Governing Minority Groups in South Korea: a Case Study of Multiculturalism Policy’S Inclusions and Exclusions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Governing Minority Groups in South Korea: a Case Study of Multiculturalism Policy’S Inclusions and Exclusions Governing Minority Groups in South Korea: A Case Study of Multiculturalism Policy’s Inclusions and Exclusions By Yihyun Ryu A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2020 Yihyun Ryu ABSTRACT Since the mid-2000s, the South Korean government has produced policies around “multiculturalism.” Researchers have actively studied these policies, focusing almost exclusively on what are termed “multicultural families,” i.e. families where wives and mothers are female marriage migrants from other countries. Restricting the research focus in this manner presents a skewed understanding of South Korean multiculturalism and helps to legitimize the government's interest in maintaining a very narrow interpretation of the multiculturalism policies. To address these limitations, this dissertation examines the inclusions and exclusions of three main migrant groups - North Korean defectors, multicultural families, and migrant workers - through the lens of South Korea’s multiculturalism policy. The dissertation is inspired by the Foucauldian theoretical concepts of governmentality and genealogy; it also draws on anti-colonial nationalism literature to examine South Korea's particularities as a post-colonial society. The primary source of data for policy discourse analysis is textual data, centred around the National Assembly minutes for the last 20 years (1998-2017), which is supplemented by interviews. The dissertation puts forward three main arguments: First, the notion of multiculturalism was embraced in South Korea to “politely” denote those cultural differences that South Korea has become willing to tolerate but at the same time to subordinate to the Korean nation. This is exemplified by the production of “multicultural families.” Second, in the context of South Korea’s political-ideological landscape shaped by the Japanese colonization and the division of the Korean peninsula, conservative forces have condemned Korean ethnic nationalism and i dominated its multiculturalism discourse while their liberal and progressive counterparts have held onto this nationalism and remained passive, if not mute, on migrant-related issues. Third, this dissertation shows that South Korean multiculturalism discourse has become fraught with conservative forces’ preferences for certain types of migrants, i.e. migrants who are politically conservative (or passive), nostalgic for a mythical Korean-ness, and obedient to the existing economic order. Of the three different migrant groups addressed in this study, it is the North Korean defectors and the multicultural families who are generally thought to satisfy these conservative preferences while the migrant workers do not. This study contributes analyses about multiculturalism policies in a country outside the usual horizon of Western studies of multiculturalism; it highlights the value of considering how South Korea’s unique historical, geopolitical, and ideological conditions have shaped its engagement with the multiculturalism discourse. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation committee, who made every effort to provide thoughtful advice and multidisciplinary expertise, all of which has enriched this dissertation. First and foremost, I would like to express gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Xiaobei Chen, who patiently stood by me while I struggled to write this dissertation. Without her unwavering academic and overall support, I could not have completed my doctoral study. The sincere kindness and words of encouragement offered by Professor Leslie Pal boosted my morale, and his elaborate feedback deepened the quality of my dissertation. Professor William Walters offered me new and diverse experiences, and his insightful feedback broadened my intellectual horizons. My genuine thanks to Professor Yasmeen Abu-Laban and Professor Megan Gaucher for the constructive discussion and fruitful advice at my dissertation defence. It gave me courage and confidence for new challenges ahead. I appreciate my precious friends for willingly coming into my life. Aazam, Deborah, Erin, Euijeong, Jiyoung, Juyoon, Khalud, Layomi, Seungchan, Victoria, Wookyung, and Yenyen. They helped to draw me out of the box I used to think was a whole world. My fellows in the SPPA, Hasan, Kassem, Nahya, and Sylvie, who picked me up and offered support while we were in the same boat. Lastly, I cannot express the depth of my love and gratitude to my parents. Their wholehearted trust in me, especially when I go adrift and into uncharted territory, always makes me stronger. Thanks to those mentioned above, I was able to successfully wrap up this dissertation, and now I gear up to head into the next phase of my academic journey. iii Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ iii Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1-1 Problematization: Why Multiculturalism and How Did It Emerge in South Korea? ........................ 1 1-2 Why a Single Case Study? ........................................................................................................... 