 10/23/95 NY 1606 02 02 ...... NY ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF ...... 360326C 11/29/95 NY 1607 02 02 ...... NY ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF ...... 360326C 10/23/95 NY 1608 02 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260007E 08/22/95 1542 01 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260007E 09/23/95 1588 02 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260007E 10/24/95 1617 01 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260007E 09/20/95 NY 1518 02 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260007E 07/31/95 NY 1542 01 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260007E 09/27/95 NY 1589 02 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260007E 11/09/95 NY 1617 01 02 ...... NY AMHERST, TOWN OF ...... 3602260009E 08/17/95 95±02±015P 05 02 ...... NY BABYLON, VILLAGE OF ...... 3607910005D 08/24/95 95±02±097P 05 02 ...... NY BABYLON,TOWN OF ...... 3607900025B 08/24/95 95±02±081P 06 28368 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

02 ...... NY BABYLON,TOWN OF ...... 3607900040C 08/24/95 95±02±081P 06 02 ...... NY BABYLON,TOWN OF ...... 3607900040C 08/24/95 95±02±081P 06 02 ...... NY BATAVIA, CITY OF ...... 3602790001B 12/15/95 NY 1645 02 02 ...... NY BEACON, CITY OF ...... 3602170001B 07/19/95 95±02±067P 02 02 ...... NY BEACON, CITY OF ...... 3602170001B 07/19/95 95±02±067P 06 02 ...... NY BEACON, CITY OF ...... 3602170001B 09/12/95 95±02±077P 05 02 ...... NY BEACON, CITY OF ...... 3602170001B 09/14/95 95±02±087P 06 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 08/09/95 1534 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 08/21/95 1535 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 09/06/95 1566 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 09/06/95 1567 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 09/06/95 1568 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 09/28/95 1594 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 09/28/95 1596 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 12/15/95 NY 1534 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 12/15/95 NY 1534 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 10/24/95 NY 1535 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 08/22/95 NY 1567 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 10/05/95 NY 1594 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 10/23/95 NY 1595 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 10/04/95 NY 1596 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 11/09/95 NY 1653 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 11/09/95 NY 1654 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 11/09/95 NY 1655 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 12/15/95 NY 1683 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 12/15/95 NY 1684 02 02 ...... NY BUFFALO, CITY OF ...... 3602300010B 12/15/95 NY 1685 02 02 ...... NY CHESTER, TOWN OF ...... 3608700005A 08/04/95 NY 1397 02 02 ...... NY CHESTER, TOWN OF ...... 3608700005A 09/12/95 NY 1419 02 02 ...... NY CHESTNUT RIDGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3616150001C 12/15/95 NY 1688 02 02 ...... NY CHITTENANGO, VILLAGE OF ...... 3603950002B 08/04/95 NY 1384 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720003D 09/25/95 95±02±158A 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720004D 08/07/95 95±02±156A 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720004D 11/21/95 95±02±198A 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720004D 11/21/95 95±02±208A 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720004D 12/01/95 96±02±002A 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720004D 08/16/95 NY 1531 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720004D 11/09/95 NY 1647 01 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720005D 12/15/95 NY 1682 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720015D 08/21/95 1533 02 02 ...... NY CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 3605720015D 07/26/95 NY 1533 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 10/23/95 NY 1540 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 10/23/95 NY 1550 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 11/09/95 NY 1553 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 10/23/95 NY 1561 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 10/23/95 NY 1593 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 10/23/95 NY 1624 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 10/23/95 NY 1625 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 12/15/95 NY 1653 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320005B 12/15/95 NY 1672 02 02 ...... NY CLARENCE, TOWN OF ...... 3602320013B 09/19/95 95±02±176A 02 02 ...... NY CLARKSTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 3606790015D 09/20/95 NY 1563 02 02 ...... NY CONESUS, TOWN OF ...... 3603820001C 11/09/95 NY 1658 02 02 ...... NY CORTLANDT, TOWN OF ...... 3609060008B 08/09/95 1526 02 02 ...... NY CORTLANDT, TOWN OF ...... 3609060008B 07/18/95 NY 1526 02 02 ...... NY EAST HAMPTON, TOWN OF ...... 3607940013E 08/25/95 95±02±184A 02 02 ...... NY EVANS, TOWN OF ...... 3602400015E 12/15/95 NY 1665 02 02 ...... NY FREEDOM, TOWN OF ...... 3600740008C 07/31/95 NY 1500 02 02 ...... NY GLEN COVE, CITY OF ...... 3604650002C 09/20/95 NY 1577 02 02 ...... NY GOSHEN, TOWN OF ...... 3606140010B 08/09/95 1519 02 02 ...... NY GOSHEN, TOWN OF ...... 3606140010B 07/11/95 NY 1519 02 02 ...... NY GREECE, TOWN OF ...... 3604170004E 08/09/95 95±02±128A 01 02 ...... NY GREECE, TOWN OF ...... 3604170004E 08/14/95 95±02±130A 01 02 ...... NY GREECE, TOWN OF ...... 3604170004E 08/07/95 95±02±132A 01 02 ...... NY GREENE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3601590001C 09/20/95 NY 1538 02 02 ...... NY GREENWOOD LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3606160001B 09/28/95 1581 02 02 ...... NY GREENWOOD LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3606160001B 11/09/95 1581 02 02 ...... NY GREENWOOD LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3606160001B 10/05/95 NY 1581 02 02 ...... NY GREENWOOD LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3606160001B 10/23/95 NY 1632 02 02 ...... NY HAMBURG, TOWN OF ...... 3602440015B 11/09/95 NY 1648 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28369

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

02 ...... NY HAMLIN, TOWN OF ...... 3604180002C 08/22/95 1548 02 02 ...... NY HAMLIN, TOWN OF ...... 3604180002C 08/11/95 NY 1548 02 02 ...... NY HEMPSTEAD, TOWN OF ...... 3604670034B 09/27/95 NY 1590 02 02 ...... NY HEMPSTEAD, TOWN OF ...... 3604670046B 09/06/95 1560 02 02 ...... NY HEMPSTEAD, TOWN OF ...... 3604670046B 08/18/95 NY 1560 02 02 ...... NY HEMPSTEAD, TOWN OF ...... 3604670046B 11/09/95 NY 1639 02 02 ...... NY HUNTINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3607960006D 10/23/95 NY 1583 02 02 ...... NY HUNTINGTON, TOWN OF ...... 3607960006D 10/23/95 NY 1612 02 02 ...... NY ISLIP, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3653370005C 08/24/95 95±02±079P 06 02 ...... NY ISLIP, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3653370016C 08/24/95 95±02±079P 06 02 ...... NY ISLIP, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3653370018D 08/24/95 95±02±079P 06 02 ...... NY ISLIP, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3653370018D 08/24/95 95±02±079P 06 02 ...... NY JERUSALEM, TOWN OF ...... 360959C 09/20/95 NY 1546 02 02 ...... NY KINDERHOOK, TOWN OF ...... 3613210010B 08/09/95 1503 02 02 ...... NY MANLIUS, TOWN OF ...... 3605840010D 07/26/95 95±02±060A 01 02 ...... NY MANLIUS, TOWN OF ...... 3605840010D 10/18/95 95±02±084A 01 02 ...... NY MANLIUS, TOWN OF ...... 3605840010D 08/10/95 NY 1547 02 02 ...... NY MANLIUS, TOWN OF ...... 3605840017D 10/24/95 NY 1602 02 02 ...... NY MARATHON, VILLAGE OF ...... 3601830001B 10/05/95 95±02±180A 02 02 ...... NY MILO, TOWN OF ...... 360961C 08/04/95 1106 02 02 ...... NY MOUNT KISCO, VILLAGE OF ...... 3609180001B 11/09/95 NY 1610 02 02 ...... NY NEW ROCHELLE, CITY OF ...... 3609220005B 10/23/95 NY 1633 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970036B 10/23/95 NY 1623 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970076C 08/14/95 95±02±170A 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970076C 08/11/95 95±02±172A 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970076C 08/14/95 95±02±172A 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970082C 08/18/95 NY 1556 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970082C 08/18/95 NY 1557 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970082C 08/18/95 NY 1558 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970082C 08/18/95 NY 1559 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970082C 09/27/95 NY 1609 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970111C 08/31/95 95±02±170A 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970125D 08/09/95 1512 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970125D 12/15/95 NY 1674 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970128D 11/29/95 NY 1342 02 02 ...... NY NEW YORK, CITY OF ...... 3604970130C 09/20/95 NY 1580 01 02 ...... NY NEWSTEAD, TOWN OF ...... 3602510010D 12/15/95 NY 1620 02 02 ...... NY OGDEN, TOWN OF ...... 3604240005B 10/17/95 95±02±112A 01 02 ...... NY ORANGETOWN, TOWN OF ...... 3606860006C 10/26/95 95±02±101P 06 02 ...... NY OSSINING, VILLAGE OF ...... 3610210002B 10/26/95 95±02±109P 06 02 ...... NY PLEASANTVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3609270001B 09/12/95 1461 02 02 ...... NY RED HOOK, TOWN OF ...... 3611430026B 09/06/95 1555 02 02 ...... NY RED HOOK, TOWN OF ...... 3611430026B 08/23/95 NY 1555 02 02 ...... NY RENSSELAER, CITY OF ...... 3610320001B 09/20/95 95±02±051P 06 02 ...... NY RHINEBECK, VILLAGE OF ...... 3619990001B 09/18/95 95±02±053A 01 02 ...... NY RIVERHEAD, TOWN OF ...... 3608050018D 10/23/95 NY 1585 02 02 ...... NY ROTTERDAM, TOWN OF ...... 3607400012B 09/20/95 NY 1552 02 02 ...... NY SCHOHARIE, VILLAGE OF ...... 3610610001C 11/09/95 NY 1613 02 02 ...... NY SCHROEPPEL, TOWN OF ...... 3606620020B 10/23/95 NY 1627 02 02 ...... NY SCHUYLER FALLS, TOWN OF ...... 3601720005C 08/22/95 1324 02 02 ...... NY SCOTIA, VILLAGE OF ...... 3607420001C 12/11/95 96±02±008A 01 02 ...... NY SYRACUSE, CITY OF ...... 3605950003E 11/09/95 NY 1636 02 02 ...... NY TROY, CITY OF ...... 3606770001B 08/09/95 1506 02 02 ...... NY TROY, CITY OF ...... 3606770001B 08/22/95 1506 02 02 ...... NY UNADILLA, TOWN OF ...... 3612810018B 11/09/95 NY 1604 01 02 ...... NY VIENNA, TOWN OF ...... 3605620025B 08/21/95 1516 02 02 ...... NY VIENNA, TOWN OF ...... 3605620025B 08/21/95 1517 02 02 ...... NY VIENNA, TOWN OF ...... 3605620025B 07/31/95 NY 1516 02 02 ...... NY VIENNA, TOWN OF ...... 3605620025B 07/31/95 NY 1517 02 02 ...... NY WATERVLIET, CITY OF ...... 3600160001B 08/22/95 1540 02 02 ...... NY WATERVLIET, CITY OF ...... 3600160001B 08/07/95 NY 1545 02 02 ...... NY WAYNE, TOWN OF ...... 3607850001B 10/23/95 NY 1579 02 02 ...... NY WEBB, TOWN OF ...... 360321A 08/22/95 1299 02 02 ...... NY WEBB, TOWN OF ...... 360321A 07/03/95 NY 1515 02 02 ...... NY WEBB, TOWN OF ...... 360321A 12/15/95 NY 1679 02 02 ...... NY WEST SENECA, TOWN OF ...... 3602620003B 10/03/95 95±02±188A 01 02 ...... NY WHEATFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 3605130004D 09/06/95 1544 02 02 ...... NY WHEATFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 3605130004D 08/07/95 NY 1544 02 02 ...... NY YORKTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 3609370007C 11/30/95 1601 02 02 ...... NY YORKTOWN, TOWN OF ...... 3609370010C 09/12/95 1461 02 28370 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000035D 07/07/95 95±02±142A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000045D 08/31/95 95±02±108A 02 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000046C 08/07/95 95±02±140A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000046C 09/28/95 95±02±168A 02 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000046C 10/03/95 95±02±174A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000047D 09/28/95 95±02±168A 02 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000120B 08/23/95 95±02±086A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000120B 10/31/95 95±02±106A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000120B 09/11/95 95±02±162A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000177D 08/28/95 95±02±166A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000277C 07/31/95 95±02±144A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000281C 07/31/95 95±02±144A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000292C 10/30/95 95±02±186A 01 02 ...... PR PUERTO RICO, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7200000292C 11/03/95 95±02±196A 01 02 ...... VI VIRGIN ISLANDS, COMMONWEALTH OF ...... 7800000075D 08/16/95 95±02±069P 06 03 ...... DE KENT COUNTY* ...... 1000010130C 12/18/95 96±03±012A 02 03 ...... DE KENT COUNTY* ...... 1000010130C 12/13/95 96±03±052A 02 03 ...... DE NEW CASTLE COUNTY* ...... 1050850015B 10/19/95 95±03±246A 02 03 ...... DE NEW CASTLE COUNTY* ...... 1050850040C 11/21/95 95±03±184A 02 03 ...... DE NEW CASTLE COUNTY* ...... 1050850040C 09/18/95 95±03±368A 02 03 ...... DE SUSSEX COUNTY* ...... 10005C0264F 11/21/95 95±03±238A 02 03 ...... DE WILMINGTON, CITY OF* ...... 1000280005C 11/29/95 95±03±478A 02 03 ...... MD ANNAPOLIS, CITY OF* ...... 2400090005B 11/13/95 95±03±430A 02 03 ...... MD ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY* ...... 2400080020C 09/19/95 95±03±168A 02 03 ...... MD ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY* ...... 2400080021C 10/31/95 95±03±422A 02 03 ...... MD ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY* ...... 2400080044D 08/24/95 95±03±316A 02 03 ...... MD ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY* ...... 2400080052D 12/15/95 96±03±128A 02 03 ...... MD BALTIMORE COUNTY* ...... 2400100245E 10/05/95 95±03±390A 02 03 ...... MD BALTIMORE COUNTY* ...... 2400100360B 08/31/95 95±03±138A 02 03 ...... MD BALTIMORE COUNTY* ...... 2400100370B 09/29/95 95±03±302A 02 03 ...... MD BALTIMORE COUNTY* ...... 2400100440C 08/24/95 95±03±328A 02 03 ...... MD CALVERT COUNTY* ...... 2400110001B 09/11/95 95±03±412A 02 03 ...... MD CALVERT COUNTY* ...... 2400110025B 08/03/95 95±03±306A 02 03 ...... MD CRISFIELD, CITY OF ...... 2400620001C 09/29/95 95±03±324A 02 03 ...... MD DORCHESTER COUNTY* ...... 2400260200A 09/19/95 95±03±276A 02 03 ...... MD HARFORD COUNTY* ...... 2400400058A 11/29/95 96±03±006A 02 03 ...... MD HARFORD COUNTY* ...... 2400400146C 09/14/95 95±03±320A 01 03 ...... MD HOWARD COUNTY* ...... 2400440005B 09/01/95 95±03±414A 02 03 ...... MD HOWARD COUNTY* ...... 2400440010B 09/01/95 95±03±414A 02 03 ...... MD MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 2400490200C 09/28/95 95±03±454A 02 03 ...... MD PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY* ...... 2452080080C 08/07/95 95±03±300A 02 03 ...... MD QUEEN ANNES COUNTY ...... 2400540054B 10/25/95 95±03±458A 02 03 ...... MD ROCKVILLE, CITY OF ...... 2400510001B 09/25/95 95±03±410A 02 03 ...... MD ROCKVILLE, CITY OF ...... 2400510001B 11/06/95 96±03±002A 02 03 ...... MD SOMERSET COUNTY* ...... 2400610325A 10/09/95 95±03±338A 02 03 ...... MD TALBOT COUNTY* ...... 2400660022A 09/11/95 95±03±380A 02 03 ...... MD TALBOT COUNTY* ...... 2400660032A 10/31/95 95±03±408A 02 03 ...... MD WASHINGTON COUNTY* ...... 2400700085B 10/03/95 95±03±428A 02 03 ...... MD WASHINGTON COUNTY* ...... 2400700095B 08/17/95 94±03±137P 06 03 ...... PA BEDMINSTER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4210490015A 11/08/95 95±03±384A 02 03 ...... PA BETHLEHEM, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4209800015B 11/21/95 95±03±166A 01 03 ...... PA BRISTOL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4209840005C 08/07/95 95±03±310A 02 03 ...... PA BRISTOL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4209840010D 11/14/95 95±03±117P 06 03 ...... PA CARLISLE, BOROUGH OF ...... 4253820004B 08/03/95 95±03±240A 02 03 ...... PA COOLBOUGH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4218860025A 10/31/95 95±03±436A 02 03 ...... PA DARBY, BOROUGH OF ...... 42045C0036D 07/17/95 95±03±270A 02 03 ...... PA DOUGLASS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4219110005B 11/22/95 96±03±018A 02 03 ...... PA EAST BRANDYWINE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4214760005B 07/05/95 95±03±118A 02 03 ...... PA FERGUSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4202600005C 09/28/95 95±03±103P 06 03 ...... PA FERGUSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4202600005C 12/15/95 96±03±004A 02 03 ...... PA FERGUSON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4202600005C 12/01/95 96±03±034A 02 03 ...... PA FLEETWOOD, BOROUGH OF ...... 4201330001B 10/27/95 95±03±448A 02 03 ...... PA LEHIGH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4219310010A 10/31/95 95±03±466A 02 03 ...... PA LOWER MAKEFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4201910001B 07/18/95 95±03±113P 06 03 ...... PA LOWER MERION, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4207010001B 09/28/95 95±03±438A 02 03 ...... PA LOWER PAXTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4203840006B 11/21/95 95±03±424A 02 03 ...... PA MATAMORAS, BOROUGH OF ...... 4207580005A 10/11/95 95±03±456A 02 03 ...... PA NEW CUMBERLAND, BOROUGH OF ...... 420366B 07/20/95 95±03±292A 02 03 ...... PA ORWIGSBURG, BOROUGH OF ...... 4212040005B 07/17/95 95±03±071P 06 03 ...... PA PLUNKETTS CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4206550030B 08/31/95 95±03±296A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28371

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

03 ...... PA PLYMOUTH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4209550001B 12/01/95 94±03±127P 06 03 ...... PA SADSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 421488B 11/21/95 95±03±216A 02 03 ...... PA SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4202690013C 08/24/95 95±03±061P 05 03 ...... PA UPPER GWYNEDD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4209560001B 11/22/95 95±03±394A 02 03 ...... PA UPPER MACUNGIE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 4210440010C 12/21/95 96±03±011P 06 03 ...... PA UPPER PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 42045C0021D 07/17/95 95±03±134A 02 03 ...... VA CHESAPEAKE, CITY OF ...... 510034B 07/20/95 95±03±162A 01 03 ...... VA CHESAPEAKE, CITY OF ...... 510034B 08/14/95 95±03±280A 02 03 ...... VA CHESAPEAKE, CITY OF ...... 510034B 10/05/95 95±03±376A 02 03 ...... VA CHESAPEAKE, CITY OF ...... 510034B 12/18/95 96±03±030A 01 03 ...... VA CHESAPEAKE, CITY OF ...... 510034B 11/29/95 96±03±032A 01 03 ...... VA CHESAPEAKE, CITY OF ...... 510034B 12/05/95 96±03±042A 01 03 ...... VA DUMFRIES, TOWN OF ...... 51153C0304D 10/23/95 95±03±348A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250025D 10/09/95 95±03±366A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250075D 07/05/95 95±03±284A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250075D 09/21/95 95±03±334A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250075D 11/13/95 95±03±370A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250075D 10/26/95 95±03±490A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250079D 10/03/95 95±03±298A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250100D 08/14/95 95±03±326A 01 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250150D 08/04/95 95±03±318A 01 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250150D 09/13/95 95±03±346A 02 03 ...... VA FAIRFAX COUNTY* ...... 5155250150D 10/31/95 95±03±494A 02 03 ...... VA FALLS CHURCH, CITY OF ...... 5100540001B 08/09/95 95±03±218A 02 03 ...... VA HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 5102370430A 09/18/95 95±03±308A 02 03 ...... VA LOUDOUN COUNTY* ...... 5100900105C 12/18/95 96±03±054A 02 03 ...... VA LOUDOUN COUNTY* ...... 5100900110C 09/13/95 95±03±178A 02 03 ...... VA MATHEWS COUNTY* ...... 5100960007C 12/05/95 96±03±010A 02 03 ...... VA NARROWS, TOWN OF ...... 5100680001B 11/21/95 96±03±024A 02 03 ...... VA NEWPORT NEWS, CITY OF ...... 5101030009C 11/29/95 95±03±358A 02 03 ...... VA PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY* ...... 51153C0238D 10/31/95 95±03±418A 02 03 ...... VA PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY* ...... 51153C0316D 07/31/95 95±03±228A 02 03 ...... VA PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY* ...... 51153C0316D 08/31/95 95±03±322A 02 03 ...... VA ROANOKE COUNTY* ...... 51161C0023D 11/03/95 95±03±077P 05 03 ...... VA ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY* ...... 5102050150A 11/21/95 95±03±304A 02 03 ...... VA ROCKINGHAM COUNTY* ...... 5101330085B 09/07/95 95±03±143P 06 03 ...... VA SHENANDOAH COUNTY* ...... 5101470200B 12/07/95 95±03±488A 02 03 ...... VA STAFFORD COUNTY* ...... 5101540135D 09/11/95 95±03±272A 02 03 ...... VA STAFFORD COUNTY* ...... 5101540135D 11/03/95 95±03±426A 02 03 ...... VA STAFFORD COUNTY* ...... 5101540135D 10/09/95 95±03±452A 02 03 ...... VA SUFFOLK, CITY OF ...... 5101560007B 08/14/95 95±03±336A 02 03 ...... VA VIRGINIA BEACH, CITY OF ...... 5155310009D 08/07/95 95±03±312A 02 03 ...... VA VIRGINIA BEACH, CITY OF ...... 5155310030D 08/14/95 95±03±330A 02 03 ...... VA VIRGINIA BEACH, CITY OF ...... 5155310030D 08/14/95 95±03±330A 02 03 ...... WV SPENCER, CITY OF ...... 5401850001B 09/18/95 95±03±344A 02 03 ...... WV WAYNE COUNTY* ...... 5402000103B 11/21/95 95±03±398A 02 04 ...... AL ANNISTON, CITY OF ...... 0100200005C 08/16/95 95±04±135P 05 04 ...... AL DECATUR, CITY OF ...... 0101760010B 10/18/95 954±025 02 04 ...... AL DECATUR, CITY OF ...... 0101760015B 10/19/95 95±04±798A 02 04 ...... AL HUEYTOWN, CITY OF ...... 0103370011B 08/09/95 952±268 02 04 ...... AL HUNTSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0101530040C 07/27/95 953±009 02 04 ...... AL JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 0102170492B 10/11/95 954±179 01 04 ...... AL JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 0102170494B 09/14/95 954±137 02 04 ...... AL MOBILE, CITY OF ...... 0150070032E 09/29/95 954±259 02 04 ...... AL MOBILE, CITY OF ...... 0150070032E 09/29/95 954±261 02 04 ...... AL MONTEVALLO, TOWN OF ...... 0103490001C 10/19/95 954±182 02 04 ...... AL MONTEVALLO, TOWN OF ...... 0103490002C 10/19/95 954±182 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 01101C0065F 11/01/95 961±043 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 01101C0135F 08/21/95 951±174 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 01101C0200F 09/14/95 952±288 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 01101C0200F 09/14/95 954±144 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY, CITY OF ...... 01101C0060F 08/21/95 953±124 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY, CITY OF ...... 01101C0070F 07/27/95 953±100 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY, CITY OF ...... 01101C0070F 07/27/95 953±101 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY, CITY OF ...... 01101C0070F 07/27/95 953±171 02 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY, CITY OF ...... 01101C0070F 09/26/95 954±204 01 04 ...... AL MONTGOMERY, CITY OF ...... 01101C0070F 12/11/95 961±150 02 04 ...... AL MOUNTAIN BROOK, CITY OF ...... 0101280005B 09/26/95 954±225 02 28372 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... AL PELL CITY, CITY OF ...... 0101890020B 07/25/95 953±260 02 04 ...... AL ST. CLAIR COUNTY* ...... 0102900325B 12/04/95 961±154 02 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010190B 10/10/95 954±163 02 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010259A 07/10/95 951±001 02 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010259A 10/11/95 954±298 02 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010269A 09/28/95 95±04±335P 08 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010269A 09/26/95 954±213 01 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010269A 09/26/95 954±223 01 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010269A 09/26/95 954±224 01 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010425A 10/05/95 95±04±932A 02 04 ...... FL ALACHUA COUNTY* ...... 1200010450A 11/27/95 954±296 02 04 ...... FL ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12117C0120E 08/03/95 95±04±814A 01 04 ...... FL BAY COUNTY* ...... 1200040335D 08/10/95 953±164 02 04 ...... FL BELLE ISLE, CITY OF ...... 1201810005B 07/10/95 953±199 02 04 ...... FL BELLEAIR BLUFFS, CITY OF ...... 1202390001C 11/03/95 95±04±786A 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0115E 09/21/95 954±079 02 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0190E 08/11/95 95±04±810A 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0260E 07/25/95 953±251 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0260E 12/12/95 961±165 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0260E 07/27/95 L±954±007 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0270E 07/10/95 953±263 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0270E 09/15/95 953±263A 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0275E 08/09/95 953±005 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0290E 10/23/95 954±258 02 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0350E 10/02/95 954±236 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0355E 07/10/95 953±204 02 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0355E 11/08/95 954±290 02 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 09/28/95 95±04±992A 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 07/10/95 953±192 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 07/10/95 953±248 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 07/27/95 954±015 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 08/21/95 954±076 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 08/24/95 954±099 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 09/15/95 954±145 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 09/15/95 954±167 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 09/26/95 954±214 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 10/02/95 954±236 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 10/11/95 954±310 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 10/16/95 954±311 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 10/17/95 961±020 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 11/27/95 961±128 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 11/27/95 961±129 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 11/27/95 961±130 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0365E 12/04/95 961±162 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0430E 08/14/95 95±04±520A 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0430E 09/01/95 95±04±796A 02 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 2009C0430E 09/28/95 95±04±992A 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0430E 07/10/95 953±223 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0435E 11/28/95 95±04±303P 06 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0435E 07/25/95 953±247 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0435E 08/10/95 954±031 02 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0435E 10/17/95 954±074 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0435E 10/11/95 954±222 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0435E 12/11/95 961±100 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0439E 09/14/95 953±239 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0441E 07/10/95 953±194 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0441E 10/11/95 954±329 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0441E 12/12/95 961±163 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0441E 12/12/95 961±177 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0607F 08/14/95 95±04±406A 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0619E 10/16/95 961±009 01 04 ...... FL BREVARD COUNTY* ...... 12009C0710E 11/27/95 954±184 02 04 ...... FL BROWARD COUNTY* ...... 12011C0190F 11/13/95 95±04±1154A 01 04 ...... FL CALHOUN COUNTY* ...... 12013C0150C 10/19/95 953±237 02 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950030C 09/11/95 95±04±1020A 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950030C 07/19/95 95±04±832A 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950030C 07/10/95 953±197 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950030C 08/09/95 954±047 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950030C 10/25/95 96±04±066A 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950030C 11/13/95 96±04±128A 01 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28373

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950030C 10/30/95 961±052 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950035C 10/11/95 95±04±1094A 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950035C 08/21/95 95±04±960A 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950040C 07/19/95 95±04±832A 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950040C 10/25/95 96±04±066A 01 04 ...... FL CAPE CORAL, CITY OF ...... 1250950045C 10/25/95 96±04±066A 01 04 ...... FL CASSELBERRY, CITY OF ...... 12117C0140E 12/13/95 96±04±078A 02 04 ...... FL CASSELBERRY, CITY OF ...... 12117C0145E 11/22/95 95±04±1130A 02 04 ...... FL CASSELBERRY, CITY OF ...... 12117C0145E 12/13/95 96±04±078A 02 04 ...... FL CHARLOTTE COUNTY* ...... 1200610035E 08/11/95 95±04±147A 01 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630020B 10/05/95 95±04±904A 01 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630115B 09/25/95 954±197 01 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630260B 07/27/95 954±016 01 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630260B 08/23/95 954±050 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630260B 09/25/95 954±174 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630260B 11/08/95 961±062 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630260B 12/11/95 961±122 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630260B 08/23/95 L±954±050 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630270B 08/24/95 954±077 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630270B 09/14/95 954±160 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630270B 09/26/95 954±198 02 04 ...... FL CITRUS COUNTY* ...... 1200630270B 08/24/95 L±954±077 02 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640040D 07/11/95 94±04±229P 06 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640045D 07/11/95 94±04±229P 06 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640065D 08/31/95 95±04±870A 01 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640110D 07/11/95 94±04±229P 06 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640130D 07/11/95 94±04±229P 06 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640155D 09/29/95 95±04±111P 05 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640155D 07/17/95 95±04±802A 01 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640155D 10/03/95 95±04±972A 01 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640155D 09/15/95 952±248 01 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640350D 10/20/95 952±267 02 04 ...... FL CLAY COUNTY* ...... 1200640375D 07/25/95 953±140 02 04 ...... FL COLLIER COUNTY* ...... 1200670605E 09/26/95 95±04±998A 01 04 ...... FL COLUMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1200700175B 11/02/95 954±241 02 04 ...... FL CORAL SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12011C0095F 08/09/95 95±04±868A 02 04 ...... FL CORAL SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12011C0095F 12/07/95 96±04±006A 01 04 ...... FL CORAL SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12011C0115F 07/31/95 95±04±862A 01 04 ...... FL CORAL SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12011C0115F 10/30/95 961±037 02 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0080J 07/07/95 95±04±768A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0080J 10/22/95 95±04±884A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0080J 11/29/95 95±04±946A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0170J 10/11/95 954±307 02 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0265J 11/29/95 95±04±1106A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0265J 08/16/95 95±04±732A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0265J 08/24/95 95±04±874A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0265J 11/29/95 96±04±088A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0266J 09/15/95 954±148 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0269J 08/09/95 953±072 02 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0356J 08/31/95 95±04±852A 01 04 ...... FL DADE COUNTY* ...... 12025C0357J 07/12/95 95±04±790A 01 04 ...... FL DAVIE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0195F 11/13/95 96±04±012A 01 04 ...... FL ESCAMBIA COUNTY* ...... 1200800245B 08/07/95 94±04±794C 01 04 ...... FL FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 1200880565C 09/26/95 954±202 02 04 ...... FL GAINESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1251070004B 09/28/95 95±04±335P 08 04 ...... FL GULFPORT, CITY OF ...... 1251080003C 08/22/95 95±04±063P 08 04 ...... FL GULFPORT, CITY OF ...... 1251080003C 08/22/95 95±04±063P 08 04 ...... FL HERNANDO COUNTY* ...... 1201100150B 09/01/95 95±04±1016A 02 04 ...... FL HERNANDO COUNTY* ...... 1201100150B 10/19/95 954±024 02 04 ...... FL HERNANDO COUNTY* ...... 1201100150B 12/11/95 961±134 02 04 ...... FL HERNANDO COUNTY* ...... 1201100280B 09/15/95 953±123 02 04 ...... FL HERNANDO COUNTY* ...... 1201100280B 09/15/95 953±125 01 04 ...... FL HERNANDO COUNTY* ...... 1201100280B 09/15/95 953±126 01 04 ...... FL HERNANDO COUNTY* ...... 1201100300B 11/27/95 961±064 02 04 ...... FL HIALEAH GARDENS, CITY OF ...... 12025C0075J 12/05/95 95±04±1008A 01 04 ...... FL HIALEAH GARDENS, CITY OF ...... 12025C0075J 08/25/95 95±04±822A 01 04 ...... FL HIALEAH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0075J 10/25/95 95±04±1092A 01 04 ...... FL HIALEAH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0075J 07/24/95 95±04±736A 01 04 ...... FL HIALEAH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0075J 08/14/95 95±04±882A 01 04 ...... FL HIALEAH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0075J 10/31/95 96±04±068A 01 28374 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120040D 09/29/95 954±090 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120045D 07/27/95 912±005A 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120065D 08/24/95 912±069A 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120065D 07/10/95 952±262 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120090E 07/25/95 953±249 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120090E 07/27/95 953±250 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120090E 10/11/95 954±232 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120090E 10/11/95 954±233 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120160C 09/11/95 95±04±928A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120160C 10/16/95 954±328 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120160C 11/29/95 96±04±074A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120160C 12/11/95 96±04±126A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 07/10/95 953±203 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 08/24/95 954±058 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 08/24/95 954±059 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 09/25/95 954±196 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 10/02/95 954±277 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 10/16/95 961±006 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 10/16/95 961±007 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 10/16/95 961±008 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 11/01/95 961±035 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 11/08/95 961±095 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120167C 12/04/95 961±155 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120180F 10/19/95 952±282 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120180F 09/29/95 954±282 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120180F 12/05/95 961±110 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120180F 12/11/95 961±125 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120185F 10/19/95 954±034 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120185F 09/26/95 954±178 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120185F 10/16/95 954±316 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120185F 11/27/95 961±061 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120185F 12/05/95 961±116 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 08/30/95 95±04±1002A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 10/17/95 95±04±1102A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 08/24/95 95±04±842A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 07/10/95 953±226 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 07/10/95 953±227 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 07/10/95 953±228 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 08/21/95 954±086 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 08/21/95 954±087 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 10/11/95 954±322 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 10/11/95 954±323 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 10/11/95 954±324 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120190D 11/29/95 96±04±044A 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120192D 08/07/95 95±04±730A 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120195D 07/11/95 953±218 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120204D 10/16/95 954±301 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 10/10/95 95±04±1072A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 08/03/95 95±04±826A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 11/28/95 95±04±952A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 09/20/95 95±04±980A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 12/12/95 954±251 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 11/29/95 96±04±106A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 12/15/95 96±04±214A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 12/11/95 961±073 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 12/12/95 961±140 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120205D 12/05/95 961±145 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120210E 08/10/95 954±049 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120211D 10/20/95 961±023 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120245D 11/21/95 95±04±916A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120380E 09/15/95 954±106 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120385E 07/10/95 953±219 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120385E 09/15/95 954±028 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120387E 11/27/95 961±049 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120387E 11/27/95 961±050 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120387E 11/27/95 961±051 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120387E 11/27/95 961±068 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120387E 12/05/95 961±105 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120387E 12/05/95 961±106 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120387E 12/12/95 961±156 01 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28375

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120389D 10/16/95 954±327 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120389D 12/12/95 961±157 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120393D 11/02/95 954±270 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 10/11/95 954±211 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 10/11/95 954±221 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 11/27/95 961±084 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 11/27/95 961±085 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 12/04/95 961±087 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 12/04/95 961±088 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 12/05/95 961±089 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 11/27/95 L±961±084 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120395E 11/27/95 L±961±085 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 07/10/95 953±229 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 07/10/95 953±230 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 07/10/95 953±231 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 07/10/95 953±232 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 07/10/95 953±233 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 07/27/95 954±012 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 11/02/95 954±048 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 11/02/95 954±051 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 11/02/95 954±052 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±057 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/25/95 954±060 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±112 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±113 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±114 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±115 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±116 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±117 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±118 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±119 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±120 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±122 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±123 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±124 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±125 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±126 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±127 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±128 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±129 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/07/95 954±130 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/15/95 954±154 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/15/95 954±155 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/15/95 954±156 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/15/95 954±157 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 09/25/95 954±166 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/11/95 954±243 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/04/95 954±297 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 11/08/95 954±297A 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/16/95 954±304 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/16/95 954±305 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/16/95 954±317 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/16/95 954±318 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/16/95 954±319 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/16/95 954±320 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 10/16/95 954±321 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 11/08/95 961±022 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 11/27/95 961±069 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 12/05/95 961±103 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 12/05/95 961±104 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 12/12/95 961±180 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120415C 12/12/95 961±203 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120494C 09/19/95 95±04±1000A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120494C 07/31/95 95±04±828A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120494C 12/01/95 96±04±100A 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120503C 10/19/95 953±138 02 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120515B 07/27/95 953±256 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120515B 07/27/95 953±257 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120515B 07/27/95 953±258 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 07/27/95 953±256 01 28376 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 07/27/95 953±257 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 07/27/95 953±258 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 12/04/95 961±083 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 12/04/95 961±086 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 12/05/95 961±090 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 12/05/95 961±091 01 04 ...... FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY* ...... 1201120520C 12/05/95 961±092 01 04 ...... FL HOLLYWOOD, CITY OF ...... 12011C0304F 11/08/95 961±026 02 04 ...... FL HOLLYWOOD, CITY OF ...... 12011C0308F 12/11/95 961±001 02 04 ...... FL HOMESTEAD, CITY OF ...... 12025C0365J 08/07/95 95±04±714A 01 04 ...... FL HOMESTEAD, CITY OF ...... 12025C0365J 11/29/95 96±04±062A 01 04 ...... FL INVERNESS, CITY OF ...... 1203480001B 10/16/95 953±222 02 04 ...... FL INVERNESS, CITY OF ...... 1203480002B 10/05/95 954±287 02 04 ...... FL INVERNESS, CITY OF ...... 1203480002B 10/05/95 954±288 02 04 ...... FL JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1200770061E 08/11/95 95±04±201P 06 04 ...... FL JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1200770065E 08/11/95 95±04±201P 06 04 ...... FL JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1200770208E 09/18/95 95±04±968A 01 04 ...... FL JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1200770243E 11/27/95 961±118 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210050B 07/25/95 953±135 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210100B 12/12/95 953±261 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210100B 12/12/95 953±262 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210100B 11/08/95 954±276 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210125B 09/25/95 953±168 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210125B 07/10/95 953±241 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210125B 07/10/95 953±244 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210125B 09/26/95 954±210 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210150B 07/25/95 953±135 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210200B 09/15/95 953±001 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210200B 07/25/95 953±044 01 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210200B 10/19/95 953±118 01 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210200B 12/11/95 953±133 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210225B 12/11/95 953±133 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210225B 12/12/95 961±028 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210275B 08/10/95 954±011 01 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210325B 08/16/95 95±04±820A 01 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210325B 09/26/95 954±172 02 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210375B 09/25/95 95±04±508A 01 04 ...... FL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1204210375B 07/10/95 953±216 02 04 ...... FL LAUDER HILL, CITY OF ...... 12011C0205F 08/23/95 95±04±880A 01 04 ...... FL LEE COUNTY* ...... 1251240045B 12/07/95 95±04±359P 05 04 ...... FL LEE COUNTY* ...... 1251240225C 07/24/95 95±04±808A 01 04 ...... FL LEE COUNTY* ...... 1251240225C 08/26/95 95±04±926A 01 04 ...... FL LEE COUNTY* ...... 1251240225C 12/18/95 96±04±236A 02 04 ...... FL LEE COUNTY* ...... 1251240250B 07/27/95 954±032 02 04 ...... FL LEE COUNTY* ...... 1251240325C 10/06/95 954±271 02 04 ...... FL LEE COUNTY* ...... 1251240433B 12/11/95 961±077 02 04 ...... FL LEON COUNTY* ...... 1201430150A 09/15/95 954±092 02 04 ...... FL LIGHTHOUSE POINT, CITY OF ...... 12011C0117F 12/11/95 961±175 02 04 ...... FL LONGWOOD, CITY OF ...... 12117C0130E 10/19/95 953±196 02 04 ...... FL LONGWOOD, CITY OF ...... 12117C0130E 09/26/95 954±159 02 04 ...... FL LONGWOOD, CITY OF ...... 12117C0130E 12/04/95 954±262 02 04 ...... FL MARGATE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0115F 08/07/95 95±04±830A 01 04 ...... FL MARGATE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0115F 07/11/95 953±235 01 04 ...... FL MARGATE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0115F 10/31/95 96±04±010A 01 04 ...... FL MARGATE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0115F 11/29/95 96±04±186A 01 04 ...... FL MELBOURNE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0441E 08/10/95 954±029 02 04 ...... FL MELBOURNE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0441E 10/11/95 954±325 01 04 ...... FL MIAMI SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12025C0160J 09/26/95 954±212 02 04 ...... FL MINNEOLA, TOWN OF ...... 1204120001A 08/10/95 954±071 02 04 ...... FL MINNEOLA, TOWN OF ...... 1204120001A 08/10/95 954±072 02 04 ...... FL MIRAMAR, CITY OF ...... 12011C0315F 11/03/95 95±04±1084A 01 04 ...... FL MIRAMAR, CITY OF ...... 12011C0315F 07/20/95 95±04±794A 01 04 ...... FL MIRAMAR, CITY OF ...... 12011C0315F 08/09/95 95±04±824A 01 04 ...... FL MIRAMAR, CITY OF ...... 12011C0315F 12/05/95 96±04±180A 01 04 ...... FL NASSAU COUNTY* ...... 1201700239C 10/17/95 954±067 02 04 ...... FL NASSAU COUNTY* ...... 1201700239C 11/24/95 954±274 02 04 ...... FL NASSAU COUNTY* ...... 1201700500C 08/09/95 953±105 02 04 ...... FL NORTH LAUDERDALE, CITY OF ...... 12011C0205F 12/11/95 95±04±1068A 01 04 ...... FL NORTH MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF ...... 12025C0081J 10/17/95 961±002 02 04 ...... FL OAKLAND PARK, CITY OF ...... 12011C0209F 11/30/95 961±003 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28377

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... FL OKALOOSA COUNTY* ...... 1201730205D 07/10/95 953±217 01 04 ...... FL OKALOOSA COUNTY* ...... 1201730205D 09/26/95 954±199 01 04 ...... FL OKALOOSA COUNTY* ...... 1201730210D 07/12/95 952±224 02 04 ...... FL OKEECHOBEE COUNTY* ...... 1201770220B 10/11/95 953±253 02 04 ...... FL OKEECHOBEE COUNTY* ...... 1201770230B 12/12/95 961±186 02 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790125D 12/26/95 95±04±738A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790175C 09/29/95 95±04±872A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790175C 09/14/95 954±044 02 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790175C 11/27/95 961±102 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790200D 10/11/95 954±293 02 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790200D 11/27/95 961±115 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790225C 12/15/95 95±04±1080A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790225C 10/19/95 95±04±1098A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790225C 07/27/95 95±04±740A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790225C 08/31/95 95±04±894A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790225C 09/15/95 953±039 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 08/23/95 94±04±780A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 11/21/95 95±04±1026A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 10/19/95 95±04±1086A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 08/09/95 953±073 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 07/25/95 953±254 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 07/25/95 953±255 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 07/25/95 953±281 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 09/25/95 954±141 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790250D 12/12/95 961±189 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790375D 08/31/95 95±04±854A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790375D 08/21/95 953±207 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790375D 08/21/95 954±056 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790375D 08/21/95 954±069 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790375D 09/07/95 954±109 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790400C 11/03/95 95±04±1132A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790400C 09/15/95 954±080 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790525B 08/07/95 95±04±748A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790550B 07/31/95 95±04±704A 01 04 ...... FL ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 1201790550B 08/28/95 95±04±806A 01 04 ...... FL ORLANDO, CITY OF ...... 1201860020D 11/03/95 95±04±800A 01 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890035B 10/18/95 952±021 02 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890045B 10/05/95 95±04±1014A 01 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890045B 07/17/95 95±04±572A 01 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890045B 09/26/95 954±193 02 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890075B 07/10/95 953±224 02 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890120B 07/25/95 953±084 02 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890135B 11/07/95 954±247 01 04 ...... FL OSCEOLA COUNTY* ...... 1201890175B 07/20/95 95±04±770A 01 04 ...... FL OVIEDO, CITY OF ...... 12117C0170E 09/28/95 95±04±858A 01 04 ...... FL OVIEDO, CITY OF ...... 12117C0170E 12/15/95 96±04±050A 01 04 ...... FL PALM BAY, CITY OF ...... 12009C0520E 07/10/95 953±238 01 04 ...... FL PALM BAY, CITY OF ...... 12009C0580E 07/27/95 954±030 02 04 ...... FL PALM BAY, CITY OF ...... 12009C0580E 09/14/95 954±070 02 04 ...... FL PALM BAY, CITY OF ...... 12009C0585E 10/16/95 954±309 02 04 ...... FL PALM BAY, CITY OF ...... 12009C0595E 12/12/95 961±195 02 04 ...... FL PALM BEACH COUNTY* ...... 1201920100B 08/24/95 95±04±688A 01 04 ...... FL PALM BEACH COUNTY* ...... 1201920102B 07/10/95 953±201 01 04 ...... FL PALM BEACH COUNTY* ...... 1201920150A 07/14/95 95±04±638A 01 04 ...... FL PALM BEACH COUNTY* ...... 1201920165B 09/26/95 954±161 02 04 ...... FL PALM BEACH GARDENS, CITY OF ...... 1202210001C 09/15/95 954±089 02 04 ...... FL PANAMA CITY BEACH, CITY OF ...... 1200130005C 10/16/95 954±303 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300195D 10/18/95 952±249 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300195D 07/27/95 952±265 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300195D 09/15/95 953±047 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300195D 07/11/95 953±195 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300195D 11/27/95 954±183 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300275D 07/10/95 953±225 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300352C 07/07/95 95±04±642A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300352C 08/26/95 95±04±878A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300353C 10/18/95 95±04±233P 08 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300354D 10/18/95 95±04±233P 08 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300354D 07/13/95 95±04±628A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 10/19/95 95±04±1048A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 10/17/95 95±04±1054A 01 28378 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 10/10/95 95±04±1148A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 08/16/95 95±04±900A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 10/18/95 953±200 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 07/27/95 954±036 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 11/02/95 954±066 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300360D 11/29/95 96±04±086A 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300362D 07/07/95 95±04±122A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300362D 08/22/95 95±04±662A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300362D 11/21/95 96±04±034A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/07/95 95±04±122A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/13/95 95±04±764A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/10/95 953±209 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/10/95 953±211 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/10/95 953±212 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/10/95 953±213 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/10/95 953±214 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/10/95 953±215 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 07/10/95 953±236 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 08/24/95 953±242 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 09/07/95 954±107 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 09/25/95 954±175 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 09/25/95 954±181 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 12/01/95 96±04±042A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 11/08/95 961±065 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 11/08/95 961±066 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 12/04/95 961±161 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300370D 08/24/95 L±953±242 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300410E 10/26/95 95±04±1030A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300410E 10/17/95 953±183 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300410E 11/02/95 954±194 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300425E 09/19/95 95±04±976C 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300425E 07/25/95 953±108 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300425E 07/27/95 954±008 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300425E 07/27/95 954±009 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300425E 08/10/95 954±010 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300425E 12/11/95 961±126 02 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300430E 10/26/95 95±04±1030A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300450E 10/18/95 95±04±382A 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300450E 10/13/95 95±04±384C 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300450E 09/26/95 953±193 01 04 ...... FL PASCO COUNTY* ...... 1202300450E 12/05/95 961±094 01 04 ...... FL PEMBROKE PINES, CITY OF ...... 12011C0290F 12/15/95 96±04±054A 01 04 ...... FL PEMBROKE PINES, CITY OF ...... 12011C0295F 12/07/95 96±04±056A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390036C 12/04/95 961±168 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390043C 08/09/95 952±164 02 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390069C 10/16/95 954±227 02 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390077C 07/20/95 94±04±750A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390077C 12/18/95 95±04±1024A 02 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390077C 11/03/95 95±04±1090A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390077C 11/06/95 95±04±982A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 10/05/95 95±04±1018A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 10/13/95 95±04±1040A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 10/19/95 95±04±1058A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 09/26/95 95±04±1096A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 08/24/95 95±04±834A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 08/03/95 95±04±838A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 07/31/95 95±04±840A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 08/30/95 95±04±914A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 09/28/95 95±04±970A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 08/09/95 953±022 02 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 08/09/95 953±081 02 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 10/26/95 96±04±032A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 11/21/95 96±04±058A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 11/21/95 96±04±082A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 12/18/95 96±04±110A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390079C 12/11/95 96±04±130A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390081C 07/20/95 95±04±816A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390081C 11/28/95 96±04±162A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390083C 08/16/95 95±04±934A 01 04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390083C 12/18/95 96±04±110A 01 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28379

