DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Offshore Wind Farms - Wikipedia 1 of 15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Offshore Wind Farms - Wikipedia 1 of 15 List of offshore wind farms - Wikipedia 1 of 15 List of offshore wind farms This page lists the largest offshore wind farms that are currently operational rated by nameplate capacity. It also lists the largest offshore wind farms currently under construction, the largest proposed offshore wind farms, and offshore wind farms with notability other than size. As of September 2018 the Walney Extension in the United Kingdom is the largest offshore wind farm in the world at 659 MW. Contents Four offshore wind farms are in the Thames Estuary area: Kentish Flats, Largest operational offshore wind farms Gunfleet Sands, Thanet and London Largest under construction Array. The latter was largest in the Largest proposed world. Other notable offshore wind farms See also References External links Largest operational offshore wind farms This is a list of offshore wind farms with at least 200 MW nameplate capacity that are currently operational. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms List of offshore wind farms - Wikipedia 2 of 15 Capacity Site Commissioning Wind farm Location Turbines & model Refs (MW) coordinates date 40 x MHI-Vestas 8.25 MW Walney United 54°5′17″N 659 47 x Siemens Gamesa 7 2018 [1] Extension Kingdom 3°44′17″W MW United 51°38′38″N 175 × Siemens London Array 630 2013 [2][3][4] Kingdom 01°33′13″E SWT-3.6-120 Gemini Wind 54°2′10″N 600 150 × Siemens SWT-4.0 2017 [5][6][7][8] Farm Netherlands 05°57′47″E Gode Wind 97 x Siemens 582 54°04′N 7°02′E 2017 [9][10] (phases 1+2) Germany SWT-6.0-154 United 53°27′00″N 160 × Siemens Gwynt y Môr 576 2015 [11] Kingdom 03°35′00″W SWT-3.6-107 United 91 x Siemens Race Bank 573 53°16′N 0°50′E 2018 [12][13] Kingdom SWT-6.0-154 Greater United 51°52′48″N 140 × Siemens 504 2012 [14][15][16] Gabbard Kingdom 1°56′24″E SWT-3.6-107 49 x MHI Vestas V164-8.3 Horns Rev 3 407 55°49′N 7°42′E 2019 [17] Denmark MW United 53°14′56″N 67 × Siemens Dudgeon 402 2017 [18] Kingdom 1°23′24″E SWT-6.0-154 54°19′1″N 67 × Siemens Veja Mate 402 2017 [19][20] Germany 5°52′15″E SWT-6.0-154 56°36′00″N 111 × Siemens [21][22] Anholt 400 2013 Denmark 11°12′36″E SWT-3.6-120 [23][24] BARD 54°22′0″N 400 80 × BARD 5.0MW 2013 [25][26][27] Offshore 1 Germany 5°59′0″E 54°30′00″N 80 × Areva Multibrid Global Tech I 400 2015 [28] Germany 6°21′30″E M5000 5.0MW United 50°40′N 116 x MHI Vestas Rampion 400 2018 [29] Kingdom 0°06′W V112-3.45 MW 34°40′04″N 100 x Siemens Binhai North 400 China 2018 [30] 120°21′29″E SWT-4.0-120 West of United 53°59′02″N 108 × Siemens Duddon 389 2014 [31][32] Kingdom 3°27′50″W SWT-3.6-120 Sands 54°46′55.200″N 60 x Siemens Arkona 385 2019 [33][34] Germany 14°7′15.600″E SWT-6.0-154 Walney United 54°02′38″N 102 × Siemens 2011 (phase 1) 367 [35][36] (phases 1&2) Kingdom 3°31′19″W SWT-3.6-107 2012 (phase 2) United 51°52′48″N 56 x Siemens Galloper 353 2018 [37][38] Kingdom 1°56′24″E SWT-6.0-154 54°50′2″N Wikinger 350 70 × Adwen AD 5-135 2018 [39] Germany 14°4′5″E 53°58′0″N Nordsee One 332 54 × Senvion 6.2M126 2017 [40] Germany 06°48′00″E 2009 (phase 1) Thorntonbank 51°33′00″N 6 × Senvion 5MW [41][42] 325 2012 (phase 2) (phases 1–3) 2°56′00″E 48 × Senvion 6.15MW [43][44] Belgium 2013 (phase 3) Sheringham United 53°7′0″N 88 × Siemens [45][46] 315 2012 Shoal Kingdom 1°8′0″E SWT-3.6-107 [47][48] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms List of offshore wind farms - Wikipedia 3 of 15 Capacity Site Commissioning Wind farm Location Turbines & model Refs (MW) coordinates date Borkum 53°58′0″N 78 × Siemens 312 2015 [49] Riffgrund 1 Germany 06°33′00″E SWT-4.0-120 51°35′27.6″N 42 x Siemens Rentel 308.7 2019 [50] Belgium 2°56′38.4″E SWT-7.0-154 SPIC Jiangsu 33.514°N 302.4 China 72 × Envision 4.2MW 2018 [51] Dafeng 121.105°E Amrumbank 54°30′0″N 80 × Siemens 302 2015 [52][53] West Germany 07°48′00″E SWT-3.6-120 United 51°26′0″N Thanet 300 100 × Vestas V90-3.0MW 2010 [54][55] Kingdom 01°38′0″E 38 x Siemens 4.0MW 19 x Haizhuang 5MW (H154) Huaneng 32.680°N 1 x Haizhuang 5MW 300 China 2017 [56] Rudong 121.323°E (H171) 12 x Envision 4.2MW (EN-136) Jiangsu 32.816°N 75 x Envision Longyuan 300 China 2018 [57] 121.516°E EN136/4.0 MW Chiang Sand 54°26′00″N Nordsee Ost 295 48 × Senvion 6.15MW 2015 [58][59] Germany 7°41′00″E 54°54′0″N 