DOCSLIB.ORG

What Does the Honeybee See? and How Do We Know?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Does the Honeybee See? and How Do We Know? WHAT DOES THE HONEYBEE SEE? AND HOW DO WE KNOW? A CRITIQUE OF SCIENTIFIC REASON WHAT DOES THE HONEYBEE SEE? AND HOW DO WE KNOW? A CRITIQUE OF SCIENTIFIC REASON ADRIAN HORRIDGE THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/honeybee_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Horridge, G. Adrian. Title: What does the honeybee see and how do we know? : a critique of scientific reason / Adrian Horridge ISBN: 9781921536984 (pbk) 9781921536991 (pdf) Subjects: Honeybee. Bees. Insects Vision Robot vision. Dewey Number: 595.799 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by Teresa Prowse, www.madebyfruitcup.com Cover image: Adrian Horridge Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2009 ANU E Press CONTENTS About the author . .vii Preface . ix Acknowledgments . xi Introduction . xiii Chapter summary . xix Glossary . xxiii 1 . Early work by the giants . 1 2 . Theories of scientific progress: help or hindrance? . 19 3 . Research techniques and ideas, 1950 on . 39 4 . Perception of pattern, from 1950 on . 63 5 . The retina, sensitivity and resolution . 85 6 . Processing and colour vision . 117 7 . Piloting: the visual control of flight . 147 8 . The route to the goal, and back again . 177 9 . Feature detectors and cues . 207 10 . Recognition of the goal . 249 11 . Do bees see shapes? . 263 12 . Generalisation and cognitive abilities in bee vision . 283 Afterthoughts . 307 Summary of the model of bees’ visual processing . 311 Bibliography . 319 v ABOUT THE AUTHOR Adrian Horridge was appointed in 1960 as Director of the Gatty Marine Laboratory, St Andrews, Scotland, while completing the two-volume work with Professor T. H. Bullock of the University of California on The Structure and Function of the Nervous Systems of Invertebrates (1965). At St Andrews, he started a research group that worked on the eyes of crustaceans and insects. In 1969, he brought this group with him to Australia, when he was appointed as one of four foundation professors of the Research School of Biological Sciences at The Australian National University. Since that time, he and his numerous students and postdoctoral collaborators have discovered much about the vision of insects. In 1969, Horridge was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London and in 1972 a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Sciences. vii PREFACE The unique and self-contained topic ‘The vision of the bee’ is of interest in its own right as the best-known example of what a typical medium-sized insect can detect with its eyes. It is also a topic of philosophical interest because it raises centuries-old questions about perception, consciousness, sentient beings, human uniqueness and insect-like robots. What does the bee really see? How does the small brain of the bee see so well? How does this influence our ideas about perception, automata and future practical applications? There are many ways to answer these questions. Bees assist us because they can be trained to come to objects or patterns, and trained bees will answer questions put to them in simple tests. The bee’s visual system is also open to analysis by optical, anatomical and electrophysiological methods, by tracking the bees while navigating and route finding and also by studying visual flight control as they pilot themselves between obstacles. This book includes a historical survey of how scientists have approached, experimented with and argued about insect vision for 100 years, finally rejecting anthropomorphism and solving some critical questions. One of the features is the (still-imperfect) coverage of the German contribution to the subject. Until about 1966, insect vision was scarcely mentioned in books in English. The older work was ignored, while the more recent contributions were controversial and unrelated to each other. There was little study of the topic in England and textbooks made a hash of it. This particular science is grounded in observation and logic. There is little mathematics, chemistry or physics involved or need for great learning. Bees are found worldwide and are reasonably representative of all large insects. Research on bee vision can be very cheap. The results have mostly been published but the story is not generally known or even available to the educated public. Here now is an account of what bees really detect with their eyes and how scientists found this out. The accounts of earlier experiments on this road of discovery, and how inferences were made from the data, make a fascinating account of the arguments and counterclaims of contending professors. The approach here is out-and-out support for experiment, backed by the logic of John Stuart Mill and the philosophy of scientific progress of Thomas S. Kuhn. The processes of designing the experiments and inferring the conclusions from the data make a ix WhAT DoES ThE honEyBEE SEE AnD hoW Do WE knoW? miniature picture of scientific effort in several areas of biology, physiology and comparative psychology. They illustrate how the work was really conducted— not always amicably. The basis of this study is the observation of the performance of bees. From the performance, an