DOCSLIB.ORG

HUNGARY - SERBIA IPA Cross-Border Co-Operation Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HUNGARY - SERBIA IPA Cross-Border Co-Operation Programme HUNGARY - SERBIA IPA Cross-border Co-operation Programme This Catalogue is conceived as a presentation of the work and cooperation of organizations from Hungary and Serbia which implemented projects in the cross-border partnerships. It is also envisaged as a summary of results of the joint and well-coordinated work of the numerous Programme implementing institutions from the European Commission, Hungary and Serbia. In this publication, we present you a summary of the outcomes and impacts of the work in progress. As it is the case with most summaries, this one also does not do justice to the reality, complexity and all endeavors, efforts and en- thusiasm of the people and institutions working on the implementation of the Hungary-Serbia IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme and the projects. Thus, in summarizing the Programme’s and project’s goals, activities and their results and impacts, we ineitably had simplied and left something out, sim- ply due to space constraints. Each implemented project is a story worth and deserving a separate volume in its own right. Yet, in order to equally promote all 203 projects to the general public from the region, but also internationally, we were bound to summarize and present, within one page, a six-month to two-year-long cooperation of cross-border project partners. Since a number of proects is still ongoing and working on the nalization of their proect actiities, the gures and numbers presented in this Catalogue should not be considered nal and conclusie. They will greatly multiply by the time the last of all projects closes. Aside from visible, easily-measurable and palpable results, such as kilometers of new cycling paths, rehabilitated roads, newly built or reconstructed buildings, facilities or outdoor spaces, the overall impact of the Programme can be and will be felt in the years to come. The contribution of the Programme to the less-tangible, but longer-lasting, result such as the creation of harmonious, economically well-developed and environ- mentally sustainable region is indisputable. Simply said, goal of the activities of the Programme bodies and institutions as well as project partnerships - to establish and strengthen durable cooperation of organizations, institutions and people from two countries - is a process which has started and is unraveling. The work of all institutions, Programme bodies, project partner organizations and project team members who jointly worked in the past seven years has already yielded its results and will continue doing so in the upcoming years. Most importantly, the smooth implementation of the Programme and achieve- ment of its planned aims and results would not have been possible without strong commitment and continuous support, timely reactions and hard work of all institutions from Hungary, Serbia and the European Commission - Programme bodies and authorities responsible for implementation of the Hungary-Serbia IPA Cross-border cooperation Programme. It also would not have been possible without efforts, dedication and work of the organizations, institutions and people who implemented the projects. We invite the reader to engage in reading the stories about these cross-border encounters, with a reminder that the implementation of the Programme is an ongoing process at the time of publication of this Catalogue. The reader of this Catalogue is invited to visit the region, its towns and settle- ments, and enjoy its natural beauties, cultural programmes, get involved in its scientic, academic or economic networks and experience the hospitality of its inhabitants. Joint Technical Secretariat of the Hungary-Serbia IPA CBC Programme I. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE HUNGARY–SERBIA IPA CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME 1. The EU and the ETC programmes 1.1. About the European Union...6 1.2. About the ETC in general...8 a) Number of Programmes and finances...9 2.What is in a name? Hungary-Serbia IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme 2.1. Hungary–Serbia...10 2.2. IPA...12 2.3. Cross-border Cooperation 2.4....12 Programme...13 3. Details of the Hungary-Serbia IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme 3.1. Objectives, priorities and actions of HU-SRB IPA CBC...14 3.2. Responsible institutions and their roles...18 3.3. Facts and figures...20 3.4. Timeline of Calls for Proposals of the HU-SRB IPA CBC...22 3.5. Financial data...26 4. Programme bodies and institutions 4.1. Management structure of the Programme...30 4.2. Illustration of communication among programme bodies...31 4 5. Description of the major procedures 5.1. Application...32 5.2. Selection and contracting...36 5.3. Implementation and modifications ...40 5.4. Reporting and payments...42 5.5. Diagram of the major procedures...45 II. OVERVIEW OF THE SUPPORTED PROJECTS 1. First Call for Proposals 1.1. Introduction...46 1.2. Presentation of the supported projects...49 2. Second Call for Proposals 2.1. Introduction...122 2.2. Presentation of the supported projects...125 3. Third Call for Proposals 3.1. Introduction...194 3.2. Presentation of the supported projects...197 5 I. