L[Ev] A[Lexandrovitch] Nessov DINOSAURS of NORTHERN EURASIA: NEW DATA ABOUT ASSEMBLAGES, ECOLOGY, and PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

L[Ev] A[Lexandrovitch] Nessov DINOSAURS of NORTHERN EURASIA: NEW DATA ABOUT ASSEMBLAGES, ECOLOGY, and PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY Saint Petersburg University Institute of Earth Crust L[ev] A[lexandrovitch] Nessov DINOSAURS OF NORTHERN EURASIA: NEW DATA ABOUT ASSEMBLAGES, ECOLOGY, AND PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY Reviewers: Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences I. S. Darevsky Doctor of Geological and Mathematical Sciences V. A. Prozorovsky Printed by resolution of the Editorial Council, Geology Faculty, St. Petersburg State University St. Petersburg, 1995 Translator: Tatayana Platonova, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia Translation editor: Hans-Dieter Sues, Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, U.S.A. NOTE ON TRANSLATION: This work, originally published in Russian in 1995, has been translated into English to introduce Nessov’s research on dinosaurs from the former Soviet Union to specialists worldwide. It contains important primary descriptions for a number of new dinosaurian taxa from the Cretaceous of Uzbekistan as well as a comprehensive synopsis of localities with dinosaurian remains on the territory of the former Soviet Union. Some of the paleobiological speculations will strike western readers as idiosyncratic, but we tried to retain the original character of Nessov’s work as much as possible in this translation. Throughout the text, pagination for the Russian original is indicated by bold-face numbers in brackets to facilitate cross-referencing. This translation should be used in conjunction with the original work to view the illustrations (which are not reproduced here). The transliteration used by the translator differs in some respects from that commonly used in the United States so that the spelling of certain names of authors and places differ (e.g., “Yefremov” rather than “Efremov”). Ms. Platonova’s translation effort was supported by National Science Foundation grant EAR-9804771. TABLE OF CONTENTS [WITH ORIGINAL PAGINATION] Introduction 4 1. Review of major dinosaurian taxa of the Middle Jurassic-Cretaceous of northern Eurasia 7 1.1.Segnosaurs 7 1.2.Theropods 15 1.3.Sauropods 19 1.4. Stegosaurs and ankylosaurs 20 1.5. Ornithopods 21 1.6. Ceratopsia 25 2. Descriptions of new discoveries 35 3. Some features of the habitat and dispersal routes of dinosaurs 58 4. Appendix. Localities of remains of bones, teeth, eggshell and tracks of dinosaurs in northern Eurasia 78 4.1. Bones and teeth of dinosaurs in Mesozoic deposits 80 4.1.1. Jurassic 80 4.1.2. Lower Cretaceous 84 4.1.3. Upper Cretaceous 89 4.2. Remains of Cretaceous dinosaurs redeposited in Paleogene sediments 112 4.3. Eggs, clutches, and eggshell of dinosaurs from the Cretaceous 113 4.4. Tracks of dinosaurs 115 4.4.1. Jurassic 115 4.4.2. Cretaceous 118 4.5. Remains that should no longer be attributed to dinosaurs and localities that should no longer be regarded as those where of dinosaurian remains were found in the CIS 120 References 125 Summary 144 Legends for plates 146 Index of taxonomic names of dinosaurs of family rank and lower, discovered within the boundaries of the former Soviet Union 152 Index of localities 154 INTRODUCTION The present work is devoted to the dinosaurs of northern Eurasia within the boundaries of the former Soviet Union. Remains and tracks of dinosaurs are known from Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tadzhikistan, Kirghizia, Turkmenistan, Russia, Armenia, and Georgia. Existing reviews of localities of dinosaurian remains discovered in the former Soviet Union (Tolmachev, 1926; Yuryev, 1954a) as well as specialized bibliographical selections of discoveries of these animals in that country (Riabinin, 1931a, 1939; Rozhdestvensky, 1964; Rozhdestvensky and Tatarinov, 1964: p. 647, 648) usually include, in addition to dinosaurs, other ancient reptiles from either particular regions or from all of Asia (Yefremov, 1944; Rozhdestvensky, 1964, 1974; Rozhdestvensky, 1977; Rozhdestvensky and Khozatsky, 1967). Some reviews are incomplete (Rozhdestvensky and Tatarinov, 1964; Paleozoology of the USSR). All have become obsolete. If considered from the perspective of cladistic systematics, dinosaurs are a paraphyletic group because they do not include the ancestor of the group nor all its descendants (as birds are the descendants of theropod dinosaurs). Dinosaurs, whether they represent one, two, or possibly several lineages, take their origin from pseudosuchians. Therefore, it would be more natural, from the cladistic point of view, to establish a group including various