DOCSLIB.ORG

Map 6 Tomales Bluff Salt Point Horseshoe Point Gualala Point

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Map 6 Tomales Bluff Salt Point Horseshoe Point Gualala Point Ald er Cr Marine Life ProtectioLLnA AAcKKt EE Garcia River (St, Ch, Co) North Central Coast Subregions 1 CC OO UU NN TT YY PPooiinntt AArreennaa Brush Cr Salmonid Outlets North For Ru H k Ga # of Specsises (Steelhead, Chinook, Coho) a rcia ia th Ri G n a ve arc 1 R w a k r ia y Cre e R MM EE NN DD OO CC II NN OO CC OO UU NN TT YY 2 Mill Creek 3 2 ek Fish Diversity and Density re k C ry F D N Top 20th Percentile Diversity 3 , 0 R m Gu a lala Top 20th Percentile Density G Top 20th Percentile Diversity and Density a l Gualala River (St) lo w ek California Department of Fish and Game a y r e C Marine Region GIS Lab, Sep 18, 2007 GGuuaallaallaa PPooiinntt 0 10 Miles G ua la SS OO NN OO MM AA la R , C O U N T Y S C O U N T Y F k 1 00 m HHoorrsseesshhooee PPooiinntt A u 3 s 0 reek ti ray C n G m C SSaalltt PPooiinntt r R n a i s s u R Russian River (St, Ch, Co) D A u t R tc a u R h s ss i a n B c W i a i ll d llo C e w re r Cre ek e o k C r 2 e 0 e 0 k m Salmon Cr eek Cr s ia b a b E 30 m Stempl e Cr North Central Coast TToommaalleess BBlluuffff Study Region Walker Creek (St) W a T lk o e r m C a r l e s B a The map depicts the top 20th percentile demersal (bottom) fish diversity y and density based on fisheries-independent trawl surveys (National Marine Fisheries Service and CDFG) and other data as compiled in the NOAA North Central California Biogeographic Assessment. Presence of steelhead, chinook, and coho salmon within the last 10 years in coastal streams determined by a literature review as compiled by The Nature Conservancy, 2005. Lagunitas Creek (St, Co) Source: 1 - The Nature Conservancy (Compiled from multiple sourc1es), 2005 0 2 - NOAA - NOS - NCCOS - CCMA Biogeography Program, 0 2003 (St) data from NMFS and CDFG surveys complete species list avmailable http://www.ccma.nos.noaa.gov/products/biogeography/ 30 m canms_cd/htm/fish/welcome.htm PPooiinntt RReeyyeess Coast Creek (St) Map 6 Areas of Fish Biodiversity North Central Coast Study Region N- orthern T o m a S O N O M A C O U N T Y le S O N O M A C O U N T Y s B Petaluma River (St) N a N Marine Life Protection Act o a y v p Lagunitas Creek (St, Co) a t North Central Coast Subregions a o C R r 1 m Salmonid Outlets 0 3 Napa River (St) # of Species (Steelhead, Chinook, Coho) L Mi (St) a lle g r C 1 O u r l n e i m ta Gallinas Creek (St) R a 2 o m s d C C MM AA RR II NN e 0 r r e o 0 3 C e re 1 Point Reyes 0 k C O U N T Y e k Point Reyes m C O U N T Y 3 Coast Creek (St) P in 2 ol e C Fish Diversity and SDaensity reek Corte Madera Creek (St) n Pa blo Cr (St) Top 20th Percentile Diversity Wildcat Creek (St) W Wildcat CS reek (St) i Pine Gulch Creek (St, Co) Top 20th Pa ercentile Density ld McKinnan Gulch (St) n c a P t C Top 20th Percaebntile Diversity and Density lo re B e BBoolliinnaass PPooiinntt ay k California Department of Fish and Game RedwoodM Carrineee Rke g(iSont ,G CISo L)ab, Sep 18, 2007 0 10 m 0 3 3 0 Miles m PPooiinntt BBoonniittaa A L A M E D A 30 m A L A M E D A CC OO UU NN TT YY SS AA NN FF RR AA NN CC II SS CC OO 3 0 CC OO UU NN TT YY m 2 00 m 1 00 m 3 0 m PPooiinntt SSaann PPeeddrroo San Pedro Creek (St) eek Cr o Devils Slide e Devils Slide t a M n a S SS AA NN Denniston Creek (St) r MM AATT EE OO PPiillllaarr PPooiinntt C s o C O U N T Y Frenchmans Creek (St) it C O U N T Y r c la Pi Creek ills n M Leo oyo Arr isima C ur r P r Cree ea k B r k C e s e o r it C b s o a L it n u T Tunitas Creek (St) 3 North Central Coast 0 Study Region m San Gregorio Creek (St) Pomponio Creek (St) San Grego rio Pom Cr 1 po nio C 0 reek 0 Pescadero Creek (St, Co) Pescadero Creek (St, Co) Cr m ro The map depicts the top 20th percentile demersal (bottom) fish diversity de sca and density based on fisheries-independent trawl