Intact Cellular Structure in Cereal Endosperm Limits Starch Digestion in Vitro

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Intact Cellular Structure in Cereal Endosperm Limits Starch Digestion in Vitro Accepted Manuscript Intact cellular structure in cereal endosperm limits starch digestion in vitro Rewati R. Bhattarai, Sushil Dhital, Andrew Mense, Michael J. Gidley, Yong-Cheng Shi PII: S0268-005X(17)32085-4 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.027 Reference: FOOHYD 4286 To appear in: Food Hydrocolloids Received Date: 17 December 2017 Revised Date: 12 February 2018 Accepted Date: 14 February 2018 Please cite this article as: Bhattarai, R.R., Dhital, S., Mense, A., Gidley, M.J., Shi, Y.-C., Intact cellular structure in cereal endosperm limits starch digestion in vitro, Food Hydrocolloids (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.foodhyd.2018.02.027. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Intact cellular structure in cereal endosperm limits 2 starch digestion in vitro ab a b a 3 Rewati R. Bhattarai , Sushil Dhital , Andrew Mense , Michael J. Gidley and b* 4 Yong-Cheng Shi 5 aARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, 6 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St 7 Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. 8 bDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 9 66506, United States. 10 11 *Corresponding Author: Prof. Yong-Cheng Shi, Ph.D. 12 E-mail: [email protected] MANUSCRIPT 13 Phone: 785-532-6771 ACCEPTED 1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14 Abstract 15 Limiting the rate and extent of starch digestion is a major target for increasing the nutritional 16 value of cereal-based foods. One mechanism that could be exploited is the ability of intact 17 cell walls to protect intracellular starches from enzyme hydrolysis, but the extent to which 18 this mechanism is valid for cereal endosperm cells is not well understood. This study aimed 19 to isolate individual intact cellular structures from cereals, viz. wheat and sorghum, in order 20 to elucidate the effect of intactness of cell walls on enzymic hydrolysis of entrapped starch. 21 Intact cells were isolated from dry milled flour obtained using three grinding rolls coupled 22 with a wet sieving technique using selected sieves having varying apertures. The intact 23 cellular structure in wheat and sorghum hindered the hydrolysis of entrapped starch as 24 observed from the lower extent of digestion (9 and 7%) compared to deliberately broken cells 25 (19 and 17% under the same conditions). The extent of digestion was markedly increased 26 once the intact cells were cooked (33 and 26% forMANUSCRIPT wheat and sorghum cooked cells), but this 27 was less than half the digestion extent of non-enca psulated cooked starches (77 and 62% 28 respectively). Microscopic observations coupled with fluorescence labelling of enzyme, cell 29 walls and starch suggest a) wheat and sorghum cell walls are effective barriers for access of 30 amylase; and b) both an extensive protein matrix (particularly in sorghum) and non-catalytic 31 binding of amylase on cell wall surfaces can limit the amylolysis of starch within intact cells. 32 Furthermore, the presence of incompletely gelatinised starch inside cooked intact cells, 33 suggests limited swelling of granules trapped inside the cells. This study shows how 34 preservation of ACCEPTEDcellular matrices in cereal-based foods could be beneficial for increasing the 35 amount of enzyme resistant starch in cereals with added nutritional benefits. 36 Keywords: Wheat, sorghum, intact cells, starch digestion, non-specific binding 37 2 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 38 1. Introduction 39 Evidence from both in vitro and in vivo experiments shows that the structure of plant-based 40 foods can have a major effect on the digestion of dietary macronutrients. More specifically, 41 enzyme susceptibility of starch, proteins and lipids in intact cells and tissues of cereals, 42 legumes, nuts and oilseeds are reduced as the macronutrients are encapsulated inside cells 43 walls that are not hydrolysed by human digestive enzymes (Berry, et al., 2008; Bhattarai, 44 Dhital, Wu, Chen, & Gidley, 2017; Dhital, Bhattarai, Gorham, & Gidley, 2016; Edwards, 