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE HUNGARY- SERBIA IPA CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME 1. The EU and the ETC programme In this chapter: We give a brief introduction to the European Union, the history of its enlargement and a map of the EU-28. Then follows a brief description of the European Territorial Cooperation Programme it ata on te prorain perio proet an nane 1.1. About the European Union1 The European Union is a unique economic and political partner- ship of 28 European countries, which was primarily initiated after the Second World War. The EU operates through a system of supranational independent institutions, including the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, the European Council, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Eu- ropean Central Bank, the Court of Auditors and the European Parliament. EU policies aim to ensure the free movement of people, goods, services and capital, enact legislation in justice and home affairs, and maintain common policies on trade, agriculture, sheries and regional development. Did you know? When the EC adopted the Flag of Europe – consisting of a circle of 12 golden (yellow) stars on an azure background – in 1985, many people believed that the stars represented the member states. However, the stars do not represent the number of member states but they symbolise the ideals of unity, solidarity and harmony among the peoples of Europe. 1 / http://europa.eu/about-eu/index_en.htm 6 Key dates in the development of the EU: 1952 Six countries (Belgium, France, Germany (Federal Republic), Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands) establish the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) 1957 In Rome, the six countries sign the treaties establishing the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) 1973 Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom join the European Communities 1981 Greece joins the European Communities 1986 Spain and Portugal join the European Communities, bringing the number of member states to 12. The Maastricht Treaty establishes the European Union under its 1993 current name. 1995 Austria, Finland and Sweden join the EU (EU-15) Figure 1. Map of EU member states (EU-28) 1999 The currencies of 11 EU countries are replaced by the euro, which is rst launched on the money markets 2002 People in the Eurozone countries begin using euro notes and coins 2004 Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia join the European Union (EU-25) 2007 Bulgaria and Romania join the EU (EU-27) 2009 The Treaty of Lisbon comes into force 2013 Croatia becomes a member state (EU-28) Figure 1. Map of EU member states (EU-28) 7 1.2. About the ETC in general 2 Territorial cooperation in the European Union is about reducing disparities between regions, reinforcing cohesion and encourag- ing optimal economic development, through addressing issues of daily life, such as transport, education, energy, health care and environmental protection. European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) – EU’s Cohesion policy encourages regions and cities to work together and learn from each other through joint programmes, projects and networks. There are three policy instruments of the European Union that support territorial cooperation: European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) supports cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation programmes involving Member states Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA) – supports cooperation between EU regions and regions in pre-accession countries European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) – supports cooperation between EU regions and regions of EU external neighbours The European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) Programme supports cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation programmes. Cross-border Cooperation Transnational Cooperation Interregional Cooperation helps transform regions locat- promotes cooperation among provides a framework for the ed on either side of internal or greater European regions and exchange of experiences external borders of the Europe- facilitates coordinated strategic between local and regional an Union into strong economic responses to joint challenges. actors from across Europe in and social poles. order to contribute to the EU’s strategies on growth, jobs and sustainable development. These cooperation programmes provide the framework and funding for local and regional insti- tutions, universities, companies and research institutes from different EU member states to work together and learn from each other through joint programmes, projects and networks. 