Interactive 4-D Visualization of Stereographic Images from the Double Orthogonal Projection
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												  On the Geometry of SpaceOn the geometry of Space Frederik Vantomme∗ Madrid, Spain 23rd of April 2015 Abstract In this paper, we explore the possibility that black holes and Space could be the geometrically Compactified Transverse Slices ("CTS"s) of their higher (+1) dimen- sional space. Our hypothesis is that we might live somewhere in between partially 1 compressed regions of space, namely 4dL+R hyperspace compactified to its 3d transverse slice, and fully compressed dark regions, i.e. black holes, still containing all Ld432-1-234dR dimensional fields. This places the DGP, ADD, Kaluza-Klein, Randall-Sundrum, Holographic and Vanishing Dimensions theories in a different perspective. We first postulate that a black hole could be the result of the compactification (fibration) of a 3d burned up S2 star to its 2d transverse slice; the 2d dimensional discus itself further spiralling down into a bundle of one-dimensional fibres. Similarly, Space could be the compactified transverse slice (fibration) of its higher 3 4dL+R S hyper-sphere to its 3d transverse slice, the latter adopting the topology of a closed and flat left+right handed trefoil knot. By further extending these two ideas, we might consider that the Universe in its initial state was a "Matroska" 4dL+R hyperspace compactified, in cascading order, to a bundle of one-dimensional fibres. The Big Bang could be an explosion from within that broke the cascadingly compressed Universe open. ∗[email protected] 1As we shall only consider spatial dimensions and leave the time dimension out, ordinary 3d+1t spacetime will be reduced to '3d' space; 4d+1t spacetime will be denoted '4d' space, etc.
- 
												  Four-Dimensional Regular Polytopesfaculty of science mathematics and applied and engineering mathematics Four-dimensional regular polytopes Bachelor’s Project Mathematics November 2020 Student: S.H.E. Kamps First supervisor: Prof.dr. J. Top Second assessor: P. Kiliçer, PhD Abstract Since Ancient times, Mathematicians have been interested in the study of convex, regular poly- hedra and their beautiful symmetries. These five polyhedra are also known as the Platonic Solids. In the 19th century, the four-dimensional analogues of the Platonic solids were described mathe- matically, adding one regular polytope to the collection with no analogue regular polyhedron. This thesis describes the six convex, regular polytopes in four-dimensional Euclidean space. The focus lies on deriving information about their cells, faces, edges and vertices. Besides that, the symmetry groups of the polytopes are touched upon. To better understand the notions of regularity and sym- metry in four dimensions, our journey begins in three-dimensional space. In this light, the thesis also works out the details of a proof of prof. dr. J. Top, showing there exist exactly five convex, regular polyhedra in three-dimensional space. Keywords: Regular convex 4-polytopes, Platonic solids, symmetry groups Acknowledgements I would like to thank prof. dr. J. Top for supervising this thesis online and adapting to the cir- cumstances of Covid-19. I also want to thank him for his patience, and all his useful comments in and outside my LATEX-file. Also many thanks to my second supervisor, dr. P. Kılıçer. Furthermore, I would like to thank Jeanne for all her hospitality and kindness to welcome me in her home during the process of writing this thesis.
- 
												![Arxiv:1204.4952V2 [Math.HO] 17 May 2012](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/2138/arxiv-1204-4952v2-math-ho-17-may-2012-2612138.webp)  Arxiv:1204.4952V2 [Math.HO] 17 May 2012Sculptures in S3 Saul Schleimer Henry Segerman∗ Mathematics Institute Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Warwick University of Melbourne Coventry CV4 7AL Parkville VIC 3010 United Kingdom Australia [email protected] [email protected] Abstract We construct a number of sculptures, each based on a geometric design native to the three-dimensional sphere. Using stereographic projection we transfer the design from the three-sphere to ordinary Euclidean space. All of the sculptures are then fabricated by the 3D printing service Shapeways. 1 Introduction The three-sphere, denoted S3, is a three-dimensional analog of the ordinary two-dimensional sphere, S2. In n+ general, the n–dimensional sphere is a subset of Euclidean space, R 1, as follows: n n+1 2 2 2 S = f(x0;x1;:::;xn) 2 R j x0 + x1 + ··· + xn = 1g: Thus S2 can be seen as the usual unit sphere in R3. Visualising objects in dimensions higher than three is non-trivial. However for S3 we can use stereographic projection to reduce the dimension from four to three. n n n Let N = (0;:::;0;1) be the north pole of S . We define stereographic projection r : S − fNg ! R by x0 x1 xn−1 r(x0;x1;:::;xn) = ; ;:::; : 1 − xn 1 − xn 1 − xn See [1, page 27]. Figure 1a displays stereographic projection in dimension one. For any point (x;y) 2 S1 − fNg draw the straight line L through N and (x;y). Then L meets R1 at a single point; this is r(x;y). Notice that the figure is also a two-dimensional cross-section of stereographic projection in any dimension.
