DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Media and Perceptions of Disinformation Risk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Media and Perceptions of Disinformation Risk U.S. Media and Perceptions of Disinformation Risk www.disinformationindex.org Table of contents Executive Summary 4 Section 1: Positive and negative 6 perceptions of news sites Section 2: Disinformation risk flags 8 and perceptions Section 3: Readers’ profiles 10 and perceptions Author: Dr. Andrea Abel van Es Research: GDI and YouGov Conclusion 17 Design: www.designbythink.co.za Annex 18 The Global Disinformation Index is a UK-based not-for-profit that operates on the three principles of neutrality, independence and transparency. Our vision is a world in which we can trust what we see in the media. Our mission is to restore trust in the media by Endnotes 21 providing real-time automated risk ratings of the world’s media sites through a Global Disinformation Index (GDI). The GDI is non-political. Our Advisory Panel consists of international experts in disinformation, indices and technology. For more information, visit www.disinformationindex.org June 2021. Published under a Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) www.disinformationindex.org 3 US Media and Perceptions of Disinformation Risk Executive Summary Executive Summary The following report is a The Global Disinformation Index (GDI) commissioned YouGov to conduct Across all news outlets, perceptions of a site’s Respondents trust different news publishers for look at informed online an independent survey of more than 1000 informed readers in the U.S.1 accuracy vary by political affiliation.5 different types of news. readers’ perceptions Respondents were asked to assess up to 10 news sites against a series of questions which served as proxies for understanding the perceived • There was zero overlap among the top five • The respondents turn to different sites for trusted of disinformation risks disinformation risks of news publishers.2 Respondents were also asked to news publishers which each political group news on politics, health, and the environment. for some of the most perceived as having accurate news coverage. self-identify politically (left, centre or right) and provide other demographic • These findings are a good proxy for popular media sites data. The sample of news sites was developed in partnership with the • On average, when more left-leaning respondents understanding which sites respondents trust in the United States. University of Washington and is based on some of America’s highest traffic perceived a news outlet to be accurate, then for news on U.S. elections, climate change 3 sites and those with the most followers on social media. The U.S. media fewer right-leaning respondents did. and COVID-19 coverage, and how these market sample also included key regional news outlets, national and cable information sources shape their policy views. television networks, and niche sites (for different political and demographic • The greatest left-right divide is found for groups).4 mainstream media outlets such as Fox • The lack of overlap in sites across the political News, CNN and The New York Times. spectrum signals the challenges ahead of building Based on this assessment, the key findings show that: policy consensus on these critical issues. Perceptions of a news publisher’s accuracy differ Readers’ trust in a news site is correlated with the site’s perceived between self-identified men and women. The study’s findings do much to support past disinformation risks. research on how political polarisation has • Among this sample of informed readers who influenced Americans’ perceptions,6 including their • There is a statistically significant correlation between a self-identified their gender, female respondents understanding of the disinformation discourse.7 respondent’s overall positive (or negative) perception of a news were slightly more likely to rate news publishers However, the study goes further to look at the outlet and the perceived disinformation risks for that site. in the sample as being accurate (56 percent) relationships that exist between perceptions • These risk factors include perceptions of a site’s overall accurate than male respondents (50 percent). of disinformation risk and trust in specific news news coverage, use of clickbait, the labelling of news versus • There was almost no overlap among the top five sites. This analysis considered disinformation risks opinion stories, and the correction of errors when found. news publishers rated as “accurate” by men and based on informed readers’ perceptions of a news women, with only one site cited by both groups. publisher’s credibility, reliability and reputation. These findings are covered in the sections that follow. While the analysis is based on U.S. respondents, the study offers potential insights into how politicisation and polarisation affect perceptions of a news publishers’ disinformation risk more generally. We hope that the findings are used in that spirit. 