In the Genre Jungle
9781405156509_4_001.qxd 11/23/07 10:46 AM Page 1 Chapter 1 In the Genre Jungle In our current discourse on artistic practices, we commonly use generic distinctions to characterize a particular work: for example, when we say that Leonardo da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa” is a portrait, and that Vincent van Gogh’s “Sunflowers” is a “still life”; when we describe the novels dealing with the investigations of Georges Simenon’s Inspector Maigret, or of Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot, as “Whodunits,” and the romances in the Harlequin series as “format romances”; or when we call Shakespeare’s Macbeth a tragedy, and Molière’s The Miser a comedy. We thus invoke the idea of genres (pictorial, literary, theatrical, etc.) to identify, classify, and differentiate particular works. The same is true with cinema. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, a film viewer will readily use the terms “musical” to describe Singin’ in the Rain (Donen/Kelly, 1952), “comedy” to refer to There’s Something About Mary (Farrelly Brothers, 1998), or “vampire film” to char- acterize Nosferatu (Murnau, 1922). Similarly, critics often make use of generic categories in both popular and scholarly publica- tions – whether at the beginning of an article, or in the body of the text – to introduce a new film and situate it in the landscape of cinema. Like other cultural productions, films, both in our discourse and our consciousness, are arranged in a geography organized by genres. 1 9781405156509_4_001.qxd 11/23/07 10:46 AM Page 2 In the Genre Jungle Cinematic Genre: An Empirical Category As a way of approaching this topic, one can begin with the common use of the concept of genre – defined as an empirical category that serves to name, differentiate, and classify works on the basis of the recurring configurations of formal and thematic elements they share.
[Show full text]