- 
												  Sculptures in S3Bridges 2012: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture Sculptures in S3 Saul Schleimer Henry Segerman∗ Mathematics Institute Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Warwick University of Melbourne Coventry CV4 7AL Parkville VIC 3010 United Kingdom Australia [email protected] [email protected] Abstract We construct a number of sculptures, each based on a geometric design native to the three-dimensional sphere. Using stereographic projection we transfer the design from the three-sphere to ordinary Euclidean space. All of the sculptures are then fabricated by the 3D printing service Shapeways. 1 Introduction The three-sphere, denoted S3, is a three-dimensional analog of the ordinary two-dimensional sphere, S2. In n+ general, the n–dimensional sphere is a subset of Euclidean space, R 1, as follows: n n+1 2 2 2 S = f(x0;x1;:::;xn) 2 R j x0 + x1 + ··· + xn = 1g: Thus S2 can be seen as the usual unit sphere in R3. Visualising objects in dimensions higher than three is non-trivial. However for S3 we can use stereographic projection to reduce the dimension from four to three. n n n Let N = (0;:::;0;1) be the north pole of S . We define stereographic projection r : S − fNg ! R by x0 x1 xn−1 r(x0;x1;:::;xn) = ; ;:::; : 1 − xn 1 − xn 1 − xn See [1, page 27]. Figure 1a displays stereographic projection in dimension one. For any point (x;y) 2 S1 − fNg draw the straight line L through N and (x;y). Then L meets R1 at a single point; this is r(x;y).
- 
												  Stereographic Visualization of 5-Dimensional Regular PolytopesS S symmetry Article Stereographic Visualization of 5-Dimensional Regular Polytopes Xingchang Wang 1, Tao Yu 1,* , Kwokwai Chung 2, Krzysztof Gdawiec 3 and Peichang Ouyang 1 1 School of Mathematics and Physics, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, China; [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (P.O.) 2 Department of Mathematics, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong; [email protected] 3 Institute of Mathematics, University of Silesia, 40-007 Katowice, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 January 2019; Accepted: 15 March 2019; Published: 18 March 2019 Abstract: Regular polytopes (RPs) are an extension of 2D (two-dimensional) regular polygons and 3D regular polyhedra in n-dimensional (n ≥ 4) space. The high abstraction and perfect symmetry are their most prominent features. The traditional projections only show vertex and edge information. Although such projections can preserve the highest degree of symmetry of the RPs, they can not transmit their metric or topological information. Based on the generalized stereographic projection, this paper establishes visualization methods for 5D RPs, which can preserve symmetries and convey general metric and topological data. It is a general strategy that can be extended to visualize n-dimensional RPs (n > 5). Keywords: five-dimensional regular polytopes; fundamental root systems; stereographic projection; kaleidoscope principle 1. Introduction Regular polytopes (RPs) are an extension of 2D regular polygons and 3D regular polyhedra in n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn (n ≥ 4), which have high abstraction and perfect symmetry [1–3]. For instance, the 5D hypercube f4, 3, 3, 3g has 32 vertices, 80 edges, 80 squares, 40 3D cubes, and 10 4D regular polytopes f4, 3, 3g.