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... FL PINELLAS COUNTY* ...... 1251390119C 10/18/95 953±146 02 04 ...... FL PINELLAS PARK, CITY OF ...... 1202510008E 09/13/95 95±04±1012A 01 04 ...... FL POLK COUNTY* ...... 1202610100B 07/18/95 95±04±712A 01 04 ...... FL POLK COUNTY* ...... 1202610250B 10/11/95 952±286 02 04 ...... FL POLK COUNTY* ...... 1202610305B 07/11/95 951±129 02 04 ...... FL POLK COUNTY* ...... 1202610350B 08/03/95 95±04±534A 02 04 ...... FL POLK COUNTY* ...... 1202610400B 08/21/95 954±093 02 04 ...... FL POLK COUNTY* ...... 1202610525B 12/11/95 961±079 02 04 ...... FL POLK COUNTY* ...... 1202610575D 08/07/95 95±04±218A 01 04 ...... FL PORT ST. LUCIE, CITY OF ...... 12111C0405F 10/17/95 954±187 01 04 ...... FL PORT ST. LUCIE, CITY OF ...... 12111C0405F 11/08/95 954±249 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 08/09/95 952±182 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 07/18/95 952±183 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 08/09/95 952±188 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 08/09/95 952±190 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 08/09/95 952±197 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 08/09/95 952±199 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 08/09/95 952±209 01 04 ...... FL ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0365E 08/09/95 952±256 01 04 ...... FL SANFORD, CITY OF ...... 12117C0040E 11/08/95 961±055 01 04 ...... FL SANIBEL, CITY OF ...... 1204020005D 09/06/95 02 04 ...... FL SANTA ROSA COUNTY* ...... 1202740355C 10/05/95 954±268 02 04 ...... FL SANTA ROSA COUNTY* ...... 1202740355C 09/29/95 954±269 02 04 ...... FL SANTA ROSA COUNTY* ...... 1202740355C 12/12/95 961±209 02 04 ...... FL SARASOTA COUNTY* ...... 1251440154E 10/13/95 95±04±846A 01 04 ...... FL SARASOTA, CITY OF ...... 1251500010B 12/11/95 961±149 02 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0020E 08/21/95 954±053 02 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0030E 10/11/95 954±246 01 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0040E 08/24/95 95±04±718A 01 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0110E 12/11/95 961±148 02 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0130E 10/18/95 954±094 02 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0130E 09/26/95 954±195 02 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0130E 11/01/95 954±237 02 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0145E 10/11/95 954±188 02 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0210E 07/13/95 95±04±264A 01 04 ...... FL SEMINOLE COUNTY* ...... 12117C0210E 12/15/95 96±04±092A 01 04 ...... FL ST. PETERSBURG, CITY OF ...... 1251480013B 10/18/95 953±149 02 04 ...... FL SUMTER COUNTY* ...... 1202960200B 11/27/95 954±142 02 04 ...... FL TALLAHASSEE, CITY OF ...... 1201440005C 11/13/95 95±04±944A 02 04 ...... FL TALLAHASSEE, CITY OF ...... 1201440010C 11/08/95 954±103 02 04 ...... FL TAMARAC, CITY OF ...... 12011C0185F 07/06/95 95±04±760A 01 04 ...... FL TAMARAC, CITY OF ...... 12011C0185F 08/30/95 95±04±986A 01 04 ...... FL TAMARAC, CITY OF ...... 12011C0205F 07/06/95 95±04±760A 01 04 ...... FL TAMARAC, CITY OF ...... 12011C0205F 08/24/95 95±04±984A 01 04 ...... FL TAMARAC, CITY OF ...... 12011C0205F 08/30/95 95±04±986A 01 04 ...... FL TAMPA, CITY OF ...... 1201140038C 11/30/95 961±146 02 04 ...... FL TAVARES, CITY OF ...... 1201380001B 08/21/95 953±139 02 04 ...... FL TAVARES, CITY OF ...... 1201380001B 12/11/95 961±158 02 04 ...... FL TITUSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0180E 11/01/95 95±04±305P 06 04 ...... FL TITUSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 12009C0180E 10/11/95 954±314 01 04 ...... FL VENICE, CITY OF ...... 1251540005D 10/10/95 954±105 02 04 ...... FL VOLUSIA COUNTY* ...... 1251550440E 09/15/95 953±117 02 04 ...... FL WALTON COUNTY* ...... 1203170335D 09/27/95 95±04±319P 08 04 ...... FL WALTON COUNTY* ...... 1203170335D 11/13/95 95±04±856A 01 04 ...... FL WALTON COUNTY* ...... 1203170365D 09/27/95 95±04±319P 08 04 ...... FL WALTON COUNTY* ...... 1203170370D 09/27/95 95±04±319P 08 04 ...... FL WINDERMERE, TOWN OF ...... 1203810001B 07/11/95 953±279 02 04 ...... FL WINTER SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 12117C0135E 07/17/95 95±04±308A 01 04 ...... GA ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY ...... 1300400023C 10/20/95 954±226 02 04 ...... GA ATLANTA, CITY OF ...... 1351570016C 12/11/95 933±072A 02 04 ...... GA ATLANTA, CITY OF ...... 1351570016C 12/05/95 961±031 02 04 ...... GA ATLANTA, CITY OF ...... 1351570019C 07/10/95 953±202 02 04 ...... GA CARROLL COUNTY* ...... 1304640050B 09/26/95 953±191 02 04 ...... GA CATOOSA COUNTY* ...... 1300280025D 12/18/95 95±04±1140A 01 04 ...... GA CHATHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300300075C 08/31/95 95±04±432A 02 04 ...... GA CHATHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300300075C 07/27/95 954±001 01 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0030F 09/11/95 954±190 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0030F 11/02/95 961±018 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0035F 12/12/95 953±205 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0035F 09/15/95 954±091 02 28380 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0035F 11/22/95 96±04±064A 01 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0035F 12/04/95 961±164 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0040F 07/27/95 952±252 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0040F 07/10/95 953±245 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0050F 08/21/95 954±055 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0050F 10/17/95 954±180 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0050F 12/04/95 961±159 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0055F 12/12/95 961±187 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0065F 10/16/95 954±203 02 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0070F 09/11/95 95±04±173P 05 04 ...... GA COBB COUNTY* ...... 13067C0070F 12/11/95 954±108 02 04 ...... GA COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 1351580075D 11/01/95 961±036 02 04 ...... GA DEKALB COUNTY* ...... 1300650001D 10/17/95 954±162 02 04 ...... GA DEKALB COUNTY* ...... 1300650003E 08/24/95 95±04±978A 01 04 ...... GA DEKALB COUNTY* ...... 1300650003E 12/12/95 961±004 02 04 ...... GA DEKALB COUNTY* ...... 1300650003E 11/08/95 961±005 02 04 ...... GA DEKALB COUNTY* ...... 1300650008C 07/10/95 953±265 02 04 ...... GA EFFINGHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300760125C 08/15/95 95±04±301P 05 04 ...... GA EFFINGHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300760155C 08/15/95 95±04±301P 05 04 ...... GA EFFINGHAM COUNTY* ...... 1300760165C 08/15/95 95±04±301P 05 04 ...... GA FAYETTEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1304310005A 09/07/95 953±153 02 04 ...... GA FULTON COUNTY* ...... 1351600055C 09/26/95 954±205 02 04 ...... GA FULTON COUNTY* ...... 1351600055C 10/06/95 954±244 02 04 ...... GA FULTON COUNTY* ...... 1351600235B 07/27/95 954±002 02 04 ...... GA GWINNETT COUNTY* ...... 1303220155D 10/16/95 953±180 02 04 ...... GA GWINNETT COUNTY* ...... 1303220170C 08/21/95 954±073 02 04 ...... GA GWINNETT COUNTY* ...... 1303220170C 12/05/95 954±073A 02 04 ...... GA GWINNETT COUNTY* ...... 1303220190C 07/10/95 952±269 02 04 ...... GA GWINNETT COUNTY* ...... 1303220195C 07/10/95 952±269 02 04 ...... GA HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 1303380150A 07/13/95 95±04±552A 02 04 ...... GA HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 1303380150A 08/31/95 95±04±812A 02 04 ...... GA HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 1303380150A 09/29/95 954±242 02 04 ...... GA HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 1303380150A 11/08/95 961±071 02 04 ...... GA HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 1303380175A 07/21/95 95±04±177P 05 04 ...... GA HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 1303380250A 07/21/95 95±04±177P 05 04 ...... GA HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 1303380250A 07/21/95 95±04±177P 05 04 ...... GA HINESVILLE,CITY OF ...... 1301250001C 11/03/95 95±04±1150A 01 04 ...... GA LAWRENCEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1300990003B 10/20/95 954±151 02 04 ...... GA MARIETTA, CITY OF ...... 13067C0035F 10/23/95 95±04±307P 05 04 ...... GA RABUN COUNTY* ...... 1301560020B 08/29/95 954±075 02 04 ...... GA RABUN COUNTY* ...... 1301560100B 10/11/95 954±189 02 04 ...... GA ROME, CITY OF ...... 1300810005C 11/27/95 954±312 02 04 ...... GA ROSWELL, CITY OF ...... 1300880010D 10/30/95 961±025 02 04 ...... GA SMYRNA, CITY OF ...... 13067C0070F 08/10/95 954±068 02 04 ...... GA SMYRNA, CITY OF ...... 13067C0070F 12/11/95 954±068A 02 04 ...... GA SMYRNA, CITY OF ...... 13067C0075F 10/11/95 954±302 02 04 ...... GA TOOMBS COUNTY ...... 1301730050A 09/12/95 95±04±295P 06 04 ...... KY BOWLING GREEN, CITY OF ...... 21227C0094D 10/18/95 954±033 02 04 ...... KY BUTLER COUNTY* ...... 2100290125C 09/15/95 953±150 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0020D 07/10/95 953±116 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0020D 12/12/95 961±181 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0080D 08/10/95 952±236 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0095D 09/26/95 954±191 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0145D 11/08/95 961±098 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0160D 07/25/95 953±143 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0170D 08/10/95 953±029 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0170D 10/10/95 954±176 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0170D 10/17/95 954±326 02 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0180D 12/06/95 96±04±003P 06 04 ...... KY JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 21111C0260D 10/20/95 954±173 02 04 ...... KY LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN CNTY GOVT ...... 2100670060C 10/18/95 952±078 02 04 ...... KY LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN CNTY GOVT ...... 2100670060C 10/30/95 954±078 02 04 ...... KY LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN CNTY GOVT ...... 2100670090C 07/10/95 953±177 02 04 ...... KY LOUISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 21111C0080D 10/31/95 95±04±782A 02 04 ...... KY LOUISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 21111C0090D 08/21/95 954±035 02 04 ...... KY LOUISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 21111C0155D 08/21/95 953±148A 01 04 ...... KY MADISON COUNTY* ...... 2103420125B 07/27/95 95±04±844A 02 04 ...... KY OWENSBORO, CITY OF ...... 2100630010B 10/19/95 95±04±1112A 02 04 ...... KY SHEPHERDSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 2100280005D 08/21/95 954±054 02 04 ...... KY SHIVELY, CITY OF ...... 21111C0135D 10/18/95 953±198 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28381

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... KY SHIVELY, CITY OF ...... 21111C0135D 08/21/95 954±088 02 04 ...... KY TRIGG COUNTY* ...... 2103150007A 12/11/95 961±127 02 04 ...... KY WORTHINGTON, CITY OF ...... 2100920001B 10/04/95 954±147 02 04 ...... MS BRANDON, CITY OF ...... 2801430001C 09/21/95 95±04±940A 01 04 ...... MS BRANDON, CITY OF ...... 2801430001C 09/28/95 95±04±956A 01 04 ...... MS HINDS COUNTY* ...... 2800700250D 08/21/95 954±021 01 04 ...... MS HINDS COUNTY* ...... 2800700250D 12/11/95 961±101 01 04 ...... MS HINDS COUNTY* ...... 2800700250D 12/11/95 961±173 01 04 ...... MS HINDS COUNTY* ...... 2800700250D 12/11/95 961±174 01 04 ...... MS HORN LAKE, CITY OF ...... 28033C0040D 08/03/95 95±04±836A 01 04 ...... MS JACKSON COUNTY* ...... 2852560190E 11/29/95 96±04±030A 02 04 ...... MS JACKSON, CITY OF ...... 2800720015F 11/08/95 954±022 02 04 ...... MS JEFFERSON DAVIS COUNTY* ...... 2803030005A 10/17/95 944±162±A 02 04 ...... MS JEFFERSON DAVIS COUNTY* ...... 2803030005A 10/17/95 944±162A 01 04 ...... MS JONES COUNTY* ...... 2802220200B 09/15/95 952±255 02 04 ...... MS LOWNDES COUNTY* ...... 2801930045D 12/11/95 961±124 02 04 ...... MS MADISON, CITY OF ...... 28089C0310D 08/09/95 95±04±622A 02 04 ...... MS MANTACHIE, TOWN OF ...... 280082 C 08/10/95 953±069 02 04 ...... MS PEARL RVR VLLY WATER SUPPLY DIST ...... 2803380065A 10/23/95 953±152 02 04 ...... MS PEARL RVR VLLY WATER SUPPLY DIST ...... 2803380065A 10/18/95 953±184 02 04 ...... MS PEARL RVR VLLY WATER SUPPLY DIST ...... 2803380070A 07/11/95 953±266 01 04 ...... MS RICHLAND, CITY OF ...... 2802990002C 10/24/95 95±04±199P 06 04 ...... MS SOUTHHAVEN, CITY OF ...... 28033C0030D 09/07/95 954±134 02 04 ...... MS SOUTHHAVEN, CITY OF ...... 28033C0030D 09/07/95 954±135 02 04 ...... NC BOILING SPRING LAKES, CITY OF ...... 3704530020B 10/16/95 954±216 02 04 ...... NC BREVARD, CITY OF ...... 3702310005B 11/27/95 961±112 02 04 ...... NC CARY, TOWN OF ...... 37183C0293E 09/25/95 954±158 02 04 ...... NC CATAWBA COUNTY* ...... 3700500325B 08/21/95 954±063 02 04 ...... NC CATAWBA COUNTY* ...... 3700500325B 09/29/95 954±200 02 04 ...... NC CATAWBA COUNTY* ...... 3700500325B 12/12/95 961±147 02 04 ...... NC CATAWBA COUNTY* ...... 3700500350B 07/27/95 954±020 02 04 ...... NC CATAWBA COUNTY* ...... 3700500350B 09/29/95 954±209 02 04 ...... NC CATAWBA COUNTY* ...... 3700500350B 10/16/95 954±313 02 04 ...... NC CHARLOTTE, CITY OF ...... 3701590029B 07/27/95 954±018 02 04 ...... NC CLEVELAND COUNTY* ...... 3703020175B 08/10/95 953±007 02 04 ...... NC CUMBERLAND COUNTY* ...... 3700760190B 10/19/95 95±04±990A 02 04 ...... NC DAVIDSON COUNTY* ...... 3703070150B 11/27/95 954±273 02 04 ...... NC DAVIDSON COUNTY* ...... 3703070150B 12/11/95 961±109 02 04 ...... NC DAVIDSON COUNTY* ...... 3703070150B 12/12/95 961±170 02 04 ...... NC DUPLIN COUNTY* ...... 3700830100B 07/27/95 954±003 02 04 ...... NC GREENVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3701910010B 08/10/95 954±062 02 04 ...... NC HAVELOCK, CITY OF ...... 3702650008B 09/29/95 954±260 02 04 ...... NC HAVELOCK, CITY OF ...... 3702650009B 10/10/95 954±064 02 04 ...... NC HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3701280003B 10/26/95 94±04±273P 05 04 ...... NC HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3701280004B 10/26/95 94±04±273P 05 04 ...... NC HIGH POINT, CITY OF ...... 3701130004B 07/26/95 95±04±277P 06 04 ...... NC HIGH POINT, CITY OF ...... 3701130005B 07/26/95 95±04±277P 06 04 ...... NC HIGH POINT, CITY OF ...... 3701130005B 07/26/95 95±04±277P 06 04 ...... NC IREDELL COUNTY* ...... 3703130200B 11/01/95 954±136 02 04 ...... NC LEXINGTON, CITY OF ...... 3700810005B 07/10/95 953±246 02 04 ...... NC LONG BEACH, TOWN OF ...... 3753540003D 12/11/95 961±151 02 04 ...... NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY* ...... 3701580055B 10/11/95 954±257 01 04 ...... NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY* ...... 3701580065B 07/13/95 95±04±640A 01 04 ...... NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY* ...... 3701580145B 10/11/95 954±265 01 04 ...... NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY* ...... 3701580145B 11/27/95 961±082 01 04 ...... NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY* ...... 3701580185B 08/02/95 95±04±920A 01 04 ...... NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY* ...... 3701580185B 08/02/95 95±04±922A 01 04 ...... NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY* ...... 3701580190B 10/30/95 961±029 01 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680085E 07/10/95 953±220 02 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680085E 11/07/95 954±023 02 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680085E 12/12/95 961±178 02 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680090E 12/12/95 961±190 02 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680091E 07/10/95 953±220 02 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680105D 08/21/95 954±061 02 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680105D 11/01/95 961±040 02 04 ...... NC NEW HANOVER COUNTY* ...... 3701680105D 11/01/95 961±040 02 04 ...... NC NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, TOWN OF ...... 3704660007A 12/11/95 961±096 02 04 ...... NC PENDER COUNTY* ...... 3703440394B 11/08/95 95±04±1118A 02 04 ...... NC PENDER COUNTY* ...... 3703440394B 09/11/95 95±04±930A 02 04 ...... NC PENDER COUNTY* ...... 3703440394B 12/05/95 96±04±188A 02 28382 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... NC PENDER COUNTY* ...... 3703440527C 10/31/95 95±04±1100A 02 04 ...... NC PENDER COUNTY* ...... 3703440527C 09/11/95 95±04±948A 02 04 ...... NC PENDER COUNTY* ...... 3703440531C 11/21/95 96±04±116A 02 04 ...... NC POLLOCKSVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 37103C0152C 09/07/95 954±131 02 04 ...... NC RALEIGH, CITY OF ...... 37183C0531E 11/27/95 95±04±345P 06 04 ...... NC RALEIGH, CITY OF ...... 37183C0533E 11/27/95 95±04±345P 06 04 ...... NC SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 3701400010B 08/24/95 954±098 02 04 ...... NC UNION COUNTY* ...... 37179C0015C 08/31/95 95±04±668A 02 04 ...... NC WASHINGTON COUNTY* ...... 3702470065B 11/27/95 961±192 02 04 ...... NC WASHINGTON, CITY OF ...... 3700170006C 08/29/95 954±065 02 04 ...... SC ANDERSON COUNTY* ...... 4500130200B 07/11/95 953±110 02 04 ...... SC BEAUFORT COUNTY* ...... 4500250035D 07/10/95 953±221 02 04 ...... SC BEAUFORT COUNTY* ...... 4500250085D 11/24/95 954±289 02 04 ...... SC COLLETON COUNTY* ...... 4500560175C 11/02/95 953±130 02 04 ...... SC DORCHESTER COUNTY* ...... 4500680245C 10/11/95 954±150 02 04 ...... SC DORCHESTER COUNTY* ...... 4500680245C 11/27/95 961±099 02 04 ...... SC FAIRFIELD COUNTY* ...... 4500750070B 11/01/95 961±041 02 04 ...... SC LEXINGTON COUNTY* ...... 45063C0025F 09/26/95 954±133 02 04 ...... SC MAULDIN, CITY OF ...... 4501980005C 08/17/95 95±04±215P 05 04 ...... SC PICKENS COUNTY* ...... 4501660210B 07/06/95 95±04±720A 01 04 ...... SC SUMMERVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 4500730005D 11/27/95 954±132 02 04 ...... SC SUMTER COUNTY* ...... 4501820090B 11/07/95 954±081 02 04 ...... SC YORK COUNTY* ...... 4501930050B 09/15/95 954±153 02 04 ...... SC YORK COUNTY* ...... 4501930125C 09/29/95 954±185 02 04 ...... TN BARTLETT, CITY OF ...... 47157C0145E 08/11/95 95±04±333P 05 04 ...... TN BARTLETT, CITY OF ...... 47157C0145E 11/27/95 954±306 02 04 ...... TN BENTON COUNTY ...... 4702180025B 10/11/95 953±252 02 04 ...... TN BRADLEY COUNTY* ...... 4703570045B 07/25/95 953±206 02 04 ...... TN BRADLEY COUNTY* ...... 4703570060B 10/23/95 953±173 02 04 ...... TN BRENTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 4702050005C 08/21/95 953±090 02 04 ...... TN BRENTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 4702050010C 11/24/95 961±117 02 04 ...... TN CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701370011C 11/07/95 953±278 02 04 ...... TN CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4701370013C 10/11/95 954±234 02 04 ...... TN CLEVELAND, CITY OF ...... 4700150004D 10/11/95 954±095 01 04 ...... TN CLEVELAND, CITY OF ...... 4700150004D 11/27/95 961±113 02 04 ...... TN CLEVELAND, CITY OF ...... 4700150004D 08/24/95 L±954±095 01 04 ...... TN CLEVELAND, CITY OF ...... 4700150006C 10/23/95 953±122 02 04 ...... TN COLLIERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 47157C0240E 07/13/95 95±04±634A 01 04 ...... TN COLLIERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 47157C0245E 11/08/95 911±077A 01 04 ...... TN COLLIERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 47157C0245E 08/14/95 95±04±788A 01 04 ...... TN COLLIERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 47157C0295E 07/13/95 95±04±634A 01 04 ...... TN DYERSBURG, CITY OF ...... 4700470005C 09/29/95 954±235 02 04 ...... TN FRANKLIN, CITY OF ...... 4702060001D 07/28/95 95±04±133P 06 04 ...... TN FRANKLIN, CITY OF ...... 4702060004D 08/10/95 953±076 02 04 ...... TN FRANKLIN, CITY OF ...... 4702060007D 11/27/95 961±078 02 04 ...... TN HAMILTON COUNTY* ...... 4700710230E 09/30/95 94±04±325P 05 04 ...... TN JACKSON, CITY OF ...... 4701130020C 10/17/95 954±186 01 04 ...... TN JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 4700970050C 10/05/95 95±04±896A 02 04 ...... TN JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF ...... 4754320002B 08/10/95 952±056 01 04 ...... TN MANCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 4700350003B 09/26/95 954±201 02 04 ...... TN MARYVILLE, CITY OF ...... 475439B 11/27/95 954±146 02 04 ...... TN MEMPHIS, CITY OF ...... 47157C0230E 10/16/95 961±015 02 04 ...... TN MEMPHIS, CITY OF ...... 47157C0280E 09/01/95 95±04±221P 06 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±267 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±268 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±269 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±270 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±271 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±272 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±273 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±274 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±275 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 07/25/95 953±276 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 09/07/95 954±138 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 09/26/95 954±207 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 09/26/95 954±208 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 11/24/95 961±119 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 11/24/95 961±120 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 11/24/95 961±121 02 04 ...... TN MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4701360050B 11/24/95 961±135 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28383

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

04 ...... TN MURFREESBORO, CITY OF ...... 4701680010C 09/05/95 95±04±950A 02 04 ...... TN MURFREESBORO, CITY OF ...... 4701680010C 11/07/95 953±277 02 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400094D 10/09/95 95±04±1088A 02 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400177B 09/13/95 95±04±1038A 01 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400177B 10/19/95 95±04±1074A 01 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400177B 10/19/95 95±04±1076A 01 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400177B 10/09/95 95±04±436A 01 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400177B 09/19/95 95±04±890A 01 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400177B 08/21/95 95±04±892A 01 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400177B 11/30/95 961±111 01 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400184B 08/16/95 95±04±778A 02 04 ...... TN NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON CNTY ...... 4700400203C 08/16/95 95±04±778A 02 04 ...... TN ROANE COUNTY* ...... 4702670095B 09/29/95 954±230 02 04 ...... TN RUTHERFORD COUNTY* ...... 4701650075B 10/31/95 961±016 02 04 ...... TN RUTHERFORD COUNTY* ...... 4701650080B 11/01/95 954±177 02 04 ...... TN RUTHERFORD COUNTY* ...... 4701650105B 07/25/95 954±026 02 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0145E 07/17/95 95±04±750A 01 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0160E 12/18/95 96±04±270A 02 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0190E 07/20/95 95±04±580A 01 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0230E 07/20/95 95±04±580A 01 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0235E 07/20/95 95±04±580A 01 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0240E 09/07/95 953±280 02 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0240E 12/04/95 961±166 02 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0240E 12/04/95 961±179 02 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0240E 12/04/95 961±183 02 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0240E 12/04/95 961±184 02 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0245E 07/20/95 95±04±580A 01 04 ...... TN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 47157C0280E 09/01/95 95±04±221P 06 04 ...... TN SUMNER COUNTY ...... 4703490090B 08/21/95 953±234 02 04 ...... TN SUMNER COUNTY ...... 4703490145B 10/30/95 954±280 02 04 ...... TN TULLAHOMA, CITY OF ...... 4700360002A 08/07/95 95±04±902A 01 04 ...... TN UNICOI COUNTY* ...... 4702380020B 09/29/95 954±027 02 04 ...... TN WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 4702040040C 10/05/95 954±152 02 04 ...... TN WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 4702040075C 12/04/95 961±160 02 04 ...... TN WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 4702040080C 07/27/95 952±234 02 05 ...... IL ADDISON, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701980004C 09/18/95 95±05±1480A 02 05 ...... IL ADDISON, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701980004C 09/28/95 95±05±2546A 01 05 ...... IL ALGONQUIN, VILLAGE OF ...... 1704740001B 08/31/95 95±05±1956A 01 05 ...... IL ANTIOCH, VILLAGE OF ...... 1703580002B 08/31/95 95±05±095P 05 05 ...... IL BATAVIA, CITY OF ...... 1703210003B 07/20/95 95±05±1098A 02 05 ...... IL BEECHER, VILLAGE OF ...... 1706960001B 08/04/95 95±05±155P 06 05 ...... IL BENSENVILLE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1702000003C 12/11/95 95±05±2380A 02 05 ...... IL BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 1704900005C 10/23/95 95±05±2306A 02 05 ...... IL BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 1704900010C 11/08/95 95±05±2536A 02 05 ...... IL BUFFALO GROVE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1700680005D 08/31/95 95±05±1692A 02 05 ...... IL BUREAU COUNTY* ...... 1707290125A 10/12/95 95±05±299P 05 05 ...... IL BURR RIDGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1700710003B 08/31/95 95±05±1718A 02 05 ...... IL CHAMPAIGN COUNTY* ...... 1708940100B 08/03/95 95±05±1776A 02 05 ...... IL CHAMPAIGN COUNTY* ...... 1708940180B 09/28/95 95±05±1634A 01 05 ...... IL CHAMPAIGN COUNTY* ...... 1708940180B 10/09/95 95±05±2622A 02 05 ...... IL CHAMPAIGN COUNTY* ...... 1708940205B 12/13/95 96±05±534A 02 05 ...... IL CHAMPAIGN COUNTY* ...... 1708940225B 11/21/95 95±05±2604A 02 05 ...... IL CLINTON COUNTY* ...... 170044 B 08/16/95 95±05±1444A 02 05 ...... IL CLINTON COUNTY* ...... 170044 B 07/13/95 95±05±1446A 02 05 ...... IL CLINTON COUNTY* ...... 1700449999A 11/03/95 96±05±048A 02 05 ...... IL COOK COUNTY* ...... 1700540035B 08/30/95 95±05±2032A 02 05 ...... IL COOK COUNTY* ...... 1700540115B 11/03/95 95±05±2504A 02 05 ...... IL COOK COUNTY* ...... 1700540190B 09/13/95 95±05±1504A 02 05 ...... IL COUNTRY CLUB HILLS, CITY OF ...... 1700780001C 07/20/95 94±05±281P 05 05 ...... IL DARIEN, CITY OF ...... 1707500002A 09/11/95 95±05±1366A 02 05 ...... IL DECATUR, CITY OF ...... 1704290005C 08/09/95 95±05±1198A 02 05 ...... IL DECATUR, CITY OF ...... 1704290005C 08/14/95 95±05±1492A 02 05 ...... IL DEKALB, CITY OF ...... 1701820005B 12/04/95 95±05±019P 05 05 ...... IL DES PLAINES, CITY OF ...... 1700810005C 11/13/95 95±05±1714A 02 05 ...... IL DUPAGE COUNTY* ...... 1701970025B 10/10/95 95±05±119P 06 05 ...... IL DUPAGE COUNTY* ...... 1701970025B 10/25/95 95±05±2058A 01 05 ...... IL DUPAGE COUNTY* ...... 1701970035B 10/17/95 95±05±578P 06 05 ...... IL ELMHURST, CITY OF ...... 1702050004C 12/01/95 95±05±1678A 02 05 ...... IL ELMHURST, CITY OF ...... 1702050004C 10/10/95 95±05±2100A 02 05 ...... IL FOX LAKE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1703620005E 08/24/95 95±05±1676A 02 28384 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... IL FOX RIVER VLLY GARDENS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1704780001B 11/03/95 95±05±1830A 02 05 ...... IL GLENDALE HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1702060001C 09/18/95 95±05±113P 05 05 ...... IL GLENDALE HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1702060001C 10/10/95 95±05±119P 06 05 ...... IL GRUNDY COUNTY* ...... 1702560085C 08/25/95 95±05±2044A 01 05 ...... IL HOFFMAN ESTATES, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701070007C 08/31/95 95±05±1974A 02 05 ...... IL HOLIDAY HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1709360001B 07/13/95 95±05±1712A 02 05 ...... IL HOLIDAY HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1709360001B 07/27/95 95±05±1838A 02 05 ...... IL HOLIDAY HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1709360001B 10/31/95 95±05±2500A 02 05 ...... IL HUNTLEY, VILLAGE OF ...... 1704800001B 08/03/95 95±05±1650A 02 05 ...... IL IROQUOIS COUNTY* ...... 17075C0255D 10/04/95 95±05±2686A 01 05 ...... IL JUSTICE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701120001B 07/24/95 95±05±1502A 02 05 ...... IL KANE COUNTY* ...... 1708960010A 11/08/95 95±05±2366A 02 05 ...... IL KANE COUNTY* ...... 1708960030A 11/08/95 95±05±2542A 02 05 ...... IL KANE COUNTY* ...... 1708960045A 07/05/95 95±05±1282A 02 05 ...... IL KANKAKEE COUNTY* ...... 1703360155B 07/13/95 95±05±101A 02 05 ...... IL KANKAKEE COUNTY* ...... 1703360185B 10/09/95 95±05±1624A 17 05 ...... IL LA SALLE COUNTY* ...... 1704000014B 09/25/95 95±05±1104A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570065B 10/05/95 95±05±2006A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570070B 07/13/95 95±05±1606A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570090B 10/19/95 95±05±2620A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570110B 08/31/95 95±05±095P 05 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570110B 10/23/95 95±05±2492A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570110B 11/14/95 95±05±2720A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570115B 10/09/95 95±05±2484A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570115B 12/11/95 96±05±550A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE COUNTY* ...... 1703570140B 07/13/95 95±05±1302A 02 05 ...... IL LAKE FOREST, CITY OF ...... 1703740003C 10/25/95 95±05±1392A 01 05 ...... IL LANSING, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701160005D 10/05/95 95±05±2562A 02 05 ...... IL LINCOLNSHIRE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1703780005C 10/31/95 95±05±2494A 01 05 ...... IL LOMBARD, VILLAGE OF ...... 1702120005B 09/05/95 95±05±1926A 02 05 ...... IL MACON COUNTY* ...... 1709280115B 11/29/95 95±05±2628A 02 05 ...... IL MADISON COUNTY* ...... 1704360120B 09/19/95 95±05±1666A 01 05 ...... IL MADISON COUNTY* ...... 1704360135B 12/15/95 95±05±1924A 02 05 ...... IL MARENGO, CITY OF ...... 1704820001B 10/06/95 95±05±2116A 02 05 ...... IL MARSHALL COUNTY* ...... 1709940025B 09/21/95 95±05±1842A 02 05 ...... IL MCHENRY COUNTY* ...... 1707320210B 08/31/95 95±05±1722A 02 05 ...... IL MCHENRY, CITY OF ...... 1704830003D 07/25/95 95±05±1872A 02 05 ...... IL MCHENRY, CITY OF ...... 1704830003D 08/31/95 95±05±1900A 02 05 ...... IL MCHENRY, CITY OF ...... 1704830003D 09/19/95 95±05±2146A 02 05 ...... IL MCHENRY, CITY OF ...... 1704830003D 09/29/95 95±05±876A 02 05 ...... IL MERRIONETTE PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 170126B 10/27/95 95±05±181P 06 05 ...... IL MINOOKA, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0255E 09/21/95 95±05±1950A 02 05 ...... IL MONTICELLO, CITY OF ...... 1705500001C 07/07/95 95±05±1552A 02 05 ...... IL MOUNT PROSPECT, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701290010B 10/19/95 95±05±2332A 02 05 ...... IL MOUNT PROSPECT, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701290015B 12/05/95 96±05±234A 02 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130011C 12/05/95 95±05±203P 05 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130012C 07/20/95 95±05±806A 01 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130016C 07/13/95 95±05±1428A 02 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130016C 09/28/95 95±05±2190A 02 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130017C 11/28/95 95±05±2214A 01 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130017C 11/28/95 95±05±2378A 01 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130020C 12/14/95 95±05±237P 06 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130021C 08/15/95 95±05±135P 06 05 ...... IL NAPERVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702130021C 10/23/95 95±05±215P 06 05 ...... IL NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 1707060005C 08/21/95 95±05±1648A 02 05 ...... IL NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 1707060005C 08/16/95 95±05±1728A 02 05 ...... IL NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0305E 12/07/95 95±05±2614A 02 05 ...... IL NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0305E 11/29/95 96±05±2626A 02 05 ...... IL NORMAL, TOWN OF ...... 1705020005B 12/15/95 95±05±2616A 01 05 ...... IL NORTHBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701320009D 07/17/95 95±05±1274A 02 05 ...... IL NORTHBROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701320010D 07/24/95 95±05±1912A 02 05 ...... IL OAK BROOK, VILLAGE OF ...... 1702140003B 12/05/95 96±05±138A 02 05 ...... IL OAK FOREST, CITY OF ...... 1701360005C 10/03/95 95±05±1732A 02 05 ...... IL OAK FOREST, CITY OF ...... 1701360005C 10/27/95 95±05±1940A 01 05 ...... IL OAK FOREST, CITY OF ...... 1701360005C 10/31/95 95±05±2396A 02 05 ...... IL OAK LAWN, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701370001C 07/10/95 95±05±1544A 02 05 ...... IL OAK LAWN, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701370004C 08/03/95 95±05±954A 01 05 ...... IL OAKBROOK TERRACE, CITY OF ...... 1702150001B 12/07/95 95±05±2724A 02 05 ...... IL ORLAND HILLS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701720001B 12/11/95 95±05±2462A 02 05 ...... IL ORLAND PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701400005D 08/29/95 95±05±1046A 01 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28385

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... IL PALATINE, VILLAGE OF ...... 1751700005B 08/14/95 95±05±1804A 01 05 ...... IL PALOS HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 1701420002C 08/21/95 95±05±1768A 02 05 ...... IL PALOS HILLS, CITY OF ...... 1701430001C 08/24/95 95±05±1514A 01 05 ...... IL PALOS HILLS, CITY OF ...... 1701430001C 08/24/95 95±05±1730A 01 05 ...... IL PEORIA COUNTY* ...... 1705330125B 10/19/95 95±05±2474A 02 05 ...... IL PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0039E 10/17/95 95±05±2012A 02 05 ...... IL PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0045E 10/03/95 95±05±2026A 01 05 ...... IL PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 17197C0045E 12/18/95 95±05±2666A 01 05 ...... IL PRINCETON, CITY OF ...... 170014B 10/12/95 95±05±299P 06 05 ...... IL ROCK ISLAND COUNTY* ...... 1705820025B 07/13/95 95±05±1600A 02 05 ...... IL ROUND LAKE BEACH, VILLAGE OF ...... 1703890001C 08/21/95 95±05±1976A 02 05 ...... IL ROUND LAKE BEACH, VILLAGE OF ...... 1703890001C 10/31/95 95±05±2290A 01 05 ...... IL ROUND LAKE BEACH, VILLAGE OF ...... 1703890001C 12/07/95 96±05±432A 01 05 ...... IL SANGAMON COUNTY* ...... 1709120275C 11/21/95 95±05±2718A 02 05 ...... IL SCHAUMBURG, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701580010D 08/25/95 95±05±149P 06 05 ...... IL SCHILLER PARK, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701590005B 07/13/95 95±05±1628A 02 05 ...... IL SOUTH HOLLAND, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701630004C 08/03/95 95±05±1090A 01 05 ...... IL ST. CLAIR COUNTY* ...... 1706160020B 09/11/95 95±05±1720A 02 05 ...... IL ST. CLAIR COUNTY* ...... 1706160040A 08/14/95 95±05±1034A 01 05 ...... IL ST. CLAIR COUNTY* ...... 1706160065A 10/31/95 95±05±2222A 02 05 ...... IL ST. CLAIR COUNTY* ...... 1706160075A 12/01/95 96±05±250A 02 05 ...... IL ST. JOSEPH, VILLAGE OF ...... 1700320001B 10/31/95 96±05±062A 02 05 ...... IL STREATOR, CITY OF ...... 1704080002B 09/11/95 95±05±1562A 02 05 ...... IL TUSCOLA, CITY OF ...... 1701950005C 12/13/95 95±05±2476A 02 05 ...... IL TUSCOLA, CITY OF ...... 1701950005C 12/18/95 96±05±144A 02 05 ...... IL TUSCOLA, CITY OF ...... 1701950005C 12/18/95 96±05±606A 02 05 ...... IL WALNUT, VILLAGE OF ...... 1700170001B 10/19/95 95±05±2636A 02 05 ...... IL WARRENVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1702180002C 11/11/95 95±05±578P 06 05 ...... IL WESTCHESTER, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701700001B 11/21/95 95±05±1726A 02 05 ...... IL WESTERN SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701710001C 11/29/95 96±05±330A 02 05 ...... IL WHEELING, VILLAGE OF ...... 1701730005C 11/21/95 95±05±2440A 17 05 ...... IL WHITESIDE COUNTY* ...... 1706870175B 07/07/95 95±05±1608A 02 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 1706950060B 08/16/95 95±05±1854A 01 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 1706950115C 07/27/95 95±05±1088A 01 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 1706950205C 08/03/95 95±05±1456A 02 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0211E 09/21/95 95±05±2004A 02 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0218E 09/18/95 95±05±2394A 02 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0255E 09/19/95 95±05±1996A 02 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0255E 11/22/95 96±05±104A 17 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0265E 10/19/95 95±05±2684A 02 05 ...... IL WILL COUNTY* ...... 17197C0440E 12/11/95 96±05±218A 17 05 ...... IL WILMINGTON, CITY OF ...... 1707150001C 08/03/95 95±05±1850A 02 05 ...... IL WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 1707200015B 09/18/95 95±05±1736A 02 05 ...... IL WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 1707200020B 11/29/95 95±05±2566A 01 05 ...... IL WOODSTOCK, CITY OF ...... 1704880003C 09/07/95 95±05±2148A 02 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0155D 10/09/95 95±05±2524A 02 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0165E 11/21/95 96±05±026A 02 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0170D 10/05/95 95±05±1268A 02 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0170D 11/28/95 95±05±2730A 02 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0170D 12/18/95 96±05±196A 02 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0195D 08/03/95 95±05±1114A 01 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0285E 08/24/95 95±05±2200A 17 05 ...... IN ALLEN COUNTY* ...... 18003C0325D 11/29/95 95±05±1710A 02 05 ...... IN BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY* ...... 1800060100B 09/13/95 95±05±1844A 01 05 ...... IN BROWN COUNTY* ...... 1851740080B 10/19/95 95±05±2706A 02 05 ...... IN CARMEL, CITY OF ...... 1800810007C 09/18/95 95±05±2126A 02 05 ...... IN CARMEL, CITY OF ...... 1800810008C 09/25/95 95±05±2236A 02 05 ...... IN CARMEL, CITY OF ...... 1800810013C 10/31/95 95±05±1076P 05 05 ...... IN CARMEL, CITY OF ...... 1800810014C 10/31/95 95±05±1076P 05 05 ...... IN CICERO, TOWN OF ...... 1803200020C 12/13/95 96±05±226A 17 05 ...... IN CLARK COUNTY* ...... 1804260175C 09/11/95 95±05±2288A 02 05 ...... IN CLARK COUNTY* ...... 1804260175C 10/11/95 95±05±2382A 02 05 ...... IN CORYDON, TOWN OF ...... 1800860005B 09/21/95 95±05±2036A 02 05 ...... IN DE KALB COUNTY* ...... 1800440025B 07/25/95 95±05±1874A 02 05 ...... IN DUBOIS COUNTY* ...... 1800540001A 09/18/95 95±05±2136A 02 05 ...... IN DYER, TOWN OF ...... 1801290001C 07/25/95 95±05±1792A 01 05 ...... IN DYER, TOWN OF ...... 1801290002C 09/25/95 95±05±1914A 01 05 ...... IN FORT WAYNE, CITY OF ...... 18003C0270E 09/11/95 95±05±1964A 02 05 ...... IN FORT WAYNE, CITY OF ...... 18003C0270E 08/31/95 95±05±2030A 02 05 ...... IN FORT WAYNE, CITY OF ...... 18003C0280E 11/29/95 95±05±2590A 02 28386 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... IN FORT WAYNE, CITY OF ...... 18003C0290D 08/14/95 95±05±1826A 02 05 ...... IN FORT WAYNE, CITY OF ...... 18003C0290D 12/13/95 96±05±262A 02 05 ...... IN FOUNTAIN COUNTY ...... 1800640002A 09/21/95 95±05±1672A 02 05 ...... IN GREENFIELD, CITY OF ...... 1800840006C 07/26/95 95±05±1032A 01 05 ...... IN GREENFIELD, CITY OF ...... 1800840006C 08/24/95 95±05±1646A 01 05 ...... IN GREENWOOD, CITY OF ...... 1801150002B 11/08/95 95±05±2708A 02 05 ...... IN HAMILTON COUNTY* ...... 1800800100C 11/29/95 95±05±2722A 02 05 ...... IN HANCOCK COUNTY* ...... 1804190050B 11/21/95 96±05±208A 02 05 ...... IN HANCOCK COUNTY* ...... 1804190100B 12/07/95 95±05±1880A 01 05 ...... IN HENDRICKS COUNTY* ...... 1804150050B 09/28/95 95±05±1946A 17 05 ...... IN HENDRICKS COUNTY* ...... 1804150100B 08/11/95 95±05±1702A 02 05 ...... IN HENDRICKS COUNTY* ...... 1804150100B 11/28/95 95±05±2364A 02 05 ...... IN HENDRICKS COUNTY* ...... 1804150100B 10/30/95 96±05±052A 01 05 ...... IN HIGHLAND, TOWN OF ...... 1851760001C 08/09/95 95±05±1902A 02 05 ...... IN HUNTINGBURG, CITY OF ...... 1803620001A 10/27/95 95±05±325P 06 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590010D 09/25/95 95±05±1984A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590010D 09/01/95 95±05±2164A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590010D 09/18/95 95±05±2178A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590015D 08/09/95 95±05±1700A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590015D 09/21/95 95±05±2338A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590020D 07/05/95 95±05±1182A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590020D 09/01/95 95±05±1952A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590020D 11/21/95 96±05±102A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590030D 12/05/95 96±05±046A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590035D 07/24/95 95±05±1682A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590035D 09/15/95 95±05±1972A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590040D 10/05/95 95±05±2224A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590040D 11/14/95 96±05±002A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590045D 07/17/95 95±05±1516A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590045D 10/27/95 95±05±2456A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590045D 12/15/95 96±05±008A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590050D 08/09/95 95±05±1942A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590060D 09/26/95 95±05±1966A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590060D 10/30/95 95±05±2088A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590070D 08/31/95 95±05±1798A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590075D 10/26/95 95±05±2042A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590090D 12/01/95 96±05±150A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590095D 08/03/95 95±05±1178A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590095D 07/13/95 95±05±1670A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590095D 10/19/95 95±05±2596A 02 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590095D 12/01/95 96±05±150A 01 05 ...... IN INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF ...... 1801590095D 12/18/95 96±05±286A 01 05 ...... IN JEFFERSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1800270005D 10/11/95 95±05±2382A 02 05 ...... IN JOHNSON COUNTY* ...... 1801110012C 08/02/95 95±05±1592A 01 05 ...... IN JOHNSON COUNTY* ...... 1801110012C 10/19/95 95±05±2064A 01 05 ...... IN JOHNSON COUNTY* ...... 1801110014C 10/27/95 95±05±2572A 01 05 ...... IN JOHNSON COUNTY* ...... 1801110100C 10/09/95 95±05±1982A 02 05 ...... IN KENDALLVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1801850012C 10/11/95 95±05±2570A 02 05 ...... IN KNOX COUNTY* ...... 1804220150C 08/31/95 95±05±2028A 02 05 ...... IN KOSCIUSKO COUNTY* ...... 18085C0040C 08/24/95 95±05±2118A 02 05 ...... IN KOSCIUSKO COUNTY* ...... 18085C0080C 08/31/95 95±05±2020A 02 05 ...... IN KOSCIUSKO COUNTY* ...... 18085C0080C 11/14/95 95±05±2070A 02 05 ...... IN KOSCIUSKO COUNTY* ...... 18085C0080C 12/11/95 96±05±202A 02 05 ...... IN LEBANON, CITY OF ...... 1800130001C 11/21/95 95±05±2228A 01 05 ...... IN LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 1804880001A 08/21/95 95±05±1866A 02 05 ...... IN MISHAWAKA, CITY OF ...... 1802270005C 08/24/95 95±05±009P 05 05 ...... IN NEW HAVEN, CITY OF ...... 18003C0285E 09/18/95 95±05±2084A 02 05 ...... IN NOBLESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1800820025E 07/13/95 95±05±1466A 01 05 ...... IN NOBLESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1800820025E 10/25/95 95±05±1760A 01 05 ...... IN NOBLESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1800820025E 12/18/95 96±05±090A 01 05 ...... IN NOBLESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1800820030E 08/03/95 95±05±1696A 01 05 ...... IN SCHERERVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 1801420005B 07/17/95 95±05±1078A 01 05 ...... IN SEYMOUR, CITY OF ...... 1800990004B 11/29/95 96±05±056A 02 05 ...... IN SEYMOUR, CITY OF ...... 1800990004B 11/29/95 96±05±266A 01 05 ...... IN SEYMOUR, CITY OF ...... 1800990004B 12/11/95 96±05±312A 02 05 ...... IN SEYMOUR, CITY OF ...... 1800990004B 12/01/95 96±05±320A 02 05 ...... IN SHELBY COUNTY* ...... 1802350060B 11/29/95 96±05±034A 02 05 ...... IN ST. JOSEPH COUNTY* ...... 1802240040B 08/24/95 95±05±009P 05 05 ...... IN STEUBEN COUNTY* ...... 1802430025B 07/07/95 95±05±1284A 02 05 ...... IN TIPPECANOE COUNTY* ...... 1804280015B 09/25/95 95±05±2358A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28387

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 10/25/95 95±05±105P 05 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 08/14/95 95±05±1988A 02 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 09/29/95 95±05±2086A 02 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 09/14/95 95±05±2298A 02 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 09/29/95 95±05±2304A 02 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 09/29/95 95±05±2464A 02 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 11/22/95 96±05±184A 02 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560025C 12/05/95 96±05±506A 02 05 ...... IN VANDERBURGH COUNTY* ...... 1802560100B 12/13/95 96±05±298A 02 05 ...... IN WARRICK COUNTY* ...... 1804180175B 08/31/95 95±05±1706A 02 05 ...... IN WESTFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 1800830011C 11/21/95 95±05±2502A 01 05 ...... IN WESTFIELD, TOWN OF ...... 1800830013C 09/07/95 95±05±2192A 02 05 ...... IN WINONA LAKE, TOWN OF ...... 18085C0086C 10/19/95 95±05±2430A 01 05 ...... MI ALGONAC, CITY OF ...... 2601910001C 08/21/95 95±05±1890A 01 05 ...... MI ALLEN PARK, CITY OF ...... 2602170002B 11/21/95 95±05±2038A 02 05 ...... MI ALPENA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2600110039C 12/05/95 95±05±2142A 02 05 ...... MI BANGOR, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2600190010B 12/13/95 95±05±2576A 02 05 ...... MI BAY MILLS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2603740050B 11/22/95 95±05±1784A 02 05 ...... MI BERLIN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601430015A 08/31/95 95±05±1680A 02 05 ...... MI CANNON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2607340025A 07/18/95 95±05±1548A 02 05 ...... MI CANTON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2602190005B 10/26/95 95±05±1778A 01 05 ...... MI CHESTERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601200010B 07/07/95 95±05±1272A 02 05 ...... MI CLAY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601940002B 10/06/95 95±05±1688A 01 05 ...... MI DEARBORN, CITY OF ...... 2602200002C 12/11/95 96±05±242A 02 05 ...... MI FABIUS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2607810025A 10/13/95 95±05±2184A 01 05 ...... MI FABIUS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2607810025A 11/08/95 95±05±2244A 02 05 ...... MI FABIUS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2607810025A 12/18/95 96±05±300A 02 05 ...... MI FLAT ROCK, CITY OF ...... 2602240003B 09/11/95 95±05±1746A 02 05 ...... MI FORD RIVER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2600620005A 10/19/95 95±05±1928A 02 05 ...... MI FRUITLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 260265B 07/13/95 95±05±1414A 02 05 ...... MI GREEN OAK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2604400015B 10/30/95 96±05±160A 02 05 ...... MI GREENBUSH, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2600010007C 08/03/95 95±05±1816A 02 05 ...... MI GROSSE ILE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2602270005B 09/29/95 95±05±2138A 02 05 ...... MI GROSSE ILE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2602270005B 10/23/95 95±05±2168A 01 05 ...... MI GROSSE ILE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2602270010B 10/11/95 95±05±1800A 01 05 ...... MI HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601230005C 07/10/95 95±05±1474A 02 05 ...... MI HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601230010C 07/10/95 95±05±1420A 01 05 ...... MI HUDSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 2604930002A 09/25/95 95±05±2334A 02 05 ...... MI IRA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601990005B 12/13/95 96±05±168A 02 05 ...... MI IRA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601990010B 09/29/95 95±05±1998A 02 05 ...... MI JAMES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2608020025A 11/21/95 95±05±2466A 02 05 ...... MI JAMES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2608020025A 11/29/95 96±05±402A 02 05 ...... MI KEEGO HARBOR, CITY OF ...... 2601730001B 11/21/95 95±05±2284A 02 05 ...... MI L'ANSE, VILLAGE OF ...... 260552A 07/13/95 95±05±978A 02 05 ...... MI LASALLE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601480002B 09/25/95 95±05±2556A 02 05 ...... MI LEELANAU, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 260114B 11/22/95 95±05±2550A 02 05 ...... MI LONG LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2607820025A 11/14/95 95±05±2330A 02 05 ...... MI MACOMB, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2604450010B 07/10/95 95±05±129P 05 05 ...... MI MACOMB, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2604450020B 12/26/95 95±05±1388P 06 05 ...... MI MANLIUS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 260348 09/13/95 95±05±2226A 02 05 ...... MI MENOMINEE, CITY OF ...... 2601380005B 09/11/95 95±05±1460A 01 05 ...... MI MENOMINEE, CITY OF ...... 2601380005B 09/25/95 95±05±2560A 01 05 ...... MI MERIDIAN, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2600930001A 11/14/95 96±05±094A 02 05 ...... MI MERIDIAN, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2600930002A 11/14/95 96±05±094A 02 05 ...... MI MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400004C 07/13/95 95±05±1782A 02 05 ...... MI MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 2601400006C 07/06/95 95±05±1418A 02 05 ...... MI NILES, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 260041B 10/05/95 95±05±1932A 02 05 ...... MI NORVELL, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 260424A 12/07/95 95±05±2390A 02 05 ...... MI OAKLAND, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2604760005B 12/15/95 96±05±166A 02 05 ...... MI ONEIDA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2600700015B 09/18/95 95±05±168A 02 05 ...... MI ORCHARD LAKE VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 2604770005A 12/07/95 96±05±318A 02 05 ...... MI OSCODA, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601010025C 10/19/95 95±05±2294A 01 05 ...... MI PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601850001B 07/27/95 95±05±916A 02 05 ...... MI PARK, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601850001B 11/08/95 96±05±038A 02 05 ...... MI PENTWATER, VILLAGE OF ...... 2602770001B 10/05/95 95±05±1786A 02 05 ...... MI PERE MARQUETTE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 260582A 11/21/95 95±05±2704A 02 05 ...... MI PLAINFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2601090005B 08/31/95 95±05±1660A 02 05 ...... MI PORTAGE, CITY OF ...... 2605770006A 08/31/95 95±05±1658A 02 05 ...... MI SALEM,TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2606360002B 12/11/95 96±05±162A 02 05 ...... MI SHERMAN, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2608220025A 08/16/95 95±05±1472A 02 28388 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... MI ST. CLAIR SHORES, CITY OF ...... 2601270005B 08/24/95 95±05±2080A 02 05 ...... MI THOMAS, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2606030020A 09/19/95 95±05±2050A 02 05 ...... MI TRENTON, CITY OF ...... 2602440003C 07/13/95 95±05±1656A 02 05 ...... MI TROY, CITY OF ...... 2601800004E 08/07/95 95±05±1264A 02 05 ...... MI TROY, CITY OF ...... 2601800004E 07/10/95 95±05±1576A 02 05 ...... MI TROY, CITY OF ...... 2601800004E 10/25/95 95±05±2212A 01 05 ...... MI TROY, CITY OF ...... 2601800004E 09/18/95 95±05±2266A 02 05 ...... MI WHITE LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2604790010B 08/03/95 95±05±1620A 02 05 ...... MI WHITE LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2604790010B 11/21/95 96±05±120A 02 05 ...... MI WOODHAVEN, CITY OF ...... 2607300005A 09/27/95 95±05±2442A 02 05 ...... MI YPSILANTI, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 2605420005B 10/19/95 95±05±2522A 02 05 ...... MN ANOKA COUNTY* ...... 2700050050A 12/11/95 96±05±346A 02 05 ...... MN BLAINE, CITY OF ...... 2700070005C 08/07/95 95±05±1006A 01 05 ...... MN BLAINE, CITY OF ...... 2700070005C 08/07/95 95±05±1748A 02 05 ...... MN BLAINE, CITY OF ...... 2700070005C 08/09/95 95±05±1884A 02 05 ...... MN BLAINE, CITY OF ...... 2700070005C 12/15/95 95±05±2340A 01 05 ...... MN BLAINE, CITY OF ...... 2700070005C 11/21/95 95±05±2512A 01 05 ...... MN BLAINE, CITY OF ...... 2700070010C 08/03/95 95±05±1056A 01 05 ...... MN BROWNSVILLE, CITY OF ...... 2701910005C 12/18/95 95±05±2404A 01 05 ...... MN CENTER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2706850001A 07/25/95 95±05±1332P 06 05 ...... MN CHAMPLIN, CITY OF ...... 2701530001A 07/07/95 95±05±1556A 02 05 ...... MN CHISAGO, CITY OF ...... 2707070001A 09/19/95 95±05±2386A 02 05 ...... MN CLAY COUNTY* ...... 2752350100C 07/25/95 95±05±1750A 02 05 ...... MN COON RAPIDS,CITY OF ...... 2700110001A 11/14/95 96±05±080A 01 05 ...... MN CROW WING COUNTY* ...... 2700910100B 11/21/95 95±05±2246A 02 05 ...... MN CRYSTAL, CITY OF ...... 2701560002B 10/13/95 95±05±2204A 02 05 ...... MN EDEN PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 2701590010C 11/14/95 95±05±2530A 02 05 ...... MN FRIDLEY, CITY OF ...... 2700130003B 09/19/95 95±05±1886A 01 05 ...... MN HAM LAKE, CITY OF ...... 2706740005B 11/21/95 95±05±2052A 02 05 ...... MN HAM LAKE, CITY OF ...... 2706740005B 12/11/95 96±05±246A 02 05 ...... MN HAM LAKE, CITY OF ...... 2706740005B 11/22/95 96±05±566A 02 05 ...... MN HAM LAKE, CITY OF ...... 2706740010B 08/25/95 95±05±2354A 02 05 ...... MN HOPKINS, CITY OF ...... 2701660002B 12/19/95 95±05±049P 05 05 ...... MN ISANTI COUNTY* ...... 2701970075A 08/07/95 95±05±948A 02 05 ...... MN LAKEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 2701070010B 07/06/95 95±05±229P 06 05 ...... MN LE SUEUR COUNTY* ...... 2702460175A 10/25/95 95±05±2296A 02 05 ...... MN LINO LAKES, CITY OF ...... 2700150010B 11/07/95 95±05±2674A 01 05 ...... MN MAPLEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 270378C 11/21/95 95±05±2106A 02 05 ...... MN MARSHALL, CITY OF ...... 2702580002C 12/01/95 96±05±200A 02 05 ...... MN MILLE LACS COUNTY* ...... 2706240225B 11/03/95 95±05±1186A 02 05 ...... MN MINNETONKA, CITY OF ...... 2701730005B 11/22/95 96±05±088A 02 05 ...... MN MINNETRISTA, CITY OF ...... 270175B 09/29/95 95±05±2122A 02 05 ...... MN MINNETRISTA, CITY OF ...... 270175B 09/29/95 95±05±2122A 02 05 ...... MN ORONO, CITY OF ...... 2701780005C 11/21/95 95±05±2672A 01 05 ...... MN PINE COUNTY* ...... 2707040325B 10/17/95 95±05±313P 06 05 ...... MN POLK COUNTY* ...... 2705030175B 07/31/95 95±05±1840A 02 05 ...... MN PRIOR LAKE, CITY OF ...... 2704320005B 08/03/95 95±05±1588A 02 05 ...... MN RICE COUNTY* ...... 2706460025C 07/13/95 94±05±1102A 02 05 ...... MN RICE COUNTY* ...... 2706460025C 09/18/95 95±05±2264A 02 05 ...... MN RICE COUNTY* ...... 2706460025C 10/05/95 95±05±2432A 02 05 ...... MN RICE COUNTY* ...... 2706460050B 09/08/95 95±05±259P 06 05 ...... MN RICE COUNTY* ...... 2706460100B 09/08/95 95±05±259P 06 05 ...... MN ROCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 27109C0161D 08/29/95 95±05±157P 05 05 ...... MN ROCHESTER, CITY OF ...... 27109C0164D 08/31/95 95±05±2108A 02 05 ...... MN SAUK RAPIDS, CITY OF ...... 2700230001C 08/18/95 95±05±1918A 01 05 ...... MN SCOTT COUNTY* ...... 2704280125C 09/19/95 95±05±1930A 02 05 ...... MN ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701840005B 08/25/95 95±05±2002A 02 05 ...... MN ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF ...... 2701840005B 07/05/95 95±05±850A 02 05 ...... MN WASHINGTON COUNTY* ...... 2704990125B 10/13/95 95±05±2326A 02 05 ...... MN WAYZATA, CITY OF ...... 2701880005C 11/08/95 95±05±2242A 02 05 ...... OH ASHTABULA COUNTY* ...... 3900100075B 12/01/95 95±05±1994A 02 05 ...... OH AUGLAIZE COUNTY* ...... 39011C0090C 10/13/95 95±05±2310A 02 05 ...... OH AURORA, CITY OF ...... 3904540001B 07/14/95 95±05±1654A 02 05 ...... OH AURORA, CITY OF ...... 3904540003B 07/14/95 95±05±1654A 02 05 ...... OH AVON, CITY OF ...... 3903480005C 07/13/95 95±05±1448A 02 05 ...... OH AVON, CITY OF ...... 3903480005C 08/26/95 95±05±1978A 02 05 ...... OH AVON, CITY OF ...... 3903480005C 10/05/95 95±05±2056A 01 05 ...... OH AVON, CITY OF ...... 3903480005C 11/29/95 95±05±2410A 02 05 ...... OH AVON, CITY OF ...... 3903480005C 12/15/95 95±05±311P 05 05 ...... OH AVON, CITY OF ...... 3903480005C 11/22/95 96±05±248A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28389

