DOCSLIB.ORG

Jewish Minorities in Hungary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jewish Minorities in Hungary [Communicated to the Members C. 273. 1925. I of the Council.] 41/41456/17190 41/44164/17190 Geneva, May 20tli, 1925. LEAGUE OF NATIONS JEWISH MINORITIES IN HUNGARY COMMUNICATION WITH ANNEXES BY Mr LUCIEN WOLF CONCERNING THE HUNGARIAN LAW No XXV, 1920, ON THE “NUMERUS CLAUSUS” Note by the Secretary-General : On September 30th, 1922, the Council adopted a report submitted by the representatives of Spain, Belgium and China regarding a petition signed by Mr. Lucien W o l f on behalf of the Joint Foreign Committee of the Jewish Board of Deputies and the Anglo-Je wish Association on the Hungarian Law No. XXV, 1920, which introduced the “ Numerus Clausus ” into higher educational institutions in Hungary. In this report, these three representatives, after expressing the opinion that it was first of all necessary to ascertain how' the Law was applied and whether in practice the legitimate rights of the minorities were prejudiced, proposed to the Council that it should request the Hungarian Government to supply the necessary information in order that it might be possible to study the applica­ tion of the Law in question over a certain period. Count Banffy, at that time Minister of Foreign Affairs in Hungary, who was present at the meeting of the Council, stated that the Hungarian Government would supply the Council with all the necessary information on the application of this Law and, in accordance with this statement, the Hungarian Government has on two occasions furnished the Members of the Council with statistical information on the matter. The Secretary-General now has the honour to circulate, for the information of the Members of the Council, a further communication on the same subject, together with annexes, also signed b y Mr.W o l f on behalf of the Joint Foreign Committee of the Jewish Board of Deputies and the Anglo-Je wish Association. This communication was forwarded to the Hungarian Government for its observations on January 28th, 1925. The Hungarian Government’s observations, which have just reached the Secretariat, are also circulated for the information of the Members of the Council. S. d. N. 175 (F) S6U (A) + ttUU ( I ) 22 > <A) 1012& Im p. tie Tribune <le tienèvtv I COMMUNICATION BY Mr. LUCIEN WOLF 2, Verulam Buildings, Gray’s Inn, London. Jan u ary 1st, 1925. 1. This Committee has lately had under its earnest consideration the deplorable situation created in Hungary and in other countries by the Hungarian Law No. XXV of the year 1920, known as the “Numerus Clausus” (Annex I). It has formed the opinion that the time has arrived when some definite step should be taken to decide whether the Law in question is or is not an infraction of the Minorities Clauses of the Treaty of Trianon. 2. I am accordingly directed to ask you to be good enough to communicate this view to the Council of the League of Nations, and to express the hope that the Council may see fit to submit the question of the validity of the Law to the Permanent Court of International Justice for an Advisory Opinion, in accordance with the provisions of the third paragraph of Article 14 of the Covenant. 3. I am to remind you that this question has been pending before the Council for more than three years, and that, it was the subject of a resolution adopted by the Council on September 30th, 1922. The Joint Foreign Committee, with whom is associated the kjAlliance Israélite universelle” of Paris, had contended that the Hungarian Law constituted an infringement of Articles 56, 57 and 58 of the Treaty of Trianon, and the “Alliance toraélite” had furthermore protested against the application of the Law to Jews, on the ground that they did not come within its provisions (Annex II). The Committee of the Council which considered the question in the first instance postponed the legal issues raised by the Joint Foreign Committee and the “Alliance Israelite”, and recommended the Council to enquire into the application of the Law and as to “whether in practice the legi­ timate rights of minorities are disregarded” (Annex III). This recommendation was adopted by the resolution referred to above, and the Hungarian Government was requested to supply the necessary information (Annex IV). On January 24th, 1923, the Hungarian Government forwarded to the Secretary-General of the League a statistical return which appeared to show that the Jews did not suffer by the application of the Law. Since then nothing has been done. 1 11 4. The grounds on which the Joint Foreign Committee now asks that the validity 6f the Hungarian Law shall be decided by the Permanent Court of International Justice &re as follows : ii (a) The Committee has been advised by Counsel, whose opinion is annexed that the Hungarian Law is in direct conflict with the Minorities Provisions of the Treaty of Trianon (Annex V). (b) Even if the application of the Law in Hungary caused no actual suffering to Hungarian Jews, a decision of the legal question would be necessary because the immunity enjoyed by Hungary in this respect has encouraged other countries in Central and Eastern Europe to contemplate similar legislation avowedly aimed at Jews, and has actually given rise to popular agitations which have caused much suffering among them (Annex VI). (<?) The statistical tables filed by the Hungarian Government on January 24th, 1923, are misleading. The legitimate rights of the Jewish Minority are disregarded in practice as well as in theory, and this to the hurt, not only of the Hungarian Jews themselves, but of the Jewish communities of other countries who art- called upon to make heavy sacrifices for the support of thousands of Jewish stu­ dents expatriated through the anti-Semitic “application” of the Hungarian “Numerus Clausus” Law (Annex VII). 