- 
											Visualization of Four Dimensional Space and Its Applications (Ph.DPurdue University Purdue e-Pubs Department of Computer Science Technical Reports Department of Computer Science 1991 Visualization of Four Dimensional Space and Its Applications (Ph.D. Thesis) Jianhua Zhou Report Number: 91-084 Zhou, Jianhua, "Visualization of Four Dimensional Space and Its Applications (Ph.D. Thesis)" (1991). Department of Computer Science Technical Reports. Paper 922. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cstech/922 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. VISUALIZATION OF FOUR DIMENSIONAL SPACE AND ITS APPLICATIONS Jianhua Zhau CSD-TR-91-084 December 1991 GradL1ale School Form 9 (Revised 8189) PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Thesis Acceptance This is to certify that the thesis prepared By _--:::..::::.:.::::::...-.::.::.:::.-Jianhua Zhou _ Entitled Visualization of Four Dimensional Space and Its Applications Complies with University regulations and meets the standards of the Graduate School for originality and quality For the degree of ____.:=_=_~..:..:__.:=_=_~::..:_=_=_=_:..::____:.Doctor of Philosophy _ Signed by the final",amining committee: -,=~~'.'::,*-~--,h.CLc-'-JJM~~:..-..:=~ ,chai' -dldd/{;;:;-d., Approved by: Dis This thesis !81 is not to be regarded as confidential VISUALIZATION OF FOUR DIMENSIONAL SPACE AND ITS APPLICATIONS A Thesis Submitted to the Paculty 01 Purdue University by Jianhua Zhou In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree 01 Doctor of Philosophy November 1991 II To my parents, Wenlong Zhou and Yuexian Chen 111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am most grateful to my advisor, Professor Christoph ~\!I. Hoffmann, for his constant encouragement and guidance, and for his reading the whole manuscript and making many valuable suggestions.
- 
												  How to See in Higher Dimensions Platonic Solids Theorem Ofcentury. Our own universe is not flat. Einstein did not envision this curved space to be embedded Polyhedra and Polytopes 12/6/09, Math circle Northeastern Oliver Knill in some higher-dimensional space. There are ideas of physicists hinting to see our space floating as a ”brane” in a higher-dimensional ambient space, but this does not help for visualization purposes and the ambient space does not need to be flat neither. In the horror movie ”Cube 2”, the heroes How to see in higher dimensions are trapped in a hypercube. They not only ”live” higher dimensional space, they all ”die” it. The topic of polyhedra is traditionally a topic for entertainment or education and not mainstream mathematical research. The reasons can be many fold: the elementary nature of the topic makes it In this lecture we look at polyhedra, mostly in higher dimensions. Mathematics has no problems difficult for many mathematicians to take it seriously. Isn’t it an ancient topic, where all questions to deal with objects in 4 or higher dimensions. It is possible for example to give a list of all regular are settled? This is of course not true. The subject got revived through sphere-packing problems polytopes in higher dimensions. How can one ”see” these objects? There are various possibilities. in higher dimensions, combinatorics, graph theory and group theory: the symmetry groups of There are even books like [15, 11] for amateur mathematicians devoted entirely to this question. higher-dimensional polyhedra are interesting ”beasts” like ”Monsters”. But open problems are The geometer HTM Coxeter recommends in [3] the axiomatic, the algebraic or the intuitive everywhere: the classification of Archimedean polyhedra in 4D has only recently been cleaned way to conquer higher dimensional space.
- 
												  1 CURVATURE CHANGES in BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS Arturo TozziPreprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 15 October 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201810.0299.v1 CURVATURE CHANGES IN BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS Arturo Tozzi (corresponding Author), Center for Nonlinear Science, University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle, #311427 Denton, TX 76203-5017 USA [email protected] [email protected] Geometry deals both with analogical thinking and physical/biological observables. Naïve, common-sense descriptions of objects’ shapes and systems’ trajectories in geometric phase spaces may help experimental investigation. For example, very different biological dynamics, as the developmental growth patterns of the oldest known animal (the extinct Dickinsonia) and the human brain electric oscillations, display a striking analogy: when encompassed in abstract geometric spaces, their paths describe the same changes in curvature: from convex, to flat, to concave and vice versa. This dynamical behavior, anticipated by Nicholas de Cusa in his analogical account of “coincidentia oppositorum” (1440), helps to describe widespread biological paths in the manageable terms of concave, flat and convex curves on donut-like structures. Every trajectory taking place on such toroidal manifolds can be located, through a topological technique called Hopf fibration, into a four-dimensional space. We discuss how the correlation between Hopf fibration and Navier-Stokes equations allows us to treat the above-mentioned biological and neuroscientific curved paths in terms of flows taking place into a viscous fluid medium that can be experimentally assessed and quantified. Keywords: lines; brain; topology; curvature; Dickinsonia; fMRI. Analogy, i.e., the common-sense identity of relation between apparently unrelated objects or features, is the ordinary way for human mental activity to cope with everyday life (Sowa and Majumdar, 2003).