12 1-3 Research Questions ..................................................................................................................... 15 1-4 Use of Terms ............................................................................................................................... 17 1-5 Chapter Outline ........................................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 2 Literature, Theoretical Framework, and Research Design ................................................. 29 2-1 Literature on South Korean Multiculturalism ............................................................................... 29 2-1-1 North Korean Defectors ........................................................................................................ 29 2-1-2 Female Marriage Migrants .................................................................................................... 33 2-1-3 Migrant Workers .................................................................................................................. 36 2-2 Theoretical and analytical framework .......................................................................................... 42 2-2-1 Anti-colonial nationalism...................................................................................................... 42 2-2-1-1 Nationalism ................................................................................................................... 42 2-2-1-2 Anti-Colonial Nationalism in the Post-Colonial Era ....................................................... 45 2-2-1-3 Anti-Colonial Nationalism and Post-Nationalism ........................................................... 49 2-2-2 Governmentality ................................................................................................................... 55 2-2-2-1 Power and Governmentality........................................................................................... 55 2-2-2-2 Governmentality and Subjectification ............................................................................ 59 2-2-2-3 Multicultural Governmentality ....................................................................................... 61 2-2-3 Genealogy ............................................................................................................................ 62 2-3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 65 2-3-1 Data sources ......................................................................................................................... 65 2-3-1-1 Government Documents and Newspapers ...................................................................... 65 2-3-1-2 In-depth and Semi-Structured Interviews ....................................................................... 69 2-3-2 Analysing discourse.............................................................................................................. 70 CHAPTER 3 Antecedents of South Korean Multiculturalism ................................................................. 74 3-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 74 iv 3-2 Korean Ethnic Nationalism .......................................................................................................... 76 3-3 Political Competition Surrounding Korean Nationalism: 1945 to the Mid-1990s .......................... 81 3-3-1 The Ruling Power ................................................................................................................. 82 3-3-2 Progressive Political Oppositions .......................................................................................... 87 3-4 Laying the Foundation for Multiculturalism: The Late 1990s to the Present ................................
Recommended publications
  • North Korea Freedom Week
    NORTH KOREA FREEDOM WEEK 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sunday, April 28 – Tuesday, May 6 Seoul, Korea Theme: For the Freedom of North Koreans Report prepared by Kang Seo Chairman of the NKFW 2013: Suzanne Scholte (North Korea Freedom Coalition Chairman) The Honorable Cho Myung-cheol (Saenuri Party) Park Sun-young (Dream Makers for North Korea Director) Co-Sponsor of the NKFW 2013 National Assembly Human Rights Forum Kim Se-yeon, Kim Jin-tae, Kim Choon-jin, Kim Hyun-sook, Kim Hyung-tae, Noh Cheol-rae, Moon Dae- seong, Park In-sook, Seo Sang-gi, Sohn In-choon, Sim Yoon-jo, Lee Jasmin, Jang Yoon-seok, Ha Tae-kyung, Hong Il-pyo (Saenuri Party) National Assembly Unification Future Forum Kang Chang-hee, Kim Kwang-rim, Kim Jong-tae, Seol Hoon, Song Young-geun, Ahn Jong-beom, Lee Byung-seok, Lee Jong-hoon, Lee Ju-young, Jeong Eui-hwa, Joo Ho-young, Choi Bong-hong, Choi Jae- cheon, Han Gi-ho (Saenuri Party) Park Sun-young (Director, Dream Makers for North Korea) Kim Tae-hoon, Esq. Lee Yong-hee (Director, Esther Prayer Group) Jhe Sung-ho (Former NKHR Ambassador, MoFAT) Kim Seok-woo (Former Vice-minister of Foreign Relations, MoFAT) Yoon Yong-nam (Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) Kwon Young-hae (Former Minister of National Defense, MoND) Lim Chang-ho (Pastor, Jangdaehyun Church) Lee Dong-bok (Director, North Korea Democratization Forum) Nishioka Tsutomu Lee Mi-il (President, KWAFU) Event Planning and Preparation Committee Director: Kim Seong Min (Director, FNKR) Planning Committee Co-director Hong Soon Kyung (Director, Committee for the Democratization
    [Show full text]
