Cueva Del Diablo: a Bat Cave in Tepoztlan 1Gabriela López Segurajáuregui, 2Karla Toledo Gutiérrez, and 3Rodrigo A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cueva Del Diablo: a Bat Cave in Tepoztlan 1Gabriela López Segurajáuregui, 2Karla Toledo Gutiérrez, and 3Rodrigo A 264 AMCS Bulletin 19 / SMES Boletín 7 — 2006 Cueva del Diablo: a Bat cave in Tepoztlan 1Gabriela López Segurajáuregui, 2Karla Toledo Gutiérrez, and 3Rodrigo A. Medellín 1 [email protected] 2 [email protected] 3 Laboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Vertebrados, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, Circuito Exterior s/n anexo al Jardín Botánico Exterior, C. P. 70 – 275 Ciudad Universitaria, UNAM, 04510 México, D. F.; [email protected] Abstract not only by quantity but also because economically important plants (Kunz their evolutionary radiation has led and Pierson, 1994). They pollinate plants In Mexico, almost half of the 140 spe- the group to an unparalleled ecologi- associated with tropical and subtropi- cies of bats use caves as alternative or cal and morphological diversification. cal dry areas, such as agaves, cactus primary roosts. One volcanic cave that Bats occupy several trophic guilds, and a variety of tropical trees (Arita houses important colonies of these ani- from primary consumers to predators; and Wilson, 1987). They disperse seeds mals is Cueva del Diablo in Tepoztlan, they roost in many types of natural and occurring in the plant families to which Morelos, central Mexico. At least three human-made structures in numbers from figs and relatives belong, like Moraceae bat species have been reported in this a few animals to millions, creating the and Piperaceae, among others (Flem- cave. One of them, the Mexican long- greatest concentrations of warm-blooded ing, 1987). Worldwide, there are more nosed bat (Leptonycteris nivalis), is of vertebrates (Medellín, 2003). than 750 plant species that have been particular importance in economical and There are 9 families of bats in Mexico listed as visited by bats (von Helversen ecological terms. This species migrates that comprises 64 genera and 140 spe- and Winter, 2003). Flower – visiting from central to northern Mexico and cies, 15 of which are endemic (Teje- bats in Mexico are represented by 12 southern United States in mid spring and dor, 2005; Ceballos et. al., 2002). The species, most of which have restricted come back in mid autumn. In Mexico, Mexican bat fauna is rich because of distribution; two of them are endemic L. nivalis is classified as a threatened the country’s complex topography, the to the country, two others to Middle species, and in the U.S. as an endan- fact that Mexico contains virtually every America and ten use caves as a main gered one. known vegetation type (Rzedowski, or alternative roost (Arita and Santos Owing to the fact that Cueva del Dia- 1978), and because it has three distinct del Prado, 1999). blo is the only known roost in which this biogeographical elements: neotropical, Despite the importance of bats for species mates, the cave was proposed neartic (the limits of which are entirely ecological processes and for humans, by us as a sanctuary to the CONANP contained within Mexico’s borders), and this group of animals is facing great (National Commission of Natural Pro- endemic (Medellín, 2003). population declines and extinction pres- tected Areas) in 2004. In addition to Chiropterans play several major sures worldwide (Hutson et. al., 2001). this proposal, the PCMM (Program for ecological roles in many ecosystems. About 24% of bats (248 species) are Conservation of Mexican Bats) has con- Insectivorous bat species are the pri- considered at risk by the IUCN (2006): ducted environmental education efforts mary consumers of nocturnal insects, 32 critical endangered, 44 endangered in the region as an attempt to modify the and given the relatively large volumes and 172 vulnerable. Mexico has a similar negative ideas about bats and to share the consumed (up to 100% of body weight percentage of species at risk but at a information concerning their importance per night) and the long distances trav- national level: 12 under special protec- and that of caves for them. eled (several km per night), these bats tion, 15 threatened and 4 endangered, Other PCMM studies conducted in are thought to play a major role in regu- including 5 endemic species (SEMAR- this cave focus on the diet of the species lating nocturnal insect population and NAT, 2002). and understanding its mating system, intransporting nutrients across the land- Over the past 400 years, at least 9 among the first studies on those subjects scape (Kunz and Pierson, 1994). Bats species of bats have become extinct for this species. This document repre- are major predators of nocturnal flying (IUCN, 2006). Bat populations in many sents a compilation of those works in insects, and an important biological countries are thought to have declined Cueva del Diablo with emphasis in their control agents of insect pests (Russell, over the past 50 – 100 years, and al- importance for the general conservation et. al. 2005; Medellín, 2003), includ- though the evidence for such reduc- of