United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,867,978 Gold (45)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,867,978 Gold (45) United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,867,978 Gold (45) . Date of Patent: Sep. 19, 1989 54 METHOD OF PROLONGING CANCEROUS 52 U.S. Cl. ..................................... 424/719; 424/709 PATIENTSURVIVAL IN HUMANS WITH 58 Field of Search ......................................... 424/166 HYDRAZINE SULFATE (56) References Cited 76) Inventor: Joseph Gold, 127 Edgemont Dr., U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Syracuse, N.Y. 13214 4,110,437 8/1978 Gold .................................... 424/66 21 Appl. No.: 276,059 Primary Examiner-Jerome D. Goldberg 22 Filed: Nov. 25, 1988 57 ABSTRACT Related U.S. Application Data Hydrazine sulfate, alone or formulated with liquid or solid carriers, will prolong patient survival when ad 63 Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 201,083, Jun. 1, 1988, ministered to early-stage human cancer patients paren abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 32,051, terally or orally. Mar. 27, 1987, abandoned. (51) Int. Cl.".............................................. A61K 33/02 7 Claims, No Drawings 4,867,978 1. 2 TABLE I-continued METHOD OF PROLONGING CANCEROUS PATENT SURVIVAL IN HUMANS WITH New Chemotypes evaluated against cancer 1960-1985 HYDRAZINE SULFATE Succeeded Failed Acylagmatine Allamandicin This application is a continuation-in-part of pending Allamandin Ser. No. 201,083, filed June 1, 1988, now abandoned, Agolosamine which is a continuation of Ser. No. 032,051, filed Mar. Anguidine 27, 1987, now abandoned. Angustmycin 10 Ansamycin BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Aureolic acid Baccharin Many different types of chemical compounds have Bakkenolide Baumycin been used in the past to retard or inhibit various tumors Bisnorditerpene in man. More than thirty compounds are approved for Bouvardin use in cancer therapy in various countries, but the 15 Brederine achievement of therapeutic benefit has reached a pla Bruceolide Bryogenin teau, and the search for antitumor agents continues in Bufadienolide various directions. Cardenoides In 1967, Weitzel and co-workers reported in the Catharanthus Zeitschrift fuer Physiologische Chemie, 348, 433-442 20 Cephalotaxine Chapparinone that hydrazine acetate and sulfate inhibit in vivo the Coformycin growth of ascites carcinoma and sarcoma 180 in the Colcemid mouse and Walker carcinosarcoma in the rat. It is well Colchicine known that the results from lower animals cannot be Colubrinol extrapolated in humans. Indeed, the experience at the 25 Coralyne Cucurbitacin U.S. National Institutes of Health has been that more Daphnetoxin than 200 new chemotypes having anticancer activity in Datiscacin animals have failed to show clinically useful anticancer Cecoyinine activity in humans, as shown in the following table Angustmycin 30 Scirpenol (Table I was compiled from various reports of the U.S. Isobruceine National Cancer Institute): Nitidine TABLE I Duborimycin Elemanolide New Chemotypes evaluated against cancer 1960-1985 Elephantopin Succeeded Failed Ellipticine 35 Elephantopin Adriamycin Enteromycin Cisplatin Tripdiolide Eremantholides Bleomycin Maytanisine Eriofertopin Mitomycin Sangivamycin Eudesmanolides Vincristine Pentamethylmelamine Eupacunin Cyclophosphamide" Taxo Euparotin Etopside Bactobolin Fabacein Alanosine Fagaronine PALA Acivicin Fusarenon Germacranolide Methyl GAG Glaucarubinone Menogarol 45 Triciribine Guaianolide Disuccinimide Helenolin Flavoneacetic acid Homoerythrina Teroxirone Hycanthone Acodazole Picrasin Iridoid actone Benzisoquinolinedione 50 Didemnin B Isobruceine Phyllanthoside Isocucurbitacin Ellipticine Isoplumericin Emetime Iatrophone Indicine-N-oxide Lapachol Bouvardin leurosidine Thalicarpine 55 Leurosine Tetrandrine Liatrin Acronycine Masine Tylocrebrine Maysenine Lapachol Maytanbutacine Nitidine Maytanbutine Neocarzinostatin Maytanprine Macromomycin Maytanvaline Largomycin Miracil D Streptimidone Mitrymicin Valinomycin Mycophenolic acid Piperazinedione Neosolaneol Fagaronine 65 Nitidine Coralyne Nivalenol Benzophenanthridine