High Country Lakes Technical Report 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Country Lakes Technical Report 2020 Canterbury high-country lakes monitoring programme – state and trends, 2005-2019 Report No. R20/50 ISBN 978-1-99-002707-9 (print) 978-1-99-002708-6 (web) Tina Bayer Adrian Meredith September 2020 Canterbury high-country lakes monitoring programme – state and trends, 2005-2019 Report No. R20/50 ISBN 978-1-99-002707-9 (print) 978-1-99-002708-6 (web) Tina Bayer Adrian Meredith September 2020 Name Date Prepared by: Tina Bayer & Adrian Meredith May 2019 Internal reviewed by: Graeme Clarke June 2019 & August 2020 External review by: David Kelly- Cawthron Institute July 2019 Approved by: Tim Davie October 2020 Director Science Group Report No. R20/50 ISBN 978-1-99-002707-9 (print) 978-1-99-002708-6 (web) 200 Tuam Street PO Box 345 Christchurch 8140 Phone (03) 365 3828 Fax (03) 365 3194 75 Church Street PO Box 550 Timaru 7940 Phone (03) 687 7800 Fax (03) 687 7808 Website: www.ecan.govt.nz Customer Services Phone 0800 324 636 Canterbury high-country lakes monitoring programme – state and trends, 2005-2019 Executive summary Background: Canterbury’s high-country lakes are highly valued for their biodiversity values and cultural significance, as well as recreation and visual amenities. Several of our high-country lakes are still relatively undisturbed ecosystems with significantly intact ecological values. However, with increasing development and land use intensification, as well as changes in climate, some of our lakes have undergone, or are likely to undergo, significant changes in level regimes, water quality, and ecological condition. The problem: Before establishing the high-country lakes monitoring programme in 2005, we had limited knowledge about the state of our high-country lakes and could not consistently assess potential changes in lake water quality and lake ecological condition. What we did: We sampled more than 30 of our high-country lakes each summer (December-May) from 2005 (or 2008) to 2019 for nutrients, algal biomass and turbidity. The lakes were also surveyed for their ecological condition, i.e. state of the community of aquatic plants (macrophytes) and presence of exotic weed beds, at regular intervals. This report presents a summary of the state and trends in water quality in Canterbury’s high-country lakes with respect to Trophic Level Index (TLI), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton biomass (chl-a) and turbidity, as well as condition of the aquatic macrophyte community (LakeSPI) and recreational water quality (E. coli). Where information on lake cultural health was available, it was also included. What we found: Our large, deep lakes generally have very good water quality. Of the small to medium sized lakes, the majority (20 out of 25 lakes) have nutrient concentrations or algal biomass that are now above the objectives set in the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan. While the condition of the five large, low-nutrient lakes (such as Lakes Ōhau and Sumner) has remained steady or improved, the water quality of 10 of the 25 smaller lakes is deteriorating (i.e. concentrations of either nutrients, phytoplankton biomass and/or TLI were increasing). Many lakes with deteriorating water quality are located in the Ashburton Lakes Area and the Upper Waimakariri. Lakes of concern include Lakes Pearson, Grasmere, Denny, Clearwater, Heron and Kellands Pond. Lake Denny, Kellands Pond and the Māori Lakes in particular have significant agricultural sources of nutrients in their catchments. In about half of the surveyed lakes the macrophyte community was in high or excellent condition (according to LakeSPI classification). Slightly more lakes are improving in ecological condition than deteriorating. Popular swimming lakes that were monitored for recreational water quality were generally safe to swim in. Out of 11 lakes currently assessed for cultural health only two were found to be in poor cultural health, the remainder was approximately equally divided between moderate and good. What does it mean? Increasing trends in nutrients, turbidity and/or phytoplankton biomass, and the failure of many smaller lakes to meet the water quality objectives set in the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan, highlight the importance to further minimise or reduce nutrient and sediment losses to lakes, particularly in the Sensitive Lake Zones outlined in the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan. This report also highlights some limitations of our current high-country lake monitoring programme. We recommend a review of the high-country lakes monitoring programme to identify opportunities to address these limitations. Environment Canterbury Technical Report i Canterbury high-country lakes monitoring programme – state and trends, 2005-2019 How we have considered climate change: Water quality in our high-country lakes is influenced by local climate, and climate change is likely to impact long-term water quality and aquatic ecosystem health. However, this report only analyses 15 years of data, and thus, it is not an assessment of the long-term impacts of climate change on our high-country lakes. ii Environment Canterbury Technical Report Canterbury high-country lakes monitoring programme – state and trends, 2005-2019 Table of contents Executive summary ................