- 
												  Frustrated Self-Assembly of Non-Euclidean Crystals of Nanoparticles ✉ Francesco Serafin1, Jun Lu2, Nicholas Kotov 2, Kai Sun 1 & Xiaoming Mao 1ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25139-9 OPEN Frustrated self-assembly of non-Euclidean crystals of nanoparticles ✉ Francesco Serafin1, Jun Lu2, Nicholas Kotov 2, Kai Sun 1 & Xiaoming Mao 1 Self-organized complex structures in nature, e.g., viral capsids, hierarchical biopolymers, and bacterial flagella, offer efficiency, adaptability, robustness, and multi-functionality. Can we program the self-assembly of three-dimensional (3D) complex structures using simple 1234567890():,; building blocks, and reach similar or higher level of sophistication in engineered materials? Here we present an analytic theory for the self-assembly of polyhedral nanoparticles (NPs) based on their crystal structures in non-Euclidean space. We show that the unavoidable geometrical frustration of these particle shapes, combined with competing attractive and repulsive interparticle interactions, lead to controllable self-assembly of structures of com- plex order. Applying this theory to tetrahedral NPs, we find high-yield and enantiopure self- assembly of helicoidal ribbons, exhibiting qualitative agreement with experimental observa- tions. We expect that this theory will offer a general framework for the self-assembly of simple polyhedral building blocks into rich complex morphologies with new material cap- abilities such as tunable optical activity, essential for multiple emerging technologies. 1 Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ✉ email: [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4925 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25139-9 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25139-9 hemically synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) display a great Euclidean 3D space, they can form non-Euclidean crystals in diversity of polyhedral shapes1.
- 
												  Generating and Rendering Four-Dimensional PolytopesGenerating and Rendering Four-Dimensional Polytopes John M. Sullivan, Geometry Supercomputer Project Current affiliation: Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana November, 1990 Abstract The regular polytopes in four dimensions can be generated easily by the judicious use of their symmetry groups, and can be rendered in three dimensions in stereographic projection. In this article we construct one such polytope, introducing the relevant group-theory concepts as needed. The result can be viewed with Mathematica graphics, or with a more sophisticated renderer such as RenderMan. Regular Polytopes and Soap Bubbles The regular polyhedra—the tetrahedron, the cube, the octahedron, the dodecahedron and the icosahedron, collectively known as the platonic solids—have long been appreciated for their beauty and symmetry. The first three of them have analogues in all dimensions higher than three; they are called the simplex, the hypercube and the orthoplex. Only in four dimensions do we find counterparts for the icosahedron and dodecahedron, and even a sixth polytope, the 24-cell, with no counterpart in any other dimension. (Polytopes are the generalization of polyhedra to higher dimensions. Their cells correspond to a polyhedron’s faces: for a four-dimensional polytope, cells are three-dimensional “faces,” and so on. An excellent reference on regular polytopes is [Cox].) In the tetrahedron, cube and dodecahedron, three faces meet around every vertex. The three lines emerging from each vertex are at equal angles; if we project them to the circumscribed sphere, they become arcs of great circles, meeting three to a vertex, at 120◦ angles (Figure 1). Because these edges meet at 120◦ angles and are “straight” (they are shortest paths along the surface of the sphere), this configuration can be physically realized by soap films: one might imagine, for example, two concentric spherical glass shells separated by a thin air cushion, with thin strips of soap film perpendicular to the shells in the pattern of Figure 1(b).
- 
												  Convex PolytopesCONVEX POLYTOPES B. GRUNBAUM AND G. C. SHEPHARD 1. Introduction The study of convex polytopes in Euclidean space of two and three dimensions is one of the oldest branches of mathematics. Yet many of the more interesting properties of polytopes have been discovered comparatively recently, and are still unknown to the majority of mathematicians. In this paper we shall survey the subject, mentioning some of the most recent results, and stating the more important unsolved problems. In order to make the exposition as self-contained as possible, in §2.1 and §3.1 we give a number of definitions with which the reader may not be familiar. We have separated our account of the combinatorial properties of poly- topes in §2, from those of a metrical character in §3. As will be seen, these two aspects of the subject overlap, and distinguishing between them is, to a large extent, a matter of expository convenience only. It is beyond the scope of the present survey to indicate proofs of the results mentioned. For these the reader is referred either to the original papers, or, for the earlier results, to the standard textbooks. In the notes(1) references are given to recent publications, and in these, precise references to the older literature may be found. It has, of course, been necessary to make a small selection from the vast amount of published material. To some extent the selection has been made according to the authors' personal interests, but we hope that it nevertheless represents a reasonably balanced account of our subject. Before the beginning of this century, three events can be picked out as being of the utmost importance for the theory of convex polytopes.