45 Grundy, et al., 2015; Ellis, et al., 2004; Livesey, et al., 1995; Roman, Gomez, Li, Hamaker, & 46 Martinez, 2017). Edwards et al (2015) reported the role of intact cellular structure in reducing 47 the in vivo human glyceamic response based on a feeding trial of porridges made from coarse 48 wheat endosperm particles (2 mm) and fine flour particles (<0.2 mm). More recently, Roman 49 et al., (2017) showed that the lower starch digestibility in maize flour from cooked hard 50 endosperm compared to a soft counterpart was relateMANUSCRIPTd to the food matrix. These and other 51 studies used fragments of plant tissues consisting of many cells, whereas the contribution of a 52 single cellular structure to the digestion of starch in cereals has not been defined to date. Our 53 previous studies provided evidence that individual intact cells from legumes are essentially 54 impervious to amylase and protease (Bhattarai, et al., 2017; Dhital, et al., 2016), however, 55 analogous information for the case of cereals is lacking. 56 The fragile and thin nature of cereal endosperm cells makes them comparatively difficult to 57 isolate, particularly under the extended aqueous conditions that are used to separate 58 individual cells ACCEPTEDfrom legume cotyledons (Dhital et al., 2016). To avoid lengthy exposure to 59 aqueous conditions, we hypothesise that the separation of individual intact cereal cells from 60 wheat and sorghum should be possible using dry milling (gradual reduction process) with 61 tight control of the particle size. The selection of wheat and sorghum for study is based on 62 their high nutritional and functional potential as well as their distinct anatomical structures. 3 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 63 Whilst sorghum endosperm is harder than wheat (Zhao & Ambrose, 2016), endosperm in 64 both grains consists of cells surrounded by cell walls and containing starch granules 65 embedded in a protein matrix (Corke, 2015; Koehler & Wieser, 2013; Rooney, Miller, & 66 Mertin, 1981; Stefoska-Needham, Beck, Johnson, & Tapsell, 2015; Vu, Bean, Hsieh, & Shi, 67 2017). We hypothesized that with the addition of an appropriate amount of moisture, wheat 68 and sorghum endosperm could be rendered softer and more friable, such that samples can be 69 gradually reduced using a series of selected roller mills to obtain fractions containing 70 individual intact cells. 71 In this study, we isolated intact cells from wheat and sorghum and investigated the enzymic 72 susceptibility of intact cells compared with flour, broken cells and isolated starches in both 73 raw and cooked forms. Identification of how to process cereals into single cell forms provides 74 a new paradigm that could lead to enhanced nutritional quality of derived foods. 75 2. Materials and methods MANUSCRIPT 76 Hard red winter (HRW, Everest, 2015) wheat was obtained from Foundation Seed (Kansas 77 State University, Manhattan, KS, USA). White pearled sorghum grain was obtained from Nu 78 Life Market LLC (Scott City, Kansas, USA). Purified α-amylase (Sigma A6255 from porcine 79 pancreas), fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer I (FITC, F7250, Sigma), calcofluor-white stain 80 (Sigma, 18909) and phosphate buffered saline buffer (PBS; P4417, Sigma, pH 7.2) were 81 purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Enzyme glucose reagent (glucose oxidase/peroxidase; 82 GOPOD) (TR15221) was purchased from Fisher Scientific, USA, and amyloglucosidase (E- 83 AMGDF100), totalACCEPTED starch assay kit (K-TSTA), α-amylase assay kit (K-CERA) and integrated 84 total dietary fibre assay kit (K-INTDF 01/17) were obtained from Megazyme, Bray, Ireland. 85 2.1 Optimisation of milling-sieving process 4 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 86 A combination of dry milling-sifting and wet sieving methods were used to isolate individual 87 intact cells from cereals (Fig. 1). HRW wheat (50 g at a time) was debranned using a 88 laboratory barley pearler (Model 17810, Strong Scott, Webster, WI) for 3 min to remove 89 most of the germ and bran fractions. The debranned wheat samples were then sifted by hand 90 for about one minute on a 300 µm sieve to remove all the dust. Debranning value was 91 calculated as the weight percentage of remaining wheat. The pearled sorghum as obtained 92 from the supplier was free from bran as indicated by its clear white endosperm. A detailed 93 description of milling-sieving techniques used to obtain intact cells is presented in 94 Supplementary section S1. MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED 5 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT MANUSCRIPT 95 96 Fig. 1 . Schematic diagram showing the dry milling and wet sieving technique used for 97 separation of intact wheat cells. 