DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Groningen Kant's Anatomy of Logic Zinkstok

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Groningen Kant's Anatomy of Logic Zinkstok University of Groningen Kant's anatomy of logic Zinkstok, Johannes Theodoor IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2013 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Zinkstok, J. T. (2013). Kant's anatomy of logic: logic and method in the critical philosophy. [s.n.]. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 10-10-2021 kant’s anatomy of logic rijksuniversiteit groningen Kant’s Anatomy of Logic Method and Logic in the Critical Philosophy proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de Wijsbegeerte aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de Rector Magnicus, dr. E. Sterken, in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 30 mei 2013 om 14.30 uur door johannes theodoor zinkstok geboren op 1 april 1979 te Utrecht Promotores: Prof. dr. D.H.K. Pätzold Prof. dr. L.W. Nauta Beoordelingscommissie: Prof. dr. W.R. de Jong Prof. dr. G. Mohr Prof. dr. P. Kleingeld Contents Acknowledgements vii Introduction: Kant’s Anatomy of Logic 1 1 Logic and Its Divisions in Kant’s Pre-Critical Period 17 1.1 Kant’s Earliest Views on Logic and Its Divisions: the 1750s and 1760s 18 1.2 1770s: General Logic and the Criticism of Practical Logic 25 1.3 Towards the Critical View: Doctrine of Method and Particular Logic 29 1.4 Kant’s View on Practical Logic in His Published Works 31 1.5 Logic and Its Divisions in Kant’s Pre-Critical Period: Conclusions 33 2 Kant on the Nature of Logic in the Critical Period 35 2.1 Logic: Its Nature and Subject Matter 38 2.2 Logic Is General 44 2.3 Logic Is Pure 58 2.4 Logic Is Necessary 61 2.5 Logic Is Formal 71 2.6 Kant on the Nature of Logic: Conclusions 76 3 e General Doctrine of Method: A General Account of Systematicity 79 3.1 e Contents of the Doctrine of Method in Kant’s Logic Lectures 80 3.2 Unifying the Contents of Kant’s General Doctrine of Method 88 3.3 e General Doctrine of Method: Conclusions 102 vi Contents 4 Particular Logic and the Methodology of Speci c Sciences 105 4.1 Kant on Particular Logic 106 4.2 inking about Kant’s Conception of Particular Logic: Two Suggestions 113 4.3 Analytic Principles and the Particular Logic of Mathematics 121 4.4 Particular Logic: Conclusions 145 5 Applied Logic: Error and Its Prevention with the Help of Empirical Psychology 147 5.1 Kant’s Anthropology and Its Common Interpretation 149 5.2 Empirical Psychology and Anthropology 152 5.3 Applied Logic as a eory of Error 159 5.4 An Example of Applied Logic: Prejudice 162 5.5 Applied Logic: Conclusions 166 6 Transcendental Logic and the a priori Content of Cognition 169 6.1 Transcendental Logic and the Content of Cognition 171 6.2 Is Transcendental Logic a Particular Logic? 185 6.3 Transcendental Logic: Conclusions 200 7 e Transcendental Doctrine of Method: A Blueprint for the System of Pure Reason 203 7.1 Interpretations of the Transcendental Doctrine of Method 204 7.2 Kant on the Transcendental Doctrine of Method 208 7.3 e Structure of the Transcendental Doctrine of Method 217 7.4 e Transcendental Doctrine of Method and Particular Logics 228 7.5 e Transcendental Doctrine of Method: Conclusions 233 Conclusions 237 Samenvatting voor niet-specialisten 241 Bibliography 255 Acknowledgements And so too, it seems, should one make a return to those with whom one has studied philosophy; for their worth cannot be measured against money, and they can get no honour which will balance their services, but still it is perhaps enough, as it is with the gods and with one’s parents, to give them what one can. Aristotle, Ethica Nicomachea ix:1, 1164b2-5 The book that lies before you has many expectations to full. A few too many, I fear. By dint of its nature it has to full the expectations of the profession. ose harbouring such expectations will at least nd a decent attempt at living up to them, and I hope it will even satisfy them to a su cient extent. But perhaps most people picking up this book expect something more, something rather dierent. ey expect this book to be the tangible justication for years of relatively solitary connement to libraries, pouring over dusty volumes of old philosophy, and that even on public means. ey expect this book to nely clarify to them what these years were about – what all the talk on this dead German philosopher was about (after all, it wasn’t just after a bottle of wine that he rambled on about it, was it?) – what the use of it all was. It is not unthinkable that even my carefully crafted summary does not oer solace to people who started to read with such expectations. For those feeling let down by this book, there is at least this preface. It is a text that anyone