DOCSLIB.ORG

Screenplay-The-Christophe-Rocancourt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PART 1 - THE SWINDLE (The Christophe Rocancourt Affair 3 Part Series) FADE IN 1 INT. LATE OCTOBER - 2001 - LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - U.S.A. - L.A. 1 COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. GEORGE MUELLER, HECTOR GUZMAN, and SANDI GIBBONS are busy scurrying about their office on routine prosecution cases in the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office. The telephone rings on George Mueller's desk. He picks up the telephone. He expresses shock and disbelief. He immediately begins to take notes by scribbling information on a note pad. GEORGE MUELLER What? When? Okay. He what? Then he did what? Okay! Okay! Who? Okay! Amazing! (laughing) Okay! I'll get right on it! George Mueller hangs up the telephone. GEORGE MUELLER (CONT'D) Sandi, Hector get over here! Hector Guzman and Sandi Gibbons race over and stand in front of George Mueller's desk. HECTOR GUZMAN What's up, George? GEORGE MUELLER That was East Hampton Village out of New York. Christophe Rocancourt was arrested, released, and disappeared! SANDI GIBBONS How could that happen? GEORGE MUELLER Our infamous Christophe was posing as a member of the Rockefeller family saying he was from France. It seems they are going to dub him the "Counterfeit Rockefeller". (CONTINUED) 2. 1 CONTINUED: 1 HECTOR GUZMAN (LAUGHING) Who was stupid enough to believe that? GEORGE MUELLER Someone was! There are gullible people everywhere, Hector. Everywhere! But he got caught in another swindle. When he was arrest he presented a passport identifying himself as a "Fabien Ortuna". He hired a lawyer and got out the next day on $45,000 bail. SANDI GIBBONS George, who was his lawyer? I'll get a hold of him and see if we can get some more information. GEORGE MUELLER Save your call Sandi. He hired Bruce Cutler, the defense lawyer for John Gotti. He isn't going to give you the time of day! HECTOR GUZMAN Ah!... his wife Pia's with him! GEORGE MUELLER That's a good assessment! Anyway, by the time they ran his finger prints and got his real identity, he vanished. Disappeared! SANDI GIBBONS What do you want us to do George? GEORGE MUELLER We're going to put this boy away for life! Okay, lets mobilize a small army of law- enforcement officials and media organizations to follow his trail. I want you and Hector to get a hold of the New York Post, the New York Times, F.B.I., U.S. (MORE) (CONTINUED) 3. 1 CONTINUED: (2) 1 GEORGE MUELLER (CONT'D) Marshals, crews from NBC Dateline, ABC PrimeTime, CNN, Court TV and celebrity magazines. His wife is a former Playboy bunny. That's our in with the media! SANDI GIBBONS Let's do it! HECTOR GUZMAN I'll get right on it! GEORGE MUELLER Let's start making the calls and contacts to make it happen! I'm going to get him one way or the other way! But, we're going to get him! 2 EXT. NOVEMBER 2000 - LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - 2 NOVEMBER - EVENING A lone Jetliner from New York arrives by descending down onto the runway and finally lands. 3 INT. NOVEMBER 2000 - LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - 3 CONTINUOUS CHRISTOPHE ROCANCOURT exits the passenger unloading area into the airport lobby. He is accompanied by his wife MARIA PIA REYES, who is of Filipino heritage, and a former Playboy bunny, and their young four year old son ZEUS. Christophe Rocancourt and Pia Reyes are holding their son Zeus by the hand. Christophe Rocancourt kneels down and takes hold of his son, carrying him along the way up into the airport lobby. Christophe Rocancourt is a small man who is 5'9"(175cm) tall and weighs 150 lbs. (68kg) and 33 years old. He is fair-haired with green eyes. His attire is casual dress. Not very noticeable to most observers, is the loss of part of his left pinky finger. Covered up and unseen through his shirt and jacket is a tattoo Eagle band around his right upper arm. Christophe's hair style is brush cut. He has a thick but soft French accent. (CONTINUED) 4. 3 CONTINUED: 3 They are met by a FAMILY FRIEND. Christophe shakes the family friend's hand, and all four leave the airport lobby area quickly and out into the corridor. 