surveys (National Marine Butano Creek (St) Pe Fisheries Service and CDFG) and other data as compiled in the NOAA North Central California Biogeographic Assessment. Presence of steelhead, PPeessccaaddeerroo PPooiinntt chinook, and coho salmon within the last 10 years in coastal streams B u r determined by a literature review as compiled by The Nature Conservancy, t C os Creek a n Gaz 2005. o PPiiggeeoonn PPooiinntt r C Source: se o u 1 - The Nature Conservancy (Compiled from multiple sources), 2005 Whiteh Gazos Creek (St, Co) r 2 - NOAA - NOS - NCCOS - CCMA Biogeography Program, 2003 C Whitehouse Creek (St) tt Whitehouse Creek (St) o data from NMFS and CDFG surveys complete species list available c S http://www.ccma.nos.noaa.gov/products/biogeography/ Año Nuevo Creek (St) canms_cd/htm/fish/welcome.htm Finney Creek (St) Waddell Creek (St, Co) Map 6 Areas of Fish Biodiversity North Central Coast Study Region S- outhern.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Memorial Sam Mcdonald Pescadero
    Topher Simon Topher permitted in trail camps. trail in permitted water is available at trail camps. Backpack stoves are are stoves Backpack camps. trail at available is water who register with the ranger at Memorial Park. No No Park. Memorial at ranger the with register who snakes, and banana slugs. banana and snakes, available for a fee on a drop-in basis for backpackers backpackers for basis drop-in a on fee a for available woodpeckers, Steller’s jays, garter snakes, gopher gopher snakes, garter jays, Steller’s woodpeckers, hikes passing through multiple parks. multiple through passing hikes Trail camps camps Trail at Shaw Flat and Tarwater Flat are are Flat Tarwater and Flat Shaw at tailed deer, raccoons, opossums, foxes, bobcats, bobcats, foxes, opossums, raccoons, deer, tailed State Park, offering the opportunity for several long long several for opportunity the offering Park, State Common wildlife in Sam McDonald includes black- includes McDonald Sam in wildlife Common Trailheads. The trail network also connects to Big Basin Redwoods Redwoods Basin Big to connects also network trail The State Park, and at the Old Haul Road and Tarwater Tarwater and Road Haul Old the at and Park, State leaf maple, and oak trees. oak and maple, leaf a number of trails with Portola Redwoods State Park Park State Redwoods Portola with trails of number a Ranger Station, Portola Trailhead, Portola Redwoods Redwoods Portola Trailhead, Portola Station, Ranger Douglas fir, madrone, California laurel, buckeye, big big buckeye, laurel, California madrone, fir, Douglas Pescadero Creek Park shares its eastern boundary and and boundary eastern its shares Park Creek Pescadero inter-park trail network trail inter-park from the Sam McDonald McDonald Sam the from The forests, dominated by coast redwood, also include include also redwood, coast by dominated forests, The rugged beauty offers a true escape.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County BBE Final Report-2016.11.2
    Assessment and Management Prioritization Regime for the Bar-built Estuaries of San Mateo County Summary Report San Pedro Creek Prepared for: United States Fish and Wildlife Service San Francisco Area Coastal Program by: Central Coast Wetlands Group Moss Landing Marine Labs 8272 Moss Landing Rd. Moss Landing, CA 95039 November 2016 Summary Report: Bar-Built Estuaries of San Mateo County TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Background and Need .................................................................................................................................... 3 What are BBEs and Why are they Important ............................................................................................................ 3 BBE are the most dominant estuarine resource on the San Mateo County coastline .............................................. 4 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ranchos of California