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods .......................................................................................................... 2 3 Limitations of current sampling programme ............................................. 15 4 High-country lakes state and trends .......................................................... 16 4.1 Regional climate summary, 2004-2019 ....................................................................... 16 4.2 Hurunui – Waiau Water Management Zone ................................................................ 17 4.2.1 Loch Katrine – Waitetemoroiti ......................................................................... 17 4.2.2 Lake Sumner - Hoka Kura .............................................................................. 21 4.2.3 Lake Taylor ..................................................................................................... 25 4.2.4 Lake Sheppard ................................................................................................ 29 4.2.5 Lake Marion .................................................................................................... 31 4.2.6 Lake Mason ..................................................................................................... 33 4.3 Selwyn – Waihora Water Management Zone .............................................................. 35 4.3.1 Lake Sarah ...................................................................................................... 39 4.3.2 Lake Grasmere ............................................................................................... 43 4.3.3 Lake Pearson - Moana Rua ............................................................................ 49 4.3.4 Lake Hawdon .................................................................................................. 54 4.3.5 Lake Lyndon .................................................................................................... 58 4.3.6 Lake Georgina................................................................................................. 62 4.3.7 Lake Ida .......................................................................................................... 66 4.3.8 Lake Selfe ....................................................................................................... 70 4.3.9 Lake Coleridge ................................................................................................ 74 4.3.10 Lake Evelyn ..................................................................................................... 80 4.3.11 Lake Catherine ................................................................................................ 82 4.3.12 Lake Henrietta ................................................................................................. 83 4.4 Ashburton Management Water Zone........................................................................... 85 4.4.1 Lake Emily ....................................................................................................... 89 4.4.2 Māori Lake (East/Front) - Ō Tū Wharekai (East) ............................................ 92 4.4.3 Māori Lake (West/Back) - Ō Tū Wharekai (West) .......................................... 97 4.4.4 Lake Denny ................................................................................................... 100 4.4.5 Lake Heron - Ō Tū Roto ................................................................................ 104 4.4.6 Lake Emma – Kirihonuhonu .......................................................................... 108 4.4.7 Lake Camp – Ōtautari ................................................................................... 112 4.4.8 Lake Clearwater - Te Puna a Taka ............................................................... 117 4.5 Orari Temuka Opihi Pareora Water Management Zone ............................................ 122 4.5.1 Lake Opuha ................................................................................................... 122 4.6 Upper Waitaki Water Management Zone .................................................................
Recommended publications
  • ¥73 A-048 A-048
    1476000 1478000 1480000 1482000 1484000 1486000 1488000 1490000 1492000 1494000 1496000 1498000 1500000 1502000 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Waimakariri 8 0 0 2 2 5 Nutrient 5 Ryton River Allocation Zone Foggy Stream Lake Porter River 0 Lyndon 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 Lake Zone 0 2 2 5 Simois Stream 5 Lake Coleridge Kowai River Coach Stream Scamander Stream Lake 73 0 ¥ 0 0 Lyndon 0 0 0 4 Kowai Forest 4 0 0 2 2 5 5 Macfarlane Lake Georgina Stream Cardinal Lake Georgina Stream Lake Zone Acheron River Parker Stream 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 Red Lakes 0 2 2 5 5 H A RP ER R O A D Coleridge Stream 0 0 0 Thirteen 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mile Bush 0 2 Rakaia Nutrient 2 5 5 Allocation Zone Stream 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 9 1 1 5 Acheron River Ben More 5 McCracken Lake Coleridge A Stream LG ID Stream US RO AD Ben More Stream 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Packers Creek THIRTEEN 6 9 9 1 1 5 MILE BUSH 5 Dry Rakaia River Acheron Selwyn River C O LE Stream North Branch R ID G E D R OU O 0 B A 0 0 L 0 E D 0 0 4 4 H 9 Dry 9 1 I 1 5 Redcliffe L 5 Jack Stream L Acheron Stream R U Stream N R O A D 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 9 Bush Stream 9 1 1 5 5 Hutt Stream Ford Stream Copper Selwyn Stream No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ag 22 January 2021