Normaysine Camptothecin Oxazinomycin Acosamine Peltatin 4,867,978 3 4. TABLE I-continued Administration. Table IV shows that the last new New Chenotypes evaluated against cancer 1960-1985 chemotype which succeeded in the clinic was discov Succeeded Failed ered more than 20 years ago. Penstenide TABLE I Phleomycin Anticancer Drugs Approved in U.S. in Order of Approval by FDA Picrasane Picropodophyllin leuprolide - Lupron Takeda-Abbott 4/9/85 Piptocarphins (gonadotropin releasing hormone) Pumericin etoposide - Vepesid BMY 11/10/83 Porfironycin streptozotocin - Zanosar Upjohn 7/7/82 Pseudoguaianolides 10 estramustine - Emcyt Roche 12/24/81 Puromycin daunorubicin - Cerubidine Ives 12/19/79 Pyrazomycin cisplatin - Platinol BMY 2A19/78 Quadrone tamoxifen - Nolvadex CI 2/30/77 Quassimarin (antiestrogen) Roridin carmustine BiCNU 3/7/77 Sanadierine 15 Sangivamycin lonustine - CEENU BMY 8/4/76 Eudesmanolide dacarbazine - DTIC-Dome Miles 5/27/75 Showdomysin doxorubicin - Adriamycin Farmitalia 8/7/74 Sikkimototoxin mitomycin C - Mutamycin BMY 5/28/74 Simalikalactone bleomycin - Blenoxane BMY 7/31/73 Sinarouboide megestrol acetate - Megace BMY 8/18/7 Stachybotrytoxin foxuridine - FUDR Roche 12/8/70 Steganacin mitotane - Lysodren BMY 7/8/70 Streptonigrin plicamycin - Mithracin Pfizer 5/5/70 Taxodione procarbazine - Matulane Roche 7/22/69 Tenulin cytarabine - Cytosar U Upjohn 6/17/69 Tetrandrine testolactone - Teslac Squibb 6/3/69 Thalicarpine 25 hydroxyurea - Hydrea Squibb 2/7/67 Trichodermin pipobroman - Vercyte Abbott 7/1/66 Undulatone melphalan - Alkeran BW /17/64 Vernolepin wincristine - Oncovin Lilly 7/10/63 Verrucarin Vincadioline uracil Enustard - Uracil Mustard Upjohn 9/13/62 Vindoline 30 5-fluorouracil - Fluorouracil Roche 4/25/62 Withaferin dronostanolone - Droban Lilly 10/26/61 Withanolide vinblastine - Velban Lilly 3/6/6 Phosphonoacetic acid cyclophosphamide - Cytoxan BMY 11/16/59 Pentostatin thiotepa - Thio-Tepa Lederle 3/9/59 Deazaguanine chlorambuci - Leukeran BW 3/18/57 Tiazofurin 35 busulfan - Myleran BW 6/26/54 Ocodazole methotrexate - Methotrexate Lederie 12/7/53 Bisbenzinidazole ICRF JB-11 A review of the FDA's New Drug Evaluation - Sta Dihydrotriazine benzene sulfonyl fluorid Glyoxylic acid sulfonylhydrazone tistical Report (March 1986) shows that no novel anti N-Methylformamide cancer drug is pending approval at the FDA. Caracemide Isopropylpyrrolizine deriv. TABLE II Phyllanthoside The following are the dispositions of antineoplastics Aphidicolin fied in 980 to 1984: Largomycin 45 Filed in 1980 Not approvable NDA No. 18-348 Antineoplastic Analog of nitrogen mustard Not approvable NDA No. 18-529 Antineoplastic Analog of podophyllotoxin Not approvable NDA No. 18-554 Antineoplastic Filed in 1981. Not approvable NDA No. 18-641 Antineoplastic In addition, hundreds of analogs of the new and old Not approvable NDA No. 18-653 Antineoplastic chemotypes have failed to show anticancer activity in Filed in 1982. Not approvable NDA No. 50-569 Antineoplastic man, in spite of good antitumor activity in animals. In 50 Filed in 1984. Not approvable NDA No. 50-595 Antineoplastic contrast to the above, only about five new chemotype anticancer drugs have reached the market in the last 25 Table IV lists the anticancer drugs approved in the years. Hence, early reports that hydrazine sulfate had United States. The last non-hormonal anticancer agent antitumor activity in animals did not serve to predict to be approved in the U.S. was etoposide in 1983. that it might have anticancer activity in humans. 55 The following are the years of discovery of the major Because of this poor predictability of animal models, anticancer drugs on the U.S. market (arbitrarily as the National Cancer Institute of the U.S. National Insti sumed to be one year before.the first publication): tutes of Health has now abandoned the mouse model after 25 years of unproductive trial and is instituting a TABLE IV new in vitro program for discovering new antitumor Etoposide 1966 Adriamycin 1966 drugs (E. Eckholm, New York Times, Dec. 23, 1986, p. Bleomycin 1966 C1). Cisplatin 1965 A total inventory of cancer drugs approved for sale Mitomycin C 1965 in the United States is set forth