5. The Joint Foreign Committee ventures to suggest that the questions to be sub­ mitted to the Permanent Court should be in the following form : (a) Is the Hungarian Law No. XXV of the year 1920 an infraction of the Minorities Clauses of the Treaty of Trianon, and more particularly of Articles 56, 57 and 58 of th at T reaty ? ( b) If the answer is in the negative, that is, if the Court hold that the Law is not in itself an infraction of the Treaty, is the Law so applied in practice as to constitute such an infraction (see Annex VIII) f 6. The Joint Foreign Committee thinks it desirable to state that, in making this application to the Council of the League, it has no definite mandate from the Hungarian Jewish community as an organised body, although many appeals have reached it from Jewish Societies and individual Jews in Hungary, as also from the Jewish students expatriated through the operation of the “Numerus Clausus” Law. The grounds on which the leaders of the Hungarian Jews decline to appeal to the League of Nations have been recently set forth in speeches of the President and Vice-President of the Budapest Community (see Annex VII b). But in view of the virulence of the anti-Semitic agitation in Hungary, it will be readily understood that the Jewish community are scarcely free agents in this matter. However that may be, the international reactions of the Hungarian “Numerus Clausus” Law are so serious as to render it impossible for the Joint Foreign Committee to avoid seeking a judgment of the Permanent Court. 7. In elucidation of the case set forth above, various documents and memoranda are annexed. These documents have, however, been mainly selected with a view to assisting the Council of the League in arriving at a conclusion on the question whether the case should be submitted to the Permanent Court. If this question is decided in the affirmative, the Joint Foreign Committee trusts that it may be afforded an opportunity of submitting further arguments on the main question for the consideration of the Court. (Signed) Lucien W o lf. Secretary. LIST OF ANNEXES T. Text of the “Num erus Clausus” L aw .................................................. 4 II. The Jewish Appeals to the League of Nations.................................... 5 III. Report on the “Numerus Clausus”, submitted to the Council of the League of Nations by the Representatives of Belgium, China and Spain, Septem ber 27th, 1922................................................................. 6 IV. Extract from the Minutes of the Twenty-first Session of the Council of the League of Nations.......................................................................... 7 V. Opinion of Dr. Hugh B e l l o t on the Validity of the “Numerus Clausus” Law ............................................................................................................................... 7 VI. Note on the ‘‘Numerus Clausus” in Austria, Poland, Boumania, etc.... 9 VII. How the Minorities suffer under the “Numerus Clausus” Law : (a) Statement of the Budapest Jewish Community............. 10 (b) Speeches at a Conference of Hungarian Jewish Communities on October 23rd, 1924................................................................. 14 V III. The Method of Applying the Law to Jew s........................................... 15 — 4 — Annex I. TEXT OF THE “NUMERUS CLAUSUS” LAW. [ Translation. ] L a w X X V o f 1920, r e l a t iv e to M atriculation at t h e U niversities , t h e P o l y t e c h n ic S c h o o l , t h e B u d a p e s t U n i v e r s it y of E c o n o m ic S c ie n c e s , a n d t h e A c a d e m ie s (F a c u l t ie s ) o f L a w . (Promulgated in the Hungarian Law Gazette on September 26th, 1920.) To all whom it may concern, I hereby declare that the National Hungarian Assembly has enacted the following Law : I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jewish Encyclopedia
