The Internal Cranial Anatomy of Champsosaurus Lindoei and Its Functional Implications by Thomas William Dudgeon a Thesis Submitt
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The internal cranial anatomy of Champsosaurus lindoei and its functional implications by Thomas William Dudgeon A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2019 Thomas William Dudgeon Abstract Although Champsosaurus is well-known in Late Cretaceous and Paleocene deposits of North America, their cranial anatomy is poorly understood. Here, a well- preserved skull of Champsosaurus lindoei is described in detail using high-resolution micro-CT scanning. This confirms the presence of the putative neomorphic bone, which may be homologous with the pre-existing stapes, or developed through incomplete fusion of dermatocranial ossification centres. The ventral openings on the skull of Champsosaurus relate to the fenestrae ovales, an unusual configuration that may be convergent with other aquatic reptiles. Overall, the endocranial anatomy of Champsosaurus is typical for a basal diapsid. The morphology of the pars inferior of the inner ear suggests that Champsosaurus were capable of detecting sound underwater, and geometric morphometric analyses of the semicircular canals suggests that they were specialized for detecting head movements in an aquatic environment. Taken together, these results suggest that Champsosaurus were well adapted for an aquatic lifestyle. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Jordan Mallon and Dr. Hillary Maddin for their supervision and guidance throughout this project, Dr. Michael Ryan and Dr. Emily Standen for their invaluable feedback, and Dr. David Evans for helping to develop this project and for his advice and assistance along the way. I would like to thank Dr. Danielle Fraser and Bassel Arnaout for patiently teaching me R. Thanks to the staff and students of Carleton University, especially to the Carleton University Palaeontology students, for their support and encouragement. Thanks also to the staff of the Canadian Museum of Nature, Royal Ontario Museum, and the Royal Tyrrell Museum for providing access to their collections. For helpful discussions, I thank Dr. Jason Anderson, Dr. Michael Coldwell, and Dr. Tetsuto Miyashita. Thanks to G. Sobral and the Museum für Naturkunde, K. Andrzewski, M. Polcyn, K. Chapelle, S. Lautenschlager, and H. Maddin for providing CT data, F. Gaidies for CT scanning the Pantherophis specimen, and the University of Texas CT Facility and the Alta Vista Animal Hospital for CT scanning CMN 8920 and CMN 8919, respectively. Special thanks to Zoe Landry, Andrew Dodge, Emmett Janssens, and Eric Guitard, for their moral support and assistance with colour identification. Finally, I would like to thank Mom, Dad, Becky, Zoe, and Gabby for their constant love and support. iii Table of Contents Title Page…………………………………………………………………………………i Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………..ii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………...iii Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………vii List of Illustrations……………………………………………………………………...ix List of Appendices……………………………………………………………………...xii Chapter 1: A review of Choristodera (Diapsida)……………………………………..1 Introduction………………………………………………………………….…...1 Institutional Abbreviations…………………………………………………….…5 Systematic Palaeontology…………………………………………………….….6 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….....46 The problem of Champsosaurus…………………………………….......46 The absence of definitions within Choristodera…………………………52 Palaeobiology of Choristodera…………………………………………..55 Cranial anatomy of Choristoderes and its biological implications……...59 Cranial bones and the neomorphic bone………………………...69 Neurosensory anatomy of Champsosaurus……………………...60 Turbinates and thermoregulation………………………………...61 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………....63 Research objectives……………………………………………………………....65 iv Chapter 2: Computed tomography (CT) analysis of the cranium of Champsosaurus lindoei and implications for the choristoderan neomorphic ossification……………66 Introduction……………………………………………………………………....66 Definitions………………………………………………………………..68 Institutional Abbreviations……………………………………………….69 Anatomical Abbreviations……………………………………………….69 Materials and Methods…………………………………………………………...71 Results…………………………………………………………………………....72 Overall skull morphology………………………………………………..72 Dermatocranium………………………………………………………....72 Splanchnocranium………………………………………………………101 Chondrocranium………………………………………………………..103 Discussion………………………………………………………………………113 Conservation of the braincase among amniotes and its implications for the choristoderan neomorphic ossification…………………………………118 Functionality of the choristoderan neomorphic ossification…………....130 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………..132 Chapter 3: The internal anatomy of the skull of Champsosaurus and implications for neurosensory