in Table II, and it will be Vincristine 1961 seen that most of these are analogs of other drugs. Table 65 5-Fluorouracil 1957 III shows that, with one exception, all of the recent Cyclophosphamide 1957 New Drug Applications filed for anticancer drugs led Methotrexate 949 to unapprovable ratings by the U.S. Food and Drug 4,867,978 5 6 Thus, there have been no new chemotype cytotoxic then two such capsules daily for the next three days, anticancer drugs discovered in the past twenty years. and then three 60 mg capsules each day thereafter. In Consequently, there remains an unfulfilled need for actual practice, patients weighing over 130 pounds do additional cancer drugs for clinical use against tumors well on three or four 60 mg capsules daily. For patients in humans. weighing less than 100 pounds, the regimen followed is Up the present time, it has been generally unrecog preferably one 30 mg capsule of hydrazine sulfate daily nized that a specific anticachexia agent (by virtue of its for the first three days, then two such capsules daily for ability to interrupt those specific thermodynamic meta the next three days, and then two or three 30 mg cap bolic processes leading to cancer cachexia) possesses sules each day thereafter. For best results blood levels antitumor potential, by virtue of a systematic thermody 10 of hydrazine sulfate should be determined on these namic interrelationship between
Recommended publications
  • Hydrazine Sulfate Hazard Summary Identification
    Common Name: HYDRAZINE SULFATE CAS Number: 10034-93-2 RTK Substance number: 2360 DOT Number: None Date: December 1994 Revision: May 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- HAZARD SUMMARY * Hydrazine Sulfate can affect you when breathed in and * Exposure to hazardous substances should be routinely may be absorbed through the skin. evaluated. This may include collecting personal and area * Hydrazine Sulfate should be handled as a air samples. You can obtain copies of sampling results CARCINOGEN—WITH EXTREME CAUTION. from your employer. You have a legal right to this * Hydrazine Sulfate can irritate and burn the eyes and skin. information under OSHA 1910.1020. * Breathing Hydrazine Sulfate can irritate the nose, throat * If you think you are experiencing any work-related health and lungs causing coughing and shortness of breath. problems, see a doctor trained to recognize occupational * Exposure can cause you to feel dizzy and lightheaded. diseases. Take this Fact Sheet with you. Higher levels can cause trembling, a feeling of excitement, and even convulsions (fits). WORKPLACE EXPOSURE LIMITS * Hydrazine Sulfate may damage blood cells causing a low No occupational exposure limits have been established for blood count (anemia). Hydrazine Sulfate. This does not mean that this substance is * Exposure may damage the liver and kidneys. not harmful. Safe work practices should always be followed. * Hydrazine Sulfate may cause a skin allergy. If allergy develops, very low future exposure can cause itching and a * Hydrazine Sulfate may be a CARCINOGEN in humans. skin rash. There may be no safe level of exposure to a carcinogen, so all contact should be reduced to the lowest possible level.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for NK Cell Therapy of Sarcoma
    cancers Review Prospects for NK Cell Therapy of Sarcoma Mieszko Lachota 1 , Marianna Vincenti 2 , Magdalena Winiarska 3, Kjetil Boye 4 , Radosław Zago˙zd˙zon 5,* and Karl-Johan Malmberg 2,6,* 1 Department of Clinical Immunology, Doctoral School, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] 3 Department of Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] 5 Department of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland 6 Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (K.-J.M.) Received: 15 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Simple Summary: Sarcomas are a group of aggressive tumors originating from mesenchymal tissues. Patients with advanced disease have poor prognosis due to the ineffectiveness of current treatment protocols. A subset of lymphocytes called natural killer (NK) cells is capable of effective surveillance and clearance of sarcomas, constituting a promising tool for immunotherapeutic treatment. However, sarcomas can cause impairment in NK cell function, associated with enhanced tumor growth and dissemination. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of sarcoma-mediated suppression of NK cells and their implications for the design of novel NK cell-based immunotherapies against sarcoma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emerging Role of Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer Therapy1