  • 2008년도 한국미생물학회연합 국제학술대회 2008 International Meeting of the Federation of Korean Microbiological Societies October 16-17, 2008 Seoul, Korea
    2008년도 한국미생물학회연합 국제학술대회 2008 International Meeting of the Federation of Korean Microbiological Societies October 16-17, 2008 Seoul, Korea Contents Timetable / 일정표 1 Floor Plan / 행사장 안내도 3 Scientific Programs / 학술프로그램 Plenary Lectures / 기조강연 5 Hantaan Prize Award Lecture / 한탄상 수상자 강연 6 Symposia / 심포지아 7 Colloquium / 콜로퀴움 15 Workshop / 워크샵 16 Public Hearing on the Future Research and 17 Development of Microbial Technology Poster Sessions / 포스터세션 18 Scientific Programs of the 9th KJISM 78 Poster Sessions / 포스터세션 81 Author Index / 저자색인 90 Exhibition / 전시회 108 Timetable / 일정표 October 16 (Thursday) Geomungo Hall Daegeum Hall Hall A Hall B Hall C 08:00-09:00 09:00-09:15 Opening Ceremony and Ceremony of Awarding Hantaan Prize (Hall C) S1 S2 S3 S4 09:15-11:15 Strategies of Pathogens Microbial Diversity and Viral Pathogenesis Fungal Bioscience for the Survival in Host Application 11:15-12:00 Plenary Lecture 1 (Hall C) 12:00-12:30 Hantaan Prize Award Lecture (Hall C) 12:30-13:30 Lunch Registration 13:30-14:30 MSK GM KSMy GM 14:30-15:15 Plenary Lecture 2 (Hall B) Poster Session 1 & Exhibition S5 S7 S6 S8 15:15-17:15 Emerging Trends Viral Replication and Regulation of Gene Expression Mushroom Science in Enzyme Screening Gene Expression 17:15-18:00 Plenary Lecture 3 (Hall A) 18:10-18:55 Plenary Lecture 4 (Hall A) 19:00-20:30 Welcome Reception (Hall B+C) October 17 (Friday) Geomungo Hall Daegeum Hall Hall A Hall B Hall C 08:00-09:00 S9 KJS1 S11 S10 09:00-11:00 New Insights into Starter Cultures Microbial Genomics and Emergence of New and Immune System
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Conference Contents
    Virtual Conference Contents 등록 및 발표장 안내 03 2020 한국물리학회 가을 학술논문발표회 및 05 임시총회 전체일정표 구두발표논문 시간표 13 포스터발표논문 시간표 129 발표자 색인 189 이번 호의 표지는 김요셉 (공동 제1저자), Yong Siah Teo (공동 제1저자), 안대건, 임동길, 조영욱, 정현석, 김윤호 회원의 최근 논문 Universal Compressive Characterization of Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 210401 (2020) 에서 모티 브를 채택했다. 이 논문에서는 효율적이고 신뢰할 수 있는 양자 채널 진단을 위한 적응형 압축센싱 방법을 제안하고 이를 실험 으로 시연하였다. 이번 가을학술논문발표회 B11-ap 세션에서 김요셉 회원이 관련 주제에 대해서 발표할 예정(B11.02)이다. 2 등록 및 발표장 안내 (Registration & Conference Room) 1. ‌Epitome Any KPS members can download the pdf files on the KPS homepage. (http://www.kps.or.kr) 2. Membership & Registration Fee Category Fee (KRW) Category Fee (KRW) Fellow/Regular member 130,000 Subscription 1 journal 80,000 Student member 70,000 (Fellow/Regular 2 journals 120,000 Registration Nonmember (general) 300,000 member) Nonmember 150,000 1 journal 40,000 (invited speaker or student) Subscription Fellow 100,000 (Student member) 2 journals 60,000 Membership Regular member 50,000 Student member 20,000 Enrolling fee New member 10,000 3. Virtual Conference Rooms Oral sessions Special sessions Division Poster sessions (Zoom rooms) (Zoom rooms) Particle and Field Physics 01, 02 • General Assembly: 20 Nuclear Physics 03 • KPS Fellow Meeting: 20 Condensed Matter Physics 05, 06, 07, 08 • NPSM Senior Invited Lecture: 20 Applied Physics 09, 10, 11 Virtual Poster rooms • Heavy Ion Accelerator Statistical Physics 12 (Nov. 2~Nov. 6) Complex, RAON: 19 Physics Teaching 13 • Computational science: 20 On-line Plasma Physics 14 • New accelerator: 20 Discussion(mandatory): • KPS-KOFWST Young Optics and Quantum Electonics 15 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • K O R E a N C in E M a 2 0
    KOREAN CINEMA 2006 www.kofic.or.kr/english Korean Cinema 2006 Contents FOREWORD 04 KOREAN FILMS IN 2006 AND 2007 05 Acknowledgements KOREAN FILM COUNCIL 12 PUBLISHER FEATURE FILMS AN Cheong-sook Fiction 22 Chairperson Korean Film Council Documentary 294 206-46, Cheongnyangni-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea 130-010 Animation 336 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Daniel D. H. PARK Director of International Promotion SHORT FILMS Fiction 344 EDITORS Documentary 431 JUNG Hyun-chang, YANG You-jeong Animation 436 COLLABORATORS Darcy Paquet, Earl Jackson, KANG Byung-woon FILMS IN PRODUCTION CONTRIBUTING WRITER Fiction 470 LEE Jong-do Film image, stills and part of film information are provided by directors, producers, production & sales companies, and Film Festivals in Korea including JIFF (Jeonju International Film Festival), PIFF APPENDIX (Pusan International Film Festival), SIFF (Seoul Independent Film Festival), Women’s Film Festival Statistics 494 in Seoul, Puchon International Fantastic Film Festival, Seoul International Youth Film Festival, Index of 2006 films 502 Asiana International Short Film Festival, and Experimental Film and Video Festival in Seoul. KOFIC appreciates their help and cooperation. Contacts 517 © Korean Film Council 2006 Foreword For the Korean film industry, the year 2006 began with LEE Joon-ik's <King and the Clown> - The Korean Film Council is striving to secure the continuous growth of Korean cinema and to released at the end of 2005 - and expanded with BONG Joon-ho's <The Host> in July. First, <King provide steadfast support to Korean filmmakers. This year, new projects of note include new and the Clown> broke the all-time box office record set by <Taegukgi> in 2004, attracting a record international support programs such as the ‘Filmmakers Development Lab’ and the ‘Business R&D breaking 12 million viewers at the box office over a three month run.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Constraints on South Korean Foreign Policy
