A Study on the Distribution of Vascular Epiphytes in a Secondary Cloud Forest, Central Cordillera, Colombia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Study on the Distribution of Vascular Epiphytes in a Secondary Cloud Forest, Central Cordillera, Colombia A study on the distribution of vascular epiphytes in a secondary cloud forest, Central Cordillera, Colombia. Maaike Bader A study on the distribution of vascular epiphytes in a secondary cloud forest, Central Cordillera, Colombia. Oktober 1999 Thesis tropical nature management (H300-762) Maaike Bader (Wageningen University) Main tutor: Drs. Frans van Dunné (Hugo de Vries Laboratory, University of Amsterdam) Other tutors: Prof. Dr. Antoine M. Cleef (Hugo de Vries Laboratory, UvA & Vertebrate Ecology & Tropical Nature Management, Wageningen University) Dr. Pieter Ketner (Vertebrate Ecology & Tropical Nature Management, Wageningen University) John Stuiver (Laboratory of Geographical Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University) Internal Report no. 326 Wageningen University and Research Centre (Formerly ‘Wageningen Agricultural University)’ THE DATA IN THIS REPORT ARE MEANT FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. NO COPYING PERMITTED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE AUTHOR OR TUTOR(S). Contents `CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE........................................................................................................................................ 3 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... 4 SAMENVATTING............................................................................................................................ 5 RESUMEN....................................................................................................................................... 6 1 EPIPHYTISM............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 DEFINITION ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION ................................................................................................... 7 1.3 DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY ........................................................................................... 10 1.4 BROMELIACEAE ................................................................................................................ 11 1.5 ORCHIDACEAE .................................................................................................................. 13 1.6 LORANTHACEAE ................................................................................................................ 14 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY ........................................................................................ 18 3 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................ 22 4 METHOD................................................................................................................................ 25 4.1 FIELDWORK ........................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 26 4.2.1 GIS ........................................................................................................................... 26 GIS pre-processing ........................................................................................................................... 27 GIS-analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Spatial point pattern .............................................................................................. 29 4.2.3 Climatic data ........................................................................................................... 30 4.2.4 Height distribution ................................................................................................. 30 4.2.5 Other environmental factors ................................................................................. 31 4.2.6 Plant appearance ................................................................................................... 31 5 RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 32 5.1 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................... 32 5.2 EPIPHYTE SPECIES ............................................................................................................ 35 Bromeliaceae ......................................................................................................................... 35 Orchidaceae ........................................................................................................................... 35 Loranthaceae ......................................................................................................................... 36 5.3 EPIPHYTE ABUNDANCE ...................................................................................................... 36 5.4 HEIGHT DISTRIBUTION ........................................................................................................ 38 5.5 SPATIAL POINT PATTERN ................................................................................................... 40 5.6 PHOROPHYTES .................................................................................................................. 40 5.7 PLOTS .............................................................................................................................. 42 5.8 GROWING SITES ................................................................................................................ 42 5.9 PLANT APPEARANCE ......................................................................................................... 43 6 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................... 45 6.1 CLIMATE ................................................................................................................................ 45 6.2 EPIPHYTE SPECIES AND ABUNDANCE .................................................................................. 