pseudosuchians, pterosaurs(?), as well as crocodylians, ornithischians, and saurischians, and also birds or a group including only several evolutionarily derived theropods and birds. It would nevertheless be reasonable to preserve the term "dinosaur" in order to be free to use it in the future. The first discoveries and/or identifications of dinosaurian remains in the European part of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) were made by Kiprianov prior to 1883, K. F. Egorov in 1912 and P. M. Klevensky in 1931, by A. D. Arkhangelsky in Transbaikalia in 1910, by V. T. Surgai and A. F. Sosedko in the Kyzylkum in 1930, by E. V. Ivanov in 1923 and V. D. Prinada in Tashkent Chul' [chul' = hilly plain; Tashkent Chul' is a hilly plain located north of Tashkent in southern Kazakhstan] in 1924-1925, by P. D. Trusov in 1928 and O. S. Vyalov in the Fergana region in the 1930's, by G. V. Mukhin in 1925, A. N. Kirikov in 1926, E. I. Belyaeva and M. G. Prokhorov in 1927 and D. I. Yakovlev in the basin of the Il River, and by I. I. Krom in the basin of the Emba River in 1926. Shell of dinosaurian eggs was found for the first time in the former Soviet Union by V. S. Erofeyev and L. D. Kudina in the Zaisan Basin in 1959. Tracks of dinosaurs were first discovered on the conterminous territory of the CIS by G. D. Romanovsky and P. A. Chuenko in 1882, and tracks of dinosaurs were found by Chabukiani in Georgia in 1933. Citizens of Russia (inhabitants of the Kasatkina stanitsa [stanitsa = large cossack village], now the village of Kasatkino) and later Colonel Manakin discovered, for the first time for science, a locality with dinosaurian remains on Chinese territory (1900-1902) (Manakin, 1902; Riabinin, 1925). This find was made long before the discovery of Central Asian localities (in Mongolia and also the Chinese provinces of Gansu and Inner Mongolia). Over the past 15 to 20 years, the amount of data on the composition of dinosaurian faunas in this country [Commonwealth of Independent States, abbreviated as CIS] and the list of localities have increased several times. [4/5] Therefore, a new review of the evidence is needed. Ichnological research on dinosaurs is proceeding vigorously, with studies being carried out by V. V. Kurbatov, V. P. Novikov, K. N. Amanniyazov, V. I. Sedletsky, and L. K. Gabuniya. These efforts have also been guided by results of paleoichnology abroad (Lockley, 1991; Lockley et al., 1991). A great body of new data was obtained by teams of the Stratigraphic Party headed by I. M. Abduazimova (Tashkent) and Leningrad (St. Petersburg) University. It was not uncommon that localities, where previously only fragmentary remains of one or two dinosaurian forms had been recorded, appeared to contain rich assemblages of these animals after several years of work. The Appendix to the present work lists all known localities, including even those that contain few dinosaurian remains that cannot be identified even to the level of order. Several of these localities may represent the first evidence of rich and previously unknown dinosaurian faunal complexes. Thus, for instance, even after dedicated paleontological exploration at Dzharakuduk, the fauna from this locality was regarded as relatively impoverished (Rozhdestvensky, 1964). Now, however, the locality is known to contain the most diverse fauna of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates from the Cretaceous of Eurasia. It should be noted that very little is known in the world as a whole and in Eurasia in particular about the dinosaurs during the period from the end of the Middle Jurassic to the beginning of the Late Jurassic (Bathonian-Callovian; Oxford Clay) and particularly about the faunas of these animals during the first half of the Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian - Santonian) (Steel, 1969, 1970; Haubold, 1979; Steel and Haubold, 1979; Norman, 1985; Czerkas and Olson, 1987; Chure and McIntosh, 1989; Russell and Weishampel, 1989; Norman, 1989; Weishampel et al., 1990b; Britt et al., 1990). Even already available data on the dinosaurs of that time given in the literature are very incomplete (Charig, 1993: fig. 3). Even fewer data on dinosaurs are available for the Aalenian stage (at the beginning of the Middle Jurassic). No significant remains of these animals are known worldwide for this age interval. During the past few years, remains of dinosaurs have been found on the territory of the former Soviet Union that belong to taxa previously unknown for this region: Segnosauria and Oviraptorosauria in the Cretaceous, Stegosauria in the Jurassic, and also true horned dinosaurs, Ceratopsidae, for which no significant records had been known for the Cretaceous of Eurasia and which had long been considered endemic to North America (Rozhdestvensky, 