    Domestic Constraints on South Korean Foreign Policy January 2018 Domestic Constraints on South Korean Foreign Policy Scott A. Snyder, Geun Lee, Young Ho Kim, and Jiyoon Kim The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business execu- tives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; con- vening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affilia- tion with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report South Korea July 2015
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Country Report South Korea Generated on July 29th 2015 Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square London E14 4QW United Kingdom _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For 60 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York Economist Intelligence Unit Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square The Economist Group London 750 Third Avenue E14 4QW 5th Floor United Kingdom New York, NY 10017, US Tel: (44.20) 7576 8000 Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Fax: (44.20) 7576 8500 Fax: (1.212) 586 0248 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Hong Kong Geneva Economist Intelligence Unit Economist Intelligence Unit 60/F, Central Plaza Rue de l’Athénée 32 18 Harbour Road 1206 Geneva Wanchai Switzerland Hong Kong Tel: (852) 2585 3888 Tel: (41) 22 566 2470 Fax: (852) 2802 7638 Fax: (41) 22 346 93 47 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] This report can be accessed electronically as soon as it is published by visiting store.eiu.com or by contacting a local sales representative. The whole report may be viewed in PDF format, or can be navigated section-by-section by using the HTML links.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice in South Korea: One Country’S Restless Search for Truth and Reconciliation
    Transitional Justice in South Korea: One Country’s Restless Search for Truth and Reconciliation Paul Hanley*† Abstract A recent Korean film, “National Security”, about a democracy activist and former Korean politician, Kim Geun-Tae, who was kidnapped and tortured into making a false confession by police in 1985, has renewed debate among South Koreans about the state of transitional justice in the country. From 1995 to 2010, South Korea took a number of steps to expose the political oppressions and human rights abuses of its past authoritarian governments and to assist individuals involved in the struggle for democracy to clear their names and restore their reputations. This article analyzes the relative success and failure of South Korea’s truth seeking process and the prospect for the realization of transitional justice in the country in the future. I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 140 II. OVERVIEW OF MODERN KOREAN HISTORY ............... 141 A. First Republic (1953 – 1960) ............................................ 142 B. Second Republic (1960 - 1961) ........................................ 143 C. Military Rule (1961 – 1962) ............................................. 144 D. Third Republic (1963 – 1972)........................................... 144 E. Fourth Republic (1972 – 1979) ......................................... 146 F. Fifth Republic (1979 - 1987) ............................................ 146 2014] TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN SOUTH KOREA 139 G. Sixth Republic (1987
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT UPR Pre-Session 33 on the Democratic People's Republic
    STATEMENT UPR Pre-Session 33 on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) Geneva, April 5, 2019 Delivered by: The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK) 1- Presentation of the Organization HRNK is the leading U.S.-based bipartisan, non-governmental organization (NGO) in the field of DPRK human rights research and advocacy. Our mission is to focus international attention on human rights abuses in the DPRK and advocate for an improvement in the lives of 25 million DPRK citizens. Since its establishment in 2001, HRNK has played an intellectual leadership role in DPRK human rights issues by publishing over thirty-five major reports. HRNK was granted UN consultative status on April 17, 2018 by the 54-member UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). On October 4, 2018, HRNK submitted our findings to the UPR of the DPRK. Based on our research, the following trends have defined the human rights situation in the DPRK over the past seven years: an intensive crackdown on attempted escape from the country leading to a higher number of prisoners in detention; a closure of prison camps near the border with China while camps inland were expanded; satellite imagery analysis revealing secure perimeters inside these detention facilities with watch towers seemingly located to provide overlapping fields of fire to prevent escapes; a disproportionate repression of women (800 out of 1000 women at Camp No. 12 were forcibly repatriated); and an aggressive purge of senior officials. 2- National consultation for the drafting of the national report Although HRNK would welcome consultation and in-country access to assess the human rights situation, the DPRK government displays a consistently antagonistic attitude towards our organization.