4 EXT. NOVEMBER 2000 - CANADIAN - U.S.A. BORDER CROSSING - BLAINE, 4 WASHINGTON - BRITISH COLUMBIA - CONTINUOUS A vehicle driven by STEVE SILVER pulls up to the Canadian Border Booth. Christophe Rocancourt is sitting in the front passenger seat of the car. His son Zeus is laying across the back seat as he sleeps with his head rested on Pia's lap. IMMIGRATION CANADA OFFICER 1 runs a routine license place check on the vehicle as the car approaches. The computer check indicates no problems regarding the owner. The vehicle stops next to the border booth window. IMMIGRATION OFFICER 2 who is standing outside of the booth, makes a casual routine walk by inspection of the rear of the car. Steve Silver pulls his wallet out to show his identification, as Immigration Canada Officer 1 turns and looks at him directly into his eyes. Christophe Rocancourt and Pia Reyes are simultaneously reaching for their identifications. IMMIGRATION OFFICER 1 How long do you plan to stay in Canada? STEVE SILVER At least for the weekend! Immigration Officer 1 hands Steve's Driver's license back to him. IMMIGRATION OFFICER 1 Okay, have a nice time! STEVE SILVER Thank you Ma'am, I'm sure we will! Steve Silver puts his vehicle in gear, and steps on the gas. The vehicle enters Canada. 5. 5 INT. NOVEMBER 2000 - BRITISH COLUMBIA - CANADA - CONTINUOUS 5 Steve Silver, Christophe Rocancourt, Pia Reyes, and Zeus are all happily excited as the vehicle proceeds on the highway into Canada. CHRISTOPHE ROCANCOURT Canada! 6 EXT. NOVEMBER 2000 - VANCOUVER B.C. WEST HASTINGS STREET - NIGHT6 Christophe Rocancourt makes a long distance telephone call. The telephone ring beep signal echo's in his ear. At the other end, is a NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER. Christophe Immediately begins to talk. NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER (O.S.) The New York Times... CHRISTOPHE ROCANCOURT My friend, I made it out of the United States! NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER (O.S.) Christophe? Where are you? CHRISTOPHE ROCANCOURT I am not going to tell you that. But, I am in an English speaking country. NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER (O.S.) Don't you think you should turn yourself in? You're going to get arrested sooner or later. CHRISTOPHE ROCANCOURT That is in the hands of God. If they catch me, I will make no deal. I will do my time. I do not regard myself as a criminal. I would not consider myself a criminal. I steal with my mind. If I take things, if that is your definition of a criminal, then I am a criminal. Christophe Rocancourt hangs up the telephone. 6. 7 EXT. JANUARY 2001 - VANITY FAIR 7 BRYAN BURROUGH is sitting at his desk and has just finished up his 14 page article with exclusive photos of Christophe Rocancourt from around the world. Bryan Burrough, is a reporter for the magazine Vanity Fair writes a huge article with front page photos and information that he has gathered in tracking Christophe Rocancourt, titled "The Counterfeit Rockefeller". His article creates a buzz on the case and is followed up by People Magazine and draws international attention to Rocancourt. The news article describes how a East Hampton painter Gines Pagan set up a fake dinner party with Christophe Rocancourt, whose guests in reality were a lawyer, photojournalist, and the New York Bureau Chief of People's Magazine. He walks over to his Editor's desk and hands his article and photos to the VANITY EDITOR. The Vanity Editor looks over the photos and begins to read Bryan Burrough's article. He becomes excited. VANITY EDITOR Excellent work of journalism Bryan! Yes, this Vanity Fair's front page for January! Take it to layout and press! BRYAN BURROUGH Yes, sir! Thank you sir! The media buzz at that time suggests that movie rights are snapped up. CAMERA ON - CONSECUTIVE SPINNING FRONT PAGE NEWS MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS HEADLINES and CAMERA FRAME IN ON - VANITY FAIR, PEOPLE'S, THE NEW YORK POST, THE NEW YORK TIMES, ETC. OF "The Counterfeit Rockefeller" and Christophe Rocancourt. 8 INT. FEBRUARY 2001 - SOME VANCOUVER RESTAURANT - NOON 8 Christophe Rocancourt and a female he'd met in Vancouver who became to (CONTINUED) 7. 8 CONTINUED: 8 be known as a MUTUAL FEMALE ACQUAINTANCE are sitting in an exquisite Vancouver restaurant when ROBERT BALDOCK enters, sees his female associate, walks over to the table and joins them. A bottle of wine sits on the table. Mikael is smoking a Cuban cigar and there are glasses of wine in front of him and the mutual female acquaintance when Mr. Baldock arrives at the table. MUTUAL FEMALE ACQUAINTANCE It's nice to see you could make it to join us for brunch. This here is Mikael Van Hoven. He's the person I told you about who might be interested in investing in your company. Robert Baldock reaches down and shakes Christophe Rocancourt's hand. ROBERT BALDOCK It's nice to meet you. So, what do you do Mr. Van Hoven? CHRISTOPHE ROCANCOURT I have a $28-million contract with Ferrari, and I am one of the best for an up-and- coming drivers. ROBERT BALDOCK What kind of driving do you for Ferrari? A WAITER walks up and fills the glasses with more wine as the business meeting continues.
Recommended publications
  • Joe Tacopina Is the Hottest

