Briefing Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Briefing Document FDA Briefing Document Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2020 Topic: New Drug Application 213378 ALKS 3831 (olanzapine/samidorphan) for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder 1 The attached package contains background information prepared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the panel members of the advisory committees. The FDA background package contains assessments or conclusions and recommendations written by individual FDA reviewers. Such conclusions and recommendations do not necessarily represent the final positions of the individual reviewers, review Divisions, or Office. FDA has brought New Drug Application 213378, ALKS 3831 (olanzapine/samidorphan) for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder, to these Advisory Committees in order to gain the Committees’ insights and opinions. The background package may not include all issues relevant to the final regulatory recommendation and, instead, is intended to focus on issues identified by FDA for discussion by the Advisory Committees. FDA will not issue a final determination on the issues at hand until input from the Advisory Committee process has been considered and all reviews have been finalized. The final determination may be affected by issues not discussed at the Advisory Committee meeting. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .....................................................................................................3 TABLE OF TABLES ..........................................................................................................4 TABLE OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................5 GLOSSARY ........................................................................................................................6 1. DIVISION DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM....................................................................7 2. OBJECTIVE OF MEETING AND OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ..................................................................................................................10 2.1. PURPOSE ...............................................................................................................10 2.2. PRODUCT UNDER REVIEW ...............................................................................10 2.3. ANTIPSYCHOTIC METABOLIC CONSIDERATIONS .....................................10 2.4. REGULATORY BACKGROUND.........................................................................13 3. SUMMARY OF CLINICAL DATA .............................................................................14 3.1. EFFECTIVENESS OF ALKS 3831 .......................................................................14 3.1.1. Study ALK3831-302 ........................................................................................16 3.1.2. Study ALK3831-A303 .....................................................................................21 3.1.3. Study ALK3831-A305 .....................................................................................38 3.1.4. Studies ALK3831-A304 and ALK3831-A306 .................................................40 3.2. SAFETY OF ALKS 3831 .......................................................................................45 3.2.1. Adverse Events and Investigations ...................................................................45 3.2.2. Safety Concerns Regarding Precipitated Opioid Withdrawal, Inadequate Analgesia, and Opioid Overdose ..................................................46 4. REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................51 5. APPENDICES ...............................................................................................................54 5.1. STUDY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULES .................................................................54 5.2. WEIGHT GAIN TRAJECTORIES BY DROPOUT REASON (STUDY A303) .....................................................................................................................56 3 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1. Olanzapine Weight Gain in Clinical Trials as Described in Labeling .................11 Table 2. Relevant Clinical Studies .....................................................................................14 Table 3. Percent Change in Body Weight at Week 12 (Study 302, Part A; FAS 1 and FAS 2 Populations) ......................................................................................................18 Table 4. Categorical Weight Gain Assessment at Week 12 (Proportion of Completers Meeting Criteria; Study 302) .......................................................................................20 Table 5. Primary Analysis Results for First Coprimary Endpoint (Study A303) ..............23 Table 6. Primary Analysis for Second Coprimary Endpoint (Study A303) ......................25 Table 7. Primary Analysis Results for Key Secondary Endpoint (Study A303) ...............25 Table 8. Sensitivity Analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24 – Delta Adjusted Pattern Mixture Model (Study A303) ...............................27 Table 9. Sensitivity Analyses by Including Both On- and Off-Treatment Weight Assessments after Premature Discontinuation of Study Drug (Study A303) ..............30 Table 10. Additional Analyses for Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Weight Gain from