intuitive inference was usually made, as a stab at explaining the behaviour. Often, the inference was incorrect because the vision of bees was counter-intuitive in several ways. Explanations made by analogy with mammalian visual systems or drawn from the terminology of the cognitive sciences were usually found to be inadequate. There were many examples of excellent observations and reliable data, from which a wrong inference was made, followed by argument without new data, stubborn resistance to reinterpretation and refusal to accept advances made by others. Later, the mechanisms of the performance were analysed by extensive testing of trained bees and, after much thought, the counter-intuitive processing mechanisms of bees’ strange visual behaviour were slowly revealed. The whole subject became an exposition of the stages of visual processing. Bees do not see shapes or objects; they detect parameters and recognise places. This story is told as an example of how early intuitive inferences have given way to the results of carefully designed tests of trained bees. The book is intended for an audience who do not want a text crowded with references and every fact that exists. The aim is for it to be read more like an essay for anyone with some scientific background. It describes the process of scientific discovery on a limited theme, with two excursions into branches of the subject in more detail: the action of the retina and processing by the nerve cells (Chapters 5 and 6). For all chapters, there are sufficient names of researchers given for anybody who wishes to dig deeper, using the extensive bibliography. This book could be used by university students interested in subjects such as vision for physiologists, perception for psychologists, insects for entomologists or zoologists, robot vision for engineers looking for new ideas and scientific method for philosophers. x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I acknowledge with enormous gratitude the contributions of those ancient institutions, St Johns College, Cambridge, where I was for 10 years absorbing a myriad influences from curious role models, and the University of St Andrews, where I learned to stand on my own feet, and where the work on insect vision began during 13 years at the Gatty Marine Laboratory. At Yale and the University of California, I was introduced to research financed by grants. Then at The Australian National University, I was able to expand with my research group on my own broad topic that seemed scientifically interesting: insect vision. Second, I thank the great number of colleagues, who worked with and near me, aided by technical staff, librarians and secretaries. I depended on their support. I owe a particular debt of gratitude to the numerous enthusiastic colleagues who made good use of the plentiful equipment, made scientific advances and mostly published their own work on insect vision. Their names appear throughout this book. Some, in particular, stand out: Tudor Barnard, Malcomb Burrows, John Scholes, Steve Shaw, Rick Butler, Ben Walcott, Ayis Ioannides, Ian Meinertzhagen and David Sandeman. In Canberra: Simon Laughlin, Allan Snyder, Andreas Dubs, Randolf Menzel, Gert Stange, Benno Meyer-Rochow, Ted Maddess, Fred Doujak, Peter Lillywhite, Jenny Kien, David Williams, Roger Hardy, Yasuo Tsukahara, Keiichi Mimura, Mark Leggett, Dan-Eric Nilsson, Mike Land, Stjepan Marčelja, Willi Ribi, Martin Wilson, Richard Payne, Roger Dubois, Doukele Stavenga, David O’Carroll, Tom Matic, Shi Jian, Jan Dalczynski, Peter McIntyre, Qijian Sun, Yang En-Cheng, Danny Osorio, Joe Howard, Mandyam Srinivasan, Tony Heyes, Andrew James, Zhang Shaowu, Miriam Lehrer, Eric Warrant, Mike Ibbotson and Neville Fletcher. There is especial gratitude to the assistants who worked with me, sometimes for many years—notably, Margaret Lang, Charlie Roemmele, Margaret Canny, Bob Jackson, Caroline Giddings, Miriam MacLean, Roland Jahnke, Jadviga Duniec, Ljerka Marčelja, Edyta Kucharska, Sasha Neist, Steve Lucock and Virginia Pierce—and to secretaries (before they became extinct): Veronique, Tess, Tiger Lily, Elizabeth and Margaret. Finally, I owe an infinite debt of gratitude to Audrey, the loving woman I married 55 years ago, who cared for me and four children, in a family life that was full of interest, culture and generosity. xi INTRODUCTION Small in size but high among the wonders of nature, insects delight and amaze us with their skill in flight and their obvious ability to see.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eric Kandel Form in Which This Information Is Stored
