DOCSLIB.ORG

What Structures Marine Biodiversity and Why Does It Vary? C. Heip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Structures Marine Biodiversity and Why Does It Vary? C. Heip 53402 What Structures Marine Biodiversity and why does it vary? C. Heip Centre for Estuarine and Coastal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, NL-4400 AC Yerseke, The Netherlands corresponding author (e-mail):[email protected] Abstract: Marine ecological biodiversity research is a scientific field with few observational data to support a weak theory largely borrowed from terrestrial ecology and lacking in experimental verification. The relative lack of scientific interest and effort until recently was a consequence of the general feeling that marine biodiversity is far less threatened than terrestrial biodiversity. This view is not sustainable. There is now ample evidence of widespread changes in most coastal habitats in populated areas around the world (coral reefs, mangroves, seagrass fields, intertidal rocky shores and subtidal sediments on the continental shelf and margin) due to exploitation of marine resources, introduction of exotic species and the increased pressure from mariculture and fisheries. The sustainable exploitation of the seas requires development of a sound theoretical framework for marine biodiversity, including genetic, species and habitat diversity and especially the relationships between them. At the present state of knowledge such a general theory is still far from being reality. In this paper an overview is given of the main elements that an ecological theory of species diversity should include and what aspects of human pressure on the biodiversity of marine ecosystems should be given priority attention. Introduction The very rapid and widespread changes due to a far and perhaps an elusive goal. Even the basic human activities in the abundance and distribution job of providing an adequate description of biodi- of biological species that have been documented versity is far from done. On the one hand there is over the last decade have raised the question still a major effort required in scientifically describ- whether these changes in biodiversity have impor- ing the species that inhabit the seas and much con- tant consequences for ecosystem functioning. Eco- cern has been expressed about the shear number of systems perform a series of vital functions for hu- undescribed species and the decline of taxonomic man society, many of which depend on a variety expertise. On the other hand we are at the dawn of of organisms present in a variable environment. unprecedented progress in charting and explaining The relationships between biodiversity and ecosys- genetic diversity in the oceans. For the first time the tem functioning are far from clear and before this prospect of a complete inventory of marine micro- issue can be properly rj::searched a number of more bial populations is no longer utopic. The research basic questions have still to be answered. that will be required to couple knowledge on genetic In current thinking biodiversity equals biologi- structure to the functioning of marine systems will cal variability, from genes to specie~ and habitats take many years and even decades to be accom- within ecosystems. The mech~nisms' that generate plished. The genomes of about 300 species will be and maintain variation at these different levels in characterized in the near future, but only very few the organisation of the biosphere are very differ- of them are relevant to marine ecology; so, although ent. A single coherent theory ofbiodiversity change the start has been taken, the work is only beginning. and maintenance will have as a major challenge the It is clear that many basic facts are missing and linking of these mechanisms over the spatial and that it will require many years of scientific effort to temporal scales at which they operate. This is still obtain them. This task can only be accomplished in From WEFER G, LAMY F, MANTOURA F (eds), 2003, Marine Science Frontiers for Europe. Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 251-264 Publication 2891 Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNA W) - - -- - - --- --- - ~ 252 Heip a fruitful way if a coherent and testable theory on which organisms have to adapt without being able marine biodiversity will be constructed over the next to modify them. To include habitats in the biodi- few years. Whether a unified theory on biodiversity versity concept is therefore a far from simple task, should be based on characteristics of individual or- although the debate is part of the marine ecologi- ganisms, including their genetic composition, or on cal literature at least since Sanders (1968) in the species or communities in landscapes remains an frame of the stability-time hypothesis discussed open question. The most easily recognized opera- the difference between biologically and physically tional building block in the biodiversity hierarchy is dominated communities. the individual organism, which is often ignored in Although it would be fascinating to summarize marine ecology. All individual organisms are differ- the processes that structure and change genetic, ent to some extent, even in clonal species. The po- species and habitat variability, and to try and link tential genetic diversity present in populations is them, the task would be far outside the scope of this much large~than the number of individuals in which paper. Even restriction to the classical use of the it is expressed