Sample Pages
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Its All Happening Just When You Thought Things Were Winding Down
Its All Happening Just when you thought things were winding down for the year and there would be only holiday racing to concentrate on, a couple of recent important announcements have rather re-focussed the mind. First of all, and definitely most importantly, a successor to Edward Rennell has been announced. As I’ve said earlier, Edward leaves a massive pair for shoes to fill, and I know that, for years to come, his legacy will be felt in many different ways. My main concern about his replacement was that it would be someone who didn’t have the same passion and love for harness racing that he undoubtedly possessed. It was with relief then, that Peter Jensen was selected to take the reins, because he is yet another whose passion for our industry is without question. Having known Peter on both a personal and business basis for many years, he will bring skills and experience to the role that will be sorely needed in the difficult times ahead. Having attended a number of meetings he has had with the Trainers & Drivers Greater Canterbury Branch since he took over at Addington, it is clear that he made a favourable impression on some folk in our game who are not easily impressed, with his considered approach and willingness to at least listen to concerns, at the same time making no promises. The other announcement, this time from the Government, was the naming of those to be involved in the Ministerial Advisory Committee. Fearing that this body would be heavily slanted in favour of our sister code, it was pleasing to see that, with the obvious exception of Sir Peter Vela, that doesn’t appear to be the case. -
CERA Inquiry Final Report
CERA Inquiry Final Report CERA: Alleged Conflicts of Interest Inquiry for State Services Commissioner Final Report dated 31 March 2017 In accordance with Principle 7 of the Privacy Act 1993, a statement received from Mr Gallagher and Mr Nikoloff is attached at the end of the Report. Michael Heron QC Page 1 of 46 CERA Inquiry Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) Introduction 2) Summary of Conclusions 3) Applicable Standards 4) Discussion - PIML 5) Discussion - 32 Oxford Terrace – Mr Cleverley Appendix 1 – Terms of Reference Appendix 2 – Prime Minister’s letter and Jurisdiction Appendix 3 – Process and Documentation Appendix 4 – Applicable Standards Appendix 5 – Interviewees Appendix 6 – Canterbury DHB chronology Page 2 of 46 CERA Inquiry Final Report 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) was established under the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 to assist with the Government's response to the devastating Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. After five years of operation, CERA was disestablished on 18 April 2016. 1.2 Within CERA, the Implementation/Central City Development Unit (CCDU) set out to drive the rebuild of central Christchurch. The Investment Strategy group sat within that unit and was responsible for retaining, promoting and attracting investment in Christchurch. 1.3 In early 2017, investigative journalist Martin van Beynen published a series of articles on alleged conflicts of interest within CERA and CCDU. Due to the serious allegations raised, the State Services Commissioner appointed me to undertake this Inquiry on his behalf on 7 February 2017 pursuant to sections 23(1) and 25(2) of the State Sector Act 1988. -
NZCC 8 NZME Limited and Fairfax NZ Limited – Authorisation Determination
ISSN 1178–2560 Decision Series Project no. 11.04/15933 Public version Determination NZME Limited and Fairfax New Zealand Limited [2017] NZCC 8 The Commission: Dr Mark Berry Sue Begg Elisabeth Welson Graham Crombie Summary of application: NZME Limited and Fairfax NZ Limited and its parent company, Fairfax Media Limited, seek approval to merge the New Zealand operations of NZME Limited and Fairfax NZ Limited. Determination: The Commerce Commission is not satisfied that the merger will not have, or would not be likely to have, the effect of substantially lessening competition in a market. The Commission is also not satisfied that the merger will result, or will be likely to result, in such a benefit to the public that it should be permitted. Therefore, the Commerce declines to grant authorisation for the merger pursuant to section 67(3)(c) of the Commerce Act 1986. Date of Determination: 2 May 2017 2875553 2 Confidential material in this report has been removed. Its location in the document is denoted by [ ]. 2875553 3 CONTENTS GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................................5 SECTION 1: THE COMMISSION’S DETERMINATION ..................................................................... 15 The proposed merger ....................................................................................................................... 15 Determination ................................................................................................................................. -
Fairfax/NZME – Response to Questions Arising from the Conference
