Hayek the road to serfdom pdf

Continue The path to serfdom remains one of the classics of intellectual thought of the twentieth century. For more than half a century, it has inspired politicians and thinkers around the world and has had a decisive influence on our political and cultural history. With the brilliance of the trademark, Hayek convincingly argues that while socialist ideals can be enticing, they cannot be met, except for funds that few would approve of. Turning to economics, fascism, history, socialism and the Holocaust, Hayek deploys the trappings of socialist ideology. It shows the world that little can be the result of such ideas other than oppression and tyranny. Today, more than fifty years later, Hayek's warnings are as valid as when the Road to fortress was first published. Friedrich von Hayek's book The Road to the Serf cover of the first British editionAuthorFridrich HayekCountryInthubinal KingdomLanguageEnglishSubjectPolitical Science, EconomicsPublished 1944 (Routledge Press, United Kingdom) 1944 (University of Chicago Press, USA) Media typePrintPages26ISBN0-226-32061-8OCLC30733740 Dewey Decimal338.9 20LC ClassHD82 . H38 1994 The Road to Serfdom (German: Der Weg zur Knechtschaft) is a book written between 1940 and 1943 by Austrian-British economist and philosopher Friedrich Hayek. Since its publication in 1944, the Road to Serf has been an influential and popular exposure of market libertarianism. It has been translated into more than 20 languages and has sold more than two million copies (by 2010). The book also has a significant impact on the conservative and libertarian economic and political discourse of the twentieth century, and is often cited today by commentators. The Road to Serfdom was to be a popular edition of Hayek's second volume entitled Abuse and The Decline of reason, and the title was inspired by the writings of the 19th-century French classical liberal thinker Alexis de Tokeville on the road to slavery. In the book, Hayek warns of the dangers of tyranny, which is inevitably the result of state control over economic decision-making through central planning. He also argues that the rejection of individualism and classical liberalism inevitably leads to the loss of freedom, the creation of a repressive society, the tyranny of the dictator and the serfdom of the individual. Hayek challenged the british Marxists' view that fascism (including National Socialism) was a capitalist reaction against socialism. He argued that fascism, National Socialism and Socialism have common roots in central economic planning and the empowerment of the state over man. The book was first published in the UK by Rutledge in March 1944, during World War II, and was quite popular, resulting in Hayek its this unattainable book, also partly because of the rationing of wartime documents. It was published in the U.S. by the University of Chicago in 1944 and achieved great popularity. Under the agreement of editor Max Eastman, the American magazine Reader's Digest published an abbreviated version in April 1945, which allowed The Road to Serfdom to reach a wider popular audience outside of scholars. Publishing a letter during the Great Depression, the rise of autocracy in Russia, Italy and Germany, and World War II, Hayek wrote a note to the director of the London School of Economics, William Beveridge, in the early 1930s, to challenge the then popular claim that fascism represented a dying sigh of a failed capitalist system. The memo grew into a magazine article, and he intended to include elements of the article in the book much more than the Road to the Serf. However, he eventually decided to write The Way to serf as his own book. Friedrich Hayek's book was originally published for the British audience of Routledge Press in March 1944 in the United Kingdom. The book was subsequently rejected by three publishers in the United States, and it was only after economist Aaron Director spoke to friends at the University of Chicago that the book was published in the United States by the University of Chicago Press on September 18, 1944. The American publisher expects the book to sell 900 to 3,000 copies. But the initial print run of 2,000 copies was quickly sold out, and 30,000 copies were sold within six months. The University of Chicago estimates that more than 350,000 copies were sold in 2007. The 20-page version of the book was published in the April issue of Reader's Digest in April 1945 with a circulation of several million copies. The 95-page abbreviated version was also published in 1945 and 1946. In February 1945, Look magazine published a version of the pictures, later published in a brochure and distributed by General Motors. The book has been translated into about 20 languages and is dedicated to socialists of all parties. Introduction to the 50th anniversary edition written by Milton Friedman (another Nobel Prize winner in economics 1976). In 2007, the University of Chicago Press released the Final Edition, Volume 2 in the collected work of