and each generation in a sexually term biodiversity - species diversity - requires reproducing population is a new and unpredictable addressing nearly the whole field of ecology. This sample from a very large gene pool. In a recent paper, is clearly impossible and I will restrict myself to a Pachepsky et al. (2001) present a framework for series of headings indicating what we should con- studying the dynamics of communities which sider to know in order to describe and explain ma- generalises the prevailing species-based approach to rine biodiversity and a short summary of what is one based on individuals that are characterised by known under that heading. I have heavily borrowed their physiological traits. from a number of review papers that appeared At the habitat or ecosystem level as well, there during recent years and that show the explosive is an important random element due to the unique growth of interest in the subject. I also refer to the and unpredictable geological setting in which eco- book ofOrmond et al. (1997) for an important col- logical processes take place. When one discusses lection of papers that cover many aspects of ma- characteristics and changes in habitats, a review rine biodiversity that are ignored here, e.g. phylo- would have to address the. complex physical, genetics and evolution. biogeo-chemical and geological processes and es- pecially their interactions that structure landscapes Is marine biodiversity special? in the sea, including the pelagic environment, and that can operate at very different time and space The theoretical foundations as well as the experi- scales. The newly coined term 'biogeomorphology' mental approach required to understand marine probably comes closest to what kind of questions biodiversity are very poorly developed, in general we have to formulate, at least for the sea floor. The and also when compared to terrestrial ecology. In interactions within biofilms and microbial mats, the fact, the whole literature is so much dominated by biological impact on sediment characteristics such theory developed for terrestrial ecosystems that one as bottom roughness, the structure of the benthic can scarcely speak of a field of marine biodiversity. boundary layer and benthic-pelagic coupling are ex- An important part of this theory has been devel- amples of research areas where a close link between oped by plant ecologists (e.g. Loreau 2000 for an biology and geology exists. Coral reefs in the trop- example) and its application to the oceanic envi- ics are the most prominent case of an environment ronments is of course problematic. One basic ques- nearly completely created by biotic processes, and tion is whether terrestrial and marine systems are several less spectacularreefforming organisms are similar enough to allow theory from one domain active in temperate waters, including maerl forming to be used for the other. Most probably this is not red algae, molluscs and polychaetes, deep water the case. Marine systems have a series of charac- corals and others. At the other extreme we have teristics which distinguish them from terrestrial environments such as sandy beaches which are systems, as explained in the following box (from nearly completely built by physical forces and to Heip et al. 1999). What Structures Marine Biodiversity and why does it vary? 253 Box 1. The distinctive features of marine biodiversity 1. Life has originated in the sea and is much older in the sea than on land. As a consequence, the diversity at higher taxonomic levels is much greater in the sea where there are 14 endemic (unique) animal phyla whereas only 1 phylum is endemic to land. There is also a remarkablediversity of life-history strategies in marine organisms. The sum total of genetic resources in the sea is therefore expected to be much more diverse than on land. 2. The physical environment in the oceans and on land is totally different. Marine organisms live in water, terrestrial organismslive in air. Environmental change in the sea has a much lower frequency than on land, both in time and in space. 3. Marine systems are more openthan terrestrial and dispersal of species may occur over much broader ranges than on land. Although most species in the ocean are benthic and live attached to or buried in a substratum, in coastal seas a very large proportion of them has larvae that remain floating in the water for days to months. These high dispersal capacities are often associated with very high fecundities and this has important consequences for their genetic structure and their evolution. 4. The main marine primary producers are very small and often mobile, whereas on land primary producers are large and static.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecological Principles and Function of Natural Ecosystems by Professor Michel RICARD