1 PUBLIC VERSION NZME AND FAIRFAX RESPONSE TO COMMERCE COMMISSION QUESTIONS ARISING FROM THE CONFERENCE ON 6 AND 7 DECEMBER 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. During its recent Conference held on 6 and 7 December 2016, the Commissioners asked the parties to follow up on a number of points. This paper sets out the parties' responses on those questions, and also provides answers to some further follow-up questions that the parties have received since the Conference. 2. The main points that this response covers are as follows: (a) Inefficient duplication of commodity news (external plurality): The Commissioners asked the parties to produce examples of "commodity" news coverage as between the five main media organisations being similar ("digger hits bridge" was provided as an example of where all the major media organisations covered effectively the same point). Reducing that duplication will be efficiency enhancing and will not materially detract from the volume or quality of news coverage. (b) A wide variety of perspectives are covered within each publication (internal plurality): The editors provided the Commission with examples of how each publication covers a wide variety of perspectives, as that is what attracts the greatest audience. This is true both within and across each of the parties' publications. The Commission asked for examples, which are provided in this response, together with additional material about why those incentives do not change post-Merger. (c) Constitutional safeguards on editorial independence: The Commissioners asked about what existing structures protected editorial independence and balance and fairness in reporting. This was asked both in the context of a possible future sale of Fairfax's stake, and in the context of the protections available to those subject to negative reporting seeking fairness and balance. -
New Zealand Media Ownership 2018
NEW ZEALAND MEDIA OWNERSHIP 2020 AUT research centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD) Edited by Merja Myllylahti and Wayne Hope December 7, 2020 ABOUT THIS REPORT This report is part of JMAD’s ongoing series of reports on New Zealand media ownership. Since 2011, the AUT research centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD) has published reports that document and analyse developments within New Zealand media. These incorporate media ownership, market structures and key events during each year. The reports are freely available and accessible to anyone via the JMAD research centre: https://www.aut.ac.nz/study/study-options/communication- studies/research/journalism,-media-and-democracy-research-centre 2020 report team To celebrate the JMAD research centre’s 10th anniversary, this 10th New Zealand media ownership report is co-written by AUT lecturers who are experts in their fields. The report is co-edited by the JMAD Co-Directors Dr Merja Myllylahti and Professor Wayne Hope. Contributors Dr Sarah Baker Dr Peter Hoar Professor Wayne Hope Dr Rufus McEwan Dr Atakohu Middleton Dr Merja Myllylahti Dr Greg Treadwell This report is covered by the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International. When reproducing any part of this report – including tables and graphs – full attribution must be given to the report author(s). 1 10TH ANNIVERSARY OF JOURNALISM, MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY RESEARCH CENTRE The AUT research centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD) was established in 2010 by (then) Associate Professors Wayne Hope and Martin Hirst to promote research into the media and communication industries and to increase knowledge about news and professional practices in journalism. -
Tess-Mcclure-Robert
Robert Bell Research Summary, 2017 FIGHTING THE BEHEMOTH Sustaining Hyper-Local Public Interest Journalism in the Digital Age T McClure Contents Introduction: Where are we now?............4 The structure of this report…………..8 Part One………..9 Solving the Problem of Trust………...9 Membership Models and Reader Engagement…………..9 What’s caused our crisis in trust?.………..10 Membership Models…………14 Case Study: De Correspondent..………..15 Possible Applications: reFining the ofFering..………..17 Local Application Case Study: The SpinoFF Auckland..………..17 Possible applications: enhancing audience engagement..………..19 Case Study: The Farenthold Method…………..19 Possible Applications: Hyperlocal Membership…………..21 Case Study: The Lens.…………..21 Part Two…………..24 Solving the Problem of Local…………..24 State Models and Content Agreements…………..24 Case Study: The Local Democracy Reporters…………..25 Possible Applications: Local Reporting as Wire Service…………..25 Part Three…………..27 2 Solving the Problem of SurFace Area…………..27 Databases, ResurFacing and Wiki Models…………..27 Case Study: The Messenger…………..29 Local Applications: Databases and ResurFacing…………..31 Conclusion………..35 3 Introduction: Where are we now? Both globally and locally, the journalism industry is experiencing unprecedented levels of convergence and financial pressure. Nowhere is it felt more than at a local level. The global trends are toward shrinking local newsrooms, and a re-concentration of reporters out of local papers and toward national or international digital platForms. Census data shows that the number of print journalists [the census does not record a digital journalist category] in New Zealand dropped an enormous 61 percent between 2006 and 2013. Meanwhile, those leFt in journalism face an increasingly dominant PR industry - closely corresponding with the drop in print journalists have been a 56 percent increase in numbers of PR proFessionals, between 2006 and 2013. -
Christchurch Journalists' Collective Trauma Experience and The