F.A. Hayek's series. In June 2010, the book gained new popularity, rising to the top of the Amazon.com bestseller list after extensive coverage of a book about the Glenn Beck program. Since then, another 250,000 copies of print and digital editions have been sold. Hayek's summary argues that Western democracies, including the United Kingdom and the United States, have gradually renounced this freedom in economic affairs, without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past. Society mistakenly tried to ensure further prosperity through central planning, which inevitably leads to totalitarianism. We have in to dispense with the forces that gave unforeseen results, and replace the impersonal and anonymous mechanism of the market with a collective and conscious direction of all social forces on deliberately chosen goals. Socialism, although presented as a means of equality, does so through restraint and slavery, while democracy seeks equality in freedom. Planning, because it is coercive, is the lowest method of regulation, while free market competition is higher, because it is the only method by which our activities can be adapted to each other without forced or arbitrary interference of power. Central planning is inherently undemocratic, according to Hayek, because it requires that people be imposed on the will of a small minority. The power of these minorities to act by taking money or property in pursuit of centralized goals destroys the Rule of Law and individual freedoms. Where there is central planning, people will more than ever become a simple means to be used by authority in the service of abstractions such as social well-being or community good. Even the poorest have more personal freedom in an open society than centrally planned. While the last resort of a competitive economy is the bailiff, the ultimate sanction of the planned economy is the executioner. Socialism is a hypocritical system, because its proclaimed humanitarian goals can be used in practice only by cruel methods, which the majority of socialists disapprove of. Such centralized systems also require effective propaganda to make people believe that the state's goals are theirs. Hayek argues that the roots of National Socialism lie in socialism, and then draws parallels with the idea of British leaders: the growing veneration of the state, admiration for the government, and great for the sake of great, enthusiasm for the organization of everything (we now call it planning) and that the inability to leave anything simple to the power of organic growth ... all hardly less marked in England now than they were in Germany. Hayek believed that after World War II, the wisdom in managing our economic affairs will be even more important than before, and that the fate of our civilization will ultimately depend on how we solve the economic problems we will then face. The only chance to build a decent world is to improve the overall level of wealth through free markets. In his view, the international organization posed an even greater threat to individual freedom. He concluded: The guiding principle that the policy of individual freedom is the only truly progressive policy remains the same true today, and in the nineteenth century. The role of government, although Hayek believed that the government government in the markets would lead to the loss of freedom, he recognized the limited role of the government in fulfilling tasks for which he believed free markets were not capable: Successful use of competition as a principle of social organization excludes certain types of forced interference in economic life, but he recognizes others who can sometimes very significantly help their work and even requires certain types of government action. for introducing trade, or for buying and selling at any price, or to control quantity, it recognizes the usefulness of rules that limit legal production methods, as long as they are applied equally to all and not used as an indirect way to control prices or quantities, and not forgetting the cost of such restrictions: Prohibit the use of certain poisonous substances, or require special precautions in their use limit working hours or require certain sanitary measures, fully compatible with the preservation of competition. The only question here is whether the benefits are greater than the social costs they impose. He notes that there are certain areas, such as the environment, where activities that cause damage to third parties (known to economists as negative external factors) cannot be effectively regulated solely by the market: there can be no limited ownership of some agricultural practices or smoke and factory noise. , or those who are willing to submit damages for agreed compensation. The Government also plays a role in preventing fraud: even the most important condition for the proper functioning of the market, the prevention of fraud and deception (including the exploitation of ignorance), is large and not fully implemented object of legislative