80 × Siemens Butendiek 288 2015 [60][61] Germany 07°45′00″E SWT-3.6-120 55°9′00″N 80 × Siemens DanTysk 288 2015 [62] Germany 7°10′30″E SWT-3.6-120 54°58′24″N 80 × Siemens Baltic 2 288 2015 [63][64] Germany 13°10′40″E SWT-3.6-120 Meerwind 54°23′00″N 80 × Siemens 288 2015 [65] Süd / Ost Germany 7°42′00″E SWT-3.6-120 Sandbank 55°11′0″N 72 × Siemens 288 2017 [66][67] (Phase 1) Germany 06°51′00″E SWT-4.0-130 United 53°11′00″N 75 × Siemens Lincs 270 2013 [68] Kingdom 00°29′00″E SWT-3.6-120 Burbo Bank United 53°28′48″N 258 32 × Vestas V164-8.0MW 2017 [69] Extension Kingdom 3°15′36″W Liuheng (Guodian 63 × Siemens 252 China 2019 [70][71] Zhoushan SWT-4.0-130 Putuo) Humber United 53°38′38″N 219 73 × Vestas V112-3.0MW 2015 [72] Gateway Kingdom 0°17′35″E 51°37′08″N Northwind 216 72 × Vestas V112-3.0MW 2014 [73] Belgium 02°54′03″E Westermost United 53°48′0″N 35 × Siemens 210 2015 [74][75] Rough Kingdom 0°9′0″E SWT-6.0-154 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms List of offshore wind farms - Wikipedia 4 of 15 Capacity Site Commissioning Wind farm Location Turbines & model Refs (MW) coordinates date 55°36′00″N Horns Rev 2 209 91 × Siemens SWT-2.3-93 2009 [76] Denmark 7°35′24″E 54°33′0″N Rødsand II 207 90 × Siemens SWT-2.3-93 2010 [77][78] Denmark 11°42′36″E Chenjiagang 34°29′00″N 134 × FD77-1500 (Jiangsu) 201 China 2010 [79][80] 119°52′00″E Dongfang Electric Xiangshui Trianel 54°2′30″N 40 × Areva Multibrid Borkum West 200 2015 [81] 6°28′0″E M5000 5.0MW II (Phase 1) Germany Jiangsu 32°55′16″N 50 × Siemens Luneng 200 China 2017 [82][83] 121°10′55″E SWT-4.0-130 Dongtai Largest under construction This is a list of wind farms with a nameplate capacity of more than 300MW currently under construction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms List of offshore wind farms - Wikipedia 5 of 15 Capacity Site Wind farm Location Turbines & model Completion Refs (MW) coordinates Hornsea Project United 174 x Siemens 1,218 2020 [84] One Kingdom SWT-7.0-154 94 x Siemens Gamesa Borssele 1&2 752 2020 [85] Netherlands 8MW East Anglia United 102 x Siemens 714 2020 [86] ONE Kingdom SWT-7.0-154 55°01′00″N Kriegers Flak 605 Denmark 72 x Siemens SG 8.4MW 2021 [87] 12°56′00″E United 58°7′48″N Beatrice 588 84 × Siemens SWT-7.0-154 2019 [88] Kingdom 3°4′12″W Hohe See 497 Germany 71 x Siemens SWT-7.0-154 2019 [89] Borkum 56 x MHI Vestas V164-8.0 450 Germany 2019 [90] Riffgrund 2 MW CGN Yangjiang 400 China 75 x Mingyang MY-5.5 MW 2020 [91] Nanpeng Island Merkur 396 Germany 66 x GE Haliade 150-6 MW 2019 [92] Norther Offshore Wind 370 Belgium 44 × Vestas V164-8.4 MW 2019 Farm 1 x Mingyang SCD 3 MW 50 x Goldwind Datang Jiangsu 316.5 China GW-140/3300 2019 [93] Binhai 45 x Sinovel SL3300/128 63 x Siemens SWT-4.0-130 10 x Envision EN136/4.2 Dongtai Four 302.4 China 2019 [94] MW Laoting Bodhi 38.986°N 300 China 75 x Siemens SWT-4.0-130 2019 [95] Island 118.804°E Largest proposed The following table lists largest offshore wind farm areas (by nameplate capacity) that are only at a proposal stage, and have achieved at least some of the formal consents required before construction can begin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms List of offshore wind farms - Wikipedia 6 of 15 Capacity Wind farm Location Site coordinates Consents Refs (MW) South Korea Offshore 2,500 Korean government approved [96] Korea Hornsea Project United 2,400 Crown Estate Round 3 [97] Three Kingdom Undergoing environmental impact Formosa III 1,900 Taiwan assessment and approvals which are [98] expected to be completed by end of 2017 Phase I and II (2 x 350MW) to be built by Ørsted Borssele Offshore 1,400 Phase III (330MW) and IV (350MW) to be [99] Netherlands (phases 1-4) built by Blauwwind II c.v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Report