    Joe Tacopina Is the Hottest

    An artist's rendering of Tacopina during the Abner Louima trial hen I _,et into the tell of a courtroom, I smell blood a mile away. And I will bring you right // there. And I will do it slowly and mnethodically. And I will make slue the jury sees your innards JOE TACOPINA IS THE coming out of you ." HOTTEST YOUNG CRIMIP This is criminal defense lawyer Joe Tacopina DEFENSE LAWYER IN NE talking about cross-examining witnesses . He is sitting on the patio behind his handsome new YORK. HOW DID HE GE' clapboard house in Westport yes, he is your THERE? BY WINNING CA! neighbor. He is a striking man of thirty-six with a straight chiseled nose and thick brown hair PEOPLE SAID HE'D combed back off his face. "This is not a God complex, believe me," he continues. "Some peo- ple go to Las Vegas and gamble. I'm up there taking a shot with a witness . I have sonic guy's life literally in my hands. This is the scary part, but Reprinted with Permission from Westport Magazine it's also the part I sort of get off on." When not battling in the courtroom, Tacopina Tacopina does not credit abandoned morgue refrigerator factory in Brooklyn. Five of is often found on tele- himself with a superior intel- the so-called "Morgue Boys" confessed in 1995 . Even with vision commentating lect or an encyclopedic knowl- their testimony working against him, however, Tacopina won on the latest legal edge of the law ; rather, he an acquittal for Sanfilippo.
  • Soff030a Revised Foreword .Indd

    Soff030a Revised Foreword .Indd

    FOREWORD hroughout half of the 1980’s and into the early 90’s the Tprincipal target of the FBI’s New York Office was John J. Gotti, the notorious Boss of Bosses who ran the city’s most powerful crime family. Recently, after spending a decade in the research and writing of four investigative books for HarperCollins on the counterterrorism and organized crime failures of The Bureau * I came to realize that I had something in common with his son: John Angelo Gotti. Over the years both of us had become experts on the misconduct of various special agents and prosecutors working for the U.S. Department of Justice. There’s no doubt that Shadow of My Father will upend many of the public’s assumptions about that mysterious secret society of criminals J. Edgar Hoover mistakenly dubbed La Cosa Nostra. Written in John Junior’s own hand, it offers a rare inside look into “the underground kingdom” that was the Gambino family. * 1000 Years For Revenge: International Terrorism and The FBI The Untold Story (2003); Cover Up: What the Government Is Still Hiding About the War on Terror (2004); Triple Cross: How bin Laden’s Master Spy Penetrated The FBI, The CIA and The Green Berets (2006-2009); and Deal With The Devil: The FBI’s Secret Thirty-Year Relationship With A Mafia Killer(2013) . v vi Shadow of My Father This isn’t some ghost-written apologia told by an ex-wise- guy who cut a deal with the Feds and now lives under the protection of U.S.
  • Gotti, Mob Funerals, and the Catholic Church

    Gotti, Mob Funerals, and the Catholic Church

    Journal of Catholic Legal Studies Volume 44 Number 1 Volume 44, 2005, Number 1 Article 13 Gotti, Mob Funerals, and the Catholic Church Patrick J. Gordon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcls Part of the Catholic Studies Commons This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Catholic Legal Studies by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GOTTI, MOB FUNERALS, AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH PATRICK J. GORDONt INTRODUCTION The American mafia has had a long and scandalous history. Glorified in the movies and television, and with names such as "Sammy the Bull," "Bugsy," "Fat Tony," and "Dapper Don" reach- ing household variety, the mafia history will seemingly live on forever. When John Gotti passed away from throat cancer in a prison hospital on June 10, 2002, one might have expected the scandal that trailed his storied life to have died along with him. His funeral procession, however, was proof to the contrary. It could have been the throngs of onlookers, the string of black Cadillacs, or the helicopters flying overhead. Or maybe it was the federal agents working surveillance out of the white van and the heavyset "companions" of John Gotti paying their respects.' Needless to say, John Gotti received more attention in death than he had in the last two years of his life, which he spent locked up in the United States Medical Center for Federal Pris- oners in Springfield, Missouri.
  • Expert Testimony on Organized Crime Under the Federal Rules of Evidence: United States V