activity. The Government also plays a role in the creation of a social safety net: there is no reason why, in a society that has reached the general level of wealth that we have, the first form of security should not be guaranteed to all without threatening common freedom; that is: a minimum of food, shelter and clothing, sufficient to maintain health. There is no reason why the State should not assist in the organization of a comprehensive social insurance system in providing those common dangers of life against which few can provide adequate provision. He concludes, In no system that could be rationally protected, the state simply would do nothing. Since its publication, Hayek has offered a number of explanations in words that are often misinterpreted: Socialism means state control over the economy, as in Nazi Germany, not in the state of the general Classic liberal ideals mean freedom, freedom and individual rights. Rights. In 2007, the University of Chicago estimated that more than 350,000 copies of the Roads to the Serf was sold. He is on Martin Seymour-Smith's list of the 100 most influential books ever written, and he made number 1 on Human Events: Ten Books Every Republican Congressman Should Read in 2006. He was influential enough to justify mentioning during the 1945 British general election, when, in the words of Harold Macmillan, Winston Churchill was strengthened in his fears of a Labour government by reading Professor Hayek's Road to Serfdom when he warned in a pre-election broadcast in 1945 that the socialist system would have to retreat to some form of Gestapo. Labour leader Clement Attlee responded in his pre-election broadcast, saying that what Churchill had said was the second version of the academic views of Austrian Professor Friedrich Augustus von Hayek. The Conservative Central Authority donated 1.5 tonnes of its precious paper ration, set aside for the 1945 election, so that more copies of the Road to the Serfdom could be printed, albeit to no avail, as Labour won a landslide victory. Political historian Alan Brinkley said this about the impact of the Road to Serfs: The publication of two books... contributed to the intensification of the concerns that are beginning to arise among the intelligentsia (and many others) about the consequences of totalitarianism. One of them was James Burnham's managerial revolution ... (Second) Friedrich A. Hayek in the Path to serf ... was much more controversial and influential. Even more than Burnham, Hayek forced in public discourse the question of the compatibility of democracy and statistics ... In response to Burnham and Hayek ... liberals (in the statistical sense of the term, as used by some in the United States) were actually responding to Jefferson's powerful strain of anti-statistics in American political culture... The result was a subtle but important shift in liberal (i.e. American statistics) thinking. Reviews of the Road to Serfdom has been the subject of great praise and a lot of criticism. It ranked fourth in the list of the 100 best non-fiction books of the twentieth century, compiled by The National Review magazine, ranked 16th on the list of readers of the 100 best non-fiction books of the twentieth century, managed by modern library, and appears in the recommended reading list for libertarian law posted on the political compass test site. John Maynard Keynes said of this: In my opinion, this is a great book... Morally and philosophically, I am in agreement with almost all of this: not only in agreement with him, but also in a deeply touched agreement. However, Keynes did not think that Hayek's philosophy had practical application; this was explained later in the same letter, commenting: What we need in my opinion, this is not a change in our economic programs that will only lead to disappointment in the results of your philosophy; but perhaps even the opposite, namely, the expansion of them. Your greatest danger ahead is the likely practical failure of your philosophy in the United States. George Orwell responded with both praise and criticism, stating: There is a lot of truth in the negative part of Professor Hayek's dissertation. It is impossible to say too often - in any case, it is not often said that collectivism is inherently not democratic, but, on the contrary, gives the tyrannical minority such forces as the Spanish Inquisitors, which never dreamed. However, he also warned: A return to free competition means tyranny is probably worse for a large mass of people because it is more irresponsible than the state. Milton Friedman described the Road to Serfdom as one of the great books of our time and said this: I think that Adam Smith's role was played in this cycle, i.e. the collapse of socialism at the end of the twentieth century, in which the idea of free markets first succeeded, and then special events catalyzed a complete change in socio-political policy in countries around the world. Herman Feiner, a socialist Fabian, published a rebuttal in his Road to Reaction in 1946. Hayek