DOCSLIB.ORG

The City Record. Department of Parks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE CITY RECORa VOL. XXXII. NEW YORK, TUESDAY, MARCH 29, 1904. NUMBER 9,393• The Board having received petitions for planting trees in several localities, the THE CITY RECORD. proceedings were duly advertised, hearings given and the findings transmitted to the Board of Estimate and Apportionment for the approval of that Board. OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. Death of Andrew H. Green. Published Under Authority of Section 1526, Greater New York Charter, by the At a meeting of the Board held November 19, 1903, the death of Honorable BOARD OF CITY RECORD. Andrew H. Green, for so many years connected with the Park Department, was an- nounced. Mr. Green was one of the Commissioners appointed under the Act of GEORGE B. McCLELLAN, MAYOR. April 17, 1857, creating the Board of Commissioners of the Central Park. He was JOHN J. DELANY, CORPORATION COUNSEL. EDWARD M. GROUT, COMPTROLLER. elected President of the Park Board in 1858, and remained its President and Treas- urer until September 15, 1859, when the office of Comptroller was created. From that date until May, 1870, Mr. Green was the only person holding that office. He PATRICK J. TRACY, SuPRavlsoR. directed the expenditure of over $to,000,000 without a single judgment being ob- tained against the City in connection therewith. Upon the Park Commission, Published daily, except legal holidays. chiefly upon Mr. Green, were also imposed by the Legislature the additional tasks Subscription, $9.30 per year, exclusive of supplements. Three cents per copy. of widening and straightening Broadway, from 'i'hirty-fourth street to Fifty-ninth SUPPLEMENTS : Civil List (containing names, salaries, etc., of the city employees), 25 street, and of laying out other parks and avenues in the upper part of the City, in- cents ; Canvass, io cents ; Registry Lists, 5 cents each Assembly District ; Law Department and eluding the widening of Seventh and Lenox avenues to the Harlem river, and the Finance Department supplements, Io cents each. laying out of streets and avenues in what was then a portion of Westchester County, Published at Room 2, City Hall (north side), New York City. but is now within the City limits. The planning of bridges and tunnels for the Entered as Second-class Matter, Post-office at New York City. Harlem river and other important public improvements was also entrusted to the Commission. Mr. Green first suggested the use of the Central Park by the school children, and was prominently connected with the establishment within the parks of the Amer- TABLE OF CONTENTS. ican Museum of Natural History, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the New York Botanical Garden, the New York Zoological Park and the Central Park Meteoro- An Approved Paper— r Law Depsrtment- logical Observatory. ln Re anon to Half-holiday ............... r990 Report for Week ending March 5, 1904.... 199. Armory Commissioners, Board of— Manhattan, Borough of- Messrs. Olmsted and Vaux were appointed Landscape Architects of the Central Propo'als . .... ...... ............ ..... arcs Public Notice ........................... 5996 Park by the Board of which Mr. Green was a member, and he was closely associated Assessors, Bo.ird of— - Mimi r ipal Civil Service Commission- with those gentlemen in the successful carrying out of their plans for the Central Pul,lic Notices........................... 1999 Public Notices ........................... 2002 Park. Mr. Green was always an earnest advocate and supporter of all movements Boar.. Meetings .............................. 1996 Notice to Contractors............... ........ 200 4 Bridge-, Department of— Official Borough Papers ....................... z:or to increase and improve the park system and of the great institutions situated there- Proposals.......... ...................... 1996 Official Directory.............. .. x994 in. Bronx, Borou h of— Official Paper ....... ........................ 1999 At its meeting on November 19, the Park Board adopted the following: Proposals .............................. 2000 Parks, Department of— Brooklyn, Boroug t of— Annual Report for the Year 1903.......... 1971 '\loved by the sad and untimely death on the 13th instant of the Honorable Ar ction Sa e ............................. x997 Proposals. ............................... 1998 Andrew H. Green, the members of the Park Board of The City of New York Proposa s ................................ 1997 1997 Pcltee, Department of- desire to record this evidence of their appreciation of the high character of the man Public Notiees ... ........ .............. Owner, Wanted for Lost Proferty......... 2032 Change of Grade Da ma;e Commission— Proposal........... .... .......... z<oz and the results of his long and useful career as a public official. Public Notice ............................ r99g "Ever mindful of the name and fame of the City to which the best efforts of his, ........... ... 1993 Public Charitie, DDepartmentepartment o of-f— Changes in Departments........ Pn,posals ................... 999 life were devoted, to its institutions and, especially. to its parks, there can be no more Correction, Department of— Querns, Borough of- ' """""' _ Proposals ........ ......... ....... 1997 endearing monument to his untiring energy and skill than the Central Park, which was i .... ...... '"""'of— Report of Commissioner of Public \Yorks 11o:kr and Fe....rr es, for Week ending February so, x904...• r9f3 acquired and largely developed under the guidance of his master hand. Proposals .......... ..................... z~r Transit Commissioners, Education. Department of— Rapid Railroad "During the many years of his connection with the Park Board, serving as Cotn- .............................. 2001 Board of— missioner, President and Comptroller, his discharge of duty was marked by great Proposals Proposals .rough............................... 5996 El;et ons, Board of— Richmond, Borough ol- ability, unbending integrity and a zealous and watchful devotion to the City's in- Meer mgs of March iS and zz, 1904 ........ 1993 Proposals .................... ............ 2000 terest. Es'imate and Appo-tionment, Bard ol— Report of Commi,sioner of Puolic Works, Pubic Hearing ......... ................. t998 1990 "In recognition of our respect for his memory and our esteem for his work, we Public Notices ........................... 1997 wreck ending March 5, e904........... extend to the family of the deceased our sincere sympathy and condolence. Examiners, Board of— Street C'eaning, Department of— Meeting of March 22, 1904 ................ 2990 Ashes, I tc., for Filling in Lands.......... zroz "It is ordered that a copy of this minute, suitably engrossed, be forwarded to the Executive Department— Public Notice ..... ...................... zo 2 family." Public Notices.. ......................... 1994 Supreme Court— Annual Report for 1902. Finance. Deportment of— Acquiring Title to Lands, Etc ............ 2003 Notice of Interest on City Bonds and Taxes and Assessments, Department of— The Board was gratified with the reception by the public and the press of the Stock... ............................. soot Public Notice ............................ z.oz report for 1902. Owing to the provisions of the Charter. the edition was a limited Notices to Property-Owners .............. zoos Water Supply, Gas and Electric.ty, L'epan- one and it was therefore impossible to send the bound report to many applicants. Fire Department— mint of— AuctionSale ..... ....................... z-os Proposals................. .... .. ...... toot This want was met, to a degree: by having the text printed as a supplement to the "City Record," several hundred copies of which were distributed. Letters received stating the report would be of service in establishing park systemstin other cities, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS. were particularly gratifying. The Conunissioner's Report of the Work of the Department of Parks for the Bor- The City of New York. Department of Parks, ottghs of Manhattan and Richmond for the Year 1903. Arsenal, Central Park, December 3f, 1903. Office of the Department of Parks, Hon. SETH LOW, Mayor, The City of New York: Boroughs of Manhattan and Richmond, The Arsenal, Central Park, Sir—I am directed by the Park Board to transmit herewith the annual report of the Departtint, for the several borough divisions, for the year 1903. New York. December 31, Ipo . Respectfully, Hon. SETH LOW, Mayor of The City of New York: GEO. S. TERRY, Secretary, Park Board, Dear Sir—In compliance with the provisions of tile CL::rter, I send you herewith the report of work undertaken and accomplished in this Department ft,r the year 1903. REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1903.- Respectfully. WILLIAMM R. %VILLCOX, Commissioner of Parks, Boroughs of Manhattan and Richmond. The Park Board. Report of the Commissioner of Parks for the Boroughs of Manhattan and Rich- William R. \Willcox, President, Commissioner of Parks for the Boroughs of mond. Manhattan and Richmond. The energies of this Department during 1903 have been devoted chiefly to carry- John E. Eustis, Commissioner of Parks for the Borough of The Bronx. ing to completion the new features established in 1902 and extending the scope of Richard Young, Commissioner of Parks for the Boroughs of Brooklyn and the park work. Queens. The playground work especially has made great progress, and many important George S. Terry, Secretary. Improvements have been prosecuted to completion. The children's farm garden in Samuel Parsons, Jr., Landscape Architect. De Witt Clinton Park was renewed on a larger scale than last
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION

    Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION

    Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street.
  • CB#6 197A Plan 197A Plan for the Eastern Section of Community District 6

    CB#6 197A Plan 197A Plan for the Eastern Section of Community District 6

    CB#6 197a Plan 197a Plan For The Eastern Section of Community District 6 Borough of Manhattan New York City Prepared with the assistance of: Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart CB#6: 14 Street on the south 59 Street on the north Lexington and Madison Avenues on the west East River on the east. 197a: 14 Street on the south 59 Street on the north Second Avenue plus 100 feet on the west East River on the east. 1 Dec 07 CB#6 197a Plan Community Board Six’s 197a plan has four themes: Orientation Land Use: This is a community CB#6: 14 Street on the south of residential neighborhoods 59 Street on the north cohabiting with institutional uses -- Lexington and Madison Avenues on the west hospitals and the United Nations. East River on the east. CD#6 is near the midtown central district but, except for a small area 197a: 14 Street on the south near Grand Central and along 59 Street on the north Second Avenue plus 100 Third Avenue, it is separate feet on the west Waterfront and Open Space: East River on the east. CD#6 is the community district United Nations. with the least open space per person in the city. The waterfront Tudor City. is a last opportunity. The goal is a continuous esplanade along the Former Con Ed Waterside. river and access at as many Kips Bay. streets as possible. NYU Medical Center. Urban Design and Preservation: The goal is investment that makes East River Science Park. the best use of the existing built fabric of the community and adds Bellevue Hospital.
  • Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011)

    Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011)

    Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Date Created Borough Map Atlas Block Lot 10/10/2019 1 2 1 10/10/2019 1 2 2 10/10/2019 1 2 3 10/10/2019 1 2 23 10/10/2019 1 3 1 10/10/2019 1 3 2 10/10/2019 1 3 3 10/10/2019 1 6 1 10/10/2019 1 10 14 10/10/2019 1 12 28 10/10/2019 1 16 1 Page 1 of 10975 10/10/2021 Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Address Street Number Street Name Parcel Name 4 SOUTH STREET 4 SOUTH STREET SI FERRY TERMINAL 10 SOUTH STREET 10 SOUTH STREET BATTERY MARITIME BLDG MARGINAL STREET MARGINAL MTA SUBSTATION STREET 1 PIER 6 1 PIER 6 PIER 6 10 BATTERY PARK 10 BATTERY PARK BATTERY PARK PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK PLAZA PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK PLAZA 24 SOUTH STREET 24 SOUTH STREET VIETNAM VETERANS PLAZA 33 WHITEHALL STREET 33 WHITEHALL STREET WHITEHALL STREET WHITEHALL BOWLING GREEN PARK STREET 22 BATTERY PLACE 22 BATTERY PLACE PIER A / MARINE UNIT #1 Page 2 of 10975 10/10/2021 Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Agency Current Uses Total Area DOT;DSBS FERRY TERMINAL;NO 209215 USE;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;LONG-TERM 191502 AGREEMENT;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS NO USE-NON RES STRC;TRANSIT 38800 SUBSTATION DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;FINAL COMMITMNT- 510025 DISP;LONG-TERM AGREEMENT;NO USE;FINAL COMMITMNT-DISP PARKS PARK 945425 PARKS PARK 39900 PARKS PARK 33600 PARKS PARK 35166 SANIT OFFICE 13214 PARKS PARK 22500 DSBS
  • General Info.Indd

    General Info.Indd

    General Information • Landmarks Beyond the obvious crowd-pleasers, New York City landmarks Guggenheim (Map 17) is one of New York’s most unique are super-subjective. One person’s favorite cobblestoned and distinctive buildings (apparently there’s some art alley is some developer’s idea of prime real estate. Bits of old inside, too). The Cathedral of St. John the Divine (Map New York disappear to differing amounts of fanfare and 18) has a very medieval vibe and is the world’s largest make room for whatever it is we’ll be romanticizing in the unfinished cathedral—a much cooler destination than the future. Ain’t that the circle of life? The landmarks discussed eternally crowded St. Patrick’s Cathedral (Map 12). are highly idiosyncratic choices, and this list is by no means complete or even logical, but we’ve included an array of places, from world famous to little known, all worth visiting. Great Public Buildings Once upon a time, the city felt that public buildings should inspire civic pride through great architecture. Coolest Skyscrapers Head downtown to view City Hall (Map 3) (1812), Most visitors to New York go to the top of the Empire State Tweed Courthouse (Map 3) (1881), Jefferson Market Building (Map 9), but it’s far more familiar to New Yorkers Courthouse (Map 5) (1877—now a library), the Municipal from afar—as a directional guide, or as a tip-off to obscure Building (Map 3) (1914), and a host of other court- holidays (orange & white means it’s time to celebrate houses built in the early 20th century.
  • CITY of HUBER HEIGHTS STATE of OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M

    CITY of HUBER HEIGHTS STATE of OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M