can understand and perhaps even enjoy (save the odd private joke), and that oers just enough material for conversation to get them through the drinks after the PhD ceremony. It has the added benet of implicating many a reader as an inadvertant accomplice to my scholarly endeavours. Naturally, I do not intend to burden anyone with any errors or omissions – if all the support I received could not prevent that from happening, it is entirely my own fault. viii Acknowledgements As it is, it is a great pleasure to be able to thank a number of people for their tremendous help and support while I was working on this dissertation. In the rst place, I want to thank my promotor Detlev Pätzold. Detlev, you have been a great help for me. Your vast knowledge and erudition proved an invaluable resource for my work, and you were always wont to share it with me. In the long, intense but above all pleasant discussions we had about Kant, Wol, Leibniz and many others, you have shown me how to be a scrupulous historian of philosophy. At times when I got stuck, your tranquil and wise demeanour always managed to get me back on track. You were a steadfast and warm-hearted Doktorvater to me. ank you for all that! To my other promotor, Lodi Nauta, I owe a lot of gratitude as well. Your sharp mind and keen eye for thinking and writing philosophically has taught me many things on structuring papers, crafting rigourous argumentations and writing engagingly. Your door was always open for help and advice – or just a drink. I remember with pleasure a night of wining and dining in Palermo, when I was a stowaway at a conference you and Suzanne attended. Such occasions proved to be characteristic of the way in which you love to combine your scholarly wit and your genial friendship. Wim de Jong, your help over the past years has been invaluable. ere is probably no-one whose knowledge of early modern logic matches yours, and I was a lucky man that you generously let me benet from it. e rst course on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason I ever followed was taught by you, and in the past years I found myself from time to time digging up your meticulous handouts, and always nding another useful reference or thought. Your comments on the drafts of many chapters of this dissertation uncanningly and invariably put the nger on some sore spot, and thanks to them the present dissertation is far better than it would have been without your assistance. I was extremely lucky to become a PhD student at the faculty were Karin de Boer worked and were Johan Blok became a PhD student together with me. We formed a small Kant research group, and I feel proud as well as priviliged to have been part of that. It was extremely stimulating and great fun to meet and discuss our work. Karin, you are one of the most energetic scholars I know. I am still impressed by the speed with which you have become a Kant expert. e amount of time and energy you invest in junior researchers such as Johan and Acknowledgements ix me is characteristic of your enthousiasm. Johan, it was great to have you as a fellow Kant scholar (although you felt compelled to stray into Bolzano scholarship as well). I have learnt a lot from your calm and self-assured readings of complex and obscure passages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Note: This Is a Pre-Print, Draft Manuscript of Toby Svoboda, Duties Regarding Nature: a Kantian Environmental Ethic (Routledge, 2016)
    Note: This is a pre-print, draft manuscript of Toby Svoboda, Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Environmental Ethic (Routledge, 2016). If citing, please consult the published version, which contains substantial revisions. Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Environmental Ethic Draft of Complete Manuscript Toby Svoboda Table of Contents • Introduction: Kant and Environmental Ethics • Chapter 1: Traditional Approaches to Environmental Ethics • Chapter 2: Kantian Approaches to Animal Ethics and Environmental Ethics • Chapter 3: Indirect Duties, Moral Perfection, and Virtuous Dispositions • Chapter 4: Teleology and Non-Human Flourishing • Chapter 5: A Kantian Environmental Virtue Ethic • Conclusion: Advantages of the Kantian Environmental Virtue Ethic • References Introduction, 1 Introduction: Kant and Environmental Ethics Why Environmental Ethics? I have set out in this book to develop and defend a Kantian approach to environmental ethics. This immediately raises a question: why should we want an environmental ethic at all, much less a Kantian one? Human beings face serious environmental problems, such as those associated with climate change, loss of biodiversity, and air pollution.1 It seems clear that these problems have various ethical dimensions, given that they threaten to increase human mortality rates, cause substantial harm to present and future generations, and exacerbate socio-economic injustice.2 Moreover, the impact of human activities on the environment, such as ocean acidification due to anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse
    [Show full text]
  • Forthcoming in the Kant Yearbook, Vol. 11 (2019) Final Draft – Please Cite the Published Version for Correct Pagination
    Forthcoming in The Kant Yearbook, Vol. 11 (2019) Final Draft – Please cite the published version for correct pagination Can there be a Finite Interpretation of the Kantian Sublime? Sacha Golob (King’s College London) Abstract Kant’s account of the sublime makes frequent appeals to infinity, appeals which have been extensively criticised by commentators such as Budd and Crowther. This paper examines the costs and benefits of reconstructing the account in finitist terms. On the one hand, drawing on a detailed comparison of the first and third Critiques, I argue that the underlying logic of Kant’s position is essentially finitist. I defend the approach against longstanding objections, as well as addressing recent infinitist work by Moore and Smith. On the other hand, however, I argue that finitism faces distinctive problems of its own: whilst the resultant theory is a coherent and interesting one, it is unclear in what sense it remains an analysis of the sublime. I illustrate the worry by juxtaposing the finitist reading with analytical cubism. §1 – Introduction Kant’s account of the sublime makes frequent reference to infinity. The “intuition” of the sublime “carries with it the idea of...infinity”; apprehension “can progress to infinity” [kann…ins Unendliche gehen]; imagination “strives to progress towards infinity” [ein Bestreben zum Fortschritte ins Unendliche]; reason demands that we “think the infinite as a whole” (KU 5:255, 252, 250, 254).1 It is obvious that the infinite played a central role in Kant’s own presentation of the problem. It is less clear whether such references are 1 References are to the standard Akademie edition of Kant’s gesammelte Schriften (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1900–; abbreviated as Ak.): Anth: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (Ak.
    [Show full text]
  • For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon Dilek Huseyinzadegan Emory University, [email protected]
    Feminist Philosophy Quarterly Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 3 2018 For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon Dilek Huseyinzadegan Emory University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, European History Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Huseyinzadegan, Dilek. 2018. "For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon." Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4, (1). Article 3. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq/vol4/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Feminist Philosophy Quarterly by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Huseyinzadegan: For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon Dilek Huseyinzadegan Abstract As feminist scholars, we hope that our own work is exempt from structural problems such as racism, sexism, and Eurocentrism, that is, the kind of problems that are exemplified and enacted by Kant’s works. In other words, we hope that we do not re-enact, implicitly or explicitly, Kant’s problematic claims, which range from the unnaturalness of a female philosopher, “who might as well have a beard,” the stupid things that a black carpenter said “because he was black from head to foot,” the poor women “living in the greatest slavery in the Orient,” to the “sheep-like existence of the inhabitants of Tahiti.” In this piece, I argue that we cannot simply hope to avoid these problems unless we are vigilant about incorporating the full picture of Kant’s and Kantian philosophy into our feminist appropriations.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Andrew Stephenson
    CV (short) DR ANDREW STEPHENSON Trinity College Email: [email protected] Oxford OX BH Website: www.acstephenson.com AOS: KANT AOC: Mind, Epistemology, Religion, Post- Kantian Philosophy, Wittgenstein EMPLOYMENT Apr - Apr Leverhulme Research Fellow, Humboldt University, Berlin Oct - Mar Career Development Lecturer, Trinity College, Oxford EDUCATION - D.Phil. in Philosophy (cont.), University of Oxford - Leave of Absence due to serious spinal injury – fully recovered - Language Student, Stiftung Maximilianeum and LMU, Munich - D.Phil. in Philosophy, University of Oxford - B.Phil. in Philosophy, University of Oxford - B.A. in Philosophy, Cardiff University RESEARCH Articles • Kant, the Paradox of Knowability, and the Meaning of ‘Experience’, Philosophers’ Imprint (forthcoming) • Imagination and Phenomenal Character, in Kant and the Philosophy of Mind (Oxford University Press, forthcoming) • Kant on the Object-Dependence of Intuition and Hallucination, The Philosophical Quarterly () • Kant’s Deduction from Apperception?, Studi Kantiani (), - • Kant on Non-Veridical Experience, Kant Yearbook (), - Book (editor) • Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: New Essays on Consciousness, Judgement, and the Self, co-edited with Anil Gomes, Oxford University Press (forthcoming) Under Review (available from website or on request) • Kant, A Priori Knowability, and Tacit Knowledge Some Recent/Upcoming Presentations • Kant and the Logic of Knowability, Sept , International Kant Congress, Vienna • Kant’s Manifest Realism?, Sept , Colloquium
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft Jury
    Freedom in Conflict On Kant’s Critique of Medical Reason Jonas Gerlings Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 24 February 2017. European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Freedom in Conflict On Kant’s Critique of Medical Reason Jonas Gerlings Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Dr. Martin van Gelderen, EUI, Lichtenberg-Kolleg – The Göttingen Institute for Advanced Study (Supervisor) Dr. Dr. h.c. Hans Erich Bödeker, Lichtenberg-Kolleg – The Göttingen Institute for Advanced Study Prof. Stéphane Van Damme, European University Institute Senior Lecturer, Dr. Avi Lifschitz, UCL © Jonas Gerlings, 2016 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I Jonas Gerlings certify that I am the author of the work Freedom in Conflict – Kant’s Critique of Medical Reason I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297).
    [Show full text]
  • Morganna F. Lambeth Department of Philosophy [email protected] Purdue University 773-682-2320 West Lafayette, in 47907-2098
    Morganna F. Lambeth Department of Philosophy [email protected] Purdue University 773-682-2320 West Lafayette, IN 47907-2098 Current Position 2018-2021 Purdue University, Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy and Cornerstone Fall 2018 Instruction: PHIL 111: Ethics (2 x 35 students) Spring 2019 Instruction: SCLA 101: Transformative Texts (30 students) PHIL 411: Modern Ethical Theories (35 students) Education 2011-2018 Northwestern University, Doctoral Program in Philosophy Ph.D. in Philosophy Dissertation: Rethinking the Structure of Events: Heidegger on Kant and the Concept of Cause Committee: Cristina Lafont (Chair), Rachel Zuckert, Mark Wrathall ABSTRACT: I draw on Heidegger’s interpretation of Kant to argue that Kant overestimates the role that causality plays in structuring our experience. Heidegger suggests that Kant’s analysis of experience mistakenly universalizes a fraction of our experience: the experience of mechanical objects. I defend the merits of this suggestion by offering a careful reconstruction of Heidegger’s controversial interpretation of the imagination and applying this interpretation in detail to one of the most debated segments of the Critique of Pure Reason: the Second Analogy. In this chapter, Kant suggests that we must employ the concept of cause in order to be aware that an event (i.e. a change in states) has occurred. While Kant’s mechanical account of events captures our experience of mechanical objects, I argue that his analysis does not capture our experience of events initiated by humans. I suggest that we experience human events rather as components of an overarching project oriented toward some goal. 2009-2011 University of California at Riverside, Doctoral Program in Philosophy M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachel Elizabeth Zuckert Department of Philosophy 5728 N. Kenmore
    Rachel Elizabeth Zuckert Department of Philosophy 5728 N. Kenmore Ave, 3N Northwestern University Chicago, IL 60660 Kresge 3-512 1880 Campus Drive home: (773) 728-7927 Evanston, IL 60208 work: (847) 491-2556 [email protected] Education: 2000 PhD, University of Chicago, Department of Philosophy and the Committee on Social Thought 1995 MA, University of Chicago, Committee on Social Thought 1992 B.A. (1), Oxford University (Philosophy and Modern Languages) 1990 B.A. (Summa Cum Laude; Highest Honors in Philosophy; Phi Beta Kappa), Williams College Areas of Specialization: Kant and eighteenth-century philosophy Aesthetics Areas of Competence: Early modern philosophy Nineteenth-century philosophy Feminist philosophy Languages: French German Academic Employment: 2018- Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University; affiliated with the German Department 2008-18 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University; affiliated with the German Department 2011-18 2006-2008 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University 