98 2.2 PreparationACCEPTED of broken cells and isolated starch fractions 99 In order to investigate the role of cell walls, intact cells were deliberately broken to obtain 100 broken cell fractions which were devoid of intact cell walls by applying a shear mixing force 101 using magnetic stirrer bars as described previously (Bhattarai, et al., 2017). Due to the 6 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 102 relatively fragile nature of cereal cells, all the intact cells were broken within 6 h, whereas 103 legume cells require 16 h. 104 In order to obtain starch fractions, the broken cells were allowed to settle in excess water and 105 sieved through a 32 µm sieve. The sedimented material that passed through the 32 µm sieve 106 contained starch and trace amount of proteins released from the breakage of intact cells. Light 107 microscopy was used to confirm the purity of starch fractions.
Recommended publications
  • Taxonomy of Cultivated Potatoes (Solanum Section
    Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 165, 107–155. With 5 figures Taxonomy of cultivated potatoes (Solanum section Petota: Solanaceae)boj_1107 107..155 ANNA OVCHINNIKOVA1, EKATERINA KRYLOVA1, TATJANA GAVRILENKO1, TAMARA SMEKALOVA1, MIKHAIL ZHUK1, SANDRA KNAPP2 and DAVID M. SPOONER3* 1N. I. Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry, Bolshaya Morskaya Street, 42–44, St Petersburg, 190000, Russia 2Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 3USDA-ARS, Vegetable Crops Research Unit, Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison WI 53706-1590, USA Received 4 May 2010; accepted for publication 2 November 2010 Solanum tuberosum, the cultivated potato of world commerce, is a primary food crop worldwide. Wild and cultivated potatoes form the germplasm base for international breeding efforts to improve potato in the face of a variety of disease, environmental and agronomic constraints. A series of national and international genebanks collect, characterize and distribute germplasm to stimulate and aid potato improvement. A knowledge of potato taxonomy and evolution guides collecting efforts, genebank operations and breeding. Past taxonomic treatments of wild and cultivated potato have differed tremendously among authors with regard to both the number of species recognized and the hypotheses of their interrelationships. In total, there are 494 epithets for wild and 626 epithets for cultivated taxa, including names not validly published. Recent classifications, however, recognize only about 100 wild species and four cultivated species. This paper compiles, for the first time, the epithets associated with all taxa of cultivated potato (many of which have appeared only in the Russian literature), places them in synonymy and provides lectotype designations for all names validly published where possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Diabetes Exchange List
    THE DIABETIC EXCHANGE LIST (EXCHANGE DIET) The Exchange Lists are the basis of a meal planning system designed by a committee of the American Diabetes Association and the American Dietetic Association. The Exchange Lists The reason for dividing food into six different groups is that foods vary in their carbohydrate, protein, fat, and calorie content. Each exchange list contains foods that are alike; each food choice on a list contains about the same amount of carbohydrate, protein, fat, and calories as the other choices on that list. The following chart shows the amounts of nutrients in one serving from each exchange list. As you read the exchange lists, you will notice that one choice is often a larger amount of food than another choice from the same list. Because foods are so different, each food is measured or weighed so that the amounts of carbohydrate, protein, fat, and calories are the same in each choice. The Diabetic Exchange List Carbohydrate (grams) Protein (grams) Fat (grams) Calories I. Starch/Bread 15 3 trace 80 II. Meat Very Lean - 7 0-1 35 Lean - 7 3 55 Medium-Fat - 7 5 75 High-Fat - 7 8 100 III. Vegetable 5 2 - 25 IV. Fruit 15 - - 60 V. Milk Skim 12 8 0-3 90 Low-fat 12 8 5 120 Whole 12 8 8 150 VI. Fat - - 5 45 You will notice symbols on some foods in the exchange groups. 