    Since Sept 27 1879 Friday, January 22, 2021 $2.20 Court News P4 INSIDE FRIDAY COLGATE CHAMPIONSFULL STORY P32 COUNCILLORS DO BATTLE TO CAP RATES RISE P3 Ph 03 307 7900 Your leading Mid Canterbury real estate to subscribe! Teamwork gets results team with over 235 years of sale experience. Ashburton 217 West Street | P 03 307 9176 | E [email protected] Talk to the best team in real estate. pb.co.nz Property Brokers Ltd Licensed REAA 2008 2 NEWS Ashburton Guardian Friday, January 22, 2021 New water supplies on radar for rural towns much lower operating costs than bility of government funds being By Sue Newman four individual membrane treat- made available for shovel-ready [email protected] ment plants, he said. water projects as a sweetener for Councillor John Falloon sug- local authorities opting into the Consumers of five Ashburton gested providing each individu- national regulator scheme. District water supplies could find al household on a rural scheme This would see all local author- themselves connected to a giant with their own treatment system ities effectively hand over their treatment plant that will ensure might be a better option. water assets and their manage- their drinking water meets the That idea had been explored, ment to a very small number of highest possible health stand- Guthrie said, but it would still government managed clusters. ards. put significant responsibility on The change is driven by the Have- As the Ashburton District the council. The water delivered lock North water contamination Council looks at ways to meet the to each of those treatment points issue which led to a raft of tough- tough new compliance standards would still have to be guaranteed er drinking water standards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glacial Sequences in the Rangitata and Ashburton Valleys, South Island, New Zealand
    ERRATA p. 10, 1.17 for tufts read tuffs p. 68, 1.12 insert the following: c) Meltwater Channel Deposit Member. This member has been mapped at a single locality along the western margin of the Mesopotamia basin. Remnants of seven one-sided meltwater channels are preserved " p. 80, 1.24 should read: "The exposure occurs beneath a small area of undulating ablation moraine." p. 84, 1.17-18 should rea.d: "In the valley of Boundary stream " p. 123, 1.3 insert the following: " landforms of successive ice fluctuations is not continuous over sufficiently large areas." p. 162, 1.6 for patter read pattern p. 166, 1.27 insert the following: " in chapter 11 (p. 95)." p. 175, 1.18 should read: "At 0.3 km to the north is abel t of ablation moraine " p. 194, 1.28 should read: " ... the Burnham Formation extends 2.5 km we(3twards II THE GLACIAL SEQUENCES IN THE RANGITATA AND ASHBURTON VALLEYS, SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the University of Canterbury by M.C.G. Mabin -7 University of Canterbury 1980 i Frontispiece: "YE HORRIBYLE GLACIERS" (Butler 1862) "THE CLYDE GLACIER: Main source Alexander Turnbull Library of the River Clyde (Rangitata)". wellington, N.Z. John Gully, watercolour 44x62 cm. Painted from an ink and water­ colour sketch by J. von Haast. This painting shows the Clyde Glacier in March 1861. It has reached an advanced position just inside the remnant of a slightly older latero-terminal moraine ridge that is visible to the left of the small figure in the middle ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Resources Report
    Crown Pastoral Land Tenure Review Lease name : Hakatere Lease number : Pc 059 Conservation resources report As part of the process of tenure review, advice on significant inherent values within the pastoral lease is provided by Department of Conservation officials in the form of a conservation resources report. This report is the result of outdoor survey and inspection. It is a key piece of information for the development of a preliminary consultation document. The report attached is released under the Official Information Act 1982. Copied June 2003 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT DOC CONSERVATION RESOURCES REPORT ON TENURE REVIEW OF HAKATERE CROWN PASTORAL LEASE PART 1 INTRODUCTION This report describes the significant inherent values of Hakatere Crown Pastoral Lease. The property is located in the ‘Ashburton Lakes’ area, inland from Mount Somers, Mid-Canterbury. The lease covers an area of approximately 9100 ha. The property boundaries are broadly defined by the South Ashburton River in the northeast, the Potts River in the west, and Lake Clearwater and Lambies Stream in the south. Adjacent properties are Mt Possession (freehold) in the south, Mt Potts (Pastoral Lease) in the west, retired land in the north, and Mt Arrowsmith (Pastoral Lease) and Barossa Station (Pastoral Lease) in the NE. Hakatere Station is evenly divided between Arrowsmith and Hakatere Ecological Districts in the Heron Ecological Region. There are six Recommended Areas for Protection on the property, identified in the 1986 Heron PNAP survey report. They are: • Hakatere Priority Natural Area (PNA) 9 (Paddle Hill Creek), • Hakatere PNA 10 (Ashburton Fans), • Hakatere PNA 11 (Spider Lakes), • Hakatere PNA 13 (Clearwater Moraines), • Hakatere PNA 20 (Potts Gorge) and • Arrowsmith PNA 5 (Dogs Range).