    Jewish Encyclopedia The History, Religion, Literature, And Customs Of The Jewish People From The Earliest Times To The Present Day Volume XII TALMUD – ZWEIFEL New York and London FUNK AND WAGNALLS COMPANY MDCCCCVI ZIONISM: Movement looking toward the segregation of the Jewish people upon a national basis and in a particular home of its own: specifically, the modern form of the movement that seeks for the Jews “a publicly and legally assured home in Palestine,” as initiated by Theodor Herzl in 1896, and since then dominating Jewish history. It seems that the designation, to distinguish the movement from the activity of the Chovevei Zion, was first used by Matthias Acher (Birnbaum) in his paper “Selbstemancipation,” 1886 (see “Ost und West,” 1902, p. 576: Ahad ha – ‘Am, “Al Parashat Derakim,” p. 93, Berlin, 1903). Biblical Basis The idea of a return of the Jews to Palestine has its roots in many passages of Holy Writ. It is an integral part of the doctrine that deals with the Messianic time, as is seen in the constantly recurring expression, “shub shebut” or heshib shebut,” used both of Israel and of Judah (Jer. xxx, 7,1; Ezek. Xxxix. 24; Lam. Ii. 14; Hos. Vi. 11; Joel iv. 1 et al.). The Dispersion was deemed merely temporal: ‘The days come … that … I will bring again the captivity of my people of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof … and I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land” (Amos ix.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Unwanted Nation: the Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository BUILDING AN UNWANTED NATION: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP AND AUSTRIAN PROPONENTS OF A SEPARATE NATIONHOOD, 1918-1934 Kevin Mason A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Advisor: Dr. Christopher Browning Reader: Dr. Konrad Jarausch Reader: Dr. Lloyd Kramer Reader: Dr. Michael Hunt Reader: Dr. Terence McIntosh ©2007 Kevin Mason ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kevin Mason: Building an Unwanted Nation: The Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934 (Under the direction of Dr. Christopher Browning) This project focuses on American and British economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties with Austria, and particularly with internal proponents of Austrian independence. Primarily through loans to build up the economy and diplomatic pressure, the United States and Great Britain helped to maintain an independent Austrian state and prevent an Anschluss or union with Germany from 1918 to 1934. In addition, this study examines the minority of Austrians who opposed an Anschluss . The three main groups of Austrians that supported independence were the Christian Social Party, monarchists, and some industries and industrialists. These Austrian nationalists cooperated with the Americans and British in sustaining an unwilling Austrian nation. Ultimately, the global depression weakened American and British capacity to practice dollar and pound diplomacy, and the popular appeal of Hitler combined with Nazi Germany’s aggression led to the realization of the Anschluss .
    [Show full text]
  • Rusztem Vambã©Ry Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3v19n6cs No online items Register of the Rusztem Vambéry papers Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 1999 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Rusztem Vambéry 75089 1 papers Title: Rusztem Vambéry papers Date (inclusive): 1887-1948 Collection Number: 75089 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: In Hungarian and English Physical Description: 9 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box(5.75 Linear Feet) Abstract: Correspondence, speeches and writings, reports, and printed matter, relating to criminology, Hungarian domestic and foreign affairs, Hungarian- American relations, and Hungarian emigres in the U.S. Creator: Vámbéry, Rusztem, 1872- Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1975. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Rusztem Vambéry Papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. 1872 Born, Budapest, Hungary 1897 Admitted to the Bar of Budapest 1899-1913 Judge to the Court of Appeals and attached to the Department of Bill Drafting at the Ministry of Justice 1902
    [Show full text]
  • A Monumental Debate in Budapest: the Hentzi Statue and the Limits of Austro-Hungarian Reconciliation, 1852–1918
    A Monumental Debate in Budapest: The Hentzi Statue and the Limits of Austro-Hungarian Reconciliation, 1852–1918 MICHAEL LAURENCE MILLER WO OF THE MOST ICONIC PHOTOS of the 1956 Hungarian revolution involve a colossal statue of Stalin, erected in 1951 and toppled on the first day of the anti-Soviet uprising. TOne of these pictures shows Stalin’s decapitated head, abandoned in the street as curious pedestrians amble by. The other shows a tall stone pedestal with nothing on it but a lonely pair of bronze boots. Situated near Heroes’ Square, Hungary’s national pantheon, the Stalin statue had served as a symbol of Hungary’s subjugation to the Soviet Union; and its ceremonious and deliberate destruction provided a poignant symbol for the fall of Stalinism. Thirty-eight years before, at the beginning of an earlier Hungarian revolution, another despised statue was toppled in Budapest, also marking a break from foreign subjugation, albeit to a different power. Unlike the Stalin statue, which stood for only five years, this statue—the so-called Hentzi Monument—had been “a splinter in the eye of the [Hungarian] nation” for sixty-six years. Perceived by many Hungarians as a symbol of “national humiliation” at the hands of the Habsburgs, the Hentzi Monument remained mired in controversy from its unveiling in 1852 until its destruction in 1918. The object of street demonstrations and parliamentary disorder in 1886, 1892, 1898, and 1899, and the object of a failed “assassination” attempt in 1895, the Hentzi Monument was even implicated in the fall of a Hungarian prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Living War, Thinking Peace (1914-1924)