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... OH BEAVERCREEK, CITY OF ...... 3908760002B 09/21/95 95±05±2062A 01 05 ...... OH BELLBROOK, CITY OF ...... 3901940001B 11/21/95 96±05±068A 02 05 ...... OH BELLBROOK, CITY OF ...... 3901940001B 11/21/95 96±05±068A 02 05 ...... OH BELMONT COUNTY* ...... 3907620131C 08/09/95 95±05±1738A 02 05 ...... OH BEREA, CITY OF ...... 3900970001B 08/16/95 95±05±1538A 02 05 ...... OH BREMEN, VILLAGE OF ...... 3901600001C 11/30/95 96±05±005P 06 05 ...... OH BRIARWOOD BEACH, VILLAGE OF ...... 3903790001B 09/27/95 95±05±1922A 02 05 ...... OH CLARK COUNTY* ...... 3907320180A 10/16/95 95±05±1386P 06 05 ...... OH CLERMONT COUNTY* ...... 3900650005B 09/15/95 95±05±1954A 01 05 ...... OH COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 3901700085B 08/24/95 95±05±1860A 01 05 ...... OH COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0180G 09/21/95 95±05±2218A 02 05 ...... OH COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0220G 12/15/95 96±05±004A 01 05 ...... OH COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0227G 08/23/95 95±05±243P 05 05 ...... OH COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0235G 12/11/95 95±05±341P 05 05 ...... OH COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 39049C0245G 09/29/95 95±05±2154A 01 05 ...... OH DELAWARE COUNTY* ...... 3901460035B 10/25/95 95±05±2124A 02 05 ...... OH DELAWARE COUNTY* ...... 3901460110B 08/31/95 95±05±2130A 01 05 ...... OH EASTLAKE, CITY OF ...... 3903130003B 11/08/95 95±05±293P 05 05 ...... OH ERIE COUNTY* ...... 3901530075C 11/03/95 95±05±2308A 01 05 ...... OH EUCLID, CITY OF ...... 3901070004B 09/25/95 95±05±2414A 02 05 ...... OH FAIRFIELD COUNTY* ...... 3901580035D 08/03/95 95±05±1450A 02 05 ...... OH FAIRFIELD, CITY OF ...... 3900380005B 10/09/95 95±05±2120A 02 05 ...... OH FINDLAY, CITY ...... 3902440005C 08/14/95 95±05±2092A 02 05 ...... OH FINDLAY, CITY ...... 3902440005C 08/14/95 95±05±2094A 02 05 ...... OH FINDLAY, CITY ...... 3902440005C 08/14/95 95±05±2096A 02 05 ...... OH FINDLAY, CITY ...... 3902440005C 08/14/95 95±05±2114A 02 05 ...... OH FINDLAY, CITY ...... 3902440005C 08/14/95 95±05±2132A 02 05 ...... OH FINDLAY, CITY ...... 3902440005C 11/13/95 95±05±2362A 01 05 ...... OH FINDLAY, CITY ...... 3902440005C 12/15/95 96±05±096A 01 05 ...... OH FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 3901670140C 09/27/95 95±05±300A 02 05 ...... OH FRANKLIN COUNTY* ...... 3901670145C 09/27/95 95±05±300A 02 05 ...... OH GREENE COUNTY* ...... 3901930050B 09/28/95 95±05±2276A 01 05 ...... OH HAMILTON COUNTY* ...... 3902040035B 11/03/95 95±05±2638A 02 05 ...... OH HANCOCK COUNTY* ...... 3907670130B 08/03/95 95±05±1846A 17 05 ...... OH HARRISON, CITY OF ...... 3902200005C 08/24/95 95±05±2268A 01 05 ...... OH HILLIARD, CITY OF ...... 3901750005C 11/07/95 95±05±1208A 01 05 ...... OH LANCASTER, CITY OF ...... 3901610005D 09/19/95 95±05±1102A 01 05 ...... OH LORAIN COUNTY* ...... 3903460095B 10/31/95 95±05±1372A 02 05 ...... OH LORAIN COUNTY* ...... 3903460095B 10/19/95 95±05±2250A 02 05 ...... OH LUCAS COUNTY* ...... 3903590025B 11/28/95 95±05±2302A 01 05 ...... OH LUCAS COUNTY* ...... 3903590025B 12/11/95 96±05±154A 02 05 ...... OH LUCAS COUNTY* ...... 3903590030B 10/09/95 95±05±2588A 02 05 ...... OH LUCAS COUNTY* ...... 3903590095B 10/23/95 95±05±2496A 02 05 ...... OH MAYFIELD, VILLAGE OF ...... 390116D 07/20/95 95±05±1074A 02 05 ...... OH MENTOR, CITY OF ...... 3903170005E 09/28/95 95±05±2506A 02 05 ...... OH MERCER COUNTY* ...... 3903920075B 09/18/95 95±05±2300A 02 05 ...... OH MERCER COUNTY* ...... 3903920100B 07/10/95 95±05±1742A 02 05 ...... OH MERCER COUNTY* ...... 3903920100B 10/25/95 95±05±1772A 02 05 ...... OH MERCER COUNTY* ...... 3903920100B 09/25/95 95±05±2316A 02 05 ...... OH MERCER COUNTY* ...... 3903920100B 10/31/95 96±05±130A 02 05 ...... OH MERCER COUNTY* ...... 3903920100B 12/01/95 96±05±140A 02 05 ...... OH MILLBURY, VILLAGE OF ...... 3905860001B 07/10/95 95±05±1376A 02 05 ...... OH MUSKINGUM COUNTY* ...... 3904250040C 10/31/95 95±05±2460A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH OLMSTED, CITY OF ...... 3901200002C 07/13/95 95±05±1534A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH OLMSTED, CITY OF ...... 3901200002C 07/10/95 95±05±1698A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH OLMSTED, CITY OF ...... 3901200002C 10/19/95 96±05±032A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH OLMSTED, CITY OF ...... 3901200002C 10/31/95 96±05±058A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH OLMSTED, CITY OF ...... 3901200002C 10/19/95 96±05±064A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH RIDGEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3903520005C 09/21/95 95±05±1868A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH RIDGEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3903520005C 10/19/95 95±05±2416A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH RIDGEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3903520005C 09/27/95 95±05±2438A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH RIDGEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3903520005C 09/25/95 95±05±2448A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH RIDGEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3903520005C 11/22/95 96±05±116A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH RIDGEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 3903520005C 12/13/95 96±05±156A 02 05 ...... OH NORTH ROYALTON, CITY OF ...... 3901210005B 07/17/95 95±05±091P 06 05 ...... OH OTTAWA COUNTY* ...... 3904320050B 09/25/95 95±05±2034A 02 05 ...... OH OXFORD, CITY OF ...... 3907310001C 08/17/95 95±05±692A 02 05 ...... OH PAINESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 390319 A 10/31/95 95±05±1788A 01 05 ...... OH PUTNAM COUNTY* ...... 3904650020B 09/19/95 95±05±2102A 02 05 ...... OH RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 3901260005B 08/18/95 95±05±143P 06 28390 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... OH STARK COUNTY* ...... 3907800102B 11/08/95 95±05±2424A 02 05 ...... OH SUMMIT COUNTY* ...... 3907810005B 09/17/95 95±05±1948A 02 05 ...... OH TOLEDO, CITY OF ...... 3953730005A 08/14/95 95±05±1194A 02 05 ...... OH TOLEDO, CITY OF ...... 3953730005A 09/25/95 95±05±2188A 02 05 ...... OH TOLEDO, CITY OF ...... 3953730005A 11/08/95 95±05±2644A 01 05 ...... OH TOLEDO, CITY OF ...... 3953730005A 12/15/95 96±05±192A 02 05 ...... OH TOLEDO, CITY OF ...... 3953730010A 08/24/95 95±05±1462A 02 05 ...... OH TOLEDO, CITY OF ...... 3953730010A 09/11/95 95±05±2348A 02 05 ...... OH TOLEDO, CITY OF ...... 3953730035A 12/11/95 96±05±252A 02 05 ...... OH TROTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 3904170002B 09/19/95 95±05±117P 05 05 ...... OH TUSCARAWAS COUNTY* ...... 3907820130B 09/19/95 95±05±1426A 02 05 ...... OH UNION COUNTY* ...... 3908080150B 11/21/95 96±05±134A 02 05 ...... OH VERMILION, CITY OF ...... 3953740005C 11/03/95 95±05±1740A 02 05 ...... OH WASHINGTON COUNTY* ...... 3905660125B 08/24/95 95±05±1822A 02 05 ...... OH WESTLAKE, CITY OF ...... 3901360003C 07/17/95 95±05±1512A 02 05 ...... OH WOOD COUNTY* ...... 3908090012C 07/06/95 95±05±1640A 01 05 ...... OH WOOD COUNTY* ...... 3908090012C 07/27/95 95±05±1796A 01 05 ...... OH WOOD COUNTY* ...... 3908090012C 08/24/95 95±05±2066A 01 05 ...... OH WOOD COUNTY* ...... 3908090012C 11/03/95 95±05±2346A 01 05 ...... OH WOOD COUNTY* ...... 3908090016B 08/03/95 95±05±1858A 01 05 ...... OH WOOD COUNTY* ...... 3908090016B 12/11/95 95±05±2350A 01 05 ...... OH WOOD COUNTY* ...... 3908090017B 07/10/95 95±05±1376A 02 05 ...... WI ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 55001C0050C 08/24/95 95±05±1578A 02 05 ...... WI BAYFIELD COUNTY* ...... 5505390020B 08/03/95 95±05±1266A 02 05 ...... WI BRILLION, CITY OF ...... 5500360001C 10/31/95 95±05±2696A 02 05 ...... WI BROOKFIELD, CITY OF ...... 5504780005B 08/24/95 95±05±1814A 01 05 ...... WI BROOKFIELD, CITY OF ...... 5504780010B 08/24/95 95±05±1674A 01 05 ...... WI BROWN COUNTY* ...... 5500200125B 10/23/95 95±05±1574A 02 05 ...... WI BURNETT COUNTY* ...... 5500320200B 09/28/95 95±05±1780A 02 05 ...... WI CALUMET COUNTY* ...... 5500350140B 11/29/95 95±05±2540A 02 05 ...... WI CHIPPEWA COUNTY* ...... 5555490275B 10/17/95 95±05±1766A 02 05 ...... WI CUDAHY, CITY OF ...... 5502720001B 07/20/95 95±05±1404A 02 05 ...... WI DUNN COUNTY* ...... 5501180225A 07/24/95 95±05±1820A 02 05 ...... WI FOND DU LAC COUNTY* ...... 5501310060B 08/31/95 95±05±2208A 02 05 ...... WI FOND DU LAC COUNTY* ...... 5501310170B 10/03/95 95±05±1436A 01 05 ...... WI FOND DU LAC, CITY OF ...... 5501360005D 10/11/95 95±05±1752A 01 05 ...... WI FORT ATKINSON, CITY OF ...... 5555540002B 11/22/95 96±05±256A 02 05 ...... WI GERMANTOWN, VILLAGE OF ...... 5504720008B 11/21/95 95±05±2144A 01 05 ...... WI GRAFTON, VILLAGE OF ...... 55089C0062D 08/07/95 95±05±219P 05 05 ...... WI GREEN BAY, CITY OF ...... 5500220020E 09/13/95 95±05±1812A 02 05 ...... WI HILLSBORO,CITY OF ...... 550455B 11/29/95 95±05±1992A 02 05 ...... WI LA CROSSE COUNTY* ...... 5502170120A 08/24/95 95±05±1238A 02 05 ...... WI LA CROSSE COUNTY* ...... 5502170120A 09/19/95 95±05±2420A 02 05 ...... WI LA CROSSE COUNTY* ...... 5502170160A 12/28/95 95±05±147P 05 05 ...... WI MARATHON COUNTY* ...... 5502450375B 08/24/95 95±05±1906A 02 05 ...... WI MARINETTE COUNTY* ...... 5502590275B 07/07/95 95±05±038A 02 05 ...... WI MARINETTE COUNTY* ...... 5502590755B 08/17/95 95±05±1664A 02 05 ...... WI MARINETTE COUNTY* ...... 5502590755B 09/27/95 95±05±2104A 02 05 ...... WI MENASHA, CITY OF ...... 5505100005C 11/03/95 95±05±2110A 02 05 ...... WI MEQUON, CITY OF ...... 55089C0090D 10/31/95 95±05±2608A 02 05 ...... WI NEENAH, CITY OF ...... 5505090001B 10/05/95 95±05±2376A 02 05 ...... WI OUTAGAMIE COUNTY* ...... 5503020050B 12/11/95 96±05±548A 02 05 ...... WI OUTAGAMIE COUNTY* ...... 5503020083C 12/18/95 96±05±306A 02 05 ...... WI OUTAGAMIE COUNTY* ...... 5503020084C 08/18/95 95±05±2220A 02 05 ...... WI OUTAGAMIE COUNTY* ...... 5503020084C 09/11/95 95±05±2278A 02 05 ...... WI OUTAGAMIE COUNTY* ...... 5503020084C 10/31/95 95±05±2700A 02 05 ...... WI OUTAGAMIE COUNTY* ...... 5503020100C 08/07/95 95±05±1612A 01 05 ...... WI PIERCE COUNTY* ...... 5555710100C 08/03/95 95±05±1878A 01 05 ...... WI PIERCE COUNTY* ...... 5555710100C 12/11/95 96±05±188A 02 05 ...... WI PIERCE COUNTY* ...... 5555710125C 08/03/95 95±05±1878A 01 05 ...... WI POLK COUNTY* ...... 5505770275B 09/21/95 95±05±1616A 02 05 ...... WI POLK COUNTY* ...... 5505770275B 09/21/95 95±05±1618A 02 05 ...... WI PORTAGE COUNTY* ...... 5505720150C 07/13/95 95±05±1138A 01 05 ...... WI RACINE COUNTY* ...... 5503470010B 08/07/95 95±05±1888A 01 05 ...... WI RACINE COUNTY* ...... 5503470010B 11/03/95 95±05±2538A 02 05 ...... WI SUPERIOR, CITY OF ...... 5501160001C 11/22/95 96±05±326A 02 05 ...... WI SUSSEX, VILLAGE OF ...... 5504900001C 11/27/95 95±05±2468A 17 05 ...... WI TREMPEALEAU COUNTY* ...... 555585A 10/13/95 95±05±2068A 02 05 ...... WI WALPACA COUNTY* ...... 5504920085A 11/21/95 95±05±2072A 02 05 ...... WI WALPACA COUNTY* ...... 5504920120B 12/13/95 95±05±2450A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28391

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

05 ...... WI WALPACA COUNTY* ...... 5504920145A 10/05/95 95±05±2444A 02 05 ...... WI WALPACA COUNTY* ...... 5504920205B 10/31/95 95±05±2678A 01 05 ...... WI WAUKESHA COUNTY* ...... 5504760015B 09/19/95 95±05±1990A 02 05 ...... WI WAUKESHA COUNTY* ...... 5504760015B 10/13/95 95±05±2232A 02 05 ...... WI WAUPUN, CITY OF ...... 5501080001E 07/05/95 95±05±1560A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370025C 07/13/95 95±05±1808A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370025C 10/05/95 95±05±2470A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370025C 10/05/95 95±05±2486A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370025C 12/01/95 96±05±182A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370050C 10/25/95 95±05±2374A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370050C 12/05/95 96±05±098A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370100C 11/29/95 95±05±2206A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370100C 11/21/95 95±05±2602A 02 05 ...... WI WINNEBAGO COUNTY* ...... 5505370150C 11/21/95 95±05±2368A 02 06 ...... AR BATESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0500910005B 10/26/95 R6±95±07±194 02 06 ...... AR BENTON COUNTY* ...... 05007C0155F 11/03/95 95±06±447P 05 06 ...... AR BENTONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 05007C0065E 09/11/95 R6±95±09±053 02 06 ...... AR BOONE COUNTY ...... 050016B 07/25/95 95±06±058A 02 06 ...... AR CABOT, CITY OF ...... 0503090005C 10/25/95 95±06±422A 01 06 ...... AR CABOT, CITY OF ...... 0503090005C 10/26/95 R6±95±10±272 02 06 ...... AR CLEBURNE COUNTY* ...... 0504240100C 08/25/95 R6±95±08±252 02 06 ...... AR CONWAY, CITY OF ...... 05045C0130F 07/14/95 R6±95±07±082 02 06 ...... AR CORNING, CITY OF ...... 0500300005B 08/07/95 R6±95±07±270 08 06 ...... AR CORNING, CITY OF ...... 0500300005B 10/17/95 R6±95±10±126 02 06 ...... AR FAYETTEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 05143C0085C 09/14/95 R6±95±09±154 01 06 ...... AR FORT SMITH, CITY OF ...... 0550130005D 12/05/95 R6±95±12±036 02 06 ...... AR GREENWOOD, CITY OF ...... 0501980005B 10/31/95 95±06±321P 06 06 ...... AR HOLLY GROVE, CITY OF ...... 0501570001B 10/27/95 R6±95±10±288 02 06 ...... AR JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0501800010D 08/17/95 95±06±348A 02 06 ...... AR JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0501800010E 08/24/95 R6±95±08±217 02 06 ...... AR JONESBORO, CITY OF ...... 05031C0131C 08/24/95 R6±95±08±295 02 06 ...... AR JONESBORO, CITY OF ...... 05031C0132C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±185 08 06 ...... AR JONESBORO, CITY OF ...... 05031C0132C 10/26/95 R6±95±10±271 02 06 ...... AR JONESBORO, CITY OF ...... 05031C0134C 07/10/95 95±06±199A 01 06 ...... AR LAKE CITY, TOWN OF ...... 05031C0175C 11/22/95 R6±95±11±203 02 06 ...... AR LITTLE ROCK, CITY OF ...... 0501810005E 09/01/95 95±06±354A 01 06 ...... AR LONOKE COUNTY* ...... 0504480365B 11/08/95 R6±95±11±082 02 06 ...... AR LONOKE, CITY OF ...... 0503410005A 10/20/95 R6±95±10±206 01 06 ...... AR OUACHITA COUNTY* ...... 0501610005C 10/13/95 R6±95±10±092 02 06 ...... AR PALESTINE, CITY OF ...... 050359A 10/13/95 R6±95±10±102 02 06 ...... AR PALESTINE, CITY OF ...... 050359A 10/13/95 R6±95±10±103 08 06 ...... AR PALESTINE, CITY OF ...... 050359A 10/13/95 R6±95±10±104 02 06 ...... AR PALESTINE, CITY OF ...... 050359A 10/13/95 R6±95±10±105 02 06 ...... AR PARAGOULD, CITY OF ...... 0500850010D 08/16/95 R6±95±08±151 02 06 ...... AR PARAGOULD, CITY OF ...... 0500850010D 11/06/95 R6±95±11±070 02 06 ...... AR PARAGOULD, CITY OF ...... 0500850010D 11/08/95 R6±95±11±105 02 06 ...... AR PINE BLUFF, CITY OF ...... 0501090005B 08/29/95 95±06±259A 02 06 ...... AR POPE COUNTY* ...... 0504580009A 08/10/95 R6±95±08±064 02 06 ...... AR ROGERS, CITY OF ...... 05007C0155F 11/03/95 95±06±447P 05 06 ...... AR STUTTGART, CITY OF ...... 050002B 11/27/95 R6±95±11±297 02 06 ...... AR STUTTGART, CITY OF ...... 050002B 11/27/95 R6±95±11±298 02 06 ...... AR STUTTGART, CITY OF ...... 050002B 11/30/95 R6±95±11±324 02 06 ...... AR STUTTGART, CITY OF ...... 0500029999 09/21/95 R6±95±09±181 02 06 ...... AR STUTTGART, CITY OF ...... 0500029999 10/17/95 R6±95±10±125 02 06 ...... AR STUTTGART, CITY OF ...... 0500029999 11/22/95 R6±95±11±226 02 06 ...... AR STUTTGART, CITY OF ...... 0500029999 11/30/95 R6±95±11±325 02 06 ...... AR TEXARKANA, CITY OF ...... 050137B 10/24/95 R6±95±10±214 02 06 ...... AR VAN BUREN, CITY OF ...... 05033C0170E 07/10/95 R6±95±07±056 02 06 ...... AR VAN BUREN, CITY OF ...... 05033C0170E 07/10/95 R6±95±07±057 02 06 ...... AR VAN BUREN, CITY OF ...... 05033C0170E 08/17/95 R6±95±08±182 02 06 ...... AR VAN BUREN, CITY OF ...... 05033C0170E 08/24/95 R6±95±08±277 02 06 ...... AR WARD, CITY OF ...... 0503720005B 09/25/95 95±06±349A 01 06 ...... LA ALEXANDRIA, CITY OF ...... 2201460010E 09/27/95 R6±95±09±274 01 06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130025B 10/17/95 R6±95±10±169 02 06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130030C 09/11/95 R6±95±09±046 02 06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130030C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±237 02 06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130030C 09/22/95 R6±95±09±240 02 06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130035C 09/27/95 R6±95±09±317 02 06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130040B 08/21/95 95±06±367A 02 06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130040B 09/27/95 R6±95±09±320 02 28392 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... LA ASCENSION PARISH* ...... 2200130045C 10/26/95 R6±95±10±258 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330005C 11/03/95 96±06±004A 01 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330005C 08/25/95 R6±95±08±219 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330005C 08/31/95 R6±95±08±399 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330005C 11/08/95 R6±95±11±078 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330005C 12/06/95 R6±95±12±023 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330010C 09/14/95 R6±95±09±125 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330010C 10/27/95 R6±95±10±300 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330020C 09/05/95 R6±95±08±160 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330020C 08/25/95 R6±95±08±267 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 07/14/95 R6±95±07±108 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 08/10/95 R6±95±08±099 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 08/25/95 R6±95±08±259 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 08/25/95 R6±95±08±260 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 09/11/95 R6±95±09±056 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 09/11/95 R6±95±09±057 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±275 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±280 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±281 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±282 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF ...... 2200330030C 10/23/95 R6±95±10±228 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310220B 07/14/95 R6±95±07±072 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310220B 09/27/95 R6±95±09±311 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310220B 11/03/95 R6±95±11±000 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310240B 08/16/95 R6±95±08±150 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 07/14/95 R6±95±07±107 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 08/08/95 R6±95±08±032 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 08/10/95 R6±95±08±065 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 08/10/95 R6±95±08±100 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 08/10/95 R6±95±08±101 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 09/11/95 R6±95±09±052 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 09/11/95 R6±95±09±055 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 09/25/95 R6±95±09±261 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 09/25/95 R6±95±09±262 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 09/25/95 R6±95±09±263 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 11/01/95 R6±95±10±000 08 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 10/23/95 R6±95±10±230 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 11/06/95 R6±95±11±064 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310285B 11/20/95 R6±95±11±134 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310295B 10/23/95 R6±95±10±229 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310295B 11/20/95 R6±95±11±136 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310295B 11/27/95 R6±95±11±272 08 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310295B 12/06/95 R6±95±12±024 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310295B 12/06/95 R6±95±12±029 02 06 ...... LA BOSSIER PARISH* ...... 2200310315B 09/11/95 R6±95±09±054 02 06 ...... LA CADDO PARISH* ...... 2203610125B 08/25/95 R6±95±08±258 02 06 ...... LA CADDO PARISH* ...... 2203610170B 08/21/95 R6±95±07±238 02 06 ...... LA CADDO PARISH* ...... 2203610170B 08/31/95 R6±95±08±403 08 06 ...... LA CADDO PARISH* ...... 2203610180B 11/08/95 R6±95±11±086 08 06 ...... LA CADDO PARISH* ...... 2203610245B 08/10/95 R6±95±07±237 08 06 ...... LA CADDO PARISH* ...... 2203610245B 11/22/95 R6±95±11±220 02 06 ...... LA CALCASIEU PARISH* ...... 2200370200B 11/06/95 R6±95±11±063 02 06 ...... LA CALCASIEU PARISH* ...... 2200370225B 07/21/95 R6±95±07±203 02 06 ...... LA CALCASIEU PARISH* ...... 2200370250B 08/08/95 R6±95±08±008 02 06 ...... LA CALCASIEU PARISH* ...... 2200370250B 10/20/95 R6±95±10±210 01 06 ...... LA CALCASIEU PARISH* ...... 2200370350B 07/07/95 R6±95±07±058 01 06 ...... LA CALCASIEU PARISH* ...... 2200370350B 11/09/95 R6±95±11±118 02 06 ...... LA CALCASIEU PARISH* ...... 2200370575B 11/22/95 R6±95±11±258 01 06 ...... LA COVINGTON, CITY OF ...... 2202000005B 10/24/95 R6±95±10±244 02 06 ...... LA EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ...... 2200580065D 07/05/95 R6±95±07±010 02 06 ...... LA EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ...... 2200580105D 08/25/95 R6±95±08±257 02 06 ...... LA EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ...... 2200580105D 11/09/95 R6±95±11±126 02 06 ...... LA EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ...... 2200580110D 12/06/95 R6±95±06±360 08 06 ...... LA EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ...... 2200580110D 09/13/95 R6±95±08±038 01 06 ...... LA EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ...... 2200580110D 12/14/95 R6±95±12±118 02 06 ...... LA EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ...... 2200580115D 08/31/95 R6±95±08±430 02 06 ...... LA GRANT PARISH* ...... 2200760095C 12/05/95 95±06±468A 02 06 ...... LA IBERIA PARISH* ...... 2200780125C 11/08/95 R6±95±11±083 02 06 ...... LA JEFFERSON PARISH* ...... 22051C0040E 07/27/95 R6±95±07±216 02 06 ...... LA JEFFERSON PARISH* ...... 22051C0125E 07/19/95 95±06±297P 06 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28393

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... LA JEFFERSON PARISH* ...... 22051C0145E 10/18/95 R6±95±10±118 02 06 ...... LA KILLIAN, VILLAGE OF ...... 2203559999A 10/06/95 R6±95±10±078 02 06 ...... LA KINDER, TOWN OF ...... 220010C 07/19/95 R6±95±07±154 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010020C 08/08/95 R6±95±08±039 01 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010040C 08/31/95 R6±95±08±439 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010045D 11/22/95 R6±95±11±239 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010065C 09/13/95 95±06±401A 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010065C 11/06/95 R6±95±10±191 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010065C 11/03/95 R6±95±11±010 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010065C 12/06/95 R6±95±12±046 08 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010065C 12/14/95 R6±95±12±107 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE PARISH* ...... 2201010075C 10/20/95 R6±95±10±182 02 06 ...... LA LAFAYETTE, CITY OF ...... 2201050005E 07/14/95 R6±95±07±081 02 06 ...... LA LIVINGSTON PARISH* ...... 2201130025B 08/11/95 R6±95±08±088 02 06 ...... LA LIVINGSTON PARISH* ...... 2201130025B 08/11/95 R6±95±08±112 02 06 ...... LA LIVINGSTON PARISH* ...... 2201130100B 08/16/95 95±06±208P 06 06 ...... LA LIVINGSTON PARISH* ...... 2201130100B 11/30/95 R6±95±11±327 02 06 ...... LA NATCHITOCHES, CITY OF ...... 2201310002C 07/06/95 95±06±242A 01 06 ...... LA NATCHITOCHES, CITY OF ...... 2201310003C 07/06/95 95±06±242A 01 06 ...... LA NEW ORLEANS/ORLEANS PARISH ...... 2252030095E 10/12/95 R6±95±10±107 02 06 ...... LA RAPIDES PARISH* ...... 2201450135B 09/20/95 95±06±383P 05 06 ...... LA SCOTT, CITY OF ...... 2201060001B 11/24/95 R6±95±11±148 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360010D 10/17/95 R6±95±10±124 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360010D 11/30/95 R6±95±11±306 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360013D 09/11/95 R6±95±09±051 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360013D 09/11/95 R6±95±09±058 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360015D 09/25/95 R6±95±09±252 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360019C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±251 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360019C 09/27/95 R6±95±09±278 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360020C 07/05/95 R6±95±07±016 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 10/04/95 95±06±429P 06 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 10/26/95 95±06±435A 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 08/07/95 R6±95±07±256 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 08/07/95 R6±95±07±257 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 08/07/95 R6±95±07±264 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 10/26/95 R6±95±10±264 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 10/27/95 R6±95±10±287 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360028D 12/07/95 R6±95±12±053 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 07/05/95 R6±95±07±020 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 08/25/95 R6±95±08±242 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 09/25/95 R6±95±09±253 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 09/25/95 R6±95±09±254 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 10/24/95 R6±95±10±242 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 11/24/95 R6±95±11±145 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 11/27/95 R6±95±11±296 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360029D 12/06/95 R6±95±12±030 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360030D 08/08/95 R6±95±08±037 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360030D 12/15/95 R6±95±12±137 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360033D 08/29/95 95±06±370A 01 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360033D 10/04/95 95±06±429P 06 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360033D 12/14/95 96±06±063A 01 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360033D 08/25/95 R6±95±08±261 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360033D 12/06/95 R6±95±12±031 01 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360034D 08/16/95 R6±95±08±153 02 06 ...... LA SHREVEPORT, CITY OF ...... 2200360035D 11/20/95 R6±95±11±135 02 06 ...... LA ST. BERNARD PARISH* ...... 2252040290B 07/20/95 R6±95±07±151 02 06 ...... LA ST. BERNARD PARISH* ...... 2252040295B 07/03/95 95±06±263A 02 06 ...... LA ST. CHARLES PARISH* ...... 2201600125C 08/15/95 R6±95±08±127 02 06 ...... LA ST. CHARLES PARISH* ...... 2201600125C 08/16/95 R6±95±08±161 02 06 ...... LA ST. MARTIN PARISH* ...... 2201780150B 09/15/95 R6±95±09±174 02 06 ...... LA ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050125C 07/14/95 R6±95±07±092 02 06 ...... LA ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050150C 11/30/95 95±06±442A 02 06 ...... LA ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050175C 09/20/95 R6±95±09±179 02 06 ...... LA ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050175C 11/03/95 R6±95±11±003 02 06 ...... LA ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050360C 08/15/95 R6±95±08±141 02 06 ...... LA ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050360C 08/15/95 R6±95±08±141 02 06 ...... LA ST. TAMMANY PARISH* ...... 2252050420D 11/21/95 R6±95±11±146 02 06 ...... LA SULPHUR, CITY OF ...... 2200410001B 09/11/95 R6±95±09±060 02 06 ...... LA TANGIPAHOA PARISH* ...... 2202060205D 11/06/95 R6±95±10±141 02 06 ...... LA TANGIPAHOA PARISH* ...... 2202060235D 12/04/95 96±06±018A 02 28394 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... LA VERMILION PARISH* ...... 2202210275D 10/03/95 R6±95±10±028 02 06 ...... LA WALKER, TOWN OF ...... 2201210001A 10/26/95 R6±95±10±161 02 06 ...... LA ZACHARY, CITY OF ...... 2200610005B 11/09/95 96±06±015A 02 06 ...... NM ALBUQUERQUE, CITY OF ...... 3500020010C 07/27/95 95±06±317P 06 06 ...... NM ALBUQUERQUE, CITY OF ...... 3500020021C 11/10/95 95±06±404P 06 06 ...... NM ALBUQUERQUE, CITY OF ...... 3500020032C 12/01/95 96±06±013P 06 06 ...... NM ALBUQUERQUE, CITY OF ...... 3500020033C 10/24/95 R6±95±10±236 02 06 ...... NM CARLSBAD, CITY OF ...... 3500170003B 08/17/95 R6±95±08±171 02 06 ...... NM HOBBS, CITY OF ...... 3500290015B 11/08/95 R6±95±11±081 02 06 ...... NM LAS CRUCES, CITY OF ...... 35013C0517F 11/06/95 R6±95±11±050 02 06 ...... NM RIO RANCHO, CITY OF ...... 3501460025A 12/13/95 96±06±034P 06 06 ...... NM RIO RANCHO, CITY OF ...... 3501460025A 12/05/95 R6±95±10±185 02 06 ...... NM SAN JUAN COUNTY* ...... 3500640340B 11/29/95 R6±95±11±307 02 06 ...... NM SILVER CITY, TOWN OF ...... 3500220004B 10/31/95 96±06±019P 06 06 ...... NM VALENCIA COUNTY* ...... 3500860185C 08/09/95 R6±95±07±033 02 06 ...... OK BARTLESVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4002200016D 10/26/95 R6±95±09±259 02 06 ...... OK BROKEN ARROW, CITY OF ...... 4002360001D 12/15/95 R6±95±12±121 02 06 ...... OK BROKEN ARROW, CITY OF ...... 4002360002C 07/05/95 R6±95±07±011 02 06 ...... OK BROKEN ARROW, CITY OF ...... 4002360004D 11/30/95 96±06±029A 02 06 ...... OK BROKEN ARROW, CITY OF ...... 4002360007D 07/05/95 R6±95±06±209 01 06 ...... OK CACHE,TOWN OF ...... 40031C0226C 08/10/95 R6±95±8±095 02 06 ...... OK CHICKASHA, CITY OF ...... 4002340002D 10/23/95 R6±95±10±197 02 06 ...... OK CHOCTAW, CITY OF ...... 4003570005B 09/25/95 R6±95±09±248 02 06 ...... OK CHOCTAW, CITY OF ...... 4003570010B 12/14/95 R6±95±12±126 02 06 ...... OK CLEVELAND COUNTY* ...... 4004750100B 09/22/95 R6±95±09±266 02 06 ...... OK CLEVELAND COUNTY* ...... 4004750100B 10/20/95 R6±95±10±216 02 06 ...... OK CLEVELAND COUNTY* ...... 4004750100B 10/20/95 R6±95±10±217 02 06 ...... OK CLEVELAND COUNTY* ...... 4004750100B 10/20/95 R6±95±10±218 02 06 ...... OK CREEK COUNTY* ...... 4004900008B 10/27/95 R6±95±10±276 02 06 ...... OK EDMOND, CITY OF ...... 4002520020B 11/07/95 R6±95±11±039 02 06 ...... OK EDMOND, CITY OF ...... 4002520045B 08/31/95 R6±95±08±404 02 06 ...... OK EDMOND, CITY OF ...... 4002520045B 12/15/95 R6±95±12±129 02 06 ...... OK ENID, CITY OF ...... 40047C0095D 10/05/95 R6±95±09±022 02 06 ...... OK ENID, CITY OF ...... 40047C0095D 10/05/95 R6±95±09±143 02 06 ...... OK ENID, CITY OF ...... 40047C0095D 12/07/95 R6±95±12±068 02 06 ...... OK FAIRVIEW, CITY OF ...... 4001120001B 10/27/95 R6±95±10±297 02 06 ...... OK LAHOMA, TOWN OF ...... 40047C0090C 07/12/95 95±06±273A 02 06 ...... OK LAWTON, CITY OF ...... 40031C0251C 12/08/95 96±06±036A 02 06 ...... OK LAWTON, CITY OF ...... 40031C0252C 11/03/95 R6±95±11±004 02 06 ...... OK LAWTON, CITY OF ...... 40031C0252C 11/22/95 R6±95±11±237 02 06 ...... OK LUTHER, TOWN OF ...... 4003960015A 12/15/95 R6±95±12±135 02 06 ...... OK MIDWEST CITY, CITY OF ...... 4004050015E 07/12/95 R6±95±06±429 02 06 ...... OK MOORE, CITY OF ...... 4000440003D 09/13/95 R6±95±09±099 01 06 ...... OK MUSKOGEE, CITY OF ...... 40101C0136D 08/25/95 R6±95±08±296 02 06 ...... OK MUSTANG, CITY OF ...... 4004090010B 11/08/95 R6±95±11±088 02 06 ...... OK NORMAN,CITY OF ...... 4000460005B 12/15/95 R6±95±12±136 02 06 ...... OK NORMAN,CITY OF ...... 4000460015B 10/18/95 95±06±399P 05 06 ...... OK NORMAN,CITY OF ...... 4000460015B 09/27/95 R6±95±09±306 02 06 ...... OK NORMAN,CITY OF ...... 4000460015B 12/07/95 R6±95±12±050 02 06 ...... OK NORMAN,CITY OF ...... 4000460020B 12/15/95 R6±95±12±127 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780035C 08/10/95 R6±95±06±216 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780110C 12/14/95 R6±95±12±101 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780155E 10/06/95 R6±95±10±069 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 08/07/95 R6±95±07±226 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 08/16/95 R6±95±08±169 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 08/29/95 R6±95±08±316 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 09/05/95 R6±95±09±009 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 10/03/95 R6±95±09±025 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 10/30/95 R6±95±10±000 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 11/09/95 R6±95±11±008 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 11/03/95 R6±95±11±015 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780160D 11/21/95 R6±95±11±143 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780170E 12/05/95 95±06±427A 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780170E 11/02/95 95±06±448P 05 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780170E 07/10/95 R6±95±07±054 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780170E 08/25/95 R6±95±08±318 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780170E 09/06/95 R6±95±08±445 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780170E 10/03/95 R6±95±10±020 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780175F 08/08/95 R6±95±08±022 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780175F 11/02/95 R6±95±10±012 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28395

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780175F 10/17/95 R6±95±10±173 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780190F 08/15/95 R6±95±08±144 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780190F 10/10/95 R6±95±10±090 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780195C 10/19/95 95±06±212P 05 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780195C 07/14/95 R6±95±07±134 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780195C 09/11/95 R6±95±09±084 08 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780195C 09/28/95 R6±95±09±328 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780200D 10/19/95 95±06±212P 05 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780225E 07/06/95 R6±95±07±048 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780225E 10/15/95 R6±95±10±164 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780225E 11/21/95 R6±95±11±130 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780255C 09/14/95 R6±95±09±114 02 06 ...... OK OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF ...... 4053780265D 11/07/95 R6±95±11±032 02 06 ...... OK OWASSO, CITY OF ...... 4002100002D 07/21/95 95±06±288A 01 06 ...... OK PRYOR CREEK,CITY OF ...... 4001170002B 11/30/95 R6±95±11±137 02 06 ...... OK ROGERS COUNTY* ...... 4053790050B 11/21/95 R6±95±11±089 02 06 ...... OK SHAWNEE, CITY OF ...... 40125C0101D 08/29/95 R6±95±08±317 02 06 ...... OK SHAWNEE, CITY OF ...... 40125C0103D 11/27/95 R6±95±11±282 02 06 ...... OK SHAWNEE, CITY OF ...... 40125C0103D 11/27/95 R6±95±11±283 08 06 ...... OK SHAWNEE, CITY OF ...... 40125C0125D 08/22/95 R6±95±08±031 02 06 ...... OK STILWATER, CITY OF ...... 4053800004C 09/06/95 R6±95±08±268 08 06 ...... OK TULSA COUNTY* ...... 4004620025B 10/20/95 R6±95±10±186 02 06 ...... OK TULSA COUNTY* ...... 4004620125B 07/12/95 R6±95±07±040 02 06 ...... OK TULSA COUNTY* ...... 4004620230B 09/25/95 R6±95±09±271 02 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810040F 11/09/95 R6±95±11±013 02 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810045F 11/03/95 R6±95±11±000 02 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810065G 11/06/95 R6±95±10±287 08 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810070G 11/03/95 R6±95±11±021 02 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810085G 07/12/95 R6±95±07±028 02 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810090F 08/25/95 R6±95±08±265 02 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810095E 08/31/95 R6±95±08±120 01 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810095E 10/17/95 R6±95±10±146 02 06 ...... OK TULSA, CITY OF ...... 4053810095E 11/07/95 R6±95±11±062 02 06 ...... OK UNION CITY, TOWN OF ...... 400334A 08/10/95 R6±95±08±005 02 06 ...... OK WASHINGTON COUNTY ...... 4004590025A 11/22/95 R6±95±11±204 02 06 ...... OK YUKON, CITY OF ...... 4000280005B 09/25/95 R6±95±09±000 02 06 ...... OK YUKON, CITY OF ...... 4000280010B 09/21/95 R6±95±09±193 01 06 ...... OK YUKON, CITY OF ...... 4000280010B 11/24/95 R6±95±10±033 01 06 ...... TX AMARILLO, CITY OF ...... 4805290005A 11/21/95 R6±95±10±181 01 06 ...... TX AMARILLO, CITY OF ...... 4805290033A 11/08/95 R6±95±10±163 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0203G 07/06/95 R6±95±07±047 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0203G 07/21/95 R6±95±07±201 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0232G 07/11/95 95±06±289A 01 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0234G 07/11/95 95±06±289A 01 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0319H 10/10/95 R6±95±10±089 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0337H 09/12/95 95±06±375P 06 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0339H 09/12/95 95±06±375P 06 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0433H 10/31/95 95±06±309P 06 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0437H 09/27/95 R6±95±09±318 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0443H 09/13/95 R6±95±09±078 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0444H 09/13/95 R6±95±09±081 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0444H 09/19/95 R6±95±09±161 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0451H 08/21/95 R6±95±08±189 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0453H 08/31/95 R6±95±08±413 02 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0454H 09/27/95 95±06±266P 05 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0458H 09/27/95 95±06±266P 05 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0462H 09/27/95 95±06±266P 05 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0462H 11/10/95 95±06±382P 05 06 ...... TX ARLINGTON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0466H 09/27/95 95±06±266P 05 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0155E 07/14/95 R6±95±07±109 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0160E 08/07/95 R6±95±07±265 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0160E 08/10/95 R6±95±08±097 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0160E 11/07/95 R6±95±11±038 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0165E 09/05/95 R6±95±09±025 08 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0165E 12/06/95 R6±95±12±041 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0200E 09/14/95 R6±95±09±130 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0205E 08/08/95 R6±95±08±044 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0205E 08/10/95 R6±95±08±089 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0210E 07/03/95 R6±95±06±422 02 06 ...... TX AUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 48453C0255E 09/25/95 R6±95±09±265 02 28396 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... TX AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0119H 10/24/95 R6±95±10±254 02 06 ...... TX AZLE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0232H 09/15/95 R6±95±09±174 02 06 ...... TX BARTONVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 4815010005D 09/14/95 R6±95±09±152 01 06 ...... TX BEAUMONT, CITY OF ...... 4854570035B 07/03/95 R6±95±06±419 01 06 ...... TX BEAUMONT, CITY OF ...... 4854570035B 08/08/95 R6±95±07±279 01 06 ...... TX BEAUMONT, CITY OF ...... 4854570035B 08/15/95 R6±95±08±119 01 06 ...... TX BEAUMONT, CITY OF ...... 4854570035B 10/24/95 R6±95±10±251 01 06 ...... TX BEAUMONT, CITY OF ...... 4854570035B 11/08/95 R6±95±11±077 01 06 ...... TX BEAUMONT, CITY OF ...... 4854570035B 10/06/95 R695±10±073 01 06 ...... TX BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 10/13/95 95±06±158P 05 06 ...... TX BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 08/28/95 95±06±336P 06 06 ...... TX BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 09/13/95 R6±95±05±208 02 06 ...... TX BEDFORD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0309H 11/07/95 R6±95±11±071 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060120B 11/08/95 R6±95±11±074 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060130B 11/22/95 R6±95±11±206 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060130B 11/22/95 R6±95±11±207 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060280B 09/14/95 R6±9±095±137 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060280B 09/14/95 R6±95±09±107 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060280B 09/14/95 R6±95±09±138 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060280B 09/14/95 R6±95±09±139 02 06 ...... TX BELL COUNTY* ...... 4807060280B 09/14/95 R6±95±09±140 02 06 ...... TX BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0385H 08/15/95 95±06±330A 02 06 ...... TX BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0390H 08/08/95 R6±95±08±012 02 06 ...... TX BENBROOK, CITY OF ...... 48439C0390H 08/31/95 R6±95±08±434 02 06 ...... TX BEXAR COUNTY* ...... 4800350075C 08/01/95 95±06±243P 06 06 ...... TX BEXAR COUNTY* ...... 4800350100C 08/10/95 R6±95±08±106 02 06 ...... TX BEXAR COUNTY* ...... 4800350100C 11/28/95 R6±95±10±225 02 06 ...... TX BEXAR COUNTY* ...... 4800350100C 11/28/95 R6±95±10±227 02 06 ...... TX BEXAR COUNTY* ...... 4800350185C 08/01/95 95±06±243P 06 06 ...... TX BEXAR COUNTY* ...... 4800350240B 07/14/95 R6±95±07±121 02 06 ...... TX BROWN COUNTY* ...... 4807170006B 11/27/95 R6±95±09±209 01 06 ...... TX BRYAN, CITY OF ...... 48041C0142C 08/16/95 R6±95±06±030 02 06 ...... TX BUDA, CITY OF ...... 4816400005A 08/10/95 R6±95±08±090 02 06 ...... TX BURLESON, CITY OF ...... 48439C0540H 09/11/95 R6±95±09±047 02 06 ...... TX CANTON, CITY OF ...... 4806320003B 11/30/95 R6±95±11±312 02 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 12/05/95 96±06±039P 05 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 07/21/95 R6±95±07±210 02 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 07/21/95 R6±95±07±211 02 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 07/21/95 R6±95±07±212 02 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 08/14/95 R6±95±08±110 01 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 10/04/95 R6±95±10±049 02 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 11/08/95 R6±95±11±076 08 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670005F 12/11/95 R6±95±11±208 01 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670015E 08/11/95 R6±95±08±104 08 06 ...... TX CARROLLTON, CITY OF ...... 4801670015E 11/03/95 R6±95±11±006 02 06 ...... TX CEDAR HILL, CITY OF ...... 4801680010B 07/06/95 95±06±169P 06 06 ...... TX CEDAR HILL, CITY OF ...... 4801680020C 09/13/95 95±06±332P 06 06 ...... TX CEDAR HILL, CITY OF ...... 4801680025B 07/06/95 95±06±169P 06 06 ...... TX CEDAR HILL, CITY OF ...... 4801680030B 07/06/95 95±06±169P 06 06 ...... TX COLLEGE STATION, CITY OF ...... 48041C0142C 08/15/95 95±06±365A 01 06 ...... TX COLLEGE STATION, CITY OF ...... 48041C0144C 10/20/95 R6±95±10±209 02 06 ...... TX COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0100G 07/17/95 R6±95±07±102 02 06 ...... TX COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0195H 09/18/95 95±06±410P 05 06 ...... TX COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0195H 11/24/95 R6±95±11±000 01 06 ...... TX COLLIN COUNTY* ...... 48085C0125E 12/11/95 R6±95±12±079 02 06 ...... TX COLLIN COUNTY* ...... 48085C0255E 09/06/95 95±06±141P 06 06 ...... TX COLLIN COUNTY* ...... 48085C0255E 12/11/95 R6±95±12±078 02 06 ...... TX COMAL COUNTY* ...... 4854630035C 11/24/95 R6±95±11±221 02 06 ...... TX COPPELL, CITY OF ...... 4801700010E 11/10/95 95±06±371P 05 06 ...... TX COPPELL, CITY OF ...... 4801700010E 10/12/95 R6±95±10±116 02 06 ...... TX COPPERAS COVE, CITY OF ...... 4801550005D 09/19/95 94±06±364P 05 06 ...... TX COPPERAS COVE, CITY OF ...... 4801550005D 07/18/95 94±06±369P 05 06 ...... TX COPPERAS COVE, CITY OF ...... 4801550005D 12/06/95 R6±95±12±028 02 06 ...... TX CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 4811430001B 11/22/95 96±06±010A 01 06 ...... TX CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 4811430004B 11/09/95 R6±95±11±123 02 06 ...... TX CORINTH, TOWN OF ...... 4811430004B 11/09/95 R6±95±11±124 02 06 ...... TX CORPUS CHRISTI, CITY OF ...... 4854640000 11/07/95 95±06±424P 06 06 ...... TX CORPUS CHRISTI, CITY OF ...... 4854640318C 11/07/95 R6±95±11±069 02 06 ...... TX CORYELL COUNTY* ...... 4807680370B 09/19/95 94±06±364P 05 06 ...... TX CORYELL COUNTY* ...... 4807680370B 08/24/95 R6±95±08±262 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28397

