DOCSLIB.ORG

Supporters List May 30, 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Supporters List May 30, 2018 NOTABLE ENDORSEMENTS Governor Jerry Brown Senator Kevin de León, President pro Tempore (Former) Senator Toni Atkins, President pro Tempore Assembly Member Anthony Rendon, Speaker Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (Former) American Heart Association American Lung Association Association of California Water Agencies Audubon California California Association of Local Conservation Corps California Chamber of Commerce California Council of Land Trusts California Democratic Party California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO California State Parks Foundation Cordoba Corporation Environmental Defense Fund Heal the Bay Humane Society of the United States League of California Cities Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Monterey Bay Aquarium Peninsula Open Space Trust Save the Redwoods League Sempervirens Fund Sierra Club California Silicon Valley Leadership Group State Building and Construction Trades Council of California The Nature Conservancy The Trust for Public Land The Wildlands Conservancy TreePeople This list connotes organizations supporting original legislation and/or bond measure. Paid for by Californians for Clean Water and Safe Parks, sponsored by Conservation Groups. Committee major funding from Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks. Yes on Proposition 68, Conservation Action Fund for clean water and parks, sponsored by environmental organizations and The Nature Conservancy. Supporters List May 30, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS 5 Gyres Institute California Trout Acterra California Urban Forests Council Agoura Hills Tomorrow California Urban Streams Partnership American Bird Conservancy California Waterfowl Association American River Conservancy California Wilderness Coalition American River Natural History Association Californians Against Waste Antelope Valley Audubon Society Canopy Arroyo Seco Foundation Carbon Cycle Institute Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy Carbon Canyon Fire Safe Council Audubon California Catalina Island Conservancy Audubon Center at Debs Park Cayucos Land Conservancy Back Country Land Trust Center for Biological Diversity Banning Ranch Conservancy Center for Climate Change and Health Batiquitos Lagoon Foundation Center for Sustainable Neighborhoods Bay Area Open Space Council Central Sierra Audubon Society Bay Area Ridge Trail Council Citizens for Los Angeles Wildlife Bear Yuba Land Trust Climate Resolve Big Sur Land Trust ClimatePlan Biocitizen Inc. Committee for Green Foothills Bolsa Chica Land Trust Conservancy for the Range of the Condor Buena Vista Audubon Society Nature Connection California Association of Local Conservation Conservation Corps Long Beach Corps Conservation Corps North Bay California Association of Resource Conservation Crystal Cove Conservancy Districts Defenders of Wildlife California Climate and Agriculture Network East Bay Nature California Coastkeeper Alliance Eastern Sierra Land Trust California Council of Land Trusts Ecology Center California Greenworks Endangered Habitats League California Invasive Plant Council Environment California California League of Conservation Voters Environmental Defense Center California Outdoor Recreation Partnership Environmental Defense Council California Rangeland Conservation Coalition Environmental Defense Fund California ReLeaf Environmental Working Group This list connotes organizations supporting original legislation and/or bond measure. Paid for by Californians for Clean Water and Safe Parks, sponsored by Conservation Groups. Committee major funding from Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks. Yes on Proposition 68, Conservation Action Fund for clean water and parks, sponsored by environmental organizations and The Nature Conservancy. Supporters List May 30, 2018 Escondido Creek Conservancy Marin Open Space Trust Fallbrook Land Conservancy Mendocino Land Trust Fibershed Mojave Desert Land Trust Fresno Audubon Society Mono Lake Committee Fresno EOC’s Local Conservation Corps Morro Coast Audubon Society Friends of Harbors, Beaches, and Parks Mountain Area Preservation Friends of Runyon Canyon Foundation Mountains Restoration Trust Friends of the Earth Mt. Diablo Audubon Society Friends of the LA River Napa Climate NOW! Friends of the Napa River National Wildlife Federation Gaviota Coast Conservancy Natural Heritage Institute Greenbelt Alliance Natural Resources Defense Council Heal the Bay Naturalist For You Hills for Everyone Nature For All Huntington Beach Tree Society Next 100 Coalition John Muir Land Trust North Richmond Shoreline Open Space Alliance Kern Audubon Society Ocean Conservancy Kerncrest Audubon Society Ocean Discovery Institute LA Compost Ojai Valley Land Conservancy LA Conservation Corps Outdoor Outreach La