    Intensive Programme on Education for sustainable development in Protected Areas Amfissa, Greece, July 2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ecological principles and function of natural ecosystems By Professor Michel RICARD Summary 1. Hierarchy of living world 2. What is Ecology 3. The Biosphere - Lithosphere - Hydrosphere - Atmosphere 4. What is an ecosystem - Ecozone - Biome - Ecosystem - Ecological community - Habitat/biotope - Ecotone - Niche 5. Biological classification 6. Ecosystem processes - Radiation: heat, temperature and light - Primary production - Secondary production - Food web and trophic levels - Trophic cascade and ecology flow 7. Population ecology and population dynamics 8. Disturbance and resilience - Human impacts on resilience 9. Nutrient cycle, decomposition and mineralization - Nutrient cycle - Decomposition 10. Ecological amplitude 11. Ecology, environmental influences, biological interactions 12. Biodiversity 13. Environmental degradation - Water resources degradation - Climate change - Nutrient pollution - Eutrophication - Other examples of environmental degradation M. Ricard: Summer courses, Amfissa July 2014 1 1. Hierarchy of living world The larger objective of ecology is to understand the nature of environmental influences on individual organisms, populations, communities and ultimately at the level of the biosphere. If ecologists can achieve an understanding of these relationships, they will be well placed to contribute to the development of systems by which humans
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
    Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India Curriculum on Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Protected Area Management Module 1 An Introduction to Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services For Field-Level MPA Managers Imprint Training Resource Material: Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Protected Area Management for Field-Level MPA Managers Module 1: An Introduction to Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Module 2: Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystems Services in the Overall Environment and Development Context Module 3: Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity into Overall Development and Environmental Planning Module 4: Coastal and Marine Protected Areas and Sustainable Fisheries Management Module 5: Governance, Law and Policies for Managing Coastal and Marine Ecosystems, Biodiversity and Protected Areas Module 6: Assessment and Monitoring of Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Relevant Issues Module 7: Effective Management Planning of Coastal and Marine Protected Areas Module 8: Communicating Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation and Management Issues ISBN 978-81-933282-1-7 October 2015 Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Wildlife Institute of India (WII) Indo-German Biodiversity Programme P.O. Box 18, Chandrabani A-2/18, Safdarjung Enclave Dehradun 248001 New Delhi 110029, India Uttarakhand, India T +91-11-4949 5353 T +91-135-2640 910 E [email protected] E [email protected] W http://www.indo-germanbiodiversity.com W www.wii.gov.in GIZ is a German government-owned not-for-profit enterprise supporting sustainable development. This training resource material has been developed under the Human Capacity Development component of the project ‘Conservation and Sustainable Management of Existing and Potential Coastal and Marine Protected Areas (CMPA)’, under the Indo-German Biodiversity Programme, in partnership with the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011
    Appendix E Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest April 2011 Appendix E Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. I 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION PROCESS ................................... 3 3.0 ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS .................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Background and Distribution of Ecosystems ..................................................................................................... 7 North-Central Appalachian Acidic Swamp ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Descriptions of the Ecological Systems ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2.1 Spruce Forest: Central and Southern Appalachian Spruce-Fir Forest .......................................................... 10 3.2.2 Northern Hardwood Forest : Appalachian (Hemlock)- Northern Hardwood Forest ..................................... 11 3.2.3 Cove Forest: Southern and Central
    [Show full text]
  • Global Marine Biodiversity Trends 95
    Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006. 31:93-122 doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100235 Copyright (c) 2006 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on August 10, 2006 G lobal M a r in e B iodiversity T r e n d s Enric Sala and Nancy Knowlton Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0202; email: [email protected], [email protected] Key Words historical change, human impacts, natural disturbances ■ Abstract Marine biodiversity encompasses all levels of complexity of life in the sea, from within species to across ecosystems. At all levels, marine biodiversity has naturally exhibited a general, slow trajectory of increase, punctuated by mass extinc­ tions at the evolutionary scale and by disturbances at the ecological scale. In historical times, a synergy of human threats, including overfishing, global warming, biological introductions, and pollution, has caused a rapid decline in global marine biodiversity, as measured by species extinctions, population depletions, and community homog­ enization. The consequences of this biodiversity loss include changes in ecosystem function and a reduction in the provision of ecosystem services. Global biodiversity loss will continue and likely accelerate in the future, with potentially more frequent ecological collapses and community-wide shifts. However, the timing and magnitude of these catastrophic events are probably unpredictable. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sustainability
    ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY INTRODUCTION Over the last half-century, ecologists have learned much about how ecosystems contribute to the fulfillment of human life. Most obviously, ecosystems provide many of the goods that are harvested and traded in the human economy -- food, fiber, timber, forage, biomass fuels, and many pharmaceuticals (Daily 1997a). Ecosystems also provide indirect benefits to humans through their impacts on nutrient flux and cycling, mitigation of flood and drought, and maintenance of biodiversity, all of which feedback in important ways on the production of ecosystem goods that humans directly derive from ecosystems (Chapin et al. 1996). Finally, ecosystems also provide less tangible, but equally important, benefits in the form of recreational, spiritual, and intellectual stimulation (Postel and Carpenter 1997). Despite widespread public awareness of the direct benefits that humans derive from ecosystems, the full magnitude of benefits attributable to ecosystems is woefully underappreciated by the public (Daily 1997b). The public’s failure to recognize these benefits increases the likelihood that natural resources will be managed and developed in a manner that leads to ecosystem degradation. Such resource development, in conjunction with increasing human populations and land use intensification, can stress ecosystems to a point where their ability to provide the aforementioned benefits is compromised (Rapport et al. 1985). Concern that the human enterprise may jeopardize the viability of ecosystems (Vitousek et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management
    Essays Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management DAVID B. LINDENMAYER,* CHRIS R. MARGULES,† AND DANIEL B. BOTKIN‡ *Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies & Department of Geography, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, email [email protected] †CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, email [email protected] ‡George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22202, and The Center for the Study of the Environment, P.O. Box 6945, Santa Barbara, CA 93160, U.S.A., email [email protected] Abstract: The conservation of biological diversity has become one of the important goals of managing for- ests in an ecologically sustainable way. Ecologists and forest resource managers need measures to judge the success or failure of management regimes designed to sustain biological diversity. The relationships between potential indicator species and total biodiversity are not well established. Carefully designed studies are re- quired to test relationships between the presence and abundance of potential indicator species and other taxa and the maintenance of critical ecosystem processes in forests. Other indicators of biological diversity in forests, in addition or as alternatives to indicator species, include what we call structure-based indicators. These are stand-level and landscape-level (spatial) features of forests such as stand structural complexity and plant species composition, connectivity, and heterogeneity. Although the adoption of practices to sustain (or recreate) key characteristics of forest ecosystems appear intuitively sensible and broadly consistent with cur- rent knowledge, information is lacking to determine whether such stand- and landscape-level features of for- ests will serve as successful indices of (and help conserve) biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ocean Genome: Conservation and the Fair, Equitable and Sustainable Use of Marine Genetic Resources
    Commissioned by BLUE PAPER The Ocean Genome: Conservation and the Fair, Equitable and Sustainable Use of Marine Genetic Resources LEAD AUTHORS Robert Blasiak, Rachel Wynberg, Kirsten Grorud-Colvert and Siva Thambisetty CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Narcisa M. Bandarra, Adelino V.M. Canário, Jessica da Silva, Carlos M. Duarte, Marcel Jaspars, Alex D. Rogers, Kerry Sink and Colette C.C. Wabnitz oceanpanel.org About the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy The High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy (Ocean Panel) is a unique initiative by 14 world leaders who are building momentum for a sustainable ocean economy in which effective protection, sustainable production and equitable prosperity go hand in hand. By enhancing humanity’s relationship with the ocean, bridging ocean health and wealth, working with diverse stakeholders and harnessing the latest knowledge, the Ocean Panel aims to facilitate a better, more resilient future for people and the planet. Established in September 2018, the Ocean Panel has been working with government, business, financial institutions, the science community and civil society to catalyse and scale bold, pragmatic solutions across policy, governance, technology and finance to ultimately develop an action agenda for transitioning to a sustainable ocean economy. Co-chaired by Norway and Palau, the Ocean Panel is the only ocean policy body made up of serving world leaders with the authority needed to trigger, amplify and accelerate action worldwide for ocean priorities. The Ocean Panel comprises members from Australia, Canada, Chile, Fiji, Ghana, Indonesia, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Namibia, Norway, Palau and Portugal and is supported by the UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy for the Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries
    MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES Balancing Ecosystem Sustainability and the Socio-Economics of Fisheries This Report Is Part Of The Ocean On The Edge Series Produced By The Aquarium Of The Pacific As Products Of Its National Conference—Ocean On The Edge: Top Ocean Issues, May 2009 2 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES Ocean on the Edge: Top Ocean Issues Making Ocean Issues Come Alive for the Public The conference brought together leading marine scientists and engineers, policy-makers, film-makers, exhibit designers, informal science educators, journalists and communicators to develop a portfolio of models for communicating major ocean issues to the public. This report is one of a series of reports from that conference. The reports include: Coastal Hazards, Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries, Pollution in the Ocean, and Critical Condition: Ocean Health and Human Health. There is also a series of briefer reports on film-making, kiosk messaging design, and communicating science to the public. All reports are available at www.aquariumofpacific.org MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES 3 4 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES Acknowledgements Support for the “Ocean on the Edge Confer- and Robert Stickney, PhD. Participants fluctu- ence: Top Ocean Issues” was provided by ated during the various workshop sessions. NOAA, the National Science Foundation, Corinne Monroe and Alexi Holford were Southern California Edison, SAVOR, the Long the rapporteurs. Contributors to this report Beach Convention Center, and the Aquarium who provided editorial comments were Mark of the Pacific. Helvey and Craig Heberer of NOAA and members of his staff. This report was facilitat- We are grateful to the Conference’s National ed by Corinne Monroe with assistance from Advisory Panel that provided valuable guid- Erica Noriega.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning: a Consensus of Current Knowledge
    Ecological Monographs, 75(1), 2005, pp. 3±35 q 2005 by the Ecological Society of America ESA Report EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE D. U. HOOPER,1,16 F. S . C HAPIN, III,2 J. J. EWEL,3 A. HECTOR,4 P. I NCHAUSTI,5 S. LAVOREL,6 J. H. LAWTON,7 D. M. LODGE,8 M. LOREAU,9 S. NAEEM,10 B. SCHMID,4 H. SETAÈ LAÈ ,11 A. J. SYMSTAD,12 J. VANDERMEER,13 AND D. A. WARDLE14,15 1Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225 USA 2Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA 3Institute of Paci®c Islands Forestry, Paci®c Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 323, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 USA 4Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 ZuÈrich, Switzerland 5CEBC-CNRS, 79360 Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France 6Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS UMR 5553, Universite J. Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France 7Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1EU, UK 8Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 369, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-0369 USA 9Laboratoire d'Ecologie, UMR 7625, Ecole Normale SupeÂrieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris Cedex 05, France 10Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York 10027 USA 11University of Helsinki, Department of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Niemenkatu 73, FIN-15140 Lahti, Finland 12U.S. Geological Survey, Mount Rushmore National Memorial, 13000 Highway 244, Keystone, South Dakota 57751 USA 13Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA 14Landcare Research, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Plant Species in Paddy Ecosystem in West Sumatra, Indonesia
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 18, Number 3, July 2017 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 1218-1225 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d180346 Diversity of plant species in paddy ecosystem in West Sumatra, Indonesia ENIE TAURUSLINA AMARULLAH1,2,♥, TRIZELIA3, YAHERWANDI3, HASMIANDY HAMID3 1Food and Horticulture Plant Protection Office of West Sumatra. Complex Agriculture Office, Jl. Raya Padang-Indarung Km.8, Bandar Buat, Padang 25231, West Sumatra, Indonesia. Tel. +62-751-72701, Fax. +62-751-72702, ♥email: [email protected] 2 Universitas Andalas, Campus Limau Manih, Padang 24063, West Sumatra, Indonesia 3Departement of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Andalas. Campus Limau Manih, Padang 24063, West Sumatra, Indonesia Manuscript received: 21 September 2016. Revision accepted: 25 July 2017. Abstract. Tauruslina EA, Trizelia, Yaherwandi, Hamid H. 2017. Diversity of plant species in paddy ecosystem in West Sumatra. Biodiversitas 18: 1218-1225. Community is a group of living things which have adjusted and inhabited a natural habitat. Characteristics of the community in an environment are its diversity. The diversity of the plants is a plant species that occupy an ecosystem. The research was aimed at determining species diversity, the dominance of plant species and summed dominance ratio (SDR) in paddy ecosystem. The plant samples were taken from the location of endemic areas of brown plant hopper in Tanjung Mutiara Subdistrict, Agam District West Sumatra. Sampling was done by using two methods, (i) survey methods with direct data collection; (ii) squares method, observation of sample plots in the field. The level of diversity of plant species was analyzed using diversity index of Shannon- Wiener (H’).