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... TX CROWLEY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0530H 10/17/95 R6±95±10±119 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS COUNTY* ...... 4801650150B 11/06/95 95±06±394P 05 06 ...... TX DALLAS COUNTY* ...... 4801650335B 10/24/95 R6±95±10±257 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710005C 10/06/95 R6±95±10±084 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710010D 11/08/95 R6±95±10±281 01 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710010D 11/07/95 R6±95±11±061 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710010D 12/05/95 R6±95±12±004 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710025C 09/12/95 95±06±351A 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710025C 08/08/95 R6±95±08±011 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710025C 08/21/95 R6±95±08±210 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710040C 08/08/95 R6±95±08±045 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710065C 11/24/95 R6±95±11±231 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710100D 09/29/95 R6±95±08±243 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710100D 09/07/95 R6±95±09±045 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710100D 11/24/95 R6±95±11±079 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710105C 11/22/95 R6±95±11±225 08 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710125D 11/06/95 95±06±394P 05 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710130C 10/06/95 R6±95±08±000 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710160D 11/10/95 94±06±372P 05 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710160D 11/06/95 95±06±394P 05 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710165D 11/06/95 95±06±394P 05 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710170D 11/24/95 R6±95±11±005 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710185D 10/17/95 R6±95±10±165 02 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710195D 11/10/95 94±06±372P 05 06 ...... TX DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4801710210C 07/10/95 R6±95±06±370 02 06 ...... TX DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0434H 12/06/95 R6±95±12±037 02 06 ...... TX DENTON COUNTY* ...... 4807740075C 07/18/95 R6±95±07±107 02 06 ...... TX DENTON COUNTY* ...... 4807740085B 11/20/95 R6±95±11±049 02 06 ...... TX DENTON, CITY OF ...... 4801940020D 10/31/95 95±06±386P 06 06 ...... TX DENTON, CITY OF ...... 4801940020D 09/20/95 R6±95±09±178 02 06 ...... TX DESOTO, CITY OF ...... 4801720020C 08/22/95 R6±95±08±103 02 06 ...... TX DESOTO, CITY OF ...... 4801720020C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±213 02 06 ...... TX DOUBLE OAK, TOWN OF ...... 4815160005D 10/03/95 R6±95±10±031 02 06 ...... TX DUNCANVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4801730005D 08/25/95 R6±95±08±241 02 06 ...... TX DUNCANVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4801730005D 10/17/95 R6±95±10±157 02 06 ...... TX ECTOR COUNTY* ...... 48135C0165C 11/03/95 R6±95±11±024 02 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140021C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±283 02 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140022D 07/24/95 95±06±245P 05 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140022D 10/18/95 95±06±444P 05 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140022D 11/21/95 R6±95±10±286 02 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140024B 12/15/95 95±06±433A 08 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140026C 08/10/95 R6±95±08±094 02 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140026C 10/17/95 R6±95±10±127 08 06 ...... TX EL PASO, CITY OF ...... 4802140027C 09/15/95 94±06±219P 05 06 ...... TX ERATH COUNTY* ...... 4802180013A 11/08/95 R6±95±11±116 02 06 ...... TX EULESS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0330H 08/11/95 95±06±268A 02 06 ...... TX FAIR OAKS RANCH, CITY OF ...... 4800350050C 09/13/95 95±06±390P 05 06 ...... TX FARMERS BRANCH, CITY OF ...... 4801740005C 07/05/95 R6±95±05±082 02 06 ...... TX FARMERS BRANCH, CITY OF ...... 4801740005C 09/14/95 R6±95±09±146 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 07/03/95 R6±95±06±428 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 07/06/95 R6±95±07±046 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 07/14/95 R6±95±07±103 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 07/14/95 R6±95±07±104 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 07/14/95 R6±95±07±105 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 07/21/95 R6±95±07±199 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 07/21/95 R6±95±07±200 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 08/31/95 R6±95±08±431 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 09/27/95 R6±95±09±319 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770005A 11/29/95 R6±95±11±304 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770010A 10/06/95 R6±95±10±065 02 06 ...... TX FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF ...... 4807770015B 11/02/95 R6±95±11±000 02 06 ...... TX FOREST HILL, CITY OF ...... 48439C0230G 07/28/95 95±06±195P 05 06 ...... TX FORNEY, CITY OF ...... 480410 B 10/13/95 R6±95±10±111 02 06 ...... TX FORT BEND COUNTY* ...... 48157C0220H 11/21/95 R6±95±09±093 08 06 ...... TX FORT BEND COUNTY* ...... 48157C0255H 09/05/95 R6±95±08±098 02 06 ...... TX FORT BEND COUNTY* ...... 48157C0550H 09/07/95 R6±95±06±353 01 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0090G 07/06/95 95±06±298A 01 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0145G 07/07/95 R6±95±07±053 02 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0185G 07/05/95 R6±95±07±029 02 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0295H 09/14/95 R6±95±09±107 02 28398 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0360H 11/29/95 R6±95±11±265 02 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0385H 08/15/95 95±06±389A 02 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0395H 08/31/95 R6±95±08±436 02 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0395H 09/25/95 R6±95±09±250 02 06 ...... TX FORT WORTH, CITY OF ...... 48439C0410H 12/11/95 R6±95±12±087 02 06 ...... TX FREDERICKSBURG, CITY OF ...... 4802520002B 12/04/95 95±06±423A 01 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710005E 10/02/95 95±06±430A 02 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710010D 10/03/95 95±06±421P 06 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710015D 10/02/95 95±06±430A 02 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710015D 07/19/95 R6±95±07±152 02 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710015D 11/09/95 R6±95±11±119 02 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710015D 12/11/95 R6±95±12±084 02 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710020D 08/16/95 R6±95±08±155 02 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710020D 10/17/95 R6±95±10±142 02 06 ...... TX GARLAND, CITY OF ...... 4854710030E 10/17/95 R6±95±10±159 02 06 ...... TX GEORGETOWN, CITY OF ...... 48491C0115C 11/08/95 95±06±214P 05 06 ...... TX GEORGETOWN, CITY OF ...... 48491C0125C 11/08/95 95±06±214P 05 06 ...... TX GILLESPIE COUNTY* ...... 4806960007B 08/07/95 R6±95±07±254 02 06 ...... TX GILLESPIE COUNTY* ...... 4806960007B 08/07/95 R6±95±07±255 02 06 ...... TX GILLESPIE COUNTY* ...... 4806960007B 09/20/95 R6±95±08±092 02 06 ...... TX GILLESPIE COUNTY* ...... 4806960007B 11/29/95 R6±95±10±250 02 06 ...... TX GILLESPIE COUNTY* ...... 4806960007B 11/29/95 R6±95±11±002 02 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720010E 08/15/95 R6±95±08±138 02 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720015E 11/06/95 95±06±394P 05 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720020E 11/06/95 95±06±394P 05 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720030E 11/10/95 94±06±372P 05 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720030E 11/06/95 95±06±394P 05 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720035F 11/10/95 94±06±372P 05 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720035F 12/13/95 95±06±438A 01 06 ...... TX GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 4854720040D 07/06/95 95±06±169P 06 06 ...... TX GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 09/18/95 95±06±410P 05 06 ...... TX GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0205H 10/24/95 95±06±453P 06 06 ...... TX GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0215H 09/18/95 95±06±410P 05 06 ...... TX GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0215H 08/08/95 R6±95±08±052 02 06 ...... TX GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0215H 10/27/95 R6±95±10±274 02 06 ...... TX GRAPEVINE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0215H 11/07/95 R6±95±11±108 02 06 ...... TX GUADALUPE COUNTY* ...... 4802660150B 11/30/95 R6±95±11±305 02 06 ...... TX GUN BARREL, CITY OF ...... 48213C0030C 07/21/95 R6±95±07±183 02 06 ...... TX GUN BARREL, CITY OF ...... 48213C0030C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±207 02 06 ...... TX GUN BARREL, CITY OF ...... 48213C0030C 10/20/95 R6±95±10±203 02 06 ...... TX GUN BARREL, CITY OF ...... 48213C0030C 12/15/95 R6±95±12±132 02 06 ...... TX HALTOM CITY, CITY OF ...... 48439C0090G 07/14/95 95±06±291P 06 06 ...... TX HARKER HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 4800290001B 07/21/95 R6±95±07±184 02 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0045H 10/31/95 95±06±449P 06 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0045H 12/11/95 96±06±067P 06 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0085H 11/08/95 95±06±327P 05 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0085H 09/27/95 95±06±393A 02 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0090G 10/31/95 95±06±449P 06 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0090G 12/11/95 96±06±067P 06 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0105G 11/14/95 95±06±439A 02 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0110G 08/28/95 95±06±347A 01 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0130G 11/08/95 95±06±327P 05 06 ...... TX HARRIS COUNTY* ...... 48201C0270H 10/20/95 96±06±014A 01 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0030C 07/19/95 R6±95±07±146 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0030C 10/03/95 R6±95±10±029 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0030C 10/17/95 R6±95±10±120 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0035C 07/05/95 R6±95±07±019 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0045C 07/21/95 R6±95±07±213 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0045C 08/15/95 R6±95±07±218 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0045C 08/24/95 R6±95±08±269 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0175C 10/20/95 R6±95±10±204 02 06 ...... TX HENDERSON COUNTY* ...... 48213C0175C 10/20/95 R6±95±10±205 02 06 ...... TX HIGHLAND VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF ...... 4811050001A 11/30/95 R6±95±11±313 02 06 ...... TX HOLLYWOOD PARK, TOWN OF ...... 4800400001C 08/22/95 95±06±334A 01 06 ...... TX HOLLYWOOD PARK, TOWN OF ...... 4800400001C 09/27/95 95±06±445A 01 06 ...... TX HOOD COUNTY* ...... 4803560045B 11/03/95 R6±95±11±022 02 06 ...... TX HOOD COUNTY* ...... 4803560065B 08/10/95 R6±95±08±093 08 06 ...... TX HOOD COUNTY* ...... 4803560065B 08/21/95 R6±95±08±181 08 06 ...... TX HOOD COUNTY* ...... 4803560065B 10/26/95 R6±95±10±138 02 06 ...... TX HOOD COUNTY* ...... 4803560145B 09/14/95 R6±95±09±153 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28399

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... TX HOUSTON, CITY OF ...... 48201C0230G 10/25/95 R6±94±10±165 02 06 ...... TX HOUSTON, CITY OF ...... 48201C0270H 08/15/95 95±06±384A 02 06 ...... TX HUNT COUNTY* ...... 48231C0275E 09/15/95 R6±95±09±162 02 06 ...... TX HURST, CITY OF ...... 48439C0304H 08/17/95 95±06±109P 06 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800005A 11/10/95 95±06±371P 05 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800015A 11/10/95 95±06±371P 05 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800015A 09/21/95 R6±95±09±183 02 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800035C 10/27/95 R6±95±10±293 02 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800045D 07/14/95 R6±95±07±110 01 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800045D 08/21/95 R6±95±08±010 02 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800045D 08/31/95 R6±95±08±420 02 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800045D 10/04/95 R6±95±10±055 02 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800045D 11/08/95 R6±95±11±097 02 06 ...... TX IRVING, CITY OF ...... 4801800045D 11/08/95 R6±95±11±104 02 06 ...... TX JOHNSON COUNTY* ...... 48251C0100F 07/28/95 R6±95±07±253 02 06 ...... TX JOHNSON COUNTY* ...... 48251C0100F 08/24/95 R6±95±08±226 02 06 ...... TX JUSTIN, CITY OF ...... 480778A 09/19/95 R6±95±09±120 02 06 ...... TX KELLER, CITY OF ...... 48439C0055G 07/25/95 95±06±193P 05 06 ...... TX KILGORE, CITY OF ...... 4802630004C 08/23/95 95±06±301P 05 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310002B 07/03/95 R6±95±07±023 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310002B 07/05/95 R6±95±07±024 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 08/08/95 95±06±357A 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 08/24/95 R6±95±08±000 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 08/24/95 R6±95±08±238 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 08/24/95 R6±95±08±264 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 08/29/95 R6±95±08±324 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 08/31/95 R6±95±08±435 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/05/95 R6±95±09±005 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/05/95 R6±95±09±007 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/11/95 R6±95±09±079 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/11/95 R6±95±09±080 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/20/95 R6±95±09±177 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±202 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±229 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±275 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±276 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/27/95 R6±95±09±308 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 09/27/95 R6±95±09±309 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 10/03/95 R6±95±10±021 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 10/03/95 R6±95±10±022 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 10/06/95 R6±95±10±066 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 11/03/95 R6±95±11±019 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 11/08/95 R6±95±11±075 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 12/15/95 R6±95±12±000 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 12/06/95 R6±95±12±026 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 12/06/95 R6±95±12±027 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 12/07/95 R6±95±12±051 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310003C 12/15/95 R6±95±12±133 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310005B 07/05/95 R6±95±07±022 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310006B 07/05/95 R6±95±07±021 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 08/15/95 R6±95±08±142 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±067 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±068 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±069 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±070 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±071 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±072 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±073 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±074 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±075 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±076 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310007B 09/12/95 R6±95±09±077 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310008B 08/24/95 R6±95±08±232 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310008B 08/24/95 R6±95±08±236 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310008B 08/24/95 R6±95±08±237 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310008B 08/24/95 R6±95±08±263 02 06 ...... TX KILLEEN, CITY OF ...... 4800310008B 11/03/95 R6±95±11±017 02 06 ...... TX LAGO VISTA, CITY OF ...... 48453C0355E 08/08/95 R6±95±08±042 02 06 ...... TX LAGO VISTA, CITY OF ...... 48453C0360E 10/13/95 R6±95±10±106 02 06 ...... TX LAKE DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4807800001A 10/27/95 R6±95±08±432 02 28400 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... TX LAKE DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4807800001A 12/13/95 R6±95±12±086 02 06 ...... TX LAKE DALLAS, CITY OF ...... 4807800001A 12/13/95 R6±95±12±086 02 06 ...... TX LAKE TANGLEWOOD, VILLAGE OF ...... 4812590001A 11/29/95 R6±95±11±131 02 06 ...... TX LAREDO, CITY OF ...... 4806510010B 09/11/95 R6±95±09±048 02 06 ...... TX LEANDER, CITY OF ...... 48491C0218C 10/27/95 R6±95±10±279 02 06 ...... TX LEWISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4801950010D 08/22/95 R6±95±08±193 01 06 ...... TX LEWISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4801950010D 11/07/95 R6±95±11±059 02 06 ...... TX LEWISVILLE, CITY OF ...... 4801950020D 12/13/95 R6±95±12±090 01 06 ...... TX LLANO COUNTY* ...... 4812340130B 07/06/95 R6±95±07±025 02 06 ...... TX LLANO COUNTY* ...... 4812340285B 11/30/95 R6±95±11±316 02 06 ...... TX LONGVIEW, CITY OF ...... 4802640010D 09/28/95 R6±95±09±264 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK COUNTY* ...... 4809150007A 09/14/95 R6±95±09±135 02 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK COUNTY* ...... 4809150007A 10/06/95 R6±95±10±075 02 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK COUNTY* ...... 4809150008A 09/15/95 R6±95±09±176 02 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 07/14/95 R6±95±07±075 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 08/15/95 R6±95±08±117 02 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 08/24/95 R6±95±08±246 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 08/29/95 R6±95±08±315 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 09/27/95 R6±95±09±000 02 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 09/11/95 R6±95±09±095 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±272 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 09/25/95 R6±95±09±273 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 10/06/95 R6±95±10±074 02 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 11/22/95 R6±95±11±227 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 11/22/95 R6±95±11±230 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 11/29/95 R6±95±11±301 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 11/30/95 R6±95±11±320 01 06 ...... TX LUBBOCK, CITY OF ...... 4804520045C 12/06/95 R6±95±12±021 01 06 ...... TX LUCAS, CITY OF ...... 48085C0405E 10/05/95 R6±95±10±056 02 06 ...... TX LUFKIN, CITY OF ...... 4800090010C 11/21/95 R6±95±10±158 08 06 ...... TX LUFKIN, CITY OF ...... 4800090010C 11/27/95 R6±95±11±000 02 06 ...... TX MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0580H 10/03/95 R6±95±10±032 02 06 ...... TX MANSFIELD, CITY OF ...... 48439C0580H 10/27/95 R6±95±10±282 02 06 ...... TX MARSHALL, CITY OF ...... 4803190005B 11/13/95 96±06±001P 05 06 ...... TX MCKINNEY, CITY OF ...... 48085C0255E 09/06/95 95±06±141P 06 06 ...... TX MCKINNEY, CITY OF ...... 48085C0265E 09/06/95 95±06±141P 06 06 ...... TX MCLENNAN COUNTY ...... 4804560050B 11/02/95 R6±95±11±011 08 06 ...... TX MCLENNAN COUNTY ...... 4804560230B 09/21/95 R6±95±09±206 02 06 ...... TX MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 4854900005G 09/21/95 R6±95±09±215 02 06 ...... TX MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 4854900010E 11/27/95 R6±95±11±295 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND COUNTY* ...... 48329C0150C 07/03/95 R6±95±06±425 01 06 ...... TX MIDLAND COUNTY* ...... 48329C0150C 08/17/95 R6±95±08±173 01 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0019D 07/03/95 R6±95±06±418 01 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0019D 10/17/95 R6±95±10±156 01 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0038C 10/13/95 R6±95±10±108 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0039C 09/07/95 R6±95±09±037 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 08/31/95 R6±95±08±410 01 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±194 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±195 08 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±196 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±197 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 09/21/95 R6±95±09±198 08 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 10/20/95 R6±95±10±208 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0082C 10/23/95 R6±95±10±226 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 09/20/95 R6±95±08±000 01 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 08/17/95 R6±95±08±172 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 08/21/95 R6±95±08±174 01 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 09/15/95 R6±95±09±169 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 09/25/95 R6±95±09±256 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 09/25/95 R6±95±09±277 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 10/27/95 R6±95±10 02 06 ...... TX MIDLAND, CITY OF ...... 48329C0101D 10/06/95 R6±95±10±058 02 06 ...... TX MISSION, CITY OF ...... 4803450005C 08/11/95 R6±95±08±105 01 06 ...... TX MISSOURI CITY, CITY OF ...... 48157C0260H 07/05/95 R6±95±07±027 02 06 ...... TX MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4804830085C 07/05/95 R6±95±07±026 02 06 ...... TX MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4804830165C 09/12/95 95±06±143A 02 06 ...... TX MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4804830165C 12/15/95 R6±95±12±108 02 06 ...... TX MONTGOMERY COUNTY* ...... 4804830205E 11/03/95 R6±95±11±018 02 06 ...... TX MURPHY, CITY OF ...... 48085C0415E 11/30/95 96±06±017P 05 06 ...... TX NEW BRAUNFELS, CITY OF ...... 4854930006C 11/21/95 R6±95±11±140 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28401

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0090G 07/14/95 95±06±291P 06 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0189H 09/29/95 95±06±413A 01 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0189H 12/13/95 96±06±042A 01 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0190H 09/29/95 95±06±413A 01 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0282H 12/11/95 96±06±046P 06 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0301H 09/19/95 95±06±414P 05 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0301H 09/25/95 R6±95±09±258 02 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0302H 11/03/95 R6±95±11±025 02 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0303H 09/19/95 95±06±414P 05 06 ...... TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF ...... 48439C0304H 08/17/95 95±06±109P 05 06 ...... TX OAK RIDGE NORTH, CITY OF ...... 4815600001B 07/19/95 R6±95±07±143 02 06 ...... TX OVERTON, CITY OF ...... 480994 08/31/95 R6±95±08±401 02 06 ...... TX PANTEGO, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0433H 10/31/95 95±06±309P 05 06 ...... TX PANTEGO, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0434H 10/31/95 95±06±309P 05 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0360E 10/27/95 95±06±388P 05 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0360E 07/27/95 R6±95±07±148 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0360E 10/13/95 R6±95±10±114 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0370E 09/27/95 95±06±303P 05 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0370E 11/30/95 95±06±306P 05 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0370E 10/18/95 R6±95±10±000 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0380E 07/14/95 R6±95±07±126 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0380E 10/25/95 R6±95±10±000 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0390E 07/19/95 R6±95±07±157 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0395E 07/27/95 R6±95±07±221 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0395E 08/22/95 R6±95±08±000 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0395E 10/04/95 R6±95±10±052 02 06 ...... TX PLANO, CITY OF ...... 48085C0395E 11/28/95 R6±95±11±000 02 06 ...... TX POTH, CITY OF ...... 4806720001B 09/21/95 R6±95±09±010 02 06 ...... TX POTTER COUNTY* ...... 4812410011A 11/24/95 R6±95±11±267 02 06 ...... TX RICHARDSON, CITY OF ...... 4801840005C 08/21/95 R6±95±08±195 02 06 ...... TX RICHARDSON, CITY OF ...... 4801840015C 08/31/95 R6±95±08±056 02 06 ...... TX RICHARDSON, CITY OF ...... 4801840015C 11/03/95 R6±95±11±020 02 06 ...... TX RICHARDSON, CITY OF ...... 4801840015C 12/07/95 R6±95±12±058 02 06 ...... TX ROCKWALL COUNTY* ...... 4805430035B 10/30/95 R6±95±10±151 02 06 ...... TX ROCKWALL, CITY OF ...... 4805470005C 08/29/95 R6±95±08±312 02 06 ...... TX ROUND ROCK, CITY OF ...... 48491C0240C 09/27/95 95±06±381P 06 06 ...... TX ROUND ROCK, CITY OF ...... 48491C0330C 07/12/95 R6±95±07±066 02 06 ...... TX ROUND ROCK, CITY OF ...... 48491C0330C 07/19/95 R6±95±07±180 02 06 ...... TX ROUND ROCK, CITY OF ...... 48491C0330C 09/20/95 R6±95±09±043 08 06 ...... TX SAN ANGELO, CITY OF ...... 4806230010D 09/27/95 95±06±374P 05 06 ...... TX SAN ANTONIO, CITY OF ...... 4800450000 08/09/95 95±06±324P 06 06 ...... TX SAN ANTONIO, CITY OF ...... 4800450011B 10/18/95 R6±95±10±150 02 06 ...... TX SAN ANTONIO, CITY OF ...... 4800450017D 08/14/95 95±06±231P 05 06 ...... TX SAN ANTONIO, CITY OF ...... 4800450023D 08/14/95 95±06±231P 05 06 ...... TX SELMA, CITY OF ...... 4800460001A 07/12/95 95±06±202P 05 06 ...... TX SELMA, CITY OF ...... 4800460002A 07/12/95 95±06±202P 05 06 ...... TX SHERMAN, CITY OF ...... 48181C0145E 12/14/95 R6±95±12±120 02 06 ...... TX SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0185H 10/27/95 R6±95±10±291 01 06 ...... TX SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 11/22/95 95±06±463A 01 06 ...... TX SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 08/10/95 R6±95±08±134 02 06 ...... TX SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF ...... 48439C0195H 11/21/95 R6±95±11±176 01 06 ...... TX STAGECOACH, TOWN OF ...... 4812960001A 08/08/95 R6±95±08±041 02 06 ...... TX SUNRISE BEACH VILLAGE, CITY OF ...... 4815310001B 10/03/95 R6±95±08±395 02 06 ...... TX SWEETWATER, CITY OF ...... 4805020005C 11/24/95 R6±95±11±205 02 06 ...... TX TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0080G 07/03/95 R6±95±06±420 02 06 ...... TX TARRANT COUNTY* ...... 48439C0140H 10/05/95 R6±95±10±018 02 06 ...... TX TAYLOR COUNTY* ...... 4810140007B 07/21/95 R6±95±07±193 02 06 ...... TX TOOL, CITY OF ...... 48213C0040C 07/27/95 R6±95±07±220 02 06 ...... TX TOOL, CITY OF ...... 48213C0040C 09/06/95 R6±95±08±442 02 06 ...... TX TOOL, CITY OF ...... 48213C0040C 11/09/95 R6±95±11±125 02 06 ...... TX TRAVIS COUNTY* ...... 48453C0200E 12/12/95 96±06±008P 06 06 ...... TX TRAVIS COUNTY* ...... 48453C0205E 08/09/95 R6±95±07±248 02 06 ...... TX TRAVIS COUNTY* ...... 48453C0245E 10/24/95 R6±95±10±246 01 06 ...... TX TRAVIS COUNTY* ...... 48453C0275E 10/06/95 R6±95±10±061 02 06 ...... TX TRAVIS COUNTY* ...... 48453C0325E 09/20/95 R6±95±09±120 02 06 ...... TX TRAVIS COUNTY* ...... 48453C0325E 10/20/95 R6±95±10±215 08 06 ...... TX TRAVIS COUNTY* ...... 48453C0330E 07/21/95 R6±95±07±204 02 06 ...... TX TYLER, CITY OF ...... 4805710015B 09/21/95 R6±95±09±182 02 06 ...... TX UVALDE, CITY OF ...... 4806300004C 08/08/95 R6±95±08±043 02 06 ...... TX VAN ZANDT COUNTY ...... 4810400004A 07/03/95 R6±95±06±430 02 28402 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

06 ...... TX VICTORIA, CITY OF ...... 4806380005F 07/05/95 R6±95±07±031 02 06 ...... TX WATAUGA, TOWN OF ...... 48439C0301H 12/07/95 R6±95±12±052 02 06 ...... TX WICHITA FALLS, CITY OF ...... 4806620025D 08/22/95 R6±95±08±180 02 06 ...... TX WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0100C 11/08/95 95±06±214P 05 06 ...... TX WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0115C 11/08/95 95±06±214P 05 06 ...... TX WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0125C 11/08/95 95±06±214P 05 06 ...... TX WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0240C 09/27/95 95±06±381P 06 06 ...... TX WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0275C 10/27/95 R6±95±10±280 08 06 ...... TX WILLIAMSON COUNTY* ...... 48491C0306C 12/15/95 R6±95±12±138 02 06 ...... TX WINDCREST, CITY OF ...... 4806890001A 09/06/95 R6±95±09±019 02 07 ...... IA ANKENY, CITY OF ...... 1902260003B 12/15/95 96±07±073A 01 07 ...... IA BETTENDORF, CITY OF ...... 1902400005E 08/29/95 95±07±152A 01 07 ...... IA BETTENDORF, CITY OF ...... 1902400005E 09/13/95 95±07±158A 02 07 ...... IA BETTENDORF, CITY OF ...... 1902400005E 09/14/95 95±07±196A 01 07 ...... IA CLIVE, CITY OF ...... 1904880005C 11/14/95 1917 02 07 ...... IA CLIVE, CITY OF ...... 1904880005C 10/31/95 95±07±211A 02 07 ...... IA CORALVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1901690005B 07/10/95 94±07±231P 05 07 ...... IA CORALVILLE, CITY OF ...... 1901690005B 07/06/95 95±07±061A 02 07 ...... IA DAVENPORT, CITY OF ...... 1902420004B 11/03/95 95±07±203A 01 07 ...... IA DES MOINES, CITY OF ...... 1902270004D 10/20/95 95±07±182A 02 07 ...... IA EMMETT COUNTY* ...... 1908650125B 10/31/95 95±07±236A 02 07 ...... IA GRIMES, CITY OF ...... 1902280001B 07/19/95 94±07±175P 05 07 ...... IA IOWA CITY, CITY OF ...... 1901710005C 07/10/95 94±07±231P 05 07 ...... IA IOWA CITY, CITY OF ...... 1901710005C 10/19/95 95±07±227A 01 07 ...... IA IOWA CITY, CITY OF ...... 1901710005C 10/30/95 95±07±241A 01 07 ...... IA JONES COUNTY* ...... 1909190150B 11/09/95 1908 02 07 ...... IA MUSCATINE, CITY OF ...... 1902130003B 10/06/95 95±07±149A 02 07 ...... IA MUSCATINE, CITY OF ...... 1902130003B 10/06/95 95±07±202A 02 07 ...... IA POLK COUNTY* ...... 1909010115C 08/14/95 95±07±150P 05 07 ...... IA STORY COUNTY* ...... 1909070055B 12/01/95 96±07±041A 01 07 ...... IA WEBSTER COUNTY* ...... 1908310002B 10/13/95 1879 02 07 ...... KS BARTON COUNTY* ...... 2000160390B 12/08/95 96±07±048A 02 07 ...... KS BEL AIRE, CITY OF ...... 2008640005B 09/12/95 1889 02 07 ...... KS BEL AIRE, CITY OF ...... 2008640005B 11/09/95 1913 02 07 ...... KS HOLCOMB, CITY OF ...... 2008680001A 10/31/95 95±07±190A 02 07 ...... KS HOLCOMB, CITY OF ...... 2008680001A 10/31/95 95±07±197A 02 07 ...... KS HOLCOMB, CITY OF ...... 2008680001A 10/05/95 95±07±198A 02 07 ...... KS HUTCHINSON, CITY OF ...... 20155C0285D 12/06/95 96±07±069A 02 07 ...... KS HUTCHINSON, CITY OF ...... 20155C0315D 09/27/95 95±07±172A 02 07 ...... KS KINGMAN COUNTY* ...... 2005890003B 11/30/95 96±07±018A 02 07 ...... KS LAWRENCE, CITY OF ...... 2000900005A 12/05/95 96±07±082A 02 07 ...... KS LENEXA, CITY OF ...... 20091C0077D 10/06/95 96±07±001A 02 07 ...... KS LIBERAL, CITY OF ...... 2003300020C 11/27/95 95±07±209A 01 07 ...... KS MCPHERSON, CITY OF ...... 2002170005D 10/06/95 1895 02 07 ...... KS MCPHERSON, CITY OF ...... 2002170005D 10/06/95 1896 02 07 ...... KS MCPHERSON, CITY OF ...... 2002170005D 10/30/95 95±07±240A 02 07 ...... KS MCPHERSON, CITY OF ...... 2002170015D 07/31/95 95±07±145A 01 07 ...... KS MULVANE, CITY OF ...... 2003260005D 11/06/95 95±07±237A 02 07 ...... KS NEOSHO COUNTY* ...... 2005980003A 08/16/95 1863 02 07 ...... KS NEWTON, CITY OF ...... 2001330005C 08/15/95 95±07±148A 01 07 ...... KS NEWTON, CITY OF ...... 2001330005C 09/13/95 95±07±162A 01 07 ...... KS NEWTON, CITY OF ...... 2001330005C 12/05/95 96±07±087A 02 07 ...... KS OLATHE, CITY OF ...... 20091C0086D 07/18/95 95±07±105P 06 07 ...... KS ONAGA, CITY OF ...... 200544 12/07/95 96±07±063A 02 07 ...... KS PRETTY PRAIRIE, CITY OF ...... 20155C0620D 10/30/95 1902 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190005B 08/22/95 1870 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190005B 11/06/95 1905 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190005B 08/29/95 95±07±147A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190005B 11/02/95 96±07±008A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190005B 11/07/95 96±07±017A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190005B 12/05/95 96±07±084A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 09/13/95 1892 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 09/13/95 1893 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 11/14/95 1918 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 10/02/95 95±07±200A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 10/31/95 96±07±006A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 11/07/95 96±07±016A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 11/07/95 96±07±020A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 12/01/95 96±07±040A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 11/20/95 96±07±060A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28403

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 12/06/95 96±07±065A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 12/15/95 96±07±109A 02 07 ...... KS SALINA, CITY OF ...... 2003190015B 12/15/95 96±07±110A 02 07 ...... KS SEDGWICK COUNTY* ...... 2003210150A 11/30/95 96±07±052A 02 07 ...... KS SEDGWICK COUNTY* ...... 2003210225A 08/04/95 1856 02 07 ...... KS SEDGWICK COUNTY* ...... 2003210225A 09/27/95 95±07±139A 01 07 ...... KS SEDGWICK COUNTY* ...... 2003210225A 10/10/95 95±07±206A 01 07 ...... KS SEDGWICK COUNTY* ...... 2003210225A 11/08/95 96±07±025A 01 07 ...... KS SEDGWICK COUNTY* ...... 2003210225A 12/04/95 96±07±038A 02 07 ...... KS SEDGWICK COUNTY* ...... 2003210225A 11/30/95 96±07±053A 02 07 ...... KS TOPEKA, CITY OF ...... 2051870018C 08/11/95 95±07±142A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280005B 08/18/95 1867 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280005B 12/01/95 96±07±036A 01 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280010B 09/11/95 1942 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280015B 09/27/95 95±07±184A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280015B 10/03/95 95±07±221A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280015B 12/07/95 96±07±066A 01 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280020B 08/03/95 95±07±129A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280020B 11/20/95 96±07±056A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280020B 12/06/95 96±07±076A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280020B 12/06/95 96±07±077A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280025B 08/09/95 1858 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280025B 08/18/95 1865 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280025B 08/12/95 1868 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280025B 10/30/95 1904 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280025B 10/10/95 95±07±235A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280030B 08/18/95 1866 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280030B 07/31/95 95±07±113A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280030B 10/19/95 95±07±223A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280030B 10/30/95 95±07±234A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280030B 11/30/95 96±07±046A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280030B 12/08/95 96±07±096A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280035B 07/07/95 1836 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280035B 08/16/95 1862 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280035B 11/09/95 1912 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280035B 11/14/95 1916 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280035B 09/14/95 95±07±175A 02 07 ...... KS WICHITA, CITY OF ...... 2003280035B 12/06/95 96±07±083A 02 07 ...... MO CASS COUNTY* ...... 2907830050C 08/29/95 95±07±143A 02 07 ...... MO CASS COUNTY* ...... 2907830125B 10/13/95 95±07±216A 02 07 ...... MO CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0140H 10/02/95 95±07±173A 01 07 ...... MO COTTLEVILLE, CITY OF ...... 29183C0115D 10/12/95 95±07±191A 01 07 ...... MO CRESTWOOD, CITY OF ...... 29189C0284H 11/03/95 95±07±174A 02 07 ...... MO CREVE COEUR, CITY OF ...... 29189C0164H 11/30/95 96±07±010A 01 07 ...... MO DUNKLIN COUNTY* ...... 2901220100B 11/09/95 96±07±014A 02 07 ...... MO FESTUS,CITY OF ...... 2901910002B 10/17/95 1900 02 07 ...... MO FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 2903520004C 08/14/95 95±07±051A 01 07 ...... MO FLORISSANT, CITY OF ...... 29189C0062H 10/23/95 95±07±232A 02 07 ...... MO GRANDVIEW, CITY OF ...... 2901710005C 09/27/95 95±07±176A 02 07 ...... MO GREENE COUNTY* ...... 2907820095B 10/18/95 95±07±194P 05 07 ...... MO JASPER COUNTY* ...... 2908070100B 11/09/95 96±07±022A 02 07 ...... MO JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 2908080085B 07/05/95 95±07±081A 01 07 ...... MO JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 2908080085C 10/17/95 95±07±133A 01 07 ...... MO JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 2908080155B 09/08/95 1881 02 07 ...... MO JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 2908080155B 11/21/95 1943 02 07 ...... MO KANSAS CITY, CITY OF ...... 2901730075B 10/31/95 95±07±169A 02 07 ...... MO LADUE,CITY OF ...... 29189C0169H 11/02/95 96±07±009A 02 07 ...... MO MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0156H 11/22/95 95±07±230A 01 07 ...... MO MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF ...... 29189C0156H 10/26/95 96±07±034A 02 07 ...... MO O'FALLON, CITY OF ...... 29183C0110D 07/10/95 95±07±111A 01 07 ...... MO O'FALLON, CITY OF ...... 29183C0115D 07/05/95 95±07±102A 01 07 ...... MO O'FALLON, CITY OF ...... 29183C0115D 07/21/95 95±07±122A 01 07 ...... MO O'FALLON, CITY OF ...... 29183C0115D 08/29/95 95±07±153A 01 07 ...... MO PACIFIC, CITY OF ...... 2901340001C 11/06/95 96±07±045A 02 07 ...... MO PLATTE COUNTY* ...... 2904750050A 12/08/95 96±07±071A 02 07 ...... MO SIKESTON, CITY OF ...... 2952700006C 07/31/95 1848 08 07 ...... MO SIKESTON, CITY OF ...... 2952700006C 08/03/95 1854 08 07 ...... MO SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF ...... 2901490009B 07/06/95 95±07±106A 02 07 ...... MO SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF ...... 2901490009B 12/05/95 96±07±007A 02 28404 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES COUNTY* ...... 29183C0115D 09/14/95 95±07±156A 01 07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES COUNTY* ...... 29183C0115D 11/03/95 96±07±004A 02 07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES COUNTY* ...... 29183C0120D 09/05/95 95±07±138A 01 07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES COUNTY* ...... 29183C0162D 07/06/95 95±07±065P 06 07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES, CITY OF ...... 29183C0162D 07/06/95 95±07±065P 06 07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES, CITY OF ...... 29183C0166D 09/12/95 1891 02 07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES, CITY OF ...... 29183C0166D 11/30/95 96±07±054A 02 07 ...... MO ST. CHARLES, CITY OF ...... 29183C0170D 11/30/95 96±07±015A 02 07 ...... MO ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0120H 10/25/95 95±07±199A 01 07 ...... MO ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0312H 10/23/95 95±07±231A 01 07 ...... MO ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0316H 12/14/95 96±07±061A 02 07 ...... MO ST. LOUIS COUNTY* ...... 29189C0405H 09/27/95 95±07±171A 02 07 ...... MO ST. PETERS, CITY OF ...... 29183C0120D 08/01/95 1849 02 07 ...... MO UNIVERSITY CITY, CITY OF ...... 29189C0000 12/01/95 95±07±192A 02 07 ...... NE AURORA, CITY OF ...... 3101050005C 10/13/95 1926 01 07 ...... NE AURORA, CITY OF ...... 3101050005C 10/30/95 95±07±233A 01 07 ...... NE BELLEVUE, CITY OF ...... 31153C0065F 11/06/95 1907 02 07 ...... NE CASS COUNTY* ...... 3104070125B 10/19/95 95±07±225P 06 07 ...... NE CEDAR CREEK, VILLAGE OF ...... 3100300005A 10/11/95 95±07±178A 01 07 ...... NE COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 3152720005C 08/21/95 95±07±144A 02 07 ...... NE COLUMBUS, CITY OF ...... 3152720015C 09/07/95 95±07±124P 06 07 ...... NE CUMING COUNTY* ...... 3104270004A 07/25/95 1841 01 07 ...... NE CUMING COUNTY* ...... 3104270006A 10/30/95 95±07±207A 02 07 ...... NE DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 3100730025B 09/07/95 95±07±154A 02 07 ...... NE DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 3100730125B 08/15/95 95±07±123A 02 07 ...... NE DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 3100730125B 07/21/95 95±07±125A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030005B 07/06/95 95±07±118A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030005B 08/03/95 95±07±132A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030005B 09/14/95 95±07±185A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030005B 10/02/95 95±07±201A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030005B 12/07/95 96±07±075A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030010B 07/12/95 1840 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030010B 07/25/95 1846 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030010B 11/09/95 1909 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030010B 11/20/95 96±07±026A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 07/25/95 1842 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 08/04/95 1853 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 11/21/95 1922 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 10/02/95 95±07±180A 01 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 10/12/95 95±07±213A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 11/20/95 96±07±027A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 11/20/95 96±07±030A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 12/05/95 96±07±070A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030015B 12/05/95 96±07±080A 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 07/12/95 1838 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 07/12/95 1839 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 07/25/95 1845 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 07/27/95 1847 02 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 08/03/95 1852 01 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 10/02/95 95±07±180A 01 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 09/21/95 95±07±186A 01 07 ...... NE GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF ...... 3101030020B 10/12/95 95±07±213A 02 07 ...... NE HALL COUNTY* ...... 3101000100C 08/22/95 1869 02 07 ...... NE KEARNEY, CITY OF ...... 3100160020C 12/05/95 95±07±177A 02 07 ...... NE KEARNEY, CITY OF ...... 3100160020C 11/09/95 96±07±021A 02 07 ...... NE LINCOLN, CITY OF ...... 3152730020C 10/13/95 95±07±170A 01 07 ...... NE LINCOLN, CITY OF ...... 3152730037D 10/30/95 1901 02 07 ...... NE OMAHA, CITY OF ...... 3152740020F 11/06/95 96±07±011A 01 07 ...... NE OMAHA, CITY OF ...... 3152740045F 10/06/95 1883 02 07 ...... NE OMAHA, CITY OF ...... 3152740045F 09/14/95 95±07±093P 05 07 ...... NE PIERCE COUNTY* ...... 3104660150B 10/03/95 95±07±188A 02 07 ...... NE PLATTE COUNTY* ...... 3104670009B 08/22/95 1787 02 07 ...... NE PLATTE COUNTY* ...... 3104670009B 08/29/95 1860 02 07 ...... NE SCHUYLER, CITY OF ...... 3100460010B 11/14/95 96±07±024A 02 07 ...... NE SEWARD, CITY OF ...... 3102100010C 10/04/95 95±07±214P 06 08 ...... CO ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0320G 09/12/95 95±08±192A 01 08 ...... CO ADAMS COUNTY* ...... 08001C0320G 09/26/95 95±08±271A 01 08 ...... CO ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0230J 09/14/95 95±08±252A 01 08 ...... CO ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0230J 11/20/95 96±08±009A 02 08 ...... CO ARAPAHOE COUNTY* ...... 08005C0230J 12/04/95 96±08±042A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28405

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

08 ...... CO ARVADA, CITY OF ...... 0850720002B 10/24/95 95±08±277A 02 08 ...... CO AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020045E 10/11/95 95±08±217P 05 08 ...... CO AURORA, CITY OF ...... 0800020185E 10/11/95 95±08±217P 05 08 ...... CO BOULDER COUNTY* ...... 0800230130B 07/05/95 95±08±161A 02 08 ...... CO BOULDER COUNTY* ...... 08013C0415F 08/03/95 95±08±220A 02 08 ...... CO BOULDER COUNTY* ...... 08013C0415F 11/01/95 95±08±241P 05 08 ...... CO BOULDER, CITY OF ...... 08013C0395F 08/02/95 95±08±210A 02 08 ...... CO BOULDER, CITY OF ...... 08013C0395F 09/11/95 95±08±248A 02 08 ...... CO BOULDER, CITY OF ...... 08013C0415F 08/31/95 95±08±238A 01 08 ...... CO BOULDER, CITY OF ...... 08013C0415F 11/01/95 95±08±241P 05 08 ...... CO BROOMFIELD, CITY OF ...... 0850730215C 08/02/95 95±08±218P 05 08 ...... CO CASTLE ROCK, TOWN OF ...... 0800500170C 08/07/95 95±08±126P 06 08 ...... CO CASTLE ROCK, TOWN OF ...... 0800500186C 08/07/95 95±08±126P 06 08 ...... CO COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600154C 07/14/95 94±08±152P 05 08 ...... CO COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600158B 07/14/95 94±08±152P 05 08 ...... CO COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600168D 10/25/95 95±08±253P 05 08 ...... CO COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600257C 08/04/95 95±08±183A 02 08 ...... CO COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600281C 09/26/95 95±08±249A 02 08 ...... CO COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF ...... 0800600281C 10/25/95 95±08±253P 05 08 ...... CO DENVER, CITY AND COUNTY OF ...... 0800460018C 12/15/95 96±08±013A 02 08 ...... CO DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 0800490065C 10/17/95 95±08±261A 02 08 ...... CO DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 0800490170C 08/07/95 95±08±126P 06 08 ...... CO DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 0800490186C 08/07/95 95±08±126P 06 08 ...... CO EL PASO COUNTY* ...... 0800590168C 10/25/95 95±08±253P 05 08 ...... CO EL PASO COUNTY* ...... 0800590281C 10/25/95 95±08±253P 05 08 ...... CO JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 0800870260B 07/10/95 95±08±195A 08 08 ...... CO JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 0800870390B 07/31/95 95±08±109P 06 08 ...... CO LAKEWOOD, CITY OF ...... 0850750005C 10/31/95 95±08±213A 02 08 ...... CO LONGMONT, CITY OF ...... 08013C0286F 09/14/95 95±08±247A 01 08 ...... CO SEVERANCE, TOWN OF ...... 0802660475C 10/19/95 95±08±276A 01 08 ...... CO THORNTON, CITY OF ...... 0800070005C 07/25/95 95±08±153P 05 08 ...... MT FLATHEAD COUNTY* ...... 3000231135D 11/15/95 95±08±255A 01 08 ...... MT GLENDIVE, CITY OF ...... 3000150005B 09/06/95 95±08±234A 02 08 ...... MT SANDERS COUNTY* ...... 3000720018A 10/12/95 95±08±191A 02 08 ...... MT THREE FORKS, TOWN OF ...... 3000290001B 07/10/95 95±08±184A 02 08 ...... MT TWIN BRIDGES, TOWN OF ...... 3000450001B 08/31/95 95±08±115A 02 08 ...... MT YELLOWSTONE COUNTY* ...... 3001420845A 08/17/95 95±08±219A 02 08 ...... ND BISMARCK, CITY OF ...... 3801490015A 10/17/95 95±08±243A 01 08 ...... ND BISMARCK, CITY OF ...... 3801490025A 07/13/95 95±08±108A 01 08 ...... ND BISMARCK, CITY OF ...... 3801490025A 10/11/95 95±08±269A 01 08 ...... ND CENTER, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3806480005B 07/05/95 95±08±173A 02 08 ...... ND DICKINSON, CITY OF ...... 3801170005C 10/26/95 95±08±244A 02 08 ...... ND DICKINSON, CITY OF ...... 3801170005C 09/22/95 95±08±256A 02 08 ...... ND FARGO, CITY OF ...... 3853640030D 10/04/95 95±08±257A 01 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS COUNTY* ...... 3800330004B 10/31/95 96±08±002A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 07/24/95 95±08±179A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 07/24/95 95±08±201A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 07/25/95 95±08±205A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 07/25/95 95±08±211A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 07/31/95 95±08±216A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 09/19/95 95±08±258A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 09/28/95 95±08±262A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 10/11/95 95±08±274A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650010D 11/03/95 96±08±007A 02 08 ...... ND GRAND FORKS, CITY OF ...... 3853650015D 08/21/95 95±08±212A 02 08 ...... ND MANDAN, CITY OF ...... 3800720010B 10/26/95 95±08±278A 02 08 ...... ND MANDAN, CITY OF ...... 3800720020B 10/11/95 95±08±268A 02 08 ...... ND PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3802630025A 07/31/95 95±08±196A 02 08 ...... ND STANLEY, TOWNSHIP OF ...... 3802580005B 08/04/95 95±08±202A 01 08 ...... ND THOMPSON, CITY OF ...... 3802080001B 12/15/95 96±08±037A 02 08 ...... ND VALLEY CITY, CITY OF ...... 3800020004E 12/01/95 95±08±279A 01 08 ...... ND VALLEY CITY, CITY OF ...... 3800020004E 12/15/95 96±08±020A 01 08 ...... SD ABERDEEN, CITY OF ...... 46013C0245C 08/02/95 95±08±215A 02 08 ...... SD ABERDEEN, CITY OF ...... 46013C0245C 09/27/95 95±08±263A 02 08 ...... SD RAPID CITY, CITY OF ...... 4654200004E 07/20/95 95±08±164P 05 08 ...... SD RAPID CITY, CITY OF ...... 4654200004E 07/05/95 95±08±171A 01 08 ...... UT CACHE COUNTY* ...... 4900120008B 09/22/95 95±08±175A 02 08 ...... UT LOGAN, CITY OF ...... 4900190008B 11/02/95 95±08±222A 02 08 ...... UT MURRAY, CITY OF ...... 4901030001C 09/06/95 95±08±206A 02 08 ...... UT MURRAY, CITY OF ...... 4901030003C 08/15/95 95±08±228A 02 28406 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

08 ...... UT OGDEN, CITY OF ...... 4901890006B 10/04/95 95±08±239P 06 08 ...... UT RIVERTON, CITY OF ...... 4901040002C 09/25/95 95±08±250P 06 08 ...... UT SALT LAKE CITY, CITY OF ...... 4901050027A 12/15/95 96±08±021A 01 08 ...... UT SOUTH JORDAN, CITY OF ...... 4901070009C 12/01/95 96±08±005A 02 08 ...... UT WASHINGTON, CITY OF ...... 4901820015C 11/02/95 96±08±001A 02 08 ...... WY CASPER, CITY OF ...... 5600370010C 10/19/95 95±08±273A 02 08 ...... WY CHEYENNE, CITY OF ...... 5600300005E 08/02/95 95±08±207A 01 08 ...... WY CHEYENNE, CITY OF ...... 5600300005E 10/19/95 95±08±275A 01 08 ...... WY JACKSON, TOWN OF ...... 56039C0000 11/01/95 95±08±208P 06 08 ...... WY NATRONA COUNTY* ...... 5600360885A 10/12/95 95±08±259A 02 08 ...... WY TETON COUNTY* ...... 56039C0655B 11/01/95 95±08±208P 06 08 ...... WY UINTA COUNTY* ...... 5600530275B 08/21/95 95±08±176A 02 08 ...... WY UINTA COUNTY* ...... 5600530275B 11/20/95 96±08±010A 02 09 ...... AZ CLARKDALE, TOWN OF ...... 0400950002B 09/19/95 95±09±818A 02 09 ...... AZ FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF ...... 0400200002C 08/16/95 95±09±727P 05 09 ...... AZ FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF ...... 0400200007C 08/16/95 95±09±727P 05 09 ...... AZ FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF ...... 0400200008B 08/16/95 95±09±727P 05 09 ...... AZ FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF ...... 0400200011B 08/17/95 95±09±603P 05 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2660E 07/31/95 95±09±720A 01 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2660E 07/25/95 95±09±721A 01 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2660E 09/06/95 95±09±832A 01 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2660E 10/17/95 95±09±995A 01 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2680F 07/24/95 95±09±690A 01 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2680F 09/06/95 95±09±833A 01 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2680F 10/19/95 96±09±008A 01 09 ...... AZ GILBERT, TOWN OF ...... 04013C2680F 11/21/95 96±09±122A 01 09 ...... AZ GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1190F 10/24/95 95±09±1022A 01 09 ...... AZ GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1190F 07/07/95 95±09±577A 01 09 ...... AZ GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1190F 12/01/95 96±09±116A 01 09 ...... AZ GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1195D 07/07/95 95±09±577A 01 09 ...... AZ GLENDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1620F 08/07/95 95±09±544P 05 09 ...... AZ GOODYEAR, CITY OF ...... 04013C2555D 09/14/95 95±09±819A 02 09 ...... AZ MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1610G 08/07/95 95±09±544P 05 09 ...... AZ MARICOPA COUNTY* ...... 04013C1620F 08/07/95 95±09±544P 05 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2180E 07/05/95 95±09±631A 02 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 08/03/95 95±09±701A 02 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 08/03/95 95±09±715A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 08/03/95 95±09±717A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 08/15/95 95±09±747A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 08/09/95 95±09±769A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 08/31/95 95±09±770A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 09/26/95 95±09±795A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 08/30/95 95±09±814A 02 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 09/11/95 95±09±868A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 09/28/95 95±09±960A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 10/04/95 95±09±970A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 09/26/95 95±09±976A 02 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 12/01/95 96±09±111A 02 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 12/07/95 96±09±131A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 12/15/95 96±09±185A 01 09 ...... AZ MESA, CITY OF ...... 04013C2195E 12/15/95 96±09±206A 02 09 ...... AZ MOHAVE COUNTY* ...... 0400582445C 07/31/95 95±09±527P 08 09 ...... AZ MOHAVE COUNTY* ...... 0400583110B 11/09/95 95±09±698P 08 09 ...... AZ PEORIA, CITY OF ...... 04013C1610G 08/07/95 95±09±544P 05 09 ...... AZ PEORIA, CITY OF ...... 04013C1620F 08/07/95 95±09±544P 05 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C0000 12/05/95 96±09±142A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1195D 07/13/95 95±09±655A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1195D 08/15/95 95±09±735A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1195D 11/02/95 96±09±018A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1195D 11/20/95 96±09±069A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1215H 10/30/95 96±09±055A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1220G 10/11/95 95±09±866A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1220G 10/04/95 95±09±932P 06 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1220G 11/02/95 96±09±050A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1220G 10/27/95 96±09±057A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1220G 12/01/95 96±09±062A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1220G 12/08/95 96±09±199A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1655G 07/24/95 95±09±663A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1655H 11/01/95 96±09±052A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1660E 10/30/95 95±09±1039A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28407

