2019 Richmond Year End Review Mayor Tom Butt
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CPY Document Title
Agenda Item 7b Attachment A Proposition 23 Supporters (As of August 17, 2010 ) State and National Organizations State and National Organizations (cont’d) American Council of Engineering Companies – Lumber Association of California and California Nevada American GI Forum of California National Federation of Independent Business American GI Forum Women of California – California (NFIB) Americans for Prosperity National Petrochemical and Refiners Associated California Loggers Association Association of Energy Service Companies National Tax Limitation Committee Black Business Association National Taxpayers Union California Association of Business and Nisei Farmers League Property Owners Printing Industries of California California Automotive Wholesalers Slavic American Chamber of Commerce Association Waste Watchers California Cattlemen’s Association Western Agricultural Processors Association California Citrus Mutual California Coalition of Filipino American Chambers Air Quality/Public Health Officials California Cotton Ginners and Growers Peter Foy, Ventura County Air Pollution Associations Control District Board Member California Dairy Campaign Brad Mitzelfelt, Mojave Desert Air Quality California Dump Truck Owners Association Management District Board Member California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce Reb Monaco, Monterey Bay Unified Air California Independent Oil Marketers Pollution Control District Board Member Association (CIOMA) Kim Yamaguchi, Butte County Air Quality California League of Food Processors Management District Board Member -
N E W S Release Office of Richmond Mayor Tom Butt
N E W S Release Office of Richmond Mayor Tom Butt Contact: For Immediate Release Terrance Cheung – Chief of Staff November 12, 2015 Office 510‐620‐6502 Cell 415‐990‐2087 Statement from Richmond Mayor Tom Butt Regarding State’s Decision to Reject Contra Costa County’s Proposal to Expand the West County Detention Facility Richmond Mayor Tom Butt issued the following statement today in response to the California Board of State and Community Corrections’ (BSCC) announcement awarding the top four large California counties that applied for jail construction grants through SB 863. Although Contra Costa County had submitted an $80 million grant to expand the West County Detention Facility, which is located within the City of Richmond, the BSCC ultimately decided to approve applications for San Francisco, Santa Clara, Alameda, and Ventura Counties but not for Contra Costa County. “We supported the expressed intent of the application, which was to provide expanded mental health, education and re-entry services,” said Mayor Tom Butt. “However, the Sheriff’s Office failed to provide a plan of how these programs would be funded at a cost of $4 to $5 million annually and a commitment to permanently close down unneeded facilities in Martinez.” This past August, the Richmond City Council adopted a resolution officially opposing the jail expansion proposal and took legal action challenging the County’s Environmental Impact Report. “The project on its face was simply a major expansion,” said Mayor Butt. “It would have made the West County Detention Facility, by far, the largest jail in the County.” The Sheriff’s Office manages the county’s three detention facilities. -
14. Official Statement
NEW ISSUE – BOOK-ENTRY RATINGS: Underlying: S&P: A- BAM Insured: AA (Stable) (See “BOND INSURANCE” and “RATINGS”) In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2014A Refunding Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2014A Refunding Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes, although Bond Counsel observes that such interest is included in adjusted current earnings in calculating corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the Refunding Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the Series 2014B Refunding Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other federal or state tax consequences relating to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Refunding Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $25,795,000 $1,655,000 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE RICHMOND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE RICHMOND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT -
Bay Trail Richmond New Year 2021 Report
Bay Trail Richmond New Year 2021 Report This has been an extraordinary year for the San Francisco Bay Trail in Richmond! The City of Richmond (City) completed the long-awaited Bay Trail connection with Point Pinole Regional Shoreline, and over $4 million in grant funds were secured by the City and East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) to construct new and improved sections of Bay Trail. The Bay Trail’s popularity soared as an excellent place to refresh the mind and exercise the body with adequate width for social distancing. This 22nd New Year report by TRAC, the Trails for Richmond Action Committee, describes progress during 2020 toward closing gaps and improving existing sections of the Bay Trail. The map on the last page of this report shows trail completed and gaps remaining. Richmond has 36 miles of Bay Trail in place, representing 10% of the existing 352 miles of this planned 500-mile walking and cycling path encircling San Francisco and San Pablo Bays. However, 6.0 miles of gaps remain in Richmond, despite having more Bay Trail completed than any other city in the Bay Area. Stay healthy and be well. See you on the Bay Trail! POINT PINOLE CONNECTED WITH THE BAY TRAIL The City completed construction of a two-way, multi-use trail east of Goodick Avenue between the Richmond Parkway Bay Trail and Dotson Family Marsh Staging Area. This project was funded by a $976,000 grant of Measure J gasoline tax revenues from Contra Costa Transportation Authority and $130,000 from the Bay Trail Project at the Association of Bay Area Governments. -
December 15, 2020
RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, December 15, 2020 The Richmond City Council Evening Open Session was called to order at 5:02 p.m. by Mayor Thomas K. Butt via teleconference. Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, Contra Costa County and Governor Gavin Newsom issued multiple orders requiring sheltering in place, social distancing, and reduction of person-to-person contact. Accordingly, Governor Gavin Newsom issued executive orders that allowed cities to hold public meetings via teleconferencing (Executive Order N-29-20). DUE TO THE SHELTER IN PLACE ORDERS, attendance at the City of Richmond City Council meeting was limited to Councilmembers, essential City of Richmond staff, and members of the news media. Public comment was confined to items appearing on the agenda and was limited to the methods provided below. Consistent with Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting utilized teleconferencing only. The following provides information on how the public participated in the meeting. The public was able to view the meeting from home on KCRT Comcast Channel 28 or AT&T Uverse Channel 99 and livestream online at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/3178/KCRT- Live. Written public comments were received via email to [email protected]. Comments received by 1:00 p.m. on December 15, 2020, were summarized at the meeting, put into the record, and considered before Council action. Comments received via email after 1:00 p.m. and up until the public comment period on the relevant agenda item closed, were put into the record. Public comments were also received via teleconference during the meeting. -
League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions
AGENDA ITEM 7.C. MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 4, 2018 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager By: Peggy Kuo, City Clerk SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to receive and file the League of California Cities (League) annual resolution and approve the voting delegate and voting alternate to use their discretion to vote on the proposed resolutions. BACKGROUND: 1. On April 3, 2018, City Council designated Councilmember Chavez as the voting delegate and Mayor Man as the voting alternate for the League's Annual Business Meeting. 2. Only August 1, 2018, the City received a copy of the League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions Packet. ANALYSIS: At its annual business meeting, the League adopts policy resolutions on issues of statewide importance that have direct bearing on municipal affairs and are of broad municipal interest. The League's primary means for developing policy is through their standing policy committees and Board of Directors. Additionally, any city, elected or appointed city official, or League Division, Department, or Policy Committee may submit a resolution sixty days before the business meeting. This year's General Assembly and business meeting will be held during the annual City Council September 4, 2018 Page 2 of 3 conference on Friday, September 14, in Long Beach. The City Council has appointed Councilmember Chavez as the City's voting delegate and Mayor Man as the voting alternate. During the conference, the respective League Policy Committees and General Resolutions Committee will consider making recommendations on one Resolution before they are voted on by the delegates in General Assembly. -
Supporters List May 30, 2018
Supporters List May 30, 2018 NOTABLE ENDORSEMENTS Governor Jerry Brown Senator Kevin de León, President pro Tempore (Former) Senator Toni Atkins, President pro Tempore Assembly Member Anthony Rendon, Speaker Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (Former) American Heart Association American Lung Association Association of California Water Agencies Audubon California California Association of Local Conservation Corps California Chamber of Commerce California Council of Land Trusts California Democratic Party California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO California State Parks Foundation Cordoba Corporation Environmental Defense Fund Heal the Bay Humane Society of the United States League of California Cities Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Monterey Bay Aquarium Peninsula Open Space Trust Save the Redwoods League Sempervirens Fund Sierra Club California Silicon Valley Leadership Group State Building and Construction Trades Council of California The Nature Conservancy The Trust for Public Land The Wildlands Conservancy TreePeople This list connotes organizations supporting original legislation and/or bond measure. Paid for by Californians for Clean Water and Safe Parks, sponsored by Conservation Groups. Committee major funding from Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks. Yes on Proposition 68, Conservation Action Fund for clean water and parks, sponsored by environmental organizations and The Nature Conservancy. Supporters List May 30, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS -
RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, June 2, 2020 the Richmond City Council
RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, June 2, 2020 The Richmond City Council Evening Open Session was called to order at 5:02 p.m. by Mayor Thomas K. Butt via teleconference. Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, Contra Costa County and Governor Gavin Newsom issued multiple orders requiring sheltering in place, social distancing, and reduction of person-to-person contact. (See, for example, March 31, 2020, County Order extending the shelter-in-place order until May 3, 2020, and March 19, 2020, statewide shelter-in-place order). Accordingly, Governor Gavin Newsom issued executive orders that allowed cities to hold public meetings via teleconferencing (Executive Order N-29-20). DUE TO THE SHELTER IN PLACE ORDERS, attendance at the City of Richmond City Council meeting was limited to Councilmembers, essential City of Richmond staff, and members of the news media. Public comment was confined to items appearing on the agenda and was limited to the methods provided below. Consistent with Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting utilized teleconferencing only. The following provides information on how the public participated in the meeting. The public was able to view the meeting from home on KCRT – Comcast Channel 28 or AT&T Uverse Channel 99, or live-streamed online at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/ 3178/KCRT-Live. Written public comments were received via email and eComment. Comments received by 3:00 p.m. on April 21, 2020, were put into the record and considered before Council action and were submitted by email to [email protected]. Comments received via email during the meeting and up until the public comment period on the relevant agenda item closed, were read into the record. -