    RESEARCH I NEWS pendent, this system would be expected to [2] HEEsch and J E Bums. Distance estimation work quite well, since the new recruit bees by foraging honeybees, The Journal ofExperi­ mental Biology, Vo1.199, pp. 155-162, 1996. tend to take the same route as the experi­ [3] M V Srinivasan, S W Zhang, M Lehrer, and T enced scout bee. What dOJhe ants do when S Collett, Honeybee Navigation en route to they cover similarly several kilometres on the goal: Visual flight control and odometry, foot to look for food? Preliminary evidence The Journal ofExperimental Biology, Vol. 199, pp. 237-244, 1996. indicates that they don't use an odometer but [4] M V Srinivasan, S W Zhang, M Altwein, and instead might count steps! J Tautz, Honeybee Navigation: Nature and Calibration of the Odometer, Science, Vol. Suggested Reading 287, pp. 851-853, 1996. [1] Karl von Frisch, The dance language and OT­ Moushumi Sen Sarma, Centre for Ecological Sci­ ientation of bees, Harvard Univ. Press, Cam­ ences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, bridge, MA, USA, 1993. India. Email: [email protected] Learning from a Sea Snail: modify future behaviour, then memory is the Eric Kandel form in which this information is stored. Together, they represent one of the most valuable and powerful adaptations ever to Rohini Balakrishnan have evolved in nervous systems, for they In the year 2000, Eric Kandel shared the allow the future to access the past, conferring Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicinel flexibility to behaviour and improving the with two other neurobiologists: Arvid chances of survival in unpredictable, rapidly Carlsson and Paul Greengard.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Joseph S. Takahashi Howard Hughes Medical
    CURRICULUM VITAE Joseph S. Takahashi Howard Hughes Medical Institute Department of Neuroscience University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., NA4.118 Dallas, Texas 75390-9111 (214) 648-1876, FAX (214) 648-1801 Email: [email protected] DATE OF BIRTH: December 16, 1951 NATIONALITY: U.S. Citizen by birth EDUCATION: 1981-1983 Pharmacology Research Associate Training Program, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Laboratory of Clinical Sciences and Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 1979-1981 Ph.D., Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, Dr. Michael Menaker, Advisor. Summer 1977 Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California 1975-1979 Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1970-1974 B.A. in Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2013-present Principal Investigator, Satellite, International Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine, World Premier International Research Center Initiative, University of Tsukuba, Japan 2009-present Professor and Chair, Department of Neuroscience, UT Southwestern Medical Center 2009-present Loyd B. Sands Distinguished Chair in Neuroscience, UT Southwestern 2009-present Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UT Southwestern 2009-present Professor Emeritus of Neurobiology and Physiology, and Walter and Mary Elizabeth Glass Professor Emeritus in the Life Sciences, Northwestern University
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Sensitivities of Wolf Spider Eyes
    =ORNELL UNIVERSITY ~',lC.V~;AL ~ULLE(.~E DEF'ARY~,:ENT OF P~-I:~IOLOGY 1300 YORK AVE.~UE NEW YORK, N.Y. Spectral Sensitivities of Wolf Spider Eyes ROBERT D. DBVOE, RALPH J. W. SMALL, and JANIS E. ZVARGULIS From the Department of Physiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 ABSTRACT ERG's to spectral lights were recorded from all eyes of intact wolf spiders. Secondary eyes have maximum relative sensitivities at 505-510 nm which are unchanged by chromatic adaptations. Principal eyes have ultraviolet sensitivities which are 10 to 100 times greater at 380 nm than at 505 nm. How- ever, two animals' eyes initially had greater blue-green sensitivities, then in 7 to 10 wk dropped 4 to 6 log units in absolute sensitivity in the visible, less in the ultraviolet. Chromatic adaptations of both types of principal eyes hardly changed relative spectral sensitivities. Small decreases in relative sensitivity in the visible with orange adaptations were possibly retinomotor in origin. Second peaks in ERG waveforms were elicited from ultraviolet-adapted principal eyes by wavelengths 400 nm and longer, and from blue-, yellow-, and orange- adapted secondary eyes by wavelengths 580 nm and longer. The second peaks in waveforms were most likely responses of unilluminated eyes to scattered light. It is concluded that both principal and secondary eyes contain cells with a visual pigment absorbing maximally at 505-510 nm. The variable absolute and ultraviolet sensitivities of principal eyes may be due to a second pigment in the same cells or to an ultraviolet-absorbing accessory pigment which excites the 505 nm absorbing visual pigment by radiationless energy transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory Experience Controls the Maturation of Song Discrimination and Sexual Response in Drosophila Xiaodong Li, Hiroshi Ishimoto, Azusa Kamikouchi*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Auditory experience controls the maturation of song discrimination and sexual response in Drosophila Xiaodong Li, Hiroshi Ishimoto, Azusa Kamikouchi* Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan Abstract In birds and higher mammals, auditory experience during development is critical to discriminate sound patterns in adulthood. However, the neural and molecular nature of this acquired ability remains elusive. In fruit flies, acoustic perception has been thought to be innate. Here we report, surprisingly, that auditory experience of a species-specific courtship song in developing Drosophila shapes adult song perception and resultant sexual behavior. Preferences in the song-response behaviors of both males and females were tuned by social acoustic exposure during development. We examined the molecular and cellular determinants of this social acoustic learning and found that GABA signaling acting on the GABAA receptor Rdl in the pC1 neurons, the integration node for courtship stimuli, regulated auditory tuning and sexual behavior. These findings demonstrate that maturation of auditory perception in flies is unexpectedly plastic and is acquired socially, providing a model to investigate how song learning regulates mating preference in insects. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34348.001 Introduction Vocal learning in infants or juvenile birds relies heavily on the early experience of the adult conspe- cific sounds. In humans, early language input is necessary to form the ability of phonetic distinction *For correspondence: and pattern detection in the phase of auditory learning (Doupe and Kuhl, 1999; Kuhl, 2004). [email protected] Because of the strong parallels between speech acquisition of humans and song learning of song- Competing interests: The birds, and the difficulties to investigate the neural mechanisms of human early auditory memory at authors declare that no cellular resolution, songbirds have been used as a predominant model in studying memory formation competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Historical Perspective
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Perspective “ Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. ” modified by the developmental history of the organism, Theodosius Dobzhansky its physiology – from cellular to systems levels – and by the social and physical environment. Finally, behaviors are shaped through evolutionary forces of natural selection OVERVIEW that optimize survival and reproduction ( Figure 1.1 ). Truly, the study of behavior provides us with a window through Behavioral genetics aims to understand the genetic which we can view much of biology. mechanisms that enable the nervous system to direct Understanding behaviors requires a multidisciplinary appropriate interactions between organisms and their perspective, with regulation of gene expression at its core. social and physical environments. Early scientific The emerging field of behavioral genetics is still taking explorations of animal behavior defined the fields shape and its boundaries are still being defined. Behavioral of experimental psychology and classical ethology. genetics has evolved through the merger of experimental Behavioral genetics has emerged as an interdisciplin- psychology and classical ethology with evolutionary biol- ary science at the interface of experimental psychology, ogy and genetics, and also incorporates aspects of neuro- classical ethology, genetics, and neuroscience. This science ( Figure 1.2 ). To gain a perspective on the current chapter provides a brief overview of the emergence of definition of this field, it is helpful
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Arthropod Abundance and Diversity with Invasive
    CHANGES IN ARTHROPOD ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY WITH INVASIVE GRASSES A Thesis by ERIN E. CORD Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies Texas A&M University-Kingsville in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2011 Major Subject: Range and Wildlife Management CHANGES IN ARTHROPOD ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY WITH INVASIVE GRASSES A Thesis by ERIN E. CORD Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________ Andrea R. Litt, Ph.D. (Chairman of Committee) ___________________________ ___________________________ Timothy E. Fulbright, Ph.D. Greta L. Schuster, Ph.D. (Member) (Member) _____________________________ Scott E. Henke, Ph.D. (Chair of Department) _________________________________ Ambrose Anoruo, Ph.D. (Associate VP for Research & Dean, College of Graduate Studies) August 2011 ABSTRACT Changes in Arthropod Abundance and Diversity with Invasive Grasses (August 2011) Erin E. Cord, B.S., University Of Delaware Chairman of Committee: Dr. Andrea R. Litt Invasive grasses can alter plant communities and can potentially affect arthropods due to specialized relationships with certain plants as food resources and reproduction sites. Kleberg bluestem (Dichanthium annulatum) is a non-native grass and tanglehead (Heteropogon contortus) is native to the United States, but recently has become dominant in south Texas. I sought to: 1) quantify changes in plant and arthropod communities in invasive grasses compared to native grasses, and 2) determine if grass origin would alter effects. I sampled vegetation and arthropods on 90 grass patches in July and September 2009 and 2010 on the King Ranch in southern Texas. Arthropod communities in invasive grasses were less diverse and abundant, compared to native grasses; I also documented differences in presence and abundance of certain orders and families.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genomes Resolve the Phylogeny of Adephaga