bats and caves. ing cucumber beetles, June bugs, corn tions is often circumstantial, there are Introduction borers, Jerusalen crickets, leafhoppers cases where declines have been well and noctuid moths which are important documented (Mohr, 1972; Stebbings, With 1116 extant species recognized agricultural pests on such crops as corn, 1988; Rabinowitz and Tuttle, 1980; R. worldwide, bats are second only to ro- spinach, pumpkins, cotton, potatoes or A. Medellín, pers. obs.). dents in terms of total number of species tomatoes (Whitaker, 1993). Factors behind the decline of bat (Simmons, 2005; Wilson and Reeder, Bats are pollinators and seed dispers- populations are often related to hu- 2005). Diversity of bats is noteworthy ers for a number of ecologically and man destruction of habitat and roosts AMCS Bulletin 19 / SMES Boletín 7 — 2006 265 (Medellin and Gaona, 2000). An increas- adaptations and demographic response. and the tropical deciduous formations ing human population brings with it extra These animals spend over half their lives (Hoffman et. al., 1986). The cave is demands for land, resources and food, subjected to the selective pressures of located in the latter type of vegetation, which often results in the degradation, their roost environment. For many bats characterized by a semi-warm wet cli- destruction or fragmentation of certain the availability and physical capacity mate with summer rain (A) C (w2) (w) i g habitat types with a concomitant effect of roosts can set limits on the number (García, 1986) and in an altitude of 1850 on bat populations (Hutson et. al., 2001). and dispersion of roosting bats, and masl. In summer, it presents an average Impacts of agriculture and its deriva- this in turn can influence the type of external temperature of 28°C during tives (e. g. reduction of fallow periods, social organization and foraging strat- day, which decreases while entering overgrazing, loss of important plant egy employed (Kunz, 1982). Roosts are the cave down to 16°C in the majority species for bat foraging, replacement important sites for mating, hibernation, of internal chambers. of natural vegetation with cash crops and rearing young. They often facilitate A full description of the cave was and monoculture as a result of that, use complex social interactions, offer protec- made by Hoffman et.al. (1986). This of pesticides that affects insect fauna tion from inclement weather, promote refuge has a volcanic origin, from a and are potentially sub-lethal for bat’s energy conservation, and minimize risks subterranean lava flow that stopped, and breeding performance, among others), of predation (Villa-R, 1967; Kunz and eventually forms a various chamber’s as well as industrial activities, fire, de- Lumsden, 2003). system with a 1 937m length (including forestation, introduced predator species Underground sites, both natural (e. all the ramifications) and a maximum or pollution, can affect negatively bat g. caves) and artificially created (e. g. depth of 110m respect the entrance populations (Hutson et. al., 2001). mines), are crucial to the survival of (Hoffman et. al., 1986). Linking bats to witchcraft and magic many bat species worldwide (Hutson Tepoztlan represents a transition point has given rise to many of the fears people et. al., 2001). In relation to other roosts, between neartic and neotropical faunas, have about them (McCracken, 1992). caves stand out because of their extend- and a confluence center of migratory Within the same topic, the feeding habits ed use among these organisms (Avila, species. In Cueva del Diablo there are of the vampire have been so exaggerated 2000). A great proportion of world’s bats three main bat species according their and confused with Old World legends can be considered cave – dwellers and, presence in the cave: Leptonycteris niva- that the animal is of particular interest. probably, caves host more individuals lis, Pteronotus parnellii mexicanus and It has been considered a threat both to than other roosts, even combined (Hill Desmodus rotundus (Hoffman, 1986) people and to their domestic animals in and Smith, 1984). Besides that, great and isolated captures of Anoura geof- Latin America (Nowak, 1994), where, dimensions and complex topography in froyi (Edmundo Huerta, pers. comm.), as an ironic fact, populations of vampire one cave only can offer several perch Artibeus jamaicensis (Rodrigo Me- bats have increased sharply in areas to sites for different individuals or colonies dellín, pers. comm; Gabriela López, which European livestock have been in- (Medellín and López – Forment, 1985; pers. comm.) and Myotis velifer (Rodrigo troduced (Hutson et. al., 2001). Common Hill and Smith, 1984; Kunz, 1982) as Medellín, pers. comm; Gabriela López, vampire bat is extensively persecuted well as different microclimates (Me- pers. comm.) as a vector of rabies, that is transmitted dellín and López – Forment, 1985). The naked – backed bat, moustached to cattle and other ungulates on which In Mexico, there are over 10 000 bat or leaf – lipped bat (Nowak, 1994) it feeds, although its incidence is low caves (Lazcano, 2001), mostly karstic Pteronotus parnelli (Gray, 1843) is ba- (<1%).