2 / http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cooperate/cooperation/egtc/index_en.cfm; http://www.interact-eu.net/etc/ etc_2007_13/4/2; http://www.interact-eu.net/etc_2014/european_territorial_cooperation/486/14849 8 a umer of Programmes and nances These three types of territorial cooperation were supported with approved European funding through ERDF, IPA and ENPI in two programming periods: from 2000 to 2006 and from 2007 to 2013 The new programming period for Cohesion Policy from 2014 to 2020 has just begun.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Characteristics of Market Production of Fruit and Grapes in Serbia
    REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA Original scientific paper Economics of Agriculture 1/2018 UDC: 913:[346.54:641.13+634.8.076](497.11) doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1801201S REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA1 Simo Stevanović2, Snežana Stevanović 3, Svjetlana Janković-Šoja4 Summary In the paper analyzes the trends in the development of market production of fruit (on the example of the apple and the plum) and grapes in Serbia from 1976 to 2015. The grouping of the Serbian districts according to the degree of the market production of fruit and grapes in 2015 was performed by a cluster analysis, on the basis of the six features of production, five features of the capacities, and five features of development. According to the data for 2015, the degree of the marketability of apples in Serbia was 47.7%, plums 15.9%, and grapes 18.3%. The Serbia-North Region shows a surplus in the production of apples, and a deficit in the production of plums (-181.7%) and grapes (-99.1%). The Serbia-South Region has a surplus in the production of the analyzed kinds of fruit (the apple accounting for 43.0%, and the plum 50.9%) and grapes (45.2%). Keywords: market production of fruit, economic development, I-distance, cluster analysis JEL: Q-13, O-11 Introduction Serbia is a traditionally significant producer of all kinds of continental fruit and grapes. Given the commercial, technological and nutritive characteristics of fruit production, 1 The paper is part of the research conducted on the “Serbia’s Rural Labor Market and Rural Economy – Income Diversification and Poverty Reduction” Project, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourists Manifestations in the Development of Culinary Tourism in Banat (Vojvodina, Serbia)
    TOURISTS MANIFESTATIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CULINARY TOURISM IN BANAT (VOJVODINA, SERBIA) Bojana KALENJUK 1, Dragan TEŠANOVIĆ 1, Snježana GAGIĆ2, Nikola VUKSANOVIĆ 1, Marija ŠKRINJAR3, 1University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Novi Sad, Serbia 2University of Alfa, College of professional studies in management and business communication, Sremski Karlovci, Serbia 3 University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Food Technology, Novi Sad, Serbia E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Abstract: Vojvodina has a large number of tourist manifestations of food and drinks which attract many domestic and foreign tourists. Tourist manifestations represent an integral part of gastronomic tourism, which is defined as the tourist visit of primary or secondary food producers, restaurants for producing and serving food and certain destinations for tasting and experiencing the regional specialties, where food and drink are primary motivation for travel. Recognizing the importance of tourist manifestations in the development of tourism this manuscript has a task to investigate the tourist manifestations in the territory of Banat, in order to determine the most frequent types of events in districts (Kikinda - Northern Banat District, Zrenjanin – Middle Banat district and Pancevo - South Banat District) and period of taking place of events. The research will include analysis of food and drink events in 2011. Keywords: tourist events, manifestation, food, beverage, culinary tourism, Vojvodina, Banat. 