    Vol. 1, 247-256, March 1995 Clinical Cancer Research 247 Minireview The Emerging Role of Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer Therapy1 Andrew D. Seidman2 overexpressing subline of MCF-7 cells appears to result in the Breast and Gynecological Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan- development of 4.4-fold less resistance (6). Furthermore, in Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021 paclitaxel-resistant cells, the ratio of soluble to polymerized tubulin is greater than that observed in sensitive cells (7). Introduction Ongoing investigation should clarify the relationship between Multiple chemotherapeutic agents and regimens exist with tubulin alterations and resistance to taxanes. documented antitumor activity against breast cancer; however, In parallel with the development of clinical trials of paclitaxel- less than one in five patients with stage IV breast cancer are alive based combination regimens, in vivo and in vitro studies have 5 years from the first detection of distant metastases (1). Although examined combinations for cytotoxicity in several systems. In vitro improved response proportions have been observed, overall sur- studies in human MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells exposed to a LD vival for patients with metastatic breast cancer has not been sig- of paclitaxel for 24 h followed by a 1-h incubation with varying nificantly improved by the progress of the past three decades. Furthermore, despite the proven magnitude of benefit of adjuvant concentrations of doxorubicin showed less than additive cytotox- icity for the combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin (8). On the systemic therapy in reducing the risk of recurrence (2), a significant fraction of patients with early stage breast cancer still will relapse other hand, when an AlT cell viability assay was used, others have and ultimately die of metastatic disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Hydrazines. US Department Of
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR HYDRAZINES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry September 1997 HYDRAZINES ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. HYDRAZINES iii UPDATE STATEMENT Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 HYDRAZINES vii CONTRIBUTORS CHEMICAL MANAGER(S)/AUTHOR(S): Gangadhar Choudhary, Ph.D. ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA Hugh IIansen, Ph.D. ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA Steve Donkin, Ph.D. Sciences International, Inc., Alexandria, VA Mr. Christopher Kirman Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH THE PROFILE HAS UNDERGONE THE FOLLOWING ATSDR INTERNAL REVIEWS: 1 . Green Border Review. Green Border review assures the consistency with ATSDR policy. 2 . Health Effects Review. The Health Effects Review Committee examines the health effects chapter of each profile for consistency and accuracy in interpreting health effects and classifying end points. 3. Minimal Risk Level Review. The Minimal Risk Level Workgroup considers issues relevant to substance-specific minimal risk levels (MRLs), reviews the health effects database of each profile, and makes recommendations for derivation of MRLs. HYDRAZINES ix PEER REVIEW A peer review panel was assembled for hydrazines. The panel consisted of the following members: 1. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Roc Appendix G