    COUNTY RANCHO By Cities on or near this rancho Alameda San Antonio Spain Alameda, Oakland, Berkeley, Albany,Emeryville, Piedmont, San Leandro Alameda San Ramon Mexico Dublin area and also in Contra Costa County Alameda Agua Caliente Mexico Fremont (Warm Springs area) near the mission Alameda Los Positas Mexico Livermore area Alameda Canada Vaqueros Mexico Livermore, but mostly in Contra Costa County Alameda San Leandro Mexico San Leandro, San Lorenzo area Alameda El Valle de San Jose Mexico Pleasanton, Sunol Alameda Potrero de los Cerritos Mexico Union City Alameda San Lorenzo Mexico Hayward, Castro Valley Alameda Arroyo de la Alameda Mexico Fremont (Niles area) Alameda Santa Rita Mexico Livermore, Dublin, Sunol Alpine No Ranchos See Yolo and Solano counties Amador No Ranchos See Yolo and Solano counties Butte Rancho del Arroyo Chico Mexico Along the river in Chico Butte Esquon Mexico Chico, Butte Creek, 7 miles south of Chico Butte Aguas Frias, later known as the Mexico South of Durham Pratt Grant Butte Bosquejo Mexico Between Chico and Los Molinos; Red Bluff (in Tehama County) Butte Llano Seco, later known as the Mexico Near Chico and Durham Parrott Grant Calaveras No early Ranchos See San Joaquin & Shasta counties Colusa Larkin Grant (surveyed by John Mexico West bank of Sacramento River in Princeton area and into Bidwell) Glenn County. Contra Costa San Pablo Mexico El Cerrito, Richmond, and San Pablo. Contra Costa San Ramon Mexico San Ramon Valley, Dublin, Alamo, and surrounding areas Contra Costa El Sobrante de San Ramon Mexico Walnut Creek, Tice Valley, East of Alamo (Stone Ranch area) Contra Costa Acalanes Mexico Lafayette, Happy Valley area Contra Costa Los Medanos (Meganos) Mexico Brentwood and Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future
    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Mateo County San Pedro San Pedro Creek flows northwesterly, entering the Pacific Ocean at Pacifica State Beach. It drains a watershed about eight square miles in area. The upper portions of the drainage contain springs (feeding the south and middle forks) that produce perennial flow in the creek. Documents with information regarding steelhead in the San Pedro Creek watershed may refer to the North Fork San Pedro Creek and the Sanchez Fork. For purposes of this report, these tributaries are considered as part of the mainstem. A 1912 letter regarding San Mateo County streams indicates that San Pedro Creek was stocked. A fishway also is noted on the creek (Smith 1912). Titus et al. (in prep.) note DFG records of steelhead spawning in the creek in 1941. In 1968, DFG staff estimated that the San Pedro Creek steelhead run consisted of 100 individuals (Wood 1968). A 1973 stream survey report notes, “Spawning habitat is a limiting factor for steelhead” (DFG 1973a, p. 2). The report called the steelhead resources of San Pedro Creek “viable and important” but cited passage at culverts, summer water diversion, and urbanization effects on the stream channel and watershed hydrology as placing “the long-term survival of the steelhead resource in question”(DFG 1973a, p. 5). The lower portions of San Pedro Creek were surveyed during the spring and summer of 1989. Three O. mykiss year classes were observed during the study throughout the lower creek. Researchers noticed “a marked exodus from the lower creek during the late summer” of yearling and age 2+ individuals, many of which showed “typical smolt characteristics” (Sullivan 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Rancho Corral De Tierra- Palomares