1. Foods that are high in fiber (three grams or more per normal serving) have the symbol *. 2. Foods that are high in sodium (400 milligrams or more of sodium per normal serving) have the symbol #.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 16 Sugar and Starches
    UNIT 16 SUGAR AND STARCHES. Structure 16.1 Introduction Objectives 16.2 Sugar 16.2.1 Sugarcane / 16.3 Starches 16.3.1 Potato 16.3.2 Cnssavn 16.4 Surnmcary 16.5 Tenninal Questions 16.6 Answers lGYl INTRODUCTION Sugar and starches, the two common forms of carbohydrates, constitute a group of organic compounds containing carbon, hydrogen and oxygen generally, in the ratios of 121. The conlparatively high percentage of oxygen makes carbohydrates a less efficient source of energy than fats and oils. They may be roughly divided into monosaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides. Monosaccliarides are the least complex of the carbohydrates having a general formula C,H2,0n They cannot be hydrolysed further into simple carbohydrates and are the building blocks of the more complex oligo- and polysaccharides. Of all plant monosaccharides, glucose and liuctose are the most common. Oligosaccharides are comp sed of two or more molecules of monosaccharides joined together by glycoside linkages and tiley yield simple sugars on hydrolysis. Sucrose (the conde~lsationproduct of a fructose and glucose unit) and maltose or malt sugar (the condensation product of two glucose molecules) are two common examples of disaccharides. Polysnccharides are complex molecules of high molecular weight composed of a large number of repenting monosaccharide units held together by glucoside linkages. They have lost all their sugar properties. Their general formula is (CnHzn.20n.l),. They can be broken down into their constituent sugars by hydl.olysis. Starch and cellulose are the two most abundant polysnccharides in plants. The carbohydrates are reserve food supply of not only plants but animals too.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Evolutionary Origin of Starch Biosynthetic Enzymes in Green and Red Algae1
    J. Phycol. 41, 1131–1141 (2005) r 2005 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00135.x COMMON EVOLUTIONARY ORIGIN OF STARCH BIOSYNTHETIC ENZYMES IN GREEN AND RED ALGAE1 Nicola J. Patron and Patrick J. Keeling2 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Botany Department, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada Plastidic starch synthesis in green algae and length and number of branches varying between or- plants occurs via ADP-glucose in likeness to pro- ganisms. The a-1,4-glucan chains are synthesized by karyotes from which plastids have evolved. In con- glycosyltransferases, which use uridine diphosphate trast, floridean starch synthesis in red algae (UDP)-glucose or ADP-glucose as the sugar donor proceeds via uridine diphosphate-glucose in sem- and a preexisting a-1,4-glucan chain as the acceptor. blance to eukaryotic glycogen synthesis and occurs Glycogen is localized in the cytoplasm of bacteria, fun- in the cytosol rather than the plastid. Given the gi, and animal cells. Both eukaryotic and prokaryotic monophyletic origin of all plastids, we investigated glycogens are always amorphous and never form the the origin of the enzymes of the plastid and cyto- crystalline granules characteristic of starch. Red algal solic starch synthetic pathways to determine wheth- starch, thought to be comprised purely of amylopectin er their location reflects their origin—either from chains (Marszalec et al. 2001, Yu et al. 2002), is cyto- the cyanobacterial endosymbiont or from the solic and is known as floridean starch, whereas in eukaryotic host. We report that, despite the com- green algae and plants, starch accumulates within the partmentalization of starch synthesis differing in plastid.