Purisma Audubon Society Pacific Crest Trail Association Laguna Greenbelt Inc. Pacific Forest Trust Lakeside’s River Park Conservancy Pacific Marine Mammal Center Lake County Land Trust Pacoima Beautiful Land Trust of Santa Barbara County Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy Land Trust of Santa Cruz County Palomar Audubon Society Latino Outdoors Pasadena Audubon Society League of Conservation Voters of the East Bay Pathways for Wildlife League to Save Lake Tahoe Paula Lane Action Network Los Cerritos Wetlands Land Trust Peninsula Open Space Trust Los Angeles Audubon Society People for Parks Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust Placer Land Trust Madrone Audubon Society Planning and Conservation League Marin Audubon Society Plumas Audubon Society Marin Carbon Project Pomona Valley Audubon Society Marin Conservation League Portola & Castle Rock Foundation This list connotes organizations supporting original legislation and/or bond measure. Paid for by Californians for Clean Water and Safe Parks, sponsored by Conservation Groups. Committee major funding from Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks. Yes on Proposition 68, Conservation Action Fund for clean water and parks, sponsored by environmental organizations and The Nature Conservancy. Supporters List May 30, 2018 Preserve Calavera Seventh Generation Advisors Protect American River Canyons Shasta Land Trust Rails-to-Trails Sierra Cascade Land Trust Council Redbud Audubon Society Sierra County Land Trust Richmond Trees Sierra Club California River LA Sierra Foothills Audubon Society River Partners Sierra Foothill Conservancy Sacramento Regional Conservation Corps Sierra Harvest Salton Sea Authority Sierra Nevada Alliance San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society Sierra Nevada Journeys San Diego Audubon Society Silicon Valley Land Conservancy San Diego Coastkeeper Sonoma Land Trust San Dieguito River Valley Conservancy Sonoma Resource Conservation District San Fernando Valley Audubon Society Southeast Greenway Campaign San Francisco Baykeeper Southern California Open Space Council San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Stewards of the Coast and Redwoods San Francisco Conservation Corps Surfrider Foundation San Gabriel Valley Conservation Corps Sustainable Conservation San Joaquin River Parkway and Conservation Sustainable Silicon Valley Trust Tahoe Resource Conservation District San Jose Conservation Corps Tejon Ranch Conservancy San Francisco Parks Alliance The Center for Oceanic Awareness, Research, Santa Barbara Audubon Society and Education (COARE) Santa Clara River Conservancy The Conservation Fund Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society The Federation of Hillside and Canyon Santa Monica Bay Audubon Society Associations, Inc. Santa Monica Mountains Fund The Fund for Animals Save Mount Diablo The Fund for People in Parks Save the American River The Land Trust for Santa Barbara County Save The Bay The Nature Conservancy Save the Redwoods League The Pacific Institute Save our Shores The Sierra Fund Sea and Sage Audubon Society The Student Conservation Association Sempervirens Fund The Wilderness Society Sequoia Audubon Society Transition Habitat Conservancy Sequoia Riverlands Trust TreePeople This list connotes organizations supporting original legislation and/or bond measure. Paid for by Californians for Clean Water and Safe Parks, sponsored by Conservation Groups. Committee major funding from Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks. Yes on Proposition 68, Conservation Action Fund for clean water and parks, sponsored by environmental organizations and The Nature Conservancy. Supporters List May 30, 2018 Tri-Valley Conservancy Volcan Mountain Foundation Trout Unlimited Western Rivers Conservancy Truckee Donner Land Trust Wildcoast Trust for Public Land Wild Birds Unlimited Tulare County Audubon Society Wilderness Ventures Upstream Policy YES Nature to Neighborhoods Valley of the Moon Observatory Association Yolo Audubon Society PARK DISTRICTS & ORGANIZATIONS Almanor Recreation and Park District Fair Oaks Recreation and Park District Anderson Marsh Interpretive Association Friends of Boeddeker Park Anza-Borrego Foundation Friends of California Citrus Park Auburn Area Recreation and Parks District Friends of China Camp California Association of Parks and Recreation Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed Commissioners Friends of Daley Ranch California Association of Recreation & Park Friends of Famosa Slough Districts Friends of the Hollywood Central Park California Park & Recreation Society Friends of Jackson Park California Parks Hospitality Association Friends of Lake Folsom and Natoma California State Park Rangers Association Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed Carmichael Recreation and Park District Friends of
Recommended publications
  • CPY Document Title