1. INTRODUCTION Tourist manifestations contribute greatly to the formation of the destinations image, increasing the cohesion of the local community and its pride, and improving their quality of life (Bjeljac et al., 2003; Bjeljac, Ž., 2004; Hadžić, O., Bjeljac, Ž., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    C 171/12 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.5.2020 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2020/C 171/07) This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Duna/Dunai’ Reference number PDO-HU-A1345-AM02 Date of communication: 9.2.2020 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Addition of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora, Újszilvás and Bácsszentgyörgy to the demarcated area (a) Product specification headings affected: IV. Demarcated area (b) Single document heading affected: Demarcated geographical area (c) Reasons: — The Wine Community Council of the Kunság Region (Kunsági Borvidék Hegyközségi Tanácsa) amended the product specification for the ‘Kunság/Kunsági’ PDO. The areas of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora and Újszilvás classified as Class I and II according to the vineyard cadastre of wine-producing regions were added to the demarcated area. The change affects the demarcated area in the product specification for the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO and has been included in this application. The characteristics of the areas included in the vineyard cadastre correspond to the demarcated area of the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO. Vine-growing is one of the traditional economic activities of local inhabitants. The classification of the wine region and the possibility to produce the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO generates significant employment and income in these municipalities and contributes greatly towards the local tourism industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Atlas
    FF II CC SS SS Field Information and Capital Elevation Coordination Support Section (Above mean sea level) Division of Operational Services UNHCR Country Office Croatia / National Office 3,250 to 4,000 metres Sources: / Liaison Office 2,500 to 3,250 metres UNHCR, Global Insight digital mapping 1,750 to 2,500 metres © 1998 Europa Technologies Ltd. UNHCR Field Office As of December 2009 1,000 to 1,750 metres UNHCR Field Unit 750 to 1,000 metres The boundaries and names shown International boundary 500 to 750 metres and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement Main road 250 to 500 metres or acceptance by the United Nations. Secondary road 0 to 250 metres g Name_of_the_workspace.WOR !! Villach !! !! !! !! Below mean sea level !! !! Davograd Railway !! Marcali !! Orosháza !! Maribor !! Szank !! !! Cortina d'Ampezzo !! !! !! Mursko Sredisce !! Kalocsa!! Kecel !! Mindszent !! !! !! Kiskunmajsa !! !! Nagykanizsa !! Jesenice Tolna !! Kiskunhalas !! !! Ptuj !! !! Hajós !! !! Hódmezövásárhely!! !! !! !! Tolmezzo !! Böhönye !! !! !! !! !! !! Cakovec !! !! Sostanj !! !! !! Forraaskut !! !! Kaposvár !! !! Balotaszállás!! !! !! !! !! Mezöhe !! Varazdin HUNGARY!! !! Jánoshalma !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Legrad !! !! Ruzsa !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Gemona del Friuli !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Csurgó !! !! Szeged !! Kranj !! Celje !! Nagyatád !! !! !! Ivanec !! !! SLOVENIA !! !! !! Makó !! Durmanec !! Komló !! Maniago !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Koprivnica !! Baja !! Horgos !! Nadlac ! !! Belluno !!
    [Show full text]
  • Forgalmazási / Értékesítési Pontok Jegyzéke
    FORGALMAZÁSI / ÉRTÉKESÍTÉSI PONTOK JEGYZÉKE S.sz Forgalmazó Elszámolásért felelős Székhely, telephely, Ügyfélfogadási, Hivatalos Telefon- Postacím: szervezet neve és forgalmazó neve, forgalmazási pont, ügyintézési idő e-mail cím: számok: (csak akkor kell kitölteni, ha nem egyezik meg az itt már rövidített neve: beosztása: értékesítési pont (nyitvatartási idő): megadott címmel) címe: 01. "Ho-Hó" Klub Gábris Katalin 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 8-16, Szo 8-11 info@hohocentrum. 06/76/418-059 6000 Kecskemét, Kecskemét HE pénztáros Füzes u. 6. hu Badacsony u. 1. 02. ZAL-KAH HE Szabari Bálint vállalk. 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 7-18, Szo: 7-13 kekmarlin@t- 30/924-2228 6000 Kecskemét, Katona J. u. 20. online.hu Katona J. u. 20. 03. ZAL-KAH HE Breki és Társa Bt. 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 8-17, Szo: 8-12 [email protected] 70/453-9854 6000 Kecskemét, B. Kovács Attila Vízöntő u. 33. Vízöntő u. 33. vállalk. 04. ZAL-KAH HE Kukac-Ka Horgászbolt 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 8-18, Szo: 8-13 [email protected] 70/949-9010 6000 Kecskemét, Farkas Krisztián Március 15. u. 2. m Március 15. u. 2. vállalk. 06. Tiszakécske és Tapodi Zoltánné 6060 Tiszakécske, H-P: 9-12, 13-16-ig tiszakecskeshe@gma Tapodi Zoltánné 6060 Tiszakécske, Környéke Sport pénztáros Botond u. 4. Ért.pont: (jan.1-jún.30.) il.com 30/703-3754 Botond u. 4. Horgász Egyesület Filyó Tamás elnök 6060 Tiszakécske, K és P: 9-12, 13-16-ig Filyó Tamás Szent Imre tér 13. (júl.1-dec.31.) 20/470-8324 07. Dunapataji HE Mádiné Király 6328 Dunapataj, H-Sze 17-18, dunapatajishe@duna 20/332-5507 6328 Dunapataj, Henriette pénztáros Ordas u.