Baseline at Week 24 by Imputation Method (Study A303) ................................31 Table 11. Other Secondary Metabolic Endpoints, Week 24 (Study A303) .......................31 Table 12. Categorical Increases in Glucose and HbA1c (Study A3030) ...........................33 Table 13. Blood Pressure (Study A303) ............................................................................36 Table 14. Change from Baseline in PANSS Total Score at Week 4 (Study A305) ..........40 Table 15. Weight and Metabolic Laboratory Parameters (Studies A304 and A306) ........44 Table 16. Assessment Schedule for A303 .........................................................................54 Table 17. Assessment Schedule for A305 .........................................................................55 4 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1. Mean Weight Change at Each Visit by Treatment Cohort, European SOHO Observational Study .....................................................................................................12 Figure 2. Schematic of Study 302 ......................................................................................17 Figure 3. Percent Change in Body Weight by Treatment Group (Study 302, Part A, FAS 1) ..........................................................................................................................19 Figure 4. Percent Change in Body Weight by Treatment Group (Study 302, Part A, FAS 2) ..........................................................................................................................20 Figure 5. Schematic of Study A303 ...................................................................................21 Figure 6. LS Mean Percent Change Weight Gain from Baseline by Treatment During 24-Week Double-Blind Period (Study A303) ..............................................................24 Figure 7. Cumulative Frequency Distribution of Percent Change from Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24 (Completers; Study A303) .................................................26 Figure 8. Mean Weight Trajectories of Subjects in Various Cohorts (Study A303) .........29 Figure 9. Change from Baseline in Fasting Glucose by Visit (Study A303) .....................33 Figure 10. Proportion of Subjects with Baseline Fasting Glucose < 126 mg/dL and a Subsequent Fasting Glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (Study A303) ...........................................34 Figure 11. Proportion of Subjects with Fasting Glucose Increase from Baseline of ≥ 10 mg/dL (Study A303) ...............................................................................................35 Figure 12. Proportion of Subjects with Baseline Triglycerides <200 and a Subsequent Triglyceride Measurement of ≥ 200 mg/dL (A303) ....................................................36 Figure 13. Change from Baseline in Blood Pressure by Visit (Study A303) ....................37 Figure 14. Schematic of Study A305 .................................................................................38 Figure 15. Mean Percent Change from Baseline in Body Weight by Visit and Treatment Sequence Through Week 12 of the Extension Study .................................42 Figure 16. Side-by-Side View of Historical Weight Results in Long-Term OLZ Studies and Long-Term Weight Results for ALKS 3831 ............................................43 Figure 17: Weight Gain Trajectories of Individual Dropouts with Top Three Discontinuation Reasons (Study A303) .......................................................................56 5 GLOSSARY AE adverse event BMI body mass index BP blood pressure CI confidence interval DDLO Division of Diabetes, Lipids, and Obesity DP Division of Psychiatry (the primary review division) DSaRM Drug Safety and Risk Management FAS full-analysis set FDA Food and Drug Administration LS least squares NDA new drug application NI non-inferiority OL open-label PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale PDAC Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee 6 1. DIVISION DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM M E M O R A N D U M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Recommended publications
  • PROZAC Product Monograph Page 1 of 49 Table of Contents
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrPROZAC® fluoxetine hydrochloride 10 mg and 20 mg Capsules Antidepressant / Antiobsessional / Antibulimic © Eli Lilly Canada Inc. Date of Revision: January, 25 Exchange Tower 2021 130 King Street West, Suite 900 PO Box 73 Toronto, Ontario M5X 1B1 1-888-545-5972 www.lilly.ca Submission Control No: 192639 PROZAC Product Monograph Page 1 of 49 Table of Contents PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .......................................................3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION...........................................................................3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ................................................................................3 CONTRAINDICATIONS .....................................................................................................4 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ....................................................................................5 ADVERSE REACTIONS ...................................................................................................13 DRUG INTERACTIONS....................................................................................................22 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................27 OVERDOSAGE..................................................................................................................28 ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ...............................................................30 STORAGE AND STABILITY............................................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday Best Bets