Recommended publications
  • Neoichnology of Bats: Morphological, Ecological, and Phylogenetic Influences on Terrestrial Behavior and Trackmaking Ability Within the Chiroptera
    NEOICHNOLOGY OF BATS: MORPHOLOGICAL, ECOLOGICAL, AND PHYLOGENETIC INFLUENCES ON TERRESTRIAL BEHAVIOR AND TRACKMAKING ABILITY WITHIN THE CHIROPTERA BY MATTHEW FRAZER JONES Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Advisory Committee: ______________________________ Chairperson Stephen T. Hasiotis ______________________________ Co-chair David A. Burnham ______________________________ Robert M. Timm Date Defended: April 8, 2016 The Thesis Committee for MATTHEW FRAZER JONES certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: NEOICHNOLOGY OF BATS: MORPHOLOGICAL, ECOLOGICAL, AND PHYLOGENETIC INFLUENCES ON TERRESTRIAL BEHAVIOR AND TRACKMAKING ABILITY WITHIN THE CHIROPTERA ______________________________ Chairperson: Stephen T. Hasiotis ______________________________ Co-chairperson: David A. Burnham Date Approved: April 8, 2016 ii ABSTRACT Among living mammals, bats (Chiroptera) are second only to rodents in total number of species with over 1100 currently known. Extant bat species occupy many trophic niches and feeding habits, including frugivores (fruit eaters), insectivores (insect eaters), nectarivores (nectar and pollen-eaters), carnivores (predators of small terrestrial vertebrates), piscivores (fish eaters), sanguinivores (blood eaters), and omnivores (eat animals and plant material). Modern bats also demonstrate a wide range of terrestrial abilities while feeding, including: (1) those that primarily feed at or near ground level, such as the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) and the New Zealand short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata); (2) those rarely observed to feed from or otherwise spend time on the ground; and (3) many intermediate forms that demonstrate terrestrial competency without an obvious ecological basis. The variation in chiropteran terrestrial ability has been hypothesized to be constrained by the morphology of the pelvis and hindlimbs into what are termed types 1, 2, and 3 bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet and the Evolution of Digestion and Renal Function in Phyllostomid Bats
    Zoology 104 (2001): 59–73 © by Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/zoology Diet and the evolution of digestion and renal function in phyllostomid bats Jorge E. Schondube1,*, L. Gerardo Herrera-M.2 and Carlos Martínez del Rio1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson 2Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Zoología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Received: April 2, 2001 · Accepted: April 12, 2001 Abstract Bat species in the monophyletic family Phyllostomidae feed on blood, insects, small vertebrates, nectar, fruit and complex omnivorous mixtures. We used nitrogen stable isotope ratios to characterize bat diets and adopted a phylogenetically informed approach to investi- gate the physiological changes that accompany evolutionary diet changes in phyllostomids. We found that nitrogen stable isotopes sep- arated plant-eating from animal-eating species. The blood of the latter was enriched in 15N. A recent phylogenetic hypothesis suggests that with the possible exception of carnivory, which may have evolved twice, all diets evolved only once from insectivory. The shift from insectivory to nectarivory and frugivory was accompanied by increased intestinal sucrase and maltase activity, decreased trehalase activity, and reduced relative medullary thickness of kidneys. The shift from insectivory to sanguinivory and carnivory resulted in re- duced trehalase activity. Vampire bats are the only known vertebrates that do not exhibit intestinal maltase activity. We argue that these physiological changes are adaptive responses to evolutionary diet shifts. Key words: Bats, comparative method, diet, digestive and renal function, stable isotopes. Introduction The family Phyllostomidae is a speciose (49 genera and Characterizing animal diets can be difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Desmodus Rotundus) Blood Feeding