July 1, 2014 Quake aftermath: Christchurch journalists' collective trauma experience and the implications for their reporting. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Ph.D in Journalism by Sean Scanlon -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand 2014 1 Abstract: On February 22, 2011, Christchurch-based journalists were jolted out of their normal work routine by a large 6.3 magnitude earthquake that killed 185 people, wrecked the city and forced reporters to reappraise their journalism. This study considers how the earthquake affected journalists’ relationship to the community, their use of sources and news selection. A theory of collective trauma is used to explain the changes that journalists made to their reporting practice. Specifically, Christchurch journalists had a greater identification and attachment to their audience post-earthquake. Journalists viewed themselves as part of the earthquake story, which prompted them to view sources differently, use those sources differently and see advocacy as a keystone of their news work after the disaster. This study adds to a growing scholarship about journalists and trauma, but focuses on what the event meant for local reporters’ choice of sources and news selection rather than measuring rates of psychological distress. 2 Acknowledgments I have many people to thank for helping me complete this study. Being a journalist by training and not an academic has made the experience an interesting one, which required the guidance of many more people than I can name. First, thanks to my patient and wise supervisors Jim Tully and Donald Matheson. I asked for critical feedback and always appreciated your honest responses and guidance. -
New Murder Probe
Monday, April 6, 2020 Since Sept 27, 1879 Retail $2.20 Home delivered from $1.40 THE INDEPENDENT VOICE OF MID CANTERBURY Siren’s birthday lockdown Life’s a beach FULL STORY P3 P4 New murder probe BY MATT MARKHAM formation available to them and going Kirsty grew up in. [email protected] that step further as well to ensure they Also, along with Detective Inspec- A new investigation into the unsolved gained as bigger picture as possible for tor, Greg Murton, who was handed the murder of Ashburton teenager Kirsty the investigation. Bentley file in 2014, they walked the Bentley in 1998 has revealed new de- “The problem with the Kirsty Bentley same track Bentley had near the Ash- tails and information around one of case is that it’s been pretty well raked burton River and visited the site in the New Zealand’s most prolific cold case over, so finding that point of difference Rakaia Gorge where her body was dis- murders. was always going to be the key for us,” covered two weeks after she went miss- Released on news website Stuff at the Ensor told the Guardian yesterday. ing. weekend, the investigation, dubbed “We spent a fair amount of time in- “That was really important for us, to Killer Blow, was undertaken by Fairfax itially just going over all the Fairfax be down in Ashburton and seeing such investigative journalists Blair Ensor and news stories on the case and from that significant areas in the case in real life Martin van Beynen and was the result we felt like we had enough information and not trying to do it all from the com- of months of interviews, research and for a really strong story, but we wanted fort of the office in Christchurch. -
JMAD New Zealand Media Ownership Report 2012
JMAD New Zealand Media Ownership Report 2012 Published: November 23, 2012 Author: Merja Myllylahti This New Zealand Media Ownership Report is the second one published by AUT’s Centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD). This report finds that in 2012 the ownership of New Zealand media companies concentrated even more tightly in hands of transnational corporations, financial institutions and private equity firms, following the international trend. It also discovers that the financialisation of media companies has intensified their need to maximise revenues. Consequently, media companies have implemented cost cutting programmes, outsourced jobs, closed down operations and sold core assets. The speed of these developments suggest that the future of New Zealand media companies is even more unpredictable than in September 2011 when the first JMAD report was published. At the same time print media organisations and online news formats struggled for commercial viability. In these fraught circumstances the principles of public broadcasting and public interest journalism were difficult to sustain. Key events and trends concerning New Zealand media ownership in 2012: Transnational media corporations tighten control over New Zealand media companies Financial institutions and private equity firms increase their New Zealand media holdings Fairfax and APN: asset sales, job cuts, paywalls and tabloid formats Traditional business models in New Zealand print media become less viable Public broadcasting shrinks further after the government effectively closes TVNZ 7 and Stratos Sky TV’s spreading influence triggers Commerce Commission investigation Journalism.org.nz: web based public interest journalism emerges Keywords: New Zealand media, ownership, convergence, financialization Note: The first JMAD New Zealand Media Ownership Report was published 2011 by AUT’s Centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD). -
NZME LIMITED and FAIRFAX NEW ZEALAND LIMITED COMMERCE COMMISSION CONFERENCE 7 DECEMBER 2016 9.30 Am Plurality