    Rancho Corral de Tierra- Palomares Biological Report & Study Compilation July, 2001 Peninsula Open Space Trust Rancho Corral de Tierra-Palomares Biological Report Contents I. Overview & Summary Biological Report Introduction 1 Physical Description 2 Landscape History 3 Geographic Location 6 Parcel Description & Topography 7 Geology and Soils 9 Climate 9 Current Biological Status Summary Biological Importance 10 Beyond the Borders 11 Unique Biological Resources Plant Communities 12 Special Status Plants 13 Animal Communities 14 Special Status Animals 15 II. Biological Description of Rancho Corral de Tierra Methodology 16 Unique Biological Communities 19 Special Status Species Key 22 Plants 23 Reptiles 30 Birds 31 Amphibians 32 Invertebrates 33 Mammals 35 Fish 35 Watershed Delineations & Resources 37 Martini creek watershed 38 Daffodil Valley drainage 41 Farallone drainage 42 Montara creek watershed 44 Sunshine Valley drainage 46 San Vicente creek watershed 47 Denniston creek watershed 50 Other watersheds and drainages 53 Alien and Invasive Species 54 List of Identified Biological Reports & Sources 58 Rancho Corral de Tierra-Palomares I. Overview As the morning mist clears along Hwy. 1, residents who commute daily and first-time travelers experience wonder as the breathtaking views are revealed around the last curve and rocky outcropping that begin the descent into Montara from Devil’s Slide. Mountain cliffs meet crashing waves as vistas of sea and mountains whiz by. Most coastside visitors, blissfully unaware of the efforts to preserve such beauty stretching along the Pacific Coast, lack an identification and understanding of this special area and the flora and fauna it supports. To enjoy and appreciate its stunning views are enough without delving into the past and its legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS OCTOBER 2005 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COAST COHO SALMON EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT Brian C. Spence Scott L. Harris Weldon E. Jones Matthew N. Goslin Aditya Agrawal Ethan Mora NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-383 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency which establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizational element within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy and the direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. Disclaimer of endorsement: Reference to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of NOAA or the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.5 Organization Comments
    Pacifica General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report Chapter 2: Comments and Responses to the Draft EIR 2.5 Organization Comments 2-16 ! ! ! ! Mr.!Lee!Diaz! Associate!Planner! City!of!Pacifica! Planning!Department! 1800!Francisco!Boulevard! Pacifica,!CA!94044! [email protected]! ! June!18,!2014! ! SUBJECT:! ! DRAFT! ENVIRONMENTAL! IMPACT! REPORT! FOR! PACIFICA! GENERAL! PLAN!UPDATE!PROJECT! Dear!Mr.!Diaz:! Grassetti!Environmental!Consulting!(GECo)!is!submitting!this!comment!letter!on! behalf!of!the!Pedro!Point!Community!Association!(PPCA).!!As!Principal!of!GECo,!I! have!prepared!these!comments!based!on!my!30+!years!of!experience!preparing!and! reviewing!California!Environmental!Quality!Act!(CEQA)!documents.!!!A!copy!of!my! CV!is!attached.!!! The!PPCA!requested!a!thorough!evaluation!of!the!potential!effects!of!the!General! Plan!Update!(“GPU”!or!“the!Project”)!on!the!Pedro!Point!Field!site!(“the!site”).!!This! letter!identifies!deficiencies!in!the!General!Plan!Update!Draft!EIR!(“DEIR”)!with! respect!to!that!site.!!It!is!based!on!my!reading!of!the!proposed!GPU!and!DEIR,!as!well! as!a!review!of!sensitive!resources!and!hazards!from!available!sources.!!General! deficiencies!are!described!first,!followed!by!some!specific!comments!on!the! adequacy!of!technical!analyses.! Introduction* Under!CEQA,!the!GPU!DEIR!must!focus!on!the!secondary!effects!that!will!follow!from! adoption!of!the!General!Plan!update!(CEQA!Guideline!15146).!!The!City!is!not! relieved!from!considering!known!impacts!of!the!project!on!specific!sites.!!! In!this!case,!the!City!has!been!provided!with!evidence!(attached!hereto!and!