    2019 Contents. INTRODUCTION About us. 1 This is Ellevio. 2 ELLEVIO 2019 Review of 2019. 4 CEO’S STATEMENT Network vital for climate targets. 6 MARKET CONDITIONS AND DRIVERS Market conditions. 8 The Swedish electricity market – how it works. 11 Drivers. 13 VALUE CREATION From the little things to the big things. 18 Society. 20 Customers. 23 Employees. 26 Environment. 32 Owners. 35 INVESTMENTS AND FINANCING Investments. 36 Financing. 42 ANNUAL REPORT 47 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 75 SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES Management. 80 Results. 83 GRI index. 91 The Annual Report consists of an Administration Report, Financial Statements and notes on pages 45–74. (The auditors’ report appears on pages 73–74.) The sustainability report has been produced in line with Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) standards ”core” level. The complete sustainability report comprises the description of our sustainability efforts on pages 2–5,8–43 along with Sustainability Disclosures and the GRI index on pages 82–96. The sustainability report also covers Ellevio’s Communication on Progress to the UN Global Compact. The statutory sustainability report in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act can be found on pages 2–5, 18–35 and 82–96. Ellevio AB (publ) Box 242 07 104 51 Stockholm www.ellevio.se All values are expressed in SEK. Figures within parentheses refer to 2018, unless specified otherwise. The data concerning markets and the competitive situation are Ellevio’s own estimates unless a specific source is indicated. These estimates are based on the best and latest available facts from published sources. About us. Sometimes it’s warm, sometimes it’s cold.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Wind Farms in France: Impact on Power System Stability
    04/11/2011 Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on power system stability KTH Master Thesis report number Alexandre Henry Examiner at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti Supervisors at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti and Camille Hamon Supervisor at EDF Dr. Bayram Tounsi Laboratory Electric Power Systems School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, November 2011 Accessibility : .. Front page Page I / III ... Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Abstract Alexandre Henry Page 1 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Nomenclature EWEA : European Wind Energy Association UK : United Kingdom EU : European union AC : Alternating current DC : Direct current HVAC : High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC : High Voltage Direct Current PCC : Point of Common Coupling TSO : Transmission System Operator RTE : Réseau de transport d’électricité (French TSO) XLPE : cross linked polythylene insulated VSC : Voltage source converter LCC : Line commutated converter FACTS : Flexible AC Transmission System SVC : Static Var Compensator DFIG : Double Fed Induction Generator MVAC : Medium Voltage Alternating Current ENTSO-E : European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity HFF : High Frequency Filter FRT : Fault Ride Through Alexandre Henry Page 2 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms
    [Show full text]
  • SKI Report 02:18 Nuclear Weapons Research in Sweden Research
    SKI’s perspective Background In the year 1998 Sweden, together with the rest of the states in the European Union and Euratom signed the Additional Protocol to the Safeguard Agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA. The Additional Protocol gives the Agency extended complimentary access to areas and buildings and rights to take environmental samples within a state. The process of ratification is going on with the intention that the protocol should be implemented simultaneously in all member states. In ratifying the agreement in May 2000, Sweden changed its Act on Nuclear Activities and passed a new law regarding inspections. The present estimate is that the protocol could be implemented in the beginning of 2003 after ratification in all EU member states. Aim When the Additional Protocol is implemented, Sweden is to be “mapped” by the IAEA, scrutinising all nuclear activities, present as well as future plans. In the light of this, SKI has chosen to go one step further, letting Dr Thomas Jonter of the Department of History at Uppsala University investigate Sweden’s past activities in the area of nuclear weapons research in a political perspective. Dr Jonter has previously studied the Swedish National Defence Research Institute’s (FOA) activities in this area up until 1972. This report deals with the civilian research programme and its links to the military plans to produce nuclear weapons. Since Sweden had plans in the nuclear weapons area it is important to show to the IAEA that all such activities have stopped. This is the main objective with this report. Results Dr Jonter has made a survey of available sources in the archives at Studsvik and FOI, where the records of the AB Atomenergi company are stored.