2001-2006 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Rice University 1999-2001 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Bucknell University Zuckert 2 Publications: Books Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment, Cambridge University Press, 2007. Awarded the American Society for Aesthetics Monograph Prize (2008); reviewed in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Comparative and Continental Philosophy, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Metascience, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Review of Metaphysics, and subject of review essays in Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and Kant Yearbook Herder’s Naturalist Aesthetics, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming (2019). Edited Volume Hegel on Philosophy in History, co-edited with James Kreines, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal List Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science) 2020
    JOURNAL TITLE ISSN eISSN PUBSLISHER NAME PUBLISHER ADDRESS 3C EMPRESA 2254‐3376 2254‐3376 AREA INNOVACION & DESARROLLO C/ELS ALZAMORA NO 17, ALCOY, ALICANTE, SPAIN, 03802 3C TECNOLOGIA 2254‐4143 2254‐4143 3CIENCIAS C/ SANTA ROSA 15, ALCOY, SPAIN, 03802 3C TIC 2254‐6529 2254‐6529 AREA INNOVACION & DESARROLLO C/ELS ALZAMORA NO 17, ALCOY, ALICANTE, SPAIN, 03802 3D RESEARCH 2092‐6731 2092‐6731 SPRINGER HEIDELBERG TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D‐69121 3L‐LANGUAGE LINGUISTICS LITERATURE‐THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES 0128‐5157 2550‐2247 PENERBIT UNIV KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA PENERBIT UNIV KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA, FAC ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, BANGI, MALAYSIA, SELANGOR, 43600 452 F‐REVISTA DE TEORIA DE LA LITERATURA Y LITERATURA COMPARADA 2013‐3294 UNIV BARCELONA, FACULTAD FILOLOGIA GRAN VIA DE LES CORTS CATALANES, 585, BARCELONA, SPAIN, 08007 AACA DIGITAL 1988‐5180 1988‐5180 ASOC ARAGONESA CRITICOS ARTE ASOC ARAGONESA CRITICOS ARTE, HUESCA, SPAIN, 00000 AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE 1559‐7768 1559‐7776 AMER ASSOC CRITICAL CARE NURSES 101 COLUMBIA, ALISO VIEJO, USA, CA, 92656 A & A PRACTICE 2325‐7237 2325‐7237 LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19103 ABAKOS 2316‐9451 2316‐9451 PONTIFICIA UNIV CATOLICA MINAS GERAIS DEPT CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS, AV DOM JOSE GASPAR 500, CORACAO EUCARISTICO, CEP: 30.535‐610, BELO HORIZONTE, BRAZIL, MG, 00000 ABANICO VETERINARIO 2007‐4204 2007‐4204 SERGIO MARTINEZ GONZALEZ TEZONTLE 171 PEDREGAL SAN JUAN, TEPIC NAYARIT, MEXICO, C P 63164 ABCD‐ARQUIVOS
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Ameriks, University of Notre Dame “Kant's Elliptical Path: on The
    Karl Ameriks, University of Notre Dame “Kant’s Elliptical Path: On the Stages, Limits, and Aftermath of Critical Philosophy” Karl Ameriks is the McMahon-Hank Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame and specializes in the history of modern philosophy, continental philosophy, and modern German philosophy. Much of his research is dedicated to the study of Immanuel Kant about whom he has published multiple books. His most recent monographs include Kant's Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason (2000), and Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy (2000), Interpreting Kant’s Critiques (2003), Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation (2006), and more than 100 articles and scholarly writings. He is a founding co-editor of Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus (International Yearbook of German Idealism) and since 1994 he has served as a co-editor of the approximately 70-volume series, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. He has served as a member of the Board of Directors for the Journal of the History of Philosophy and on the editorial boards of Owl of Minerva (Hegel Society of America), Critical Horizons, Kant Yearbook, Oxford Philosophical Concepts, and Philosophisches Jahrbuch. A faculty fellow in Notre Dame’s Nanovic Institute for European Studies, Professor Ameriks was elected a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS) in 2009. Among his many prestigious honors and awards are several fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), the Earhart Foundation (most recently in 2010) and an Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 2021; 2(1): 21–45
    Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 2021; 2(1): 21–45 Brigitte Falkenburg* Edgar Wind on Experiment and Metaphysics https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2020-0038 Published online April 26, 2021 Abstract: The paper presents a detailed interpretation of Edgar Wind’s Experiment and Metaphysics (1934), a unique work on the philosophy of physics which broke with the Neo-Kantian tradition under the influence of American pragmatism. Taking up Cassirer’s interpretation of physics, Wind develops a holistic theory of the experiment and a constructivist account of empirical facts. Based on the concept of embodiment which plays a key role in Wind’s later writings on art history, he argues, however, that the outcomes of measurements are contingent. He then proposes an anti-Kantian conception of a metaphysics of nature. For him, nature is an unknown totality which manifests itself in discrepancies between theories and experiment, and hence the theory formation of physics can increas- ingly approximate the structure of nature. It is shown that this view is ambiguous between a transcendental, metaphysical realism in Kant’s sense and an internal realism in Putnam’s sense. Wind’s central claim is that twentieth century physics offers new options for resolving Kant’s cosmological antinomies. In particular, he connected quantum indeterminism with the possibility of human freedom, a connection that Cassirer sharply opposed. Keywords: cosmological antinomy, experiment, metaphysics, Edgar wind, embodiment 1 Introduction Edgar Wind’s Experiment and Metaphysics (Wind 1934, 2001) is a neglected work in the philosophy of science. When it was published, Wind, like Cassirer and many other scholars, had already left Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • «Kant on Science and Rationality»
    IMMANUEL KANT BALTIC FEDERAL UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR THE HUMANITIES ACADEMIA KANTIANA THE THIRD IMMANUEL KANT INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL «KANT ON SCIENCE AND RATIONALITY» JULY 22 - 28, 2019 KALININGRAD REGION, SVETLOGORSK, HOTEL «BALTIKA» IMMANUEL KANT BALTIC FEDERAL UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR THE HUMANITIES ACADEMIA KANTIANA THE THIRD IMMANUEL KANT INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL «KANT ON SCIENCE AND RATIONALITY» Program Abstracts JULY 22 – 28, 2019 KALININGRAD REGION, SVETLOGORSK, HOTEL «BALTIKA» 1 Scientific Supervisor and Lecturer Prof. Dr. Thomas Sturm Autonomous University of Barcelona Scientific Assistants Dr. habil. Vadim A. Chaly Dr. Rudolf Meer Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Chairperson Prof. Dr. Nina A. Dmitrieva Scientific Director of the Academia Kantiana Deputy Chairperson Dr. Leonid Yu. Kornilaev Research Fellow of the Academia Kantiana Members Dr. habil. Vadim A. Chaly Senior Research Fellow of the Academia Kantiana Dr. Rudolf Meer Senior Research Fellow of the Academia Kantiana Dr. Mikhail Yu. Zagirnyak Research Fellow of the Academia Kantiana Andrey S. Zilber Junior Research Fellow of the Academia Kantiana 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summer School Program 4 Abstracts Fabian Burt: Kant’s Cosmology and the Regulative Use of the Cosmological Principle 9 Aaron Higgins-Brake: Science, Metaphysics, and Methodology in Kant’s Prize Essay 12 Luciana Martínez: The Role of Unconscious Representations for the Development of 16 Sciences during the Silent Decade Michael Lewin: Methodological Principles
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Table of Contents
    CURRICULUM VITAE Revised February 2015 ADRIAN MARGARET SMITH PIPER Born 20 September 1948, New York City TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Educational Record ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Languages...................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Philosophy Dissertation Topic.................................................................................................................. 2 4. Areas of Special Competence in Philosophy ......................................................................................... 2 5. Other Areas of Research Interest in Philosophy ................................................................................... 2 6. Teaching Experience.................................................................................................................................... 2 7. Fellowships and Awards in Philosophy ................................................................................................. 4 8. Professional Philosophical Associations................................................................................................. 4 9. Service to the Profession of Philosophy .................................................................................................. 5 10. Invited Papers and Conferences in Philosophy .................................................................................
    [Show full text]