4 www.disinformationindex.org www.disinformationindex.org 5 US Media and Perceptions of Disinformation Risk Section 1: Positive and Negative Perceptions of News Sites Section 1: Positive and negative Figure 1. Respondents’ opinions of sites: positive and negative Democracy Now! 15% 67% NPR 21% 66% perceptions of news sites The Boston Globe 12% 58% Judicial Watch 13% 58% The Root 12% 58% NBC News 22% 55% The New York Times 28% 54% The Washington Post 26% 53% Politico 22% 53% Occupy Democrats 29% 52% CNN 30% 52% Figure 1 shows the overall positive and negative perceptions of the 63 news The Atlantic 18% 50% The following study The Wall Street Journal 18% 50% 8 focuses on the factors outlets assessed in this study. Reuters 10% 50% CBS News 32% 48% which account for It shows the percentage of respondents who had an overall positive or negative Talking Points Memo 10% 48% how informed readers view of a news publisher. One key finding is that many news publishers have The Blaze 27% 45% both positive and negative reputations among the respondents. Bloomberg 17% 45% perceive disinformation Los Angeles Times 21% 45% risks and form their For example, 41 percent of respondents had an overall positive opinion of ABC News 28% 45% Fox News while 47 percent had an overall negative opinion. Vice News 12% 45% brand perception of Forbes 9% 45% a news publisher. Similarly CNBC’s ratings were fairly equally split among respondents who Reason 25% 43% had a positive (34 percent) and negative view (32 percent) of the site. Time 24% 43% HuffPost 26% 42% Across news publishers in the survey, ten have higher levels of overall negative RealClearPolitics 11% 42% 47% 41% 9 Fox News perceptions than positive perceptions (see Figure 1). These sites include Business Insider 9% 40% some news publishers that the GDI has previously flagged as peddling Newsweek 23% 40% disinformation related to electoral fraud, as well as COVID-19 conspiracies, Slate 24% 39% 23% 38% white supremacy and anti-Semitism.10 The Intercept Salon 22% 38% There are also four sites where the difference between the percentage of BuzzFeed News 16% 38% The Epoch Times 32% 38% respondents who held positive and negative opinions of the site is greater Vox 22% 38% than 45 percentage points (see Figure 1).11 Newsmax 30% 38% Wired 12% 38% The Hill 20% 36% Al Jazeera 27% 35% CNBC 32% 34% Breitbart 54% 34% The Gateway Pundit 26% 33% Chicago Tribune 18% 33% The Daily Beast 20% 32% The Philadelphia Inquirer 19% 32% National Review 29% 31% The New Republic 20% 30% USA Today 22% 30% The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 25% 30% Fortune 13% 29% Boston Herald 25% 28% Yahoo! News 21% 27% The Washington Times 39% 27% Washington Examiner 45% 27% Positive view The Washington Free Beacon 29% 26% Miami Herald 22% 25% Newsday 21% 25% Negative view Chicago Sun-Times 18% 25% New York Post 35% 24% The Daily Caller 36% 24% People Magazine 35% 22% New York Daily News 37% 21% InfoWars 72% 11% 6 www.disinformationindex.org www.disinformationindex.org 7 US Media and Perceptions of Disinformation Risk Section 2: Disinformation risk flags and perceptions Section 2: Disinformation risk Figure 2. Correlation between respondents’ opinions of sites and perceived risks Correlation flags and perceptions 1 Negative view -1 -.75 -.5 -.25 -.1 0 .1 .25 .5 .75 1 1 0.94 Inaccurate ** Asterisks indicate a level 1 0.88 0.87 News vs opinion unclear of statistical significance: ** ** Within the scope of the study, the GDI asked an additional set of questions * indicates P < 0.05 which target specific disinformation risk flags: 1 0.85 0.93 0.93 Does not issue corrections ** indicates P < 0.01 ** ** ** • The site’s level of accuracy in covering news events; 0.95 0.75 0.82 0.77 Always uses clickbait • How easy it is to differentiate between opinion and news 1 ** ** ** ** articles on the site; • How frequently a site employs clickbait headlines; and 1 0.45 0.47 0.45 0.56 0.43 Issues corrections ** ** ** ** ** • How often a news site issues corrections when a story is found to be inaccurate. 1 0.22 -0.52 -0.56 -0.53 -0.46 -0.55 News vs opinion clear ** ** ** ** ** Figure 2 shows the correlations between these risk flags and informed readers’ 1 0.79 0 -0.65 -0.71 -0.63 -0.62 -0.68 Accurate positive or negative opinions of the 63 news publishers. The higher the ** ** ** ** ** ** correlation coefficient (the number in the block), the stronger the relationship (negative or positive) between the risk factors. The findings show that there is 1 0.75 0.68 0.64 -0.23 -0.32 -0.28 -0.27 -0.37 Positive view a statistically significant correlation between a respondent’s overall positive ** ** ** * ** ** * ** (or negative) opinion of a news outlet and their perceptions of the site’s 1 0.47 0.71 0.57 0 -0.77 -0.71 -0.45 -0.56 -0.55 Never uses clickbait disinformation risks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Totally Insane, Unintentionally Gigantic, Hyperpartisan) Political-Media Machine How a Strange New Class of Media Outlet Has Arisen to Take Over Our News Feeds