    [Show full text]
  • Certified Environmental Product Declaration EPD of Electricity From
    Certified Environmental Product Declaration EPD® of Electricity from Vattenfall Nordic Nuclear Power Plants UNCPC Code 17, Group 171 – Electrical energy The International EPD® system, EPD International AB - In line with ISO 14025 S-P 00923 2019-12-31 Vattenfall AB - Vattenfall AB Nuclear Power Confidentiality class: None (C1) Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 8 1.1. Declared Unit ............................................................................................................ 8 ® 1.2. The Declaration and the EPD system....................................................................... 8 ® 1.3. Vattenfall, LCA and EPD ......................................................................................... 8 2. Producer and product ............................................................................ 9 2.1. Producer .................................................................................................................. 9 2.2. Product System Description .................................................................................... 11 3. Environmental Performance Based on LCA ........................................ 17 3.1. Life Cycle Assessment Method ............................................................................... 17 3.2. Technical Service Life, Reference Flow, Reference Year ......................................... 17 3.3. System Boundaries, Allocation and Data Sources ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Definitive Who's Who of the Wind Energy Industry
    2014 Top 100 Power People 1 100 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2014 The definitive who’s who of the wind energy industry © A Word About Wind, 2014 2014 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Editorial: Introducing the Top 100 Power People 3 Compiling the top 100: Advisory panel and methodology 4 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 11 6 Q&A: Rory O’Connor, Managing Director, BlackRock 15 Q&A: David Jones, Managing Director, Allianz Capital Partners 19 Q&A: Torben Möger Pedersen, CEO, PensionDanmark 23 Top ten profiles:The most influential people in global wind 25 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2014 28 Next year: Key dates for A Word About Wind in 2015 30 Networking at A Word About Wind Quarterly Drinks © A Word About Wind, 2014 2014 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL elcome to our third annual Top from the six last year, but shows there W100 Power People report. is still plenty that wind can do to attract and retain women in senior roles. When we took on the challenge back in 2012 of identifying and assessing the Wind likes to think of itself as a pro- key people working in wind, it was a gressive industry, and in many ways it timely task. The industry was starting to is. But let’s not be blind to the ways in move out of established pockets in Eu- which it continues to operate like many rope, North America and Asia, and into other sectors, with males continuing to by Richard Heap, emerging markets around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Changes in Electricity Industries Against Actors and Technologies: Utility to Business Transformations in Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain
    Received February 28, 2012 / Accepted June 9, 2012 J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2012, Volume 7, Issue 2 Analysing Changes in Electricity Industries Against Actors and Technologies: Utility to Business Transformations in Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain Mari Ratinen1, Peter Lund Abstract Liberalization of electricity markets, governmental policies for renewable electricity and technology development are transforming national electricity industries. However, there are considerable national differences in how these industries have changed and which businesses have been developed. We propose a typology for comparing changes in electricity industry based on the changes in the actors and technologies. Wind power and solar photovoltaic are used here as technology examples. A qualitative analysis of the changes in electricity industries