    Sunday SUNDAY PRIME TIME APRIL 8 S1 – DISH S2 - DIRECTV Best Bets 6 PM 6:30 7 PM 7:30 8 PM 8:30 9 PM 9:30 10 PM 10:30 11 PM 11:30 S1 S2 WSAZ WSAZ NBC News Dateline NBC Harry's Law "The Celebrity Apprentice "Ad Hawk" A celebrity WSAZ :35 Storm 3 3 NBC News Lying Game" (N) goes on a tirade against a teammate. (N) News Stories WLPX 5:30 < Space Cowboys ('00) Tommy Lee Jones, Clint < The Visitor ('07) Haaz Sleiman, Richard Jenkins. A < Rebound ('05) ION Eastwood. NASA recruits hotshot pilots to repair a satellite. professor finds a couple living in his NY apartment. Martin Lawrence. 29 - 5:00 < Out of Bounds World's Funniest Masters of Illusion < Freeway ('96) Reese Witherspoon. A Crook and Music TV10 - - ('03) Sophia Myles. Moments troubled young girl flees the foster-care system. Chase Row WCHS Eyewit- World America's Funniest Once Upon a Time GCB "Turn the Other GCB "Sex Is Divine" Eyewit- :35 Ent. ABC ness News News Home Videos "7:15 a.m." Cheek" (N) (N) ness News Tonight 8 8 WVAH Big Bang Two and a The Cleveland The B.Burger Family American Eyewitness News at Wrestling Ring of FOX Theory Half Men Simpsons Show Simpsons "Torpedo" Guy Dad 10 p.m. Honor 11 11 WOWK 2:00 Golf Masters 60 Minutes The Amazing Race (N) The Good Wife "The CSI: Miami "Habeas 13 News Cold Case CBS Tournament (L) Death Zone" Corpse" (SF) (N) Weekend 13 13 WKYT 2:00 Golf Masters 60 Minutes The Amazing Race (N) The Good Wife "The CSI: Miami "Habeas 27 :35 CBS Tournament (L) Death Zone" Corpse" (SF) (N) NewsFirst Courtesy - - WHCP < The Addams Family A greedy lawyer < Addams Family Values The family must Met Your Met Your The King The King CW tries to plunder the family's fortune.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinance No. 2015-37
    ORDINANCE NO. 2015-37 ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF FL., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, FOR THE COLLECTION OF RESIDENTIAL MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE, AS THE COMPANY WITH THE HIGHEST RANKED BEST OVERALL PROPOSAL PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 2014-15-9500-00-002, FOR A TERM BEGINNING UPON EXECUTION OF THE EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BY THE PARTIES AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2019, WITH AN AUTOMATIC RENEWAL TERM THEREAFTER OF FIVE YEARS, BEGINNING ON OCTOBER 1, 2019 AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2023, AND SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS AT THE OPTION OF THE PARTIES, FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR EACH, WITH A CUMULATIVE DURATION OF ALL SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS AFTER THE FIRST RENEWAL TERM NOT EXCEEDING A TOTAL OF FIVE YEARS; APPROVING THE TERMS OF THE EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY WITH THE AGREEMENT ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AS EXHIBIT '·t··; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK, AS ATTESTING WITNESS, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, TO EXECUTE THE EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City issued a request for proposals ("'RFP") for certain types of Solid Waste Collection Services; and ORDINANCE NO. 2015-37 Page 2 WHEREAS, Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, Inc. ("'Progressive Waste") submitted a proposal in response to the City's RFP (RFP No. 2014-15-9500-00-002); and WHEREAS, the City has relied upon
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al
    US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report
    Research Report Revised Junio 2018 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Table of Contents Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Overview How do medications to treat opioid use disorder work? How effective are medications to treat opioid use disorder? What are misconceptions about maintenance treatment? What is the treatment need versus the diversion risk for opioid use disorder treatment? What is the impact of medication for opioid use disorder treatment on HIV/HCV outcomes? How is opioid use disorder treated in the criminal justice system? Is medication to treat opioid use disorder available in the military? What treatment is available for pregnant mothers and their babies? How much does opioid treatment cost? Is naloxone accessible? References Page 1 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Discusses effective medications used to treat opioid use disorders: methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Overview An estimated 1.4 million people in the United States had a substance use disorder related to prescription opioids in 2019.1 However, only a fraction of people with prescription opioid use disorders receive tailored treatment (22 percent in 2019).1 Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids more than quadrupled from 1999 through 2016 followed by significant declines reported in both 2018 and 2019.2,3 Besides overdose, consequences of the opioid crisis include a rising incidence of infants born dependent on opioids because their mothers used these substances during pregnancy4,5 and increased spread of infectious diseases, including HIV and hepatitis C (HCV), as was seen in 2015 in southern Indiana.6 Effective prevention and treatment strategies exist for opioid misuse and use disorder but are highly underutilized across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Overdose – Use of Naloxone