    Report on Carcinogens, Fourteenth Edition For Table of Contents, see home page: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc Appendix G: 91-59-8 see 2-Naphthylamine 91-94-1 (3,3′-dichlorobenzidine) see 3,3′-Dichlorobenzidine and Its Dihydrochloride List of Substances by CAS Number 92-67-1 see 4-Aminobiphenyl 92-87-5 (benzidine) see Benzidine and Dyes Metabolized to Benzidine 50-00-0 see Formaldehyde 93-15-2 see Methyleugenol 50-18-0 see Cyclophosphamide 94-59-7 see Safrole 50-29-3 see Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane 95-06-7 see Sulfallate 50-32-8 (benzo[a]pyrene) see Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: 15 Listings 95-53-4 (o-toluidine) see o-Toluidine and Its Hydrochloride 50-55-5 see Reserpine 95-69-2 (p-chloro-o-toluidine) see p-Chloro-o-toluidine and Its Hydrochloride 51-52-5 see Propylthiouracil 95-80-7 see 2,4-Diaminotoluene 51-79-6 see Urethane 95-83-0 see 4-Chloro-o-phenylenediamine 52-24-4 see Thiotepa 96-09-3 see Styrene-7,8-oxide 53-70-3 (dibenz[a,h]anthracene) see Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: 15 Listings 96-12-8 see 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 53-96-3 see 2-Acetylaminofluorene 96-13-9 see 2,3-Dibromo-1-propanol 55-18-5 (N-Nitrosodiethylamine) see N-Nitrosamines: 15 Listings 96-18-4 see 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 55-86-7 see Nitrogen Mustard Hydrochloride 96-45-7 see Ethylene Thiourea 55-98-1 see 1,4-Butanediol Dimethansulfonate 97-56-3 see o-Aminoazotoluene 56-23-5 see Carbon Tetrachloride 98-07-7 see Benzotrichloride 56-53-1 see Diethylstilbestrol 98-82-8 see Cumene 56-55-3 (benz[a]anthracene) see Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: 15 Listings
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,062,029 B2 Schadt Et Al
    USOO9062O29B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,062,029 B2 Schadt et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jun. 23, 2015 (54) PYRIMIDINYL PYRIDAZINONE 417/10 (2013.01); C07D 417/14 (2013.01); DERVATIVES C07D 451/06 (2013.01); C07D 453/02 (2013.01); A61 K3I/501 (2013.01); A61 K (71) Applicant: Merck Patent GmbH, Darmstadt (DE) 3 1/506 (2013.01); A61 K3I/5355 (2013.01): (72) Inventors: Oliver Schadt, Rodenbach (DE); Dieter A6IK3I/5377 (2013.01); A61K3I/55 Dorsch, Ober-Ramstadt (DE); Frank (2013.01); A61K 45/06 (2013.01) Stieber, Heidelberg (DE); Andree (58) Field of Classification Search Blaukat, Schriesheim (DE) CPC C07D 403/14: A61K31/506; A61K31/5377 USPC ................... 514/236.5, 252.02:544/123, 298 (73) Assignee: Merck Patent GmbH, Darmstadt (DE) See application file for complete search history. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 (56) References Cited U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. This patent is Subject to a terminal dis U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS claimer. 6,242.461 Bl 6/2001 Goldstein 6,403,586 B1 6/2002 Ohkuchi et al. (21) Appl. No.: 14/149,110 8,071,593 B2 12/2011 Schadt et al. 8,173,653 B2 5, 2012 Dorsch et al. (22) Filed: Jan. 7, 2014 8,329,692 B2 12/2012 Schadt et al. 8,580,781 B2 * 1 1/2013 Dorsch et al. ............ 514,217.06 (65) Prior Publication Data 8,658,643 B2 * 2/2014 Schadt et al. .............. 514,236.5 2004/O152739 A1 8, 2004 Hanau US 2014/O128396 A1 May 8, 2014 2004/0259863 A1 12/2004 Eggenweiler et al.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDRAZINE Method Number: 108 Matrix: Air Target Concentration
    HYDRAZINE Method number: 108 Matrix: Air Target concentration: 10 ppb (13 µg/m3) and 1 ppm (1.3 mg/m3) OSHA PEL: 1 ppm (1.3 mg/m3) ACGIH TLV: 10 ppb (13 µg/m3) Procedure: Samples are collected closed-face by drawing known volumes of air through sampling devices consisting of three-piece cassettes, each containing two sulfuric acid treated 37-mm glass fiber filters separated by the ring section. The filters are extracted with a buffered EDTA disodium solution. An aliquot of the extract is derivatized with a benzaldehyde solution to form benzalazine from any hydrazine in the samples. The benzalazine is quantitated by LC using a UV detector. Recommended air volume and sampling rate: 240 L at 1.0 L/min Reliable quantitation limit: 0.058 ppb (0.076 µg/m3) Standard error of estimate at the target concentration: 7.5% at 10 ppb Target Concentration 5.2% at 1 ppm Target Concentration Status of method: Evaluated method. This method has been subjected to the established evaluation