1977; Coombs, 1984; Russell, 1991). The world's oldest, or at least very early, representatives of several taxa were found: Hadrosauridae in the late Albian, Protoceratopsidae in the late Albian and early Cenomanian, Ceratopsidae in the late Turonian and Coniacian, Segnosauria in the Albian, early Cenomanian, and possibly late Barremian - middle Aptian, Caenagnathidae in the late Turonian, the genus Troodon in the early Cenomanian, and Stegosauria at the boundary between the Middle and Late Jurassic. All these data as well as other new evidence significantly clarify possible dispersal routes, evolutionary histories of taxa, and the evolutionary history of some dinosaurian assemblages from the Central Asian part of the CIS, Kazakhstan, Transbaikalia, the Far East and North-East of Russia, and also China, Mongolia, and western North America. Unfortunately, only a few complete skeletons of dinosaurs have been found on the territory of the former Soviet Union.
Recommended publications
  • PALEONTOLOGY and BIOSTRATIGRAPHY of MONGOLIA the JOINT SOVIET-MONGOLIAN PALEONTOLOGICAL EXPEDITION (Transactions, Vol
    PALEONTOLOGY AND BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF MONGOLIA THE JOINT SOVIET-MONGOLIAN PALEONTOLOGICAL EXPEDITION (Transactions, vol. 3) EDITORIAL BOARD: N. N. Kramarenko (editor-in-chief) B. Luvsandansan, Yu. I. Voronin, R. Barsbold, A. K. Rozhdestvensky, B. A. Trofimov, V. Yu. Reshetov 1976 S. M. Kurzanov A NEW CARNOSAUR FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF NOGON-TSAV, MONGOLIA* The Upper Cretaceous locality of Nogon-Tsav, located in the Zaltaika Gobi, 20 km NW of Mt. Ongon-Ulan-Ula, was discovered by geologists of the MNR. Then, in a series of years (1969–1971, 1973) the joint Soviet-Mongolian Geological Expedition investigated the site. According to the oral report of B. Yu. Reshetova, the deposits in this region are composed basically of sandstone and clay, clearly subdivided into two deposits. The lower great thickness contains many complete skulls, separate bones of tarbosaurs, ornithomimids, and claws of therizinosaurs. The upper red-colored beds are characterized only by scattered fragments of skulls. The fragments described below are of a new carnivorous dinosaur, Alioramus remotus (coll. South Goby region), from the family Tyrannosauridae, which occurs in the lower gray beds. Genus Alioramus Kurzanov, gen. nov. G e n u s n a m e from alius (Lat.) – other, ramus (Lat.) – branch; masc. G e n o t y p e — A. remotus Kurzanov, sp. nov., Upper Cretaceous, Nemegetinskaya suite, southern Mongolia. D i a g n o s i s . Tyrannosaurid of average size. Skull low, with highly elongated jaws. Nasals with well-developed separate crests of 1–l.5 cm height. Second antorbital fenestrae displaced forward, reaching the anterior end of the 5th tooth.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Fossil Fishes from the Smoky Hill Chalk of the Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) in Kansas
    Lucas, S. G. and Sullivan, R.M., eds., 2006, Late Cretaceous vertebrates from the Western Interior. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 35. 193 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF FOSSIL FISHES FROM THE SMOKY HILL CHALK OF THE NIOBRARA CHALK (UPPER CRETACEOUS) IN KANSAS KENSHU SHIMADA1 AND CHRISTOPHER FIELITZ2 1Environmental Science Program and Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University,2325 North Clifton Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60614; and Sternberg Museum of Natural History, Fort Hays State University, 3000 Sternberg Drive, Hays, Kansas 67601;2Department of Biology, Emory & Henry College, P.O. Box 947, Emory, Virginia 24327 Abstract—The Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Chalk is an Upper Cretaceous marine deposit found in Kansas and adjacent states in North America. The rock, which was formed under the Western Interior Sea, has a long history of yielding spectacular fossil marine vertebrates, including fishes. Here, we present an annotated taxo- nomic list of fossil fishes (= non-tetrapod vertebrates) described from the Smoky Hill Chalk based on published records. Our study shows that there are a total of 643 referable paleoichthyological specimens from the Smoky Hill Chalk documented in literature of which 133 belong to chondrichthyans and 510 to osteichthyans. These 643 specimens support the occurrence of a minimum of 70 species, comprising at least 16 chondrichthyans and 54 osteichthyans. Of these 70 species, 44 are represented by type specimens from the Smoky Hill Chalk. However, it must be noted that the fossil record of Niobrara fishes shows evidence of preservation, collecting, and research biases, and that the paleofauna is a time-averaged assemblage over five million years of chalk deposition.