    Living War, Thinking Peace (1914-1924) Living War, Thinking Peace (1914-1924): Women’s Experiences, Feminist Thought, and International Relations Edited by Bruna Bianchi and Geraldine Ludbrook Living War, Thinking Peace (1914-1924): Women’s Experiences, Feminist Thought, and International Relations Edited by Bruna Bianchi and Geraldine Ludbrook This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Bruna Bianchi, Geraldine Ludbrook and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-8684-X ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-8684-0 CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................. viii Bruna Bianchi and Geraldine Ludbrook Part One: Living War. Women’s Experiences during the War Chapter One ................................................................................................. 2 Women in Popular Demonstrations against the War in Italy Giovanna Procacci Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 26 Inside the Storm: The Experiences of Women during the Austro-German Occupation
    [Show full text]
  • Empress Elisabeth ('Sisi') of Austria and Patriotic Fashionism
    VanDemark, Christopher. “Empress Elisabeth (‘Sisi’) of Austria and Patriotic Fashionism.” Hungarian Cultural Studies. e-Journal of the American Hungarian Educators Association, Volume 9 (2016): http://ahea.pitt.edu DOI: 10.5195/ahea.2016.254 Empress Elisabeth (‘Sisi’) of Austria and Patriotic Fashionism Christopher M. VanDemark Abstract: In this article, Christopher VanDemark explores the intersections between nationalism, fashion, and the royal figure in Hungary between 1857 and the Compromise of 1867. Focusing on aesthetics as a vehicle for feminine power at a critical junction in Hungarian history, VanDemark contextualizes Empress Elisabeth’s role in engendering a revised political schema in the Habsburg sphere. Foreseeing the power of emblematic politics, the young Empress adeptly situated herself between the Hungarians and the Austrians to recast the Hungarian martyrology narrative promulgated after the failed revolution of 1848. Eminent Hungarian newspapers such as the Pesti Napló, Pester Lloyd, and the Vasárnapi Újság form the backbone of this article, as publications such as these facilitated the dissemination of patriotic sentiment while simultaneously exulting the efficacy of symbolic fashions. The topic of study engages with contemporary works on nationalism, which emphasize gender and aesthetics, and contributes to the emerging body of scholarship on important women in Hungarian history. Seminal texts by Catherine Brice, Sara Maza, Abby Zanger, and Lynn Hunt compliment the wider objective of this brief analysis, namely, the notion that the Queen’s body can both enhance and reform monarchical power within a nineteenth-century milieu. Keywords: Empress Elisabeth, Habsburg Monarchy, fashion and politics, fashion and nationalism, 1867 Compromise Biography: Christopher VanDemark received his B.A in History and Political Science from the University of Florida, Gainesville.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Utopia in Zweig's Brazil. a Land of the Future
    The European Utopia in Zweig’s Brazil. A Land of the Future David Fontanals ADHUC, Universitat de Barcelona Abstract: The publication in 1941 of Stefan Zweig’s Brazil. A Land of the Future (Brasilien. Ein Land der Zukunft) was met both with great enthusiasm and harsh criticisms. Many re- viewers thought that Zweig’s view of the country was too exotic, naive, idealistic, utopian, and even the result of the propaganda efforts carried out by the Vargas administration. In an attempt to understand and bridge the gap between Zweig’s idea of Brazil and the coun- try’s «reality», this article analyzes the text hand in hand with Zweig’s memoirs and other of his non-fiction works from the perspective of his utopian thinking and ethical commitment to the notions of freedom, peace, cosmopolitanism, tolerance, and common understanding. Keywords: Stefan Zweig; ethical commitment; Europe; utopia; Brasilien. Ein Land der Zu- kunft. A utopia europeia em O Brasil: país do futuro de Zweig Resumo: A publicação em 1941 de Brazil, um país do futuro (Brasilien. Ein Land der Zu- kunft), de Stefan Zweig, foi recebida com um grande entusiasmo e com as críticas mais duras. Muitos críticos pensaram que a visão que Zweig tinha do país era exótica, ingênua, idealista e utópica demais, refletindo até o resultado dos esforços de propaganda realizados pelo governo Vargas. Na tentativa de compreender e preencher o vazio entre a ideia que Zweig tinha do Brasil e a «realidade» do país, este artigo analisa o texto junto com as me- mórias de Zweig e outros trabalhos de não-ficção a partir da perspetiva do seu pensamento utópico e do compromisso ético das noções de liberdade, paz, cosmopolitismo, tolerância e entendimento comum.