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    Cross-border Cooperation in South East Europe: regional cooperation perspectives from the Province of Vojvodina Novi Sad, July 2013 The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina is an autonomous province in Serbia. Its capital and largest city is Novi Sad. Area: 21.5O6 km2 Sub-regions: • Backa • Banat • Srem • Vojvodina prides itself on its multi- ethnicity and multi-cultural identity with a number of mechanisms for the promotion of minorities. • There are more than 26 ethnic minorities in the province, with six languages in official use. Strengths Opportunities • Geographical position in the • Experience in project region that can be implementation through developed and IPA components I and II strengthened through construction and • A number of trained human reconstruction of roads and resources in public infrastructure administration • Natural resources in water • In process of preparation of and agriculture that can be new and updated strategic developed through IPA documents and actions components III and V plans Western Balkans 1991-2006 • Since 1991, EU has invested more than 6.8 billion euros in the Western Balkans countries through various assistance programs. • When humanitarian and bilateral assistance is added, it is more than 20 billion euros . • Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilization (CARDS) program had a budget of 4.6 billion euros from 2000 to 2006 with priorities: 1. reforms in the justice and home affairs 2. administrative capacity building 3. economic and social development 4. democratic stabilization 5. protection of the environment and natural resources Instrument for Pre-Assesion Assistance 2000-2006 2007-2013 *** Total budget 11.468 billion euros IPA components 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Language in Education in Hungary
    The Serbian language in education in Hungary European Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning hosted by SERBIAN The Serbian language in education in Hungary c/o Fryske Akademy Doelestrjitte 8 P.O. Box 54 NL-8900 AB Ljouwert/Leeuwarden The Netherlands T 0031 (0) 58 - 234 3027 W www.mercator-research.eu E [email protected] | Regional dossiers series | t ca r cum n n i- ual e : Available in this series: This document was published by the Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism Albanian; the Albanian language in education in Italy and Language Learning with financial support from the Fryske Akademy and the Province Asturian; the Asturian language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) of Fryslân. Basque; the Basque language in education in France (2nd ed.) Basque; the Basque language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) Breton; the Breton language in education in France (2nd ed.) Catalan; the Catalan language in education in France Catalan; the Catalan language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) © Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism Cornish; the Cornish language in education in the UK and Language Learning, 2014 Corsican; the Corsican language in education in France (2nd ed.) Croatian; the Croatian language in education in Austria ISSN: 1570 – 1239 Frisian; the Frisian language in education in the Netherlands (4th ed.) 1st edition Friulian; the Friulian language in education in Italy Gaelic; the Gaelic language in education in the UK The contents of this dossier may be reproduced in print, except for commercial purposes, Galician; the Galician language in education in Spain provided that the extract is proceeded by a complete reference to the Mercator European German; the German language in education in Alsace, France (2nd ed.) Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mi Újság a Szomszédban? (Csongrád Megyei Helyzetkép)
    CSONGRÁD MEGYEI KORMÁNYHIVATAL FÖLDHIVATALA Mi újság a szomszédban? (Csongrád megyei helyzetkép) Gósz Zoltán hivatalvezető Földügyi Napok Békéscsaba, 2014. november 25-26. CSONGRÁD MEGYEI KORMÁNYHIVATAL FÖLDHIVATALA Alig több, mint egy év telt el azóta, hogy a járási rendszer létrejöttével kapcsolatos első szakmai benyomásainkat itt Békéscsabán közösen értékeltük. Megállapítható, hogy az elmúlt majdnem két év alatt jelentős változáson ment át a földhivatali struktúra. Igyekszem a Csongrád megyei tapasztalatokról rövid áttekintést adni, melynek különös apropója lehet a hamarosan induló osztatlan közös tulajdon megszüntetésével kapcsolatos várható földmérési tevékenység is. Földügyi Napok Gósz Zoltán 2 Békéscsaba, 2014. november 25-26. CSONGRÁD MEGYEI KORMÁNYHIVATAL FÖLDHIVATALA Az előadás vázlata • Járások, földhivatalok kialakítása Csongrád megyében. • A földhivatali szerkezeti struktúra áttekintése. • Új és régi feladatok. • Terveink. • (Remélhetően) pozitív jövőkép. Földügyi Napok Gósz Zoltán 3 Békéscsaba, 2014. november 25-26. CSONGRÁD MEGYEI KORMÁNYHIVATAL FÖLDHIVATALA Az államigazgatás átalakításának célja, lényege • A járások kialakításáról 2012. szeptemberében döntött a kormány, a közigazgatás átfogó, a közjót szolgáló átalakításának, a Jó Állam kialakításának egyik fontos állomásaként. „A közigazgatás az emberekért van” – fogalmazta meg Magyary Zoltán, mintegy 70 évvel ezelőtt . Az átalakítás célja ennek az alapelvnek a megvalósítása volt. Olyan ésszerű változtatások által történt mindez a gyakorlatban, mint az önkormányzati és