45 1 6.3 POPULATION STRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 46 6.4 HEIGHT DISTRIBUTION ........................................................................................................ 48 Height of the epiphytes ........................................................................................................... 48 Ecological equivalence and coexistence ................................................................................ 49 Defining the vertical position .................................................................................................. 51 6.5 SPATIAL PATTERN ............................................................................................................. 51 Clustering of the epiphytes ..................................................................................................... 51 Describing spatial patterns ..................................................................................................... 52 6.6 PHOROPHYTES .................................................................................................................. 53 6.7 PLOTS .............................................................................................................................. 54 6.8 GROWING SITES ................................................................................................................ 55 6.9 PLANT APPEARANCE ......................................................................................................... 56 6.10 GIS .................................................................................................................................. 57 7 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 59 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 60 APPENDIX I : EVALUATION OF SOME METHODS................................................................... 68 Field methods ....................................................................................................................... 68 Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 69 APPENDIX II-1: MAPS OF THE PLOTS: SOME GRAPHICS ..................................................... 71 APPENDIX III-1: HEIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF ALL EPIPHYTES. .............................................. 83 APPENDIX IV : DIFFERENT HEIGHT MEASURES PER PLOT ................................................. 90 APPENDIX V : DIFFERENT HEIGHT MEASURES PER SPECIES............................................ 91 APPENDIX VI-1: L 2-GRAPHS ...................................................................................................... 92 APPENDIX VII-1 : DISTRIBUTION ON PHOROPHYTES.......................................................... 108 APPENDIX VIII:
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Monocotiledóneas Y Pteridófitos De La Planada, Colombia
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Ramírez Padilla, Bernardo; Mendoza Cifuentes, Humberto Monocotiledóneas y Pteridófitos de La Planada, Colombia Biota Colombiana, vol. 3, núm. 2, diciembre, 2002, pp. 285-295 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49103204 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative BiotaRamírez-P Colombiana & Mendoza-C 3 (2) 285 - 295, 2002 Monocots and Fern-allies of La Planada, Colombia -285 Monocotiledóneas y Pteridófitos de La Planada, Colombia Bernardo Ramírez-Padilla1 y Humberto Mendoza-Cifuentes2 1 Universidad del Cauca, Herbario CAUP, A.A. 1113, Popayán, Colombia. [email protected] 2 Instituto Alexander von Humboldt, A.A. 8693 Bogotá D.C., Colombia. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Flora, Bosque Nublado, Los Andes, Colombia, Lista de Especies La Planada es una reserva natural privada y un centro La mayoría de los registros del presente listado provienen de de investigación biológica de gran importancia en Colom- colecciones realizadas en la altiplanicie de la Reserva entre bia. Se localiza en la vertiente Pacífica de Los Andes colom- los 1800-1900 m de altitud. En esta área se encuentra vegeta- bianos, Municipio de Ricaurte, departamento de Nariño, ción de bosque maduro y bosque en avanzado estado de cerca de la frontera con el Ecuador, entre los 1500 y 2100 m, regeneración (más de 15 años).
    [Show full text]
  • Filogenia De Tillandsia Subgen. Diaphoranthema Y Evolución De La Autogamia Y La Poliembrionía
    Tesis Doctoral Filogenia de Tillandsia subgen. Diaphoranthema y evolución de la autogamia y la poliembrionía Donadío, Sabina 2013-03-21 Este documento forma parte de la colección de tesis doctorales y de maestría de la Biblioteca Central Dr. Luis Federico Leloir, disponible en digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar. Su utilización debe ser acompañada por la cita bibliográfica con reconocimiento de la fuente. This document is part of the doctoral theses collection of the Central Library Dr. Luis Federico Leloir, available in digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar. It should be used accompanied by the corresponding citation acknowledging the source. Cita tipo APA: Donadío, Sabina. (2013-03-21). Filogenia de Tillandsia subgen. Diaphoranthema y evolución de la autogamia y la poliembrionía. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Cita tipo Chicago: Donadío, Sabina. "Filogenia de Tillandsia subgen. Diaphoranthema y evolución de la autogamia y la poliembrionía". Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. 2013-03-21. Dirección: Biblioteca Central Dr. Luis F. Leloir, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Contacto: [email protected] Intendente Güiraldes 2160 - C1428EGA - Tel. (++54 +11) 4789-9293 Universidad de Buenos Aires Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución Filogenia de Tillandsia subgen. Diaphoranthema y evolución de la autogamia y la poliembrionía Tesis presentada para optar al título de Doctor de la Universidad de Buenos Aires en el área: CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS Sabina Donadío Director de tesis: Dr. Raúl Ernesto Pozner Directora Asistente: Dra. Liliana Mónica Giussani Consejera de estudios: Dra. Viviana A.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Scan Data