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1660E 08/04/95 95±09±742A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1660F 10/24/95 95±09±1040A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1660F 10/17/95 95±09±1041A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1660F 11/03/95 96±09±053A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1660F 10/30/95 96±09±058A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1665G 10/26/95 95±09±1038P 05 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1665G 10/30/95 96±09±061A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1670E 10/24/95 95±09±1042A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1670E 10/31/95 96±09±051A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1670E 10/26/95 96±09±059A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1670E 11/02/95 96±09±064A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1680E 10/30/95 95±09±1039A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1680F 10/24/95 95±09±1040A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1680F 12/15/95 96±09±192A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C1690E 10/26/95 95±09±1019A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2130E 12/01/95 96±09±136A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2145F 10/31/95 96±09±056A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2155E 10/04/95 95±09±827A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2155E 11/01/95 96±09±054A 02 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2155E 10/24/95 96±09±060A 01 09 ...... AZ PHOENIX, CITY OF ...... 04013C2155E 10/27/95 96±09±063A 01 09 ...... AZ PRESCOTT VALLEY, TOWN OF ...... 0401210001C 10/11/95 95±09±972A 02 09 ...... AZ SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1235E 10/06/95 95±09±895P 06 09 ...... AZ SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1235E 10/27/95 95±09±904A 02 09 ...... AZ SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C1705D 07/24/95 95±09±656A 02 09 ...... AZ SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF ...... 04013C2160D 08/31/95 95±09±538A 02 09 ...... AZ SIERRA VISTA, CITY OF ...... 0400170005C 07/31/95 95±09±409A 02 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760015F 08/17/95 95±09±746A 01 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760015F 08/16/95 95±09±763P 06 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760015F 11/20/95 96±09±005A 01 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760020G 08/15/95 95±09±755A 02 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760020G 08/23/95 95±09±785A 02 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760025H 10/30/95 95±09±1020A 02 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760025H 11/03/95 96±09±045A 02 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760030H 12/15/95 95±09±1001A 01 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760030H 12/15/95 96±09±176A 02 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760045G 07/10/95 95±09±653A 02 09 ...... AZ TUCSON, CITY OF ...... 0400760055G 10/31/95 95±09±910A 02 09 ...... CA AGOURA HILLS, CITY OF ...... 0650720002B 12/01/95 95±09±994A 08 09 ...... CA ANTIOCH, CITY OF ...... 0600260002D 09/19/95 95±09±811A 01 09 ...... CA ARCATA, CITY OF ...... 0600610002D 09/22/95 95±09±903A 01 09 ...... CA BELMONT, CITY OF ...... 0650160005B 09/27/95 95±09±638A 02 09 ...... CA CAMARILLO, CITY OF ...... 0650200003B 09/26/95 95±09±877P 05 09 ...... CA CAMARILLO, CITY OF ...... 0650200006B 09/26/95 95±09±877P 05 09 ...... CA CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 0600270001B 07/28/95 95±09±602A 01 09 ...... CA CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 0600270001B 08/15/95 95±09±673A 08 09 ...... CA CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 0600270001B 08/31/95 95±09±702A 01 09 ...... CA CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 0600270001B 09/06/95 95±09±821A 01 09 ...... CA CLAYTON, CITY OF ...... 0600270001B 09/06/95 95±09±869A 01 09 ...... CA CLOVIS, CITY OF ...... 0600440005D 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA COLTON, CITY OF ...... 0602730007B 07/21/95 94±09±872P 08 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250210B 07/17/95 95±09±290P 05 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250230B 07/17/95 95±09±290P 05 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250250B 10/24/95 95±09±942A 02 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250250B 12/14/95 96±09±168A 02 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250290B 10/24/95 95±09±1017A 02 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250350B 11/20/95 95±09±948A 02 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250355B 07/05/95 95±09±610A 01 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250370B 08/21/95 95±09±757P 06 09 ...... CA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY* ...... 0600250400B 08/21/95 95±09±757P 06 09 ...... CA CORTE MADERA, TOWN OF ...... 0650230001B 09/28/95 95±09±483A 02 09 ...... CA COSTA MESA, CITY OF ...... 06059C0038E 07/25/95 95±09±713A 02 09 ...... CA COSTA MESA, CITY OF ...... 06059C0038E 12/15/95 96±09±195A 02 09 ...... CA COSTA MESA, CITY OF ...... 06059C0038E 12/05/95 96±09±212A 02 09 ...... CA COSTA MESA, CITY OF ...... 06059C0038E 12/15/95 96±09±213A 02 09 ...... CA DANVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0607070001A 07/10/95 95±09±657A 08 09 ...... CA DANVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0607070001A 07/10/95 95±09±661A 02 09 ...... CA DANVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0607070001A 09/11/95 95±09±860A 02 09 ...... CA DANVILLE, TOWN OF ...... 0607070001A 09/14/95 95±09±893A 02 09 ...... CA DEL NORTE COUNTY* ...... 0650250100C 11/03/95 95±09±954A 02 28408 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

09 ...... CA DINUBA, CITY OF ...... 0604030001B 12/08/95 96±09±167A 08 09 ...... CA EL DORADO COUNTY ...... 0600400450B 12/07/95 96±09±156A 02 09 ...... CA FAIRFIELD, CITY OF ...... 0603700009D 07/10/95 95±09±607C 01 09 ...... CA FAIRFIELD, CITY OF ...... 0603700010C 12/15/95 95±09±959A 01 09 ...... CA FREMONT,CITY OF ...... 0650280004B 08/21/95 95±09±804A 01 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290590B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290595B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290615B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290870B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290880B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290885B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290890B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290895B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO COUNTY* ...... 0650290905B 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480010C 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480010C 08/23/95 95±09±791A 01 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480010C 09/14/95 95±09±957A 01 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480010C 10/31/95 96±09±003A 02 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480015C 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480020C 10/19/95 95±09±1003A 02 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480020C 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480030C 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA FRESNO, CITY OF ...... 0600480035C 09/20/95 95±09±591P 05 09 ...... CA GILROY, CITY OF ...... 0603400001C 08/31/95 95±09±744P 05 09 ...... CA GILROY, CITY OF ...... 0603400001C 12/04/95 95±09±784A 02 09 ...... CA GILROY, CITY OF ...... 0603400002C 08/31/95 95±09±744P 05 09 ...... CA GILROY, CITY OF ...... 0603400004D 08/31/95 95±09±744P 05 09 ...... CA HAYWARD, CITY OF ...... 0650330020D 11/09/95 96±09±021A 01 09 ...... CA HEMET, CITY OF ...... 0602530005C 07/17/95 95±09±674A 01 09 ...... CA HEMET, CITY OF ...... 0602530005C 07/25/95 95±09±679A 01 09 ...... CA HEMET, CITY OF ...... 0602530005C 08/09/95 95±09±722A 01 09 ...... CA HEMET, CITY OF ...... 0602530005C 09/06/95 95±09±830A 01 09 ...... CA HUMBOLDT COUNTY* ...... 0600600625B 12/07/95 96±09±129A 02 09 ...... CA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY OF ...... 06059C0036E 07/10/95 95±09±660A 08 09 ...... CA IRVINE, CITY OF ...... 06059C0039E 10/25/95 95±09±749P 06 09 ...... CA IRVINE, CITY OF ...... 06059C0040E 10/25/95 95±09±749P 06 09 ...... CA LAKE COUNTY* ...... 0600900550A 12/15/95 96±09±161A 02 09 ...... CA LAKE ELSINORE, CITY OF ...... 0606360006C 10/26/95 95±09±955A 01 09 ...... CA LOS ALTOS HILLS, TOWN OF ...... 0603420001B 12/06/95 96±09±159A 02 09 ...... CA LOS ALTOS, CITY OF ...... 0603410002B 10/19/95 95±09±1007A 02 09 ...... CA LOS ANGELES COUNTY* ...... 0650430025B 07/31/95 95±09±593A 02 09 ...... CA LOS ANGELES COUNTY* ...... 0650430345B 10/25/95 95±09±398P 06 09 ...... CA LOS ANGELES COUNTY* ...... 0650430360B 07/31/95 95±09±672A 02 09 ...... CA LOS ANGELES COUNTY* ...... 0650430460B 11/03/95 95±09±788A 02 09 ...... CA LOS ANGELES, CITY OF ...... 0601370055C 07/12/95 95±09±662A 02 09 ...... CA LOS ANGELES, CITY OF ...... 0601370071C 09/19/95 95±09±831A 02 09 ...... CA MADERA COUNTY* ...... 0601700615B 08/15/95 95±09±738A 08 09 ...... CA MADERA COUNTY* ...... 0601700620B 07/25/95 95±09±748A 01 09 ...... CA MARIN COUNTY* ...... 0601730259A 09/19/95 95±09±822A 02 09 ...... CA MARIN COUNTY* ...... 0601730264A 11/09/95 96±09±033A 02 09 ...... CA MARIN COUNTY* ...... 0601730269A 08/17/95 95±09±736A 01 09 ...... CA MARIN COUNTY* ...... 0601730276A 10/20/95 95±09±982A 02 09 ...... CA MARIN COUNTY* ...... 0601730444A 09/22/95 95±09±864A 02 09 ...... CA MENDOCINO COUNTY* ...... 0601830587C 11/03/95 95±09±998A 02 09 ...... CA MERCED COUNTY* ...... 0601880295C 07/05/95 95±09±620A 01 09 ...... CA MERCED COUNTY* ...... 06047C0470E 09/27/95 95±09±966A 01 09 ...... CA MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0430E 08/17/95 95±09±786A 01 09 ...... CA MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0430E 11/08/95 96±09±039A 01 09 ...... CA MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0440E 09/14/95 95±09±863A 01 09 ...... CA MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0440E 09/14/95 95±09±871A 02 09 ...... CA MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0440E 09/28/95 95±09±965A 01 09 ...... CA MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0440E 12/15/95 96±09±171A 01 09 ...... CA MERCED, CITY OF ...... 06047C0445E 09/14/95 95±09±863A 01 09 ...... CA MILL VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0601770005B 10/24/95 95±09±1018A 02 09 ...... CA MILL VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0601770005B 08/25/95 95±09±754A 02 09 ...... CA MILL VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0601770005B 12/07/95 95±09±906A 02 09 ...... CA MONTEREY COUNTY* ...... 0601950015E 08/15/95 95±09±737A 02 09 ...... CA MOUNTAIN VIEW, CITY OF ...... 0603470004D 08/09/95 95±09±613A 01 09 ...... CA MOUNTAIN VIEW, CITY OF ...... 0603470004D 07/31/95 95±09±676A 02 09 ...... CA MOUNTAIN VIEW, CITY OF ...... 0603470004D 12/06/95 96±09±143A 01 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28409

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

09 ...... CA NAPA, CITY OF ...... 0602070005C 08/15/95 95±09±706A 01 09 ...... CA NAPA, CITY OF ...... 0602070005C 09/11/95 95±09±760A 02 09 ...... CA NAPA, CITY OF ...... 0602070005C 10/31/95 95±09±984A 01 09 ...... CA NAPA, CITY OF ...... 0602070010C 08/15/95 95±09±699A 01 09 ...... CA NAPA, CITY OF ...... 0602070010C 10/24/95 95±09±958A 01 09 ...... CA NAPA, CITY OF ...... 0602070010C 12/01/95 96±09±090A 01 09 ...... CA NEVADA COUNTY* ...... 0602100484C 07/05/95 95±09±650A 02 09 ...... CA NEVADA COUNTY* ...... 0602100484C 12/01/95 96±09±088A 02 09 ...... CA NEVADA COUNTY* ...... 0602100484C 11/30/95 96±09±110A 01 09 ...... CA NEWPORT BEACH, CITY OF ...... 06059C0054E 07/25/95 95±09±678A 02 09 ...... CA NORCO, CITY OF ...... 0602560003B 08/07/95 95±09±741A 02 09 ...... CA NOVATO, CITY OF ...... 0601780002C 08/04/95 95±09±654A 02 09 ...... CA NOVATO, CITY OF ...... 0601780006C 09/27/95 95±09±879A 02 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940003C 10/20/95 95±09±1005A 01 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940003C 12/01/95 95±09±1033A 01 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940003C 07/10/95 95±09±648A 01 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940003C 08/09/95 95±09±766A 01 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940003C 09/14/95 95±09±880A 02 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940003C 11/09/95 96±09±027A 01 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940011C 10/20/95 95±09±1005A 01 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940012C 07/17/95 95±09±568A 02 09 ...... CA OCEANSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602940012C 08/02/95 95±09±682A 02 09 ...... CA ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 06059C0039E 10/25/95 95±09±749P 06 09 ...... CA ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 06059C0040E 10/25/95 95±09±749P 06 09 ...... CA ORANGE COUNTY* ...... 06059C0059E 07/11/95 95±09±545P 06 09 ...... CA ORANGE, CITY OF ...... 06059C0022F 07/10/95 95±09±651A 02 09 ...... CA ORINDA, CITY OF ...... 0607220005A 09/28/95 95±09±956A 02 09 ...... CA ORINDA, CITY OF ...... 0607220020A 09/27/95 95±09±943A 02 09 ...... CA PERRIS, CITY OF ...... 0602580010D 09/06/95 95±09±820A 01 09 ...... CA PERRIS, CITY OF ...... 0602580010D 09/06/95 95±09±870A 01 09 ...... CA PETALUMA, CITY OF ...... 0603790005C 11/13/95 96±09±044A 02 09 ...... CA PLEASANTON, CITY OF ...... 0600120001D 10/31/95 96±09±013A 02 09 ...... CA PLEASANTON, CITY OF ...... 0600120001D 11/20/95 96±09±030A 02 09 ...... CA PLEASANTON, CITY OF ...... 0600120003D 10/24/95 95±09±1027A 02 09 ...... CA PLEASANTON, CITY OF ...... 0600120003D 10/20/95 95±09±953A 02 09 ...... CA PLUMAS COUNTY* ...... 060244B 07/14/95 95±09±634A 2 09 ...... CA PLUMAS COUNTY* ...... 060244B 07/13/95 95±09±666A 02 09 ...... CA PLUMAS COUNTY* ...... 060244B 09/22/95 95±09±781A 02 09 ...... CA PORTOLA, CITY OF ...... 0604560001C 11/20/95 96±09±042A 02 09 ...... CA POWAY, CITY OF ...... 0607020008B 12/15/95 96±09±100A 01 09 ...... CA REDDING, CITY OF ...... 0603600020C 09/27/95 95±09±971A 02 09 ...... CA REDDING, CITY OF ...... 0603600020C 12/01/95 96±09±023A 01 09 ...... CA REDDING, CITY OF ...... 0603600025C 07/17/95 95±09±681A 02 09 ...... CA REDDING, CITY OF ...... 0603600025C 08/25/95 95±09±765A 02 09 ...... CA REDDING, CITY OF ...... 0603600025C 12/15/95 95±09±933A 02 09 ...... CA REDDING, CITY OF ...... 0603600025C 11/09/95 96±09±029A 02 09 ...... CA REDLANDS, CITY OF ...... 0602790010D 12/05/95 95±09±907A 02 09 ...... CA REDLANDS, CITY OF ...... 0602790010D 10/26/95 95±09±992A 02 09 ...... CA RICHMOND, CITY OF ...... 0600350025B 07/17/95 95±09±290P 05 09 ...... CA RICHMOND, CITY OF ...... 0600350030B 07/17/95 95±09±290P 05 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE COUNTY* ...... 0602450020A 10/23/95 95±09±950P 06 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE COUNTY* ...... 0602450685A 10/23/95 95±09±950P 06 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE COUNTY* ...... 0602450705A 08/31/95 95±09±724A 01 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE COUNTY* ...... 0602450900C 10/12/95 95±09±813A 02 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE COUNTY* ...... 0602451475B 07/31/95 95±09±596A 02 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE COUNTY* ...... 0602451625B 10/19/95 95±09±931P 08 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602600015A 07/07/95 95±09±035P 05 09 ...... CA RIVERSIDE, CITY OF ...... 0602600020A 07/07/95 95±09±035P 05 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620060C 08/04/95 95±09±762A 01 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620090D 11/30/95 96±09±107A 01 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620095D 07/10/95 95±09±641A 02 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620095D 07/31/95 95±09±694A 02 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620105C 07/05/95 95±09±621A 02 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620105C 08/31/95 95±09±806A 02 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620185E 08/31/95 95±09±797A 02 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620310E 07/03/95 95±09±514P 05 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620320D 07/10/95 95±09±646A 01 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620345C 08/21/95 95±09±761A 02 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO COUNTY* ...... 0602620500C 07/13/95 95±09±645A 02 09 ...... CA SACRAMENTO, CITY OF ...... 0602660030E 12/01/95 96±09±112A 02 28410 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

09 ...... CA SALINAS, CITY OF ...... 0602020003D 07/10/95 95±09±640A 02 09 ...... CA SALINAS, CITY OF ...... 0602020003D 09/27/95 95±09±649P 06 09 ...... CA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY* ...... 0602708695B 07/21/95 94±09±872P 08 09 ...... CA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY* ...... 0602708740C 07/10/95 95±09±549A 08 09 ...... CA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY* ...... 0602708740C 08/31/95 95±09±890A 02 09 ...... CA SAN CLEMENTE, CITY OF ...... 06059C0075F 10/18/95 95±09±991P 06 09 ...... CA SAN CLEMENTE, CITY OF ...... 06059C0079F 10/18/95 95±09±991P 06 09 ...... CA SAN DIEGO COUNTY* ...... 0602841075C 09/14/95 95±09±829A 02 09 ...... CA SAN DIEGO COUNTY* ...... 0602841136C 10/13/95 95±09±981A 01 09 ...... CA SAN DIEGO COUNTY* ...... 0602841393C 08/15/95 95±09±708A 02 09 ...... CA SAN DIEGO, CITY OF ...... 0602950053C 07/25/95 95±09±590P 06 09 ...... CA SAN DIEGO, CITY OF ...... 0602950054C 07/25/95 95±09±590P 06 09 ...... CA SAN JOSE, CITY OF ...... 0603490009F 12/15/95 96±09±169A 02 09 ...... CA SAN JOSE, CITY OF ...... 0603490020E 12/04/95 96±09±154A 02 09 ...... CA SAN JOSE, CITY OF ...... 0603490053D 07/13/95 95±09±635A 02 09 ...... CA SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY* ...... 0603040477B 07/10/95 95±09±580A 08 09 ...... CA SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITY OF ...... 0603100005C 07/10/95 95±09±658A 02 09 ...... CA SAN RAFAEL, CITY OF ...... 0650580015B 07/24/95 95±09±700A 02 09 ...... CA SAN RAFAEL, CITY OF ...... 0650580015B 10/04/95 95±09±980A 02 09 ...... CA SAN RAMON, CITY OF ...... 0607100001B 07/05/95 94±09±692P 05 09 ...... CA SANTA ANA, CITY OF ...... 06059C0037E 07/10/95 95±09±693A 02 09 ...... CA SANTA ANA, CITY OF ...... 06059C0038E 07/10/95 95±09±693A 02 09 ...... CA SANTA BARBARA COUNTY* ...... 0603310403D 12/15/95 96±09±089A 01 09 ...... CA SANTA BARBARA, CITY OF ...... 0603350005D 10/11/95 95±09±894P 05 09 ...... CA SANTA BARBARA, CITY OF ...... 0603350009D 08/22/95 95±09±630A 01 09 ...... CA SANTA CLARA COUNTY* ...... 0603370640D 08/31/95 95±09±744P 05 09 ...... CA SANTA CLARA COUNTY* ...... 0603370645D 08/31/95 95±09±744P 05 09 ...... CA SANTA CLARA COUNTY* ...... 0603370760E 08/31/95 95±09±744P 05 09 ...... CA SANTA CLARA, CITY OF ...... 0603500005C 08/31/95 95±09±477A 02 09 ...... CA SANTA CLARITA, CITY OF ...... 0607290480C 07/31/95 95±09±680A 02 09 ...... CA SANTA CRUZ COUNTY* ...... 0603530405B 12/15/95 96±09±120A 02 09 ...... CA SANTA CRUZ, CITY OF ...... 0603550002B 07/05/95 95±09±573A 02 09 ...... CA SANTA CRUZ, CITY OF ...... 0603550002B 09/06/95 95±09±794A 02 09 ...... CA SARATOGA, CITY OF ...... 0603510002B 10/06/95 95±09±913P 05 09 ...... CA SHASTA COUNTY* ...... 0603580350B 08/22/95 95±09±816A 02 09 ...... CA SHASTA COUNTY* ...... 0603580685C 07/05/95 95±09±627A 02 09 ...... CA SHASTA COUNTY* ...... 0603580685C 07/31/95 95±09±743A 02 09 ...... CA SHASTA COUNTY* ...... 0603580715B 10/17/95 95±09±911A 02 09 ...... CA SIMI VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0604210002A 08/02/95 95±09±322P 06 09 ...... CA SIMI VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0604210002A 09/22/95 95±09±973A 01 09 ...... CA SIMI VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0604210004A 08/02/95 95±09±322P 06 09 ...... CA SIMI VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0604210008A 08/02/95 95±09±322P 06 09 ...... CA SIMI VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0604210008A 07/17/95 95±09±667A 02 09 ...... CA SIMI VALLEY, CITY OF ...... 0604210009A 08/25/95 95±09±775A 02 09 ...... CA SOLANO COUNTY* ...... 0606310218B 11/20/95 96±09±032A 02 09 ...... CA SOLANO COUNTY* ...... 0606310218B 11/20/95 96±09±047A 02 09 ...... CA SOLANO COUNTY* ...... 0606310406B 07/10/95 95±09±688A 02 09 ...... CA SOLANO COUNTY* ...... 0606310406B 09/18/95 95±09±949A 02 09 ...... CA SOLANO COUNTY* ...... 0606310406B 10/11/95 95±09±975A 02 09 ...... CA SOLANO COUNTY* ...... 0606310406B 10/12/95 95±09±996A 02 09 ...... CA SONOMA COUNTY* ...... 0603750635B 10/11/95 95±09±800A 02 09 ...... CA SONOMA COUNTY* ...... 0603750745B 08/31/95 95±09±756A 02 09 ...... CA SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CITY OF ...... 0650600010B 10/24/95 95±09±1030A 02 09 ...... CA STANISLAUS COUNTY* ...... 0603840250B 12/08/95 96±09±020A 01 09 ...... CA TEHAMA COUNTY* ...... 0650640270C 09/26/95 95±09±951P 06 09 ...... CA TEHAMA COUNTY* ...... 0650640290D 09/14/95 95±09±883A 02 09 ...... CA TEHAMA COUNTY* ...... 0650640290D 09/26/95 95±09±951P 06 09 ...... CA TEHAMA COUNTY* ...... 0650640665B 09/19/95 95±09±929A 08 09 ...... CA THOUSAND OAKS, CITY OF ...... 0604220015B 12/01/95 96±09±118A 02 09 ...... CA TULARE COUNTY* ...... 0650660465B 07/10/95 95±09±632A 01 09 ...... CA TULARE COUNTY* ...... 0650660465B 12/15/95 96±09±145A 01 09 ...... CA TULARE COUNTY* ...... 0650661210B 08/15/95 95±09±732A 01 09 ...... CA UNION CITY, CITY OF ...... 0600140010B 11/15/95 95±09±1031A 01 09 ...... CA UNION CITY, CITY OF ...... 0600140010B 09/19/95 95±09±908A 01 09 ...... CA VACAVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0603730004B 07/28/95 95±09±675P 05 09 ...... CA VACAVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0603730005B 07/28/95 95±09±675P 05 09 ...... CA VACAVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0603730007B 11/21/95 95±09±1024A 02 09 ...... CA VACAVILLE, CITY OF ...... 0603730007B 12/15/95 95±09±798A 08 09 ...... CA VENTURA COUNTY* ...... 0604130930B 09/26/95 95±09±877P 05 09 ...... CA VENTURA COUNTY* ...... 0604130975B 07/25/95 95±09±644A 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28411

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

09 ...... CA VISALIA, CITY OF ...... 0604090005C 10/24/95 95±09±1026A 02 09 ...... CA VISALIA, CITY OF ...... 0604090005C 07/10/95 95±09±606A 01 09 ...... CA VISALIA, CITY OF ...... 0604090010C 12/05/95 95±09±1035A 01 09 ...... CA VISALIA, CITY OF ...... 0604090010C 08/30/95 95±09±790A 02 09 ...... CA VISALIA, CITY OF ...... 0604090010C 12/01/95 96±09±037A 02 09 ...... CA VISALIA, CITY OF ...... 0604090010C 11/20/95 96±09±070A 02 09 ...... CA VISALIA, CITY OF ...... 0604090010C 12/01/95 96±09±130A 02 09 ...... CA WINTERS, CITY OF ...... 0604250005B 12/01/95 96±09±028A 01 09 ...... CA YUCAIPA, CITY OF ...... 0602708740C 11/03/95 95±09±993A 01 09 ...... HI HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010072B 11/13/95 95±09±579P 05 09 ...... HI HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010072B 07/10/95 95±09±642A 02 09 ...... HI HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010110D 12/15/95 96±09±187P 05 09 ...... HI HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010120C 12/01/95 95±09±718A 08 09 ...... HI HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010130C 12/15/95 96±09±187P 05 09 ...... HI HONOLULU COUNTY* ...... 1500010135C 12/15/95 96±09±187P 05 09 ...... HI MAUI COUNTY* ...... 1500030151B 08/17/95 95±09±471P 05 09 ...... NV CARSON CITY, CITY OF ...... 3200010040B 11/21/95 95±09±730A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 3200030775B 07/26/95 95±09±533P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 3200031025B 07/31/95 95±09±684A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 3200031225B 07/10/95 95±09±623A 08 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C1755D 10/04/95 95±09±925P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2135D 10/04/95 95±09±923P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2145D 10/04/95 95±09±923P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2155D 10/04/95 95±09±923P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2160D 09/20/95 95±09±862P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2178D 10/17/95 95±09±916A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2180D 09/14/95 95±09±835A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2180D 10/20/95 95±09±897A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2190D 10/19/95 95±09±872A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2190D 10/20/95 95±09±892A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 11/02/95 95±09±848A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 11/03/95 95±09±873A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 11/02/95 95±09±898A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 11/03/95 95±09±899A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 11/02/95 95±09±915A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 11/13/95 95±09±919A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2200D 11/08/95 95±09±928A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2535D 11/20/95 95±09±896A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2550D 10/17/95 95±09±914A 02 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2551D 11/20/95 95±09±896A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2552D 12/14/95 95±09±990A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2554D 11/21/95 96±09±072A 08 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2567D 10/27/95 95±09±686P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2567D 10/20/95 95±09±891A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2580D 10/12/95 95±09±917A 02 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2580D 10/17/95 95±09±918A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 09/06/95 95±09±808A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 10/24/95 95±09±817A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 10/20/95 95±09±876A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 10/04/95 95±09±977A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 10/17/95 96±09±019P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 11/09/95 96±09±025A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2590D 11/27/95 96±09±114A 01 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2595D 08/22/95 95±09±841P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C2955D 10/06/95 95±09±934P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3995D 10/18/95 95±09±920P 05 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C3995D 10/18/95 95±09±922P 06 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4015D 10/18/95 95±09±920P 05 09 ...... NV CLARK COUNTY* ...... 32003C4060D 10/18/95 95±09±922P 06 09 ...... NV DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 32005C0015D 08/31/95 95±09±778A 02 09 ...... NV DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 32005C0108D 08/04/95 95±09±712A 02 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 3200050020B 07/20/95 95±09±435P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 3200050020B 08/03/95 95±09±465P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2580D 11/20/95 96±09±080A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2585D 12/01/95 96±09±085A 02 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2585D 12/04/95 96±09±086A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 12/07/95 95±09±1010A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 10/03/95 95±09±417P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/01/95 95±09±745A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 09/08/95 95±09±771P 06 28412 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 10/04/95 95±09±936P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 09/06/95 95±09±937P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/07/95 95±09±939A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 10/17/95 96±09±019P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/20/95 96±09±081A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/07/95 96±09±082A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/20/95 96±09±083A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/03/95 96±09±084A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/07/95 96±09±103A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/03/95 96±09±104A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/07/95 96±09±105A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 12/01/95 96±09±132A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 12/01/95 96±09±133A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 11/21/95 96±09±134A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 12/05/95 96±09±141A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2590D 12/15/95 96±09±170A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2615D 10/04/95 95±09±938P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2615D 09/28/95 95±09±941A 01 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2955D 10/06/95 95±09±934P 06 09 ...... NV HENDERSON, CITY OF ...... 32003C2975D 10/06/95 95±09±934P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1735D 10/04/95 95±09±927P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1745D 08/17/95 95±09±716A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1755D 10/04/95 95±09±927P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1765D 08/17/95 95±09±716A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1765D 10/18/95 95±09±838A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1765D 10/04/95 95±09±927P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2145D 08/25/95 95±09±751A 08 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 09/06/95 95±09±842P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 10/11/95 95±09±844A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 10/11/95 95±09±845A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 10/11/95 95±09±847A 02 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 10/11/95 95±09±854A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 10/11/95 95±09±855A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2155D 10/04/95 95±09±926P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2160D 08/21/95 95±09±536P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2160D 10/12/95 95±09±856A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2180D 10/11/95 95±09±858A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±824A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±846A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±849A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±850A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±851A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±852A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±853A 02 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±857A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±858A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2187D 10/11/95 95±09±859A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2200D 10/11/95 95±09±850A 01 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 3252760010B 07/26/95 95±09±534P 06 09 ...... NV LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 3252760015C 07/14/95 95±09±529P 06 09 ...... NV MESQUITE, CITY OF ...... 32003C0387D 10/24/95 96±09±040A 02 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 3200070002B 07/21/95 95±09±537P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 3200070003C 08/11/95 95±09±500P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 3200070004C 08/15/95 95±09±615P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 3200070005C 08/11/95 95±09±500P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C1770D 12/15/95 96±09±183P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2160D 08/21/95 95±09±535P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2160D 11/08/95 96±09±092P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2160D 12/15/95 96±09±182P 06 09 ...... NV NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF ...... 32003C2176D 12/01/95 96±09±126A 01 09 ...... NV RENO, CITY OF ...... 32031C2794E 07/31/95 95±09±739A 01 09 ...... NV RENO, CITY OF ...... 32031C2988E 08/09/95 95±09±677A 02 09 ...... NV RENO, CITY OF ...... 32031C3176E 07/12/95 95±09±575A 01 09 ...... NV RENO, CITY OF ...... 32031C3176E 07/31/95 95±09±664A 01 09 ...... NV RENO, CITY OF ...... 32031C3176E 08/03/95 95±09±711A 02 09 ...... NV SPARKS, CITY OF ...... 32031C0000 11/22/95 96±09±077P 06 09 ...... NV WASHOE COUNTY* ...... 32031C2840E 08/07/95 95±09±565A 08 09 ...... NV WASHOE COUNTY* ...... 32031C3003E 11/22/95 96±09±077P 06 10 ...... AK JUNEAU, CITY AND BOROUGH OF ...... 0200090885B 10/16/95 95±R10±197 02 10 ...... AK JUNEAU, CITY AND BOROUGH OF ...... 0200090895B 08/04/95 95±R10±192 02 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28413

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

10 ...... ID AMMON, CITY OF ...... 1600280001B 11/29/95 96±R10±059 02 10 ...... ID BINGHAM COUNTY* ...... 1600180280B 07/19/95 95±R10±172 01 10 ...... ID BINGHAM COUNTY* ...... 1600180290B 07/19/95 95±R10±171 02 10 ...... ID BINGHAM COUNTY* ...... 1600180430B 10/18/95 96±R10±020 01 10 ...... ID BONNER COUNTY* ...... 1602060050B 07/05/95 95±R10±157 02 10 ...... ID BONNER COUNTY* ...... 1602060325B 08/23/95 95±R10±215 02 10 ...... ID BONNER COUNTY* ...... 1602060325B 10/30/95 96±R10±246 02 10 ...... ID GARDEN CITY, CITY OF ...... 1600040002E 08/17/95 95±R10±204 02 10 ...... ID KOOTENAI COUNTY* ...... 1600760190D 08/22/95 95±R10±213 02 10 ...... ID MIDDLETON, CITY OF ...... 1600370001E 07/21/95 95±R10±182 02 10 ...... ID NEZ PERCE COUNTY* ...... 1601010125B 11/07/95 96±R10±012 02 10 ...... ID PAYETTE COUNTY* ...... 1601980129B 08/18/95 95±R10±208 02 10 ...... ID POCATELLO, CITY OF ...... 1600120004B 10/12/95 95±10±064P 05 10 ...... ID POCATELLO, CITY OF ...... 1600120008B 10/12/95 95±10±064P 05 10 ...... ID SANDPOINT,CITY OF ...... 1600250001C 08/04/95 95±R10±194 02 10 ...... OR ALBANY, CITY OF ...... 4101370005E 07/26/95 95±R10±141 02 10 ...... OR BENTON COUNTY* ...... 4100080050C 07/05/95 95±R10±160 02 10 ...... OR BENTON COUNTY* ...... 4100080050C 09/28/95 95±R10±165 02 10 ...... OR BENTON COUNTY* ...... 4100080050C 12/05/95 96±R10±065 02 10 ...... OR CANNON BEACH, CITY OF ...... 4100290005B 11/07/95 95±10±073A 08 10 ...... OR CLACKAMAS COUNTY* ...... 4155880135A 12/05/95 96±R10±052 02 10 ...... OR CLACKAMAS COUNTY* ...... 4155880140A 10/17/95 96±R10±017 02 10 ...... OR CLACKAMAS COUNTY* ...... 4155880206A 11/21/95 96±R10±032 02 10 ...... OR COOS COUNTY* ...... 4100420240B 09/19/95 95±R10±240 02 10 ...... OR CORNELIUS, CITY OF ...... 4102610001A 09/26/95 95±R10±243 02 10 ...... OR CORVALLIS, CITY OF ...... 4100090005E 10/23/95 96±R10±025 02 10 ...... OR CORVALLIS, CITY OF ...... 4100090006E 10/16/95 96±R10±008 02 10 ...... OR CRESWELL, CITY OF ...... 4101210001A 07/10/95 95±10±054A 01 10 ...... OR CULVER, CITY OF ...... 4102900001A 09/06/95 95±10±066P 05 10 ...... OR CULVER, CITY OF ...... 4102900001A 08/07/95 95±R10±198 02 10 ...... OR CULVER, CITY OF ...... 4102900001A 08/07/95 95±R10±199 02 10 ...... OR CULVER, CITY OF ...... 4102900001A 08/22/95 95±R10±214 02 10 ...... OR CURRY COUNTY* ...... 4100520290C 12/04/95 94±10±013P 06 10 ...... OR CURRY COUNTY* ...... 4100520295C 12/04/95 94±10±013P 06 10 ...... OR DESCHUTES COUNTY* ...... 41017C0460C 09/19/95 95±R10±176 02 10 ...... OR DOUGLAS COUNTY* ...... 4100590930A 07/05/95 95±R10±159 02 10 ...... OR EUGENE, CITY OF ...... 4101220003B 11/28/95 95±R10±018 02 10 ...... OR EUGENE, CITY OF ...... 4101220003B 11/06/95 96±R10±035 02 10 ...... OR JACKSON COUNTY* ...... 4155890189B 09/19/95 95±R10±226 02 10 ...... OR JACKSON COUNTY* ...... 4155890226B 11/20/95 95±R10±207 02 10 ...... OR JOSEPHINE COUNTY* ...... 4155900237D 08/28/95 95±R10±219 02 10 ...... OR KLAMATH COUNTY* ...... 4101090745B 07/11/95 95±R10±163 02 10 ...... OR KLAMATH COUNTY* ...... 4101091350B 10/26/95 96±R10±027 02 10 ...... OR KLAMATH FALLS, CITY OF ...... 4101120001B 09/28/95 95±R10±249 02 10 ...... OR LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF ...... 4100180003C 12/11/95 96±R10±069 02 10 ...... OR LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF ...... 4100180004C 08/18/95 95±R10±170 02 10 ...... OR LANE COUNTY* ...... 4155910355C 07/21/95 95±R10±181 02 10 ...... OR LANE COUNTY* ...... 4155910355C 08/18/95 95±R10±191 02 10 ...... OR LANE COUNTY* ...... 4155910355C 09/01/95 95±R10±224 02 10 ...... OR LANE COUNTY* ...... 4155910370C 08/17/95 95±R10±205 02 10 ...... OR LANE COUNTY* ...... 4155910380C 09/19/95 95±R10±242 02 10 ...... OR LANE COUNTY* ...... 4155910390D 07/18/95 95±R10±133 02 10 ...... OR LINCOLN CITY, CITY OF ...... 4101300001B 07/26/95 95±R10±186 02 10 ...... OR LINCOLN CITY, CITY OF ...... 4101300001B 09/21/95 95±R10±247 02 10 ...... OR LINN COUNTY* ...... 4101360195B 08/07/95 95±R10±120 02 10 ...... OR LINN COUNTY* ...... 4101360350B 10/27/95 96±R10±028 02 10 ...... OR MARION COUNTY* ...... 4101540050C 08/10/95 95±10±049P 06 10 ...... OR MARION COUNTY* ...... 4101540200B 11/06/95 96±R10±034 02 10 ...... OR SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670007D 07/20/95 95±10±022P 05 10 ...... OR SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670007D 10/06/95 95±10±031P 05 10 ...... OR SALEM, CITY OF ...... 4101670011D 10/06/95 95±10±031P 05 10 ...... OR WASHINGTON COUNTY* ...... 4102380361B 09/15/95 95±R10±068 02 10 ...... OR WASHINGTON COUNTY* ...... 4102380500B 10/31/95 96±R10±006 02 10 ...... OR WOODBURN, CITY OF ...... 4101720001B 11/13/95 96±R10±044 02 10 ...... WA ABERDEEN, CITY OF ...... 5300580003B 11/21/95 96±R10±054 02 10 ...... WA ABERDEEN, CITY OF ...... 5300580004B 09/22/95 95±10±069A 02 10 ...... WA ABERDEEN, CITY OF ...... 5300580004B 09/06/95 95±R10±228 02 10 ...... WA ABERDEEN, CITY OF ...... 5300580004B 11/06/95 96±R10±033 02 10 ...... WA ABERDEEN, CITY OF ...... 5300580004B 12/04/95 96±R10±061 02 10 ...... WA BENTON COUNTY* ...... 5302370636D 08/21/95 95±R10±210 02 28414 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

LETTERS OF MAP CHANGEÐContinued [Effective July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995]

Effective Deter- Region State Community Map panel No. date Case No. mination

10 ...... WA BOTHELL, CITY OF ...... 5300750007C 07/05/95 95±10±041P 06 10 ...... WA BRIER, CITY OF ...... 5302760005A 10/31/95 96±R10±030 02 10 ...... WA BURIEN, CITY OF ...... 53033C0955F 11/08/95 96±R10±041 02 10 ...... WA CLARK COUNTY* ...... 5300240317C 07/18/95 95±R10±168 02 10 ...... WA CLARK COUNTY* ...... 5300240317C 08/04/95 95±R10±180 02 10 ...... WA COWLITZ COUNTY* ...... 5300320215C 07/20/95 95±R10±175 01 10 ...... WA GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY* ...... 5300570325B 08/04/95 95±R10±195 02 10 ...... WA JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 5300690410B 07/21/95 95±R10±183 02 10 ...... WA JEFFERSON COUNTY* ...... 5300690410B 08/14/95 95±R10±203 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C0419F 10/06/95 96±R10±001 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C0680F 09/01/95 95±R10±222 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C0680F 10/06/95 96±R10±002 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C0680F 11/09/95 96±R10±043 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C0680F 11/05/95 96±R10±066 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C0736F 11/29/95 96±R10±051 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C0744F 07/17/95 95±R10±119 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C1009F 09/13/95 95±R10±235 02 10 ...... WA KING COUNTY* ...... 53033C1515F 09/22/95 95±R10±248 02 10 ...... WA KITSAP COUNTY* ...... 5300920205B 07/19/95 95±R10±147 02 10 ...... WA KITSAP COUNTY* ...... 5300920205B 11/08/95 96±R10±029 02 10 ...... WA KITSAP COUNTY* ...... 5300920220B 12/12/95 96±R10±072 02 10 ...... WA MASON COUNTY* ...... 5301150200C 11/14/95 96±R10±015 02 10 ...... WA MASON COUNTY* ...... 5301150275C 07/21/95 95±R10±179 02 10 ...... WA MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF ...... 5301580001B 10/17/95 96±R10±011 02 10 ...... WA NOOKSACK, CITY OF ...... 5302030001A 09/29/95 95±R10±245 02 10 ...... WA PACIFIC COUNTY* ...... 5301260025B 07/17/95 95±R10±166 02 10 ...... WA PEND OREILLE COUNTY* ...... 530131B 07/21/95 95±R10±177 02 10 ...... WA PIERCE COUNTY* ...... 5301380318C 09/01/95 95±R10±212 02 10 ...... WA PUYALLUP, CITY OF ...... 5301440005B 07/27/95 95±R10±142 01 10 ...... WA PUYALLUP, CITY OF ...... 5301440005B 07/27/95 95±R10±142A 01 10 ...... WA REDMOND, CITY OF ...... 53033C0390F 07/12/95 95±10±023P 06 10 ...... WA SKAGIT COUNTY* ...... 5301510225C 11/01/95 96±R10±031 02 10 ...... WA SKAGIT COUNTY* ...... 5301510250C 07/21/95 95±R10±178 02 10 ...... WA SKAGIT COUNTY* ...... 5301510250C 11/07/95 96±R10±039 02 10 ...... WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY* ...... 5355340185B 09/13/95 95±R10±231 02 10 ...... WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY* ...... 5355340185B 12/08/95 96±R10±049 02 10 ...... WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY* ...... 5355340335B 08/23/95 95±R10±216 02 10 ...... WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY* ...... 5355340335B 11/29/95 96±R10±047 02 10 ...... WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY* ...... 5355340375B 10/31/95 96±R10±030 02 10 ...... WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY* ...... 5355340467C 09/12/95 95±R10±166 02 10 ...... WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY* ...... 5355340467C 12/12/95 96±R10±071 02 10 ...... WA SPOKANE COUNTY* ...... 5301740294C 10/16/95 96±R10±003 02 10 ...... WA SPOKANE COUNTY* ...... 5301740400B 11/07/95 96±R10±040 02 10 ...... WA SPOKANE COUNTY* ...... 5301740425B 10/18/95 96±R10±021 02 10 ...... WA SULTAN, TOWN OF ...... 5301730001B 07/28/95 95±R10±130 02 10 ...... WA SULTAN, TOWN OF ...... 5301730001B 11/13/95 96±R10±045 02 10 ...... WA VANCOUVER, CITY OF ...... 5300270008B 08/18/95 95±R10±173 02 10 ...... WA VANCOUVER, CITY OF ...... 5300270008B 10/18/95 95±R10±173 01 10 ...... WA WAITSBURG, CITY OF ...... 5301960001B 08/04/95 95±R10±193 02 10 ...... WA WENATCHEE, CITY OF ...... 5300200005C 09/08/95 95±10±061A 02 10 ...... WA WHATCOM COUNTY* ...... 530198B 09/12/95 95±R10±232 02 10 ...... WA WHATCOM COUNTY* ...... 530198B 09/29/95 95±R10±244 02 10 ...... WA WHATCOM COUNTY* ...... 530198B 10/23/95 96±R10±026 02 10 ...... WA YAKIMA COUNTY* ...... 5302170715B 07/17/95 95±R10±016 02 10 ...... WA YAKIMA COUNTY* ...... 5302170715B 07/27/95 95±R10±139 02 10 ...... WA YAKIMA COUNTY* ...... 5302171008B 09/06/95 95±R10±211 02

[FR Doc. 96–13800 Filed 6–03–96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6718±04±P federal register June 4,1996 Tuesday Child RestraintSystems;FinalRule 49 CFRPart571 14 CFRPart91,etal. Administration National HighwayTrafficSafety Federal AviationAdministration Transportation Department of Part IV 28415 28416 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION with aircraft seat belts. In addition, the The provisions of §§ 91.107, 121.311, study found that vest- and harness-type 125.211, and 135.128 identify those Federal Aviation Administration devices allowed excessive forward body child restraints that are approved for use excursion, resulting in the test dummy aboard aircraft. These child restraint 14 CFR Parts 91, 121, 125, and 135 sliding off the front of the seat with a provisions also apply whenever a child [Docket No. 28229; Amendment No. 91±250, high likelihood of the child’s entire restraint is used for a child 2 years old 121±255, 125±26, 135±62] body impacting the seat back of the seat or older who is required to have a directly in front of it. Rebound separate seat on the aircraft. A child 2 RIN 2120±AF52 acceleration presented further risk of years old or older must either be Child Restraint Systems injury. Also, the study found that belly properly secured in an approved child belts allowed the test dummy to make restraint or properly secured with a AGENCY: Federal Aviation severe contact with the back of the seat safety belt in a passenger seat. Administration (FAA), DOT. in the row in front of the test dummy The FAA’s 1992 determination as to ACTION: Final rule. and that a child may be crushed by the which child restraint systems would be forward bending motion of the adult to approved for use aboard aircraft was SUMMARY: This action withdraws FAA whom the child is attached. The based on many years of work by both approval for the use of booster seats and research involved dynamic impact tests the FAA and the National Highway vest- and harness-type child restraint with a variety of certified child Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). systems in aircraft during takeoff, restraints installed in transport airplane In the 1970’s, NHTSA adopted dynamic landing, and movement on the surface. passenger seats at the 16g peak loads testing requirements for child restraint In addition, this action emphasizes the required in 14 CFR § 25.562(b)(2). Some systems for use in automobiles. In the existing prohibition in all aircraft of the tests of child restraint systems mid 1980’s, the FAA and NHTSA against the use of lap held child were configured to represent a typical undertook an effort to develop a restraint systems (including belly belts). multi-row seat installation and included common approach to the approval of This action is needed because the FAA testing the effects of the occupant child restraints for aircraft use. Federal has determined that, during an aircraft impact against the backs of seats. The Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) crash, the banned devices may put tests investigated transport airplane No. 213 (49 CFR § 571.213) was children in a potentially worse situation passenger seat compatibility with child amended to provide criteria for than the allowable alternatives. restraints. A copy of the study is manufacturers’ self-certification of child EFFECTIVE DATE: September 3, 1996. included in the rulemaking docket restraints that were appropriate for both FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: established for this rulemaking. aircraft and automobiles. Donell Pollard, (AFS–203), Air On May 19, 1995, the FAA issued FMVSS No. 213, as revised, is the Transportation Division, Flight Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) current U.S. standard, and has allowed Standards Service, Federal Aviation No. 95–7 (60 FR 30690, June 9, 1995). hundreds of models of seats to be Administration, 800 Independence The NPRM proposed to withdraw FAA approved, including booster-type child Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20591; approval for the use of booster seats and restraint systems (‘‘booster seats’’) and Telephone (202) 267–3735. vest- and harness-type child restraint vest- and harness-type devices. The current FAA child restraint rules do not SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: systems in aircraft during takeoff, landing, and movement on the surface. specifically refer to FMVSS No. 213. Backround In addition, the NPRM emphasized the However, FMVSS No. 213 is the basis for the labels required under the FAA The FAA is concerned about the existing prohibition against the use in all aircraft of lap-held child restraint rules. safety of children who use certain forms The current FAA rules on child systems (including belly belts). The rule of child restraint systems aboard restraint systems permit the use of child language adopted by this final rule has aircraft. In 1992. The FAA set forth in restraint systems only if they bear a not been changed from the rule language §§ 91.107(a), 121.311(b), 125.211(b), and proper label(s), meet certain use that was proposed. 135.128(a) the child restraint systems requirements, and meet adult Also, in June 1995, the FAA issued a acceptable for use in aircraft by accompaniment requirements. imposing labeling requirements and Report to Congress concerning Child Approved labels fall into three certain use requirements. Since that Restraint Systems. A copy of this report categories as follows: time the FAA has supplemented these is included in the rulemaking docket 1. Seats manufactured to U.S. rules with advisory material and with a established for this rulemaking. standards between January 1, 1981, and public information leaflet entitled, Under present regulations a child who February 25, 1985, must bear a label that ‘‘Child/Infant Safety Seats has not reached his or her second states ‘‘This child restraint system Recommended for Use in Aircraft.’’ birthday (infant) is not required to have conforms to all applicable Federal motor In September 1994, the FAA issued a a separate seat aboard an aircraft. This vehicles safety standards.’’ However, report entitled, ‘‘The Performance of means that the person accompanying an vest- and harness-type child restraint Child Restraint Devices in Transport infant may choose to hold the infant systems manufactured before February Airplane Passenger Seats’’ (the ‘‘CAMI’’ during flight. If the accompanying adult 26, 1985, are not approved for use on study). The study found that, as a class wishes to put the infant in a child aircraft even if they bear this label. of child restraint devices, shield-type restraint system on a passenger seat, the 2. Seats manufactured to U.S. booster seats, in combination with other airline may require the adult to standards on or after February 26, 1985, factors, contributed to an abdominal purchase a separate ticket for the infant. must bear the following two labels: pressure measurement higher than in Whether or not the airline requires the (i) ‘‘This child restraint system other means of protection while not purchase of a ticket for the infant, a conforms to all applicable Federal motor preventing a head impact. The study separate passenger seat is required if a vehicle safety standards’’; and found that fundamental design child restraint is to be used (14 CFR (ii) ‘‘THIS RESTRAINT IS CERTIFIED characteristics of shield-type booster §§ 121.311(c), 125.211(c), and FOR USE IN MOTOR VEHICLES AND seats made their belt paths incompatible 135.128(b)). AIRCRAFT’’, in red lettering. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28417