    Agenda Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – Council Chambers 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: 2. Approval of Minutes: A. March 22, 2018 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion 4. Adjournment: https://destinyhosted.com/print_all.cfm?seq=3604&reloaded=true&id=48237 3/29/2018 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – City Council Chambers Meeting Started at 6:00pm 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: Members present: Bryan Detty, Keith Hensley, Vicki Dix, Nancy Byrge, Vincent King & Richard Shaw Members NOT present: Toni Webb • Nina Deam was resigned from the Committee 2. Approval of Minutes: No Minutes to Approval 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion • Mr. King mentioned the “Meet Me at the Park” $20,000 Grant campaign. • Mr. Detty mentioned the Lowe’s communication. • Ms. Byrge discussed the March 29, 2018 email (Copy Enclosed) • Mr. Shaw discussed access to a Shared Drive for additional information. • Mr. King shared concerns regarding “Banning” smoking at the park as no park in Huber is currently banned. • Ms. Byrge suggested Benches inside and out of the park area. • Mr. Hensley and the committee discussed in length the optional sizes for the park. • Mr. Detty expressed interest in a limestone entrance area. • Mr. Hensley suggested the 100ft distance from the North line of the Neighbors and the School property line to the South.
  • Rare and Endangered Plants at Gateway National Recreation Area: a Case for Protection of Urban Natural Areas John T

    Rare and Endangered Plants at Gateway National Recreation Area: a Case for Protection of Urban Natural Areas John T

    Molloy College DigitalCommons@Molloy Faculty Works: CERCOM CERCOM 7-1996 Rare and endangered plants at Gateway National Recreation Area: a case for protection of urban natural areas John T. Tanacredi Ph.D. Molloy College, [email protected] Richard Stalter Saint Johns University Michael D. Byer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/cercom_fac Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Chemistry Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons DigitalCommons@Molloy Feedback Recommended Citation Tanacredi, John T. Ph.D.; Stalter, Richard; and Byer, Michael D., "Rare and endangered plants at Gateway National Recreation Area: a case for protection of urban natural areas" (1996). Faculty Works: CERCOM. 8. https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/cercom_fac/8 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by the CERCOM at DigitalCommons@Molloy. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Works: CERCOM by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Molloy. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Rare and endangered plants at Gateway National Recreation Area: a case for protection of urban natural areas Richard Stalter Michael D. Byer John T. Tanacredi Abstract The diversity of native plant species in urban environments is usually overlooked when biodiversity levels are considered. Inventories of native plants reveal many to be rare species surviving the harsh conditions encountered in urban ecosystems. Knowledge of their existence and an inventory of their distribution will assist in maintaining these populations.
  • July 8 Grants Press Release

    July 8 Grants Press Release

    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks.
  • Take Advantage of Dog Park Fun That's Off the Chain(PDF)

    Take Advantage of Dog Park Fun That's Off the Chain(PDF)

    TIPS +tails SEPTEMBER 2012 Take Advantage of Dog Park Fun That’s Off the Chain New York City’s many off-leash dog parks provide the perfect venue for a tail-wagging good time The start of fall is probably one of the most beautiful times to be outside in the City with your dog. Now that the dog days are wafting away on cooler breezes, it may be a great time to treat yourself and your pooch to a quality time dedicated to socializing, fun and freedom. Did you know New York City boasts more than 50 off-leash dog parks, each with its own charm and amenities ranging from nature trails to swimming pools? For a good time, keep this list of the top 25 handy and refer to it often. With it, you and your dog will never tire of a walk outside. 1. Carl Schurz Park Dog Run: East End Ave. between 12. Inwood Hill Park Dog Run: Dyckman St and Payson 24. Tompkins Square Park Dog Run: 1st Ave and Ave 84th and 89th St. Stroll along the East River after Ave. It’s a popular City park for both pooches and B between 7th and 10th. Soft mulch and fun times your pup mixes it up in two off-leash dog runs. pet owners, and there’s plenty of room to explore. await at this well-maintained off-leash park. 2. Central Park. Central Park is designated off-leash 13. J. Hood Wright Dog Run: Fort Washington & 25. Washington Square Park Dog Run: Washington for the hours of 9pm until 9am daily.
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
  • Great Kills Harbor Breakwater Study: Hydrodynamic Modeling