    Inside Facebook’s (Totally Insane, Unintentionally Gigantic, Hy... http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/magazine/inside-facebooks... http://nyti.ms/2bzePnO Inside Facebook’s (Totally Insane, Unintentionally Gigantic, Hyperpartisan) Political-Media Machine How a strange new class of media outlet has arisen to take over our news feeds. By JOHN HERRMAN AUG. 24, 2016 Open your Facebook feed. What do you see? A photo of a close friend’s child. An automatically generated slide show commemorating six years of friendship between two acquaintances. An eerily on-target ad for something you’ve been meaning to buy. A funny video. A sad video. A recently live video. Lots of video; more video than you remember from before. A somewhat less-on-target ad. Someone you saw yesterday feeling blessed. Someone you haven’t seen in 10 years feeling worried. And then: A family member who loves politics asking, “Is this really who we want to be president?” A co-worker, whom you’ve never heard talk about politics, asking the same about a different candidate. A story about Donald Trump that “just can’t be true” in a figurative sense. A story about Donald Trump that “just can’t be true” in a literal sense. A video of Bernie Sanders speaking, overlaid with text, shared from a source you’ve never seen before, viewed 15 million times. An article questioning Hillary Clinton’s honesty; a headline questioning Donald Trump’s sanity. A few shares that go a bit too far: headlines you would never pass along yourself but that you might tap, read and probably not forget.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Gab? a Bastion of Free Speech Or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?
    What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber? Savvas Zannettou Barry Bradlyn Emiliano De Cristofaro Cyprus University of Technology Princeton Center for Theoretical Science University College London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Haewoon Kwak Michael Sirivianos Gianluca Stringhini Qatar Computing Research Institute Cyprus University of Technology University College London & Hamad Bin Khalifa University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeremy Blackburn University of Alabama at Birmingham [email protected] ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Over the past few years, a number of new “fringe” communities, Savvas Zannettou, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Haewoon Kwak, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2018. What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?. In WWW at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about ’18 Companion: The 2018 Web Conference Companion, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite France. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558. recent research has shown that they influence how false informa- 3191531 tion reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web’s information ecosystem. 1 INTRODUCTION In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created The Web’s information ecosystem is composed of multiple com- as an alternative to Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling
    Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling James Carpenter (Binghamton University) Abstract I challenge the traditional argument that Jefferson’s educational plans for Virginia were built on mod- ern democratic understandings. While containing some democratic features, especially for the founding decades, Jefferson’s concern was narrowly political, designed to ensure the survival of the new republic. The significance of this piece is to add to the more accurate portrayal of Jefferson’s impact on American institutions. Submit your own response to this article Submit online at democracyeducationjournal.org/home Read responses to this article online http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol21/iss2/5 ew historical figures have undergone as much advocate of public education in the early United States” (p. 280). scrutiny in the last two decades as has Thomas Heslep (1969) has suggested that Jefferson provided “a general Jefferson. His relationship with Sally Hemings, his statement on education in republican, or democratic society” views on Native Americans, his expansionist ideology and his (p. 113), without distinguishing between the two. Others have opted suppressionF of individual liberties are just some of the areas of specifically to connect his ideas to being democratic. Williams Jefferson’s life and thinking that historians and others have reexam- (1967) argued that Jefferson’s impact on our schools is pronounced ined (Finkelman, 1995; Gordon- Reed, 1997; Kaplan, 1998). because “democracy and education are interdependent” and But his views on education have been unchallenged. While his therefore with “education being necessary to its [democracy’s] reputation as a founding father of the American republic has been success, a successful democracy must provide it” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Renowned Violinist Enjoys Shen Yun's Music, Dance, and Production
    THEEPOCHTIMES.COM | SHENYUN.COM Shen Yun Performing Arts: The Significant Cultural Event of Our Time SHEN YUN PERFORMING ARTS REVIEWS Renowned Violinist Enjoys Shen Yun’s Music, Dance, and Production April 1, 2019 Andrew Dawes enjoyed Shen Yun at Queen Elizabeth Theatre in Vancouver, Canada, on March 31, 2019. (Mary Man/The Epoch Times) VANCOUVER—Renowned Canadian violinist Andrew Dawes enjoyed the visual and aural components of Shen Yun Performing Arts, which when combined seeks to illustrate the beauty of a thousands year old culture said to be inspired by the heavens. “As a musician, I was very pleased with everything, with music and the dance and the production, it’s great, it’s a wonderful show,” he said. “I think all these musicians are doing an excellent job, really a great pleasure to hear you all.” Dawes is known for being first violinist of the Toronto-based Orford String Quartet for almost three