    [Show full text]
  • 35-51 New Data on Pleuropholis Decastroi (Teleostei, Pleuropholidae)
    Geo-Eco-Trop., 2019, 43, 1 : 35-51 New data on Pleuropholis decastroi (Teleostei, Pleuropholidae), a “pholidophoriform” fish from the Lower Cretaceous of the Eurafrican Mesogea Nouvelles données sur Pleuropholis decastroi (Teleostei, Pleuropholidae), un poisson “pholidophoriforme” du Crétacé inférieur de la Mésogée eurafricaine Louis TAVERNE 1 & Luigi CAPASSO 2 Résumé: Le crâne et le corps de Pleuropholis decastroi, un poisson fossile de l’Albien (Crétacé inférieur) du sud de l’Italie, sont redécrits en détails. P. decastroi diffère des autres espèces du genre par ses deux nasaux en contact médian et qui séparent complètement le dermethmoïde ( = rostral) des frontaux. Avec son maxillaire extrêmement élargi qui couvre la mâchoire inférieure et son supramaxillaire fortement réduit, P. decastroi semble plus nettement apparenté avec Pleuropholis cisnerosorum, du Jurassique supérieur du Mexique, qu’avec les autres espèces du genre. Par ses mâchoires raccourcies et ses nombreux os orbitaires, Pleuropholis apparaît également comme le genre le plus spécialisé de la famille. La position systématique des Pleuropholidae au sein du groupe des « pholidophoriformes » est discutée. Mots-clés: Pleuropholis decastroi, Albien, Italie du sud, Pleuropholis, Pleuropholidae, “Pholidophoriformes”, ostéologie, position systématique. Abstract: The skull and the body of Pleuropholis decastroi, a fossil fish from the marine Albian (Lower Cretaceous) of southern Italy, are re-described in details. P. decastroi differs from the other species of the genus by their two nasals that are in contact along the mid-line, completely separating the dermethmoid (= rostral) from the frontals. With its extremely broadened maxilla that covers the lower jaw and its strongly reduced supramaxilla, P. decastroi seems more closely related to Pleuropholis cisnerosorum, from the Upper Jurassic of Mexico, than to the other species of the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • FR-1995-02-28.Pdf
    2±28±95 Tuesday Vol. 60 No. 39 February 28, 1995 Pages 10789±11016 Briefings on How To Use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Washington, DC, and Dallas, TX, see announcement on the inside cover of this issue. federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 1995 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), by Online: the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Telnet swais.access.gpo.gov, login as newuser <enter>, no Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register > Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the password <enter ; or use a modem to call (202) 512±1661, login as swais, no password <enter>, at the second login as regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register > > (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of newuser <enter , no password <enter . Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Assistance with online subscriptions 202±512±1530 20402. Single copies/back copies: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 512±1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Executive Orders and Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress and other Federal agency documents of public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Restos Directos De Dinosaurios Terópodos (Excluyendo Aves) En España
    Canudo, J. I. y Ruiz-Omeñaca, J. I. 2003. Ciencias de la Tierra. Dinosaurios y otros reptiles mesozoicos de España, 26, 347-373. LOS RESTOS DIRECTOS DE DINOSAURIOS TERÓPODOS (EXCLUYENDO AVES) EN ESPAÑA CANUDO1, J. I. y RUIZ-OMEÑACA1,2 J. I. 1 Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra (Área de Paleontología) y Museo Paleontológico. Universidad de Zaragoza. 50009 Zaragoza. [email protected] 2 Paleoymás, S. L. L. Nuestra Señora del Salz, 4, local, 50017 Zaragoza. [email protected] RESUMEN La mayoría de los restos fósiles de dinosaurios terópodos de España son dientes aislados y escasos restos postcraneales. La única excepción es el ornitomimosaurio Pelecanimimus polyodon, del Barremiense de Las Hoyas (Cuenca). Hay registro de terópodos en el Jurásico superior (Oxfordiense superior-Tithónico inferior), en el tránsito Jurásico-Cretácico (Tithónico superior- Berriasiense inferior) y en todos los pisos del Cretácico inferior, con excepción del Valanginiense. En el Cretácico superior únicamente hay restos en el Campaniense y Maastrichtiense. La mayor parte de las determinaciones son demasiado generales, lo que impide