    CHAPTER: 41.3.1 Page 1 of 4 NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS MANUAL CHAPTER: 41.3.1 TITLE: OPIOID OVERDOSE – USE OF NALOXONE EFFECTIVE: 10/22/2017 REVISED: 06/24/2018 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to set forth guidelines with respect to the appropriate field administration of Naloxone (Narcan) kits by members of New Orleans Police Department in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents. POLICY STATEMENT 1. Commissioned members of the NOPD are often the first emergency responders to the scene of a medical, suspected medical and overdose incident. Recognizing this, the NOPD has adopted this Chapter with the following goals: (a) To provide a framework for training in the field use of Naloxone, (b) To provide a framework on the proper field administration of Naloxone, and (c) To facilitate life-saving intervention in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents where NOPD officers are the first to arrive on the scene. 2. All commissioned and/or civilian members who have been trained in the use and administration of the department’s Naloxone nasal administration kits for suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents are authorized to carry, use and administer the kits. 3. All members responding to medical calls, including suspected opioid overdoses, shall use universal precautions. DEFINITIONS: Definitions related to this Chapter include: Administration—Nasal administration of approved Naloxone 2mg kits with atomizer; 1mg (1/2 dose) to be administered in each nostril. Naloxone—A narcotic analgesic antagonist, used in the reversal of acute narcotic analgesic respiratory depression. Naloxone is effectively an antidote to opioid overdose and may completely reverse the effects of an opioid overdose if administered in time.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title Page Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7
    JPET Fast Forward. Published on December 31, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000189 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. JPET-AR-2020-000189R1: Obeng et al. Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine: In Vitro Affinity and Efficacy for Mu-Opioid Receptor and Morphine-Like Discriminative-Stimulus Effects in Rats. Title Page Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine: In Vitro Affinity and Efficacy for Mu-Opioid Receptor and Opioid-Like Behavioral Effects in Rats Samuel Obeng1,2,#, Jenny L. Wilkerson1,#, Francisco León2, Morgan E. Reeves1, Luis F. Restrepo1, Lea R. Gamez-Jimenez1, Avi Patel1, Anna E. Pennington1, Victoria A. Taylor1, Nicholas P. Ho1, Tobias Braun1, John D. Fortner2, Morgan L. Crowley2, Morgan R. Williamson1, Victoria L.C. Pallares1, Marco Mottinelli2, Carolina Lopera-Londoño2, Christopher R. McCurdy2, Lance R. McMahon1, and Takato Hiranita1* Downloaded from Departments of Pharmacodynamics1 and Medicinal Chemistry2, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida jpet.aspetjournals.org #These authors contributed equally Recommended section: Behavioral Pharmacology at ASPET Journals on September 29, 2021 Correspondence: *Takato Hiranita, Ph.D. Department of Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida 1345 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610 Email: [email protected] Phone: +1.352.294.5411 Fax: +1.352.273.7705 Keywords: kratom, mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, morphine, opioid, discriminative stimulus Conflicts of Interests or Disclaimers: None Manuscript statistics: Number of text pages: 56 Number of tables: 7 Number of figures: 10 Number of supplementary Tables: 4 Number of supplementary figures: 7 1 JPET Fast Forward. Published on December 31, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000189 This article has not been copyedited and formatted.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Valley Toxicology Drug List
    Chloroform ~F~ Lithium ~A~ Chlorpheniramine Loratadine Famotidine Acebutolol Chlorpromazine Lorazepam Fenoprofen Acetaminophen Cimetidine Loxapine Fentanyl Acetone Citalopram LSD (Lysergide) Fexofenadine 6-mono- Clomipramine acetylmorphine Flecainide ~M~ Clonazepam a-Hydroxyalprazolam Fluconazole Maprotiline Clonidine a-Hydroxytriazolam Flunitrazepam MDA Clorazepate Albuterol Fluoxetine MDMA Clozapine Alprazolam Fluphenazine Medazepam Cocaethylene Amantadine Flurazepam Meperidine Cocaine 7-Aminoflunitrazepam Fluvoxamine Mephobarbital Codeine Amiodarone Fosinopril Meprobamate Conine Amitriptyline Furosemide Mesoridazine Cotinine Amlodipine Methadone Cyanide ~G~ Amobarbital Methanol Cyclobenzaprine Gabapentin Amoxapine d-Methamphetamine Cyclosporine GHB d-Amphetamine l-Methamphetamine Glutethamide l-Amphetamine ~D~ Methapyrilene Guaifenesin Aprobarbital Demoxepam Methaqualone Atenolol Desalkylfurazepam ~H~ Methocarbamol Atropine Desipramine Halazepam Methylphenidate ~B~ Desmethyldoxepin Haloperidol Methyprylon Dextromethoraphan Heroin Metoclopramide Baclofen Diazepam Hexobarbital Metoprolol Barbital Digoxin Hydrocodone Mexiletine Benzoylecgonine Dihydrocodein Hydromorphone Midazolam Benzphetamine Dihydrokevain Hydroxychloroquine Mirtazapine Benztropine Diltiazem Hydroxyzine Morphine (Total/Free) Brodificoum Dimenhydrinate Bromazepam ~N~ Diphenhydramine ~I~ Bupivacaine Nafcillin Disopyramide Ibuprofen Buprenorphine Naloxone Doxapram Imipramine Bupropion Naltrexone Doxazosin Indomethacin Buspirone NAPA Doxepin Isoniazid Butabarbital Naproxen