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Echo, 2020 Fall
    Mountain Echo THE NEWSLETTER OF SEMPERVIRENS FUND | FALL 2020 Neighbors in Common Cause The habitats, waterways, and natural resiliency scenic resources on their private forest lands. Those of the Santa Cruz Mountain region are at risk protections are connected to the property forever, unless we permanently protect healthy, connected no matter who owns the land, which is essential to coast redwood forests from development and maintaining a thriving regional forest ecosystem. degradation. Thanks to you, these conservation values are upheld when we protect wild areas and Conservation easements have helped protect vital transfer land to a public agency like California State conservation resources, like those found in the Parks. Another way to protect nature is partnering San Vicente Redwoods. They also ensure great with the region’s landowners to secure conservation youth experiences in nature, including easements easements for their land. This approach protects managed by Sempervirens Fund that keep camps forests on rural homesites, timberlands, outdoor like Camp Butano Creek, Camp Hammer, and educational camps, and other properties that Skylark Ranch operating for generations to come. cannot or should not become part of a traditional public park. Since 1900, Sempervirens Fund has permanently protected nearly 54 square miles of redwood Conservation easements allow landowners and forests in the Santa Cruz Mountains, raising a land trust, like Sempervirens Fund, to agree to more than $50 million to purchase and protect permanently protect a property’s natural and forest lands. With your support, and by leveraging Continued on p. 3 Rebecca Schoenenberger Gives Back to Nature Growing up in San Jose, Rebecca Schoenenberger For Rebecca, giving back is what it’s all about.
    [Show full text]
  • Butano State Park Preliminary General Plan and Draft EIR March 2008
    2 E XISTING C ONDITIONS Photo on reverse: View from Butano ridge Butano State Park Preliminary General Plan and Draft EIR March 2008 C HAPTER 2: E XISTING C ONDITIONS 2.1 REGIONAL LAND USE Land use patterns in the Santa Cruz Mountains as well as on the San Mateo and Santa Cruz county coasts have not changed dramatically in the recent past. The general character of land use surrounding Butano SP is a mix of natural lands, coastal terrace and valley agriculture, hillside grazing, timber production, and small residential properties. The community of Pescadero is located approximately 3.5 miles north of the park at the intersection of Cloverdale Road and Pescadero Road. Butano SP shares its southern border with Año Nuevo SP, with Año Nuevo State Natural Reserve (SNR) and Big Basin Redwoods SP in proximity. Pescadero State Beach (SB), Bean Hollow SB, and Pigeon Point Light Station State Historic Park (SHP) are to the northwest along the coast. Portola Redwoods SP, Pescadero Creek County Park, Michelson Ranch, and several other recreational and open space lands are located north of the park. Large undeveloped Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST) properties are located adjacent to the park’s west side. Año Nuevo Point and the Santa Cruz Mountains, viewed from Private ownership around the park generally consists of Pigeon Point. relatively large or very small parcels of land. Large parcels of private forested lands, some in timber production, are located between Butano SP and Big Basin Redwoods SP to the east, and also on the park’s northern border.
    [Show full text]
  • 38Th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference
    Salmonid Restoration Federation’s Mission Statement 38th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference Salmonid Restoration Federation was formed in 1986 to help stream March 31 – April 3, 2020 Santa Cruz, CA restoration practitioners advance the art and science of restoration. Salmonid Restoration Federation promotes restoration, stewardship, 2020 Vision for California’s Salmonscape and recovery of California native salmon, steelhead, and trout populations through education, collaboration, and advocacy. 38 th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference • 2020, Santa Cruz, CA Conference • 2020, Restoration Salmonid Annual SRF Goals & Objectives 1. To provide affordable technical education and best management practices trainings to the watershed restoration community. Conference Co-Sponsors Balance Hydrologics, Inc., Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria, 2. Conduct outreach to constituents, landowners, and decision-makers Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board, California American Water, California Conservation Corps, to inform the public about the plight of endangered salmon and California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Water Resources, the need to preserve and restore habitat to recover salmonid California State Coastal Conservancy, CalTrans, California Trout - North Coast, Cardno, cbec, inc., City of Santa Cruz-Water Branch, County of Santa Cruz, East Bay Municipal Utility District, populations. Environmental Science Associates, Eureka Water Probes, FISHBIO, GHD, Green Diamond Resource Company - CA Timberlands
    [Show full text]