1 1 NZME LIMITED AND FAIRFAX NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2 COMMERCE COMMISSION CONFERENCE 3 7 DECEMBER 2016 4 9.30 am 5 6 Plurality ...................................................................................................... 2 7 8 ___________________________________________________________________ 9 10 CHAIR: Welcome back to day two of the conference on the Fairfax NZME merger. I'm not sure 11 whether I have to redo the health and safety comments I did yesterday, but out of an 12 abundance of caution I'll give you my truncated version of it and, that is, if a siren sounds 13 you'll be ushered out to an assembly point and if there's an earthquake it's crouching and 14 holding in here until such time as it's safe to go outside, don't go rushing outside, I think 15 those were the two key points. 16 One other matter of housekeeping, the draft of the transcript for yesterday's public 17 sessions are available and they'll be published on the website today. That will appear on 18 our NZME Fairfax project page. 19 Today is going to be exploring some wide-ranging views initially on plurality and 20 there'll be just a bit of traffic and organisation because not only will we hear from the 21 executives of the company, but we are keen today to hear from journalists with different 22 voices and I assume they are present in the room today and will come in, some on the 23 phone as well. So we just have to be very careful for the record to make sure that 24 everybody is identifying themselves and speaking clearly into a source that can be heard by 25 the stenographer. -
EERI-Recon-Rpt-111316 NZ Tsunami Final
EERI Preliminary Notes on Tsunami Damage and Response: Tsunami Generated by M7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand, Earthquake on November 14, 2016 Compiled by Rick Wilson and Laurie Johnson December 2016 A product of the EERI Learning From Earthquakes Program EERI Notes on Tsunami Response and Damage: Tsunami Generated by M7.8 New Zealand Earthquake on November 13, 2016 Page 1 1 PURPOSE The Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) supports gathering and sharing information about the effects and damage caused by tsunamis as well as the lessons learned about tsunami evacuation and response activities. This report summarizes the damage and response outcomes of the tsunami which was generated by the M7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand earthquake on November 14, 2016 (November 13, 2016 for U.S.) (Figure 1). Although EERI-related field teams were not deployed for the tsunami, the report provides information compiled by the authors from various references, colleagues, and their own experiences during and after the event. Laurie Johnson was a member of the Geotechnical Extreme Event Reconnaissance team supported by the National Science Foundation to investigate geotechnical effects of the earthquake. The information presented should be considered preliminary; for updates, the authors recommend readers visit the scientific and emergency management websites discussed herein. Figure 1 The epicentral area of the November 14, 2016, earthquake. The authors who compiled this information include: § Rick Wilson, Senior Engineering Geologist with the California Geological Survey § Laurie Johnson, Laurie Johnson Consulting/Research The authors’ objectives for this paper include: 1. Summarizing the physical tsunami effects and damage from the event. 2. Documenting tsunami notification and response activities both in New Zealand and elsewhere. -
Volume 2011-2
Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies Volume 2011–2 SPECIAL ISSUE - A FOCUS ON THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES Contents How the 2010 Canterbury (Darfield) earthquake affected earthquake risk perception: Comparing citizens inside and outside the earthquake region John McClure, Celine Wills, David Johnston & Claudia Recker 3 Sleeplessness, Stress, Cognitive Disruption and Academic Performance Following the September 4, 2010, Christchurch Earthquake Simon Kemp, William S. Helton, Jessica J. Richardson, Neville M. Blampied & Michael Grimshaw 11 Early Disaster Recovery: A Guide for Communities Suzanne Vallance 19 Rapid response research in Christchurch: Providing evidence for recovery decisions and for future theoretical research Felicity Powell, Abigail Harding, Jared Thomas & Kate Mora 26 The Management of Portable Toilets in the Eastern Suburbs of Christchurch after the February 22, 2011 Earthquake R Potangaroa, S Wilkinson, M Zare & P Steinfort 35 Animal welfare impact following the 4 September 2010 Canterbury (Darfield) earthquake Steve Glassey & Thomas Wilson 49 COMMENTARY ARTICLE Caring for the Carers: the emotional effects of disasters on health care professionals Peter Huggard 60 1 trauma.massey.ac.nz 2 trauma.massey.ac.nz Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies Volume 2011–2 How the 2010 Canterbury (Darfield) earthquake affected earthquake risk perception: Comparing citizens inside and outside the earthquake region John McClure1 Canterbury. Christchurch participants also reported Celine Wills1 damage suffered in the earthquake. Expectations of 2 David Johnston an earthquake occurring in Canterbury were low before Claudia Recker1 the Darfield earthquake in all three samples and rose 1 Victoria University of Wellington significantly after that earthquake. Palmerston North 2 Massey University / GNS(Science), expectancies of an earthquake in their own city also Joint Centre for Disaster Research.