3. Seats that are not manufactured to that a 90-day effective date should for a restraint system. The ATA is also approved U.S. standards must bear afford air carriers sufficient time to get concerned about the overall either a label showing approval of a the necessary information to all affected effectiveness of child restraint systems. foreign government or a label showing flight crewmembers and that it is In addition, ATA stated that steps must that the seats were manufactured under unnecessary to synchronize the be taken to address the problem of the standards of the United Nations. dissemination of this information with inconsistent FAA guidance and While the current rule language recurrent training. No data were recommended that industry bodies disallows vest- and harness-type child presented by UAL or other commenters assist the FAA in identifying possible restraint systems manufactured before on any cost issues. Compliance costs, problem areas before they arise. February 26, 1985, some of these however, are discussed in the economic FAA Response: This rulemaking systems manufactured after that date analysis set out in this preamble. prohibits the use of booster seats and meet U.S., foreign government, or AFA, while supporting the proposal, vest- and harness-type devices by United Nations requirements. stated that it continues to actively children, even if they bear an approved The use requirements for child pursue the mandatory use of child label. Therefore, enforcement issues restraint systems are as follows: restraint devices. In addition, AFA concerning labels in foreign languages 1. The restraint system must be disagreed with the FAA assertion that if are not relevant to this final rule. Nor is properly secured to an approved parents must purchase a separate seat to the question of whether the child is forward-facing seat or berth; use an approved child restraint device, within the weight limits specified on 2. The child must be properly secured they would drive rather than fly. They the label. in the restraint system and must not stated that the FAA assumptions on this The FAA acknowledges ATA’s exceed the specified weight limit for the issue are unrealistic and flawed and do concern that there could be compliance restraint system; and not take into account the impact of low- problems concerning child restraint 3. The restraint system must bear the cost airlines and their enormous appeal devices that bear labels indicating that appropriate label(s). to the family/tourist end of the travel they are certified for use aboard aircraft Because lap held child restraint market. The AFA stated that a family when in fact they are not approved for systems (belly belts) are not secured to who is predisposed to buy a ticket use aboard aircraft. A companion rule a forward-facing seat or berth, but would go ahead and purchase a separate issued by NHTSA, published in today’s instead are secured to the adult, they ticket to use with an approved and Federal Register, amends a provision in cannot be used under existing rules. recommended child restraint device. FMVSS No. 213 that permits booster Nonetheless, the FAA has decided that FAA Response: The FAA has seats and vest- and harness-type devices it is important to emphasize this evaluated the costs and benefits to be certified for use in aircraft. In view prohibition and has added clarifying associated with child restraint devices of the FAA’s decision to withdraw language to the existing rules. three times since 1990. The first report approval of booster seats and vest- and The adult accompaniment provisions was prepared in 1990, the second report harness-type devices for use on aircraft, for child restraint systems require that in 1993, and the third report in June NHTSA believes continuing to permit the child be accompanied by a parent, 1995. AFA’s comment was based on the certification of those restraints for guardian, or attendant designated by the information contained in the second aircraft use will likely be confusing to child’s parent or guardian to attend to report. The third report, submitted to the public. Accordingly, NHTSA’s rule the safety of the child during the flight. Congress on June 7, 1995, analyzed no longer permits those restraints to be alternative scenarios. The scenario certified for aircraft use, and instead Discussion of Comments analyses concluded that if any requires manufacturers to label these The FAA received ten comments in significant charge is made for infant restraints as not certified for use in response to the proposed rule. The occupancy of a seat, the expected result aircraft. Also, in conjunction with this comments were received from Little is diversion to automobiles and a net rulemaking, the FAA will embark on a Cargo, Inc., a child restraint increase in infant and adult fatalities public education program designed to manufacturer; the Association of Flight and injuries. The study referenced by provide parents with the information Attendants (AFA); the Air Transport AFA was based on information from the necessary to make an informed decision Association of America (ATA); United second report. The AFA study simply about the use of child restraint devices Air Lines, Inc. (UAL); two members of documented observed market behavior on aircraft. The FAA understands that the Asia Pacific Cabin Safety Working associated with the entry of low cost parents may be confused when trying to Group (APCS Working Group); Cosco, carriers into a market and found that determine what type of child restraint Inc., a child restraint manufacturer; the average fares fall and passenger volume device is best for their child. If clear United Kingdom’s Civil Aviation increases. These findings are consistent guidance is readily available to parents Authority (CAA); the Joint Aviation with the FAA’s findings and concerning child restraint devices for Authorities (JAA); and an individual conclusions in all three studies on this aircraft, the FAA expects that they will parent. issue. In addition, the FAA agrees with choose an approved device in order to UAL supported the proposal, but the AFA that a family who is provide the safest traveling environment stated that the effective date of any new predisposed to buy a ticket would for their children. The FAA needs the regulations should be consistent with purchase a separate ticket to use with an assistance of air carriers, however, to reasonable recurrent training schedules. approved and recommended child enforce the regulations. In addition, UAL stated that changes in restraint device. The above studies, With regard to the ATA’s staff training would result in added however, indicate that very few families recommendation that industry bodies costs to air carriers, but they did not seem predisposed to purchasing tickets assist the FAA in identifying possible quantify these costs. for their infants. problem areas before they arise, the FAA Response: The FAA has ATA commented that it was FAA always welcomes input from determined that the regulations should concerned about enforcement issues industry and will continue to seek such be effective in 90 days. UAL did not caused by labels in a foreign language input on this issue. In response to suggest a specific time frame in its and the problem of determining whether ATA’s concern about inconsistent comment, but the FAA has determined a child is within the weight restrictions internal FAA guidance, the FAA notes 28418 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations that information contained in Flight manufacturer’s weight specifications of Although Little Cargo and Cosco Standards Information Bulletins, vest- and harness-type devices (25 to 50 questioned if submarining is better than Advisory Circulars, etc., will be pounds) would be better protected in a the head injury threat seen with forward reviewed to ensure that they correctly passenger seat lap belt or a forward facing devices, it is important to note reflect the new requirements in this facing child restraint device than in a that neither the booster seats nor the rulemaking, so there should not be any vest- and harness-type device. Forward vest-or harness-type device tested by conflicts. facing child restraint devices are CAMI performed in a manner that Little Cargo stated that vest- and designed for children from 20 to 40 would prevent head impact. It is not harness-type devices should not be pounds. While some forward facing correct to say there would be little or no prohibited until the FAA gathers child restraint devices do not provide a risk of a head injury with booster seats additional information and performance desired level of protection in a worst or vest- or harness-type devices. CAMI data on them. It is concerned that the case survivable aircraft crash, there are testing clearly shows that booster seats FAA’s decision to ban vest- and no better alternative availables at this do not protect the head because of an harness-type devices was based on time. Also, because forward facing unacceptable degree of head excursion inadequate testing and that such devices and passenger seat lap belts in an aircraft environment. Forward restraints could be modified to perform prevent the extreme body excursions facing devices, with rigid backs, reduce satisfactorily. Little Cargo stated that the observed in the harness test, most the risk of exposure to abdominal injury prohibition of vest- and harness-type children within this weight when compared to booster seats. devices was based primarily on one specification for vest- and harness-type Forward facing devices offer protection uninstrumented test in contrast to the devices (25 to 50 pounds) would be from the risk of abdominal injury and, breadth of tests conducted on the other better protected in either forward facing unlike vest- and harness-type devices, types of child restraint devices. devices or lap belts. prevent excessive body excursion. FAA Response: In response to Little In addition, Little Cargo stated that, in Cosco questioned the proposed ban Cargo’s concern that only one type of Notice No. 95–7, the FAA concluded since it was based on a small sampling test was performed on the vest- and that children weighing between 25 and of booster seats and vest- and harness- harness-type device, the FAA notes that 50 pounds, and even children under 2 type devices. Cosco believes that the during dynamic testing, unacceptable years old, would be safer in a passenger problems encountered with the vest- head and body excursions and vertical seat lap belt than in a vest restraint. and harness-type device tested are displacement of the anthropomorphic Little Cargo is concerned that using lap solvable and that all such restraints test dummy was observed to the extent belts as the sole restraining device should not be banned based on the that the type of instrumented tests that places enhanced stress on a child’s experience of just one. other child restraint devices underwent abdomen that could lead to injury. FAA Response: The FAA has was deemed not necessary for the FAA Response: While the FAA stated determined that at this time all vest- and harness. If the unsafe characteristics that that, if a child under 2 falls in the harness-type devices have certain all these devices share change in the weight use limits recommended by vest inherent critical design factors that future, the prohibition can be re- and harness manufacturers, the child preclude them from performing examined. would be safer in a passenger seat adequately in an aircraft seat. The Little Cargo also stated that the FAA restrained by a lap belt than in a vest- testing, while only performed on a small has significant performance concerns or harness-type device if no other sample of such devices, confirmed the with all available forward facing child approved device were available, the basic problems with the design of the restraints, but is only prohibiting certain FAA went on to state that a child falling devices. categories of these devices, including within the weight limits of a vest- or In regard to the FAA’s request for vest- and harness-type devices. harness-type device (25 to 40 pounds), comments on whether abdominal FAA Response: When considering would be better protected in a forward loading by itself is a predictor of injury, which, if any, child restraint devices facing child restraint device than in a Cosco stated that rulemaking cannot be should be prohibited, the FAA looked at lap belt. In addition, the study noted predicated on abstract numbers when the alternatives available for children that the lap belt remained across the the baseline for serious injury is within the weight limits specified by pelvis of the 24-month old dummy undetermined. Cosco also stated that child restraint manufacturers. The FAA throughout the impact and did not shield-type booster seats keep lap belts has determined that most children who appear to directly load the abdomen. off a child’s stomach whereas lap belts are within the weight specifications of Thus, CAMI testing indicates that Little might become repositioned over the booster seats (30 to 60 pounds) would Cargo’s concerns about abdominal stomach because children often move be better protected in a passenger seat loading are unfounded. around so much while in the lap belt. lap belt than in a booster seat because Little Cargo also questioned whether FAA Response: The FAA there would be less abdominal loading the impact of excessive submarining is acknowledges that the baseline for in a lap belt. For a child in the 30 to 60 not potentially safer than the excessive serious injury from abdominal loading pound range, a lap belt should remain head excursion/head strike observed is undetermined. However, the CAMI across the pelvis and not directly load with 6 out of 8 forward facing restraints. study found that shield-type booster the abdomen. Because forward facing Similarly, Cosco questioned why there seats, in combination with other factors, devices have rigid backs, unlike booster is more concern for abdominal loading contributed to an abdominal pressure seats, the FAA has determined that than the high HIC levels evidenced in measurement higher than in other children in the 30 to 40 pound range the forward facing child restraint means of protection. In certifying would be better protected in a forward devices. aircraft seats and belts, any evidence of facing device than in a booster seat FAA Response: While forward facing abdominal loading is considered because there is a decreased risk of child restraint devices may not grounds for disapproving a design. For abdominal loading in a forward facing presently provide a desired level of many years, the FAA has not approved device than in a booster seat. In protection in a worst case survivable any design of passenger restraint that addition, the FAA determined that aircraft crash, there are no better showed evidence of imposing restraint children who are within the alternatives available at this time. loads on the abdomen. It is accepted Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28419 practice among restraint designers that different that the process a parent would seats, by virtue of fundamental design the abdomen is not a load-carrying body go through before the prohibition. While characteristics, do not provide segment. The unique nature of airline the FAA encourages parents to use protection from this threat. That one of seats, where seat back breakover will devices that may be used throughout the the four booster seats tested did not cause a child in a booster seat to be flight, the devices banned by this rule exceed the head strike envelope crushed between the booster seat’s may be used during cruise. specified in FMVSS–213 has no bearing shield and the crash forces of the adult Cosco also believes that parents may on the threat of abdominal injury. in the row behind, are of sufficient opt to fly with children on their laps Cosco also stated that the primary concern to the FAA to prohibit the use rather than carry on a forward-facing or benefit of child restraints on aircraft is of booster seats in aircraft during convertible child restraint device. They to restrain children in the event of takeoff, landing, and movement on the also stated that an educated parent turbulence. They stated that while surface. would not buy a ticket in order to use certain types of child restraint devices The FAA notes that Cosco, like the an approved child restraint device do not perform well in crash situations, FAA, seems concerned about the instead of a vest- and harness-type this should not preclude their overall dangers of abdominal loading. In its device. They stated that a harness is use since crashes are rare while comment, Cosco states that ‘‘in motor much more convenient to carry around turbulence is not. vehicles, children often move around so than a convertible forward-facing seat CAA was also concerned about much that the lap belt becomes and therefore the parent may fly with a prohibiting devices that can prevent repositioned over the stomach, where it child or his/her lap rather than carry a injury in common occurrences such as can cause serious injury in even a minor convertible forward-facing seat. Little flight turbulence. crash * * *. Therefore, a shield booster, Cargo also expressed concerns that, FAA Response: The FAA is not which keeps the lap belt off the child’s when considering the alternatives of prohibiting the use of booster seats and stomach would be a significant lap-holding a child, using the passenger vest-and harness-type devices in cruise improvement in most cases * * *’’ In seat lap belt alone, or bringing an portions of flight. The FAA addition, Cosco states that shield-type approved convertible child restraint acknowledges that booster seats and booster seats, which keep a lap belt off system, parents will likely not choose to vest- and harness-type devices might a child’s stomach, would be a carry on a bulky restraint. prevent injuries during turbulence and significant improvement in rough FAA Response: While the FAA agrees therefore is not prohibiting their use landings, even if its crash protection with Cosco and Little Cargo that a vest- during cruise portions of flight. were less than a lap belt alone (since and harness-type device is probably Cosco stated that a design-restrictive survivable crashes are so rare). easier to carry than a convertible ban precludes development of future FAA Response: Performance data on forward facing child restraint device, for products that may prove safe and would the effectiveness of child restraint most parents the cost of an airline be more convenient for parents to use. devices in ‘‘rough landings’’ are not passenger seat for the infant is probably FAA Response: The FAA has available. However, because aircraft seat more important to the parent than the determined that, at this time, booster belt anchor points are located ease of carrying a child restraint device. seats and vest-and harness-type devices considerably forward of their location in Since the commenters did not provide put children in a potentially worse a car, it is unlikely that an aircraft seat any specific information or statistics on situation than the allowable belt will move up into a child’s this issue, the FAA continues to believe alternatives. If in the future a abdomen. that parents who are predisposed to buy manufacturer designs such a device that Cosco also stated that parents would a ticket for a separate airplane seat for the FAA determines is a safe alternative, be more willing to carry a small booster use with a booster seat or vest- and it will review the prohibition. The FAA seat rather than a larger forward-facing harness-type device and who have must, however, prohibit booster seats child restraint device. Cosco believes received education on the effectiveness and vest- and harness-type devices at that they are then more likely to have of the allowable alternatives in advance this time because of safety concerns. the appropriate restraint for the child of purchasing tickets would purchase a The FAA cannot delay this rule with the when they reach their destination and it ticket for a separate seat in order to use thought that a manufacturer might will be the one that they are familiar an approved and recommended child design a safe booster seat or vest- and with. Cosco states that by banning restraint device. harness-type device in the future or that booster seats, parents will be less likely In addition, Cosco commented that, of such a ban precludes a manufacturer to have an appropriate restraint for their the four booster seats tested, head from development future products that children when they reach their excursions for two did not exceed the may prove safe and convenient. destination. limits set forth in FMVSS No. 213. CAA stated that in a significant FAA Response: The FAA would like FAA Response: Although Cosco stated proportion of the cases where to clarify that the rule as proposed and that of the four booster seats tested, two passengers carry small children on adopted prohibits the use of booster did not exceed the limits of FMVSS No. aircraft, the alternative to travel by seats only during take off, landing, and 213, in actuality one of the two booster private car will not be viable, so these movement on the surface. It does not seats that supposedly did not exceed the passengers will continue to travel by air, prohibit their use inflight. Therefore, limits of FMVSS No. 213 disintegrated notwithstanding the additional cost. parents can consider their booster seats during the test and could not be CAA also states that it is reasonable to as carry on baggage, use the restraints analyzed for head excursion. The fact conclude that there will be an increase during the cruise portion of flight, and that of the four booster seats tested, in the number of people who will carry still have them readily available when head excursion for one did not exceed their children without any form of they reach their destination. These the limits set forth in FMVSS No. 213 restraint if this continues to be devices can be stowed in overhead bins, is not relevant to the decision to ban permitted. in coat closets, or in some cases under shield-type booster seats. As discussed FAA Response: The FAA’s 1995 study seats. Except for storing the devices earlier, seat back breakover, a unique on the costs and benefits associated during takeoff, landing, and movement feature of aircraft seats, presents a threat with child restraint devices addressed on the surface, this process is no of abdominal injury. Backless booster CAA’s comment that the alternative to 28420 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations travel by private car will not be viable, FAA expects, with its education Economic Analysis so passengers will continue to travel by campaign providing clear guidance on Changes to Federal regulations are air notwithstanding the additional cost. child restraint devices, parents will required to undergo several economic While the FAA agrees that a significant choose an approved device, rather than analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 number of families taking long trips will lap holding their children, in order to directs each Federal agency to propose continue to do so even if a charge is provide the safest traveling environment or adopt a regulation only upon a imposed for passenger seats occupied by for their children. The two members of reasoned determination that the benefits infants, the scenario analyses concluded the APCS Working Group submitted of the intended regulation justify its that if any significant charge is made for identical letters that discussed the need costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility infant occupancy of a passenger seat, to mandate restraints for children. In Act of 1980 requires agencies to analyze there will be some passenger diversion addition, they stated that the FAA’s the economic effect of regulatory to automobiles and a net increase in argument that the extra cost to families changes on small entities. Third, the infant and adult fatalities and injuries. caused by mandating child restraint Office of Management and Budget The scenario analyses also concluded devices would force them to less safe directs agencies to assess the effect of that families taking longer trips are less road travel is invalid since the same cost regulatory changes on international likely to divert to alternative modes of situation arises when the child is 3 or trade. With respect to this regulation, transportation than people taking 4 or 10 years old. the FAA has determined that it: (1) is ‘‘a shorter trips. The FAA agrees that there significant regulatory action’’ as defined are cases where parents would fly rather FAA Response: The APCS Working in the Executive Order; (2) is significant than not take a trip because they do not Group’s argument is that the extra cost as defined in the Department of have a practical second alternative to to families of mandating child restraint flying. In most cases, however, parents devices is no more of a deterrent to air Transportation’s Regulatory Policies and have an alternative to flying. In the 1995 travel than the price of a ticket for a Procedures; (3) will not have a report, the FAA again found that child of any age. However, the FAA significant impact on a substantial mandating child restraint devices could notes that this argument does not take number of small entities; and (4) will cause more deaths and injuries than it into account that ordinarily there is no not constitute a barrier to international trade. The FAA does not believe that would prevent. Therefore, the FAA will charge for a lap-held child, whereas this regulation will impose any not mandate the use of child restraint certificate holders very often do charge significant costs on the public. devices for children under 2 years old. if a seat is requested for this infant. Therefore, a full regulatory analysis, A copy of the report is included in the Thus, many people would switch to less which includes the identification and docket established for this rulemaking. safe automobile travel as a result of In addition, the FAA will pursue an evaluation of cost-reducing alternatives mandating child restraint usage because to this regulation, has not been education program to better inform unlike most rulemakings where the parents about child restraint devices. If prepared. Instead, the agency has compliance costs are passed along to all prepared a more concise analysis of this clear guidance is readily available to travelers, mandatory use of child parents, the FAA expects that they will regulation that is presented in the restraint would impose compliance following paragraphs. choose an approved device, rather than costs only on families with infants. lap holding their children, in order to Costs and Benefits provide the safest traveling environment Other commenters raised comments for their children. that are beyond the scope of this There will be some compliance costs CAA and JAA state that they permit rulemaking, such as providing design/ associated with this regulation. This the belly belt on the grounds that it certification standards for child restraint rule will reduce the types of child provides a measure of protection to systems that are compatible with restraint systems that can be used children and/or other passengers versus existing aircraft seat belt systems, during ground movement, takeoff, and lap holding a child. revising FMVSS–213, changing anchor landings by prohibiting the use of all FAA Response: The FAA would like locations of seat belts, adopting booster seats and vest- and harness-type to emphasize that belly belts are not performance standards for child child restraint systems during these permitted under current regulations. restraint system, establishing a child phases of a flight. The restrictions on Even if belly belts do provide some restraint friendly section of aircraft with the use of these devices will need to be measure or protection, the CAMI study modified seats, and clarifying what incorporated into flight attendant found that belly belts allowed the test types of restraints are acceptable. training and included in flight manuals, dummy to make severe contact with the and this will impose additional costs on back of the seat in the row in front of Editorial Note air carriers. For a period of time after the rule becomes effective, there will also be the test dummy and that a child may be The rules, as adopted, make it clear crushed by the forward bending motion some public education necessary and that, while the certificate holder has the potential flight delays when flight of the adult to whom the child is authority to provide a child restraint attached. Consideration of revising this attendant tell parents who brought system, such a system must be one current prohibition is beyond the scope prohibited child restraint devices on authorized by the rule. This is to avoid of the notice. board the aircraft that the devices are The JAA also stated that in a crash or any misinterpretation of this provision banned for use during takeoff, landing, severe air turbulence, parents are often as an exception to the prohibitions and movement on the ground. The FAA unable to keep a lap-held child in their adopted in this final rule. has determined that booster seats and arms. Paperwork Reduction Act vest- and harness-type devices put FAA Response: As discussed earlier, children in a potentially worse situation the FAA has determined that mandating In accordance with the Paperwork than the alternatives during an aircraft child restraint devices could cause more Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–511), crash. According to the CAMI study, deaths and injuries than it would there are no requirements for these child restraint systems do not prevent. However, the FAA does not information collection associated with securely hold a child in place in an encourage lap-holding children. The this final rule. aircraft crash, and may themselves even Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28421 cause harm to a child in the event of a regulation will not have sufficient § 91.107 Use of safety belts, shoulder crash. These types of accidents, while federalism implications to warrant the harnesses, and child restraint systems. they rarely happen, usually occur preparation of a Federalism Assessment. (a) * * * during the takeoff or landing phases of (3) * * * Conclusion a flight. Thus, prohibiting the use of (i) Be held by an adult who is these child restraint systems during Because of the substantial interest of occupying an approved seat or berth, takeoff and landing will enhance the the public in this subject matter, and provided that the person being held has child’s safety, and the safety benefits based on the findings in the Regulatory not reached his or her second birthday will outweigh the slight compliance Flexibility Determination and the and does not occupy or use any costs discussed above. Since it is International Trade Impact Analysis, the restraining device; impractical to expect flight attendants to FAA has determined that this regulation * * * * * monitor whether children are out of is a significant regulatory action under (iii) * * * banned devices just prior to takeoff, the Executive Order 12866. For the same (B) Except as provided in paragraph FAA is prohibiting the use of these reason, this rule is considered (a)(3)(iii)(B)(4) of this action, the devices during movement on the surface significant under DOT Regulatory approved child restraint system bears also. Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; one or more labels as follows: Regulatory Flexibility Determination February 26, 1979). In addition, it is * * * * * certified that this rule will not have a (4) Notwithstanding any other The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 significant economic impact, positive or (RFA) was enacted by Congress to provision of this section, booster-type negative, on a substantial number of child restraint systems (as defined in ensure that small entities are not small entities under the criteria of the unnecessarily or disproportionately Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Regulatory Flexibility Act. Because the No. 213 (49 CFR 571.213)), vest- and burdened by Federal regulations. The economic impact of this rule is RFA requires a Regulatory Flexibility harness-type child restraint systems, considered minimal, a formal regulatory and lap held child restraints are not Analysis if a rule will have ‘‘a evaluation has not been prepared. significant economic impact on a approved for use in aircraft; and substantial number of small entities.’’ List of Subjects * * * * * FAA Order 2100.14A outlines FAA’s 14 CFR Part 91 procedures and criteria for PART 121ÐOPERATING implementing the RFA. Small entities Aircraft, Aviation safety. REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG, AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS are defined as independently owned 14 CFR Part 121 and operated small businesses and 3. The authority citation for Part 121 Air carriers, Aircraft, Aviation safety, small not-for-profit organizations. continues to read as follows: This rule will impose some Charter flights, Safety, Transportation. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 40119, unquantified costs on air carriers. These 14 CFR Part 125 costs include changing manuals and 44101, 44701–44702, 44705, 44709–44711, Aircraft, Aviation safety. 44713, 44716–44717, 44722, 44901, 44903– training flight attendants about the 44904, 44912, 46105. restrictions on the use of certain child 14 CFR Part 135 restraint devices. Initially, there may be 4. Section 121.311 is amended by some public education necessary and Air taxis, Aircraft, Aviation safety. removing the last sentence in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) immediately preceding the possible flight delays when flight The Amendment attendants tell parents or guardians that semicolon; by removing the final ‘‘and’’ they may not use certain child restraint In consideration of the foregoing, the in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C); by revising devices during ground movement, Federal Aviation Administration paragraph (b)(1); by revising the takeoff, or landing. However, the FAA amends parts 91, 121, 125, and 135 of introductory text of paragraph (b)(2)(ii); believes that this rule will not have a the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 by adding a new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(D); significant economic impact on a CFR parts 91, 121, 125, and 135) as and by revising paragraph (c) to read as substantial number of small entities. follows: follows: International Trade Impact Assessment PART 91ÐGENERAL OPERATING AND § 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses. This rule will not constitute a barrier FLIGHT RULES to international trade, including the * * * * * 1. The authority citation for part 91 (b) * * * export of American goods and services continues to read as follows: to foreign countries and the import of (1) Be held by an adult who is foreign goods and services to the United Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, occupying an approved seat or berth, States. 40120, 44101, 44111, 44701, 44709, 44711, provided the child has not reached his 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717, 44722, 46306, or her second birthday and the child Federalism Implications 46315, 46316, 46502, 46504, 46506–46507, does not occupy or use any restraining The regulations herein will not have 47122, 47508, 47528–47531. device; or substantial direct effects on the states, 2. Section 91.107 is amended by (2) * * * on the relationship between the national removing the last sentence in paragraph (ii) Except as provided in paragraph government and that of any state, or on (a)(3)(iii)(B)(1) immediately preceding (b)(2)(ii)(D) of this section, the approved the distribution of power and the semicolon; by removing the final child restraint system bears one or more responsibilities among the various ‘‘and’’ in paragraph (a)(3)(iii)(B)(3); by labels as follows: levels of government. The respondents revising paragraph (a)(3)(i); by revising * * * * * affected by the amendments are private the introductory text of paragraph (D) Notwithstanding any other citizens, not state governments. (a)(3)(iii)(B); and by adding a new provisions of this section, booster-type Therefore, in accordance with Executive paragraph (a)(3)(iii)(B)(4) to read as child restraint systems (as defined in Order 12612, it is determined that this follows: Federal Motor Vehicle Standard No. 213 28422 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

(49 CFR 571.213)), vest- and harness- (b) * * * Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701– type child restraint systems, and lap (1) Be held by an adult who is 44702, 44705, 44709, 44711–44713, 44715– held child restraints are not approved occupying an approved seat or berth, 44717, 44722. for use in aircraft; and provided the child has not reached his 8. Section 135.128 is amended by * * * * * or her second birthday and the child removing the last sentence in paragraph (c) Except as provided in paragraph does not occupy or use any restraining (a)(2)(ii)(A) immediately preceding the (c)(3) of this section, the following device; or semicolon; by removing the final ‘‘and’’ prohibitions apply to certificate holders: (2) * * * in paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C); by revising (1) No certificate holder may permit a (ii) Except as provided in paragraph paragraph (a)(1); by revising the child, in an aircraft, to occupy a booster- (b)(2)(ii)(D) of this section, the approved introductory text of paragraph (a)(2)(ii); type child restraint system, a vest-type child restraint system bears one or more by adding a new paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(D); child restraint system, a harness-type labels as follows: and by revising paragraph (b) to read as child restraint system, or a lap held * * * * * follows: child restraint system during take off, landing, and movement on the surface. (D) Notwithstanding any other § 135.128 Use of safety belts and child (2) Except as required in paragraph provisions of this section, booster-type restraint systems. (c)(1) of this section, no certificate child restraint systems (as defined in (a) * * * holder may prohibit a child, if requested Federal Motor Vehicle Standard No. 213 (1) Be held by an adult who is by the child’s parent, guardian, or (49 CFR 571.213)), vest- and harness- occupying an approved seat or berth, designated attendant, from occupying a type child restraint systems, and lap provided the child has not reached his child restraint system furnished by the held child restraints are not approved or her second birthday and the child child’s parent, guardian, or designated for use in aircraft; and does not occupy or use any restraining attendant provided— * * * * * device; or (i) The child holds a ticket for an (c) Except as provided in paragraph (2) * * * approved seat or berth or such seat or (c)(3) of this section, the following (ii) Except as provided in paragraph berth is otherwise made available by the prohibitions apply to certificate holders: (a)(2)(ii)(D) of this section, the approved certificate holder for the child’s use; (1) No certificate holder may permit a child restraint system bears one or more (ii) The requirements of paragraph child, in an aircraft, to occupy a booster- labels as follows: (b)(2)(i) of this section are met; type child restraint system, a vest-type * * * * * (iii) The requirements of paragraph child restraint system, a harness-type (D) Notwithstanding any other (b)(2)(iii) of this section are met; and child restraint system, or a lap held provision of this section, booster-type (iv) The child restraint system has one child restraint system during take off, child restraint systems (as defined in or more of the labels described in landing, and movement on the surface. Federal Motor Vehicle Standard No. 213 paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(A) through (2) Except as required in paragraph (49 CFR 571.213)), vest- and harness- (b)(2)(ii)(C) of this section. (c)(1) of this section, no certificate type child restraint systems, and lap (3) This section does not prohibit the holder may prohibit a child, if requested held child restraints are not approved certificate holder from providing child by the child’s parent, guardian, or for use in aircraft; and restraint systems authorized by this designated attendant, from occupying a section or, consistent with safe * * * * * child restraint system furnished by the operating practices, determining the (b) Except as provided in paragraph child’s parent, guardian, or designated most appropriate passenger seat location (b)(3) of this section, the following attendant provided: for the child restraint system. prohibitions apply to certificate holders: (1) The child holds a ticket for an (1) No certificate holder may permit a * * * * * approved seat or berth or such seat or child, in an aircraft, to occupy a booster- PART 125ÐCERTIFICATION AND berth is otherwise made available by the type child restraint system, a vest-type OPERATIONS: AIRPLANES HAVING A certificate holder for the child’s use; child restraint system, a harness-type SEATING CAPACITY OF 20 OR MORE (ii) The requirements of paragraph child restraint system, or a lap held PASSENGERS OR A MAXIMUM (b)(2)(i) of this section are met; child restraint system during take off, PAYLOAD CAPACITY OF 6,000 (iii) The requirements of paragraph landing, or movement on the surface. POUNDS OR MORE (b)(2)(iii) of this section are met; and (2) Except as required in paragraph (iv) The child restraint system has one (b)(1) of this section, no certificate 5. The authority citation for Part 125 or more of the labels described in holder may prohibit a child, if requested continues to read as follows: paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(A) through by the child’s parent, guardian, or Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701– (b)(2)(ii)(C) of this section. designated attendant, from occupying a 44702, 44705, 44710–44711, 44713, 44716– (3) This section does not prohibit the child restraint system furnished by the 44717, 44722. certificate holder from providing child child’s parent, guardian, or designated 6. Section 125.211 is amended by restraint systems authorized by this attendant provided: removing the last sentence in paragraph section or, consistent with safe (i) The child holds a ticket for an (b)(2)(ii)(A) immediately preceding the operating practices, determining the approved seat or berth or such seat or semicolon; by removing the final ‘‘and’’ most appropriate passenger seat location berth is otherwise made available by the in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C); by revising for the child restraint system. certificate holder for the child’s use; (ii) The requirements of paragraph paragraph (b)(1); by revising the * * * * * introductory text of paragraph (b)(2)(ii); (a)(2)(i) of this section are met; by adding a new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(D); PART 135ÐOPERATING (iii) The requirements of paragraph and by revising paragraph (c) to read as REQUIREMENTS: COMMUTER AND (a)(2)(iii) of this section are met; and follows: ON-DEMAND OPERATIONS (iv) The child restraint system has one or more of the labels described in § 125.211 Seat and safety belts. 7. The authority citation for Part 135 paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)(A) through * * * * * continues to read as follows: (a)(2)(ii)(C) of this section. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28423

(3) This section does not prohibit the DATES: This rule is effective on booster seat.1 A backless child restraint certificate holder from providing child September 3, 1996. has a structural element (typically a restraint systems authorized by this or, Petitions for reconsideration of the shield) designed to restrain forward consistent with safe operating practices, rule must be received by July 19, 1996. motion of the child’s torso in a frontal determining the most appropriate ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration crash. Backless child restraint systems passenger seat location for the child should refer to the docket and number are generally intended for children restraint system. of this document and be submitted to: weighing from 30 to 60 pounds. Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 24, Administrator, Room 5220, National Backless child restraint systems are also 1996. Highway Traffic Safety Administration, known as ‘‘backless booster seats’’ or David R. Hinson, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, ‘‘shield-type’’ booster seats. D.C., 20590. Administrator. Background FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [FR Doc. 96–13771 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] For nonlegal issues: Dr. George Mouchahoir, Standard 213 permits manufacturers 2 BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Office of Vehicle Safety Standards to certify their restraints for aircraft use (telephone 202–366–4919, fax 202–366– if they are certified for use in motor 4329). For legal issues: Ms. Deirdre vehicles and meet an additional DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fujita, Office of the Chief Counsel requirement, an inversion test. The (telephone 202–366–2992, fax 202–366– provisions permitting such certification National Highway Traffic Safety were added to the standard in 1984 (49 Administration 3820). Both can be reached at the National Highway Traffic Safety FR 34357; August 30, 1984), partly in response to suggestions of the National 49 CFR Part 571 Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, D.C., 20590. For Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) that [Docket No. 74±09; Notice 45] information on FAA’s rule, contact Ms. DOT simplify its standards for the performance of child restraints on RIN 2127±AF46 Donell Pollard (AFS–203), Air Transportation Division, Flight aircraft by combining all technical Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards Service (telephone 202–267– requirements into a single standard Standards; Child Restraint Systems 3735), Federal Aviation Administration, (NTSB Safety Recommendations A–83– 800 Independence Avenue SW., 1, February 24, 1983). Prior to the AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Washington, D.C., 20591. amendment, FAA had its own child Safety Administration (NHTSA), restraint standard, Technical Standard SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Department of Transportation. Order C100 (TSO C100). TSO C100 and document amends the provision in FMVSS 213 had different performance ACTION: Final rule. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard requirements, methods of certification No. 213, ‘‘Child Restraint Systems,’’ that SUMMARY: This rule, and a companion and testing procedures. rule issued by the Federal Aviation permits child restraint systems to be In the 1984 rulemaking, NHTSA and Administration (FAA), address the use certified for use in both motor vehicles FAA concluded that the DOT child of child harnesses and backless child and aircraft. This rule complements an restraint requirements should be restraints in aircraft. This document FAA rule, published elsewhere in consolidated in FMVSS 213 and that a amends a provision in Federal Motor today’s Federal Register, that withdraws TSO C100 inversion test was the only Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213, ‘‘Child approval for the use of booster seats and performance requirement from the FAA Restraint Systems,’’ that permits those vest- and harness-type child restraint standard that needed to be incorporated restraints to be certified for use in both systems on aircraft, and prohibits into FMVSS 213. In the inversion test, motor vehicles and aircraft. airlines from permitting a child to be the combination of a child restraint, test Under the current FAA regulations, restrained in such a restraint during take dummy and aircraft passenger seat is aircraft-certified child restraints may be off, landing, and movement on the rotated forward at a specified speed to used on aircraft. However, because surface, even if the restraint is certified an inverted position and held there, and testing has raised FAA’s concerns about for aircraft use. The notice of proposed later rotated sideways at the same speed the safety of using harnesses and rulemaking (NPRM) on which this and held. During the test, the child backless child restraint systems on the NHTSA rule is based was published at restraint must not fall out of the aircraft types of seats found in aircraft, FAA is 60 FR 30696 (June 9, 1995). safety belt and the test dummy must not Harnesses and booster seats are types publishing a rule in today’s Federal fall out of the child restraint. of child restraint systems regulated by Register that prohibits the use of booster Prior to the 1984 rulemaking, a Standard 213. A harness typically seats, and vest- and harness-type child manufacturer wishing to designate a consists of a vest or a series of straps restraint systems on aircraft during take child restraint model as suitable for use that form a vest-like garment, that off, landing and movement on the in aircraft had to submit information to attaches at the back of the harness to a surface, even if these restraints are FAA to obtain its approval of the model. vehicle seat’s lap belt. Harnesses are As a result of this pre-1984 approval certified for aircraft use. generally intended for children who In view of the FAA’s determination process, there was a disparity between weigh from 25 to 50 pounds. Some that harnesses and booster seats are the number of child restraints available require the use of a tether strap to unsuitable for use during significant supplement the lap belt. The restraint portions of a flight, the agency believes 1 The other type of booster seat is the ‘‘belt that the FAA refers to as a ‘‘booster continuing to permit the certification of positioning seat,’’ which is intended for use by seat’’ is a ‘‘backless child restraint children weighing from 30 to 60 pounds, and those restraints for aircraft use would be system’’ under Standard 213. (See designed for use with a lap/shoulder belt system. inconsistent and likely confusing to the definitions of ‘‘booster seat’’ and 2 The ‘‘belt positioning’’ booster seat is not public. Accordingly, this rule no longer eligible for such certification. FMVSS No. 213 does ‘‘backless child restraint system’’ in S4 not permit these restraints to be certified for aircraft permits those restraints to be certified of FMVSS 213.) A ‘‘backless child for aircraft use, and instead requires use because aircraft passenger seats typically lack restraint system’’ is one of two types of shoulder belts. See amendment of FMVSS 213 to manufacturers to label these restraints permit manufacture of belt-positioning child seats as not certified for use in aircraft. (59 FR 37167; July 21, 1994). 28424 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations for use in motor vehicles and the harnesses and shield boosters, these limit occupant head excursion, head number available for use in aircraft. In systems included ‘‘infant seats,’’ which and chest accelerations and abdominal 1984, approximately 28 models of child position an infant so that the baby faces forces. In addition, the test program restraints were produced under FMVSS toward the rear of the motor vehicle or evaluated the effect that the impact load 213 for use in motor vehicles. The child aircraft; and ‘‘convertible’’ child seats, of an ‘‘aft row occupant’’ had on the restraint manufacturers obtained TSO which convert so that they can be used performance of a child restraint located authorizations for only five of the 28 rear-facing with infants and forward- in an aircraft seat immediately in front models, or only 16 percent of the total facing with toddlers. In addition, there of the aft row occupant. The aft row production of child restraints. are restraint systems that are certified occupant impact load was generated in The lack of FAA approval of most for use in airplanes by foreign countries. tests called ‘‘double row tests,’’ using an motor vehicle child restraints for use in adult test dummy placed in the aft row FAA Withdrawal of Approval aircraft aroused several safety concerns. seat. One was that some families traveling by Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register, air were discouraged from taking FAA is withdrawing approval for the Booster Seat Tests unapproved child restraints with them use of booster seats and vest- and CAMI tested four models of shield- and thus did not have them available for harness-type child restraint systems on type booster seats in six dynamic tests, use at their destination to protect their aircraft, and prohibiting airlines from three of which involved single row tests, children while the family was driving. permitting a child to be restrained in and the other three, double row tests. The other concern was that those such a restraint during take off, landing, With regard to fit and adjustment of the families who nevertheless took their and movement on the surface. The FAA booster seats to the airplane seat chosen unapproved child restraints on trips had is also emphasizing the existing for testing purposes, CAMI found that to stow the restraints in the aircraft prohibition in all aircraft against the use three had fit and adjustment problems. cargo compartment, and thus were not of lap held child restraints, such as belly One booster seat had problems fitting an able to use them to protect their belts.3 airplane seat because of the limited children during the flight. FAA’s action responds to research by width between arm rests on the The effect of the 1984 rulemaking was its Civil Aeromedical Institute (CAMI). passenger seat. This may have occurred to speed certification of child restraints The CAMI research is discussed in a because of the difference in width for use in aircraft, and thereby increase report entitled, ‘‘The Performance of between the representative aircraft seat the availability of aircraft-certified child Child Restraint Devices in Transport (about 20 inches wide) used in FMVSS restraints. Since then, manufacturers Airplane Passenger Seats,’’ a copy of 213 and the aircraft seat (17.25 inches have been able, under FMVSS 213, to which has been placed in NHTSA wide) used in the CAMI testing. Two certify their child restraints for aircraft rulemaking docket 74–09, notice 41. booster seats had incompatibility use by ensuring that they pass all of the (Persons wishing to obtain a copy of the problems between the buckle/webbing standard’s motor vehicle requirements report should contact FAA at the path molded in the front shield and the and the inversion test. As a result, there address given in the ‘‘For Further airplane web path and buckle position has been a tremendous increase in the Information’’ section at the beginning of of the lap belt on the airplane passenger number of child restraints certified for this final rule document.) CAMI seat used by CAMI. In fact, the webbing use in aircraft. dynamically tested six types of could not be installed over the front FAA complemented NHTSA’s restraining devices: child harnesses, shield in accordance with the rulemaking by amending its Federal booster seats, rear-facing infant seats, positioning instruction of the booster Aviation Regulations (FARs)(14 CFR convertible child restraint systems, seats’ manufacturers. CAMI also found Parts 91, 121, 125 and 135) to provide airplane seat lap belts, and belly belts. that one of the four booster seats failed for the in-flight use of aircraft-certified The first four devices were evaluated for structurally, and two of the others child restraints. The amendments their ability to fit and adjust to an allowed forward head excursion in required the air carriers to allow the use airplane passenger seat and lap belt. The excess of the 32-inch distance permitted of any child restraint having a label lap belt was evaluated for its ability to by FMVSS 213. indicating that it is certified to FMVSS secure test dummies representative of CAMI also found a problem with the 213, manufactured under the standards children two and three years old. Fit loads that the child dummies restrained of the United Nations, or approved by and adjustment was not considered an in the tested booster seats experienced a foreign government, as long as the issue for the installation of the belly when the boosters were on a seat with restraint can be secured to a forward- belt. All of the devices were evaluated a breakover seat back and exposed to facing passenger seat. An infant or child for their performance in aircraft seats loads from the aft row occupant. Its tests who is accompanied by a parent, with and without ‘‘breakover’’ seat showed that loads from an aft row adult guardian, or properly designated backs (a breakover feature allows the occupant resulted in an increase in attendant and who is properly placed in seat back to rotate forward easily when abdominal loading of the dummy in a a device that meets the labeling impacted by an occupant from behind). booster seat, as compared to the requirements of the FARs and that, in They were also evaluated, using abdominal loading of a dummy in an turn, is properly secured in an approved anthropomorphic test dummies aircraft lap belt with an adult aft-row aircraft seat using the safety belt, has representing children, for their ability to occupant. The CAMI study states that, been considered by FAA to comply with when placed in a seat with a breakover 3 its regulations requiring each person to Belly belts restrain a small child on the lap of seat back, the booster seat encounters occupy an approved seat during takeoff an adult and consist of a short loop of webbing with buckle hardware on the ends. The belt is buckled problems because: and landing. around the child’s abdomen and is secured to the There are currently many different With no back shell, the typical booster seat adult’s safety belt by routing the adult’s safety belt does not provide protection from the forces types of child restraint systems that are through a small loop of webbing sewn on the belly transmitted by the airplane seat back during certified as complying with FMVSS belt. Belly belts are certified for airplane use by the Civil Aviation Authority of the United Kingdom. horizontal impact conditions. Traditionally, 213’s motor vehicle and aircraft However, belly belts cannot meet the performance restraint systems in airplanes have been requirements, and thus permitted by requirements of FMVSS 213 and therefore have not designed to avoid loads transmitted to the FAA for use on aircraft. In addition to been certified for use in the United States. soft tissues of the abdomen. A child Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28425 restrained in a booster seat may be forced use. The standard already requires that in today’s Federal Register). That against the rigid shield due to the seat back belt-positioning booster seats be so document also discusses FAA’s breakover action. For the intended size of labeled. The agency issued the proposal responses to the other nine comments children in booster seats, the load path of on the basis that, in view of the FAA’s these breakover forces may include the on its NPRM, including those from abdominal region. determination that harnesses and industry groups, aviation authorities, air booster seats are unsuitable for use carriers and child restraint It is to be noted that CAMI also found during significant portions of a flight, manufacturers. that the abdominal loads on a child continuing to permit the certification of ATA’s comment was pertinent to dummy placed in a shield-type booster those restraints for aircraft use would be NHTSA in two respects. First, it seat secured to an airplane seat with a inconsistent and likely confusing to the locked seat back were higher than on a public. provides support for NHTSA’s child dummy secured in a typical NHTSA received one comment on its rulemaking, in that it indicates that airplane seat lap belt with a locked seat rulemaking proposal. The commenter confusion is not only likely, but has in back. The FAA recognized, however, was the Air Transport Association of fact resulted from a discrepancy that there are no accepted criteria to America (ATA), representing its U.S. between a manufacturer’s assertion assess the relationship between passenger carrying airline members. The about the suitability of a restraint for differences in measured levels of ATA comment responded to both the aircraft and the FAA’s determination abdominal loadings and any resulting NHTSA and FAA proposals. FAA that it is not. By preventing risk of abdominal injury, and the type received nine other comments on its manufacturers from labeling booster and severity of such injury. proposal. seats and harnesses as appropriate for Harness Tests With regard to ATA’s comment on the aircraft use, NHTSA’s rule will reduce agencies’ proposals, except as noted the potential for confusion to the extent CAMI tested one type of harness below, ATA focused mainly on issues possible. restraint. The restraint consisted of a relating to the proposed FAA provisions torso vest with straps over the shoulders In addition, ATA also stated that it for implementing the contemplated ban. believed that ‘‘before final action is and around the waist, and a crotch The commenter particularly directed its taken on this rulemaking,’’ FAA and strap. The shoulder and abdomen straps comments toward what ATA believed NHTSA must explain how this were attached to a rectangular metal were potential difficulties the airlines rulemaking relates to a ‘‘larger issue.’’ plate on the back of the restraint. The (‘‘carriers’’) may experience in enforcing While ATA was unclear defining the airplane lap belts were routed through it. ATA believed carriers should not be a loop of webbing attached to the metal placed in the role of ‘‘policing ‘‘larger issue,’’ it appears that ATA is back plate on the restraint. compliance’’ with the proposed concerned about possible fit and The restraint was tested with a three- requirements, suggesting instead ‘‘a adjustment problems between the year-old test dummy in two single row more informational role.’’ ATA was airplane seat and restraint systems that tests. CAMI found incompatibility concerned that some passengers might can continue to be certified for and used problems between the harness and the insist on using a banned restraint, and in aircraft, in the aftermath of today’s airplane seat lap belts: might be confused by the fact that their rule. For example, the CAMI report With the lap belts adjusted to the restraint might be certified for aircraft found that some forward facing minimum length, the [harness] could be use. (NHTSA’s rule will affect restraints convertible restraints could not be moved forward approximately 7 inches that are manufactured on or after the secured satisfactorily in the airplane before tension was developed in the belts. effective date of the rule. Restraints that passenger seat used for testing purposes. This was considered unsatisfactory for testing. were manufactured before the effective FAA and NHTSA believe this issue date and that were certified for aircraft was addressed in the NPRMs. As CAMI also found grossly excessive use bear a label that the restraint is so discussed there, in view of the problems excursion of the child anthropomorphic certified.) ATA stated that, test dummy (ATD) restrained in the revealed by the CAMI testing, NHTSA harness: It has been the practice of several airlines and FAA will consider a separate that when confronted with an appropriately rulemaking to assess the need to The ATD moved forward and over the front labeled device that is not actually approved improve FMVSS 213’s requirements for edge of the seat cushion and proceeded to for use (e.g., belly belts) to advise the submarine toward the floor. Elasticity in the passenger of that fact and to attempt to aircraft-certified child restraints other webbing of the harness and the lap belts then discourage the use of the device. For the most than harnesses and booster seats. The heaved the ATD rearward. The force pulling part, these efforts are successful. In the agencies are developing possible the ATD back into the seat appeared to be unusual case, however, where a passenger requirements and procedures that could applied by the Gz [crotch] strap directly insists upon the use of the device (often improve the assessment of the through the pubic symphysis of the pelvic citing the ‘‘appropriate label’’ as allowing performance of child restraint systems bone. this use) the practice is to avoid confrontation and permit the use if that is the in the aircraft environment. Among Based on this finding, CAMI only remaining alternative. In light of the other issues, the agencies will consider concluded that a harness performs new increasing numbers of devices with whether the seat assembly used under poorly in protecting the child occupant. regard to which this type of experience is to FMVSS 213 in testing child restraints be expected, the rule obviously must take Proposal and Comments for aircraft use sufficiently represents an into account the practicalities of this real aircraft passenger seat.4 The agencies are Based on these test results, the FAA world experience and provide for this type of proceeding with this assessment. proposed to withdraw approval for the situation without threat of penalty to the carrier. (Emphasis in text.) use of harnesses and booster seats on 4 Child restraints certified as complying with aircraft. 60 FR 30690, June 9, 1995. At For FAA’s response to this and other FMVSS 213’s aircraft requirements are currently the same time, NHTSA issued an NPRM comments from the ATA on tested on a ‘‘representative aircraft passenger seat’’ to amend FMVSS 213 to require requirements proposed by FAA, readers (S7.3 of FMVSS 213). FMVSS 213 also specifies that manufacturers to label harnesses and should refer to the FAA final rule FAA approved aircraft safety belts are used to test backless booster seats as not for aircraft (published concurrently with this rule, child restraints that are certified to the aircraft requirements. 28426 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Other Issues seating environment of motor vehicles Booster seats could fit better on motor In undertaking the current and that of aircraft. Because of those vehicles than aircraft in part because of rulemaking, NHTSA recognized that a differences, the problems encountered the design of the belt restraints with rule restricting the use of child with child restraint use in aircraft are which the boosters are attached to the restraints in aircraft could affect the use not encountered with child restraint use automobile. The position of the buckle of the restraints in motor vehicles. In the in motor vehicles. Therefore, for an aircraft seat belt assembly is very 1984 rulemaking that allowed child notwithstanding this rule, the use of different from that of a buckle for a restraints to be certified for use in motor harnesses and booster seats in motor vehicle seat belt assembly. An aircraft vehicles and aircraft, NHTSA vehicles continues to be important for seat belt assembly is designed so that recognized that parents might not use child safety. when it is buckled, the buckle is located The problems reported by CAMI, i.e., child restraints to transport their midway between the anchorages, in the combined effects of aircraft seatback children in a vehicle to and from the front of the user’s abdomen. A motor breakover designs and aft occupant vehicle lap/shoulder belt or lap-only airport if the child restraint could not be impacts, are not encountered in motor used on the aircraft. The data indicated belt is designed so that the buckle is vehicles. The seat back in a motor located to the side of the user’s torso, that child safety was not a critical issue vehicle is designed to remain fixed in a for aircraft in terms of the number of near the hip, when the belt is buckled. crash and not ‘‘breakover’’ in the Another reason for believing that the child deaths or injuries, but that it was manner of an airplane seat. Also, a a large problem for motor vehicles. problems reported by CAMI are not vehicle seat containing a child restraint indicative of the performance of child Many State laws that require the use of is less likely to be impacted from the child seats in motor vehicles do not restraints in motor vehicles is the rear by an adult than is an aircraft seat difference between the crash pulse used cover all the ages of children that might containing a child restraint. There are use booster seats. NHTSA was by CAMI and the crash pulse used in several reasons for this. First, child FMVSS 213 testing. In its testing of head concerned that, if booster seats may not restraints are recommended for use in be used on aircraft, and if parents are excursion, head and chest acceleration the rear instead of front vehicle seating and abdominal forces, CAMI used a not willing to stow them with their positions. Thus, if a child restraint is luggage, there is a possibility that the crash pulse appropriate for aircraft. installed as recommended, there will FMVSS 213 testing, by contrast, restraints could be left home altogether not, in most cases, be any passenger and thus not used to restrain a child in involves the use of a motor vehicle rearward of the child restraint who crash pulse. the vehicle. It was suggested that the could impact and load the seat number of child injuries in motor containing the child restraint in the Compliance Date vehicle accidents might increase event of a frontal crash. Exceptions The compliance date for this rule is in because of this non-use. would be in vehicles, such as vans and 90 days. There is good cause for this In issuing the NPRM, NHTSA reached some station wagons, which have three short compliance date. It is the same as a tentative conclusion that restricting rows of seats. Second, if there were a that of FAA’s rule that withdraws the use of booster seats and harnesses passenger seated behind the seat approval of boosters and harnesses for on aircraft would not adversely affect containing a child restraint, and that use on aircraft. The effective date for the motor vehicle safety by increasing the person were sitting in an outboard agencies’ rules should be identical since numbers of unrestrained children in seating position, the person most likely the two rulemaking actions complement vehicles. While NHTSA requested would have a lap/shoulder belt system each other. FAA seeks to restrict the use comments on how it should assess this available for use. Most aircraft lack of boosters and harnesses on aircraft as issue, no comment was received. The shoulder belts. If the vehicle passenger expeditiously as possible to address agency has decided to proceed with this were restrained by that belt system, the what that agency has concluded to be a rulemaking in view of the lack of person would not load the seat with the possible safety problem. NHTSA’s rule information indicating that the child restraint in the manner observed minimizes the potential for confusion rulemaking will reduce the use of child in the CAMI study. Third, given the and misunderstanding on the part of restraints during the ground portion of number of persons typically carried in consumers, by preventing a trip. However, the agencies will a motor vehicle, it is unlikely there manufacturers from certifying boosters monitor the situation for a possible would be an adult seated behind a child and harnesses for aircraft use when in degradation of motor vehicle safety. in a child restraint, regardless of the fact FAA does not approve of those After considering ATA’s comment on number or pattern of seats in the the rulemaking and other pertinent restraints for such use. Given the above, vehicle. a 90-day effective date is in the public information, NHTSA has decided to Further, harnesses and other child interest. adopt the requirements proposed in the restraints are tested under FMVSS 213 NPRM, without change. This on a seat assembly that is representative Rulemaking Analyses and Notices amendment to Standard 213 will of a motor vehicle seat, and that is Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory remove the possibility that a restraint equipped with a safety belt Planning and Review) and DOT could be certified for aircraft use despite representative of the lap belt in the Regulatory Policies and Procedures the fact the FAA has prohibited such center rear seating position. In its use of that restraint. This amendment compliance testing, the agency has not NHTSA has evaluated the impacts of reduces the likelihood of confusion and found a problem between the vehicle this rule and has determined that it is misunderstanding on the part of lap belt and a child harness such as that significant within the meaning of the consumers, and makes the FAA and found by CAMI between an airplane lap Department of Transportation’s NHTSA requirements consistent. belt and a harness. In addition, NHTSA regulatory policies and procedures. The However, for clarification purposes, has not found in its compliance testing rulemaking action is significant because NHTSA emphasizes the following the type of fit and adjustment problems of the substantial public interest in points about the use and performance of between booster seats and the vehicle issues involving child seats on aircraft. child restraints. First, there are seats that CAMI found between booster Further, this rule is a significant significant differences between the seats and the aircraft seats. regulatory action under E.O. 12866. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28427