in four EU member states is presented. Based on the preliminary findings, we conclude that if the industry consists of many, small firms with relatively loose ties with the government the industry is more likely to change than if it consists of few large firms with strong relations with the government. Keywords: electricity industry; liberalization; technology development; wind energy; solar photovoltaic 1Aalto University, School of Sciences, P.O. Box 11000, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland. email: [email protected] ISSN: 0718-2724. (http://www.jotmi.org) Journal of Technology Management & Innovation © Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 87 J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2012, Volume 7, Issue 2 1. Introduction fluence energy policies. Citizens influencing by voting green parties, supporting anti-nuclear movements or parties with National electricity industries are undergoing fundamen- environmental programs have brought about changes in en- tal changes, which are brought about by three interlinked ergy policies and technologies (O’Neill, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Ørsted Annual Report 2018 Ørsted Annual Report 2018 Contents
    Ørsted Annual report 2018 Ørsted Annual report 2018 Contents Our vision Let’s create a world that runs entirely on green energy Ørsted Annual report 2018 Contents Content Management’s review Financial statements Overview 4 Consolidated financial statements 72 Chairman’s statement 5 Income statement 73 CEO’s review 6 Statement of comprehensive income 74 Performance highlights 10 Balance sheet 75 Outlook 2019 12 Statement of changes in equity 76 Financial estimates and policies 14 Statement of cash flows 77 Note summary 78 Our business 15 Notes 79 The green transformation 16 Our strategic playing field 18 Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) 167 Our markets 19 Basis of reporting 168 Our strategy 22 Environment 169 Our business model 25 Social 171 Strategic targets 26 Governance 172 Our geographic footprints 28 Parent company financial statements 175 Results 30 Income statement 176 Results 31 Balance sheet 176 Five-year summary 35 Statement of changes in equity 177 Fourth quarter 36 Notes 178 Quarterly summary, 2017-18 38 Management statement, Business units 39 auditor’s reports and glossary 185 Our business units 40 Statement by the Executive Board Offshore 41 and the Board of Directors 186 Onshore 46 Independent Auditors’ report 187 Bioenergy 49 Limited assurance report of the independent auditor 191 Customer Solutions 52 Glossary 192 Governance 55 Board of Directors 56 Group Executive Management 58 Corporate governance 59 Remuneration report 63 Risk and risk management 66 Shareholder information 70 3 / 193 Ørsted Annual
    [Show full text]
  • Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 Tnuos Tariffs
    Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 1 Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs This information paper contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) that National Grid will use in the calculation of Generation TNUoS charges from April 2018. October 2017 October 2017 Contents Executive Summary 4 Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 5 Table 1: Annual Load Factors By Generating Station 5 Table 2: Generic Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 10 Changes to the Draft ALFs 11 The Onshore Wind Generic ALF has changed 11 Edinbane 11 Pen Y Cymoedd 11 Inactive Generators 12 How Are ALFs Calculated? 13 Five Years Of Data 13 Four Years Of Data 14 Three Years Of Data 14 Fewer Than Three Years Of Data 14 Calculation Of Partial Year ALFs 15 Generic ALFs 15 Next Steps 15 Appendix A: Generation Charging Principles 16 CMP268 16 The TNUoS Wider Tariff 16 Other Charges 17 Contact Us If you have any comments or questions on the contents or format of this report, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us. Team Email & Phone [email protected] 01926 654633 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 3 Executive Summary This document contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) to be used in the calculation of generator Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs for 2018/19, effective from 1 April 2018. The ALFs are based on generation data for five years from 2012/13 until 2016/17.