    [Show full text]
  • No Longer an Alien, the English Jew: the Nineteenth-Century Jewish
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1997 No Longer an Alien, the English Jew: The Nineteenth-Century Jewish Reader and Literary Representations of the Jew in the Works of Benjamin Disraeli, Matthew Arnold, and George Eliot Mary A. Linderman Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Linderman, Mary A., "No Longer an Alien, the English Jew: The Nineteenth-Century Jewish Reader and Literary Representations of the Jew in the Works of Benjamin Disraeli, Matthew Arnold, and George Eliot" (1997). Dissertations. 3684. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/3684 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1997 Mary A. Linderman LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO "NO LONGER AN ALIEN, THE ENGLISH JEW": THE NINETEENTH-CENTURY JEWISH READER AND LITERARY REPRESENTATIONS OF THE JEW IN THE WORKS OF BENJAMIN DISRAELI, MATTHEW ARNOLD, AND GEORGE ELIOT VOLUME I (CHAPTERS I-VI) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH BY MARY A. LINDERMAN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JANUARY 1997 Copyright by Mary A. Linderman, 1997 All rights reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to acknowledge the invaluable services of Dr. Micael Clarke as my dissertation director, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Document 2-15 (PDF)
    ■ United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies Documenting Life and Destruction Holocaust Sources in Context SERIES EDITOR Jürgen Matthäus CONTRIBUTING EDITOR Jan Lambertz HHungary_3rd.indbungary_3rd.indb i 77/22/13/22/13 55:53:53 AAMM DOCUMENTING LIFE AND DESTRUCTION HOLOCAUST SOURCES IN CONTEXT Th is groundbreaking series provides a new perspective on history using fi rst- hand accounts of the lives of those who suff ered through the Holocaust, those who perpetrated it, and those who witnessed it as bystanders. Th e United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies pres- ents a wide range of documents from diff erent archival holdings, expanding knowledge about the lives and fates of Holocaust victims and making these resources broadly available to the general public and scholarly communities for the fi rst time. Books in the Series 1 . Jewish Responses to Persecution, Volume I, 1933–1938, Jürgen Matthäus and Mark Roseman (2010) 2. Children during the Holocaust, Patricia Heberer (2011) 3. Jewish Responses to Persecution, Volume II, 1938–1940, Alexandra Garbarini with Emil Kerenji, Jan Lambertz, and Avinoam Patt (2011) 4. Th e Diary of Samuel Golfard and the Holocaust in Galicia, Wendy Lower (2011) 5. Jewish Responses to Persecution, Volume III, 1941–1942, Jürgen Matthäus with Emil Kerenji, Jan Lambertz, and Leah Wolfson (2013) 6. The Holocaust in Hungary: Evolution of a Genocide, Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár (2013) HHungary_3rd.indbungary_3rd.indb iiii 77/22/13/22/13 55:53:53 AAMM A project of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Sara J.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Emancipation and Antisemitism: Jewish Presence in Parliamentary Politics in Hungary 1867–1884
    BETWEEN EMANCIPATION AND ANTISEMITISM: JEWISH PRESENCE IN PARLIAMENTARY POLITICS IN HUNGARY 1867–1884 Árpád Welker THE PERIOD UNDER STUDY The early 1880s were both difficult and extraordinary from the point of view of Hungarian Jewry. Political antisemitism had been present for half a decade, but it became violent and influential during these years, though only for these years. In other words, this was a time of crisis within the ‘Golden Era’ of the Hungarian Jewry, as some researchers of Hungarian Jews call the period of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy 1867–1918. [1] Besides antisemitism ‘normal’ political debate took place in parliament simultaneously, namely that related to the bill on Jewish–Christian marriages, which was also decisive from a Jewish point of view. The ‘antisemitic wave’ started with the attempts to establish a nation-wide movement, the Central Association of Non-Jewish Hungarians, following the example of Wilhelm Marr’s Antisemitenliga in Germany. [2] This period of virulent antisemitic activity culminated in the events related to the infamous