conocer algunas de las familias que posiblemente estén representadas. Se han reconocido: Neoceratosauria, Baryonychidae, Ornithomimosauria, Dromaeosauridae, además de terópodos indeterminados, y celurosaurios indeterminados (dientes pequeños sin dentículos). La mayoría de los restos son de Maniraptoriformes, siendo especialmente abundantes los dromeosáuridos. Las únicas excepciones son por el momento, el posible Ceratosauria del Jurásico superior de Asturias, los barionícidos del Hauteriviense-Barremiense de Burgos, Teruel y La Rioja, el posible carcharodontosáurido del Aptiense inferior de Morella y el posible abelisáurido del Campaniense de Laño. Además hay algunos terópodos incertae sedis, como los "paronicodóntidos" (entre los que se incluye Euronychodon), y Richardoestesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Brains and Intelligence
    BRAINS AND INTELLIGENCE The EQ or Encephalization Quotient is a simple way of measuring an animal's intelligence. EQ is the ratio of the brain weight of the animal to the brain weight of a "typical" animal of the same body weight. Assuming that smarter animals have larger brains to body ratios than less intelligent ones, this helps determine the relative intelligence of extinct animals. In general, warm-blooded animals (like mammals) have a higher EQ than cold-blooded ones (like reptiles and fish). Birds and mammals have brains that are about 10 times bigger than those of bony fish, amphibians, and reptiles of the same body size. The Least Intelligent Dinosaurs: The primitive dinosaurs belonging to the group sauropodomorpha (which included Massospondylus, Riojasaurus, and others) were among the least intelligent of the dinosaurs, with an EQ of about 0.05 (Hopson, 1980). Smartest Dinosaurs: The Troodontids (like Troödon) were probably the smartest dinosaurs, followed by the dromaeosaurid dinosaurs (the "raptors," which included Dromeosaurus, Velociraptor, Deinonychus, and others) had the highest EQ among the dinosaurs, about 5.8 (Hopson, 1980). The Encephalization Quotient was developed by the psychologist Harry J. Jerison in the 1970's. J. A. Hopson (a paleontologist from the University of Chicago) did further development of the EQ concept using brain casts of many dinosaurs. Hopson found that theropods (especially Troodontids) had higher EQ's than plant-eating dinosaurs. The lowest EQ's belonged to sauropods, ankylosaurs, and stegosaurids. A SECOND BRAIN? It used to be thought that the large sauropods (like Brachiosaurus and Apatosaurus) and the ornithischian Stegosaurus had a second brain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Basal Ornithischia (Reptilia, Dinosauria)
    A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE BASAL ORNITHISCHIA (REPTILIA, DINOSAURIA) Marc Richard Spencer A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2007 Committee: Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor Don C. Steinker Daniel M. Pavuk © 2007 Marc Richard Spencer All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor The placement of Lesothosaurus diagnosticus and the Heterodontosauridae within the Ornithischia has been problematic. Historically, Lesothosaurus has been regarded as a basal ornithischian dinosaur, the sister taxon to the Genasauria. Recent phylogenetic analyses, however, have placed Lesothosaurus as a more derived ornithischian within the Genasauria. The Fabrosauridae, of which Lesothosaurus was considered a member, has never been phylogenetically corroborated and has been considered a paraphyletic assemblage. Prior to recent phylogenetic analyses, the problematic Heterodontosauridae was placed within the Ornithopoda as the sister taxon to the Euornithopoda. The heterodontosaurids have also been considered as the basal member of the Cerapoda (Ornithopoda + Marginocephalia), the sister taxon to the Marginocephalia, and as the sister taxon to the Genasauria. To reevaluate the placement of these taxa, along with other basal ornithischians and more derived subclades, a phylogenetic analysis of 19 taxonomic units, including two outgroup taxa, was performed. Analysis of 97 characters and their associated character states culled, modified, and/or rescored from published literature based on published descriptions, produced four most parsimonious trees. Consistency and retention indices were calculated and a bootstrap analysis was performed to determine the relative support for the resultant phylogeny. The Ornithischia was recovered with Pisanosaurus as its basalmost member.