    1 Mitochondrial genomes resolve the phylogeny 2 of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and confirm tiger 3 beetles (Cicindelidae) as an independent family 4 Alejandro López-López1,2,3 and Alfried P. Vogler1,2 5 1: Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK 6 2: Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK 7 3: Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Campus 8 Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain 9 10 Corresponding author: Alejandro López-López ([email protected]) 11 12 Abstract 13 The beetle suborder Adephaga consists of several aquatic (‘Hydradephaga’) and terrestrial 14 (‘Geadephaga’) families whose relationships remain poorly known. In particular, the position 15 of Cicindelidae (tiger beetles) appears problematic, as recent studies have found them either 16 within the Hydradephaga based on mitogenomes, or together with several unlikely relatives 17 in Geadeadephaga based on 18S rRNA genes. We newly sequenced nine mitogenomes of 18 representatives of Cicindelidae and three ground beetles (Carabidae), and conducted 19 phylogenetic analyses together with 29 existing mitogenomes of Adephaga. Our results 20 support a basal split of Geadephaga and Hydradephaga, and reveal Cicindelidae, together 21 with Trachypachidae, as sister to all other Geadephaga, supporting their status as Family. We 22 show that alternative arrangements of basal adephagan relationships coincide with increased 23 rates of evolutionary change and with nucleotide compositional bias, but these confounding 24 factors were overcome by the CAT-Poisson model of PhyloBayes. The mitogenome + 18S 25 rRNA combined matrix supports the same topology only after removal of the hypervariable 26 expansion segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurobiology, Endocrinology and Behavior E
    Neurobiology, Endocrinology and Behavior E. Adkins-Regan, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA C. S. Carter, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA ã 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Introduction In subsequent centuries, many scientists examined and described the structure of the brain and nervous system Two types of mechanisms, neural and hormonal, have in an array of animal species. A common theme was to note been prominent in the history of research directed at what seemed to be marked differences in the organization uncovering the proximate physiological causes of animal of the brain, especially the forebrain, and in the relative behavior. During the first part of this history, the nervous sizes of structures and brain divisions, and to speculate and endocrine systems were envisioned as separate sys- about their relationship to behavior and intelligence. tems and were studied by somewhat different research With the publication of Charles Darwin’s theory of communities. As a result, research on physiological evolution by natural selection, these species differences mechanisms of animal behavior has tended to develop in brain structure and size began to be interpreted in an along two somewhat separate and parallel tracks. These evolutionary framework. Until the middle of the 1900s, dual origins are reflected in the organization of this sur- the dominant view had been that the brains (especially vey. Beginning in the twentieth century, several discov- forebrains) of different vertebrate classes (as represented eries led to the realization that the nervous and endocrine by a small number of species from each of the largest systems are physiologically integrated to a highly signifi- classes) were fundamentally different in organization, cant extent, which is of great importance for animal that they formed an evolutionary series progressing behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Through Moving Eyes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/083691; this version posted June 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Seeing through moving eyes - microsaccadic information sampling provides 2 Drosophila hyperacute vision 3 4 Mikko Juusola1,2*‡, An Dau2‡, Zhuoyi Song2‡, Narendra Solanki2, Diana Rien1,2, David Jaciuch2, 5 Sidhartha Dongre2, Florence Blanchard2, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja3, Roger C. Hardie4 and Jouni 6 Takalo2 7 8 1National Key laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing, Beijing Normal 9 University, Beijing 100875, China 10 2Department of Biomedical Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 T2N, UK 11 3Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, 12 Portugal 13 4Department of Physiology Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 14 3EG, UK 15 16 *Correspondence to: [email protected] 17 ‡ Equal contribution 18 19 Small fly eyes should not see fine image details. Because flies exhibit saccadic visual behaviors 20 and their compound eyes have relatively few ommatidia (sampling points), their photoreceptors 21 would be expected to generate blurry and coarse retinal images of the world. Here we 22 demonstrate that Drosophila see the world far better than predicted from the classic theories. 23 By using electrophysiological, optical and behavioral assays, we found that R1-R6 24 photoreceptors’ encoding capacity in time is maximized to fast high-contrast bursts, which 25 resemble their light input during saccadic behaviors. Whilst over space, R1-R6s resolve moving 26 objects at saccadic speeds beyond the predicted motion-blur-limit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spiking Neuron Classifier Network with a Deep Architecture Inspired By