    Selbyana 15: 132-149 CHECKLIST OF VENEZUELAN BROMELIACEAE WITH NOTES ON SPECIES DISTRIBUTION BY STATE AND LEVELS OF ENDEMISM BRUCE K. HOLST Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, USA ABSTRACf. A checklist of the 24 genera and 364 native species ofBromeliaceae known from Venezuela is presented, including their occurrence by state and indications of which are endemic to the country. A comparison of the number of genera and species known from Mesoamerica (southern Mexico to Panama), Colombia, Venezuela, the Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana), Ecuador, and Peru is presented, as well as a summary of the number of species and endemic species in each Venezuelan state. RESUMEN. Se presenta un listado de los 24 generos y 364 especies nativas de Bromeliaceae que se conocen de Venezuela, junto con sus distribuciones por estado y una indicaci6n cuales son endemicas a Venezuela. Se presenta tambien una comparaci6n del numero de los generos y especies de Mesoamerica (sur de Mexico a Panama), Colombia, Venezuela, las Guayanas (Guyana, Suriname, Guyana Francesa), Ecuador, y Peru, y un resumen del numero de especies y numero de especies endemicas de cada estado de Venezuela. INTRODUCTION Bromeliaceae (Smith 1971), and Revision of the Guayana Highland Bromeliaceae (Smith 1986). The checklist ofVenezuelan Bromeliaceae pre­ Several additional country records were reported sented below (Appendix 1) adds three genera in works by Smith and Read (1982), Luther (Brewcaria, Neoregelia, and Steyerbromelia) and (1984), Morillo (1986), and Oliva-Esteva and 71 species to the totals for the country since the Steyermark (1987). Author abbreviations used last summary of Venezuelan bromeliads in the in the checklist follow Brummit and Powell Flora de Venezuela series which contained 293 (1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Yanacocha and Verdecocha Reserve Visited by Hummingbirds 1 Francisco Tobar1,4, Tatiana Santander G.1, Esteban A
    Yanacocha-Verdecocha, Quito, Pichincha-Ecuador Plants of Yanacocha and Verdecocha Reserve visited by hummingbirds 1 Francisco Tobar1,4, Tatiana Santander G.1, Esteban A. Guevara1,2, Álvaro J. Pérez3, Edison Rea3, Daniela Cevallos3, William Artega1, Cristian Poveda1, Bryan G. Rojas1 & Catherine Graham2 2 1Área de Investigación y Monitoreo de Avifauna, Aves y Conservación – BirdLife en Ecuador, Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Unit, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 3Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, 4Herbario Nacional del Ecuador, Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad Photos by: Francisco Tobar, Álvaro Pérez, Tatiana Santander, Aves y Conservación © Francisco Tobar [[email protected]] Support from Swiss Federal Research Institute (WSL) – National Geographic – Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) – European Research Council Advanced Grants (ERC) – Aves y Conservación/BirdLife in Ecuador – Rufford Foundation – Jocotoco Foundation (Reserva Yanacocha) –Maldonado Family (Reserva Verdecocha) )LHOG0XVHXP &&%<1&/RVWUDEDMRVFRQHVWDOLFHQFLDVRQOLEUHVGHXVDUFRPSDUWLU UHPH]FODUFRQDWULEXFLyQSHURQRSHUPLWHQHOXVRFRPHUFLDOGHOWUDEDMRRULJLQDO [fieldguides.fieldmusuem.org] [1237] version 1 9/2020 Interactions (EPHI) project aims to understand how and why plant-hummingbird interactions vary across time and environmental gradients. This knowledge is fundamental to develop a predictive science of biotic interactions which are the backbone of ecological processes, critical for human wellbeing, like pollination and seed dispersal. In the current pace of global change this understanding is relevant to conservation efforts, especially in systems like Yanacocha that hold several threatened species like the Black-breasted Puffleg which is an important pollinator for several plants. We would like to thank the following collaborators: Jocotoco Foundation (Reserva Yanacocha), Maldonado Family (Reserva Verdecocha), GAD Parroquial de Nono, Rolando Hipo, Wilson Hipo, Silvio Calderón, Jefferson García, José Antonio Dávila, Gabriela Manzano and Ibeth Alarcón.
    [Show full text]
  • BROMELI ANA PUBLISHED by the NEW YORK BROMELIAD SOCIETY1 (Visit Our Website
    BROMELI ANA PUBLISHED BY THE NEW YORK BROMELIAD SOCIETY1 (visit our website www.nybromeliadsociety.org) November, 2014 Vol. 51, No. 9 THE WBC IN HAWAII - Updates and Corrections by Herb Plever My report of the World Conference in the October issue was silent about visiting a local grower. We were scheduled to visit Larry McGraw’s garden during our trip to Lyon Arboretum and Nu’uanu Pali overlook, but were advised that we had to skip the visit because our bus couldn’t make the steep turnaround on Lisa Vinzant’s unnamed Auction Neo. the narrow road up to the garden. (We were running There was a lot of suspense about the late.) beautiful, unnamed Neoregelia generously But I learned from the In Larry McGraw’s garden - what donated by Lisa Vinzant, but it had not yet been looks like Neo. ‘Fireball’ in the back, report in the East London Tillandsia streptophylla in the middle auctioned when I had to leave. Lisa had given the Bromeliad Society (South and Tillandsia xerographica in front. buyer the right to name the plant (subject to her Africa) Newsletter that approval). I have heard that the plant went for another bus did manage to visit Larry McGraw’s $600 but the purchaser likely believes that is a garden and the people were very impressed. The bargain for such an outstanding plant. The winner and adjacent photo is from that Newsletter. any name given the plant have not yet been We did not stay to the end of the Rare Plant confirmed. (See photo above.) Auction on Saturday night after the banquet, as we Two trees dominated the coastal landscape on had an early flight to Kona the next morning.