    [Show full text]
  • Manuka Point
    Crown Pastoral Land Tenure Review Lease name : MANUKA POINT Lease number : PC 053 Conservation Resources Report As part of the process of Tenure Review, advice on significant inherent values within the pastoral lease is provided by Department of Conservation officials in the form of a Conservation Resources Report. This report is the result of outdoor survey and inspection. It is a key piece of information for the development of a preliminary consultation document. Note: Plans which form part of the Conservation Resources Report are published separately. These documents are all released under the Official information Act 1982. October 06 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT MANUKA POINT PASTORAL LEASE CONSERVATION RESOURCES REPORT DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SEPTEMBER 2006 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Map Topo/Cadastral 5 PART 2 INHERENT VALUES 6 2.1 Landscape 6 2.1.1 Landscape Context 6 2.1.2 Landscape Description 6 2.1.3 Visual Values 9 Map Landscape Units and Values 11 2.2 Geology, Landforms and Soils 12 2.2.1 Geology 12 2.2.2 Landforms 12 2.2.3 Soils 12 2.3 Climate 12 2.4 Land Environments of New Zealand (LENZ) 13 Map Lenz Threat Categories 14 2.5 Vegetation 15 2.5.1 Ecological Context 15 2.5.2 Vegetation and Flora 15 Map Botanical Values 22 2.5.3 Problem Plants 23 2.6 Fauna 24 2.6.1 Bats 24 2.6.2 Birds 24 2.6.3 Lizards 27 Map Bird and Lizard Values 29 2.6.4 Freshwater Fauna (fish and invertebrates) 30 Map Aquatic Values 33 2.6.5 Terrestrial Invertebrates 34 Map Invertebrate
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Health Assessment of Ō Tū Wharekai / the Ashburton Lakes
    Ō TŪ WHAREKAI ORA TONU CULTURAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF Ō TŪ WHAREKAI / THE ASHBURTON LAKES Maruaroa / June 2010 This report is the work of: Te Rūnanga o Arowhenua Craig Pauling Takerei Norton This report was reviewed by: Karl Russell Mandy Home Makarini Rupene Te Marino Lenihan Iaean Cranwell John Aitken Kennedy Lange Wendy Sullivan Rose Clucas Date: Maruaroa/June 2010 Reference: Final Whakaahua Taupoki - Cover Photographs: Ruka - Top: View of Kirihonuhonu / Lake Emma, looking towards Mahaanui / Mount Harper (09/02/2010). Waekanui - Middle: View of Ō Tū Wharekai / Lower Maori Lake looking north, with Uhi / Clent Hills in the right midground (10/02/2010). Raro - Bottom: View of Ō Tū Roto / Lake Heron looking north to the outlet of Lake Stream, with Te Urupā o Te Kapa / Mount Sugarloaf in the midground just to the right of centre (11/02/2010). All photographs © Takerei Norton 2010. Ō Tū Wharekai / Ashburton Lakes Cultural Health Assessment 2010 Page 2 Te Whakarāpopotanga - Executive Summary Te Rūnanga o Arowhenua is working in partnership with the Department of Conservation to restore the Ō Tū Wharekai / Ashburton Lakes area as part of a national initiative to protect and enhance wetlands and waterways of outstanding significance. Part of this work is to undertake an assessment of the cultural values and health of the Ō Tū Wharekai area. The first report produced through this project, the „Ō Tū Wharekai Cultural Values Report’ was completed in September 2009. It aimed to identify, compile and record the traditional and contemporary cultural values of tangata whenua associated with Ō Tū Wharekai / the Ashburton Lakes, and involved a site visit and reviewing published and unpublished literature and tribal records.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrowsmith and Hakatere Ecological Districts, Canterbury, New Zealand
    Arrowsmith and Hakatere Ecological Districts, Canterbury, New Zealand Annotated bibliography for conservation DOC SCIENCE INTERNAL SERIES 37 Colin J. Burrows Published by Department of Conservation P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand DOC Science Internal Series is a published record of scientific research carried out, or advice given, by Department of Conservation staff, or external contractors funded by DOC. It comprises progress reports and short communications that are generally peer-reviewed within DOC, but not always externally refereed. Fully refereed contract reports funded from the Conservation Services Levy are also included. Individual contributions to the series are first released on the departmental intranet in pdf form. Hardcopy is printed, bound, and distributed at regular intervals. Titles are listed in the DOC Science Publishing catalogue on the departmental website http://www.doc.govt.nz and electronic copies of CSL papers can be downloaded from http://csl.doc.govt.nz © February 2002, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1175–6519 ISBN 0–478–22216–5 This is a client report commissioned by Canterbury Conservancy and funded from the Unprogrammed Science Advice fund. It was prepared for publication by DOC Science Publishing, Science & Research Unit; editing and layout by Geoff Gregory. Publication was approved by the Manager, Science & Research Unit, Science Technology and Information Services, Department of Conservation, Wellington. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Land status 8 3. Organisation of the bibliography 9 3.1 Earth sciences 10 3.1.1 Older rocks and fossils 10 3.1.2 Quaternary rocks, Landforms 13 3.1.3 Soils 14 3.1.4 Hydrology, Climate 16 3.2 Biology 17 3.2.1 Plants, Vegetation 17 3.2.2 Animals 19 3.2.3 Habitats, Ecology, Conservation 20 3.2.4 Pests 20 3.3 Human interest 20 3.3.1 Archaeology, Tangata whenua 20 3.3.2 European history 21 3.3.3 Recreation 21 3.4 General 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Contents
    1 1 = 3 The Power of Working Together ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Contents 02 Who We Are 03 Highlights & Strategic Focus 04 Directors’ Report 07 Board of Directors 08 Chief Executive’s Report 10 Leadership Team 12 Snowtown Stage II 14 Reliable Irrigation 16 Fibre Services Shine 18 Powering Locals 20 Shared Understanding 22 Safety First 23 Stakeholders with Vision 24 About our Sustainability Report 25 Sustainability Outlook 26 Our People 27 Our Environment 28 Our Community 29 Our Customers 30 Our Economic Performance 32 Stakeholder Interaction 34 Corporate Governance Statement 37 Financial Statements 2013 38 Auditors’ Report 76 Statutory Information 79 Security Holder Information 81 Directory 81 Financial Calendar TRUSTPOWER ANNUAL REPORT 2013 01 TrustPower Our Industry Partners Our Customers Our Local Communities Our Staff Our Environment Better Results We believe that working collaboratively will consistently deliver better results. Hence we’re always looking for opportunities to bring together teams of talented people to work simultaneously to make things better. 02 These assets produce an average of 2,800GWh per year. Our first Who We Are irrigation asset, a pumping facility using water from our Highbank hydro generation scheme, has completed its first full season of operation. We own 630MW of hydro and wind generation spread We supply electricity to around 206,000 customers and provide 43,000 telecommunications services to 26,000 customers throughout throughout New Zealand as New Zealand. We have 481 full time equivalent employees working well as the 100MW Snowtown throughout New Zealand and three employees in Adelaide. Around 65% Wind Farm in South Australia. of New Zealand employees are based in our Tauranga head office.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene Vegetation History of a High- Elevation (1200 M) Site in the Lake Heron Basin, Inland Canterbury, New Zealand
    Holocene vegetation history of a high-elevation site in the Lake Heron Basin, New Zealand 69 5 Holocene vegetation history of a high- elevation (1200 m) site in the Lake Heron Basin, inland Canterbury, New Zealand J. M. Pugh Department of Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand J. Shulmeister School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Australia [email protected] Introduction The Canterbury high country is a favourable location to examine climate-change histories because it lies in the lee of the Southern Alps. This causes the area to be a rain-shadow region and it is sensitive to changes in the strength and persistence of the regional westerly flow. Strong westerly flow is associated with droughts and high summer temperatures. In contrast, weakened westerly flow allows moisture from the east to penetrate these upland basins. As a consequence, this is an important area to study changes in the Southern Hemisphere westerly winds in this sector of the Southern Ocean. This record is unusual because it comes from near the natural tree line and as a consequence should be particularly sensitive to climate change and other environmental forcing. There are a number of significant palaeoecological questions that relate to this setting, including: (1) the persistence of montane podocarp woodland dominated by Phyllocladus and Halocarpus into the Holocene and the timing and cause of its subsequent replacement by beech forest; (2) the role played by fire in controlling vegetation structure and species composition; and (3) human impacts in the high country, especially with the transfer of high-country land into the conservation estate and consequential issues of ecological and landscape management (Armstrong et al.