    A spiking neuron classifier network with a deep architecture inspired by the olfactory system of the honeybee Chris Hausler¨ ∗†, Martin Paul Nawrot∗† and Michael Schmuker∗† ∗Neuroinformatics & Theoretical Neuroscience, Institute of Biology Freie Universitat¨ Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany † Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany Email: [email protected], fmartin.nawrot, [email protected] Abstract—We decompose the honeybee’s olfactory pathway Mushroom into local circuits that represent successive processing stages and body (MB) calyx resemble a deep learning architecture. Using spiking neuronal network models, we infer the specific functional role of these microcircuits in odor discrimination, and measure their con- 2 tribution to the performance of a spiking implementation of a probabilistic classifier, trained in a supervised manner. The entire Kenyon network is based on a network of spiking neurons, suited for Cells (KC) implementation on neuromorphic hardware. Lateral horn 3 I. INTRODUCTION Projection Honeybees can identify odorant stimuli in a quick and neurons (PN) MB-extrinsic neurons To motor reliable fashion [1], [2]. The neuronal circuits involved in neurons odor discrimination are well described at the structural level. 1 Antennal Primary olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) project to the lobe (AL) From odorant antennal lobe (AL, circuit 1 in Fig. 1). Each ORN is believed receptor neurons to express only one of about 160 olfactory receptor genes [3]. ORNs expressing the same receptor protein converge in the Fig. 1. Processing hierarchy in the honeybee brain. The stages relevant to AL in the same glomerulus, a spherical compartment where this study are numbered for reference.
    [Show full text]
  • EMBC Annual Report 2007
    EMBO | EMBC annual report 2007 EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ORGANIZATION | EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY CONFERENCE EMBO | EMBC table of contents introduction preface by Hermann Bujard, EMBO 4 preface by Tim Hunt and Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, EMBO Council 6 preface by Marja Makarow and Isabella Beretta, EMBC 7 past & present timeline 10 brief history 11 EMBO | EMBC | EMBL aims 12 EMBO actions 2007 15 EMBC actions 2007 17 EMBO & EMBC programmes and activities fellowship programme 20 courses & workshops programme 21 young investigator programme 22 installation grants 23 science & society programme 24 electronic information programme 25 EMBO activities The EMBO Journal 28 EMBO reports 29 Molecular Systems Biology 30 journal subject categories 31 national science reviews 32 women in science 33 gold medal 34 award for communication in the life sciences 35 plenary lectures 36 communications 37 European Life Sciences Forum (ELSF) 38 ➔ 2 table of contents appendix EMBC delegates and advisers 42 EMBC scale of contributions 49 EMBO council members 2007 50 EMBO committee members & auditors 2007 51 EMBO council members 2008 52 EMBO committee members & auditors 2008 53 EMBO members elected in 2007 54 advisory editorial boards & senior editors 2007 64 long-term fellowship awards 2007 66 long-term fellowships: statistics 82 long-term fellowships 2007: geographical distribution 84 short-term fellowship awards 2007 86 short-term fellowships: statistics 104 short-term fellowships 2007: geographical distribution 106 young investigators 2007 108 installation
    [Show full text]
  • Can Mammalian Vision Be Restored Following Optic Nerve Degeneration?
    Journal name: Journal of Neurorestoratology Article Designation: REVIEW Year: 2016 Volume: 4 Journal of Neurorestoratology Dovepress Running head verso: Kuffler Running head recto: Restoring vision following an optic nerve injury open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JN.S109523 Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Can mammalian vision be restored following optic nerve degeneration? Damien P Kuffler Abstract: For most adult vertebrates, glaucoma, trauma, and tumors close to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) result in their neuron death and no possibility of vision reestablishment. For more Institute of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, distant traumas, RGCs survive, but their axons do not regenerate into the distal nerve stump San Juan, Puerto Rico due to regeneration-inhibiting factors and absence of regeneration-promoting factors. The annual clinical incidence of blindness in the United States is 1:28 (4%) for persons >40 years, with the total number of blind people approaching 1.6 million. Thus, failure of optic nerves to regenerate is a significant problem. However, following transection of the optic nerve of adult amphibians and fish, the RGCs survive and their axons regenerate through the distal optic nerve stump and reestablish appropriate functional retinotopic connections and fully functional For personal use only. vision. This is because they lack factors that inhibit axon regeneration and possess factors that promote regeneration. The axon regeneration in lower vertebrates has led to extensive studies by using them as models in studies that attempt to understand the mechanisms by which axon regeneration is promoted, so that these mechanisms might be applied to higher vertebrates for restoring vision.
    [Show full text]