    toxins Article Vampire Venom: Vasodilatory Mechanisms of Vampire Bat (Desmodus rotundus) Blood Feeding Rahini Kakumanu 1, Wayne C. Hodgson 1, Ravina Ravi 1, Alejandro Alagon 2, Richard J. Harris 3 , Andreas Brust 4, Paul F. Alewood 4, Barbara K. Kemp-Harper 1,† and Bryan G. Fry 3,*,† 1 Department of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; [email protected] (R.K.); [email protected] (W.C.H.); [email protected] (R.R.); [email protected] (B.K.K.-H.) 2 Departamento de Medicina Molecular y Bioprocesos, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Venom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia; [email protected] 4 Institute for Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (P.F.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Joint senior authors. Received: 20 November 2018; Accepted: 2 January 2019; Published: 8 January 2019 Abstract: Animals that specialise in blood feeding have particular challenges in obtaining their meal, whereby they impair blood hemostasis by promoting anticoagulation and vasodilation in order to facilitate feeding. These convergent selection pressures have been studied in a number of lineages, ranging from fleas to leeches. However, the vampire bat (Desmondus rotundus) is unstudied in regards to potential vasodilatory mechanisms of their feeding secretions (which are a type of venom). This is despite the intense investigations of their anticoagulant properties which have demonstrated that D.
    [Show full text]
  • BATS of the Golfo Dulce Region, Costa Rica
    MURCIÉLAGOS de la región del Golfo Dulce, Puntarenas, Costa Rica BATS of the Golfo Dulce Region, Costa Rica 1 Elène Haave-Audet1,2, Gloriana Chaverri3,4, Doris Audet2, Manuel Sánchez1, Andrew Whitworth1 1Osa Conservation, 2University of Alberta, 3Universidad de Costa Rica, 4Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Photos: Doris Audet (DA), Joxerra Aihartza (JA), Gloriana Chaverri (GC), Sébastien Puechmaille (SP), Manuel Sánchez (MS). Map: Hellen Solís, Universidad de Costa Rica © Elène Haave-Audet [[email protected]] and other authors. Thanks to: Osa Conservation and the Bobolink Foundation. [fieldguides.fieldmuseum.org] [1209] version 1 11/2019 The Golfo Dulce region is comprised of old and secondary growth seasonally wet tropical forest. This guide includes representative species from all families encountered in the lowlands (< 400 masl), where ca. 75 species possibly occur. Species checklist for the region was compiled based on bat captures by the authors and from: Lista y distribución de murciélagos de Costa Rica. Rodríguez & Wilson (1999); The mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico. Reid (2012). Taxonomy according to Simmons (2005). La región del Golfo Dulce está compuesta de bosque estacionalmente húmedo primario y secundario. Esta guía incluye especies representativas de las familias presentes en las tierras bajas de la región (< de 400 m.s.n.m), donde se puede encontrar c. 75 especies. La lista de especies fue preparada con base en capturas de los autores y desde: Lista y distribución de murciélagos de Costa Rica. Rodríguez
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Level Classification of Phyllostomid Bats with a Summary of DNA Synapomorphies
    Acta Chiropterologica, 18(1): 1–38, 2016 PL ISSN 1508-1109 © Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS doi: 10.3161/15081109ACC2016.18.1.001 Higher level classification of phyllostomid bats with a summary of DNA synapomorphies ROBERT J. BAKER1, SERGIO SOLARI2, ANDREA CIRRANELLO3, and NANCY B. SIMMONS4 1Department of Biological Sciences and Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA 2Instituto de Biología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia 3Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 4Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA 5Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] The family Phyllostomidae is recognized as representing the most extensive radiation known in any mammalian family. Creating a Linnaean classification for this clade has been difficult and controversial. In two