    Expert Testimony on Organized Crime Under the Federal Rules of Evidence: United States V

    Hofstra Law Review Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 5 1993 Expert Testimony on Organized Crime Under the Federal Rules of Evidence: United States v. Frank Locascio and John Gotti Jason Sabot Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sabot, Jason (1993) "Expert Testimony on Organized Crime Under the Federal Rules of Evidence: United States v. Frank Locascio and John Gotti," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol22/iss1/5 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sabot: Expert Testimony on Organized Crime Under the Federal Rules of Ev COMMENT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON ORGANIZED CRIME UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE: UNITED STATES V. FRANK LOCASCIO AND JOHN GOTTI CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................. 178 H. EXPERT TESTIMONY AT COMMON LAW ............. 182 III. THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE ................ 185 A. Rule 702 ............................. 186 B. Rule 703 ............................. 187 IV. HELPFULNESS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S USE OF "ExPERTs" ON ORGANIZED CRIME ................ 189 A. General Background of the Gotti Case .......... 193 B. Gotti and the Scope of Expert Testimony ......... 194 1. United States v. Daly .................. 197 2. United States v. Long .................. 200 C. Qualifications of an Expert on Organized Crime ........................ 204 V. THE "REASONABLE RELIANCE" REQUIREMENT OF RULE 703 ................................. 205 A. The Gotti Flexible Approach ................
  • The Foreword

    The Foreword

    FOREWORD hroughout half of the 1980’s and into the early 90’s the Tprincipal target of the FBI’s New York Office was John J. Gotti, the notorious Boss of Bosses who ran the city’s most powerful crime family. Recently, after spending a decade in the research and writing of four investigative books for HarperCollins on the counterterrorism and organized crime failures of The Bureau* I came to realize that I had something in common with his son: John Angelo Gotti. Over the years both of us had become experts on the misconduct of various special agents and prosecutors working for the U.S. Department of Justice. There’s no doubt that Shadow of My Father will upend many of the public’s assumptions about that mysterious secret society of criminals J. Edgar Hoover mistakenly dubbed La Cosa Nostra. Written in John Junior’s own hand, it offers a rare inside look into “the underground kingdom” that was the Gambino family. * 1000 Years For Revenge: International Terrorism and The FBI The Untold Story (2003); Cover Up: What the Government Is Still Hiding About the War on Terror (2004); Triple Cross: How bin Laden’s Master Spy Penetrated The FBI, The CIA and The Green Berets (2006-2009); and Deal With The Devil: The FBI’s Secret Thirty-Year Relationship With A Mafia Killer(2013) . v vi Shadow of My Father This isn’t some ghost-written apologia told by an ex-wise- guy who cut a deal with the Feds and now lives under the protection of U.S.
  • Expert Testimony on Organized Crime Under the Federal Rules of Evidence: United States V

    Expert Testimony on Organized Crime Under the Federal Rules of Evidence: United States V

    COMMENT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON ORGANIZED CRIME UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE: UNITED STATES V. FRANK LOCASCIO AND JOHN GOTTI CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................. 178 H. EXPERT TESTIMONY AT COMMON LAW ............. 182 III. THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE ................ 185 A. Rule 702 ............................. 186 B. Rule 703 ............................. 187 IV. HELPFULNESS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S USE OF "ExPERTs" ON ORGANIZED CRIME ................ 189 A. General Background of the Gotti Case .......... 193 B. Gotti and the Scope of Expert Testimony ......... 194 1. United States v. Daly .................. 197 2. United States v. Long .................. 200 C. Qualifications of an Expert on Organized Crime ........................ 204 V. THE "REASONABLE RELIANCE" REQUIREMENT OF RULE 703 ................................. 205 A. The Gotti Flexible Approach ................. 208 B. Two Major Cases: The Restrictive Approach Versus the Liberal Approach ................. 212 1. Barrel of Fun, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co............. 212 2. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation .................... 214 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 22:177 C. Reliability Versus Unreliability: The Rhode Approach ...................... 216 D. The Flexible Approach Should Be Used by Federal Courts ............. 222 VI. CONCLUSION .............................. 226 I. INTRODUCTION The time was 10:00 a.m., on the morning of June 17, 1993; the place was the United States Courthouse in Foley Square, New York. Oral argument before a panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Frank Locascio and John Gotti ("the Gotti case") was scheduled last, after four other appeals. It soon became apparent that because of John Gotti's notoriety this schedule was impracticable. The courtroom was packed to capacity, as was the lobby. The main event was the Gotti appeal, and it was going to be a long haul if everyone had to wait until the early afternoon to hear it.
  • PANEL 1: Secrecy and the Criminal Justice System William E