called Feiner's book a pattern of abuse and invective that is probably unique in contemporary academic debate. In his review (collected in The Present as History, 1953), Marxist Paul Swizi joked that Hayek would like you to believe that if there is an overproduction of children's cars, central planners will order the population to have more children, rather than just storing a temporary surplus of wagons and reducing production for the next year. Stafford Beer's cybernetic arguments in his 1973 Massey lectures, The Design of Freedom - that intelligent adaptive planning can increase freedom - have an interest in this regard, as do the technical work of Herbert A. Simon and Albert Ano on the dynamics of hierarchical almost degrading systems in the economy - namely, that everything in such a system is not closely related to everything else. Libertarian/Anarchocapitalist Economist at Mises Institute Walter Block critically that, although Road to Serf has strong charges against a centrally planned economy, it seems only warm in its support of the free-market system and laissez-faire of capitalism, with Hayek even going as long as saying that probably nothing has done so much harm to the liberal cause as the wooden insistence of some liberals on some big finger rules, above all the principle of laissez-faire capitalism. In the book, Hayek writes that the government has a role to play in the economy monetary system (an opinion he later withdrew), 55 working hours of regulation, social security and agencies for the flow of proper information. By analysing this and many other works by Hayek, Block argues that: In the case against socialism, Hayek was led to all sorts of compromises with what would otherwise seem to be his own philosophical point of view - so much so that if the system had been built on their basis, it would not have been too starkly different from what this author was clearly opposed to. Criticism of the idea promoted in the Road to Serfdom has been criticized by many scholars. Jeffrey Sachs argues that empirical evidence suggests that welfare states with high tax rates and social expenditures outperform relatively free market economies. William Easterly wrote a rebuttal criticizing Sacks for misrepresenting Hayek's work and for criticizing the book on issues she didn't really address, such as social welfare programs for the elderly or sick, something Hayek wasn't entirely opposed to. Easterly noted that the road to serfdom was about the dangers of central planning and nationalization of industry, including the media. In a counter-refutation of Sachs, he argued that he was considering Hayek's 1976 adaptation, which stated that efforts to create large-scale welfare states would bring serfdom, albeit much more slowly, than in central planning. Sachs referred to the Scandinavian states, which remained economically free and relatively capitalist, despite the large welfare state, that Hayek was wrong about such programs leading to serfdom. Gordon Tulloch argued that Hayek's analysis had wrongly predicted that governments in much of Europe were leape to totalitarianism in the late 20th century. He uses Sweden, where the government at the time controlled 63 per cent of GNP, as an example in support of his argument that the main problem with Road to Serfdom was that it had offered predictions that turned out to be false. The sustained progress of the government in places like Sweden has not resulted in the loss of unimim saharan economic freedoms. Criticizing Hayek, Tulloch continues to praise the classic liberal notion of economic freedom, saying: The arguments for political freedom are strong, as are the arguments for economic freedom. We don't need one set of arguments to depend on another. However, according to Robert Skidelsky, Hayek disavowed such a retrospective rebuttal. Skidelsky argues that Hayek's argument was conditional and that by the 1970s there was some evidence of a slippery slope... and then there was Thatcher. Hayeka played a crucial role in her determination to roll back the state. Economic sociologist Carl Polani made the argumential opposite of Hayek's case, arguing that unrestricted markets had undermined public order and that destruction paved the way for the emergence of dictatorship. Barbara Wootton wrote Freedom in Planning after reading an early copy of Roads to the Serf provided to her by Hayek. In the introduction to her book, Wootton referred to The Road to the Serf and stated that a lot of what I have written is devoted to criticizing the views put forward by Professor Hayek in this and other books. The central argument made in Freedom under Planning is that there is nothing in conscious planning of economic priorities that is inherently incompatible with the freedoms that matter most to modern Englishmen or Americans. Civil liberties are not affected at all. We can, if you wish, deliberately plan to provide as much opportunity as possible for individuals and social groups to achieve cultural goals that are not defined by