companion papers, we here propose a revised classification drawing on the strengths of genetic and morphological data and reflecting current ideas regarding phylogenetic relationships within this monophyletic clade. We recognize 11 subfamilies (Macrotinae, Micronycterinae, Desmodontinae, Phyllostominae, Glossophaginae, Lonchorhininae, Lonchophyllinae, Glyphonycterinae, Carolliinae, Rhinophyllinae, and Stenodermatinae), 12 tribes (Diphyllini, Desmodontini, Macrophyllini, Phyllostomini, Vampyrini, Glossophagnini, Brachyphyllini, Choeronycterini, Lonchophyllini, Hsunycterini, Sturnirini, and Stenodermatini), and nine subtribes (Brachyphyllina, Phyllonycterina,
    [Show full text]
  • Trachops Cirrhosus (Fringe-Lipped Bat) Family: Phyllostomidae (Leaf-Nosed Bats) Order: Chiroptera (Bats) Class: Mammalia (Mammals)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology Trachops cirrhosus (Fringe-lipped Bat) Family: Phyllostomidae (Leaf-nosed Bats) Order: Chiroptera (Bats) Class: Mammalia (Mammals) Fig. 1. Fringe-lipped bat, Trachops cirrhosis. [http://fineartamerica.com/featured/fringe-lipped-bat-trachops-cirrhosus-christian-ziegler.html, downloaded 25 February 2015] TRAITS. Trachops Cirrhosus is medium sized; it attains a maximum length of 10cm and weighs around 32-45g (Anon., 2002). It has long, woolly, wavy, shiny fur that extends along the forearm for half the length of the body. Forearm length is around 5.7- 6.4cm. The dorsal region (upper parts) of the organism body is reddish brown in colour while the ventral region (under parts) is dull brown with a tinge of grey (Cramer et al., 2001). Ears are large, rounded and erect (Fig. 1) UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology (Reid, 2009); and the tragus (fleshy projection that covers the entrance of the ear) is pointed (Cramer et al., 2001). Cylindrical or conical wart-like bumps studs the lips and chin, while the nose leaf (leaf shaped nose) has a serrated edge (Eisenberg and Redford, 2009). The tail is short, length 1.2-2.1cm, feet are large and claws are short and robust. Broad wings and high wing loading (body mass is high compared to total wing area) (Cramer et al., 2001). The mouth has two pairs of lower incisors and three pairs of lower premolars, which have tubercular depressions, and w- shaped cusps (Rocha et al., 2012). No true sexual dimorphism seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Bats and Floral Resources in a Premontane Forest, Valle Del Cauca, Colombia
    THERYA, 2018, Vol. 9 (2): 129-136 DOI: 10.12933/therya-18-560 ISSN 2007-3364 Interactions between bats and floral resources in a premontane forest, Valle del Cauca, Colombia CATHERINE MORA-BELTRÁN*1, AND HUGO FERNANDO LÓPEZ-ARÉVALO1 1 Grupo en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Carrera 30 nº 45-03, edificio 425, oficina 110. Bogotá, Colombia. Email: [email protected] (CMB), [email protected] (HLA). * Corresponding author The study of interaction networks between species is a subject that has drawn increasing attention in recent decades, especially in inves- tigations involving relationships between plants and pollinators or seed dispersers. In the Neotropics, bats of the subfamily Glossophaginae show morphological modifications for a specialized diet consisting of nectar and pollen, but opportunistic species belonging to other subfami- lies that consume floral resources (nectar and pollen) have also been identified. This study describes for the first time the interactions between nectarivorous bats in the Andean region of Colombia from the identification of pollen associated with the bat species inhabiting the protected area “Reserva Forestal Bosque de Yotoco (RFBY)”. Bats were captured with mist nets; a pollen sample was collected from each specimen by con- tact with glycerin gelatin, and pollen samples were mounted on slides. In addition, plant material of the blooming species that displayed the syndrome of chiropterophyly was collected to build a reference pollen collection. For the analysis, we used Levin’s standardized niche breadth (BA), the relative frequency of resources (Fi), and the Resource Importance Value Index (RIVI).