    [Show full text]
  • Chloroplasts Are the Food Producers of the Cell. the Organelles Are Only Found in Plant Cells and Some Protists Such As Algae
    Name: ___________________________ Cell #2 H.W. due September 22nd, 2016 Period: _________ Chloroplasts are the food producers of the cell. The organelles are only found in plant cells and some protists such as algae. Animal cells do not have chloroplasts. Chloroplasts work to convert light energy of the Sun into sugars that can be used by cells. It is like a solar panel that changes sunlight energy into electric energy. The entire process is called photosynthesis and it all depends on the little green chlorophyll molecules in each chloroplast. In the process of photosynthesis, plants create sugars and release oxygen (O2). The oxygen released by the chloroplasts is the same oxygen you breathe every day. Chloroplasts are found in plant cells, but not in animal cells. The purpose of the chloroplast is to make sugars that feed the cell’s machinery. Photosynthesis is the process of a plant taking energy from the Sun and creating sugars. When the energy from the Sun hits a chloroplast and the chlorophyll molecules, light energy is converted into the chemical energy. Plants use water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight to make sugar and oxygen. During photosynthesis radiant energy or solar energy or light energy is transferred into chemical energy in the form of sugar (glucose). You already know that during photosynthesis plants make their own food. The food that the plant makes is in the form of sugar that is used to provide energy for the plant. The extra sugar that the plant does not use is stored as starch for later use. Mitochondria are known as the powerhouses of the cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Starch Biosynthesis and Degradation in Plants’ (2007) by Alison M Smith
    Starch Biosynthesis and Advanced article Article Contents Degradation in Plants • Introduction • Starch Synthesis James R Lloyd, Department of Genetics, Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Univer- • Starch Degradation sity of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa • Importance of Starch Oliver Kötting, Department of Biology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Online posting date: 15th July 2016 Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Based in part on the previous version of this eLS article ‘Starch Biosynthesis and Degradation in Plants’ (2007) by Alison M Smith. Starch is the main form in which plants store degradation occur during distinct developmental periods, which carbon. Its presence and turnover are important may be separated by months or even years. In starch-storing for proper plant growth and productivity. The glu- seeds, starch synthesis occurs during most of the period of cose polymers that constitute the semi-crystalline growth and maturation. Starch degradation occurs after the onset of germination, providing carbon for the initial growth of the starch granule are synthesised by the concerted seedling. In vegetative storage organs, starch is synthesised dur- actions of well-conserved classes of isoforms of ing growth periods favourable for photosynthesis. It persists dur- starch synthase and starch-branching enzyme, ing unfavourable periods, when the photosynthetic parts of the via a process that also requires the debranch- plant may die. It is then degraded after the onset of regrowth, ing enzyme isoamylase. The degradation of the to provide carbon for initial growth until photosynthetic organs granule proceeds via different pathways in differ- are reestablished. In addition to its role in storage organs, starch ent types of starch-storing tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistant Starch Richard Collins, MD, “The Cooking Cardiologist” Susan Buckley, RDN, CDE
    3/4/2015 Resistant Starch Richard Collins, MD, “The Cooking Cardiologist” Susan Buckley, RDN, CDE What is Resistant Starch? Although this may be the first you've heard of resistant starch, it's likely been a part of your diet most of your life Resistant starch is a type of dietary fiber naturally found in many carbohydrate-rich foods such as potatoes, grains, and beans, particularly when these foods are cooked and cooled. It gets its name because it "resists" digestion in the body, and though this is true of many types of fiber, what makes resistant starch so special is the powerful impact it has on weight loss and overall health 1 3/4/2015 What is Resistant Starch? Over the past several years there has been an exponential increase in the number of studies linking imbalances or disturbances of the gut microbiota to a wide range of diseases including obesity, inflammatory bowel diseases, depression and anxiety The normal human gut has hundreds of bacterial species, some good and some not so good. The overall number and relative quantity of each type has a profound effect on our health and well being. Resistant starch selectively stimulates the good bacteria in our intestines, helping to maintain a healthy balance of bacteria What is Resistant Starch? Most of the carbohydrates that we eat in the diet are starches: grains, legumes and starchy vegetables such as potatoes, corn, peas, winter squash and sweet potatoes. Starches are long chains of glucose that are found in these foods. But not all of the starch we eat gets digested.