    CPY Document Title

    Agenda Item 7b Attachment A Proposition 23 Supporters (As of August 17, 2010 ) State and National Organizations State and National Organizations (cont’d) American Council of Engineering Companies – Lumber Association of California and California Nevada American GI Forum of California National Federation of Independent Business American GI Forum Women of California – California (NFIB) Americans for Prosperity National Petrochemical and Refiners Associated California Loggers Association Association of Energy Service Companies National Tax Limitation Committee Black Business Association National Taxpayers Union California Association of Business and Nisei Farmers League Property Owners Printing Industries of California California Automotive Wholesalers Slavic American Chamber of Commerce Association Waste Watchers California Cattlemen’s Association Western Agricultural Processors Association California Citrus Mutual California Coalition of Filipino American Chambers Air Quality/Public Health Officials California Cotton Ginners and Growers Peter Foy, Ventura County Air Pollution Associations Control District Board Member California Dairy Campaign Brad Mitzelfelt, Mojave Desert Air Quality California Dump Truck Owners Association Management District Board Member California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce Reb Monaco, Monterey Bay Unified Air California Independent Oil Marketers Pollution Control District Board Member Association (CIOMA) Kim Yamaguchi, Butte County Air Quality California League of Food Processors Management District Board Member
  • N E W S Release Office of Richmond Mayor Tom Butt

    N E W S Release Office of Richmond Mayor Tom Butt

    N E W S Release Office of Richmond Mayor Tom Butt Contact: For Immediate Release Terrance Cheung – Chief of Staff November 12, 2015 Office 510‐620‐6502 Cell 415‐990‐2087 Statement from Richmond Mayor Tom Butt Regarding State’s Decision to Reject Contra Costa County’s Proposal to Expand the West County Detention Facility Richmond Mayor Tom Butt issued the following statement today in response to the California Board of State and Community Corrections’ (BSCC) announcement awarding the top four large California counties that applied for jail construction grants through SB 863. Although Contra Costa County had submitted an $80 million grant to expand the West County Detention Facility, which is located within the City of Richmond, the BSCC ultimately decided to approve applications for San Francisco, Santa Clara, Alameda, and Ventura Counties but not for Contra Costa County. “We supported the expressed intent of the application, which was to provide expanded mental health, education and re-entry services,” said Mayor Tom Butt. “However, the Sheriff’s Office failed to provide a plan of how these programs would be funded at a cost of $4 to $5 million annually and a commitment to permanently close down unneeded facilities in Martinez.” This past August, the Richmond City Council adopted a resolution officially opposing the jail expansion proposal and took legal action challenging the County’s Environmental Impact Report. “The project on its face was simply a major expansion,” said Mayor Butt. “It would have made the West County Detention Facility, by far, the largest jail in the County.” The Sheriff’s Office manages the county’s three detention facilities.
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033

    Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033

    THE NATIONAL GROUPa bi-partisan company WEST LLc March 17, 2003 The Partners, Mr. Tom Kirk, Executive Director Salton Sea Authority 78-401 Highway 111, SuiteT Danki S. Mitrovkh La Quinta, CA 92253 Lindn K. Mbrovtch Dear Mr. Kirk, Please find attached our response to your Request for Proposal, Developing a WiHiatn C. O/dcUrf Preferred Salton Sea Restoration Project. James B. Riden Our team of experts has the necessary background and desire to fulfill the agency’s requirement goal to be your Restoration Plaiming and Management Team for the Project. R. Hunter Bkkn We look forward to the opportunity to discuss our proposal and your request in , ,..|J greater detail at the earliest date possible. Whatever the outcome of your selection, our team wishes all of you at the Authority much success in the challenge that lies ahead of you. Sincerely, Linda K. Mitrovich, Partner 10900 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 801 Los Angeles, CA 90024 310.481.0920 phone 310.481.0915 fax http://TNGWest.com Response to Proposal: Developing a Preferred Salton Sea Restoration Project March 17, 2003 Overview The National Group West, LLC. (TNG West) is a newly organized governmental affairs company that specializes in finding viable solutions to complex problems, including environmental problems. While the formal group is new, the principals have spent their careers ■ accomplishing the impossible. Our expertise is in building specialized teams that can identify the real problem, work with the client to develop a strategy, and then implement the strategy to ^ achieve the client’s objectives. We have learned that each project requires a specialized Team having a range of expertise to be successful in developing a comprehensive and cohesive strategy to meet to the client’s goals.
  • California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: a Bibliography

    California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: a Bibliography

    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2019 California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: A Bibliography James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: A Bibliography" (2019). Botanical Studies. 70. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/70 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA FLORAS, MANUALS, AND CHECKLISTS Literature on the Identification and Uses of California Vascular Plants Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 21st Edition – 14 November 2019 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Introduction . 1 1: North American & U. S. Regional Floras. 2 2: California Statewide Floras . 4 3: California Regional Floras . 6 Northern California Sierra Nevada & Eastern California San Francisco Bay, & Central Coast Central Valley & Central California Southern California 4: National Parks, Forests, Monuments, Etc.. 15 5: State Parks and Other Sites . 23 6: County and Local Floras . 27 7: Selected Subjects. 56 Endemic Plants Rare and Endangered Plants Extinct Aquatic Plants & Vernal Pools Cacti Carnivorous Plants Conifers Ferns & Fern Allies Flowering Trees & Shrubs Grasses Orchids Ornamentals Weeds Medicinal Plants Poisonous Plants Useful Plants & Ethnobotanical Studies Wild Edible Plants 8: Sources .
  • Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife and Forest Conservation. Bonds

    Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife and Forest Conservation. Bonds

    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 6-7-1993 Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife And Forest Conservation. Bonds. Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits Recommended Citation Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife And Forest Conservation. Bonds. California Initiative 593 (1993). http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits/756 This Initiative is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Initiatives by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE December 9, 1993 TO: All County Clerks/Registrars of Voters (93155) Pursuant to Section 3523 of the Elections Code, I hereby certify that on December 9, 1993 the certificates received from the County Clerks or Registrars of Voters by the Secretary of State established that the Initiative Statute, PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVATION. BONDS has been signed by the requisite number of qualified electors needed to declare the petition sufficient. The PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVATION. BONDS. INITIATIVE STATUTE is, therefore, qualified for the June 7, 1994 Primary Election. PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVA­ TION. BONDS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes general obligation bonds of almost $2 billion, to be repaid from the General Fund, for acquisition, development, rehabilitation, restoration and conservation of park lands, historic sites, wildlife areas and forest throughout California. Includes funds for parks and recreational facilities throughout the State.
  • 10 State Parks Closed in Southern California