procedures of the Organic Methods Evaluation Branch. Date: February 1997 Chemist: Carl J. Elskamp Organic Methods Evaluation Branch OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center Salt Lake City, UT 84165-0200 1 of 19 T-108-FV-01-9702-M 1. General Discussion 1.1 Background 1.1.1 History In 1980, an air sampling and analytical procedure to determine hydrazine was validated by the OSHA Analytical Laboratory. (Ref. 5.1) The method (OSHA Method 20) is based on a field procedure developed by the U.S. Air Force that involves collection of samples using sulfuric acid coated Gas Chrom R and colorimetric analysis using p¯dimethylaminobenzaldehyde.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrazine/Hydrazine Sulfate; CASRN 302-01-2
    Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment Hydrazine/Hydrazine sulfate; CASRN 302-01-2 Human health assessment information on a chemical substance is included in the IRIS database only after a comprehensive review of toxicity data, as outlined in the IRIS assessment development process. Sections I (Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects) and II (Carcinogenicity Assessment for Lifetime Exposure) present the conclusions that were reached during the assessment development process. Supporting information and explanations of the methods used to derive the values given in IRIS are provided in the guidance documents located on the IRIS website. STATUS OF DATA FOR Hydrazine/Hydrazine sulfate File First On-Line 09/07/1988 Category (section) Assessment Available? Last Revised Oral RfD (I.A.) not evaluated Inhalation RfC (I.B.) not evaluated Carcinogenicity Assessment (II.) yes 09/07/1988 I. Chronic Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects I.A. Reference Dose for Chronic Oral Exposure (RfD) Substance Name — Hydrazine/Hydrazine sulfate CASRN — 302-01-2 Not available at this time. 1 Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment I.B. Reference Concentration for Chronic Inhalation Exposure (RfC) Substance Name — Hydrazine/Hydrazine sulfate CASRN — 302-01-2 Not available at this time. II. Carcinogenicity Assessment for Lifetime Exposure Substance Name — Hydrazine/Hydrazine sulfate CASRN — 302-01-2 Last Revised — 09/07/1988 Section II provides information on three aspects of the carcinogenic assessment for the substance in question; the weight-of-evidence judgment of the likelihood that the substance is a human carcinogen, and quantitative estimates of risk from oral exposure and from inhalation exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0226431 A1 Habib (43) Pub
    US 20090226431A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0226431 A1 Habib (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 10, 2009 (54) TREATMENT OF CANCER AND OTHER Publication Classification DISEASES (51) Int. Cl. A 6LX 3/575 (2006.01) (76)76) InventorInventor: Nabilabil Habib,Habib. Beirut (LB(LB) C07J 9/00 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) 101 FEDERAL STREET A6IP 29/00 (2006.01) A6IP35/00 (2006.01) (21) Appl. No.: 12/085,892 A6IP37/00 (2006.01) 1-1. (52) U.S. Cl. ...................... 424/133.1:552/551; 514/182: (22) PCT Filed: Nov.30, 2006 514/171 (86). PCT No.: PCT/US2O06/045665 (57) ABSTRACT .."St. Mar. 6, 2009 The present invention relates to a novel compound (e.g., 24-ethyl-cholestane-3B.5C,6C.-triol), its production, its use, and to methods of treating neoplasms and other tumors as Related U.S. Application Data well as other diseases including hypercholesterolemia, (60) Provisional application No. 60/741,725, filed on Dec. autoimmune diseases, viral diseases (e.g., hepatitis B, hepa 2, 2005. titis C, or HIV), and diabetes. F2: . - 2 . : F2z "..., . Cz: ".. .. 2. , tie - . 2 2. , "Sphagoshgelin , , re Cls Phosphatidiglethanolamine * - 2 .- . t - r y ... CBs .. A . - . Patent Application Publication Sep. 10, 2009 Sheet 1 of 16 US 2009/0226431 A1 E. e'' . Phosphatidylcholine. " . Ez'.. C.2 . Phosphatidylserias. * . - A. z' C. w E. a...2 .". is 2 - - " - B 2. Sphingoshgelin . Cls Phosphatidglethanglamine Figure 1 Patent Application Publication Sep. 10, 2009 Sheet 2 of 16 US 2009/0226431 A1 Chile Phosphater Glycerol Phosphatidylcholine E.