    Great Kills Harbor Breakwater Study: Hydrodynamic Modeling

    DECEMBER, 2014 NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION GREAT KILLS HARBOR BREAKWATER STUDY: HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING TASK 3 SUMMARY REPORT ADDRESS SCAPE / LANDSCAPE ADDRESS Ocean and Coastal ARCHITECTURE PLLC Consultants, Inc. 277 Broadway 35 Corporate Drive Suite 1606 Suite 1200 New York, NY 10007 Trumbull, CT 06611 TEL 212-462-2628 TEL 203-268-5007 FAX 212-462-4164 FAX 203-268-8821 WWW scapestudio.com WWW ocean-coastal.com GREAT KILLS HARBOR BREAKWATER STUDY: HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING TASK 3 SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NO. 214038 DOCUMENT NO. T3_01 VERSION 2.0 DATE OF ISSUE December 19, 2014 PREPARED BRCO CHECKED TPMA APPROVED AZSL S:\OCC\Projects\2014\OCC_214038.0\3_Project_Files\Reports\Task 3 Modeling\20141219 Final V2.0\214038-3_Task3Summary_BRCO_2.0.docx TASK 3 SUMMARY 5 Task Introduction and Scope The Evaluation of an Offshore Breakwater System Adjacent to and South of Great Kills Harbor is co-led by Ocean & Coastal Consultants, a COWI Company and SCAPE Landscape Architecture (OCC/SCAPE) along with project partners ARCADIS US, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff, Biohabitats, and SeArc Marine Consulting. This feasibility study will provide guidance on the use of offshore breakwaters as an adaptation strategy to reduce wave action while maintaining or enhancing habitat value. The project’s objective seeks to determine the technical feasibility and marine habitat benefits and impacts offered by an offshore breakwater system outside of and adjacent to Great Kills Harbor. The results of the study will serve to inform New York City's Office of Recovery and Resiliency (ORR), New York City Department of City Planning, New York State's Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the Hudson River Estuary Program (HREP), and other agencies and community groups for use in community planning, shoreline adaptation, and resiliency.
  • LONG ISLAND CITY T

    LONG ISLAND CITY T

    8 THE SUN, SUNDAY. MAY 11. 1913. nr.w. nr.u, t ,000,000 IN L. I. r.T.Tr. at Atcnov. nr.Ai, rr.Arr. at .mttio.s III M IA1I l Ml MOV nr.Ai, kstatk at ArcTio.v. f.htatr at acctio. r.i, ktatb at aittion. CITY IMPROVEMENT. LONG ISLAND CITY t. ti To. to nnild r.Iir TihIii. Receites Full Benefit 1 r C..1 O . I'non whirli $330,000,000 I of the Compllete la to Be Lxpende. i i iM'iniunl Noiir Tluunsoii lUai JUUWciy Oyaiem Kill iictim PropPl'ty. A 5 Cent Fare Over 629 Miles of Tracks While on Present Subway it is only possible to ride 34 Miles for a 5 Cent Fare I FIVE YKAltS M Th?e Lot. Will Be 8 Mmute from Tune- - Square 1. .'. Pornon Says Industrial Governor Hughes iM.iwtli ami Subways Mnkc had the laws changed making it powible. L. I. City ppsirartle. e.ri'vf" the nenon Realty and, i Urf er.irnt I'omnnny. - -- Governor Sulzer ; -- - iA th at urn of ItW.imu.CXK) car- tt.e t.ett mo yo.irv in th develop-- t has had it i : rv city lnt In Long Inland City - ried into practical effect for the benefit of r- fiMry f'liMinR!' where- 50,000 nnn t lw - will tir.d employment Michael 1 all people. j V"C " kea of th company, builder the t .vlrffnr-Bolmo- tunnel from MaLbAVAn tn IOtip Ul.ind City and of nf the present subway pyatem, M Te!rday that thl operntion nlone a Bank failed H When "rr.oAn that hemes tnuat le pro-ride- formerly Recelv-- r durlr.p the next five years within a roach ct hl factory properties for no lew was appointed to dfcpote of the assets.
  • Chapter 4: Social Conditions

    Chapter 4: Social Conditions

    Chapter 4: Social Conditions A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This chapter addresses a variety of issues that support social conditions, including population and housing characteristics, community facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The discussion of social conditions considers the entire MESA study area (depicted in Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3, above) with particular focus on the project corridor—the routes proposed for the various project alternatives—where the greatest potential for change would occur. Because none of the project alternatives have the potential to change social conditions in the secondary study area, where Build Alternatives 1 and 2 would add service along an existing subway line, this analysis is of the primary study area only. The analysis was conducted by first compiling existing data for population and housing, com- munity facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The source for the population and housing data is the 1990 Census of Population and Housing. The inventory of community facilities is based on Community District Needs (1997) for Manhattan’s Community Boards, the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Property Lists (dated November 4, 1996), supplementary information provided by the various Community Boards within the study area, and the informa- tion gathered for the analysis of land use, zoning, and public policy in Chapter 3. The assessment of neighborhood character is based on information gathered for other chapters of this document, particularly including the analyses of land use (Chapter 3) and visual and aesthetic considerations (Chapter 6). After assessing the existing conditions in the study area, the expected changes in the future are considered, based on information compiled in Chapter 3.