Tiszaeszlár blood libel case, including a series of riots threatening the safety of Jews in numerous counties, and the foundation of the National Antisemitic Party in 1883. After the clear defeat of the antisemites in the elections of 1884, antisemitism practically became insignificant. [3] It took ten years until a political party incorporated antisemitism in its programme again, but the antisemitism of the Catholic People’s Party was ‘less virulent’, [4] and neither their only nor even their main goal. THE ‘DOUBLE PROGRAMME OF EMANCIPATION AND ASSIMILATION’ András Kovács in an article about the relationship between politics and Hungarian Jews argues that ‘independent Jewish politics has no tradition in the history of Hungarian Jewry’.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary After a Thousand Years
    HUNGARY AFTER A THOUSAND YEARS by Imre Josika-Herczeg Edited by Andrew L. Simon Copyright © by Andrew L. Simon, 2000 Original Copyright by Dr. Imre de Jó sika-Herczeg 1934 Originally published in 1936 by American Hungarian Daily, Inc. New York, NY and printed in the United States by J.J. Little and Ives Company, New York ISBN 0-9665734-5-5 Library of Congress Card Number: 00-101927 Published by Simon Publications, P.O. Box 321, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Printed by Lightning Print, Inc. La Vergne , TN 37086 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction by Andrew L. Simon 1 Preface by Count Albert Apponyi 7 1. HUNGARY IN 1934 AS SEEN BY THE TRAVELLER 9 2. THE BEGINNINGS OF HUNGARY 19 3. FROM THE HUNYADIS TO THE HABSBURGS 31 4. REACTION, REPRESSION, REVOLUTION 51 5. REVENGE AND REFORM UNDER FRANCIS JOSEPH 79 6. THE WORLD WAR AND AFTER 93 7. THE COLLAPSE OF THE HABSBURG MONARCHY 101 8. SOME PRELIMINARIES TO THE WORLD WAR 113 9. THE ARMISTICE AND THE “FOURTEEN POINTS” 121 10. HUNGARY AFTER THE WAR 129 11. THE HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTION 141 12. EDUCATION IN HUNGARY 153 13. HUNGARIAN ART AND LITERATURE 167 14. ECONOMICS AND FINANCE IN POST-WAR HUNGARY 177 15. THE FOREIGN POLICY OF HUNGARY 189 16. GREAT BRITAIN AND MODERN HUNGARY 211 17. HUNGARIANS IN AMERICA 235 18. REVISION AND REVISIONISM 281 APPENDICES: General Harry H. Bandholtz 289 Lt. Col. Charles à Court Repington 292 Graham Hutton 311 John F. Montgomery 315 In tro duc tion by An drew L. Simon This book is quite unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Moria Paz States & Networks in the Formation of Intl
    States and Networks in the Formation of International Law Moria Paz! Abstract The current struggle of the international legal system to address extremist non-state actors highlights the general inability of our legal institutions to engage with transnational ethnic/religious groups that take on political stances, whether violent or not. Dispersed communities that maintain a group political allegiance but are uninterested in the system of territory and citizenship appear essentially incomprehensible within an international order that is built on the foundation of state sovereignty. This paper investigates the operations and political capabilities of cross-border ethnic/religious networks that generate a group identity and political agenda through cultural institutions, and also traces when and how such networks were excluded from formal status in international law. Using an in-depth study of one organization based on a network of religious schools, I show that these entities can supply many of the same services to their members that a territorial state provides to its citizens. I investigate the consolidation of the state-based legal system at the conclusion of World War I, with a particular focus on the Minorities Treaties as a legal regime intended to address the needs of minority ethnic/religious populations within the new order then emerging. I argue that through these treaties and subsequent case law on their implementation, international law as a discipline played a decisive role in legitimating the primacy of territorial states and casting the network form as deviant. The limited and poorly-defined legal category of minority rights displaced the network model from visibility, leaving international law with few practical structures for interacting with minority communities.
    [Show full text]