Politics of Pride
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Politics of Pride: Why do people participate in civil society in South Africa? Shotaro Togawa, TGWSHO001 A minor dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirementsTown for the award of the degree of Masters (MPhil) in Development Studies Cape of Faculty of the Humanities University of Cape Town 2011 University COMPULSORY DECLARATION This work has not been previously submitted in whole, or in part, for the award of any degree. It is my own work. Each significant contribution to, and quotation in, this dissertation from the work, or works, of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. Signature: Date: Abstract Civil society in South Africa is generally celebrated as a space for action to promote social justice, either through organisations that play the role of “watchdog”, or through mobilisation by the poor themselves around their own concerns. However, civil society can reflect and reproduce many of the pathologies and injustices of the wider society. Sometimes it works to benefit a specific ethnic group or political group, and also reflects some unsatisfactory aspects of culture to which the constituents of civil society belong. In this study, both qualitative and quantitative analyses show that the associational activities and social movements in Cape Town reflect some kind of pathologies or injustices of the wider society. The qualitative analysis focuses on the ‘toilet war’, which took place throughout 2010 in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. It surely has an aspect of “service delivery protest”, where the poor and the marginalised undertake protest action to express their grievancesTown for the improvement of service delivery. Nevertheless, the data shows that the “poorest of the poor” are actually excluded and deserted by democracy within the community, the partisan purpose, and the rage against the legacy of apartheid. Ironically, Capedemocratic and participatory processes of decision-making in the small community contributeof toward ignoring the voices of the poorest of the poor, who are still the minority there. The partisan purpose and the rage against racism restrict the interest of the poorest of the poor, too. Also there is a subtle but critical disjuncture between the “commander” of the ‘toilet war’ and its followers, which makes it more difficult to ensure the civil rights of the poorest of the poor. On the other hand, the quantitative analysis shows that participation in associational activities and protests is not correlated so much Universityto incomes and grievances. Rather, variables such as race, political attitudes, and psychological resources are more correlated with participation. This is particularly true with associational activities like being a member of community-based groups or attending community meetings. Cape Town has a substantial overlap amongst race, income and grievances, but the regression analyses indicate that race still has significant correlation with participation in civil society. Opposed to the general expectation for civil society in South Africa, participation in civil society is not always the channel for the poor to express their grievances. Although further research should be conducted on why black people are more likely to participate in civil society than other races, this study disputes the general romantic notion of civil society in South Africa. i Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. iv Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... v Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter I – Civil Society in Africa, South Africa and Cape Town ..................................... 4 What is Civil Society? ............................................................................................................ 4 Context of South Africa .......................................................................................................... 8 Cape Town Politics ..............................................................................................................Town 12 Research Framework and Methodology .............................................................................. 17 Chapter II – Narrative of the ‘Toilet War’ .........................................................................Cape 21 Makhaza in Khayelitsha .......................................................................................................of 21 Beginning of the Story (End of January – Mid-March 2010) .............................................. 24 Kill the Boer! Kill the Farmer! (End of May – Beginning of June 2010) ............................ 28 Findings by the SAHRC and Legal Action by Residents (After Mid-June 2010) ................. 31 Chapter III – Analysing the ‘Toilet War’ ............................................................................ 33 Introduction..........................................................................................................................University 33 The ‘Toilet War’ for the Civil Rights ................................................................................... 33 The ‘Toilet War’ for the Community .................................................................................... 35 The ‘Toilet War’ for the Partisan ........................................................................................ 38 The ‘Toilet War’ for the Pride ............................................................................................. 41 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 44 Chapter I V – Quantitative Analysis of the Cape A rea Study 2005 ................................... 46 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 46 Set the Variables .................................................................................................................. 46 ii Descriptive Analysis on Participation in Civil Society ........................................................ 51 Race, Incomes, and Grievances ........................................................................................... 58 Regression Analysis on Participation in Civil Society ........................................................ 65 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 70 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 74 References ............................................................................................................................... 76 Appendix 1: Pictures of the ‘Toilet War’ (for Chapter 2 & 3) ............................................. i Appendix 2: List of variables (for Chapter 4) ..................................................................... iii Appendix 3: Correlation coefficients of explanatory variables (for Chapter 4) ............... vi Town Cape of University iii Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof. Jeremy Seekings. He was always very patient in communicating with me, even when I was having difficulties, and has given me plenty of thoughtful comments and advice on my study. He recommended a lot of literature to review, which really helped to develop my thesis. I have happy memories of walking his dogs with him – Yaiga, Milo, and Mr. Biscuit – along the beach in Hout Bay. I would also like to thank my professors in Japan. Prof. Mitsugi Endo, University of Tokyo, is the one who told me about Prof. Seekings. His advice also helped me to frame my research. Prof. Masafumi Nagao, International Christian University, is the one who encouraged me to study at the University of Cape Town. Without him, I would never have come to South Africa. Town The residents in Zone 14, Makhaza, Khayelitsha. Thank you for accepting me warmly. My mama, Lulu, who was always concerned about me and told me a lot of things about Makhaza. I have fond memories of going to church with Capeher and holding a Christmas party with Japanese food at her shack. My tata, Vukile.of I am very happy that he finally got a job. I did not see him so often, but he is the one who gave me a lot of information about Zone 14. Tolo, I will never forget your tears when you talked about your past. I could do nothing for you, but I will do my best to let people know how you have been struggling for your pride. My best friends in Cape Town. They told me how