April-May-June 2020 in Memoriam
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Public Comment Response
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e Shpack_Landfill_08.01_0229_a March 12 2006 Comments to MDPH on Health Consultation Report for the Shapck Landfill Dated November 16 2006 History with the of Engineers and the January 2002 At public meeting in Norton Army Corps for the US Enviromnental Protection Agency addressing cleanup plans Shpack residents concerns about possible link SuperfundfFUSRAP Site several expressed number of cancer cases between the contamination at the Shpack dump and high among it of residents who lived nearby explained that was not the responsibility that those health issues It was matter representatives for the Corps or EPA to address Massachusetts of Public Health who would we could pursue with the Department in Norton hopefully schedule subsequent -
Minority Percentages at Participating Newspapers
Minority Percentages at Participating Newspapers Asian Native Asian Native Am. Black Hisp Am. Total Am. Black Hisp Am. Total ALABAMA The Anniston Star........................................................3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 Free Lance, Hollister ...................................................0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 12.5 The News-Courier, Athens...........................................0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lake County Record-Bee, Lakeport...............................0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Birmingham News................................................0.7 16.7 0.7 0.0 18.1 The Lompoc Record..................................................20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 The Decatur Daily........................................................0.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 8.6 Press-Telegram, Long Beach .......................................7.0 4.2 16.9 0.0 28.2 Dothan Eagle..............................................................0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.3 Los Angeles Times......................................................8.5 3.4 6.4 0.2 18.6 Enterprise Ledger........................................................0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Madera Tribune...........................................................0.0 0.0 37.5 0.0 37.5 TimesDaily, Florence...................................................0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 Appeal-Democrat, Marysville.......................................4.2 0.0 8.3 0.0 12.5 The Gadsden Times.....................................................0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Merced Sun-Star.........................................................5.0 -
From Secret White House Recordings to @Realdonaldtrump: the Ed Mocratic Value of Presidential Tweets Douglas B
Campbell Law Review Volume 40 Article 7 Issue 2 Spring Symposium 2018 2018 From Secret White House Recordings to @realdonaldtrump: The eD mocratic Value of Presidential Tweets Douglas B. McKechnie United States Air Force Academy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Douglas B. McKechnie, From Secret White House Recordings to @realdonaldtrump: The Democratic Value of Presidential Tweets, 40 Campbell L. Rev. 611 (2018). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Campbell Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. McKechnie: From Secret White House Recordings to @realdonaldtrump: The Democ From Secret White House Recordings to @realDonaldTrump: The Democratic Value of Presidential Tweets DOUGLAS B. McKECHNIE* ABSTRACT Modern US. presidents have chosen their words meticulously and deliberately, with the assistance of aides and speechwriters, all with a view toward how their message would be delivered and understood. Rarely has the electorate had access to the unvarnished thoughts of a president. At times, secretly recorded conversations in the White House have allowed Americans to hear the unabashed thoughts of various presidents. However, save for the Watergate scandal, those recordings had no immediate, discernible democratic impact because they were released years after the presidents' words were recorded. The recordings are noteworthy because they capture presidents'musings in the private sphere, where one is more secure and more likely to engage in self-reflective, authentic expression. -
American “Populism” and the Spatial Contradictions of US Government in the Time of COVID-19
ARTÍCULO INVITADO Geopolítica(s) Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder ISSN: 2172-3958 https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/geop.69018 American “Populism” and the Spatial Contradictions of US Government in the Time of COVID-19 John Agnew1 Recibido: 16 de abril de 2020 / Aceptado: 10 de mayo de 2020 Abstract. President Donald Trump has been the public face of the blundering managerial response of the US federal government to the Coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, beyond Trump’s personal failure lies a failure of the US governmental system. More specifically, the role of the federal gov- ernment in fashioning nationwide policies across a range of areas, including public health, that one think would be empowered by a self-defined “nationalist” or right-wing populist in the White House, has been crippled by an anti-federalist ideology and the institutional inertia it has created. These have roots going back to the 1980s and the distortion of historic US federalism that these have entailed. Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; United States; Donald Trump; right-wing populism; public health policy. [es] El “populismo” americano y las contradicciones espaciales del gobierno de Estados Unidos en tiempos de COVID-19 Resumen. El presidente Donald Trump ha sido el rostro público de la torpe respuesta gerencial del gobierno federal de los Estados Unidos a la pandemia de Coronavirus/COVID-19. Sin embargo, más allá del fracaso personal de Trump se encuentra un fracaso del sistema gubernamental de los EE UU Más específicamente, el papel del gobierno federal en la formulación de políticas a nivel nacional en una variedad de áreas, incluida la salud pública, que uno cree que sería potenciado por un ocupante de la Casa Blanca que se ha autodenominado “nacionalista” o populista de derecha, se ha paralizado por una ideología antifederalista y la inercia institucional que ésta ha creado. -
Minority Percentages at Participating Newspapers
2012 Minority Percentages at Participating Newspapers American Asian Indian American Black Hispanic Multi-racial Total American Asian The News-Times, El Dorado 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 11.8 Indian American Black Hispanic Multi-racial Total Times Record, Fort Smith 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 3.3 ALABAMA Harrison Daily Times 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Alexander City Outlook 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Daily World, Helena 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Andalusia Star-News 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Sentinel-Record, Hot Springs National Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The News-Courier, Athens 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Jonesboro Sun 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Birmingham News 0.0 0.0 20.2 0.0 0.0 20.2 Banner-News, Magnolia 0.0 0.0 15.4 0.0 0.0 15.4 The Cullman Times 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Malvern Daily Record 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Decatur Daily 0.0 0.0 13.9 11.1 0.0 25.0 Paragould Daily Press 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Enterprise Ledger 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pine Bluff Commercial 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 TimesDaily, Florence 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.8 The Daily Citizen, Searcy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fort Payne Times-Journal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stuttgart Daily Leader 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Valley Times-News, Lanett 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Evening Times, West Memphis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Press-Register, Mobile 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 1.4 10.1 CALIFORNIA Montgomery Advertiser 0.0 0.0 17.5 0.0 0.0 17.5 The Bakersfield Californian 0.0 2.4 2.4 16.7 0.0 21.4 The Selma Times-Journal 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 Desert Dispatch, Barstow 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -
Low Turnout in American Elections David Hill Bridgewater State College
Bridgewater Review Volume 20 | Issue 1 Article 5 Jun-2001 Low Turnout in American Elections David Hill Bridgewater State College Recommended Citation Hill, David (2001). Low Turnout in American Elections. Bridgewater Review, 20(1), 3-7. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol20/iss1/5 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. One aspect of the election, however, was remarkably simi lar to past elections. As with every presidential election since 1972 only about half of the eligible citizens actually cast a ballot. While final vote totals have yet to be confirmed by the Federal Election Commission, most estimates indicate turnout nationwide was somewhere between 50 and 52%, which is a modest increase over the 49% rate in 1996 (the lowest since 1924). While turnout indeed increased, this by no means suggests American democracy is on the mend. 2000 is simply another in a long line of low turnout elections since 1972. Given the closeness of the election, the low turnout is surprising. With so much in the balance and the intense focus of the media on the closeness of the election one would expect citizens to show up and participate in order to make a difference. Once again, however, students Low TURNOUT of political participation are left asking, why is turnout in American elections so low? In order to understand participation rates in the United IN AMERICAN States one must compare our turnout with that of other comparable democracies (See Figure 1) . Between 1960 and ELECTIONS 1995 turnout in 24 democracies without mandatory voting averaged 80% . -