    [Show full text]
  • Physicochemical Properties, Modifications and Applications of Starches from Different Botanical Sources Sylvia Carolina ALCÁZAR-ALAY1, Maria Angela Almeida MEIRELES1*
    a Food Science and Technology ISSN 0101-2061 DDOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.6749 Physicochemical properties, modifications and applications of starches from different botanical sources Sylvia Carolina ALCÁZAR-ALAY1, Maria Angela Almeida MEIRELES1* Abstract Present trends towards technologies and processes that increase the use of residues make starchy vegetal biomass an important alternative material in various applications due to starch’s versatility, low cost and ease of use when its physicochemical properties are altered. Starch is increasingly used in many industrial applications and as a renewable energy resource. Starch can be modified to enhance its positive attributes and eliminate deficiencies in its native characteristics. In this article, the state of knowledge on conventional and unconventional starches and their properties, characteristics, modifications and applications are reviewed. Keywords: starch modification; starch granules; paste properties; conventional starch; unconventional starch; starch biomass; food. Practical Application: Use of unconventional starches and vegetal residues containing starch in industry. 1 Starch Starch is the most abundant carbohydrate reserve in plants of α-glucans chains of different sizes and the grouping of branch and is found in leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, different types of points in the amylopectin molecule allow the formation of double stems and roots. Starch is used by plants as source of carbon helical chains. Amylose and amylopectin can be arranged in a and energy (Smith, 2001). The biochemical chain responsible for semicrystalline structure forming a matrix of starch granules with starch synthesis involves glucose molecules produced in plant alternating amorphous (amylose) and crystalline (amylopectin) cells by photosynthesis. Starch is formed in the chloroplasts material, which is known as the growth rings in superior plant of green leaves and amyloplasts, organelles responsible for the starch (Jenkins et al., 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Botany for Arborists: Energy and Trees
    WESTERN A rborist Botany for arborists: Energy and trees Dr. Kevin T. Smith and Dr. A. James Downer Energy capture glucose. Glucose is converted into free-living soil microorganisms. This The sun bathes the earth in waves of other sugars, such as sucrose for transformed solar energy then be- radiated energy. The waves of radia- translocation throughout the plant. comes part of the soil matrix and the tion occur along the electromagnetic These sugars are collectively known living web of soil organisms. In this spectrum that includes microwaves, as photosynthate. Other plant parts way, trees energize the environment radio waves, visible light, and infra- such as young branches or cortical around them. Even in death, trees red heat. The visible portion of that cells just beneath the epidermis or are a source of energy. As trees shed spectrum is the rainbow formed by thin bark can also photosynthesize leaves, flowers, branches, and roots, sunlight passing through a prism. (Fig. 2). In regions with very short or when the stem itself dies or falls, Solar energy is increasingly used to growing seasons, such as subarctic the energy bound in the plant parts power our homes, offices, and busi- forests and arid deserts, stem and becomes an energy source for sapro- nesses. Trees and other green plants branch photosynthesis may provide phytic bacteria and fungi. As plant have been using solar energy for a significant share of total energy parts decompose, they provide food many millions of years. Plants use captured. as well as habitat for many inverte- that radiant energy to make and Photosynthate moves to the fur- brates and other animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Photosynthesis (Quick Questions) 1. What Is the Word Equation For