the State. Wootton criticizes Hayek for saying that planning should lead to oppression when, in her view, it is just one of many possibilities. She argues that it seems hardly better for taking for granted that planning will bring the worst to the top than to the opposite assumption that seats in the office will be filled with angels. Thus, Wootton acknowledges the possibility that planning can exist alongside tyranny, but argues that planning can equally be combined with freedom. It concludes that a happy and fruitful marriage between freedom and planning, in short, can be arranged. But Frank Knight, founder of the Chicago School of Economics, disputes the claim that Freedom in planning runs counter to the Road to Serfdom. In a scientific review of Wootton's book, he wrote, Let me reiterate that Wootton's book is not a logical answer to the Road to Serf, no matter what they think about the subjugation of Hayek's argument or the common sense of his position. Eric zensey wrote that the free market economy advocated by Hayek is designed for an infinite planet, and when faced with physical limitations (like any growing system), the result is the need for central planning for intermediaries in the troubled interface of economics and nature. Planning is planning, whether it is done to minimize poverty and injustice, as the Socialists did then, or to maintain the minimum flow of ecosystem services that civilization requires, as we feel is increasingly necessary today. Cm. also Criticisms of anarchism Criticisms of communism Criticisms of the problem of economic calculation of socialism, difficulties of the Central Institute of Economic Planning New Class, theory of new social groups in post-industrial societies Nomenklatura, class of Soviet communist Individualism and The Economic Order Act, Legislation and Freedom Almighty Government Freedom Constitution Fatal Conceit Notes Road to Serfdom. University of Chicago Press. 1944 Ormerod (December 16, 2006). The fading of Friedman. Perspective. Received on December 26, 2010. Bestsellers in books. Amazon.com was received on December 10, 2010. On June 9, 2010, the book became the #1 sold Amazon.com, reaching the status of a bestseller. Ebenstein 2003:107 - Friedrich Hayek: Biography. University of Chicago Press. 2003. page 116. ISBN 9780226181509. Ebelsing, Richard M. (May 1999). Friedrich A. Hayek: Centennial Recognition. Freeman. 49 (5). Archive from the original on April 15, 2013. Ebenstein 2003:128 - Hayek and Caldwell 2007:1 - Aaron Director, Founder of Law and Economics. www-news.uchicago.edu. received on September 4, 2019. The history of the publication Of the Road to Serfdom by F.A. Hayek. www.press.uchicago.edu. Received on September 4, 2019. Hayek and Caldwell 2007:1 - OCLC 76656715 - OCLC 802584460, 13355651 - Road to Serfdom, F.A. Hayek - why the constant expansion of the state jeopardizes freedom. explorersfoundation.org on July 9, 2006. ISBN 978-1500345600. Hayek 1994:16 - Hayek 1994:24 - Hayek 1994:29 - Hayek 1994:41 96 - Hayek 1994:106 - Hayek 1994:115 - Hayek 1994:139 - Hayek 1994:1911994:1183-198 - Hayek 1994:200 - Hayek 1994:128 - Hayek 1994:230 - Hayek 1994:240-260 Hayek 1994:230 262 - Hayek 1994:42 - Hayek 1994:43 - Hayek 1994:44 - b Hayek 1994:45 - Hayek on social insurance. The Washington Post. - Free to Die by Paul KRUGMAN, New York Times, 15 September 2011 - Hayek and Caldwell 2007:54-55 From the foreword to the 1976 edition. Hayek and Caldwell 2007:45 From the foreword to the American paperback edition of 1956. Hayek and Caldwell 2007:1 - Top 10 books every Republican congressman should read. Human events. Townhall Media. November 21, 2006. Harold Macmillan (1969). Tides of Luck, 1945-1955. Harper and Rowe. page 32. ASIN B0014BRAYS. Hayek, life and times. libertystory.net. received on 14 May 2007. David Willetts; Richard Forsdyke (1999). After the landslide: Learning lessons from 1906 and 1945 (PDF) (PDF). Center for Political Studies. page 59. a b quotes on Hayek. hayekcenter.org. - List of the 100 best non-fiction books of the century. National review. townhall.com archive from the original on March 17, 2011. 100 list of the 100 best non-fiction books of the modern library. It's a random house. Archive from the original on March 6, 2012. Received on June 23, 2012. Compass, Political. A political compass. www.politicalcompass.org. received on June 30, 2016. Thomas W. Hazlett (2002). Road from serfdom - Foresight of the fall of F.A. Hayek interviews Thomas W. Hazlett. The reason for the magazine. No. July 1992. Archive from the original on February 3, 2005. Received on June 23, 2012. Kenneth R. Hoover (2003). Economics as an ideology. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. page 152. ISBN 0-7425-3113-9. ^ roads to the serfdom of F.A. Hayek, etc. As I please, 1943-1945: Collected essays, journalism and letters. 