33740000 Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency
NEW ISSUE—BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: S&P: “A” See “RATING” In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the 2010 Series A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2010 Series A Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes, nor is it included in adjusted current earnings when calculating federal corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2010 Series A Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $33,740,000 RICHMOND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (Richmond, California) Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Merged Project Areas) 2010 Series A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on the inside front cover This cover page contains information for quick reference only. It is not intended to be a summary of all factors relevant to an investment in the 2010 Series A Bonds. Investors should read the entire Official Statement before making any investment decision. Capitalized terms used in this cover page shall have the meanings given such terms herein. -
DELIVERS Farhl R[^-/OLJ'
DELIVERS fARhL r[^-/OLJ' May 6, 2020 Attn: Bill Gates, Chair City Council Board of Supervisors I Civic Center Plaza Maricopa County Irvine, CA 92606 301 West Jefferson Street Phoenix, AZ 85003 City oflrvine Economic Development Department Attn: Wallin Gustin City Manager Interim State Rapid Response Coordinator 1 Civic Center Plaza Employer Engagement Administration Irvine, CA 92606 Arizona Department of Economic Security PO Box 6123 Michelle Steel, Chair Mail Drop 5574 Orange County Board of Supervisors Phoenix, AZ 85012 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Kate Gallego, Mayor Phoenix City Hal] Sam Liccardo, Mayor 200 W. Washington Street City of San Jose Phoenix, AZ 85003 San Jose City Hall 200 East Santa Clara Street Christine MacKay, Director San Jose, CA 95113 City of Phoenix Community & Economic Development Kim Walsh, Deputy City Manager/ 200 W. Washington Street Dh'ector of Economic Development Phoenix, AZ 85003 City of San Jose Department of Economic Development Jennifer Gouvaia, Deputy Chief San Jose City Mail Program and Technical Assistance Section 200 East Santa Clara Street CA Employment Development Branch San Jose, CA 95113 Worforce Services Division 722 Capitol Mail, MIC 50 Employment Services Sacramento, CA 95814 1879 Senter Road San Jose, CA 95112 WARN Act Coordinator Statewide Services Unit Joe Smitian, President Workforce Services Division Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Employment development department Clerk of the Board PO Box 826880, MIC 69/Room 3099 Boards and Commissions Sacramento, CA 94280-0001 70 West Hedding Street East Wing,! Oth Floor San Jose, CA 95110 Christina L. Shea, Mayor Pauline Cutter, Mayor City oflrvine City of San Leandro 835 E. -
Restore America's Parks
Restore America’s Parks October 11, 2019 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker of the House of Representatives United States Senate United States House of Representatives U.S. Capitol Building, Room S-230 U.S. Capitol Building, Room 232 Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Leader McConnell and Speaker Pelosi: We are elected leaders of cities, towns, and counties that are adjacent to national park sites. The preservation of these sites is critical to the health of our local economies. That is why we urge you to advance legislation, S. 500 and H.R. 1225, that would dedicate federal funding for their repair. As you may know, the National Park System has a nearly $12 billion deferred maintenance backlog that affects the upkeep of historic artifacts and buildings, water systems, roads and trails, and many visitor facilities. As gateways to national parks, we understand first-hand the economic importance of sustaining these special places in ways that attract visitation and tourism. Our communities provide the lodging, gas, food establishments, and other amenities that tourists require before, during, and after their park visits. According to the National Park Service, in 2018, the 318 million visitors to national parks contributed more than $40 billion in national economic output, which supported 329,000 jobs. Those jobs are economic lifelines for many of our residents. We are proud neighbors and partners of America’s national parks and understand the important roles these places play in protecting and providing access to our natural and cultural heritage. We need to repair and maintain these cherished sites, not only for the economic benefits they supply, but to keep intact our National Park System, which historian Wallace Stegner called “America’s best idea.” Please provide your leadership in guiding S. -
The Honorable Tom Butt Mayor of Richmond, California Sponsored By
Resolution No. Submitted by: The Honorable Tom Butt Mayor of Richmond, California Sponsored by: The Honorable Kirk Caldwell Mayor of Honolulu, Hawaii The Honorable Martine Watkins Mayor of Santa Cruz, California The Honorable Libby Schaaf Mayor of Oakland, California The Honorable Jackie Biskupski Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah The Honorable Pauline Russo Cutter Mayor of San Leandro, California The Honorable Suzanne Jones Mayor of Boulder, Colorado The Honorable Jack Young Mayor of Baltimore, Maryland SUPPORTING CITIES’ RIGHTS AND EFFORTS TO MITIGATE CLIMATE CHANGE DAMAGES AND PROTECT TAXPAYERS FROM RELATED ADAPTATION COSTS WHEREAS, the United States Conference of Mayors has adopted multiple resolutions over the past several years concerning the impacts of climate change on cities, including findings that: • Scientific evidence is increasingly clear that human activities are largely responsible for the accelerating changes in the global climate [2016]; • Climate change poses a major threat to the health and livelihood of American cities, with impacts as wide-ranging as increased flooding, drought, reduced water supply, fire, public health impacts, habitat loss, and invasive species [2016]; • Climate change, if unchecked, will have mounting impacts on human health, natural systems, and infrastructure, creating new costs for individuals, businesses, and governments [2016]; • Climate change has had a disproportionate impact on low income and disadvantaged communities [2016]; • The Third National Climate assessment shows that cities will continue