    [Show full text]
  • Interagency Committee on Chemical Management
    DECEMBER 14, 2018 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13-17 REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR WALKE, PETER Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Recommended Statutory Amendments or Regulatory Changes to Existing Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements that are Required to Facilitate Assessment of Risks to Human Health and the Environment Posed by Chemical Use in the State ............................................................................................................................ 5 III. Summary of Chemical Use in the State Based on Reported Chemical Inventories....... 8 IV. Summary of Identified Risks to Human Health and the Environment from Reported Chemical Inventories ........................................................................................................... 9 V. Summary of any change under Federal Statute or Rule affecting the Regulation of Chemicals in the State ....................................................................................................... 12 VI. Recommended Legislative or Regulatory Action to Reduce Risks to Human Health and the Environment from Regulated and Unregulated Chemicals of Emerging Concern ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TOMMANNUUTTILIMINATIONUS009862693B2 (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No
    TOMMANNUUTTILIMINATIONUS009862693B2 (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 9 , 862, 693 B2 Pietras et al. (45 ) Date of Patent : Jan . 9 , 2018 ( 54 ) COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF ( 56 ) References Cited TREATING CANCER U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS (71 ) Applicant : The Regents of the University of 4 , 574 ,123 A * 3 / 1986 Edwards . .. .. C07C 279/ 28 California , Oakland , CA (US ) 162 / 161 4 , 861, 760 A 8 / 1989 Mazuel et al. ( 72 ) Inventors : Richard J . Pietras , Los Angeles , CA 4 ,911 , 920 A 3 / 1990 Jani et al . (US ) ; Michael E . Jung, Los Angeles , 5 ,212 , 162 A 5 / 1993 Missel et al. CA (US ) ; Diana C . Marquez -Garban , 5 , 403 , 841 A 4 / 1995 Lang et al . 6 ,699 ,989 B1 * 3 / 2004 Shetty CO7D 215 / 56 Los Angeles, CA (US ) ; Gang Deng, 540 /474 Los Angeles, CA (US ) 7 , 285 ,681 B2 * 10 /2007 Moinet .. .. .. CO7D 295/ 215 564 /233 ( 73 ) Assignee : The Regents of the University of 7 ,671 , 019 B2 * 3 /2010 Tobia A61K 8 /44 California , Oaklnad , CA (US ) 514 / 1 . 1 8 , 853, 259 B2 10 /2014 Mylari Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 2010 / 0087544 A1 4 / 2010 Kim et al. ( * ) Notice : 2011 /0196015 A1 8 / 2011 Kim et al . patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2011 / 0207810 Al 8 / 2011 Kim et al . U . S . C . 154 (b ) by 40 days. 2015 /0126518 Al 5 /2015 Kim et al . ( 21) Appl . No. : 14 /566 ,055 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ( 22 ) Filed : Dec . 10 , 2014 WO WO - 96 /05309 A2 2 / 1996 WO WO - 96 /05309 A3 2 / 1996 (65 ) Prior Publication Data WO WO - 2011 /083998 A2 7 / 2011 WO WO - 2011 /083998 A3 7 / 2011 US 2015 /0158832 A1 Jun .
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Tumor Potential of IMP Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: a Century-Long Story
    Review Anti-Tumor Potential of IMP Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: A Century-Long Story Rand Naffouje 1, Punita Grover 1, Hongyang Yu 2,3, Arun Sendilnathan 1, Kara Wolfe 1,4, Nazanin Majd 5, Eric P. Smith 6, Koh Takeuchi 7, Toshiya Senda 2,3, Satoshi Kofuji 8 and Atsuo T. Sasaki 1,4,9,10,* 1 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (K.W.); [email protected] (A.T.S.) 2 Structural Biology Research Center, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tokyo 135-0063, Japan; [email protected] (H.Y.); [email protected] (T.S.) 3 Department of Accelerator Science, School of High Energy Accelerator Science, SOKENDAI (the Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan 4 Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH 45267, USA 5 Department of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; [email protected] 7 Molecular Profiling Research Center for Drug Discovery, National Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, 2-3-26 Aomi, Koto, Tokyo 135-0063, Japan; [email protected] 8 Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; [email protected] 9 Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center at UC Gardner Neuroscience Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA 10 Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata 997-0052, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 August 2019; Accepted: 2 September 2019; Published: 11 September 2019 Abstract: The purine nucleotides ATP and GTP are essential precursors to DNA and RNA synthesis and fundamental for energy metabolism.
    [Show full text]