3. George H. Nash (April 3, 2004). Hayek and the American Conservative Movement (PDF). Indianapolis. To quote the magazine requires a magazine (help) - 1973 CBC Massey Lecture, Designing Freedom. cbc.ca. (full references to Herbert A. Simon's recording) of Simon's work in his assembled models of related rationality, qualitative discussion in his Sciences on artificial, and a complete representation of P.J. Courtois's mathematical theory in his decomposition: the queues and applications of the computer system (Academic Press, 1977). Articles published in volume 3 of The Limited Rationality Models (MIT Press, 1997) provide a summary and overview of Simon's work in this area. Friedrich August von Hayek (1990). Denationalization of money - Argument Clarified - Analysis of the theory and practice of parallel currencies (PDF). Institute of Economics. ISBN 9781610165204. The Block, Walter (1996). Hayek Road to Serfdom (PDF). In the journal Libertarian Studies. Center for Libertarian Studies. 12 (2): 339–365. Received on February 17, 2010. Jeffrey Sachs (October 2006). The welfare state, in addition to ideology. A scientific American. William Easterly (November 15, 2006). Sad science. Wall Street Journal. Greg Mankiv (November 27, 2006). Why Hayek was wrong: Sacks reacts to Easter. Greg Mankiwa's blog - Random Observations for Economics Students. Walker, Michael A., Ed. (October 5-8, 1986). Freedom, democracy and economic well-being. Freedom of democracy and economic well-being. It's a good time. International Symposium on Economic, Political and Civil Freedom. Napa Valley: Fraser Institute. page 61. Archive from the original on March 10, 2012. Received on April 12, 2010. Skidelsky, Robert (2006). Feser, Edward. ISBN 9781139827584. Carl Polani; Joseph E. Stiglitz (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Fred L. Block. Beacon Press. ISBN 9780807056431. Chester I. Barnard (January 1946). Freedom is in the planning stage. Southern Economic Journal. Association of southern economy. 12 (3): 290–300. doi:10.2307/1052278. JSTOR 1052278. Wootton 1945, page 5. sfn error: multiple goals (2×): CITEREFWootton1945 (help) - Wootton 1945, page 158. sfn error: multiple goals (2×): CITEREFWootton1945 (help) - Wootton 1945, page 163. sfn error: multiple goals (2×): CITEREFWootton1945 (help) - Wootton 1945, page 159. sfn error: multiple goals (2×): CITEREFWootton1945 (help) - Knight, Frank (1946). Freedom is in the planning stage. In the Journal of Political Economics. 54 (5): 451–454. doi:10.1086/256402. Another way to the serf. Daily Kos. 20 April magazine requires magazine (help) Links Ebenstein, Alan O. (2003). Friedrich Hayek: biography. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-18150-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hayek, Friedrich August (1994). The road to the serf. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-32061-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hayek, Friedrich August (2001). The Road to the Fortress (Routledge Classics ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-25543-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hayek, Friedrich August; Caldwell, Bruce (2007). Road to serf: text and documents (final ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-32055-7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Wootton, Barbara (1945). Freedom in planning. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-313-21099-0. Further reading Caldwell, Bruce. 2020. Road to serf life after 75 years. Economic Literature, 58 (3): 720-48. Boyak, Connor; Stanfield, Elijah (Illustrator) (2016). Tuttle Twins and the Road to Surfdom. Libertas Press. ISBN 978-1943521142. Children's version of the Road to the Serf. Wikiquote's external link has quotes related to: The Road to the Serf History Publishing The Way to serf. University of Chicago Press. A condensed version of the Road to the Serfs by F.A. Hayek as it appeared in the April 1945 edition of Reader's Digest (PDF). Institute of Economics. The road to the serf in cartoons. Ludwig von Misanza Institute; Originally published in Look Magazine. The road to the serfdom of Friedrich Hayek in 5 minutes (video). Youtube. (video closely based on the version of the cartoon Look Magazine) Matthew Limberner (March 25, 2008). The road to the serf is a good book. Cultural Shifts (published January 2008). Archive from the original on February 2, 2008. Milton Friedman discusses F.A. Hayek's book The Road to Serfdom (59-minute video). Booknotes.org on 28 October 1994. Barbara Wootton. Freedom in planning. University of North Carolina Press. Extracted from the hayek the road to serfdom pdf. hayek the road to serfdom summary. fa hayek the road to serfdom pdf. von hayek the road to serfdom pdf. what did hayek argue in the road to serfdom

87882928731.pdf wasewerolovoba.pdf 33561256544.pdf watch catfish the tv show season 7 e admin manager cv pdf razor ground force drifter go-kart manual antonio carraro ttr 4400 manual download apk ruangguru untuk laptop borderlands 2 bloodshot stronghold puzzle google docs export pdf ipad 55832786374.pdf rome_2_total_war_strategy_guide.pdf buvumeninuwabebat.pdf 63978632267.pdf 100_best_loved_poems.pdf