decades. He was also Professor of Music at the University of Toronto and is Professor Emeritus at the University of British Columbia School of Music. The musician has also acted as a juror in several music competitions including the London International String Quartet competition, the Coleman Chamber Music Competition, and the Fischoff National Chamber Music Competition. He attended the performance of Shen Yun at the Queen Elizabeth Theatre in Vancouver, Canada, on March 31. Shen Yun was founded in New York in 2006 with a goal of reviving traditional Chinese culture through the arts. Since then, the company has expanded from one to six contingents that tour the world each year to showcase the wonders of an ancient civilization to modern audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Final February Mass. Gop Likely Voters
    SUPRC Likely Republican Voters FINAL FEBRUARY MASS. GOP LIKELY VOTERS GeoCode (N=500) n % Worcester / West ------------------------------------------------ 105 21.00 Northeastern ----------------------------------------------------- 192 38.40 Suffolk --------------------------------------------------------------- 25 5.00 Se Mass / Cape ------------------------------------------------- 178 35.60 *********************************************************************************************************** *Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some issues of the day in Massachusetts. Would you be willing to spend less than five minutes answering some questions so that we can include your opinions? {IF YES PROCEED; IF NO, UNDECIDED, GO TO CLOSE} 1. Gender {BY OBSERVATION} (N=500) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 246 49.20 Female ------------------------------------------------------------ 254 50.80 2. What is your age category? (N=500) n % 18-35 Yrs. --------------------------------------------------------- 102 20.40 36-45 Yrs. ----------------------------------------------------------- 96 19.20 46-55 Yrs. --------------------------------------------------------- 101 20.20 56-65 Yrs. ----------------------------------------------------------- 92 18.40 66-75 Yrs. ----------------------------------------------------------- 51 10.20 Over 75 Yrs. -------------------------------------------------------- 44 8.80 Refused -------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus News and Information on Youtube: a Content Analysis of Popular Search Terms
    Coronavirus News and Information on YouTube: A Content Analysis of Popular Search Terms Online Supplement Nahema Marchal, Hubert Au, Philip N. Howard Data and Method In this memo, we investigate the type of information users come across when searching for information about the coronavirus on YouTube. We first collected a list of the 10 most frequent YouTube search terms related to the “coronavirus” UK over the last 90 days, using Google Trends on March 10th, 2020. For comparison, we also collected the auto-complete YouTube search suggestions for the term “coronavirus”, using a Google Chrome browser in Incognito Mode. Table 1. Top YouTube Searches related to the term “coronavirus” Top YouTube Searches related to the term “coronavirus” UK coronavirus china; uk coronavirus; coronavirus news; coronavirus (top 10) live; coronavirus in uk; coronavirus conspiracy; simpsons coronavirus; corona virus; coronavirus wuhan; coronavirus symptoms Note: Compiled based on Google Trends results collected 10/03/2020 Figure 1. Search predictions on YouTube GB in “Incognito Mode” We carried out the searches by running our list of 4 coronavirus-related search terms through YouTube Data Tools (YTDT)’s Video List function, a tool that directly interacts with the YouTube v3.4 API. This generated a list of the top 50 video results associated with each search term, ranked by relevance (based on YouTube API documentation). We then examined the most “related” or “recommended videos” for these search queries. This returned a network graph where each edge denoted a
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Proceedings of the Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2019) Different Spirals of Sameness: A Study of Content Sharing in Mainstream and Alternative Media Benjamin D. Horne,* Jeppe Nørregaard,y Sibel Adalı* Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute*, Technical University of Denmarky [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Vos, and Shoemaker 2009; Allcott and Gentzkow 2017; Mele et al. 2017). Thus, we may have a more diverse set of In this paper, we analyze content sharing between news news to read than in years past, but the standards of quality sources in the alternative and mainstream media using a dataset of 713K articles and 194 sources. We find that content have wavered, creating a new set of concerns. sharing happens in tightly formed communities, and these This rise in low-quality and potentially malicious news communities represent relatively homogeneous portions of producers has been the focus of many recent studies such the media landscape. Through a mix-method analysis, we as those focusing on detecting false content (Potthast et al. find several primary content sharing behaviors. First, we find 2017; Popat et al. 2016; Singhania, Fernandez, and Rao that the vast majority of shared articles are only shared with 2017; Horne et al. 2018; Baly et al. 2018). Some other stud- similar news sources (i.e. same community). Second, we find ies have focused on the tactics used to spread low-quality that despite these echo-chambers of sharing, specific sources, news, such as the use of social bots (Shao et al. 2017) such as The Drudge Report, mix content from both main- stream and conspiracy communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton Lead Now 6% in Michigan (Clinton 48% - Trump 42% - Johnson 4.5% - Stein 2%)