    [Show full text]
  • The New Face of Drug Abuse: Impact on Your Children, Family, and Community
    The New Face of Drug Abuse: Impact on your Children, Family, and Community Patrick J. Sammon, Ph.D . [email protected] Impact of Prescription Drug Abuse: Illegal use of these drugs is responsible for multiple overdoses and fatalities Opiate addiction is blamed for causing a surge in crime: Robberies and break-ins at pharmacies Drug shoppers scamming doctors Harassments, assaults, and robberies of patients leaving drugstores Shoplifting and burglaries to support addiction Domestic violence and abuse Who’s at risk, who are the most vulnerable?: Adolescents - Sharp increase in 12 to 17 yr. olds and the 18 to 25 yr. olds Women - Increase rate of use in younger women Older adults - 17% of 60 + yr. olds may be affected by prescription drug abuse Why are Prescription Drugs so Popular? Legal, Easy to Obtain, Cheap and Safe & Non-addictive Legal: Perception that there is less legal risk than illicit drugs − Federal law does not distinguish between CI & CII drugs Easily obtainable: - From users, diverters, clinics, hospitals, Emergency Departments and practitioners and easy to steal Cheap: Low or no co-pay cost; may motivate people to use or sell PD’s Safer and Non-addictive: - Easily identity and less stigma than street drugs - Higher purity and less risky - Less HIV or hepatitis risk - Easier to use, no IV injecting but what about tolerance…and addiction! Commonly Misused and Abused Prescription & OTC Drugs Substance misuse is use of a drug that varies from a socially or medically accepted use. Substance abuse - any use of drugs that cause physical, psychological, economic, legal or social harm to the individual user or to others affected by the drug use's behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • The Evaluation of Drug Regulation - Economic Approaches Into the Valuation and Evaluation of the Drug Regulatory Framework
    The Evaluation of Drug Regulation - Economic approaches into the valuation and evaluation of the drug regulatory framework Jacoline Bouvy The evaluation of drug regulation – Economic approaches into the valuation and evaluation of the drug regulatory framework Bouvy, JC. ISBN 000000 Author Jacoline Bouvy Cover photo Bigstock.com Printed by Drukkerij Mostert en Van Onderen! The evaluation of drug regulation – Economic approaches into the valuation and evaluation of the drug regulatory framework Evaluatie van geneesmiddelenregulering – Economische toepassingen in de waardering en evaluatie van het regulatoire geneesmiddelensysteem (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 23 januari 2013 des middags te 12.45 uur door Jacoline Catharina Bouvy geboren op 27 maart 1985 te Rotterdam Promotor: Prof. dr. H. Schellekens Co-promotor: Dr. M.A. Koopmanschap The studies presented in this thesis were performed in the context of the Escher project (T6- 202), a project of the Dutch Top Institute Pharma. ‘It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities.’ Albus Dumbledore (In J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets) Glossary ADR Adverse drug reaction CBG-MEB Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board CKD Chronic Kidney Disease DCE Discrete Choice Experiment DHPC Direct Healthcare
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 30:75-105 (1987) Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates FREDERICK S. SZALAY, ALFRED L. ROSENBERGER, AND MARIAN DAGOSTO Department of Anthropolog* Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York 10021 (F.S.S.); University of Illinois, Urbanq Illinois 61801 (A.L. R.1; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University/ Baltimore, h4D 21218 (M.B.) KEY WORDS Semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, Suborders Strepsirhini and Haplorhini, Semisuborder Anthropoidea, Cranioskeletal morphology, Adapidae, Omomyidae, Grades vs. monophyletic (paraphyletic or holophyletic) taxa ABSTRACT We contrast our approach to a phylogenetic diagnosis of the order Primates, and its various supraspecific taxa, with definitional proce- dures. The order, which we divide into the semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, is clearly diagnosable on the basis of well-corroborated informa- tion from the fossil record. Lists of derived features which we hypothesize to have been fixed in the first representative species of the Primates, Eupri- mates, Strepsirhini, Haplorhini, and Anthropoidea, are presented. Our clas- sification of the order includes both holophyletic and paraphyletic groups, depending on the nature of the available evidence. We discuss in detail the problematic evidence of the basicranium in Paleo- gene primates and present new evidence for the resolution of previously controversial interpretations. We renew and expand our emphasis on postcra- nial analysis of fossil and living primates to show the importance of under- standing their evolutionary morphology and subsequent to this their use for understanding taxon phylogeny. We reject the much advocated %ladograms first, phylogeny next, and scenario third” approach which maintains that biologically founded character analysis, i.e., functional-adaptive analysis and paleontology, is irrelevant to genealogy hypotheses.
    [Show full text]