    Photosynthesis (Quick Questions) 1. What is the word equation for photosynthesis? 2. Describe what happens during photosynthesis. 3. Why do plants use glucose for? 4. What does a plant convert glucose to if it isn’t used straight away? 5. How can iodine be used to test for photosynthesis? 6. Name 4 adaptations of a leaf 7. How are algae plants (aquatic plants) adapted to photosynthesise in water? 8. What are limiting factors? 9. Name 3 limiting factors of photosynthesis 10. Name 4 ways in which a plant uses the glucose produced by photosynthesis. 11. Why is glucose not stored in plants and instead converted to starch for storage? 12. Where is starch stored in a plant? 13. Why do plants grow faster in a greenhouse than outside? 14. What are hydroponics? Photosynthesis (Quick Answers) 1. (+ light energy) Carbon dioxide + water glucose + oxygen 2. Light energy is absorbed by the chlorophyll in the chloroplasts. This energy is used to convert carbon dioxide from the air and water from the soil into the simple sugar glucose and the by-product oxygen. 3. They use it for respiration to provide energy for cell functions such as growth and reproduction. 4. Starch (which is insoluble). 5. Iodine can be used. It turns from a yellow-brown colour to a dark blue colour if starch is present, which means photosynthesis has taken place. 6. a. Broad leaves, giving them a big surface area for light to fall on. b. Contain chlorophyll in the chloroplasts to absorb light energy. c. have air spaces (in the spongy layer) that allow carbon dioxide to get to the cells, and oxygen to leave then by diffusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Structures, Properties, and Digestibility of Resistant Starch Yongfeng Ai Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2013 Structures, properties, and digestibility of resistant starch Yongfeng Ai Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Food Science Commons Recommended Citation Ai, Yongfeng, "Structures, properties, and digestibility of resistant starch" (2013). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 13558. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13558 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Structures, properties, and digestibility of resistant starch By Yongfeng Ai A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Food Science and Technology Program of Study Committee: Jay-lin Jane, Major Professor Tong Wang Buddhi P. Lamsal Michael Blanco Huaiqing Wu Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2013 Copyright © Yongfeng Ai, 2013. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 DISSERTATION ORGANIZATION 4 CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW 5 1. Structure of starch granules 5 2. Thermal property of starch 8 3. Pasting property of starch 10 4. Gel formation of starch 11 5. Amylose-lipid complex 12 6. Enzymatic hydrolysis of starch 13 7. Resistant starch 17 References 21 Figures 32 CHAPTER 2. EFFECTS OF LIPIDS ON ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF STARCH 37 Abstract 37 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SUGAR STARCH Fruit the Natural Upgrade
    AGRANA Beteiligungs-AG № 2015|16 SUGAR STARCH FRUIT The natural upgrade WWW.AGRANA.COM » Page 3 « agrana AT A GLANCE Sugar, starch and fruit – AGRANA is successfully active around the world in these three segments. We refine agricultural raw materials, turning them into a range of different industrial products to supply local producers as well as large multinational companies active in the food processing industry, in particular. We also serve the end-consumer market in the Sugar segment with country-specific brands such as ‘Wiener Zucker’ in Austria. AN INTEGRAL PART OF MODERN LIFE. The product range extends from sugar for food products, starch for textiles Leading CONTENTS and technical applications to bioethanol as a sustainable and environmentally sensitive fuel, as well as fruit SUGAR preparations for yoghurt and fruit juice concentrates. SUPPLIER in Central, Eastern & 03 AGRANA at a glance OUR EMPLOYEES ARE OUR MOST IMPORTANT South-Eastern Europe AGRANA maintains a global presence with 04 Statement of the management board RESOURCE. around 8,700 employees based at 54 production facilities 06 Mission statement located on five continents. Their dedication and expertise Major manufacturer of 08 History ensure the company‘s success. customer-specific 10 Production Sites AGRANA IS A STOCK CORPORATION. The Group has been STARCH 12 Sustainability listed in the Prime Market segment of the Vienna Stock PRODUCTS in Europe Exchange since 1991. AGRANA most recently generated 16 Segment SUGAR consolidated revenues of approximately EUR 2.5 billion. 22 Segment STARCH World market leader 28 Segment FRUIT SUSTAINABLE OPERATIONS. In view of our commercial in the production of activities and the associated proximity to raw agricultural 34 Employees products, striving for sustainability represents an existen- F RUIT 36 Research & Development tial and integral part of AGRANA’s business model.
    [Show full text]