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Student Edition CHAPTER 6 for Review Purposes Only 2
    Sample Student Edition CHAPTER 6 For Review Purposes Only 2 BiologyMiller & Levine ogy Student Edition Sampler Biol Chapter 6 Communities and Ecosystem Dynamics Miller & Levine & Miller Chapter Opener/Case Study .......................................... 4 Lesson 6.1 Habitats, Niches, and Species Interactions .................... 6 Lesson 6.2 Succession .................................................................... 14 Lesson 6.3 Biodiversity, Ecosystems, and Resilience ..................... 18 Case Study Wrap-Up ................................................... .22 Study Guide .................................................................. 24 Performance-Based Assessment ................................. .26 Assessment ................................................................... 28 End-of-Course Assessment .......................................... 31 3 Communities and CHAPTER 6 Ecosystem Dynamics CASE STUDY 6.1 6.2 6.3 Habitats, Niches, and Succession Biodiversity, Ecosystems, How do species interactions shape Go Online to Species Interactions and Resilience access your digital course. ecosystems? VIDEO As dusk falls over Yellowstone National Park, elk emerge from dense woods to browse on ten- Beavers build dams that der willows along a stream. Suddenly, they freeze. An instant later, wolves dash from the forest, AUDIO shape river ecosystems. aiming for a kill. The elk react in the nick of time, bolting out of reach. This hunt, like most, has INTERACTIVITY failed. But those elk have been attacked here before. Will
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Biodiversity in the Ocean and Its Ecosystem Service
    Chapter 3 Biodiversity in the ocean and its ecosystem service In this chapter, functions of the ocean and the current status of the marine biodiversity at the global level and for water around Japan will be identified and summarized to provide prerequisites for preparation of the basic concepts for conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity. 1. What are the biodiversity and various fauna and flora. circulations occur there. Evaporation of water the ecosystem service? The blessings people can obtain from such from the ocean plays a major role in sustaining Ever since beginning of its primitive form, ecosystems where various organisms interact the atmosphere-to-land circulation of water. life has repeated adaptation, evolution and are called “ecosystem services.” They include Along with water, the ocean transports heat, extinction in response to various changes “provisioning services” of resources such as it mitigates drastic changes of the climate of environment on the Earth, to create the seafood and the genetic resources for medicine, through its interactions with the atmosphere, present diversity of as many as 30 million “regulating services” for stable climate and and maintains the temperature within the species4 and their associations. “Biodiversity” clean water, “cultural services” to provide acceptable range for occurrence and growth could be referred to as the “character” and recreational and mental benefits such as sea of organisms. The ocean is deeply involved in “interconnection” of life created through the bathing, and “supporting services” such as the weather around the world and the climate long history of evolution. Human being is one nutrient circulation and photosynthesis5.
    [Show full text]