    [Show full text]
  • Community Revitalization Through Democratic Action – Economy Program
    COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION THROUGH DEMOCRATIC ACTION – ECONOMY PROGRAM FINAL REPORT JULY 15, 2001 – JULY 15, 2007 AGREEMENT NUMBER: 169-A-00-01-00124-00 Submitted to USAID/Serbia By America's Development Foundation October 2007 America’s Development Foundation 101 North Union Street, Suite 200 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Tel. (703) 836-2717 www.adfusa.org List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ADF America’s Development Foundation AoR Area of Responsibility ASB Arbeiter Samariter Bund Deutschland BSRC Business Service Resource Center CBC Cross Border Cooperation CDA Community Development Association CDC Community Development Center CE "Conformité Européene" CHF Cooperative Housing Federation CRDA Community Revitalization through Democratic Action CRDA-E Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy EAR European Agency for Reconstruction EU European Union FI Flag International FPRH Family Planning and Reproductive Health HACCP Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points IESC International Executive Service Corps IFC International Finance Corporation IR Intermediate Result LED Local Economic Development MAFWM Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Water Management MEGA Municipal Economic Growth Activity MZ Mesna Zajednica PRS Project Reporting System SIEPA Serbian Investment and Export Promotion Agency SO Strategic Objective SWG Sectoral Working Group T&TA Training and Technical Assistance TOT Training of Trainers USDA US Department of Agriculture WB World Bank I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. PROGRAM OVERVIEW 6 II.1. Background 6 II.2. Methodology 6 II.2.1. The ADF Team 6 II.2.2. Program Design 7 II.2.3. Selection of Municipalities and Communities / Geographical Coverage 7 II.2.4. Community Mobilization 8 Clustering as an approach 12 Program change – CRDA becomes CRDA-E 12 II.2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • R.Br. Opština Mesto Adresa Prodavnice 1 Ada Obornjača Ada
    R.br. Opština Mesto Najbliža prodavnica Adresa prodavnice 1 Ada Obornjača Ada Save Kovačevida 7 2 Aleksandrovac Bratidi Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 3 Aleksandrovac Bzenice Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 4 Aleksandrovac Koznica Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 5 Aleksandrovac Rogavčina Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 6 Aranđelovac Progoreoci Aranđelovac Knjaza Miloša 182 7 Babušnica Bogdanovac Vlasotince Nemanjina 47 8 Babušnica Ostatovica Vlasotince Nemanjina 47 9 Bačka Topola Bagremovo Bačka Topola Glavna 6 10 Bačka Topola Bogaraš Bačka Topola Glavna 6 11 Bačka Topola Kavilo Bačka Topola Glavna 6 12 Bačka Topola Midunovo Bačka Topola Glavna 6 13 Bačka Topola Obornjača Bačka Topola Glavna 6 14 Bačka Topola Srednji Salaš Bačka Topola Glavna 6 15 Bačka Topola Zobnatica Bačka Topola Glavna 6 16 Bajina Bašta Mala Reka Bajina bašta Vuka Karadzida 17 17 Bajina Bašta Zaugline Bajina bašta Vuka Karadzida 17 18 Bela Crkva Kaluđerovo Vršac Trg pobede 4 19 Bela Palanka Crveni Breg Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 20 Bela Palanka Dolac (selo) Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 21 Bela Palanka Donja Glama Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 22 Bela Palanka Gornji Rinj Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 23 Bela Palanka Leskovik Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 24 Bela Palanka Telovac Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 25 Bojnik Borince Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 26 Bojnik Dobra Voda Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 27 Bojnik Gornje Brijanje Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 28 Bojnik Ivanje Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 29 Bojnik Obražda Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 30 Bojnik Orane Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 31 Bosilegrad Brankovci Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 32 Bosilegrad Gložje Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 33 Bosilegrad Grujinci Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 34 Bosilegrad Izvor Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 35 Bosilegrad Milevci Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 36 Bosilegrad Zli Dol Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 37 Brus Grad Aleksandrovac 29.
    [Show full text]