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Caenagnathid Dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A new caenagnathid dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group of Shandong, China, with Received: 12 October 2017 Accepted: 7 March 2018 comments on size variation among Published: xx xx xxxx oviraptorosaurs Yilun Yu1, Kebai Wang2, Shuqing Chen2, Corwin Sullivan3,4, Shuo Wang 5,6, Peiye Wang2 & Xing Xu7 The bone-beds of the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group in Zhucheng, Shandong, China are rich in fossil remains of the gigantic hadrosaurid Shantungosaurus. Here we report a new oviraptorosaur, Anomalipes zhaoi gen. et sp. nov., based on a recently collected specimen comprising a partial left hindlimb from the Kugou Locality in Zhucheng. This specimen’s systematic position was assessed by three numerical cladistic analyses based on recently published theropod phylogenetic datasets, with the inclusion of several new characters. Anomalipes zhaoi difers from other known caenagnathids in having a unique combination of features: femoral head anteroposteriorly narrow and with signifcant posterior orientation; accessory trochanter low and confuent with lesser trochanter; lateral ridge present on femoral lateral surface; weak fourth trochanter present; metatarsal III with triangular proximal articular surface, prominent anterior fange near proximal end, highly asymmetrical hemicondyles, and longitudinal groove on distal articular surface; and ungual of pedal digit II with lateral collateral groove deeper and more dorsally located than medial groove. The holotype of Anomalipes zhaoi is smaller than is typical for Caenagnathidae but larger than is typical for the other major oviraptorosaurian subclade, Oviraptoridae. Size comparisons among oviraptorisaurians show that the Caenagnathidae vary much more widely in size than the Oviraptoridae. Oviraptorosauria is a clade of maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs characterized by a short, high skull, long neck and short tail.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT to the CHURCH
    REPORT to the CHURCH All Saints’ Day 2011 Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society TABLE of CONTENTS Introduction 4 Office of the Presiding Bishop 5 President of the House of Deputies 6 Chief Operating Officer 7 Mission Department 8 Diversity, Social, and Environmental Ministries Team 9 Office of Asiamerican Ministries 10 Office of Black Ministries 11 Office of Economic and Environmental Affairs 12 Office of Social and Economic Justice 13 Office of Latino/Hispanic Ministries 14 Office of Native American and Indigenous Ministries 15 Diocesan and Congregational Ministries Team 16 Office of Transition Ministry 17 Church Planting, Ministry Redevelopment, 18 and Fresh Expressions of Ministry Office of Congregational Vitality 19 Office of Stewardship 20 Office of Congregational Research 21 Office of Global Partnerships 22 Partnership Office for Africa 23 Partnership Office for Asia and the Pacific 24 Partnership Office for Latin America and the Caribbean 25 Partnership Office for the Middle East 26 Partnership Office for Province IX 27 United Thank Offering 28 Office of Mission Personnel 29 Office of Global Relations 30 Office of Global Networking 31 Office of Ecumenical and Interreligious Relationships 32 Formation and Vocation Team 33 Office of Youth Ministries 34 Office of Lifelong Christian Formation 35 Office of Campus Ministries 36 Office of Young Adult Ministries 37 Office of Government Relations 38 Episcopal Migration Ministries 39 Grants and Scholarships 40 Office of Mission Funding 41 2 Office of Pastoral Development 42 Office of Armed Services and Federal Ministries 43 Archives of the Episcopal Church 44 Office of Communication 45 Information Technology 46 Office of Finance 47 Human Resources 48 Building Services 49 Office of the General Convention 50 3 We, the staff of the Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, working from New York City and 15 other locations in the United States and abroad, are pleased to offer this report to the church we are privileged to serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoherpetofauna Portuguesa