While this action is significant restraints (not counting vehicle standards. That section does not require because of the public interest associated manufacturers that produce and install submission of a petition for with it, NHTSA concludes that this rule built-in restraints), 7 of which are reconsideration or other administrative will have minimal impacts. In 1991, considered to be small businesses proceedings before parties may file suit there were an estimated 1,200,000 (including Kolcraft, which with an in court. booster seats produced. The consumer estimated 500 employees, is on the List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571 cost of a label is estimated to be $0.09 borderline of being a small business). to $0.17, and total annual costs of a This number does not constitute a Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor separate label range from $108,000 to substantial number of small entities. vehicles. $204,000. Regardless of this number, NHTSA does In consideration of the foregoing, However, adding a sentence to the not believe this rule will have a NHTSA amends 49 CFR Part 571 as set existing label, most likely the course of significant impact on small businesses. forth below. action taken in response to this As noted above, this rulemaking will rulemaking, would cost much less. This have a minimal effect on labeling costs PART 571Ð[AMENDED] cost might be $0.01 per label, resulting and no effect on child restraint sales. in a total annual cost of $12,000. Fewer 1. The authority citation for Part 571 harnesses are produced than booster Executive Order 12612 (Federalism) continues to read as follows: seats. The label on a harness is typically This rulemaking action has been Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, cloth, and sewn on to the restraint. analyzed in accordance with the 30117 and 30166; delegation of authority at Assuming that 10,000 to 50,000 principles and criteria contained in 49 CFR 1.50. harnesses are produced annually, the Executive Order 12612. The agency has 2. Section 571.213 is amended by cost of a label will probably be over determined that this rule will not have revising S5.5.2(n) to read as follows: $1.00. However, even with this cost, the sufficient federalism implications to cost of the labeling requirement is warrant the preparation of a Federalism § 571.213 Standard No. 213; Child restraint minimal. Moreover, there is a possible Assessment. systems. economic benefit of this rule. Since * * * * * National Environmental Policy Act booster seats and harnesses will no S5.5.2 * * * longer be permitted to be certified for NHTSA has analyzed this rulemaking (n) Child restraint systems, other than aircraft, there will be no need to perform action for the purposes of the National belt-positioning seats, harnesses and the inversion test. Thus, testing costs to Environmental Policy Act. The agency backless child restraint systems, may be the child restraint manufacturer will be has determined that implementation of certified as complying with the slightly reduced. this action will not have any significant provisions of S8. Child restraints that Further, the agency believes sales of impact on the quality of the human are so certified shall be labeled with the booster seats and harnesses will be environment. statement ‘‘This Restraint is Certified for minimally affected, if at all, by the Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Use in Motor Vehicles and Aircraft.’’ prohibition against their certification for Reform) Belt-positioning seats, harnesses and This rule will not have any retroactive aircraft use. NHTSA believes almost all backless child restraint systems shall be effect. Under section 49 U.S.C. 30103, consumers decide to purchase a child labeled with the statement ‘‘This whenever a Federal motor vehicle safety restraint based on their intent to use the Restraint is Not Certified for Use in standard is in effect, a state may not restraint in a motor vehicle, not in Aircraft.’’ The statement required by adopt or maintain a safety standard aircraft. this paragraph shall be in red lettering applicable to the same aspect of and shall be placed after the Regulatory Flexibility Act performance which is not identical to certification statement required by NHTSA has considered the effects of the Federal standard, except to the S5.5.2(e). this rule under the Regulatory extent that the state requirement Flexibility Act. For the reasons noted imposes a higher level of performance * * * * * above and below, I hereby certify that and applies only to vehicles procured Issued on May 20, 1996. this rule will not have a significant for the State’s use. 49 U.S.C. 30161 sets Ricardo Martinez, economic impact on a substantial forth a procedure for judicial review of Administrator. number of small entities. The agency final rules establishing, amending or [FR Doc. 96–13772 Filed 6–03–96; 8:45 am] knows of 13 manufacturers of child revoking Federal motor vehicle safety BILLING CODE 4910±59±P federal register June 4,1996 Tuesday Vibration andTests;FinalRule Rotation andRotorLockingTests, Airworthiness Standards;Continued 14 CFRPart33 Federal AviationAdministration Transportation Department of Part V 28429 28430 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, ‘‘likely to occur’’. The FAA has also and the United States. The basis for the made additional changes to revised Federal Aviation Administration comparison was part 33, as amended § 33.74 as noted in response to other through Amendment 11, and JAR–E, as comments. 14 CFR Part 33 amended through Change 7. As its One commenter states that the term [Docket No. 28107; Amendment No. 33±17] initial effort, the study group focused on ‘‘typical installation’’ should be deleted, gas turbine engines and concentrated on because the rule applies to all RIN 2120±AF57 JAR–E items that appeared to be more installations. The FAA agrees. This term has been Airworthiness Standards; Continued stringent than part 33. The continued deleted from this section. Rotation and Rotor Locking Tests, and rotation and rotor locking test One commenter states that the term Vibration and Vibration Tests requirements, and vibration and vibration test requirements, were ‘‘for any reason’’ be either deleted or AGENCY: Federal Aviation identified as differences sufficiently clarified, because this wording will Administration, DOT. significant to cause the JAA to apply require compliance for the case of a ACTION: Final rule. additional conditions to U.S. failed rotor locking devices, if installed. manufacturers seeking JAA certification. The FAA agrees. The rule does not SUMMARY: This amendment revises the The FAA requested the ARAC to further intend to consider a failed rotor locking Federal Aviation Administration’s evaluate these initiatives and ARAC device. The FAA has, therefore, added (FAA’s) continued rotation and assigned the task to the Propulsion a clarifying statement to this effect. vibration certification standards for the Harmonization Working Group. The However, the term ‘‘for any reason’’ has issuance of original and amended type task resulted in an ARAC been retained to cover all other reasons certificates for aircraft engines. This recommendation to the FAA to proceed for an engine shutdown. amendment is the result of an effort to with rulemaking. The FAA issued a One commenter states that the term harmonize the Federal Aviation Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ‘‘flight conditions expected to occur’’ be Regulations (FAR’s) with European (NPRM), No. 95–3, published in the included in the text of the rule. requirements being drafted by the Joint Federal Register (60 FR 12360, dated The FAA agrees. The FAA has Aviation Authorities (JAA). This March 6, 1995). The proposal reflected included this term in the rule. amendment will provide nearly uniform the ARAC recommendations. Two commenters state that the term requirements that will simplify ‘‘hazard to the aircraft’’ should be international airworthiness approval, Discussion of Comments deleted, and replaced by more definitive while maintaining a level of safety All interested persons have been criteria. equivalent to that established by the afforded an opportunity to participate in The FAA agrees. The FAA has current standards. this rulemaking, and due consideration replaced this term with a more DATES: Effective July 5, 1996. has been given to all comments definitive criteria by referencing § 33.75. That criteria can be evaluated at the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: received. The commenters represent engine level, without the need for an Marc Bouthillier, or Thomas Boudreau, domestic industry and foreign aircraft installation assessment. Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, airworthiness authorities. Six One commenter states that the ANE–110, Engine and Propeller commenters provided the FAA with proposed rule should also require Directorate, Aircraft Certification comments to NPRM 95–3. Two of these determination of aircraft/engine Service, FAA, New England Region, 12 six commenters expressed no objection interface loads associated with New England Executive Park, to the proposals. The comments are continued rotation with rotor Burlington, MA 01803–5299; telephone grouped according to the applicable unbalance, and submittal of these for (617) 238–7111; fax (617) 238–7199. revised and new sections of part 33. engine certification. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 33.74 Continued Rotation The FAA disagrees. The FAA Two commenters state that the term considers this comment to be beyond Background ‘‘windmilling’’ should be changed to the scope of this rulemaking, because Part 33 of title 14 of the Code of ‘‘continued rotation,’’ to be consistent the proposal addresses only the Federal Regulations (14 CFR part 33) with the existing wording of part 23 and continued rotation characteristics of the prescribes certification standards for the part 25, and to encompass mechanical engine; it did not address aircraft issuance of original and amended type as well as aerodynamic effects. structural requirements for various certificates for aircraft engines. Part E of The FAA agrees. The FAA has engine load conditions. Also, the the Joint Aviation Requirements (JAR–E) changed the term ‘‘windmilling’’ to commenter does not specify any criteria prescribes the corresponding ‘‘continued rotation,’’ wherever it for evaluating aircraft/engine interface certification standards of the JAA. While appears. loads, which can only be evaluated part 33 and JAR–E are similar, they One commenter states that the when considering an entire airplane. differ in several respects. Non–uniform wording of proposed 33.74 in the NPRM standards impose a regulatory burden is awkward, and should be revised for Section 33.63 Vibration on applicants seeking certification clarity. One commenter expressed concern under both sets of standards in the form The FAA agrees. The FAA has with the apparent inference to structural of additional costs and delays in the rewritten this section to more clearly assessments of the aircraft due to engine time required for certification. state the requirement. The phrase ‘‘any dynamic loads. The commenter suggests As part of its commitment to promote of the engine main rotating systems’’ that this part of the proposal not be harmonization of part 33 and JAR–E, the replaces ‘‘engine’’, and the revised issued and that the appropriate ARAC FAA, with the cooperation of the JAA, section now specifies that the standard Structures and Propulsion working established the part 33/JAR–E does not apply when rotor locking groups be tasked to work the issue. Authorities Engine Group to compare systems are in place. In addition the The FAA disagrees. The FAA part 33 and JAR–E. This group included phrase ‘‘and in the flight conditions considers this comment is beyond the regulatory representatives from France, expected to occur’’ replaces the phrase scope of this rulemaking. The revision Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28431 to § 33.63 clarifies, but does not alter, of the harmonized vibration order of proposed paragraphs 33.83 (d) the original intent of a requirement that requirements. and (e) needs to be reversed. was promulgated as a Civil Air One commenter states the phrase The FAA agrees. The FAA has Regulation on June 15, 1956. The ‘‘throughout the declared flight reversed order of new paragraphs 33.83 practical application of this requirement envelope’’ was used redundantly in (d) and (e) and has added additional is to demonstrate those peak vibratory proposed paragraphs 33.83(a) and words to clarify which criterion applies stresses of engine components do not 33.83(b). in each condition. exceed the material endurance limit for The FAA disagrees. Revised One commenter suggested editorial all normal engine operation (i.e., does paragraph 33.83(a) contains general changes to clarify that vibratory stresses not consider engine failure conditions vibration test requirements while are combined with steady stresses when that would be evident to the crew). The revised paragraph 33.83(b) contains comparing to the material’s endurance requirement of parts 23.939, 25.939, more specific test requirements. The limit. 27.939, and 29.939 further ensures that defining term ‘‘throughout the declared The FAA agrees. The paragraph has the installation of the engine to the flight envelope’’ is needed in both been revised to better define the intent aircraft will not result in excessive paragraphs. of the harmonized vibration vibratory stresses of engine components One commenter states that alternative requirements. The phrase ‘‘when for all normal engine operation. wording is needed to the speed combined with the appropriate steady Additionally, the combined extension requirements of proposed state stresses’’ has been added to new requirements of paragraphs 33.63 and paragraph 33.83(b). The commenter paragraph 33.83(d). 33.29(b) require that an indication of further states that the surveys should be One commenter states that proposed excessive vibration (rotor unbalance) be extended sufficiently to reveal the paragraph 33.83(e) appears to be a provided to the installer. These maximum stress value but limiting the design not a performance requirement, indications are provided to the crew to rotational speed extension to no more and therefore, infers that this proposed alert them of conditions beyond what is than an additional 2 percentage points. paragraph is inappropriately included considered normal engine operation so The FAA agrees. The FAA will in the vibration test section. that immediate corrective actions can be incorporate the wording recommended The FAA disagrees. New paragraph taken. It has never been the intent of by the commenter to better define the 33.83(d) is the primary criterion for this requirement nor is it the intent of intent of the speed extension evaluating the results of tests and the revised requirement to establish the requirement. analyses conducted in accordance with abnormal engine environment for revised paragraphs 33.83 (a), (b), and (c). Section 33.83(c) One commenter states that the designing aircraft structures. In a One commenter states that the standard requiring vibration stresses to separate and unrelated task, the FAA proposal eliminates those requirements be less than the endurance limits of the has chartered the ARAC Loads and specific to accessory drives and materials concerned should be relaxed Dynamic Harmonization Working Group mounting attachments, and also asks to assess the vibration stresses against to assess whether the current aircraft whether the FAA is still concerned the endurance limits of the materials structural requirements adequately about accessory drives and mounting concerned. address the engine dynamic loads attachments. The FAA does not agree. The resulting from turbine engine failures. The FAA disagrees. The FAA still has commenter’s suggestion allows for Section 33.83 Vibration test concerns on the integration acceptance of vibration stresses greater requirements of accessory drives and than the endurance limits without any Section 33.83(a) mounting attachments and specific definitive limitation. All engines on an One commenter states that additional reference to accessory loading is aircraft are subject to the same clarification be provided on the retained in revised paragraph 33.83(c). environmental and operating intended means of measuring vibration New paragraph 33.83(f) provides for a conditions. The standard requiring stresses. The commenter states that the more complete and thorough integration vibratory stresses of less than the requirements infer direct measurements of the engine to the aircraft, including endurance limit is necessary, therefore, of vibratory stresses can only be accessory drives and mounting to minimize the likelihood of having measured using strain gauges. attachments. multiple engines on the same aircraft The FAA disagrees. Typically, One commenter states that an fail for the same root cause. The FAA vibration stresses are measured directly. additional subparagraph to paragraph recognizes that there may be instances However, in certain instances, indirect 33.83(c) is needed to emphasize the where a particular vibration failure measurements of blade deflections can requirement to evaluate factors that mode does not result in engine supplement direct measurements of might induce or influence flutter anomalies (such as, power loss, high vibratory stresses. Further clarification vibration. vibrations sensed by the flight crew, of the intended measurements is not The FAA agrees. Flutter vibration was limit exceeded) that could cascade into needed as the regulation retains included in the discussion of proposed a hazardous condition. The FAA has language that is understood by engine 33.83(b) in the NPRM. Revised 33.83(c) determined that such instances are rare. manufacturers and is basically contains a new paragraph (c)(2) that The FAA can evaluate the merit of these unchanged since its inception as a Civil defines the intent of the harmonized instances on a case by case basis. Air Regulation on June 15, 1956. vibration requirements. Section 33.83(e) Section 33.83(b) Section 33.83(d) One commenter suggested editorial One commenter suggested editorial Two commenters state that proposed changes to clarify the assessment of changes to emphasize that the vibration paragraphs 33.83 (d) and (e) need fault conditions. surveys cover the ranges of physical and clarification to distinguish between the The FAA agrees. The paragraph has corrected rotation speeds. standard that applies to normal been revised to better define the intent The FAA agrees. The paragraph has operation from that applicable to likely of the harmonized vibration been revised to better define the intent fault conditions. One suggests that the requirements. The phrase ‘‘of likely 28432 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations fault conditions’’ has been replaced by economic effect of regulatory changes International Trade Impact Assessment the phrase ‘‘of excitation forces caused on small entities. Third, the Office of by fault conditions’’, and the phrase ‘‘on Management and Budget directs The rule will not constitute a barrier vibration characteristics’’ has been agencies to assess the effect of to international trade, including the moved to the beginning of the regulatory changes on international export of U.S. aircraft engines to foreign paragraph. trade. In conducting these analyses, the countries and the import of foreign One commenter states that the FAA has determined that this rule: (1) aircraft engines into the U.S. Instead, requirement to assess vibrations should will generate benefits outweighing its the revised standards will harmonize not apply throughout the declared flight costs; (2) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory with existing and proposed standards of envelope for failure conditions. The action’’ as defined in the Executive foreign aviation authorities, thereby commenter further states that it is Order; (3) is not ‘‘significant’’ as defined lessening restraints on trade. excessive to require assessments by DOT’s policies and procedures; (4) Paperwork Reduction Act throughout the declared flight envelope will not have a significant impact on a for failure conditions. substantial number of small entities; In accordance with the Paperwork The FAA does not agree. The FAA and (5) will not constitute a barrier to Reduction Act of 1990 (44 U.S.C. 3501 does not intend that the requirements international trade. These analyses, et Seq.), there are no requirements for apply to all failure conditions. No available in the docket, are summarized information collection associated with assessments are required, for example, below. this rule. where the condition will quickly result Regulatory Evaluation Summary in an engine shutdown or result in International Compatibility immediate symptoms that will Of the several amendments, only one The FAA has reviewed corresponding necessitate flight crew actions. The FAA might result in additional cost. The FAA International Civil Aviation does intend, however, that assessments has identified the requirements in Organization international standards be made of typical fault conditions revised § 33.83(b) as the only and recommended practices and Joint (such as, turbine nozzle guide vane amendment that could require minor Aviation Authorities requirements and burn-throughs, fuel nozzle blockage, additional engine testing and has identified no difference in these minor foreign object damage) that may engineering analysis, resulting in minor amendments and the foreign not be immediately detectable by the additional compliance costs. The regulations. flight crew and that could cascade into revised engine continued rotation a hazardous condition. Requiring requirements of new § 33.74 and the Federalism Implications assessments of typical fault conditions amendments to § 33.92(a) could throughout the declared flight envelope potentially result in cost savings to The regulations adopted herein will is not considered excessive. The engine and transport airplane not have substantial direct effects on the assessment criterion for fault conditions manufacturers. States, on the relationship between the is to show only that no hazardous The primary benefits of the rule will national government and the States, or condition is created, where the stricter be harmonization of airworthiness on the distribution of power and assessment criterion for normal standards with the European Joint responsibilities among the various operation requires that assessed Aviation Requirements and clarification levels of government. Therefore, in vibratory stresses do not exceed the of existing standards. The resulting accordance with Executive Order 12612, material’s endurance limit. increased uniformity of standards will it is determined that this regulation will simplify airworthiness approval for not have sufficient federalism Section 33.83(f) import and export purposes and will implications to warrant the preparation One commenter suggested changing avoid some of the costs that can result of a Federalism Assessment. ‘‘installation documents’’ to read when manufacturers seek type Conclusion ‘‘installation instructions’’ to be certification under both sets of standards. While not readily consistent with § 33.5. For the reasons discussed above, the quantifiable, the cost economies of The FAA agrees. The noted editorial FAA has determined that this regulation harmonization will far exceed the minor change has been incorporated. (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory incremental cost of the rule. Paperwork Reduction Act action’’ under Executive Order 12866; Regulatory Flexibility Determination (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT In accordance with the Paperwork Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 Reduction Act on 1990 (44 U.S.C. 3501 The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) FR 11034, February 26, 1979); (3) will et seq.), there are no requirements for of 1980 was enacted by Congress to not have a significant economic impact, information collection associated with ensure that small entities are not positive or negative, on a substantial this rule. unnecessarily or disproportionately burdened by Federal Regulations. The number of small entities under the Regulatory Evaluation, Regulatory RFA requires a Regulatory Flexibility criteria of the RFA; and (4) will not Flexibility Determination, and Trade Analysis if a proposed rule will have a substantially impact on international Impact Assessment significant economic impact, either trade. A final regulatory evaluation of Proposed changes to Federal detrimental or beneficial, on a the regulation, including a final regulations must undergo several substantial number of small entities. Regulatory Flexibility Determination economic analyses. First, Executive Based on FAA Order 2100.14A and International Trade Impact Order 12866 directs that each Federal (Regulatory Flexibility Criteria and Assessment, has been placed in the agency shall propose or adopt a Guidance), which outlines procedures docket. A copy may be obtained by regulation only upon a reasoned and criteria for implementing the RFA, contacting the person identified under determination that the benefits of the the FAA has determined that the rule FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. intended regulation justify its costs. will not have a significant economic List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 33 Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act impact on a substantial number of small of 1980 requires agencies to analyze the entities. Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 28433

Adoption of the Amendment as a minimum, blades, vanes, rotor need to be limited, operating and Accordingly, the Federal Aviation discs, spacers, and rotor shafts. installation limitations shall be (b) The surveys shall cover the ranges Administration (FAA) amends 14 CFR established. of power or thrust, and both the part 33 as follows. (e) The effects on vibration physical and corrected rotational speeds characteristics of excitation forces PART 33ÐAIRWORTHINESS for each rotor system, corresponding to caused by fault conditions (such as, but STANDARDS: AIRCRAFT ENGINES operations throughout the range of not limited to, out-of balance, local ambient conditions in the declared blockage or enlargement of stator vane 1. The authority citation for part 33 flight envelope, from the minimum passages, fuel nozzle blockage, continues to read as follows: rotational speed up to 103 percent of the incorrectly schedule compressor Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, maximum physical and corrected variables, etc.) shall be evaluated by test 44702, 44704. rotational speed permitted for rating or analysis, or by reference to previous periods of two minutes or longer, and 2. Section 33.63 is revised to read as experience and shall be shown not to up to 100 percent of all other permitted follows: create a hazardous condition. physical and corrected rotational (f) Compliance with this section shall § 33.63 Vibration. speeds, including those that are be substantiated for each specific Each engine must be designed and overspeeds. If there is any indication of installation configuration that can affect constructed to function throughout its a stress peak arising at the highest of the vibration characteristics of the declared flight envelope and operating those required physical or corrected engine. If these vibration effects cannot range of rotational speeds and power/ rotational speeds, the surveys shall be be fully investigated during engine thrust, without inducing excessive extended sufficiently to reveal the certification, the methods by which they stress in any engine part because of maximum stress values present, except can be evaluated and methods by which vibration and without imparting that the extension need not cover more compliance can be shown shall be excessive vibration forces to the aircraft than a further 2 percentage points substantiated and defined in the structure. increase beyond those speeds. installation instructions required by 3. A new section 33.74 is added to (c) Evaluations shall be made of the § 33.5. read as follows: following: 5. Section 33.92 is revised to read as (1) The effects on vibration follows: § 33.74 Continued rotation. characteristics of operating with If any of the engine main rotating scheduled changes (including § 33.92 Rotor locking tests. systems will continue to rotate after the tolerances) to variable vane angles, If continued rotation is prevented by engine is shutdown for any reason while compressor bleeds, accessory loading, a means to lock the rotor(s), the engine in flight, and where means to prevent the most adverse inlet air flow must be subjected to a test that includes that continued rotation are not distortion pattern declared by the 25 operations of this means under the provided; then any continued rotation manufacturer, and the most adverse following conditions: during the maximum period of flight, conditions in the exhaust duct(s); and (a) The engine must be shut down and in the flight conditions expected to (2) The aerodynamic and from rated maximum continuous thrust occur with that engine inoperative, must aeromechanical factors which might or power; and not result in any condition described in induce or influence flutter in those (b) The means for stopping and § 33.75 (a) through (c). systems susceptible to that form of locking the rotor(s) must be operated as 4. Section 33.83 is revised to read as vibration. specified in the engine operating follows: (d) Except as provided by paragraph instructions while being subjected to the (e) of this section, the vibration stresses § 33.83 Vibration test. maximum torque that could result from associated with the vibration continued flight in this condition; and (a) Each engine must undergo characteristics determined under this (c) Following rotor locking, the vibration surveys to establish that the section, when combined with the rotor(s) must be held stationary under vibration characteristics of those appropriate steady stresses, must be less these conditions for five minutes for components that may be subject to than the endurance limits of the each of the 25 operations. mechanically or aerodynamically materials concerned, after making due induced vibratory excitations are allowances for operating conditions for Issued in Washington, DC, on May 29, acceptable throughout the declared the permitted variations in properties of 1996. flight envelope. The engine surveys the materials. The suitability of these David R. Hinson, shall be based upon an appropriate stress margins must be justified for each Administrator. combination of experience, analysis, part evaluated. If it is determined that [FR Doc. 96–13946 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] and component test and shall address, certain operating conditions, or ranges, BILLING CODE 4910±13±M federal register June 4,1996 Tuesday Rehabilitation Research;Notices National InstituteonDisabilityand Education Department of Part VI 28435 28436 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION On March 25, 1996, the Secretary Discussion: The Secretary agrees that published three separate notices of barriers in transportation and National Institute on Disability and proposed priorities in the Federal information management can have a Rehabilitation Research; Final Funding Register (61 FR 12062–12068). The significant impact on the employment Priorities for Fiscal Year 1996±1997 Department of Education received 13 status of individuals with disabilities. letters commenting on the three notices The Secretary believes that an applicant AGENCY: Department of Education. of proposed priorities by the deadline could propose to study the effect of ACTION: Notice of Final Funding date. Three additional comments were vocational rehabilitation services on Priorities for Fiscal Years 1996–1997 for received after the deadline date and those barriers. However, the Secretary a Research and Demonstration Project, were not considered in this response. prefers to provide applicants with the Rehabilitation Research and Training Technical and other minor changes— discretion to propose specific topics for Centers, and a Rehabilitation and suggested changes the Secretary is investigation. Engineering Research Center. not legally authorized to make under Changes: None. statutory authority—are not addressed. Comment: One commenter SUMMARY: The Secretary announces final recommended that the RRTC on funding priorities for the Research and Analysis of Comments and Changes— individuals who are blind or visually Demonstration Project (R&D) Program, Research and Demonstration Projects impaired address computer-related Rehabilitation Research and Training Program technological advancements and issues Center (RRTC) Program, and This section contains an analysis of of accessibility to the information Rehabilitation Engineering Research the comments and the changes in the superhighway and develop methods of Center (RERC) Program under the priorities since the publication of the improving access to these vital areas. National Institute on Disability and notice of proposed priorities. Discussion: The Secretary points out Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) for that a NIDRR grantee, the Trace Center fiscal years 1996–1997. The Secretary Priority: Emerging Disability at the University of Wisconsin, takes this action to focus research Populations currently addresses a wide range of attention on areas of national need. Comment: One commenter computer and information systems These priorities are intended to improve recommended that individuals with issues related to persons with rehabilitation services and outcomes for tuberculosis be included among the disabilities. The Secretary does not individuals with disabilities. emerging disability populations. believe that research on computer- EFFECTIVE DATE: These priorities take Discussion: The Secretary believes that related technological advancements and effect on July 5, 1996. an applicant could propose to include issues of accessibility to the information FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: individuals with tuberculosis as part of superhighway is within the scope of this David Esquith, U.S. Department of the universe of individuals who will be priority. However, the Secretary does Education, 600 Independence Avenue, addressed by the project. However, the believe that an applicant for this RRTC S.W., Switzer Building, Room 3424, Secretary believes that applicants could propose to train or provide Washington, D.C. 20202–2601. should have the discretion to define and technical assistance to rehabilitation Telephone: (202) 205–8801. Individuals characterize the emerging universe of professionals on pertinent issues related who use a telecommunications device disability. to computer-related technological for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD Changes: None. advancements and the information number at (202) 205–8133. Internet: superhighway. Analysis of Comments and Changes— David—[email protected] Changes: None. Rehabilitation Research and Training SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Centers (RRTCs) Other Changes notice contains final priorities to Discussion: The Secretary believes This section contains an analysis of establish: one R&D project for research that training State vocational the comments and the changes in the on emerging disability populations, two rehabilitation staff on state-of-the-art priorities since the publication of the RRTCs for research related to vocational computer technology for individuals notice of proposed priorities. rehabilitation services to individuals who are blind or visually impaired is an who are blind or visually impaired and Priority 1: Vocational Rehabilitation important function for the RRTC to vocational rehabilitation services to Services for Individuals Who are Blind perform. individuals who are deaf or hard of or Visually Impaired Changes: The priority has been hearing; and one RERC for research on revised to require the RRTC to conduct technology for older persons with Comment: One commenter at least three conferences to train State disabilities. recommended requiring the RRTC to vocational rehabilitation staff on state- NIDRR is in the process of developing conduct ‘‘a survey and analysis of the of-the-art computer technology for a revised long-range plan. The final long-term efficacy, and employment individuals who are blind or visually priorities in this notice are consistent results, of education for print-disabled impaired. with the long-range planning process. students which includes reliance on These final priorities support the taped texts.’’ Priority 2: Vocational Rehabilitation National Education Goal that calls for Discussion: The Secretary believes Services for Individuals Who are Deaf or all Americans to possess the knowledge that studying the effectiveness and Hard of Hearing and skills necessary to compete in a impact of the education provided to Comment: One commenter global economy and exercise the rights print-disabled students is outside the recommended identifying new and responsibilities of citizenship. scope of the priority. accommodation strategies that utilize Changes: None. Note: This notice of final priorities does advanced technology. not solicit applications. A notice inviting Comment: One commenter Discussion: The Secretary agrees that applications under these competitions is recommended requiring the RRTC to new accommodation strategies that published in a separate notice in this issue address barriers in transportation and utilize advanced technology are needed. of the Federal Register. information management. The Secretary points out that the RRTC Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28437 is required to identify or develop to require the RRTC to develop and necessary in order to accomplish the vocational rehabilitation techniques or disseminate consumer-oriented commenters’ recommendation. reasonable accommodations that materials, and include consumers and Changes: None. address barriers to entering or employers as part of the target audience Comment: One commenter maintaining employment, including for the national information and recommended that the RRTC address those using emerging assistive resource referral data base. literacy skills development. technology such as assistive listening Comment: Three commenters Discussion: The Secretary agrees that devices, telecommunications addressed the inclusion of low- literacy skills development is a critical equipment, and remote access functioning individuals who are deaf in programming area that should be technology. The Secretary does not the priority. The commenters emphasized in the priority. believe any further requirements are questioned the ability of the RRTC to Changes: The priority has been necessary in order to address the address the wide range of needs revised to require the RRTC to identify commenter’s recommendation. evidenced by persons who are deaf, late- or develop vocational rehabilitation Changes: None. deafened, hard of hearing, or low- techniques or reasonable Comment: The same commenter functioning deaf. accommodations that address literacy recommended that the RRTC study Discussion: The Secretary recognizes skills development. States’ policies on the provision of that the persons who are deaf, late- Comment: The same commenter accommodations for communication, deafened, hard of hearing, or low- indicated that the third and fourth such as assistive listening devices and functioning deaf have a wide range of purposes of the priority should not be realtime captioning in addition to sign vocational rehabilitation needs. The presented as separate activities, but language interpreting services. Secretary expects the RRTC to include should apply to all of the purposes in Discussion: The Secretary believes that staff with expertise in all of these areas. the priority. an applicant could propose to The Secretary believes one Center, using Discussion: The Secretary believes investigate how States’ policies on the a holistic approach, is best suited to that the training and data base provision of communication address the unique and common needs development purposes of the priority accommodations affect the vocational of persons who are deaf or hard of are discrete activities that do not apply rehabilitation services provided to hearing. to all of the purposes of the priority. persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. Changes: None. Changes: None. However, the Secretary prefers to Comment: Two commenters Comment: The same commenter provide applicants with the discretion expressed a concern that the priority recommended emphasizing the to propose specific topics for simply repeated the current priority and inclusion of low-functioning deaf investigation. would not advance the field. The individuals in the requirement to solicit Changes: None. commenters indicated that a sufficient and utilize input from individuals who Comment: The same commenter body of knowledge existed on the are deaf or hard of hearing in the recommended requiring the RRTC to employment status of individuals who planning, development, and train consumers and employers on were deaf or hard of hearing. The implementation of the grant. accommodations in addition to commenters recommended that the Discussion: The Secretary agrees that rehabilitation professionals. The RRTC build on the work that has been the priority should be revised to ensure commenter also recommended completed by the current RRTC in this that the RRTC solicits and utilizes input expanding the target audience of the area and focus on the development and from low-functioning deaf individuals. national information and resource verification of intervention strategies. Changes: The priority has been referral data base to consumers and Discussion: The Secretary agrees that revised to emphasize the inclusion of employers. A second commenter the RRTC should utilize existing low-functioning deaf individuals in the stressed the need for the development information and build upon the work of planning, development, and and dissemination of consumer-oriented the current RRTC in this area. If valid implementation of the grant. materials and recommended the and reliable information exists regarding Comment: One commenter development of print and media the employment status on individuals recommended broadening the materials that can be used by who are deaf or hard of hearing, the coordination requirement to include consumers, as well as employers and Secretary expects the RRTC to update grantees from RSA and the Office of rehabilitation professionals. this information as necessary. In Special Education Programs (OSEP), Discussion: The Secretary believes addition, the Secretary believes that the such as the Regional Centers on that the RRTC should develop and priority requires the RRTC to develop a Postsecondary Education. disseminate materials that can be used level of detail that does not currently Discussion: The Secretary agrees that by consumers. The Secretary agrees that exist regarding the employment status of it would be beneficial for the RRTC to requiring the RRTC to train consumers persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. expand its coordination efforts to and employers on accommodations The Secretary believes that applicants include grantees from OSEP and RSA. would be worthwhile as long as it did should have the discretion to propose Changes: The priority has been not diminish the training that the RRTC how they will fulfill the purposes of the revised to broaden the RRTC’s research provides to rehabilitation professionals. RRTC. coordination requirements to include Similarly, the Secretary agrees Regarding the intervention strategies, grantees from OSEP and RSA. consumers and employers could benefit the Secretary agrees that the RRTC Comment: One commenter from access to the national information should develop and verify intervention recommended that the RRTC emphasize and resource referral data base. strategies. The Secretary points out that the needs of deaf individuals with Changes: The priority has been the second purpose of the RRTC is, in mental illness. revised to include, as appropriate, part, to develop vocational Discussion: The Secretary recognizes consumers and employers in the rehabilitation techniques or reasonable the unique needs of deaf individuals training provided to rehabilitation accommodations that address barriers to with mental illness. The Secretary professionals on accommodations. In employment. The Secretary does not believes that an applicant could propose addition, the priority has been revised believe any further requirements are to emphasize the needs of deaf 28438 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices individuals with mental illness. recommended that the RERC conduct Priority: Emerging Disability However, the Secretary prefers to general studies on effects of assistive Populations provide applicants with the discretion technology on physiological function in Background to propose areas of emphasis. the elderly. Changes: None. Demographic and social trends Comment: One commenter Discussion: The Secretary believes indicate that the prevalence and recommended that the RRTC for that the only ‘‘at-risk’’ populations that distribution of various types of individuals who are deaf or hard of are within the scope of the priority are disability are changing, and that new hearing address computer-related those individuals with disabilities who populations of individuals are emerging technological advancements and issues are at-risk of developing secondary to create unique demands on social of accessibility to the information disabilities or aggravating their current policy and service systems. These new superhighway and develop methods of disability. The Secretary does not populations frequently result from such improving access to these vital areas. believe that elderly persons who do not factors as: (1) Changing etiologies for Discussion: One commenter points have disabilities, but who are ‘‘at-risk’’ existing disabilities; (2) growth in out that a NIDRR grantee, the Trace of developing a disability, are within the segments of the population with higher Center at the University of Wisconsin, scope of the priority. Similarly, the prevalence rates for certain disabilities, currently addresses a wide range of Secretary believes that the RERC may including the aging of the population in computer and information systems pursue general studies on the effects of general and the population of issues related to persons with assistive technology on physiological individuals with disabilities in disabilities. The Secretary does not function for elderly persons who have particular; (3) the unintended believe that research on computer- disabilities, but may not pursue such consequences of changes in public policy; or (4) the introduction of new related technological advancements and studies for elderly persons who do not disabilities. issues of accessibility to the information have disabilities. superhighway is within the scope of this The first category includes, for priority. However, the Secretary does Changes: None. example, mental retardation that results believe that an applicant for this RRTC Comment: One commenter from high-risk births, (President’s could propose to train or provide recommended that the RERC’s testing of Committee on Mental Retardation, The technical assistance to rehabilitation assistive devices should include New Morbidity, 1993) or spinal cord professionals on pertinent issues related quantitative assessment of outcomes. injury resulting from interpersonal violence (Stover, unpublished to computer-related technological Discussion: The Secretary points out advancements and the information communique to NIDRR, 1994). The that the testing of prototype devices is superhighway. second category is exemplified by Changes: None. a general requirement of the RERC. The higher incidence and prevalence of Secretary believes that applicants may activity limitations due to impairments Analysis of Comments and Changes— propose to include quantitative typically correlated with increased age. Rehabilitation Engineering Research assessment of outcomes. However, the (LaPlante, 1995). Examples include the Center (RERC) Secretary believes that applicants onset of sensory loss in older persons, This section contains an analysis of should have the discretion to propose or certain strength-limiting the comments and the changes in the specific testing methodologies. musculoskeletal or neuromuscular diseases. A subset of this category is priorities since the publication of the Changes: None. notice of proposed priorities. represented by the acquisition of Research and Demonstration Projects secondary disabilities or new Priority: Assistive Technology for Older exacerbations of existing disabilities Persons With Disabilities Under this program the Secretary among individuals with disabilities as Comment: One commenter makes awards to public agencies and they age, for example post-polio recommended targeting older persons private agencies and organizations, syndrome or deterioration of stressed and their caregivers for dissemination including institutions of higher joints. The third category of emerging activities. education, Indian tribes, and tribal disabilities may have iatrogenic causes Discussion: The Secretary points out organizations. This program is designed or may result from inappropriate that the priority requires the RERC to to assist in the development of solutions societal interventions such as target its dissemination initiative to to the problems encountered by institutionalization or segregation disability and elderly organizations as individuals with handicaps in their during which the acquisition of social well as assistive technology service daily activities, especially problems skills and learning opportunities are providers activities. The Secretary related to employment (see 34 CFR forfeited. Social policies such as believes that older persons with 351.1). Under the regulations for this deinstitutionalization into inadequately disabilities and their caregivers will program (see 34 CFR 351.32), the supportive environments, while not necessarily creating new disabilities, receive information from the RERC Secretary may establish research have led to different manifestations of through the dissemination activities of priorities by reserving funds to support problems associated with long-term the organizations and service providers. the research activities listed in 34 CFR mental illness, including homelessness, The Secretary does not believe any 351.10. further requirements are necessary in abuse, involvement in the criminal order for older persons with disabilities Priority justice system, and the acquisition of and their caregivers to receive additional disabilities and health information from the RERC. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the problems. Other disabilities, Changes: None. Secretary gives an absolute preference to particularly secondary disabilities, may Comment: One commenter applications that meet the following result from policy decisions that result recommended that the RERC’s research priority. The Secretary will fund under in inadequate preventive services. The include those ‘‘at risk’’ to develop this competition only applications that final category includes persons with severe disabilities. The same commenter meet this absolute priority: newly emergent disabilities, most Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28439 clearly illustrated by persons living with R&D project shall carry out the procedures, and devices that will HIV disease and AIDS, and by following activities: benefit individuals with disabilities, environmental or workplace disabilities • Determine and test methods, using especially those with the most severe such as repetitive motion syndrome, a range of existing databases, to estimate disabilities. environmental allergies, and various and describe the emerging universe of Under the regulations for this program hidden disabilities. disability both for the present and in the (see 34 CFR 352.32) the Secretary may The causes of each of these categories future, and assess the feasibility of using establish research priorities by reserving of disabilities are such that emergent existing, or establishing new, funds to support particular research disabilities tend to be differentially surveillance systems to predict and activities. distributed throughout the population characterize future emerging Description of the Rehabilitation in ways that are not typical of other disabilities; Research and Training Center Program common disabilities. While there is a • Assess the particular needs of the strong correlation between disability emerging universe, both now and for the RRTCs are operated in collaboration with institutions of higher education or and poverty generally, (LaPlante, 1995; future, for vocational rehabilitation, providers of rehabilitation services or The New Morbidity, 1993; McNeil, 1995; special education, medical and other appropriate services. RRTCs serve Aday, 1993) these emergent disabilities psychosocial rehabilitation, as centers of national excellence and appear to be inordinately concentrated independent living services, and national or regional resources for among the poor, minorities, youth, the assistive technology services, as well as providers and individuals with aged, the poorly educated, and those for community-based supports, income disabilities and the parents, family who already have other disabilities. supports, and medical assistance; • Analyze the implications for the members, guardians, advocates or The underlying causes of these authorized representatives of the emergent disabilities may be socio- selection, preparation, and training of personnel, including professionals and individuals. behavioral, environmental, or socio- RRTCs conduct coordinated and economic, but are most often a peers, to provide services to the emerging universe, and for the ways in advanced programs of research in combination of these elements. Among rehabilitation targeted toward the the most important factors creating this which services should be delivered; • Design a practical and prioritized production of new knowledge to ‘‘emerging universe of disability’’ are improve rehabilitation methodology and interpersonal violence, such as agenda for a future research program to develop interventions and policy service delivery systems, alleviate or shootings, battery, or child abuse; low- stabilize disabling conditions, and birthweight and other high-risk births, approaches to address the disability- related problems of various segments of promote maximum social and economic often to mothers who are young independence of individuals with teenagers, substance abusers, HIV- the emerging universe; and • disabilities. positive, or with poor prenatal care; Convene a conference of individuals both within and outside of RRTCs provide training, including aging, with or without prior existing graduate, pre-service, and in-service disabilities; high risk behaviors the disability field to discuss the Center’s findings and their implications. training, to assist individuals to more involving substance abuse or sexual effectively provide rehabilitation activities; and secondary conditions, APPLICABLE PROGRAM REGULATIONS: 34 services. They also provide training, often resulting from inadequate acute or CFR parts 350 and 351. including graduate, pre-service, and in- long-term care. Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 760–762. service training, for rehabilitation The nation lacks a clear research personnel and other understanding of the existence of these Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (RRTCs) rehabilitation personnel. disabilities, which are closely related to RRTCs serve as informational and an individual’s position in the social Authority for the RRTC program of technical assistance resources to structure, and certainly does not NIDRR is contained in section 204(b)(2) providers, individuals with disabilities, comprehend the possible consequences of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as and the parents, family members, for the disability service systems of a amended (29 U.S.C. 760–762). Under guardians, advocates, or authorized new population of disabled persons this program the Secretary makes representatives of these individuals from among what one author calls ‘‘the awards to public and private through conferences, workshops, public vulnerable.’’ (Aday, 1993). There are organizations, including institutions of education programs, in-service training many gaps in the knowledge base about higher education and Indian tribes or programs and similar activities. risk factors associated with the tribal organizations, for coordinated NIDRR encourages all Centers to emergence of disability, as there are no research and training activities. These involve individuals with disabilities comprehensive surveillance systems or entities must be of sufficient size, scope, and minorities as recipients in research epidemiological studies. and quality to effectively carry out the training, as well as clinical training. activities of the Center in an efficient Applicants have considerable latitude Priority manner consistent with appropriate in proposing the specific research and The Secretary will establish a research State and Federal laws. They must related projects they will undertake to and demonstration project to: (1) Define demonstrate the ability to carry out the achieve the designated outcomes; and characterize the emerging universe training activities either directly or however, the regulatory selection of disability; (2) assess the incidence through another entity that can provide criteria for the program (34 CFR 352.31) and prevalence of these ‘‘new universe’’ such training. state that the Secretary reviews the disabilities; (3) identify etiologies The Secretary may make awards for extent to which applicants justify their associated with these disabilities; and up to 60 months through grants or choice of research projects in terms of (4) evaluate the implications of these cooperative agreements. The purpose of the relevance to the priority and to the emerging disabilities for service systems the awards is for planning and needs of individuals with disabilities. and social policy. In addition to conducting research, training, The Secretary also reviews the extent to activities proposed by the applicant to demonstrations, and related activities which applicants present a scientific carry out these purposes, the proposed leading to the development of methods, methodology that includes reasonable 28440 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices hypotheses, methods of data collection noninstitutionalized population of the staff need training on state-of-the-art and analysis, and a means to evaluate United States were unable to see to read computer technology for individuals the extent to which project objectives ordinary newspaper print even when who are blind or visually impaired. To have been achieved. wearing glasses. Of these 4.3 million address this need, RSA is collaborating The Department is particularly individuals approximately 515,000 were with NIDRR to support the training of interested in ensuring that the blind in both eyes (K.A. Nelson and E. State VR agency staff through this expenditure of public funds is justified Dimitrova, Severe Visual Impairment in RRTC, using a train the trainer model. by the execution of intended activities the United States and in Each State, Since 1936 the Randolph-Sheppard and the advancement of knowledge and, 1990, Journal of Visual Impairment and Act program has been a source of thus, has built this accountability into Blindness, March 1993, 80). The employment for individuals who are the selection criteria. Not later than number of persons with a visual blind. The program enables individuals three years after the establishment of impairment that substantially limits one who are blind to become licensed any RRTC, NIDRR will conduct one or or more major life activity is estimated facility managers and operate vending more reviews of the activities and to be 1.3 million (M. Laplante and D. facilities on Federal property. According achievements of the Center. In Carlson, Disability in the United States: to RSA, in fiscal year 1994, 3,524 blind accordance with the provisions of 34 Prevalence and Causes, 1992, Disability vendors operated 3,419 vending CFR 75.253(a), continued funding Statistics Rehabilitation Research and facilities under the Randolph-Sheppard depends at all times on satisfactory Training Center, University of Act program. The program generated performance and accomplishment. California, San Francisco, October, $401 million in gross earnings with 1995). These individuals are the vendors averaging an annual income of General primary target audience for this RRTC. $26,478. The following requirements apply to For the years 1991 and 1992, of the In order to ensure that the vending these RRTCs pursuant to the priorities 4.57 million persons 21 to 64 years old facilities are competitive, an assessment unless noted otherwise: who had some functional limitation should be undertaken to identify areas Each RRTC must conduct an seeing words or letters, 2.086 million of the program that may be improved by integrated program of research to individuals or 45.6 percent were training State Business Enterprise develop solutions to problems employed, while 144,000 individuals, or program counselors and licensed facility confronted by individuals with 25.6 percent of those who were totally managers. unable to see words or letters, were disabilities. Priority 1 Each RRTC must conduct a employed. By comparison, for the same The Secretary will establish an RRTC coordinated and advanced program of age group, 80.5 percent of all on vocational rehabilitation services for training in rehabilitation research, individuals without a disability were individuals who are blind or visually including training in research employed (J. McNeil, Americans with impaired that will: (1) Investigate and methodology and applied research Disabilities: 1991–1992, Household document the employment status of experience, that will contribute to the Economic Studies, P70–33, December individuals who are blind or visually number of qualified researchers working 1993). Among the cases closed by State impaired; (2) identify the barriers to in the area of rehabilitation research. vocational rehabilitation agencies as employment that can be addressed by Each Center must disseminate and non-rehabilitated or rehabilitated in rehabilitation service providers or encourage the use of new rehabilitation 1993, 25,488 individuals were blind or employers, and develop or identify knowledge. They must publish all visually impaired. Of those individuals, rehabilitation techniques or reasonable materials for dissemination or training 18,273 or 71.7 percent, were accommodations that address these in alternate formats to make them rehabilitated (Rehabilitation Services barriers; (3) train rehabilitation accessible to individuals with a range of Administration (RSA), Caseload professionals on new and effective disabling conditions. Services data, 1993). In order to improve the employment rehabilitation techniques and Each RRTC must involve individuals status of individuals who are blind and accommodations; (4) develop a national with disabilities and, if appropriate, visually impaired, there is a need to information and resource referral data their family members, as well as identify barriers to achieving base for rehabilitation professionals and rehabilitation service providers in employment outcomes and to develop employers; and (5) identify the training planning and implementing the research new and improved rehabilitation needs of State Business Enterprise and training programs, in interpreting techniques that rehabilitation service program counselors and licensed facility and disseminating the research findings, providers can use to address these managers that will enable the vending and in evaluating the Center. barriers. In addition, rehabilitation facilities to be competitive, develop and Priorities service providers and employers must deliver training programs to meet the be knowledgeable about job Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the identified needs, and evaluate the accommodations. Rehabilitation service Secretary gives an absolute preference to efficacy of the training. providers and employers should have applications that meet one of the In carrying out the purposes of the the ability to assist individuals who are following priorities. The Secretary will priority, the RRTC shall: blind or visually impaired to overcome • Conduct at least three conferences fund under these competitions only not only physical barriers, but also to train State vocational rehabilitation applications that meet one of these technological barriers to the emerging staff on state-of-the-art computer absolute priorities: electronic information infrastructure. technology for individuals who are Priority 1: Vocational Rehabilitation Computer technology is changing blind or visually impaired; Services for Individuals Who Are Blind rapidly. Rehabilitation professionals • Solicit and utilize input from or Visually Impaired must have up-to-date knowledge of individuals who are blind or severely accessible computer technology for visually impaired in the planning, Background individuals who are blind or visually development, and implementation of In 1990, approximately 17 out of impaired. RSA has determined that the activities of the RRTC as much as every 1,000 persons in the civilian State vocational rehabilitation agency possible; and Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28441