    PANEL 1: Secrecy and the Criminal Justice System William E

    Journal of Law and Policy Volume 9 Issue 1SYMPOSIUM: The aD vid G. Trager Public Policy Symposium Article 2 Behind Closed Doors: Secret Justice in America 2000 PANEL 1: Secrecy and the Criminal Justice System William E. Hellerstein Hon. Michael B. Mukasey Mary Jo White Adam Liptak Gerald L. Shargel Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp Recommended Citation William E. Hellerstein, Hon. Michael B. Mukasey, Mary Jo White, Adam Liptak & Gerald L. Shargel, PANEL 1: Secrecy and the Criminal Justice System, 9 J. L. & Pol'y (2000). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol9/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Policy by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. PANEL I: SECRECY AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM William E. Hellerstein*. Good morning. In 1914, Justice Brandeis wrote that "[s]unlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman."' Implicit in this simple aphorism is that openness is a foundational differentiating characteristic that serves to distinguish a free society from one that is not. Indeed, we in America have persistently and loudly proclaimed that ours is an open society, one that compares favorably not only to totalitarian regimes but also to others that are less open than ours. The subject of this panel, "Secrecy in the Criminal Justice System," will focus on the greatest source of tension in our constitutional framework - that between openness and the occa- sional necessity for secrecy as to proceedings in which personal liberty is at stake.
  • US V. Bruce Cutler

    US V. Bruce Cutler

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, --v.-- BRUCE CUTLER, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 94-1382 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 58 F.3d 825; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15549; 23 Media L. Rep. 2089 March 23, 1995, Argued June 19, 1995, Decided SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: [**1] As Amended July 13, 1995. PRIOR HISTORY: Defendant, a criminal defense lawyer, appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Platt, then-C.J.). The district judge ordered him to comply with a local court rule during criminal proceedings against his client. Defendant, nevertheless, spoke repeatedly to the media about matters on which the rule forbade comment. After a bench trial, defendant was held in criminal contempt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401(3), and sentenced to probation.On appeal, defendant argues that: (1) the rule is unconstitutional; (2) the evidence does not support his contempt conviction; and (3) several aspects of his probation were an abuse of discretion. Because he could have challenged the district court's orders earlier, his constitutional challenge is collaterally barred. The evidence amply supports his conviction. The sentence of probation is affirmed. DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED. CASE SUMMARY: PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Defendant attorney appealed a decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, finding defendant guilty of criminal contempt, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 401(3), and sentencing him to 90 days' house arrest and three years' probation, and also suspending him from practicing law in the Eastern District of New York for 180 days, in his violation of U.S.
  • Impact of the Media on Fair Trial Rights: Panel on Protection of Reporters’ Sources

    Impact of the Media on Fair Trial Rights: Panel on Protection of Reporters’ Sources

    Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 3 Volume III Number 2 Volume III Book 2 Article 3 1993 Impact of the Media on Fair Trial Rights: Panel on Protection of Reporters’ Sources Hugh C. Hansen Fordham University School of Law Martin B. Adelman Mark A. Conrad Fordham University Graduate School of Business Administration George Freeman The New York Times Company; Nicholas J. Jollymore Time Inc. See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Hugh C. Hansen, Martin B. Adelman, Mark A. Conrad, George Freeman, Nicholas J. Jollymore, Arnold H. Lubasch, and William A. Rome, Impact of the Media on Fair Trial Rights: Panel on Protection of Reporters’ Sources, 3 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 239 (1993). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol3/iss2/3 This Transcript is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Impact of the Media on Fair Trial Rights: Panel on Protection of Reporters’ Sources Authors Hugh C. Hansen, Martin B. Adelman, Mark A. Conrad, George Freeman, Nicholas J. Jollymore, Arnold H. Lubasch, and William A. Rome This transcript is available in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol3/iss2/3 Impact of the Media on Fair Trial Rights: Panel on Protection of Report- ers' Sources Moderator: Professor Hugh C.