    Rev. Esp. Herp. (2002): 17-35 17 Paleoherpetofauna Portuguesa E.G. CRESPO Centro de Biologia Ambiental – Fac. Ciências Univ. Lisboa Resumo: Nos últimos anos a importância da paleoherpetofauna portuguesa tem sido posta em evidência sobre- tudo através do seu grupo mais mediático, os dinossauros. As recentes descobertas em Portugal de vestígios de vários dinossauros, incluindo ossos, ovos, embriões, gastrólitos e pegadas, têm merecido ampla cobertura jorna- lística e têm sido oportunamente acompanhadas por intensas campanhas de divulgação, levadas a cabo pelo Mu- seu Nacional de História Natural de Lisboa, encabeçadas pelo geólogo, Professor Galopim de Carvalho. As pro- longadas e por vezes polémicas acções de sensibilização pública e política que foi necessário empreender para se preservarem muitos dos locais onde esses vestígios foram encontrados, contribuiram também para sustentar e até aumentar o interesse por este grupo de grandes répteis. A importância da paleoherpetofauna portuguesa está porém longe de se limitar apenas aos dinossauros! Em Portugal viveram muitos outros répteis e anfíbios de que existem vestígios desde o começo do Mesozói- co –Quelónios, Crocodilos, Ictiossauros, Plesiossauros, Pterossauros, Lepidossauros, “Estegossauros” e Lis- samphia– que, embora geralmente muito menos conhecidos, têm um significado evolutivo, paleogeográfico e paleoclimático extremamente importante. Na sua descoberta e estudo estiveram envolvidos, já desde o século passado, numerosos investigadores por- tugueses e estrangeiros, dos quais se destacam, entre outros, Georges Zbyszewski, Miguel Telles Antunes, Vei- ga Ferreira, H. Sauvage, A.F. Lapparent, L. Ginsburg, R.Thulborn, P. Galton. Muitos destes estudos encontram- se todavia dispersos por uma vasta gama de publicações em que, frequentemente, as referências aos répteis e aos anfíbios ou são laterais ou são apresentadas em contextos zoológicos mais abrangentes, pelo que, como parece que tem acontecido, têm passado praticamente despercebidos à maioria daqueles que se dedicam aos estudo da nossa herpetofauna actual.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in Later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2020-0174.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 04-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Holtz, Thomas; University of Maryland at College Park, Department of Geology; NationalDraft Museum of Natural History, Department of Geology Keyword: Dinosaur, Ontogeny, Theropod, Paleocology, Mesozoic, Tyrannosauridae Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Tribute to Dale Russell Issue? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: 2 Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous 3 Asiamerica 4 5 6 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 7 8 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA 9 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 USA 10 Email address: [email protected] 11 ORCID: 0000-0002-2906-4900 Draft 12 13 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 14 Department of Geology 15 8000 Regents Drive 16 University of Maryland 17 College Park, MD 20742 18 USA 19 Phone: 1-301-405-4084 20 Fax: 1-301-314-9661 21 Email address: [email protected] 22 23 1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 91 24 ABSTRACT 25 Well-sampled dinosaur communities from the Jurassic through the early Late Cretaceous show 26 greater taxonomic diversity among larger (>50kg) theropod taxa than communities of the 27 Campano-Maastrichtian, particularly to those of eastern/central Asia and Laramidia.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex
    Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex By Karen E. Poole B.A. in Geology, May 2004, University of Pennsylvania M.A. in Earth and Planetary Sciences, August 2008, Washington University in St. Louis A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2015 Dissertation Directed by Catherine Forster Professor of Biology The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Karen Poole has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of August 10th, 2015. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex Karen E. Poole Dissertation Research Committee: Catherine A. Forster, Professor of Biology, Dissertation Director James M. Clark, Ronald Weintraub Professor of Biology, Committee Member R. Alexander Pyron, Robert F. Griggs Assistant Professor of Biology, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2015 by Karen Poole All rights reserved iii Dedication To Joseph Theis, for his unending support, and for always reminding me what matters most in life. To my parents, who have always encouraged me to pursue my dreams, even those they didn’t understand. iv Acknowledgements First, a heartfelt thank you is due to my advisor, Cathy Forster, for giving me free reign in this dissertation, but always providing valuable commentary on any piece of writing I sent her, no matter how messy.
    [Show full text]