    [Show full text]
  • Repower Systems AG Corporate Presentation
    REpower Systems AG Corporate Presentation September 2009 “Of all the forces of nature, I should think the wind contains the largest amount of motive power – that is, power to move things.” …… Abraham Lincoln (1859) “We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories […] All this we can do. And all this we will do.” …… Barack Obama (2009) 2 There are four good reasons for the growth of renewable energies. Scarce resources Import dependency RENEWABLERENEWABLE Climatic change ENERGIESENERGIES Growing energy demand 3 Agenda At a glance Market Company Technology Projects Financials & Outlook 4 Fiscal year 2008/09 at a glance. ExpansionExpansion InnovationsInnovations OffshoreOffshore milestonesmilestones ofof capacitiescapacities StartStart ofof 5M5M serialserial ProductProduct launchlaunch ofof upgradedupgraded ConstructionConstruction startstart ofof newnew productionproduction inin thethe newnew offshoreoffshore turbineturbine REpowerREpower R&DR&D CentreCentre offshoreoffshore manufacturingmanufacturing andand 6M6M (Osterrönfeld, Germany) (Osterrönfeld, Germany) logisticslogistics centrecentre ProductProduct launchlaunch ofof newnew StartStart ofof rotorrotor bladeblade CompletionCompletion ofof firstfirst fullyfully onshoreonshore turbineturbine REpowerREpower productionproduction inin thethe newnew rotorrotor approvedapproved BelgiumBelgium offshoreoffshore 3.XM3.XM bladeblade facilityfacility windwind farmfarm „Thornton„Thornton Bank“Bank“ StartStart ofof serialserial productionproduction ofof FrameworkFramework
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind in Europe Key Trends and Statistics 2020
    Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Published in February 2021 windeurope.org This report summarises construction and financing activity in European offshore wind farms from 1 January to 31 December 2020. WindEurope regularly surveys the industry to determine the level of installations of foundations and turbines, and the subsequent dispatch of first power to the grid. The data includes demonstration sites and factors in decommissioning where it has occurred. Annual installations are expressed in gross figures while cumulative capacity represents net installations per site and country. Rounding of figures is at the discretion of the author. DISCLAIMER This publication contains information collected on a regular basis throughout the year and then verified with relevant members of the industry ahead of publication. Neither WindEurope nor its members, nor their related entities are, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Neither WindEurope nor its members shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. TEXT AND ANALYSIS: Lizet Ramírez, WindEurope Daniel Fraile, WindEurope Guy Brindley, WindEurope EDITOR: Rory O’Sullivan, WindEurope DESIGN: Laia Miró, WindEurope Lin Van de Velde, Drukvorm FINANCE DATA: Clean Energy Pipeline and IJ Global All currency conversions made at EUR/ GBP 0.8897 and EUR/USD 1.1422. Figures include estimates for undisclosed values. PHOTO COVER: Kriegers Flak
    [Show full text]
  • IEA Wind Task 26
    Work Package 1 Final Report IEA Wind Task 26 Multi-national Case Study of the Financial Cost of Wind Energy Leading Authors Paul Schwabe: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Sander Lensink: Energy Research Center of the Netherlands Maureen Hand: National Renewable Energy Laboratory IEA Wind Task 26 Multi-national Case Study of the Financial Cost of wind Energy Work Package 1 Lead Authors: Paul Schwabe: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Sander Lensink: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands Maureen Hand: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Contributing Authors: Athanasia Arapogianni: European Wind Energy Association Alberto Ceña: Spanish Wind Energy Association Karlynn Cory: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Markus Geissmann: Swiss Federal Office of Energy Klaus Hammes: Swedish Energy Agency Stefan Luxembourg: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands Ángeles Mora Sánchez: Spanish Wind Energy Association Edward James-Smith: Ea Energy Analyses Jan Wallasch: Deutsche WindGuard Paul Wilczek: European Wind Energy Association The IEA Wind agreement, also known as the Implementing Agreement for cooperation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems, functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings, and publications of IEA Wind do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of all its individual member countries. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 1617 Cole Boulevard NREL/TP-6A2-48155 Golden, Colorado 80401 March 2011 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Offshore Networks: the Context of Our Work
    Developing offshore grids : An integrated approach Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. Andrew Hiorns Integrated offshore networks: the context of our work Sustainability We are interested in establishing workable arrangements at the lowest costs for UK consumers such that: The potential deliverability of offshore wind is maximised Security of supply and network resilience are maximised The overall cost to consumers is minimised Affordability The scale of potential offshore a Offshore wind leased wind necessitates reflection on capacity* the delivery challenges: 1GW Security of supply 7GW European interconnection Technology development Security of 32GW supply Supply chain capability Planning consents Financing Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Skills * Source: DECC website 2 http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/energy_mix/renewable/policy/offshore/wind_leasing/wind_leasing.aspx 1 Assumptions: Generation mix scenarios 2008/09 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM AS AT 31st DECEMBER 2007 400kV Substations 275kV Substations Slow Progression 132kV Substations 400kV Circuits 275kV Circuits 132kV Circuits Major Generating Sites Including Pumped Storage Pentland Firth Connected at 400kV THE SHETLAND ISLANDS 6 Connected at 275kV 9,724MW offshore wind in 2020 Hydro Generation 23,174MW offshore wind in 2030 1 21% renewable electricity generation 2020 target missed 5 7 8 9 2 10 Gone Green 4 3 16,374MW offshore wind
    [Show full text]