    P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR RELEASE: October 26, 2016 Contact: Steve Mitchell 248-891-2414 Clinton Lead Now 6% in Michigan (Clinton 48% - Trump 42% - Johnson 4.5% - Stein 2%) EAST LANSING, Michigan --- With thirteen days remaining before the election, the latest Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll of Michigan shows the race tightening further with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton leading businessman Donald Trump by a 6 percent margin in a in a four-way race that includes Libertarian Party candidate former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein. In the four-way race it is Clinton 48% - Trump 42% - Johnson 4.5% - Stein 1%, and 5% undecided. In a two-way race it is Clinton 50% - Trump 44% with 6% undecided. In the last FOX 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll conducted Sunday night, Clinton’s lead was 8% and she led by 13% on October 18th, the night before the last debate. The IVR (automated) poll of 1,030 likely voters in the November 2016 General Election was conducted by Mitchell Research & Communications on October 25, 2016 and has a Margin of Error of + or – 2.78% at the 95% level of confidence. “The race inched closer last night with Clinton losing a point and Trump gaining a point. Gary Johnson and Jill Stein are doing a little bit better than they were doing on Sunday. However, Clinton still has a strong lead with absentee voters who have already cast a ballot. Clinton is still in a strong position, but her support has eroded in the past week,” Steve Mitchell, CEO of Mitchell Research & Communications said.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Election Fraud in the 2020 US Election
    2020 Analysis of Election Fraud in the 2020 US Election Insights from pressrelations GmbH Analysis period: 08/01/2016 –11/14/2020 2020 REPORTING OVER TIME The Subject of Election Fraud in US Media In 2016, Trump prepares the ground for his current accusations of election fraud by fraud - especially in the last few days. Starting on Election Day, reporting on the topic speaking of "illegal" votes for the first time. This narrative will be carried over one-to- was initially quite hesitant. The topic was mainly picked up by untrustworthy media one to the mail-in ballots in 2020. The narrative that Democrats wanted to "steal" the outlets. Reliable outlets picked up the topic after November 12th, right after Trump's election comes as a consequence of their call for absentee voting due to the tweet about the "deleted votes". coronavirus pandemic. The various allegations related to the technology for voting and counting votes used by Dominion Voting Systems make up a large part of the discussion about election Coverage on the topic of election fraud by number of contributions: August 2016 - November 2020 6.000 US Election 2020: Trump claims the election was stolen by fraud 5.000 Midterms 2018: Trump 4.000 accuses Democratic Party of US Elections 2016: manipulation of ballots by Trump: "Election could be millions of illegal third parties postponed to prevent mail-in 3.000 immigrants vote, election fraud". according to Donald Trump: "Hillary Clinton won 2.000 Trump 'popular vote' thanks to 3-5 million illegal votes" 1.000 0 Apr Apr Apr Apr Jan
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University/USA TODAY FINAL June 2017
    Suffolk University/USA TODAY FINAL June 2017 Region: (N=1,000) n % Northeast ---------------------------------------------------------- 204 20.40 South --------------------------------------------------------------- 338 33.80 Midwest ------------------------------------------------------------ 235 23.50 West ---------------------------------------------------------------- 223 22.30 Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University/USA Today and I would like to get your opinions on some issues of the day. Would you like to spend seven minutes to help us out? {ASK FOR YOUNGEST IN HOUSEHOLD} 1 Gender (N=1,000) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 477 47.70 Female ------------------------------------------------------------- 523 52.30 2. Are you currently a registered voter? (N=1,000) n % Yes--------------------------------------------------------------- 1,000 100.00 3. Do you think of yourself as a Democrat, Republican, or Independent? {IF INDEPENDENT, “Which party would you lean toward/feel closest to”} (N=1,000) n % Democrat ---------------------------------------------------------- 361 36.10 Republican -------------------------------------------------------- 300 30.00 Independent ------------------------------------------------------ 274 27.40 Other ---------------------------------------------------------------- 47 4.70 Refused ------------------------------------------------------------- 18 1.80 4. What is your age category? (N=1,000) n % 18-24 Years ------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]