    [Show full text]
  • An Alphabetical List of Bromeliad Binomials
    AN ALPHABETICAL LIST OF BROMELIAD BINOMIALS Compiled by HARRY E. LUTHER The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Sarasota, Florida, USA ELEVENTH EDITION Published by the Bromeliad Society International June 2008 ii INTRODUCTION TO EDITION XI This list is presented as a spelling guide for validly published taxa accepted at the Bromeliad Identification Center. The list contains the following information: 1) Genus number (the left-hand number) based on the systematic sequence published in the Smith & Downs monograph: Bromeliaceae (Flora Neotropica, number 14, parts 1-3; 1974, 1977, 1979). Whole numbers are as published in the monograph. 2) Species number (the second number) according to its systematic position in the monograph. Note: Taxa not included in the monograph or that have been reclassified have been assigned numbers to reflect their systematic position within the Smith & Downs framework (e.g., taxon 14.1 is related to taxon 14). The utility of this method is that one may assume for example that Tillandsia comarapaensis (150.2) is related to T. didisticha (150) and therefore may have certain horticultural qualities in common with that species. 3) Genus and species names follow the respective numbers. 4) Subspecific taxa (subspecies, varieties, forms) names are indented below the species names. Note: Variety "a" (the type variety) is not listed unless it contains a form (see Aechmea caudata ). Similarly, the type form is not listed. 5) Author name follows the specific and subspecific names. These names are included for the convenience of specialist users of the list. This list does not contain publication data or synonymy, as it is not our intent for it to be a technical nomenclatural guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilist 1.0: a Global Checklist of Vascular Epiphytes
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 EpiList 1.0: a global checklist of vascular epiphytes Zotz, Gerhard ; Weigelt, Patrick ; Kessler, Michael ; Kreft, Holger ; Taylor, Amanda Abstract: Epiphytes make up roughly 10% of all vascular plant species globally and play important functional roles, especially in tropical forests. However, to date, there is no comprehensive list of vas- cular epiphyte species. Here, we present EpiList 1.0, the first global list of vascular epiphytes based on standardized definitions and taxonomy. We include obligate epiphytes, facultative epiphytes, and hemiepiphytes, as the latter share the vulnerable epiphytic stage as juveniles. Based on 978 references, the checklist includes >31,000 species of 79 plant families. Species names were standardized against World Flora Online for seed plants and against the World Ferns database for lycophytes and ferns. In cases of species missing from these databases, we used other databases (mostly World Checklist of Selected Plant Families). For all species, author names and IDs for World Flora Online entries are provided to facilitate the alignment with other plant databases, and to avoid ambiguities. EpiList 1.0 will be a rich source for synthetic studies in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology as it offers, for the first time, a species‐level overview over all currently known vascular epiphytes. At the same time, the list represents work in progress: species descriptions of epiphytic taxa are ongoing and published life form information in floristic inventories and trait and distribution databases is often incomplete and sometimes evenwrong.