• Coordinate its research efforts with rehabilitation training and related materials and develop a national other NIDRR grantees that address services accessible and available to information and resource referral data vocational rehabilitation in general, as them. This segment of the deaf base for rehabilitation professionals and well as those that address the needs of population—sometimes called ‘‘low employers; and (5) identify the range of individuals who are blind or visually achieving,’’ ‘‘multiply disabled deaf,’’ or vocational rehabilitation services and impaired. ‘‘traditionally underserved deaf’’— service resources required to meet the requires long-term and intensive needs of low-functioning deaf Priority 2: Vocational Rehabilitation habilitative and rehabilitative services. individuals. Services for Individuals Who are Deaf or These individuals exhibit deficits in In carrying out the purposes of the Hard of Hearing vocational skills, independent living priority, the RRTC shall: • Background skills, manual and oral communication Examine patterns of vocational rehabilitation service usage by low- In 1991–1992 there were skills, social skills, and academic skills, and many have significant secondary functioning deaf individuals with approximately 10.9 million persons age disabilities. Many are from specific attention to those from diverse 15 and older with a ‘‘functional socioeconomically and culturally cultural backgrounds; limitation hearing normal conversation’’ disadvantaged backgrounds, and many • Solicit and utilize input from and an additional 924,000 persons who are from ethnic or linguistic minorities. individuals who are deaf or hard of were ‘‘unable to hear normal Services to this population are scarce hearing, including low-functioning deaf conversation’’ (J. McNeil, Americans and fragmented. In addition to individuals, in the planning, with Disabilities: 1991–1992, Household understanding the social, vocational, development, and implementation of Economic Studies, P70–33, December and educational implications of the the activities of the grant as much as 1993). The number of persons with a disability, vocational rehabilitation possible; and • hearing impairment that substantially service providers must also be able to Coordinate its research efforts with limits one or more major life activity is communicate with the individuals, grantees from NIDRR, OSEP, and RSA estimated to be 1.2 million (M. Laplante often through less than optimal means, that address vocational rehabilitation in and D. Carlson, Disability in the United such as rudimentary sign language. general, as well as those that address the States: Prevalence and Causes, 1992, The application of emerging needs of individuals who are deaf or Disability Statistics Rehabilitation technology is expected to play a pivotal hard of hearing. Research and Training Center, role in improving the vocational Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR University of California, San Francisco, rehabilitation and employment status of parts 350 and 352. October, 1995). These individuals are persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 760–762. the primary target audience for this This new technology will address a RRTC. wide-range of workplace Rehabilitation Engineering Research For the years 1991 and 1992, of all accommodation issues including, but Center (RERC) persons 21 to 64 years old who had not limited to, communication, safety, Authority for the RERC program of some functional limitation hearing and literacy. NIDRR is contained in section 204(b)(3) normal conversation, 3,335,000 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as individuals or 63.6 percent were Priority 2 amended (29 U.S.C. 760–762). Under employed, while 189,000 individuals, or The Secretary will establish an RRTC this program the Secretary makes 58.2 percent of those who were totally on the vocational rehabilitation of awards to public and private agencies unable to hear normal conversation, individuals who are deaf or hard of and organizations, including were employed. By comparison, for the hearing that will: (1) Investigate and institutions of higher education, Indian same age group, 80.5 percent of all document the employment status of tribes, and tribal organizations, to individuals without a disability were individuals who are deaf or hard of conduct research, demonstration, and employed (J. McNeil, 1993). Among the hearing by age, gender, ethnic or training activities regarding cases closed by State vocational linguistic background, education, level rehabilitation technology in order to rehabilitation agencies as non- of impairment, age at on-set of enhance opportunities for meeting the rehabilitated or rehabilitated in 1993, impairment (particularly late-deafened needs of, and addressing the barriers 21,888 individuals were deaf or hard of adults), and co-existing conditions; (2) confronted by, individuals with hearing. Of those individuals, 15,901, or identify the barriers to entering or disabilities in all aspects of their lives. 72.6 percent, were rehabilitated maintaining employment that can be An RERC must be operated by or in (Rehabilitation Services Administration addressed by vocational rehabilitation collaboration with an institution of (RSA), Caseload Services data, 1993). service providers or employers, and higher education or a nonprofit Although the Federal vocational identify or develop vocational organization. rehabilitation system successfully serves rehabilitation techniques or reasonable Under the regulations for this program and rehabilitates significant numbers of accommodations that address these (see 34 CFR 353.32) the Secretary may individuals who are deaf or hard of barriers, including those related to establish research priorities by reserving hearing, new knowledge is needed to literacy skills and those using emerging funds to support particular research address the vocational rehabilitation assistive technology such as assistive activities. needs of specific subgroups within this listening devices, telecommunications population such as late-deafened adults, equipment, and remote access Description of the Rehabilitation individuals who have limited English technology; (3) train rehabilitation Engineering Research Center Program proficiency, individuals who are professionals, including peer advocates, RERCs carry out research or functionally illiterate, and individuals on new and effective rehabilitation demonstration activities by: (1) with co-existing disabilities, including techniques and accommodations, and as Developing and disseminating psychiatric disabilities and mental appropriate include consumers and innovative methods of applying retardation. employers in the training on advanced technology, scientific ‘‘Low-functioning’’ deaf individuals accommodations; (4) develop and achievement, and psychological and often do not have comprehensive disseminate consumer-oriented social knowledge to (a) solve 28442 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices rehabilitation problems and remove The RERC must share information and person requiring a wheelchair, because environmental barriers, and (b) study data, and, as appropriate, collaborate on of gradual loss of muscle mass, may not new or emerging technologies, products, research and training with other NIDRR- have, or may not be able to develop, the or environments; (2) demonstrating and supported grantees including, but not requisite arm strength to use grab bars disseminating (a) innovative models for limited to, the Americans with to assist them in transferring in and out the delivery of cost-effective Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability and of their wheelchair. rehabilitation technology services to Business Technical Assistance Centers Efforts to develop and disseminate rural and urban areas, and (b) other and other related RERCs and RRTCs. technological aids to older persons with scientific research to assist in meeting The RERC must work closely with the functional limitations must be the employment and independent living RERC on Technology Evaluation and conducted in the context of using needs of individuals with severe Transfer at the State University of New effective information dissemination disabilities; or (3) facilitating service York at Buffalo. strategies to reach older persons. It is delivery systems change through (a) the development, evaluation, and Priority also necessary to deliver effective dissemination of consumer-responsive Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the training in the use and maintenance of and individual and family-centered Secretary gives an absolute preference to the technology that is prescribed. It is innovative models for the delivery to applications that meet the following particularly important to make both rural and urban areas of innovative priority. The Secretary will fund under information on assistive technology for cost-effective rehabilitation technology this competition only applications that older persons with disabilities available services, and (b) other scientific meet this absolute priority: in relation to the major activities of research to assist in meeting the work, personal and health care, and employment and independent needs of Priority: Assistive Technology for Older leisure. Persons With Disabilities individuals with severe disabilities. Assistive technology can address the Each RERC must provide training Background physical stress that is problematic for opportunities to individuals, including In 1991–1992, of 30.68 million caregivers of older persons with individuals with disabilities, to become persons who were 65 years old and disabilities. Many of these caregivers are researchers of rehabilitation technology over, 16.54 million or 53.9 percent had spouses who are elderly themselves. and practitioners of rehabilitation a disability. Of those 16.54 million with Premature admission to institutional technology in conjunction with a disability, 15.21 million persons had care is commonly caused by a crisis of institutions of higher education and a ‘‘functional limitation’’ performing the caregiver rather than by a sudden nonprofit organizations. activities such as seeing, hearing, deterioration in the health or abilities of General reaching, or walking (J. McNeil, the older persons with a disability. Americans with Disabilities: 1991–1992, Typically, the caregiver becomes injured The following requirements apply to or sick and finds it impossible to this RERC pursuant to this absolute Household Economic Studies, P70–33, December 1993). The prevalence of continue to do the lifting and other priority unless noted otherwise: demanding physical tasks. Assistive The RERC must have the capability to medical, neurological and orthopedic technology that can assist the caregiver design, build, and test prototype devices impairments increases with the age of can have a major impact on eliminating and assist in the transfer of successful the population. It is estimated that over the need or delaying the time for solutions to the marketplace. The RERC half of all Americans over seventy years institutional placement of an older must evaluate the efficacy and safety of of age have one or more disabilities person with a disability. its new products, instrumentation, or (McNeil, 1993). Also, as a result of assistive devices. improved life-long health care and Priority The RERC must provide graduate- expanded employment and educational level research training to build capacity opportunities, increased numbers of The Secretary will establish an RERC for engineering research in the persons with severe disabilities will on assistive technology for older rehabilitation field and to provide become part of our elderly population persons with disabilities for the training in the applications of new and experience new or changed purposes of: (1) Identifying the needs for technology to service providers and to assistive technology needs. assistive technology by older persons individuals with disabilities and their While assistive technology has been with disabilities; (2) developing design families. used in rehabilitation to help reduce the modifications to existing assistive The RERC must develop all training adverse effects of disability, it is only technology devices and disseminating materials in formats that will be beginning to be used effectively to these modifications to developers of accessible to individuals with various address problems in geriatric assistive technology; (3) developing and types of disabilities and communication rehabilitation. An RERC on assistive evaluating unique assistive technology modes, and widely disseminate findings technology for older persons with devices that otherwise will not be and products to individuals with disabilities will address the application developed by the field; (4) identifying disabilities and their families and of technology to meet the special needs the problems of assistive technology representatives, service providers, of older persons with disabilities and service delivery utilization, including manufacturers and distributors, and their caregivers. maintenance, and developing and other appropriate target populations. Many devices or techniques aimed at testing service delivery models to The RERC must involve individuals ameliorating specific disabilities are address those problems; and (5) with disabilities and, if appropriate, designed to augment or take advantage developing and delivering training and their family members in planning and of compensatory abilities. However, technical assistance to rehabilitation implementing the research, multiple and gradual changes related to service providers, providers of general development, and training programs, in aging may leave older persons without services to older persons, and interpreting and disseminating the one or more areas of strength with consumers, on sources and uses of research findings, and in evaluating the which to compensate for other assistive technology for older persons Center. functional losses. For example, an older with disabilities and caregivers. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28443

In addition to activities proposed by DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 82, 85, the applicant to carry out these and 86; and the following program [CFDA Nos.: 84.133A, 84.133B and 84.133E] purposes, the RERC shall: regulations: • Develop and implement an Office of Special Education and Research and Demonstration Projects information dissemination initiative to Rehabilitative Services; National (R&D)—34 CFR parts 350 and 351. address utilization problems, including Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (RRTCs)—34 CFR parts 350 and targeting disability and elderly Rehabilitation Research; Notice 352. organizations as well as assistive Inviting Applications for New Awards Rehabilitation Engineering Research technology service providers; Under Certain Programs for Fiscal Year 1996 Centers (RERCs)—34 CFR Parts 350 and • Coordinate and share information 353. with NIDRR-funded RRTCs on Note to Applicants Program Title: Research and Rehabilitation and Aging, and with This notice is a complete application Demonstration Projects. programs funded under the Technology- package. Together with the statute CFDA Number: 84.133A. Related Assistance for Individuals with authorizing the programs and applicable Purpose of Program: The Research Disabilities Act of 1988; and regulations governing the programs, and Demonstration Projects program is • Establish a collaborative including the Education Department designed to support discrete research, relationship with the RERC on General Administrative Regulations demonstration, training, and related Technology Evaluation and Transfer (EDGAR), this notice contains projects to develop methods, procedures, and technology that and the RERC on Accessible Housing information, application forms, and maximize the full inclusion and and Universal Design. instructions needed to apply for a grant under these competitions. integration into society, independent Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR These programs support the National living, employment, family support, and Parts 350 and 353. Education Goal that calls for all economic and social self-sufficiency of Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 760–762. Americans to possess the knowledge individuals with disabilities, especially (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance and skills necessary to compete in a those with the most severe disabilities. Numbers: 84.133A, Research and global economy and exercise the rights In addition, the R&D program supports Demonstration Projects, 84.133B, and responsibilities of citizenship. discrete research, demonstration, and Rehabilitation Research and Training Center The estimated funding levels in this training projects that specifically Program, 84.133E, Rehabilitation Engineering notice do not bind the Department of address the implementation of Titles I, and Research Center Program) Education to make awards in any of III, VI, VII, and VIII of the Rehabilitation Dated: May 29, 1996. these categories, or to any specific Act, with emphasis on projects to Andrew Pepin, number of awards or funding levels, improve the effectiveness of these unless otherwise specified in statute. programs and to meet the needs Acting Assistant Secretary for Special described in State Plans submitted to Education and Rehabilitative Services. Applicable Regulations the Rehabilitation Services [FR Doc. 96–13910 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] The Education Department General Administration by State vocational BILLING CODE 4000±01±P Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), rehabilitation agencies.

APPLICATION NOTICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996, REHABILITATION ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER PROGRAM, CFDA NO. 84.133E

Maximum Estimated award Project Funding priority Deadline for transmittal of applications number of amount (per period awards year)* (months)

Assistive Technology for Older Persons with Disabilities July 19, 1996 ...... 1 $500,000 60 Note: The Secretary will reject without consideration or evaluation any application that proposes a project funding level that exceeds the stated maximum award amount (See 34 CFR 75.104(b)).

Selection Criteria (5) The training needs are clearly (2) The means to disseminate and The Secretary uses the following defined (training activities only); promote utilization by others are selection criteria to evaluate (6) The training methods and defined; applications under this program. developed subject matter are likely to (3) The training methods and content (a) Potential Impact of Outcomes: meet the defined need (training are to be packaged for dissemination Importance of Program (Weight 3.0). activities only); and and use by others (training activities The Secretary reviews each application only); and (7) The need for information exists to determine to what degree— (4) The utilization approach is likely (1) The proposed activity relates to (utilization activities only). to address the defined need (utilization the announced priority; (b) Potential Impact of Outcomes: activities only). (2) The research is likely to produce Dissemination/Utilization (Weight 3.0). (c) Probability of Achieving Proposed new and useful information (research The Secretary reviews each application Outcomes: Program/Project Design activities only); to determine to what degree— (Weight 5.0). The Secretary reviews each application to determine to what (3) The need and target population are (1) The research results are likely to degree— adequately defined; become available to others working in (4) The outcomes are likely to benefit (1) The objectives of the project(s) are the field (research activities only); the defined target population; clearly stated; 28444 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

(2) The hypothesis is sound and based practices, to encourage applications for 1.0). The Secretary reviews each on evidence (research activities only); employment from persons who are application to determine to what (3) The project design/methodology is members of groups that traditionally degree— likely to achieve the objectives; have been underrepresented, such as— (1)The budget for the project(s) is (4) The measurement methodology (i) Members of racial or ethnic adequate to support the activities; and analysis is sound; minority groups; (5) The conceptual model (if used) is (ii) Women; (2) The costs are reasonable in sound (development/demonstration (iii) Handicapped persons; and relation to the objectives of the activities only); (iv) The elderly. project(s); and (6) The sample populations are (e) Probability of Achieving Proposed (3) The budget for subcontracts (if correct and significant (research and Outcomes: Evaluation Plan (Weight 1.0). required) is detailed and appropriate. development/demonstration activities The Secretary reviews each application Eligible Applicants: Parties eligible to only); to determine to what degree— apply for grants under this program are (1) There is a mechanism to evaluate (7) The human subjects are public and private nonprofit and for- sufficiently protected (research and plans, progress and results; (2) The evaluation methods and profit agencies and organizations, development/demonstration activities including institutions of higher only); objectives are likely to produce data that are quantifiable; and education and Indian tribes and tribal (8) The device(s) or model system is organizations. to be developed in an appropriate (3) The evaluation results, where Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 761a environment; relevant, are likely to be assessed in a (9) The training content is service setting. and 762. comprehensive and at an appropriate (f) Program/Project Management: Plan PROGRAM TITLE: Rehabilitation level (training activities only); of Operation (Weight 2.0). The Secretary Research and Training Centers reviews each application to determine (10) The training methods are likely to CFDA Number: 84.133B to what degree— be effective (training activities only); PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: RRTCs (11) The new materials (if developed) (1) There is an effective plan of operation that insures proper and conduct coordinated and advanced are likely to be of high quality and programs of research on disability and uniqueness (training activities only); efficient administration of the project(s); (2) The applicant’s planned use of its rehabilitation that will produce new (12) The target populations are linked resources and personnel is likely to knowledge that will improve to the project (utilization activities achieve each objective; rehabilitation methods and service only); and (3) Collaboration between institutions, delivery systems, alleviate or stabilize (13) The format of the dissemination if proposed, is likely to be effective; and disabling conditions, and promote medium is the best to achieve the (4) There is a clear description of how maximum social and economic desired result (utilization activities the applicant will include eligible independence for individuals with only). project participants who have been (d) Probability of Achieving Proposed disabilities. RRTCs provide training to traditionally underrepresented, such service providers at the pre-service, in- Outcomes: Key Personnel (Weight 4.0). as— The Secretary reviews each application service training, undergraduate, and (i) Members of racial or ethnic graduate levels to improve the quality to determine to what degree— minority groups; (1) The principal investigator and and effectiveness of rehabilitation (ii) Women; services. They also provide advanced other key staff have adequate training (iii) Handicapped persons; and and/or experience and demonstrate research training to individuals with (iv) The elderly. disabilities and those from minority appropriate potential to conduct the (g) Program/Project Management: backgrounds, engaged in research on proposed research, demonstration, Adequacy of Resources (Weight 1.0). disability and rehabilitation. RRTCs training, development, or dissemination The Secretary reviews each application serve as national and regional technical activity; to determine to what degree— assistance resources, and provide (2) The principal investigator and (1) The facilities planned for use are training for service providers, other key staff are familiar with adequate; pertinent literature and/or methods; (2) The equipment and supplies individuals with disabilities and (3) All required disciplines are planned for use are adequate; and families and representatives, and effectively covered; (3) The commitment of the applicant rehabilitation researchers. (4) Commitments of staff time are to provide administrative support and The Rehabilitation Services adequate for the project; and adequate facilities is evident. Administration is collaborating with (5) The applicant is likely, as part of (h) Program/Project Management: NIDRR to provide financial support for its non-discriminatory employment Budget and Cost Effectiveness (Weight the RRTCs included in this notice.

APPLICATION NOTICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996, REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING CENTERS CFDA NO. 84.133B

Maximum Estimated award Project pe- Funding priority Deadline for transmittal of applications number of amount (per riod awards year) * (months)

Vocational Rehabilitation Services for Individuals Who July 19, 1996 ...... 1 $650,000 60 Are Blind or Visually Impaired. Vocational Rehabilitation Services for Individuals Who July 19, 1996 ...... 1 $650,000 60 Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. Note: The Secretary will reject without consideration or evaluation any application that proposes a project funding level that exceeds the stated maximum award amount (See 34 CFR 75.104(b)). Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28445

Selection Criteria (1) The proposed plan for training and adequate, and cost-effective for the The Secretary uses the following dissemination provides evidence that proposed activities; selection criteria to evaluate research results will be effectively (3) The facilities, equipment, and applications under this program. disseminated and utilized based on the other resources are adequate and are (a) Relevance and importance of the identification of appropriate and appropriately accessible to persons with research program (20 points). The accessible target groups; the proposed disabilities; training materials and methods are Secretary reviews each application to (4) The plan of operations is adequate appropriate; the proposed activities are determine to what degree— to accomplish the Center’s objectives relevant to the regional and national (1) The proposed activities are and to ensure proper and efficient needs of the rehabilitation field; and the responsive to a priority established by management of the Center; the Secretary and address a significant training materials and dissemination (5) The proposed relationships with need of a disabled target population and packages will be developed in alternate Federal, State, and local rehabilitation rehabilitation service providers; media that are usable by people with (2) The overall research program of various types of disabilities. service providers and consumer the Center includes appropriate (2) The proposed plan for training and organizations are likely to ensure that interdisciplinary and collaborative dissemination provides for— the Center program is relevant and research activities, is likely to lead to (i) Advanced training in rehabilitation applicable to the needs of consumers new and useful knowledge in the research; and service providers; priority area, and is likely to become a (ii) Training rehabilitation service (6) The past performance and nationally recognized source of personnel and other appropriate accomplishments of the applicant scientific knowledge; and individuals to improve practitioner indicate an ability to complete (3) The applicant demonstrates that skills based on new knowledge derived successfully the proposed scope of all component activities of the Center from research; work; (iii) Training packages that make are related to the overall objective of the (7) The application demonstrates research results available to service Center, and will build upon and appropriate commitment and support by providers, researchers, educators, complement each other to enhance the the host institution and opportunities individuals with disabilities, parents, likelihood of solving significant for interdisciplinary activities and and others; rehabilitation problems. collaboration with other institutions; (b) Quality of the research design (35 (iv) Technical assistance or consultation that is responsive to the and points). The Secretary reviews each (8) The plan for evaluation of the application to determine to what concerns of service providers and consumers; and Center provides for an annual degree— assessment of the outcomes of the (1) The applicant proposes a (v) Dissemination of research findings research, the impact of the training and comprehensive research program for the through publication in professional dissemination activities on the target entire project period, including at least journals, textbooks, and consumer and populations, and the extent to which the three interrelated research projects; other publications, and through other (2) The research design and appropriate media such as audiovisual overall objectives have been methodology of each proposed activity materials and telecommunications. accomplished. (vi) Dissemination of research are meritorious in that— Eligible Applicants (i) The literature review is appropriate findings and other materials in and indicates familiarity with current appropriate formats and accessible Institutions of higher education and research in the field; media for use by individuals with public or private agencies and (ii) The research hypotheses are various disabilities. organizations collaborating with important and scientifically relevant; (d) Quality of the organization and institutions of higher education, (iii) The sample populations are management (20 points). The Secretary including Indian tribes and tribal appropriate and significant; reviews each application to determine organizations, are eligible to apply for (iv) The data collection and the degree to which— awards under this program. measurement techniques are (1) The staffing plan for the Center Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762. provides evidence that the project appropriate and likely to be effective; PROGRAM TITLE: Rehabilitation (v) The data analysis methods are director, research director, training Engineering Research Centers appropriate; and director, principal investigators, and (vi) The applicant assures that human other personnel have appropriate CFDA Number: 84.133E subjects, animals, and the environment training and experience in disciplines Purpose of Program are adequately protected; and required to conduct the proposed (3) The application discusses the activities; the commitment of staff time Rehabilitation Engineering Research anticipated research results and is adequate to conduct all proposed Centers conduct research, demonstrates how those results would activities; and the Center, as part of its demonstration, and training activities satisfy the original hypotheses and nondiscriminatory employment regarding rehabilitation technology— could be used for planning future practices, will ensure that its personnel including rehabilitation engineering, research, including generation of new are selected for employment without assistive technology devices, and hypotheses where applicable. regard to race, color, national origin, assistive technology services, in order to (c) Quality of the training and gender, age, or handicapping enhance the opportunities to better meet dissemination program (25 points). The conditions; the needs of, and address the barriers Secretary reviews each application to (2) The budgets for the Center and for confronted by, individuals with determine the degree to which— each component project are reasonable, disabilities in all aspects of their lives. 28446 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

APPLICATION NOTICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996, RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS 84.133YA

Maximum Estimated award Project pe- Funding priority Deadline for transmittal of applications number of amount (per riod awards year) * (months)

Emerging Disability Populations ...... July 19, 1996 ...... 1 $350,000 36 Note: The Secretary will reject without consideration or evaluation any application that proposes a project funding level that exceeds the stated maximum award amount (See 34 CFR 75.104(b)).

Selection Criteria (3) The plan for development, clinical reviews each application to determine The Secretary uses the following testing, and evaluation of new devices to what degree— selection criteria to evaluate and technology is likely to yield (1) The staffing plan for the Center applications under this program. significant products; and provides evidence that the principal (a) Relevance and Importance of the (4) The application discusses the investigator and other personnel have Research Program (25 points). The anticipated research results and appropriate training and experience in Secretary reviews each application to demonstrates how those results would disciplines required to conduct the determine to what degree— satisfy the original hypotheses; and proposed activities; the commitment of (1) The proposed activities are could be used for planning additional time for all staff is adequate to conduct responsive to a priority established by research, including the generation of all proposed activities; and the Center, the Secretary and address a significant new hypotheses where applicable. as part of its nondiscriminatory need of a disabled target population and (c) Quality of the Dissemination and employment practices, will ensure that rehabilitation service providers; Utilization Program (25 points). The its personnel are selected for (2) The overall research program of Secretary reviews each application to employment without regard to race, the Center includes appropriate determine to what degree— color, national origin, gender, age, or interdisciplinary and collaborative (1) The proposed plan for handicapping condition; research activities, is likely to lead to dissemination provides evidence (2) The budgets for the Center and new and useful knowledge in the utilized based on the identification of each of the proposed activities are priority area and to the development of appropriate and accessible target reasonable, adequate, and cost-effective new technology or new applications of groups; the proposed activities are for the proposed activities; existing technology, and is likely to relevant to regional and national needs become a nationally recognized source of the rehabilitation field; and (3) The facilities, equipment, and of information on technology in the dissemination packages will be other resources are adequate and are priority area; and prepared in a form usable by appropriately accessible to persons with (3) The applicant demonstrates that individuals with all types of disabilities; disabilities; all component activity of the Center are (2) The proposed plan for (4) The plan of operations is adequate related to the overall objectives of the dissemination and utilization of the to accomplish the Center’s objectives Center, and will build upon and research and development provides and to ensure proper and efficient complement each other to enhance the for— management of the Center; likelihood of finding solutions to (i) Orientation programs for (5) The proposed relationships with significant rehabilitation problems. rehabilitation service personnel to (b) Quality of the Research Design (25 Federal, State, and local rehabilitation improve the application of service providers and consumer points). The Secretary reviews each rehabilitation technology; application to determine to what organizations are likely to ensure that (ii) Programs which specifically the Center program is relevant and degree— demonstrate means for utilizing (1) The applicant proposes a applicable to the needs of consumers rehabilitation technology; and service providers; comprehensive program of research for (iii) Technical assistance and (6) The past performance and the total project period, including at consultation that are responsive to accomplishments of the applicant least three interrelated research projects; concerns of service providers and (2) The research design and indicate an ability to complete consumers; and methodology of each proposed activity successfully the proposed scope of (iv) Dissemination of research are meritorious in that— work; (i) The literature review is appropriate findings through publication in professional journals, textbooks, and (7) The application demonstrates and indicates familiarity with the state- appropriate commitment and support by of-the-art and current research in consumer and other publications, and through other appropriate media such as the host institution and opportunities rehabilitation technology; for interdisciplinary activities and (ii) The research hypotheses are audiovisual materials and telecommunications, in an effort to collaboration with other institutions; important and scientifically relevant; and (iii) The sample populations are make research results accessible to appropriate and significant; manufacturers, rehabilitation service (8) The plan for evaluation of the (iv) The data collection and providers, researchers, educators, Center will assess annually the measurement techniques are disabled individuals and their families, outcomes of the discrete and appropriate and likely to be effective; and others; and interrelated research projects, the (v) The data analysis methods are (3) There is an appropriate plan to impact of the training and appropriate; and ensure the distribution and utilization dissemination activities on the target (vi) The applicant assures that human of new devices and technology. populations, and the extent to which the subjects, animals, and the environment (d) Quality of the Organization and overall objectives have been are adequately protected; Management (25 points). The Secretary accomplished. Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28447

Eligible Applicants organized in the same manner that the Dated: May 29, 1996. Public or private entities, including submitted application should be Andrew Pepin, Indian tribes and tribal organizations, organized. These parts are as follows: Acting Assistant Secretary for Special are eligible to receive awards under this Part I: Application for Federal Education and Rehabilitative Services. Assistance (Standard Form 424 (Rev. 4– program provided they ensure that the Appendix Center is operated in collaboration with 88)) and instructions. an organization of higher education or a Part II: Budget Form—Non- Application Forms and Instructions nonprofit organization. Construction Programs (Standard Form Applicants are advised to reproduce Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 524A) and instructions. and complete the application forms in 763(b)(3)(A)). Part III: Application Narrative. this Section. Applicants are required to submit an original and two copies of Instructions for Transmittal of Additional Materials each application as provided in this Applications Estimated Public Reporting Burden. Section. (a) If an applicant wants to apply for Assurances—Non-Construction a grant, the applicant shall— Programs (Standard Form 424B). Frequent Questions (1) Mail the original and two copies Certification Regarding Lobbying, 1. Can I Get an Extension of the Due of the application on or before the Debarment, Suspension, and Other Date? deadline date to: U.S. Department of Responsibility Matters: and Drug-Free Education, Application Control Center, Work-Place Requirements (ED Form 80– No! On rare occasions the Department Attention: (CFDA # (Applicant must 0013). of Education may extend a closing date insert number and letter)), Washington, Certification Regarding Debarment, for all applicants. If that occurs, a notice DC 20202–4725, or Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary of the revised due date is published in (2) Hand deliver the original and two Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered the Federal Register. However, there are copies of the application by 4:30 p.m. Transactions (ED Form 80–0014) and no extensions or exceptions to the due (Washington, DC time) on the deadline instructions. (NOTE: ED Form GCS–014 date made for individual applicants. date to: U.S. Department of Education, is intended for the use of primary 2. What Should Be Included in the Application Control Center, Attention: Participants and should not be Application? (CFDA # (Applicant must insert number transmitted to the Department.) The application should include a and letter)), Room #3633, Regional Disclosure of Lobbying Activities project narrative, vitae of key personnel, Office Building #3, 7th and D Streets, (Standard Form LLL (if applicable) and and a budget, as well as the Assurances SW., Washington, DC. instructions; and Disclosure Lobbying forms included in this package. Vitae of (b) An applicant must show one of the Activities Continuation Sheet (Standard staff or consultants should include the following as proof of mailing: Form LLL–A). (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service An applicant may submit information individual’s title and role in the postmark. on a photostatic copy of the application proposed project, and other information (2) A legible mail receipt with the and budget forms, the assurances, and that is specifically pertinent to this date of mailing stamped by the U.S. the certifications. However, the proposed project. The budgets for both Postal Service. application form, the assurances, and the first year and all subsequent project (3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or the certifications must each have an years should be included. receipt from a commercial carrier. original signature. No grant may be If collaboration with another (4) Any other proof of mailing awarded unless a completed application organization is involved in the proposed acceptable to the Secretary. form has been received. activity, the application should include (c) If an application is mailed through For Applications Contact: In order to assurances of participation by the other the U.S. Postal Service, the Secretary obtain an application package, contact parties, including written agreements or does not accept either of the following William H. Whalen, U.S. Department of assurances of cooperation. It is not as proof of mailing: Education, 600 Independence Avenue useful to include general letters of (1) A private metered postmark. SW, Switzer Building, Room 3411, support or endorsement in the (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by Washington, DC. 20202. Telephone: application. If the applicant proposes to use the U.S. Postal Service. (202) 205–9141. Individuals who use a unique tests or other measurement telecommunications device for the deaf Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not instruments that are not widely known uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before (TDD) may call the TDD number at (202) in the field, it would be helpful to relying on this method, an applicant should 205–8887. include the instrument in the check with its local post office. Information about the Department’s application. (2) An applicant wishing to know that its funding opportunities, including copies Many applications contain application has been received by the of application notices for discretionary Department must include with the voluminous appendices that are not grant competitions, can be viewed on application a stamped self-addressed helpful and in many cases cannot even the Department’s electronic bulletin postcard containing the CFDA number and be mailed to the reviewers. It is board (ED Board), telephone (202) 260– title of this program. generally not helpful to include such 9950; on the Internet Gopher Server at (3) The applicant must indicate on the things as brochures, general capability envelope and—if not provided by the GOPHER.ED.GOV (under statements of collaborating Department—in Item 10 of the Application Announcements, Bulletins, and Press organizations, maps, copies of for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) Releases); or on the World Wide Web at publications, or descriptions of other the CFDA number—and letter, if any—of the http://www.ed.gov/money.html projects completed by the applicant. competition under which the application is However, the official application notice being submitted. for a discretionary grant competition is 3. What Format Should Be Used for the Application Forms and Instructions the notice published in the Federal Application? The appendix to this application is Register. NIDRR generally advises applicants divided into four parts. These parts are Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 760–762. that they may organize the application 28448 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices to follow the selection criteria that will on the grant, and in some programs will five to six months of the closing date. be used. The specific review criteria be required to share in the costs of the Unsuccessful applicants generally will vary according to the specific program, project. be notified within that time frame as and are contained in this Consolidated well. For the purpose of estimating a 7. Can Individuals Apply for Grants? Application Package. project start date, the applicant should No. Only organizations are eligible to estimate approximately six months from 4. May I Submit Applications to More apply for grants under NIDRR programs. Than One NIDRR Program Competition the closing date, but no later than the However, individuals are the only following September 30. or More Than One Application to a entities eligible to apply for fellowships. Program? 11. Can I Call NIDRR To Find Out if My 8. Can NIDRR Staff Advise Me Whether Yes, you may submit applications to Application Is Being Funded? My Project Is of Interest to NIDRR or any program for which they are Likely To Be Funded? No. When NIDRR is able to release responsive to the program requirements. information on the status of grant You may submit the same application to No. NIDRR staff can advise you of the as many competitions as you believe requirements of the program in which applications, it will notify applicants by appropriate. You may also submit more you propose to submit your application. letter. The results of the peer review than one application in any given However, staff cannot advise you of cannot be released except through this competition. whether your subject area or proposed formal notification. approach is likely to receive approval. 5. What Is the Allowable Indirect Cost 12. If My Application Is Successful, Can Rate? 9. How Do I Assure That My I Assume I Will Get the Requested Application Will Be Referred to the Budget Amount in Subsequent Years? The limits on indirect costs vary Most Appropriate Panel for Review? according to the program and the type No. Funding in subsequent years is of application. Applicants should be sure that their subject to availability of funds and Applicants in the R&D and RERC applications are referred to the correct project performance. grants programs should limit indirect competition by clearly including the charges to the organization’s approved competition title and CFDA number, 13. Will All Approved Applications Be rate. If the organization does not have an including alphabetical code, on the Funded? Standard Form 424, and including a approved rate, the application should No. It often happens that the peer project title that describes the project. include an estimated actual rate. review panels approve for funding more Applicants for projects in the RRTC 10. How Soon After Submitting My applications than NIDRR can fund program are limited to an indirect rate Application Can I Find Out if It Will Be within available resources. Applicants of 15 percent. Funded? who are approved but not funded are 6. Can Profitmaking Businesses Apply The time from closing date to grant encouraged to consider submitting for Grants? award date varies from program to similar applications in future Yes. However, for-profit organizations program. Generally speaking, NIDRR competitions. will not be able to collect a fee or profit endeavors to have awards made within BILLING CODE 4000±01±P Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28449 28450 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28451 28452 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

BILLING CODE 4000±01±C Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28453

Public reporting burden for these collections of information is estimated to average 30 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of these collections of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: the U.S. Department of Education, Information Management and Compliance Division, Washington, D.C. 20202–4651; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project 1820–0027, Washington, D.C. 20503. Research and Demonstration Projects (CFDA No. 84.133A) 34 CFR Parts 350 and 351. Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (CFDA No. 84.133B) 34 CFR Parts 350 and 352. Rehabilitation Engineering and Research Center (CFDA No. 84.133E) 34 CFR Parts 350 and 353.

BILLING CODE 4000±01±P 28454 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices

BILLING CODE 4000±01±C Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28455

Assurances—Non-Construction Programs Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91–616), as management program developed under the Note: Certain of these assurances may not amended, relating to nondiscrimination on Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 be applicable to your project or program. If the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of you have questions, please contact the §§ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Federal actions to State (Clear Air) awarding agency. Further, certain Federal Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd–3 and 290 ee– Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) awarding agencies may require applicants to 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of of the Clear Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 certify to additional assurances. If such is the alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.); (g) protection of case, you will be notified. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 underground sources of drinking water under U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to As the duly authorized representative of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or the applicant I certify that the applicant: amended (P.L. 93–523); and (h) protection of financing of housing; (i) any other 1. Has the legal authority to apply for endangered species under the Endangered nondiscrimination provisions in the specific Federal assistance, and the institutional, Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93– statute(s) under which application for managerial and financial capability 205). Federal assistance is being made; and (j) the (including funds sufficient to pay the non- 12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic requirements of any other nondiscrimination Federal share of project costs) to ensure Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1271 et seq.) statute(s) which may apply to the proper planning, management and related to protecting components or potential application. completion of the project described in this components of the national wide and scenic 7. Will comply, or has already complied, application. with the requirements of Titles II and III of rivers system. 2. Will give the awarding agency, the the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 13. Will assist the awarding agency in Comptroller General of the United States, and Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 assuring compliance with Section 106 of the if appropriate, the State, through any (P.L. 91–646) which provide for fair and National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as authorized representative, access to and the equitable treatment of persons displaced or amended (16 U.S.C. 470), E.O. 11593 right to examine all records, books, papers, whose property is acquired as a result of (identification and protection of historic or documents related to the award; and will properties), and the Archaeological and establish a proper accounting system in Federal or federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. accordance with generally accepted 469a–1 et seq.). accounting standards or agency directives. property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in 14. Will comply with P.L. 93–348 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit regarding the protection of human subjects employees from using their positions for a purchases. involved in research, development, and purpose that constitutes or presents the 8. Will comply with the provisions of the related activities supported by this award of appearance of personal or organizational Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501–1508 and 7324– assistance. conflict of interest, or personal gain. 7328) which limit the political activities of 4. Will initiate and complete the work employees whose principal employment 15. Will comply with the Laboratory within the applicable time frame after receipt activities are funded in whole or in part with Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89–544, as of approval of the awarding agency. Federal funds. amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to 5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental 9. Will comply, as applicable, with the the care, handling, and treatment of warm Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4728– provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. blooded animals held for research, teaching, 4763) relating to prescribed standards for §§ 276a to 276a–7), the Copeland Act (40 or other activities supported by this award of merit systems for programs funded under one U.S.C. § 276c and 18 U.S.C. § 874), and the assistance. of the nineteen statutes or regulations Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint specified in Appendix A of OPM’s Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327–333), regarding labor Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 4801 for a Merit System of Personnel standards for federally assisted construction et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead based Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). subagreements. paint in costruction or rehabilitation of 6. Will comply with all Federal statutes 10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood residence structures. relating to nondiscrimination. These include insurance purchase requirements of Section 17. Will cause to be performed the required but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of financial and compliance audits in Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88–352) which 1973 (P.L. 93–234) which requires recipients accordance with the Single Audit Act of prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, in a special flood hazard area to participate 1984. color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the in the program and to purchase flood 18. Will comply with all applicable Education Amendments of 1972, as amended insurance if the total cost of insurable requirements of all other Federal laws, (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1683, and 1685–1686), construction and acquisition is $10,000 or executive orders, regulations and policies which prohibits discrimination on the basis more. governing this program. of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation 11. Will comply with environmental lllllllllllllllllllll standards which may be prescribed pursuant Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED to the following: (a) institution of which prohibits discrimination on the basis CERTIFYING OFFICIAL of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act environmental quality control measures lllllllllllllllllllll of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101– under the National Environmental Policy Act 6107), which prohibits discrimination on the of 1969 (P.L. 91–190) and Executive Order TITLE basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating lllllllllllllllllllll Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92–255), as facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection APPLICANT ORGANIZATION amended, relating to nondiscrimination on of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) lllllllllllllllllllll the basis of drug abuse; (f) the evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in DATE SUBMITTED Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurrance of Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and project consistency with the approved State BILLING CODE 4000±01±P 28456 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28457 28458 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28459 28460 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Notices 28461

[FR Doc. 96–13908 Filed 6–3–96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000±01±C federal register June 4,1996 Tuesday Week, 1996 Proclamation 6902ÐSmallBusiness The President Part VII 28463

28465

Federal Register Presidential Documents Vol. 61, No. 108

Tuesday, June 4, 1996

Title 3— Proclamation 6902 of May 31, 1996

The President Small Business Week, 1996

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

The American Dream has long held out the promise of a better life to our citizens—one of prosperity, security, and personal fulfillment for all those who are willing to work hard to reach their goals. Our Nation’s 22 million small business owners possess the determination and initiative to make that promise a reality, and their entrepreneurial spirit helps to drive the engine of our economy. In addition, products developed by small firms such as the artificial heart valve, the pacemaker, and the personal computer, have revolutionized our daily lives and made this an age of extraordinary possibility. The number of new small businesses has increased steadily over the last three decades, with 800,000 new businesses incorporated in 1995 alone. Small businesses employ some 53 percent of the private work force, account for 47 percent of all sales in the country, and generate more than half of our private gross domestic product. In addition, industries dominated by small business were responsible for 75 percent of the 1.66 million new jobs created during 1995. Last year, delegates to the White House Conference on Small Business forged an agenda that will continue such progress and prepare our economy for the challenges of the next century. By implementing their recommendations, ‘‘reinventing’’ the U.S. Small Business Administration, and pursuing other incentives and initiatives, we can establish an even better environment for small business creation and growth. These efforts are vital to keeping our economy strong and strengthening the proud legacy of innovation that has always inspired our people and made America great. NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2 through June 8, 1996, as Small Business Week. I call upon Government officials and all the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs that celebrate the achievements of small business owners and encourage the formation of new firms. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twentieth.

[FR Doc. 96–14240 œ– Filed 6–3–96; 11:08 am] Billing code 3195–01–P i

Reader Aids Federal Register Vol. 61, No. 108 Tuesday, June 4, 1996

CUSTOMER SERVICE AND INFORMATION CFR PARTS AFFECTED DURING JUNE

Federal Register/Code of Federal Regulations At the end of each month, the Office of the Federal Register General Information, indexes and other finding 202±523±5227 publishes separately a List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA), which aids lists parts and sections affected by documents published since Public inspection announcement line 523±5215 the revision date of each title. 161...... 27771 Laws 3 CFR 163...... 27771 Public Laws Update Services (numbers, dates, etc.) 523±6641 Proclamations: 172...... 27771 For additional information 523±5227 6902...... 28465 177...... 28049 Presidential Documents Administrative Orders: 178...... 28051 Memorandums: 182...... 27771 Executive orders and proclamations 523±5227 No. 96±26 of May 22, 186...... 27771 The United States Government Manual 523±5227 1996 ...... 27767 197...... 27771 Other Services 700...... 27771 5 CFR Electronic and on-line services (voice) 523±4534 Proposed Rules: Privacy Act Compilation 523±3187 532...... 27995, 27996 1...... 28116 2...... 28116 TDD for the hearing impaired 523±5229 7 CFR 3...... 28116 29...... 27997 5...... 28116 ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARD 610...... 27998 10...... 28116 12...... 28116 Free Electronic Bulletin Board service for Public Law numbers, 928...... 28000 20...... 28116 Federal Register finding aids, and list of documents on public 1230...... 28002 56...... 28116 inspection. 202±275±0920 8 CFR 58...... 28116 FAX-ON-DEMAND 103...... 28003 25 CFR You may access our Fax-On-Demand service. You only need a fax 299...... 28003 65...... 27780 machine and there is no charge for the service except for long 9 CFR distance telephone charges the user may incur. The list of 66...... 27780 documents on public inspection and the daily Federal Register’s Proposed Rules: 76...... 27780 table of contents are available using this service. The document 92...... 27797, 28073 Proposed Rules: numbers are 7050-Public Inspection list and 7051-Table of 1...... 27821 12 CFR Contents list. The public inspection list will be updated 150...... 27822 immediately for documents filed on an emergency basis. 747...... 28021 166...... 27824 Proposed Rules: 217...... 27831 NOTE: YOU WILL ONLY GET A LISTING OF DOCUMENTS ON 271...... 27833 FILE AND NOT THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT. Documents on 229...... 27802 704...... 28085 272...... 27833 public inspection may be viewed and copied in our office located 274...... 27833 at 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 700. The Fax-On-Demand 709...... 28085 741...... 28085 277...... 27833 telephone number is: 301±713±6905 278...... 27833 14 CFR 26 CFR FEDERAL REGISTER PAGES AND DATES, JUNE 33...... 28430 39 ...... 28028, 28029, 28031 40...... 28053 27767±27994...... 3 71 ...... 28033, 28034, 28035, 48...... 28053 27995±28466...... 4 28036, 28037, 28038, 28039, Proposed Rules: 28040, 28041, 28042, 28043, 1 ...... 27833, 27834, 28118 28044, 28045 91...... 28416 29 CFR 95...... 27769 1952...... 28053 121...... 28416 125...... 28416 29 CFR 135...... 28416 Proposed Rules: Proposed Rules: 1904...... 27850 39...... 28112, 28114 1952...... 27850 250...... 27818 33 CFR 20 CFR 62...... 27780 404...... 28046 100...... 27782 165...... 28055 21 CFR 14...... 28047, 28048 34 CFR 100...... 27771 Proposed Rules: 101...... 27771 701...... 27990 103...... 27771 104...... 27771 38 CFR 105...... 27771 2...... 27783 109...... 27771 14...... 27783 137...... 27771 36...... 28057 ii Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Reader Aids

39 CFR 233...... 28059 40 CFR 52...... 28061 63...... 27785 300...... 27788 Proposed Rules: 180...... 28118, 28120 44 CFR 64...... 28067 46 CFR 108...... 28260 110...... 28260 111...... 28260 112...... 28260 113...... 28260 161...... 28260 47 CFR Proposed Rules: 0...... 28122 80...... 28122 48 CFR Proposed Rules: 45...... 27851 52...... 27851 49 CFR 107...... 27948 190...... 27789 191...... 27789 192...... 27789 193...... 27789 571...... 28423 Proposed Rules: 571...... 28123, 28124 50 CFR 216...... 27793 247...... 27793 620...... 27795 672...... 28069, 28070 675 ...... 27796, 28071, 28072 Proposed Rules: 625...... 27851 650...... 27862 651...... 27862, 27948 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Reader Aids iii

REMINDERS Mail reasonably suspected Limited access management Radio stations; table of The rules and proposed rules of being dangerous to of Federal fisheries in and assignments: in this list were editorially persons or property; off of Alaska Illinois; comments due by 6- compiled as an aid to Federal treatment; published 6-4- Gulf of Alaska and Bering 10-96; published 4-26-96 Register users. Inclusion or 96 Sea and Aleutian Kansas; comments due by exclusion from this list has no SOCIAL SECURITY Islands groundfish; 6-13-96; published 4-29- legal significance. ADMINISTRATION comments due by 6-13- 96 Social security benefits: 96; published 5-15-96 Missouri; comments due by Ocean salmon off coasts of RULES GOING INTO Disability and blindness 6-10-96; published 4-26- determinations-- Washington, Oregon, and 96 EFFECT TODAY California; comments due Musculoskeletal system New Mexico; comments due by 6-10-96; published 5- listings; expiration date by 6-10-96; published 4- 24-96 AGRICULTURE extension; published 6- 26-96 DEPARTMENT 4-96 DEFENSE DEPARTMENT Ohio; comments due by 6- Agricultural Marketing Acquisition regulations: 13-96; published 4-29-96 Service VETERANS AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT Government property; use Onions grown in-- Pennsylvania; comments Loan guaranty: and charges clause class due by 6-10-96; published Texas; published 5-17-96 deviation; comments due Miscellaneous amendments; 4-26-96 Onions, imported; published 5- by 6-14-96; published 5- published 6-4-96 Wisconsin; comments due 22-96 15-96 by 6-10-96; published 4- COMMERCE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL 26-96 National Oceanic and COMMENTS DUE NEXT PROTECTION AGENCY WEEK Telecommunications Act of Atmospheric Administration Air pollutants, hazardous; 1996; implementation: national emission standards: Fishery conservation and Customer proprietary management: AGRICULTURE Equivalent emission DEPARTMENT network information, etc.; Atlantic swordfish; published limitations by permit; telecommunications Agricultural Marketing 5-31-96 implementation; comments carriers' use; comments Service HEALTH AND HUMAN due by 6-10-96; published due by 6-11-96; published SERVICES DEPARTMENT Specialty crops; import 5-10-96 5-28-96 regulations: Air quality implementation Food and Drug HEALTH AND HUMAN Medjhool dates grown in plans; approval and Administration SERVICES DEPARTMENT Administrative practice and California; comments due promulgation; various by 6-10-96; published 4-9- States: Food and Drug procedure: Administration 96 Illinois; comments due by 6- Advisory committees-- Animal drugs, feeds, and AGRICULTURE 10-96; published 5-10-96 Name and function related products: DEPARTMENT Ohio; comments due by 6- changes; published 6-4- Protein derived from 96 Forest Service 14-96; published 5-15-96 Wisconsin; comments due ruminants prohibited in Name and function Alaska Federal public lands ruminant feed; comments changes; published 6-4- subsistence management by 6-10-96; published 5- 10-96 due by 6-13-96; published 96 regulations 5-14-96 Air quality planning purposes; Chlorofluorocarbon propellants Waters subject to Food for human consumption: in self-pressurized subsistence priority designation of areas: Food labeling-- containers: regulation; identification; Arizona; comments due by Sterile aerosol talc-- Federal Subsistence 6-10-96; published 5-10- Nutrient content claims; Program and Federal 96 dietary supplements, Addition to list of essential nutrition and ingredient uses; published 5-21-96 Subsistence Board's Hazardous waste: Authority; expansion; Land disposal restrictions-- labeling; comment Food additives: periods extension; comments due by 6-14- Wood preserving wastes Adjuvants, production aids, 96; published 4-4-96 comments due by 6-10- and sanitizers-- and toxicity 96; published 4-15-96 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT characteristic metal Hydrogen peroxide, etc. Human drugs: National Oceanic and wastes; comments due (aqueous solution); Orally ingested (OTC) drug published 6-4-96 Atmospheric Administration by 6-10-96; published 5-10-96 products containing Polymers-- Endangered and threatened species: Superfund program: alcohol as inactive Petroleum hydrocarbon ingredient; maximum National oil and hazardous resins (cyclopentadiene- Sea turtle conservation; concentration limit; substances contingency type), hydrogenated; shrimp trawling comments due by 6-10- plan-- published 6-4-96 requirements-- 96; published 5-10-96 National priorities list LABOR DEPARTMENT Soft turtle excluder Medical devices: devices approval update; comments due Occupational Safety and removed, etc.; by 6-12-96; published Analyte specific regents; Health Administration comments due by 6-10- 5-13-96 classification/ State plans; development, reclassification as 96; published 4-24-96 National priorities list enforcement, etc.: restricted devices; Fishery conservation and update; comments due comments due by 6-12- North Carolina; published 6- management: by 6-12-96; published 4-96 96; published 3-14-96 Gulf of Alaska and Bering 5-13-96 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Sea and Aleutian Islands FEDERAL INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OFFICE groundfish; comments due COMMUNICATIONS Fish and Wildlife Service Prevailing rate systems; by 6-10-96; published 4- COMMISSION Alaska Federal public lands published 6-4-96 15-96 Freedom of Information Act; subsistence management POSTAL SERVICE Gulf of Alaska groundfish; implementation; comments regulations Organization and comments due by 6-14- due by 6-14-96; published Waters subject to administration: 96; published 6-4-96 4-15-96 subsistence priority iv Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 4, 1996 / Reader Aids

regulation; identification; Reporting reliability and Airbus; comments due by 6- comments due by 6-10- Federal Subsistence availability information for 10-96; published 4-29-96 96; published 4-11-96 Program and Federal risk-significant systems Bell; comments due by 6- Subsistence Board's and equipment; comments 10-96; published 4-10-96 TRANSPORTATION Authority; expansion; DEPARTMENT due by 6-11-96; published Boeing; comments due by comments due by 6-14- 2-12-96 6-10-96; published 3-11- 96; published 4-4-96 Surface Transportation PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 96 Board INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OFFICE CFM International; Minerals Management Employment: comments due by 6-14- Carrier rates and service Service Federal employee training; 96; published 4-15-96 terms: Outer Continental Shelf; oil, comments due by 6-12- Jetstream; comments due Rail common carriage; gas, and sulphur operations: 96; published 5-13-96 by 6-10-96; published 4- disclosure, publication, Tracts offered for sale; high RAILROAD RETIREMENT bids, acceptance or 29-96 and notice of change of BOARD rejection; time period McCauley; comments due rates and other service extension; comments due Railroad Unemployment by 6-11-96; published 4- terms; comments due by by 6-14-96; published 5- Insurance Act: 12-96 6-10-96; published 5-9-96 Representative payment; 15-96 McDonnell Douglas; comments due by 6-10- TREASURY DEPARTMENT JUSTICE DEPARTMENT comments due by 6-10- 96; published 4-11-96 Justice Programs Office 96; published 4-10-96 Internal Revenue Service TRANSPORTATION Grants: Class E airspace; comments DEPARTMENT Violence against women; due by 6-14-96; published Excise taxes: arrest policies; comments Coast Guard 5-2-96 Regattas and marine parades: Gasoline and diesel fuel dye due by 6-13-96; published TRANSPORTATION injection systems; Newport-Bermuda Regatta; 5-14-96 DEPARTMENT comments due by 6-12- comments due by 6-12- LABOR DEPARTMENT 96; published 3-14-96 96; published 5-13-96 National Highway Traffic Wage and Hour Division Safety Administration Migrant and seasonal Searsport Lobster Boat agricultural worker Races; comments due by Motor vehicle safety protection: 6-12-96; published 5-13- standards: LIST OF PUBLIC LAWS Employ, independent 96 Accelerator control systems; contractor and joint TRANSPORTATION comments due by 6-14- Note: No public bills which employment, definitions; DEPARTMENT 96; published 4-30-96 have become law were comments due by 6-12- Federal Aviation Lamps, reflective devices, received by the Office of the 96; published 3-29-96 Administration and associated Federal Register for inclusion equipment-- NUCLEAR REGULATORY Airworthiness directives: in today's List of Public COMMISSION Aerospatiale; comments due Headlamp concealment Laws. Production and utilization by 6-12-96; published 4-9- devices; Federal facilities; domestic licensing: 96 regulatory review; Last List May 31, 1996