function…………………………………………………………….134 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….134 Materials and methods………………………………………………………….137 Materials………………………………………………………………..137 Scanning and segmentation…………………………………………….139 v Estimation of auditory perception……………………………………....140 Inferring ecology and the endosseous labyrinth………………………..142 Results…………………………………………………………………………..147 Champsosaurus brain endocast…………………………………………147 Cranial nerves…………………………………………………………..152 Endosseous labyrinth…………………………………………………...156 Vasculature……………………………………………………………..158 Nasal cavity……………………………………………………………..159 Auditory capabilities…………………………………………………....161 Geometric morphometrics of the semicircular canals………………….162 Discussion………………………………………………………………………175 The brain endocast……………………………………………………...175 Olfaction………………………………………………………………..178 Vision…………………………………………………………………...180 Hearing………………………………………………………………….181 Phylogeny and the endosseous labyrinth……………………………….189 Ecology and the endosseous labyrinth………………………………….191 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………..197 Chapter 4: Conclusions and future work……………………………………………200 Choristodere taxonomy and systematics………………...……………………..200 Cranial anatomy and the choristoderan neomorphic bone....…………………..203 Neuroanatomy, behaviour, and ecology….…………………………………….204 Final remarks…………………………………………………………………...207 vi Appendices……………………………………………………………………………..208 References……………………………………………………………………………...212 vii List of Tables Table 1.1: Eight dubious species of Champsosaurus and their synonyms……………....37 Table 2.1: Measurements for the skull of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)………..78 Table 2.2: A comparison of braincase bones acrossAmniota…………………………..120 Table 3.1: Bloomberg’s K value and associated p-value for both centroid size and landmark coordinates of the endosseous labyrinths…………………………………….168 Table 3.2: ANCOVA of ecology, centroid size, and the interaction between ecology and centroid size against canal shape……………………………………………………….169 Table 3.3: Phylogenetic generalized least squares of semicircular canal shape against ecology, and semicircular canal centroid size………………………………………….170 Table 3.4: Posterior probabilities (10 000 permutations) of significant differences between the ecological groups based on Mahalanobis distances………………………174 Table 3.5: Posterior probabilities (10 000 permutations) and log-likelihood estimates of Champsosaurus species belonging to separate ecological groups……………………..176 viii List of Illustrations Figure 1.1: A phylogeny of Sauria with Choristodera highlighted in red………………...2 Figure 1.2: Time-calibrated phylogeny of Choristodera (from Matsumoto et al., 2019)…3 Figure 1.3: . Reconstructed line drawing of the dorsal and ventral view of the skull of Cteniogenys (modified from Evans 1990)……………………………………………….11 Figure 1.4: Line drawing of Lazarussuchus sp. (modified from Matsumoto et al., 2013)……………………………………………………………………………………..16 Figure 1.5: A nearly complete juvenile Monjurosuchus splendens (modified from Gao et al., 2000)…………………………………………………………………………………19 Figure 1.6: A mature Hyphalosaurus baitaigouensis (from Ji et al., 2010)……………..22 Figure 1.7: The skull of Simoedosaurus dakotensis (modified from Erickson 1987)…...29 Figure 1.8: The skull of Tchoiria (from Ksepka et al., 2005)……………………………31 Figure 1.9: The skull of Ikechosaurus sunailinae (modified from Brinkman and Dong 1993)……………………………………………………………………………………..33 Figure 1.10: The dorsal surface of the skull of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)….36 Figure 1.11: Map of North America with reported occurrences of Champsosaurus…….38 Figure 1.12: Dorsal view of the Champsosaurus type specimen, AMNH FR 5696 (Champsosaurus sp.)…………………………………………………………………….47 Figure 2.1: Articulated skull of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920) in dorsal, ventral, and left lateral view………………………………………………………………………73 Figure 2.2: Articulated skull of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920) in anterior and posterior view…………………………………………………………………………….74 ix Figure 2.3: Major skull openings of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)……………..75 Figure 2.4: Skull measurements for Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)……………..76 Figure 2.5: Isolated premaxilla and maxilla of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)….77 Figure 2.6: Isolated nasal and lacrimal of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)……….81 Figure 2.7: Isolated prefrontals and frontals of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)….83 Figure 2.8: Isolated postfrontal and postorbital of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)……………………………………………………………………………………..86 Figure 2.9: Isolated parietals of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)………………….87 Figure 2.10: Isolated left neomorphic bone of Champsosaurus lindoei (CMN 8920)…..90 Figure 2.11: Isolated jugal, quadratojugal, and squamosal