    [Show full text]
  • South Island Fishing Regulations for 2020
    Fish & Game 1 2 3 4 5 6 Check www.fishandgame.org.nz for details of regional boundaries Code of Conduct ....................................................................4 National Sports Fishing Regulations ...................................... 5 First Schedule ......................................................................... 7 1. Nelson/Marlborough .......................................................... 11 2. West Coast ........................................................................16 3. North Canterbury ............................................................. 23 4. Central South Island ......................................................... 33 5. Otago ................................................................................44 6. Southland .........................................................................54 The regulations printed in this guide booklet are subject to the Minister of Conservation’s approval. A copy of the published Anglers’ Notice in the New Zealand Gazette is available on www.fishandgame.org.nz Cover Photo: Jaymie Challis 3 Regulations CODE OF CONDUCT Please consider the rights of others and observe the anglers’ code of conduct • Always ask permission from the land occupier before crossing private property unless a Fish & Game access sign is present. • Do not park vehicles so that they obstruct gateways or cause a hazard on the road or access way. • Always use gates, stiles or other recognised access points and avoid damage to fences. • Leave everything as you found it. If a gate is open or closed leave it that way. • A farm is the owner’s livelihood and if they say no dogs, then please respect this. • When driving on riverbeds keep to marked tracks or park on the bank and walk to your fishing spot. • Never push in on a pool occupied by another angler. If you are in any doubt have a chat and work out who goes where. • However, if agreed to share the pool then always enter behind any angler already there. • Move upstream or downstream with every few casts (unless you are alone).
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Geomorphic Environments in Canterbury During the Aranuian
    New Zealand Journal of Botany ISSN: 0028-825X (Print) 1175-8643 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzb20 Changes in geomorphic environments in Canterbury during the Aranuian Jane M. Soons To cite this article: Jane M. Soons (1994) Changes in geomorphic environments in Canterbury during the Aranuian, New Zealand Journal of Botany, 32:3, 365-372, DOI: 10.1080/0028825X.1994.10410479 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1994.10410479 Published online: 31 Jan 2012. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 65 Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzb20 New Zealand Journal of Botany, 1994, Vol. 32:365-372 365 0028-825X/94/3203-0365 $2.50/0 9The Royal Society of New Zealand 1994 Changes in geomorphic environments in Canterbury during the Aranuian JANE M. SOONS in climatic conditions, with associated changes in Department of Geography vegetation cover, has been the subject of interest to University of Canterbury botanists who have identified fluctuations in the Private Bag 4800 generally warming trend of the Aranuian. In very Christchurch, New Zealand recent years, this period of warming has become of wider interest as a possible analogue of global warm- ing. McGlone (1988) has demonstrated, however, Abstract Changes in landforms in Canterbury that climate change alone does not provide a compre- consequent on the change from glacial to non-glacial hensive explanation for the known vegetation conditions during the Aranuian are examined. Land- changes. form evidence may supplement that provided in the Sea level at the beginning of the Aranuian was vegetation record and suggest that the montane low--probably some 60-70 m below that of today environments of Canterbury were more sensitive to (Carter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Rākaia River to Rangitata River — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa
    9/28/2021 Rākaia River to Rangitata River — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Rākaia River to Rangitata River Walking Difculty Hard Length 69.7 km Journey Time 4 days Region Canterbury Sub-Regions Ashburton District , Selwyn District Part of Collections Te Araroa - New Zealand's Trail , Te Araroa - South Island Track maintained by Te Araroa Trail Trust https://www.walkingaccess.govt.nz/track/rakaia-river-to-rangitata-river/pdfPreview 1/6 9/28/2021 Rākaia River to Rangitata River — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa This Te Araroa section, from the Rākaia River to the Hakatere Heron Road, starts on a public access easement over Glenariffe Station, 34km from SH77. It then crosses the 60000ha Hakatere Conservation Park before nishing in the Heron Basin on a paper road that runs through Castle Ridge Station. It’s an area rich in high country history dating back to 1857 when Clent Hills Station was rst farmed as a 20000ha run under licence from the Crown. Over the years the station has survived many incarnations the most recent being the Nature Heritage Fund purchase of 10000ha, which reduced the station to a rump of 2000ha within the Heron Basin. The Clent Hills pastoral lease was in the Buick family from 1923 to 1982. The rst 3 years of this tenure was spent eradicating rabbits before stock could be reintroduced to the property. Glenrock Stream to Comyns Hut - 15.7km / 4-5hr From the DOC sign notifying “Access to North Branch Ashburton Stream” the track follows markers through farm land up the true right side of Glenrock Stream - look out for electric fences.
    [Show full text]