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA WEST COAST BROMELIAD SOCIETY 1954-2014 Celebrating 60 Years of Bromeliads Floridabromeliads.Org
    FLORIDA WEST COAST BROMELIAD SOCIETY 1954-2014 Celebrating 60 Years of Bromeliads floridabromeliads.org November 2014 Newsletter NEXT MEETING Date & Time: Location: Tuesday, November 4 Good Samaritan Church Doors open at 7 pm; meeting starts at 7:30 6085 Park Boulevard Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 Program Member Dave Johnston will give an interactive educational program on a range of bromeliad topics such as general bromeliad knowledge, plant identification, and famous bromeliad people. His Powerpoint presentation will be in a question-and-answer format, sort of a Bromeliad Jeopardy! He will pose a series of bromeliad-related questions and award prizes for correct answers. If you want to participate in the question-and-answer parts, bring a pen or pencil to keep score and Dave will supply score cards. And if not, come, sit, and listen because Dave’s talks are always crammed with information. Plant Sales The speaker will be the sole plant vendor for this meeting and there will be no member plant sales. 2015 Officers and Trustees Election At the November meeting members will vote on a slate of nominees for our 2015 officers and trustee, as follows: President Ashley Graham Vice President Larry Sousa Secretary Sal Vactor Treasurer Gary Lund Trustee (three-year term) Barbra Stayer (to serve from 2015 through 2017) Additional candidates may be added to the slate, with permission of the nominee, any time before the voting takes place. If you want to make a nomination or run for one of these offices, contact Carol Schultz, Nominating Committee Chairman, at [email protected]. OCTOBER MEETING HIGHLIGHTS Program In his talk Bromeliads – Are They Better in the Bahamas? Jay Thurrott gave us insight into how folks in the Bahamas grow bromeliads and the difficulties they experience in their efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • AUTOR: Nelson Armando Jaramillo Díaz DIRECTOR
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LOJA ÁREA AGROPECUARIA Y DE RECURSOS NATURALES RENOVABLES CARRERA DE INGENIERÍA FORESTAL ESTRUCTURA FUNCIONAL DE COMUNIDADES DE BROMELIÁCEAS CON ÉNFASIS EN EL FLUJO DE METANO, AGUA Y NUTRIENTES A LO LARGO DE LA GRADIENTE ALTITUDINAL DE LA CUENCA AMAZÓNICA ECUATORIANA Tesis de Grado, previa a la obtención del Título de Ingeniero Forestal AUTOR: Nelson Armando Jaramillo Díaz DIRECTOR: Zhofre Aguirre Mendoza, Ph. D Loja – Ecuador 2015 i CERTIFICACIÓN Ing. Zhofre Aguirre Mendoza, Ph. D DIRECTOR DE TESIS CERTIFICA: Que la tesis titulada “ESTRUCTURA FUNCIONAL DE COMUNIDADES DE BROMELIÁCEAS CON ÉNFASIS EN EL FLUJO DE METANO, AGUA Y NUTRIENTES A LO LARGO DE LA GRADIENTE ALTITUDINAL DE LA CUENCA AMAZÓNICA ECUATORIANA”, de autoría del egresado Nelson Armando Jaramillo Díaz, ha sido dirigida, revisada y aprobada en su integridad, por lo que autorizo su publicación y difusión. Loja, mayo del 2015 .......................................................... Ing. Zhofre Aguirre Mendoza Ph. D DIRECTOR DE TESIS ii EL TRIBUNAL CALIFICADOR DE LA TESIS “ESTRUCTURA FUNCIONAL DE COMUNIDADES DE BROMELIÁCEAS CON ÉNFASIS EN EL FLUJO DE METANO, AGUA Y NUTRIENTES A LO LARGO DE LA GRADIENTE ALTITUDINAL DE LA CUENCA AMAZÓNICA ECUATORIANA” CERTIFICA: En calidad de Tribunal de Calificación de la tesis titulada “ESTRUCTURA FUNCIONAL DE COMUNIDADES DE BROMELIÁCEAS CON ÉNFASIS EN EL FLUJO DE METANO, AGUA Y NUTRIENTES A LO LARGO DE LA GRADIENTE ALTITUDINAL DE LA CUENCA AMAZÓNICA ECUATORIANA”, de autoría del egresado Nelson Armando Jaramillo Díaz, ha sido dirigida, revisada e incorporadas todas las sugerencias efectuadas por el Tribunal Calificador, y luego de su revisión se ha procedido a la respectiva calificación y aprobación.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriocnemis Nigrivestis), a Critically Endangered Hummingbird
    J. Field Ornithol. 88(3):229–235, 2017 DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12208 Plant and habitat use by Black-breasted Pufflegs (Eriocnemis nigrivestis), a critically endangered hummingbird Esteban A. Guevara,1,4 Rolando Hipo,1 Cristian Poveda,1,2 Bryan Rojas,1,2 Catherine H. Graham,3 and Tatiana Santander G.1 1 Area de Investigacion y Monitoreo de Avifauna, Aves y Conservacion – BirdLife in Ecuador, Pasaje Joaquın Tinajero E3-05 y Jorge Drom, Quito 170135, Ecuador 2Departamento de Biologıa, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, Av. 12 de Octubre 1076 y Roca, Quito, Ecuador 3Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zurcherstrasse€ 111, Birmensdorf 8903, Switzerland Received 1 October 2016; accepted 30 June 2017 ABSTRACT. Black-breasted Pufflegs (Eriocnemis nigrivestis) are hummingbirds endemic to Ecuador and are considered critically