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea | Freedom House: Freedom in the World 2019
    South Korea | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/south-korea A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 11 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The 1988 constitution vests executive power in a directly elected president, who is limited to a single five-year term. Executive elections in South Korea are largely free and fair. Moon Jae-in of the liberal Minjoo Party won a May 2017 snap presidential election following the impeachment of former president Park. He took 41 percent of the vote, followed by Hong Jun-pyo of the conservative Liberty Korea Party with 24 percent and Ahn Cheol-soo of the centrist People’s Party with 21 percent. About 77 percent of registered voters turned out for the election. In the June 2018 local elections, the Minjoo Party won 14 of 17 metropolitan mayoral and gubernatorial offices, with two of the others going to the Liberty Korea Party and one to an independent. Turnout for the local elections was 60.2 percent, marking the first time the voting rate had surpassed 60 percent for local elections since 1995. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The unicameral National Assembly is composed of 300 members serving four-year terms, with 253 elected in single-member constituencies and 47 through national party lists. The contests are typically free of major irregularities. In the 2016 elections, the Minjoo Party won 123 seats, while the Saenuri Party (which later became the Liberty Korea Party) won 122.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Ian E. Rinehart Analyst in Asian Affairs Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance June 11, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 c11173008 . U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (known officially as the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia, and since 2009 relations between the two countries arguably have been at their most robust state in decades. Members of Congress tend to be interested in South Korea-related issues for a number of reasons. First, the United States and South Korea have been treaty allies since the early 1950s. The United States is committed to helping South Korea defend itself, particularly against any aggression from North Korea. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK and South Korea is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Second, Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. Third, the two countries’ economies are closely entwined and are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ sixth- largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second-largest trading partner. South Korea has taken the first steps toward possible entry into the U.S.-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement negotiations. Strategic Cooperation and the U.S.-ROK Alliance Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the U.S.-South Korean relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Park Geun-Hye Presidency and the Future of the US-South Korea
    The Park Geun-hye Presidency and the Future of the U.S.-South Korea... http://www.cfr.org/south-korea/park-geun-hye-presidency-future-us-so... Current Issues in U.S.-ROK Relations Author: Park Ihn-hwi, Associate Professor, Ewha Woman’s University New South Korean president Park Geun-hye of the Saenuri Party is the focus of great interest. This curiosity extends to her presidency, as she enters into office with outstanding issues with the United States and domestic concern about South Korea's relations with China and North Korea. On February 25, 2013, Park was inaugurated as the Republic of Korea's Publisher (ROK) eighteenth president. Park is the first female South Korean Council on Foreign Relations Press president and the first president to be elected by a majority of the country's voters. She is also the daughter of the late authoritarian leader Release Date and president Park Chung-hee. March 2013 Park is likely to pursue a foreign policy that emphasizes continued cooperation with the United States. She is relatively empowered to do so, having the support of her majority party in the parliament, but her efforts may be obstructed by an increasingly influential minority party and civil society. Most newly elected South Korean presidents begin their tenure evaluating and criticizing their predecessor's diplomatic policies. Former ROK president Lee Myung-bak, however, is credited with successfully consolidating the U.S.-ROK alliance. Park is likely to continue many of Lee's policies toward the United States and pursue a strengthened bilateral relationship. In particular, she is expected to facilitate the administration of the current South Korea-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Crisis in South Korea
    MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS Beteta 1 Mental Health Crisis in South Korea Shirley Beteta College of East Asian Studies, Wesleyan University Senior Capstone May 15, 2020 MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS Beteta 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Problem Statement .................................................................................................................3 1.2 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................................5 1.3 Clarification of Terms ........................................................................................................7 2. Literature Review ......................................................................................................................9 2.1 State of the Field ...................................................................................................................9 2.2 Mental Health Amongst the Youth of South Korea ...........................................................10 2.3 Mental Health Amongst the Elderly of South Korea .......................................................13 2.4 Mental Health Amongst the Idols of South Korea .........................................................16 3. Combatting the Mental Health Crisis in South Korea .........................................................21 3.1 Suicide Prevention Amongst the Youth of South Korea ......................................................22
    [Show full text]