    10 State Parks Closed in Southern California

    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION California State Parks Fire Update 3 Parks Closed in Southern California Fires All Other Parks Open November 1 Memorial Day Reservations Available Thursday Updated 12 p.m. Wednesday October 31, 2007 The threat of wildfires and smoke has subsided and many parks have reopened. As listed below, there are still three state parks that remain closed and 11 have reopened. California State Parks continues to assist in the fire emergency by providing temporarily campsites and day use areas to nearly 100 evacuees at the parks listed far below. For visitors who had their reservations canceled as a result, we appreciate your understanding in this time of crisis. For all but the three closed parks, reservations that had been canceled through October 31 will resume taking reservations on Thursday at 8 a.m. This will be the first opportunity for all visitors to make a reservation at any of our 278 state parks for the three-day, Memorial Day weekend. Reopened The 11 parks that were closed on Friday have resumed normal operations. Of the parks listed below, those that take reservations will resume doing so on Thursday, November 1. San Diego County Orange County Cuyamaca Rancho State Park Crystal Cove State Park’s San Elijo State Beach primitive campsites San Onofre State Beach’s Doheny State Beach San Mateo Campground San Clemente State Beach Silver Strand State Beach South Carlsbad State Beach Riverside County Lake Perris State Recreation Area San Bernardino County Chino Hills State Park Wildwood Canyon Closed Parks Reservations and day use are not available at the parks below.
  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Hosted by the San Fernando Valley Audubon Society

    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Hosted by the San Fernando Valley Audubon Society

    AUDUBON CA – SOCAL MEETING AGENDA 01/17/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Hosted by the San Fernando Valley Audubon Society Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. The Japanese Garden Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area, 6100 Woodley Ave, Van Nuys, CA 91406 **Please brown bag it and bring your own lunch** ATTENDEES: Rosemary Leibowitz – San Fernando Valley Audubon Heather Medvitz – San Fernando Valley Audubon Dave Weeshoff – San Fernando Valley Audubon Mark Osokow – San Fernando Valley Audubon Jim Houghton – San Fernando Valley Audubon Kris Ohlenkamp – San Fernando Valley Audubon Ellen Vahan – Santa Monica Bay Audubon Chuck Almdale – Santa Monica Bay Audubon David Quadhamer – Palos Verdes/South Bay Audubon Carolyn Vance – El Dorado Audubon Eva Lydick – Laguna Hills Audubon Drew Feldman – San Bernardino Valley Audubon Vic Leipzig – Sea & Sage Audubon Bruce Aird – Sea & Sage Audubon Janet & Al Baumann – Sea & Sage Audubon Garry George – Los Angeles Audubon & Audubon CA Travis Abeyta – Audubon CA 1 AUDUBON CA – SOCAL MEETING AGENDA 01/17/2015 AGENDA: 8:00 am BIRD WALK (OPTIONAL) 9:00 am INTRODUCTIONS AND FINALIZATION OF AGENDA Garry George called the meeting to order. Garry introduced Travis Abeyta as the new Chapter Network Manager for Southern California. Travis gave a PowerPoint presentation to the group that explained his role as a Chapter Network Manager. The PowerPoint has been posted online at http://ca.audubon.org/documents/what-chapter-network-manager2015. 9:15 am SWAINSON’S HAWK IN ANTELOPE VALLEY & GREATER SAGE GROUSE LEK ACCESS POLICY AND VIEWING GUIDELINES IN EASTERN SIERRA Garry George gave a PowerPoint presentation which detailed the positive impacts for Swainson’s hawks that Audubon CA and local chapters have made in the Antelope Valley IBA.
  • 5.15 Recreation

    5.15 Recreation

    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5. Environmental Analysis 5.15 RECREATION This section of the San Bernardino County (County) Countywide Plan (CWP or Project) Program Environmental Impact Report describes the regulatory framework, existing conditions, and the potential for environmental impacts related to parks and recreations. 5.15.1 Environmental Setting 5.15.1.1 REGULATORY BACKGROUND Federal National Park Service The National Park system is considered to have begun in 1872 when Congress established Yellowstone National Park under exclusive control of the Secretary of the Interior. In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson signed the “Organic Act” to create the National Park Service to “promote and regulate the use of the Federal areas known as national parks, monuments and reservations” and to “conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wildlife therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.” Wilderness Act of 1964 In the Wilderness Act of 1964, Congress directed certain federal agencies to study lands they administer for inclusion in a system of preserved wildernesses where no extractive activities can occur. Wilderness designation ensures the resources are managed to retain their “primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation.” Wilderness areas are open to hiking and, in some cases, horseback riding, backpacking, and other nonmechanical recreation. The Wilderness Act prohibits permanent roads and commercial enterprises, except in some instances related to recreation and safety. California Desert Conservation Area Plan The California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan was approved in 1980 in accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act.
  • League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions

    League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions

    AGENDA ITEM 7.C. MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 4, 2018 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager By: Peggy Kuo, City Clerk SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to receive and file the League of California Cities (League) annual resolution and approve the voting delegate and voting alternate to use their discretion to vote on the proposed resolutions. BACKGROUND: 1. On April 3, 2018, City Council designated Councilmember Chavez as the voting delegate and Mayor Man as the voting alternate for the League's Annual Business Meeting. 2. Only August 1, 2018, the City received a copy of the League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions Packet. ANALYSIS: At its annual business meeting, the League adopts policy resolutions on issues of statewide importance that have direct bearing on municipal affairs and are of broad municipal interest. The League's primary means for developing policy is through their standing policy committees and Board of Directors. Additionally, any city, elected or appointed city official, or League Division, Department, or Policy Committee may submit a resolution sixty days before the business meeting. This year's General Assembly and business meeting will be held during the annual City Council September 4, 2018 Page 2 of 3 conference on Friday, September 14, in Long Beach. The City Council has appointed Councilmember Chavez as the City's voting delegate and Mayor Man as the voting alternate. During the conference, the respective League Policy Committees and General Resolutions Committee will consider making recommendations on one Resolution before they are voted on by the delegates in General Assembly.
  • State Parks and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fund Act of 2010 Supporters List

    State Parks and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fund Act of 2010 Supporters List

    State Parks and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fund Act of 2010 Supporters List Conservation Organizations Altacal Audubon Society Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust American Land Conservancy Literacy for Environmental Justice American River Conservancy Marin Conservation League Audubon California Mendocino Land Trust Ballona Institute Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Batiquitos Lagoon Foundation Mono Lake Committee Bay Area Open Space Council Mt. Shasta Area Audubon Society Bay Area Mycological Society Muir Heritage Land Trust Big Sur Land Trust Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District Bolsa Chica Land Trust Napa‐Solano Audubon Society California Council of Land Trusts National Trust for Historic Preservation California Fish and Game Commission National Wildlife Federation California League of Conservation Voters Natural Resources Defense Council California Native Plant Society The Nature Conservancy California Outdoor Heritage Alliance Nisene 2 Sea California ReLeaf Northcoast Regional Land Trust California Wilderness Coalition North East Trees Coastside Land Trust Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy The Conservation Fund Palos Verdes/South Bay Audubon Society Defenders of Wildlife Pasadena Audubon Society Earth Resource Foundation Peninsula Open Space Trust Endangered Habitats League Peregrine Audubon Society Environment California Piercy Watersheds Association Environmental Priorities Network Planning and Conservation League Forests Forever Redbud Audubon Society Fresno Audubon Society Redwood Region Audubon Society
  • Prado Basin Sediment Management Demonstration Project Biological Conditions Technical Report

    Prado Basin Sediment Management Demonstration Project Biological Conditions Technical Report

    PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact: Richard Zembal Daniel Bott July 2013 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1-1 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 2-1 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Regional Setting ................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Local Setting ......................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Relevant Biological Resource Management Programs ......................... 3-8 4.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................4-1 4.1 Methodology ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Vegetation Communities ....................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Sensitive Communities/Special Status Plants ..................................... 4-11 4.4 Wildlife ................................................................................................4-19 4.5 Wildlife Movement Corridors ............................................................... 4-51 5.0 SUMMARY OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................... 5-1 6.0