endangered because of their limited distribution, a population estimated at fewer than 1000 individuals, and ongoing habitat degradation. From November 2013 to June 2016, we examined the foraging preferences of these hummingbirds using a combination of direct observations, time-lapse cameras, and motion-detection software. We first identified 21 species of ornithophilous plants distributed among five sites in the northwestern flanks of the Pichincha volcano in northwest Ecuador. We then monitored these plant species using time-lapse cameras and recorded 144 visits by Black-breasted Pufflegs to seven of the 21 species. Most visits (128 of 144 visits, 89%) were to just two species of plants, Macleania rupestris and Palicourea fuchsioides, the latter of which is also an endemic and threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad De Plantas Y Vegetación Del Páramo Andino
    Plant diversity and vegetation of the Andean Páramo Diversidad de plantas y vegetación del Páramo Andino By Gwendolyn Peyre A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor from the University of Barcelona and Aarhus University University of Barcelona, Faculty of Biology, PhD Program Biodiversity Aarhus University, Institute of Bioscience, PhD Program Bioscience Supervisors: Dr. Xavier Font, Dr. Henrik Balslev Tutor: Dr. Xavier Font March, 2015 Aux peuples andins Summary The páramo is a high mountain ecosystem that includes all natural habitats located between the montane treeline and the permanent snowline in the humid northern Andes. Given its recent origin and continental insularity among tropical lowlands, the páramo evolved as a biodiversity hotspot, with a vascular flora of more than 3400 species and high endemism. Moreover, the páramo provides many ecosystem services for human populations, essentially water supply and carbon storage. Anthropogenic activities, mostly agriculture and burning- grazing practices, as well as climate change are major threats for the páramo’s integrity. Consequently, further scientific research and conservation strategies must be oriented towards this unique region. Botanical and ecological knowledge on the páramo is extensive but geographically heterogeneous. Moreover, most research studies and management strategies are carried out at local to national scale and given the vast extension of the páramo, regional studies are also needed. The principal limitation for regional páramo studies is the lack of a substantial source of good quality botanical data covering the entire region and freely accessible. To meet the needs for a regional data source, we created VegPáramo, a floristic and vegetation database containing 3000 vegetation plots sampled with the phytosociological method throughout the páramo region and proceeding from the existing literature and our fieldwork (Chapter 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Código Internacional De Nomenclatura Para Algas, Hongos Y Plantas (Código De Shenzhen)
    Cambios de numeración Occasional papers from the Herbarium Greuter – 4 Código Internacional de Nomenclatura para algas, hongos y plantas (Código de Shenzhen) vii Traducción al español de la versión oficial en inglés autorizada por la International Association for Plant Taxonomy Publicado por: Stiftung Herbarium Greuter (Fundación Herbario Greuter) Englerallee 24B 14195 Berlín, Alemania © Stiftung Herbarium Greuter ISBN: 978-3-9820137-4-9 eISBN: 978-3-9820137-0-1 Impresión: Texto traducido por: Werner Greuter, Herbarium Mediterraneum, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Italy; and Botanischer Garten & Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany ([email protected]). Rosa Rankin Rodríguez, Jardín Botánico Nacional, Universidad de La Haba- na, Cuba ([email protected]). Con la colaboración de: Luis Alberto Parra Sánchez, Avda. Padre Claret 7, 5º G, 09400 Aranda de Duero, Burgos, España ([email protected]). Juan Bautista Martínez Laborde, Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vege- tal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosis- temas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, España (juanbau.martinez@ upm.es). Alina Freire Fierro, Apartado Postal Personal 17-17-793, Quito, Ecuador (ali- [email protected]). Renée Hersilia Fortunato, CONICET, Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, CIRN- INTA, N. Repetto y Los Reseros s/n, Hurlingham 1686, Facultad de Agronomía y Ciencias Agroalimentarias, Universidad de Morón, Prov. de Buenos Aires, Argen- tina ([email protected]). Comité editorial Código Internacional de Nomenclatura para algas, hongos y plantas (Código de Shenzhen) adoptado por el decimonoveno Congreso Internacional de Botánica Shenzhen, China, julio de 2017 Preparado y editado por NICHOLAS J. TURLAND, Presidente JOHN H. WIERSEMA, Secretario, y FRED R.
    [Show full text]