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of Central Mexico Juan Cruzado Cortes and Venkat Sankar (Author; [email protected]) August 5-10, 2019
    Venkat Sankar 2019 1 Mammals of Central Mexico Juan Cruzado Cortes and Venkat Sankar (author; [email protected]) August 5-10, 2019 Beautiful scenery at Barrancas de Aguacatitla; Mexican Volcano Mouse; Mexican Ground Squirrel Introduction While searching for mammals in Oaxaca this March, Juan told me that a mammalogist friend of his in Tabasco, Dr. Rafael Avila Flores, had found some amazing bats in an area of karst near the state’s border with Chiapas. These included a number of impressive and distinctive species I’ve long wanted to see, like the Sword-nosed Bat and White-winged Vampire Bat. I had to visit, and with few breaks this summer thanks to academic commitments, this was the perfect choice for a long weekend’s trip. Juan suggested we spend a few days in Mexico City with another biologist friend, Melany Aguilar Lopez, to find several endemics of the Mexican Plateau, and then connect to Tabasco. And so a plan was formed! Itinerary 8/5/19: Mexico City—RB Barrancas de Metztitlan (O/N UMA Santana) 8/6/19: RB Barrancas de Metztitlan—PN el Chico (O/N Mineral de Chico) 8/7/19: PN el Chico—Tlaxco—Area Communitaria Milpa Alta (O/N San Pablo Oztotepec) 8/8/19: Milpa Alta—Villahermosa (flight)—Ejido Poana (O/N Tacotalpa) 8/9/19: Full day exploring Ejido Poana (O/N Tacotalpa) 8/10/19: Early deparature from Villahermosa Key sites RB Barrancas de Metztitlan This scenic area of deep canyons spans a diverse range of habitats from dry pine-oak forest on the rim, into high desert, and eventually tropical deciduous forest on the canyon floor.
    [Show full text]
  • VAMPIRE BATS – the Good, the Bad, and the Amazing
    Exhibit Dates: May 2014 - January 2015 VAMPIRE BATS – The Good, the Bad, and the Amazing Vampire bats are sanguivores, organisms that feed upon the blood of other animals. They are the only mammals that feed exclusively on blood. Despite horror-movie depictions, vampire bats very rarely bite humans to feed on their blood. They feed primarily on domestic livestock, due to their abundance, and to a lesser degree on wild mammals and birds. They are very small animals, with wingspans of about 12-15 inches, and weigh less than 2 ounces. SPECIES AND DISTRIBUTIONS Three species of vampire bats are recognized. Vampire bats occur in warm climates in both arid and humid regions of Mexico, Central America, and South America. Distribution of the three species of vampire bats. Common Vampire Bat (Desmodus rotundus) This species is the most abundant and most well-known of the vampire bats. Desmodus feeds mainly on mammals, particularly livestock. They occur from northern Mexico southward through Central America and much of South America, to Uruguay, northern Argentina, and central Chile, and on the island of Trinidad in the West Indies. Common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus. White-winged Vampire Bat (Diaemus youngi) This species feeds mainly on the blood of birds. They occur from Mexico to southern Argentina and are present on the islands of Trinidad and Isla Margarita. White-winged vampire bat, Diaemus youngi. Hairy-legged Vampire Bat (Diphylla ecaudata) This species also feeds mainly on the blood of birds. They occur from Mexico to Venezuela, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil. One specimen was collected in 1967 from an abandoned railroad tunnel in Val Verde County, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical Nectar-Feeding Bats (Family Phyllostomidae) Revisited: Lingual Data Support a Recently-Proposed Molecular Phylogeny
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Biology 4-25-2001 Neotropical Nectar-feeding Bats (Family Phyllostomidae) Revisited: Lingual Data Support a Recently-Proposed Molecular Phylogeny Shawn De La Mar '01 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/bio_honproj Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation De La Mar '01, Shawn, "Neotropical Nectar-feeding Bats (Family Phyllostomidae) Revisited: Lingual Data Support a Recently-Proposed Molecular Phylogeny" (2001). Honors Projects. 5. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/bio_honproj/5 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Neotropical Nectar-feeding Bats (Family PhyUostomidae) Revisited: Lingual Data Support a Recently-proposed Molecular Phylogeny. A Senior Research Honors Paper Presented By Shawn De La Mar Deparbnent ofBiology Illinois Wesleyan University April 25, 2001 Neotropical Nectar-feeding Bats Revisited: Lingual Data Support a Recently­ proposed Molecular Phylogeny. A Senior Research Honors Paper Presented by Shawn De La Mar Department of Biology Illinois Wesleyan University April 25, 2001 Approved as to style and content by: Th~~Ri:t~F=gy;':;'=IL..WU----- Research Advisor Charles Springwood, pt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multifaceted Approach to Understanding Bat Community Response to Disturbance in a Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest Darwin Valle 1,2, Daniel M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A multifaceted approach to understanding bat community response to disturbance in a seasonally dry tropical forest Darwin Valle 1,2, Daniel M. Grifth 2*, Andrea Jara‑Guerrero 2, Diego Armijos‑Ojeda 2 & Carlos I. Espinosa 2 Given widespread habitat degradation and loss, reliable indicators are needed that provide a comprehensive assessment of community response to anthropogenic disturbance. The family Phyllostomidae (Order Chiroptera) has frequently been the focus of research evaluating bats’ response to habitat disturbance in seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs). However, few studies compare this family to the larger bat assemblage to assess its efcacy as a bioindicator. We compared community and species‑specifc attributes of understory phyllostomid and all understory bat species: (1) along a gradient of habitat disturbance within a human‑modifed SDTF landscape; and (2) between forest and riparian habitats within each disturbance level. We captured 290 individuals belonging to 13 species and 4 families. Phyllostomid species exhibited greater sensitivity to disturbance than the understory bat community as a whole based on richness and beta diversity. Both groups were more sensitive to disturbance in forest than riparian habitat, but phyllostomid species were more likely to be lost from highly disturbed forest habitat. The two dominant species declined in abundance with disturbance but variation in body condition was species‑specifc. These results suggest that Phyllostomidae are more efective indicators of human disturbance in SDTF than the understory bat community as a whole and evaluation of bats’ response to disturbance is best accomplished with a multifaceted approach. Ecosystem structure and functionality are changing worldwide due to the increasing intensity and extent of human activities1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny of the Neotropical Nectar-Feeding Bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) Based on Morphological and Molecular Data
    Journal of Mammalian Evolution, Vol. 9, No. 1/ 2, June 2002 ( 2002) A Phylogeny of the Neotropical Nectar-Feeding Bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) Based on Morphological and Molecular Data Bryan C. Carstens,1,3 Barbara L. Lundrigan,1 and Philip Myers,2 We present a phylogeny of 35 species of nectar-feeding bats based on 119 morphological characters: 62 from the skin, skull, and dentition and 57 soft tissue characters (the latter from Wetterer et al., 2000). These data support monophyly of the subfamilies Brachyphyllinae, Phyllonycterinae, and Glossophaginae, and the tribes Glossophagini and Lonchophyllini. Our analysis contradicts the phylogeny estimated from the RAG-2 gene, which does not support a monophyletic Glossophaginae (Baker et al., 2000). Parsimony analysis of a combined matrix, containing morphological characters and RAG-2 sequences, results in a phylogeny that includes Brachyphyllinae and Phyllonycterinae in Glossophaginae. Support for most clades is stronger than in the morphological tree, but support for basal nodes of the phylogeny remains weak. The weak support at these basal nodes underscores the historical disagreements regarding relationships among these taxa; combining morphological and molecular data has not improved support for these nodes. Uncertainty regarding basal relationships complicates description of morphological change during the evolution of nectarivory in the Phyllostomidae. KEY WORDS: Phyllostomidae, Glossophaginae, Brachyphyllinae, Phyllonycterinae, nectar-feeding, RAG-2. INTRODUCTION The taxonomic history of the nectar-feeding phyllostomid bats has been dominated by questions pertaining to the relationships among three major groups (Table I), the Caribbean subfamilies Brachyphyllinae and Phyllonycterinae and the more broadly dis- tributed Glossophaginae. There has been little consensus regarding relationships among these groups.
    [Show full text]